HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA200800007 Legacy Document 2008-08-08STAFF PERSON: Amelia McCulley
PUBLIC HEARING: July 8, 2008
STAFF REPORT VA -2008-007
OWNER / APPLICANT: American Legion Post 74 Lodge, Inc.
TAX MAP / PARCEL: 79/19
ZONING: C1, Commercial and EC, Entrance Corridor
ACREAGE: 1.988 acres
LOCATION: 3025 Louisa Road. Located on the south side of Rt. 22
(Louisa Rd), 500 feet east of the intersection with Route 250
East.
TECHNICAL REQUEST AND EXPLANATION:
The applicant requests relief from Section 4.15.12 of the Sign Regulations for the C1
district. This district allows a maximum 32 square feet of sign area for a freestanding
sign and they propose a 48 square foot freestanding sign. This is a variance request for
16 additional square feet of sign area.
They propose the installation of a new internally illuminated freestanding sign with a
reader board. The main sign panel is a fixed sign which consists of 32 square feet with
the American Legion logo and the following text:
Charlottesville & Albemarle
American Legion
Post 74 Since 1919
The reader board consists of 16 square feet with 3 lines for 4 inch tall changeable text.
While the content or purpose of the additional sign area may not be relevant, it is
provided for the Board's information. They propose to use the reader board for patriotic
messages such as "Support our Veterans."
Because this site is located on an Entrance Corridor, the sign is subject to ARB review.
The ARB review is scheduled for Monday, July 7th, the day prior to the BZA meeting.
The staff report, including recommendations, is found in Attachment A.
The variance application proposes a new sign location rather than using the existing
sign location on the east side of the entrance into the site. The new sign location would
necessitate removal of existing required landscaping in order for the sign to be installed
and be visible. Zoning staff and the ARB staff recommend that the applicant use the
existing sign location instead of the proposed new location. Use of the existing sign
location will: a) be more visible and better identify the entrance for turning movements
on a busy road; and b) not necessitate the removal of existing required landscaping.
The applicant has agreed to this condition.
VA -2008-007 2 July 8, 2008
RELEVANT HISTORY:
■ Shadwell Antiquaries Preliminary Site Plan was approved in January, 1999 and
the Final Site Plan was approved in June, 1999.
■ A special use permit (SP 2002-50) was approved for Shadwell Animal Hospital.
■ The American Legion Post 74 purchased the property recently.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND QUALIFYING CONDITIONS:
This area is largely rural in character with most of the commercial development located
along the north side of Route 250E at the intersection with Route 22. This section of
Route 22 is scheduled for a road improvement project which will include widening.
This property is improved with two buildings which are connected with a covered
walkway. This lot is not particularly small for a commercial property. The topography is
not exceptional. It is not difficult to view a freestanding sign on the property frontage or
a wall sign on the building, from the road.
Staff can not recall another freestanding sign area variance in recent history. We have
typically considered physical qualifying conditions such as difficult topography impacting
sign visibility, in granting increased sign area, sign height and the like.
We are very supportive of the mission of the American Legion organization. However,
we are not able to find qualifying conditions for this request. If the reader board (the
additional 16 square feet above the maximum sign area) is critical to the applicants,
they have other options which do not necessitate a variance. For example, they could
redesign the sign panel area to include the reader board and not to exceed 32 square
feet. This would involve either reducing the size of the text and/or logo or eliminating a
portion of it. Another option would be to eliminate or not utilize a reader board.
APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION AND STAFF COMMENT: A review of the variance
criteria provided by the applicant and comments by staff follows:
Hardship
Staff comments are written in italics and follow the applicant's comments. The applicant
notes that the variance is necessary:
Request sign permit to be approved as submitted. Translucent background on
faces (to see American Legion logo).
Community message board 2 ft. x 6 ft. to promote and inform the public about
our flag, our troops, our veterans, Americanism and Patriotism. This is what the
American Legion is all about.
VA -2008-007 3 July 8, 2008
• We won't promote sales or sell hot dogs off this board.
While staff is supportive of the applicant's mission and their intentions, they have not
provided evidence of undue hardship in accordance with the State Code criteria for
granting a variance. Although they offer to limit the messages for the reader board, we
may not be legally able to condition the message.
1. The applicant has not provided evidence that the strict application of
the ordinance would produce undue hardship.
Uniqueness of Hardship
The applicant notes:
• There is no other organization here that was formed by an act of Congress in
1919 or promotes patriotism as we do. Post 74 was chartered in 1919.
• Support your veterans and active duty troops.
Because we are not able to find evidence of a hardship, staff can not find that there is a
unique hardship. The need for additional sign area is not unique to this applicant.
People who use signs such as property owners and business owners are often "in
need" of additional signage. They often have to choose which businesses or services
can be listed on a limited maximum sign area.
2. The applicant has not provided evidence that such hardship is not
shared generally by other properties in the same zoning district and
the same vicinity.
Impact on Character of the Area
The applicant offers:
• We hope our American flag and messages inform and educate the public.
• To be a member of the American legion, you must have served on active duty
during war time, no exceptions.
• We have over 600 active members from World War II, Vietnam, Cuban crisis,
and the current war.
• Stand up and support us. We fought for you.
