Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB202000056 Correspondence 2020-08-07 Margaret Maliszewski From: Margaret Maliszewski Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 5:01 PM To: Alan Wong Subject: Stonefield D1 - materials/colors Alan, Thanks for returning my call this afternoon. We talked about 2 color/material questions: 1. It looks like the Sto physical sample that was submitted(white)does not represent the proposed color,which is 31337. I need a physical sample of 31337 or a physical sample of some of color system that matches 31337 to complete my review. 2. Some of the site walls are identified as"buff block"but there is no specific manufacturer name or color number and no sample was provided. I am concerned that the buff color is too light. A segmental wall that we have approved for other sites in the county is Anchor Diamond Pro in the"James River"color. Please let me know the manufacturer name and color for the proposed block.Hopefully, I will have a sample, so you won't need to provide one. As we discussed,I also have some lighting and landscaping comments.All comments are combined here: 1. Provide a physical sample of Sto 31337. This color will be reviewed for appropriateness with other building material colors, and for site walls. (Note that staff may ask ARB members to confirm color selections.) 2. Indicate manufacturer and color for the"buff" site walls.Note that"James River"by Anchor Diamond Pro has been approved for other retaining walls in the County. 3. Revise the photometric plan using an LLF of 1.0. 4. G is not a full cutoff fixture and emits more than 3000 lumens. Fixtures emitting 3,000 or more lumens must be full cutoff fixtures. Revise the photometric plan accordingly. 5. The existing tree at the corner of Hydraulic and Inglewood is shown as to be demolished on C-7 (demolition plan) and as to remain on the landscape plans. Please rectify the discrepancy. Please let me know if you have questions or want to discuss comments before making revisions. Thanks. Margaret Margaret Maliszewski, Chief of Planning/Resource Management Albemarle County Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 434-296-5832 x3276 1 8/2/20 review of Stonefield D1 resubmittal 1. Confirm with staff that proposed colors are consistent with the renderings. Physical samples for gray slate siding and panels and iron gray panel/trim were not provided, but we have available from other projects; Sto 31337 color sample is needed. Physical samples received for Curated cream siding; bronze window, louver, guardrail. May ask ARB to review to confirm consistency/appropriateness of colors 31320 vat C2 3321 053 C2 31333 v43 Cl 313331759.1 3,3>e.7r+6 C 1111 3133D 013 73 31331 022 C2 31332 1729 CI 313331139 C1 31334[03 C 31335 1.59 CI 31336 CI167 r1 31332023 CI 313D0 viz c3 3nal 0r�I3 lne v33 r, n3a30,5 c .0 71. Ste BaWaey wnn ooxrvar 2. Identify the material and color of the site walls shown in the elevation drawings. Colors and materials identified. They are: • On Inglewood: cast in place to match EIFS building trim (31337) —OK if EIFS color is OK • Fieldstone veneer at Bond St. —won't be visible • Buff colored segmental block at courtyard and at Hydraulic end of District— will be visible on District—no sample provided, looks too light. 3. Revise the lighting plans to include a complete luminaire schedule. Identify all options for proposed fixtures, including finish, wattage, color temperature (not to exceed 3000K), mounting height etc. Schedule provided. Options noted. Photometrics calculated using an LLF of.9. G is not a full cutoff fixture and emits more than 3000 lumens. Fixtures emitting 3,000 or more lumens must be full cutoff fixtures. 4. Make all light fixture labels legible. Labels are legible. 5. Reduce illumination to not exceed 20 fc at the ground. Max is less than 20. 6. Revise the lighting plans to indicate color temperatures for all proposed fixtures not to exceed 3000K. 3000K indicated for all lamps in schedule. 7. Revise the lighting plans to identify a consistent color/fmish for all fixtures. Bronze identified for all lamps in schedule. 8. Revise the lighting plans to clearly show that pole-mounted fixtures will not exceed 20' in height, including any bases. Schedule notes that pole-mounted fixtures will not exceed 20'. 9. Include clearly identified utilities and easements on the landscape plan. Ensure coordination of landscaping with utilities and easements without reducing plant quantities. The trees along Hydraulic are located outside the easement. 10. Consider replacing the Miscanthus Sinensis with a locally native species. Replaced with "wood oats". 11. Include the landscape and lighting plans as part of the overall site plan set. Done? 12. Coordinate the site, demolition, and landscape plans regarding the trees to remain on Inglewood Drive. Show tree protection fencing. The existing tree at the corner of Hydraulic and Inglewood is shown as to be demolished on C-7 (demolition plan) and as to remain on the landscape plans. Tree protection fencing is shown on the landscape plans. COMMENTS 1. Provide a physical sample of Sto 31337. This color will be reviewed for appropriateness with other building material colors,and for site walls.(Note that staff may ask ARB members to confirm color selections.) 2. Indicate manufacturer and color for the"buff'site walls.Note that"James River"by Anchor Diamond Pro has been approved for other retaining walls in the County. 3. Revise the photometric plan using an LLF of 1.0. 4. G is not a full cutoff fixture and emits more than 3000 lumens.Fixtures emitting 3,000 or more lumens must be full cutoff fixtures.Revise the photometric plan accordingly. 5. The existing tree at the corner of Hydraulic and Inglewood is shown as to be demolished on C-7 (demolition plan)and as to remain on the landscape plans.Please rectify the discrepancy.