HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB200800156 Legacy Document 2008-07-21Scott's Comment
From: Scott Clark
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 3:33 PM
To: Patrick Lawrence
Subject: Comments on SUB 2008 -155, -156
Importance: High
Pat --
Here are my comments on SUB 2008 -155 and -156 (Clayton
1. Please clarify, and if possible resolve, the 0.12 -acre boundary overlap on the next revisions of
these plats. It would be preferable not to have this unresolved overlap shown on the plats, in
order to avoid possible conflicts with the terms of the conservation easement on this property.
The 100 -acre residue parcel must not drop below 100 acres.
2. If the overlap cannot be resolved, we would recommend that the boundaries be adjusted to
reduce the acreage of the smaller (29.34 -acre) lot and increase the acreage of the residue parcel
so that, even if the overlap is decided in VDOT's favor, the residue parcel would still be at least
100 acres.
Let me know if you need more, or have any questions to be answered before this goes out to the
applicants.
Thanks
Scott
f Scott Clark, Senior Planner
f Albemarle County Community Development Dept. 1
F 434 - 296 -5832 ext 3325 1 fax 434 - 972 -4012