Again, staff recognizes, appreciates and supports the sacrifice and mission embodied in
this organization. However, this alone does not meet the criteria for approval of a sign
variance.
VA -2008-007 4 July 8, 2008
A significant consideration in terms of the character of the area is the impact on the
Entrance Corridor. As stated in the staff report for this ARB sign review, reader boards
are generally discouraged. The ARB staff recommends that either the reader board be
removed or that it be redesigned so that it "does not have a temporary appearance and
is completely coordinated with the overall sign, including but not limited to colors and
method of attachment." Staff is not able to make positive findings that the proposed
sign with the 16 square feet of additional sign area positively impacts the character of
the area.
3. The applicant has not provided evidence that the authorization of
such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent
property and that the character of the district will not be changed by
the granting of the variance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Since none of the three criteria for approval has been
met, staff must recommend denial of this variance request.
Should the Board find cause to approve this request, it will be subject to conditions of
ARB approval. In addition, staff recommends the following condition:
1. This variance is approved for a sign located at the existing entrance. This
shall be either a modification of the existing sign or a replacement of the
existing freestanding sign.
2. The main sign panel and reader board shall be redesigned in accordance
with ARB recommendations for color and method of attachment.
Attachments:
A — ARB 2008-70 American Legion Sign staff report
B — Variance Application
Attachment A
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #: Name
ARB -2008-70: American Legion Sign
Review Type
Certificate of Appropriateness for a Sign
Parcel Identification
Tax Map 79, Parcel 19
Location
3025 Louisa Road: Located on the south side of Rt. 22 (Louisa Rd), 500'
east of the intersection with Route 250E.
Zoned
Commercial (C1) and Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner/Applicant
American Legion Post 74 Lodge Inc.
Magisterial District
Scottsville
Proposal
To install an internally illuminated freestanding sign with reader board.
ARB Meeting Date
July 7, 2008
Staff Contact
Brent Nelson
SITE/PROJECT HISTORY
• The current application is for the installation of an internally illuminated freestanding sign with a
reader board. A temporary sign was installed, without a sign permit, across the top of the existing
freestanding sign located in the northeast corner of the site, on the east side of the site entrance. A
panel wall sign was installed, without a sign permit, in the pediment above the building entrance
in the northeast elevation.
• May 30, 2008: VA 2008-7, American Legion Sign, Request for additional sign area. The zoning
ordinance permits 32 square feet of sign area by -right. The applicant is requesting an additional
16 square feet of sign area (for a total of 48 square feet) to allow a reader board in addition to the
main sign panel. BZA to review July 8, 2008.
• December 30, 2004, ARB 2004-154, In Vino Veritas, Certificate of Appropriateness for 2 Wall
Signs, administrative approval.
• October 18, 1999, ARB 1999-77, Shadwell Antiquaries, Certificate of Appropriateness for a
Freestanding Sign, administrative approval.
• May 19, 2008, Scottsville Elementary School Sign, Proposal for a freestanding sign with non -
illuminated reader board and dark background (to coordinate with brick monument). Presented as
an Other Business item for direction from the Board. The ARB indicated they were willing to
consider the proposal; however, it would require a full review.
• May 7, 2007, Albemarle Baptist Church Sign, Proposal for a freestanding sign with internally
illuminated reader board. Presented as an Other Business item for direction from the Board. The
ARB was not supportive of the reader board request.
o June 28, 2007, the applicant withdrew the sign proposal upon receiving the staff report
recommending denial of the reader board request.
• May 15, 2003, ARB 2003-36, Jiffy Lube Reader Board, a motion to recommend approval of the
request failed by a 1:3 vote.
ARB 7/7/08, American Legion, Sign - Page 1
CONTEXT
The proposed sign is to be located on the south side of the State Route 22 Entrance Corridor, along the
frontage of a two -building commercial development located 500' east of the intersection with Route
250E. This section of the Entrance Corridor is largely rural in character with most of the commercial
development located along the north side of the Route 250E EC and at the intersection with Route 22.
Many of the commercial developments predate the Entrance Corridor and do not reflect established
design guidelines.
VISIBILITY
Due to its close proximity to the road, the sign under review will be highly visible from the State Route
22 EC. The sign is not expected to be visible from the Route 250E EC.
PROPOSAL
Vie: Double face freestanding monument sign with reader board
Materials: Sign Panels: Lexan and Aluminum; Base: Brick
Overall Sign Size: 12' H x 9' - 8" W x 20" D
Sign Panel Size 4' H x 8' W x 2" D
Reader Board Size: 2' H x 6' W x 1" D
Text: "CHARLOTTESVILLE & ALBEMARLE"
"AMERICAN LEGION"
"POST 74 Since 1919"
Reader Board: 3 lines provided for 4" tall changeable text
Graphics: American Legion seal
Colors: Base: brick
Sign text: "Dark Red" PMS 201 (3M 3630-73)
Sign background: White
Graphic: Red, blue and yellow
Reader Board: background: white, text: black
Location: Adjacent to State Route 22, 5' offset from right-of-way line, 160' east of the northwest
property corner.
Illumination: Internal, LED
Landscaping_ 1 existing Oak street tree, adjacent to the Route 22 right-of-way, to be removed to
provide room for the monument.
