HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA202100012 Staff Report 2022-01-25 (2)SKYLINE RIDGE APARTMENTS - REZONING PERMIT
REZONING PERMIT #: (ZMA 2021-00012)
JACK JOUETT MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
NARRATIVE AND APPLICATION PLAN
Submission Date: SEPTEMBER 20, 2021
Updated: December 6, 2021
Application Plan
Skyline Ridge Apartments - Narrative
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Project Narrative
I. Project Overview
Figure IA: 1996 Aerial Image of the Skyline Ridge property
Figure 1B: 2000 Aerial Image of the Skyline Ridge property
Figure 1C: 2002 Aerial Image of the Skyline Ridge property
Figure 1D: 2010 Aerial Image of the Skyline Ridge property
Figure IE: 2018 Aerial Image of the Skyline Ridge property &
Context Map
II. Existing Conditions & Surrounding Area
III. Consistency with the Comprehensive plan
Figure 2: Current Comprehensive Plan
Figure 3: Current Zoning Map
IV. Environmental Impacts
Figure 4: Overall Context Map
V. Steep Slope analysis
VI. Conclusion
Application Plan:
1.
Exhibit #1:
Existing Conditions — Original Site Plan
2.
Exhibit #2:
Original Limits of Disturbance & Critical Slope Impacts
3.
Exhibit #3:
Original Final Site Plan and Grading Plan
4.
Exhibit #4:
Original Development Area with Albemarle County GIS
Preserved Slopes
5.
Original Development Area with Field Verified Preserved Slopes
6.
Exhibit #6:
Proposed Application Plan with Preserved Steep Slope
Impacts
I. Proiect Overview
The applicant, Woodard Properties, is seeking a zoning map amendment (ZMA) permit to amend the preserved
steep slopes within the original approved development area for the Skyline Ridge project. This project is a by -
right apartment complex in the R-15 zoning district, located off Ivy Road at the end of Colonnade Drive. The
property tax map number is 06000-00-00-04008, and the property is 4.96 acres. Woodard Properties is a real
estate development and property management company located in Charlottesville, Virginia, and they are
proposing to construct a maximum of 74 multi -family apartment units on the property.
Woodard Properties received a Land Disturbance permit for the original apartment building and parking lot in
1997 and started the site construction. The site was cleared, erosion and sediment control measures were
installed, the site was rough graded creating the apartment building pad and parking lot areas, and some of the
utilities to the site were installed. Sometime shortly after this work was completed, the project was paused due
to market demands for the apartment building at that time. The disturbed areas were restabilized and the
construction team demobilized from the project. Figures lA through lE show the aerial photo of the site
between 1996 and 2018. From the photos, the clearing and land disturbing operations can be seen in the 2000
and 2002 aerial photos, with the site being restabilized from 2002 to 2010. The 2018 aerial photo shows the
current state of the property and the general context map for the site.
ZMA — Application Plan
Skyline Ridge Apartment Rezoning Amendment Narrative
At the point when construction stopped on the property in 1998, the property had been graded and the land
prepared to start the installation of the footings and concrete pads for the apartment building. The existing
critical slopes within the limits of disturbance area on the property had been impacted and graded with the
intermediate grading of the site for preparation of the start of the building construction. The original approved
site plan included a critical slope waiver for the impacts to the existing critical slopes within the development
area of the project. The total land disturbance of the original development was 2.66 acres and the total amount of
critical slopes approved by staff for impacts was approximately 41,820 sf (0.96 acres). See Exhibit 1 and Exhibit
2 in the attached development plans for the approved existing conditions of the site when the site plan was
approved in 1996 and the total amount of critical slopes approved for impacts with the site plan. Exhibit 3 shows
the approved site development plan and grading plan for this project. The site was rough graded based this
approved site plan, before stopping and restabilizing the disturbed areas.
In 2014, the Board of Supervisors adopted the Steep Slopes overlay district, which classified preserved slopes
and managed slopes on properties within the development area of Albemarle County. When the steep slope
overlay district mapping was performed on this site, there were several areas that were classified with slopes
over 25%. These areas were classified as preserved slopes across the site, including the 25% slopes created
when the site was cleared and rough graded for the apartment project. Exhibit 4 illustrates these areas of critical
slopes included in the original limits of disturbance that are now determined as preserved slopes. The applicant
is requesting a rezoning amendment to amend the steep slope overlay district on the property to remove the
preserved slopes from the original approved development area of the property. The slopes that exist within this
area are manmade slopes and do not have the characteristics of preserved slopes, see the steep slope analysis
section on sheet 4 of this application narrative.
