HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB202100134 Staff Report 2021-12-14ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #/Name
ARB-2021-134: Caliber Collision Major Amendment
Review Type
Major Amendment to a Site Plan
Parcel Identification
04500-00-00-10600
Location
1720 Seminole Trail
Zoned
Highway Commercial (HQ / Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner/Applicant
TAP Investments LLC / Cross Architects (Bret Flory)
Magisterial District
Rio
Proposal
To renovate an existing 9,200 sf building to establish an auto body shop in addition to associated site improvements on a 1.02-acre parcel.
Context
This parcel is located on the west side of Rt. 29 approximately 447' north of the Rt. 29 and Rio Road intersection. This portion of Route 29 is characterized by
commercial development, including Albemarle Square Shopping Center across Rt. 29 to the east, self -storage buildings to the north/west, and Jefferson Coin and CVS
to the south (Fig. 1).
Visibility
This site is readily visible from the Rt. 29 Entrance Corridor. Some views of the rear of the site are available from the Rio Rd. Entrance Corridor.
ARB Meeting Date
December 20, 2021
Staff Contact
Khris Taggart
SITE HISTORY
A site plan was first approved for this site in 1973. The building was constructed in 1974, prior to the establishment of the Entrance Corridors. The ARB reviewed a sign for the site in 2006. That review resulted in
a change from multiple cabinet signs attached to the building's fascia, to the current sign which is composed of white letters on a long, opaque blue background.
CURRENT PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DETAILS
On March 1, 2021 the ARB reviewed but did not recommend approval of the Special Use Permit for this site due to the screening issues related to new roof -mounted mechanical equipment for the auto body shop
use. A work session was held during the April 5, 2021 ARB meeting where the ARB reviewed the revised proposal and recommended approval of the use and provided preliminary comments for the site plan
submittal. On December 7, 2021 the Planning Commission reviewed the Special Use Permit for this site (SP-2021-03) and forwarded a recommendation of approval with revisions to the condition stated in the staff
report to the Board of Supervisors.
Figure 1: Pictometry image showing project area along the Rt. 29 Entrance Corridor.
ANALYSIS
REF
GUIDELINE
RECOMMENDATION from
CURRENT ISSUE
RECOMMENDATION
April 5, 2021 meeting
12/20/21
GENERAL GUIDELINES
Purpose, Compadbifity with significant historic sues
1
The goal of the regulation of the design of development within the designated Entrance
See landscaping and fencing, below.
The warehouse building was
See landscaping and fencing
Corridors is to ensure that new development within the corridors reflects the traditional
constructed prior to the
recommendations, below.
architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the purpose of ARB review and of these
establishment of the Entrance
Guidelines, that proposed development within the designated Entrance Corridors
Corridors. It does not reflect the
reflect elements of design characteristic of the significant historical landmarks,
traditions of local historic
buildings, and structures of the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote
architecture and the proposed
orderly and attractive development within these corridors. Applicants should note that
changes to the site will not alter
replication of historic structures is neither required nor desired.
that condition.
Orderly and attractive
2
Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area
experience these sites as ensembles of buildings, land, and vegetation. In order to
development could be promoted
accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and vegetation characteristic of these
with the addition of appropriate
sites, the Guidelines require attention to four primary factors: compatibility with
landscaping and fencing.
significant historic sites in the area; the character of the Entrance Corridor; site
development and layout; and landscaping.
3
New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should respect the
traditions of the architecture of historically significant buildings in the Charlottesville
and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in the area, as well as drawings
of architectural features, which provide important examples of this tradition are
contained in Appendix A.
4
The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for building design:
the standard of compatibility with the area's historic structures is not intended to
impose a rigid design solution for new development. Replication of the design of the
important historic sites in the area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's
standard of compatibility can be met through building scale, materials, and forms
which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional.
The Guidelines allow individuality in design to accommodate varying tastes as well as
special functional requirements.
