HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201800083 Review Comments Rural Division Plat 2018-09-06County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To:
W. Morris Foster
From:
Paty Saternye- Senior Planner
Division:
Planning Services
Date:
June 22, 2018
Rev. 1: September 4, 2018
Rev. 1 UPDATE: September 6, 2018
SUB-2018- Richard P. Palermo— Rural Subdivision
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will grant or recommend approval of the
Final Plat referenced above once the following comments have been addressed: [Each
comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning
Ordinances unless otherwise specified.]
[14-302 (A)(10)] Right of further division of proposed lots. Revise the
development rights note by addressing the following:
a) For the development rights for TM 89-61 the number of acres appears to be
wrong for the 31 acre rule. The plat that subdivided this parcel stated that the
portion of the parcel the south of the road could have lots of less than 21
acres comprising no more than 15.08 acres, not the 15.92 listed in the note.
Revise the note.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
b) Because of the error specified in the item above, the number of acres
specified for Tracts 1 and 3 are not correct. Revise the note so that the total
number of acres, for parcels under 21 acres, for both tracts 1 & 2 combined is
15.08 and not 15.92.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
c) Revise the development rights for the existing TM 89-63B so that it specifies
the plat that created the parcel and assigned it development rights (DB2009
PG 724) instead of the much older plat that did not show the parcel in its
current state and specified development rights significantly below those being
specified in this plat and the more recent plat.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
d) Include in the development right note information on the revised/combined
TM 89-63B. In that added section of the note specify that the development
rights for the existing TM 89-63B can only be used within its 5.45 acre area
and that the development rights for Tract 1 can only be uses in its 23.86 acre
portion of the proposed parcel. Example wording would be "The 5.45 acres
from TM 89-63B retains 2 development rights and if utilized they shall only be
used within the bounds of the 5.45 acre portion of the new 29.31 acre parcel.
Tract 1, which is the 23.86 acre portion of TM 89-61, is being added to TM
89-63B and is assigned 2 development rights and if utilized they shall only be
used within the bounds of the 23.86 portion of the new 29.31 acre parcel."
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
2. [14-302 (B)(1)] General Information. When revising the plat include a date of last
revision on the plat. This date should be updated prior to each resubmission.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. When revising the plat include a date
of last revision on the plat. This date should be updated prior to each
resubmission.
[14-302 (A)(5) & 14-303 (Q] Public easements, Public utility, drainage and sight
distance easements. Specify the owner, deed book and page number, and width
of all the public easements crossing or within either of the subject parcels. Also,
show the location and dimensions of each public utility, drainage and/or sight
distance easement on the plat.
Rev. 1: Comment not addressed. Specify the deed book and page
number, and if possible the width, of the two public easements
crossing the parcels.
[14-302 (A)(3)] Existing or platted streets. Revise to accurately show, and
dimension, the prescriptive road easement in both TM 89-61 and TM 89-63B
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
a) Because of the scale of the drawing, the prescriptive easement alonq
Route 706 cannot be seen for part of its length. Ensure the prescriptive
easement is clear and visible. The revision necessary to address
engineering's comment about the scale of this plat may help with this.
b) There appears to be 9 private street segments shown on the plat, but
bearing and distances are shown for only 8 segments on the cover
sheet, between point A & B. Ensure road is fully dimensioned.
5. [14-302 (A)(9)] Building Sites on proposed lots. Revise the plat to include the
required 30,000 square foot building site rectangles for tracts 2 & 3. Ensure
that all requirements of 4.2.1 & 4.2.2 are met and that critical slopes are not
crossed or impacted in order to reach the building site.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
6. [14-302 (A)(11)] Instrument creating propertyproposedforsubdivision. Revise the
deed book and page number for the plat that is specified in the County Development
Rights note for TM 89-63B. The plat include in the recorded document specified does not
show the current lot configuration or specify the development rights assigned to the
parcel. Either list DB2009 PG 724 or specify another deed book and page number
that is more appropriate.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
114-309; 14-3101 Soils evaluation; Health Director Approval. Soils work must be
submitted to the County. The County will forward it to the Health Department for
review. Approval of the soil evaluation by the Health Department is required for
both Tract 2 & Tract 3 before approval the subdivision will be final.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed. Address the comment. Ensure that once the
documentation is prepared that it is submitted to the County for review. As
specified above, the County will then forward it to the Health Department
for their review.