IL Existin! Conditions & Surrounding Area
The subject property, as shown in Figure lE on sheet 3, is surrounded by existing apartments on the north
and east side of the property. The site is bounded on the westem and southern boundaries by (2) single
family residences. A water tower owned and operated by the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority is also
located along the southern boundary of the property. The site is located approximately 1200 linear feet
south of Ivy Road. Colonnade Drive provides access to the property and the property is located at the end
of the cul-de-sac of the roadway. As noted, the development area of the property was cleared and graded in
1997 but has since been restabilized after the construction activity ended. Site vegetation has been
reestablished on the property and is predominately wooded. The remnants of the erosion control measures
and some of the existing utilities still exist on the property from the land disturbing activity in 1997 and
1998.
From the clearing and grading activity in 1997, the site was cleared and rough graded for the approved
apartment building. The building was approved in the location as shown on the approved site development
plan, exhibit 3. The apartment building is located just below the 700 elevation contour, adhering to the
mountaintop development requirements. The proposed project will continue to adhere to these
requirements. The residential house along the western property line is located on top of Lewis Mountain,
which is adjacent to this property. This property is located along the eastern limits of Lewis Mountain.
21Page
Figure IA: 1996 Aerial image of the Skyline Ridge property
Figure 1B: 2000 Aerial image of the Skyline Ridge property
ZMA — Application Plan
Skyline Ridge Apartment Rezoning Amendment Narrative
Figure 1C: 2002 Aerial image of the Skyline Ridge property
Figure 1D: 2010 Aerial image of the Skyline Ridge property
3 1 P a g c
III. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
The proposed apartment complex is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's designation of Urban Density
Residential, as shown in Figure 2: Comprehensive plan on Sheet 5. In addition, the existing zoning of the
property, as shown in Figure 3: Zoning Map on Sheet 6, is R-15 residential zoning, allowing 15 dwelling units
per acre. The proposed density of the site meets the allowable density for both the Comprehensive plan and the
existing R-15 zoning on the property. The Urban Density residential allows 6.01 DUA to 34 DUA on the
property. The property also has noted areas of Greenspace, which do not allow for any residential density in
these areas. From the 4.96 acres on the property, approximately 2.3 acres are located within the Urban Density
residential area, and the remaining 2.66 acres is classified as Greenspace, per the Comprehensive plan. The
allowable density for the property, per the Comprehensive plan is 2.3 acres x 34 DUA = 78 dwelling units. The
allowable density with the R-15 zoning is 15 DUA x 4.96 acres = 74 dwelling units. The maximum number of
dwelling units proposed with the project is 74 units. This complies with both the R15 zoning on the property and
the Comprehensive land use designation areas on the property.
The proposed density and multi -family development on the property is consistent with the adjacent properties to
the north and east of the site. These properties are also R15 residential and have been developed consistent with
the allowable density in the R-15 zoning. The residential property to the south is also located on R-15 zoned
property. This property may be redeveloped in the future for higher density under this by -right zoning.
Figure 1E: 2018 Aerial image of the Skyline Ridge property & Context Map
41Page
ZMA — Application Plan
Skyline Ridge Apartment Rezoning Amendment Narrative
Artydeferminatlondbggmphyorm0oum,nanydeplctlonofpt is limpovemne, properly linesorhouddlarlesislagereral iMnmelion only artleball twl he iRetlfor V4 Malgn ramification , or construction of Improvements to real property or for flout plain determination. cecemMr 6, 2021
Map element, trey scale larger Man GIS data measved In the map or as povlded on the dale download page due to the poolroom used. Map Phalli VUGS84 Mb Mandator (Amillary Sphere) (EPSG 385J
Figure 2: Comprehensive Plan
Application Plan 5 1 P a g e
Skyline Ridge Apartments - Narrative
60-31
Poplai
`N
60-36A
\` 6A-J 3
�
60-40C1 60-40D '�
Legend
Idob: saw ms heon map Instinor appear in legend)
s Gj�\{
n `d� .6' O•
' o . Cd �
1 \' �,
ems/
/
C { F
� N--u
12 A/1 ?'
'��"o+J
,�.
60-4081
S
(60-40E D,'.+
60-4005 60-40G2
Parcel Info
❑Parcels
zoning Into
zoning Classifications
village
0 60-34A
1 ,s1yv
r
R�eseaernial
R7 Residential
6U_40C3
■ Rz Rasitlentel
GO-30 60H-A 'y//� ^
!, 6
•I 1Q
0112 a
o O4
/
R4 Resid itsl
A RS Residential
■ R70 Residential
■ R15 Residential
�O� / O�
06 ,
/'O o
rQl�,� 60-40A
L
60-40C4.
;
Q.
Planned Unit Development
0 Pegnetlhood Model
Davtrict
■ Neighborhood Motlal District
>
O 60y ; 4
n U
p
Ei
Monticello His District
O
r` h
Ct Commerclel
Commercial
`Er O tI ltn
�ofo = 2
s�-b`rp-�;
Q
OC
Off •
6U-40Cd L' S� lift r; �. �.
Commercial office
■ Highway Commercial
■ Planned Development Shopping Ctr.
■ Planned Development Mwed Comm.
