Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB202100126 Staff Report 2021-11-29ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Project #/Name ARB2021-126: Chipotle Review Type Initial Site Development Plan and Preliminary review of an architectural design Parcel Identification 03200000004300 Location 109 Community Street in the Hollymead Town Center, on the west side of Rt. 29 North, between the Pet Smart and Target stores (See Figure 1.) Zoned Planned Development Mixed Commercial (PDMC), Entrance Corridor (EC) Owner/Applicant New Market — Hollymead LLC/Kimley Horn (Ryan Perkins) Magisterial District Rio Proposal To replace a vacant restaurant building with a new structure to house a Chipotle restaurant. (See Attachments 1 and 2.) Context & Visibility The site is located within Hollymead Town Center Area B, a shopping center consisting of buildings with coordinated architectural designs. The building sits at the top of a berm as viewed from the Rt. 29 EC. The berm is substantially planted with landscaping. When leaves are on the trees, available views of the existing building are reduced. When leaves are off the trees, the building is clearly visible. (See Figure 2.) ARB Meeting Date December 61 2021 Staff Contact Margaret Maliszewski 3]C 03 R 10y3 11.1ll 2141 / 35z 717n•1 J 1uv �� o,u` „ova r,r- 3426 �g[jltll�/ � 2170 /JiRI _ d 3 \ Au 2171 � 1/il I 32-41DO 1e98 2731 h110 2112 32ND II NDJ�. Lel tale 1.1]3'll 1151 2773 2112 O 3370 1412 1J31 269 - 1s 1.,1.1-^5... - - II33 alv 17ki - I -sit' 1355 32 31 1 15 2174 137 ¢pi e "v. ]Fn - ]5�1L1i���..,,f. 1713 - ] zs411155'i0'' 4 N -k RO -']SfiU —v , 301c -3243B 4eb ilYV .Cad_ Le.l 3311 1`afi '_ 1573 °. \321 ln5 p. 3187 1311 i 17 ��\" ,o ., s 'T1-33 f ♦ IN p39 1779 I\ /■ I O W'_ S , + ' S. lJSfl _\ \*� 4 � �o, asp 3317 L.: VG \ IJ59 wOr ll. % nQ OOy �..9� 1 7 VV � 4.IL Db1 32912771 It, \ /1 1IP3 r 3 - SVlI r i1Js r, I- -I a6B41�&r; J2'410 \ / 31/11 C` 12791 32 QC 32-41D 4�i�+ 46B4-A OHO 375 /�25a :. eDl n �e 340 465 �a< p2z2 ilel 46"4 i �1 3211 it 32 / 3 \: 12P1 _` )zl4 32o_'i� �� 46BJ�0'�al•,sv 1212 3221) M11 Figure 1: Map showing the location of the proposd development. PROJECT HISTORY The site is currently occupied by a vacant TGI Friday's restaurant. A Certificate of Appropriateness was issued for this portion of the Hollymead Town Center development (Building G) on December 13, 2004 (ARB-2004-88). The approved materials and colors of the existing building are consistent with those used throughout the shopping center. N ANALYSIS Gray highligh = means the guideline can't be reviewed at initial site plan stage, but recommendations can be provided for final Yellow highlight = means the guideline can only be reviewed for location/configuration at the initial plan stage Regular text = means the guideline can be reviewed at initial plan stage, can be made a condition of initial plan approval, and can be the basis for denial REF GUIDELINE ISSUE RECOMMENDATION Purpose Compatibility with significant historic sites; Structure design 1 The goal of the regulation of the design of development NOTE: the directional labels on the architectural Reduce the height of the within the designated Entrance Corridors is to insure that elevations are not accurate. The elevation labeled EIFS band and/or add new development within the corridors reflects the "north "faces Rt. 29; the elevation labeled "west" detailing to reduce the top - traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the faces Target; the elevation labeled "east" faces heavy appearance of the purpose of ARB review and of these Guidelines, that Pet Smart. building. proposed development within the designated Entrance Corridors reflect elements of design characteristic of the The proposed building design is composed of a Provide additional significant historical landmarks, buildings, and structures brick wall topped by a tall EIFS band, storefront information to clarify the of the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote at the west end of the building, and accents appearance of the metal orderly and attractive development within these including metal panels at the drive thru-window tubes on the drive-thru corridors. Applicants should note that replication of and metal tubes on that elevation. The design is a window elevation. historic structures is neither required nor desired. contemporary one that does not have a strong connection to the historic architecture of the area. 2 Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area experience these sites The height of the EIFS band results in an over - as ensembles of buildings, land, and vegetation. In order scaled, top-heavy appearance for the building. An to accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and alternate design and/or additional detailing to vegetation characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines reduce that top-heavy character would be require attention to four primary factors: compatibility appropriate. The metal tubes are an unusual with significant historic sites in the area; the character of feature; it isn't entirely clear what they will look the Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; and like. landscaping. 3 New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should respect the traditions of the architecture of historically significant buildings in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in the area, as well as drawings of architectural features, which provide important examples of this tradition are contained in Appendix A. 4 The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for building design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic structures is not intended to impose a rigid design solution for new development. Replication of the design of the important historic sites in the area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of compatibility can be met through building scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The Guidelines allow individuality in design to accommodate varying tastes as well as special functional re uirements. 