HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA200800003 Review Comments 2008-05-06STAFF PERSON: Amelia McCulley
PUBLIC HEARING: May 6, 2008
STAFF REPORT VA -2008-003
OWNER / APPLICANT: Pantops Park LLC (owner)/ Virginia National Bank
(applicant)
TAX MAP / PARCEL: 78/16
ZONING: NMD, Neighborhood Model District and EC, Entrance
Corridor
ACREAGE: 4.87 Acres
LOCATION: 1241 Richmond Road on the south side of Route 250
East, just east of Riverbend Drive.
TECHNICAL REQUEST AND EXPLANATION: The applicant requests relief
from Section 4.15.12 of the Sign Regulations for the Neighborhood Model
District. The applicant proposes three (3) different wall signs at heights of 54, 57
and 58 feet instead of 30 feet; this results in variances of 24, 27 and 28 feet.
The owner wishes to install three (Virginia National Bank) company logos on
three buildings (one logo per building) at approximately 57 feet above the main
(entry) level.
The applicant states in their justification:
We are not claiming a hardship in the typical sense. That is, the building
is visible and other signage opportunities allowed by ordinance are
available. Rather we have two primary observations that suggest this
variance is appropriate. First we seek to establish an understanding that
would apply to all Neighborhood Model projects in this particular entry
corridor. Secondly we feel these logos may be viewed differently than
conventional signage.
Neighborhood Model:
The County vision for this area follows the Neighborhood Model ideal. We
had the property rezoned in order to comply with that future vision. This
notion promotes the placement of buildings near the road with parking
concealed to the side or rear yards. Four to five story buildings are
depicted in the County renderings used to explain the vision. When this
future is realized many taller buildings will be in close proximity and lower
level signage may not be adequate as views will be limited. A time will
come when the placement of wall signs at higher elevations will have to be
VA -2008-003 2 May 6, 2008
considered. Limiting size and type for higher signage is best done in
advance of future applications.
Logos vs. Signs:
The three logos signs in question (shown on the attached elevation
drawings) differ from standard signs as they contain no words. These
simple logos are more decorative elements rather than signage. Perhaps
this precedent is good for the County. Establishing it now will allow for
strict enforcement of a "no -word," "no lighting" policy for such signs in the
future. The character of the area is not diminished by these logos.
Making them of bronze anodized aluminum is consistent with the
architecture of the building and they suggest a dignified, restrained
manner of handling of such items.
RELEVANT HISTORY:
On January 11, 2006, the Board approved ZMA 2005-008 Pantops Park and SP
2005-015 Virginia National Bank at Pantops. This rezoned the property from
Highway Commercial to Neighborhood Model District and approved a special use
permit for the bank drive-through use.
Approval of these signs is subject to the issuance of a certificate of
appropriateness from the Architectural Review Board. The ARB has not
approved the logos on these signs to -date.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND QUALIFYING CONDITIONS:
By the applicant's own justification, the qualifying condition for the granting of this
variance is the more appropriate implementation of the neighborhood model
zoning district. The County has encouraged development within the designated
Development Areas of the Comprehensive Plan to be consistent with the
neighborhood model of development. Towards that end, the Neighborhood
Model district was adopted into the Zoning Ordinance in recent years. The
applicant rezoned this property to this recommended zoning district.
The State Code and Zoning Ordinance clearly state that a common or recurring
variance should be resolved legislatively (see below). The remedy for this
situation is either a) an amendment to the zoning ordinance or b) a request to
waive the sign regulations through the rezoning process for the neighborhood
model district.
No variance shall be authorized unless the board of zoning appeals finds that the
condition or situation of the property concerned or the intended use of the
property is not of so general or recurring a nature as to make reasonably
practicable the formulation of a general regulation to be adopted as an
amendment to the ordinance.