Compatibility with the character of the Entrance Corridor
5
It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a pattern of compatible
See landscaping and equipment
The building would be painted
See landscaping
architectural characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in order to achieve unity
recommendations, below.
a color (Nomadic Desert) that is
recommendations, below.
and coherence. Building designs should demonstrate sensitivity to other nearby
compatible with the
structures within the Entrance Corridor. Where a designated corridor is substantially
surroundings. Mechanical
developed, these Guidelines require striking a careful balance between harmonizing
equipment screens, that match
new development with the existing character of the corridor and achieving
the existing building material
compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area.
and the proposed paint color,
are shown screening both
10
Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of buildings.
existing and new roof -mounted
equipment. Unity and
coherence would be more
substantially improved by
brin in landsca ing into
conformance with ordinance
and uidelines re uirements.
Structure design
9
Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials, colors and
None.
With this proposal, no major
Revise the architectural drawings
textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the significant historic
changes to the existing building
to correctly note the illustrated
buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to) the buildings described in
form are proposed. The
building paint colors.
Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The standard of compatibility can be met
proposed changes include
through scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is
painting of the building, the
contemporary as well as traditional. The replication of important historic sites in
addition of a garage bay door
Albemarle County is not the objective of these guidelines.
near the southeast comer of the
building, mechanical equipment
screens on the roof, and the
infill of an existing opening
along the north elevation.
The building paint colors
appear to be labeled incorrectly
in a few locations on the
elevation drawings. The front
elevation notes the base and
upper wall color as Nomadic
Desert (PT-3) while the other
elevations show Nomadic
Desert as the upper wall color
and Kilim Beige (PT-5) for the
garage bay doors and the base
alon the ri t elevation.
11
The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale should be integral to
None.
The scale of the building would
None.
the building and site design.
not change with this proposal.
The heavy fascia at the
southeast corner and the length
of blank walls on the north tend
to diminish the sense of human
scale.
12
Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms, shapes, scale,
None.
The proposal would not change
None.
and materials to create a cohesive whole.
the building form, scale or
materials.
13
Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building design should be relieved
See landscaping of building
The proposal does not include
See landscaping of building
using design detail or vegetation, or both.
recommendations, below.
any proposed changes to the
recommendations, below.
existing blank elevations.
14
Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting devices should be used to unify
None.
The site includes a single
None.
groups of buildings within a development.
building so connecting devices
are not necessary.
15
Trademark buildings and related features should be modified to meet the requirements
None.
The existing building is not
None.
of the Guidelines.
reflective of any trademark
design. The proposed paint
colors appear to be standard for
the company, but they do not
create an overall trademark
a eazance for the building.
16
Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly tinted or highly reflective.
None.
No window changes are
None.
Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the following criteria: Visible
proposed.
light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR)
shall not exceed 30%. Specifications on the proposed window glass should be
submitted with the applicafionforfinal review.
Accessory structures and equipment
17
Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated into the overall plan of
Revise the plans to show a dumpster
The plan includes a detail (02
Revise the plans to show a
development and shall, to the extent possible, be compatible with the building designs
enclosure that has a coordinated
on SP1.0) that is labeled
dumpster enclosure that matches
used on the site.
appearance with the overall
development.
"Dumpster Enclosure" but the
detail only addresses the
the ornamental fencing.
18
The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance Corridor street.
If, after appropriate siting, these features will still have a negative visual impact on the
concrete pad. An enclosure to
Revise the ornamental fence
Entrance Corridor street, screening should be provided to eliminate visibility. a. Loading
The additional mitigation measures
match the approved screening
detail to indicate material and
areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment, f.
shown for screening the rooftop
fencing would be appropriate.
color.
Above -ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor wire, and similar
equipment appear appropriate.
security fencing devices.
Revise the plans show a fence
The mechanical equipment
screens reviewed during the
Revise the ornamental fence
detail to indicate screening fabric
19
Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and
surrounding natural vegetation and may consist of. a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c.
design that relates more closely to
April 51 work session remain.
color.
Fencing.
the building and the surrounding
The screens match the existing
commercial context. Consider
building material and proposed
Revise the plans to indicate a
alternative, more durable screening
color for the building and
single color for the chain link
materials.
screen both the existing and
fence vision slats that matches
new roof -mounted equipment.
the ornamental fencing.
Revise the plans to indicate a
compatible color for the vision slats
The fence design, ornamental
for the chain link fence.
fencing with screening fabric,
reviewed during the April 51
No increase in chain link fence is
work session remains. Detail 08
approved.
on sheet SPI.1 notes 1" sq.
ornamental pickets but does not
indicate fence material or the
color for the fence and
screening fabric. The
perspective view shows the
fencing and screening fabric as
black or dark bronze which is
expected to have an appropriate
appearance. Due to the design
of the proposed fencing, the
screening of vehicles awaiting
repair is reliant on the screening
fabric attached to the fence.