■ Downtown Crozet District
60 H-A2
Light
■ Heavy Industry
■ Planned Development Industrial Par
Town of Scottsville
Lewis
Al
60-40e6
n
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
60-30A
60-4 -8
J -
76-2A
i
-2A1
a/
76-3A
• ,� t `
376 ft
1
F Gargles,76-3B Global GamliSurreal
. Ibanerlemg/gu
- i
76-4
76-3
era.* fax)zasaeaz
Airy ddermmaeon of wpogrepny or contours, orenydepiction of plryaical hnpmvemanrs, pmpertr lines or boundaries is for general information only ant shall not be eased far Me desig, mosporgon. or construction of Improvements to real propenr or for flood plain determination. August 22, 2021
Mapdementsmaya WisMar Mr GISddanwas nthemgoraspr Won Medd tlowNoadpageduew"projectionwetl.Map P,4a n:WGShh Web Macaha(Aw3 Sphwe)(F M385))
61Page
ZMA — Application Plan
Skyline Ridge Apartment Rezoning Amendment Narrative
Figure 3: Zoning Map
Figure 4: Overall Critical Resources Map
IV. EnvironmentalImnacts
Figure 4 illustrates the existing environmental features on the property in the Overall Critical Resources Map In
addition to the preserved steep slopes on the property as shown in green in Figure 4, there is an existing
Mountain Protection Area on the property (shown in purple) starting at the 700 contour elevation. The
development, as indicated in the narrative, is proposing to impact the existing steep slopes on the property within
the original development area from the approved 1997 site plan. The improvements within the development area
will stop prior to the existing 700 contour and will not impact the existing Mountain Protection area. The
proposed development will preserved all the existing steep slopes outside of the original development area and
will also preserve the Mountain Protection Area by not allowing the construction of any structures above the 700
foot contour area.
There are no existing floodplains or water protection buffers located on the property, and the development of this
property will not impact any existing floodplains or Water protections areas.
V. Steep Slope Analysis:
The slopes within the original development area on the previously approved site plan meet the requirements of
managed slopes, and not preserved slopes. There are number of requirements listed in the Section 30.7.3 of the
Albemarle County Zoning ordinance for which steep slopes are classified as managed slopes or preserved slopes.
ZMA — Application Plan
Skyline Ridge Apartment Rezoning Amendment Narrative
The following is an analysis of the existing steep slopes within the development area and how their
characteristics compare the requirements of preserved and managed slopes:
1. The characteristics of the steep slopes are limited or fragmented (managed slopes) verses contiguous area
of steep slopes ranging in either a close grouping of slopes or creating an area of 10,000 sf or greater
(preserved slopes) — the steep slopes within the development area of the property, as shown in Figure 4
and Exhibit 4, are fragmented across the area and the majority of areas are not greater than 10,000 sf in
area. The steep slopes vary across the development area, and match the rough grading of the original
site plan.
2. The slopes are part of a system of slopes associated with or abutting a water feature (preserved slopes)
verses not be associated with or abutting a water feature (managed slopes) — none of the steep slopes
within the approved development area on the property are associated with or abutting any water features,
such as ponds, rivers, streams, or reservoirs. These slopes have the characteristics of managed slopes
under this requirement.
3. The slopes are part of a hillside system (preserved slopes) verses slopes that are not natural but
manufactured — the current steep slopes within the approved development area on the property were
created with the rough grading of the site under the previously approved site plan. These slopes are now
determined to be manmade or manufactured slopes. There were existing steep slopes within the
development area that would have been classified as preserved slopes as they were part of the overall
hillside on the property; however, these have been impacted with the previous site development and the
new steep slopes are manufactured slopes.
4. The slopes were significantly disturbed prior to June 1, 2021 (managed slopes requirement) — yes, the
site within the approved development area was cleared and graded in 1998, see the aerial exhibits in
Figures I through I of the clearing and grading of the site from the year 2000 through 2010.
5. The slopes are located within previously approved single-family residential lots (managed slope
requirement)— this requirement does not apply as the property was originally cleared and disturbed for an
apartment building and associated parking areas.
6. The slopes are shown to be disturbed, or allowed to be disturbed, by a prior county action (managed
slope requirement) — yes, the original steep slopes within the approved development area were approved
by Albemarle county for impacts with the approved site plan. A critical slopes waiver was approved by
the County staff for the project.
7. The slopes are identified as a resource in the comprehensive plan (preserved slopes) — yes, the steep
slopes on the property as mapped in 2014 are shown as greenspace areas in the Comprehensive plan.
However, as noted above in the other conditions, these slopes do not have the characteristics of preserved
slopes and should not be classified as resource areas in the comprehensive plan.
8. The slopes are of significant value to the entrance corridor overlay district (preserved slope requirement)
— no, this condition does not apply to the steep slopes on this property. The property is not located in an
Entrance Corridor overlay district and does not impact this overlay district.
9. The slopes have been preserved by a prior county action (preserved slope requirement) — no, the
preserved steep slopes within the previously approved development area have not been preserved by a
prior county action. On the contrary, the steep slopes within this development area proposed to be
impacted were previously approved for impacts by the county for the approved site plan, which has
expired.
