HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-02-14
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FIN A L
FEBRUARY 14, 2007
COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
2:00 P.M. - ROOM 235
1. Call to Order.
2. 2:00 p.m. Work Session: Business Plan (CIP) (continued from February 7, 2007).
3. 3:00 p.m. - Tour of Newly Renovated Community Development Offices.
4. 3:30 p.m. - Joint meetina with School Board
a. 3:30 p.m. - 3:45 p.m. - Co-location and Development of Public Facilities.
b. 3:45 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. - Revised Calendar for CIP Process.
c. 4:00 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. - Living Wage Report.
5. 5:15 p.m. - Recess.
6:00 P.M., AUDITORIUM
6. Call to Order.
7. Pledge of Allegiance.
8. Moment of Silence.
9. From the Public: Matters Not Listed for Public Hearing on the Agenda.
10. From the Board: Committee Reports and Matters Not Listed on the Agenda.
11. Consent Agenda (on next sheet).
12. Public Hearina: 2007/08-2012/13 Six Year Secondary Road Plan.
13. Public Hearina: Water Protection Ordinance. Illicit Discharaes and Connections.
14. PROJECT: SP-2006-025. Kina Familv Vineyards - Winery Expansion (Sians #41. 43). PROPOSAL:
Expansion of existing farm winery to allow two special events per week (beyond the 12 events per year permitted
by right). (Applicant requests indefinite deferral)
15. Public Hearina: PROJECT: ZMA-2005-007. Haden Place (Sians #12,13). PROPOSAL: Rezone 6.69 acres
from R-2 Residential (2 units/acre) to NMD Neighborhood Model District - residential (3 - 34 units/acre) mixed with
commercial, service and industrial uses for 20 single family homes and 14 townhomes. PROFFERS: Yes.
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE/DENSITY: Community of Crozet; CT-3 Urban Edge: single
family residential (net 3.5-6.5 units/acre) supporting uses such as religious institutions and schools and other
small-scale non-residential uses. ENTRANCE CORRIDOR: No. LOCATION: Between Haden (Rt. 1209) & Killdeer
Lanes (Rt. 1215), south of Jarman's Gap Road. TAX MAP/PARCEL: TM 55 Parcel 69 & TM 56 Parcel 9.
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: White Hall.
16. Public Hearina: PROJECT: SP-2006-034. North Pointe - Stream Crossina (Sian #8): PROPOSED: Fill in the
floodplain of Flat Branch Creek for a road crossing to provide access for residential development. ZONING
CATEGORY/GENERAL USAGE: Planned Development Mixed Commercial with which allows large-scale
commercial uses; and residential by special use permit (15 units/ acre). A special use permit exists for residential
use. SECTION: 30.3.05.2.1. of the Zoning Ordinance which allows for fill in the floodplain. COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN LAND USE/DENSITY: Urban Density Residential- residential (6.01-34 units/acre) and supporting uses
such as religious institutions, schools, commercial, office and service uses. ENTRANCE CORRIDOR: Yes.
LOCATION: East Side of Route 29 North (Seminole Trail) across from Lewis and Clark Drive. TAX MAP/PARCEL:
32-22K. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Rivanna.
17. From the Board: Committee Reports and Matters Not Listed on the Agenda.
18. Adjourn.
CONSENT AGENDA
FOR APPROVAL:
11.1 Approval of Minutes: June 7, June 14 and September 13, 2006.
11 .2 SOCA South Fork Expansion - Request to amend the Albemarle County Service Authority Jurisdictional Area to
provide sewer service to Tax Map 46, Parcels 22 and 22C, located adjacent to the SOCA sports facility on Polo
Grounds Road.
11.3 Resolution - Acceptance of FY 2004-05 and FY 2005-06 landowners' offers to sell conservation easements.
11.4 Resolution Authorizing Funding for the Regional Transit Authority Plan.
11.5 Resolution of the Industrial Development Authority authorizing the issuance of Colorado Health Facilities Authority
revenue bonds, pursuant to the Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act, in an amount not to exceed
$51,000,000 for the benefit of Global Country of World Peace.
11.6 Resolution of the Industrial Development Authority authorizing the issuance of revenue bonds, pursuant to the
Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act, in an amount not to exceed $45,000,000 for Westminster-
Canterbury of the Blue Ridge.
FOR INFORMATION:
11.7 FY 2007 Second Quarter Financial Report.
11.8 Copy of letter dated December 29, 2006, from John Shepherd, Manager of Zoning Administration, to Brian S. Ray,
Inc., re: OFFICIAL DETERMINA TlON OF PARCELS AND DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS -- Tax Map 120, Parcel 16-
Scottsville Magisterial District (Property of Margaret R. Van Clief Revocable Trust) Section 10.3.1.
ACTIONS
Board of Supervisors Meetina of February 14, 2007
February 15, 2007
1. Call to order.
. Meeting called to order at 2:05 p.m., by the
Chairman, Mr. Boyd. All BOS members
were present. Also present were Bob
Tucker, Larry Davis and Ella Carev.
2. Work Session: Business Plan (CIP)
. HELD.
3. Tour of Nowly Renovatod Community Do'.<elop
mont Offices.
. Due to time constraints, removed from
aaenda.
JOINT MEETING WITH SCHOOL BOARD
. All School Board members were present.
Also oresent was Pam Moran.
4a. Co-location and Development of Public Facilities. Tom Foley/Diane Behrens: Bring additional
. Staff to come back with specific details and information to joint boards.
how the concept would work relative to the
proposal from the Jefferson Institute of
Lifelona Learnina (JILL).
4b. Revised Calendar for CIP process. Clerk: Include joint meeting on Board's
. Included in the process, a joint meeting with schedule.
the School Board on December 5th to review
the CIP Oversight Committee's recommend-
dations.
4c. Living Wage Report.
. Decided to not move forward with setting a
minimum livinq waqe at this time.
5. Recess.
. The meetinq recessed at 5:36 p.m.
6. Call to Order.
. Meeting was called back to order at 6:06
p.m. by the Chairman, Mr. Boyd. All BOS
members were present. Also present were
Bob Tucker, Larry Davis, and Meaaan Hov.
9. From the Public: Matter Not Listed for Public
Hearing on the Agenda.
. There were none.
10. From the Board: Committee Reports and Matters
Not Listed on the Agenda.
Dennis Rooker
. Discussed a meeting he and Mr. Boyd had
with representatives from the City regarding
transit funding for the year and price of
transit routes in the County. They were able
to establish a long term formula on which
transit will be priced to the County. Schedule on April 4th agenda.
Sallv Thomas: Clerk:
. Requested an update from Rivanna on
sewer system capacity be scheduled on a
future agenda.
. Requested a letter be written to Aooalachian
Power Company regarding clearing of
debris after tree trimming under their power
lines.
David Wyant:
. Asked that this agenda item be moved
before "comments from the public" on future
aaendas.
11.2 SOCA South Fork Expansion. Clerk: Schedule on regular agenda for April
. DEFERRED until April 11, 2007 to coincide 11 , 2007.
with special use permit request.
11.3 Resolution - Acceptance of FY 2004-05 and FY Clerk: Forward resolutions to David Benish,
2005-06 landowners' offer to sell conservation Ches Goodall, and County Attorney's Office.
easements. (Attachments 1 and 2)
. ADOPTED the attached resolution, by a vote
of 6:0, accepting FY 2004-05 applicant's offer
(from Rock Mills Land Trust) to sell a
conservation easement to the County, for the
price specified and subject to the terms and
conditions contained in the proposed deed of
easement, and authorize the County
Executive to sign the final deed of easement
for each property.
. ADOPTED the attached resolution, by a vote
of 6:0, accepting FY 2005-06 applicants'
offers (from Hook and Chester) to donate
and sell a conservation easement to the
County, respectively, for the price (Chester)
specified and subject to the terms and
conditions contained in the proposed deeds
of easement, and authorize the County
Executive to sign the final deed of easement
for each property.
11.4 Resolution Authorizing Funding for the Regional Clerk: Forward resolution to Harrison Rue
Transit Authority Plan. and County Attorney's Office. (Attachment 3)
. ADOPTED resolution by a vote of 6:0. Staff OMB: Schedule on next budget amendment.
to prepare appropriation to come forward as
budget amendment.
11.5 Resolution of the IDA authorizing the issuance of Clerk: Forward resolution to Daniel Siegel,
Colorado Health Facilities Authority revenue Bond Counsel. (Attachment 4)
bonds, pursuant to the Industrial Development
and Revenue Bond Act, in an amount not to
exceed $51,000,000 for the benefit of Global
Country of World Peace.
. ADOPTED resolution by a vote of 6:0.
11.6 Resolution of the IDA authorizing the issuance of Clerk: Forward resolution to David
revenue bonds, pursuant to the lAD and Revenue Richardson, Bond Counsel. (Attachment 5)
Bond Act, in an amount not to exceed
$45,000,000 for Westminster-Canterbury of the
Blue Ridge.
. ADOPTED resolution by a vote of 6:0.
12. 2007/08-2012/13 Six Year Secondary Road Plan. Clerk: Forward to Juandiego Wade and David
. APPROVED the County Priority List of Benish to coordinate with VDoT.
Secondary Road Improvements, as
modified, with the addition of Berkmar
2
Bridge, and Maxfield Road as a Rural Rustic
Road for improvement in the current year;
and AUTHORIZED the County Executive to
sign the VDOT Secondary System
Construction Program for Albemarle County
consistent with the County's Priority List.
13. Water Protection Ordinance. Illicit Discharges Clerk: Forward ordinance to George
and Connections. Shad man , Greg Harper and County Attorney's
. ADOPTED the attached ordinance. office. (Attachment 6)
14. King Family Vineyards - Winery Expansion. Clerk: Reschedule and advertise for public
. INDEFINTL Y DEFERRED at the applicant's hearing when ready to come back to Board.
request.
15. ZMA-2005-007. Haden Place (Signs #13,13) Clerk: Set out proffers. (Attachment 7)
. APPROVED ZMA 2005-0007, by a vote of
6:0, subject to the applicant's proffers, Code
of Development and Application Plan.
16. SP-2006-034. North Pointe - Stream Crossing Clerk: Set out conditions of approval.
(Sign #8). (Attachment 8)
. APPROVED SP-2006-034 subject to the 11
conditions recommended by the Planning
Commission, with conditions #9 and #10
amended at the Board meetinq.
17. From the Board: Committee Reports and Matters
Not Listed on the Agenda.
Dennis Rooker:
. Confirmed that staff would invite Com cast to
speak before the Board.
David Wyant:
. Asked if the issue of bonus density and
affordable housing would be coming back
for more discussion. Mr. Rooker
commented that the issue needs to be
resolved.
Sallv Thomas:
. She would like for County staff to get to the
point where it can require or request
applicants to follow the liahting ordinance.
18. Adiourn. At 9:17 p.m., the Board adiourned.
Attachment 1 - Resolution accepting FY 2004-05 landowners' offers to sell conservation easements
Attachment 2 - Resolution accepting FY 2005-06 landowners' offers to sell conservation easements
Attachment 3 - Resolution - Regional Transit Authority Plan
Attachment 4 - Resolution - IDA - Global Country of World Peace
Attachment 5 - Resolution - IDA - Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge
Attachment 6 - Ordinance - Water Protection
Attachment 7 - ZMA-2005-007 Haden Place Proffers
Attachment 8 - Conditions of Approval
3
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING OFFER TO SELL
A CONSERVATION EASEMENT UNDER THE ACE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the County has received an offer to sell a conservation easement under the ACE
Program from the owner of the following properties:
Rock Mills Land Trust
TM 74, Parcel 19
TM 74. Parcel 20
Total
(136.540 acres)
( 9.000 acres)
(145.540 acres)
WHEREAS, the owner offered to sell a conservation easement on the respective properties to the
County for a fixed purchase price, subject to terms and conditions set forth in the proposed deed of
easement enclosed with the County's invitation to offer to sell, subject to any further revisions deemed
necessary by the County Attorney and agreed to by the owner.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts the offer to
sell a conservation easement for each of the properties described above, and authorizes the County
Executive to execute all documents necessary for completing the acquisitions.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors hereby directs the County Attorney to
send copies of this resolution to the owner(s) of the properties identified herein, or their contact persons.
4
ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING OFFER TO SELL
A CONSERVATION EASEMENT UNDER THE ACE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the County has received an offer to sell a conservation easement under the ACE
Program from the owner(s) of the following properties:
Hook
TM 84, Parcel 11 B "A"
TM 84. Parcel 11 B "B"
Total
(114.000 acres)
( 7.000 acres)
(121.000 acres)
( 22.011 acres)
( 2.450 acres)
( 52.000 acres)
( 76.461 acres)
Chester
TM 65, Parcel 11
TM 65, Parcel 11 B
TM 65. Parcel 11 C
Total
WHEREAS, the owner(s) offered to sell a conservation easement on the respective properties to
the County for a fixed purchase price, subject to terms and conditions set forth in the proposed deed of
easement enclosed with the County's invitation to offer to sell, subject to any further revisions deemed
necessary by the County Attorney and agreed to by the owner; and
WHEREAS, the owner of the Hook property has advised the County that she desires to donate
the conservation easement.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts the offer to
donate (Hook) and to sell (Chester) a conservation easement for each of the properties described above,
and authorizes the County Executive to execute all documents necessary for completing the acquisitions.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors hereby directs the County Attorney to
send copies of this resolution to the owner(s) of the properties identified herein, or their contact persons.
5
ATTACHMENT 3
Resolution Authorizing Funding for the
Regional Transit Authority Plan
WHEREAS, The Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Policy
Board has authorized Harrison Rue, Executive Director of the Thomas Jefferson Planning District
Commission (TJPDC) as fiscal agent for the MPO, to execute and file an application to the Department of
Rail and Public Transportation, Commonwealth of Virginia, hereafter referred to as "Department," for a
grant of financial assistance in the amount of $100,000 to defray the costs for the development of the
Regional Transit Authority Plan (RT AP) and to accept from the Department grants in such amounts as
may be awarded, and to authorize MPO Staff to furnish to the Department such documents and other
information as may be required for processing the grant request; and
WHEREAS, a grant of financial assistance from the Department requires a local match of 10%
and the 10% local match for this grant of financial assistance is $10,000; and
WHEREAS, the costs of the local match of $10,000 will be distributed equally between the City of
Charlottesville and County of Albemarle, with each contributing $5,000; and
WHEREAS, The Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Policy
Board has approved the Regional Transit Authority Plan (RTAP) Scope of Work budget estimate with
$100,000 funded by the Department and $100,000 funded by combined equal contribution from the
County of Albemarle and City of Charlottesville; and
WHEREAS, The Charlottesville-Albemarle MPO Policy Board has recommended that the County
of Albemarle and City of Charlottesville contribute $50,000 each to the RTAP which includes $5,000 from
each jurisdiction to fund the 10% local match required by the Department.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the County of Albemarle will provide funds in the
amount of $50,000, to contribute to the Regional Transit Authority Plan, of which $5,000 will be used to
match the state funds in the ratio as required and $45,000 will fund its share of the remaining costs of the
approved Scope of Work approved by unanimous vote of the MPO Policy Board.
6
ATTACHMENT 4
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF COLORADO HEALTH
FACILITIES AUTHORITY REVENUE BONDS IN A MAXIMUM AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF
$51,000,000 FOR THE PURPOSES OF FINANCING AND REFINANCING THE COSTS OF
ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT, RENOVATION, REMODELING, FURNISHING
AND EQUIPPING OF CERTAIN HEALTH FACILITIES AND CERTAIN OTHER MATTERS RELATING
THERETO
WHEREAS, there has been described to the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle
County, Virginia (the "Albemarle Authority") in a public hearing on behalf of the County of Albemarle,
Virginia ("Albemarle County") the plan of financing of Global Country of World Peace (the "Borrower"),
an Iowa nonprofit corporation exempt from taxation under Section 501 (c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended (the "Code") which has its principal place of business at 1900 Capital Blvd.,
Fairfield, Iowa 52566;
WHEREAS, the Borrower has requested that the Colorado Health Facilities Authority (the
"Colorado Issuer") issue its revenue bonds (the "Bonds") in one or more series in a maximum amount
of a total of $51,000,000;
WHEREAS, the Borrower has represented that the proceeds of the Bonds will be used to: (a)
finance the costs of acquisition, construction, improvement, renovation, remodeling, furnishing and
equipping of certain health and health related support facilities of the Borrower, including but not limited to
(i) regional peace center facilities to be located on approximately 450 acres at 137 Waldemere Road,
Livingston Manor, New York; on approximately 1160 combined acres at 20043 70 Road, Lebanon
Kansas and 17022 100 Road, Smith Center, Kansas; on approximately 668 acres at 160 Echota and Old
Fort Road, Asheville, North Carolina; on approximately 522 acres at 00000 Lost Valley Road, 1000 feet
southeast of the corner of Blackwood Drive and Canebrake Road, Boulevard, California; and on
approximately 52 acres at 21650 Ballenger Road, Cedarpines Park, California; and (ii) local peace center
facilities at the approximately three acres adjacent to the northern boundary of 1068 Elkton Drive,
Colorado Springs, Colorado; 5504 Edson Road, N. Bethesda, Maryland; 380 Parkland Plaza, Ann Arbor,
Michigan; 399 Ruth Street S., St. Paul, Minnesota; 968 154th Street, Pleasant Dale, Nebraska; 1929
Greentree Road, Cherry Hill, New Jersey; 9450 Transit Road, E. Amherst, New York; 1669 Pittsford
Victor Road, Perinton, New York; .28 miles west of Old Willets Path on the south side of Route 25,
Smithtown, Long Island, New York; 999 Rocky Ridge, Asheville, North Carolina; 971 Beaver Grade Road,
Coraopolis, Pennsylvania; 3254 East Main Road, Portsmouth, Rhode Island; One Alpha Lane, Hixson,
Tennessee; 7901 Centre Park Drive, Austin, Texas; Whitewood Road at the SW corner of Whitewood
and Oak Forest Drive, in Charlottesville, Virginia (Lot B, Div of Parcel 26, with a proposed street address
of 109 Whitewood Road) (collectively, the "Facilities"); (b) fund capitalized interest on the Bonds, if
any; (c) fund any required debt service reserve fund; and (d) pay certain costs of issuance of the Bonds,
including initial costs of any credit enhancement. Each local peace center or related facility will consist of
an approximately 12,000 square foot two-story facility in which the Borrower intends to conduct health
and wellness activities or related support activities. Each regional peace center will consist of at least
one, but not more than four of the same approximately 12,000 square foot facility where the Borrower
intends to conduct health and wellness activities or related support activities. No more than $10,000,000
of the proceeds of the Bonds is expected to be spent in any single location. No more than $3,500,000 of
the proceeds of the Bonds will be used to finance Facilities located at Whitewood Road at the SW corner
of Whitewood and Oak Forest Drive, in Charlottesville, Virginia (Lot B, Div of Parcel 26, with a proposed
street address of 109 Whitewood Road). The Borrower will be the owner and operator of the Facilities
and will be the party responsible for all costs of the Facilities and all costs of the issuance of and debt
service on the Bonds;
7
WHEREAS, the Facilities located on Whitewood Road at the corner of Whitewood and Oak
Forest Drive, in Charlottesville, Virginia (Lot B, Div of Parcel 26, with a proposed street address of 109
Whitewood Road) (the "Albemarle Facilities") to be financed or refinanced are located within the
territorial limits of Albemarle County;
WHEREAS, that there has been published, at least 14 days prior to the date of the meeting of the
Albemarle Authority in which the public hearing was held, in a newspaper of general circulation within
Albemarle County, a notice that a public hearing regarding the Bonds would be held on the date thereof;
and
WHEREAS, such public hearing was conducted on February 13, 2007, by the Albemarle
Authority on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, at which time an opportunity was
provided to interested parties to present arguments both for and against the issuance of the Bonds; and
WHEREAS, the issuance of the Bonds by the Colorado Issuer will not constitute a debt or pledge
of the faith and credit of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Albemarle County or the Albemarle Authority;
WHEREAS, the Borrower described the benefits to Albemarle County and requested the
Albemarle Authority recommend to the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County its approval of and
concurrence with the issuance of the Bonds by the Colorado Issuer in such amounts as may be
necessary to finance the cost of the Facilities;
WHEREAS, the Albemarle Authority after public hearing, has recommended that the Board of
Supervisors approve of and concur with the issuance of the Bonds by the Colorado Issuer in such
amounts as may be necessary to finance the cost of the Facilities,
WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Code provides that both the governmental unit having
jurisdiction over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of private activity bonds is
located and the governmental unit on behalf of which such bonds are issued must approve the issuance
of the bonds after public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Albemarle Facilities included within the Facilities to be financed through the
issuance of the Bonds is located in Albemarle County and the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County
constitutes the highest elected governmental unit of Albemarle County; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
1. The Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County following the public hearing by the Albemarle
Authority on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, hereby approves and concurs
with the financing of the Albemarle Facilities and the issuance of the Bonds by the Colorado Issuer for
the benefit of the Borrower, as required by Section 147(f) of the Code.
2. The approval of and concurrence with the issuance of the Bonds, as required by said Section 147(f)
of the Code, do not constitute an endorsement of the Bonds or the creditworthiness of the Borrower
or otherwise indicate that the Albemarle Facilities possesses any economic viability. The issuance of
the Bonds by the Colorado Issuer will not constitute a debt or pledge of the faith and credit of the
Commonwealth of Virginia, the Albemarle Authority or Albemarle County, Virginia. Neither the
Commonwealth of Virginia nor any political subdivision thereof, including the Albemarle Authority and
Albemarle County, Virginia shall be obligated to pay the Bonds, or the interest thereon, or other costs
incident thereto, and neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth of Virginia
nor any political subdivision thereof, including the Albemarle Authority and Albemarle County,
Virginia, will be pledged to payment of principal of such Bonds or the interest thereon or other costs
incidental thereto.
8
3. The Chairman or Vice Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, County Administrator, Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors or other County officials are hereby authorized and directed to take such action
and to execute and deliver such certificates or documents which they deem necessary or advisable in
order to carry out, give effect to and comply with terms and intent of this resolution.
4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
9
ATTACHMENT 5
RESOLUTION
OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia ("Authority"), has
considered the application of Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge ("Borrower") requesting the
issuance of the Authority's revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $45,000,000 ("Bonds") to assist
the Borrower in (a) refinancing all or a portion of the Authority's $69,815,000 Residential Care Facility
Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2001A issued on October 12, 2001 to finance or refinance various of
capital projects at the Borrower's continuing care retirement community ("Facility"), located at 250
Pantops Mountain Drive in Albemarle County, Virginia (b) financing additional capital improvements to the
Facility, and (c) financing a debt service reserve fund and costs of issuance for the bonds (collectively,
the "Project"), and has held a public hearing on February 13, 2007.
WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"),
provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of private activity bonds and over
the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of private activity bonds is located must approve
the issuance of the bonds;
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Albemarle, Virginia
("County"); the Project is located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle,
Virginia ("Board") constitutes the highest elected governmental unit of the County;
WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended that the Board approve the issuance of the Bonds;
and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bonds, subject to
the terms to be agreed upon, a certificate of the public hearing and a Fiscal Impact Statement have been
filed with the Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA:
1. The Board approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for the benefit of the
Borrower, as required by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 15.2-4906 of the Code of Virginia of
1950, as amended to permit the Authority to assist in the refinancing of the Project.
2. The approval of the issuance of the Bonds does not constitute an endorsement to a
prospective purchaser of the Bonds of the creditworthiness of the Project or the Borrower.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
10
ATTACHMENT 6
ORDINANCE NO. 07-17( )
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 17, WATER PROTECTION, OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF ALEMARLE, VIRGINIA, BY AMENDING ARTICLE I, GENERAL, ARTICLE III, STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT AND WATER QUALITY, ARTICLE IV, GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENTS, AND BY
ADDING ARTICLE V, ILLICIT DISCHARGES AND CONNECTIONS
BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 17,
Water Protection, is amended and reordained as follows:
By Amending:
Sec.17-102 Purposes
Sec. 17-104 Definitions
Sec.17-105 Designation of program authority; powers and duties
Sec. 17-300 Applicability
Sec. 17-301 Designation of water resources areas
Sec. 17-402 Tier 2 Assessments
Sec. 17-403 Tier 3 Assessments
Sec. 17-404 Tier 4 Assessments
By Adding:
Sec. 17-107 Relation of chapter to other laws
Sec. 17-500 Applicability
Sec. 17-501 Illicit discharges prohibited; exempt and authorized discharges
Sec. 17-502 Illicit connections prohibited
Sec. 17-503 Dumping prohibited
Sec. 17-504 Maintaining the functional performance of streams
Sec. 17-505 Inspections and monitoring
Sec. 17-506 Discovery, containment, cleanup and notification of discharge
Sec. 17-507 Penalties and remedies
1. BCHAP
CHAPTER 17
WATER PROTECTION
ARTICLE I. GENERAL
Sec. 17-102 Purposes.
The board of supervisors finds that this chapter is necessary to protect the health, safety and
general welfare of the citizens of the county and the Commonwealth of Virginia and to prevent water from
being rendered dangerous to the health of persons living in the county, and is supported by the findings of
watershed studies that have been conducted. Therefore, the specific purposes of this chapter are to:
1.
activities;
inhibit the deterioration of state waters and waterways resulting from land disturbing
2. protect the safety and welfare of citizens, property owners, and businesses by minimizing
the negative impacts of increased stormwater discharges from new land development and
redevelopment;
11
3. protect against and minimize the pollution and eutrophication of public drinking water
supplies resulting from land development;
4. control nonpoint source pollution, erosion and sedimentation, and stream channel
erosion;
5. maintain the integrity of existing stream channels and networks for their biological
functions, drainage, and natural recharge of groundwater;
6.
functions;
protect the condition of state waters for all reasonable public uses and ecological
7. provide for the long-term responsibility for and maintenance of stormwater management
facilities and best management practices;
8. regulate the discharge of pollutants into storm drainage systems and state waters by
prohibiting illicit discharges and connections, and the dumping of refuse and pollutants; the board of
supervisors hereby determines that applying such regulations to not only the county's municipal separate
storm sewer system but also to privately owned and operated storm drainage systems and state waters is
necessary to prevent any further degradation to water resources;
9. facilitate the integration of stormwater management and pollution control with other
county ordinances, programs, policies, and the comprehensive plan; and
10. promote the long-term sustainability of groundwater resources.
(s 7-1, 6-18-75, S 2, 2-11-87, 3-18-92; S 19.1-4, 9-29-77, art. I, S 1, 7-11-90; S 19.2-2, 6-19-91, S 2; S
19.3-3, 2-11-98; Code 1988, SS 7-1, 19.1-4, 19.2-2, 19.3-3; Ord. 98-A(1), 8-5-98; Ord. 04-17(1), adopted
12-8-04, effective 2-8-05; Ord. 07-17(1), 2-14-07)
State law reference-Va. Code SS 10.1-560 et seq., 10.1-603.1 et seq., S10.1-2108.
Sec. 17-104 Definitions.
The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation and implementation of this chapter:
(4) Best management practice (BMP). The term "best management practice (BMP)" means a
practice or combination of practices, including treatment practices, operating procedures, general good
housekeeping practices, pollution prevention, prohibitions of activities, education practices, and other
management practices, determined by the program authority to be the most effective, practical means of
preventing or reducing the amount of water pollution generated by non point sources to a level compatible
with water quality goals.
(10) County engineer. The term "county engineer" means the county engineer within the
department of community development or his designee.
(12) Department of community development. The term "department of community development"
means the county department of community development.
(12.1) Department of general services. The term "department of general services" means the
county department of general services.
12
(20.1) Hazardous substance. The term "hazardous substance" means any substance
designated as such under the Virginia Code and 40 CFR Part 116 (2000) pursuant to ~ 311 of the Clean
Water Act, .codified in 33 U.S.C. ~ 1251 et seq.
(20.2) Illicit discharge. The term "illicit discharge" means any discharge to the storm drainage
system that is not composed entirely of stormwater, excepting discharges pursuant to a Virginia Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System ("VPDES") or Virginia Storm Management Program ("VSMP") permit (other
than a VSMP permit for discharges from the municipal separate storm sewer), discharges resulting from
fire fighting activities, and discharges identified by and in compliance with 4 VAC 50-60-1220(C)(2), as
delineated in section 17-501.
(20.3) Illicit connection. The term "illicit connection" means either:
(a) Any drain or conveyance, whether on the surface or subsurface, that allows an
illicit discharge to enter the storm drainage system, and includes but is not limited to: (i) any conveyances
that allow sewage, process wastewater, wash water or pollutants to enter the system; and (ii) any
connections to the system from indoor drains and sinks, regardless of whether such connections were
previously allowed, permitted, or approved by the county or any other government agency; or
(b) Any drain or conveyance connected to the storm drainage system from a
commercial or industrial use that has not been approved by the county in a site plan, subdivision plat, or
other plan or permit.
(26.1) Municipal separate storm sewer system ("MS4'J. The term "municipal separate storm
sewer system" means all separate storm sewers comprising the system of conveyances, including roads
with drainage systems, public streets, catch basins, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade
channels, or storm drains: (i) owned or operated by the county; (ii) designed or used for collecting or
conveying stormwater; (iii) that are not a combined sewer; and (iv) that are not part of a publicly owned
treatment works.
(29.1) Non-stormwater discharge. The term "non-stormwater discharge" means any discharge to
the storm drainage system or state waters that is not comprised entirely of stormwater.
(35.1) Person. The term "person" means a natural person, corporation, partnership, sole
proprietorship, trust, trustee, joint venture, or any other entity.
(36.1) Pollutant. The term "pollutant" means dredged spoil, solid waste, incinerator residue, filter
backwash, sewage, garbage, sewage sludge, munitions, chemical wastes, biological materials,
radioactive materials (except those regulated under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 USC
~2011 et seq.)), heat, wrecked or discarded equipment, rock, sand, cellar dirt and industrial, municipal,
and agricultural waste discharged into water.
(a) The term "pollutant" includes, but is not limited to: paints, varnishes, and
solvents; oil and other automotive fluids; non-hazardous liquids and solid wastes and yard wastes; refuse,
rubbish, garbage, litter, or other discarded or abandoned objects, ordnances, and accumulations, so that
same may cause or contribute to pollution; floatables; pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers; hazardous
substances and wastes; sewage, fecal coliform and pathogens; dissolved and particulate metals; animal
wastes; wastes and residues that result from constructing a building or structure; and noxious or offensive
matter of any kind.
13
(b) The term "pollutant" does not include: (i) sewage from vessels; or (ii) water, gas,
or other material that is injected into a well to facilitate production of oil or gas, or water derived in
association with oil and gas production and disposed of in a well if the well used either to facilitate
production or for disposal purposes is approved by the Virginia Soil and Water Conservation board and if
the board determines that the injection or disposal will not result in the degradation of ground or surface
water resources.
(36.2) Premises. The term "premises" means any building or structure, or any lot or parcel,
whether improved or unimproved, and including adjacent curbs, gutters, sidewalks and planting strips.
(37) Program authority. The term "program authority" means the department of community
development, and except where the context clearly indicates otherwise, includes any officer or employee
of the department of community development or the department of general services authorized by the
director of the department of community development to act pursuant to this chapter.
(43.1) Storm drainage system. The term "storm drainage system" means the municipal separate
storm sewer system and any privately owned and maintained improvements by which stormwater is
collected and/or conveyed and which ultimately discharges to state waters, including but not limited to,
street drainage systems, streets, gutters, curbs, inlets, piped storm drains, pumping facilities, retention
and detention basins, human-made or altered drainage channels, ponds, and other drainage structures.
(43.2) Storm water. The term "stormwater" means precipitation that is discharged across the land
surface or through conveyances to one or more waterways and that may include stormwater runoff, snow
melt runoff, and surface runoff and drainage.
(47.1) Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) permit. The term "Virginia
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) permit" means a document issued by the State Water
Control Board pursuant to the State Water Control Law authorizing, under prescribed conditions, the
potential or actual discharge of pollutants from a point source to surface waters and the use or disposal of
sewage sludge.
(97-2,6-18-75,94,7-9-80,2-11-87,3-18-92,9 19.1-5,9-29-77, art. 1,92,9-13-78,7-11-90,8-3-94; 9
19.2-4,6-19-91; 919.3-5,2-11-98; Code 1988, 99 7-2,19.1-5,19.2-4,19.3-5; Ord. 98-A(1), 8-5-98; Ord.
07-17(1),2-14-07)
State law reference-oVa. Code SS 10.1-560, 10.1-603.2.
Sec. 17-105 Designation of program authority; powers and duties.
A. The board of supervisors hereby designates the department of community development
as the program authority.
B. The program authority shall administer and enforce this chapter as authorized by law.
C. The program authority shall establish reasonable administrative procedures for the
administration of this chapter, including developing and maintaining for article III a design manual
containing information about the content of plans required by article III, calculation methods, maintenance
and inspection procedures, and other information to assist with the implementation and enforcement of
article III. The program authority shall update the design manual periodically. The manual shall be
consistent with this chapter and all applicable statutes and regulations.
14
D. The program authority shall assure that the erosion and sediment control program set
forth in article II is administered by a certified program administrator, a certified plan reviewer, and a
certified project inspector. Such positions may be filled by the same person.
E. The program authority shall take appropriate enforcement actions to achieve compliance
with this chapter, and shall maintain a record of enforcement actions for all active land disturbing
activities, land developments, illicit discharges, illicit connections, and prohibited dumping.
F. The program authority is authorized to cooperate with any federal or state agency in
connection with plans for erosion and sediment control or stormwater management. The program
authority may also recommend to the county executive any proposed agreement with such agency for
such purposes, which agreement shall be executed, if at all, by the county executive on behalf of the
county.
(s 7-9, 4-21-76, 2-11-87, 3-18-92; S 19.3-6,2-11-98; Code 1988, SS 7-9,19.3-6; Ord. 98-A(1), 8-5-98;
Ord. 07-17(1), 2-14-07)
State law reference--Va. Code 99 10.1-562, 10.1-603.3. 10.1-603.12:1 et seq.
Sec. 17-107 Relation of chapter to other laws
The requirements of this chapter are:
A. Separate from, but supplementary to, all other applicable requirements of the Code.
Compliance with the requirements of this chapter shall not be deemed to be compliance with other
applicable ordinances or regulations.
B. Separate from, but supplementary to, all other applicable requirements of state or federal
law. If the requirements of this chapter are in direct conflict with mandatory state or federal requirements,
then the state or federal requirements shall apply.
C. Separate from the requirements, terms or conditions of any private easement, covenant,
agreement or restriction. Neither the county nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have any
duty to enforce a private easement, covenant, agreement or restriction.
ARTICLE III. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND WATER QUALITY
Sec. 17-300 Applicability.
Each owner shall comply with the requirements of this article prior to commencing any land
development, or allowing any land development to occur, on his property and at all times thereafter.
(s 19.1-6,9-29-77, art. II, S 1,10-19-77,9-13-78,10-22-80,7-11-90,8-3-94; S 19.2-5, 6-19-91, S 5; S
19.3-24,2-11-98; Code 1988, SS 19.1-6, 19.2-5, 19.3-24; Ord. 98-A(1), 8-5-98; Ord. 07-17(1), 2-14-07)
State law reference--Va. Code 9910.1-603.3,10.1-603.9,10.1-2108.
Sec. 17-301 Designation of water resources areas.
In order to better effectuate the purposes of this article, all of the land within the county is hereby
designated as being within one or more of the following water resources areas:
A. Development areas: Development areas are those areas of land within the county
designated as development areas in the land use element of the comprehensive plan, and as shown on
the official map of the land use element.
15
B. Areas of intill and redevelopment: Areas of infill and redevelopment are those areas of
land within the county that are: (i) within a development area; and (ii) designated as areas of infill and
redevelopment for purposes of this article by the board of supervisors, and as shown on the official map
adopted showing such areas. The board of supervisors shall designate such areas based on a finding
that existing development has altered severely the natural condition of the area, including the presence of
vegetation, and that infill and redevelopment activities would serve other community and comprehensive
plan goals.
C. Water supply protection areas: Water supply protection areas are those areas of land
within the county that are within the watershed of a public water supply reservoir or water supply intake,
and such areas shall consist of all land within the county that drains naturally to the South Fork Rivanna
Reservoir, Beaver Creek Reservoir, Totier Creek Reservoir, Sugar Hollow Reservoir, Ragged Mountain
Reservoir, Chris Greene Lake, the North Fork Rivanna River intake, and to any impoundment or water
supply intake designated in the future by the board of supervisors as a public water supply reservoir.
D. Other rural land: Other rural land consists of those areas of land that are not within a
development area, an area of infill and redevelopment, or a water supply protection area.
(919.2-6,6-19-91,96; 9 19.3-25,2-11-98; Code 1988, 99 19.2-6, 19.3-25; Ord. 98-A(1), 8-5-98; Ord. 07-
17(1),2-14-07)
State law reference-oVa. Code S 10.1-2108.
ARTICLE IV. GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENTS
Sec. 17-402 Tier 2 assessments.
A Tier 2 assessment shall consist of the program authority reviewing and evaluating the county's
well database, available hydrogeologic studies, and information from the Virginia Department of Health
and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, as provided in chapter 2 of the design standards
manual. Based on this evaluation, the program authority may require that the owner provide additional
groundwater assessment data prior to subdivision plat or site plan approval, or may require that a Tier 3
assessment be submitted.
(9402, Ord. 04-17(1),12-8-04, effective 2-8-05; Ord. 07-17(1), 2-14-07)
Sec. 17-403 Tier 3 assessments.
2.
A Tier 3 assessment shall consist of the following:
A. The owner shall submit a draft groundwater management plan with the preliminary plat
or site plan. The groundwater management plan shall comply with the requirements for such plans in
chapter 2 of the design standards manual. If the groundwater management plan identifies special areas
of concern, such as an off-site resource of high groundwater sensitivity or a previously unknown source of
contamination, then the program authority may require additional groundwater assessment data prior to
preliminary subdivision plat or site plan approval.
B. The owner shall submit a final groundwater management plan that must be approved by
the program authority prior to approval of the final plat or site plan.
C. Any structural measures (e.g., best management practices) shall be bonded as a
subdivision plat or site plan improvement.
16
The program authority may require that a Tier 4 assessment be submitted instead of a Tier 3
assessment if the special areas of concern identified in subsection (A) have not been adequately
addressed by the additional groundwater assessment data.
(~17-403, Ord. 04-17(1),12-8-04, effective 2-8-05; Ord. 07-17(1), 2-14-07)
Sec. 17-404 Tier 4 assessments.
A Tier 4 assessment shall consist of the following:
A. The owner shall submit a draft groundwater management plan and an aquifer testing
workplan complying with the requirements for such plans in chapter 2 of the design standards manual,
with the preliminary plat, preliminary site plan, or the application for a central water supply. The
groundwater management plan must demonstrate to the program authority's satisfaction that the site's
groundwater conditions have been considered with the subdivision or site plan's layout and design. The
aquifer testing workplan must be approved by the program authority before the owner may conduct
aquifer testing as required by subsection (B).
B. After the program authority approves the aquifer testing workplan, the owner shall conduct
aquifer testing as provided in the workplan.
C. The owner shall submit a final groundwater management plan and a groundwater
assessment report complying with the requirements for such a report in chapter 2 of the design standards
manual, based upon the results of the aquifer testing. The final groundwater management plan and the
groundwater assessment report must be approved by the program authority prior to final subdivision plat
or site plan approval.
D. Any structural measures (e.g., best management practices) shall be bonded as a
subdivision plat or site plan improvement.
(~404, Ord. 04-17(1), 12-8-04, effective 2-8-05; Ord. 07-17(1), 2-14-07)
ARTICLE V. ILLICIT DISCHARGES AND CONNECTIONS
Sec. 17-500 Applicability.
This article shall apply to all activities that cause or allow to be caused direct or indirect illicit
discharges, illicit connections, and the prohibited dumping of refuse and pollutants, or which negatively
impede the flow capacity of the storm drainage system or state waters that (i) are not covered by other
articles of this chapter and (ii) are not expressly exempt from this article.
State law reference-oVa. Code SS 10.1-603.3,10.1-603.7.
Sec. 17-501 Illicit discharges prohibited; exempt and authorized discharges.
No person shall throw, drain, or otherwise discharge, cause or allow others under their control to
throw, drain, or otherwise discharge into the storm drainage system or state waters any pollutants or
waters containing any pollutants, other than stormwater. The commencement, conduct, or continuance of
any such illicit discharge to the storm drainage system or state waters is prohibited, subject to the
following:
A.
this article:
Conditionally exempt discharges. The following discharges are conditionally exempt from
17
1. Discharges pursuant to a Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
("VPDES") or Virginia Storm Management Program ("VSMP") permit (other than a VSMP permit for
discharges from the municipal separate storm sewer);
2. Discharges resulting from fire fighting and other public safety activities;
3. Discharges associated with the maintenance or repair of public water, sanitary,
and storm sewer lines, and public drinking water reservoirs and drinking water treatment or distributions
systems conducted in accordance with applicable federal and state regulations and standards;
4. Discharges associated with any activity by the county, its employees and agents,
in the maintenance of any component of a county-maintained stormwater management facility conducted
in accordance with applicable federal and state regulations and standards;
5. Discharges specified in writing by the program authority as being necessary to
protect public health and safety;
6. Water line flushing;
7. Landscape irrigation and lawn watering;
8. Non-point discharges associated with agricultural and silvicultural operations;
9. Diverted stream flows;
10. Rising ground water, springs, uncontaminated ground water infiltration, and
pumped ground water;
11. Flows from riparian habitats and wetlands;
condensation;
12. Discharges from potable water sources, foundation drains, and air conditioning
13. Water from crawl space pumps and footing drains;
14. House washing and individual car washing on residential lots;
15. De-chlorinated swimming pool discharges having less than 1 part per million
chlorine and discharges from hot tubs;
16. Street wash water;
17. Water from washed parking lots or sidewalks to remove algae or oil buildup;
lots.
18. Application of salts or other de-icing substances to streets, sidewalks and parking
19. Discharges associated with dye testing, provided that the program authority is
notified in writing before the test.
If the program authority determines that any of these exempted activities are causing adverse
impacts to state waters in a specific case, the program authority may revoke the exemption for that
specific case and such revocation shall be effective from the date the person responsible for the
discharge is informed in writing of the determination that the exemption is revoked.
18
B. Discharges authorized by VPDES permit, waiver or waste discharge order. The
prohibition shall not apply to any non-stormwater discharge permitted under a VPDES permit, waiver, or
waste discharge order issued to the discharger and administered under the authority of the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), provided that the discharger is in full compliance with all
requirements of the permit, waiver, or order and other applicable laws and regulations and provided that
written approval has been granted for any discharge to the storm drainage system.
State law reference-oVa. Code SS 10.1-603.3, 10.1-603.7.
Sec. 17-502 Illicit connections prohibited.
The construction, use, maintenance, or continued existence of illicit connections to the storm
drainage system is prohibited.
A. Pre-existing illicit connections. Any illicit connection previously authorized before the
effective date of this chapter shall comply with the requirements of this chapter by December 31,2007, or
such later date as expressly authorized by the program authority upon good cause shown by the person
requesting the extension.
B. Disconnection and redirection. Any illicit connection shall be disconnected and
redirected, if necessary, to an approved onsite wastewater management system or the sanitary sewer
system upon approval of the Albemarle County Service Authority.
C. Locating undocumented connections. Any drain or conveyance that has not been
documented in plans, maps, or their equivalent and which appears to be connected to the storm drainage
system shall be located by the owner, occupant, lessee, principal, agent, employee or otherwise, of that
property within the time period specified in the written notice of violation from the program authority
requiring that the connection be located. The notice shall require that: (i) the location of the drain or
conveyance be determined; (ii) the drain or conveyance be identified as a storm sewer, sanitary sewer, or
other; and (iii) the outfall location or point of connection to the storm drainage system, sanitary sewer
system, or other discharge point be identified. The results of these investigations shall be documented
and provided to the program authority.
State law reference-oVa. Code SS 10.1-603.3, 10.1-603.7.
Sec. 17-503 Dumping prohibited.
No person, whether the owner, occupant, lessee, principal, agent, employee or otherwise,
may dump or discharge, or allow any other person to dump or discharge, refuse, as that term is
defined in section 13-100 of the Code, or any other material or pollutant, natural or synthetic, into the
storm drainage system or a natural stream, unless the dumping or discharge is expressly authorized by
the Code.
Sec. 17-504 Maintaining the functional performance of the storm drainage system and streams.
The storm drainage system and natural streams shall be maintained as follows:
A. Keeping the storm drainage system and natural streams free of refuse and other
obstacles. Every person, whether the owner, occupant, lessee, principal, agent, employee or otherwise,
owning, occupying or otherwise responsible for the condition of the property through which a privately-
maintained storm drainage system or natural stream passes, shall maintain the part of such system or
stream on the property free of refuse, as that term is defined in section 13-100 of the Code, and other
obstacles that would pollute, contaminate, or adversely impact the system's or stream's functional
performance.
19
B. Maintaining structures within the flood hazard overlay district. Every person, whether the
owner, occupant, lessee, principal, agent, employee or otherwise, owning, occupying or otherwise
responsible for the condition of the property through which a natural stream passes, shall maintain
existing privately-owned structures within the flood hazard overlay district established under section 18-
30.3 of the Code so that such structures do not become a hazard to the use, function, or physical or
ecological integrity of the stream.
State law reference-oVa. Code SS 10.1-603.3,10.1-603.7.
Sec. 17-505 Inspections and monitoring.
The program authority is authorized to assure compliance with the requirements of this
article as follows:
A. Inspections and monitoring, generally. The program authority is authorized to conduct
inspections of private property and to conduct monitoring of storm drainage systems, natural streams,
and facilities permitted by VPDES permits, in the manner authorized by law to assure compliance with the
requirements of this article.
B. Inspection of records of VPDES permittees. Every VPDES permitee shall allow the
program authority to examine VPDES application materials, plans, specifications, and other pertinent
information as may be necessary to determine the effect of the permittee's discharge on the quality of
state waters, such other information as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this article,
including records required to be kept under the conditions of the permit, and enforcement records such as
inspection reports, notices of violation, and documents detailing the nature of any land disturbing activity
that may have occurred, or similar documents, that are not exempt from disclosure under Virginia Code ~
10.1-603.12:2.
C. Monitoring and sampling equipment on VPDES permitted facilities. The program
authority is authorized, either under a condition of the VPDES permit, with the permittee's consent or by
court order: (i) to establish on any permitted facility such devices as are necessary in the opinion of the
program authority to conduct monitoring and/or sampling of the facility's stormwater discharge; and (ii) to
require the permittee to install monitoring equipment as the program authority deems necessary. The
facility's sampling and monitoring equipment shall be maintained at all times in a safe and proper
operating condition by the permittee at its own expense. All devices used to measure stormwater flow
and quality shall be calibrated to ensure their accuracy.
D. Obligation of VPDES permittee to assure clear access. At the written or oral request of
the program authority, every VPDES permittee shall promptly remove any temporary or permanent
obstruction to safe and easy access to the permitted facility to be inspected and/or sampled, and such
obstructions shall not be replaced. The costs of removing such obstructions shall be borne by the
operator.
State law reference-oVa. Code SS 10.1-603.3,10.1-603.7,10.1-603.12:1,10.1-603.12:2.
Sec. 17-506 Discovery, containment, cleanup and notification of discharge.
If a discharge occurs or is suspected to have occurred, the following procedures shall apply:
A. Discovery, containment and cleanup. Notwithstanding any other requirement of law, as
soon as any person responsible for a facility, operation, or activity, or responsible for the emergency
response for a facility, operation, or activity, has information of any known or suspected discharge of
substances which are resulting or may result in an illicit discharge into the storm drainage system or state
waters, that person shall take all necessary steps to ensure the discovery, containment, and cleanup of
the discharge.
20
B. Notification. The person identified in subsection (A) also shall provide the following
notification of the discharge: (i) if the discharge contains, or may contain, a hazardous substance, the
person shall immediately notify emergency response agencies of the occurrence via emergency dispatch
services; and (ii) if the discharge contains, or may contain, only non-hazardous substances, the person
shall notify the program authority in person, by phone, by email, or by facsimile no later than the next
business day. Notifications in person or by phone shall be confirmed by written notice addressed and
mailed to the program authority within five (5) business days of the phone notice.
C. Record of discharge from commercial or industrial establishment. If an illicit discharge is
from a commercial or industrial establishment, the owner or operator of the establishment shall retain on-
site a written record of the discharge and the actions taken to prevent its recurrence. Such records shall
be retained for at least two (2) years and a copy thereof shall be provided to the program authority within
fifteen (15) days of the date of the discharge.
State law reference-oVa. Code SS 10.1-603.3, 10.1-603.7, 10.1-603.11.
Sec. 17-507 Penalties and remedies.
The penalties and other remedies for a violation of this article shall be as provided in Virginia
Code 910.1-603.14.
State law reference--Va. Code 9 10.1-603.14.
21
ATTACHMENT 7
Proffer Form
Date: October 2, 2006
10/05/06
12/01/06
Revisions:
01/24/07
02/05/07
ZMA: 2005-0007
Tax Map and Parcel Numbers: 55-69 and 56-9
69 Acres to be rezoned from R2 to NMD (Nei2hborhood Model District)
in accordance with the Application Plan titled Haden Place, dated September 4, 2006 revised January 23.
2007
And prepared by Dominion Development Resources. LLC
Pursuant to Section 33.3 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance, the owner, or its duly authorized
agent, hereby voluntarily proffers the conditions listed below which shall be applied to the property, if
rezoned. These conditions are proffered as a part of the requested rezoning and it is agreed that: (1) the
rezoning itself gives rise to the need for the conditions; and (2) such conditions have a reasonable
relation to the rezoning request.
1) Construction of Off-Site Improvements: No later than 12 months after approval of the first
subdivision plat or site plan within Haden Place, the Applicant shall design and construct at its
sole expense the following:
a. Haden Lane Road Widening: Haden Lane, from the southern boundary of Haden Place
to Jarmans Gap Road, and from the southern boundary of Haden Place to its terminus at
the southern Boundary of Tax Map 56 Parcel 8, shall be widened to a minimum pavement
width of 20' and shoulders and ditches shall be installed to the extent allowed within the
existing right-of-way. The improvements shall be designed and constructed to the
satisfaction of the County Engineer.
b. Stormwater Drainage to Powell's Creek: The Owner shall not request that the County
issue a building permit within Haden Place prior to the construction or bonding of an off-
site stormwater drainage system to Powell's Creek in general accord to that shown on the
General Development Plan.
2) Interparcel connection to Summerford Lane:
Final location for dedication of the inter-parcel connection with Ballard Fields will be determined
as a condition of first subdivision plat or first site plan approval for any development within Haden
Place. The Owner shall design and construct at its sole expense the inter-parcel vehicular
connection to Summerford Lane. Said construction shall be completed as designed and approved
by the County Engineer, no later than 12 months after approval of the final subdivision plat or final
site plan approval for lots within Blocks C, D, E, F, or G as shown on the General Development
Plan.
3) Vehicular Ingress/Egress:
Vehicular connection from the Proposed Connector Road shown on the ZMA 2005-0007
Application Plan, last revised February 5, 2007 to Killdeer Lane shall be prohibited until such time
that sight distance improvements, acceptable to the Virginia Department of Transportation, are
22
made to the intersection of Killdeer Lane and Jarmans Gap Road. The bollards prohibiting
vehicular connection from the Proposed Connector Road to Killdeer Lane shall be removed within
60 days of the Virginia Department of Transportation's acceptance of the sight distance
improvements.
4) Future Dedication for Realignment of Killdeer Lane:
a. Upon the request of Albemarle County, a fifty (50) foot wide portion of the open space
area shown as "Block J" on sheet A5.1 of the Application Plan shall be dedicated to public
use, as necessary, for future realignment of Killdeer Lane. The location of the realignment
is shown conceptually on the General Development Plan.
b. If the land dedicated in Proffer 4a is not used for its stated purpose within 10 years of
dedication, then the Owner may pursue vacation or abandonment of the dedicated right-
of-way.
5) Cash Proffers:
The Owner shall contribute a total of $82,000 cash for the purpose of mitigating traffic impacts
from the development. The cash contribution shall be used only for the purpose of funding
transportation projects identified in the County's Capital Improvements Program within the
Community of Crozet. The cash contribution shall be paid in increments of $3,200 for each
detached market rate unit and $2,700 for each market rate attached unit, prior to or at the time of
issuance of the building permit for each unit. If this cash contribution has not been exhausted by
the County for the stated purpose within ten (10) years from the date of the last payment of the
contribution, all unexpended funds shall be applied to project(s) identified in the County's Capital
Improvements Program within the Community of Crozet.
6) Affordable Housing:
a. The Owner shall provide six (6) "for sale" residential units of affordable housing in Haden
Place as identified on the Application Plan. The Owner shall convey the responsibility of
constructing the affordable units to any subsequent purchaser of the subject property.
The current Owner or subsequent Owner shall create units affordable to households with
incomes less than 80% of the area median income, such that housing costs consisting of
principal, interest, real estate taxes and homeowner's insurance (PITI) do not exceed
30% of the gross household income. The Albemarle County Office of Housing or its
designee shall approve all purchasers of these units. The Owner/builder shall provide the
County or its designee a period of 180 days to identify and pre-qualify an eligible
purchaser for the affordable units. The 180-day period shall commence upon written
notice from the Owner that the units will be available for sale. This notice shall not be
given more than 120 days prior to anticipated receipt of the certificate of occupancy. If the
County or its designee does not provide a qualified purchaser during this period, the
Owner shall have the right to sell the unit(s) without any restriction on sales price or
income of purchaser. This proffer shall apply only to the first sale of each of the six (6)
units.
b. Prior to the issuance of the fifteenth building permit for a market rate dwelling unit within
Haden Place, the Owner shall obtain certificates of occupancy for three (3) affordable
dwelling units. Prior to the issuance of the final building permit for a market rate dwelling
unit within Haden Place, the Owner shall obtain certificates of occupancy for all of the
affordable dwelling units within Haden Place.
7) Historic Resources: As a condition of the first preliminary subdivision plat or preliminary site
plan approval for any development within Haden Place, the Owner shall provide a
23
reconnaissance level survey performed by an architectural historian or other qualified individual,
to adequately provide an archival record of the existing homestead. The survey shall meet the
requirements of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey Field
Form, and results shall be included in the Haden Place Code of Development.
8) Overlot Grading Plan: For any subdivision not requiring a site development plan, the Owner
shall submit an Overlot Grading Plan to the satisfaction of the County Engineer. The Owner shall
obtain approval of the Overlot Grading Plan by the County Engineer before the first final
subdivision plat or site plan is approved within Haden Place. The Owner shall not request that a
Certificate of Occupancy be issued for a dwelling unit on a lot if the County Engineer has
determined the lot grading is not consistent with the approved grading plans.
Signature of Owner,
Wendell W. Gibson
Printed Name of Owner
02-05-2007
Date
Wendell W. Gibson, President
Wendell W. Gibson, Inc.
24
ATTACHMENT 8
PROJECT: SP-2006-034. North Pointe - Stream Crossina (Sian #8): PROPOSED: Fill in the
floodplain of Flat Branch Creek for a road crossing to provide access for residential development.
ZONING CATEGORY/GENERAL USAGE: Planned Development Mixed Commercial with which allows
large-scale commercial uses; and residential by special use permit (15 units/ acre). A special use permit
exists for residential use. SECTION: 30.3.05.2.1. of the Zoning Ordinance which allows for fill in the
floodplain. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE/DENSITY: Urban Density Residential - residential
(6.01-34 units/acre) and supporting uses such as religious institutions, schools, commercial, office and
service uses. ENTRANCE CORRIDOR: Yes. LOCATION: East Side of Route 29 North (Seminole Trail)
across from Lewis and Clark Drive. TAX MAP/PARCEL: 32-22K. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Rivanna.
1 . County and VDOT approval of the final lane configuration for the Northwest Passage over the
stream crossing with the final road plans;
2. County and VDOT approval of final design plans and hydrologic/hydraulic computations for the
stream crossing;
3. The applicant must obtain a map revision, letter of revision, or letter of amendment as required
from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and copy the County Engineer on all
correspondence;
4. County approval of a grading and an erosion and sediment control plan prior to the issuance of a
grading permit for modification of the existing stream crossing;
5. Natural Resources Manager approval of a stream buffer mitigation plan prior to the issuance of a
grading permit for modification of the existing stream crossing;
6. Provide an informal planting of mixed tree and shrub species and sizes to compensate for
removed vegetation, and low-growing plants to stabilize slopes in the "proposed landscaping
areas" shown on the plan submitted for ARB review entitled "Proposed Entry Layout with
Landscaping North West Passage Intersection @ Route 29 North" with revision date of 12-04-06.
7. Provide large shade trees on the north and south sides of Northwest Passage, along the sidewalk
and space reserved for the sidewalk, two and one half inch (2%") caliper minimum at planting,
forty feet (40') on center, for a minimum distance of four hundred feet (400') from the existing
edge of pavement of Route 29 North;
8. Provide trees in the median of Northwest Passage, beginning at the point closest to Route 29
North that can be approved by VDOT and extending for a minimum distance of four hundred feet
(400') from the existing edge of pavement of Route 29 North. The planting shall take the form of a
continuous informal mix of large, medium and small deciduous trees ranging from one and one-
half inches (1 %" ) to two and one half inches (2W' ) caliper and evergreen trees ranging from four
feet (4') to six feet (6') in height;
9. All of the above-noted landscaping shall be shown on the road plans submitted for Northwest
Passage. The plans shall include a complete planting schedule keyed to the plan. The plans are
subject to approval of the Design Planner;
10. Design details of the retaining walls, including column cap design, pier design, stone finish, other
materials, etc., plant size and planting configuration shall be shown on the road plans and are
subject to approval of the Design Planner; and
11. If the use, structure, or activity for which this special use permit is issued is not commenced within
sixty (60) months after the permit is issued, the permit shall be deemed abandoned and the
authority granted thereunder shall thereupon terminate.
25
... I
. _~)I-I-l-c200 7
. .c2
~G
,- r'
--,....---.- -..,.-------.
Meetiml91 PIUff)QSe
-"'-' ~
: $.tErd'eqjfi~ f.'1IJJl,1 G'lJJflll fi~~ /if!f1di fhf#.i @;G.Aatyls' Ff!.Wrf#.J Neaf!!i.
, ~ Q/)j~V..e.~~{!)J},lt~~pJ al ~JJmorteJ1en:i~ ~trrfl.mgMtelafA}
fbJf' fiJa.tJmgj fJJJU/fg, IJftfiJiJJJ
i
'Outc0mes::
,~
i]~ PQIiQ~' diJ.~ctjQfI th.rQl.Jgh Capit9J r-l.JJ;ldjng: Gl,JIcielir;v~s} tQ.
Q,~'l!~~d in fl:ltk!J~, capital. pl,q[lJ71il:lg,
Ws.e Qf cash.,
l)~~. Qt'Ie,as.e. revenl!e fi[lancinQ.
· Ws"e. Qt' GO: SQnds r~qlJ.i[rli1g, ~. re.fer-~!.lql![Tl.
i
~ Oit"~Gtibli1, fQr< fUJildi'nQ ttl~ F,Y Q.8:,..~1j2: CIP
~ S~giLl r~vi~w Qf I.l;IdJV!Ql,J<:11 CI.P-' P-rQjeG~s.,
-~ -~
---~,
_--.J
1
T
A!llemJaJa, '
~ ~.~,vi.~\l\l: of proPQ~erl: FY 4QQ&-1,2: Capital
FlJnd.ing. PI.~o. .
· R.~.Q.'Q.m..r:n._,.~nd.'_Cl.tjQns.:. ~IQ.f'.l:l. s.e. <?-t ca. S..bz. ~~g~.~ RE;\-l~nl!~'
FI[).g.nGJIl~, and G.Q. BQnQ. Fl!lJa!1.Glng,
;. Sas.ed Or;! Pr~viou~, ~QClrQ. il1f,1l!t ~
" e<:ls~d. on R~Gomm1ndation~. frqrn FinClJlGiCll Ad.visors
!,If" Closer ReNi:~V\t of 9, Year" QI.P PrQj~~t$,
~ FQGl..!$. on 5; rat/:l~r.~ tqg.n. 1 Q year'lQo..K, .