9 Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials, colors and textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the significant historic buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to) the buildings described in Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The standard of compatibility can be met through scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The replication of important historic sites in Albemarle County is not the objective of these uidelines. 5 It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to The building is under 20' tall and is smaller than None. establish a pattern of compatible architectural the existing building. The overall form and size characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in order are expected to support a unified development. to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should demonstrate sensitivity to other nearby structures within The design incorporates the brick color that is the Entrance Corridor. Where a designated corridor is used elsewhere in the shopping center, which substantially developed, these Guidelines require striking helps relate the building to the surrounding a careful balance between harmonizing new development context, but it adds a color called "fog" for the with the existing character of the corridor and achieving EIFS band at the top of the wall. The PPG web compatibility with the significant historic sites in the site describes "fog" as a "light, warn, cloudy gray area. with a pearly undertone." The metal added at the drive-thru window is a charcoal color. The grey 10 Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of buildings. and charcoal colors are expected to be compatible with the other approved colors in the shopping 12 Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms, shapes, scale, and materials to create a center. cohesive whole. The proposed design incorporates less detailing than the original buildings in the shopping center, adds metal elements not used elsewhere in the center (drive-thru window feature and aluminum tubes), and has a sign band that appears taller and incorporates fewer elements to relieve the expanse of wall area than other buildings in the center. Overall, these differences are not expected to appear non -cohesive as viewed from the EC street. 11 The overall design of buildings should have human scale. The overall size of the building, the use of brick Reduce the height of the Scale should be integral to the building and site design. and an accent band near the base, and the divided EIFS band or otherwise storefront windows help establish a human scale. revise the building design A reduced height for the EIFS band would to provide less of a top - provide a more comfortable, less top-heavy heavy appearance for the appearance. upper wall. 13 Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building The height of the EIFS band and its lack of design should be relieved using design detail or detailing results in a blank appearance. ve etation, or both. 14 Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting The proposed building would replace an existing None. devices should be used to unify groups of buildings building in a larger development. The existing within a development. buildings share a material/color palette and similar detailing to establish unity. The proposed building design would maintain a level of unity by using matching brick, but it also introduces new colors and materials. Overall, these differences are not expected to appear non -cohesive as viewed from the EC street. 15 Trademark buildings and related features should be From the EC street, the proposed building does is None. modified to meet the requirements of the Guidelines. not expected to look like a trademark design. 16 Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be Details on window glass have not been provided. None. highly tinted or highly reflective. Window glass in the Given the location of the glass at the west end of Entrance Corridors should meet the following criteria: the building, it is not expected to have a Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below significant visual impact on the EC street. 40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%. Specifications on the proposed window glass should be submitted with the application.for final review. Accessory structures and equipment 17 Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated The proposed design retains the screen wall that Revise the plans and into the overall plan of development and shall, to the fronts the EC street, and extends it to wrap around elevations to show the extent possible, be compatible with the building designs a new dumpster location. The architectural plans locations of building- and used on the site. show that the new wall would use materials to match those of the existing wall. The original wall ground -mounted equipment and to show 18 The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, screened a loading area. With the proposed site how it will be screened. these features will still have a negative visual impact on the layout, the wall would screen the dumpster, a Entrance Corridor street, screening should be provided to portion of the drive-thru lanes, some drive-thru Note on the site plan that eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. signage/equipment, and most of the rear elevation the extension of the screen Refuse areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment, of the building. wall will match the design f. Above -ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed of the existing wall. wire, razor wire, and similar security fencing devices. The existing wall contains a bay of windows backed by painted concrete block. (See Figure 2.) Revise the screen wall 19 Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and surrounding natural vegetation and Those windows do not appear in the elevation elevation to show the may consist of a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c. Fencing. drawings. They add a level of detail to the existing windows. screening wall and relieve blankness. The submittal does not address building -mounted equipment. Presumably, the parapet will screen roof -mounted equipment, but this isn't clear from the plans. 