71Page
In exhibit 4, the overall preserved steep slopes, as identified by the Albemarle County GIS, have been shown and
delineated on the development plan. The total critical slopes within the proposed area of disturbance are 48,740
SF. The original critical slopes within the disturbed area from the expired approved site plan of 1997 were
41,820 sf, as shown in Exhibit 2. With the rough grading of the site in 1997, the overall critical slopes on the
property increased by 6,920 sf.
Based on the field run topo, the critical slopes within the development area have been field verified. Exhibit 5
illustrates the field verified preserved steep slopes within the proposed development area for the project. The
total field verified preserved steep slopes are 35,905 sf. This is a decrease of 12,835 sf, or 25% of the preserved
steep slopes based on the Albemarle County GIS analysis of the site within the development area. However, it
will be necessary to disturb the majority of the remaining 35,905 sf of the field verified preserved steep slopes
within the proposed development area for the building and parking for the proposed apartment building. Exhibit
6 illustrates the building and parking envelopes overlaid on the existing topography and preserved steep slopes.
VIL Conclusion
As summarized in the narrative, the developer is seeking a rezoning map amendment to amend the steep slopes
within the previously approved development area of a final site plan that has expired. The site was graded, based
on an approved site plan from 1997, and created steep slopes across the site that match the proposed
development plan for the apartment building and parking lot. The developer would like to continue with the
project now that there is a demand for the apartment units. They are requesting a zoning amendment to remove
the preserved slopes within the development area on the property, changing these steep slopes to managed
slopes. The property would then be developed, once a new final site plan and VSMP plan is approved, meeting
the requirements of developing on managed slopes. These existing steep slopes have more characteristics
matching the managed slope requirements as opposed to the criteria for preserved slopes. In addition, the
creation of the steep slopes within the development area is tied to an approved site plan and land disturbance
permit. The steep slopes within the development area on the property should be re-classified as managed slopes
with this rezoning application for the continuation of the apartment building and parking lot.
8 1 P a g e
ZMA — Application Plan
Skyline Ridge Apartment Rezoning Amendment Narrative
r r 11 1 --
4800 E EXHIBIT #1: EXISTING CONDITIONS - ORIGINAL SITE PLAN
7
ORIGINAL SITE LEGEND
PLAN IS FOR - LIMITS OF PROPERTY
REFERENCE ONLY
-72
/ I \ � \ ��OiEb7l1M119� � - amR-: �, '�`es-'�.✓ / / - z
\ ` � __ ,\ . \�� \^ � 19(,AOIEi _ � ,�- �>^ - � I: •,cart, 'oar
4950E
\wpm"♦
Ld
""�iw."OO1 / \ \l iu _ / L �� '/'r"s 6 ,f ✓•..�''..r /i ii'ii ` •J L Q
Ld
V A v-wM`v-iii gain / �s • - \ _ _ , i> // / / / { �. (/i i'
5100E +
//. r / / g0
I �''
y
i
.` \I •.\ F _ -.. ,SwPE5eN 1N�moP�Rt�i / x ✓' /'/� x� .. - / /I I + / / / /, LLj W
4-/ /' /� /./ Z. 0
•' - `���\, ' '�'"�� _ ._.. _ �i,// // i// / /- // // �/ // / / // / / 1 Il 11 �� /// l J ...�
,j' - L�\�-OEA10tJSN-E%I C-CiRikl-.� �� /i/� /'"/' // // /� // //// //// //� - I y �q ./ // i"- �m
\ IN C00 ➢ON M1TH /cCiA AND RWW�Sh CLEAR -CND f. UG,Ex(I;S27Jmb '�j6�I.IiND$ / / / F 'how caM1
WA TANKS TO, BE-AVIJLABIEi�/ TQ-GMI NC D GRADING / / Y�'tl Q -�
nuES a No coNSTRUCTION / / / / / / �' �$ GRAPHIC SCALE60
Q
-Nts EARTH XCAVATION SHALL' �i i� / / // // / / / / / f`/ /
�+ `� JAKE -OVER
16' WA NE
__,—_\ /1\�APWtoVa ACSK� // i .✓ / / / / / / / 1/ / 1 /
/'..` 11 / ( IN FEET J. j
inch = 36 ft.
5250 E
WLIT ANDREMOVERE
710N OF WOOD RETALAINI G
/ _ — .. '•_ . i /` / / / /_ I GRADE TO PROVIDE
/ _leiOPER ROPE BEHIND WAL
—_—
\ ` a �.p e['er // / j_ -- S .n ies Ih � ASPHALT AND PAVEMENT.
PLA EG
--- / /"' J�� /%/-g—'..��r1 '-r •�\ Tg4AATCH E)7STNG S CTION.
