Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA200600003 Other 2006-03-22 jakt/ V _ p.tof A k COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,Room 227 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 Fax (434)972-4012 March 22, 2006 Andy Graff Old Albemarle Surveying 612 East Jefferson Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: SUB 2005-0314 Central Virginia Capital- Lots A, B & C: Waiver of Section 404 of the Subdivision Ordinance (Tax Map 55 Parcel 57) Dear Mr. Graff: The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on March 14, 2006, approved the above- noted waiver of Section 404 of the Subdivision Ordinance for lot C, and denied the waiver request for lots A and B on SUB-2005-314 Central Virginia Capital—Lots A, B &C Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. VDOT approval of entrance locations; 2. Closure of existing entrance on lot C located nearest the existing dwelling; and 3. Health Department approval. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me at(434)296-5832. Sincerely, David E. Pennock Principal Planner Zoning&Current Development Division I Cc• Central Virginia Capital LLC C/O Express Homebuyers 6801-A Backlick Rd, Springfield, VA 22150 Ella Carey Jack Kelsey Amelia McCulley Steve Allshouse COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: AGENDA DATE: March 14, 2006 SUB-05-314: Central Virginia Capital - Lots A, B, and C ITEM NUMBER: SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Application for preliminary plat approval to create three ACTION: Yes INFORMATION: (3) lots on 4.80 acres. This application also includes a request, pursuant to Section 14-404(C), for a waiver of CONSENT AGENDA: No the requirement that all lots shall have reasonable access ACTION: INFORMATION: from only one street, established at the time of subdivision. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report STAFF CONTACT(S): REVIEWED BY: David Pennock � AGM PROPERTY OWNER & DEVELOPER: Central Virginia Capital, LLC BACKGROUND: The subject parcel,Tax Map 55, Parcel 57, is a 4.80 acre property that is zoned R-1 (Residential) and is located on Lanetown Road [Route#684], approximately 0.6 miles from its intersection with Railroad Avenue [Route#788] (Attachment A). The property is split by Lanetown Road. The Comprehensive Plan designates it as both Neighborhood Density in Rural Area 3 (area north of Lanetown Road) and CT-1 and CT-2 in the Crozet Community(area south of Lanetown Road). The applicant intends to subdivide the property in order to create one lot (shown on Attachment B as Lot C) that includes an existing house on the south side of Lanetown Road, as well as two lots on the north side of Lanetown Road (shown as Lots A and B) in an area that has one accessory structure, but is otherwise wooded. The applicant wishes to utilize existing driveways for Lots A and C, with Lot B accessed via a future driveway. DISCUSSION: Due to the physical limitation created by Lanetown Road, Lot C must use a different entrance than either Lot A or Lot B. Thus, the waiver request discussed herein applies only to a shared point of access for Lots A and B. Staff has reviewed the modification request. The review has resulted in mixed findings for and against approval of the waiver. Factors favorable to this request include: 1. Approval would allow use of existing driveways and alleviate the need for creation of a new shared access for Lots A and B. Factors unfavorable to this request include: 1. There are no physical barriers which effectively prohibit or prevent compliance with the ordinance. 