ANALYSIS based on: Sign Drawings American Legion, Sheets 1 and 2, latest revision date 6/5/08; Site
Plan Drawing: Major Site Plan Amendment, latest revision date 3/20/2000. Materials: brick for the
monument structure.
Issue: Reader Board
Comments: EC Guidelines state that reader boards are discouraged because their typical structure, style,
color, and location add an element to the site that is often incompatible with other design elements that
establish the overall appearance of the site. They do not contribute to a cohesive image on site. Their
general appearance is typically temporary in nature. The proposed reader board with its modern design,
light colored vinyl surface, internal illumination, and surface mount style of attachment results in a sign
design that stands in sharp contrast with the traditional character of the building it serves and the overall
site. Revising the sign proposal by eliminating the reader board would result in a sign with a more
traditional character that meets EC guidelines.
Recommendations: Revise the sign drawings by removing the reader board from the proposal or
ARB 7/7/08, American Legion, Sign - Page 2
providing a reader board design that does not have a temporary appearance and is completely coordinated
with the overall sign, including but not limited to colors and method of attachment.
Issue: Existing & Proposed Monument Signs/Location
Comments: The existing site has a monument sign located in the northwest corner, on the east side of the
entrance into the site. The overall size of the monument structure is 8' long, 3' — 8" tall, and 2' wide. The
monument is made of brick that is a medium terracotta color. The wood panel sign on the monument has
a white background with black letters. Although not indicated in the original application, the applicant has
since stated that the removal of this existing monument is part of their proposal. The proposed monument
sign is to be located 140' east of the existing sign and adjacent to Route 22. The location of the existing
monument is more visible from the EC, marking the site entrance and providing direction into the site, all
of which makes it appear more integrated with the overall site and landscape design.
Recommendations: Revise the proposal by adding to the existing monument structure to include signage
for the American Legion proposal, or replace it with an appropriately designed new sign in the same
location. The American Legion sign could be accommodated by increasing the total height of the existing
monument structure.
Issue: Proportion and Scale
Comments: EC guidelines state that the structure of the monument sign shall not overwhelm the sign. The
structure and the sign it supports must be in proportion to each other. The 12' height of the proposed
structure appears to be out of scale with (overpowering) the 4' tall x 8' wide panel sign and the 2' tall x 6'
wide reader board attached to it. From the site plan drawing provided, it appears that the base of the
monument would be situated approximately 4 to 5 feet above the finish floor elevation of the building it is
located in front of. EC views of the proposed monument would include views of the two buildings. Both
buildings on this site are one-story structures with a low roof profile. The 12' height of the proposed sign
structure would appear to be out of scale with the building and the overall development. A monument
structure 8' in height would be more in scale with the front (northeast) elevation of both buildings and the
overall development.
Recommendations: Revise the sign drawings by reducing the overall height of the monument structure to
8'.
Issue: Sign Panel/Monument/Overcrowding
Comments: EC guidelines state that wall signs should not obscure architectural details. The proposed sign
panel is shown overlapping the 8" soldier course located across the top of the monument. This prevents
the soldier course from providing a more finished appearance to the overall structure. Lowering the top of
the sign panel to just below the soldier course would provide a more finished appearance, allowing the
monument to frame the sign panel, no longer obscuring the brick detail.
Comments: Revise the sign drawings by showing the top of the sign panel located just below the brick
soldier course at the top of the monument.
Issue: Materials and Colors/Brick Detailing
Comments: EC guidelines state that materials used in both the sign and support structures should be
complimentary. They should also support the aesthetics of the building and/or complex being served by
the sign although a direct duplication is not necessary. It is preferred that the base material match one of
the primary building materials unless the design of the sign represents itself as a freestanding element
complimenting the building. Proposed materials include aluminum and lexan for the sign panel and a dark
red oversized brick for the monument (sample provided). The sign colors include a white background
with dark red letters. The reader board colors include a white background, black letters, and a 1" retainer
ARB 7/7/08, American Legion, Sign - Page 3
(color not indicated). The existing monument sign at the entrance to the site is a medium terracotta color
brick structure with a projecting brick cornice across the top. The panel sign has a white background with
black metal letters and is recessed within the structure giving it a more finished appearance than the
surface mounted panel sign and reader board in the proposed monument. Existing wall panel signs are
located in the west end gable of the smaller building (In Vino Veritas) and in the first story gable on the
front of the same building, facing Route 22. These signs have dark green backgrounds with white letters.
The dark red color of the oversized brick proposed for the monument does not match any of the materials
in the buildings for type or color; however, the medium terracotta color of the brick in the existing
monument sign blends more readily with the colors of the buildings.
Recommendations: Revise the monument proposal to include the use of a brick similar in size and color
to that of the existing monument. Revise the design of the structure to include a projecting brick cornice
across the top similar to that of the existing monument structure, with all signs shown recessed within the
structure.
Issue: Lighting
Comments: EC guidelines encourage the use of external illumination for signs because it allows
consistency with the daytime image of the sign. External lighting appears to the viewer as reflected light
and allows the focus of the sign to be the overall shape, color and complete design of the sign. Internal
lighting produces a fragmented, rather than unified, sign image at night compared to external lighting and
may project light that is distracting to the viewer. The applicant is proposing internal LED lighting for
both the sign and the reader board. Both the sign panel and reader board are proposed with non-opaque
backgrounds, and the sign panel is to have an internally lit logo. The existing monument sign has
external, ground mounted lighting, and the existing wall panel signs have external, gooseneck lights.
