The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZMA201600015 Resubmittal 2016-09-29 Edwards designStudio Landscape Architecture and Site Planning Transmittal Date: September 29, 2016 Pages: 1 of 1 From: Steve Edwards To: Mr. JT Newberry Senior Planner Albemarle County of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: Oakleigh: Rezoning Application For: X Distribution X Review& Comment X Records Other: Transmitting the Following: Qty. Item y.8' Application for Zoning Map Amendment 1 Resubmittal of information for ZMA form 1 Comment Response Letter - Resubmission Fee not applicable this time -- Proffers (submitted separately from Valerie Long at William Mullins) Comments: If you have any additional request prior to the meeting to help answer specific questions staff may have please don't hesitate to call. Cc: George Ray, Oakleigh Albemarle, Inc. Valerie Long, William Mullins 16-06-29, Newberry, Oakleigh, Rezoning Application,Transmittal.dOCX 4836 Old Boonsboro Road • Lynchburg, Virginia • 24503 •tele: 434.531.7507 email: steve@edwardsdesignstudio.com 1 of 1 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SP# Fee Amount S Date Paid By who"' Receipt# Ck# By Resubmittal of information for 4g® Zoning Map Amendment '�IN` PROJECT NUMBER THAT HAS BEEN ASSIGNED: ZMA201600015 Oakleigh Owner/Applicant Must Read and Sign I hereby certify that the information provided with this resubmittal is what has been requested from staff 9-29-16 Signature of Owner,Contract Purchaser Date George Ray, Jr. 434-978-1766 Print Name Daytime phone number of Signatory FEES that may apply: ❑ Deferral of scheduled public hearing at applicant's request $194 Resubmittal fees for original Zoning Map Amendment fee of$2,688 ® First resubmission FREE ❑ Each additional resubmission (TO BE PAID WIZEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF) $1,344 Resubmittal fees for original Zoning Map Amendment fee of$3,763 ❑ First resubmission FREE ❑ Each additional resubmission(TO BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF) $1,881 To be paid after staff review for public notice: Most applications for a Zoning Map Amendment require at least one public hearing by the Planning Commission and one public hearing by the Board of Supervisors. Virginia State Code requires that notice for public hearings be made by publishing a legal advertisement in the newspaper and by mailing letters to adjacent property owners. Therefore,at least two fees for public notice are required before a Zoning Map Amendment may be heard by the Board of Supervisors. The total fee for public notice will be provided to the applicant after the final cost is determined and must be paid before the application is heard by a public body. i- Preparing and mailing or delivering up to fifty(50)notices $215+actual cost of first-class postage > Preparing and mailing or delivering each notice after fifty(50) $1.08 for each additional notice+actual cost of first-class postage Legal advertisement(published twice in the newspaper for each public hearing) Actual cost (averages between$150 and$250) County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296-5832 Fax: (434) 972-4126 Revised I I/022015 Page I of I Edwards designStudio Landscape Architecture and Site Planning 29 September 2016 Mr. JT Newberry Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 RE: Oakleigh: Rezoning (ZMA201600015); Comment Response Letter Dear JT: Regarding the comments received dated September 9, 2016 from you on the Oakleigh Rezoning Amendment application, please find our responses below. Zoning and Planning: 1. Comments related to the appropriate compliance issue... According to the assisted living representative and other health care attorneys these types tr of facilities do not require a Certificate of Public Need from Virginia only licensure from the Virginia Department of Social Services and local zoning approval. 2. Comments related to the justification for the need given the building size... This issue came up during our ARB Advisory Review meeting. The assisted living group —tr. explained that the building footprint is the size shown to make their business model more economically efficient and reduce the number of floors. On the contrary, if this building was a smaller footprint, then more floors would be needed as well as more staff. As shown, the building can be nestled behind the large existing trees and relate better to the surrounding character of the neighbor and rest of the development. Furthermore, having only 2 stories allows residents to enjoy greater safety, ability to interact in more programming ancTiTgrthe ability to better watch and keep safe the residents within the courtyards and on each floor. 3. Comments related to the Proffers... This issue has been addressed by Williams Mullen and includes wording that came out of the ARB Advisory Review meeting held on September 19, 2016. Revisions have been submitted to the County Attorney for review. 4. Comments related to the Neighborhood Model... This revision removes the outdated principle titled "Neighborhood Friendly Streets and Paths"with the "Multi-Modal Transportation Opportunities" principle. This can been found on Sheet 5 under General Project Information: Principles of the Neighborhood Model. 5. Comments related to the Conceptual Plan... On Sheet 1, the application number has been revised and a revision date has been added. On Sheet 4, the number of Townhomes on the different charts have been coordinated. On Sheet 5, we have updated the Neighborhood Model Principles. We have replaced the word "shall"to allow greater flexibility. Letters C,D and E have been removed under the Architectural Standards. Footnote 3 has been updated per your request. Footnote 4 has been removed and it's reference. The Front Lot Lines column in the table titled Yard Requirements by Block has been removed. As discussed, the reason for the discrepancies is due to how the tables are laid out. Some state specifics while others state ranges. According to the assisted living representative 4936 Old Boonsboro Road • Lynchburg, Virginia • 24503 • tele: 434.531.7507 email: steve@edwardsdesignstudio.com 1 of 2 Edwards designStudio Landscape Architecture and Site Planning there are expecting to have 120 total units which equates to 132 beds. The Code of Development is intended to allow flexibility and anticipate possible changes in the future. Engineering: Engineering has no objection to the application. Additional requirements will need to be addressed during the site plan review. ACSA: ACSA have no objections to the application. Additional requirements will need to be addressed during the site plan review. VDOT: VDOT finds the application generally acceptable. Additional comments will be provided during site plan review. Fire Rescue: Fire and Rescue finds the application generally acceptable. Additional comments will be provided during site plan review. 1. Require a secondary entrance to Block V. We have meet and presented concepts on how we could address this issue. It appears Fire/Rescue can be satisfied. 2. Requested a turn-around or connection for Block IV. After discussing this with Robbie Gilmer he is comfortable removing this request if we agree to sprinkle the townhome units. The client has indicated this is acceptable. ARB: Have no objections to the application at this time. It was a 5:0 vote in favor of the project. Zoning: Have no objections to the application. Inspections: Have no objections to the application. We appreciate your time and effort in reviewing our plans and respectfully request that your approval be given to proceed to the Planning Commission. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. I can be reached at 434-531-7507. Sincerely, 41,4'(ice. 11�1"XC�r..s Steven W. Edwards, CLA 4936 Old Boonsboro Road • Lynchburg, Virginia • 24503 • tele: 434.531.7507 email: steve@edwardsdesignstudio.corn 2 of 2 D' - / .4 a JEu C b{c, *t- ,6 Lv r e- L , {e-(( ? I5 d„x, l o°l 444 12.4 0144a c,. 2 -, soo U