2. The intent of this section of the Subdivision Ordinance is in part to reduce the numbers of entrances on State roads, and thus reduce conflict points with the flow of traffic. Allowing a separate entrance for • Lot B would be contrary to that goal. The Site Review Committee has reviewed this application and recommends approval of the preliminary A cite subdivision plat. '4ef, �o ug.e re'" ea4 RECOMMENDATION: Stares _Ry.. Staff recommends approval of a waiver of Section 14-404(A) to allow a separate entrance for Lot C. �r eon 1 Generally, staff finds that the waiver request for Lots A and B is not appropriate in this circumstance, and lave j,,, therefore cannot recommend approval of a waiver to allow separate entrances for Lots A and B. hdfi The preliminary plat is otherwise consistent with the requirements of the Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary subdivision plat, subject to the following condition: t. V�t�-fAtLs Ct05J�4 OF Er- OPIlNu EfAEA-NCI_ 041-0Tc • r (^lG bV""NIG l% 5P�-1i 2. Vier /rpo2.004- OF cAT W(3 3, t•+a PrLt t tvIE tic cia A-PfrolM- G01-s STAFF CONTACT: David E. Pennock, AICP PLANNING COMMISSION: March 14, 2006 AGENDA TITLE: SUB-05-314: Central Virginia Capital - Lots A, B, and C REQUEST: Application for preliminary plat approval to create three (3) lots on 4.80 acres. This application also includes a request, pursuant to Section 14-404(C), for a waiver of the requirement that all lots shall have reasonable access from only one street, established at the time of subdivision (Attachment C). The subject parcel, Tax Map 55, Parcel 57, is a 4.80 acre property that is zoned R-1 (Residential) and is located on Lanetown Road [Route #684], approximately 0.6 miles from its intersection with Railroad Avenue [Route#788]. The property is split by Lanetown Road. The Comprehensive Plan designates it as both Neighborhood Density in Rural Area 3 (area north of Lanetown Road) and CT-1 and CT-2 in the Crozet Community(area south of Lanetown Road). PROPERTY OWNER & DEVELOPER: Central Virginia Capital, LLC CHARACTER OF THE AREA: Proposed Lot C has an existing dwelling, as well as two small driveways. Two streams cross through this property. The area near each stream is wooded. This property is gently sloped. Proposed Lot A has an existing accessory structure and one small driveway. A stream feeds through the rear of Lot A from a culvert under the railroad tracks and intersects a second stream along the western property line. Most of the rest of proposed Lots A and B is thickly wooded and are also gently sloped. BACKGROUND: The preliminary subdivision application for this property was originally submitted in October, 2005. The application review was deferred twice in order to address comments made by members of the Site Review Committee. This item was referred for Planning Commission review by an adjacent property owner in November, 2005, in accordance with Section 14-218 of the Subdivision Ordinance (see Attachment D). In addition, a request was submitted by the applicant for waiver of Section 14-404(A) in order to allow individual drives to serve each of the lots. The subject property is split by Lanetown Road, which is the northern boundary of the development areas indicated in the Crozet Master Plan. In addition, Lanetown Road serves as the boundary for extension of water based on the current service area. Proposed Lot C is eligible for water only to existing structures. The existing dwelling on Lot C is served by public water and a private septic drainfield. Proposed Lots A and B are not eligible for public water or sewer connections. The reason the above discussion is relative to the preliminary plat review is due to minimum lot sizes and other area requirements. Although the minimum lot size for R-1 zoned property is 45,000 square feet (ref. Chapt. 18, Sec. 13.3), general regulations apply to lot area based on provision of central or public water or sewer. Whichever is the greatest area requirement is what applies to the property (district versus general regulation). Lots (such as Lot C) served by either water or sewer,but not both, must be at least 40,000 square feet. However, lots served by neither water nor sewer must be at least 60,000 square feet (ref. 18-4.1.3), regardless of the underlying zoning district requirements. Thus, proposed Lots A and B must each be a minimum of 60,000 square feet, as neither is eligible to connect to public