External lighting is particularly appropriate for this site, due to its strong traditional styling and location in
a largely rural area. If internal illumination is approved, all backgrounds, including the reader board must
be opaque. The internal illumination of logos, while discouraged in the EC guidelines, have been
approved by the Board on a case by case basis. The proposed logo is 2' x 2" in diameter, centered in the
sign panel, with dark red, blue, yellow, and green colors. Due to its dark colors, small size, and integral
location on the panel, internal illumination of the proposed logo is not expected to have an adverse impact
on the EC, if the sign background is made opaque.
Recommendations: Revise the proposal by removing all proposed internal illumination. Revise the
drawings to show the use of exterior, ground mounted lights. Provide cutsheets of the proposed lights. All
lighting emitting 3,000 lumens or more shall be a full cutoff style fixture. If internal illumination of the
sign panel (with logo), and reader board is approved, revise the drawings to indicate that the backgrounds
of both will be opaque.
Issue: Setback
Comments: The applicant is proposing to locate the sign adjacent to the Route 22 right-of-way. The
Zoning Ordinance requires a 5' minimum setback from the right-of-way in a C-1 zone. The sign location,
as shown on the site plan drawing, is not dimensioned to indicate whether or not this requirement is being
observed.
Recommendations: Revise the site plan drawing to show the dimensioned location of the sign structure,
clearly indicating that it meets the 5' minimum setback requirement.
Issue: Landscaping
Comments: EC guidelines state that ground cover, shrubs, and/or trees shall be used to integrate the
freestanding sign into the overall landscape development of the site. The applicant submitted a copy of
the approved Major Site Plan Amendment for this site; however, the landscaping shown across the
ARB 7/7/08, American Legion, Sign - Page 4
frontage of this site does not correspond with the existing landscaping. Additional proposed landscaping,
addressing the guidelines, was not indicated. The applicant has indicated that the installation of the
monument/sign in the proposed location would require the removal of one of the existing oak street trees
lining the State Route 22 frontage. Disrupting consistent landscaping such as this, to install a
monument/sign, when a reasonable alternate location is available is not recommended. The existing
freestanding sign at the site entrance is located in a bed of low growing junipers. These plantings are not
reflected on the copy of the Major Site Plan Amendment provided with this submission; however, they do
successfully integrate the sign into the overall site and landscape development.
Recommendations: Provide a site plan showing the location of the proposed sign, the correct location of
existing landscaping identified for type, plants to be removed, and the location of any proposed
landscaping addressing the EC guidelines for signage landscaping. A sign in the location currently
proposed by the applicant would require additional landscaping to integrate it into the overall landscape
development. A sign where the existing monument sign is located may integrate successfully with the
existing landscaping.
Issue Wall Sign/No Permit
Comments: A panel wall sign was installed, without ARB review/approval or a sign permit, in the
pediment above the building entrance in the northeast elevation. The applicant needs to make an ARB
application for the review of this circular sign of the American Legion logo. The sign appears to be
overscaled for its location in the pediment.
Recommendations: Submit an ARB application for the wall sign currently located in the pediment above
the building entrance in the northeast elevation. Provide drawings showing the existing sign replaced with
the same sign in a smaller size (diameter), appearing proportionate with the pediment, allowing the
pediment to frame the sign.
SUMMARY OF REVIEW
The proposed sign is overscaled. The proposed reader board materials and lighting do not meet the EC
guidelines. The proposed location of the monument/sign/reader board emphasizes the negative aspects of
this proposal with regards to scale and the lack of an adequate landscape proposal. A freestanding sign,
without the reader board, located where the existing monument structure is located, in a similar color and
design, up to 8' in height, could address most of the staff concerns for this proposal.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. Proposed materials and design of the sign and structure.
2. Coordination of the sign proposal with the building and site design.
3. The character of the proposed reader board.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness pending staff administrative approval of
the following conditions:
1. Revise the sign drawings by removing the reader board from the proposal or providing a reader board
design that does not have a temporary appearance and is completely coordinated with the overall sign,
including but not limited to colors and method of attachment.
2. Revise the proposal by adding to the existing monument structure to include signage for the American
Legion proposal, or replace it with an appropriately designed new sign in the same location. The
American Legion sign could be accommodated by increasing the total height of the existing
ARB 7/7/08, American Legion, Sign - Page 5
monument structure.
3. Revise the sign drawings by reducing the overall height of the monument structure to 8'.
4. Revise the sign drawings by showing the top of the sign panel located just below the brick soldier
course at the top of the monument.
5. Revise the monument proposal to include the use of a brick similar in size and color to that of the
existing monument. Revise the design of the structure to include a projecting brick cornice across the
top similar to that of the existing monument structure, with all signs shown recessed within the
structure.
6. Revise the proposal by removing all proposed internal illumination. Revise the drawings to show the
use of exterior, ground mounted lights. Provide cutsheets of the proposed lights. All lighting emitting
3,000 lumens or more shall be a full cutoff style fixture. If internal illumination of the sign panel
(with logo), and reader board is approved, revise the drawings to indicate that the backgrounds of
both will be opaque.