_ / — j1°� I PROVIDE ALL SAFETY MEASURES
\" RpO. FOR VEHICLES 8 PEDESTRIANS
J� _ _ ____ / i v _ +i � j i /` -g 1. s•y4 I I°iwnv�u .i
fill
1 _ aXv
_ 5400E ! ../ \ _ ` / / o--/�'.o . � / /e• ..
YYq
/ - / — s% vAx rw ea ruw wce... a[xa uuM 1 Gt o
g/ ^' �'� y i r u wn fwsK) uwnmrt crosm'�r,-� ar I ° OR •:.;�
eea oc sm amxv.
nv..emo
fin f 38.97a
op
t
4800E--
;;\\ EXH BIT #2: ORIGINAL LIMITS
OF DISTURBA CE & CRITICAL SLOPE
IMPACTS
\0 �T"717
. _
ORIGINAL SITE
PLAN IS FOR -
LEGEND
REFERENCE ONLY
LIMITS OF PROPERTY
ORIGINAL LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE AREA
CRITICAL SLOPE IMPACTS
\ � am.:-: ^w-�'r✓/.
_
II l .� � �RROII;BtUM1�S� ,�,.^^'
y /
VA SOUTH 'ONf
MD
4950E
e.. � \� \��\\\ \\ _'1- � "'. T.r ".' '�s'�a r
/ . / /'i///// / / /
r✓✓
E ...
_
✓ .r'i.�`r/r'T,rl/ /
// / 1 I
.� ...��"r"'x y'r .r r'•r'''".^r'�3F"��s^""i:'"'
- " : yam'
xY s., r`r �„ 77 / / I
' r' r . fir ✓ r,. ' / "y7 l-/I /'
r�a' r,, r
x
.. � / ./- X .,rj/:_r J' _J
\\\\\ �r'r
� � /✓//�Z�✓�
aNr� �" :�'jrr' :'f
:✓r r� €yr''� / /j.
e
'.
rl-.v..
/
/ / \ r_
u \fir/ '��
�'}.�.� _ /-X�"X`- � �€.r'
'x r��'.,A..,.- iiii'i//'i
.,e'w�•
.b'✓� ter";.;
/
\,\;i \ ( ro.uoms / ti / \ • ,., jr 1 6E8ER6�` i' '�. �€yGy�•
� m..,., `#'� 1'/ri' �-�+Ss �� �^ �'E" �� l //'% /' /
/
a.
.,L �\��,• /
.
r _ _ _ - - - -' 'ORI01(uL rwroYcti i
tR GA SLOPEST / s
�I10] pp NAPACIEPl09&ALR -�
Y
/ / /
�^!' /
- s�:-.Y 'M / !/•
j` \ '---OEMOLI9H KISTI G"G`RAVEL CGES$OOZ
➢ON 1M-TH-ACSA AND'RWSh- CLEANf{ 1MDf.
UD 6T114G Wt10D AND$ /' /'/'
y�,y a
/ f �r 'I 1< F cad
GRAPHIC SCALE
WA TANKS TO BE'AVAILABIEi✓/ TOSIM
ML--TIYIES O NO CONSTRUCTION- -
Al! GRADING / / // /
I �y`Eow
$' /
60 0 30 EC
NS EARTH CAVATION SHALL -
TAW OVER =9TINc
16' WA HE MTHOUT OR' // r//i==.
A"OVAL ACSA:-
/ / /
? I I 1 /
( IN MET
// / .y/
// r/ // / /' /
I I 1 1 /
1 inch = 30 1L
5250E
//
WWT AND REMOVE AI G
/ / /\.= TKIN OF WOOD RETAINING
TO PROVIDE
/! GRADESLOPE
///'
�✓ OPENROPE BEHIND WA L
`
_ --- .IE s(u'sr '� // "--- S ' f'A Vies I SAWCUT AND REMOVE XIS'nNG
ASPHALT PAVEMENT. F EPLACE
Tg4AATCH EMSTNG S CTION.
I PROVIDE ALL SAFETY I EASURES
_
R?D. FOR VEHICLES 8 PEDESTRIANS
CUM
Jffill
✓ i
d_
SxE
5400E _-_____._— - - _ / ../. -'�/ r /_ .. "'E _� •?'
ORIGINAL SITE _ \ -- / 'A — .E, �. / a c #>Sx� ,�.�o/
\ / !' \
�g . 9'\'N
/ 'cam' / ass Erin aE arc
PLAN IS FOR _, �_ y_ / xm aawn «.....� Exo xN h 1 ogO
�':.�wnmrt ,wR
REFERENCE ONLY 4 \ � / / eM. oe seq w sm p?:Eu
Z
Q
Z
O
U
Lu
J aQ
Z
Z ace
p Lr.�
LLJ
N r'
D Qz
O �o
U�U
Lj LLj LLI
J
Z pQ
J �
�Y U m
V / 7 Q
EXHIBIT #3: ORIGINAL FINAL SITE PLAN AND GRADING PLAN
"_—
/ / '/
SCENIL T 91v IoA>V/
,/', , ///'
/S/CA
( 0\ \
—__--'—
KKEW\ \
�� �� l //
/
40//'CIjAPAIC
/' /'man
'
FUTURE WATER \
Imx
\ 1\6 \ \ \\ ___ -
C
_ _ _ _ -
'D.B. 1D7TJ.'PU. '/$9. TAT //'// /' �•�
Lj1T�, UNIVEgSNP HEIGH�15�' / / /
9s58 ACRES//'
// ,
'' er
/ / / /
\ _
/
WgRIF OAO,LG-_-_-_
- E%L IiSE: VNCINT- ..