20 Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be No new above -ground stormwater facilities are None. designed to fit into the natural topography to avoid the proposed. need for screening. When visible from the Entrance Corridor street, these features must be frilly integrated into the landscape. They should not have the appearance of engineered features. 21 The following note should be added to the site plan and the The note does not appear on the plans. Add the standard architectural plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." note to the site and architectural drawings. Li htin General Guidelines 22 Light should be contained on the site and not spill over The photometric plan shows no excessive Revise the lighting plan onto adjacent properties or streets, spillover, but the plan was calculated using a light using an LLF of 1.0. loss factor (LLF) of .95. An LLF of 1.0 is needed Ensure that light is to meet County requirements, and this would tend contained on the site and to increase light levels somewhat. does not spill over onto adjacent streets. 23 Light should be shielded, recessed or flush -mounted to Proposed light fixtures are frill cutoff fixtures. None. eliminate glare. All fixtures with lamps emitting 3000 lumens or more must be full cutoff fixtures. 24 Light levels exceeding 30 footcandles are not appropriate The photometric plan shows a maximum level of Revise the lighting plan for display lots in the Entrance Corridors. Lower light 7.5 fc at the ground. However, the plan was using an LLF of 1.0. levels will apply to most other uses in the Entrance calculated using a light loss factor (LLF) of .95. Corridors. An LLF of 1.0 is needed to meet County requirements, and this would tend to increase light levels somewhat. 25 Light should have the appearance of white light with a The light fixtures are proposed with LED lamps Revise the color warm soft glow, however, a consistent appearance with a color temperature of 4000K. 3000K would temperature of the light throughout a site or development is required. provide a wane white light. fixtures to 3000K. Consequently, if existing lamps that emit non -white light are to remain, new lamps may be required to match them. 26 Dark brown, dark bronze, or black are appropriate colors The color of the fixtures has not been specified. Revise the lighting plan to for free-standing pole mounted light fixtures in the Poles are proposed with a platinum silver finish. indicate a bronze finish for Entrance Corridors. Existing poles and fixtures in the center are bronze. Consistent colors would provide more light fixtures and poles. 28 In determining the appropriateness of lighting fixtures for the Entrance Corridors, the individual context of the site unity across the site. will be taken into consideration on a case by case basis. 27 The height and scale of freestanding, pole -mounted light 15' poles are proposed. None. fixtures should be compatible with the height and scale of the buildings and the sites they are illuminating, and with the use of the site. Typically, the height of freestanding pole -mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors should not exceed 20 feet, including the base. Fixtures that exceed 20 feet in height will typically require additional screening to achieve an appropriate aDDearance from the Entrance Corridor. 29 The following note should be included on the lighting The note does not appear on the plan. Add the standard lighting plan: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp thil note to the plan. emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle." 30-31 Guidelines or the Use o Decorative Landscape Lighting No such lighting is proposed. None. Landscaping 7 The requirements of the Guidelines regarding Landscaping is in place along the EC frontage. Include a demolition plan landscaping are intended to reflect the landscaping The proposed plan does not accurately show the in the site plan set. characteristic of many of the area's significant historic previously approved planting and it does not show Identify all plants that are sites which is characterized by large shade trees and plants to be removed. proposed to be removed. lawns. Landscaping should promote visual order within the Entrance Corridor and help to integrate buildings into Revise the plan to clearly the existing environment of the corridor. indicate that all frontage landscaping approved with 8 Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting different types of plant materials previous approvals is to that share similar characteristics. Such common elements remain. allow for more flexibility in the design of structures because common landscape features will help to harmonize the appearance of development as seen from the street upon which the Corridor is centered. 32 Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include the following: a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the Entrance Corridor Street. Such trees should be at least 3% inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 35 feet on center. b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The ornamental trees need not alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They may be planted among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern. c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone wall, typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor street. d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive of road right -of- and utility easements. 33 Landscaping along interior roads: This site includes no interior roads. None. a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior roads. Such trees should be at least 2% inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 40 feet on center. 