· Roads. ~nq lJXQ.ClCt !!:1lrCls.trl!Gtl:Jre OIlJ~' tQ.. the.. ~xtent Qf
Vlthg.tZs. q[r~Cldy.' iJl. tb'r Clp-. .
w FlJ.rtl1~r r~\f.ie.w of sc<<r.nario.'~; in. flJt.lJre. Cl.S !Jl.q$te./j plaQs.. and.
tn:~.nspo[tatiQn diliectiqn Q.~GQme.s mqce) Glea[:
.~
1- !
1 --~
ID' fu' 11 2'{)'{)~" ~ M to.
r ' . . '- " r r -, r - OJ,': i . . r." ~. F . .
I _~eQem~fl. 'J - C' ~ c. ",,(1) JQO
: ~ The. BfJf;1ffj' qJi!flQtS' stattt€). plr:;{HJr~ q' tflrlJill?l'l.!lm$}j
IPJ~m.' to. prQvi~e ttJf]9~' tQ~' th~ CQLlnltsj IQll~; [rq!!lgl~
cap.ital' I:1~~gs. that ~aY' mclqd~. thElI u$.e ot
g~!!lerat. QbligatibJJ QiQf1/ds. tQ. maximi~f;) th~.
b tit. fth P\ . t. I' t'" /. {{'/lmb d' to.
'..eoe.,$.: Q,' . ;.f;., 4~l:1q Y S Iflp ,fJ. ~...~lt~' ra m.g~
Yhf?i IrnpIElmGotatIQ[1! sch.fJqul~ tQ/! thiS pl~n !$h.all
gQfici'p..ate q NQV~lrl/;JElf 2Q.Q8:' Re.f~r~nqlJ.!J1: to,
obtain \toter E)PPIo'lt~f' tor- the. Q~fJitgl f)lfojects'
. identiti.~d: to, be {ihan.c.eQ; QY get:1'ElEElI QbJigg.tiQP'.
I qQr;Jgs." . . .
w.
2
3
4
~n_
---I
r!;.~
~,r,l;'\nos.e~' ~Y:/ ~A'i\8. '..1 ~
~- ~ ~-~. _~ ."=-' __"Q IJ- ~1.l'Q, ~--- OJ"
Capital: ~Ymdim.gl P[aJilJ
Prqj~~t~ ~\!!.lc;!~q WIth Qc!.s.11,
Maintenance and Replacement Projects
Technology Improvements
VDOT Revenue Sharing Program
On-going Transportation Contributions
ACE Program
Current Urban Infrastructure Improvements
Contributions to Others; County Facilities/Operations
Minor/On-Going Park Projects
Crozet Library
Storm Water Management Projects
School Technology/Minor Maintenance/Replacement Projects
Total
$ 9.55
$ 2.42
$ 5.00
$ 10.63
$ 9.78
$ 10.34
$ 3.39
$ 2.05
$ 4.13
$ 4.48
!...1QdQ
$ 72.16
".' f.'flQj~t~: fl!rWe,ct w~th QeJJ.t:
Major Court Projects
Libraries
New Major Parks & Recreation Facilities
Public Safety Facilities
Emergency Response Apparatus
Ivy Landfill
IT Server Upgrades
County Facilities (in conjunction with School Division)
Major School Improvements (VPSA or Lease Revenue?)
Total
$ 5.74
$ 22.98
$ 2.96
$ 10.26
$ 10.80
$ 2.69
$ 1.85
$ 1.24
~
$147.55
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Co-location and Development of Public/Community
Facilities
AGENDA DATE:
February 14, 2007
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
SUBJ ECT/PROPOSALlREQU EST:
Direction from the Joint Boards
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Tucker, Moran, Foley, Davis, Behrens
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
REVIEWED BY:
---
LEGAL REVIEW: Yes
BACKGROUND:
The School Board has expressed interest in exploring the concept of co-located and co-developed facilities when possible
as a service model for the community. The School Board was made aware of one proposal where the development of a
partnership between Albemarle High School and the Jefferson Institute of Lifelong Learning (JILL) might be possible. The
proposal is included as Attachment A. This proposal suggests that an opportunity exists to research and potentially
develop a site and facility model that shifts schools from being created and viewed as primarily PK-12 facilities to a
prototype for a 24/7 community-school center concept. Other ideas include extended services for children or adults located
on school sites. How well this may work on this specific project or others and the pros and cons of such use have not been
evaluated by staff.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Goal Three: Develop Policies and Infrastructure Improvements to Address the County's Growing needs
DISCUSSION:
As staff plans for the CIP needs of the future, direction regarding the degree to which there is interest in pursuing joint use
opportunities would be useful. Pursuing this concept would mean that personnel would have to be identified to explore the
pros and cons of this concept further and report back on issues that will need to be considered. In considering this concept
further, a number of questions will need to be answered:
. How will funding be identified for such joint endeavors?
. Is there fiscal efficiency by co-locating facilities?
. Would the proposed space use provide services to the school which would assist or enhance the learning or
social-psychological development of school-age children?
. Are there significant problems or hardships created by the proposed use of the school?
BUDGET IMPACT:
Sources of funding for such projects would have to be identified.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors and the School Board discuss whether or not there is an interest in
exploring the concept of co-located and co-developed facilities and direct staff to identify the process for this to occur.
ATTACHMENTS
A - Intergenerational Partnership Concept Proposal
07.021
Attachment A
Inten!enerational Partnership Concept Proposal
November 29, 2006
Background:
The Jefferson Area Board for the Aging hosted a meeting on November 21,2006 between Jefferson Institute for
Lifelong Learning (JILL) representatives and Division staff to informally discuss the potential for a partnership
between Albemarle High School and the Institute. The Institute has been in operation since 2001 and is recognized as a
University-Related Foundation by the University of Virginia Board of Visitors. JILL is an all-volunteer organization,
with the exception of two part-time staff members, that serves our community by bringing together people from various
backgrounds and experiences who share a common interest in learning and intellectual stimulation. JILL brings
together seniors and retirees from across the community to engage in coursework taught by specialists in their fields
who work or have worked at the university level or are professionals from the community at large. Gordon Walker,
Diantha McKeel, Jim McGrath, Leigh Middleditch, Pam Moran, and Diane Behrens were in attendance at the meeting.
Matt Haas was unable to come but is informed about the concept proposal.
Concept Description:
The intergenerational concept option proposed to Division staff at this meeting would provide additional space to house
the office and program space needs of JILL at Albemarle High School. This would create an opportunity during the
school day for the JILL program courses to be taught on site at AHS and through this partnership to allow AHS to
utilize potential resources available through JILL - volunteers, guest lecturers and instructors, and possible seats
available to students in JILL courses. In conjunction with the potential development of a specialty center at AHS, the
JILL proposal offers an opportunity for our Division to develop an innovative approach to partnering with a senior
organization committed to lifelong learning. This concept proposal supports the Albemarle County Public Schools'
Goals (including the volunteer outcome measure for Goal 1, Priority 1.2) as well as the Albemarle County
Government's Goal to "provide high quality educational opportunities for citizens of all ages."
Consideration Rationale:
This concept proposal provides an opportunity to research and potentially develop a site and facility model that shifts
schools from being created and viewed as primarily PK -12 facilities through a prototype for a 24/7 community-school
center concept in this Division. The shifting age demographics for this community point to the need for resources that
mutually serve the learning needs of an increasing elder population as well as the 4-18 year-old and adult education
populations. JILL representatives identify the need for a dependable space for scheduled programs as critical to
continuation and expansion of their offerings within the community. This partnership has the potential to mutually
enhance and enrich the experiences of high school students and seniors within one learning community.
Recommendation:
Staffbe directed to work with JILL representatives and local government as appropriate to research factors and
variables that would be used to determine the feasibility of this intergenerational concept being implemented as a
component of the proposed AHS addition or in the future at AHS or another school. Such factors and variables may
include but not be limited to square footage costs, available funding sources beyond the Division's CIP, operational
costs, parking and handicapped accessibility needs, and other school- community priorities.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
CIP Calendar
AGENDA DATE:
February 14, 2007
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
SU BJECT/PROPOSALlREQU EST:
Clarify and Approve Revised CIP Calendar
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Tucker, Moran, Foley, Behrens
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
LEGAL REVIEW: Yes
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
The County recently revised the process for review of the proposed CIP by creating a separate CIP Oversight Committee
and Technical Review Team (attachments A & B). Previously, the responsibilities of these two teams were combined into
what was referred to as a CIP Technical Review Committee. The charge of the previous committee included both
technical and policy review. It was determined that separating the two charges would provide a more effective and
complete review. This past fall was the first time the new process was utilized for the two year update of the CIP.
However, because of confusion regarding the description of the process included on the CIP calendar, review of the School
portion of the CIP did not occur as intended.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Goal Three: Develop Policies and Infrastructure Improvements to Address the County's Growing needs
DISCUSSION:
The primary issue needing clarification was the timing of the submittal of the School Board's proposed CIP to the CIP
Oversight Committee. As is outlined in the charge of the Committee, its role is to review all requests from County
departments and agencies and make final recommendations on projects based on an evaluation of the projects
themselves and a review of the available revenues to fund those projects. Because of this new charge and the confusion
over timing, the School Board did not have the opportunity to review the proposed School CIP developed by the School's
Long Range Planning Committee prior to its submittal for review by the CIP Oversight Committee. To ensure that the
School Board has adequate time to finalize the school system's request prior to submittal to the CIP Oversight Committee
and because of the school systems desire to review the September 30 enrollment data prior to completing its submittal, the
CIP calendar for the coming year has been adjusted as much as possible to allow additional time for this review. While this
adjustment has added an additional month for school review, additional changes to the internal school review process will
likely be necessary to ensure that the recommended School Board request is received in time for the CIP Oversight
Committee to fulfill its charge.
The purpose of this agenda item is to review the CIP calendar and clarify the charge of the CIP Oversight Committee, if
there are any questions.
BUDGET IMPACT:
There is no budget impact.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Approval of the proposed CIP Calendar
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - CIP Oversight Committee Charter
Attachment B - CIP Technical Review Committee Charter
Attachment C - Proposed CIP Budqet Process Calendar
Attachment A
CIP Oversight Committee Charter
Charge: The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is the planning guide for County expenditures for major
capital facilities and equipment and includes a 5-year approved CIP balanced to revenues and a ten-year
Capital Assessment to identify long-term capital needs beyond the 5-year CIP. The CIP Oversight
Committee will assist the County in the CIP process by reviewing and evaluating the recommended CIP
brought forward by the CIP Technical Review Team. The Committee will assure that the proposed CIP
projects are aligned with County policies, established priorities and long term vision, as defined in the
County's Strategic Plan. The Committee will also assure that the recommended 5-year CIP is aligned with
approved financial policies and that the County's financial stability is maintained through the prudent use of
its revenues. The CIP Oversight Committee will report its recommendations directly to the County
Executive.
Member Responsibilities:
. Review the recommended CIP presented by the CIP Technical Review Team;
. Ensure that all CIP projects carry out the County's long-range goals and objectives;
. Ensure that the recommended 5-year CIP addresses County needs through the proper timing and
prioritization of local government and school division projects;
. Ensure that County revenues are used wisely to address the County's capital needs and that the
recommended CIP conforms to approved financial policies, including the use of on-going revenues
and borrowed funds;
. Propose revisions or adjustments to the 5-year CIP proposed by the CIP Technical Review Team, if
needed;
. Recommend a 5-year CIP with any documented revisions to the County Executive.
Team Composition: Tom Foley, Assistant County Executive, will serve as the Team Leader to ensure that
the Team's work is documented and effectively communicated.
Lindsay Dorrier, Board of Supervisors
David Wyant ,Board of Supervisors
Barbara Massie-Mouly, School Board
Jon Stokes, School Board
Pete Craddock, Planning Commission
Roxanne White, County Executive's Office
Tom Foley, County Executive's Office
Diane Behrens, Superintendent's Office
Richard Wiggans, Finance Department
Chris Lee, Community Representative
Time Frame:
The CIP Oversight Committee will meet during the months of October/November.
June 15, 2006
Attachment B
CIP Technical Review Team Charter
Charge: The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is the planning guide for County expenditures for major
capital facilities and equipment and includes a 5-year approved CIP balanced to revenues and a ten-year
Capital Assessment to identify long-term capital needs beyond the 5-year CIP. The CIP Technical Review
Team will assist the County in the CIP process by assuring that the technical aspects and costs of each of
the requested projects have been well researched and documented. The team will also review, evaluate
and document the need for each project and make recommendations for priority funding based on the
established CIP evaluation criteria. The CIP Technical Review Team will report their recommendations to
the CIP Oversight Team.
Member Responsibilities:
. Review all CIP project requests for clarity, accuracy and appropriate timing;
. Meet with project submitters to clarify requests and propose revisions, if needed;
. Rank requested CIP projects based on established evaluation criteria;
. Review available revenues and debt service requirements for project requests based on approved
County financial policies;
. Prioritize 5-year CIP projects based on their ranking and available revenues;
. Develop a recommended CIP scenario (s) for the 5-year CIP and the ten-year Capital Needs
Assessment;
. Forward recommendation to the CIP Oversight Team for their review.
Team Composition: The CIP Technical Review Team is recommended to be composed of the following
members:
Melvin Breeden
AI Reaser
Jackson Zimmermann
Steve Allshouse
George Shad man
Brenda Neitz
David Benish
Melvin Breeden, OMB Director will serve as the Team Leader to ensure that the Team's work is
documented and effectively communicated.
Time Frame:
The CIP Technical Team will meet as needed during the month of September/October.
June 15, 2006
Attachment C
PROPOSED Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) Calendar
Proposed Calendar
Friday, June 15, 2007
Post OP Instructions and Forms to OP Team Services Site
Monday, August 20, 2007
Department and Agency Project Justifications & Cost Data Due to Office Of Management
& Budget (OMB)
Tuesday, September 04, 2007
Send CIP Request Forms to General Services for Review
Monday, September 24, 2007
General Services Sends Evaluations of CIP Project Requests to OMB
Thursday, September 27,2007
All OP Forms and General Services' Evaluations Posted to Team Services Site
Thursday, October 04, 2007
OP Project Requests and Engineering Evaluations Sent to the CIP Technical Review Team
(TRT)
Thursday, October 18, 2007
Meeting #1 - CIP TRT Meeting to review CIP Project Requests and 10 Year Assessments
October 19 - 24, 2007 (Friday - Wednesday) Departments and Agencies Respond to TRT Questions and Comments
Thursday, October 25,2007
Meeting #2 - CIP TRT Meeting to Review Project Analyses, Department/Agency Response
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
School Division Project Cost Data Posted To Team Services and Approved School Board
Document to OMB
Monday, November 5, 2007
Meeting #3 - ClP TRT Meeting (Schools Projects and ClP Revenue Overview)
Thursday, November 08, 2007
CIP Project Requests and Information sent to CIP Oversight Committee
Thursday, November 15, 2007
Meeting #1 - CIP Oversight Committee Meeting
Monday, November 19, 2007
Meeting #2 - ClP Oversight Committee Meeting
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Meeting #3 - CIP Oversight Committee Meeting (School Projects) and CIP Revenues
Overview
Monday, December 03, 2007
County Executive Staff Preliminary Review of Recommended ClP
Wednesday, December 5, 2007
Board of Supervisors Review of ClP Oversight Committee's Recommendation
Monday, December 10, 2007
Final Recommended ClP Document Prepared
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
Planning Commission Presentation for Comment
Monday, January 07, 2008
County Executive Review/Approve Recommended CIP
Revised: 09/27/2007
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Living Wage Report
AGENDA DATE:
February 14, 2007
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
SU BJ ECT/PROPOSALlREQU EST:
Information for Board consideration to implement a
living wage
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACTCS):
Tucker, White, Davis, Suyes, Zimmermann,
Gerome
LEGAL REVIEW: Yes
REVIEWED BY:
~----------
,
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
BACKGROUND:
As directed by the Board of Supervisors and the School Board, a team comprised of two members from each Board and
staff members reviewed information and developed recommendations to implement a "living wage" for Albemarle County
and School Division employees. The team provides information for Board consideration on the methodology for
determining living wage and estimated costs based on full decompression.
DISCUSSION:
Methodology for determining living wage
The living wage is an annual income (or the equivalent hourly wage) that enables a person working full-time to meet their
family's basic needs. Adjusted for the costs in a given locality, these basic needs include the combined annual costs of
housing, food, childcare, healthcare, transportation, taxes and other necessities. The team reviewed methods for
calculating the living wage from the following: The Economic Policy Institute, Federal Living Wage Responsibility Act
of 2003, Virginia Organizing Project, and the Self-Sufficiency Standard for Virginia
Recommended methodology
As the Economic Policy Institute and the Self Sufficiency Standard for Virginia use local data to calculate the "living wage",
the team identified the following strategy to determine "living wage" for Albemarle County:
Average the EPI and the Self Sufficiency Standard for Virginia to arrive at the County's living wage.
· The Economic Policy Institute (EPI), a non-partisan think tank, bases its analysis on seven categories of
need (taxes, other necessities, transportation, health care, food, housing, childcare) and estimates that a
family income for two working adults and two children needs to be $44,592 for the Charlottesville Metropolitan
region. When this annual income is divided by full-time work (2080 hours), the living hourly wage is $10.72.
· The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Virginia developed as part of the State Organizing Project for Family
Economic Self-Sufficiency estimates the level of income necessary for a working adult to meet their basic
needs without subsidies of any kind. The standard takes into account that many costs differ not only by family
size but also by the age of children and accounts for regional variations in cost. The standard includes seven
basic categories of expenditures (basic shelter/utilities, transportation, food, health care, child care, taxes and
miscellaneous expense of 10% of all other costs). The Self Sufficiency Standard for Virginia for a family of
four (preschooler and school age) is an annual salary of $44,844 or hourly wage of $10.78.
Hourly Living Wage:
Average the EPI (currently $1 0.72) and the Self Sufficiency Standard for Virginia (currently $1 0.78) to arrive at the
County's living wage of $10.75 per hour. However, neither the Self Sufficiency Standard for Virginia nor the
Economic Policy Institute adjusts their identified living wage amounts annually. Historical data for the Virginia Self
Sufficiency Standard indicates that the rate in 2002 was $9.24 and the next adjustment occurred in 2006 to
$10.78. Therefore, the team recommends projecting an annual increase by using the Albemarle County scale
adjustment projection. For FY 07/08, the recommended scale adjustment is 3%, so the living wage amount would
adjust from $10.75 to $11.07.
AGENDA TITLE:
Living Wage Report
February 14, 2007
Page 2
Administrative Considerations:
Employees
The team discussed implementation of a living wage for employee groups to include:
1. Full and Part Time Employees on the County classified pay scale
2. Substitutes and Temporary Employees
Staff recommends implementation include both groups, however the team did not arrive at consensus on this issue.
Compression issues
The team recognized that raising the minimum hourly rate not only impacts those employees currently paid less than the
new rate, but also creates salary compression problems. "Salary compression" is the situation where the pay rate for
experienced employees is near or equal to the pay rate for newly hired employees in the same position. For example, an
employee in a paygrade 1, hired seven years ago, who received "exceeds on expectations" on every performance
evaluation has a current hourly salary of $9.87. Employees with fewer years of service and newly hired employees would
be hired at $9.75. Salary compression creates an inequitable pay relationship, and is extremely detrimental to employee
morale and retention.
Various methods of addressing compression were modeled and evaluated. Several models of "partial" decompression
were evaluated, but due to the subjectivity and potential morale issues in limiting decompression to only selected pay
grades, the team recommends implementation with a full decompression model. The full decompression model
recommended was created with a declining adjustment, so that the level of increase progressively goes down with each
higher pay grade.
Impact on self sustaining programs
The team recognized the budgetary impact for Child Nutrition and EDEP. These costs are provided.
BUDGET IMPACT:
Estimated Costs (Attachment #1 ):
Costs are provided based on the identified County living wage of $11.07, as well as $9.75 per hour (the placeholder for
budgeting identified at the October Joint Board meeting based on living wage amounts for the City of Charlottesville and the
University of Virginia.)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The team provides information for Joint Board consideration in implementing a living wage for Albemarle County
employees as follows:
· A recommended methodology for determining living wage based on averaging the EPI (currently $1 0.72)
and the Self Sufficiency Standard for Virginia (currently $10.78) and applying the scale adjustment to
arrive at a living wage for County employees of $11.07 per hour.
· Estimated costs include full and part time employees on the County classified pay scale and substitutes
and temporary employees.
· Estimated costs are based on a full decompression model
Staff requests direction from the Board of Supervisors and the School Board in setting a minimum living wage for the FY08
budget, as well as approving the scope of the employees to be covered and the methodology for addressing compression.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - Estimated Costs. Full Decompression Model
07.018
t-
o
o
N
>-
...
ro
:J
15
Q)
LL
..... C'\I C'? I.[) ..- ..- N 0) ..-
I'- ..- C'\I ..- I'- 0) "" ""
... -.- I'- 0) C'\I C'? I.[) ....... M. .....
::::::::;w;.;:::::::::
:.:.:.:.S:-:.:.:. I.[) ..- C'? C'\I I.[) co co ......
<:t CD I.[) 0 I.[) ..... "" <0
:}}O",::::: CD feEt feEt ..- feEt 0) N .....
!I:w:r:!! feEt feEt ..,. ..,. .....
10 ..,.
I'-: ...........
0) 0 CD I'- C'\I 10 "" 0)
..,.
- ::::::::~k::::: C'\I CD I'- I'- M M <0
CO I.[) CO 0) CO ~ 0) .....
Ql :::::::::m:::::: CO C'\I CD- <:t M ci ~
OJ iij/i/IIIIIIIJ! I.[) feEt feEt ..- CO CO <0
CO ..- feEt ..... ..,. N
3: feEt ..,. ..,.
OJ
s::
'S: ;:::;::+Mif:::;:;::: C'\I (J) <:t 0) "" 10 0)
:J ::::::::i:!\:} I.[) I.[) C'? (J) "" ..... 10
!!!!!::I!::!!!: C'\I C'? C'? CD <0. "". O.
I'- 0 I.[) ci M ...... .....
::::::::1::::::: CO I.[) (J) <:t ...... <0 ""
<:t feEt feEt feEt <0 ..... CO
:::::::::m:::::: feEt ..,. ..,. ..,.
:::::::!;::::::::
C'\I (J) I.[) CO "" ...... .....
C'? <:t I.[) 0) M ...... .....
... <:t I'- I.[) CO <0. CO 10.
0 10'
.j...::I::J:!:: I'- ..- (J) I.[) "" 0
t <:t 0 C'? ..- 0 M ""
I'- ..- C'\I ..- ~ 10 "':.
0 feEt feEt feEt ..,.
0.. ..- N N
Q) ...... feEt ..,. ..,.
Ix: C!
Q)
OJ ..... C'? CO C'\I <0
ro ..... C'? <0 N
S ..,. }}:I:::} <:t <:t ..- <:t "" ..... <0
- CO (J) I.[) I'- O. "". ~
OJ CO :::::::::~:::::: (J) CD CD C'\I <0 CO ""
c Ql il::/:II/IIIII/: <:t feEt ..- C'\I 0) 10 10
S OJ I.[) feEt feEt 10 ..... ......
::J CO feEt ..,. ..,. ..,.
3:
OJ
s:: ....... (J) CD I'- CD CO ..... 0)
'S: j:j::::!i:::.:.: CO 0 C'? I.[) CO <0 ""
:J I.[) CO 0 10. ~ O.
:::::::s:::::::: I'- <:t C'? C'? CO ...... <0
(J) (J) C'\I (J) 0 ...... CO
III/il/I/I/I///I ..- feEt C'\I feEt <0. M 0).
- feEt ..,.
..- ..... .....
feEt ..,. ..,.
CU (il:::::
"'C
0 ......
:2i: .~I.;:.:!::.:j
c:::
0 ..Ii!..m
'en i~lill/1 (J) CD 10 <0 .....
I/) CD CO 0 C'\I 0 "" 10
cu (J) CD CD ~ 10 .......
10. .i.......s. .....
a.
E :!:i:!:::!!:~!
0
(.) :3:::::::::::::::
CU
C
-
:::l
LL (ij
I -
I/) c (ij 0
- CO I-
.,.... I/) - -
=1:1: 0 1i5 0 s::
Ql ::J I- Ql
C U s:: 0 () (f) s:: E
0 .Q
<I.l "'C "iij 0 .~ :!:::: s::
E ..r:::: Q) Q) III Qj
CU :~ .!!2 () (f) :~
..c - 0 (f) (f) >
c..l l'\:I Cl 0 ..... -0 ..... Cl 0
Q)
~ E "0 ..r:::: Q) 0 ..r:::: "0 C)
~ () 4= 0 0
:.t:i 0 (f) <( LL 0 (ij .s
I/) ..c::: ..c::: 0
() 0 0 0
W en en ...J I-
Memorandum
TO:
FROM:
Members, Board of Supervisors I
Ella Washington Carey, CMC, Cle~~ rA.-
February 8, 2007
DATE:
SUBJECT: Reading List for February 14, 2007
June 7, 2006
pages 1-40 - Mr. Dorrier
pages 41-end - Mr. Boyd
June 14, 2006
Mr. Slutzky
September 13, 2006
Mr. Wyant
NOTE: PLEASE REMEMBER TO PULL YOUR MINUTES IF YOU HAVE NOT
READ THEM.
/ewe
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
SOCA South Fork Expansion - Request to amend the
Albemarle County Service Authority Jurisdictional Area
AGENDA DATE:
February 14, 2007
SU BJ ECT/PROPOSALlREQU EST:
Request for public hearing to amend the Jurisdictional Area
Boundary to provide sewer service to Tax Map 46, Parcel
22 and 22C located adjacent to the SOCA sports facility on
Polo Grounds Road. (Attachment A.)
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACTCS):
Messrs. Tucker, Foley, Davis, Cilimberg, Benish, Arnold
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
REVIEWED BY:
----
LEGAL REVIEW: Yes
BACKGROUND:
The applicant is requesting an amendment to a 'limited service' ACSA Jurisdictional Area designation on an approximately
10.00 acre parcel to provide public sewer service for a proposed expansion of the existing SOCA field facility (SP2006-08) on
adjacent parcel 22C1. The expansion of the SOCA facility would include club offices, rest rooms, concession facilities, locker
rooms (5,400 sq. ft.) and an indoor soccer arena (33,920 sq. ft.) to be used by SOCA for club purposes only. Under the current
limited service designation, only the existing soccer facilities and the recently approved office facility (trailer) can be served with
sewer service.
The parcels impacted (TM 45, parcels 22 and 22C) are located on Polo Grounds Road and are primarily a mix of deciduous
forest and open grassland. Parcel22C is bounded by the Rivanna River to the south, the existing SOCA facility and floodplain
to the west, single family residences on large wooded tracts to the north and the railroad tracks near the edge of a residential
subdivision to the east. Parcel 22 is recessed into the northwest corner of parcel 22C and includes a small residence.
(Attachment A) The expanded SOCA facility is proposed to be located on a 10 acre portion of a reconfiguration of the
northernmost areas of parcels 22 and 22C. (Attachment A inset)
Parcels 22 and 22C are located within Comprehensive Plan Rural Area 2 in the Rivanna Magisterial District. The properties
adjacent to the northeast and southwest of these parcels are located in the Development Areas and are designated for both
water and sewer service. The property to the east and northwest is not within the Jurisdictional Area for water or sewer service.
(Attachment B)
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Objective 2.2: Increase the quality, supply, and protection of the County's water resources.
DISCUSSION:
The Utilities section of the Comprehensive Plan 'Defining Public Water and Sewer Service Areas' (page 129) includes the
following basis for recommendations about proposed changes in the Jurisdictional Area outside of the Development Areas:
"Only allow changes in jurisdictional areas outside of designated Development Areas in cases where the property is:
(1) adjacent to existing lines; and (2) public health and/or safety is in danger. "
The Public Water and Sewer section of the Land Use Plan states that the County should:
"Discourage the utilization of central water and/or sewer systems or the extension of public water and sewer into the
Rural Area except in the cases where public health and safety are at issue. Rural Area development will be served by
individual water and septic systems only (central water facilities are considered wells, springs or other systems capable
of serving three or more connections. Central sewer facilities are considered systems consisting
AGENDA TITLE: SOCA South Fork Expansion - Request to amend the Albemarle County Service Authority
Jurisdictional Area
AGENDA DATE: February 14, 2007
Page 2 of 2
of drain fields or septic tanks capable of serving three or more connections)."
The applicant has requested sewer service for these parcels due to soils comprised largely of fill, creating conditions not
suitable for septic systems. The soils cannot support a septic system adequate to serve the facilities proposed in SP2006-08.
Sewer service was previously approved for bathrooms facilities serving the existing soccer fields and, more recently, a 1,000
square foot temporary office trailer for SOCA on adjacent parcel 22C 1 only as approved under SP2006-14. The existing SOCA
trailer is adjacent to existing sewer lines and the floodplain of the Rivanna River. The topographic conditions on the site and
the proposed location of the trailer related to the floodplain necessitate locating any septic fields up hill from the trailer, away
from the floodplain. Gravity disposal of effluent is preferred over pumping up hill; the inclusion of a pump as part of the disposal
system increases the possibility of mechanical failure. Allowing for public sewer on parcel 22C1 eliminated the possibility of a
public health threat from effluent contamination resulting from a failed septic system pump.
Staff notes a past action taken to provide water and sewer service for a church on a portion of this parcel, then Tax Map 46,
parcel 22 (now 22, 22C, and 22C1). In 1992 The Board of Supervisors approved a Special Use Permit (SP1990-35) for the
Covenant Church of God to construct a church building on parcel 22 with an 800 seat sanctuary. The proposed church was
larger by 300 seats than any other proposed or existing church in the Rural Areas at that time. The same issue of consistency
with the County's policy for extending water and service was present with the church proposal and identified by staff. The
Board of Supervisors approved (2/12/92) an amendment to the ACSA jurisdictional area boundary to include the church site
(Parcel 22) for water and sewer service, limiting service to only the church building as approved under SP1990-35 for the
Covenant Church of God. The proposed church site was comprised of 10.3 acres and located partially in the same area as the
proposed SOCA expansion (Attachment B). This previous jurisdictional area amendment to provide service to the church site
is no longer in effect, having been modified by the subsequent ACSA amendment providing limited sewer service only to the
approved SOCA field facility.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The cost for extending service to this site will be the responsibility of the applicant.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The request for sewer service to the proposed SOCA facility expansion on parcels 22 and 22C is not due to an existing health
or safety threat. Therefore, staff finds that the requested use is not in conformity with the Utilities section of the Comprehensive
Plan provisions for sewer service outside of the designated Development Area. No verification of endangerment to public
health and safety has been provided. Based on this information, staff does not recommend approval of this request and does
not see a necessity for this to proceed to public hearing.
Should the Board approve the proposed expansion of the existing SOCA facility (SP2006-08), staff recommends that the Board
set a public hearing to consider amending the jurisdictional area designation for Tax Map 46, Parcels 22 and 22C to provide
limited sewer service to the SOCA soccer complex as approved under SP2006-08. This alternative recommendation is based
on the existing soil conditions which cannot support a septic/drain field system adequate to serve the proposed use.
ATTACHMENTS
A. SOCA amendment, aerial context
B. SOCA amendment. proposed parcel reconfiquration. location of sewer lines
C. SOCA ACSA JA . RAlDA context; inset: oroposed location for Covenant Church of God (SP1990<-&)
07.015
~
:5
-.:
'5
iE
...
'"
~
-.:
~.. .
...
..
..
~
......
'..
26Cl
/ ....
..
f' ..
/ .......
......
..
.,#
.....
....
.
} .......
/ ....
/ j....
/' ..
/' ...
. ..
. _-f"" .
. .'
: .....
:...
..
/
22C
J
I
r
('
..
Note: This map is for display purposes only and shQWs parcels as of 12/31/2004. See Map Book Introduction for additional details.
Aerial Imagery 2002 Copyright Commonwealth of Virginia
, .
~II c1.,.'~~: -,A...
~ ,,\' \~",
~. ~ ." '
....""= ~~ .,."
.. ..-....~~ [Ii,.,:,
,~
~~='~
,~
Legend
~ developmenCareas
D No Service
_ Vllater Only
_ Vllater and Sewer
D Vllater Only To Existing Structures
11III Limited Service
o
o 0.03750.075
0.15
0.225
Miles
0.3
...... sewerlines
D 100 year floodplain
Tax Map 46, Parcel 22/22C
Attachment B. ACSA JA Boundary Adjustment/or SOCA Major Amendment
i
aI !f1
~ 8
J! ..
s ~
't;;
e ...
s 2
= <
o c:
i i
.. E
~ <3
~
'" ....~.
....~~... .,
Ii. '
,~
14,
~
~.
(i)'
G
.c-
..
O.
.D
;&;
CiS)
"i
z
I ~
....
~
::
~
\J
~
~
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING OFFER TO SEll
A CONSERVATION EASEMENT UNDER THE ACE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the County has received an offer to sell a conservation easement
under the ACE Program from the owner of the following properties:
Rock Mills land Trust
TM 74, Parcel 19
TM 74. Parcel 20
Total
(136.540 acres)
( 9.000 acres)
(145.540 acres)
WHEREAS, the owner offered to sell a conservation easement on the respective
properties to the County for a fixed purchase price, subject to terms and conditions set
forth in the proposed deed of easement enclosed with the County's invitation to offer to
sell, subject to any further revisions deemed necessary by the County Attorney and
agreed to by the owner.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors hereby
accepts the offer to sell a conservation easement for each of the properties described
above, and authorizes the County Executive to execute all documents necessary for
completing the acquisitions.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors hereby directs the
County Attorney to send copies of this resolution to the owner(s) of the properties
identified herein, or their contact persons.
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy
of a Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County by a vote
of six to zero, as recorded below, at a meeting held on February 14, 2007.
Mr. Boyd
Mr. Dorrier
Mr. Rooker
Mr. Slutzky
Ms. Thomas
Mr. Wyant
Ave Nav
y
y
y
y
y
y
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Acceptance of FY 2004-05 and FY 2005-06
Landowners' Offers to Sell Conservation Easements
AGENDA DATE:
February 14, 2007
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Adopt Resolution Accepting FY 2004-05 and FY
2005-06 Landowners' Offers to Sell Conservation
Easements
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
STAFF CONTACTCS):
Messrs.: Tucker, Foley, Davis, Kamptner, Cilimberg, Benish,
Goodall
REVIEWED BY:
~-----
f
LEGAL REVIEW: Yes
BACKGROUND:
ACE regulations require each landowner who desires to sell a conservation easement to submit a written offer to the County to
sell the easement for a fixed price, determined by an appraisal and subject to an adjustment based on adjusted gross income.
The easement is also subject to the terms and conditions contained in a proposed deed of easement negotiated by the parties.
The regulations also require that, if the Board accepts the offer, it must do so in writing and only after an action by the Board
authorizing acceptance. The Board is not required to accept an offer to sell a conservation easement. Either the Albemarle
County Public Recreational Facilities Authority (PRFA) or the Virginia Outdoors Foundation (VOF) may be co-holders of the
easements.
Acceptance of FY 2004-05 landowners' offers to sell a conservation easement - On July 5, 2006, the Board of Supervisors
approved the appraisals of six FY 2004-05 applications and approved extending invitations to acquire easements on all of those
properties. By January 2007, the Board of Supervisors had formally accepted offers from five of the six properties (Vieille, Boyle,
Donnelly Metcalf/South and Davey). Rock Mills Land Trust was the only applicant who had not submitted an offer to sell an
easement to the County. Since the January meeting the remaining applicant, Rock Mills Land Trust, has submitted an offer to the
County.
Acceptance of FY 2005-06 landowners' offers to sell a conservation easement - On November 1, 2006, the Board of Supervisors
approved the appraisals of five FY 2005-06 applications and approved extending invitations to acquire easements on those
properties. On January 10,2007, the Board of Supervisors formally accepted offers submitted by three applicants from this five-
applicant class (Motley, Fields and Huckleberry Hills Farm). The remaining two applicants (Hook and Chester) had not yet
submitted their offers to sell easements to the County. Since the January meeting the remaining two applicants, Hook and
Chester, have submitted offers to the County.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Goal 2. Protect the County's Natural Resources.
Goal 4. Effectively Manage the County's Growth and Development.
DISCUSSION:
Acceotance of FY 2004-05 landowners' offers to sell a conservation easement - From the Round 5 (FY 2004-05) applicant pool,
the County recently received an offer to sell a conservation easement from Rock Mills Land Trust. This easement will be co-held
by the County and the PRFA.
Owner
Rock Mills Land Trust
Tax Mao-Parcel Number
TM 74, Parcel 19 (136.540 acres)
TM 74. Parcel 20 ( 9.000 acres)
Total (145.540 acres)
Price
$322,400
Co-holder
PRFA
DR's Eliminated
14
AGENDA TITLE: Acceptance of FY 2004-05 and FY 2005-06 Landowners' Offers to Sell Conservation Easements
AGENDA DATE: February 14, 2007
Page 2 of 3
This easement will provide the following conservation values: 1) elimination of 14 development rights; 2) protection of a property
in the watershed of the South Fork of the Rivanna River reservoir; 3) approximately 5,000 feet of stream frontage protected by
riparian forest buffers; and 4) 145.540 acres of permanently protected land.
Acceptance of FY 2005-06 landowners' offers to sell a conservation easement - From the Round 6 (FY 2005-06) applicant pool,
the County recently received offers to sell conservation easements from Hook and Chester.
Owner
Hook
Tax Map-Parcel Number
TM 84, Parcel11B "A" (114.000 acres)
TM 84. Parcel 11 B "B" ( 7.000 acres)
Total (121.000 acres)
Price Co-holder
$0 (donated) PRFA
DR's Eliminated
10
Chester
TM 65, Parcel 11
TM 65, Parcel 11 B
TM 84, Parcel 11 C
Total
(22.011 acres)
( 2.450 acres)
(52.000 acres)
(76.461 acres)
$309,760
PRFA
11
The Hook and Chester easements will provide the following conservation values: 1) elimination of 21 development rights; 2)
protection of a property in the watershed of the South Fork of the Rivanna River reservoir; 3) approximately 5,000 feet of stream
frontage protected by riparian forest buffers; 4) nearly 2,000 feet of common boundary with other properties currently protected
by easement; and 5) 197.461 acres of permanently protected land.
A summary of all the conservation values protected by the ACE Program after six rounds of applications is found in Attachment
"D". This attachment also shows the conservation values for each of the six classes.
BUDGET IMPACT:
For the first four years of the ACE program, in which the County acquired easements on sixteen properties and protected 3,759
acres, the County's net cost was approximately $3,125,737 out of the County's budgeted funds of $3,872,500. Although a
portion of unspent funds can be attributed to applicant attrition (approved applicants withdrawing or not making offers to sell),
$357,933 was also leveraged from outside contributions and additional savings were realized from adjustments of easement
value from the income grid (see Attachment "C"). If the County acquires easements on all eleven applicants from FY 2004-05
and FY 2005-06 as currently valued, the County will have acquired easements on twenty-seven properties and protected 5,497
acres at a cost of up to $6,012,099. The County's budgeted funds of $5,872,500 for that period combined with additional
funding from outside contributions ($489,433) will cover the cost.
For a cash flow analysis of the FY 2004-05 and FY 2005-06 applicant pools, see attachment "E". This analysis projects cash
flows and net acquisition costs (after annual ACE appropriations and easement acquisition costs) for each applicant class. Also
provided is information on total available funds as of FY06-07, and the amount of those funds obligated for remaining easement
purchases through to the current round of the program (Round 7, FY06-07).
Funding for the purchase of conservation easements from both applicant classes comes from the CIP-Planning-Conservation
budget (line-item 9010-81010-580409) and the CIP-Tourism-Conservation budget (line-item #9010-72030-580416), a budget
previously approved by the Board to fund ACE properties with "tourism value".
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The following recommendations are provided for action by the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors:
1) Adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment A) accepting FY 2004-05 applicant's offer (from Rock Mills Land Trust) to sell a
conservation easement to the County, for the price specified and subject to the terms and conditions contained in the
proposed deed of easement, and authorize the County Executive to sign the final deed of easement for each property.
2) Adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment B) accepting FY 2005-06 applicants' offers (from Hook and Chester) to
donate and sell a conservation easement to the County, respectively, for the price (Chester) specified and subject to
the terms and conditions contained in the proposed deeds of easement, and authorize the County Executive to sign
the final deed of easement for each property.
AGENDA TITLE: Acceptance of FY 2004-05 and FY 2005-06 Landowners' Offers to Sell Conservation Easements
AGENDA DATE: February 14, 2007
Page 3 of 3
ATTACHMENTS
A - ACE Resolution Acceptin!:1 Offers to Sell FY 2004-05 Easements to the County
B - ACE Resolution Acceptin!:1 Offers to Sell FY 2005-06 Easements to the County
C - Net Acquisition Cost of ACE Easements
D - Conservation Values of ACE Easements from the First Six Rounds (FY 2000-2006)
E - Cash Flow Analysis for FY 2004-05 & FY 2005-06 ACE Applicant Pools
07.014
Attachment A
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING OFFER TO SELL
A CONSERVATION EASEMENT UNDER THE ACE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the County has received an offer to sell a conservation easement under the
ACE Program from the owner of the following properties:
Rock Mills Land Trust
TM 74, Parcel 19
TM 74, Parcel 20
Total
(136.540 acres)
( 9.000 acres)
(145.540 acres)
WHEREAS, the owner offered to sell a conservation easement on the respective properties to
the County for a fixed purchase price, subject to terms and conditions set forth in the proposed deed of
easement enclosed with the County's invitation to offer to sell, subject to any further revisions deemed
necessary by the County Attorney and agreed to by the owner.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors hereby
accepts the offer to sell a conservation easement for each of the properties described above, and
authorizes the County Executive to execute all documents necessary for completing the
acquisitions.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors hereby directs the
County Attorney to send copies of this resolution to the owner(s) of the properties identified
herein, or their contact persons.
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a
Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County by vote of _ to
_, as recorded below, at a meeting held on
Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
Aye Nav
Mr. Boyd
Mr. Dorrier
Mr. Rooker
Mr. Slutzky
Ms. Thomas
Mr. Wyant
Attachment B
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING OFFER TO SELL
A CONSERVATION EASEMENT UNDER THE ACE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the County has received an offer to sell a conservation easement under the
ACE Program from the owner(s) of the following properties:
Hook
TM 84, Parcel lIB "A" (114.000 acres)
TM 84, Parcel lIB "B" ( 7.000 acres)
Total (121. 000 acres)
Chester
TM 65, Parcel 11
TM 65, ParcelllB
TM 65, ParcelllC
Total
( 22.011 acres)
( 2.450 acres)
( 52.000 acres)
( 76.461 acres)
WHEREAS, the owner(s) offered to sell a conservation easement on the respective
properties to the County for a fixed purchase price, subject to terms and conditions set forth in
the proposed deed of easement enclosed with the County's invitation to offer to sell, subject to
any further revisions deemed necessary by the County Attorney and agreed to by the owner; and
WHEREAS, the owner of the Hook property has advised the County that she desires to
donate the conservation easement.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors hereby
accepts the offer to donate (Hook) and to sell (Chester) a conservation easement for each of the
properties described above, and authorizes the County Executive to execute all documents
necessary for completing the acquisitions.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors hereby directs the
County Attorney to send copies of this resolution to the owner(s) of the properties identified
herein, or their contact persons.
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a
Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County by vote of _ to
_, as recorded below, at a meeting held on
Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
Aye Nav
Mr. Boyd
Mr. Dorrier
Mr. Rooker
Mr. Slutzky
Ms. Thomas
Mr. Wyant
Attachment C
Net ACQuisition Costs for ACE Easements from First Three Rounds
Applicant Pool Budget Easement Value ACE Payment Closing Costs Net Costs
FY 2000-01 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,430,000 $ 1,136,200 $ 14,975 $ 1,151,175
FY 2001-02 1,000,000 730,000 693,700 20,170 713,870
FY 2002-03 1,000,000 717,000 695,700 15,798 711,498
FY 2003-04 872,500 611,000 526,000 23,194 549,194
FY 2004-05 1,000,000 2,354,000 1,866,620 27,272 1,893,892
FY 2005-06 1.000.000 1.352.000 973.760 18.710 992.470
Totals $ 5,872,500 $ 7,194,000 $ 5,891,980 $ 120,119 $ 6,012,099
Notes:
Italics means an estimated value. Since we have not closed on any properties from either the FY 2004-05
or FY 2005-06 class, we cannot predict how many applicants will actually sell an easement to the County.
In FY 2000-01, the Virginia Outdoors Foundation put $250,000 towards the purchase ofthe Powell
easement. The balance of savings ($43,800) was the result of paying an "adjusted" value instead of the
full "appraised" value (because the landowners income exceeded the $50,000 minimum). A total of
1,045.497 acres were placed under easement for this round.
In FY 2001-02, all savings ($36,300) were the result of paying an "adjusted" value instead of the full
"appraised" value (because the landowners income exceeded the $50,000 minimum). A total of
1,156.750 acres were placed under easement for this round.
In FY 2002-03, the Piedmont Environmental Council donated $22,500 toward the purchase of easements
in the Southwest Mountains while the balance of savings ($21,300) was the result of paying an
"adjusted" value instead of the full "appraised" value (because the landowners income exceeded the
$50,000 minimum). A total of910.700 acres were placed under easement for this round.
In FY 2003-04, the Virginia Land Conservation Fund provided a grant of $85,433 towards the purchase
of the Page easement. Since the only two applicants from the class received 100% of easement value,
there was no additional leveraging based on income. A total of 664.340 acres were placed under
easement for this round.
In FY 2004-05, all savings are the result of paying an "adjusted" value instead of the full "appraised"
value (because the landowners income exceeded the $55,000 minimum). A total of 1110.29 acres will be
placed under easement if all landowners from this applicant class agree to sell an easement to the County.
In FY 2005-06, all savings are the result of paying an "adjusted" value instead of the full "appraised"
value (because the landowners income exceeded the $55,000 minimum). A total of 582.521 acres will be
placed under easement if all landowners from this applicant class agree to sell an easement to the County.
Attachment D
Conservation Values from Six Rounds of ACE Applications (FY 2000-2006)
First year applicant pool (FY 2000-01 ):
. 11 initial applicants
. acquired easements on 4 properties
. 2/4 properties have "tourism" value
. protected 1,045 acres
. eliminated 102 development lots
. protected 502 acres of "prime" farm and forestland
. 2/4 properties in the Southwest Mountains Rural Historic District
. 1/4 properties adjoin land protected by easement
. protected 4,050 feet along a scenic highway/entrance corridor
. 1/4 lie in the watershed of a drinking supply reservoir
. 4/4 are working family farms
Second year applicant pool (FY 2001-02):
. 8 initial applicants
. acquired easements on 5 properties
. 2/5 properties have "tourism" value
. protected 1,157 acres
. eliminated 39 development lots
. protected 284 acres of "prime" farm and forestland
. 2/4 properties in the Southwest Mountains Rural Historic District
. 1/4 properties adjoin land protected by easement
. protected 93 acres of mountaintop
. protected 1,118 feet along a scenic highway/entrance corridor
. 3/5 lie in the watershed of a drinking supply reservoir
. 2/5 are working family farms
Third year applicant pool (FY 2002-03):
. 8 applicants
. acquired easements on 5 properties
. 4/5 properties have "tourism" value
. protected 910 acres
. eliminated 65 development lots
. protected 86 acres of "prime" farm and forestland
. 3/5 properties in the Southwest Mountains Rural Historic District
· 4/5 properties adjoin land protected by easement
· protected 133 acres of mountaintop
· 1/5 lie in the watershed of a drinking supply reservoir
. 4/5 are working family farms
Fourth year applicant pool (FY 2003-04):
. 8 initial applicants
. acquired easements on 2 properties
. 2/2 properties have "tourism" value
. protected 647 acres
. eliminated 38 development lots
. protected 443 acres of "prime" farm and forestland
. protected 60 acres of mountaintop
. 15,300 feet of streamside protected by riparian forest buffers
. 2/2 are working family farms
Fifth year applicant pool (FY 2004-05):
. 10 initial applicants
. hope to acquire easements on 6 properties
. 3/6 properties have "tourism" value
. protect 1,110 acres
. eliminate 66 development lots
. protect 763 acres of "prime" farm and forestland
. protect 10,294 along a scenic highway/entrance corridor
. 29,065 feet of streamside protected by riparian forest buffers
. 2/6 properties adjoin land protected by easement
. 2/6 lie in the watershed of a drinking supply reservoir
. 3/6 are working family farms
Sixth year applicant pool (FY 2005-06):
. 8 applicants
. hope to acquire easements on 5 properties
. 3/5 properties have "tourism" value
. protect 609 acres
. eliminate 44 development lots
. protect 349 acres of "prime" farm and forestland
. protect 1,134 feet along a scenic highway/entrance corridor
. protected 133 acres of mountaintop
. 5,800 feet of streamside protected by riparian forest buffers
. 2/5 properties in the Southwest Mountains Rural Historic District
. 4/5 properties adjoin land protected by easement
. 2/5 lie in the watershed of a drinking supply reservoir
. 3/5 are working family farms
Summary of Six Rounds of ACE Applicants (FY 2000-06):
. 53 applicants
. hope to acquire easements on 27 properties (16/27 are already acquired)
. 16/27 properties have "tourism" value
. protect 5,478 acres
. eliminate 354 development lots
. protect 2,429 acres of "prime" farm and forestland
. protect 16,596 feet along a scenic highway/entrance corridor
. protect 286 acres of mountaintop
. 50,165 feet of streamside protected by riparian forest buffers
. 8/27 properties in the Southwest Mountains Rural Historic District
. 13/27 properties adjoin land protected by easement
. 9/27 lie in the watershed of a drinking supply reservoir
. 18/27 are working family farms
Attachment E
Cash Flow Analysis for FY 2004-05 & FY 2005-06 ACE Applicant Pools
ACE Bud2et for FY 2004-05 Applicant Pool
Net 2004-05 ACE appropriation
Net carryover from all 2003-04 ACE funds
Net funds available for acquiring easements
$ 1,000,000.00
882,867.20
$ 1,882,867.20
Cost of ACQuirin2 Top 6 ACE Easements from FY 2004-05
Easement purchase price before income adjustment $ 2,354,000.00
Easement purchase price after income adjustment $ 1,866,620.00
Funds available for acquiring 2004-05 easements
Minus purchase price of top 6 ACE easements
Minus closing costs, appraisal fees for top 6 easements
Net balance after acquiring 2004-05 easements
ACE Bud2et for FY 2005-06 Applicant Pool
Net 2005-06 ACE appropriation
Net carryover from 2004-05 all ACE Funds
Net funds available for acquiring easements
$ 1,882,867.20
1,866,620.00
24,1 77.21
($ 7,930.01)
$ 1,000,000.00
( 7,930.01)
$ 992,070.99
Cost of ACQuirin2 Top 5 ACE Easements from FY 2005-06
Easement purchase price before income adjustment $ 1,328,500.00
Easement purchase price after income adjustment $ 948,310.00
Funds available for acquiring 2005-06 easements
Minus purchase price of top 5 ACE easements
Minus closing costs, appraisal fees for top 5 easements
Net balance after acquiring 2005-06 easements
$ 992,070.99
948,310.00
15,296.00
$ 28,464.99
Note: The main purpose of information provided above is to show the approximate net costs for
easement acquisition for two specific applicant pools (FY 2004-05 and FY 2005-06). The above
cash flow estimates reflect the major costs for acquiring easements including easement purchase
price, closing costs, recording fees and appraisal costs for a given fiscal year applicant class, it does
not reflect the current status of the budget. The current status of the budget is provided below.
Current Status of ACE Bud2et and Obli2ations (as of 12/06)
Total approp. FY06-07 (incl. Tourism Funds)
Total obligated costs for Round 5* (FY 04-05)
Total obligated costs for Round 6* (FY04-05)
Other costs for rounds 5 and 6,estimated (closing costs, title ins. etc.)
Net funding available after FY04-05 & FY05-06 obligations
Funds available for FY06-07 easements purchases, other costs
(program marketing, appraisals, title ins., closing/fees, etc.)
$ 4,252,032.00
$ 1,854,937.00
$ 948,310.00
$ 11,000.00
$ 1,437,785.00
$ 1,437,785.00
*obligated cost for the purchase of easements, 6 applicants in FY04-05 and 5 applicants in FY05-06
Kenneth C. Boyd
Rivanna
COUNTY OF ALBEMARlE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(434) 296-5843 FAX (434) 296-5800
February 28,2007
Undsay G. Dorrier, Jr.
ScotisvilIe
Dennis S. Rooker
Jack Jouett
Mr. Harrison Rue
Executive Director
T J PI~nning District Commission
PO Box 1505
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Harrison:
At its meeting on February 14, 2007 the Board of Supervisors, adopted the
attached Resolution Authorizing Funding for the Regional Transit Authority Plan.
lewc
Attachment
cc: Bob Tucker
*
Printed on recycled paper
David L. Slutzky
Rio
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
David C. Wyant
White Hall
Resolution Authorizing Funding for the
Regional Transit Authority Plan
WHEREAS, The Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Policy
Board has authorized Harrison Rue, Executive Director of the Thomas Jefferson Planning District
Commission (T JPDC) as fiscal agent for the MPO, to execute and file an application to the
Department of Rail and Public Transportation, Commonwealth of Virginia, hereafter referred to as
"Department," for a grant of financial assistance in the amount of $100,000 to defray the costs for the
development of the Regional Transit Authority Plan (RT AP) and to accept from the Department
grants in such amounts as may be awarded, and to authorize MPO Staff to furnish to the
Department such documents and other information as may be required for processing the grant
request; and
WHEREAS, a grant of financial assistance from the Department requires a local match of
10% and the 10% local match for this grant of financial assistance is $10,000; and
WHEREAS, the costs of the local match of $10,000 will be distributed equally between the
City of Charlottesville and County of Albemarle, with each contributing $5,000; and
WHEREAS, The Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Policy
Board has approved the Regional Transit Authority Plan (RTAP) Scope of Work budget estimate
with $100,000 funded by the Department and $100,000 funded by combined equal contribution from
the County of Albemarle and City of Charlottesville; and
WHEREAS, The Charlottesville-Albemarle MPO Policy Board has recommended that the
County of Albemarle and City of Charlottesville contribute $50,000 each to the RTAP which includes
$5,000 from each jurisdiction to fund the 10% local match required by the Department.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the County of Albemarle will provide funds in
the amount of $50,000, to contribute to the Regional Transit Authority Plan, of which $5,000 will be
used to match the state funds in the ratio as required and $45,000 will fund its share of the
remaining costs of the approved Scope of Work approved by unanimous vote of the MPO Policy
Board.
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a
Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County by a vote of six to zero,
as recorded below, at a meeting held on February 14. 2007.
W(!ti-1J--
C erk, Board of County Sup
Mr. Boyd
Mr. Dorrier
Mr. Rooker
Mr. Slutzky
Ms. Thomas
Mr. Wyant
Aye Nay
y
y
y
y
y
y
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Resolution Authorizing Funding for the Regional
Transit Authority Plan
AGENDA DATE:
February 14, 2007
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJ ECT IPROPOSALlREQU EST:
Approval of Resolution Authorizing Funding for the
Regional Transit Authority Plan
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
STAFF CONTACTCS):
Messrs. Tucker, Foley, Davis, Bowman
REVIEWED BY:
~
,
LEGAL REVIEW: Yes
BACKGROUND:
In recent months, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, Charlottesville City Council and Charlottesville-Albemarle
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) have held discussions regarding improvements to public transportation
services, including the creation of a Regional Transit Authority. The MPO Policy Board has approved a scope of work to
create a Regional Transit Authority Plan (RT AP), which will outline how to implement the regional transit vision adopted by
the MPO, City, and County. An overview of both the scope of work and funding is available in Attachment A. The full scope
of work is available in Attachment B. The Board's approval of the resolution authorizing funding (Attachment C) is
requested.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Objective: By June 30, 2010, expand regional transit opportunities, while accelerating the completion of the Meadowcreek
Parkway, 2 local, and 2 regional transportation projects.
BUDGET IMPACT:
This request will have a one-time cost of $50,000 for the County. The $50,000 expenditure consists of a $5,000 local
match for a grant and an additional $45,000 to complete the identified scope of work. The total local match for the
grant and costs not covered by the grant are shared equally with the City. Further funding details are available in
Attachment A (see "RTAP Funding").
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends the Board approve the Resolution Authorizing Funding for the Regional Transit Authority Plan
(Attachment C). If approved, staff will prepare an appropriation to come forward to the Board as a budget amendment.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - Overview of Reqional Transit Authority Plan Scope of Work and Fundinq
Attachment B - Scope of Work for Charlottesville-Albemarle Reaional Transit Authoritv Plan
Attachment C - Resolution Authorizinq Fundinq for the Reqional Transit Authority Plan
07.016
...
tj pdc.org
Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization
of the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission
POB 1505,401 E. Water St, Charlottesville, VA 22902 www.~pdc.org
(434) 979-7310 phone. (434) 979-1597 fax .info@~pdc.org email
Memorandum
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, Charlottesville City Council
Harrison Rue
January 26, 2007
Regional Transit Authority Plan Scope of Work and Funding
Regional Transit Authoritv Plan (RTAP) Scope of Work
The Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Policy Board has approved
the attached Scope of Work to create a Regional Transit Authority Plan (RTAP). The RTAP will outline
how to implement the regional transit vision adopted by the MPO, City, and County - frequent,
dependable, and seamless service that provides direct links to the area's major destinations: Downtown,
UV NMedical Center, Pantops, and the Rt. 29 Corridor. The RTAP will be a ready-to-implement action
plan to expand and enhance regional transit service, create a governing structure, and identify funding
mechanisms.
The RTAP includes 3 main work streams to review regional transit issues and options for the
Charlottesville-Albemarle area: management and governance, service and operations, cost estimation
(operating and capital) and funding. In the course of developing the RT AP, which will include a transition
plan, these work streams will produce the following deliverables:
1. Recommended RTA management and governance framework
2. Recommended regional transit service and operations framework
3. Recommended regional transit funding and cost estimation formulas
If the Consultant concludes that forming an RTA is not desirable, then the RTAP and transition plan will
outline other initiatives that the City and County can pursue (such as contracting, enhanced service
coordination, and marketing) that will improve the effectiveness of the public transportation system.
Consultant work will be monitored and evaluated by the project team. The project team includes staff
from the MPO, Albemarle, Charlottesville, JAUNT, CTS, UTS, RideShare, Department of Rail and
Public Transportation (DRPT), and other stakeholders. The project team will work closely with
policymakers throughout the study process.
RTAP Fundin2
The RTAP will require approximately nine to twelve months to complete and has an estimated budget of
$190,000. With authorization from the MPO Policy Board, MPO Staff have applied for a DRPT grant for
$100,000. Of this total, federal and state funding contribute $90,000 to the RTAP, and a $10,000 (10%)
local match is required. Successful applications will be awarded in July 2007. The MPO Policy Board
has recommended that the $10,000 local match and remaining $90,000 not covered by the DRPT grant be
covered equally by the City of Charlottesville and County of Albemarle. This amounts to a total $50,000
contribution from both the City of Charlottesville and County of Albemarle. The non-DRPT grant
contribution will be used to begin the RTAP work prior to July 2007. This will include a process to
advertise a Request for Qualifications for the RTAP (approximately one month) and consultant selection
process (approximately three weeks).
DRAFT RTA Scope of Work
Draft as of 1/22/07
Draft Scope of Work
Charlottesville-Albemarle Regional Transit Authority Plan
The Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPa), City of
Charlottesville (City), and the County of Albemarle (County) intend to develop an expanded and
enhanced regional transit service, a governing structure, and a set of mechanisms to fund this
service. Both the City and the County are eager to determine how best to grow the existing
municipal transit system, Charlottesville Transit Service (CTS), to become a regional transit
system. JAUNT is also a public transportation provider that serves the broader region. Within
the Charlottesville-Albemarle area, JAUNT's role is to provide Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA) complementary paratransit service, along with regional services that originate outside the
urban area but often include service to and from the urban area. Policy makers have agreed that
they are interested in regional transit alternatives that complement and take advantage of existing
JAUNT services, not in replacing JAUNT.