VA -2008-003 3 May 6, 2008
The State Code has provided for variances from the zoning regulations for
properties which have a hardship resulting from particular constraints. The Land
Use Handbook states: A variance is a reasonable deviation from those provisions of
the Zoning Ordinance regulating the size or area of a lot or parcel of land, or the size,
area, bulk or location of a building or structure.
One of the powers and duties of the Board of Zoning Appeals (granted in Section
34.2 of the zoning ordinance) allows that a variance may be authorized as
follows:
"... in specific cases such variance from the terms of this ordinance as will not
be contrary to the public interest, when owing to special conditions a literal
enforcement of the provision will result in unnecessary hardship; provided that
the spirit of the ordinance shall be observed and substantial justice done, as
follows: When a property owner can show that his property was acquired in good
faith and where, by reason of.. exceptional topographic conditions. or other
extraordinary situation ... the strict application of the terms of this ordinance
would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of the property or
where the board is satisfied, upon the evidence heard by it, that the granting of
such variance will alleviate a clearly demonstrable hardship approaching
confiscation, as distinguished from a special privilege or convenience sought by
the applicant, provided that all variances shall be in harmony with the intended
spirit and purpose of this ordinance. "
While the applicant may potentially have a valid argument, his remedy is
legislative and not through approval of a variance. This proposal does not meet
the three criteria for variance approval.
APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION AND STAFF COMMENT: A review of the
variance criteria provided by the applicant and comments by staff follows:
Hardship
Staff comments are written in italics and follow the applicant's comments. The
applicant notes that the variance is necessary to better achieve the ideals of the
neighborhood model.
While staff supports the neighborhood model form of development, we are
unable to make positive findings of undue hardship under the State Code criteria
in this particular case.
1. The applicant has not provided evidence that the strict
application of the ordinance would produce undue hardship.
VA -2008-003 4 May 6, 2008
Uniqueness of Hardship
Because staff is unable to find an undue hardship, we can not find a uniqueness
of hardship. The uniqueness would seem to apply to all properties zoned
neighborhood model district in the present and future.
2. The applicant has not provided evidence that such hardship is
not shared generally by other properties in the same zoning
district and the same vicinity.
act on Character of the Area
Because this is a designated Entrance Corridor, input from the ARB regarding
this criterion would be relevant. At this time, the ARB has not yet granted
approval to these proposed logo signs. Therefore, we are unable to making
positive findings under this criterion.
3. The applicant has not provided evidence that the authorization
of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to
adjacent property and that the character of the district will not
be changed by the granting of the variance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Since none of the three criteria for approval have
been met, staff must recommend denial of this variance request. Should the
Board find cause to approve it, staff recommends the following condition:
1. These signs are subject to ARB approval.
411111
■U
al P s
.k..4i- , ..,„;:. SI
"ii, 'AV
r.><
..,V'.• f
4.4
1 r'
•
► yR•
4 •, r� C.
1
mi. 1
nr
1
C
\P''' ' ' i'CI\.
Etz9i E It Y t I-i 6-7,
0
_ . _
11
: ITi ! t_e . I I .., .________ 2
is ,n ii ii id
ill$ 1MN
. r
IN
'uri ., i LI. Ni it ! ; r le a i
I 1
n an inn N�� ■■ F-S1 t T50
n ,��� 1111 1111 ■ ilintill 1
It 1 1 BA/A ��
i i ... . ., a k i
ri
iretaraikill .- :la 1 ir
t ter. , NM._
ii
j rj.
i ,
i 1
mil*..
. kNif fir ir '
III � . .
t
_
.. 4,
---•""rrr. . . '''''- -in 60,...., _ —: -,:-' ';
.........- ___Lt:_.--,--...—... j g - w i
i i 4' t 1 ti rt.
--ii wir
Tx r
...
a 1 . ii • , it a ,
,./4 t
g g It ig Is - 7 —
"" V I I .4
11
' .•''.. I tit* _ • 111 is ••`11 -11- ill --_ ..