7. Revise the site plan drawing to show the dimensioned location of the sign structure, clearly indicating
that it meets the 5' minimum setback requirement.
8. Provide a site plan showing the location of the proposed sign, the correct location of existing
landscaping identified for type, plants to be removed, and the location of any proposed landscaping
addressing the EC guidelines for signage landscaping. A sign in the location currently proposed by
the applicant would require additional landscaping to integrate it into the overall landscape
development. A sign where the existing monument sign is located may integrate successfully with
the existing landscaping.
9. Submit an ARB application for the wall sign currently located in the pediment above the building
entrance in the northeast elevation. Provide drawings showing the existing sign replaced with the
same sign in a smaller size (diameter), appearing proportionate with the pediment, allowing the
pediment to frame the sign.
ARB 7/7/08, American Legion, Sign - Page 6
Application for
Variance
77 Variance = S120
Project Name;
Attachment B
Tax map and parcel: 07/ OD eV 620 —0//400 Magisterial District: SCn�� UlLls Zoning:
Physical Street Address (if assigned): 30172-6,L 044 1,,5,4 ,}J, �F 1.111 Gg i/A
Location of property (landmarks, m[ersections, or other): >�oN / D f �`� 1 � //V9 Q1V �f avZ
Contact Person (Who should we call/write concerning this project?): 7 -IJ -
Address Ze. 46 /6� .16
City Zip O6
I Mytime Phone ( _ b7 D �/��� Fax P ( ) E-mail
Owner oi'Record_A14y at 6,4A/ Lei,7!&0-
Address _ 30 0 city lfW G State Zip
Daytime Phone
Fax # ( )
E-mail
Applicant (Who is the Contact person representing?):
Address E' A5 by, City
City
Daytime Phone O
Fax tl (_)
E-mail
State Zip
OR
A-\1
VA 2008-007 Signs # (2 & 16) American Legion Post 74 Lodge Inc. (owner /
applicant) Request variance to increase size for proposed freestanding sign from 32 to
48 square feet, an increase of 16 square feet. Property located at 3025 Louisa Road is
located on the north side of Rt. 250 East (Richmond Rd) at the intersection with Rt. 22
(Louisa Rd). Tax Map 79, Parcel 19 is zoned C1, Commercial and EC, Entrance
Corridor overlay.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY NIA # C�[ 00$( CA
rL'L n) °���%!t�fl!/}'�?�� 7�'j L
Ice Amount $ Date Paid � . it � ITY who. � . Receipt 11Ckd By:
Counti; of Albemarle Department of Community' Development `�
v47
The fullowiu! information Shall he xuhmitttd with the application and is to be provided by the ap dint , 7.
I I kec►>rd;:d Iliai or boundary of the property requested for the rezoning. If there i:, nu dei er}efl''j1'1�it"t`1`'I uu lair'su � , picric
provide lei_,;ti dusuriplioij of the proticrt< and tl,c IDeeri Book anri n12e• number or Mat Book and page rlunlher
MAY � C 208
'') Th": appropriate drawing:; show1m., all existing. and proposed improvements on the property, with all dime, a+>fl,r{,�tnteCLL::hu
properl\ lines. and any special conditions on the property that play justify the request. � �`'""`°` s
I-ccI. layahlc to the ('011111',' of nlhemaric.
i) JustiFication shall he based on these three (3) criteria: /MJF k�dn �� � � �l�GtlllJ'e /yam LLQ
I •t'11:11 ill(, strict annlication of this ordinance would produce undue hardship.
lw-' t l 14 ) F ���l `� 0T2,/, 9 %�E f//�C�� f�''l� i �� .✓t [ o /`
F_
P�JA,I'Q
3. That the authorization of'such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and that the character of the
district will Ilot be changed 1,1' the granting of the variance.
7-
_. _! L, if I --/r A_., --.:r t _. /fin' / /,li M:� c' AYWi/G //Al
C- Cit /C sv W149, Ocaner•/.ApPticant Must Read and Sign i
w�
The appilcal.ion may he deferred by the staff or the ioard of Zoning Appcals, if sufficicnl information to this
reviMA' has not been submitted by the deadline.
I herchy certify that the 1111"61-illationprovided on this application and accompanying information is accurate, trLle and corruct
to the hest of my I:now dge am h I /
t '/,/�1ti r
Print Name/ /
2
Date
Daytime phone number of' Signatory
cnUTA,V') _f")
! I
9 8..
8,_0
6. 0..