Establishing a Regional Transit Authority (RTA) will include three main work streams to review
issues and options and select the strategies that are best suited to the needs of the Charlottesville-
Albemarle area. Elements of the work streams may be conducted concurrently, and are detailed
on the attached task list. These work streams are:
1. Regional transit management and governance
2. Regional transit service and operations
3. Regional transit cost estimation (operating and capital) and funding
This Scope of Work outlines a thorough process to create a unified Regional Transit Authority
Plan (RTAP). The RTAP will outline how to implement the regional transit vision adopted by
the MPO, City, and County - fast, frequent, dependable, and seamless service that provides direct
links between and among the area's four major destinations: Downtown, UV A/Medical Center,
Pantops, and the Rt. 29 North Corridor.
The Regional Transit Authority Plan will identify routes, level of service, phasing, vehicle
technology, funding mechanisms, and operating responsibilities. The MPa, City, and County
intend to actively participate in the development of the R TAP, and to implement its
recommendations to create an RT A that provides an attractive, competitive choice for those who
travel throughout the region - residents, commuters, employees, students, and visitors.
General Division of Project Responsibilities:
The MPa recognizes that simultaneously analyzing multiple factors requires several
combinations and permutations to be under consideration at anyone time. In their proposals,
consultants are invited to demonstrate how the variables can be best addressed. The MPa will
also accept proposals that outline a different approach than that which appears in the Scope of
Work, provided that approach appears to be an improvement.
In general, the consultant will be responsible for technical research and report production. while
Staff (includes MPO, City, County, DRPT, VDOT, UV A, and other interested stakeholders) will
be responsible for public involvement activities.
1
DRAFT RTA Scope of Work
Draft as of 1/22/07
The consultant shall provide clarification to Staff of research and reports as needed. While Staff
will be primarily responsible for public involvement, the consultant shall assist Staff by making
technical presentations and aiding, as needed, in responses to questions and comments. The
details of the Budget and Timeline outlined in this Scope of Work, along with a more specific
division of responsibilities, will be finalized when a final consultant contract is negotiated.
Regional Transit Authority Plan (RT AP) Tasks:
1. Regional Transit Management and Governance
a. Identify the advantages and disadvantages of forming a regional transit authority (RT A) that would
include the County of Albemarle and the City of Charlottesville, as outlined in the Regional Transit
Vision endorsed by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), City of Charlottesville City
Council, and the County of Albemarle Board of Supervisors. The advantages and disadvantages
should be compared to the option of Charlottesville Transit Service (CTS) increasing service within
the County or City in response to funded requests for service.
b. Provide a detailed exploration of at least three potential frameworks for the organizational and
management structure of the RT A; include review of other similar agencies/organizations.
Recommend one of the frameworks.
c. Develop a labor analysis and recommend a staffing plan for operations and administration based on
current levels of service. Identify future positions that may be necessary.
d. Provide a summary matrix that identifies all functional areas of responsibility of a transit
organization (e.g. legal, human resources, accounting, facility maintenance)
e. Identify the advantages and disadvantages of incorporating University Transit Service (UTS) in the
RTA. Outline options for UTS participation.
2. Regional Transit Service and Operations
a. Estimate ridership impacts, such as the potential to attract new transit riders (e.g. how many people
might begin commuting by transit who previously commuted by car). Emphasis should also be
placed on the potential impact on current non-riders that currently commute alone into the
Charlottesville-Albemarle area, but may participate in commuter transit, RideShare or other
carpooling activities once regional transit service is provided.
b. Outline at least three potential frameworks for transit service in the Charlottesville - Albemarle area,
including recommended service routes, corridors, and destinations. Recommend one of the
frameworks. The frameworks should also specify how service provided by the RT A will interact
with other transit service such as UTS, JAUNT, Greene County Transit, Charlottesville-Albemarle
Airport, Amtrak, and others.
c. Identify areas for priority transit service, including review of how existing CTS and UTS service can
be modified to work in a way that complements and takes advantage of priority transit service. This
should include consideration of JAUNT in its role as a regional transit provider and as the
complementary paratransit service provider for CTS.
d. Provide a summary matrix and map that identifies existing CTS routes and service showing how it is
recommended that areas currently served by CTS will be served by the RTA. Include frequency,
span of service, day of week, and cost comparisons. Any recommended service improvements
should also be addressed in this matrix.
2
DRAFT RTA Scope of Work
Draft as of 1/22/07
e. Evaluate capital needs, including vehicle, customer service, infrastructure improvements, and
operations technologies.
f. Identify service standards that should be met including level of service, customer service, and others.
This should also include preliminary development of performance measures to be used to monitor
how well service standards are met.
3. Regional Transit Cost Estimation and Funding
a. Determine the amount of prior investment in CTS made by each member of the RTA. Review
current CTS service levels and costs and consider current and planned CTS facility and equipment
needs and costs.
b. Provide a summary matrix of cost estimates for operations and staffing plan for the recommended
regional transit framework (Tasks I band 2b).
c. Provide a summary matrix that identifies how the functional areas of CTS (Task 2c) are currently
funded by the City of Charlottesville and how it is recommended that they be addressed by the RT A.
d. Provide a summary matrix of facility and equipment needs for the recommended regional transit
framework (Task 2b). Include cost estimates.
e. Develop a funding formula for the determination of local share for each member of the RTA,
including accounting for prior investments by the members.
f. Develop new strategies for enhancing sources of revenue (e.g. potential public-private partnerships).
g. Estimate the RT A's impact on State and Federal funds for public transportation in the Charlottesville
- Albemarle area. Separately consider operating and capital funds.
4. Regional Transit Authority Plan and Recommendations
a. If the Consultant concludes that forming an RTA is desirable, recommend a plan to transition from
CTS to the RTA. The transition plan should address the reality that CTS is currently governed by
the City of Charlottesville while the RT A will be overseen by both the City and the County.
Therefore, the transition of each functional area of a transit organization listed in the summary
matrix (Task 2c) must be addressed. If the Consultant concludes that forming an RTA is not
desirable, then make recommendations about other initiatives that the City and County can pursue
(such as contracting, enhanced service coordination, and marketing) that will improve the
effectiveness of the public transportation system.
3
DRAFT RTA Scope of Work
Draft as of 1/22/07
ESTIMATED BUDGET:
The estimated budget is outlined below. This budget is an approximation; a detailed budget
estimate will be finalized when a consultant contract is ne otiated.
1 Re ional Transit Mana ement and Governance
Identify advantages and disadvantages of forming a Regional Transit Authority
RTA
b Provide a detailed exploration of at least 3 potential frameworks for the
or ranizational and mana ement structure of the RTA- recommend one
c Develop a labor analysis and recommend a staffing plan for operations and
administration' identif future ositions that ma be necessar
d Provide a summary matrix that identifies all functional areas of responsibility
e. . Ie al human resources etc.
e Identif the advanta es and disadvanta es of inco
Task Subtotal
2 Re ional Transit Service and 0 erations
a Estimate ridership impacts, including potential to attract new riders. Include
em hasis on otential for current non-riders to become riders
b Outline 3 potential frameworks for transit service; Recommend one; Specify
how R T A will interact with other trans ortation services
c Identify areas for priority transit service, include suggestions for modification 0
CTS routes and consideration of JAUNT UTS
d Provide a summary matrix and map that identifies existing CTS routes and
service and how it is recommended that they are served by the R T A; include
recommended service im rovements
e Evaluate ca ita 1 needs e. . vehicle 0 erations infrastructure etc.
f Identif service standards Develo reliminar erformance measures
Task Subtotal
3 Re ional Transit Cost Estimation and Fundin Tasks
a Determine the amount of prior investment in CTS by each RTA member;
Review current and planned CTS service levels, facility and equipment needs
and costs
b Provide a summary matrix of cost estimates for operations and staffing plan.
c Provide a summary matrix to identify transit organization's functional areas of
res onsibili how the are funded and how RT A will address
d Provide a summar matrix of facili and e ui ment needs
e Develop a funding formula for determining local share for each RTA member;
account for rior investment b members
f Develo new strate ies for enhancin sources of revenue
g Estimate the RT A's impact on State and Federal funds; separately consider
o era tin and ca ital funds
Task Subtotal
4 Re ional Transit Authorit Plan and Recommendations
a Recommend RT A transition plan OR other initiatives to improve RT A
effectiveness
Task Subtotal
Total Consultant Estimated Costs
Total Sta . Estimated Costs
Overall Bud et Estimate
27%
33%
33%
70'
/0
100%
$40,000
$50,000
$50,000
$10,000
$150,000
$40,000
$190,000
4
DRAFT RTA Scope of Work
Draft as of 1/22/07
PROJECT TIMELINE
This work is expected to take nine - twelve months to complete. Several of the subtasks will be
completed concurrently. A detailed timeline will be finalized when a consultant contract is
ne otiated.
1 Re ional Transit Mana ement and Governance
a Identify advantages and disadvantages of forming a Regional Transit
Authorit RTA
b Provide a detailed exploration of at least 3 potential frameworks for the
or anizational and mana ement structure of the RTA- recommend one
c Develop a labor analysis and recommend a staffing plan for operations
and administration; identify future positions that may be necessary
d Provide a summary matrix that identifies all functional areas of
responsibility (e.g. legal, human resources, etc.)
e Identify the advantages and disadvantages of incorporating UTS
2 Re ional Transit Service and 0 erations
a Estimate ridership impacts, including potential to attract new riders.
Include em hasis on otential for current non-riders to become riders
b Outline 3 potential frameworks for transit service; Recommend one;
S ecif how RT A will interact with other trans ortation services
c Identify areas for priority transit service, include suggestions for
modification of existing CTS & UTS routes, and consideration of JAUNT
d Provide a summary matrix and map that identifies existing CTS routes
and service and how it is recommended that they are served by the R T A;
include recommended service improvements
e Evaluate capital needs (e.g. vehicle, operations, infrastructure, etc.)
f Identify service standards, Develop preliminary performance measures
3 Re ional Transit Cost Estimation and Fundin Tasks
a Determine the amount of prior investment in CTS by each RTA member;
Review current and planned CTS service levels, facility and equipment
needs and costs
b Provide a summary matrix of cost estimates for operations and staffing
Ian
c Provide a summary matrix to identify transit organization's functional
areas of responsibility, how they are funded, and how RTA will address
d Provide a summar matrix of facili and e ui ment needs
e Develop a funding formula for determining local share for each R T A
member; account for prior investment by members
f Develop new strategies for enhancing sources of revenue
g Estimate the RTA's impact on State and Federal funds; separately
consider operating and capital funds
4 Re ional Transit Authorit Plan and Recommendations
a Recommend RTA Ian OR other initiatives to im rove re ional transit
5
Resolution Authorizing Funding for the
Regional Transit Authority Plan
WHEREAS, The Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Policy
Board has authorized Harrison Rue, Executive Director of the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission
(TJPDC) as fiscal agent for the MPO, to execute and file an application to the Department of Rail and Public
Transportation, Cormnonwealth of Virginia, hereafter referred to as "Department," for a grant of financial
assistance in the amount of $100,000 to defray the costs for the development of the Regional Transit Authority
Plan (R TAP) and to accept from the Department grants in such amounts as may be awarded, and to authorize
MPO Staff to furnish to the Department such documents and other information as may be required for
processing the grant request; and
WHEREAS, a grant of financial assistance from the Department requires a local match of 10% and
the 10% local match for this grant of financial assistance is $10,000; and
WHEREAS, the costs of the local match of $10,000 will be distributed equally between the City of
Charlottesville and County of Albemarle, with each contributing $5,000; and
WHEREAS, The Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Policy
Board has approved the Regional Transit Authority Plan (RTAP) Scope of Work budget estimate with
$100,000 funded by the Department and $100,000 funded by combined equal contribution from the County of
Albemarle and City of Charlottesville, and
WHEREAS, The Charlottesville-Albemarle MPO Policy Board has recormnended that the County of
Albemarle and City of Charlottesville contribute $50,000 each to the RT AP which includes $5,000 from each
jurisdiction to fund the 10% local match required by the Department.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the County of Albemarle will provide funds in the amount
of $50,000, to contribute to the Regional Transit Authority Plan, of which $5,000 will be used to match the
state funds in the ratio as required and $45,000 will fund its share of the remaining costs of the approved Scope
of Work approved by unanimous vote of the MPO Policy Board.
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true and correct copy of a Resolution
duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County by a vote of to , as recorded
below, at a meeting held on
Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
Aye Nay
Mr. Boyd
Mr. Dorrier
Mr. Rooker
Mr. Slutzky
Ms. Thomas
Mr. Wyant
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF COLORADO
HEALTH FACILITIES AUTHORITY REVENUE BONDS IN A MAXIMUM
AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $51,000,000 FOR THE PURPOSES OF
FINANCING AND REFINANCING THE COSTS OF ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION,
IMPROVEMENT, RENOVATION, REMODELING, FURNISHING AND EQUIPPING OF
CERTAIN HEALTH FACILITIES AND CERTAIN OTHER MATTERS RELATING
THERETO
WHEREAS, there has been described to the Industrial Development Authority of
Albemarle County, Virginia (the "Albemarle Authority") in a public hearing on behalf
of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("Albemarle County") the plan of financing of
Global Country of World Peace (the "Borrower"), an Iowa nonprofit corporation
exempt from taxation under Section 501 (c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the "Code") which has its principal place of business at 1900 Capital Blvd.,
Fairfield, Iowa 52566;
WHEREAS, the Borrower has requested that the Colorado Health Facilities
Authority (the "Colorado Issuer") issue its revenue bonds (the "Bonds") in one or
more series in a maximum amount of a total of $51 ,000,000;
WHEREAS, the Borrower has represented that the proceeds of the Bonds will be
used to: (a) finance the costs of acquisition, construction, improvement, renovation,
remodeling, furnishing and equipping of certain health and health related support
facilities of the Borrower, including but not limited to (i) regional peace center facilities to
be located on approximately 450 acres at 137 Waldemere Road, Livingston Manor,
New York; on approximately 1160 combined acres at 20043 70 Road, Lebanon Kansas
and 17022 100 Road, Smith Center, Kansas; on approximately 668 acres at 160 Echota
and Old Fort Road, Asheville, North Carolina; on approximately 522 acres at 00000 Lost
Valley Road, 1000 feet southeast of the corner of Blackwood Drive and Canebrake
Road, Boulevard, California; and on approximately 52 acres at 21650 Ballenger Road,
Cedarpines Park, California; and (ii) local peace center facilities at the approximately
three acres adjacent to the northern boundary of 1068 Elkton Drive, Colorado Springs,
Colorado; 5504 Edson Road, N. Bethesda, Maryland; 380 Parkland Plaza, Ann Arbor,
Michigan; 399 Ruth Street S., St. Paul, Minnesota; 968 154th Street, Pleasant Dale,
Nebraska; 1929 Greentree Road, Cherry Hill, New Jersey; 9450 Transit Road, E.
Amherst, New York; 1669 Pittsford Victor Road, Perinton, New York; .28 miles west of
Old Willets Path on the south side of Route 25, Smithtown, Long Island, New York; 999
Rocky Ridge, Asheville, North Carolina; 971 Beaver Grade Road, Coraopolis,
Pennsylvania; 3254 East Main Road, Portsmouth, Rhode Island; One Alpha Lane,
Hixson, Tennessee; 7901 Centre Park Drive, Austin, Texas; Whitewood Road at the
SW corner of Whitewood and Oak Forest Drive, in Charlottesville, Virginia (Lot B, Div of
Parcel 26, with a proposed street address of 109 Whitewood Road) (collectively, the
"Facilities"); (b) fund capitalized interest on the Bonds, if any; (c) fund any required
debt service reserve fund; and (d) pay certain costs of issuance of the Bonds, including
initial costs of any credit enhancement. Each local peace center or related facility will
consist of an approximately 12,000 square foot two-story facility in which the Borrower
intends to conduct health and wellness activities or related support activities. Each
regional peace center will consist of at least one, but not more than four of the same
approximately 12,000 square foot facility where the Borrower intends to conduct health
and wellness activities or related support activities. No more than $10,000,000 of the
proceeds of the Bonds is expected to be spent in any single location. No more than
$3,500,000 of the proceeds of the Bonds will be used to finance Facilities located at
Whitewood Road at the SW corner of Whitewood and Oak Forest Drive, in
Charlottesville, Virginia (Lot B, Div of Parcel 26, with a proposed street address of 109
Whitewood Road). The Borrower will be the owner and operator of the Facilities and
will be the party responsible for all costs of the Facilities and all costs of the issuance of
and debt service on the Bonds;
WHEREAS, the Facilities located on Whitewood Road at the corner of
Whitewood and Oak Forest Drive, in Charlottesville, Virginia (Lot B, Div of Parcel 26,
with a proposed street address of 109 Whitewood Road) (the "Albemarle Facilities")
to be financed or refinanced are located within the territorial limits of Albemarle County;
WHEREAS, that there has been published, at least 14 days prior to the date of
the meeting of the Albemarle Authority in which the public hearing was held, in a
newspaper of general circulation within Albemarle County, a notice that a public hearing
regarding the Bonds would be held on the date thereof; and
WHEREAS, such public hearing was conducted on February 13, 2007, by the
Albemarle Authority on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, at
which time an opportunity was provided to interested parties to present arguments both
for and against the issuance of the Bonds; and
WHEREAS, the issuance of the Bonds by the Colorado Issuer will not constitute
a debt or pledge of the faith and credit of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Albemarle
County or the Albemarle Authority;
WHEREAS, the Borrower described the benefits to Albemarle County and
requested the Albemarle Authority recommend to the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County its approval of and concurrence with the issuance of the Bonds by the Colorado
Issuer in such amounts as may be necessary to finance the cost of the Facilities;
WHEREAS, the Albemarle Authority after public hearing, has recommended that
the Board of Supervisors approve of and concur with the issuance of the Bonds by the
Colorado Issuer in such amounts as may be necessary to finance the cost of the
Facilities,
WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Code provides that both the governmental unit
having jurisdiction over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of
private activity bonds is located and the governmental unit on behalf of which such
bonds are issued must approve the issuance of the bonds after public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Albemarle Facilities included within the Facilities to be financed
through the issuance of the Bonds is located in Albemarle County and the Board of
Supervisors of Albemarle County constitutes the highest elected governmental unit of
Albemarle County; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
1. The Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County following the public hearing by the
Albemarle Authority on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County,
hereby approves and concurs with the financing of the Albemarle Facilities and the
issuance of the Bonds by the Colorado Issuer for the benefit of the Borrower, as
required by Section 147(f) of the Code.
2. The approval of and concurrence with the issuance of the Bonds, as required by
said Section 147(f) of the Code, do not constitute an endorsement of the Bonds or
the creditworthiness of the Borrower or otherwise indicate that the Albemarle
Facilities possesses any economic viability. The issuance of the Bonds by the
Colorado Issuer will not constitute a debt or pledge of the faith and credit of the
Commonwealth of Virginia, the Albemarle Authority or Albemarle County, Virginia.
Neither the Commonwealth of Virginia nor any political subdivision thereof, including
the Albemarle Authority and Albemarle County, Virginia shall be obligated to pay the
Bonds, or the interest thereon, or other costs incident thereto, and neither the faith
and credit nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth of Virginia nor any political
subdivision thereof, including the Albemarle Authority and Albemarle County,
Virginia, will be pledged to payment of principal of such Bonds or the interest
thereon or other costs incidental thereto.
3. The Chairman or Vice Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, County Administrator,
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors or other County officials are hereby authorized and
directed to take such action and to execute and deliver such certificates or
documents which they deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out, give effect
to and comply with terms and intent of this resolution.
4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
CERTIFICATE
The resolution set forth above was adopted at an open meeting during a regular
meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, all in accordance
with law, by the following votes:
AYES: Mr. Boyd, Mr. Dorrier, Mr. Rooker, Mr. Slutzky, Ms. Thomas and Mr. Wyant.
NAYS: None.
ABSTENTIONS: None.
The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia
hereby certifies that the foregoing is a true, correct and complete copy of a Resolution
adopted by a majority of the members present and voting during an open meeting at a
meeting duly called and held on February 14, 2007, in accordance with law, and that
such Resolution has not been repealed, revoked, rescinded or amended but is in full
force and effect on the date hereof.
WITNESS the following ~~/:" : da~ February, 2007.
Clerk, Board of Supervisors of Albe Ie County, Virginia
[SEAL]
SANDS ANDERSON
MARKS & MILLER ~~
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Daniel lV1. Siegel
Attorney
RICHMOND. BlACKSBURG . FREDERICKSBURG
FAiRFAX. McLEAN
RESEARCH TRIANGLE
Direct: (804) 783-7219
E-mail: DSiegcl(dSandsAnderson.com
WWW.SANDSANDERSON.COM
80 I East Main Street
Post Office Box 1998
Richmond, Virginia 232 i 8-1 ()98
Main: (800) 296-1636
Fax: (804) 7x3-7291
February 6,2007
Ms. Ella Carey
Board of Supervisors
Albemarle County Administration Building
401 McIntire Road, 4111 Floor
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: Public Approval for up to $51,000,000 revenue bonds to be issued by the
Colorado Health Facilities Authority
Dear Ms. Carey:
As promised, enclosed with this letter is a proposed Resolution tcn presentation to the
Board of Supervisors at its meeting on Wednesday, February 14th, following a public hearing
held on February 13111 by the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia, at
the request of the applicant, Global Country of World Peace (the "Borrower").
The BOITower seeks to finance a number of regional and local health and health related
facilities in various locations throughout the country through the issuance of revenue bonds by
the Colorado Health Facilities Authority (the "Colorado Authority") in a maximum aggregate
principal amount of up to $51,000,000 (the "Bonds"), including a facility located at Whitewood
Road at the SW corner of Whitewood Road and Oak Forest Drive in Albemarle County, Virginia
(lot B, Division of Parcel 26, with a proposed street address of 109 Whitewood Road,
Charlottesville, V A) (the "Albemarle Facilities"). No more than $3.500,000 from the issue of
Bonds will be used f()r the Albemarle Facilities.
The Albemarle Facilities will consist of an approximately J 2,000 square foot two-story
facility in which the Borrower intends to conduct health and wellness activities or related support
activities.
The Bonds are expected to be sold or placed with a large national tax exempt bond fi.ll1d.
the same fund which purchased approximately $21 million of such Bonds in December of 2006
for the BOlTower.
Federal tax law (Section l47(t) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended)
requires that public approval be obtained from the highest applicable elected representative of
Ms. Ella Carey
February 6, 2007
Page 2 of2
the governmental umt 10 which the issuer is located and by the highest applicable elected
representative of the governmental unit in which the facility to be tinanced is located.
In this instance, the Issuer, the Colorado Authority, as a state issuer, must obtain the
approval from the Governor of Colorado.
In order for the Albemarle Facilities to be included as one of the Facilities to be financed
by the Bonds, a public hearing must be held and approval must be obtained by the Board of
Supervisors. In Virginia, this process is generally accomplished by a public hearing being held
by the local industrial development authority on behalf of the County, which is the purpose for
the request and public hearing
Prior to submission for approval to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, we are
seeking the recommendation of the Albemarle Authority after the holding of its public hearing.
week.
Thank you again tor all of your help on this matter.
;\
:?J::t1A
Daniel M: Siegel
look torward to seeing you next
Enclosures
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF COLORADO
HEAL TH FACILITIES AUTHORITY REVENUE BONDS IN A MAXIMUM
AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $51,000,000 FOR THE PURPOSES OF
FINANCING AND REFINANCING THE COSTS OF ACQUISITION,
CONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT, RENOVATION, REMODELING, FURNISHING
AND EQUIPPING OF CERTAIN HEALTH FACILITIES AND CERTAIN OTHER
MATTERS RELATING THERETO
WHEREAS, there has been described to the Industrial Development Authority of
Albemarle County, Virginia (the "Albemarle Authority") in a public hearing on behalf of the
County of Albemarle, Virginia ("Albemarle County") the plan of financing of Global Country
of World Peace (the "Borrower"), an Iowa nonprofit corporation exempt from taxation under
Section 501(c)(3) ofthe Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") which has its
principal place of business at 1900 Capital Blvd., Fairfield, Iowa 52566;
WHEREAS, the Borrower has requested that the Colorado Health Facilities Authority
(the "Colorado Issuer") issue its revenue bonds (the "Bonds") in one or more series in a
maximum amount ofa total of$51,000,000;
WHEREAS, the Borrower has represented that the proceeds of the Bonds will be used
to: (a) finance the costs of acquisition, construction, improvement, renovation, remodeling,
furnishing and equipping of certain health and health related support facilities of the Borrower,
including but not limited to (i) regional peace center facilities to be located on approximately 450
acres at 137 Waldemere Road, Livingston Manor, New York; on approximately 1160 combined
acres at 20043 70 Road, Lebanon Kansas and 17022 100 Road, Smith Center, Kansas; on
approximately 668 acres at 160 Echota and Old Fort Road, Asheville, North Carolina; on
approximately 522 acres at 00000 Lost Valley Road, 1000 feet southeast of the comer of
Blackwood Drive and Canebrake Road, Boulevard, California; and on approximately 52 acres at
21650 Ballenger Road, Cedarpines Park, California; and (ii) local peace center facilities at the
approximately three acres adjacent to the northern boundary of 1068 Elkton Drive, Colorado
Springs, Colorado; 5504 Edson Road, N. Bethesda, Maryland; 380 Parkland Plaza, Ann Arbor,
Michigan; 399 Ruth Street S., St. Paul, Minnesota; 968 154th Street, Pleasant Dale, Nebraska;
1929 Greentree Road, Cherry Hill, New Jersey; 9450 Transit Road, E. Amherst, New York;
1669 Pittsford Victor Road, Perinton, New York; .28 miles west of Old Willets Path on the south
side of Route 25, Smithtown, Long Island, New York; 999 Rocky Ridge, Asheville, North
Carolina; 971 Beaver Grade Road, Coraopolis, Pennsylvania; 3254 East Main Road, Portsmouth,
Rhode Island; One Alpha Lane, Hixson, Tennessee; 7901 Centre Park Drive, Austin, Texas;
Whitewood Road at the SW comer of Whitewood and Oak Forest Drive, in Charlottesville,
Virginia (Lot B, Div of Parcel 26, with a proposed street address of 109 Whitewood Road)
(collectively, the "Facilities"); (b) fund capitalized interest on the Bonds, if any; (c) fund any
required debt service reserve fund; and (d) pay certain costs of issuance of the Bonds, including
initial costs of any credit enhancement. Each local peace center or related facility will consist of
an approximately 12,000 square foot two-story facility in which the Borrower intends to conduct
{W0381681.1 012265-067652}
health and wellness activities or related support actIvItIes. Each regional peace center will
consist of at least one, but not more than four of the same approximately 12,000 square foot
facility where the Borrower intends to conduct health and wellness activities or related support
activities. No more than $10,000,000 of the proceeds of the Bonds is expected to be spent in any
single location. No more than $3,500,000 of the proceeds of the Bonds will be used to finance
Facilities located at Whitewood Road at the SW comer of Whitewood and Oak Forest Drive, in
Charlottesville, Virginia (Lot B, Div of Parcel 26, with a proposed street address of 109
Whitewood Road). The Borrower will be the owner and operator of the Facilities and will be the
party responsible for all costs of the Facilities and all costs of the issuance of and debt service on
the Bonds;.
WHEREAS, the Facilities located on Whitewood Road at the comer of Whitewood and
Oak Forest Drive, in Charlottesville, Virginia (Lot B, Div of Parcel 26, with a proposed street
address of 109 Whitewood Road) (the "Albemarle Facilities") to be financed or refinanced are
located within the territorial limits of Albemarle County;
WHEREAS, that there has been published, at least 14 days prior to the date of the
meeting of the Albemarle Authority in which the public hearing was held, in a newspaper of
general circulation within Albemarle County, a notice that a public hearing regarding the Bonds
would be held on the date thereof; and
WHEREAS, such public hearing was conducted on February 13, 2007, by the Albemarle
Authority on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, at which time an
opportunity was provided to interested parties to present arguments both for and against the
issuance of the Bonds; and
WHEREAS, the issuance of the Bonds by the Colorado Issuer will not constitute a debt
or pledge of the faith and credit of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Albemarle County or the
Albemarle Authority;
WHEREAS, the Borrower described the benefits to Albemarle County and requested the
Albemarle Authority recommend to the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County its approval
of and concurrence with the issuance of the Bonds by the Colorado Issuer in such amounts as
may be necessary to finance the cost of the Facilities;
WHEREAS, the Albemarle Authority after public hearing, has recommended that the
Board of Supervisors approve of and concur with the issuance of the Bonds by the Colorado
Issuer in such amounts as may be necessary to finance the cost of the Facilities,
WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Code provides that both the governmental unit having
jurisdiction over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of private activity
bonds is located and the governmental unit on behalf of which such bonds are issued must
approve the issuance ofthe bonds after public hearing; and
{W0381681.1 012265-067652}
WHEREAS, the Albemarle Facilities included within the Facilities to be financed
through the issuance of the Bonds is located in Albemarle County and the Board of Supervisors
of Albemarle County constitutes the highest elected governmental unit of Albemarle County; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
1. The Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County following the public hearing by the
Albemarle Authority on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, hereby
approves and concurs with the financing of the Albemarle Facilities and the issuance of the
Bonds by the Colorado Issuer for the benefit of the Borrower, as required by Section 147 (f)
of the Code.
2. The approval of and concurrence with the issuance of the Bonds, as required by said Section
147(f) of the Code, do not constitute an endorsement of the Bonds or the creditworthiness of
the Borrower or otherwise indicate that the Albemarle Facilities possesses any economic
viability. The issuance of the Bonds by the Colorado Issuer will not constitute a debt or
pledge of the faith and credit of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the Albemarle Authority or
Albemarle County, Virginia. Neither the Commonwealth of Virginia nor any political
subdivision thereof, including the Albemarle Authority and Albemarle County, Virginia shall
be obligated to pay the Bonds, or the interest thereon, or other costs incident thereto, and
neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth of Virginia nor any
political subdivision thereof, including the Albemarle Authority and Albemarle County,
Virginia, will be pledged to payment of principal of such Bonds or the interest thereon or
other costs incidental thereto.
3. The Chairman or Vice Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, County Administrator, Clerk
of the Board of Supervisors or other County officials are hereby authorized and directed to
take such action and to execute and deliver such certificates or documents which they deem
necessary or advisable in order to carry out, give effect to and comply with terms and intent
of this resolution.
4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
CERTIFICATE
The resolution set forth above was adopted at an open meeting during a regular meeting
of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, all in accordance with law, by the
following votes:
AYES:
NAYS:
{W0381681.1 012265-067652}
ABSTENTIONS:
The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia
hereby certifies that the foregoing is a true, correct and complete copy of a Resolution adopted
by a majority of the members present and voting during an open meeting at a meeting duly called
and held on February 14, 2007, in accordance with law, and that such Resolution has not been
repealed, revoked, rescinded or amended but is in full force and effect on the date hereof.
WITNESS the following signature this _ day of February, 2007.
Clerk, Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia
[SEAL]
{W0381681.1 012265-067652}
At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle,
Virginia, held on the 14th day of February 2007, the following Board members were
recorded as present:
PRESENT: Kenneth C. Boyd; Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr.; Dennis S. Rooker; David Slutzky;
Sally H. Thomas; and David C. Wyant.
On motion by Sallv Thomas, seconded by David Wyant, the attached Resolution
was adopted by a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors by a roll call
vote, the votes being recorded as follows:
MEMBER VOTE
Mr. Boyd Aye
Mr. Dorrier Aye
Mr. Rooker Aye
Mr. Slutzky Aye
Ms. Thomas Aye
Mr. Wyant Aye
RESOLUTION
OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia
("Authority"), has considered the application of Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue
Ridge ("Borrower") requesting the issuance of the Authority's revenue bonds in an
amount not to exceed $45,000,000 ("Bonds") to assist the Borrower in (a) refinancing all
or a portion of the Authority's $69,815,000 Residential Care Facility Mortgage Revenue
Bonds, Series 2001A issued on October 12, 2001 to finance or refinance various of
capital projects at the Borrower's continuing care retirement community ("Facility"),
located at 250 Pantops Mountain Drive in Albemarle County, Virginia (b) financing
additional capital improvements to the Facility, and (c) financing a debt service reserve
fund and costs of issuance for the bonds (collectively, the "Project"), and has held a
public hearing on February 13, 2007.
WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the "Code"), provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of
private activity bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds
of private activity bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds;
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Albemarle,
Virginia ("County"); the Project is located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of
the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("Board") constitutes the highest elected
governmental unit of the County;
WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended that the Board approve the
issuance of the Bonds; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the
Bonds, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, a certificate of the public hearing and a
Fiscal Impact Statement have been filed with the Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA:
1 . The Board approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for the
benefit of the Borrower, as required by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 15.2-4906
of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended to permit the Authority to assist in the
refinancing of the Project.
2. The approval of the issuance of the Bonds does not constitute an
endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bonds of the creditworthiness of the
Project or the Borrower.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
February 13, 2007
Board of Supervisors
Albemarle County, Virginia
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia
Proposed Financing for Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge
Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge ("Borrower") has requested that the Industrial
Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia ("Authority"), assist the Borrower in (a)
refinancing all or a portion of the Authority's $69,815,000 Residential Care Facility Mortgage
Revenue Bonds, Series 2001A issued on October 12, 2001 to finance or refinance a variety of
capital projects at the Borrower's continuing care retirement community ("Facility"), located at
250 Pantops Mountain Drive in Albemarle County, Virginia (b) financing additional capital
improvements to the Facility, and (c) financing a debt service reserve fund and costs of issuance
for the bonds by the issuance of its revenue bonds in the amount not to exceed $45,000,000
("Bonds").
As set forth in the resolution of the Authority attached hereto ("Resolution"), the
Authority has agreed to issue its Bonds as requested. The Authority has conducted a public
hearing on the proposed refinancing of the Project and has recommended that you approve the
issuance of the Bonds as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, and Section 15.2-4906 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended.
Attached hereto is (1) a certificate evidencing the conduct of the public hearing and the
action taken by the Authority, (2) the Fiscal Impact Statement required pursuant to Virginia
Code Section 15.2-4907, and (3) the form of resolution suggested by counsel to evidence your
approval.
Secretary, Industrial Development Authority
of Albemarle County, Virginia
CERTIFICATE
The undersigned Secretary of the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle
County, Virginia ("Authority") certifies as follows:
1. A meeting of the Authority was duly called and held on February 13, 2007, at 4:00
o'clock p.m. in the Fourth Floor Conference Room of the County Office Building, 401 McIntire
Road, Charlottesville, Virginia, pursuant to proper notice given to each Director of the Authority
before such meeting. The meeting was open to the public. The time of the meeting and the
place at which the meeting was held provided a reasonable opportunity for persons of differing
views to appear and be heard.
2. The Chairman announced the commencement of a public hearing on the application
of Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge and that a notice of the hearing was published
once a week for two successive weeks in a newspaper having general circulation in the County
of Albemarle Virginia ("Notice"), with the second publication appearing not less than seven days
nor more than twenty-one days prior to the hearing date. A copy of the Notice has been filed
with the minutes of the Authority and is attached as Exhibit A.
3. A summary of the statements made at the public hearing is attached as Exhibit B.
4. Attached as Exhibit C is a true, correct and complete copy of a resolution
("Resolution") adopted at such meeting of the Authority by a majority of the Directors present at
such meeting. The Resolution constitutes all formal action taken by the Authority at such
meeting relating to matters referred to in the Resolution. The Resolution has not been repealed,
revoked, rescinded or amended and is in full force and effect on this date.
WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Authority, this 13th day of February, 2007.
Secretary, Industrial Development Authority
of Albemarle County, Virginia
[SEAL]
Exhibits:
A - Copy of Certified Notice
B - Summary of Statements
C - Inducement Resolution
-2-
EXHIBIT B TO CERTIFICATE
Summary of Statements
Representatives of Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge and McGuireWoods LLP,
bond counsel, appeared before the Authority to explain the proposed plan of financing. No one
appeared in opposition to the proposed bond issue
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
FOR PROPOSED BOND FINANCING
Date: February 13, 2007
To the Board of Supervisors
of Albemarle County, Virginia
Applicant:
F acili ty:
Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge
Continuing Care Retirement Community
1.
Maximum amount of financing sought.
$
45,000,000
2.
Estimated taxable value of the facility's real property
to be constructed in the locality.
$
6,000,000
3.
Estimated real property tax per year using present tax
rates.
$
800,000
4. Estimated personal property tax per year using
present tax rates. $ 25,000
5. Estimated merchants' capital tax per year using
present tax rates. $ 0
6. (a) Estimated dollar value per year of goods that will be
purchased from Virginia companies within the $ 2,000,000
locality.
(b) Estimated dollar value per year of goods that will be
purchased from non-Virginia companies within the
locality.
$
1,000,000
(c) Estimated dollar value per year of services that will
be purchased from Virginia companies within the
locality.
$
200,000
(d) Estimated dollar value per year of services that will
be purchased from non-Virginia companies within
the locality.
$
100,000
7.
Estimated number of regular employees on year
round basis.
260
8.
Average annual salary per employee.
$
30,000
Chairman, Industrial Development Authority
of Albemarle County, Virginia
At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia,
held on the 14th day of February 2007, the following Board members were recorded as present:
PRESENT:
On
motion
by
seconded
by
, the attached Resolution was adopted by a majority of the
members ofthe Board of Supervisors by a roll call vote, the votes being recorded as follows:
MEMBER
VOTE
RESOLUTION
OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia
("Authority"), has considered the application of Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge
("Borrower") requesting the issuance of the Authority's revenue bonds in an amount not to
exceed $45,000,000 ("Bonds") to assist the Borrower in (a) refinancing all or a portion of the
Authority's $69,815,000 Residential Care Facility Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2001A
issued on October 12, 2001 to finance or refinance various of capital projects at the Borrower's
continuing care retirement community ("Facility"), located at 250 Pantops Mountain Drive in
Albemarle County, Virginia (b) financing additional capital improvements to the Facility, and (c)
financing a debt service reserve fund and costs of issuance for the bonds (collectively, the
"Project"), and has held a public hearing on February 13, 2007.
WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
"Code"), provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of private
activity bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of private
activity bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds;
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Albemarle,
Virginia ("County"); the Project is located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Albemarle, Virginia ("Board") constitutes the highest elected governmental unit of the
County;
WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended that the Board approve the issuance of the
Bonds; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bonds,
subject to the terms to be agreed upon, a certificate of the public hearing and a Fiscal Impact
Statement have been filed with the Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA:
1: The Board approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for the benefit of
the Borrower, as required by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 15.2-4906 of the Code of
Virginia of 1950, as amended to permit the Authority to assist in the refinancing of the Project.
2. The approval of the issuance of the Bonds does not constitute an endorsement to a
prospective purchaser ofthe Bonds of the creditworthiness of the Project or the Borrower.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
Adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia this 14th day
of February, 2007.
Clerk, Board of Supervisors of the
County of Albemarle, Virginia
[SEAL]
-2-
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
FY07 Second Quarter Financial Report
AGENDA DATE:
February 14, 2007
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SU BJ ECT/PROPOSALlREQUEST:
Quarterly Financial Report for the Six Months
Ended December 31, 2006
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: INFORMATION: X
LEGAL REVIEW: Yes
REVIEWED BY:
/~
(
ST AFF CO NT ACT(S):
Tucker, White, Davis, Wiggans, Walters
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
BACKGROUND:
The attached Quarterly Financial Report provides information on the County's General Fund operations and Fund Balance
as of December 31, 2006. The Financial Report includes a bar chart that compares current fiscal year revenue and
expenditure data with data from the previous fiscal year.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Goal 5: Fund the County's Future Needs
DISCUSSION:
($ in Millions)
A. Attachment A: Financial Report:
1. Revenues:
The Department of Finance estimates that General Fund revenues will exceed appropriations by $2.182
million, 1.1 %, an increase of $0.41 0 million from the December 6,2006 Financial Report. Transfers from
other funds will exceed appropriations by $0.027 million. Total revenue, use of other funds, and use of
fund balance will exceed appropriations by $2.208 million, 1.1 %.
a. Real Estate tax revenues are estimated to exceed appropriations by $0.698 million, 0.7%, a
$0.948 million increase from the last Financial Report. The overall increase is due to a greater
than anticipated 2006 new construction and the finalization of the 2007 reassessment. The
Budget was prepared based on a 22.5%, net of land use, estimated reassessment increase. The
actual increase was 25.3%, an incremental increase of 2.8%.
b. Personal Property tax revenues are estimated to exceed appropriations by $0.743 million, 4.5%,
a $0.300 million decrease from the last Financial Report. The decrease is due to the lower than
anticipated 2006 second half tax bill total. The overall greater than appropriation increase
continues to be the result of frozen state PPTR payments shifting the tax burden from the state to
the taxpayer and an increase in vehicle assessments.
c. Business License tax revenues are estimated to exceed appropriations by $0.244 million, 2.7%, a
$0.001 decrease from the last Financial Report. The overall increase is due to the continuing
strong economy.
d. Utility tax revenues are estimated to be $0.241 million, 3.1 %, less than appropriations, a $0.091
million decrease from the last Financial Report. The decrease is due to the continued mild
weather conditions. Weather conditions are volatile and can change unexpectedly significantly
affecting revenues.
e. Food and Beverage tax revenues are estimated to exceed appropriations by $0.200 million, 3.9%,
a $0.150 million increase from the last Financial Report. The increase is attributed to the
continued growth in convenience food preparation as evident by the increased number of
restaurants.
f. Other Local tax revenues are estimated to exceed appropriations by $0.347 million, 3.7%, a
$0.032 million decrease from the last Financial Report. Vehicle License tax revenues are
expected to exceed appropriations by $0.200 million due to the increased number of vehicles as
well as the number of vehicles subject to the tax. Bank Franchise tax revenues are expected to
exceed appropriations by $0.150 million due to additional deposits with local branches.
g. Other Local revenues are estimated to exceed appropriations by $0.540 million, 10.9%, a $0.185
million increase from the last Financial Report. Interest revenues are expected to exceed
appropriation by $0.4 75 million due to higher yields and larger cash balances. Law enforcement
service fees continue to increase due to additional billable services.
h. State revenues are estimated to be $0.147 million, 0.6% less than appropriations, a $0.113
million increase from the last Financial Report. The overall decrease is due to the continued shift
from state to federal reimbursement for social service expenditures. Activity since the last
Financial Report has shown a reduction in the rate of change.
i. Other categories are estimated to vary less than $0.100 million from appropriations.
2. Expenditures:
Total Expenditures, including transfers, are within appropriate levels at 45.1 % for the first six months.
a. Departmental expenditures are at 44.3% of appropriations.
b. No attempt has been made to estimate expenditures.
3. Revised Revenues less Revised Expenditure Appropriations:
a. Revised revenues less appropriated expenditures project a $2.208 million increase by the end of
the fiscal year based on January revenue updates.
b. Fund Balance available February 14, 2007 is $0.784 million. This is net a reduction for an
estimated $9.225 million transfer to the CIP fund. The $0.784 million may be used for other
projects at the Board's discretion and approval.
c. Projected End-of-Year Available Funds are $2.991 million. This reflects the audited FY06 fund
balance, revised FY07 revenue estimates, supplemental appropriations, and the proposed CIP
transfer.
B. Attachment B: BudQet Comparison Report:
The bar-chart report tracks changes in revenue and expenditure changes over time.
1. Only two revenue categories, Other Local Taxes and State Revenue, project decreases over last year
actual revenues.
2. Expenditures in all categories except Non-School Transfers are expected to increase over FY06.
C. Attachment C: Fund Balance Report:
The report indicates that the County:
1. Has an Audited FY06 Fund Balance of $25.079 million at June 30, 2006,
2. Appropriated $2.020 million for FY07 projects,
3. Has a remaining FY06 Fund Balance of $23.059 million at December 31,2006,
4. Reserved $13.000 million for cash flow purposes,
5. Has approved a $0.50 million appropriation after December 31,2006,
6. Has a preliminary $9.225 million CIP transfer commitment, and
7. Has Unobligated Funds Available of $0.784 million at February 14, 2007.
BUDGET IMPACT:
This report is based on audited financial data for FY06 and six months of operations for FY07. Staff will utilize this data
as the basis for the FY08 Budget.
It is important to remember that any change in the County's real estate tax rate will impact both the FY07 and FY08
Budgeted tax revenues. Staff estimates that each one cent reduction is the real estate tax rate will reduce tax
revenues in FY07 by approximately $750,000.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
This report has been prepared for your information. No action is required.
ATTACHMENTS:
A - General Fund Quarterlv Financial Report
B - General Fund Budqet Comparison Report
C - General Fund Balance Report
07.020
<(
c
CD
E
.t::
~
<(
CD
o
o
N
....
M
t:: ...
o CIl
c..,Q
CIl E
It: B
:!CIl
(.)C
~c:'t:l
... ftI CIl
ftIc:'t:l
E .- c:
CIlLLWCil
,Q>. c
::::;:'t:Ul~
.....CIl.c:,-:
....t::-e
o ftI 5.5:
.a-::I~~
c:G)(
:::::I 't:l.-
Oc:(/)
O:::::lCll
LL.c:
-
fti ...
;.s!
c: CIl
CD-
C)~
I
o
'"'t
...
ftI
CD
>
III i
.. - ...
u 0
;~<
':6 :: (0
> e
~
"C .. III
.. '" ..
~ i ~
'[ i; 'i
lI..O::>
i
'C!tn
=cs
.- ~ <<I
ij; ij; E
D::O::i
w
...
e
:g ;
t ~o'"
... :~:
>:E j: Kl:g
> N
c: ...
~
...
'"
(.)
~ -0 la[
- ..
~~::
011I'3
~"u..
..,
o
ill
o
>
u..
...
..
..
>
...
o
.;::
lI..
la;
~iG
- '"
- -
'" u
u..<
~ .......0 ;!( ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;i(. ':?.[ ~
00.....0000000000
f'..ll'>oo-q-,........--O>f'..o)(O(")...
ci~crioNMMMcio..-....:
" , ,.... I ,
co (l') <0. O~~. 0,..... 0 r::::--.! N
~r!~2~~~~~~~~
oooc:ioocicioaON
U9- ------ --- ---
co 0 co 0 co ~ 0 co m co col "It
LOLOmLOCO,.....I/)...,.COCOCO...
CO('l')CO,.....('I')~(l'),.....~(l')m"llt
~~oMa)r--.:Lcia)"OM~CJi
~,.... ,.... N =
U>
~~~~~~~~~~~I,e
O~~&~N&,&fo~~&,
~a)a)~cDON,.....:,.....:O)NN
V""''''''('I') ""'LO(l')LOV~"llt
..,iG
0-=
:;~
NO
...~
('I') LO ,..... co co ,.... ,.... co .... (l') m,...
('I')NCOO<>>ONCOLOCO...,.N
""'N""'~""""","""LOCOCO,...."llt
~cDo~oMNMN~N.
'<t ~ co
U>
.., 'i~
ei
... ..
M
~ ~
<
m,..... ...,. 0 ('I') LO 0 0) C>> LO N'M
LOOCOOC\l,....LOC>>v,....MM
mco<>>CO""''''''',....(l')C>>LOON
cicOciMm""":..om.q:M..o"':
~,.... ,.... C\I ~
U>
I
~~
- ..
e 'C
"'0
0...
<
C>> ,..... V a ('I') LO 0 m ,..... LO NI'"
LOOCOON,....LOmOCOMCD
mCOC>>CO....,.....,....MC>>vO...
ococi('l)m~..om.q:(")..o,..:
0,.... ,.... C\I m
~ ...
U>
~~~~~~~~~~~I~
~N&o~~&,&,fooM~
r--.:cDcDcOmom~~Lci~cw;
"lltV"lltM V""'(l')vVv"llt
..,iG
0-=
- u
~<
NO
......
>
o co ,..... ,.... ,.... 0 co ,..... C"') m ,.....1...
COC>>MO)COV,....LOM(O,...........
(O(l')("),.....COOLOC>>LOU'>C>>CD
~~ci~ci('l)N('I)Nc:i~,,)
'<t ~ ...
U>
...,. m 0 ,.... N co 0 co 0) (') <>>/M
V...,.C>>,....,.....OLO,.....,....,.....,...........
""'(")(0(")(")1.00...,.(")...,.,...._
r--.:..nciC".io)r--.:..nciLci(,,)~N
co,....,.... ,.... N IX)
U> ...
c
~
:J
'EUm m
~~~ ~
:J><I- ~ Q)
()-~~ '" Q) ~
~~~ ~ ~~~ ~cn
~8.e ~ ~~&~~!
., Q) e a.. ~ ._ m ~ _ _ c: > I:
1II-C-c><...JQ) rlrlQ)"~
~-mmQ)m~~-gooa>~ c>>
i ~ 5 g-: ~.... co ~ ~ ~ ..~ 0::
> m ~ =-= ~ Oiij ~"8 Q) Q) - -0 S
~&~~~c55&@@~~~
~ g;1 ~I
oo;:~
~~19
~~II
~~I~
~~I~
~~Ii
~~II
~~I~
~~I~
~~Ii
~ '"
C"O
II> C
~~
-g~
"'-
u..0
'0'0
3l3l~
;:) ;:) ...
III ~
.. - ...
u 0
.~ ~ <C
"III..,
....0
> -
N
...
..
-g ; =
u:sg
.. c ..
'0' c>> 'C
... Q. ..
lI..alj>
III
..
"C ...
.. '"
..-
"s;:g ~
.. ..
O::Q.
><
W
...
o
~ ;
~ .a '0 ...
... ~~:
:Ej:Kl:g
> >... N
c:
~
::l
(.)
iG ...[
'" - ..
_0..
~~::
011I'3
..."u..
>
..,
o
ill
o
>
u..
...
..
~
,2
D:
laj
~iG
_ ::l
'3ti
u..<
000000010
00000000
00000000
cicic:icicic:icici
U>
C"')LOM,....VN~'"
CO,...."""I/)CO...,.NN
Mco""""""co"""com
c:i(")Lci~cc..nr--.:.
""'U9-NU9-,....U9- ......
U> U> U>
~~~~~~~I,e
00000000
MCOOVCOCOCOM
~~~~~~~~
..,iG
0-=
- u
~<
NO
...~
CO,..... 0...... co co ,.....,'"
<>>LON,....MCOLOCD
"""""",....OLOCOC\l_
~~NNCONC".icw;
U> ~ M
.., 'I~
e:;
~ ...
~ e
<
M 1.0 C"') ,.... ...... N 01 '"
CO"","""LOCO...,.C\IN
Mco,.....,..... co t---coCD
ci(")..o~cO..or--.:ot:t
,.... C\I,.... ......
U>
I
:g~
- ..
... .-
0"
;::: 0
0...
<
o 0) ...,. m M 0 MI'"
COC\lNOLOCOCO_
""'LOt---O)CO,.......,.'IIlit
oC".i..oMcO..o""":cw;
..- N,.... .....
U>
'::f!........0 '::f!. '::f!......"O '::f!. '::f!.j ~
00....000....000
OC\l,....MvNM'IIlit
aOcDN~oq:C".icD
LOLOvl/)...,.NI/)'IIlit
..,iG
0-=
- u
~<
NO
......
>
,..... 0 0 """ ,.... CD ml'"
""'<>>",,"OO>LOM C"')
I/)LO,.......,CO""'NLO'IIlit
~~O~c:O~Mai
U> ~ N
M..- LO I/) co 0""'1 "It
...,. t---C\1 (0 I/) co...,. co
o,,-C"')o<>>,....coC"')
olMNM(")..ocCM
U9- N 'II"""" CD
c
Q) III
'E~E g
Q) .a g. ;;
Il:!g ~~~~o 0
~~ *o:~;:
"C.!!1men~ cO:::J oS
i'~:Q~~ E~-~.g
.n~~~&:f~8U)
~I
0010
000
000
cicio
CD~CD
CD ~ 0
~ I'- 00
~~ ,.....:
O>~I'-
U> ~
'::f!. '::f!.1 ':?
c c c
OM '<t
a~ .q:
LO '<t
M '<tjl'-
OOLOO
LO~O>
Lei c:i cD
'<t I'-
CD Nj <0
CD... 0
~ I'- 00
~~ r--.:
'" ~ I'-
CD ~I M
CD N 0
~ 00 '<t
~~ c:O
0> ~ I'-
';F.';F.I ;F.
OLO'<t
c:i c:i ..0
LO '<t
... LOI N
'" '<t I'-
'<t 0 Ol
c:i a 0)
'<t CD
~ CD,...
00 0> CD
0> I'- ~
do>~
00 LO
Cil
"0
C
.2
~
OJ
Q)
c:
Q)
'"
c ~
:~ ~
>.s::
0'"
-..
o :J
o c
.s::Q)
u >
~~-
:::as
~q ~
ego;
I-Z
~I
Q)
u
.~
..
en
15
Q)
Cl
"0
C
II>
"0
C
:J
u..
S
'0.
II>
()
.9
e!
2
~ ~
~ 0
......
~I
~Ii
-
co
:;a
N
...
r-
...
'"
cr>
N
...
~
;!
"-=
a
~;
~I~
~I~
I~
c
e
e
lI..
1"
..
c
~
l!
lI..
GO
c
o
il
i
o
~
<
~
'"
:I::
'1:1
i
><
w
..
GO
.!!
:
'"
c
~
~
i
III
'>
..
,!;
...
o
C>
N
..;
~
2
il
u..
..
:is
.!!
J
<
..
u
c
..
iG
III
"C
C
'"
.!!:.
GO
'1:1
C
'"
u..
CI>
:is
.!!
~
...
..
~
,.!.
~
"C
C
W
'1:1
S
~
e
.a:.
~Ii
~II
~I~
~I~I
~II
,...
o
o
'"
gf8
~ ~.
. c: c;;
~ ~ w
g '0..0
lD "' E
,... '" 13
o CD CD
8 ~ 0
G:ti~
I "w '"
c: CD "'
" " c:
15 ~~~
I ~ a; 'C
.~,~iK
i:$......U):{
I ~ 2 .~ "
;q~'[~e
..~~~~
~1O~1ij~
~~~!~
a; ("I. B ~
~ ..... C rn
~ ~ ~ ~
_ S~~~
co
C
Q)
E
s:.
(.)
I1l
~
-
(II)
't: ...
o (I)
c..c
(I) E
a::: (I)
s::: (,)
o (I)
t/)c
(I) 'C "
i: ...
C'lS C'lS ....
E c."
(l)Eafi
:aSt/)
<(_,c
""'(1)-
o C') 5
~-g:!
5 co,~
o,,(/,)
o s::: (I)
=,c
LL_
...
l! 0
(l)LL
s::: (I)
(1)-
C)~
I
o
-
I
...
C'lS
(I)
>
CD
o
o
N
-
If)
c:
,g
E
c:
EA-
........
,A.
""
$'''''
$'''''
$'''''
fn
CD
;j
c:
CD
>
CD
0:::
o 0 0 0 0
00000
~ CD <D v N
SUO!II!UJ U! $
$',
0..
0"
0"
$'0
6',9
fl
c:
<1l
(ij
al
"0
C
:>
u..
6'"
6'"
6'"
.."
(;;
.c:
5 III
III "0
~ C
.g! :>
1IlLJ..
c
~
I-
Os
Os
Os
"..
~ ~
.. c
~ ~
u..&
Ql
::>
c
..
>
Ql
0::
Ql
1il
U5
$'s
6'..
6'..
~ ~
...J c:
Qj ~
.c: Ql
50::
"s
<.
6'
~ III
~ ~
~ <1l
~I-
5
,A.
6'
,A,
6'
,As
"s
"",
Os
><
~
III
(ij
..
::
$'.
<
><
<1l
I-
~
:5
<;-
<;-
$'.
<
III III
III Ql
Ql III
.~ ~
~ .S:?
al...J
><
<1l
I-
III
Ql
(ij
(/)
><
(ij~
6~
~ ~
c.. 0
c:
><
<1l
I-
.l!l
<1l
u;
W
(ij
Ql
0::
Q)
ro
,5
"tii
w
"t:l
Q)
l/l
'S:
Q)
a:::
l"-
e
-
CD
e
.
l/l
c
.Q
ro
'C
c..
e
0.
0.
<(
"t:l
Q)
l/l
'S:
Q)
a:::
l"-
e
-
CD
e
.
"t:l
Q)
ro
'C
c..
o
...
c..
0.
<(
>-
"S
...,
o
Cii
:::::I
13
<(
CD
e
-
LO
e
.
N
m
N
en
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0
Nom m ~ NOm ID ~
m m CD CD CD CD CD ~ ~ ~
sUO!ll!W U! !II
fn
CD
..
~
~
"C
c:
CD
Q.
><
W
"s"
<$>~
o 0 0 0 0 a
o ~ 0 ~ 0 ~
('") N N
SUO!II!W U! $
'E
Ql
c: E
<1l 0.
E 0
f~
Ql
o
III
-"
~
.~
:0
::>
c..
~
.g!
'"
(/)
,~
:0
::>
c..
(ij
'0
'i5
::>
--,
c:
g
jg
III
'c
'E
"0
<
c
o
'c;;
'S;
Ci
(5
o
.c:
U
Ul
.9
.g!
III
c:
~
I-
(5 III
o ~
"5,*
(/) c
C: e
~I-
s
c
, Ql
C E
Ot
z <1l
0.
..
"0
l/l
c
,Q
ro
'C
c..
e
c..
0.
<(
"t:l
(I)
l/l
'S:
(I)
a:::
I"-
Q
CD
e
.
't:l
(I)
ro
'C
0.
o
...
c..
c..
<(
~'E
,- Ql
c: E
::> 0.
E 0
EQi
o >
U Ql
Cl
O/S
~ ~
0::",
enS
~u
<1l
c..
>.
"S
...,
o
Cii
:J
13
<(
CD
~
e
.
()
.....
c:
a.l
E
.I::.
U
l'll
.....
~
....
II)
~
II)
N
~
i
;
~ g ~ ~ ~0.1 ~I
0000 ~
Q)
II)
~
M
N
~
~I
I
~II
~ !I ~I
~
CD
C)
C)
N
1:: "r'"
0 C")
Q, ..
CI) CI)
D:: E
CI) CI) lil
C.)
C.) CI) C/)
c C a.l >-
~ u c:::
0
CI) ca -c .... >- <{
'i: OJ CI) 0.. c::: Z
ca -c ..... C/) <{
a.l CD ~
E -c c C) a.l Z
> C/) 0 ::::J
c W - 't:l t) 0
CI) C/) :::::I :;::; CIl ~ w
.Q :s c: .0 C/) l'll a.l ~ N ....
LL tn g .... E "e' CO ...J c:::
< .c CD ,5; a.l CD 0 .... W 0- 0
~- 0 "0 ,5; 0.. ~ Ul 0 M c::: 0
'to- - c E 0 "0 .... ~ ~ N ~ N
o ; 0 N a.l 0 "0 0 CD 0- 0- ..tf
,5; > C/) a.l a.l a.l ;: ..- C) .0
~1:::E e ..... c: ..... ~ C'? () ....
~ CD U C/) a.l .c: ,5; E 0-
0.. a.l l'll .... Ci Ul 0 .... ~
C CU >< ... .c: .E a.l "0 CD .9
:s :s .- CD 0.. "[ e E ca u::: .0 c: CJ () ca
oOrn .Q .!!!. C/) 0 c.l E ::J CIl 0 C/) ::I
E 0.. ::J "0 U C) ~ u. C ..... C) ~
C/) 0.. c: II) a.l c: .0
O-cCl) CD a.l "0 c: ,5 u C/) C/) 'S;
:::::I ca 0 CD
c:5 CJ .~ a.l C) ..... :::::I a.l ~ a.l
CIl Q3 ,5; CIl 't:l (.) - ::J l'll LL.