[14-302 (A)(15)] Identification of all owners and certain interest holders.
Include the addresses of all owners of the parcels as well as any holders of any
easements affecting the property. The two parcels should be listed separately and
provide the individual owner names. The County's GIS information shows two different
owners and two different addresses. Ensure that this information is correct and if it is
different from the GIS provide information supporting this to the plan reviewer.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The addresses shown for the two
owners does not match those shown on the County's GIS data. Please
address the following:
a) Provide information on the updated owner addresses.
b) The County's GIS has Midkiff Timber Company located at 1671 Dudley
Mountain Road. If Midkiff Timber Company is actually located in
"Winginia, VA" it appears there is a typographical error and it should be
"Wingina".
c) It appears that two different addresses are shown for Richard Palermo
in the County GIS. One is on Dudley Mountain Road and the other is on
Singleton Lane in Charlottesville. Ensure the current address is the one
shown on the plat.
9. [14-302 (B)(4)] Places of burial. If there are any burial sites show them on the
plat.
Rev. 1: No burial places have been specified.
10. [14-302 (B)(7)] Reservoir watershed; agricultural -forestal district. Update the
watershed designation to specify that the parcel lies within the Moore's Creek
Watershed.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
11. [14-302 (13)(8)] Yards. Revise the yards to be correct for the RA zone.
Address the following:
a) The front setback is incorrect. Revise it to be 75'.
b) Include the setback for internal roads in the note.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Revise the "County Building
Setbacks:" information on the cover sheet to state the following:
• Front yard (from existing public roads or public road prescriptive
easements) = 75'
• Front yard (from internal public or private road) = 25'
• Side yard = 25'
• Rear yard = 35'
12. [14-303 (E)] Dimension standards and information on all lots, streets, alleys,
easements, and shared driveways. Revise the plat to include all required
curvilinear dimensions for any curved portion of the property boundaries. This
shall include radius, central angle, are length, and tangent distances.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
13. [14-303 (H)] Monuments. Revise the plat to include monuments for the
triangular portion of the property lines along the road.
Rev. 1: Comment withdrawn.
14. [14-302 (A)(4), (6) & 14-303 (E)] Private Easements; Alleys and shared
driveways; Dimension standards and information on all lots, streets, alleys,
easements, and shared driveways. Label the "50' Joint Access Easement" as
either "Need' or "Existing". If "Existing" provide the deed book and page number
for the plat and deed. If it is "Need' provide all required locations, dimensions,
notes and labels and ensure that the easement is accurately drawn on the plat
and be able to be scaled.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Revise the label for the proposed private
easement to state "NEW 50' Private Street Easement". Engineering has been
made aware that "Private Street" is the necessary label in this circumstance and
has therefore revised their comments accordingly.
Rev. 1 UPDATE: Comment changed — Address Engineering comment on
wording of label for access easement. Previous comment was not correct
about it needing to be a private street.
15. [14-302 (A)(4)&(6)] Private easements; Alleys and shared driveways. If the
access easement is "Need' provide a copy of the proposed deed and the
proposed maintenance agreement. These must be reviewed by the County
Attorney's office. After they are approved, they must be signed and notarized
prior to the plat approval and also must be recorded with the plat.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Address the following:
a) Although a "road maintenance agreement" document was submitted by email
to the reviewer on 8/14/18 the reviewer responded on that same day that
additional information was required. No other items have been submitted to
the County for review. If the County's template is not utilized for the road
maintenance agreement document then the following must be submitted for
review:
I. The legal document (not based on the template) that had been
highlighted and numbered based upon the checklist provided to the
owner (Review of Private Improvement Maintenance Instrument).