Durability is one of the
considerations identified in the
screening fence design criteria
approved by the ARB for
Countywide Certificates of
Appropriateness. (See Table A.)
The manufacturer's information
for the screening fabric
included with the submittal
indicates a 10+ year life
expectancy if properly installed.
This appears to satisfy the
material durability
consideration.
Vinyl privacy slats are proposed
for the existing chain link fence.
Two different colors are
specified in the site plan (tan on
SP1.1 and black on SP1.0).
Matching the color of the
ornamental fence and screening
would help establish a more
cohesive appear ce.
20
Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be designed to fit into the natural
None.
No above -ground stormwater
None.
topography to avoid the need for screening. When visible from the Entrance Corridor
facilities are existing or
street, these features must be frilly integrated into the landscape. They should not have
proposed.
the appearance of engineered features.
21
The following note should be added to the site plan and the architectural plan: "Visibility
Revise the site and architectural
The note is not present on the
Revise the site and architectural
of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated."
plans to include the standard
site or architectural plan.
plans to include the standard
mechanical equipment note.
mechanical equipment note.
22-29
Lighting
None.
The site includes three pole
If any new lighting is proposed
lights and building -mounted
revise the site plan set to provide
lighting. The applicant proposes
a complete lighting plan.
no change to the lights.
Three decorative streetlights
were installed along Rt. 29 as
part ofstreetscape
improvements associated with
the Rt. 29 upgrades.
30-31
Guidelines for the Use of Decorative Landscape Lighting
None.
No decorative lighting has been
None.
proposed.
Landscaping
7
The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping are intended to reflect the
Note that the site changes that are
Currently, a row of shrubs runs
Revise the landscape plan to
landscaping characteristic of many of the area's significant historic sites which is
shown will require a Site Plan
along the northern half of the
show large trees with an upright
characterized by large shade trees and lawns. Landscaping should promote visual order
Amendment. A complete landscape
east elevation of the building.
habit and an arrangement of
within the Entrance Corridor and help to integrate buildings into the existing
plan should be provided with the
There are no street trees along
ornamental trees and shrubs at a
environment of the corridor.
first submittal of that amendment.
the Rt. 29 Entrance Corridor.
The plant schedule notes 11
minimum of 24" at time of
planting in the planting area
8
Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting different types
of plant materials that share similar characteristics. Such common elements allow for
boxwoods with no planting size
along the frontage.
more flexibility in the design of structures because common landscape features will
indicated and 20 Japanese
help to harmonize the appearance of development as seen from the street upon which
Barberry specified at 3 gal. in
the Corridor is centered.
the planting bed along the EC
elevation. This planting
32
Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include the
following:
arrangement is not typical of
a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the Entrance Corridor Street. Such
frontage landscaping.
trees should be at least 3'/z inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the ground) and
should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least
Base on the overall length
every 35 feet on center.
(148.56') of the EC frontage, 4
b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be interspersed
large trees are required;
among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The ornamental trees need not
however, due to the existing
alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They may be planted among the large
entrances to the site only
shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern.
approximately 81' of the
c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone wall, typical
frontage has available planting
of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor street.
area. This area is further limited
by existing and potential future
edestrian aths the Rio29 plan
d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and fencing
recommends a 14' shared -use
should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive of road right-
path), and an overhead line, but
of -way and utility easements.
there appears to be available
space for 1 or 2 large trees with
an upright habit and an
arrangement of ornamental
trees and shrubs.
33
Landscaping along interior roads:
None.
There are no interior roads in
None.
a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior roads. Such trees should be at
this site.
least 2% inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should be of a
plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 40 feet
on center.
34
Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways:
None.
Other than the sidewalk around
None.
a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior pedestrian ways. Such trees
the southeast corner of the
should be at least 2% inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and
building there are no interior
should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every
pedestrian ways within this site.
25 feet on center.