~ .... co - ::I 0 - C/)
:s c a.l c:
.. Ci 't:l 0 ca (j ~ c: c: a.l CD
LL 0 ~ Qi E c: > > C a.l CD .9 ::J CD > a.l :E
c: l'll 0 .5 = t ::I ....
LL C/) ..... ~ u. 0 u C a.l ~ .!!
~ ca ..... l'll 0 1ii c: ca 0 C" ....
c: ..... u .... Iii I- CIi 0..
CI) c: 0 c: ..... l'll CD a.l CIl C/) 't:l 'i
CI) - a.l a.l c: :::::I l'll c: Ul :E Iii :E :::::I 0.. Ul C/) c: ~
cu .5 E ...J .9 ::J 0 U 0
c E ~ c: lD .Q a.l a.l
C 1ii <( co co co 0 .!! .!! a.l ::I U 0..
CI) e z c: 0 0 0 ~ C/) c x )( II)
I :::::I .... "0 ;; 'i 'i (/)
C) ~ :.c u::: a.l > > >- 't:l ca 0 .0 a.l a.l a.l "
c.. > u. u. U. l'll 't: > u:: ~ ::J E 't:l ..... ..... c
<{ 0 ..... <( C/) CIl 0 0 Ul ::I
.. ..... ..... 0 ..... c.. 0.. > .... .... -
ca CD .... CD " 0 0 0 0 CD .c: CD "0 0 in c: LL.
CJ ,g c.l C/) ... c.l C/) CJ a.l a:i 0 ..... .i!! .i!! CIl
CI) C c Iii c: c: a.l c: c.. c: l'll c: > ... c: C/) C/) E 't:l
>- .!! "0 .!! u 0 0 C/) 0 c.. ca () ca 0 > c.. a.l c: c: CD
::J 0 :;::; :;::; :::::I :;::; 'ii .... a.l c.. E l'll l'll - -
ftI <{ ftI ...J l'll l'll l'll <( 'ii 't:l 0 <( .J::: .... 'E ca
!Xl !Xl ';:: ';:: 't:l ';:: CD !Xl a.l !Xl :!: ..... .~
Iii 't:l 0.. 0.. a.l 0..0 ,!:::; ,2 Ul E "0 "0 E :E
't:l c: 't:l a.l e e ..... e > 't:l ::J " E c: E a.l a.l
C ~ c: ..... C/) c: c: 0 C/) C/) 0 0
a.l 0.. 0.. a.l ~LL. 0- 0 0 (.)
::I ::I C) 0.. 0.. :::::I ~ a.l ~ c: ;; 0 0 c:
u.. 't:l LL. "0 l'll l'll 0- l'll 't:l u.. c::: LL. 0 ca () 0.. 0.. 't:l ;:)
0 0
CD "0 CD ::J a.l a.l a.l a.l CD CD E CD u 't: 't:l .... .... CD CD
0 <{ 0 <{ lD c::: c::: c::: c::: > 0 0 w c.. a.l a.. 0- Ul 0
0 0 0 0 ::J 0 e C/) 0 0
N N t- ... N ,5 N 0 0.. N
c.. c..
0 0 0 c.. c: 0 c.. 0 e
> <( 0 ~ <( .... c.. 0
M M U. M M <{ 0- M
CIl CIl C/) fti CD C/) CD C/) 'ii C/) fti CD
c c C/) - c: C/) c C/) - C/) - c:
~ ~ a.l 0 ::I a.l ::I a.l 0 a.l 0 ~
., ., ...J I- ., ...J ., ...J I- ...J I- .,
,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832
Fax (434) 972-4126
February 1, 2007
Brian S. Ray
1717 - 1 B Allied Street
Charlottesville, VA 22903
RE: OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF PARCELS AND DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS--
Tax Map 120, Parcel 16 Scottsville Magisterial District (Property of Margaret R.
Van Clief Revocable Trust) Section 10.3,1
Dear Mr. Ray:
The County Attorney and I have reviewed the title information for the above-noted
property. It is the County Attorney's advisory opinion and my official determination that
Tax Map 120, Parcel 16 consists of seven (7) separate parcels that are shown on
Sketch #4, prepared by Roger W. Ray and Assoc., Inc. that is attached. The parcels
and their associated theoretical development rights are identified below. The basis for
this determination follows.
Parcel Acreage DB/p Development
Ri hts
A 1 Oakland 474.8 203/83 5
A 1 Meadow Farm 420.16 203/83 5
B 4 236/239 2
C 22.4 243/489 5
D 15 212/575 5
2 37.5 298/83 5
4 4 298/83 2
Our records indicate Tax Map 120, parcel 16 contains 931.645 acres and five (5)
dwellings. The parcel is located in the Scottsville Magisterial District. The most recent
recorded instrument for this property is recorded in Deed Book 909, page 643.
The most recent instrument for two parcels that are a part of "Nydrie" and are identified
as Parcel 2 and Parcel 4 on Sketch #4 that was recorded prior to the adoption of the
Zoning Ordinance, December 10, 1980, is in Deed Book 203, page 83, and is dated
October 8, 1928. The deed conveyed Parcels 1, 2 and 4 from William B. Forsyth &
Hedwig P. Forsyth, Douglas Forsyth & Lena L. Forsyth, Harry Forsyth & Joan W.
Forsyth, George L. Forsyth & Elise M. Forsyth, Noel Louise Elliott & John B. Elliott and
Edith Agnes Langhorn & W, H. Longhorn to Daniel Good Van Clief
1:\DEPT\BCZS\Determin of Parcel\2007\120-16 Van Clief LOD 2006-41.doc
.,
Brian S. Ray
February 2, 2007
Page 2
and Ray Alan Van Clief. The parcels are shown on Sketch #4 and described, in part, as
follows:
Parcel 1 : This tract is described as containing two separate parcels, containing a total
of 899 acres. It designated as Tract A in Deed Book 298, page 497 and analyzed below
in the discussion of Deed Book 298, page 497.
Parcel 2: This tract is described as containing 37.5 acres and by reference to Deed
Book 107, page 250. The Munford tract is identified on the plat of record in Deed Book
104, page 173. It is designated as Parcel 2 on Sketch #4.
Deed book 107, page 250, dated January 23,1897, conveyed 37.5 acres from
Loveless Munford and Elvira Munford to Sarah R. Forsythe. The property is
described by metes and bounds and by reference to the deed of Thos. S. Coles.
Based on these two deeds and the plat, the 37.5-acre portion of Parcel 16 that is
designated as Parcel 2 on Sketch #4 is determined to a parcel of record with five
(5) development rights.
Parcel 4: This parcel is described as containing 4 acres and by reference to Deed Book
119, page 487. The Monroe parcel is identified on the plat of record in Deed Book 104,
page 173. It is designated as Parcel 4 on Sketch #4.
Deed Book 119, page 487, dated March 28,1901, conveyed 4 acres from B. G.
Monroe and Martha Monroe to S. R. Forsythe. The parcel is described by metes
and bounds.
Based on these two deeds, the 4-acre portion of Parcel 16 designated as Parcel 4
on Sketch #4 is determined to a parcel of record with two (2) development rights.
This assumes that the parcel contains at least 4 acres.
The most recent instrument for five parcels known together as "Nydrie" recorded prior to
the adoption of the Zoning Ordinance, December 1 0, 1980, is recorded in Deed Book
298, page 497, and is dated May 23, 1951. The deed conveyed Parcels A, B, C and D
from Daniel Good Van Clief and Ray Alan Van Clief, Executors of and Trustees under
the will of Margaret Good Van Clief to Daniel Good Van Clief and Ray Alan Van Clief.
The parcels are shown on Sketch #1 and described, in part, as follows:
Parcel A: Those parcels conveyed by the deed recorded in Deed Book 203, page 83
and the plat recorded in Deed Book 104, page 173,
The plat recorded in Deed Book 104, page 173, dated October 1895 shows
Oaklands, containing 474.8 acres and Meadow Farm, containing 424 1/6 acres.
I:\DEPT\BCZS\Delermin of Parcel\2007\120-16 Van Clief LOD 2006-41.doc
Brian S, Ray
February, 2007
Page 3
Deed Book 203, page 83, dated October 8, 1928, conveyed 936.12 acres
described as Parcels 1, 2 and 4. Parcel 1 is described as containing two certain
tracts containing together 899 acres and by reference to the plat in Deed Book
104, page 170. Parcels 2 and 4 are discussed above.
Based on these three deeds, the portion of Parcel 16 known as Oaklands,
containing 474.8 acres, and the portion of Parcel 16 known as Meadow Farm,
containing 424 1/6 acres, are each determined to be parcels of record with five (5)
development rights. The approximate location of Oaklands and Meadow Farm is
shown on Sketch #4.
Parcel B: Those parcels conveyed by the deed recorded in Deed Book 236, page 239.
Deed Book 236, page 239, dated June 16, 1937, conveyed 4 acres from George
Gilmer, Commissioner to Ray Alan Van Clief. The property is described by metes
and bounds. This 4-acre tract is a portion of Meadow Farm. As a result of this
transaction Meadow Farm contained 420.16 acres. The parcel is designated as
Parcel B on Sketch #4.
Based on these two deeds, the 4-acre portion of Parcel 16 designated as Parcel B
on Sketch #4 is determined to a parcel of record with two (2) development rights.
This assumes that the parcel contains at least 4 acres.
Parcel C: Those parcels conveyed by the deed recorded in Deed Book 243, page 489.
Deed Book 243, page 489, dated June 14, 1939, conveyed 22.4 acres from
Martha Monroe to R. A. Van Clief. The property is described on a plat by M. M.
Van Doren attached to the deed. The location of the parcel is designated as
Parcel C on Sketch #4.
Based on these two deeds, the 22.4-acre portion of Parcel 16 designated as
Parcel C on Sketch #4 is determined to a parcel of record with five (5)
development rights,
Parcel 0: Those parcels conveyed by the deed recorded in Deed Book 212, page 575
and Deed Book 248, page 410.
Deed Book 212, page 575, dated March 22,1931, conveyed approximately 15
acres from A. H, Lloyd and Donna L. D. Lloyd to R. A. Van Clief. The deed
states, "it will be noticed that Lot #4 contains about 38 acres within its entire
boundary, but it is the intention of this deed to convey only that part of it which
lies to the north of Keene Road adjoining the "Nydrie" line which contains about
15 acres more or less." The parcel is shown on a plat attached to the deed. The
parcel is designated as Parcel D on Sketch #4.
1:\DEPT\BCZS\Determin of Parcel\2007\120-16 Van Clief LOD 2006-41 ,doc
Brian S. Ray
February 1, 2007
Page 4
Deed Book 248, page 410, dated November 15,1940, conveyed 3 tracts from
Arthur H. Lloyd and Donna L. D. Lloyd to Ray Alan Van Clief. Parcel 1 ,
containing 5.4 acres, Parcel 2, containing 9.4 acres and Parcel 3, described as
so much of Lot 4 as lies south of the Esmont and Keene Road are not part of this
determination. These 3 parcels are all located south of Esmont Road and west of
Parcel 16.
Based on these three deeds, the 15-acre portion of Parcel 16 that is designated as
Parcel D on Sketch #4 is determined to be a parcel of record with five (5)
development rights.
Deed Book 909, page 643, dated November 12,1986, conveyed 15.507 acres from
Daniel Good Van Clief and Margaret R. Van Clief. This parcel is now designated as Tax
Map 120, Parcel 16E. It is not a subject of this determination.
The parcels are entitled to the noted development rights if all other applicable
regulations can be met. These development rights may only be utilized within the
bounds of the original parcel with which they are associated. These development rights
are theoretical in nature but do represent the maximum number of lots containing less
than twenty one acres allowed to be created by right. In addition to the development
right lots, the parcel may create as many smaller parcels containing a minimum of
twenty-one acres as it has land to make.
If you are aggrieved by this determination, you have a right to appeal it within thirty days
of the date notice of this determination is given, in accordance with Section 15.2-2311 of
the Code of Virginia. If you do not file a timely appeal, this determination shall be final
and unappealable. An appeal shall be taken only by filing with the Zoning Administrator
and the Board of Zoning Appeals a notice of appeal which specifies the grounds for the
appeal. An appeal application must be completed and filed along with the fee of $120.
The date notice of this determination was given is the same as the date of this letter.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
~
John Shepherd
Manager of Zoning Administration
Copy: Gay Carver, Real Estate Supervisor
Ella Carey, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
1:\DEPT\BCZS\Determin of Parcel\2007\120-16 Van CHef LOD 2006-41.doc
"E
51<.. +C,k #
122
/.. ~ .
.... '\~
,
\ -
.- \
\ -
~ \-
\
~
I
./
i
~
\..
~
C.VU&'-I'T "T..,Jc M.." S."'hJIN~ AL.L P^~C.EL.S \.J''T!+lrV C.\J~Ru.rT 1M 1:20-1~
b
s::
::J
o
o
(I)
i:
cu
E
(I)
.a
-
c(
! 1
t
I: I ~I
ill
~h
.u
-e
~
~
s::
::::J
o
o
CD
i:
ns
E
CD
.a
-
c(
t I
. III
.-11'.1
I .'
ill
'h
'14
-e
Ii
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Public Hearing for Six Year Secondary Road Plan
AGENDA DATE:
February 14, 2007
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
SU BJECT/PROPOSALlREQUEST:
Public Hearing on Six Year Secondary Road Plan
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs.: Tucker, Foley, Davis, Graham, Benish,
Wade
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
REVIEWED BY:
~--
I
LEGAL REVIEW: Yes
BACKGROUND:
This public hearing is to receive public input on the County Priority List of Secondary Road Improvements (Page 1 of
Attachment C) and the proposed VDOT Six Year Secondary System Construction Program (Attachment D). The Board
held a work session on January 3, 2007 to review the Six Year Secondary Road Priority List. At the meeting, VDOT staff
distributed the draft Six Year Secondary System Construction Plan, which is based on the County's Six Year Secondary
Road Priority List and is reflective of available funding. The Board of Supervisors requested that staff create a version of
the County Priority List that identifies the projects that are scheduled to receive funding from VDOT and the County over
the next six years (Attachment A) and also provide a list of VDOT's bridge project priorities (Attachment B),
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Goal Three: Develop Policies and Infrastructure Improvements to Address the County's Growing Needs.
· Develop a comprehensive strategy/plan for funding future needs,
· By June 30, 2010, expand regional transit opportunities, while accelerating the completion of the Meadow Creek
Parkway, 2 local, and 2 regional transportation projects,
DISCUSSION:
As requested by the Board, staff has provided a version of the County's Priority List of Road Improvements which indicates
the level of funding provided to each project on the List (Attachment A), The VDOT Secondary System Construction
Program (Attachment D) essentially provides the same information. The VDOT Six Year Program provides a plan for the
allocations of available road construction funds over the six year period which is intended to reflect the priorities of the
County, Page 1 of the VDOT Program shows anticipated total allocations of road construction funding over the next six
years, The remaining pages indicate how those funds will be allocated to projects over that six year period. Much like the
County's CIP, the first year (FY 07-08) of the Program is the budget year and VDOT appropriations for that year should
reflect the adopted plan.
Staff provides the following additional comments:
· Please note the surplus for Jarman's Gap Road (this can be found on either Attachment A or D). This surplus in
funding reflects VDOT's anticipated increase in cost of construction to complete the entire project as currently
proposed, However, final revised cost estimates have not been completed and reflected in VDOT's budgeting
process to date; therefore, the "Estimated Cost" in VDOT's Secondary Plan cannot be revised at this time.
· A list of VDOT's bridge priorities for the County is provided on Attachment B. VDOT has allocated funding to the
highest of these projects over the next six years, Bridge projects are funded from a federal bridge fund, VDOT's
priorities are based primarily on the road classification (National Highways of Significance -NHS; interstate;
primary, secondary) and the bridge's sufficiency rating. The County's four highest priorities are not located in the
NHS. Bridge projects are funded from a federal bridge fund and require a 20% State match.
AGENDA TITLE:
Public Hearing for Six Year Secondary Road Plan
February 14, 2007
Page 2
· Attachment C is the County's Priority List of Secondary Road Improvements that staff is recommending the Board
approve. This list reflects efforts to support the strategic plan goals of completing the Meadow Creek Parkway,
Jarman's Gap Road and Georgetown Road projects, Attachment D is the draft VDOT Secondary System
Construction Program, It is consistent with the proposed County Priority List of Secondary Road Improvements.
Staff recommends that the Board also adopt this Six Year Program,
BUDGET IMPACT:
The Six Year Road Planning process primarily establishes the County's priorities for the expenditure of StateNDOT
secondary road construction funds. The County has already directed VDOT to transfer previously allocated funding from
the Proffit Road, Old Ivy Road and Northern Free State Road projects to Meadow Creek Parkway, Funding has not been
reduced for Jarman's Gap Road and Georgetown Road projects in an effort to maintain the current construction schedules.
Additionally, funding is already earmarked in the CIP for revenue sharing and transportation projects to match the Revenue
Sharing Program funding request for FY 07.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the County Priority List of Secondary Road Improvements
(Attachment C) and authorize the County Executive to sign the VDOT Secondary System Construction Program for
Albemarle County consistent with the County's Priority List (consistent with the draft provided in Attachment D).
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - Fundinq Information on Proiects In VDOT's Six Year Construction Program
Attachment B - Bridge Priority List
Attachment C - Draft List of Strateqic Priorities for the Six Year Secondary Road List
Priority List for Pavinq Proiects (reqular and rural rustic)
Technical Addendum
Attachment D1 - Secondary System Construction Proqram Estimated Allocations
Attachment D2 - Secondary System Construction Proqram
07,019
.
~ ~
o (ji.
c
OJ 0"
.:< ~
8 -
~ a
5' 3
S. tll
o' ::J
OJ (fO
S' ~
~ S-
o. -
m C
0. 5-
S' ~
!l) (3
~ 3
5 St
ur ~
(fO
:T"O
o (3
:E ro
OJ ()
5' ur
-0 ~
ro 0.
6. ~
C <
(fO m
~ ~
o m
() (f)
~ :T
0' ~
:J ::i'
(J):: to
Q ~
"TI 0.
5 OJ
9, to
OJ
to
S.
OJ
-<
m
~
-0
w
OJ,
()
Q.
C
3
OJ
.
.
<
o
o
-1
:T
!l)
(fO
OJ
8-
0.
m
ro
3
OJ
m
0.
!l)
()
o
~
m
~
~j"
!l)
ro
~
s:
m
(fO
m
"0
(3
roo
()
Ul
~
s:
(ji.
3'
m
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~. ~. ~. ~. ~. ~. ~. ~. ~. ~. ~
to to to to to to to to to to ~
"0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 ~
a a a a a a a a a a 0
roo ro' roo roo roo roo ro ro ro ro' ~
~ n u u n n n n n n
jj
~
3
"0
!l)
<
5'
to
"0
(3
ro'
n.
OJ OJ -..J
o -..J 0
0:> r0 .1>0
I OJ "TI
!l) E 0
"0 ~ ;:l.
"0 0 C
'< :J ~
() ~
CD 0 ~
m !l) OJ
^ 0. m
8'2222
~ co :1
o 01
22 0" 0"
OJ 0. 0.
.1>0 m m
01 !l) !l)
o a. a.
m m
22. OJ OJ
.e-e
-..J OJ 0:>
OJ OJ 0
r0 0:> OJ
~ ~ m
o !l) (fO
~ 3" ~
I ~ ~
r 0.:
() ~ to
~ i ~
:T 0.
~ ~ ~
22 ~ ~
~ ~ ~
_ m m
o ~ ~
~ m ~
~.e,5fj
S ~
CJl
.1>0
.9
s::
o
C
OJ
0;-
S' 8"
~g-
~ ~
m
OJ OJ
0" 0.
22
-..J OJ -..J -..J OJ
r0 .1>0 OJ (".) .1>0
r0 -..J 0 .1>0 0
OS::~OJ0.
a: !l) m (ji. a:
~ 0. :T m
G) (ii' ~.g ;:l.
~ a: (f) ;!:=' f;!2
:J ::u () a
o.:T~~r
22~o.~
r0 ~ 22, 0.
r0 0. ro
OJ
0.
S.
-..J
22 ~
~ 0- ~
8" ~ a..
~ co ~
-..J ~ ~
CP
~ 0
::u
2!
'0
ro
<
o.
I:
(fO
-<
ro
to
C
~
"0
!l)
<
5'
to
"0
(3
roo
g
{I} {I} {I} {I} {I}
f\J U'l ~ N N
W (.rJ ~ c.n
fjo-..J_oo
CJl -.1>0 0 0 j,.
~ ~ 8 8 Rl
~
{I}
y){f}{I)(fl{l){I){f}~-E:Il(l')-Efl
000 0 0 0 0 mOO 0
-..J
<0
~~~~~~~ ~{f)~
_018g;8g;p~~~_~g;
0000000 000
000 0 0 0 0 000
000 0 0 0 0 000
{I}{fl{fl{l}{I}{I}{I}{I}{fl{l}{I}
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
:J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000
m m ro ID ID ID ro ro ID ro w
a. Q a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a.
a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a.
m w ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro
ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a a a a
~ g g g g g g g g g g
~. ~. ffi' ~. ~. ~. ffi' ~. ~. ~. ~.
~ ~ 3. 3. 3' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
m m m m m m m m m m m
-..J CJl CJl C
0:> 0 .1>0 OJ
.1>0 CJl (".) "'0
o 0 ~ III
o ('i. 0-. ~
U 7\ '..
oms:: C.
en (h ;::u
()gUig
(3 0.
(fO -0
5' ~ 0
to 22 - 'iii'
0:> 0 ()
~ ~ 3 0/
OJ 10 til
o 0 (J) ('l)
S22~~
~ III
~ 0 ::u CD
~9i~
"'0
III
~,
OJ
CO
-
c:
::I
C.
11I
ro ro ro
to to to
C C C
~ ~ ~
"0 "0 "0
III III III
< < :S.
S' S' ::J
to to to
"0 "0 "0
a a a
ro ro roo
u u u
{I} {I} {I}
~ r0
-..J m <0
<00:><0
.1>0 <0 -..J
01 01 (".)
01 .1>0 0
OJ -..J 0
~{fl
{l}0~
o ~ _CJl
~ r0
.1>0 OJ
r0 (".)
{fl
r0 01
_0:> {I} <0
<0 0
0:> -<0
r0 .1>0
(".)
{I} {I} {fl
000
<0 r0
~ 6 6
~ ~ ~
6 6
CJl -..J
{I}
~
'"
..,.
00 --.j
~ :;;: ~
0:> (".) C.
O)>CO
-< 0. m
~ Qi "'C
. OJ ..,
0.: () 0
to m 'iii'
m s:: ()
~ cr
~ ~ ~
-:- Ci CD
g ~ ~
~, 0 -g
ro .tlo. ..,
(fO 3 III
(fO CD
o en .....
I: (fO m
g. en g.
a a ~
22 ~ C"
-..J 0'> :::!.
(".) .1>0 0.
~ ...J. cg
..,
gJgJ.g
0.: 0.: Qj
to to ()
m m m
III III 3
~ ~ m
D.> Q) a
"0 "0 _
"0 "0 c:
a a ::1
III III 0.
() () (fO
:T :T
(1) m
(fO (fO
o 0
< <
~ ~
() z
(f) 0
x S:
?l "TI
g
(3 ^
III ~
0. <.
III
OJ
OJ
III
{fl {I}
~ r0
<0 r0
o 0
o 0
o 0
o 0
o 0
{fl
{I} _8
o 0
o
o
{fl
OJ
.1>0
{fl -..J
o 0:>
r0
-..J
{fl {I}
o 0
OJ OJ
o 0
'" '"
0. 0.
0. 0.
III !l)
ro ro
a a
g g
(ii' iii'
3' 3'
m m
..,. w '"
o 0
s:: OJ () () ~
mr0000
m01ccCU
0. I OJ OJ c.
o~-<-<()
:EO":E:EO
()Ojo.:o.:::I
CD ." CD CD !a.
~ m 3 2
-o~~Ill~
Q 0" ~ g'
~ &l OJ "tI
m 3" ~ a
rr S' @ (D'
o to 0
C 3. ...
3 "'0 Cf
ct> a C:
~ < 11I
0. m m
3 11I
m 0;-
;a. Cb
11I
m
()
o
::I
3. 3. r0 .g g g g.
"O"OwmtOtO-<
2 ~ ~ ?l ~. ~. (3
m CD a 0' to to cu 1
3 () Q) ~ C 2' ~ ::
2. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [ !i
g ~ 8 ~ <0 to ~ ::
CD g ~ ; ~ 0 :1
~o"""' Q Q. tu g::
;:;':E 0' g' o' ::
~ s: ~ ~ ~ ~ !i
0"0" (30011
~ ~ Q Q) roO ~ !i
i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ii
(JJ ~ g. 3" -0' ~ n
Q) ::1 o' S' CD !. I:
5.. a.:::J (Q Y) ::
en 5: 8. -0 tB" 3 ::
~ (l) a ~. ~ ~ ::
:E ~ III ()"O::'::
Q.) ;;if 0. (j) - ::::J II
~ en ~ ~ 11
3 3 ::
_x." ~ !!
CD ::
0" H
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
i:
"
"
"
"
::
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
n
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
::
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
::
"
"
"
"
::
"
"
"
"
n
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
n
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
n
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
!!
OJ OJ
01 <0
CJl ~
G) <-
m III
o 3
to III
m OJ
0" (fO
:E G)
OJ III
~"O
o ~
III 0
0. !l)
0.
~~
OJ _22
01 r0
.1>0 .1>0
o
0"
0"
22 22 0"
~
o.
~
5
-..J
.1>0 CJl
~ 0:>
~
{I} {I}
r0 ~
09
~ 0
0:> -..J
(".) r0
01
(".) 0
o
{I} 0 < <
I'\.) :J ~ Q)
~ <g o. o.
0) S' C C
oc.c(J)CfJ
~ ~ ~
(".) roo roo
() ()
en en
{I}
-Ell ~ ~_~
tv ~ OJ 0 ~ 0
o -..J r0 0 0 OJ
......1\J"'OI'\.)(O
_-..J _0:> 1""0 0 0
t 'f ~ ~ 8~.
O1(".)r0~
~
{I} {I}
~ '-1 ~
r0 N 0
{fl Rl ~ 0 ffi (]1
o 01 ~ 000
~01g g
0:> 0
.&J~~
~ ~ -..J
o (".) CJl
o CJl _0
-..J 0 -..J
01 0 ~
{I} {I} {I}
000
OJ
o
III
0.
0.
*" <0
6 L
2t CD c
g: 6 6
(ji" 0:> 0:>
<
z ~ z
}; g };
(fO
3
m
ffi
-"
r-o"tl
o ~. 0
o o~.
~ ~ ~
o' '< .....
.::1 ;u
o
"TI c::
~ ro
o z
:!: c:
~ 3
g [
;u
o
III
C.
Z
III
3
(1)
om
o 11I
~ ~
3
III
CD
C.
"tI
iil
~
~t5
cO
o -1
!!:.
o'
OJ
11I
"TI "TI
-< c:
~ :l ::I
00)9:
~ ;;:~
o ~ ~
~ "tI 0'
...a. iil ~
~ :J ;-
~ C.
"TI
I: 0
:l 0
0. c:
5' ::J
(Q", ~
.
.
)>
c.
< m
o ~ !!l.
III iii' 3'
CD C'D Q)
3 ro
m c.
~
o
m
11I
g,
"S.
o'
::I
n
o
3
3
m
::I
lii
tl
~
"'n
"""l
N
o
o
.......
I
o
00
-l
::r
..,
o
c:
l.C
::r
N
o
....
N
I
....
W
'0"
me
Cf) Z
~ 0
~Z
oG>
(!)
;:a.Z
~' b
~;;o
Q. s:
~)>
':::!
~O
Q Z
Q) ~
8:("')
6'0
::J e
~Z
::J -i
0'-<
3 en
~. m
g ("')
o 0
::J Z
Q) 0
-g. )>
Q ;;0
2:-<
iR ;;0
o
)>
o
en
-<
en
-i
m
s:
en
-i
;;0
)>
-i
m
G>
("')
""C
;;0
o
;;0
-i
m
en
-
"
-<
p..)
o
o
00
....
o
"
>-<
-1p..)
~O
n...:r.
J:W
3:-
m
Z
--r
>
.~
".
o
Cl:
w
ro
5
3'
ro
o
ro
<
ro
o
"
3
2
)>
ro
w
~
C
:J
"
W
<
'"
"-
;0
o
w
"-
~
.Q
'"
~
()
~
-<
:J
~
"'-
cG
i'5
ill
Sf
~
<
o
o
--<
2
:J
"-
5
<0
(fl
~
;;,
~
o
~
5
<0
~
3'
<
c
o
-;
i5
S
~
o
w
"-
Sf
~
2
:J
"-
5
<0
'"
A
<
~
0'
5i
o
"
!!l
0'
iil
3
5
"j
3
ro
"'
c
~
"-
s
0,
5
<0
o
~
w
a.
"
9!
5'
<0
'1
c
:J
'0
W
<
'"
"-
o
"
it
<
~
is
f;;
'"
w
....
o
N
;0
'"
'"
'"
:2
~"
;0
o
w
0.
"T\
o
:J
;;;
~
'"
)>
<
!'
~
o
o
'"
w
0.
'"
:J
0.
-g
<
~'
"'
W
:J
0.
'"
."
~
:j'
"
;;
<
'"
3
'"
~
ij;
"'
c
"-
'<
'"
"
o
"
'"
~,
~'
.;;
;;
<
'"
3
,
~
~
3
~
"'
!,
~
'"
~
~
-c
w
~
'"
0'
~
I/O
W
~
'D
c
CJ:
n"
;0
<D
.0
C
~
N
o
8
'CO
o
~
co
co
(J)
N
N
~
m
w
'"
r;
3
()
o
~
~
'"
'"
~
;0
o
c
r;
N
'"
o
o
;0
o
c:
r;
N
'"
N
'"
:t
~
.9
:J
'"
"
;;
W
0.
Vi'
'"
~
,
"
-<
"
ro
:;'
"'
'"
C-
o.
~'
"-
g
W
:J
!!.
<E"
~
3
'"
~
()
w
-c
w
'"
~"
o
:t
)>
;0
-l
N
o
o
'"
eo
'"
'"
~
'"
'"
:J
g-
~"
""
:c'
'"
....
e
:I:
'<
0.
~
~
0'
;0
o
W
0.
:i"
~
'"
'"
~
0'
:J
!,
:T
~
N
'"
3
-c
c3
<
'"
3
'"
:J
ij;
ro
'"
o
3
3
'"
:J
0.
'"
"-
;;
3
N
'"
:I:
N
'"
o
"C
:J
W
'"
'"
N
If>
c-
"-
'<
()
w
-g
Q
-<
'"
w
~
i0
co
I
'"
en
o
(fl
C
~
N
o
8
eo
'CD
o
o
N
o
o
c..;
N
o
:i"
~
'"
'"
~
0'
:J
!,
:T
~
N
'"
N
'"
:t
~
.9
3
"
o
<
'"
3
<')
:J
"il
;;
n
o
3
3
'"
~
0.
'"
0.
;;
3
N
'"
~
'"
o
:>'
.,
'"
'"
N
(fl
C-
o.
'<
()
'"
8
"
~"
If,
"'-
~
i0
co
I
N
en
o
(.I>
C
~
N
o
8
'"
o
'0
o
o
N
o
o
c..;
co
(J)
A
W
'0
o
o
G)
o
C
:J
it
;0
o
w
o
"
iii
~
c;'
i5.
<g
;0
o
w
"-
;0
C
c
ro
N
CO
o
;0
o
c
CD
(J)
A
CO
-0
~
'"
3
~
!!.
'"
3
'"
.'"
"
R
"j
"
~
'"
:3
'"
o
;0
(fl
N
o
(')
'"
~
(fl
w
m
-<
'D
c
CJ:
ii'
;0
'"
.0
C
iR
'0
o
~
CO
CO
...,
-<
-<
""
c;'
i'i
.0
'"
;0
'!!
a-
w
"-
~
fD
-a
~
!!l
"T\
~
':!
<c
o
o
'0
o
o
o
~
~
'"
",'
;r
'3
01
W
m
-<
(j;
o
:J
o
2.
.~
o
o
N
o
o
o
m
...,
t;
)>
2-
w
:J
o
'"
s:
s:
;0
o
;0
0.
@
"
'"
:J
"C
~
,..
r-
w
:J
'"
en
;0
o
W
("-
'"
N
"0
o
o
'0
o
o
Q
~
~
m
'0"
;r
'3
~
~
o
:-t
(')
o
o
"
-<
'"
~
;0
o
;0
o
W
0.
3'
-C
<3
<
'"
'"
c:
~
~
"-
w
a.
:;'
r;
'^
ro
~
0'
:J
'3
w
'<
cr
ro
C
~
"-
ro
0.
:;'
-C
W
~
~
~"
o
-<
~
~"
"-
'"
<
ro
0-
-c
~
c:
:J
0.
.!!:
(fl
w
is'
-<
S
N
W
'0
o
o
N
o
o
N
m
w
<Il
~
~
)>
<
~
C'
'"
JJ
o
c:
r;
.>
..
o
o
;0
o
c:
r;
N
'"
o
~'
r;
;;
o
2
~
C
C-
oO
;;
.c
:J
o
~
:J
o
o
C.
<Il
~~
'0
~.
o
o
c
c.
'"
;0
;0
C
:J
it
~
~
w
~
c,
g-
o:
<0
'"
o
<
~
r-
;;'
,..
~'
'"
:J
o
..
Q
,..
()
w
~
.:;:
o
8
~
s:
e:
if
1J
ill
:J
.A
o
o
N
o
o
c..;
'"
CO
en
OJ
<t-
C)
:Y
fD
?"
;0
o
w
c,
5'
~
~
~
:J
'1
;0
o
c
in
"
CO
o
~
'"
'"
:J
g-
~.
?
o
(f)
'"
3
:;'
o
;;-
(f)
-!'
5
~
'"
g
o
:J
'j
".'
~
ro
3
m
"
".f>
w
if
'D
c
CJ:
ii
;0
<D
.0
C
~
(J)
w
~
CO
<D
'"
c;
~
;j;
0.
w
;;-
""
:c
'"
:J
'"
~
'"
o
~
~
,
'"
Q
o
w
0.
cr
..
~
'"
<')
~
~
;;;
c.
w
;;-
;0
0.
w
~
"-
J'
0.
~
~
o
;0
p.
o
0'
'"
'"
o
:J
;!:
2
'"
;;
Co.
~
s"
~
C'
W
:J
C
:J
~
()
"3
Q
.:;:
~
"-
w
ill
~
fD
~
in
~
g
(fl
c
.:t
w
'0
o
o
N
o
o
A
ro
~l
N
en
~
3
11
o
0:
r-
'<
:J
'"
:J
0'
c:
.0
'"
o
W
0.
x
"
~
;0
o
w
"-
;0
g
in
"
<D
en
o
;0
o
c
ro
w
o
N
v
U
~
'3
'0
~
'"
:1;
u
~
ro
'"
'"
;r
"-
if,
~
n
fD
JJ
(fl
"
o
o
"
o
w
(f:
,
ff
u,
o
~
ill
N
'0
o
o
N
o
"
o
'"
~
i,..
'"
~
CJ)
'"
'"
o
~
'-'
g
'"
-c
:a
3
-c
o
<
'"
3
~
~
ij;
w
<
~
0'
c
'"
0'
'"
el
o
~
'"
;"
(fl
...,
o
:::
~
n
rn
1l~
E
CO
.,
ii
"'
ro
u
"
"
N
'w
o
o
N
o
"
N
c
....
~
(f)
o
c
~
~
:J
'0
W'-
~
W
'<
If>
C
:J
'"
II
~
~
~
~
z
()
r-
o
"T\
:i'
:J
~
,..,
x
it
:J
0.
'"
0.
'"
-C
~
w
~
"-
~'
~
3'
-C
2
<
!'
c:
a-
w
~
x
,;,
'"
.~
c
-C
~
w
0.
'"
N
;;;
:J
'"
;"
(fl
N
o
~
a
.'"
-c
~
"-
?
T
'"
w
'"
'"
'"
'"
"'
()
~
'<
c
"!
0.
'"
<D
'1J
~
-.....
o
~
co
$
-0
~
o
~
~
o
"T\
~
:;
~
'"
'"
N
o
o
'0
o
o
rT'
x
;;
:J
"-
o
'"
:T
~
~
-c
'"
"-
~
~
:;;"
:.J
J
T
'"
w
~
?
"
~
0.
z
'"
.0'
~
C'
3-
:;
c
.,
!!;
~"
it
"'
<ii'
:J
V>
U
..
~
.:J.
)
g
Q
':<
(;;
~
3'
'"
3
'..)
-<
(fl
c
~
'"
'0
o
i:;
o
o
'"
z
o
~
~
'"
:;
~
ro
(fl
;;;
<>
;0
o
w
"-
o
n
"
'<
;0
"
.,
0.
;0
o
c:
;;
~
o
N
g
;;
N
"'
'"
..
'N
o
o
'"
o
o
~
o
~
;;c
~
c:
~
~
,
'"
:J
'"
:l
a.
'"
o
~
'"
'"
~
~
o
0'
~
<Il
c-
:J.
~'
"-
S'
~
"
2,
!.
:T
~
0'
~
in
(fl
N
"'
f":
"'
"
-<
i'i
I
)>
X
N
(J)
'0
o
i:;
o
o
A
'"
:::
:;:-
'<
;0
~
w
"-
r
~
"
N
"'
~
-c
...
'"
Co
o
N
Co
o
o
~
0:
?
3
'E'
"
<
'"
!!i.
<ii'
~
3
rr
"
C'
;;'
'"
..-
~
1:
w
'"
w
g
~
~
;"
(f)
N
o
o
o
~
n
~
~
E
r
w
'"
"-
c
"'
'"
'1J
~
"
'"
o
o
N
o
o
A
en
'"
'"
'"
~
o
~
;0
o
w
"-
~
N
'"
o
'"
~,
;;-
'"
~
;!:
k:
'"
'0
o
o
3
-c
<3
<
'"
!!!.
I,C"
~
3
'"
~
~
g
:J
"
<"
~
~
o
:J
!,
:;
0'
T
~
V>
0:
'"
~
'"
';0
(fl
N
o
o
'"
N
8
'"
c:
'"
~
~
"'-
co
i
'"
,J
"-
C
'"
fD
U
~
.....
o
o
N
o
o
A
'"
~
:;'
'"
'"
If>
a;
;;
;0
o
.,
"-
'"
g:
(;)
..
o
.0
'"
(;
~
~
;0
o
w
"-
"T\
;;;
~
(f)
a;
;;
;0
o
.,
"-
'"
'"
a.
o
'"
-.
o
o
~
o
-c
o
'"
!!.
o
'"
o
:J
~
C
~
<3
w
"-
<3
3
;0
0'
;0
0.
C
:;'
'"
~
~
JJ
"-
o
'"
'1J
;;;
~
"'
c
C'
<Il
a;
~
0.
~
"-
g-
o:
<D
'"
!2
;;
-c
;;;
'"
ro
g-
o:
"'
~
(',
W
IT
.:;:
<
o
o
--<
(J)
A
o
N
o
8
-<
'"
~
'-
.,
3
w
'"
'"
~
'1J
;0
o
W
0.
;0
o
c
;;
'"
'"
A
o
;0
o
c
;;
....
e
'"
N
~
'"
(.,
'"'
~
'C
2
3
'C
~
ro
~
F
~
~
'"
.
o
o
~
C:
g
,
o
~
g"
]
"
.
"
~
.
o
g"
.
.
&\
'"
g
~
;U
'"
'"
'"
'"
~)
-<
.
Ci
~
3'
'U
'I
~
0;
CD
'0
o
o
N
o
o
A
-<
-<
~
~
w
"-
C
~
~
'"
'"
,..
~
~
w
'<
JJ
g
it
...,
'"
o
o
;0
o
c
;;
'"
CD
'"
g>
0:
"'
~
o
<
~
()
(fl
x
o
'"
'"
6
eo
~
o
'0
....
N
'"
o
o
'"
~
<
'"
:;'
Q
~
w
'"
'"
"-
~
w
!.
3
~'
~
0:
~
~
~'
'?
-c
~
"-
C'
T
~
w
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'JJ
(fl
"'
"'
"'
a
o
i
-<
.,
%
~
"-
~
'U
.~
o
'"
'0
'"
o
OJ
w
o
o
..
o
t
..
l3
~
~
w
0.
o
~
Q
~
ro
,..
~
,..
"
w
'<
'-
C
:J
6
CD
'"
'"
N
o
o
-0
o
o
.,
"'
'"
g
~
0.
"
;:
-c
<3
fj;'
~
w
0'
o
<
~
()
rn
-g
S
L~
j:;
JJ
-<
N
o
'0
o
o
N
o
o
A
-<
oJ]
N
en
:r.
'"
(;
'"
n
~
~
'"
cr
o
~
:J
~
;0
0.
o
;0
0'
;0
g
0.
I
!!.
(;
:J
"T\
~
-<
~
C
:J
6
'"
'"
'"
'"
....
'"
o
N
'"
'"'
~
o
;;;
:J
'"
"-
'"
'"
.c'
:J
w
-c
-c
<3
<
~
"-
0'
'<
()
o
C
:J
-<
W
:J
"-
()
o
3
?
::;'
w
~
-c
o
~
'"
0.
:;'
'"
c
"-
'"
'"
g-
o:
<D
'"
~
~
()
(fl
x
;0
;0
()
w
u
w
<:>
-;:,
()
I
)>
JJ
-<
'"
o
'0
o
i:;
o
o
A
,<
()
g
~
"
i'i
CD
3
'.0
2-
'0
o
<0
ill
3
':!
N
o
o
o
o
o
u
CD
91
o
:.J
'1
~
I
(j,"
~
n
o
u
m
~
o
~
0;
'"'
-<
-<
()
n
g
:.J
-<
<
i5.
CD
--<
ill
'"'
0"
()
o
c
~
"
i'i
CD
':!
o
N
o
o
o
o
:Ji
<go
w
CD
"-
~
ill
'"'
n
"
l~)
3'
5
<0
'1J
o
ro
a
3'
o
C
<0
:J
o
S.
3'
ro
()
o
}
S'
'"
3
m
"'
ro
D
C
~"
~
*
(f:
w
m
,"
'D
c
"
ii
;0
CD
.0
C
.~
"'
c
"-
~
"
"
~
~
en
.0
o
o
o
'"
'"
.~
'1J
fj
ro
'tJ
~
3
"
ro
~
If,
c:.
~
3
w
"
W
5
C
:J
;l
o
~
ill
,,",
u
c
CJ:
ii
ro
.0
"
::
"
"
n
n
"
n
n
"
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
"
n
n
"
"
n
"
"
"
"
"
n
::
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
n
n
n
n
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
n
n
n
n
n
::
n
::
n
n
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
n
"
n
n
n
n
n
n
"
"
"
"
"
n
"
"
n
"
"
n
n
n
n
"
::
"
n
::
"
n
"
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
"
"
n
"
"
n
n
n
n
"
"
"
::
"
::
::
::
"
n
"
n
::
"
"
n
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
n
::
n
n
::
"
:1
"
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
::
"
n
"
"
"
::
"
n
"
"
n
"
"
n
::
"
n
n
n
n
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
::
"
"
"
"
::
"
,.
::
"
::
"
::
"
"
"
"
"
::
n
::
"
"
::
o
;;;
:J
;0
w
~
,..
:;'
<0
CJ)
~
"
E
"-
~
."
<3
u
o
'"
~
"-
."
<3
3
--<
o
o
w
;;
f
"
;;'
ro
~
()
o
:e
If>
o
~
'"
'"
2-
;0
~
.0
c:
~
;!:
-c
~
~
c.
o
~
~
g:
-<
r-
!a'
W
:J
0.
'<
'"
~
So
()
o
c
a
::;'
.,
:l:
0'
()
o
c
a
<
o
o
-l
",'
()
o
c:
~
",'
;0
o
c
;;
Z
c:
3
cr
~
.,
:J
0.
Z
w
3
ro,
r-
o
'"
el
0'
:J
m
;!:
'3
w
;;
0.
m
~
3
.,
it
"-
o
"
'"
Q
~
0'
:J
o
o
3
3
~
'-
c:
;!:
~
0'
el
0'
:J
s:
u
;;
...'
~
-<
~
~
~
o
<;;'
~
~
'"
~
o
~
()
~
'"
a
CJ)
....
...,
Q)
....
('I)
(")
"'0
~.
o
...,
a:
('I)
CIl
"'0
...,
o
('I)
(")
....
CIl
~
I
N
~
o
~
."
""'i
N
o
o
--...I
I
o
0)
-I
;:r
...,
o
c:
(Q
;:r
N
o
.....
N
I
.....
(.oJ
C/)
-1
;0
)>
-I
m
G)
()
"'0
;0
o
;0
~
m
C/)
"T1
o
;0
)>
r
OJ
m
s:
)>
;0
r
m
()
o
c
Z
-I
-<
"'0
;0
o
;0
-I
-<
r
C/)
-I
"T1
o
;0
C/)
m
()
o
z
o
)>
;U
-<
;0
o
)>
o
s:
"'0
;U
o
<
m
s:
m
z
-I
C/)
m
)(
~
0-
;:+
()
~
.
.Q
.
It
o
iir in
o 0
E. 0
~ ~
3 ~
[ ~.
,
<J'>
W
--J
--J 0
UJ o'
on '"
~
o
~
<
.
"
"
.
.
.
I
~
~.
I
~
.
f<1
" ~ :?:
. 0
~ :> 0
SSg.
8 ~ ~
~ ~ ~
I
.
<
.
*
it
o
o
(3
III
a.
rt>
:E ?i!
s: ~
(j) en Q) OJ
o c.o C. ~
N ~. 0
oOo.<f6"
~ ~ ~ ..... ~
iRi~~!g
~ en N 0" a.
IS <
o
. C
~ 3
o C1l
~' ~
:E
III
iil
:>
~
~
<5"
6'
CD
.....
!;
~
o
o
o
"
o
o
~ ?i!
<
o
o
-I
"0
III
<
5'
<C
3"
"0
(3
<
N N ct> .,f:l..
003 'f>
N N C'D N
a 0 ::J 0
ggurg
en"U "U
5" ~ Q ~
Q. 0" ;U 0"
CD CD :::0 CD
-g-g~-g
CD CD CD
~ ~ ~
~ ~
g g
co CD
~ ;t
OJ m
::> ::>
'" '"
5' ::;-
co co
c. c.
<: <:
CD CD
o 0
ti) Q)
=l: =l:
o' o'
" "
o 0
<: <:
?- ~
--J
<J'> ... <J'>
o --J W
o "U --J
en m 0
~ 0 ~ ~
;:; ~ ~ :?:
CD ""U m g
I>> 0 CD a.
3 ~ " (I)
;0 "U ;0 ;0
o Q) 0 0
W (J) Ql I>>
a. (J) a. a.
C
:>
"0
III
<
C1l
a.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~
~ ~
~
-..,J ~~ ~~ -..,J ~
~ ~ --J ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ t ~ ~ i
8 m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [ -..,J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !g ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [ ~ ~
i ~ i ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.
r ~ ~ ~ r D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~
~ g 2 2 ~ ~ 2 2 g g g g g g g g ~ ~ g g
CD a. a. a. CD ~ a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a.
~ ~ ~ ;U
~. ~;:2 ~ ;U g
[ ~ en -..,J Z ~ ~ j -..,J 00 g ro
CD (j) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 en ~ m ~
~ goo 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ff
o 0 ~ 0 a. ~ 0 ~ ~ a. ~ ~ 0 ;U
~ ~ ~ [ [ ~ [ ~ ~ [ ~ ~ ~ ~
N (j) -..,J CD CD m CD m m CD m 0 -..,J 00
W ~ ~ ~ ~ .,f:l.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
o 00 a. a. (j) a. a. a. a. a. N-..,J
on ex> ex>
o 0 ?
N N N
000
000
o 0 W
iil
<C
c
D>
"U en "U
<: ::T <:
Q: 0 Q:
o' Q. (1'
CD @ m
.0 .0 .0
<: <: <:
CD CD CD
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
g g g g
m m CO m
;l;la.~
ID ID DJ w
::J :J :J :J
7' 7' " 7'
:;' S" :;" 5"
ee (Q co (Q
a. a. a. a.
c c c c:
CD CD CD ro
o 0 0 8"
ID D3 Q) Q)
=l: =l: =l: =l:
o' o' o' o'
non n
o 0 0 0
c c c c
~ ~ ~ ~
?i! ?i! ?i! 3'
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
ID ID ID ID ID ID ID ID ID
ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro
~ ~ ~
---J W
~ -.....J 0
.w ~g g
on 0 0
;0 ;0
o 0
'" '"
c. c.
CD
::>
a.
Q.
-a
;0
o
<-
m
o
-i
Z C/l
*" -I
o :I:
~ ::> ~ ;0 ~
ffi- P ffi- g 0
~ en 0 en ~ ~
~m;~o~~~
00(,.0.) 0-<
6' ~ ~ 0 ;U "
:~~~~~
w5.~i5.~~
)>
r
;0
C
00 0000
00 00-(
~.g.g~.g.gn
ymmymm;u
[[ [[0
)>
o
"
~
z
G'l
Z
-a
;:0
i5
;:0
=1
~
;0
>
Z
^
Z
Cl
3'
?i! ?i!
~ -.....J
<J'> '" 0
<J'> '" '"
o 0 ~
o g- 6'
~ [ ~
<J'> CD --J
<J'> ::> ex>
on c. ...
"
o
I 5'
III ;0 0
a. g m
~ ro ~
~ ~ a.
fil <J'> "
o 0 g
;:0 0 ~
;:0 m A
~ ~ ~"
cg i5. !
::> ::>
o 0
c. c.
'" '"
ro ro
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~
o 0 0 0 0 0 -.....J ~ 0 ~
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 moo
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a 0 0 0 0 a 0 ~ 0 0
o 0 ~ N N N ~ ~ m N VJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
a a 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a a a 0 a a
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(,.0.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VJ W VJ W woo VJ W W woo 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ 5 a ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ro ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,,' ! ~CD- i,,' t
..0..0..0..0..0..0..0 ro..o..o..o..o ro..o..o..o ~ 0 8 ~o 8
ffi ~ ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi m ffi ffi ffi ffi m ffi ffi ffi ~ 3 3 Q 3 3
~~~~~~~.g T~~~.g ~~~n$-$-o$-~
m 0 en 0' ro mOm m
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ goo 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c
mmmmmmmoO"mmrooromro n.
a a a a a a a ~ ~ a a a ~ a a a ~"
~ a a ~ ~ a a m ~ a a a CD a a a
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5" ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
ffi ffi ~O ffi ffi ffi ffi ID ~ ffi ffi ffi ID ffi ffi ffi
o 0 0 6" 6" 6" ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0
a a a a ~ w ~ ~o a a 00 W -0 a a a
=l: =l: =l: =l: =l: =l: =l: ro =l: =l: =l: =l: =l: =l:
5" 5" 5" 5' 5' 5" 5' ID ~ 5' 5' 5' W 5" 5" 5"
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~
<: <:
~ i=t
"U "U
<: <:
Q: Q:
5' 5'
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'" '"
o 0
o 0
on on
'"
o
o
w
'"
o
o
w
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
'"
o
o
w
-a5"::O
iii"<c
" 0
0::0
-i)>
r-
::0
C
en
-I
(;
::0
o
)>
C
"0
~
Z
G')
"0
::0
a'O
3 g ::0
~
0' =t
r} " -<
o
o ;:0
C ;:0 0
::> 0 <:
~ ~ CD
:? z
g' ~ 3
~ lD .[
>
~ m
C ~ ~
~ Cii' 3'
CD CI:I !
3 lD
CD c.
a
;:0
CD m
cg (") ~
iii" 0 3'
~ ~ i
;:0 Q.
;:0
..
"
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
s. () ~
g ~ a
;a
o
CD
In
!::
~
o
::>
n
o
3
3
CD
a
In
"0
iii"
" ~
lD lD
Q. ~
g ~
-a 02,
5" ~
... -
~ ~
r- In
~
U3
o
s:
m
"U
;0
o
<-
m
o
-1
en
s:
:>
~
z
o
-1
OJ
m
o
o
s:
"U
r
m
-1
m
o
:>
en
"U
;0
~ 0
=i ~
N JJ'
m ."
~ -l
c '"
m 0
-1 0
o "'"
"U I
;0 ~
2
m -I
o ::T
-1 .,
o 0
o c:
s: l.C
"U ::T
f; '"
>< 0
=i .....
~ '"
:> .:...
5 w
o
;0
:>
:;;
r=
:>
OJ
r
m
."
C
Z
g
Z
~
)>
r
[[I
m
s:
)>
;;C
r
m
n
o
c
Z
-I
-<
"'tI
;;C
o
~
-I
-<
r
en
-I
"T1
o
;;C
en
m
n
o
z
c
)>
;;C
-<
;;C
o
)>
c
s:
"'tI
;;C
o
<
m
s:
m
z
-I
en
"T1
o
;;C
;;C
C
;;C
)>
r
;;C
c
en
-I
n
;;C
o
)>
c
en
m
><
::r
c:
;:;:
C'l
"1J
a
ro
f,f
5'
cr
o
c:
OJ
:J
"-
5'
~
~.
OJ
en
:J
CD
:;:
o
:J
5'
u;'
'<
CD
~
<n-
"Q
Q"
~
~
-<
-< -< -< -< -<
co
....... Q en ~
ci en ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ en ~ ~ Q ~ ....... ~ ~ ~ ~ .......
ro g ro ....... ~ ~ 0 zen....... ~ w ~ w Z ....... ~ 00 en
~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ co ~ co ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ; ~ g ~
~ ::J en ~ 0 () ~ wi:::: :T ~ a t;; ~ ~ m n' 5" :T ~ -< E ^ 5. ~ g ~ ~ ;u
~ ; I ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ j ~ i ! f ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ! I J t ! ! i ~
Q ~ ~ ~ s 0 ~ a ~ CD i g w i ~ : ~ g ~ ~ i I c: ff ~ OJ n ~ ~ =
~ ~ ;u ~ [ [ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ffi' ~ ~ ~. i ;u ;u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ;u ~ ~
~ ~ [ [ ~ ~ [ [ I ~ ~ ~ [ ~ [ ~. ~ ~ [ [ ~ [ ~ ~. ~ [ ~. [ ~ [
i2
3'
""
...
w
i2 3'
"1J
a
ro
f,f
5
cr
o
c:
OJ
:J
"-
5
~
0'
<n
CD
en
:J
CD
:;:
o
:J
5'
u;'
'<
CD
~
<n-
"Q
Q"
.z
~
:J
-0
o
Qo
^
CD
en
:;:
0'
'"
n
(-)
"I
;c
;c
;c
'v
3'
en ~
w co
co <D
o '"
i2 0
m ~
w '"
'" <D
Vi
CD
~
cr
~
:J
""
m
w
'"
""
m
w
m
"-
o
iJ:
3
3
CD
!Po
<
o
o
..,
en
.0
c:
~.
3
CD
g
;c
~ g
m
Rl co
'" ~
0- 0
~ ;c
c: 0
:J c:
'< m
r ""
S' 0
CD co
3' i2 i2
'" co
"" '" w
... 0 '"
...
o
?2 en en
'" w '"
'" '" ...
0" 0-
i2 i2
3'
co
'"
o
;c 0
g 3'
~ 3' ~ 3'
o ~ {J"l f\J
o 0::0 co
::u 0 ~ 0
g re ~ ~
CD a. en
~ ~ a ~
o "- w
o 0
CD CD
<;' <(
o 0
co ""
~ {J"l en ....... ~ ~ 0 0 ~ N W ~ ~ ~ {J"l en en ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ z z ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ z z z z
g g g g g g g g g g g g g ~ ~ g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g
o 0 0 0 woo 0 woo a 0 ....... ....... 0 a woo 0 w W woo W W W W
-0 -0
c: c::
:Q: g:
o' o'
;!: ;!: ;!: ;!:
;!: ;!: ;!:
;!: ;!: ;!:
;!: ;!:
;!: ;!: ;!: ;!: ;!: ;!: ;!: ;!: ;!:
""
<D
'"
'"
o
o
...
'" '"
Q 0
Q 0
'" ...
'" '"
o 0
o 0
... ...
'" '"
Q 0
Q 0
'" ...
'"
Q
Q
'"
'"
o
o
...
:J
o
"-
OJ
ro
:J }> :J
o c:: 0
g.~g-
m CD
'"
w
o
-""
'"
'"
<D
{It (f) ~ fh ~ ~
~ g ~ ~ ~ ~
oo~~-::..~co~-..J
g g ~ 01 ~ g
-0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0
c c: c: c c c:
!2: !2: Q: !2: g: !2:
o' o' o' o' 0' 0'
'"
o
o
'"
'"
o
o
'"
-0
c::
Q:
0"
ro
.0
c::
CD
!!l.
o
OJ
"-
a.
rr '"
:;.: 0
CD 0
lil W
:J
CD
en
o
:J
o
:J
CD
en
c:
CD
S"
'"
o
o
'"
"'ll
;c
o
<-
m
C'l
-i
(Jl
-i
:I:
>
-i
o
C
>
r
'ii
-<
"T1
o
;c
;:0
m
G>
c
r
)>
;:0
"tl
)>
:5
z
G>
Z
"'ll
;c
6
;c
=i
-<
;c
>
z
^
Z
o
"'ll :; ;::0
~ a lR
o C
-i r
>
C'l;c ;::0
gg~-o
~~~z~
~ Q) c z
Q'gg.G'>
~ _~ "tJ
~
o
:;0
::j
-<
a b
3 ~
-i (5'
o :J
>
~ m
C ;l ~
~ en. 3.
CD CD II>
3 ;-
CD a.
~
;c
CD m
cg (') ~
iil 0 3'
~ ~ s-
;c a.
;c
..
:J
Co
'<
~
!l.
()
o
c:
3.
'"
o
!a.
~
'"
;;"
()
o
c
3.
()
c
~
3.
o
CD
en
~
-a
(5'
::I
o
o
3
3
."
:J
it
'0
iil
n -<
~ ~
g "'ll
a
~ CD.
~. g.
~ ~
r en
~
(j)
o
;::
m
"'ll
;c
o
<-
m
n
-i
(f)
;::
}>
-<
z
o
-i
OJ
m
n
o
;::
"'ll
r
m
-i
m
o
}>
(f)
-u
;c
~ 0
=i ~
N ~
m "
~ ""l
c I>.)
m 0
-i 0
o ......
-u I
;c 0
o 00
<- -l
~ :::::I"
-i .,
n 0
o c:
;:: to
-u :::::I"
h; I>.)
X 0
=i ...>.
-< ':"
)> ...>.
is w
o
;c
}>
:;;
s::
OJ
r
m
."
c
z
12
z
~
)>
r-
OJ
m
s:
)>
;;0
r-
m
("')
o
c:
Z
-I
-<
""C
;;0
o
~
-I
-<
r-
en
-I
"
o
;;0
en
m
("')
o
z
c
)>
;;0
-<
;;0
o
)>
c
s:
""C
;;0
o
<
m
s:
m
z
-I
en
"
o
;;0
c:
Z
""C
)>
<
m
c
;;0
o
)>
c
en
m
><
::r
g
(")
.4
B~
-I -U
::T a
(ii" CD"
$4
-I
::T
en"
0) ::i"
re a
en" 3
~
0'
:::J
::T
tll
(fl
e-
C1l
C1l
:::J
:;: c:
e: C1l
("") a
Q 0 ~
3 ~
~ ~ 5'
~ ~ ~
::) or Q)
en ;::::1. c.
s: S' .g
tll_ <0 CD
5" a.
N -U
o OJ
8 :::J
Q
ro
(fl
C1l
:2
C1l
0.
tll
ro
c
:::J
15"
c
C1l
o
5'
en"
"0
a
'<ii'
$4
en
C
0.
'<
m
"
'"
1f
"
()
o
"
"
"
n
g
;>J
o
S.
"
...
'"
o
;;
;>J
o
c:
CD
...
'"
5"
~
CD
~
5
:J
~-
5'
il!