34 Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways: There is a sidewalk between the parking row and None. a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior the drive-thru lane, and a sidewalk on the west pedestrian ways. Such trees should be at least 2'/2 inches side of the building that turns and extends halfway caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and down the south elevation. There is no landscaping should be of a species common to the area. Such trees along these sidewalks. Existing frontage should be located at least every 25 feet on center. landscaping is substantial and mitigates the need for additional trees along pedestrian ways in this case. 35 Landscaping of parking areas: The row of parking spaces to the west of the None. a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, building has a row of existing trees. located 40 feet on center. Trees should be planted in the interior of parking areas at the rate of one tree for every 10 parking spaces provided and should be evenly distributed throughout the interior of the parking area. b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 2% inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be planted in planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain the health of the tree and shall be protected by curbing. c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area's impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 inches in height. 36 Landscaping of buildings and other structures: There are a few new shrubs proposed near the None. a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the building. The proposed building is not particularly front of long buildings as necessary to soften the long and benefits from substantial existing appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and type frontage planting. of such trees or vegetation should be determined by the length, height, and blankness of such walls. b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru" windows; service areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height. 37 Plant species: a. Plantspecies required should be as The only proposed plants are Shamrock Inkberry None. approved by the Staff based upon but not limited to the Holly and Hameln Fountain Grass. The holly is Generic Landscape Plan Recommended Species List and included in the lists. Grasses are not listed. Native Plants or Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D . 38 Plant health: The following note should be added to the The note does not appear on the plans. Add the standard plant landscape plan: "All site plantings of trees and shrubs health note to the plan. shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of theplant." Site Development and layout Development paftern 6 Site development should be sensitive to the existing The plan appears generally organized. The None. natural landscape and should contribute to the creation of building is oriented parallel to the EC, though the an organized development plan. This may be rear elevation faces the EC. The development fits accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the within the established parking lot and travelways. trees and rolling terrain typical of the area; planting new The site has already been developed; no open trees along streets and pedestrian ways and choosing spaces remain. No natural features remain, though species that reflect native forest elements; insuring that the frontage landscaping has significant positive any grading will blend into the surrounding topography visual impact. The proposed building would not thereby creating a continuous landscape; preserving, to impact any existing views or vistas. the extent practical, existing significant river and stream valleys which may be located on the site and integrating these features into the design of surrounding development; and limiting the building mass and height to a scale that does not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor. 39 The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance Corridor street and to other development within the corridor should be as follows: a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, and pedestrian walks should guide the layout of the site. b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street should be parallel to the street. Building groupings should be arranged to parallel the Entrance Corridor street. c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian and vehicular circulations stems. 10 d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity within the Entrance Corridor. e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys, steep slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the provisions of Section 32.5.2.n of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements required by that section should be located so as to maximize the use of existing features in screening such improvements from Entrance Corridor streets. f. The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and vistas on and around the site. Site Grading 40 Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the The site has already been graded. New grading is None. site to surrounding conditions by limiting the use of proposed primarily to establish the drive-thru retaining walls and by shaping the terrain through the use lane. of smooth, rounded land forms that blend with the existing terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed contours on the grading plan shall be rounded with a ten foot minimum radius where they meet the adjacent condition. Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller, when necessary, shall be terraced and Wanted to blend with the landscape. 41 No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the Grading does not appear to conflict with drip lines Revise the plan to clearly drip line of any trees or other existing features designated of trees to remain. Tree protection fencing is not indicate that all frontage for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness. shown. landscaping approved with Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and previous approvals is to coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and remain. erosion and sediment control plans. 42 Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate The proposed plan does not appear to show Maintain grading outside of Appropriateness should be clearly delineated and planting that matches the approved landscape the driplines of trees to protected on the site prior to any grading activity on the plan. Tree protection is not shown. remain. Show tree site. This protection should remain in place until protection fencing on, and com letion of the development of the site. coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping, and 43 Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy equipment within this area. erosion and sediment u control plans. 