. / ' / / Ci
/ / j/"
\
sE9n eJo --
-____---
\ --'--IT UEGRAVTSI JUTE MAT
cLng EEnn~
F
.
//
TOP-720.5 /
INV=714.8((1N)
\ - ____--
-__- {..,'. /,
'Ile/// J' �/' / -
/ ,/ / // /
Z
\ INVe713.0(OUT)
�
•r
a
`
a
_ SEE ARCR EHWSS TPK`
- -T WATER
/ "/ ',// /
I / I V
JZ
\ � PS P
e• A _ - ._ -..R
RCP \
9.6TORY (EE-682.5
L%PARXINQ„ _ � STfIY-Ml)
p11g
- c cnIXls..TYP.
B4 69070846710101N. 3)
IU Hf5 A]F ��yx�
'
O LL
�\` ��` -
\\•\.�
„� //
/ (J t(
/ / ^
( I Amp ApING�
r�ED
I /
___
\1
_ _�
M Hh_ 46 SIMIDMOS N�
`
1
I 1of
of
nn ___ __
-' PER wSA
V)>-
I•\ _� _
♦ \� _ _ -
r4' - P" PVC SAN SEW
LATTJdH,AACIICNSWS -
/% rSS
I l y
r /
jl\
VZ
A411 Py4I
eP ,/
1 / / , / I
QO
LLl LLI
-
`-��_
- -- _
T\
/ /
I I I I 1
ir
Owl
_ m �,
p\\
D
_ -' REi
- /
\
/
u
J
TL
JE.
/�^ Q J
7Q
WA
PA 4 . 1 E r0 TNx NL
/ , 1 9 a / Off SUE ASCMENTS I
\ m� qS V _ }/_
__�\�a�.
_ - \ \` _
_
/ /
/ I MIUx 3 \` I
J! xP.•
■
STD
/ /
� c � I /
-\f
R
/ /
'
TAPF
AM
6
Ax
x
___--"_
/
�.� \
/
/ 600
// -----' REET
/-0 __- /
/
RI.l3.
MTi
`� ____
\ �'\'
_/' / /' _ -
12147
1
`
'
\
IIp T
\ \ MET
epl
ORIGINAL I
\ \
a — —
. ' X,
''/i'Sg > �/ Y ROAD
�'
\� / / parFiA9 lot p xci
EMT.
'i
/
PLAN IS FOR
:
_PR4JFSLLIb117S-
` — —` 4.96 ACRES
i
REFERENCE ONLY
36.
/ / /
Mx
CRMECT l0
,/
51.
EIU6T.S/
LEGENDR—
!--'
D
,.
LIMITS OF PROPERTY'\
v
`N _ _ ___
`
/'
-' �_ '' / 'q'll
\6// 01' TE (30^X30') 562 TOPDI -647TE O�•X307
/
ORIGINAL LIMITS OF DIS RB E '.
'/''
,gam''
' � / IN firs.+x X IN
INV�6655. INV,
` /6 1 _
_ /
—
\_ __ --- 8. / U
OUT= 044.6 O
644.6 UT
TAX MAP 60, PARCEL 4006 BENCH
`
MMK '
U
CHARLOTTESNLLE INVESTMENT 1C" CHISLED 2 BONNET
BOLT
t
76-2A1
N/F RIVANNA WATER &
SEWER AUTHORRY
DB 1920 PG 482
C7
A-245.23'
R=237.00'
D-59'17'10'
CD=234.44'
CB-S 14.01'32' E
IMP 76-2A
N/F RIVANNA WATER &
SEWER AUTHORITY
DB 1920 PG 479
IMP 76-2
N/F WN/NG
DB 1967 PG 376 r
IBIT#4: ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT AREA WITH ALBEMAR LE COUNTY GIS PRESERVED SLOPES
---rMP-60-30A -
N/F tEWIS MOUMP&, _ LEGEND
LC
OB 3955 PG 380 LIMITS OF PROPERTY
PROPOSED AREA OF DISTURBANCE
----- ALBEMARLE COUNTY PRESERVED
STEEP SLOPES
-- _ FIELD SURVEY - TOPOGRAPHY
PROJECT LIMIT$ ajft�
4.96ACRES - Do 7.