'"
<D
r:3
<D
::I:
'"
en
.9
() () ()
" tll tll
"C "0 "0
" tll tll
~ & ~
... N N
000
000
'" w w
:;;: :;;: en
tll tll "0
Q" Q" a
z
"
:l;
;>J
o
"
0.
z
~
z
9-
"'"
::
o
:l;
::
!!:.
5'
jj;"
3'
"
()
:I:
l>
;>J
-l
N N
<0 <0
I I
N N
U1 U1
o 0
(f) en
C c-
o. 0.
'< '<
z
o
z
j;
~
"
~"
~.
l!!-
.0'
::
3
"
~
'"
e-
o.
'<
c:
::
0.
~
"
'<
'"
OJ
OJ
Gl
CD
CD
:J
g-
~.
~
<:'
CD
::tI
C1l
("")
o
:::J
!:t
2
$4
0"
:::J
'"
.",
o
o
N
o
o
en
-<
'"
'"
z z
o 0
N
'"
<D
::I:
'"
en
o
;>J
Q
n
o
3
3
CD
:J
0.
!!l-
5
1;l
--.j
-'"
w
::I:
'<
0.
iil
s
1i'
;>J
o
"
0.
5"
~
CD
~
5'
:J
~,
5'
il!
'"
<D
r:3
<D
::I:
'"
en
.9
::tI
C1l
("")
o
:::J
!:t
2
$4
0"
:::J
<D
.0
o
o
N
o
o
en
-<
C1l
(fl
'"
'"
<D
I
'"
en
o
;>J
ro
n
o
3
3
ro
"
0.
!!l-
5
1;l
OJ
-'"
W
"C
o
5"
Gl
i3
c
:J
iF
;;0
o
"
0.
--.j
o
'"
o
-<
~
0:
'"
ro
;;0
o
CD
0.
;;0
o
c
m
'"
<D
o
;;0
o
c:
m
'l:
<D
...
...
'"
l>
0.
<
"
"
n
"
~
iii
g'
0:
<C
"
;>J
eo,
a-
"
0.
o
<
~
"C
~
;>J
o
S.
"
...
...
'"
;;0
5'
;>J
0.
@
"C
ro
:J
"C
~
r
"
:J
CD
OJ
~
;;0
5
;;0
o
"
0.
m
"
'"
m
3
~
ro
:J
c
CD
;;0
o
c:
m
'"
-'"
o
o
;;0
o
c
m
'"
'"
o
--.j
<D
'"
<II
ro
:J
:0-
ro
3
;;0
o
"
0.
:J
m
en
ro
~
5'
:J
a
;;0
o
c
m
--.j
<D
o
:!=
in
0.
"
ro
~
<:
ro
Gl
CD
ro
:J
g-
~.
~
o
'"
ro
3
5'
o
ro
'"
.0
--.j
'"
OJ
OJ
~
o
0:
r
'<
:J
n
:0-
0-
c:
<i3
;;0
o
CD
0.
W
en
~
'"
;\;
-'"
o
il!
--.j
o
'"
--.j
~
'"
o
c
5'
~
:J
"C
"
~
"
'<
~
o
:J
~
o
-"
=;;
3'
~
z
o
:J
:0-
ro
3
-"
CD
ro
'"
Iii
m
;;0
o
"
0.
;ll
o
c
m
OJ
~
~
;;0
o
"
0.
o
o '"
;;0 en
o 0
C N
m <D
'" <II
<D :;j
OJ
""
o
0:
<"
'<
;;0
o
"
0.
OJ
-'"
<D
"C
i3
~
;;0
o
"
0.
OJ
en
OJ
Gl
ro
~
'"
ro
o
:E
:J
;;0
o
CD
0.
OJ
<:;
~
CD
:3
CD
:J
'"
Gl
"
"C
;;0
o
"
0.
;;0
o
C
m
OJ
'"
-'"
o
;;0
o
C
m
--.j
-'"
w
OJ
~
~
CD
CD
'"
Iii
m
;>J
o
"
0.
;;0
o
C
m
'"
-'"
o
o
;;0
o
C
m
OJ
'"
-'"
~
ro
CD
'"
Iii
m
;;0
o
"
0.
~
"
3
iJ:
;;0
<:
~
;;0
o
"
0.
;;0
o
C
m
--.j
<D
'"
o
;;0
o
C
m
w
o
'"
'"
C
1;l
!'l
l>
<
ro
:J
C
ro
z
"
r
o
-"
;'j;
:0-
~
~
m
:J
0.
ro
0.
il!
'"
<D
o
en
;I,
ro
'"
CD
~
en (f)
tll tll
~ en
.:<.:<
() () ()
o 0 () () 0 () () () () () ()
~ ~ ~ ~ ::) W W Q) ~ Q) Q) ID Q) Q) W W
~ Q) ~ W ::) ID ~ ~ ::) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~
~ en ~ en ~ ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~. en Q)
~ .:< $: .:< <' .:< ~ ~ <' ~ ~ .:< ~ ~ .:< ~
-< ~ ~
3
"0
a
<
C1l
3
C1l
::J
(ii
.",
o
o
N
o
o
w
z
o
z
o
z
o
<II
o
i3.
ro
en
o
l>
r r en
00"0
:;: :e 9-
~ ~ 3
cO' ce' "'0
a: ~ ~
~ go CD
.g: 0: ~
C1l cg a
.0
o
o
N
o
o
o
z
o
z
o
-<
C1l
(fl
5"
:E
:E
ro
<5'
;r
g-
g
ro
N
o
o
CI>
o
o
o
N
o
o
'"
z
o
!a
III
~
C
o
-I
z
o
:l;
"
.0'
'"
~
jj;"
::
o
:l;
5'
Ol
CD
;;
::
'"
'"
-'"
o
o
o
N
o
o
'"
-<
C1l
(fl
()
I
)>
::tI
-I
z
o
<0
o
-<
0.
,:!?
3
CD
'<
"
"'"
ro
"C
i>>
n
ro
o
3
"C
"
~
5
~
CD
~
5
:J
N
o
o
w
(f)
"0
Z 9-
C1l 3"
:;: "0
::tI a
o <
tll C1l
0. 3
C1l
a
.-'"
o
o
N
o
o
w
-<
C1l
(fl
()
a
N
~
:;;:
tll
(fl
~
-U
OJ
::J
z
o
o
W
"
s:
"
CD
n
o
3
3
!g
0.
!!l-
5'
:J
OJ
en
o
N
o
o
en
z
o
z
o
z
o
o
~
"
o
~
'"
~
0.
m
Iii
:J
n
CD
z
C1l
:;:
::tI
o
tll
0.
w
.0
o
o
N
o
o
-'"
-<
C1l
(fl
()
I
)>
::tI
-I
z
o
'"
8
:J
:J
ro
"
o
~
0.
iil
S
1i
;;0
o
"
0.
(f) (f) (f)
"0 "0 "0
2. 2. g.
3" 3" 3"
"0 "0 "0
a a a
< < <
C1l C1l C1l
333
C1l C1l C1l
a a a
'"
.0
o
o
N
o
o
o
z
o
(f)
()
g
(fl
~
CD
z
o
o
0>
CD
.0
C
~
i3
3
g>
~
ro
'"
-'"
o
o
N
o
o
en
-<
C1l
(fl
r
tll
:::J
0.
C
(fl
C1l
-U
OJ
:::J
z
o
l>
0.
0.
=;;
5
:J
"'-
0.
:!?
CD
5"
"C
3
CD
;<
5
'"
o
C
5'
ro
3
"
CD
"
z :;;: :;;: :;;: :;;:
~ tll tll tll tll
;t) Q' Q' Q' Q'
o
tll
0.
o
2:
~
-<
C1l
(fl
en
o
r c
tll 5'
5. C1l
c 3
~ Q
-u -<
OJ (f)
:::J C
0.
'<
z
o
l>
0.
!?;
5
:J
"'-
0.
:!?
ro
5"
"C
3
ro
;<
5
'"
o
C
3'
ro
3
"
CD
"
z
C1l
:;:
::tI
o
tll
0.
'"
o
o
o
N
o
o
-'"
-<
C1l
(fl
z
o
"C
~
0:
CD
n
o
:J
:J
CD
n
Q
0-
ro
5"
:E
;\;
-'"
'"
OJ
o
o
o
N
o
o
-'"
-<
C1l
(fl
()
I
)>
::tI
-I
z
o
;ll
"'-
~
CD
iil
=0
1i-
o
:J
;;0
5'
;;0
0.
i!i
'"
<D
::tI
C1l
("")
o
:::J
!:t
2
$4
0"
::J
'"
.0
o
o
N
o
o
en
-<
C1l
(fl
r
tll
:::J
0.
C
(fl
C1l
-u
OJ
:::J
z
o
<
o
o
-i
o
~
5
ro
0.
n
~
"
:J
0.
'"
n
o
"C
ro
5
'"
o
""
::tI
C1l
()
o
:::J
!:t
2
$4
0"
::J
--.j
.w
o
'?
'"
o
o
en
-<
C1l
(fl
()
I
)>
::tI
-I
z
o
z
ro
:E
'"
n
:0-
o
Q.
CD
:J
0.
0.
ro
<
ro
5"
"C
3
ro
;<
::tI
C1l
()
o
:::J
!:t
2
$4
0"
::J
OJ
.0
o
o
N
o
o
en
-<
C1l
(fl
GJ
C1l
o
cO
C1l
o
:;:
::J
::tI
0.
-u
OJ
:::J
z
o
N
~
Ol
-i
e:
^
-"
~
n
CD
CD
n
o
3
3
ro
:J
0.
!!l-
5
1;l
Z
ro
t
~
::tI ,g.
C1l ro
("") ;;0
o CD
:::J '0
!e. ~
2 CD
$4 ~
o' %.
::J
.'"
en
o
o
N
o
o
-'"
OJ
-'"
o
N
o
o
w
-<
C1l
(fl
-<
C1l
(fl
()
a
N
~
()
I
)>
::tI
-I
:;;:
tll
(fl
~
-U
OJ
:::J
z
o
z
o
o
'"
Ol
l>
0.
g
5'
:J
"'-
0.
:!?
ro
5"
'0
3
ro
;<
"
5"
:J
'"
i3
"
0.
Z
ro
:E
g-
o:
'"
ro
CD
:J
0.
~
:J
ro
:E
i3
"
0.
s:
CD
"
0.
o
:E
"
CD
ro
"'"
"
"
~
"
'<
s:
ro
0'
o
C
3
ro
;>J
0.
o
;;0
5
;;0
o
"
0.
z
C1l
:;:
::tI
o
tll
0.
'"
o
o
o
o
N
o
o
-'"
-<
C1l
(fl
()
I
)>
::tI
-I
z
o
<0
;;0
"'-
~
ro
iil
=0
1i
o
:J
;;0
5
;;0
0.
i!i
'"
<D
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
11
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I
" r
o 0
3 ~
o'
d '"
"tJ
o
(D'
~
c...
c
~
""'" ~
~ o'
~
o'
'"
r
~
-<
C1l
~
o
'"
"tJ
~ 0
"C (;'
C1l ~
"
::
0.
'<
CD
~
So
()
o
C
~
;<
"
=I:
;;'
()
o
C
~
c
C1l r
< 0
~ ~ ~
C1l "C C1l
III 3 c.
C1l 5'
~
:::J
"tJ III
iii g.
:2* "S.
C1l
c.
"tJ
c
;u en 5!:
.2: g. ('j'
15 0 en
~ ~ ~
.g:
~ $
o' ('")
('") ;u
o III
3 ~
3 5'
C1l cc
~ ~
;u
o
c
ro
z
c
3
C'
~
III
'"
C.
Z
III
3
CD
"
~.
...
::;
;:
o
~
()
~
CD
~
o
~
."
.......
I\)
o
o
.......
I
o
00
-I
:::T
..,
o
c:
CO
:::T
I\)
o
....
I\)
I
....
W
)>
r
m
m
s:
)>
::0
r
m
o
o
c
Z
-4
-<
"'tJ
::0
o
::0
-4
-<
r
en
-4
"T1
o
::0
en
m
o
o
z
o
)>
::0
-<
::0
o
)>
o
s:
"'tJ
::0
o
<
m
s:
m
z
-4
en
-I
m
("')
:::c
z
("')
:J>
r
:J>
C
C
m
z
c
c
s:
"T1
o
:::0
CJ)
-I
:::0
:J>
-I
m
G>
("')
"'tJ
~
o
:::0
:3
m
CJ)
.
m
><
:T
c-
;:+
()
Secondary System
Albemarle County
Construction Program
Estimated Allocations
Fund FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 Total
----------------------------------------------
Formula Secondary Mixed $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Secondary Unpaved Roads $609,565 $501,743 $372,684 $376,216 $337,710 $337,710 $2,535,628
TeleFee $263,581 $260,945 $258,336 $255,752 $253,195 $253,195 $1,545,004
STP Converted from 1M $199,661 $200,279 $247,052 $187,985 $163,360 $163,360 $1,161,697
STP $102,028 $99,466 $540 $130,630 $2,902 $2,902 $338,468
MG Formula $168,022 $164,587 $164,041 $160,848 $202,887 $202,887 $1,063,272
BR Formula $219,862 $298,399 $0 $0 $0 $0 $518,261
Formula STP - Match $480,746 $453,491 $352,480 $361,386 $391,387 $391,387 $2,430,877
State Funds $586,646 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $586,646
Formula STP $1,233,413 $1,246,054 $1,271,564 $1,297,596 $1,324,160 $1,324,160 $7,696,947
----------------------------------------------
Total $3,863,524 $3,224,964 $2,666,697 $2,770,413 $2,675,601 $2,675,601 $17,876,800
Board Approval Date:
1/5/2006
James Utterback
Residency Administrator
Date
Robert W, Tucker
County Administrator
Date
Page 1 of 6
-u
III
(Q
CD
I\l
S-
<D
0 Im m 0 ~ i!' 0 Im )> 0 '" 2! 0 Im m 0 ~ 2! 0 Im m 0 ~ i!' 0 Im m 0 '" i!' =1' ~ ~ f," ., :D
0 mm 0 " 0 mm )> 0 ,. 0 mm .... 0 '" 0 mm .... 0 :: 0 mm 0 '" -0 g
g 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 :: w 0 ~. -c -c "
)>0 Z ~ 0 ,. )>0 :D Z '" w )>0 ." Z " )>0 -0 Z '" '" )>0 z 0 '" ro ro 0 ..
0 :DO .... '" 0 :DO m .... ,. 0 :DO Jj .... '" ~ 0 :DO .... '" 0 :DO .... 3 (0 "
0 25 :D ~ 0 za < :D '" 0 za m :D '" 0 25 :D ~ 0 za :D ~ "- "-
)> m )> < )> )> )> ,. ." m '!2. ~5
Gl)> 0 Gl)> I 0 Gl)> m 0 Gl)> 0 Gl)> 0 <3 5 in'
O:D .... O:D m .... O:D .... O:D .... O:D .... "i'i' g. 3"
m-< m-< m-< m-< m-< [!. 2-
m, m, m, (/), (/),
Gi.... Gio Gio Gio Gi....
z:E Zz zZ ZZ z:E
0 m m m 0
w :Dm:D :DZ:D O:D :D s: ~ :D :D :D 0 )> 0 :D :D "m:D 0 Gl - :D :D )>:D 0 '- ~ ~5~ :DZ :D:D:D 0 s:
0, <~g )>00 Z.... 0 m '" 0 0 .... '" :ii '" 0 0 m-.... '" m '" 0 0 '.... '" )> W 0.... iS~iT1 '" 0 , .... m 0 ." :D
r:nC ,m 0 )> c c m ... c c )>Om '" 0 c c Gim ~ :D r=::DOO )>m ~ ~ 0 :D ~ S~. 0
]~rr1 0 '" -0 ~~ffi '" s: Z 0 ..
:E".... -<", 0 0 .... .... '" 0 0 .... .... 0 :D .... .... Z'" 0 ~'TI~ O:D :lL. O'l 0 .... ~ rr "-
)>om ~ B 0 m m ,. 0 :D m m 0 Gl m m s:~ B )> )>Os: m ~~~ 0 :ii s:
'" ':i :D)>'" '" z ':i ~. z
m" -<'''' " :E ::g '" .... '" '" m', " m '::: ~ m " -<~r= m O~~ m '" ..
0'" _^W '" 0 0 '" :D ,. '" m^m '" .... 0 ~~ '" G> 0 " g" ~
~~r~ m- Z w :D '" :D CD w ,. .. 0 ,. CD )> mm .... CD :D
0<3 m m 0 "'." :E 0 ." Oz is m' 0
:E m 0 )> mO O~
:D'" c:... m 0 0 )>.... Z m :D co Z m
<'s: ....0 , ^ Z " - :D Z 0 ....:D s: Zm x
)>- ~~ 0 ." m mS: 0 '" )> I.... ~ :DO ;-<
zM; 0 ^ .... ...." 0 mI
:D, )> )> ~ ~~ mZ
Zz zm .... :E :D -<, 0 OJ 5"
-< c " 0
)>0 m is 0 :D C 0'
:D 0 Z .... 0 :D )>)>
.... c 5 < z ....Z
I .... " Z m m mm
I m 0
C' (') OJ C' (') OJ C' (') OJ C' (') OJ C' (') OJ
0 " ~ " 0 " ~ " 0 "
![ '" :;;: m ![ :;;: m ![ '" ::;: m ![ :;;: m ![ '" :;;: m ~
~ ~ )> ~.
"-
W 0 0 "
'" '" N ~ '" '" '" '" ~ '" '" N '" ~ ~ '" .. "-
0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 '" "
,. ,. 0 '" ,. '" '" '" 0 0 '" " 0 '" '" 0 " 0
;., ." ,. -,. <.n CD '" g ~ '" '" CD '" .", "::! <.n CD -,. N "' W ~
0 0 '" " W '" 0 0 '" g,: '" '" W .r;; 0
0 0 CD ,. '" '" '" oo 0 0 '" '" oo 0 ?' 0
'" .0 en <.n w "; ~ ~ '" 0 u. '" <.n '" ;., ~ ~ '"
0 '" '" 0 CD 0 ,. 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 oo 0
0 0 0 0 '" 0 "" '" ... W 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... W 0 0
'" '" ~r iF
'" ~ t: oo
t; :... :... ;." "- <
"" '" '" '" ~r ~
... '" "" '" '"
:... en ;." .. ..
'" '" '" ,. ...
0 ... '" ... '"
:D m )>
'" ~ '" '" ro <: "-
'" tl '" '" .g ~ ~
:... ,. w ~ ~. "- ~r
CD '" ~ ,. 5
CD '" '" '" "- "' !!.
;." g 1:: ~
'" ~
0 '" '"
'" "
~ '" 0
0
'" ~ '"
'" 0 6
'" .. ;." oo
.. .. ~ '"
0 0 0 '"
.. "
'" 0
:.. tl 0
'" oo
"" "" 6
.. W '" "
'" .. .. '" ... :D
0 0 0 '" ... 2
m
" 0
.. 0 ....
~ 0 m
'" 0
0 ~ "
'"
.. 0 en
'" .. '" '" '" 0
0 0 0 '" 0 )>
r
-<
.. " m
)>
'" :: :D
;." 0 )>
~ ~ ,
w ,
.. '" .. '" '" ~ 0
0 0 0 ... 0 0
)>
....
is
.. " Z
~ :: m
~
'" Co
'" en "
.. .. '" ~
0 0 0 '"
.. "
'" ::
:..
;;; ~
.. '" en w
.. '" ..
0 0 0 '" 0
<;; " OJ
.. <;; .. ~3 ..
'" .. '" '" ii>
:... '" ~ " ~
,. '" ~
'" '" ~ rr ro
'" '" .. '" (~
;." '" .", 0'
'" ~ ~
0 c;; ~
" :D:D w Z :D w :D - :D:D:D '" m W '" :D ~ ....m:D w Z 0 m ~f
m ~ ~ I m :i: 5 m w ~ ~ ~ ~ )> 1'; m ~*~ 15
0 :": '" ~ m 0 I ....
~ ~ ~ :: :E 8 0 ~ ~ ~ " m is 8 0 0; :0 :E 3 :E ~
0 0 m 0 3 1~
-< c c 0 Z c c c ::;! m~ 0 )>
<1> <1> 0 ~ ~ z 3 ?5 <1> '" " ii'
m <1> <1> <1> m 0 ~
~~ z .... ~~~ ==1 .... ~g? z n
m :D :D ~ :D (/) "- ~
~ ~ .... ;;' c ~ ~ ~ )> c ~ .... ~~
S" S" :D " 0 3" S" S" m :E n 3' :D
",,'" C "- .... <0<0<0 m (jj .... <0 C
0 3' 5 0
"'''' .... :E 5 n
-~~ <0 "''''''' ....
is z 0 '" Z ",,,,,,, is
CD"''' " sn ~t\) ~w
:&;:'"......1 z 000 m OJ w""'" Z
oo'" 0-.....0 :D ~ -"''''
,. '001'0 (/) to _OJ ~....J.
"'", 000 ==1 , '".....JW.J:>.
;'"" 0",0 CD"'"
~th o~w (/) ~ ~"",.
mOO "''''"'' s: g;
, CD'
8{JJ~
OJ 0 0
0 g ~.
..
0. ~ g"
)>
-c 0
-c c
<3 is'
< ro
!!. ~
0
..
~
CJ)
m
(")
0
Z
C
}>
:Il
" -<
0
0 CJ)
b
"" -<
or CJ)
<3 -t
c m
<0
or s:
"
:0 (")
0
Z
CJ)
-t
:Il
C
(")
-t
0
Z
"'lJ
:Il
0
G)
:Il
}>
s:
~
:::::I
c..
0
Dr
..,
~
-u
Pl
to
CD
W
So
to
0 I (I) OJ 0 '" ::E 0 I (I) OJ 0 '" ?l 0 I (I) OJ 0 " ?l 0 I (I) OJ 0 " ::E 0 I (I) CD 0 " ?l ~ -<' -<' )> -u :D
"" mm :D 0 ~ "" mm :D 0 ~ "" mm JJ 0 ;;j "" mm JJ 0 " "" mm JJ 0 " g -u g
g 0 0 N 0 N ~ ~r '" '"
.... )>0 0 Z N '" )>0 0 Z N m N )>0 Z " m )>0 0 Z " " 0 >0 0 Z ;;j '" '" 0 ;;;: "
0 :DO (I) .., '" g 0 :DO (I) .., '" 0 0 :DO .., m .... 0 :DO (I) .., .... 0 0 :DO (I) .., t::, .z 2- 2- 3 (I)
0 25 JJ 0 25 :D m 0 25 :D "' 0 25 :D '" 0 25 :D "- (5
> > )> > > '" -u " ~
Gl)> 0 Gl> 0 Gl> 0 Gl> 0 Gl> 0 0 5 ::T
O:D .., O:D .., O:D .., O:D .., O:D .., ~. ~ 3
m-< m-< m-< m-< m-<
(I), (I), (I), (j), (j), ~
Cio Cio Cio Cio Cio
ZZ ZZ ZZ ZZ ZZ
m m m m m
0 OJ '-OCD 0 0 CD "OCD 0 0 (I) 0 Z>:D 0 0 (j) (jp :D>:D ~ 0 (I) ~p ">:D ~
0 :D >-JJ m 0 :D O-:D m N ~ o-u.., m N .., >-u.., N .., O-u.., 19 .., " ~ -u :D
(5 00- 0 (5 :Do- 0 .., :D-um .... :D "'0 r--om al :D -0 :D-um .... 0 :D <3 0
OAO m m :D "' - "' -.... '"
Gl 0 Gl ^~g 0 C Z ":D,,, 0 C :DJJ" 0 C A:D" 0 ~ 0 ro' '"
OJmGl 0 0 00.... 0 0 ;;;: 000 Rl 0 ;;;: :DO.... 0 ;;;: Q.
m (j):Dm N m :D:Dm N 0 0 ,>"' N .., r= )>)>'" .., r= ->'" N "!? " Z
> ~gs~ N (j) <(.1)::0 N .., :D "'0 ' N C m 00' N C m <0' N '" '"
"' "' C .., '" '" '" g
Z m > )>Om " :D I (j)ICD .... :D (I) IOJ '" :D (I) >IOJ N 3
0 ZZ-u Z ZZ-u m Om:D m 0 mJJ m 0 Zm:D '"
> :D' 0 Z:D' 0 ccn5 '" c (j)(5 '" C Z(I)-
0> >0> '" ." m >08
." >0 > ~O~ m JJ ..,OGl 0 .., OGl ~ ..,
." -u 0 I<m '" I <m I <m
:D Om -u << .... 0 ~~Qo .... !jl.. 0 !jl"
0 0;;;: :D mm !E c 0 .... 0
> ~~ 0 :D .., Z " 0 "
0 > m :D JJ Z
I JJ'" 0 Z ~ :D 0 (j) 0 0
m I 0 :D C X C :D
(I) m :D "' .., .., ..,
(j) .., m m I
I
~ 0 JJ ~ 0 JJ ~ 0 JJ ~ 0 JJ ~ 0 JJ
~ " 0 " ~ " 0 " 0 ;f:
~ :;: rn ~ ;;: :;: rn ~ :;: rn ~ ;;: :;: rn ~ ;;: :;: !r
)> 3
Q. '"
0 "
'" '" '" ~ ~ ~ 11 ~ '" Q.
'" '" '" '" N ~ ~ '" '" '" '" '" " 0
0> '" ~ N in " ;." in Ie ~ '" N N '" ;." in N '" ~
0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'0 '0 '0 g '0 g g g '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 0 '0 g g g
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ -u
~ ~ ~ ~
~ Q.
'" 0 5' 5'
0 0 <C 55
'0 '" '0
0 '" 0 '" 0
0 0 0 0 0
ii,' " >
12 11 ~ Q.
'" ~ .c 5 g,
m in ;." '" ~ Q. 5'
.... 0 '" 0 0 " 5 ~
0 0 0> 0 0 Q. <C !!!.
b b ... b b
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
N
'" 0
'" ~
~
Co
'" '" '" '" '"
0 0 0 0 0>
N
'" 0
0
'" '"
..,
'" 6
'" "' ."
'" '" '" '" '" :D
0 0 0 0 '" 0
'-
m
N 0
..,
0 m
0
"' 0
": "
u;
'" '" '" '" '" 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 ~
-<
N m
>
"" :D
0 ~
":
'" '" '" '" '" 5
0 0 0 0 0 0
>
..,
B
S z
(j)
~
'" '" N
'" '" '"
0 0 0 0 0
N
""
'::
'" '" '" '"
'" '"
0 0 0 0 0
n CD
'" '" ~ ~ 0 '"
'" '" '" ~ ~
en in i:l '" ~
.... 0 0 m ~
0 0 0> 0 '" "
'0 g ~ g :.. S
0 ....
0 0 0 0 '"
~(I)> ~ OJ ~ ~~ ~ OJ ~~ ~!~~~ OJ ~~~~ m OJ ~~~~ - OJ 0 " (I)
n",Q. :D :D ~
[g~ :D :D g; :D ~ I n ..,
g (5 ~,o 0 <5 0 <5 g <5 0 <5 ::;: 0 ~
_. --I.-..J "' ~~~g~:IJ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ '"
~ Q. 0 Gl (i)N-o Gl '" Gl '" Gl '" Gl 3 > '" '"
~~ ~ m P-tIJ-; m 0.. :Ug} O;~-; m m-:DO-i m ~l~~ m ~ '" 2- ii'
:D :D." :D ~>()36.:Z~ :D ... <tl -'"'Tl :D :D ~
.c (I) ~ m "" m m E~~c m m ::;:
~"< ~ -u cc -u i~~ ~~ ~~ -u .0 iil-<c ~
c () ......:J ~ eo...... :.') ~
[*~ r;; ZZ , , :::::" CD 0 a. :::;" co 0 a.
00 > fig !!5'$'~g > p.~Qo~ > ~~Qo; >
, 30 0 (1)(1) 0 0 0 0
'CT m :,,;;;: m g~~~~~~ m ~ ,,'" m ~ ,,'" m
:D'" ;;;: ;;;: ;;;: :::~-g, ;;;: --<"2- ;;;:
~~ m "'> m m ~ ~ '" m C~<D' m
< .., Q.::I~...ctla.-l
~. ~. Z Uj"O Z ~~~~g~~ Z ~ Q. Z ~ Q. Z
.., ~~ .., .., ~~~ .., ~~~ ..,
Q.Q. ~~ro&~g~
'" ~Z ~~i :D"'-
Q. g.Gl ~.~~
CT (pro g;5-.o-n
"< "'." Ui.-~
g.~ ~ 9..~"'-< '" '" '" '"
::T Q. Q. Q. Q.
'" mO 0
CD 0 0
0 ~ ~.
'"
a. ~ g"
>
'" 0
'" ~
~ iJ
'"
!!!. '"
0 ~
'"
~
en
m
()
0
Z
0
)>
:c
N -<
g
m en
6 -<
....
3' en
<3 -l
~ m
<g.
N s:
0
()
N 0
Z
en
-l
:c
C
()
-l
0
Z
"'C
:c
0
G>
:c
)>
s:
-.
:::::I
c..
0
III
..,
~
-0
III
lO
CO
-1>0
So
c.o
'" -oZ en 0 -J fI '" -oz en 0 -J fI '" -oz en 0 '" E '" -oz en 0 '" E '" -oz en 0 <n fI :" -; -; > -0 JJ
S ~o 0 '" S ~o 0 ~ s ~o 0 '" s ~o 0 t S ~o 0 '" '< '< g -0 ~
~ '" '" '" '" '" :: '" g: '" '"
'" z Z -J co Z Z '" -J Z Z ~ -J '" Z Z '" '" '" z z '" '" '" 0 ;;::
'" -; '" ~ '" -; '" ~ '" -; CO '" -; '" '" '" -; CO to .z 3 en
'" i:n JJ '" i:n JJ '" i:n JJ '" '" i:n JJ '" '" en JJ 8- 8-
'" "2- 6
m > m > m > m > m > -0 "T1 ~'
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (3 5 ~
0 -; 0 -; 0 -; 0 -; 0 -; ~. fir 3
z z z z z '"
0 0 0 0 0 "-
> > > > >
JJ JJ JJ JJ JJ
-< -< -< -< -<
'" JJ JJ IenJJ ~ Q '" JJ JJ IenJJ '" ;;:: 1" JJ JJ IenJJ '" 0 '" JJ JJ IenJJ '" 0 ~ ~ JJ IenJJ '"
io 0 0 >c-; r= :". 0 0 >c-; '" 6 - 0 0 >c-; -J 0 '" 0 0 >c-; '" C'i c. 0 >c-; '" :; -; "T1 0 -0 JJ
co co '" '"
c C JJJJm -J r C C JJJJm co :;: C C JJJJm '" 0 C C JJJJm '" ^ '" C JJJJm w ~ 0 JJ '" (3 0
-; -; 0"T1-J '" C -; -; 0"T1", '" -; -; 0"T1-J '" -; -; -; 0"T1", '" ;;:: -; 0"T1", '" 0 ~ ~ ~
m m en>co '" ;;:: m m en>co '" > m m en>co '" 0 m m en>", '" m m en>'" 2 ;;:: "-
cO-J '" coco N -< co'" '" co'" N JJ r= cow "2." z
-J '" -0 en co '" -0 '" '" -0 JJ 0 co -0 en m '" -0 '"
'" co JJm JJ '" w JJm JJ '" '" JJm en '" JJm -J 0 en '" JJm ;;! g" ~
co '" "T1-;JJ '" <n "T1-;JJ 0 '" '" "T1-;JJ 0 w '" "T1-;JJ <n Z "T1-;JJ 3
>JJm 6 >JJm >JJm '" >JJm :;: >JJm '"
OmO Q OmO > OmO JJ OmO JJ OmO
0 0 m
m>o m m>o m>o m>o 0 en m>o
o-;z O-;Z O-;Z en o-;z > -; JJ-;Z
JJZen JJ JJZen JJZen en JJZen 0 JJ Ozen
00-; D 00-; 00-; Z 00-; 0 >0-;
>zJJ >zJJ >zJJ Q >zJJ C DZJJ
D'c D'C D'c O,C -; ,c
0 0 0 0 m 0
-; -; -; -; -;
"" "" "" "" '" ""
'"
0' C) JJ 0' C) JJ 0' C) JJ 0' C) JJ 0' () JJ
0 " 0 " ~ " 0 " 0 "
f[ "" :;: m f[ "" :;: m f[ :;: m f[ "" :;: m f[ "" :;: m ~
co ~ > 3
iD ~ ~ "- ~
" D "
S 1'2 " ~ "-
~ ~ '" ~ ~ '" '" "
'" ... ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" '" N 0
W ~ ~ ... -:.., ~ i:j '" in in ... '" io a, ~ '" ~
'" '" ~ '" '" '" '" co '" '" -J '" W '" ~
-J '" W '" '" '" co '" co '" '" -J -J N '"
i.n i.n ... g ~ ~ '" '"g: j;'J ~ '" i.n i.n '" 1.> ~ g ~
'" N ... '" co ... '" ... '" '"
'" '" '" '" ... '" '" '" '" w '" -J -J '" '" '" '" '" '"
'" ~ -0
'" " ~
b "-
'" ~ 3' 5'
-J '" "' 5i
-:.., N
'" '" '" ... '"
'" '" '" '" W
JJ "T1 ,.
~ '" '" c "-
'" ~ '" '" .0 " g;,
w -:.., '" 1.> S. "- 5'
'" t, '" ~ ~ " 3 "
-J '" "- "' !'C
i.n ~ i.n '" b
'" '" '" '"
'" '" '" '" -J
'"
'" '"
'" '" '"
'" co -J
co '" 6
'" '" io i.n co
co '" co
'" '" '" '" W
N
'" '"
'"
~ co
6
'" '" .... '" -0
'" '" ... JJ
'" '" '" '" '" 2
m
'" 0
-;
'" '" m
'"
'" '" 0
-J S "T1
'" Cii
'" '" -:.., '"
.. '" s 0
'" '" '" '" ~
-<
N m
>
'" S JJ
'" '" ~
t, S
b r
'" '" '" '" co 0
'" '" '" '" '" 0
>
-;
is
'" z
~ ~ en
-J ~
'" ~
'" '" '" io '"
'" '"
'" '" '" '" '"
'" ~
... '"
~
'" '" '" '" io '"
'"
'" '" '" '" '"
n OJ
~ 0 ~
'" ~ '" '" 3 0;-
w -:.., '" "
'" -J n
'" ... '" ~ '" <D '"
-J W '" '" <D
i.n ~ i.n '" b c;
'" -J '" '"
'" ... ... '" ...
m JJ '" m JJ '" m JJ '" "'Q m JJ - ~ ~ JJ ~ 0 "T1 en
'" m ~ '" m ~ m ~ "'~ m -J '" m 0 I n -;
'" 0 0 '" 0 "'''' '" '" g g <n 0
'" '" co< '" 0 0 3 :;: ~
'" 0 w 0 '" 0 ex,~ '" 0 '" '" 0 3 '"
z z > '"
z 85' z '" z ~ n'
en en en en '" en '" 8- 0
-; -; -;
JJ JJ JJ "'" -; (3 -; ~ 0
"'''- JJ JJ ~
C C C " , c 3 c
0 0 0 ""2 0 ()
-; -; -; ~ 0 -; JJ -;
is is is ~~ is " is
2 Z Z 2 -J 2
'"
~ N
fI
~
OJ 0 D
g g ~.
"- " g"
> ~
'" 0
'" C
(3 -0
< '"
!'C '"
D ~
~
frf
'"
g
'"
6
-J
'5'
g
<g.
'"
S
en
m
(")
o
z
c
)>
:c
-<
en
-<
en
-l
m
s::
(")
o
z
en
-l
:c
c:
(")
-l
(5
Z
"'1J
:c
o
G')
:c
)>
s::
'"
~
:::::I
c..
2-
lil
....
.e
-u
P>
c.o
<ll
(J1
S.
<D
0 -oz '" m-o'" '" ~ 0 -oz '" () ..... ~ 0 -oz '" () ..... ~ 0 -oz '" m-oCJl ..... i'i 0 -oz CJl m-o", ..... i'i :!' --< --< > -0 JJ
0 r;;o 00--< 0 0 r;;o 0 '" 0 r;;o 0 '" 0 r;;o 00--< '" 0 r;;o 00-< '" '< '< " -0 g
'" CJJ> ..... 0 '" z '" 0 '" z '" 0 ~ CJJ> 0 '" CJJ> ':') 0 g' "C "C " s:
... z -()-< '" ..... w Z '" ..... '" z '" '" z -()-< <0 ..... 0 Z -()-< ..... '" '" 0 <ii'
0 in -omm ... '" 0 in -< w w 0 ill -< 0 ... 0 in -omm 0 '" 0 in -omm ..... ... ~ So So 3 '"
0 0 0 JJ ... 0 JJ 0 0 <0 0 ... '2. 0
m S:'" m > m > m S:CJl m S:'" .. -0 -0
() m- () () () () () m_ () m- e 5 in'
ZI ZI ZI ::r
0 -<:0 0 --< 0 --< 0 -<:0 0 -<:0 ~ g- 3
z z z z z '"
0 m 0 0 0 m 0 m 2-
> 0 > > > 0 > 0
JJ JJ JJ JJ JJ
-< -< -< -< -<
0 JJ JJ OJJJJ ~ 0 JJ JJ IJJJJ 0 '" - JJ m IJJJJ 0 Q ~ JJ m IJJJJ 0 0 JJ 0 IJJJJ 0 I
'" 0 0 JJO--< '" 0 0 >0-< ..... Ui '" > z >0--< '" r= :,. 0 z >0--< ..... i:n 0 ~ >0--< ..... " r --< -n 0 -0 JJ
'" w ... '" t
C C > ' m 0 C C JJ"m ... I r= 0 JJ>m 0 '" C 0 JJ"m <0 C JJ>m () ~ 0 JJ ~ .2. 0
-< -< ~z~~ 0 -< -< 00..... 0 0 JJ 00," 0 m -< 00..... 0 -< s: 00..... 0 ^ '% 0 ~
0 0 Q '" a.
m m fi m m ~cn~ 0 -0 0 ~cn~ fi JJ m CJl_'" 0 m ~cn t: fi -< s: !?
-oJJo '" -0 -n ccn~ '" r= 0 "2.' z
:::i '" -0 a; ;;oj -0 > -0 -< ~ ..... m -0
<0 >>, JJC' I 0 I JJC' s: JJC ~ :: JJC' :;: g .. ~
'" <rJJ ~ 0 '" -nJJJJ r= > -oJJJJ '" > -nJJJJ Z -nJJJJ ~ 3
--< z
mJJm ..... >-nc r '" JJ >-nc > Z >-nc 0 "-nC '"
co ()>JJ JJ JJ 0 ()>JJ -< -< ()>JJ JJ ()>JJ JJ
~~ m()> 0 0 '" m()> 5 m m()" --< m()" 0
-mr > Q C -mr z -mr I -mr >
Q~ -<JJ 0 m JJ -<JJ Z > -<JJ JJ -<JJ 0
QCJl JJC -n JJC Z JJC 0 JJC
JJ() m", > mCJl () m", C mCJl
>--< () >-< m >--< >--<
>I -<- m -<- ~o -< -<-
00 () ZO m 0
_m~ Z '" Z
0 0 0 '" 0
f' f' f' 0 f'
0' () '" 0' () '" 0' () '" 0' () '" 0' () '"
0 ~ ~ ;:g ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~
e!: <: :;: m e!: :;: e!: :;: m e!: :;: m e!: <: :;: m ~
<0 '" > 3
W W a. ~
~ ~ 0 <ii'
~ a.
0 0 <ii' ()
~ ~ .... ~ .... i(j 0 .... ~ 0 ....
.... ~ .... '" '" ::j '" <5 .... !a
'" ~ '" ..... w '" ... .... ..... .... <0 ....
..... ... w 0 '" '" c '" '" '" ... '" c '" '"
'" 0 0 '" 0 0 -.. -... 0 w w 0 '" 0 g
0 0 .... 0 c 0 .... 0 '" '" .... 0 '" '" .... 0 0 0 ....
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" '" 0 0 <0 <0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-0 -0
~ ~ 5 ~
a.
..... c 3' 5'
CD 0 '" 5i
w 0
.... .... ~ '" 0
0 c CD 0
JJ -0 >
'" c: a.
~ .... .... "€ :J go
~ Dl a. 5'
'" iii 3' :J
..... 0 0 a. '" I!!-
'" '" -..
0 0 ~ .. ..
0 0 0 0
'"
~ ~ 0
.. 0
0 '" '" .....
'" '" 0 6
0 '" '" CD
C 0 0 .. ..
0 0 0 0 0
'"
0
0
CD
6
.... <0 -0
.... .... .. .. JJ
0 c 0 c 0 t'
m
'" ()
-<
0 m
0
<0 0
S -n
.... .... 0 Ui
.... ... ... ()
0 0 0 c 0 ~
-<
'" m
"
S JJ
0 >
S r
.... .... ~ ... .... 5
c 0 0 0 ()
>
--<
5
'" z
S CJl
.... .... '"
.... .... ....
0 0 0 0 0
'"
S
'"
.... .... .... .... w
..
0 0 c 0 0
" g>
0
~ ~ 3 0;-
.... "C is
'" ... '" 1D '"
'" '" c <ii'
'" '" -.. 0
0 0 '" .... ....
0 c '" 0 0
~ JJ JJ C;; JJ - JJJJ C;; JJ ill JJ C;; JJ JJ ~ JJ ~ () -n g>
'" m c: m ..... ~ c: m c: '" gg
0 0 0 0 0 0 m c: m 0 I ~
0 0 i!l ~ '" a~ '" i!l CJl i!l 0 (Jl 3 :;: 0
w 0 C ~ C ~ C ~ C "C
3 > '"
Z ~ JJ ~JJ JJ JJ JJ ~ JJ '" n'
'" -n o.c: -n ~ -n -n fr .. So
-< " ~~. > > > :;: 0
JJ n' 0 0 n' 0 n' () 0
C JJ Z <0 JJ Z JJ Z II z ~ ~
() 0 Q '" 0 Q 0 Gl Q
--< .. ~
5 a. a. 1i 1i
z ~
'"
"-
g"
a
'" ()
~ g
~ ~
"C
"C
e
<
I!!-
o
~
o
~
g'
()
c:
-0
'"
-0
'!l
'"
o
o
'"
6
.....
3'
e
c:
<g.
'"
S
en
m
()
o
z
c
:t>
J:l
-<
en
-<
en
-l
m
s:::
()
o
z
en
-l
J:l
c::
()
-l
o
Z
"tl
J:l
o
G)
J:l
:t>
s:::
'"
:::::I
c..
~
iil
...
Ul
---
-0
OJ
<0
<D
en
8-
to
0 "1lZ UJ m-"UJ CO ;!! 0 "1lZ UJ m-"UJ CO ;!! 0 "1lZ UJ m-"UJ CO i!! 0 "1lZ UJ 0 " ;!! 0 "1lZ UJ 0 " ;!! :" ~ ~ g "1l Jl
0 <;;:0 00-1 '" 0 <;;:0 00-1 :;J 0 <;;:0 00-1 '" 0 <;;:0 0 '" 0 <;;:0 0 '" "1l g
'" CJl>> '" ~ '" CJl>> 0 '" CJl>> '" 0 '" Z '" 0 '" Z ~ 0 ~r -a -a s:
0 Z .. '" Z g; '" CO Z .. CO " Z '" " '" Z '" ro ro 0 it
0 -0-1 '" '" 0 -0-1 g; 0 -0-1 '" 0 0 -I .. '" 0 -I '" ~ '" S. 3 UJ
0 en "1lmm '" 0 en "1lmm 0 en "1lmm '" 0 en Jl '" 0 en Jl s. "2- 6
m s:'" m S:'" m S:UJ m >> m >> .. "1l ~ ~'
0 m- 0 m_ 0 m_ 0 0 0 0 <3
0 ZI 0 ZI 0 ZI 0 -I 0 -I ~ 3"
Z -I:;; Z -I:;; Z -I:;; Z Z ~ ~ ~
0 m 0 m 0 m 0 0
>> 0 >> 0 >> 0 >> >>
Jl Jl Jl Jl Jl
-< -< -< -< -<
~ 0 Jl JlJl 0 Jl ~ 0 Jl mJl:O 0 0 0 :0 :0:0 0 m '" :0 :0 I:O:O 0 0 0 m :0 IUJ:O 0 s:
m 0 00 " 0 a, m 0 zoo '" W m 0 00 CO UJ N 0 0 >>0-1 " , 1>> Z 0 >>C-I '" >> , -I -" ~ "1l 8'
'" '" 0 '" ..
>> C >>c '" UJ >> C O' C co >> C >>c '" -I C C :o>>m '" 0 0 C :o:om " X i 0 Jl <3
0 -I 0-1 0 m 0 -I -"-1 0 0 -I 0-1 0 m -I -I 00" 0 Gl 0 -I 0-"", 0 -" 0 ill m' '"
m m 0 m :Om :;; m m 0 UJ m m UJ_ '" :;; m UJ>>" :;; ;;; s: Q.
m '" I m 0", m '" '" :0 '" CUJ'" :0 -" cO" , "E" "- Z
Z ~ Gl" "1l ;= Z ~ "1l Z ClCO "1l ~ "1l m UJ :;J "1l .. '"
0 :0'" 0 , 0 s:'" ~ 0 ~ :00 8 6 :oc m -I :om- :j 0 ~r 3
>>';' '" 0 :0 co >>';' Gl -,,:0:0 Z >> -"-IJl Jl ro
0 -I' >>-"C >>Jlm
OJl I . :;: 0:0 m O>>Jl s: -I OmO 0
mc C ~>> mc Jl mO>> -I m m>>o >>
oJl :0 0' 0:0 0 -m, Z s: O-lZ 0
:0>> 0 -IZ :0>> -1:0 :0 >> :OZUJ
>>, I o"i >>, :oc 0 Z 00-1
z~ z~ mUJ -I >>Z:O
0, >>-1 m o,C
""UJ mm ""UJ -1- Z 0
"1l-l >>< "1l=1 ZO }> -I
~o O[!J :::0 0 Z ""
'? 0
m m m
0' () :JJ 0' () :JJ 0' () :JJ 0' () :JJ 0' () :JJ
0 " 0 " 0 " 0 " ~ "
i!t '" ::E rn i!t '" ::E rn i!t '" ::E rn ~ '" ::E rn ~ ::E rn fr
>> 'j
Q. '"
0 it
.. .. '" Q.
0; 0
'" '" .. .. ~
:., fd '" '" .. ": ~
'" '" to> '" '"
en '" " 0 '" '" 0
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. w w 0 ~ ~ in in
.. ~ ~ .. 0 '" 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" '" '"
-" "1l
~ '3 "
Q. <
'" ~. ~.
in
.. .. .. .. ...
0 0 0 0 '"
Jl ~ }>
.. ro Q.
N .. .D g;.
j '" <: Q. 6'
to> " 5 ~
en co Q. '" 2C
W :.,
.. .. .. ~ ...
0 0 0 '"
'"
0
0
"
6
.. co
.. .. .. ..
0 0 0 0 0
'"
.. 0
0
:;J co
0 6
.. '0 '" "1l
.. .. 0 .. :0
0 0 0 0 0 0
'-
m
'" 0
-I
~ 0 m
0
.. '" 0
'" '" "': -"
0
.. '0 '0 0 en
c:> 0 .. .. 0
c:> 0 0 c:> 0 >>
,
-<
'" m
>>
~ .. ::; :0
0 to> 0 }>
c:> '" "': ,
'0 '0 ,
c:> c:> .. .. .. 0
c:> c:> 0 0 0 0
}>
-I
i5
'" Z
::; UJ
-
.. .. '"
.. .. ..
0 c:> 0 0 c:>
'"
::;
'!:
.. .. .. .. '"
..
0 c:> 0 c:> 0
" !Xl
~ ~ .. 0 '"
;; N .. 3 .,
~
0 '" '" U. to> -a "
0 0 0 0 to> ro- ro
'0 '0 '0 en Cl> 0; 0'
0 c:> 0 ~ :.,
c:> c:> .g ...
'"
- :0 ~ Jl 0; Jl :0 ~ ~ - :0 ~ 0 ,. UJ
'" m '" m m g; '" '"
0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 m 0 I g -I
8 8 8 0 UJ 0 0 3 ::: -a ~
0 0 0 " C !Eo '" 0 3 )> ro
Z Z Z :0 Z ~ .. ii
UJ UJ UJ -" 8' UJ S- O
-I -I -I >> -I :;:
:0 :0 :0 0 '" ~
Q. :0
C C C Z c ~
0 0 0 i(j
-I -I -I Cl 0
i5 i5 i5 0 -I
0 i5
Z Z Z g Z
0
~
:0
!i'
"
0
'"
ro 0
! l
-a
-a
<3
<
2C
o
'"
0;
o
~
g"
~
-0
ro
'0
!!i
'"
o
o
'"
6
"
'"
<3
c
'"
'"
'"
::;
'"
CIl
m
(")
o
z
o
)>
::c
-<
CIl
-<
CIl
-I
m
:5:
(")
o
z
CIl
-I
::c
c:
(")
-I
o
Z
"tl
::c
o
(;)
::c
)>
:5:
:::::I
c..
2-
iii
....
.!!!..
-0
OJ
to
<1l
-..J
So
<D
"' c.. i!t 0 CD rn m"rn a- 2i 0 "z rn m"rn 00 i!t 0 "z rn m"rn 0> 2i 0 "z rn m"rn 0> i!t :? --< --< f; " JJ
w 0 "' c 00--< Co> 0 ,>0 00--< '" 0 ,>0 00--< '" 0 ,>0 00--< '" '< '< " 0
"' .... "' 0 CJJ)> ~ a Co> CJJ)> '" 0 Co> CJJ)> '" a ~ CJJ)> '" 0 } 'tl 'tl " ;:: co
"' "' a- Co> Z ... a- '" Z ... a- Z :"': .... " " 0 "
"' ... a Gl -0--< '" '" a -0--< ... 0 a -0--< 0> .... a -0--< 0 So 3 rn
"' 0 m "mm <n 0 en "mm 0> 0 en "mm '" 0 en "mm ... So "2- 0
--< ;::rn m ;::rn m ;::rn m ;::rn .. " ? ij,
m- 0 m_ 0 m- 0 m- a
=< zI ZI ZI ZI 3"
m --<;0 0 --<;0 0 --<;0 0 --<;0 ro' ~
z z z 0- "
;:: m 0 m 0 m 0 m ~
rn 0 )> 0 )> 0 )> 0
JJ JJ JJ
-< -< -<
0 0 0 "JJ 0 I - JJ JJ "JJ 0 I - 0 JJ "JJ 0 0 0 JJ "JJ 0 "
~. a " m--< '" )> :... 0 0 )>0 a- )> "' m 0 JJO '" a m 0 )>0 .... 0 r --< " ~ " JJ
'" 0 .... 0
m JJm <n =1 C C <c 0> " )> C Oc '" )> C <c ... JJ i 0 JJ a g
Sl JJ JJa- 0 --< --< m--< 0 " 0 --< ;::--< 0 0 --< m--< 0 --< 0 ~. c.
)> -<'" 0 0 m m m 0 -< m m JJm 0 m m m 2 C ;::
rn --< ,<n '" Z '" '" z ~ z
" Z !E a- '" a- " 0 Z ~ --<a- " Z :j .... " m .. '"
" CD' " ... ... 0 0 JJ 0 ' .... 0 0 0 s g 3
g Gl cO m '" <n 0> ... m 0 ~r:-> 0 <n ... r
0" JJ m )> "
c. CD Glm JJ Gl ^ OCD Gl z
'" C mJJ -< JJ --<r JJ m
-< 0 --<)> ,. JJ OC )>
'" Gl ---< 0 0 0:'1 0
5' m --<m .m mo .m
--< mI
g ;::,. 0 "z 0
6' --< JJ OJJ JJ
ii: --< )> mO )>
0 z z,. Z
z '" 00 '"
0' (") OJ 0' (") OJ 0' (") OJ 0' (") OJ 0' (") OJ
a ." ~ ." a ." a ." ~ ."
~ ~ ::;: m ~ ::;: m ~ ~ ::;: m ~ ~ ::;: m ~ ::;: m r;:
)> 'j
c. '"
0 "
'" c.
" 0
:a
., "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ., "" "" "" "" "" "" "" '" "" "" ""
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
" "
3 ~
., c.
... ~. 6'
0 ~
b
'" 0 ., ., .,
0 0 0 0 0
r ? )>
" ~
<;; ~ c. 6'
... " 5'
0 <0 "
b Q !!C
'" 0 ., ., .,
0 s 0 0 0
'"
0
'" 0
'" ....
0 6
., b 0>
0 ., ., .,
0 0 0 0 0
N
., :5
'" 0>
0 6
b "' "
., 0 ., ., ., JJ
0 0 0 0 0 2
m
'" 0
--<
0 m
0
., "' 0
'" '" "
0
b 0 1ii
., 0 ., ., ., 0
0 0 0 0 0 )>
r
-<
~ m
)>
JJ
., ~ 0 )>
'" '" r
0 '"
., b b - 5
0 ., ., 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
)>
--<
0
'" z
., ., ~ S rn
'"
'" ~ 0 ~
0 0
., b g b b N
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
'"
'" S
'" r::
0
., b Co>
0 ., ., .,
0 0 0 0 0
" CD
~ 0 '"
<;; ~ ~ 3 ~
en ... 0 '" 'tl
0 '" 0 0 ro "
b b b b " 6'
~ 0 0 0 0
S 0 0 0
[~~~ - JJ N 0; JJ 0; JJ 0; JJ 0 " g>
'" m ['5
~g~~ 0 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 I --<
0 0 0 0 0 3 ::; 0 ~
8 8 8 'tl
-c. Z Co> 0 0 0 0 3 ;p "
cll.J:Do Z Z Z Z ~ " So 1'5'
::l-< 0 m rn rn rn (f) 0
g-Tl~O --< --< --< --< :;: 0
JJ JJ JJ JJ
00" C C C C ~ ~
3-l(J) 0 0 0 0
c rn m --< --< --< --<
ilIZ0 0 0 0 0
",00 Z Z Z Z
<--<z
"-0
wZ)>
'" (f) JJ
~-<-<
cn15"
"'. C
,. Z
0
(f)
CD 0 0
0 l ~
'"
a. g:
)>
'tl ~
'tl
~ -c
"
!!C 'tl
;;? ~
~
en
m
(")
0
Z
0
l>
:c
['5 -<
0 en
b
.... -<
3' en
a -l
co m
<g.
~ !5:
(")
c.. 0
z
en
-l
:c
C
(")
-l
0
Z
""lJ
:c
0
C>
:c
l>
!5:
..--
:::::I
c..
2-
Qi"
....
.e
-0
Ol
<Cl
CD
CD
So
<D
'" '" ;!I '" '" 12 '" '" 12 '" -[f) [f) Z --J 12 '" )>;:: [f) 00 ':j ~ ::s> --< --< )> -u JJ
~ '" Co> '" Co> '" 0--< 0 '" '" ~5 Z --< '110 '< '< n -u g
Co> :.. '" '" '" '" '" Oc ~ 0 '" -u --J } 16 16 n
'" '" '" '" '" '" '" --< '" <c '" '" 0 ;::
'" 0 CD g --J 0 JJo '" 0 [f)"U mz [f) "
"' 0 "' "' 0 "' )> '" "' '" '" !2, !2, 3
JJ- mr r--< --J
'" '" '" Co> '" '" '" . '11 -U '" '" 0)> 0- .. "- 0
,,[f) ~ OZ "Um "U " ~.
.[f)O z." m[f) a 5 3"
-z 0 Om JJ a;' ~
[f)r )> )>0 .(j) !l "
;,,-< Cll JJ 2-
r '11
--< '11 -< -;
[) "
0< "UO r;; 0< )>0 ~ 0< '110 ~ 0 G) G) (j))>JJ 0 0 OJJ JJ rXJJ ~
0)> ro 0)> 00 '" 0)> zo '" JJ JJ --<0--< ::3 "' JJO 0 6:;:--< '" r --< " 0 -u JJ
0 ~ 0 '" '::l i 0 JJ 0
cJJ )>c '" c;!l Oc c;!l --<c '" '11 '11 com '" ~~ C I)>m E a
zo Zz 0 :::;z 0 JJz 0 '11 '11 Om" 0 --< 0 0 a;' ~
zo zo --<r~ "
:!5i JJ--< 0 --<c ---< 0 --<c ::::::! 0 z z -<[f)'" 0 '11 -^'" ::3 ;:: !l
'11-< '" -<[f) ~~ Co> -<[f) " '11 Cll [f) ~ co '" Z[f)'" [f) "2: z
::;:;: ~~ JJ ;::0 Co> '" ~ G). --J 6' .. ~
r r 0 . JJ' --J ~
5 [f)_ m )>0 '" '" '" ~
~~ 0 0 0 0 0 JJ zJJ Gi :0 mmJJ
0 0 '11 0 '11 C --<[f))>
)> )> JJ ~ -u Z JJ )>JJ JJ 0 0~~
--< [f) --< c 'ti -; 0 G)o '11
0 C 0 0 -< )> '110 '11 JJ "UO
JJ '11 r ;::JJ z 0
z Cll z )> z 0 .'11;::
[f) 0 [f) r [f) "" Z '11)> Cll )>
<: '11 Zz JJ g '11
Z Z Z --<0 m 0
[jj JJ 'j;
0 z
z
0' 0 OJ 0' 0 OJ 0' 0 OJ 0' 0 OJ 0' 0 OJ
et ~ ~ 1J et a ~ 1J et a ~ 1J et a ~ 1J et a ~ 1J
m <: m <: m <: m <: m ~
03 )> 3
a. *
" 0
0 ~ "
0 " ~
'" '" co '" '"
'" '" '" "
0 g '" '" If>
'" '" '" '"
'" '" '" '" '" '" '" '0 '" '" -:.. 0 .",
'" '" '" '" '" '" '" 0 '" 0 '" 0
'" 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.." "U
'" ~ '" 5 ~
'" '" '" '" a.
'" --J '" 0 '" ~. ~.
CD --J ~ 0 '"
in '0 '0 '0
'" 0 .... 8 '"
CD CD '" '"
JJ .." )>
.. ~ " 5 "
.. '" '" D ~
'" ~ "
'" --J '" ~ '" @ S' g"
CD --J !" '"
~ '0 0 '" " <C ec
'" ::j '0 ~
S .!!! '"
'" '"
"
0
0
--J
g
'" '" '" '" '"
'" '" '" '" '"
"
0
~ ~ 0
'" CD
'" '" '" 6
0 '0 8 '" "U
'" '" '" '" JJ
'" '" '" '" '" 2
'11
'" 0
--<
0 '11
~ '" '" ~ 0
'" ;:; '" "
'0 '0 '0 0 [jj
'" '" '" '" '" 0
0 '" '" '" 0 ~
-<
'" '11
)>
'" '" S JJ
'" 0 )>
U; ;:; '" ~ r
'0 '0 0 r
'" '" '" '" '" 0
'" '" 0 '" '" 0
)>
--<
0
~ z
[f)
'" '" ~
U; ;:; '"
'" ~
'0 '0 8 '"
'" '" '" '"
'" '" '" '" '"
"
0
~ ~ '" ')'
'" '" '"
'0 '0 '0 Co>
'" '" '" '" '"
0 '" '" '" '"
n Cll
.. ~ ~ 0 ~
'" 3 ~
'" '" "
'" '" ~ '" '"
Co> .... '" '" * "
in 8 '" '" c;
'" .... '0 '"
CD CD '" '" '"
'" '"
:!Jzz(/) 0 ~~~ 0 ~)>:2z 0 "U ~ [f) ;::ICll ~ (j) 0 '11 W
Z(I)OC "'1JZ""'O(J) '11 --< ~~~ S )> 0 :r -;
~-orOJ T1:"":O JJOm-l ~ :;: C .." 3 :E 0 ~
'meo O. )> 0 '11 "
OO[f))> " 3 )> "
l> 0 t:,<: :OJJr ~:t~~ '" m 3.~ :! ~ " !2, (';'
ggm~ ,,0)> [f) ;::;.;"U ~
<~g " " ==< :;:
mz:s:::O :s:::m-o-l 0 "" :0
m::D::DQ -" ~
~\OOr=; ~~3 if o V> )>
~~~~ ~5". "
:::::z~!; '11'110 -< ,,~ "
)>:oz . ~ rri s: "'~ 0
~~~~ ~o~ "'- 0
",3
. "(j) omJJ "''' -u
0'11'11 "'11 ~~~ Y10 '11
--< < Co 0< :0
0 m z--< Z)>" 0" (j)
z :;: 556 )>zO ,,3 ==<
" G)OJJ " " [f)
0 OZ '11'11 ~ 2- ;::
:0 )>Co> [f)
z~
Cll 0
~ l
"
"
a
<
ec
o
~
o
~.
g"
o
~
-0
i
"
g
'"
6
....
or
a
~
<C
or
~
en
m
(")
o
z
c
)>
:c
-<
en
-<
en
-I
m
::
(")
o
z
en
-I
:c
C
(")
-I
o
Z
"tl
:c
o
G')
:c
)>
::
~
~
:::::I
c..