water or sewer. The area of the portion of Tax Map 55, Parcel 57 south of Lanetown Road (proposed Lot C) is only 39,435 square feet. However, Section 2.1.4 of the Zoning Ordinance prohibits the reduction of lot area below the minimum specified for each zoning district. With no opportunity to qualify for a variance, Lot C must be at least 45,000 square feet in size. The applicant was unable to acquire additional acreage to add to proposed Lot C. 1 , the current proposal indicates a sli' f property, approximately 5,585 square feet in size, on the north side of Lanetown Road .., ,)e a part of Lot C. Section 14-402 of the Subdivision Ordinance prohibits "peculiarly shaped elongations designed solely to provide required square footage of area." In this case, though, the situation exists currently, and is being made no worse under the subdivision proposal. Staff has reviewed many proposals for the location of this sliver of property and believes that its indicated location will have minimal impact on any of the proposed lots or adjacent properties. The required stream buffer on Lot A can not be disturbed, as this area is a reservoir watershed. As such, while not ideal, the location within this buffer does not adversely affect proposed Lot A or C. Staff is requesting that the shape of this piece be modified so that it doesn't come to a sharp point. Staff notes that the adjacent property owner's letter of request for Planning Commission review of this preliminary plat includes a number of concerns (see Attachment D). Staff has met with the author as well as other neighbors and has addressed many of the concerns. Two of the outstanding items are to be addressed during final plat review. The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) reviewed the preliminary plat and commented that "each lot will be a standard private entrance for a single family unit" (Attachment E). Each specific driveway location must have VDOT approval prior to final plat recordation. In addition, neighbors have indicated that the septic system serving the existing house may not be functioning correctly. During field inspections, staff was unable to verify if this is the case. The applicant must verify with the Health Department that the existing system is suitable prior to final plat approval. REVIEW OF WAIVER TO SEC. 14-404: 14-404 Lot location to allow access from lot onto street or shared driveway. Each lot within a subdivision shall be located as follows: A. Each lot, other than a corner lot within the development areas, shall have reasonable access to the building site from only one street, shared driveway or alley established at the same time as the subdivision;provided that a lot may be located so that its driveway enters only onto a public street abutting the subdivision if: (i) the commission grants a waiver under subsection (C); (ii) the subdivider obtains an entrance permit from the Virginia Department of Transportation for the access; (iii) the entrance complies with the design standards set forth in sections 14-410(F) and 14-410(G); and (iv) the subdivider demonstrates to the agent prior to approval of the final plat that the waiver does not violate any covenants to be recorded for the subdivision. For purposes of this section, the term "reasonable access" means a location for a driveway or, if a driveway location is not provided, a location for a suitable foot path from the parking spaces required by the zoning ordinance to the building site; the term "within the subdivision"means within the exterior boundary lines of the lands • being divided. B. If the subdivision is within the rural areas, all subsequent divisions of the residue shall enter only onto such street(s)shown on the approved final plat and shall have no immediate access onto any public street. This section of the Subdivision Ordinance serves to limit the number of new entrances off of existing public roads. In accordance with section 14-404(C), the Commission may approve a waiver or variation if it finds that: (i) the county engineer recommends an alternative standard; The County engineer has not recommended an alternative standard. (ii) because of unusual size, topography, shape of the property, location of the property or other unusual conditions, excluding the proprietary interests of the subdivider, strict application of the applicable requirements would result in significant degradation of the property or to the land adjacent thereto; The division of the property by Lane+ s 1!ni Road is seen as an unusual condition; proposed Lot C must use a different entrance than propose )ts A and B. Regarding Lots A and B, there are no unusual conditions that will require use of separate entrances. -requiring the standard would not forward the purposes of this chapter or otherwise serve the public interest; The granting of this waiver does not seem to contradict any of the stated purposes of the Subdivision Ordinance in Section 14-101. However, allowing a separate entrance for Lot B would be contrary to the goals of Section 14-404, which limits new entrances on to existing public roads. -granting the waiver would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, to the orderly development of the area, to sound engineering practices, and to the land adjacent thereto; Proposed Lots A and C each have existing driveways. Extending the existing drive on Lot A to serve Lot B would require a minimum of between 150 and 200 feet of new roadway to be constructed across Lot A. To minimize the length of this drive, the construction of one new entrance to serve both lots, near the common property line, may be a more practical way to share access. However, as indicated in the applicant's letter, construction of a new entrance for Lot B with continued usage of the existing entrance for Lot A may limit the amount of disturbance necessary by eliminating the need for the extension of the existing drive as a"subdivision road". Staff has reviewed the modification request. The review has resulted in mixed findings for and against approval of the waiver. Factors favorable to this request include: 1. Approval would allow use of existing driveways and alleviate the need for creation of a new shared access for Lots A and B. Factors unfavorable to this request include: 1. There are no physical barriers which effectively prohibit or prevent compliance with the ordinance. 2. The intent of this section of the Subdivision Ordinance is in part to reduce the numbers of entrances on State roads, and thus reduce conflict points with the flow of traffic. Allowing a separate entrance for Lot B would be contrary to that goal. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a waiver of Section 14-404(A) to allow a separate entrance for Lot C. Generally, staff finds that the waiver request for Lots A and B is not appropriate in this circumstance, and therefore cannot recommend approval of a waiver to allow separate entrances for Lots A and B. The preliminary plat is otherwise consistent with the requirements of the Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary subdivision plat, subject to the following condition: 1. The preliminary plat must be amended to reflect a more uniform shape for the portion of Lot C shown north of Lanetown Road. Attachments: A- Vicinity Map B - Copy of Proposal for this Property C - Letter of Request for Waiver(from applicant) D - Letter of Request for Planning Commission Review (from neighbor) E - VDOT Preliminary Subdivision Plat Comment G • Albemarle County GIS-Web March 6, 2006 SUb-.5-314: Central VA Capital �� �� ) . 9'1,•{t !4ti/ 825-ft / o p 5 g5 �0�,. ggJ96_:-/a 55-/40F {t 55-45 ,,,,, g 4k ���. iay�930 fi ._��, 6 0./. 002 co 55-i 3 c' /� 55 41 A�` Op{t� 0{t Oh� co 0 805.ft g�gEie �I �o0 (-------81924. fr 0. g 55-42 6390g2 { /� �55/=53B 895 ft h Cs�:P 1470.1472 55C--OH-16/ ' k� �- ) 0�1496 ^y. �" .J -1 R/�P. 14i00/' / 5D=02--7 fit, 164' 04 ., ��,c� M'P / �' S 1 ...- O - ` - 1 i 55D=02--8 = Og g�0��< 1 55-55 y- -- c..