TMP
60-40CB
WP COLONNADES, LLC
215,910 SF
4.957 AC
PROPOSED AREA /
OF DISTURBANCE
TMP 60-4007
N/F CHARLOTTESVILLE
INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
08 860 PG 568
VA SOUTH ZONF
� NAD 883
GRAPHIC SCALE
60 0 60
LAN
? RO/I. ( 1N FEET )
- I inch 30 fL.
' IMP 60-4006
N/F CHARLOTTESVILLE
--��- INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
D8 860 PG 568
EXHIBIT #5: ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT AREA WITH FIELD VERIFIED PRESERVED SLOPES
3
60_30A
u a N/F LEW/S MOUNTAW, _. LLC LEGEND
v
OB 3955 PG 380 LIMITS OF PROPERTY
PROPOSED AREA OF DISTURBANCE
----- ALBEMARLE COUNTY PRESERVED
STEEP SLOPES
-- FIELD SURVEY - TOPOGRAPHY
PR096AICBS !MITS/•90� d ---- ___ FIELD SURVEY If FIELD VERIFIED
'FI•oo.Dl --- PRESERVED STEEP SLOPES
N -
TMP 76-2A TMP
N/F RI✓ANN4 WATER & 60-4OCB
MP 76-2A1 SEWER AUTHORITY
N/F RI✓ANNA WATER & DB 1920 PG 479 WP COLONNADES, LLC
SEWER AUTHORRY 215,910 SF
DB 1920 PG 482 4.957 AC
PROPOSED AREA l..'
OF DISTURBANCE
Cy
9�
c `p
A SoUr,
A=245.23' �. 4�'b+e vzO'L�
R=237.00' 83
D=59'1
CD=234.44' \
CBS 14*014'O1.32' £ IMP 60-4007
\ O S N/CIE
P INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
0 860 P 568
E B 860 PG 568
S 05 F D CRES)
9 A I
0
TM 7P 6-2
N/F WNING
DB 1967 PG 376
O.
GRAPHIC SCALE
ao 0 60
LAN
1N FEET )
- I inch 30 fL.
' IMP 60-4006
N/F CHARLOTTESVILLE
--��— INVESTMENT PROPERTES
DB 860 PO 568
Pr
TMP 76-2A '
NAF RIVANNA WATER &
MP 76-2A1
SEWER AUTHORITY
N/F RIVANNA WATER &
DB 1920 PG 479
SEWER AUTHORITY
DB 1920 PG 482
CI
A-245.23'
R=237.00'
D-59'17'10'
CD=234.44'
CB-S 14'01'32' E
IIAE
D8
r
PROTECT LIMITS
4.96 ACRES
EXHIBIT #6: PROPOSED APPLICATION PLAN WITH PRESERVED STEEP SLOPE IMPACTS
IMP 45Q-30A
NIF LEWIS MOUNTAIN
LLC - _ --� LEGEND
DB 3955 PG 380 - UM TS OF PROPERTY
ORIGINAL SITE
PLAN IS FOR
REFERENCE ONLY
lw
TMP
60-40CB
Tnr.oNNADES,LLC
215,910 SF
_ 4.93Z ACPROPO
---
---
FDIST R AREA
OF DISTURBANCE
_
s _fi
4
j
sea-f_ a�rtnwn'!xr xro. uxa+
' —_ y enV seu xu iar eo, rrcn .°cs' e'"eii au� °
" `+` IMP 60-4006- -s°F1R .nrx °�°.
' N/F CHARLOTTESVILLE
INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
OB 860 PO 568
z
Z
O
IMP 60-4007
N/F CHARLOTTESVILLE
INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
08a860 PG 568
O�5
F W
Paz
020
Uku
LLJ w
ocr
za�
5YW
mum
(A>¢
I
PROPOSED AREA OF DISTURBANCE
_ALBEMARLE COUNTY PRESERVED
STEEP SLOPES
FIELD SURVEY - TOPOGRAPHY
® PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE
PROPOSED PARKING ENVELOPE
FIELD SURVEY / FIELD VERIFIED
PRESERVED STEEP SLOPES
[=3OPEN SPACE GREENSPACE TO
REMAIN (APPROX. 3.0+/-ACREES)
60%+/- OF THE SITE
ZF SOUTH <ONE
VAD83
CR:\PHTC 3G\T.F
60
I
( IN FEET )
I inch SO fL.