!2.
Qi"
....
~
-0
OJ
<0
CD
(f)
So
(f)
<D " <i <D N <i <D " ?i <D N <i '" " ?i =I' -<' -<' )> " :IJ
'" <D '" t8 '" g " g
'" w :.. <D W :.. '" w ... w :.. '" ~ ... ! i;l -c
'" -.J <D -.J <D -.J '" :j 0 '" ro 0 ;::
... 0 w 0 N 0 0 0 (/) "
"' 0 "' 0 "' ~ ~ 0 "' 0 2- 2- 3
'" <D '" co '" a> '" '" 'It "2- 0
" ? in'
<3 or
~ ~ 3
ro
2-
0< 00 ;:; 0< mo ;:; 0< (/)0 - 0< 000 ~ 0< 000 ;:;
0)> )>0 0)> ZO 0)> mo N 0)> (/)0 N 0)> (/)0 , --< ." 0 " :IJ
0 0 ';;: ';;: 0
c"" 'C ~ c<i Qc ~ c:IJ :IJc c:IJ mC c"" CC ... g 0 :IJ ~ <3 0
zo ;::z zO ""z ZO <z 0 ZO mz 0 zo :IJZ 0 '30 0 ~ ~
--<c ---< 0 --<c :! 0 :!~ 0--< 0 --<c 0--< 0 --<c <--< 0 ;:: Q "-
B~ '" co -.J a> '" "2." Z
-<(/) -<(/) m~ -<(/) ~~ -<(/) ':!~ 'It "
, , :E , , , ~r 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ro
0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m
~ --< )> :IJ )> --< )> ." )> m
:IJ --< Gi --< :IJ --< m --< Z
0 )> 0 0 )> 0 :n 0 Q
Z ." Z I Z ." Z --< Z Z
(/) ." (/) --< (/J ." (/J r= (/)
0 z 0 z 0 Z N Z m
Z m
." )> :IJ
:E --< Z
)> 0 Q
-< Z
0< (') :n 0< (') :n 0< () :n 0< () :n 0< () :n
~ ri\ 0 "tJ 0 "tJ 0 ri\ 0 "tJ
!!: ::;: !!: <: ::;: rn !!: <: ::;: rn !!: <: ::;: !!: <: ::;: rn !r
)> 'j
"- "
0 "
" "-
" 0
f,l
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
." "
~ ... 5 ~
... ... ... "-
0 N .... ... ~. 6'
'" <D en <D ~ i;i
., ... a. ""
:j ... Co> ... ....
'" '" 0> Co>
:t ." )>
~ <;; 2 c "-
<;; <;; ~ ~
... ~ "-
0 '" .... ... 0; 5' g"
'" <D 0> '" ~ '"
., ... a. "" a. ~
~ ... Co> ... ....
'" ~ ~ Co>
N
8
-.J
1i:
.. ... ... ... ...
0 0 0 0 0
N
0
... ~ 0
... ... .. co
'" 0 '" 0 6
'0 '0 '0 '0 '" "
... 0 :5 0 0 :IJ
0 0 0 0 2
m
~ 0
--<
0 m
... ... .. ... '" 0
... 0 ~ ."
'" 0 '"
'0 '0 '0 '0 0 Ui
... 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 )>
,
-<
N m
)>
:0 :IJ
... ~ ... ~ 0 )>
'" 0 '" 0 6 ,
'0 '0 '0 '0 ~ 5
~ 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
)>
--<
0
N Z
0 (/)
... t ... ~
'" 0 '" 0
... '0 '0 '0 '0 N
0 0 :5 0
0 0 0 0
N
~ ... :0
... ... '::
'" '" 0
... '0 '0 '0 '0 w
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
n OJ
~ <;; 0 "
<;; ~ <;; 3 ~
0> -c
0 '" .... '" ro
'" ... en '" ro
., ... a. "" ~ " c;
:j Ii: ~ ;;; ....
Co>
00--< 0 )>)>c 0 C/)c/)c/)-1 0 0;::'" 0 :E--<m;:: 0 0 :J ~
-m:IJ 0,,(/J m-cmJJ
(/J--<)> z-u~ omz- 0 --<
--<m." O:IJm ()mo)> ~~~5 3 ~
omo"Tl ~~E <- -c
~JJ"T1 5:0:E zoz:!J 3 " ro
os:o (/JLI . )> ~ ~ ~ 'It 2- ii'
-120 ~~~ oenoO OmN 0
)> -L:t> en Z:nc ~
--<m)> :OCJJm Z(l)~ O_:D ~
:IJo, Z);.~ ~S2-<:o 0,- -Z<
~OJ~ )>00 ZQm
0--<" (/)m(J)< :IJ"Z Q.,,-<
.,,-<Z 0--<)> C5Y) ~ 0 -<m)>
O::nQ (/JO:IJ 0000
--<:IJ--< ~~tJrn (/)(/)Z ~:o-o
mm;:: . 20 -<..,0
Z~m m)> INZ (/))>(/) ..,OJ:IJ
Qo)> -<, m00 "'OJm )>cm
-m(/) mrm ,0'
Zzc .".., :IJZ' 5:NO :!~~
~Q~ mo zmc
mo m(/JO ~z "..,Z
:IJ)>(/) :E- m -Q m )>
~" 0.., :D
z)> ~ m Zo -<
O(/) "-Z
OJ 0
g g
~ ~
-c
-c
<3
<
~
:;;
ftr
o
~.
g"
~
-0
ro
-c
~
N
o
o
en
6
-.J
or
g
<g.
~
CIl
m
()
o
z
C
l>
::D
-<
CIl
-<
CIl
-I
m
:s:
()
o
z
CIl
-I
::D
C
()
-I
(5
Z
"'C
::D
o
G)
::D
l>
:s:
-'..
-
:::::I
c..
o
iii
....
~
it
c
o
~
]
i ~
. ..
[.. 8
~ ~
~ f3
i ~ ...
~ ~ ~
f ; ~
< a= a.
~ ;0 ~
~ ~ ~
J
~
o
~
~
~
~
~
.
.
I
.
~
:>
~'
~
~
.
.
c
~
"0
tIl
<
CD
0-
a
tIl
0-
en
~.
:T
'" '" tIl
~ ~ ~
o a -<
~ ~, ~,
~
~
~
.
~
~
.
<
.
~
~
.
8
..
o
[
S
~
~
n
.g
~ ~
~'
~
~ ~
n n
c c
iiJ iiJ
;a a
@ OJ
::J ::J
'" '"
5" 5"
IC IC
C. C.
c c
<1> <1>
o 0
OJ iii
:;; :;;
co n
n n
o 0
c c
?a ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' , ~
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" (')
" 0
II 5 ;u
II ~ 2
II, "lJ Co
" ::1. Z
" 0 ..
" ~ 3
II ~ CD
"
"
"
"'II "
;u "
o II
.... "
m "
(') "
-l "
~ CII II
en -I II
o ::z: II
;o::J;o;o~1I
o () 0 0 II
~r~~gu
~O)om~)>
~ '" ; ~ ~ ~
6" ~ ~ 0 ;0 "II
<1> _ <1> 0 0
~~I~~"
... <1> m <1> .. ~
~ ::J _a ::J '" C
Q. c.o~
r-
~
C
no oocn
00 00-1
z.g.gz.g.gc:;
);m~);CDm;:tJ
~a. ~~O
>
C
"tI
~
Z
G)
~ ~
~
...
'" ....
o ...
o "U
-...j en ~
0) 0 c-
CD ::J '<
OJ '< ()
<1> "U CD
Q) 0 <1>
3 ~ "
;0 "U ;0
~ ~ ,g
c. (Il C.
... ...
en ~ ~~(X)~~ m ~~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0. 0. ~ ~ ... ~ ~ 0.
l? <3 g'{l ~ ~ ~ ~!i G) ~ OJ i[... g g g'!; ~ ~ '" g
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~
I ~ ~ ~ ! c 9 I I ~ 0 ~_. ~ a ~ ~ ~_. ~ ~ m (Il ~ ~
cn!!t"",=,ffic:~CD9'Q. C'C-<;j::\ <:::::I0.3::::):::l
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~
~ :::::I ID ID ID :::::I r ID ID ID m ID m m m m m m m ~ ;0 m m
Co CD Co Co Co CD ~ a. Co Co a. a. a. a. Co Co a. a. Co Co Co Co Co
~ ~ ~ ;0
~~. ~~ ~~~ ;;ug
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
o ~ goo 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ! ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ f [ ~ f [ [ [ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
a. ex> Co Co m a. a. a. a. Co ~-...j
~ ~
'" '"
~ ~
:::::I :::::I :::::I :::::I :::::I :::::I :::::I :::::I :::::I
000 0 0 0 0 0 0
Co Co a. a. Co Co Co Co Co
~ S ~ S ~ g ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ 0
en 0 a
~ 8 8
;;0
;;0
~
en "D "'U ""U ""U
o c c c c
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
l ~ ~
ffi r
o 000 n 0 0 n 0 0 0 ~ g 0 n n
c: c: c c: c c c c c c c ~ ~ c c c
iiJ iiJ iiJ iiJ iiJ iiJ iiJ iiJ iiJ iiJ iiJ n cr iiJ iiJ iiJ
a a a a a a a a a a a c ~ a a a
OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ ~ OJ OJ iiJ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5' ~ ~ ~
(C (C ~(C (C (C (C (C (0 to to ~ otO (C (C
~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g g g S N g g g
~ ~ ~ ; ~ ; ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ;
~ ~ ~ ~ m m m m @ ~ @ ~ ~ @ m @
:;; :;; :;; :;; :;; :;; :;; :;; :;; :;; :;; 0 m :;; :;; :;;
n n n 0 0 0 0 0 0 n n @ ~ n n n
g g 8 8 8 g 8 g g g g ~ a 8 g g
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~
c
;a.
....
Dl
Rl ~ 3l
'" '" 0
<
o
E
3
CD
c-
CD
5"
:E
tIl
ro
~
a
m.
<5'
C'
ro
Q'
<
o
o
-l
"0
tIl
<
5'
to
3'
"0
a
<
~ ? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
g g ~ g 888 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
'=i'
CD
to
C
en "'U ~ "'U "'U (J) "'U
:rCOCC:::TC
~ ~ -. ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~~~
Cc ccC
CD CD CD CD CD
~~ ~~~
"U "U "U "U
c c c c
2: 2: 2: 2:
c;- c;- (i" c;-
"U
c
2:
('j'
~ ~ ~
c c c
<1> <1> <1>
~ ~ ~
"U "U
c c
2: 2:
(i' (i'
~ ~
c c
<1> <1>
~ ~
~ ~
c c
<1> <1>
~ ~
~ ~ ~
c c c
<1> <1> <1>
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
'" '"
o 0
o 0
01 01
'"
o
o
w
'"
o
o
w
~ ~
~ "
'" CD 0
'" 01 CD
o 0 .f:lI.
6" g- 0
"{l ~ "{l
'" <1> ...
'" ::J (Xl
01 C. ....
CD ;n
5. ,.
a ~
~ ;0 g
i3. g 1Il
~ CD ~
~ m 5-
@ m w
- 0 0-
o D ~
:il <1>
OJ ~ ~
6: CD 2,
<g i5. !
::J ::J
o 0
C. C.
"' Q)
CD CD
Z
~~~~~~~~~~"'II
~ 0 rn 0 rn 0 m ~ ~ ID ~
g g g g g g b ~ g ~ ~
o 088 8 g g ~ 0 8 ~
~
Z
"
Z
G'l
~ ~
c c
<1> <1>
~ ~
"U "U
.2 .2.
<1> <1>
0- 0-
n n
o 0
3 3
~~
~ ~
(Il "U "U
~ .2, .9,
go ~ ~
~ 8 8
Q"jj
n
~ ~ [
2
0-
cr
::J
~
c
~ ; ; ;
~ c: c C
n iiJ iiJ iiJ
c a a a
iiJ OJ OJ OJ
a ~ ~ ~
m S' S' S'
~ to (C (0
s: a. a. a.
to ffi ffi ffi
g 6" 8" 6"
; m @ Q3
iii 1Jl 1Jl 1Jl
~ g g g
8 ?- ?- ?-
c
;a.
'"
o
o
w
"1lS';:U
~<c
~~
r-
;:u
c
en
~~
CD ;:u
~o
3 )>
:Ie
:" "tl
)>
:$
z
C)
"tl
;:u
arO
3g;:u
~-
ad' ~
)>
~m
C !. !4.
~ ii' ~'
at 3 CD
CD Cl.
a
;U m
.8 ~
c (')
~ ~ ~
;u [
;u
~
~
Q. .... s:
~ a; ;
!: ~ n
~ g ~
g a a
a
c
CD
CII
n
::1.
~
o'
::J
?i
o
3
i
::J
iil'
"
iii
n ~
CD CD
Cl. !!l
g ~
"'II ,2,
S' ~
~ ~
..
.... CII
i
en
o
~
m
"U
;0
o
'-
m
()
-l
CIl
;;::
)>
~
z
o
-l
OJ
m
()
o
~
"U
r
m
-l
m
o
)>
CIl
"U
;0
~ t:l
=i ;:Q
N )),
[g :!l
o
c
m
-l
o
"U
;0
o
'-
m
()
-l
()
o
~
"U
r
m
X
=i
~
)>
z
o
o
;0
)>
;;;
~
OJ
r
m
"Tl
c
z
o
Z
g
)>
r-
OJ
m
:s::
)>
:;:c
r-
m
(')
o
c
z
=<!
"'C
:;:c
o
:;:c
~
r-
en
-t
"'T1
o
:;:c
(J)
m
(')
o
z
c
)>
~
:;:c
o
)>
c
:s::
"'C
:;:c
o
<
m
:s::
m
z
-t
(J)
"'T1
o
:;:c
:;:c
C
~
r-
:;:c
C
(J)
-t
(;
:;:c
o
)>
c
(J)
N
o
o
.......
I
o
co
-l
::r
a
c:
cc
::r
N
o
....
N
I
....
Co)
m
)C
:T
g
o
4'
02,
CD
U
'"
S'
0'
o
0:
Ql
:>
0.
S'
9f
i:j'
-< -< -< -< -< -<
00
'" N
~Ol ~ ~ ~g~ ~j ~ j~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [ ~ i '" ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
j;g~~~~~ "'~o ::+::r~a ti~a~~g~~~ c;><;5.oog ~l?~
~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ro ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~. ~ ff ~ ~ 5"
~O~~5'~~a ~'lS ~g ~~ ~~~ [[~~~;Ua()~ ~~~ ~
i i I I I i I i [ I i ~ i ~ I Iii Iii I i ~ ~ i J i i i
?1
-..j ~
... '"
'" '"
o ...
CIl 0
;U ~;u g ~
~ ?1 ?1 ~ g ~ ~ ~ ?1 ~ ?1
?1 ~ ~ "'~. ?1 ~ CD ~?1 ~ a ~ ?1 '" ?1 ~
C')~I\)~ N~m~ol\)m~ -...I8jOJ
~ : S 0 ~ ~ 0 S . ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 to", ~
B ~ ~ ~ ~ ff ~ ~ e ~. B ~ ~ ff i B S
?1 _,;u ~ ~ ~ ?1 ~ ~ 0 0' ?1 ~ a ~ ?1 ~ ?1 ~
m m CD OJ -..j m m ~ -...I ~ ff CD -...I m -...I OJ
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P t ~ ~ ~
'"
::r
o
::l-
a
Ql
0.
~
3
<Il
a
0'
'i
:>
"U
o
po
;><;
<Il
~
1'i'
"'"
()
!:1
!!l
CD
:>
~
o
:>
5'
in'
~
CD
-,.
'"
"C
:>,
o
:>,
-<
~
"U
il
(;j'
@-
S'
0'
o
0:
CD
:>
0.
S'
~
i:j'
Ql
m
~
o
:>
5'
in'
~
CD
;;:-
"C
:>,
o
:>,
-<
~
;U
;U
;U
,..,
?1
m ~
~ CJ) ~
'" '"
o m c.c
o 0 I\J
m ~ 0
~ CJ) t1
:J '" N
0. '" ~
;U
t1 ~
'" <Il
N '"
N R5
6" 0
() ;U
g 0
:J C
'< CD
~ a
<Il 00
::D pJ
~ N
... '"
~ ~
?1 ?1
'"
N '"
N '"
21
00
'"
a
;U S
g Fl
~ rJ U1
pJ 0 -...I?l
m a ~ U1 N
~oo:oco
o ~ 0 ~ 0
t1 ~ ~ ~ pJ
(X) en m ~ ~
~i:;5.~w
:J )> :J
o C 0
g-~g-
ro CD
o 0
~ ~
6 6
'" ...
"'
CD
~
~
:>
~
'"
W
01
po
'"
w
'"
0.
o
CD
'"
3
3
!l
<
o
o
-I
~
@"
3
CD
:>
g
:J
o
0.
Ql
CD
~
'"
a
...
'"
N
~
~tA~fA~~
(..)~'"....Jc.nCnCo
~ g co ~ OJ co
ao~~co-'"
gg~~~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
g g 8 8 B g g 8 8 g 8 g g ~ ~ 8 8 2 8 g g 8 8 8 8 888 8 8
~
o'
~ ~ ~ ~ j
~ ~ ~ ~ l
~
o 0 n 0 ~
c c C C n
iil iil iil iil c:
aaaa;...=
iU w w OJ
* ~ ~ ~ il
S" :i' :5" ::J --
(C to (C co s:
ggggCQ
CD CD CD CD a.
o 0 0 6" i
@ @ W W 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
g g g g ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 8
5
,..
"U "U "U "U
c c c: c
g: Q: g: Q:
ci" CS" ci" ci"
~ ~ ~
N
a
a
...
N
a
o
...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Q: Q: Q: ...- Q:
(';' (';' ,;, ~ (';'
~~~~~
c C cAlc
CD CD CD ::. CD
~~~~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
ggg91g
iil iil iil g' iil
;;a =- =- ~ =-
D1 D1 D1 .is D1
::I ::I ::I c: ::I
;::-:' ;::-:' ;::-:' CD ;::-:'
~" ~. ~" !!1 ~"
a. a. a. a.
c c c c
CD CD CD CD
6" 6" 6" 6"
Gl Gl ~
31 31 31
n n n
n n n
000
C C C
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
ui"ggggggo-
'0 (") (") (") (") (") (") ir
.2,~~~~~~~
0. c c: c: c: c: c: .is
~__~~~~~~i
lQ.
g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (")
~ egg ~ ceo egg g g g g g g
~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 6" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~jjj@jj~jjjjjjjjj
~ ~ g g ~ g ~ ~. g g g g ~ g g g g
~ g g g g g g ~ s s SSg S ; ; g
N _ ~ @ @ ~ ~ ~ _ @ ~ @
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "U 31 31 ~ ~ ~ ~ 31 ~ ~ ~ ~ 31
g ::I g g g ~ g g ~ g g g g g g g g g
! ; ! ! ! ~ ! ! : ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
"'0"" ;0 S
;U ,..
?1
...
~
'"
'" N
Q a
Q a
~ ...
'"
:is
~
N N
a a
o a
... ...
"U "U "U "U "U "U "U "U "U
c c c c c C c c c
Q: Q: Q: Q: Q: Q: Q: Q: Q:
~ ~ ~. ~. ~ ~" ff ~" ~"
~ ~
C C
<Il <Il
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
C C C C C
CD CD m CD CD
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'" N
:is g
~ ...
N
a
a
'"
N
a
a
'"
"0 CIl CIl
~ g g
a= OJ CD
~~~5..g
c c ;:;0 '0 CD
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
(';. ~
m n
.0 C
~ a
~ ;a
~ ~
n "'"
c S"
a co
a ~
D1 <Il
:J 0
"'"
~. Gl
0. 31
C n
<Il 8
6" a.
~
31
n
n
o
C
i3-
"U
C
Q:
(';'
iil
.0
C
<Il
~
o
III
0.
0.
0' N
;x; 0
<Il a
ill '"
:J
<Il
'"
o
:J
o
:J
<Il
'"
c:
CD
S'
N
a
a
?'
"tI
::0
o
c..
m
()
-I
en
-I
::J:
~
o
c
)0
r-
~
."
o
::0
;0
m
C'l
c:
~
;0
"'ll
~
<
z
C'l
Z I
"tI
;U
i5
;U
~
~
Z
"
Z
c;)
~ :i" C;
::l < c:
C r-
~ )>
;a
"tJ
li::o;u)>
c 2 0 <
~o.;.z
"tIif~G')
S' ~ 3 "tJ
i _~;a
5
;a
~
a !;"
3 ~
-l 0'
o ::l
~
< m
C ! ~
! ir l
3 ~
~ Q.
a
::0
.. m
lQ ~
~ !;> 3'
ii ~ !I.
;u 3-
;u
w
~
c.
~
~
;I:
o
~
n
~
~
a
-<
~
n
a n
n 0
o ~
~ a
a
C
..
III
!:l
i
0'
2..
()
o
3
3
~
::l
to
'C
or
n ~
CD III
Q. ..
g "tI
"tI a
::I. or
o l:l.
i ~
r- III
~
Ul
o
;:::
m
"U
;u
o
'-
m
()
-l
CIl
;:::
)>
-<
z
o
-I
OJ
m
()
o
;:::
"U
r-
m
-I
m
o
1'Ji
"U
;U
~ 0
::j ~
N )i
m ."
~ ""'I
c t.)
m 0
-I 0
o .....
"U I
;u 0
o co
ffi -l
() :r
-l ...
() 0
o c:
;::: CQ
"U :r
r- t.)
~ 0
::j ....
-< t.)
)> I
Z ....
o Co)
o
;U
)>
~
~
OJ
r-
m
."
c
Z
o
z
.9
(:)
Z
C
)>
:::c
-(!
:::c
o
)>
c
s:
"'tJ
:::c
o
<
m
s:
m
z
~
CJ)
'TI
o
:::c
c
z
"'tJ
)>
<
m
c
:::c
o
)>
c
CJ)
m
><
::T
g
(")
ORDINANCE NO. 07-17( )
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 17, WATER PROTECTION, OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF ALEMARLE, VIRGINIA, BY AMENDING ARTICLE I, GENERAL, ARTICLE III, STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT AND WATER QUALITY, ARTICLE IV, GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENTS, AND BY
ADDING ARTICLE V, ILLICIT DISCHARGES AND CONNECTIONS
BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 17,
Water Protection, is amended and reordained as follows:
By Amending:
Sec. 17-102 Purposes
Sec. 1 7-104 Defin it ions
Sec, 17-105 Designation of program authority; powers and duties
Sec. 17-300 Applicability
Sec, 17-301 Designation of water resources areas
Sec. 1 7-402 Tier 2 Assessments
Sec. 17-403 Tier 3 Assessments
Sec. 17-404 Tier 4 Assessments
By Adding:
Sec. 17-107 Relation of chapter to other laws
Sec. 17-500 Applicability
Sec. 17-501 Illicit discharges prohibited; exempt and authorized discharges
Sec, 17-502 Illicit connections prohibited
Sec. 17-503 Dumping prohibited
Sec. 17-504 Maintaining the functional performance of streams
Sec. 17-505 Inspections and monitoring
Sec. 17-506 Discovery, containment, cleanup and notification of discharge
Sec. 17-507 Penalties and remedies
CHAPTER 17
WATER PROTECTION
ARTICLE I. GENERAL
Sec. 17-102 Purposes,
The board of supervisors finds that this chapter is necessary to protect the health, safety and
general welfare of the citizens of the county and the Commonwealth of Virginia and to prevent water from
being rendered dangerous to the health of persons living in the county, and is supported by the findings of
watershed studies that have been conducted. Therefore, the specific purposes of this chapter are to:
1.
activities;
inhibit the deterioration of state waters and waterways resulting from land disturbing
2. protect the safety and welfare of citizens, property owners, and businesses by minimizing
the negative impacts of increased stormwater discharges from new land development and
redevelopment;
3. protect against and minimize the pollution and eutrophication of public drinking water
supplies resulting from land development;
4.
erosion;
control nonpoint source pollution, erosion and sedimentation, and stream channel
5. maintain the integrity of existing stream channels and networks for their biological
functions, drainage, and natural recharge of groundwater;
1
6.
functions;
protect the condition of state waters for all reasonable public uses and ecological
7, provide for the long-term responsibility for and maintenance of storm water management
facilities and best management practices;
8. regulate the discharge of pollutants into storm drainage systems and state waters by
prohibiting illicit discharges and connections, and the dumping of refuse and pollutants; the board of
supervisors hereby determines that applying such regulations to not only the county's municipal separate
storm sewer system but also to privately owned and operated storm drainage systems and state waters is
necessary to prevent any further degradation to water resources;
9. facilitate the integration of stormwater management and pollution control with other
county ordinances, programs, policies, and the comprehensive plan; and
10. promote the long-term sustainability of groundwater resources,
(97-1,6-18-75,92,2-11-87,3-18-92; 9 19,1-4, 9-29-77, art, 1,91,7-11-90; 9 19,2-2, 6-19-91,92; 9
19.3-3,2-11-98; Code 1988, 997-1,19.1-4,19.2-2,19.3-3; Ord, 98-A(1), 8-5-98; Ord, 04-17(1), adopted
12-8-04, effective 2-8-05; Ord. 07-17(1), 2-14-07)
State law reference-oVa, Code SS 10,1-560 et seq" 10,1-603,1 et seq., S10,1-2108,
Sec. 17-104 Definitions.
The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation and implementation of this chapter:
(4) Best management practice (BMP). The term "best management practice (BMP)" means a
practice or combination of practices, including treatment practices, operating procedures, general good
housekeeping practices, pollution prevention, prohibitions of activities, education practices, and other
management practices, determined by the program authority to be the most effective, practical means of
preventing or reducing the amount of water pollution generated by non point sources to a level compatible
with water quality goals.
(10) County engineer, The term "county engineer" means the county engineer within the
department of community development or his designee.
(12) Department of community development, The term "department of community development"
means the county department of community development.
(12,1) Department of general services, The term "department of general services" means the
county department of general services.
(20.1) Hazardous substance, The term "hazardous substance" means any substance
designated as such under the Virginia Code and 40 CFR Part 116 (2000) pursuant to 9 311 of the Clean
Water Act, codified in 33 U.S,C, 9 1251 et seq.
(20.2) Illicit discharge, The term "illicit discharge" means any discharge to the storm drainage
system that is not composed entirely of stormwater, excepting discharges pursuant to a Virginia Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System ("VPDES") or Virginia Storm Management Program ("VSMP") permit (other
than a VSMP permit for discharges from the municipal separate storm sewer), discharges resulting from
fire fighting activities, and discharges identified by and in compliance with 4 VAC 50-60-1220(C)(2), as
delineated in section 17-501,
2
(20,3) Illicit connection, The term "illicit connection" means either:
(a) Any drain or conveyance, whether on the surface or subsurface, that allows an
illicit discharge to enter the storm drainage system, and includes but is not limited to: (i) any conveyances
that allow sewage, process wastewater, wash water or pollutants to enter the system; and (ii) any
connections to the system from indoor drains and sinks, regardless of whether such connections were
previously allowed, permitted, or approved by the county or any other government agency; or
(b) Any drain or conveyance connected to the storm drainage system from a
commercial or industrial use that has not been approved by the county in a site plan, subdivision plat, or
other plan or permit.
(26.1) Municipal separate storm sewer system ("MS4"), The term "municipal separate storm
sewer system" means all separate storm sewers comprising the system of conveyances, including roads
with drainage systems, public streets, catch basins, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade
channels, or storm drains: (i) owned or operated by the county; (ii) designed or used for collecting or
conveying stormwater; (iii) that are not a combined sewer; and (iv) that are not part of a publicly owned
treatment works.
(29.1) Non-stormwater discharge. The term "non-stormwater discharge" means any discharge to
the storm drainage system or state waters that is not comprised entirely of stormwater.
(35.1) Person. The term "person" means a natural person, corporation, partnership, sole
proprietorship, trust, trustee, joint venture, or any other entity.
(36.1) Pollutant. The term "pollutant" means dredged spoil, solid waste, incinerator residue, filter
backwash, sewage, garbage, sewage sludge, munitions, chemical wastes, biological materials,
radioactive materials (except those regulated under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 USC
92011 et seq,)), heat, wrecked or discarded equipment, rock, sand, cellar dirt and industrial, municipal,
and agricultural waste discharged into water.
(a) The term "pollutant" includes, but is not limited to: paints, varnishes, and
solvents; oil and other automotive fluids; non-hazardous liquids and solid wastes and yard wastes; refuse,
rubbish, garbage, litter, or other discarded or abandoned objects, ordnances, and accumulations, so that
same may cause or contribute to pollution; floatables; pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers; hazardous
substances and wastes; sewage, fecal coliform and pathogens; dissolved and particulate metals; animal
wastes; wastes and residues that result from constructing a building or structure; and noxious or offensive
matter of any kind.
(b) The term "pollutant" does not include: (i) sewage from vessels; or (ii) water, gas,
or other material that is injected into a well to facilitate production of oil or gas, or water derived in
association with oil and gas production and disposed of in a well if the well used either to facilitate
production or for disposal purposes is approved by the Virginia Soil and Water Conservation board and if
the board determines that the injection or disposal will not result in the degradation of ground or surface
water resources.
(36.2) Premises, The term "premises" means any building or structure, or any lot or parcel,
whether improved or unimproved, and including adjacent curbs, gutters, sidewalks and planting strips,
(37) Program authority. The term "program authority" means the department of community
development, and except where the context clearly indicates otherwise, includes any officer or employee
of the department of community development or the department of general services authorized by the
director of the department of community development to act pursuant to this chapter.
3
(43.1) Storm drainage system, The term "storm drainage system" means the municipal separate
storm sewer system and any privately owned and maintained improvements by which stormwater is
collected and/or conveyed and which ultimately discharges to state waters, including but not limited to,
street drainage systems, streets, gutters, curbs, inlets, piped storm drains, pumping facilities, retention
and detention basins, human-made or altered drainage channels, ponds, and other drainage structures.
(43.2) Storm water, The term "stormwater" means precipitation that is discharged across the land
surface or through conveyances to one or more waterways and that may include stormwater runoff, snow
melt runoff, and surface runoff and drainage.
(47.1) Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) permit, The term "Virginia
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) permit" means a document issued by the State Water
Control Board pursuant to the State Water Control Law authorizing, under prescribed conditions, the
potential or actual discharge of pollutants from a point source to surface waters and the use or disposal of
sewage sludge.
(97-2, 6-18-75, 94, 7-9-80,2-11-87, 3-18-92, 9 19,1-5, 9-29-77, art. I, 92, 9-13-78, 7-11-90, 8-3-94; 9
19.2-4,6-19-91; 9 19,3-5,2-11-98; Code 1988, 997-2,19.1-5,19.2-4,19.3-5; Ord. 98-A(1), 8-5-98; Ord,
07-17(1),2-14-07)
State law reference-oVa, Code SS 10,1-560, 10,1-603,2,
Sec. 17-105 Designation of program authority; powers and duties.
A. The board of supervisors hereby designates the department of community development
as the program authority.
B, The program authority shall administer and enforce this chapter as authorized by law.
C. The program authority shall establish reasonable administrative procedures for the
administration of this chapter, including developing and maintaining for article III a design manual
containing information about the content of plans required by article III, calculation methods, maintenance
and inspection procedures, and other information to assist with the implementation and enforcement of
article III. The program authority shall update the design manual periodically. The manual shall be
consistent with this chapter and all applicable statutes and regulations.
D, The program authority shall assure that the erosion and sediment control program set
forth in article II is administered by a certified program administrator, a certified plan reviewer, and a
certified project inspector. Such positions may be filled by the same person,
E, The program authority shall take appropriate enforcement actions to achieve compliance
with this chapter, and shall maintain a record of enforcement actions for all active land disturbing
activities, land developments, illicit discharges, illicit connections, and prohibited dumping,
F. The program authority is authorized to cooperate with any federal or state agency in
connection with plans for erosion and sediment control or stormwater management. The program
authority may also recommend to the county executive any proposed agreement with such agency for
such purposes, which agreement shall be executed, if at all, by the county executive on behalf of the
county.
(97-9,4-21-76,2-11-87,3-18-92; 9 19,3-6,2-11-98; Code 1988, 997-9,19.3-6; Ord. 98-A(1), 8-5-98;
Ord. 07-17(1), 2-14-07)
State law reference-oVa. Code 99 10.1-562, 10,1-603.3. 10.1-603.12:1 et seq,
4
Sec. 17-107 Relation of chapter to other laws
The requirements of this chapter are:
A. Separate from, but supplementary to, all other applicable requirements of the Code.
Compliance with the requirements of this chapter shall not be deemed to be compliance with other
applicable ordinances or regulations.
B. Separate from, but supplementary to, all other applicable requirements of state or federal
law. If the requirements of this chapter are in direct conflict with mandatory state or federal requirements,
then the state or federal requirements shall apply.
C. Separate from the requirements, terms or conditions of any private easement, covenant,
agreement or restriction. Neither the county nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have any
duty to enforce a private easement, covenant, agreement or restriction.
ARTICLE III. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND WATER QUALITY
Sec. 17-300 Applicability.
Each owner shall comply with the requirements of this article prior to commencing any land
development, or allowing any land development to occur, on his property and at all times thereafter.
(919,1-6,9-29-77, art, 11,91,10-19-77,9-13-78,10-22-80,7-11-90,8-3-94; 9 19,2-5,6-19-91,95; 9
19.3-24,2-11-98; Code 1988, 99 19,1-6, 19.2-5, 19.3-24; Ord. 98-A(1), 8-5-98; Ord, 07-17(1), 2-14-07)
State law reference-oVa, Code ss 10,1-603,3, 10,1-603,9, 10.1-2108.
Sec. 17-301 Designation of water resources areas.
In order to better effectuate the purposes of this article, all of the land within the county is hereby
designated as being within one or more of the following water resources areas:
A. Development areas: Development areas are those areas of land within the county
designated as development areas in the land use element of the comprehensive plan, and as shown on
the official map of the land use element.
B. Areas of infi/! and redevelopment: Areas of infill and redevelopment are those areas of
land within the county that are: (i) within a development area; and (ii) designated as areas of infill and
redevelopment for purposes of this article by the board of supervisors, and as shown on the official map
adopted showing such areas. The board of supervisors shall designate such areas based on a finding
that existing development has altered severely the natural condition of the area, including the presence of
vegetation, and that infill and redevelopment activities would serve other community and comprehensive
plan goals.
C. Water supply protection areas: Water supply protection areas are those areas of land
within the county that are within the watershed of a public water supply reservoir or water supply intake,
and such areas shall consist of all land within the county that drains naturally to the South Fork Rivanna
Reservoir, Beaver Creek Reservoir, Totier Creek Reservoir, Sugar Hollow Reservoir, Ragged Mountain
Reservoir, Chris Greene Lake, the North Fork Rivanna River intake, and to any impoundment or water
supply intake designated in the future by the board of supervisors as a public water supply reservoir.
D. Other rural land: Other rural land consists of those areas of land that are not within a
development area, an area of infill and redevelopment, or a water supply protection area,
(9 19,2-6, 6-19-91, 96; 9 19,3-25,2-11-98; Code 1988, 99 19,2-6, 19.3-25; Ord, 98-A(1), 8-5-98; Ord. 07-
17(1),2-14-07)
5
State law reference-oVa. Code ~ 10.1-2108,
ARTICLE IV. GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENTS
Sec. 17-402 Tier 2 assessments.
A Tier 2 assessment shall consist of the program authority reviewing and evaluating the county's
well database, available hydrogeologic studies, and information from the Virginia Department of Health
and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, as provided in chapter 2 of the design standards
manual. Based on this evaluation, the program authority may require that the owner provide additional
groundwater assessment data prior to subdivision plat or site plan approval, or may require that a Tier 3
assessment be submitted.
(~402, Ord, 04-17(1), 12-8-04, effective 2-8-05; Ord, 07-17(1), 2-14-07)
Sec. 17-403 Tier 3 assessments.
A Tier 3 assessment shall consist of the following:
A. The owner shall submit a draft groundwater management plan with the preliminary plat
or site plan. The groundwater management plan shall comply with the requirements for such plans in
chapter 2 of the design standards manual. If the groundwater management plan identifies special areas
of concern, such as an off-site resource of high groundwater sensitivity or a previously unknown source of
contamination, then the program authority may require additional groundwater assessment data prior to
preliminary subdivision plat or site plan approval.
B. The owner shall submit a final groundwater management plan that must be approved by
the program authority prior to approval of the final plat or site plan.
C. Any structural measures (e.g., best management practices) shall be bonded as a
subdivision plat or site plan improvement.
The program authority may require that a Tier 4 assessment be submitted instead of a Tier 3
assessment if the special areas of concern identified in subsection (A) have not been adequately
addressed by the additional groundwater assessment data.
(~17-403, Ord. 04-17(1),12-8-04, effective 2-8-05; Ord, 07-17(1), 2-14-07)
Sec, 17-404 Tier 4 assessments.
A Tier 4 assessment shall consist of the following:
A. The owner shall submit a draft groundwater management plan and an aquifer testing
workplan complying with the requirements for such plans in chapter 2 of the design standards manual,
with the preliminary plat, preliminary site plan, or the application for a central water supply, The
groundwater management plan must demonstrate to the program authority's satisfaction that the site's
groundwater conditions have been considered with the subdivision or site plan's layout and design, The
aquifer testing workplan must be approved by the program authority before the owner may conduct
aquifer testing as required by subsection (B).
B, After the program authority approves the aquifer testing workplan, the owner shall conduct
aquifer testing as provided in the workplan.
C. The owner shall submit a final groundwater management plan and a groundwater
assessment report complying with the requirements for such a report in chapter 2 of the design standards
manual, based upon the results of the aquifer testing. The final groundwater management plan and the
groundwater assessment report must be approved by the program authority prior to final subdivision plat
or site plan approval.
6
D. Any structural measures (e.g., best management practices) shall be bonded as a
subdivision plat or site plan improvement.
(9404, Ord, 04-17(1),12-8-04, effective 2-8-05; Ord. 07-17(1),2-14-07)
ARTICLE V. ILLICIT DISCHARGES AND CONNECTIONS
Sec. 17-500 Applicability.
This article shall apply to all activities that cause or allow to be caused direct or indirect illicit
discharges, illicit connections, and the prohibited dumping of refuse and pollutants, or which negatively
impede the flow capacity of the storm drainage system or state waters that (i) are not covered by other
articles of this chapter and (ii) are not expressly exempt from this article,
State law reference-oVa, Code SS 10.1-603,3,10,1-603.7,
Sec, 17-501 Illicit discharges prohibited; exempt and authorized discharges.
No person shall throw, drain, or otherwise discharge, cause or allow others under their control to
throw, drain, or otherwise discharge into the storm drainage system or state waters any pollutants or
waters containing any pollutants, other than stormwater. The commencement, conduct, or continuance of
any such illicit discharge to the storm drainage system or state waters is prohibited, subject to the
following:
A.
this article:
Conditionally exempt discharges. The following discharges are conditionally exempt from
1. Discharges pursuant to a Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
("VPDES") or Virginia Storm Management Program ("VSMP") permit (other than a VSMP permit for
discharges from the municipal separate storm sewer);
2, Discharges resulting from fire fighting and other public safety activities;
3. Discharges associated with the maintenance or repair of public water, sanitary,
and storm sewer lines, and public drinking water reservoirs and drinking water treatment or distributions
systems conducted in accordance with applicable federal and state regulations and standards;
4. Discharges associated with any activity by the county, its employees and agents,
in the maintenance of any component of a county-maintained stormwater management facility conducted
in accordance with applicable federal and state regulations and standards;
5. Discharges specified in writing by the program authority as being necessary to
protect public health and safety;
6. Water line flushing;
7. Landscape irrigation and lawn watering;
8. Non-point discharges associated with agricultural and silvicultural operations;
9, Diverted stream flows;
10. Rising ground water, springs, uncontaminated ground water infiltration, and
pumped ground water;
11. Flows from riparian habitats and wetlands;
7
condensation;
12, Discharges from potable water sources, foundation drains, and air conditioning
13. Water from crawl space pumps and footing drains;
14. House washing and individual car washing on residential lots;
15, De-chlorinated swimming pool discharges having less than 1 part per million
chlorine and discharges from hot tubs;
16. Street wash water;
17, Water from washed parking lots or sidewalks to remove algae or oil buildup;
lots.
18. Application of salts or other de-icing substances to streets, sidewalks and parking
19, Discharges associated with dye testing, provided that the program authority is
notified in writing before the test.
If the program authority determines that any of these exempted activities are causing adverse
impacts to state waters in a specific case, the program authority may revoke the exemption for that
specific case and such revocation shall be effective from the date the person responsible for the
discharge is informed in writing of the determination that the exemption is revoked,
B. Discharges authorized by VPDES permit, waiver or waste discharge order. The
prohibition shall not apply to any non-stormwater discharge permitted under a VPDES permit, waiver, or
waste discharge order issued to the discharger and administered under the authority of the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), provided that the discharger is in full compliance with all
requirements of the permit, waiver, or order and other applicable laws and regulations and provided that
written approval has been granted for any discharge to the storm drainage system,
State law reference-oVa. Code SS 10.1-603,3, 10.1-603,7,
Sec. 17-502 Illicit connections prohibited.
The construction, use, maintenance, or continued existence of illicit connections to the storm
drainage system is prohibited.
A, Pre-existing illicit connections. Any illicit connection previously authorized before the
effective date of this chapter shall comply with the requirements of this chapter by December 31,2007, or
such later date as expressly authorized by the program authority upon good cause shown by the person
requesting the extension,
B. Disconnection and redirection. Any illicit connection shall be disconnected and
redirected, if necessary, to an approved onsite wastewater management system or the sanitary sewer
system upon approval of the Albemarle County Service Authority.
C. Locating undocumented connections. Any drain or conveyance that has not been
documented in plans, maps, or their equivalent and which appears to be connected to the storm drainage
system shall be located by the owner, occupant, lessee, principal, agent, employee or otherwise, of that
property within the time period specified in the written notice of violation from the program authority
requiring that the connection be located. The notice shall require that: (i) the location of the drain or
conveyance be determined; (ii) the drain or conveyance be identified as a storm sewer, sanitary sewer, or
other; and (iii) the outfall location or point of connection to the storm drainage system, sanitary sewer
system, or other discharge point be identified, The results of these investigations shall be documented
and provided to the program authority.
State law reference-oVa, Code SS 10,1-603,3, 10,1-603,7.
8
Sec. 17-503 Dumping prohibited.
No person, whether the owner, occupant, lessee, principal, agent, employee or otherwise,
may dump or discharge, or allow any other person to dump or discharge, refuse, as that term is
defined in section 13-100 of the Code, or any other material or pollutant, natural or synthetic, into the
storm drainage system or a natural stream, unless the dumping or discharge is expressly authorized by
the Code.
Sec. 17-504 Maintaining the functional performance of the storm drainage system and streams.
The storm drainage system and natural streams shall be maintained as follows:
A. Keeping the storm drainage system and natural streams free of refuse and other
obstacles. Every person, whether the owner, occupant, lessee, principal, agent, employee or otherwise,
owning, occupying or otherwise responsible for the condition of the property through which a privately-
maintained storm drainage system or natural stream passes, shall maintain the part of such system or
stream on the property free of refuse, as that term is defined in section 13-100 of the Code, and other
obstacles that would pollute, contaminate, or adversely impact the system's or stream's functional
performance.
B, Maintaining structures within the flood hazard overlay district. Every person, whether the
owner, occupant, lessee, principal, agent, employee or otherwise, owning, occupying or otherwise
responsible for the condition of the property through which a natural stream passes, shall maintain
existing privately-owned structures within the flood hazard overlay district established under section 18-
30.3 of the Code so that such structures do not become a hazard to the use, function, or physical or
ecological integrity of the stream,
State law reference-oVa, Code SS 10,1-603.3,10,1-603,7,
Sec. 17-505 Inspections and monitoring.
The program authority is authorized to assure compliance with the requirements of this
article as follows:
A. Inspections and monitoring, generally. The program authority is authorized to conduct
inspections of private property and to conduct monitoring of storm drainage systems, natural streams,
and facilities permitted by VPDES permits, in the manner authorized by law to assure compliance with the
requirements of this article.
B, Inspection of records of VPDES permittees. Every VPDES permitee shall allow the
program authority to examine VPDES application materials, plans, specifications, and other pertinent
information as may be necessary to determine the effect of the permittee's discharge on the quality of
state waters, such other information as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this article,
including records required to be kept under the conditions of the permit, and enforcement records such as
inspection reports, notices of violation, and documents detailing the nature of any land disturbing activity
that may have occurred, or similar documents, that are not exempt from disclosure under Virginia Code 9
10,1-603,12:2.
C. Monitoring and sampling equipment on VPDES permitted facilities. The program
authority is authorized, either under a condition of the VPDES permit, with the permittee's consent or by
court order: (i) to establish on any permitted facility such devices as are necessary in the opinion of the
program authority to conduct monitoring andlor sampling of the facility's stormwater discharge; and (ii) to
require the permittee to install monitoring equipment as the program authority deems necessary, The
facility's sampling and monitoring equipment shall be maintained at all times in a safe and proper
operating condition by the permittee at its own expense, All devices used to measure stormwater flow
and quality shall be calibrated to ensure their accuracy.
9
D. Obligation of VPDES permittee to assure clear access. At the written or oral request of
the program authority, every VPDES permittee shall promptly remove any temporary or permanent
obstruction to safe and easy access to the permitted facility to be inspected andlor sampled, and such
obstructions shall not be replaced. The costs of removing such obstructions shall be borne by the
operator.
State law reference-oVa. Code SS 10,1-603,3, 10,1-603,7, 10,1-603.12:1, 10,1-603,12:2,
Sec. 17-506 Discovery, containment, cleanup and notification of discharge.
If a discharge occurs or is suspected to have occurred, the following procedures shall apply:
A. Discovery, containment and cleanup. Notwithstanding any other requirement of law, as
soon as any person responsible for a facility, operation, or activity, or responsible for the emergency
response for a facility, operation, or activity, has information of any known or suspected discharge of
substances which are resulting or may result in an illicit discharge into the storm drainage system or state
waters, that person shall take all necessary steps to ensure the discovery, containment, and cleanup of
the discharge.
B. Notification, The person identified in subsection (A) also shall provide the following
notification of the discharge: (i) if the discharge contains, or may contain, a hazardous substance, the
person shall immediately notify emergency response agencies of the occurrence via emergency dispatch
services; and (ii) if the discharge contains, or may contain, only non-hazardous substances, the person
shall notify the program authority in person, by phone, by email, or by facsimile no later than the next
business day, Notifications in person or by phone shall be confirmed by written notice addressed and
mailed to the program authority within five (5) business days of the phone notice.
C. Record of discharge from commercial or industrial establishment. If an illicit discharge is
from a commercial or industrial establishment, the owner or operator of the establishment shall retain on-
site a written record of the discharge and the actions taken to prevent its recurrence, Such records shall
be retained for at least two (2) years and a copy thereof shall be provided to the program authority within
fifteen (15) days of the date of the discharge.
State law reference-oVa, Code SS 10,1-603.3, 10,1-603,7, 10.1-603,11,
Sec. 17-507 Penalties and remedies,
The penalties and other remedies for a violation of this article shall be as provided in Virginia
Code S 10,1-603.14,
State law reference-oVa. Code S 10,1-603.14.
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of an
Ordinance duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County by a vote of six to zero, as
recorded below, at a meeting held on Februar 1 007.
Nav
Mr. Boyd
Mr. Dorrier
Mr. Rooker
Mr. Slutzky
Ms, Thomas
Mr. Wyant
Aye
y
y
y
y
y
y
10
.-.
Q)
~
c.
o
....
::r
CD
..,
Q)
3
CD
~
c.
3
CD
~
....
en
-
I
en "'Tl
c CD
3 g-
3 c
0) 0)
~~
-lto.
-../:::0.
o ~
OJ!\.)
00
C/)O
......,
I
[!CC=
3" ~ (i)" ()
_" co ("') ;::+
:::J("')::::T
Q) ~ Q)
.=toea
o :::J co
:::J Q)
:::J
a.
-
I\.)
o
o
~
~
-U
o
--I
CD
><
,.-+.
c
C
m
)>
3
CD
:J
C.
3
CD
:J
,.-+.
en
~en
-UC
03
_3
CD Q)
~~
Q) 0
3 ~
CD CD
~ C")
0..0
3 3
CD 3
aCD
en ~
.. 0..
CD
0..
(') . ,.....
:::r 0 0 · C/) · ...,
~ :T (') ~ c:: 0. II) ·
co CD a Ci3 :g CD :::d.;
m ..., "0 II) ~~" <g 0
::J _ 3 co II)
011). 'e::J 00.
::l ::l 0"' o~ Q) -+. CD
I c..C !:!': "C ::l
en en ,~ (j) 0 ..., -.
5- ~ ~::J g.cE
en ,0. 0 -. c.c
lit ~:;:, - g CD
;a 'Q'f Q) i 0" 0
:;::" (') <i3 (jj ::J ~
CD ~ Q).... ~
,..... :::r
cr
....
CD....
~~5~
t::C")~C")
~::r-I~
~Q) ~~
C/)~ca 0 ---
CD~~
s:C/)~'"O
C/) s. ~ a
~..................::r-
:::0 CD &
--~--
. ~ ...-.:
:::r-
CD
s::
"'CO)
CD::J
3-, 0..
0)
_. roo+-
roo+-CD
00..
.. c-
'<
CJ)
roo+-
0)
roo+-
CD
3
Q)
:J
a.
Q)
.......
CD
c..
. . .
@~OO'I
en f"'+
;::r =: c. "0 "0
Q) =: g ~.
en Q) (1) ;a
m ~ 0
CD 0
~
Q.)
ro+
(1)
..,
'"'
a)'"'
()Q...~~
O ....... 0 'LJ
C/)~()
t::()-.J........
~ ~ ~ ;::.
~Q)........CD
C/)'-td ~ ~
:>CD31:)
~C/)~~
C/) s. Q5 ~
~OCD~
~ ...... .
........ ........
~
CD
-
-.
.0
C
-.
C.
=:
Q)
en
m
Slen
;:r
(1)
..,
<
(1)
;:r
-.
Sl.
(1)
E~
-.(1)
~..-
00
-.
-
..
.
< -
(1) Q.)
;:rC
n. ~
CD~
o
~
"'CO)
CD ::J
......c..
3m
_. r-+-
r-+-(D
r-+- c..
~c-
'<
en
r-+-
0)
r-+-
CD
3
0)
::J
C.
0)
,......
CD
C.
. .
=: en
m ~
;::rQ)
=:cc
Q) CD
m
..,
~
i: CD s::
()9-::J~ 3
fncn o en" 0 CD -c Q)
r+~
Q II t::()::J() CD ::J Q)
::J::J-I~ ., c.. :::1
33 ~Q) ~(13 3
Q) c..
fnC en '- cd 0 --- -. ,-+.
CD::3 CD~"" '-+'CD Q)
- ~ (5" S:en "0 ,-+. c.. ,..-+.
s: CD -" 0 CD
(J) ..,"0 en S. ~ d
fn~ . . c- o..
~
-- '<fn ~..................::J- '<
::::J '- 0 CD -.
a. cnCD '- 0.: (J)
-- m"O .........~-.
C') ~ ,-+.
Q) 3Q) ::r- Q)
~ m CD
CD ,-+.
a. m CD
--
::::J
.,
(I)
c.
--
II en ......
~o2.
0,0)
3 3 =
__ en ~
(j)COcc
tn ~ ......
CO ~
, 0
-+.
. . OJ :J
Q) Q) "'C en Q) -- 0 .., 0
::J - ~. '< - :J 0 :J
- - -h Ol
a. < en en C")
::J - c.. I
Q)mr-+ -
en Q) C 0 3
r-+3o CD
r-+ r-+ eo ., c.. 0
., c :J Q)
eo ., '-"en 3 CD
Q) Q) - - mOl :J
3 - '-""'en
(") "'Ceo ..,-0 a.
en :::r a-~ C-o Q)
Q) -
CD - ~
==eo --
::J (") ., CJ) C") CD
::J Ol c..
eo Q) ,..-+. c-
- ::J 0
en --
a. -
--
,..-+.
'<
usa.s-
N-s.......
,,_, CD 0)
-0)-
g3CD
3 eneB
-- ~
CD 0
t/) -.
U en .......
.......0
NO.......
cn-sO)
03=
3 en CD
CD :::J
-. c:::: co
-c:;.......
CD CD :::J'"
t/) -s 0
-.
0) en
""'" c
CD"'C
O)"'C
-
'<
"'C
""'"
o
roo+>
CD
(")
roo+>
--
o
:J
~ ~
~en
CD --
""",CO
en :J
::::TO)
CD ~
0.0
0) :J
en 0
~ ~
0) :J
roo+> roo+>
CD 0)
""'" '"
CD
.
z
;00
- - ;:+.
< :::T
~ ."
-- 0
:J ...,
r-+ ""
~;o
CD --
<
Q)
:J
:J
Q)
::J
o
::J
I
3
Q)
::J
a.
Q)
r-+
CD
C.
II ~
-:< z z ""
lJl 0 :" en
o c
.... ~
^ ~
;;0 -
<' '<
III
~ ~
;;0 S'
~" Cil
.... :::r
5" ~
~ fi"
<1l
OJ
...., en en -. 3
..cCO ,...... - - ~ ..,
o -. ...J
C ...,(0 mO CD CD
_. 3 ::T ...., o.c ::J
...., ,...... 3 I
co:E~ _ 0' ~.o.
3 Q) 3 ~o CO.., 3
co,...... co,......
:JCDQ:JeT" CD
,...... ....,...., ,...... c: ::J
en3co en~ r-+
Q) en ~ co c::
::J ~ co ...., <:
Q) _. Q) en 0
coe5 3 0 c
co co en::J 0.-
3::J
co""'"
::J
,......
.
.
~z~
< 0 OJ
co~r-+
.., ::r CO
-. ..,
::J 11 en
r-+o::r
OJ .., CO
~~o.
CO :::0 0
- . ......,
< r-+
OJ ::r
::J CO
::J
OJ
::J
o
::J
I
3
Q)
::J
c..
Q)
~
CD
C.
en
,^.. CD
~ .. O"n
(i30c-"
0) :J :;::R ~
3~ ~ W
-.., . -"
c o' ~
~~ C
.., C C
en Q3 ~
':::J"-
0)- 0
-0)
-:J
::r 0. ;
Sl en Dr
C C -.
0. en ~
CD CD 0
o 0. ...
o
o 0' CD
0)'" fA
I\) 0 Dr
CJ1 a 0"
.....,"0 ::
o _ fA
o 0) ::T
r+ :J fA
0"'0. ....
Co ;
~ : S>>
CD r+ 3
"""\':::J"
CD
...,
CD
.g ~
-- --
..., -
CD -
3 ~
CD 0
a~
en
~
t\)
~
~
o
CD
~
cr
...,
("')
CD
~
CJ1
I
cr
o
~
C'"
c
ar
...,
en
t"'+
...,
CD
Q)
3
c-
c:
~
...,
o
:::1
""
(')""
...,
o
""C
-
Q)
:::1
a.
w
...
...
:J
o
:J
I
3
Q)
:J
c..
Q)
,.....
CD
c..
en
CD
.0.0 :: n
CD '""'" m ~
< ..... Q) .......
CD :2: (") _1_ 'to
- CJ) =r ..,..
o -
."0 Q) 0 C5
3 a:IE -.....
CD (") ::J ,
::J-CD"a
. ..... CD ..., "a
"0 CJ) =
:::!. =r n
o Q) Q)
""=0'"
..... (") --
o 0 =
(") 3 ~
. ~ ~ -
3'<
. CD ~.
::J .....
(")=r
-. .....
::J=r
co CD
Q) ...,
::J CD
,<..0
-c
Q) =;-
. ::J CD
0.3
CD
::J
.....
CJ)
CJ) ::
t:tO
CD ::J
Q) Q)
3co
...,
C'" -.
c (")
c
ar;:+
..., c
...,
CJ) Q)
=r-
Q)-
-Q)
-::J
:5" 0.
(") CJ)
-c
c CJ)
0. CD
CDo.
0'
Q) ...,
(")
1\). a
01"0
0'-
o Q)
.....::J
C"'o.
c.
~:
CD .....
....... =r
- CD
en
CD
O'"n
c~
i~
.,w
- ~
.......
c
c
~
o
ca
Dr
--
~
o
.,
CD
tn
Dr
0'"
-
--
tn
::r
tn
..
ca
Q)
3
CD I
-g ~.
...,
CD Q)
3 -
CD 0
::J ~
r-+
C/)
r-+
Q)
~
r-+
o
CD
::J
0'
...,
(")
CD
I\.')
CJ1
I
0'
o
r-+
en
f""'1a
...,
CD
tu
3
c-
c:
~
...,
o
:J
c-
c
ar
...,
...
...
(")
...,
o
"'C
-
tu
:J
c..
en
...
...
::J
o
::J
I
3
Q)
::J
Cl.
Q)
r-+-
CD
c..
I
o Q) Q)
-, a. . I'
~OCD
::J -C -,
Q) ,..... "'C
::J -C C
0-'0-
CD 0 -
-C --
Q) 0 0
3 en :::T
CD CD CD
::J a. ~
a. --
3 c.5
CD -
::J
,.....
en
-
;0
CD
C1
o
3
3
CD
::J
c..
Q)
r-+
--
o
::J
. .
,<~p.:;~~-~~:~
/../ t ",.,
/1/ ...(-1
({-~
\I~"
RIVANNA WATER & SEWER AUTHORITY
695 MOORES CREEK LANE . CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22902-9016
(434) 977-2970 . FAX: (434) 293-8858 . WEBSITE: WWW.RIVANNA,ORG
February 14,2007
Mr. Greg Harper
Water Resources Manager
Albemarle County Planning Division
40 I McIntire Road
Charlottesville, V A 22902
::<' pi '01
. cr--
'1Y\~
Dear Mr. Harper:
Before you today is a proposed amendment to the Albemarle County Water Protection
Ordinance (WPO). While the primary focus of the amendment is the addition of an article to
address illicit stormwater discharges, a minor amendment seeks to include the drainage area
upstream of the North Fork River Intake as a water supply protection area. Currently, the
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority (RWSA) operates Beaver Creek, Totier Creek, Ragged
Mountain, Sugar Hollow, and the South Fork Rivanna Reservoirs; all of which are within
water supply protection areas.
Although not a water impoundment, the North Fork Rivanna raw water intake serves as the
primary water supply to the northern reaches of the ACSA jurisdictional service area along
Route 29. At this time, I would like to express RWSA's full support for the inclusion of this
drainage area as a water supply protection area. thereby providing additional water quality
protections such as buffer and water quality enhancements. I believe that this amendment is a
fine example of our collective regional efforts to enhance and maintain the quality of our
watershed and the source water it provides.
Tpank you for your consideration.
I
I
I
~incer~
I-
i li r
cc: Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
~~
~u~,
FED 14 ZOO7
~~
S:\Board\Board of Supervisors\No~W~e;:~HV~thl!tfte1lt t1\H~LE COUNTY
Haden Place: rerSUllal VPllllUUl uo.u.....u.....u.