1 f
Tai IIJ ,.. .
WI.... _ ......„1,1 .--.-
3 11
... . ..
I
11
1A.1.1*.>11 II 11)01
_
15— 400, I/Is i :::)! IJA mi ik KR
, ill1
1 1 4411
q ,
so
...,:... *I-we:4 - 1
.., , :._
.......„
. ...1.,„.. i
•,°''''''' •
11.!
—"'
.#.
...
l)(
kiti 1/b
11 f\
1.1
no1,1110 c)93-e\' te17A oil
r-70). ;4-Ij
.„--...-
0
-KM 11 STONEKING VON STORCII
UMSO ID.S \
} ARCHITECT S+1 W[TI
1 1111
JTIJTFI iNall ill w.u.BOII
IJ4 Sf372/2 0VC AmO TR-M
1E,
/1/195A%/V 1R01A
.. -tZ1E:
�
•
TT
- -, . J ! nr r.rr wrr..r r
r r..r.Sr�..w.✓....rr•
...b r lr.�/�iir,M.r,ra 1r.
NO�NI NO _ u I, I / i Sii ��iia 111 NI r w./
al
—— —_ -- gm
Pantops Park
, 1 , ni
1111 _ p
iffri lim
Ki-1 ii in_ a n; Virginia 'rational Bank
F-
1 11 a 1.-: 11.-11 iii ,
�_ �_ ki________
_,______
u�
RIME + - - BBDi 901111,
FRANCE
4 BUILDING IA - NORTH ELEVATION RI-, ��f �"� BUILDING IA - EAST ELEVATION 5ISj , 1
La51---
RUM Sal NI T
- - -
rii ill
- __E,----
--- •.:,I m,� ��■li' (!■��■ ! '- p'M ffi —ff_r
_ DATE CONSTRUCTION
OI�' �1U �ii� il!ail �'� 1l�® Fri
!al 111
nii Nnii
ii'
u _
ilk
qq�I , . -- TTT
3S I
DATE PRE-CONSTRUCTION!
EH iti
VIROINIA IIATIONAL IANL
T011 6/-- --- _ -
.. /
Fa 111011 --_
--- = ,ii lia ii _ _- __-_ —_
- - ..-. -.._ - SHEET TITLE
L rl Mill 1  Building t o I
-.-_ NI
INIIINIIIUIHIIIIII I 1(Il 1l111_lLl i!�1 r
t�;,, - __ _ Elevations
- 1:1-�-r� 1 tf -1 - _
gm +1._ + :__.._ . ___ _.
14
= i-i#` ,,t BUILDING IA - SOUTH ELEVATION IJOB NO
opplowelit�
I
1 V Ly IASHEET NO...........................
MINE BUILDING IA - WEST ELEVATION
•.. i !
S.4 ''''.e.' ilgti-Pd,(2) c r z S
20o r G2.So 5
0
1; * STONEKING VON SPORCII
I - ARCHITECTS
A
CURVED SPANDREL BEHIND--- - �F' ///�7_
I�` 11 ll u /_� --- THIS SIGN OCCUPIES AN IMPLIED RECTANGLE
LLjj uvv jj ���fff ( \ OF 24.5 SQUARE FEET
NAT AL' P.O.BOX 1312 GIIi0IITSWJE,NMI 22l0:
Vev/71.71S47Nt Fa/313ilH .ws-aex
FRIZOUADRATA ANODIZED ALUMINUM Lti1tNS, 14' -- D K
HIGH/ 10' HIGH, 1/2• THICK. 3/4' STAND OFF �� \Vl "��
r .r.e.rr rr.
MOUNT, NON-ILLUMINATED USE MANUFACTURER'S } „yam r,,,,.,�` „�,�,,,^
STANDARD SPACER MOUNT DETAIL in « r'•
I.