LOWER CABINET
r 1O"
2" RETAINER
N ("DARK RED" 3M 3630-73)
10
NOTES:
1,1 LOGO COLORS TO ��-_�P�41
@Y CUSTOMER PRIOR
MAN�FA�T�II�IN.(i:
2.) ALL COLORS TO BE VERIFIED
PRIOR LQ.MANUFACTURINy.,
8" SOLDIER
---- .080 ALUM. D/F
SIGN CABINET-- - -- - ---
FLAT LEXAN FACE
BKG "WHITE"
---- - 2" RETAINER--- --
"DARK RED" PMS 201
(3M 3630-73)
.080 ALUM. D/F
SIGN CABINET
PAINT LINE W/ 4" LETTER
ZIP -TRACK BKG. TO BE WHITE
- - 1" RETAINER
(COLOR TBD) -
BRICK QY OTHERS
GRADE
20"
TU► W INET
16•
/ BRIG
LIGHTING DETAIL,
SEE PAGE 2
Client Name: AMERICAN LEGION (RANDY SMITH)
General Sign Speclfkations:
Wot:
TAMLEY ANC
❑ h eq E+ Ul ,uba
Location: XXX
�:
COMPANY
❑ s.+ow Focea Do";cx:e ❑bion lYl us+eo
KW*%233
C/ESIJE.�IF, u9(S(7" 5 1
I>51l SIS-I�0] fA1C 116115Y-VIl]
[!4<�A]
Sign Type: PYLON SIGN
❑ PJOf�-�IPV .J ■ b—nW ❑ �
•"�������������- ����--•_._--�_��-
(:velli Jl VfldlOfQ ryrPfOY♦✓
Sales Rep: Rs StartDab: Co Filel: A1042908
❑ 120 Wn1 F,,,py,r-; ■moo
_-
A FULL SFiMCE SicH co.
❑ 277`t*1 krco.r'' ❑ H.O.LAWS
Pte• I of
Designer: MM I Last Revisbn: 06/05/2008. by MM Scale: 3/8" = 1- - o"
062 063 -- - - 064
i
79-5A
i 79-46
I
i
I
i
i 46A
\� \` 80-2A
I ��- �X,
80-2
5D
'I
23
J ` `
5C 12D
t d
12B
79-10
79-2A - - �m ,.� p
$r CO
t n% o
o I= n 79-12A
4C
1 -- f /�•�
a y
79 CH
50
2 10
10
'79-7B ` v
•79-7 19 i +
17C��a+*`'�
79-7A CSv��`` 1
1 16
20 21 - -�
5
r y 4A, MIM
8 a 23F
1 `�23
f 36E ; 23A
36D
C1 VA -2008'2-007 American Legion
= Post 74 Lodge Inc. (owner
f' 43S'R� %a applicant)
43 °' Tax map 79, parcel 19
43F 5B`
C 43K
JS
r�4
3 43L 43M 79 �3 3F1 /,� �__ 5'26 A
t j
1
a 3� 44 43F2 43F4 79-43F }, ... N�� n ,
092 093 Tax
94
Scale Albemarle County 079 Map: r-
0 Boo 1600 2,400
r 1
Note: This map is kr display purposes only t(`l
and snows parcels as of 12/31/7007.
�/ See Map Book Introduction for additional details.
VA -2008-007 American Legion Post 74 Lodge Inc.
Some items on map may not appear in legend)
F7 w.
El
3008
79-9
_ ff
3015
79-19r
l
C'S'M
3025
79-19
0
O
J
�O
79-7+
79-18
79-9 25
1054 79-17C
7 �-19h
��
0�
1066 100668
2 GIS -Web
1070
!`•PO % –17
Geographic Data Services
(434 x9
)296-5832
79-20
729
�1v
79-21
0
/t� ( 171 Feet
N
79-23A
7,9-23F 79-246
—p, . ivr ...prey purpoaee omy • i+enai imagery Tram uommonweal[n w virgin
June 2, 2008
V
10, qj
.Ti
OO0
JaF-R PO R.25'
°EOR�O_ #"OCA R'D
PSTANc
xo10
i /.
SCALE: T'-� \ -\7\Z-
IONS DATE
TO V.S !- ✓r� -RED MAPLE TREES 'HRU9$ER 28. •`+DA SEPTEMBER 9, +999
OT\ 04 W R 6, 1999B.M. ELEV. - 365.16 6SlyNIN QASE CF POLE. 'S `LE' �E_22 _,R 15, 1999U$OM qR ,:' MAX.M ' 18, 2061:NG-33.0'�� }��� } `► } CH 20. 207)
EX•C".'� PA ENT -22' tO MA TION XISTING Jill�L/ArilY,1 AIMQVA-CR MATCH TsON NGOPE TOCROSS-SECTIONsyAC11FL'!,(. RNANNA MAGISTERIAL DIAl PrUAMF COUNTY VIR
SM -2 SCALE
JADS AND DANIELE LOGARtDES
12 AGG- EASE('YPE 1 A) Tl SI:SORADE-CER MN. 10 "a SADDLEWO00 DRIVE
BV'i..DING SETBACK$:
A4 UA TYPICAL OFF-SITE ROTE 22 WIDENING CHARLOTTE$VI1E, 'ARGINIA 2z9oz euc :cAL•s
BOT, �S Ar�G 'I - S pROPER.TY DATA; CONT SETBACK - 30' AND 30' FRIM P+1
4< k/ SES Bf v PART OF TAX MAP 79 PARCEL 19
SIDE SETBACK : 0' i0 NEST (STORE ADJACENT)
W LY' r - :'yp REAR SETBACK - D' RAILROAD R/W �S GREATER THAN 59
SrS7ACKiNC RAY P:,% rGN -0� AN Z '9-r, LEGAL REFERENCES:
�STANcc ?�, S rD BE AWAY WN o4`1 �D 94 O.S. 1759 PP. 598,599, 3 600 PARKING SETBACKS
T1pfR`. MARO YO 80.Y 4wAy T' 1J' Ctl ROUTES 250 4ND 22
O.Q
BY 'ES -ESI. PRGPR TY IS ZONED C-1 'MTN 20' FROM R.A.