EXHIBIT #7: PROPOSED MANAGED SLOPES & EXISTING PRESERVED SLOPES
IMP 76-2A
N/F RIVANNA WATER
TAk, 76-2A1 SEWER AUTHORITY
N/F RIVAAINA WATER & DB 1920 PG 479
SEWER UTHOR/TY
DB 192 PC 482
CI
A-245.23'
R=237.00'
D-59'17'10'
CD=234.44'
CB-S 14'01'32' E
IMP 60-30A
N/F LEWIS MOUNTAIN,
LLC
DB 3956 PG 380
TO REMAIN
TMP
60-40CB
WP COLONNADES, LLC
215,910 SF
4.957 AC
TMP 60-4007
N/F CHARLOTTESVILLE
INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
08 860 PG 568
am wor
IMP 76�2
�jl� rDB 1967 PG 376
LEGEND
LIMITS OF PROPERTY
PROPOSED AREA OF DISTURBANCE
PRESERVED SLOPES OUTSIDE THE
AREA OF DISTURBANCE TO REMAIN
(EXISTING PRESERVED SLOPES TO REMAIN)
FIELD SURVEY - TOPOGRAPHY
PRESERVED SLOPES WITHIN THE AREA
OF DISTURBANCE PROPOSED
MANAGED SLOPES
VA SOUTH ZONE
� NAD 83
GRAPHIC SCALE
C( 0 60
Olp�,
? RO/T. ( 1N FEET )
- I inch 30 fL.
'- IMP 60-4006
N/F CHARLOTTESVILLE
--��— INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
D8 860 PG 568
EXHIBIT #5: ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT AREA WITH FIELD VERIFIED PRESERVED SLOPES
TMP 76-2A1
N/E RIVANNA WATER &
SEWER AUTHORITY
DB 1920 PC 462
Cl
A=145.23'
R=237.00'
0-59' 17' 10"
CD=234.44'
CB-S 14'01$2" E
TMP 76-2A
N/F RIVANNA WATER &
SEWER AUTHORITY
DB 1920 PC 479
TM 7P 6-2
N/F VINING
DE? 1967 PC 375 _m
PROJECT LIMITS
4.96 ACRES
TMP-60_-30A
N/F LEWIS MOUNTAIN,_
LLC
DB 3955 PC 380
t
TMP
60-40CB
WP COLONNADES, LLC
215,910 SF
4.957 AC
700' Contour
n i I w I
TMP 60-4006
N/F CHARLOTTESVILLE
INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
OB 860 PG 568
I
I
LEGEND
LIMITS OF PROPERTY
PROPOSED AREA OF DISTURBANCE
_ALBEMARLE COUNTY PRESERVED
STEEP SLOPES
FIELD SURVEY -TOPOGRAPHY
FIELD SURVEY / FIELD VERIFIED
PRESERVED STEEP SLOPES
TMP 60-4007
N/F CHARLOTTESVILLE
INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
OB 860 PC 568
GRAPHIC SCALE
60 fi0
Oozo
dR� 440 ,
IN FEET I
I inch 30 fL.
EXHIBIT #6: PROPOSED APPLICATION PLAN WITH PRESERVED STEEP SLOPE IMPACTS
76-2A1
N/F RIVANNA WATER &
SEWER AUTHORITY
DB 1920 PC 482
c1
A-245.23'
R=237.00'
D-59'17'10' 1
CD=234.44'
CB—S 14'O1'32- £
TMP 76-2A
N/F RIVANNA WATER &
SEWER AUTHORITY
DB 1920 PG 479
NIF LEWIS M6UNTA
LTC
DB 3955 PG 380
PROJECT LIMITS
4.96 ACRES
TMP
60-4OCB
jKp munNIVADES. LLC
215,910 SF
PROPOSED AREA
OF DISTURBANCE
1 3y, 1s
_ 1
jr,
M%T:r�
Ii\2�
I
xwi �-
.4 41 A-!xr
ra wv w. nwcn wu
TMP 60-10C6---mow
N/F CHARLOTTESVILLE
INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
OB 860 PO 568
1
ORIGINAL SITE
PLAN IS FOR
REFERENCE ONLY
z
t—
Z
O
MM
iP 60-4007
N/F CHARLOTTESVILLE
INVESTMENT PROPERDES
DB 860 PG 568
�crs
Fw
r02
::) 2
a
020
Uk0
Lj
ZaQ
7
XW
yvm
LEGEND
LIMITS OF PROPERTY
PROPOSED AREA OF DISTURBANCE
_ALBEMARLE
COUNTY PRESERVED
STEEP SLOPES
FIELD SURVEY - TOPOGRAPHY
®
PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE
PROPOSED PARKING ENVELOPE
FIELD SURVEY / FIELD VERIFIED
PRESERVED STEEP SLOPES
OPEN SPACE /GREENSPACE TO
REMAIN (APPR0X. 3.0+/-ACRES)
50%+/- OF THE SITE
*approximate
location
D83
CR 1PRiC 3G\i.F.
fi0
I
IN FEET )
I inch 30 fL.
/--
0
LAND USE MAP: WESTERN NEIGHBORHOODS
1. PWIS Are,,
A+
WL
N
r
L i
ZMA 2021=12 Skyline Ridge Apts
/i
� n
\\` er
i
>Ch Mottesville
1
R Vc
60-31 O H
d03060-3 1-1 IVYy d
Od
60-30B�F
'Yj/`? 60-4005
0-34A
pd, .r, /�i0-40AJ�
4Cr x / \
nirersity Heights
hA
y
60-40Cs
•l
60-30A -'LP
76-3B
76-2
76-3