„2",..._1, 60.67 -,6 , f"-'850.ft t 5 -56 ==—� G f-v 55-41 / ��p�• o` `�, 55D-�02\6GpLP+55D-02t 9�1 a a. .5-56A "yapr. 55D-O2--5 55D=0 1i1 N `b Oki ��Q1+4t' 117420. 1723 65 .. -13 / t .. ..S .- 10 e A 55D=02--•14f 1► r� / y" �O.iv 1�5 55-62 oof ;15 55D OX����NGt / 't` �,. 795 ft ,..- S5D-02--12 P 1.26 A 55=62A 13$7 •55-63 I ,��5'�• 55=57 ` 0 t 55D-02c.3 55D-02--15(7'0 5-58D + 55-63A 55D-a2--1 55D-02- 1'7 1435+ 55D-02-47/ / 1781 55D-02-7<41'1U >�+"-:' 790 fi �-1t 14097 ;N p' , 1793" 55D-02 -19(.rSlS./%B %$C �55�58A 7gp ft $ft �PNE�O9� 55D 02I 20`� 6430' � ,qC 6422 �j/ 55=636� �775:ft _ 55D-02--21 yo c 4 ' S5-58F RFS/ �55-5$B ~�� 770'ft 55D-02--25 55 02 23 55D-02--22 is. - IT '^----55D-02 6,55 OD 2--24 1386' 55 58G a .,,,., _ , s 55D-02--A can \ ,./ N t` ✓�`�`,� �>S Sff tT 55-39 � g .f� \ 795•ft ` t75:tt -? 55D-01 F �- {� �5-61 r _55D ^55D-01=i l��.� gOg �~8asr 8't5 55D=01- 1A6.3 2 Z6"55D;01--1+12.55D-0`8.5'S5 -y` t o� g20it 55D-01�105 55D�0�}la9 �" y /� 55-60A ,^ 55D�01--86SSD-OI--8455D-OAl -E j 11.1 55-38A 81 . � 1--104.400 1 r 1 � ( :.1,., .1 ' .('��� b I �rl`5�D-01--D(_ �� 55D�Q '3t55 - '-- 1' �4 GRA'YR'OCK D,R _ t r . Aix.: 55-60 6 \ 1333 r55D-01=-1�/55D-ai'--118� ( •-01",-66 - / .. a�_ O 13'43\--5D I01--O`55D-01s n -atlr9 55D-`1r 1�7 3111111191110: ' - 4r� _ ❑ Tax Map Gnd T _ mtad�011 � ri — Overview Roads —�I1-IiI Figi�t®mmemtai-:dm• 6 d� ��rI� _ ❑ Road Bridges P. - z4�Giiii�00�©F,i�© �� Road Centerlines A. 3a©1��.�©�©©EI©�IZ©©Eai,a� — V '°" ° al U EMIW triZa lei -- Roads Address Labels EiE 7m ©itilt Rid n1Q111 1111 Buildings Geographic D ata 22 ��0 Services �420Q0 Driveways •96 m96 99 1001,0110203 104?05106 401 McIntire Road 1071oS19110 111 113114116116� — Elevation Contours(5 ft) Charlottesville,VA 22902 117 11s 119 121 122 123 115 Parcel Labels 12 24 All data is provided for graphic representation only. The 125 126.127.12812930 131 ❑ Parcels County of Albemarle expressly disclaims all warranties of any type,expressed or implied,including•but not limited to.any 132 133 135 136 137 Lakes and Reservoirs warranty as to the accuracy of the data,merchantability.or 1J134 Ponds fitness for a particular purpose. Aenal Imagery 0 2002 Commonwealth of Virginia-Maps are for internal use only ATTACHMENT A sl—' Sucz. CI_ ' q Old Albemarle Surveying,LLC 612 East Jefferson Street Charlottesville,Va.22902 434 293-7530 434 293-7581 Fax January 30, 2006 Mr.David E. Pennock Senior Planner Dept. of Community Development County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,Va. 22902 Dear Mr. Pennock : Re : Central Virginia Capital, L.L.C.-Lots A, B & C Please accept this as a"request for wavier" of Section 14-404 of the Subdivision Ordinance. Lots A,B & C each front on State Route 684 (Lanetown Road). Currently, Lot A &Lot B have existing entrance plat,Lots has &C wtwo oianild use existing entrancesces(with a ng dwelling). As proposed on the subdivisionp and Lot B would use a new entrance. I ask that you grant this wavier request from having to build one street to serve all of the lots. My reasoning for this is that I am proposing the same number of new entrances (one)as required by Section 14-404 with much less construction impact than having to build a new subdivision road. Also, this usage matches almost all of the existing parcels from this property south to State Route 691 (individual entrances). do Thank you for considering my request and should you have anyquestions,please not hesitate to call. I am,most sincerely and respectfully, yours, Orndu .,) _9/44 �J. Andrew Graff 1R)164CP. LCniR ATTACHMENT C . . . • -, I ..-; 0,01 g - , * if i•I' i'.1‘°11 .f 11 r: PtIC PDC'c 4 ‘,,Aj/..1 Ci 1 ‘.1 1 I 0 Via- j2,0 CIS ' t,'," i I of: O 1 rirt a ri .Pre136.4‘0 ' e Ceo+tfei a f ali i i eeef, 44/4 ii tvivip /C.-, .r- ; Ifitj iv I i.',%5 41,.,,,f 4.,•,-,j 3v oi- r(,, ci 4-0 Ice- ‘5‘4.i r- r. 4442. 4144i A a•• '4- , , e ../ I ..... , 1:‘,01 filly/ 0.0 1-1114 0(0 V tviii 5 i tri4; ie. a,V4it.Ci Mt .4, p, peer i via_ 4 i 7 1 fl.,0 t 1 1-1-i I .. J,, it 1 .: , Li -'f-, it, .„ . et , ) , „,/ 6/1*, 4''' - t 7- ) -1,s v t---1 v0At z,.