HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200700150 Legacy Document 2008-03-04 (4)J7RGl1st�'
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING
STAFF REPORT SUMMARY
Project Name: SDP2007 -150- Bonner Critical
Staff: Megan Yaniglos- Planner
Slopes Waiver
Planning Commission Public Hearing:
Board of Supervisors Hearing:
March 11, 2008
Not applicable
Owners: Lane or Anne Bonner
Applicant: Lane Bonner
Acreage: 2.795 acres
Rezone from: Not applicable
Special Use Permit for: Not applicable
TMP: Tax Map 76C -02, Parcel 4
By -right use: R1- Residential
Location: Adjacent to the Bellair Subdivision on
Deer Path Road [Route 809] approximately 500 feet
from the intersection with Old Farm Road [Route
846].
Magisterial District: Samuel Miller
Proffers /Conditions: No
Requested # of Dwelling Lots: n/a
DA — X RA — n/a
Proposal: Proposal for a waiver to zoning ordinance
Comp. Plan Designation: The
section 4.2, Critical Slopes. The request is for a
Comprehensive Plan designates this property
waiver to allow the disturbance of critical slopes in
as Neighborhood Density in Urban Area 6.
the development areas.
Character of Property: This property contains an
Use of Surrounding Properties:
existing house and is mainly wooded with an
Residential /Single Family Homes
intermittent stream and a pond, located adjacent to
the Bellair subdivision.
RECOMMENDATION:
Zoning Ordinance Waivers:
1. Waiver of Section 4.2.5 — disturbance of critical slopes (recommendation, denial)
STAFF PERSON: Megan Yaniglos- Planner, Jonathan Sharp- Engineer
PLANNING COMMISSION: March 11, 2008
AGENDA TITLE: SDP2007 -150 Bonner Critical Slopes Waiver
APPLICANT: Lane Bonner
PROPERTY OWNER(S): Lane or Anne Bonner
APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL:
Proposal for a waiver to zoning ordinance section 4.2, Critical Slopes. The request is for a waiver to
allow the disturbance of critical slopes in the development areas. [Attachment B].
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Neighborhood Density in Urban Area 6.
REASON FOR PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW:
The applicant has requested a waiver of zoning ordinance requirements to allow disturbance of critical
slopes.
PLANNING AND ZONING HISTORY:
SUB2007 -164- Boundary line adjustment for tax maps 76C -02 parcel 1, 76C -02 parcel 4, and 76C -02
parcel 5 that was approved in June 2007 and recorded.
The property was issued a notice of violation for the disturbance of critical slopes by the Zoning
Division on December 4, 2007 [Attachment G].
This property has a single family dwelling which was constructed in 1953 according to County records.
Based on a review of available aerial photos it appears that the access to this dwelling has always been
to Edgemont Lane and not to Deer Path. The applicant is the owner of the parcel under review and was
the owner of Parcel 5. The driveway that served Parcel 4 crossed Parcel 5 in order to reach Edgemont
Lane. The applicant has entered into a contract to sell Parcel 5; it is not know if that transfer has
occurred. It is the County's position that the applicant's failure to preserve an easement for the
driveway to serve Parcel 4 does not entitle Parcel 4 to any of the exemptions available by the ordinance
for the disturbance of critical slopes. Further, it is the County's position that this situation is a self
imposed hardship and as such does not place the County in a position where a modification to allow
critical slopes must be granted.
1. CRITICAL SLOPES MODIFICATION
The applicant is requesting approval for the disturbance of critical slopes that were disturbed during the
construction of a driveway on the property [Attachment C]. The applicant did not get a waiver to disturb
these critical slopes prior to constructing the driveway off of Deer Path Road, and is currently under
violation from the Zoning Division for the disturbance [Attachment G]. The driveway that was
constructed crosses an intermittent stream that runs parallel to Deer Path Road. There is an existing
driveway that provided access to the property through the back of the parcel, however the applicant has
abandoned that access.
The request for a modification has been reviewed for both the Engineering and Planning aspects of the
critical slopes regulations. Section 4.2.3.2 of the Zoning Ordinance restricts earth- disturbing activity on
2
critical slopes, while Section 4.2.5(b) allows the Planning Commission to waive this restriction. The
applicant has submitted a request and justification for the waiver [Attachment C], and staff has analyzed
this request to address the provisions of the ordinance.