T Og, V,�
7C'.
P ENTRANCE CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT
406 PARKING SUMMARY:
PROPOSED USE:
ACJ+ 50 R7CNT- '� THE PROPERTY WILL BE USED FOR TEAIL +TIOUIE SHOP 'SPA
A SHOP(RESTAU (RESTAURANT)
S0. FT . �R6=5.70 SPACES
27 SPACES
A RETAIL ANnOUE STORE AND
---
WA 7)E REPI:R S+CP TOTAL ':PACES RECU!PEO - 9SPACES
•/ r T� iA�E P v ,� 8�'"r1 I` /l? &P -j- ` 1 `� "`-^ _ _ lt� ,- - / vA TH SF P.r oW7CAP98PSPES ES
_, � �� � 5;��� ,,(("'JJuuj/'��11 / , FL2i r "`•`A - - -- ` � 40.001 : 6Op• TOT ,4A
�SA
4 a ON
?'
A`�-,3
. -x �_ _ _'�' ti's 1 = ry - b V -�� "'�- - -_ , '1•rp�_ EOR �iiplcAPE
DI P,pO BO% �� - `.l 2 fig Z ��"G 7'L OE'Aq S. 1 TO ;Lu?(AINISMLLE
_77—
cI.D r�:I.yc-.
I7`/
SZ
_
I'I )� - I -1 -
_ �A. �• ;0 _ !!!///•-_ y I
xc.
N�1
37'4 U, WAIT KWA YEA 4
ENF.tNi
ITYR
SA OAD212 I
CONT JTANCE i N tARMP 79 PA
RCEL 196
Or
0 1V, h. to OratO R.
' � R - ?C. ° CATER � '^ t '1' % 5 ! •R �-r, �p j _ _ '1 >
AND
I R-♦ \ rL y '+< r.l. >r:y, �J' k E
s;° T R T,uL ENTR i r " ;
CDG gRE.A G i 1 _ - - ! f v ` NG BUFFER ISET6ACK
t.
< <J ._ .�- -,Is,-, o 1 yyyy LOQ, A`
,,,,,T� •� 3� `�C' -rn _ - ---- - --- Ec4q Ev rR - - --- - V,1' `^ ! _ �1 T� _ ,\� Q'��.a"y2594 sa, r1 y�o
• 1 � l ,'. CG`7 ` J4Agr4AY FV - Th8 1 JF � �Z� `{� r f _ �� f!� � / Q � n 0 ti 3 �p� � I r� <S OS
• Y'J, 6. �~ y _ R Gar r -�� v lt^F(TP �' ` 6 "�! >�= ` J .�`�• \ F S 1-
f ,r
R
ry ASNi44�, \ ti / t ''pp gL�pti.C�'�,,0 - �. ,y�. I h8.13.' 9�9Z•- .\' .
�\. 1 , ryJ. Ci � - - l _ WAI y \ REA I.E O� %% - ycr .�.. 3S' � � �Al �i •-! T_� 1
f 1 L V /
—
wy
' t r .ol ` fS �_�,(r!- rl.cil- s r`VRp �- l,�Y'�.+ �- �4.�•1L�' - _- -_ _. ti�si �.. n'
• (.S� '~ _�_ Pj 5 :06 1.,''A'BEL F'
REaI�ED ON ?( w \C _ �: - - -- " � LANDSCAPE PLAN
f w"� - K � � '� ; � ` , � T;� _NAV �+r" �_ GOVERNS ALL PLANTING
- 'L :,r.!�--r ..,6Jy@S _ - 1�{. i t E LA'+ SC APIy� PLAN SPLh t+EEi luF 5
- , =a L T; - r /1 - v 9 Sp 4 \ MrW SCREENiN+ _ V 60 K �R apD UOYERNS �lL-. xN i SNC
nLl dE -! KEC - 'Jlj l c 4C y_. -_-
F ; ! to �:' \ aJf �' EA -1. 7� ,' / \ e 6 �•. - ^ 1 L .1✓ 1, ALT. FUD IMPROVEMENTS 'AILL BE TO 4O.OT STANDAPCS
I S 0T 'r *9' B 02. 2. A I'EMA FLC00 PLAIN DOES NOT EXIST ON THIS PLAT
SEE SHEET 4 OF 5 Lr+ 73 - 1-/{�i�� 3 WATER AND SANITgRY SEWER SERVCES ARE 40T N --.E
FOR OUTDOOR LIGHTING) f it c{; E'A ��i v'� 1. O) �[-" �RISDItT!CNAL AREA OF THE ALBEUARLE .., r,rr
�c a t, •S r1 SER OLE AHCKt
UTI'Y (RSCS) E
4 -HE S -ORM NATER MLL BE MANAGED BY DROP n:,ETS AND LEyTL SP4EA0 RS
O {,P - - l(
Nc 1E- `, IE MJST BE hSFE tEG 9Y WATER PEg0U4CE - o - SX \�-� .-+� AND DRECTTILI TOWARD THE RETENTION RIPE AND R';OAD T!ON
1, TE ER PROP 0 NSPEC EDS QF TFR PERS - _ _ - _ �J _�ITF ARA _ =0NTR T FACILITIES AND RELEASED EAST THE RV TAE
oNSfRICTION- - _ C r�r' TOTAL AREA (8,688 SOFT. .NC •ER tHE SAME CONDITIONS THAT E:a$f Al 1FI�.5 TME
TO VERIFY CHAT SITE S ALEOUATFL" STABILIZED AND ",j A1�� _ �{� PR+OR '0 CONS71-1clON.