€ , Fitt ,... (.,Isf,-;;,. t,4.1 .,,, y ' -4,-, ..,t, f. • C xikfv- .„ q)as, ii 4;4 4.7'11 arl Vie ---. so V 11.- i I e " 0 < J le)'10'C'? .1•P‘ r .4-i/v..i, „,-, cc; L' if, ,Otya si A 'htly-c- P0 - 4 i el ii -ftv.,, .14c ),c,/ey-t ,/,-t (c_ 1 / , . • . FIT t);icfivt.,s • t/0 v , r1 pitcz retAx5 t4A c.• riFii „i 1 ) ,41 l 'v)1 o r4 - A i I ii(0 - .., t , f i A ,4A6-or' riry itte...r..-- v g4 i ( ' p 1 -rf:.... f,r,--i i;) 4,,/,:,st,x,/,‘,71>/ T4 i'1;. ; c,, •t:•... p 446... i ,. ., _ .,. ,... hi,4 ,„ ,. iii).....---a-i;:, p Jo-Pt,...i/' 11.,..-• --------- --r-I' or' " vi it tt., t t-...-r‘ -- - / , , .1/4. . . /* ' (a4r V' 4- i ,t''' t. iliiri.,- le ' ,....'0' "A i4 i..-' l' ,,, •41 i .4f,..A i I " • i. i . i I,rj,*046 1 i ... . ia." . ea' 4 1 t A / 44 -1 i / •': 44" ' IA 0 etwg— - ..-'; ./-- t "iii 4,,,44:+..,- '‘ v--A ./.1 Vitr- it,-.4., P i... -1 , 0 4 t ;),;,,,,..e p r 1 ,..4 .9..; ., ,... . ..-i . p••.-, •i,,...4;Z ••-,• 4;'$'-1,• . P,.... v...-4.;;-=4‘,•s/i ti.. e.fi.I•t.f4-` - rt4;1 -'-4 , ti : 4,1- A.,. / 4 - - 1 /- -, — , ./ / 1 .! 1 , f 'II, , I 0 i i4 1 Pi 4 ,iiiv - --,VV., 4--.../f On ATTACHMENT D1 7 tO Ottild , TI4 , A4iC0‘-. 5 w#kt"t .4.- -kr ,i (t- . 4 A V , 444) 1 . 1.6 ac, ,lei. t.., li-i ....L. t, it A V',,; 1 4 i-0,444:. cii-A. 4-4,-,4:...A.rts-ei 4:4 v1.41 I. . , i ' ' ; i • , 4, A CA ir 01+-i,„.......- „i, .,) 1/i ..„ „ris,rt. tv,...‘4 ( ,,,...... alvit, -) Th44/ NO es- 1 iri, .h,.....- 1, r." I r (4 1 t , tik ' f t i tv J 41:1( i4w& 14''''"C(: 5' T 1/1.4 0"lk ‘ k g t : ci.4 .) kciA4z -fiNt 444C-i o' 4 4 iArt oeit,t, C 1 , iffit -f i 1 a + 4i 1 0 i-i ' * ' - 'T Al ( i 45(40 0*It Iv c4.--"" +1 ,,04. iA' 0 es.,41C C.:4 , i i.\. •1 AiP 4ese „,„ (4 ,:i• ,,,4 Ar I VI, 4r/i,Ar.."tr- t1144)4444.' Y ol'',4 ' *'d I % ir) / i-ti CO rC - - ise4vr + 7 4 lbi/. i i I 1-0 t7-1 pm t-C-cf w-1-",,„-LceilI iikW- rICAra ,barrei,,AAA--1 t.-- . 1-i A _ d fi ef VI 4,p , ifort v wv vit.- 1 „r_i,' A.1 ..„ . #4/11/%-)4,C ;11AL / I VA,' 1 v 4,4,,,' F ,t----+,- 0 , , 4.0 /X e A I ; :'.A'A, 1,... W (t )e,(4,...," ' i i } t_. , 4 al „lk vi.„4„, ii." I eV aak if. • 4"' 41.'•1 • %..- 1.*.-j kiliVir "Ct i if,,t (vvvf ‘., 40 • .- . '- ^ eel c,vvt);/44 o/c iv t__^ j€,,,t,s.if / il . ,..t . i ,1 ttrFet e.oliot .+4(4, ,... .4Itv-k-ti- I , , , , :.-.): 4,..`.., 3"4.•••••44 ffi e ...... I i/l. . . , A t • ‹._ 4,- iv t ' t,, A :41 rt.A, ,";- _ , •:„ .,: )A lili 4,40...-2,...;4,- , ‘ T...ti . 4, 4.1, 0 ,. . , ,..... _ . . i,,, ...,..-t . 1 i 4) , / .q, /....- 3-• Ve" 1 VOL. KV*;et r ... -T-4--c.-4 f c/ ( 4:1, 0, , - i, it-'4 5-41„../L) 1 P .e , ' • ' ' ., yo 4. jr%,, (,,, 0/ II)--,, ' - , -.4....-• v c...t, p i 6 i . t • ro't iivry‘ lact‘zui vv141/1 I ; " 1 4 , • ' j1011' il t.'V' vrtic ( 4=10,41 1 .14:41 c-livvti t4,1'44't V14- ( , / • , (4 , I A 1,0v.0,,,,Z,4 dot$4,ir 4 oi,f0A- ir/v-4.-%-ki vNi 5 opitd., +(., ad ..... . . I ; /, ' T ' I e7 71' / el /IV / 01" t tio•1 ;:, CiArttr>f t -4- '' 1. iiit4 pe VI.0 r I 1 o I Je • , • mi;• ' ° •• ATTACHMENT DZ • l j 4 ..way COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 701 VDOT Way Charlottesville,VA 22911 GREGORY A.WHIRLEY ACTING COMMISSIONER November 14, 2005 Mr, Glenn Brooks 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 Re: Site and Subdivision Review Comments Dear Mr, Brooks Below are VDOT's comments on the following plan packages SDP 2005 0103 Community Self S tor a e (Steve Tugwell) • This project does not adjoin the State Highway System, so no review is necessary • The entrance from Rio Road appears to be adequate. SUB 2005-00301 Ashcroft Phase IV (Francis McCall) • Each lot will be a standard private entrance for a single family unit. • A VDOT entrance permit will be required for construction on a State right of way. Sja 2005-314 Central Virginia Cipatal (David Pennock) • • Each lot will be a standard private entrance for a single family unit. • A VDOT entrance permit will be required for construction on a State right of way. 6boTEARS Of TRANSPORTATION EXCELUNCE I 1 9 0 6 • 2 0 0 6 ATTACHMENT E