Reminder: AOl will never ask yoo to send us yoor password or credit card number In an emall.
This message has been scanned for known viruses,
From: sedwards@terraconceptspc.com
To: wwghomes@aol.com
Subject:
Date:
Haden Place: Personal Opinion/Statement
Wed. 14 Feb 2007 2:24 PM
Dear Mr. Chairman and other Board members.
I would like to speak on the behalf of Gibson Homes and their project before you tonight. Unfortunately due to the weather and having to watch our kids I am not
able to attend in person, Therefore, I've asked Mr, Gibson to share my personal thoughts.
I currenlly reside at 422 Cranberry Lane in Crozet, VA. The neighborhood in which I live is called Parkside Village, and as some of you know, is located next to
Claudius Crozet Park and was one of the first of this type of neighborhood to evolve out of the Neighborhood Model discussions and Crozet Master Plan. Parkside
Village is approximately 70 homes of which 35 are SFD and the rest are TH's. The streets are classified as urban and throughout the day the sidewalks are used
frequently by both walkers and kids alike, Homes are situated close together as well as to the street; giving a great neighborly feel to the project. Enhancing the
street appeal are white picket fences just behind the public sidewalks that delineate each front yard from the street but certainly do not discourage conversations.
Having lived there for over a year now, my family and I have become very close to our neighbors and feel apart of the overall neighborhood,
Certainly Haden Place is not Parkside Village, but I definitely imagine it being a wonderful neighborhood and asset to the larger Crozet community. Haden Place
appears to comply with both the Neighborhood Model principles and Crozet Master Plan. Gibson Homes appears to have given atlention to how pedestrians
circulate, the scale and friendliness ofthe streetscape, interconnectivity to the adjacent trails and communities, amenities (such as the pocket parks and ample
open space surrounding/buffering the residents), mixture of unit types, relegated parking and respecting the terrain, as well as providing the affordable product
along with the other NM principles, In conclusion. I would encourage you all to approve this project at the time of your vote.
Sincerely and Respectfully,
Steve Edwards
~"~~ ~.OO1-
IS "-
~~
http://m03.webmai1.ao1.com/23 546/aoVen-us/maill display -message.aspx
2/14/2007
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Ordinance to Amend County Code Chapter 17, Water
Protection
AGENDA DATE:
February 14, 2007
SU BJECT/PROPOSALlREQU EST:
Public hearing to receive comments on a proposed
ordinance to amend County Code Chapter 17, Water
Protection, to incorporate rules prohibiting illicit
discharges to any storm sewer system or state waters.
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Foley, Davis, Kamptner, Shadman,
Harper
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
REVIEWED BY:
LEGAL REVIEW: Yes
BACKGROUND:
Albemarle County, under its Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) permit, must implement a program
to detect and eliminate illicit discharges to its storm sewer system. One component of this program is the adoption of an
ordinance prohibiting non-stormwater discharges into the storm sewer system, The proposed text amendments to the
Water Protection Ordinance (WPO) would satisfy this component of the state mandate,
In addition to a new article in the WPO regarding illicit discharges and connections, other housekeeping-type amendments
are proposed to the WPO, including: 1) designating the watershed of the North Fork Rivanna River intake as a water
supply protection area, 2) correcting an impediment to enforcing stream buffer requirements for crop lands, and 3) updating
obsolete language throughout the WPO.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Goal 2: Protect the County's Natural Resources.
DISCUSSION:
Albemarle County is regulated as an operator of a small municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) by the Virginia
Department of Conservation and Recreation, Under the VPDES program, the County is mandated to protect water
resources through the implementation of six minimum control measures. Measure three is illicit discharge detection and
elimination (IDDE).
IDDE is a strategy to keep non-stormwater pollutants - such as sewage, wash water, vehicle fluids, and food wastes-
from entering the storm sewer system and, ultimately, natural streams. According to the Center for Watershed Protection,
past studies have indicated that non-stormwater flows from storm sewer systems may contribute a greater quantity of
some pollutants than stormwater flows. While County staff have already developed and have begun implementing
methods to locate and eliminate possible illicit discharges, the County is required to expressly prohibit these discharges.
A condition of the County's VPDES permit reads:
"To the extent allowable under state, tribal or local law, effectively prohibit, through ordinance, or other
regulatory mechanism, non-stormwater discharges into the storm sewer system and implement appropriate
enforcement procedures and actions,"
A review of existing County ordinances reveals only two that are remotely related to IDDE:
Sec. 13-300 - Dumping waste on public property, a public highway, right-of-way, or on private property,
A. It shall be unlawful for any person to dump or otherwise dispose of refuse or other unsightly matter on
public property, including a public highway, right-of-way, property adjacent to such highway or right-of-way,
or on private property without the written consent of the owner thereof or his agent.
Sec. 16-404 - Prohibited Waste Discharges
No person shall discharge or cause to be discharged into any portion of the sewerage system, directly or
indirectly, any pollutant or wastewater which will interfere with the operation or performance of the
collection system or sewage treatment plant; constitute a hazard to human life or health, interfere with or
impede the disposal of treatment by-products such as scums and sludges; pass through the treatment
system so as to violate any local, State or Federal stream standard; or create a public nuisance.
AGENDA TITLE: Ordinance to Amend County Code Chapter 17, Water Protection
AGENDA DATE: February 14, 2007
Page 2 of 3
Neither of these sections is particularly applicable to IDDE. Section13-300 is concerned with solid and semi-liquid wastes
and does not explicitly mention storm sewer systems or natural streams. Section 16-404 is similar in intent to the IDDE
program but is relevant only to the sanitary sewer system.
In addition to the County Code, the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code contains rules which require the connection of
both residential and commercial plumbing fixtures to a sanitary sewer or approved private sewage disposal system.
Proposed Illicit Discharge Rules
The proposed amendment language (Attachment A) is derived from a model ordinance developed by the Center for
Watershed Protection and refined by way of staff discussions.
Major features of the draft amendment are:
. prohibition of illicit non-stormwater discharges and connections to the storm drainage system and natural streams
throughout the County;
. exemption of certain activities and discharges serving identified public purposes and other common activities
determined to be insignificant contributors of pollutants;
. prohibition of dumping trash and debris into the storm drainage system and natural streams;
. authorization of the WPO program authority to inspect and monitor for illicit discharges, connections and dumping;
. responsibility of persons to discover, contain, clean up and notify;
. enforcement and penalties.
The County is specifically required to take measures to prevent illicit discharges to its MS4 (municipal separate storm
sewer system). However, the purpose of this requirement is to protect receiving streams and other water resources. The
County, unlike the City of Charlottesville, for instance, does not own and maintain a significant MS4. The County has only a
few small, discrete storm sewer systems located on County-owned properties. The state enabling authority allows
localities to adopt regulations that do more than the minimum provided by state law. In order to effectively fulfill the intent
of the state mandate and the County's VPDES permit, the proposed amendment extends the range of the County's
authority to include any storm sewer system (public or private) and all state waters within the County.
The proposed IDDE ordinance amendment would give staff the authority needed to effectively bring to an end any identified
prohibited illicit discharges.
Other Text Amendments (not mandated)
Additional housekeeping-type amendments to the WPO are proposed, including:
Updates to outdated language - These updates include changing terminology such as "department of engineering and
public works".
North Fork Rivanna River intake - The WPO grants protection to the public water supply through 1) the designation of
water supply protection areas and 2) imposing more stringent stream buffer and stormwater management requirements in
these areas. The North Fork Rivanna River intake is the primary source of potable water for the northern portions of the
Albemarle County Service Authority jurisdictional area and yet is currently lacking the same level of protection as that for
water supply reservoirs because this intake is not included in the definition of water supply protection areas in the WPO.
The proposed text change will include the watershed of the North Fork Rivanna River intake in the definition of water
supply protection areas.
Stream Buffer Requirement for Crop Lands- Section 17-317(D) of the WPO states that a 25-foot buffer be retained or
established along perennial streams and contiguous wetlands located on agricultural lands used for crop land, However,
staff has not been able to enforce this requirement because agricultural uses are not one of the listed uses in the
applicability section (Section 17-300) to which Section 17-317 pertains. Removing the list of use classifications from this
clause will correct this issue. The proposed change will not alter any other aspect of the WPO as it relates to agricultural
activities - all those uses currently exempted (agricultural ponds, pasture land, hay land, etc.) will continue to be exempt.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The lODE program is being implemented using existing staff resources and through an existing, ongoing contract with the
Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District. The adoption of the proposed WPO text amendments will not
result in the need for any additional staff or capital expenditures.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
After the public hearing, staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached ordinance.
AGENDA TITLE: Ordinance to Amend County Code Chapter 17, Water Protection
AGENDA DATE: February 14, 2007
Page 3 of 3
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - Proposed text amendment to the Water Protection Ordinance,
Attachment B - Map indicating the affected watersheds of the North Fork Rivanna River intake.
07.017
Attachment A
Draft: 02/05/07
ORDINANCE NO. 07-17( )
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 17, WATER PROTECTION, OF THE CODE OF THE
COUNTY OF ALEMARLE, VIRGINIA, BY AMENDING ARTICLE I, GENERAL, ARTICLE III,
STORMW ATER MANAGEMENT AND WATER QUALITY, ARTICLE IV, GROUNDWATER
ASSESSMENTS, AND BY ADDING ARTICLE V, ILLICIT DISCHARGES AND CONNECTIONS
BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter
17, Water Protection, is amended and reordained as follows:
By Amending:
Sec. 17-102 Purposes
Sec. 17-104 Definitions
Sec. 17-105 Designation of program authority; powers and duties
Sec. 17-300 Applicability
Sec. 17-301 Designation of water resources areas
Sec. 17-402 Tier 2 Assessments
Sec. 17-403 Tier 3 Assessments
Sec. 17-404 Tier 4 Assessments
By Adding:
Sec. 17-107 Relation of chapter to other laws
Sec, 17-500 Applicability
Sec. 17-501 Illicit discharges prohibited; exempt and authorized discharges
Sec. 17-502 Illicit connections prohibited
Sec. 17-503 Dumping prohibited
Sec. 17-504 Maintaining the functional performance of streams
Sec. 17-505 Inspections and monitoring
Sec. 17-506 Discovery, containment, cleanup and notification of discharge
Sec. 17-507 Penalties and remedies
CHAPTER 17
WATER PROTECTION
ARTICLE I. GENERAL
Sec. 17-102 Purposes.
The board of supervisors finds that this chapter is necessary to protect the health, safety and
general welfare ofthe citizens of the county and the Commonwealth of Virginia and to prevent water
from being rendered dangerous to the health of persons living in the county, and is supported by the
findings of watershed studies that have been conducted. Therefore, the specific purposes of this
chapter are to:
1.
activities;
inhibit the deterioration of state waters and waterways resulting from land disturbing
1
Attachment A
Draft: 02/05/07
2. protect the safety and welfare of citizens, property owners, and businesses by
minimizing the negative impacts of increased stormwater discharges from new land development and
redevelopment;
3. protect against and minimize the pollution and eutrophication of public drinking water
supplies resulting from land development;
4. control nonpoint source pollution, erosion and sedimentation, and stream channel
erOSIOn;
5. maintain the integrity of existing stream channels and networks for their biological
functions, drainage, and natural recharge of groundwater;
6.
functions;
protect the condition of state waters for all reasonable public uses and ecological
7. provide for the long-term responsibility for and maintenance of stormwater management
facilities and best management practices;
8. regulate the discharge ofoollutants into storm drainage svstems and state waters bv
orohibiting illicit discharges and connections. and the dumoing of refuse and oollutants: the board of
suoervisors herebv determines that aoolving such regulations to not onlv the county's municioal
seoarate storm sewer svstem but also to orivatelv owned and ooerated storm drainal:!e svstems and state
waters is necessarY to orevent anv further degradation to water resources:
&2. facilitate the integration of stormwater management and pollution control with other
county ordinances, programs, policies, and the comprehensive plan; and
910, promote the long-term sustainability of groundwater resources.
(~7-1, 6-18-75, ~ 2, 2-11-87, 3-18-92; ~ 19.1-4,9-29-77, art. I, ~ 1, 7-11-90; ~ 19.2-2, 6-19-91, ~ 2; ~
19.3-3,2-11-98; Code 1988, ~~ 7-1,19.1-4,19.2-2,19.3-3; Ord. 98-A(1), 8-5-98; Ord. 04-17(1),
adopted 12-8-04, effective 2-8-05)
State law reference--Va. Code ~~ 10.1-560 et seq., 10.1-603.1 et seq., ~ 10.1-2108.
Sec. 17-104 Definitions.
The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation and implementation ofthis chapter:
(4) Best management practice (BMP). The term "best management practice (BMP)" means a
practice or combination of practices. including treatment oractices. ooeratinl:! orocedures. l:!eneral good
housekeeoinl:! oractices. oollution orevention. orohibitions of activities. education oractices. and other
manal:!ement oractices. that-is determined by the state, a designated area wide planning agency, or the
program authority, to be the most effective, practical means of preventing or reducing the amount of
water pollution generated by nonpoint sources to a level compatible with water quality goals.
2
Attachment A
Draft: 02/05/07
(10) County engineer. The term "county engineer" means the director of the dopartment of
engineering and public works countv enlZineer within the deoartment of community develooment or his
desilIDee.
(12) Department of engineering and fJ1:iblie ',.'orks. The term "department of engineering and
public works" means the .^...1bemarle Coooty Department of Engineering and Public Works communitv
develovment. The term "deoartment of community develooment" means the county deoartment of
communitv develooment.
02.1) Devartment of f!eneral services. The term "deoartment of lZeneral services" means the
countv deoartment of lZeneral services.
(20.1) Hazardous substance. The term "hazardous substance" means anv substance desilZnated
as such under the VirlZinia Code and 40 CFR Part 116 (2000) oursuant to & 311 of the Clean Water
Act. codified in 33 V.S.C. & 1251 et sea.
(20.2) Illicit discharf!e. The term "illicit dischame" means any discharlZe to the storm drainalZe
svstem that is not comoosed entirelv of stormwater. exceotinlZ discharlZes oursuant to a VirlZinia
Pollutant DischarlZe Elimination Svstem ("VPDES") or VirlZinia Storm ManalZement ProlZram
("VSMP") oermit (other than a VSMP oermit for discharlZes from the municioal seoarate storm sewer).
discharlZes resultinlZ from fire fililitinlZ activities. and discharlZes identified bv and in comoliance with 4
V AC 50-60-1220(C)(2)' as delineated in section 17-501.
(20.3) Illicit connection. The term "illicit connection" means either:
(a) Anv drain or conveyance. whether on the surface or subsurface. that allows an
illicit discharlZe to enter the storm drainalZe svstem. and includes but is not limited to: (i) any
convevances that allow sewalZe. orocess wastewater. wash water or oollutants to enter the svstem: and
(ii) anv connections to the svstem from indoor drains and sinks. relZardless of whether such connections
were oreviouslv allowed. oermitted. or aooroved bv the countv or anv other lZovernment alZencv: or
(b) Anv drain or convevance connected to the storm drainalZe svstem from a
commercial or industrial use that has not been aooroved bv the countv in a site olano subdivision olat.
or other olan or oermit.
(26.1) Municival sevarate storm sewer svstem (HMS4"). The term "municioal seoarate storm
sewer svstem" means all seoarate storm sewers comorisinlZ the svstem of convevances. includinlZ roads
with drainalZe svstems. oublic streets. catch basins. sidewalks. curbs. lZutters. ditches. manmade
channels. or storm drains: (i) owned or ooerated bv the countv: (ii) desilIDed or used for collectinlZ or
3
Attachment A
Draft: 02/05/07
convevim! stormwater: (iii) that are not a combined sewer: and (iv) that are not Dart of a nubliclv
owned treatment works.
(29.1) Non-stormwater discharf!e. The term "non-stormwater discharQ:e" means any dischame
to the storm drainaQ:e svstem or state waters that is not comnrised entirelv of stormwater.
05.1) Person. The term "nerson" means a natural nerson. corooration. nartnershin. sole
nronrietorshin. trust. trustee. joint venture. or anv other entitv.
06.1) Pol/utant. The term "nollutant" means dredQ:ed snoiL solid waste. incinerator residue.
filter backwash. sewaQ:e. Q:arbaQ:e. sewaQ:e sludQ:e. munitions. chemical wastes. bioloQ:ical materials.
radioactive materials (excent those reQ:ulated under the Atomic Enenrv Act of 1954. as amended (42
USC S2011 et sea.)). heat. wrecked or discarded eauinment. rock. sand. cellar dirt and industrial.
municinaL and arncultural waste discharQ:ed into water.
(a) The term "nollutant" includes. but is not limited to: naints. varnishes. and
solvents: oil and other automotive fluids: non-hazardous liauids and solid wastes and vard wastes:
refuse. rubbish. Q:arbaQ:e. litter. or other discarded or abandoned objects. ordnances. and accumulations.
so that same mav cause or contribute to nollution: floatables: nesticides. herbicides. and fertilizers:
hazardous substances and wastes: sewaQ:e. fecal coliform and nathoQ:ens: dissolved and narticulate
metals: animal wastes: wastes and residues that result from constructinQ: a buildinQ: or structure: and
noxious or offensive matter of anv kind.
(b) The term "nollutant" does not include: (i) sewaQ:e from vessels: or (ii) water. Q:as.
or other material that is injected into a well to facilitate nroduction of oil or Q:as. or water derived in
association with oil and Q:as nroduction and disnosed of in a well if the well used either to facilitate
nroduction or for disnosal nurooses is annroved bv the Viminia Soil and Water Conservation board and
if the board determines that the injection or disnosal will not result in the delrradation of lrround or
surface water resources.
(36.2) Premises. The term "nremises" means anv buildinQ: or structure. or anv lot or narceL
whether imnroved or unimnroved. and includinQ: adjacent curbs. Q:utters. sidewalks and nlantinQ: strins.
(37) Program authority. The term "program authority" means the department of engineering
and public works communitv develonment. and ~xcept where the context clearly indicates otherwise,
the term "program authority" includes any officer or employee of the department of engineering and
pl:lblic works community develonment or the denartment of Q:eneral services authorized by the county
engineer director of the denartment of communitv develonment to act pursuant to this chapter.
4
Attachment A
Draft: 02/05/07
(43.1) Storm drainafle svstem. The term "storm drainalZe svstem" means the municioal
seoarate storm sewer svstem and anv orivatelv owned and maintained imorovements bv which
stormwater is collected and/or conveved and which ultimatelv discharlZes to state waters. includinlZ but
not limited to. street drainalZe svstems. streets. !!Utters. curbs. inlets. Dined storm drains. oumoinlZ
facilities. retention and detention basins. human-made or altered drainalZe channels. oonds. and other
drainalZe structures.
(43.2) Stormwater. The term "stormwater" means orecioitation that is discharlZed across the
land surface or throulZh convevances to one or more waterwavs and that mav include stormwater
runoff. snow melt runoff. and surface runoff and drainalZe.
(47.1) Virrzinia Pol/utant Discharrze Elimination Svstem (VPDES) vermit. The term "VirlZinia
Pollutant DischarlZe Elimination Svstem (VPDES) oermit" means a document issued bv the State
Water Control Board oursuant to the State Water Control Law authorizinlZ. under orescribed
conditions. the ootential or actual discharlZe of oollutants from a ooint source to surface waters and the
use or disoosal of sewalZe sludlZe,
(s 7-2,6-18-75, S 4, 7-9-80, 2-11-87, 3-18-92, S 19.1-5,9-29-77, art. I, S 2, 9-13-78, 7-11-90, 8-3-94;
S 19.2-4,6-19-91; S 19.3-5,2-11-98; Code 1988, SS 7-2,19.1-5,19.2-4,19.3-5; Ord. 98-A(1), 8-5-98)
State law reference--Va. Code SS 10.1-560, 10.1-603.2.
Sec. 17-105 Designation of program authority; powers and duties.
A. The board of supervisors hereby designates the department of engineering and public
weFks communitv develooment as the program authority.
B. The program authority shall administer and enforce this chapter as authorized bv law.
C. The program authority shall establish reasonable administrative procedures for the
administration ofthis chapter, including developing and maintaining for article III a design manual
containing information about the content of plans required by article III, calculation methods,
maintenance and inspection procedures, and other information to assist with the implementation and
enforcement of article III. The program authority shall update the design manual periodically. The
manual shall be consistent with this chapter and all applicable statutes and regulations.
D. \Vithin one year of the date of adoption ofthis chapter tlhe program authority shall
assure that the erosion and sediment control program set forth in article II is administered by a certified
program administrator, a certified plan reviewer, and a certified project inspector. Such positions may
be filled by the same person.
E, The program authority shall take appropriate enforcement actions to achieve compliance
with this chapter, and shall maintain a record of enforcement actions for all active land disturbing
activities~ aaG land developments. illicit discharlZes. illicit connections. and orohibited dumoinl2:.
5
Attachment A
Draft: 02/05/07
F. The program authority is authorized to cooperate with any federal or state agency in
connection with plans for erosion and sediment control or stormwater management. The program
authority may also recommend to the county executive any proposed agreement with such agency for
such purposes, which agreement shall be executed, if at all, by the county executive on behalf of the
county.
(~7-9, 4-21-76, 2-11-87, 3-18-92; ~ 19,3-6,2-11-98; Code 1988, ~~ 7-9,19.3-6; Ord. 98-A(l), 8-5-98)
State law reference--Va. Code ~~ 10.1-562, 10.1-603.3. 10.1-603.12: 1 et seq.
Sec. 17-107 Relation of chanter to other laws
The reQuirements of this chanter are:
A. Senarate from. but sunnlementarv to. all other ann Ii cable reQuirements of the Code.
Comnliance with the reQuirements of this chanter shall not be deemed to be comnliance with other
annlicable ordinances or rewlations.
B. Senarate from. but sunnlementarv to. all other annlicable reQuirements of state or federal
law. If the reQuirements of this chanter are in direct conflict with mandatorv state or federal
reQuirements. then the state or federal reQuirements shall ann Iv.
C. Senarate from the reQuirements. terms or conditions of anv nrivate easement. covenant.
agreement or restriction. Neither the countv nor anv of its officers. emnlovees or aQ:ents shall have anv
dutv to enforce a nrivate easement. covenant. agreement or restriction.
ARTICLE III. STORMW ATER MANAGEMENT AND WATER QUALITY
Sec. 17-300 Applicability.
Each owner shall comply with the requirements of this article prior to commencing any land
development, or allowing any land development to occur, on his property, for residential, commercial,
industrial or institutionall:lse, and at all times thereafter.
(s 19.1-6,9-29-77, art. II, ~ l, 10-19-77,9-13-78,10-22-80,7-11-90, 8-3-94; ~ 19.2-5, 6-19-91, ~ 5; ~
19.3-24,2-11-98; Code 1988, ~~ 19.1-6, 19.2-5, 19.3-24; Ord. 98-A(l), 8-5-98)
State law reference--Va. Code ~~ 10.1-603.3, 10.1-603.9, 10.1-2108.
Sec. 17-301 Designation of water resources areas.
In order to better effectuate the purposes ofthis article, all of the land within the county is
hereby designated as being within one or more of the following water resources areas:
A. Development areas: Development areas are those areas of land within the county
designated as development areas in the land use element of the comprehensive plan, and as shown on
the official map of the land use element.
6
Attachment A
Draft: 02/05/07
B. Areas of infill and redevelopment: Areas of infill and redevelopment are those areas of
land within the county that are: (i) within a development area; and (ii) designated as areas of infill and
redevelopment for purposes of this article by the board of supervisors, and as shown on the official
map adopted showing such areas. The board of supervisors shall designate such areas based on a
finding that existing development has altered severely the natural condition of the area, including the
presence of vegetation, and that infill and redevelopment activities would serve other community and
comprehensive plan goals.
C. Water supply protection areas: Water supply protection areas are those areas of land
within the county that are within the watershed of a public water supply reservoir or water suoolv
intake, and such areas shall consist of all land within the county that drains naturally to the South Fork
Rivanna Reservoir, Beaver Creek Reservoir, Totier Creek Reservoir, Sugar Hollow Reservoir, Ragged
Mountain Reservoir, Chris Greene Lake, the North Fork Rivanna River intake. and to any
impoundment or water suoolv intake designated in the future by the board of supervisors as a public
water supply reservoir,
D. Other rural land: Other rural land consists of those areas ofland that are not within a
development area, an area of infill and redevelopment, or a water supply protection area.
(s 19.2-6,6-19-91, S 6; S 19.3-25,2-11-98; Code 1988, SS 19.2-6, 19.3-25; Ord. 98-A(l), 8-5-98)
State law reference--Va. Code S 10.1-2108.
ARTICLE IV. GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENTS
Sec. 17-402 Tier 2 assessments.
A Tier 2 assessment shall consist of the program authority reviewing and evaluating the county's
well database, available hydrogeologic studies, and information from the Virginia Department of Health
and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, as provided in chapter ~ ~ of the design standards
manual. Based on this evaluation, the program authority may require that the owner provide additional
groundwater assessment data prior to subdivision plat or site plan approval, or may require that a Tier 3
assessment be submitted,
(s 402, Ord. 04-17(1), 12-8-04, effective 2-8-05)
Sec. 17-403 Tier 3 assessments.
A Tier 3 assessment shall consist of the following:
A. The owner shall submit a draft groundwater management plan with the preliminary plat
or site plan. The groundwater management plan shall comply with the requirements for such plans in
chapter ~ ~ of the design standards manual. If the groundwater management plan identifies special
areas of concern, such as an off-site resource of high groundwater sensitivity or a previously unknown
source of contamination, then the program authority may require additional groundwater assessment
data prior to preliminary subdivision plat or site plan approval.
7
Attachment A
Draft: 02/05/07
B. The owner shall submit a final groundwater management plan that must be approved by
the program authority prior to approval ofthe final plat or site plan.
C. Any structural measures (e.g., best management practices) shall be bonded as a
subdivision plat or site plan improvement.
The program authority may require that a Tier 4 assessment be submitted instead of a Tier 3
assessment if the special areas of concern identified in subsection (A) have not been adequately
addressed by the additional groundwater assessment data.
(s 17-403, Ord. 04-17(1), 12-8-04, effective 2-8-05)
Sec. 17-404 Tier 4 assessments.
A Tier 4 assessment shall consist of the following:
A. The owner shall submit a draft groundwater management plan and an aquifer testing
workplan complying with the requirements for such plans in chapter ~ ~ of the design standards manual,
with the preliminary plat, preliminary site plan, or the application for a central water supply. The
groundwater management plan must demonstrate to the program authority's satisfaction that the site's
groundwater conditions have been considered with the subdivision or site plan's layout and design. The
aquifer testing workplan must be approved by the program authority before the owner may conduct aquifer
testing as required by subsection (B).
B. After the program authority approves the aquifer testing workplan, the owner shall conduct
aquifer testing as provided in the workplan,
C. The owner shall submit a final groundwater management plan and a groundwater
assessment report complying with the requirements for such a report in chapter ~ ~ of the design standards
manual, based upon the results of the aquifer testing. The final groundwater management plan and the
groundwater assessment report must be approved by the program authority prior to final subdivision plat or
site plan approval.
D. Any structural measures (e.g., best management practices) shall be bonded as a subdivision
plat or site plan improvement.
(S404, Ord. 04-17(1), 12-8-04, effective 2-8-05)
ARTICLE V. ILLICIT DISCHARGES AND CONNECTIONS
Sec. 17-500 Aoolicabilitv.
This article shall annlv to all activities that cause or allow to be caused direct or indirect illicit
discharl!es. illicit connections. and the nrohibited dumninl! of refuse and nollutants. or which
nel!ativelv imnede the flow canacitv of the storm drainal!e svstem or state waters that (i) are not
covered bv other articles of this chanter and (ii) are not exoresslv exemnt from this article.
8
Attachment A
Draft: 02/05/07
State law reference--Va. Code ~~ 10.1-603.3, 10.1-603.7.
Sec. 17-501 Illicit discharf!es orohibited: exemot and authorized discharf!es.
No oerson shall throw. drain. or otherwise discharge. cause or allow others under their control
to throw. drain. or otherwise discharl!e into the storm drainal!e svstem or state waters any oollutants or
waters containinl! anv oollutants. other than stormwater. The commencement. conduct. or continuance
of anv such illicit discharl!e to the storm drainal!e svstem or state waters is orohibited. subiect to the
followinl!:
A. Conditionallv exemvt discharf!es. The followinl! discharl!es are conditionallv exemot
from this article:
1. Discharl!es oursuant to a Virl!inia Pollutant Discharl!e Elimination Svstem
("VPDES") or Virl!inia Storm Manal!ement Prol!ram ("VSMP") oermit (other than a VSMP oermit for
discharl!es from the municioal seoarate storm sewer):
2. Discharl!es resultinl! from fire fil!htinl! and other oublic safetv activitie~
3. Discharl!es associated with the maintenance or reo air ofoublic water. sanitarv.
and storm sewer lines. and oublic drinkinl! water reservoirs and drinkinl! water treatment or
distributions svstems conducted in accordance with aoolicable federal and state re!llilations and
standards:
4. Discharl!es associated with anv activity bv the countv. its emolovees and al!ents.
in the maintenance of anv comoonent of a countv-maintained stormwater manal!ement facility
conducted in accordance with aoolicable federal and state rel!ulations and standards:
5. Discharl!es soecified in writinl! bv the orolITam authoritv as beinl! necessarv to
orotect oublic health and safetv:
6. Water line flushinl!:
7. Landscaoe irril!ation and lawn waterinl!:
8. Non-ooint discharges associated with alITicultural and silvicultural ooerations:
9. Diverted stream flows:
10. Risinl! lITound water. sorinl!s. uncontaminated lITound water infiltration. and
oumoed lITound water:
11. Flows from rioarian habitats and wetlands:
condensation:
12. Discharl!es from ootable water sources. foundation drains. and air conditioninl!
9
Attachment A
Draft: 02/05/07
13. Water from crawl soace oumos and footing drains:
14. House washing and individual car washing on residential lots:
15, De-chlorinated swimming 0001 discharges having less than 1 oart oer million
chlorine and discharges from hot tubs:
16. Street wash water:
17. Water from washed oarking lots or sidewalks to remove algae or oil builduo:
oarking lots.
18. Aoolication of salts or other de-icing substances to streets. sidewalks and
19. Discharges associated with dve testing. orovided that the urogram authority is
notified in writing before the test.
If the orogram authoritv determines that anv of these exemoted activities are causing adverse
imoacts to state waters in a soecific case. the urogram authoritv mav revoke the ex emotion for that
soecific case and such revocation shall be effective from the date the oerson resoonsible for the
discharge is informed in writing of the determination that the exemotion is revoked.
B. Discharrzes authorized bv VPDES Dermit. waiver or waste discharrze order. The
orohibition shall not aoolv to any non-stormwater discharge oermitted under a VPDES oermit. waiver.
or waste discharge order issued to the discharger and administered under the authoritv of the United
States Environmental Protection Agencv CEP At urovided that the discharger is in full comoliance with
all reQuirements of the oermit. waiver. or order and other aoolicable laws and regulations and orovided
that written aooroval has been granted for anv discharge to the storm drainage svstem.
State law reference--Va. Code ~~ 10.1-603.3,10.1-603.7.
Sec. 17-502 Illicit connections orohibited.
The construction. use. maintenance. or continued existence of illicit connections to the storm
drainage svstem is urohibited.
A. Pre-existinrz illicit connections. Anv illicit connection oreviouslv authorized before the
effective date of this chaoter shall comolv with the reQuirements of this chaoter bv December 31. 2007.
or such later date as exuresslv authorized bv the urogram authority uoon good cause shown bv the
oerson reQuesting the extension.
B. Disconnection and redirection. Anv illicit connection shall be disconnected and
redirected. if necessarv. to an aouroved onsite wastewater management svstem or the sanitarv sewer
system uoon aooroval of the Albemarle County Service Authoritv.
C. Locatinrz undocumented connections. Anv drain or conveyance that has not been
documented in olans. maos. or their eQuivalent and which aooears to be connected to the storm
10
Attachment A
Draft: 02/05/07
drainal:!e svstem shall be located by the owner. occuoant. lessee. orincioal. al:!ent. emolovee or
otherwise. of that orooerty within the time oeriod soecified in the written notice of violation from the
oroQIam authoritv reQuirinl:! that the connection be located. The notice shall reQuire that: (i) the
location of the drain or conveyance be determined: (ii) the drain or convevance be identified as a storm
sewer. sanitarY sewer. or other: and (iii) the outfall location or ooint of connection to the storm
drainal:!e svstem. sanitarY sewer svstem. or other dischame ooint be identified. The results of these
investil:!ations shall be documented and orovided to the oroQIam authoritv.
State law reference--Va. Code ~~ 10.1-603.3, 10,1-603,7.
Sec. 17-503 Dumnin!! nrohibited.
No oerson. whether the owner. occuoant. lessee. nrincinal. al:!ent. emnlovee or otherwise.
mav dumn or dischame. or allow any other oerson to dumn or discharl:!e. refuse. as that term is
defined in section 13-100 of the Code. or anv other material or nollutant. natural or svnthetic. into the
storm drainal:!e svstem or a natural stream. unless the dumninl:! or discharl:!e is exnresslv authorized bv
the Code.
Sec. 17-504 Maintainin!! the functional nerformance of the storm draina!!e svstem and streams.
The storm drainal:!e system and natural streams shall be maintained as follows:
A. Keevinfl the storm drainafle svstem and natural streams free of refuse and other
obstacles. Everv nerson. whether the owner. occunant. lessee. nrincinal. al:!ent. emolovee or otherwise.
owninl:!. occunvinl:! or otherwise resnonsible for the condition of the nronertv throul:!h which a
nrivately-maintained storm drainal:!e svstem or natural stream nasses. shall maintain the Dart of such
svstem or stream on the nronertv free of refuse. as that term is defined in section 13-100 of the Code.
and other obstacles that would nollute. contaminate. or adverselv imnact the system's or stream's
functional nerformance.
B. Maintainim! structures within the flood hazard overlav district. Everv nerson. whether
the owner. occuoant. lessee. nrincinal. al:!ent. emnlovee or otherwise. owninl:!. occunvinl:! or otherwise
resnonsible for the condition of the oronertv throul:!h which a natural stream nasses. shall maintain
existinl:! nrivatelv-owned structures within the flood hazard overlav district established under section
18-30.3 of the Code so that such structures do not become a hazard to the use. function. or nhvsical or
ecolol:!ical interntv of the stream.
State law reference--Va. Code ~~ 10.1-603.3, 10.1-603.7.
Sec. 17-505 Insnections and monitorin!!.
The orOQIam authoritv is authorized to assure comnliance with the reQuirements of this
article as follows:
A. Insvections and monitorine. flenerallv. The orOQIam authority is authorized to conduct
insnections of nrivate oronertv and to conduct monitorinl:! of storm drainal:!e svstems. natural streams.
and facilities nermitted bv VPDES nermits. in the manner authorized bv law to assure comnliance with
the reQuirements of this article.
11
Attachment A
Draft: 02/05/07
B. Inspection of records ofVPDES permittees. Everv VPDES oermitee shall allow the
orOlrram authoritv to examine VPDES aoolication materials. olans. soecifications. and other oertinent
information as may be necessarv to determine the effect of the oermittee' s discharQe on the Quality of
state waters. such other information as mav be necessarY to accomolish the oumoses of this article.
includinQ records reQuired to be keot under the conditions of the oermit. and enforcement records such
as insoection reoorts. notices of violation. and documents detailinQ the nature of anv land disturbinQ
activitv that mav have occurred. or similar documents. that are not exemot from disclosure under
VirQinia Code S 10.1-603.12:2.
C, Monitorinf! and samplinf! eauipment on VPDES permitted facilities. The orOlrram
authority is authorized. either under a condition of the VPDES oermit. with the oermittee's consent or
by court order: (i) to establish on anv oermitted facilitv such devices as are necessarY in the ooinion of
the orOQram authority to conduct monitorinQ and/or samolinQ of the facility's stormwater discharQe:
and (ii) to reQuire the oermittee to install monitorinQ eQuioment as the orOlrram authoritv deems
necessarY. The facility's samolinQ and monitorinQ eQuioment shall be maintained at all times in a safe
and orooer ooeratinQ condition bv the oermittee at its own exoense. All devices used to measure
stormwater flow and Qualitv shall be calibrated to ensure their accuracv.
D. Oblif!ation of VPDES permittee to assure clear access. At the written or oral reQuest of
the orOlrram authoritv. everv VPDES oermittee shall oromotlv remove anv temoorarv or oermanent
obstruction to safe and easv access to the oermitted facilitv to be insoected and/or samoled. and such
obstructions shall not be reo laced. The costs of removinQ such obstructions shall be borne bv the
ooerator.
State law reference--Va. Code ~~ 10.1-603.3, 10.1-603.7, 10.1-603.12:1, 10.1-603.12:2.
Sec. 17-506 Discoyerv. containment. cleanuD and notification of dischar~e.
If a discharQe occurs or is susoected to have occurred. the followinQ orocedures shall aoolv:
A. Discoverv. containment and cleanup. NotwithstandinQ anv other reQuirement oflaw. as
soon as anv oerson resoonsible for a facilitv. ooeration. or activitv. or resoonsible for the emerQencv
resoonse for a facilitv. oDeration. or activitv. has information of anv known or susoected discharQe of
substances which are resultinQ or mav result in an illicit discharQe into the storm drainaQe svstem or
state waters. that oerson shall take all necessarv steos to ensure the discoverv. containment. and
cleanuo of the discharQe,
B. Notification. The oerson identified in subsection (A) also shall orovide the followinQ
notification of the discharQe: (i) if the discharQe contains. or mav contain. a hazardous substance. the
oerson shall immediatelv notify emerQencv resoonse aQencies of the occurrence via emerQencv
disoatch services: and (ii) if the dischafQe contains. or mav contain. onlv non-hazardous substances. the
oerson shall notifv the orOlrram authoritv in oerson. bv ohone. bv email. or by facsimile no later than
the next business dav. Notifications in oerson or bv ohone shall be confirmed bv written notice
addressed and mailed to the orolrram authoritv within five (5) business davs of the ohone notice.
C. Record of discharf!e from commercial or industrial establishment. If an illicit discharQe
is from a commercial or industrial establishment. the owner or ooerator of the establishment shall
12
Attachment A
Draft: 02/05/07
retain on-site a written record of the discharlZe and the actions taken to orevent its recurrence. Such
records shall be retained for at least two (2) vears and a coov thereof shall be orovided to the orOQfam
authority within fifteen (15) davs of the date ofthe discharlZe.
State law reference--Va. Code ~~ 10.1-603.3, 10.1-603.7, 10.1-603.11.
Sec. 17-507 Penalties and remedies.
The oenalties and other remedies for a violation of this article shall be as orovided in VirlZinia
Code S 10.1-603.14.
State law reference--Va. Code S 10.1-603.14.
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of an Ordinance
duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, by a vote of _ to _,
as recorded below, at a regular meeting held on
Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
Aye Nay
Mr. Boyd
Mr. Domer
Mr. Rooker
Mr. Slutzky
Ms. Thomas
Mr. Wyant
13
ATTACHMENT B
The map below indicates the watershed of the North Fork Rivanna River water supply intake that would be affected
by the proposed text amendment to Section 17-301 of the Water Protection Ordinance.
Water Supply Watersheds
~ N, Fork Rivanna River intake
_No
Yes
.:j.;jP
K.rV L
I -'+v'+-OLJ- f OU I
fJ,L
,~ ~ ,,~
a:~ GT../ el). _/
~7U/l!J" C/rcl/Jllf!f' VI/Zf!Jllras/
February 6th, 2007
Mr. Scott Clark
County of Albemarle
Planning Commission
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Re: Special Use Permit Deferment
Dear Mr. Clark:
After speaking with David, we have decided to indefinitely defer our application for the
special use permit. There are simply too many problems with the multiple conditions set
forth by the planning commission. Thanks very much for your time...we thought you and
the department did an excellent job of looking at all the issues and coming up with a
workable plan....Please email me a confirmation of receipt oftms deferment notice.
Sincerely yours,
/. ./ "
l../I'_ I
L./L-u-tG1
C;{j
Ellen King
King Family Vineyards
).O.(~
6550 Roseland Farm Crozc[, Virgirua 229~2 434-823-78GO E1.X: 434-823-7801
v,'ww, kingfa milyvin c~!ards ,com info@kingfamilyvineyards,com
I
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
.
AGENDA TITLE:
ZMA 2005-0007 Haden Place
STAFF:
REBECCA RAGSDALE
SUBJECT/PROPOSAUREQUEST:
Haden Place is a request to rezone 6,69 acres from
R2 Residential to NMD Neighborhood Model District
for 34 residential units (20 detached, 14 attached),
AGENDA DATE:
February 14, 2007
ACTION: X INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Cilimberg, Echols, Ragsdale
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: INFORMATION:
LEGAL REVIEW: YES
ATTACHMENTS: YES
OWNER/APPLICANT PURCHASER:
Wendell W, Gibson of Gibson Homes is the ownerlapplicant with Kelly Strickland of Dominion
Development Resources (formerly Rivanna Engineering & Surveying) as the consulting engineer,
.
BACKGROUND:
A public hearing was held on this rezoning at the Planning Commission on July 11, 2006 and the
Commission recommended approval to the Board of Supervisors. Staff and the Planning
Commission found the following factors favorable, leading to the recommendation of approval:
o The project positively addresses the principles of the Neighborhood Model with specific
emphasis on a pedestrian orientation, neighborhood friendly streets and paths, parks and
open space, relegated parking, provision for affordable housing, and interconnected
streets have been provided for consistent with the Crozet Master Plan with the "proposed
Connector Road", Summerford Lane connection, and provisions for Killdeer Lane and
Haden Lane,
o Density is in keeping with the Crozet Master Plan, at the upper end of the range
suggested in the Plan.
o The property relates to two centers---Downtown Crozet and the future Old Trail Village
Center and it is located within walking distance to Downtown Crozet. The property fits
well within the context of the existing and emerging fabric of the western part of Crozet.
On October 11, 2006, the Board held a public hearing on this rezoning request and voted to defer
the item. (Minutes from 1 0/11/06-Attachment A). Discussion and issues identified by the Board
during consideration of this item included:
o Provision of an interconnection to Summerford Lane in adjoining Old Trail
o Deficiencies of roads serving the site, including Haden and Killdeer Lanes and Jarman's
Gap Road
o Timing of Construction of the Affordable Housing Units
o Adequacy of Cash Proffers
.
On December 1, 2006, the applicant submitted a response letter to each item the Board
discussed at the October meeting, along with revised proffers and an amendment to the
application plan, At their December 13, 2006 meeting, the Board further discussed the new
information provided by the applicant: off-site construction of the interconnection to Summerford
Lane in Ballard Field (Old Trail), with the permission from the adjoining property owner; provision
of phasing of affordable housing units in the proffers; provision of frontage improvements to both
Haden and Killdeer Lanes; and, off-site improvements to include the widening of Haden Lane to
ZMA 2005-00007 Haden Place
BOS February 14, 2007
18 feet of pavement width from the Haden Place property north to Jarman's Gap Road, but no
longer proposing the same for Killdeer Lane.
Following this discussion, the Board deferred the rezoning to allow staff to evaluate the new
information and to provide direction to the applicant regarding traffic impacts, interconnections
and off-site improvements, and to devise acceptable language for phasing of affordable housing
units within the project.
DISCUSSION:
Since the December Board meeting, staff has evaluated the revised submittal provided by the
applicant and the applicant has revised the proffers and plans to respond to staff
recommendations. The County Engineer has worked in conjunction with VDOT staff to determine
recommended off-site improvements and has made further field evaluations to provide the
analysis and recommendations to address traffic impacts from Haden Place, discussed below.
Provision of an interconnection to Summerford Lane in adjoining Old Trail and Other Off-
Site Improvements
The applicant proposes to construct a connection from Haden Place to Summerford Lane as
illustrated on the attached application plan and committed to in the attached proffers,
(Attachments B-Proffers and D-Application Plan), Since the December meeting, the applicant has
been able to provide written acknowledgement from the Ballard Field property owner that they
will allow construction of this interconnection, The previous plan and proffers reviewed at the
Board's October 11, 2006 public hearing proposed that this interconnection be constructed to the
Haden PlacelBallard Field property line only,
The County Transportation Engineer, Jack Kelsey, and Chuck Proctor (VDOT) assessed the
potential traffic impact to Haden Lane resulting from the connection to Summerford Lane, The
assessment assumed that the east-west connection between Killdeer Lane and the Haden Lane
labeled "Proposed Connector Road" (shown on Attachment D) would be barricaded at Killdeer
Lane, Consideration was then given to the potential diversion of some Haden Place traffic from
Haden Lane to Summerford Lane enroute to Old Trail Drive. The assessment also considered
the potential diversion of some Ballard Field traffic, from Old Trail Drive to Haden Lane, enroute
to Jarmans Gap Road and downtown Crozet. The projected traffic on Haden Lane from existing
and proposed development is illustrated on Attachment-E and summarized below.
Haden Lane Proiected AveraQe Daily Trips
Existing Lots: 140 adt
Haden Place: 189 adt (284 total; the remaining 95adt (33%) assumed to go to
Old Trail Drive)
Ballard Field: 212 adt (30% diverted from Old Trail Drive)
Total Projected Traffic: 541 adt
The Haden Place development further proposes improvements to Haden Lane along its frontage
that will accommodate this traffic volume. However, the off-site portion of Haden Lane north of
Haden Place to Jarmans Gap Road also needs widening to 20 feet to comply with VDOT
requirements, The applicant has also provided for this in revised proffers and on the revised
application plan. (Attachment F) This widening can be accommodated within the existing right-of-
way through a method called "trench widening", VDOT has successfully used this approach on
some of their road projects and Attachments G and H show examples of trench widening using a
milling machine and a motor-grader with a special blade attachment.
Frontage improvements along Killdeer Lane are proposed on the application plan, as
recommended by staff, These improvements include constructing the "Proposed Connector
Road" between Haden Lane and Killdeer Lane with the installation of bollards at the western end
of the "Proposed Connector Road", adjacent to the intersection with Killdeer Lane. These
bollards will remain in place until the northern off-site portion of Killdeer Lane is widened and the
sight distance at Jarman's Gap Road is improved.
ZMA 2005-00007 Haden Place
BOS February 14, 2007
2
.
Finally, the approved road plans for Ballard Field required the developer to provide a barricade
between their Haden TerracelHaden Lane improvements and the existing Haden Lane
(Attachment-I) This is because the portion of Haden Lane off-site of Ballard Field is about 16 feet
wide and is recommended to be widened to 20 feet to comply with VDOT standards (Attachment-
J-Photo of Haden Lane South), The applicant has provided for this improvement in their proffers
and application plan which will allow the barricade to be removed and Ballard Field traffic to be
dispersed to two points of access on Haden Lane,
Timing of Construction of the Affordable Housing Units
The applicant has provided for a phasing of half of the affordable units by completion of half of the
market rate units, This is provided for with Proffer # 6b, which includes language that the Housing
Director, County Attorney, and Zoning Administrator prefer.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
In consideration of prior staff and Planning Commission recommendations and subsequent Board
concerns, staff believes the applicant has appropriately addressed issues as to interconnections,
deficiencies of Haden and Killdeer Lanes and timing of construction of affordable housing units.
Should the Board find that the applicant's plan and proffers adequately address the project's
impacts, staff recommend's approval of ZMA 2005-0007 with the attached proffers, code of
development, and application plan,
.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Board of Supervisor minutes from October 11, 2006 meeting for Agenda Item No. 10,
ZMA -2005-007 Haden Place
B, ZMA 2005-007 Haden Place Proffer Form, last revised February 5, 2007
C, Haden Place ZMA 2005-007 Application Plan, last revised February 5, 2007 and
prepared by Dominion Development Resources
D. Haden Place Neighborhood Model Code of Development, last revised February 5, 2007
and prepared by Dominion Development Resources
E. Projected Traffic Distribution
F. Offsite Haden Lane - North
G. Milling Machine Trench Widening
H, Motor-Grader Trench Widening
I. Haden Lane at Ballard Field
J. Off-site Haden Lane - South
.
ZMA 2005-00007 Haden Place
BOS February '14, 2007
3
Attachment A
October 11, 2006 (Adjourned and Regular Night Meetings)
(Page 21)
was looking at the 20-year approach, but the RWSA looked at the 50-year plan, so there was a
discrepancy in the numbers. He said the water supply plan would be built on that 50-year numher. That
is what has been projected and proposed in terms of the Ragged Mountain Reservoir to meet the needs
for that time period,
Mr. Rooker said growth in the area's population is based on an assumed percentage increase in
population year to year over that 50-year period, whether it takes place in Crozet or somewhere else, He
added that the only issue is whether Crozet would be connected to the urban water system so the 50-
year water supply takes care of all the needs of the community, wherever the growth occurs.
Mr. Wyant said the boundaries of Crozet are fixed; only so much development can occur there,
Ms. Thomas said the question is on what basis the build-out might be more, as no one in Crozet
has "endorsed" a higher population,
Mr. Rooker said the Rivanna Auth,ority (RWSA) used the 12,000 population figure for Crozet, but
the number is impacted by whether it would be connected to an urban system,
Ms. Thomas noted that she has become interested in air quality because scientists are finding
that a lot of the nutrients affecting the Chesapeake Bay are coming from the air, not the ground and
water, specifically from car exhaust emissions.)
Item 9.6. Copy of letter dated September 27, 2006, from John Shepherd, Manager of Zoning
Administration, to Tara Boyd, re: Letter of Correction, OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF PARCELS AND
DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS -- Tax Map 122, Parcels 24 & 28 and Tax Map 123, Parcels 33 & 34 (Property
of Murcielago LLC) Section 10.3.1, received as information.
Item 9.7. Copy of letter dated October 4,2006, from John Shepherd, Manager of Zoning
Administration, to Tara Boyd, re: OFFICIAL DETERMINATION OF PARCELS AND DEVELOPMENT
RIGHTS -- Tax Map 114, Parcels 67, 67A, 67B, 67L & 67M Tax Map 123, Parcels 2 & 59 (Property of
Murcielago LLC) Section 10.3.1, received for information.
Agenda Item No. 10. ZMA-2005-007. Haden Place (Signs #12,13).
Proposal: Rezone 6.69 acres from R-2 Residential (2 unitslacre) to NMD Neighborhood Model
District - residential (3-34 unitslacre) mixed with commercial, service and industrial uses for 20
single-family homes and 14 townhomes,
Proffers: Yes.
Existina Comprehensive Plan land Use/Densitv: Community of Crozet; CT -3 Urban Edge:
single-family residential (net 3,5-6.5 unitslacre) supporting uses such as religious institutions and
schools and other small-scale non-residential uses.
Entrance Corridor: No.
Location: Between Haden (Rt 1209) & Killdeer Lanes (Rt 1215), south of Jarman's Gap Road.
Tax Map/Parcel: TM 55, Parcel 69 & TM 56, Parcel 9,
Maqisterial District: White Hall.
(Notice of this public hearing was published in the Daily Progress on September 25 and October
2, 2006.)
Mr. Cilimberg reported that this proposal was submitted in May, 2005. The Commission had a
work session over a year ago and provided guidance to the applicant - there was a need for consistency
to the Crozet Master Plan regarding density and provision of affordable housing, road improvements and
treatment of historic resources, He said the petition came back to the Commission in July, 2006 for a
It
.
October 11, 2006 (Adjourned and Regular Night Meetings)
(Page 22)
public hearing to request a change from R-2 Residential to Neighborhood Model; the existing by-right use
would allow 13 single-family units and with bonus provisions up to 20 units, The proposal is for 20 single-
family homes including six cottages and 14 townhouses for a density of 6,35 dwelling units per acre. He
mentioned that this property lies in the CT-3 area of the Crozet Master Plan.
Mr. Cilimberg said that in their report to the Commission, staff noted favorable factors as: how
the project addresses the principles of the Neighborhood Model; density as it relates to the Crozet Master
Plan; and, the relationship of the property to two centers - one in "downtown" Crozet and one being the
future Old Trail Village Center. He said the unfavorable factors noted were: the moderately-priced
housing did not meet the County's definition for affordable housing, and revisions were needed to the
Code of Development, Application Plan and proffers, He said that on July 11, 2006, the Commission
recommended approval to the Board noting areas of the petition that needed to be addressed: the
expectation of an affordable housing proffer that would be modified to conform to the County's affordable
housing policy in the Comprehensive Plan; technical changes that needed to be made to the Code of
Development, Application Plan and proffers; cash proffers devoted to transportation improvements in
Crozet; and, an interconnection provided and illustrated on the Application Plan from the proposed east-
west connector road between Haden Lane and Killdeer Lane southward to Summerford Lane and Ballard
Field,
.
Mr. Cilimberg reviewed the proffers and how they are being addressed. He said the two roads
that would serve either side of this property - coming from Jarman's Gap Road - Haden Lane and
Killdeer Lane - are both at this time substandard for any additional development. He said the applicant
controls the land along Haden Lane on one side, and beyond that does not have ownership control. He
said they have proffered to widen Haden Lane to a minimum width of 18 feet with shoulders and ditches
to the extent allowable using existing right-of-way and to satisfy the requirements of the County Engineer.
He added that the applicant's plan shows frontage improvements to create an urban cross-section on
their side of Haden Lane.
Ms, Thomas asked about the clause that says "as the right-of-way allows," and if what the
applicant is proposing can actually be done. Mr, Cilimberg said the County Engineer looked at it and
believes the 18 feet for ditches and shoulders could be accommodated but until road plans are made he
cannot be certain. He said the developer would improve the intersection, but any offsite sight distance
outside of the right-of-way could not be addressed; Jarman's Gap improvements would help when done,
In response to Mr. Rooker's question about use of Haden Lane, Mr. Cilimberg confirmed that
Haden Lane would be the access for the property until the Killdeer Lane intersection could be dealt with in
an appropriate manner. He said the applicant has proffered doing urban section improvements to
Killdeer, and has indicated that the County will not be requested for a building permit prior to construction
or bonding of offsite stormwater drainage, They have shown where the integrated park and stormwater
management facility will be and indicated that construction requirements will be met within 12 months for
that.
Mr. Cilimberg said inter-parcel connectivity with Ballard Field andlor the realignment of Killdeer
Lane has also been accommodated, explaining that they proffered to build to their property line for
connection with Summerford Lane. He added that they have also proffered for a relocation of Killdeer
through their property should it be desired, but some would be across property they do not own,
.
Mr, Rooker commented that the Old Trail developer didn't like the plan to come across that
property. Mr. Cilimberg agreed, stating that the allowance for the curb in Killdeer was only being provided
in the event that that was desired, but a more direct commitment is to the potential connection he
indicated initially.
Mr, Slutzky said that is no assurance that connection would be made, Mr, Cilimberg replied that
they have not proffered anything beyond their property line,
t)
October 11, 2006 (Adjourned and Regular Night Meetings)
(Page 23)
Ms. Thomas asked if the ability of Summerford Lane to handle traffic was evaluated by staff. Mr.
Cilimberg said that should have been part of what the County Engineer looked at in his review, and he
determined it to be adequate.
Mr. Rooker said the Board must assume that connection would not be made, and look at the
outlet that is a sure bet. Mr. Cilimberg agreed, adding that properties that are possibilities for access do
not belong to this developer,
Ms, Thomas said she has heard that the concern among Haden Lane residents is that no one
would use Summerford Lane, and the concern among Summerford Lane is that everyone would use that
road. Mr. Cilimberg said there is no data to show how that would play out.
Mr. Rooker emphasized that until Jarman's Gap Road is finished, the sole access for the
development would be Haden Lane, Mr, Cilimberg added that Old Trail Road - formerly Western Avenue
- is not in the State System at this time even though it has been built through,
Mr. Wyant commented that Haden Lane is a State-maintained road.
Mr. Cilimberg reported that cash proffers are provided at $3,200 for each detached market rate
unit and $2,700 for each attached market rate unit, for a total of $82,000, He said six affordable units for
sale are being proffered, and additional affordable units should be calculated at 50 percent of the middle
range. He said they used what staff had come up with for calculations - half of the difference between
what's allowed at the medium range and what's allowed at the highest end-range to determine the
number of units in the higher density. At the last meeting it was said that essentially equates to what
people have to proffer in affordable units anyway and the real calculation for affordable units should be 5C
percent of the middle range. The circumstances mentioned last month have been the same for both
reviews, and now staff would like some direction from the Board on whether to use that or the 50 percent
of mid-range,
Mr. Rooker commented that when the Board reviewed the protocol before, it was the under-
standing to use the 50 percent midpoint, but during review of the Wickham Pond petition there was a
discrepancy in how to arrive at the figure needed to receive the density bonus. He said the minutes of the
discussion outlining the density bonus show a fairly clear intent by the Board to use the midpoint multiplier
and they were making an exception for that review. Board members agreed that they had been informed
that Haden Place was in the works during the Wickham Pond discussion,
Mr. Cilimberg responded that staff did not receive a clear direction, and that is why the Wickham
Pond issue was uncertain, He said the applicant in this rezoning is proffering six affordable units, which
would be 17 percent. He mentioned that staff had included a comparison of rezonings and cash proffers
in the executive summary for this request in order to compare Haden Place to Wickham Pond II and
Westhall V. He concluded that if the Board finds the affordable housing and density provisions
acceptable, and agrees that the proffers sufficiently address the impacts of the project, staff and the
Commission recommend approval of ZMA-2005-007 subject to the current proffers, amended Code of
Development, and amended General Development Plan,
With no further questions for the staff, Mr. Rooker asked the applicant to speak,
The applicant, Mr. Wendell Gibson, addressed the Board. He said he has been building in the
County for 12 years, As a small builder, it is hard for him to compete with the large-scale developers. He
tried to contact the Beights Development Group to discuss interconnectivity and got no response, He
said Beights wanted him to purchase the property that would give him a cut-through, but he did not want
to spend that kind of money, He said he has proffered affordable detached units and has kept them in
line with other developments in the area such as Old Trail.
~
.
October 11, 2006 (Adjourned and Regular Night Meetings)
(Page 24)
Mr. Kelly Strickler of Dominion Development Resources addressed the Board, saying he was
present for the applicant. He said the development was approved as a by-right development for 13
single-family detached homes, but Mr. Gibson wanted to build homes similar to those in Parkside Village,
He emphasized that Beights Development was not cooperative when contacted about making the
connection, and said the property has a potential for five connections in different directions for the 34
units. He said there is not sufficient sight distance at the end of Killdeer Lane because of a retaining wall,
but that would be rectified when the Jarman's Gap improvements are made,
Mr, Strickler said they are improving Haden Lane to VDOT standards, The County Engineer, Mr.
Kelsey, has walked both roads in the development. The plan deals with the vertical curve as well as
widening Haden Lane from 15 feet to 18 feet to accommodate 280 vehicle trips per day, Eventually, he
said the development would have multiple points of access. The Commission was happy with the initial
proposed density of 40 units, but the 80 percent rule for net development has been accommodated so the
number has been reduced. He said there are five different housing types in the development, and
showed on a map where the houses would be located on the property, He emphasized that they are
going from 20 market-rate houses with four affordable houses to 22 market-rate houses with 12
affordable houses, He said there are four or five culverts on Haden Lane and Killdeer Lane that would
need to be relocated, and some mailboxes that would need to be moved back, but most of that
topography is flat and the rights-of-way are 30 feet with an 18-foot pavement that would accommodate
every bit of traffic the development would generate.
.
Mr, Wyant asked for clarification of the roads and rights-of-way, Mr, Strickler explained that there
is a parking lane inside the property line, a green strip, and a sidewalk, and two feet behind that is the
proposed new property line -there are substantial right-of-way dedications throughout this project. He
added that there would be a 3D-foot right-of-way, and 18-foot road width and a ditch, but the sidewalk
would only go to the property line.