,I PECT SANO/SOit_ NIXIIURE. a •y,� "TA l M=ER'.'NUS PARK.!NG AND VEHICULAR 'MPER',"OVS AREA 5 SIGN HILL BE :)ZED AND INSTALLED TO CODE. IPERMIi �ErY:IHED)
3� _ MPER'AOUS AREA - 39,945 SOFT
6 OU TDODR 1.. EH- NG SHALL BE DIRECTED W TOWARD `HE `RTE AND AWAY
ERNOUS AREA M�� ;ROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND ROADWAYS THE FIX TERES SHALL BE
z UI OTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA - 49.057 SOFT. SHIELDED MTH LIGHT RAYS NOT EMITTING ABOVE THE HORIZONTAL PLANE
' _ --- '0 CHI.R' I i� . �/� /G -:1 MAP T9 PARCEL IE
NUMBER MJF EMPLOYEES OF THE LIGHT Fl%T1,0E- THE FOOT-CANDLE 4TENSI7Y MLL NOT EXCEED
• - ` •!>/`l�D., - Z.I,ED RA S EUPLOYEES MAX. 0.5 FOOT-CANDLES At ANY PROPERTY (RIGHT-OF-WAY) UNE.
7 EACH nu TDOOR LUIIMAkRE EQUIPPED WITH A LAMP WHICH EMITS
Z,I SETBACK r RAILROAD R/W) BFNCN MARX/'OATLM:
�-•1I F' BENCHMARK IS LOCATED IN FPCNT OF 3000 CR MORE INITIAL LUMENS SHALL BE A FULL CUTOFT
to' -M I U 17 LUMINMRE OR DECORATIVE U;WNAIRE WITH FULL CvTOFF GP?CS .�{�LlyQ1,
v 1/4'.1, i / POWER POLE NEAR FRONT REST PROPERTY C,;,yRNER 8. THE SPILLOVER OF LIGHTING FROM PARKING AREA ..,MiNA:RES
;u -2A RF AC{ L:PE r0 COUNTY APPROVAL %LOCK IN ..ATT RGUZE 22. A PAR CA' %AILS r V
CN70 F'.!BLIC ROACS AND PROPERTY IN RESIDENTIAL JR
rP•CA S C,ONCPETE D WALK _ 'N AT BASE OF POLE: FLEV.-34,516 RURAL AREAS ZONING DISTRICTS SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE-
MAT;.N fjTADING PLAN. 1, 24 MIN. STC:I,IE FA i:`CPE it -A) rl
_ DEPARTMENT OF ENJnEERING q nSJ LATE ' Tlik
.-I:.. -- I \�• F.X6 '+F.LDED MRE MESH ?EINFORC'NG —- TOPOGRAPHY, NALF(1; 2) FQOT CANDLE
P'--.NNING AND ::MM„NITY CE',ELJPMENT }3-91 - DATE 1,/23/r4 O
' - � 'UPOGRAPHIC MAPPING PROVIDED BY 9, SITE IS NOT IN RESERVOIR WATERSHED
DEPARTMENT OF iDN'`IG i • ` - DATE �l]l: aV G_OECKNER k OSBORNE, INC- 10 SITE IS NOT N ZONE A (100 YEAR FLOOD PLAINT til-�O
=OBGPa „BR N 10(951F COMPACTION) ACCORDING TO FEMA J a
6' GG, SA7W PF .IA) UE _ S yOTE. 1 ALT. F XTuRES TANKS, AND FIRE tlF11. StIE WILL BE SERIED 8Y WELL FiCIAL ')ATE LAND SURVE"'NG• AND 4A
!1 Lam- �v
g• r PNG MLL CONFORM tU THE //GLZECKNEP A CSBOANE. NC CHARLOTTESVILE. `:A. FIELD
Y:_IPl� ^,�.___ )RAIN -'LE PIPE :A. STATE HEAL7:-1 IEPT. BCI.GNG OFT'CIAL i/ f ATc _ 12 NO-HNG IS TO 3E CONSTRUCTED UR
,PECIFiCA'!UNS. S -E PLAN PREPARAT!CN: PLACED LIN THE WELL LOT.
2 ALL 3 SEPTIC GTALKS WILL BE ALBEMARI,E :O •.ER-i,.E A! nI�ErIiY IL DA -F T«IS 0loru-ENT WAS FREPIREC RY-'KURT M. -Lm,E'XNER PROFESSyOw4 '+E;P
VVI)T(-AT PAPkgW
'r. 1.nT A, T?PTTC FIFi.1) SECTION ,., .. --__— ---_ _ ^- ,.., /
♦K1.TR of
•�9MT K644 09FI1p
0 loO
h/AL
T
U W
z
VI Z F
c "d1 f
v O
U /1 4
w n
H a
1� O
a
W
f
O O
� f
4
G9
JOB NUMBER
9d C0
DWG. NAME
051 Fe...We
JI
e��A-� 4G•
\1
k ap)
4
SHEET
1 5
v, ,