44 Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new No new above -ground stormwater facilities are None. drainage patterns) should be incorporated into the proposed. finished site to the extent possible. SIGNS Wall signs are shown on the west and south Wall signs visible from the building elevations. The southern sign may be EC street must meet the visible from the EC. The type of sign illustrated in design criteria outlined in the elevations (letters on a background panel) the approved does not meet the approved Comprehensive Sign Comprehensive Sign Plan Plan (CSP) for this shopping center. Individual for the Hollymead Town letters with red faces are required by the CSP. Center Area B. Individual letters with red faces are required for proposed wall signs. Figure 2: 2020 Pictometry image of the vacant TGI Friday's building. 12 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion: 1. Anticipated visibility of the building 2. The height of the EIFS band 3. The design of the screening wall 4. The metal tubes Staff recommends that the ARB forward the following recommendations to the Agent for the Site Review Committee: • Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18-30.6.4c(2), (3) and (5) and recommended conditions of initial plan approval: o Prior to Initial Plan approval the following items shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the ARB: None. The ARB recommends approval of the initial plan with no conditions. • Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None. • Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit: 1. Maintain grading outside the driplines of trees to remain. Show tree protection fencing on, and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping, and erosion and sediment control plans. • Regarding the final site plan submittal: A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. The following items and all items on the ARB Final Site Plan Checklist must be addressed: 1. Reduce the height of the EIFS band or otherwise revise the building design to provide less of a top-heavy appearance for the upper wall. 2. Provide additional information to clarify the appearance of the metal tubes on the drive-thru window elevation. 3. Revise the plans and elevations to show the locations of building- and ground -mounted equipment and to show how it will be screened. 4. Note on the site plan that the extension of the screen wall will match the design of the existing wall. 5. Revise the screen wall elevation to show the existing windows. 6. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the site and architectural drawings: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." 7. Revise the lighting plan using an LLF of 1.0. Ensure that light is contained on the site and does not spill over onto adjacent streets. 8. Revise the color temperature of the light fixtures to 3000K. 9. Revise the lighting plan to indicate a bronze finish for light fixtures and poles. 10. Add the standard lighting note to the plan: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle." 11. Include a demolition plan in the site plan set. Identify all plants that are proposed to be removed. 13 12. Revise the plan to clearly indicate that all frontage landscaping approved with previous approvals is to remain. 13. Add the standard plant health note to the plan: "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant." 14. Maintain grading outside the driplines of trees to remain. Show tree protection fencing on, and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping, and erosion and sediment control plans. 15. Wall signs visible from the EC street must meet the design criteria outlined in the approved Comprehensive Sign Plan for the Hollymead Town Center Area B. Individual letters with red faces are required for proposed wall signs. ATTACHMENTS Attach. 1: ARB2021-126: Chipotle Site Plan Attach. 2: ARB2021-126: Chipotle Architectural Drawings 14 ,cAt e U '9 Architectural Review Board County of Albemarle Meeting Agenda- December 6, 2021 ;4MAR41Q' Community Development Department Virtual Meeting _ �1&GII3 1. Call to order 2. Establish a Quorum 3. Disclosures 4. Public Comment 5. Consent Agenda: None 6. Work Session: None 7. Regular Review Items a. ARB-2021-126: Chipotle at Hollymead Town Center Staff: Margaret Maliszewski b. ARB-2021-131: Discount Tire Final Site Plan Staff: Khris Taggart 8. Other Business a. Approval of Minutes: November 15, 2021 b. Next ARB Meeting: December 20, 2021, 1:00 PM - VIRTUAL MEETING NOTES REGARDING PUBLIC MEETINGS 1 This meeting is being held pursuant to and in compliance with Ordinance No. 20-A(16), An Ordinance to Ensure the Continuity of Government During the COVID-19 Disaster.The opportunities for the public to access and participate in the electronic meeting are posted on the Albemarle County website on the Albemarle County calendar. Participation will include the opportunity to comment on those matters for which comments from the public will be received. 2. Each applicant is allowed to make a single presentation not exceeding 15 minutes in length. The applicant may divide the 15-minute allotment among various presenters,but the total presentation time will not exceed 15 minutes. 3. Each member of the general public who wishes to speak on a matter shall be allowed one appearance not to exceed 3 minutes. 4 Any person aggrieved by any decision of the Architectural Review Board may demand a review of the application by the Board of Supervisors. Such demand shall be made by filing a request therefore in writing with the clerk of the Board of Supervisors within ten calendar days of the date of such decision.For additional information see section 30.6 8 of the Zoning Ordinance NOTES REGARDING ARB ACTIONS 1. Certificates of Appropriateness are valid for the same period that the corresponding site plan is valid.If there is no site plan required for the proposed work,the Certificate of Appropriateness is valid for 3 years. Applicants requesting an extension of the period of validity must do so in writing.The letter must be received by the Director of Planning prior to the expiration date