35
Landscaping of parking areas:
Revise the plan to show landscaping
The landscape plan has not
Revise the plan to show large
a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, located 40 feet on center.
in the planting areas along the
been revised to show any
trees (with an upright habit where
Trees should be planted in the interior of parking areas at the rate of one tree for every
northern and southern perimeters of
landscaping in the planting
overhead lines are located
10 parking spaces provided and should be evenly distributed throughout the interior of
the site.
areas along the northern and
nearby), spaced 40' on center and
the parking area.
southern perimeters of the site.
2'/z" caliper at time of planting in
b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 2% inches caliper
The changes that are proposed
the planting areas along the
(measured six inches above the ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be of a
to north and south ends of the
northern and southern perimeters
species common to the area. Such trees should be planted in planters or medians
building are minor and do not
of the site.
sufficiently large to maintain the health of the tree and shall be protected by curbing.
help to soften the appearance of
c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area's impact on
these long elevations that are
Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 inches in height.
mostly blank. No planting areas
are existing or proposed along
36
Landscaping of buildings and other structures:
a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the front of long buildings as
these elevations but the addition
necessary to soften the appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and type of
of trees along the northern and
such trees or vegetation should be determined by the length, height, and blankness of
southern perimeters of the site
such walls.
could help to soften the
b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other structures;
appearance of these blank
dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive flim" windows; service areas;
elevations and integrate the
and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height.
development into the EC.
37
Plant species: a. Plant species required should be as approved by the Staff based upon
Provide a complete landscape plan
A plant schedule has been
None.
but not limited to the Generic Landscape Plan Recommended Species List and Native
with the first site plan submittal.
provided with this submittal.
Plants for Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D).
The schedule notes two species
of shrubs in the planting area
along the frontage. The
ro osed lants are on the list.
38
Plant health: The following note should be added to the landscape plan: "All site
Include the plant health note on the
The standard plant health note
Add the standard plant health
plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature
landscape plan in the first site plan
is not present on the landscape
note to the landscape plan.
height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally
submittal.
plan.
and only to support the overall health of theplant."
Site development and layout
6
Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural landscape and should
None.
No major changes are proposed
None.
contribute to the creation of an organized development plan. This may be
to the general site layout. The
accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the trees and rolling terrain typical
existing building is oriented
of the area; planting new trees along streets and pedestrian ways and choosing species
parallel to the Entrance
that reflect native forest elements; insuring that any grading will blend into the
Corridor. No changes are
surrounding topography thereby creating a continuous landscape; preserving, to the
proposed to the site entrances or
extent practical, existing significant river and stream valleys which may be located on
the sidewalk along Rt. 29. No
the site and integrating these features into the design of surrounding development; and
significant natural features
limiting the building mass and height to a scale that does not overpower the natural
remain on this property. Views
settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor.
are not expected to be impacted.
39
The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance Corridor street and to
other development within the corridor should be as follows:
a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, and pedestrian walks should
guide the layout of the site.
b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street should be parallel to the
street. Building groupings should be arranged to parallel the Entrance Corridor street.
c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian and vehicular
circulation systems.
d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity within the
Entrance Corridor.
e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys, steep slopes,
significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such natural
features should be reflected in the site layout. If the provisions of Section 32.5.2.n of
the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements required by that
section should be located so as to maximize the use of existing features in screening
such improvements from Entrance Corridor streets.
f The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and vistas on
and around the site.
Site Grading
40
Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site to surrounding conditions
None.
No grading of the site is shown.
None.
by limiting the use of retaining walls and by shaping the terrain through the use of
smooth, rounded landforms that blend with the existing terrain. Steep cut or fill sections
are generally unacceptable. Proposed contours on the grading plan shall be rounded with a
ten -foot minimum radius where they meet the adjacent condition. Final grading should
achieve a natural, rather than engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and
taller, when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend with the landscape.
41
No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the drip line of any trees or other
existing features designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness.
Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and coordinated throughout, the
grading, landscaping and erosion and sediment control plans.
42
Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness should be
clearly delineated and protected on the site prior to any grading activity on the site.
This protection should remain in place until completion of the development of the site.
43
Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy equipment
within this area.
44
Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage patterns) should be
None.
Existing drainage patterns are
None.
incorporated into the finished site to the extent possible.
not proposed to be changed.