II. A copy of the checklist that has been filled out and checked, ensuring
that all required items are included in (and highlighted and numbered in)
the legal document submitted.
b) No deed of easement has been submitted to the County for review and
approval. Address the comment and supply a draft copy of the proposed
deed of easement.
Rev. 1 UPDATE: Comment changed — Address the following:
a) Previous comment was not correct about it needing to be a private
street. A
b) A new private deed of easement will be required. Submit a DRAFT deed
of easement for this ingress/egress for review by the County Attorney's
office. The final plat will not be approved until the County Attorney's
office has approved the deed of easement.
c) A Private Street Maintenance Agreement was submitted on 9/6/18 and
will be reviewed for the shared driveway easement.
d) The deed and maintenance agreement will be reviewed by the County
Attorney's office. The County Attorney's approval of the deeds is
required before this subdivision plat will be approved.
16. [Comment] The Critical Slopes shown on the plat do not appear to match those
shown on the County's GIS. Revise the Critical Slopes to match the GIS.
Rev. 1: Comment not addressed. The Critical Slopes shown on the plat do
not appear to match those shown on the County's GIS. Revise the Critical
Slopes to match the GIS. See comment #20 below in reference to this.
17. [Comment] Public water and sewer is not available to this parcel. Add a note on
the cover sheet that states that it will not be available.
Rev. 1: Comment not addressed. Address the comment.
18. [GOfiiuiciiy i, a stfea, ,, u,uaauiy VVIII uc icyuucu w ,cau,, a future building site the
crossing will need to meet the requirements of the Water Protection Ordinance.
Rev. 1: Comment for future reference. If a stream crossing will be
required to reach a future building site the crossing will need to meet
the requirements of the Water Protection Ordinance.
19. [Comment] See the attached comments from the other reviewers. Engineering
and Planning approval is still required before approval of the plat.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. See the attached comments from
the other reviewers. Engineering and Planning approval is still
required before approval of the plat.
20. Rev. 1: [NEW COMMENTI In order to address engineering's comments please
contact the engineering reviewer to discuss his comments #1, #5 & #6.
Rev. 1 UPDATE [NEW COMMENTI: Comment changed - In order to address
engineering's comments please contact the engineering reviewer to
discuss his comments #5 & #6.
21. Rev. 1: FNEW COMMENTI There are two areas of stream buffer not shown
on the plat, both of which cross Route 706. Ensure all of the stream
buffer/WPO areas are shown accurately on the plat.
22. Rev. 1: [NEW COMMENTI Revise the plat to correct the followin
typographical errors:
a) In the development rights, in the Tract 3 portion of the note, reivise
"most" to be "must" in "All Dev. Rights Must Be Located...".
b) In the stream buffer note revise the note to say "Managed" instead of
"Mmanaged".
c) As specified in a comment above, it appears that "Winginia" should be
"Wingina".
d) "Steep Slopes" should be "Critical Slopes". For future reference,
"Critical Slopes" are in the rural areas, and "Steep Slopes" are in the
development area, of the County.
Please contact Paty Saternye at the Department of Community Development 296-5832
ext. 3250 for further information.
CC: Richard P. Palermo
Review Comments for SUB201800083 Rural Division
Project Name: Richard R Palermo - Rural
Date Completed: Monday, August 06, 2018 Department/DivisiordAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: David James CDD Enoineerino FI Requested Changes
Updated my comments - 9/5/18:
1. Ok, 1:200 scale is acceptable.
2. Not addressed. Show deed book & page for existing easements (Le. 50' joint access easement). Rename label from joint
access' to 'shared driveway' easement. [14-303(E)]
3. Not addressed. Add note stating that maintenance shall be by the owners of the lots affected by the shared driveway
easement, not by the Virginia Department of Transportation or the county. [14-3O3(E)]
5. Partially addressed. Steep slopes don't quite match what's shown in the County GIS layer.
6. Not addressed. Stream buffers don't quite match whats shown in the County GIS layer.
Pager County of Albemarle Printed On: 09/06/2018