7 s..,/,�a.,....r.
r I o...w.....i^1*w
SIGNS NO. I EAST FACADE AT MAIN ENTRY (BLDG 1A)
FRIZOUADRATA ANODIZED ALUMINUM LETTERS, Pantops Park ,
, THICK,NON-ILLUMINATED3 USE STAND OFF MOUNT, MilRGLIN - AN T� R �JJ Vir lnia National Bank
STANDARD SPACER MOUNT TDETAIL AII0I�\IIAL 3ANIK( OF 12.1 SQUARE FEET
4 jl V e Q 11 V L1�1 -- THIS SIGN OCCUPIES AN IMPLIED RECTANGLE
lei
-___1,
SIGN NO. 4 WEST FACADE (BLDG 1A) .4
1
'� t t ANODIZED ALUMINUM CUT-OUT LOGO. - - - THIS SIGN OCCUPIES AN
1/2'THICK, STAND-OFF MOUNT, IMPLIED RECTANGLE OF 11.2
NON-ILLUMINATED SQUARE FEET 3/4.SWOT v t cor IAMWOL1191
,.... ' " , 14!( " .
•
rrrc0.4Az SWIM,Tom mu Al
SIGNS NO. 5,6,7 (BLDG IA) minKmi"LYo.c.
_ MOUNTING POINT DETAIL, FULL SCALE RI NIL T NU III SAO 1111.
V S
MI ME OP
CAST STONE TO MATCH
DARK BRONZE CUT BANK BUILDINGir 'i
OUT SIGN AND 4'
STAND-OFF MOUNT '� DATE CONSTRUCTION
I I
II II
\ , THIS SIGN- 11.9 SQUAEg FgBT, EA SBAAster' �'� }$1
VIRGINIA VIRGINIA
NATIONAL NATIONAL —
BANK SiM. TO NORTH OEM
BRICK TO MATCH
BRICK COLOR BUILDING,K NO IRN Mil NOM NNW- ——— FREE STANDING SIGN, __ _—.N MIN ELEVATION •r(IL C�0 SMN* ill
allIN� 51 4
III�_ DOUBLE SIDED. ILLUMINATED NUM ti
MINI _--�— VIA GROUND MOUNTED SPOT — SIMEINIIII� • DATE PRE-CONSTRUCTION
LIGHT- BOTH SIDESIIN
}I
mresooN
rKY0 IMMOmin[RONKNI
S-JkCOMM ROW prro®Nil A I
SITE SIGN 'B' NORTH ELEVATION SITE SIGN 'B' SOUTH ELEVATIONur laMill
CAST STONE TO MATCH
DARK BRONZE CUT BANK BUILDING I x •
t
OUT SIGN AND 1
STAND-OFT MOUNT SHORT SECTION END ELEVATION TITLE
LETTERS ^
1111 �0®O0 SIC�tlag2
PAN a PS PARK PANTOPS PARK
S . i• Details
SM. TO NORTH r- !*
+.1 Budding 200 Budding 300 THIS SIGN- 11.9 SQUARE F13Sr, F.A. SIDR Building 200 Building 300 ELEVATION IIIIMOniN
Mal IINNam MN NMI IIIIN—E7♦�— +�. 3/4 1 0
Ni is 11J• Oa Ca La 110 '
.. NI NNW—MNMNIN FREE STANDING SIGN, glMN—Ili Inn NI
BRICK TO MATCH DOUBLE SIDED, ILLUMINATED MtlEN�M
BANK BUILDING, VIA GROUND MOUNTED 11 --M ( 1-1
�E���� —--- JOBe..w yr eaw.
BRICK COLOR NO t ■ SPOT LIGHT- BOTH SIDES + — yNEaiRSBBIOINN a, .• •,,,,m
r } SITE SIGN DETAILS PLAN AT CAST STONE
SHEET NO SITE SIGN 'C' NORTH ELEVATION SITE SIGN 'C' SOUTH ELEVATION /2