Signs
Sign applications are required for all
No changes have been made to
Please note separate sign
proposed signs. Note that the
the signage shown for the site
applications are required for all
number of colors in the wall sign
since the previous submittal.
proposed signs. The following
exceeds the guidelines maximum
While signage is reviewed and
comment for the sign application
and internal illumination of the
approved by separate
submittal has been provided:
multicolor band will not likely be
submission, the following
Because the band includes more
recommended.
comments that were provided
than 3 colors, staff recommends
with the advisory review still
that the band not be illuminated.
apply:
The ARB may require that the
color and scale of standard
templates for trademarks,
service marks, corporate logos
and graphics be modified.
A wall sign is shown on the east
end of the building. The sign is
composed of individual white
letters (possibly internally
illuminated channel letters)
above a rainbow -colored band.
The number of colors in the
sign exceeds the guidelines
maximum; internal illumination
of the band is not appropriate.
m
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. The proposed frontage landscaping.
2. The proposed landscaping along the north and south perimeters of the site.
3. The design proposed for the new fence; the color of vision slats for the existing chain link fence.
Staff offers the following recommendations on the proposal:
1. Revise the architectural drawings to correctly note the illustrated building paint colors.
2. Revise the plans to show a dumpster enclosure that matches the ornamental fencing.
3. Revise the ornamental fence detail to indicate material and color.
4. Revise the ornamental fence detail to indicate screening fabric color.
5. Revise the plans to indicate a single color for the chain link fence vision slats that matches the ornamental fencing.
6. Revise the site and architectural plans to include the standard mechanical equipment note: Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated.
7. If any new lighting is proposed revise the site plan set to provide a complete lighting plan.
8. Revise the landscape plan to show large trees with an upright habit and an arrangement of ornamental trees and shrubs at a minimum of 24" at time of planting in the planting area along the frontage.
9. Revise the plan to show large trees (with an upright habit where overhead lines are located nearby), spaced 40' on center and 2%" caliper at time of planting in the planting areas along the northern and
southern perimeters of the site.
10. Add the standard plant health note to the landscape plan: All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and
trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant.
11. Please note separate sign applications are required for all proposed signs. The following comment for the sign application submittal has been provided: Because the band includes more than 3 colors, staff
recommends that the band not be illuminated.
ATTACHMENTS
• Attach. 1: ARB2021-134: Caliber Collision Site Plan
• Attach. 2: ARB2021-134: Caliber Collision Architectural Drawings
TABLE A Design Criteria for Screening Fencing
DESIGN CRITERIA
Screening fencing
Height
Height should be as low as possible while maintaining full
screening.
Size/Scale
Lengths of 80' or more must provide variation by using
Length of fence should be mitigated through surface
changes in height, different material combinations,
relief, either in detail or massing.
projections forward or back, piers, other similar features,
or a combination of these.
Structure Design
Minimize the place of the fence structure in the landscape.
Detailing should be used to mitigate surface and
Ornamental screening fences may be approved on
Design and detailing should be simple.
texture.
a case -by -case basis.
Fences along pedestrian routes should be scaled and
detailed relative to human size.
Materials
Possible fence materials include wood, wood composite,
No chain link with or without vinyl slats. No barbed
Metal panel fencing will likely require planting
stone, brick, decorative concrete block, metal panels, or a
wire, razor wire or similar devices.
along the fence for mitigation.
combination of these materials.
Length and visibility of fence will be considered in
determining appropriate fence material.
Fence material should match or complement the materials
found on the building and/or adjoining structures or
landscape.
Fence materials should have a proven track record of
durability and longevity relative to color retention and
overall appearance.
Colors
Color should be neutral — for example: gray, brown, or
No shiny, reflective finishes. Flat finishes are required.
black. A white screening fence will rarely be appropriate.
Planting
Planting should be used in masses to mitigate the visual
Placement of planting shall be sufficient to allow for
Fences longer than 40' shall include one evergreen
impact of the length of the fence.
proper plant growth.
tree or 3 shrubs for each 40-foot section or portion
thereof planted on the public side.
Location
Areas requiring screening should be placed behind
buildings, as viewed from the EC. If buildings are not
available for screening, areas and features to be screened
should be located as far from the EC as possible.
Locating screening fences along pedestrian paths should
be limited.
12