Critical slopes cover approximately .25 acres, or approximately 9 percent, of the 2.8 acres included in
this request. The critical slopes disturbed were 750 square feet, or 7 percent, of the critical slopes. Staff
has reviewed this waiver request with consideration for the concerns that are set forth in Section 4.2 of
the Zoning Ordinance, entitled "Critical Slopes." These concerns have been addressed directly through
the analysis provided herein, which is presented in two parts, based on the Section of the Ordinance each
pertains to.
Section 4.2.5(a)
Review of the request by Current Development Engineeriny, staff:
Description of critical slope area and proposed (existing) disturbance:
A driveway has been installed on TMP 76- C -02 -4 to provide direct access to the house from Deer Path
Road. The driveway was built partially on critical slopes areas. The area is predominantly wooded. The
driveway was built on critical slopes without obtaining a critical slopes waiver (construction of the
driveway is not exempt, see below).
Areas
Total site
2.8 acres approximately
Critical slopes
0.25
acres
9% of site
Critical slopes disturbed
750 sq ft
7% of critical slopes
Below, each of the concerns of Zoning Ordinance section 18 -4.2 is discussed:
Compliance with Zoning Ordinance 18 -4.2:
"movement of soil and rock"
Grading has already been preformed. Construction appears to be properly stabilized.
"excessive stormwater runoff'
Any increase in stormwater runoff is insignificant.
"siltation"
Driveway has already been installed and stabilized. Siltation does not appear to be a problem.
"loss of aesthetic resource"
The constructed disturbance can be seen from Deer Path Road and possibly by neighboring parcels.
"septic effluent"
Primary and reserve drainfields are already in place. Construction of the driveway has no effect on the
drainfelds, and will not cause septic effluent to travel further distances.
Exemptions to critical slopes waivers for driveways, roads and utilities without reasonable
alternative locations:
The disturbed critical slopes are not exempt, as a prior existing driveway was in place to provide access
from the street to the house site. The original driveway is a reasonable alternative location.
Based on the above review, Engineering recommends approval to the critical slope waiver. The
installed driveway appears to be properly stabilized.
Review of the request by Current Development Planning staff:
Summary of review of modification of Section 4.2:
Section 4.2.5 establishes the review process and criteria for granting a waiver of Section 4.2.3. The
preceding comments by staff address the provisions of Section 4.2.5(a). Staff has included the
provisions of Section 4.2.5(b) here, along with staff comment on the various provisions.
The commission may modify or waive any requirement of section 4.2 in a particular case upon finding
that:
Strict application of the requirements of section 4.2 would not forward the purposes of this
chapter or otherwise serve the public health, safety or welfare, or that alternatives proposed by
the developer would satisfy the purposes of section 4.2 to at least an equivalent degree; or
(Added 11- 15 -89)
The applicant has an existing alternate driveway that accessed the parcel from Edgemont Lane.
No alternative has been proposed that would satisfy the purposes of section 4.2 to at least an
equivalent degree.
2. Due to its unusual size, topography, shape of the property, location of the property or other
unusual conditions, excluding the proprietary interest of the developer, the requirements of
section 4.2 would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of the property or would
result in significant degradation of the site or adjacent properties. Such modification or waiver
shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, to the orderly development of the
area, or to adjacent properties, or be contrary to sound engineering practices; or (Added 11 -15-
89)
Denial of this waiver would not prohibit or restrict the use of the property, as there was an
existing driveway to the parcel. However, if the waiver is denied the applicant will need to
remove the new driveway and restore the site to its original topography. The removal of the new
driveway will require more disturbance to the site, and may cause additional sediment into the
existing intermittent stream.
The Department of Enviromental Quality (DEQ) and The Army Corps of Engineers have
inspected the parcel for compliance of their regulations. Their findings and comments are
included in Attachment D.
3. Granting such modification or waiver would serve a public purpose of greater import than
would be served by strict application of section 4.2. (Added 11- 15 -89)
Granting the waiver would not serve a public purpose of greater import.
RECOMMENDATION:
Since both favorable and unfavorable factors have been identified under this section, staff is unable to
make an overall positive finding for the approval of the critical slopes waiver.
4
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Plat
B. Location/Detail Maps
C. Applicant Justification
D. DEQ and Army Corps of Engineers comments and findings
E. Correspondence from Applicant's attorney
F. Correspondence between Bellair residents and applicant
G. Notice of Violation from Zoning Division
H. Adjacent Owner Letter