Ms. Thomas said Haden Lane adds up to 40 feet, but if it's not, it would be difficult to
accommodate the ditch lines, shoulders and other things proposed, She said sidewalks are being
created to a certain point, but then there would be no sidewalks from the edge of this proposal to
Jarman's Gap Road, Mr. Strickler said they have agreed to do whatever they can to the existing right-of-
way, as the applicant doesn't own the next property,
Mr, Gibson said his goal is to build the products then try to get young professional people who
could serve the community to move in, He wants to make his homes affordable for them,
Mr. Rooker said North Pointe has a requirement to build their affordable housing on a staggered
schedule so it is built as each set of market-rate units is built.
Mr. Wyant said he supports the phasing in of affordable units.
Mr, Strickler said the detached housing units on Killdeer Lane and Haden Lane would require
approval of a subdivision plat and plans for roads and stormwater management. Phase II will be the
townhouses and cottages and they will be built together, In order to do the cottages first, it would take a
lot more time and it doesn't quite make as much sense from a business point of view.
At this time, Mr, Rooker opened the public hearing,
.
Mr, Kevin Markee, a resident of Haden Lane, addressed the Board. He said he sent an e-mail to
the Board about this development. He thinks this is a wonderful plan, but he thinks putting it into action
without the improvements to the road connections at Jarman's Gap Road with Killdeer Lane and Haden
Lane is a mistake, He goes to Charlottesville every day from Haden Lane, and he won't go through Old
Trail because it takes too long and is too slow. He said improvements at the corner of Haden Lane and
Jarman's Gap Road will still be constrained by an abutment to a bridge over Powell's Creek and a
telephone pole on the other side.
1
October 11, 2006 (Adjourned and Regular Night Meetings)
(Page 25)
Mr. Tom Loach pointed out that the matrix in the Crozet Master Plan shows the number of homes
for that area has already been used up, plus 100 percent more. He said everyone has been waiting for
Jarman's Gap Road to be improved, and he listed the developments that have gone in under the
assumption the road would be improved. He said as soon as there is money for the Jarman's Gap Road
project the Board can come back and put its plan into action.
Mr. Jeff Werner, representing the Piedmont Environment Council, addressed the Board. He
applauded Mr. Strickler for his efforts to put five units on an acre. He said developers in other counties
have actually stopped short of reaching certain numbers to avoid having to put in the next tier of
affordable housing units, so he appreciates the Board's consideration of staggering how they are built.
Ms. Mary Rice addressed the Board. She said the population in the Crozet growth area as of
August was 4,800 people with 1,875 dwelling units with Certificates of Occupancy. To that number, you
must add 3,315 - the total dwelling units that have been finally or preliminarily approved, for a total of
5,224 existing and potential dwelling units. Using the multiplier of 2.55 for those homes ends up with
13,321 people - if not one by-right unit is built and no additional rezonings occur. She said the
infrastructure mentioned in the Crozet Master Plan is based on a population of 12,000. The community
would already be past that number with the units already approved. She emphasized that while there is
no way to tell how fast they will be built, the maximum numbers must be used in planning for
infrastructure. She said Crozet is a "cautionary tale" for the rest of the County, as giving developers the
full green-light for development will result in double-digit growth rates, and the money for infrastructure is
not available,
Ms, Barbara Westbrook of Crozet addressed the Board. She presented some pictures of roads ir
the area, including Haden Lane, adding that its intersection with Jarman's Gap is "really bad for most of
these roads." She hopes the construction traffic would be kept off of the Killdeer Lane entrance during
construction, saying people can use Western Avenue but may not be aware that it goes through, She
said there are a lot of cars coming through Hillsborough to get to either Route 250 or 1-64, and maybe
Western Avenue could be better utilized. She asked Mr. Juan Wade about installation of a sign indicating
this road could be used, and he indicated the process for doing so.
Mr. Strickler commented that Mr. Gibson builds approximately 30 homes per year in the area. He
wants to build homes in the growth area that are more affordable than those in many other new
developments. He acknowledged that there are a lot of parcels which have been rezoned so are
available in the growth area. That is what the Master Plan was trying to accomplish, He said the Board
should keep some flexibility to allow growth were it's needed and discourage it where it's not.
(Note: The Board took a brief recess, then reconvened,)
Mr, Slutzky said that in the future, he would like to see a phasing of affordable housing in the
proffers, and would like to give that signal to staff now, Mr, Davis said the requirement with Old Trail and
North Pointe was that they designate affordable building lots in each section as development goes along,
They get a credit if more lots are put in, but none of the proffers have actually required construction on
lots - just that they be distributed and designated in the different sections,
Mr. Boyd asked if any affordable housing units have been built since this initiative was started.
Mr, Cilimberg said it is early in the actual rezoning process to determine how the timing is working for
affordable housing.
Mr. Rooker asked about the Western Avenue situation mentioned earlier, specifically the sign.
Mr. Davis said it is a public right-of-way, but it will be privately-maintained until it is taken into the State
System. Mr, Cilimberg agreed to have staff follow up on installation of a sign indicating the road goes all
the way through,
~
.
October 11, 2006 (Adjourned and Regular Night Meetings)
(Page 26)
Mr. Wyant said the timing has not been favorable because Jarman's Gap Road has not been
improved, and the development pattern in the Crozet Master Plan anticipated it would be by now. He
said the Crozet Citizens' Advisory Committee has identified that issue in its discussions.
Mr. Cilimberg said a lot of what's being done in Old Trail is by-right, and the requirements are not
in the ordinance to have that road built to the standard in the Crozet Master Plan for by-right
development.
Mr, Rooker commented that this is a lot like Wickham Pond on a small scale, and the plan is
nicely done, He said the units are being offered at a lower price point than the competition, The problem
is with lack of sufficient infrastructure, especially since the Jarman's Gap Road improvements have been
moved back. A second point is that this development is being proposed at a higher density than that
recommended in the Crozet Master Plan unless the bonus factor is used, Using the approach that staff
has been using for the density bonus every rezoning would qualify for a 50 percent higher density than
called for in the Master Plan, He emphasized that the infrastructure is just not there, and there are not
adequate contributions for it.
Mr, Dorrier said this developer is trying to provide affordable housing, but he is coming to the
conclusion the Crozet Master Plan needs to be revised to deal with the problem of lack of infrastructure.
He does not think the Board can keep piling on new development in Crozet without the infrastructure,
.
Mr, Slutzky said he is sympathetic with the developer trying to get access to other developments,
Mr, Gibson and Mr, Strickler have demonstrated where connections could go, While he agrees there is
inadequate infrastructure, it still needs to be addressed in appropriate ways, rather than denying a good
Neighborhood Model project inside a designated growth area. He said staff pointed out in their report that
if these same units were developed in the rural area, the Board would end up with no proffers, He feels
good Neighborhood Model projects in a designated growth area need to be approved until growth is shut
down in the rural area, and he supports the project.
Ms. Thomas said she has found some decisions to be agonizing. She is glad to see the density
proposed, she likes the price points, and the adjacent price points, But she is also concerned about the
lack of a connection to Summerford Lane, and the gap in the sidewalk connection to Jarman's Gap Road.
If the County doesn't say no at some point, the message is never going to get through to the State that
localities are being greatly impacted by their inability to act.
Mr, Boyd said he does not know anyway the infrastructure problem can be solved now, and
Jarman's Gap Road would likely not be at the top of a list. He feels the applicant has gone to a great deal
of expense to build a project like this, which has affordable units and market rate units that are also
reasonably priced.
Mr, Wyant asked if the plan follows the Crozet Master Plan recommendations, Mr. Cilimberg said
the property is located in a CT-3 area, one that is recommended at a density within the bonus provision if
the staff's interpretation of how that applies is used.
Mr, Wyant said he likes the density of the project and the affordable housing proposed, but he
cannot vote for approval at this time because of the lack of offsite improvements,
.
Mr. Slutzky said he thinks the Board needs to let the development community understand what it
expects in the future, If the Board says "no" to this proposal in a growth area, then he thinks it is clear
that the applicant will be building his 30 units in the rural area,
Mr. Rooker said that is Mr. Slutzky's conclusion. He does not necessarily agree with that
conclusion. There are 7,000 units already approved in the growth area, which is almost a 15-year supply
of units, and there are a number of additional units "in the pipeline." With that kind of supply available, he
4
October 11, 2006 (Adjourned and Regular Night Meetings)
(Page 27)
does not buy the argument that everybody who can't get a unit approved in the growth area today will run
out to the rural area tomorrow.
Mr. Slutzky asked if the Board is saying it will declare a moratorium on approvals of otherwise
acceptable development in the growth areas until the infrastructure situation is resolved. What is the
development community supposed to expect?
Mr. Boyd said he thinks this is a unique situation, as this development has only one point of
access (a very poor one), even though there is potential for other connections.
Mr, Wyant agreed that it would put a lot of burden on Haden Lane, and he doesn't think it can be
built in the 30-foot right of way.
Mr, Slutzky said if this is based on site-specific shortcomings.
Mr. Boyd said that is definitely the case, and perhaps the applicant could defer the matter until the
access point issue is resolved.
Road.
Mr. Wyant said he has a problem with Haden Lane, and also with its intersection at Jarman's Gap
Ms. Thomas said she considers in her deliberation what would happen with the property if it were
built by-right, adding that she will approve a project to get the amenities and proffers just because it's
better than a by-right without any additional offerings. She stated that in this case, a by-right
development wouldn't be "terrible" as the 13 houses allowed would generate less traffic and impact to
infrastructure.
Mr, Rooker said there are already 3,000 approved units in Crozet. The question is how far in
front of infrastructure is development at a density higher than that recommended in the Crozet Master
Plan approved. He thinks there are things peculiar to this development that might make it worse than in
other cases - the inadequate road leading out to Jarman's Gap Road, the inability to make the other
connections, etc. He thinks the Board has to send a message that small cash proffers - in this case
$3,200 per unit - are not acceptable. He said Greene County uses $5,600; Loudoun uses $47,000; and,
Fairfax is $70,000, To suggest that $3,200 is an adequate number in Albemarle County to compensate
for the impact on infrastructure is illogical to him.
Mr. Slutzky responded that he doesn't want to set the bar so high those developments are
pushed into the rural areas or into a by-right situation.
Mr, Rooker said transportation problems and inadequate funding are acute, and these projects
simply do not have the infrastructure needed to support them,
Board members suggested the applicant seek an indefinite deferral so connectivity issues could
be addressed. Mr. Davis said an indefinite deferral might not be the best option, as plans can change,
Mr, Rooker said the developer could put in a contingency stating he would not apply for
occupancy permits prior to the time improvements to Jarman's Gap Road are completed, He could
proffer more for infrastructure, or proffer a different density, etc, He said Board members do not seem to
be supportive of this request for different reasons,
Mr, Davis pointed out that inadequate public facilities alone is not a basis for denying a rezoning
request, but the Board has stated factors beyond that, and has discretion to approve or deny this
application, He cautioned them in laying out reasons, He said it would not be prudent to focus solely on
lack of infrastructure. He also said this item would not have to be voted on tonight.
lO
.
October 11, 2006 (Adjourned and Regular Night Meetings)
(Page 28)
(Note: The Board took a recess at 7:45 p.m., and reconvened at 7:52 p.m. After Agenda Item
No, 11, the Board resumed its discussion of this petition.)
Agenda Item No. 11, Reconsideration of Downtown Scottsville Streetscape Plan Funding
Request.
Mr. Tucker said the Town has requested that the Board fund half of its initial request for
$502,000, as a previous vote on their full request failed by a 3-3 vote. He said the Town will come up
with other sources for the remaining half of the cost.
Mr. Dorrier said he met with Mayor Phipps and Mr. Hogan, who have until October 22 to provide
evidence of funding. They are working to identify those sources. He said the drop in oil prices may affect
the project contractor's fee,
Ms, Thomas emphasized that if the County puts up one-half, she thinks it needs to be for the plan
presented, and the motion needs to be worded so it is expected the project will be shown to the Board,
Mr. Dorrier said the Town has not indicated it wants to cut it back on the project.
Mr. Boyd said the motion could be worded to say the County would match half up to $250,000.
.
Mr, Dorrier moved for approval of matching funds up to $250,000 for use by the Town of
Scottsville for its streetscape project, and that no changes be made to dilute the value of the project or
significantly change the placement of lines underground and other major points of the project - including
trees, tree replacement, storm drainage, and placement of underground utilities,
Mr. Boyd suggested changing the motion to state the Board approves up to $251,065.14 in
matching funds to accomplish the project substantially as presented to the Board,
Mr. Davis said the motion is actually to approve an appropriation of up to $251,065.14 to match
an amount presented by Scottsville to complete the project materially in the fashion that was previously
presented to the Board,
Mr, Wyant seconded the motion, which passed by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Slutzky, Ms. Thomas, Mr. Wyant, Mr. Boyd, Mr, Dorrier and Mr. Rooker.
NAYS: None.
At this time, the Board resumed its consideration of Agenda Item No, 10, ZMA-2005-007, Haden
Place.
Mr, Gibson addressed the Board and asked what it would take for the Board to approve the
development other than the Jarman's Gap Road improvements,
Mr, Rooker said he doesn't want to answer hypothetical questions, but the request would need to
answer some of the issues raised - contribution to infrastructure, timing, density, affordable housing units,
etc.
e
Mr. Slutzky suggested the applicants speak with Board members informally about the Jarman's
Gap Road improvements and other aspects of denial.
Mr. Wyant moved to accept the applicant's request for an indefinite deferral of ZMA-2005-007
Haden Place, Ms. Thomas seconded the motion, which passed by the following recorded vote:
Ii
Attachment B
Proffer Form
Date: October 2,2006
ZMA: 2005-0007
Revisions: 10/05/06
12/01/06
01/24/07
02/05/07
Tax Map and Parcel Numbers: 55-69 and 56-9
6.69 Acres to be rezoned from R2 to NMD (Neighborhood Model District)
in accordance with the Application Plan titled Haden Place, dated September 4,2006 revised January 23,
2007
And prepared by Dominion Development Resources, LLC
Pursuant to Section 33.3 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance, the owner, or its duly
authorized agent, hereby voluntarily proffers the conditions listed below which shall be applied to
the property, if rezoned. These conditions are proffered as a part of the requested rezoning and it is
agreed that: (1) the rezoning itself gives rise to the need for the conditions; and (2) such conditions
have a reasonable relation to the rezoning request.
1) Construction of Off-Site Improvements: No later than 12 months after approval of the
first subdivision plat or site plan within Haden Place, the Applicant shall design and
construct at its sole expense the following:
a. Haden Lane Road Widening: Haden Lane, from the southern boundary of Haden
Place to Jarmans Gap Road, and from the southern boundary of Haden Place to its
terminus at the southern Boundary of Tax Map 56 Parcel 8, shall be widened to a
minimum pavement width of20' and shoulders and ditches shall be installed to the
extent allowed within the existing right-of-way. The improvements shall be designed
and constructed to the satisfaction of the County Engineer.
b. Stormwater Drainage to Powell's Creek: The Owner shall not request that the
County issue a building permit within Haden Place prior to the construction or
bonding of an off-site stormwater drainage system to Powell's Creek in general
accord to that shown on the General Development Plan.
2) Interparcel connection to Summerford Lane:
Final location for dedication ofthe inter-parcel connection with Ballard Fields will be
determined as a condition of first subdivision plat or first site plan approval for any
development within Haden Place. The Owner shall design and construct at its sole expense
the inter-parcel vehicular connection to Summerford Lane. Said construction shall be
completed as designed and approved by the County Engineer, no later than 12 months after
/7-
TT _'I _. hi _ _ _
.
approval of the final subdivision plat or final site plan approval for lots within Blocks C, D,
E, F, or G as shown on the General Development Plan.
3) Vehicular Ingress / Egress:
Vehicular connection from the Proposed Connector Road shown on the ZMA 2005-0007
Application Plan, last revised February 5, 2007 to Killdeer Lane shall be prohibited until
such time that sight distance improvements, acceptable to the Virginia Department of
Transportation, are made to the intersection of Killdeer Lane and Jarmans Gap Road. The
bollards prohibiting vehicular connection from the Proposed Connector Road to Killdeer
Lane shall be removed within 60 days of the Virginia Department of Transportation's
acceptance of the sight distance improvements.
4) Future Dedication for Realignment of Killdeer Lane:
a. Upon the request of Albemarle County, a fifty (50) foot wide portion of the open space
area shown as "Block J" on sheet A5.1 of the Application Plan shall be dedicated to
public use, as necessary, for future realignment of Killdeer Lane. The location of the
realignment is shown conceptually on the General Development Plan,
.
b. If the land dedicated in Proffer 4a is not used for its stated purpose within 10 years of
dedication, then the Owner may pursue vacation or abandonment of the dedicated right-
of-way.
5) Cash Proffers:
The Owner shall contribute a total of $82,000 cash for the purpose of mitigating traffic
impacts from the development. The cash contribution shall be used only for the purpose of
funding transportation projects identified in the County's Capital Improvements Program
within the Community of Crozet. The cash contribution shall be paid in increments of
$3,200 for each detached market rate unit and $2,700 for each market rate attached unit, prior
to or at the time of issuance of the building permit for each unit. If this cash contribution has
not been exhausted by the County for the stated purpose within ten (10) years from the date
of the last payment of the contribution, all unexpended funds shall be applied to project(s)
identified in the County's Capital Improvements Program within the Community of Crozet.
6) Affordable Housing:
.
a. The Owner shall provide six (6) "for sale" residential units of affordable housing in Haden
Place as identified on the Application Plan. The Owner shall convey the responsibility of
constructing the affordable units to any subsequent purchaser of the subject property.
The current Owner or subsequent Owner shall create units affordable to households with
incomes less than 80% of the area median income, such that housing costs consisting of
principal, interest, real estate taxes and homeowner's insurance (PITI) do not exceed 30%
of the gross household income. The Albemarle County Office of Housing or its designee
shall approve all purchasers of these units. The Owner/builder shall provide the County
or its designee a period of 180 days to identify and pre-qualify an eligible purchaser for
I~
Haden Place
PT"ff"T J;^~
the affordable units. The 180-day period shall commence upon written notice from the
Owner that the units will be available for sale. This notice shall not be given more than
120 days prior to anticipated receipt of the certificate of occupancy. Ifthe County or its
designee does not provide a qualified purchaser during this period, the Owner shall have
the right to sell the unite s) without any restriction on sales price or income of purchaser.
This proffer shall apply only to the first sale of each ofthe six (6) units.
b. Prior to the issuance of the fifteenth building permit for a market rate dwelling unit
within Haden Place, the Owner shall obtain certificates of occupancy for three (3)
affordable dwelling units. Prior to the issuance of the final building permit for a market
rate dwelling unit within Haden Place, the Owner shall obtain certificates of occupancy
for all of the affordable dwelling units within Haden Place.
7) Historic Resources: As a condition of the first preliminary subdivision plat or preliminary
site plan approval for any development within Haden Place, the Owner shall provide a
reconnaissance level survey performed by an architectural historian or other qualified
individual, to adequately provide an archival record of the existing homestead. The survey
shall meet the requirements of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources
Reconnaissance Survey Field Form, and results shall be included in the Haden Place Code of
Development.
8) Overlot Grading Plan: For any subdivision not requiring a site development plan, the
Owner shall submit an Overlot Grading Plan to the satisfaction of the County Engineer. The
Owner shall obtain approval of the Overlot Grading Plan by the County Engineer before the
first final subdivision plat or site plan is approved within Haden Place. The Owner shall not
request that a Certificate of Occupancy be issued for a dwelling unit on a lot if the County
Engineer has determined the lot grading is not consistent with the approved grading plans,
Signature of Owner,
'1/111/ It ~r"Li
endell W. Gibson, President
Wendell W. Gibson, Inc,
lJ Q /I) Je. (( k). G I' 65 oN'
Printed Name of Owner
2-- ~- 0 7
Date
It
TT_.J__ nl___
n_.......r:t:'...._T':'~_
. ............-.
...~;o-..~' .
.
....-~'"::=--a...~=-=-~Ii;,~1A1U
. I - /
!; ." /'/
/1 IrJ7 : .J
'/,/ 1/ .
~! .//' ~
/!/ q :' II
,r, .!i
! I j
'/! .<
. iT
/ ' ' /'
Ii iI
.I
Attachment E
IP
,i
,,!!O" ci" II 'B
I ; ~ " .
,"
l'
"'""
.
ii
/
I
I
=
<c...
....,...
....
-.
-.... ..
.........
(1EJ{E.
--...oc
.
--
---
-----.
"
~"Dl.G."'"...r.;",4Io'\~~.P, "
'''~~cc::.r.~'
.:'"-"....,M.J..:;,,_tci..ooJOO.
-..~;-.J ~
:'1JW~I..
."""",
-......
-
-.-
t~1tII'C5
<
r
f-l.ade.n L.nne. C^(6irl1~ Lo-k
~adeh Fface . 284 adt -fobl
~'? exit di'Ae.rled (301.) -to ddlfud br.
&I/ard field. 2/2 crl-f: divexied ('?of.) to Heiden LI1.
l-lacbt lal'\e -+o~ ( . 541 a:H:
/40 adt.
(asSUW\e-s ,,",0 COht\ecUtt\)
-b ~ IIdeey Lat'\€.
.
IS-
~
\
;
;'
~
J~
1./ \
.-~ ..,',
)>
-
-
D,)
(")
:T
3
~
::s
-
'T1
,-
:;;0'-
o:P
;p.:;;O
~~
zz
-it.n
me;)
:;;o~
t.n"'Q
m
()
~
6
z
- ~
-..
-...
....
\
~
'< ~ 1
'\,.
~~\
} 1
-
~
.
,
,..
\
, ,
~~ ,~.
,~.. ~; 1-"" ~ J~
... ~,.. "'.. - Ii.,. ,
.~~ ~ .~ . ~- \]-:...
,l .....;.1 --'~.
w ~. .
. '...:~'* , ~.; :
... .i .... -
., ~t.1'"
"'-
-.
.),0
1&
.
.
.
Attachment G
1'~'~
'~~,
~l" ~
.. 11:.!Ji,1'~'
~,~,,"t. .
"::.;,~~I
:.).
II
Atta'chment H
.....~
~
.,' ,%~~::>'.i \'\' ,~
~:.:~ f.'", ,~~
,o::.-..~ '- . .. ' .'.
,:..,; ..~ ...
...... ..... ~.
:. ". :l .~.
.~ ,~
"" ,. -,
,
..{~
..
,
~..,
J
f'
- ~
l
, ~ ~,
.'\
. ' I
-" \4
/" , .~
,
. , . r.
.1N
.~
~
,
"~
..
., ~' J
~i 'I'.
'"
"
"
~.~./
,~,
J
..
~
if
.
.
.
t;')
::0
(- It i;
"'Ii! ::r::
~~ n
tfJ
;a A (")
~
.
~- '-
""-
.,
,
.......
,:'>< <
"
'"
/"
.
,
( ,~,O(fOO?:
I ~ t ~~.-<;~ 3.?:?:~riS B~/I'
. t' ,. ~~~,.,~~j;j /ic g
\ ~iIl~~;t~i / q:i
.\........ I :-,' .c:~ ~~ 2~~~S,<<~ I 0
/ I . ~t::l ~~ ::!~;~ ~~ /
:. '! . \~::i (I ~~: ,/ I.,
~'" '1 "'-~~ -~-
'\)\ \\\ ;.7~~'^ "}fUIt
..-t ,~-\-, ,~' - "-'__.__ -:"(: p ~,~
)>
-4
-4
)>
(")
:I:
s:
m
z
-4
,....
....
,
..l'._.
... .
. r.. ~
-.
--
~
>
-
w)
~-
=
-
c....
< .
Application for
Special Use Permit
Pleasc See the List at1he botWmofpage4 for1heApproprlam Fee
(sIaff'wiIlasslst}'llll wilh tbls iIem)
fa
~ r
PR.OJBCTNAM&: (how IIIuld we J'IIIill"to tWa .ppIIcatioll!): J
PROPOSAL: ~.weo..m... CYO$\~
BXIS'I1RGOlMP......LAND................~~hO<<l \)q\si ~~ ~en1ioJ
LOCATlON:f+.2:1~Y1Or-\:h~1 ~~~""l!axt:. 'br.
. TAXMAP:tABCEL(1): ~2.- ~ .
MA.GISl'DlA)..DI8TRJCT: R\ V ~
'OF ACRES TO BECOVEBBD BY~ mE PERMIr(irapGrtlollltmwt be ddbleated 011 a p1a1): ~D. \
:& 1IIiB IJIlIlIlOCIlIJeDt1D IJI GlldugSplclalU" perm.ltf If Yes praride tItat SP Number. 0 ns NO
Are a 1& wIdL tbll ? YES NO
CoDlactJ.telwa{WhOlbClaJdwecalIlMits~thlspnjecl2):\lolC:ie.. ijj. ~ ) W \ lli/UY\s .M v.l\ef\-
.Adc!nl11l3n ~.JJv1iY\ G-. SuHe~ CiJ}w\o-Hei!il.Q.. S1SVA ~Ci2.-
,. DaytbcPlJOllC~~ll'altt#~~:s.mail '\' .~
Omoerot:: \J~r:~ \CA.- oUlAd. -ri'l.lDt
......._~~~~ ~ ~~f~\\Q s~ V~ ZiplZQOb
DaylimaP&cm LJ i'1lE# L.J Jl.mQl
Appllc:aDt(Wllclfs OmIetp~NoY~ ~V(~ I L. \... C.
AMr_ ~e ~~ 'Cit,y~~\\\Q.. SIIIIIIV~ ~c:&-'3Stb
Pl'l~"'LHl.f\ Pax.~ di3-"J't1 BoIIIail~C.2.Q ~. e..IrM..
o SpecIal Use l't:mIils:
o v.;..,....,
CollcuneDt....u.w olSll&DevcIopmeucPlM?
I J1OR.OI'J'[Cl!: VS&OIlLV
. 1'ecAmollDtS n.Pa!II
SPit
lJ tal: of AIIIIIariIat!oll
NO
BywlD?
Rilcefpt#
CklI
Ill,;
I
CoIUrty oiAlhemarle Department of Community Development
401 M~Road Charlo~- VA.u90~;V.oI~(434}296-S83Z.Fax:.(434) 912-4126
8I1,0c)6 Pap 1 of4
... I , ~ .
-,
,
Section 31.2.4.1 of the Albemarle County' Zoning OIdinance states that, '"Tho board of supervisors he:l:eby
reserves UIJto'itao1f1he right to issue aU special use peanits pemrltted hereunder. Special uae permits for
'Q8Ol5 as praridod in thiII otdinanDc may be iQued upon a finding by the bomi of rmpervisors tbat suah use
will not be of sube1antial detrimmrt to 8.lljaccmt property, tbat tbt; ~ oflDe disb:ictwi11 not be
changed tb8reby and that BDCh uso wiI1 be in hatmony wilh the putpOSO and intc:al ofthia ordinance. with
the uses ~ by right in tbe district, with additional regulations provided in section 5.0 of this
ordinance, and with.the public bcalih, safety and gcne;mI we1filre. ..
Tho i1mns that fuUowwilI be reviewed by the staff in their analysis of yoUI request. Please eamp1ete this
form and"provide addi1iom1 iufil1.mation which will assist1he County in itUfM8W of you request. JfjOU
need 88Ilis1anae fiIlin,g 0111 ~ese item&. stBff is 1MlilabIe.
How will the proposed spl:Qial use affeet adjaoc:Dt property'l
~ n..~~.
:&w will thcproposcd apec:ia11l8O Iffi=ct 1be cbamcter ofthc diaO:(s) SUItOIJElding lhOproperty?
~e.t. o.+btrherl.
How iS1De UlIC in haImoDy with tho purpose and intont of'lhe- 2dmiag OJ:diumce?
~e o.+'buJ,ed.
How is the-ose in haImDay wUh. the uses pmniticd by rlgbtia thedimict?
~ee. (l. --\:to thu .
What additi~ rcgu1ztiOIlS pmYided in ~ 5.0 oflhe Zoaing Ordinance apply to 1bis use?
~ee. a.-t*tat-he.d.
~ow will this use prcmotlS thepubJic health,. saii:ty. and genec:al welfare of1he eommnnity?
~ee Cl#tl~.
an~ PJta<I2of4
n. 1
, .
Describe your IIlQ.uest in detail and inolude aU pertinent iDformation such as the number ofpextlOllS involved in
the use, operating hOUtS, 8I1d any unique features of'fbe use: ~ 0. ttd cl1 d .
ATrACIWENTS DQUDltD -provide two (2) copies ofc:a.ch.
IJ 1. Rflcordcd plat or reccnded botmdary survey offho property xequested fur the permit. Iftbcre is
no recoMed plat or baundaty S1ltgey. p1eaae provide legal de8criptian ofthc property and the Deed
Book 811d page nnmber or PlatBook and p8F JI1ID1ber.
Q 2, ()wnm8hip infOImAMn - If ownemhip ofb proplStt,Y is in the runnc of any 1;Ype of1cgal eulity or
organi2a1ion.incIurling. but not 1imi1ed fe. the :name of a cDIpOIlltion. partneI8bjp or assooiation. or in
the J1llDle ofa 1Iu8t. or in a fictitioos name., a docwmmt acceptable 10 tho Co1U11y must be subnritlJed
cerIifyi:Jig '!hat file petIOIl signing below has the autbmity to do so.
lfthe applicant is a con1J:act purabaser, a document ~le 110 1fIc County DBlst be sulm1it:l!ld.
containing tbD ownet's writlien consentto !he application.
Ifthc appIicaDt is tho agent ofb OWDM. II documcm acceptable to the Count;y must be su"bmiUed that
is evi&mce ofb: cDstCDCC.md soope,of1bc agency. - .
OP'llONALATTA.ClIMENTS:
o 3. Provide 16 copic8 of DY drawfng& or COIICCptual plans.
o 4. Additional InfomJation, if any. (16 copies)
OwBer/Appllcaut MutJlead and Sip
I h=eby~thatI own the subjecl:propc.rty. orhavcthe legalpowertoacl:on bllbalfoflhc owner in fiJmgtbis appllcatiou. ;
I also certify that b iDfom:Ja!ion provided 011 this application aadaccompanyiug intbr.tnation is &CCU%lIte. ttuc, and correct to ;
t;.~o~;;Cektt&o)u.\\~) LL~_ _AA h ,Ne.~lJioyl...ood. :ri\JeGt~ -N~ LJ-f
~~ ,~~~ - ~e.......e -~ t.cr ~I~" ti3'tf!q~~
SlprtmeO t . a!C ~ ~ \ .!
t~ ~'t'. 414/ - (Ed IV \
PrintNamc ~phone~ ~fSignatory t
817Jll!S P8ac g 0(4
>!
, ,
FEES
[J Rma! -= div/siCXI fhr the purpoBe of "fimnly divlaion" Where III cripBl1980 ~opDlIlI1t ripta have bor:D exhausI.cd ItIIder
"ftIm11ydivisioD" at deftned lIDlb' sccIion 14-106 (IS) of'thc subdi'villioa ordinance "'$22.0
o Rmalatelldlvisionl-Sl,240
[J Commmcial1llO" 1980
C Indu'8IriaI uil8" "$1.020
o 1'rive1e~facility-Sl,02()
o Mobile boma pIIic or IlIIbdiviaion '" $980
Public utiIitiof= $1 ,mo
0:radaIil1l in G1e flood pJsin = $870 .
1:1 Mincrall1lllldmerlt ID validspccla1 usr:peani1or .lIpCOialllScpormlttoallowminor~ian ofUon-eanformingUS8=SllO
C BJdeDding apeoial uae pcmita.. $70
a Home: (Ic;c:upIlIion-B-S440
r:a Par day cara Cllldcn - six (6) to me (!}) ehUdrcD .. $490
CJ For dI1 cara caIICI'lI - tal (l 0) OI"lI1OtO cbiIchm" $980
o All adicruscs a=:pl: sip" $980 . .
Q Sip _ Per Cbapta' 18 SecliaD 4.15.5 Bleclric 1tIllIIllIIF sigos. off-sittl ~ lIIld $igos in public fish1s-of-way - 5:120.00
(Be8ni bdlreJhe BoBidofZcmhls AJlPIl8ls- BZA).
&'1Alti~4of4
.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
SP2006-34 North Pointe Stream Crossing at
Northwest Passage
AGENDA DATE:
February 14, 2007
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT/PROPOSALlREQUEST:
Modify an existing stream crossing by replacing an
existing 60" corrugated metal pipe with a box culvert
to serve the proposed Northwest Passage entrance
for the proposed North Point Community (ZMA
2000-009)
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Ambler
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
LEGAL REVIEW: No
BACKGROUND:
On January 9, 2007 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the North Point stream crossing at Northwest
Passage, The Planning Commission recommended approval of the stream crossing with staffs ten recommended
conditions, plus an eleventh condition specifying that the permit would be valid for a five-year period, Conditions 1 through
5 are standard in nature and deal with review and approval of engineering issues associated with the stream crossing,
Conditions 6 through 8 deal with specific landscaping requirements requested by the Architectural Review Board, No
concerns were raised by the Planning Commission for these first 8 conditions of approval. However, conditions 9 and 10
involve the request by the ARB to formally review the project road plans for landscaping and design details, The Planning
.ommission questioned the authority of the ARB to review road plans and expressed concern over the intensity of design
.view that would be afforded the ARB. In its approval of the special use permit, the Planning Commission ruled that
conditions 9 and 10 shall remain open for revision by staff,
DISCUSSION:
In response to the Planning Commission's concerns, staff recommends that the formal review of the road plans by the ARB
is not imperative to ensure that the landscaping and design issues requested by the ARB are considered, Instead, the
County Design Planner can be afforded the opportunity to review the road plans for these items, Utilizing the Design
Planner for review will also promote efficiency in the development review process, Also in response to the Planning
Commission's concern about the intensity of the design review, staff recommends that color of the box culvert will not likely
be visible due to the height of the fill slope, and so review of the color is not necessary,
RECOMMENDA TIONS:
Staff recommends approval of SP 2006-34 with conditions #9 and #10 amended as follows:
9. All of the above-noted landscaping shall be shown on the road plans submitted for Northwest Passage,
The plans shall include a complete planting schedule keyed to the plan, The plans are subject to
approval of the AAPrDesign Planner.
10, Design details of the retaining walls, including column cap design, pier design, stone finish, other
materials, etc., culvert color, plant size and planting configuration shall be shown on the road plans and
are subject to ARB 3pprov31 3S pClrt of the review 3nd ClpprovClI of the r03d plClns approval of the
Design Planner.
ATTACHMENTS
Planning Commission Action Letter for January 9, 2007
.taft Report dated January 9, 2007 with attachments
.
.
.
G
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832
Fax (434) 972-4012
January 24,2007
Valerie W. Long
Williams Mullen
321 East Main Street, Suite 400
Charlottesville, V A 22902
RE: SP 2006-034 North Pointe - Stream Crossing (Sign #8)
Tax Map 32 Parcel 22K
Dear Ms. Long:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on January 9, 2007, unanimously
recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors.
Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. County and VDOT approval of the final lane configuration for the Northwest Passage over the
stream crossing with the final road plans
2. County and VDOT approval of final design plans and hydrologic/hydraulic computations for the
stream crossing.
3. The applicant must obtain a map revision, letter of revision, or letter of amendment as required
from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and copy the County Engineer on all
correspondence.
4. County approval of a grading and an erosion and sediment control plan prior to the issuance of a
grading permit for modification of the existing stream crossing.
5. Natural Resources Manager approval of a stream buffer mitigation plan prior to the issuance of a
grading permit for modification of the existing stream crossing
6. Provide an informal planting of mixed tree and shrub species and sizes to compensate for removed
vegetation, and low-growing plants to stabilize slopes in the "proposed landscaping areas" shown on
the plan submitted for ARB review entitled "Proposed Entry Layout with Landscaping North West
Passage Intersection @ Route 29 North" with revision date of 12-04-06.
7. Provide large shade trees on the north and south sides of Northwest Passage, along the sidewalk and
space reserved for the sidewalk, 2Yz" caliper minimum at planting, 40' on center, for a minimum
distance of 400' from the existing edge of pavement ()fRoute 29 North.
8. Provide trees in the median of Northwest Passage, beginning at the point closest to Route 29 North that
can be approved by VDOT and extending for a minimum distance of 400' from the existing edge of
pavement of Route 29 North. The planting shall take the form ofa continuous informal mix oflarge,
medium and small deciduous trees ranging from 1 Yz" to 2W' caliper and evergreen trees ranging from
4'-6' in height.
9. All of the above-noted landscaping shall be shown on the road plans submitted for Northwest Passage.
The plans shall include a complete planting schedule keyed to the plan. The plans are subject to review
of the ARB.
10. Design details of the retaining walls, including column cap design, pier design, stone finish, other
materials, etc., culvert color, plant size and planting configuration shall be shown on the road plans and
are subject to ARB approval as part of the review and approval of the road plans.
11. Ifthe use, structure, or activity for which this special use permit is issued is not commenced within
sixty (60) months after the permit is issued, the permit shall be deemed abandoned and the
authority granted thereunder shall thereupon terminate.
The Commission also ruled that conditions 9 and 10 shall remain open for applicant and staff to review at
and revise if necessary before the Board of Supervisors public hearing date.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive
public comment at their meeting on February 14, 2007.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to
contact me at (434) 296-5832.
Sincerely,
~~
Tamara Ambler
Natural Resources Manager
Planning Division
TA/aer
Cc: North Pointe Charlottesville, LLC
C/O Great Eastern Management Co.
P.O. Box 5526, Charlottesville, VA 22905-5526
Virginia Land Trust; Charles Wm Hurt & Shirley L Fisher Trustees
POBox 8147, Charlottesville VA 22906
Ella Carey
Amelia McCulley
Jack Kelsey
Steve Allshouse
.
Project Name: SP 2006-34 North Pointe Stream Staff: Tamara Jo Ambler
Crossing at Northwest Passage
Planning Commission Public Hearing: Board of Supervisors Public Hearing:
January 9, 2007 February 14, 2007
Owners: Virginia Land Trust - Charles WM Hurt & Applicant: North Pointe Charlottesville, LLC
Shirley L. Fisher Trustees
Acreage: 20.1 acres Special Use Permit for: Request for fill in the
floodplain for road crossing in accordance with
Section 30.3.05.2.1 (2) of the Zoning ordinance
TMP: 32-22K Conditions: Yes
Location: East side of Route 29 North (Seminole Trail)
across from Lewis and Clark Drive.
Existing Zoning and By-right use: PD-MC Planned Magisterial District: Rivanna
Development - Mixed Commercial - large scale
commercial uses with residential use by special use
permit (15 units/acre); FH Flood Hazard Overlay
District - agricultural, recreational, and utility location
uses which will not pose a danger to life or property in
the event of a flood; EC Entrance Corridor Overlay
District - overlay to protect properties of historic,
architectural or cultural significance from visual impacts
of development along routes of tourist access; all uses
permitted by right in the underlying districts
Requested # of Dwelling Units: N/A DA (Development Area): X
RA (Rural Area):
Proposal: The applicant proposes to modify an existing Comprehensive Plan Designation:
stream crossing by replacing an existing 60" corrugated Neiahborhood Densitv Residential - residential
metal pipe with a box culvert to serve the proposed (3-6 units/acre) and supporting uses such as
Northwest Passage entrance for the proposed North religious institutions and schools and other small-
Pointe Community (ZMA 2000-009). scale non-residential uses.
Character of Property: The immediate vicinity of the Use of Surrounding Properties: The property is
project area is currently wooded and undeveloped. located across Route 29 from the University of
Virginia North Fork Research Park and is one of
18 parcels associated with the proposed North
Pointe Community (ZMA 2000-009).
Factors Favorable: Factors Unfavorable:
1. No impact to neighboring properties is expected as a Staff has not identified any factors which are
result of this special use permit unfavorable to this request.
2. No increase in flood levels will result from the
modification of the existing crossing.
3. The new crossing may result in a reduction of the
1 OO-vear flood elevation
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval with conditions.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY
.
.
1
PETITION:
PROJECT: SP 2006-34 North Pointe Stream Crossing at Northwest Passage
PROPOSED: Request to modify an existing stream crossing by replacing an existing 60" corrugated
metal pipe with a concrete box culvert to serve the proposed Northwest Passage entrance for the
proposed North Pointe Community (ZMA 2000-009).
ZONING CATEGORY/GENERAL USAGE: PD-MC Planned Development - Mixed Commercial -
large scale commercial uses with residential use by special use permit (15 units/acre) - a special use
permit does exist for residential use (SP 2002-072); FH Flood Hazard Overlay District - agricultural,
recreational, and utility location uses which will not pose a danger to life or property in the event of a
flood; EC Entrance Corridor Overlay District - overlay to protect properties of historic, architectural
or cultural significance from visual impacts of development along routes of tourist access; all uses
permitted by right in the underlying districts
SECTION: Section 30.3.05.2.1 (2) of the Zoning ordinance
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE/DENSITY: Neighborhood Density Residential - residential (3-6
units/acre) and supporting uses such as religious institutions and schools and other small-scale non-
residential uses.
ENTRANCE CORRIDOR: Yes_X_No_ Location: East side of Route 29 North (Seminole Trail)
across from Lewis and Clark Drive.
TAX MAP/PARCEL: 32-22K
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Rivanna
CHARACTER OF THE AREA: The parcel is located on the east side of Route 29, and is across from
the University of Virginia North Fork Research Park, which is served by Lewis and Clark Drive. Route
29 has been identified as an Entrance Corridor by the County Zoning Ordinance. The North Fork of the
Rivanna River and several parcels associated with the proposed North Pointe Community are to the
east and south. The area to the north contains a mixture of low density residential, commercial, and
undeveloped properties.
SPECIFICS OF THE PROPOSAL: A special use permit is being requested for fill in the floodplain to
modify an existing stream crossing of Flat Branch. The modified stream crossing will serve the
proposed Northwest Passage entrance to the North Pointe Community from Route 29. The existing
crossing utilizes a 60-inch corrugated metal pipe with earthen fill over the pipe and adjacent to Route
29 to provide a roadbed connection from Route 29. This existing crossing serves only as access to the
property from Route 29, and is not associated with any improvements to the property. No file
information for this original crossing is available, and it is assumed that the crossing served as farm or
forestry access. Photographs of the existing crossing are attached, and show that the upstream side of
this existing culvert is currently blocked, hindering natural stream flow and exacerbating flood
conditions. The new crossing will utilize a concrete box culvert with earthen fill over the box culvert and
adjacent to Route 29 to provide a larger roadbed connection to Route 29 and to accommodate
improvements to Route 29 associated with the construction of the Northwest Passage.
The 2005 FEMA Flood Study and Maps included this stream in the "detailed study" and the Base Flood
Elevations were determined. According to this study the 1 OO-year flood elevation at the downstream
side of the existing stream crossing is base flood elevation 385.5. The 1 OO-year flood elevation on the
upstream side of the existing Flat Branch stream crossing rises to the base flood elevation 399.7, very
likely due to the capacity constraints of the existing 60-inch culvert, and floodwaters appear to impact
Route 29 Northbound. The applicant states that the replacement of the existing culvert with a 8-foot by
6-foot box culvert will reduce the elevation of the 1 OO-year floodplain on the upstream side of the
crossing to elevation 392, thereby reducing or eliminating the apparent existing impacts to Route 29
Northbound.
The length of the new box culvert and subsequent design and treatment of the fill slopes for Northwest
Passage have not yet been finalized because approval of the lane configurations for Northwest
Passage and related improvements to Route 29 have not been granted by VDOT and water quality
2
· permits have not yet been authorized by Federal and State water quality permitting agencies for
impacts to Flat Branch. If final lane configuration design for this stream crossing involves
improvements to Route 29 Northbound then a longer box culvert and additional fill may be required to
accommodate those improvements. Because the design has not yet been finalized it is the intent of
this special use permit request to authorize the necessary fill in the floodplain associated with the
overall final lane configuration for the construction of the Northwest Passage crossing over Flat Branch
and the associated improvements to Route 29 Northbound. The authorization will prevent the applicant
from the need to revise the special use permit as a result of minor design changes.
Regarding the design and treatment of the fill slopes associated with the modified stream crossing, if a
longer culvert is utilized then the roadway cross section for Northwest Passage will consist of the typical
vegetated 2: 1 fill slopes. If a shorter culvert is utilized, then stone retaining walls will be incorporated
into the 2: 1 fill slopes to shorten the slope length and provide for the necessary roadway section. The
slopes and the retaining walls would be visible from the Entrance Corridor.
The modified crossing will be located within the vegetative stream buffer for Flat Branch required by
Section 17-317 of the Water Protection Ordinance. This buffer area has been previously impacted by
the installation of the existing crossing. The applicant has proposed to mitigate these impacts as
required under Section of 17-322 of the Water Protection Ordinance through restoration and permanent
preservation of riparian areas along Flat Branch as part of an overall stream impact mitigation plan
currently being developed for the cumulative impacts associated with the entire North Pointe
Community project.
. PLANNING AND ZONING HISTORY:
In 1997 the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors approved SP 1997-046 (see
Attachment C) for fill in the floodplain for Virginia Land Trust to expand this existing crossing of Flat
Branch to provide access to a proposed Korean Community Church on an adjacent parcel, which was
also authorized by special use permit (SP 1997-003). The permit was valid for five (5) years and
construction did not commence within that timeframe. In 2002 the Planning Commission and the Board
of Supervisors approved 2002-047 (see Attachment D) to extend the original special use permit for fill
in the floodplain for another five (5) years. The original permit for the Korean Community Church was
also approved in 2002 for another five (5) year period (SP 2002-035). To this date no activity or
construction has commenced under the approved extensions.
On August 2, 2006 the Board of Supervisors approved a rezoning request for the proposed North
Pointe Community. The concept plan associated with this rezoning illustrates this crossing of Flat
Branch to serve as the northernmost of three proposed entrances from Route 29 to the proposed North
Pointe development (see Attachment B).
Although SP 2002-047 has not yet expired, the scope of work authorized under that permit would not
be sufficient to accommodate the proposed entrance to the North Pointe Community. As stated above,
it is the intent of this new special use permit to authorize the necessary fill in the floodplain associated
with the overall final lane configuration for the construction of the Northwest Passage crossing over Flat
Branch and the associated improvements to Route 29 Northbound. The authorization will prevent the
applicant from the need to revise the special use permit as a result of minor design changes.
.conformitv with the Comprehensive Plan:
The Open Space and Critical Resources Plan, a component of the Comprehensive Plan, identifies this
area of the proposed stream crossing modification as a "major and locally important stream valley" due
to the presence of critical slopes and 1 OO-year floodplain for Flat Branch. The concept plan associated
3
with the approved North Pointe Community rezoning illustrates the stream valley areas around the
proposed crossing as "conservation areas with utilities" and calls for these areas to remain undisturbed
and protected from development beyond the construction of streets, pedestrian paths, stormwater
management facilities and utilities.
The Stormwater Master Plan, also a component of the Comprehensive Plan, identifies this portion of
Flat Branch as "community and private use/trails", which means that the primary objective of these
stream corridors is to provide access to natural refuge and trails in proximity to developed areas.
STAFF COMMENT:
Staff will address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance
31.2.4.1: Special Use Permits provided for in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the
Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of substantia/ detriment to adjacent properly.
The County Engineer and engineering staff have reviewed the applicant's proposal, and concur with the
applicant's conclusion that the replacement of the existing 60-inch culvert with an 8-foot by 6-foot box
culvert and the placement of fill for this stream crossing and road improvements will not result in an
increase in the 1 OO-year flood elevation and will not detrimentally affect adjacent properties, and that
this new crossing may result in a reduction of the 1 OO-year flood elevation.
that the character of the district will not be changed thereby and
The Architectural Review Board conducted a full review of the proposal, and because length of the
culvert and subsequent treatment of the fill slopes for Northwest Passage have not been finalized, the
ARB requests review of the road plans. If a longer culvert is utilized then the roadway cross section for
Northwest Passage will consist of the typical vegetated 2: 1 fill slopes. If a shorter culvert is utilized,
then stone retaining walls will be incorporated into the 2: 1 fill slopes to shorten the slope length and
provide for the necessary roadway section. The slopes and the retaining walls would be visible from the
Entrance Corridor. The ARB has requested to review the treatment of the fill slopes and the design of
the retaining walls that might be used. The ARB has also recommended conditions regarding the
streetscape planting associated with the stream crossing. Conditions for approval relating to the ARB's
further review of the design are listed as items 6 through 10 below, and are listed in the attached
excerpt from the ARB action memo dated December 18, 2006.
that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance.
The intent of the Planned Development - Mixed Commercial zoning is to permit development of large-
scale commercial areas with a broad range of commercial uses under a unified planned approach. The
Flood Hazard zoning has the purpose and intent of restricting development in the floodplain which may
result in danger to life and property, public costs for flood control measures, public costs for rescue and
relief efforts, soil erosion and sedimentation, pollution of water resources, and general degradation of
the natural and man-made environment. The purpose and intent of the Entrance Corridor Zoning is to
protect properties of historic, architectural, or cultural significance from visual impacts of development
along routes of tourist access.
The modification of the existing crossing of Flat Branch to improve the passage of normal streamflow
and floodwaters is in harmony with the Flood Hazard overlay zoning. The final design of the retaining
wall, slope treatment, and streetscape planting for the crossing will be reviewed by the ARB to ensure
that the treatment is appropriate for the Entrance Corridor overlay zoning.
with uses permitted by right in the district.
The modification of an existing stream crossing to provide access to a planned development would
appear to be in harmony with the other uses permitted by right in the district.
4
.
.
.
with the additional regulations provided in section 5.0 of this ordinance,
There are no supplementary regulations relating to the placement of fill in the floodplain for a stream
crossing in Section 5.0 of the Zoning Ordinance.
and with the public health, safety and general welfare.
The modification of the existing stream crossing to provide a larger culvert will not raise the 100-year
flood elevation and will not detrimentally affect adjacent properties. The modification may result in a
decrease in the 1 OO-year flood elevation.
SUMMARY:
Staff has identified the following factors which are favorable to this request:
1. No impact to neighboring properties is expected as a result of this special use permit
2. No increase in flood levels will result from the modification of the existing crossing.
3. The new crossing may result in a reduction of the 1 OO-year flood elevation
Staff has not identified any factors which are unfavorable to this request.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends approval of the request with the following conditions:
1. County and VDOT approval of the final lane configuration for the Northwest Passage over the
stream crossing with the final road plans
2. County and VDOT approval of final design plans and hydrologic/hydraulic computations for
the stream crossing.
3. The applicant must obtain a map revision, letter of revision, or letter of amendment as
required from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and copy the County
Engineer on all correspondence.
4. County approval of a grading and an erosion and sediment control plan prior to the issuance
of a grading permit for modification of the existing stream crossing.
5. Natural Resources Manager approval of a stream buffer mitigation plan prior to the issuance
of a grading permit for modification of the existing stream crossing
6. Provide an informal planting of mixed tree and shrub species and sizes to compensate for
removed vegetation, and low-growing plants to stabilize slopes in the "proposed landscaping
areas" shown on the plan submitted for ARB review entitled "Proposed Entry Layout with
Landscaping North West Passage Intersection @ Route 29 North" with revision date of 12-
04-06.
7. Provide large shade trees on the north and south sides of Northwest Passage, along the
sidewalk and space reserved for the sidewalk, 2W' caliper minimum at planting, 40' on
center, for a minimum distance of 400' from the existing edge of pavement of Route 29
North.
8. Provide trees in the median of Northwest Passage, beginning at the point closest to Route
29 North that can be approved by VDOT and extending for a minimum distance of 400' from
the existing edge of pavement of Route 29 North. The planting shall take the form of a
continuous informal mix of large, medium and small deciduous trees ranging from 1 Y:z" to
2Y:z" caliper and evergreen trees ranging from 4'-6' in height.
9. All of the above-noted landscaping shall be shown on the road plans submitted for
Northwest Passage. The plans shall include a complete planting schedule keyed to the plan.
The plans are subject to review of the ARB.
5
10. Design details of the retaining walls, including column cap design, pier design, stone finish,
other materials, etc., culvert color, plant size and planting configuration shall be shown on
the road plans and are subject to ARB approval as part of the review and approval of the
road plans.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A - Location Map
Attachment B - Proposal from applicant
Attachment C - Board of Supervisors Action Letter for SP-1997-046
Attachment D - Board of Supervisors Action Letter for SP-2002-047
Attachment E - Photographs of Existing Stream Crossing
Attachment F - Excerpt from Architectural Review Board Action Memo for ARB-2006-129 and
proposed entry layout with landscaping concept submitted to the ARB
6
.
019
020
021
.
32-41 "
---r/ /
"-./', i
/ ".
'/U
._.S"'_.,
-......:.n
32-1.____/
,r--/
",...-.",..:
'.......no.......
,
'"
''''''''''-'.
"
tt}?~~.'5'~.
. \.
\
~ /
(
"../ /
.//
/ /
A'.
/./... 2A /
/ '/'" /
/. ""
."..../
...:"\.......-........./-..\..
./ North Pointe - Stream Crossing
~/ SP 2006-00034
Tax Map 32, Parcel 22K
;~..
{/~i:P<:. ,)
;~~/
CII:J.: \
,) '..~
.//
! '--.-.
'''.. '32-10 32-1001
\. 32-10C 32-10'02
.'\ 32-100 32-1003
'Y'3MQ.E 32-1004
,32-10F'.. 32-1005
\32-10G "i!2-1006
,32-101 ~1oo7
/32-10J 32'1008
: 32-10P 32-1009
"a2-10S 32-1010
32:10U 32-1011
32-10X 32-1012
32-10Y 32-1013
32-10Z 32-1014
32-1088
'32dOCC
"'" 32-1000
'-" 32-10EE
"32-2001
32-2002
32-2003
32-2004
32-2005
32-2006
32-2007
32-2008
32-2009
32-2010
32-2011
32-2012
32-2013
32-2014 ,
\.
33-15
/'
\.:..........."
\
-.,/
C::':'7 ,.-/
'-....1"
32-24 i
:~:
.I
.-----.-./
.
800
Scale
1.800
2.400
Albemarle County
Tax Map:
n~?
1
~7
F."
Note: This map Is for display purpos.s only
and shows parcels.s 0(12/3112005.
Sse Map Book Introduction for additional datalls.
Attachment A
1 S l JY'\
PROJECT NAME: (bow should we refer to this appUcatlon?):
PROPOSAL: S4-Yeo..m.. Crossi ~
.
EXISTING COMP PLAN LAND USElDENSITY:
LOCATION: YIOr: Pr
TAX MAP PARCEL(s): "3 Z - 2.2-K.
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: f<\ y llJU\1)....
# OF ACRES TO BE COVERED BY SPECIAL USE PERMIT (if a portion it must be delineated on a plat): ~O. \
Applic'ation for
Special Use Permit
Is this an amendment to an existing Special Use Permit? If Yes provide that SP Number. 0 YES NO
Are ou submltti a re site Ian with this a Iication? 0 YES ~ NO
Contact Person (Who should we caJllwrite concerning this projecl?):\l rMe.rie.. 'Jj. ~ ) W \ l t, OJ'V\S M u..llOf\-
Address32\ €-. ).AoiV\ Q-. Su.i-k \\:00 ciJ:Vw\()*~"dl.Q.. State VA Zi2,7!f()2.
. DaytimePbOne~~Fax#~~E-mail "lon.9@W\lli~smu.bW\. ~
Ownu .r....... ~\ rt~o-. I.4Act -rn.wt
Address~\.) ~ ~\'-tJ Ci~~V\\~ State V/\ Zip~
Daytime Phone L..J Fax # L-) E-mail
A.pOuR' (Who "r """""......- Nor-\h Po(~I~viUe, L. L . C.
CO ~ e~ ~~CD. ~~ \1_ -c... ~-S '11
Address 0. &:# 5'32..b City \ \U.. State V /'r.. Z~ "J;;>--;7 ~
DaYtimePhone~ ~~-4-ltf\ Fax#~ ~3-lQJ't1 E-mail ~c..2.~ ~. C.JlW\.
Does the owner of this property own (or have any ownership interest in) any abutting property? If yes, please list those tax map and parcel nwnbers
~~. e ~\dW\ ~ 0 (U"l- ~Of= fOir'\:te -t\t\ are dI'lt1~
'oi Vo..Y\ OlA.S <:.V\ . ~e.~: 32.....'23 :!>2.- 2.'3A. 32,.. 2.~6) ~- z.e>c-) '3 .. 2~ 1 0:;2.-2'312)
32..... 2'3 r) 32,- 23G-) ~.z...'2..-;\.1) ~- Z'3"S ) ~- 20) ':32..-2DA )~2.- 2.-DA),.., ~z.:- 2oA~)
~2 - 2.0 A. 3 -=32..... 22\-t ~2..t-~$. ~ ....--
....../ . Histo!)': ./
IW" Special Use Permits: .I q Cr> - OO_~ I I qq 7 -0 Y<p IJY'" ZMAs & Proffers: ~ (X)() ~ Q) q
o Variances:
lJ Letter of Authorization
Concurrent review of Site Development Plan?
DYES DNO
FOR OFFICE USE~ Y .~, I/) co J" I SP # _
Fee Amount 970 Datepai~~ho?
County of Albemarle Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, V A22902'voic~: (434) 296-5832 Fax: {43~~~2:t~2~CQo
Snl06 Page I of 4
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Attachment B ~
.
Section 31.2.4.1 of the Albemarle County' Zoning Ordinance states that, ''The board of supervisors hereby
reserves unto itself the right to issue all special use permits permitted hereunder. Special use permits for
uses as provided in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the board of supervisors that such use
will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property~ that the character of the district will not be
changed thereby and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance, with
the uses permitted by right in the district, with additional regulations provided in section 5.0 of this
ordinance, and with the public health, safety and general welfare."
The items that follow will be reviewed by the staff in their analysis of your request. Please complete this
form and provide additional information which will assist the County in its review of you request. If you
need assistance filling out these items, staff is available.
How will the proposed special use affect adjacent property?
See., ~-tto.c..Y\erl.
How will the proposed special use affect the character of the district(s) surrounding the property?
geL 0. thtth e.c\ .
.
How is the use in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance?
~e.e ~ +-t11tJ-\ ed .
How is the use in harmony with the uses permitted by right in the district?
~e.e. Q -\"to. U1e.d .
What additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of the Zoning Ordinance apply to this use?
See at+a c..heQ ,
How will this use promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community?
~ ee Q. tta. c.V\o.d .
.
8nt06 Page 2 of 4
Attachment B 1
Describe your request in detail and include all pertinent information such as the number of persons involved in
the use, operating hours, and any unique features of the use: ~e (l +ta c..h e.d .
ATTACHMENTS REQUIRED - provide two (2) copies of each
Cl 1. Recorded plat or recorded boundary survey of the property requested for the permit. If there is
no recorded plat or boundary survey, please provide legal description of the property and the Deed
Book and page number or Plat Book and page number.
Cl 2. Ownership information -If ownership of the property is in the name of any type of legal entity or
organization. including, but not limited to, the name of a corporation, partnership or association, or in
the name of a trust, or in a fictitious name, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted
certifying that the person signing below has the authority to do so.
If the applicant is a contract purchaser, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted
containing the owner's written consent to the application.
If the applicant is the agent of the owner, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted that
is evidence of the existence and scope,ofthe agency. .
OPTIONAL ATTACHMENTS:
Cl 3. Provide 16 copies of any drawings or conceptual plans.
D 4. Additional Information, ifany. (16 copies)
Owner/Applicant Must Read and Sign
I hereby certify that I own the subject property, or have the legal power to act on behalf of the owner in filing this application.
I also certify that the information provided on this application and accompanying information is accurate, true, and correct to
the best oyny knowledge. 'L L ~
/Jr:;rk. r \S \ll't~ C "AlL--K /+ c,Jv - \ t. )
13." ,~... ~~ ""'j) ,
~ :. - ,-
Signature Of~ . ~~.-- "":Date
. (Jp ~ - ;2tt b - 41 4 , - (l1:t
Print Name . . Daytime phone number of Signatory
tlJ
8/7/06 Page 3 of 4 i D
Attachment B
.
.'
.
FEES
I:l Rural area division for the purpose of "family division" where all original 1980 development rights have been exhausted under
"family division" as defined under section 14-106 (15) of the subdivision ordinance = $220
I:l Rural area divisions = $1,240
I:l Commercial use = $980
I:l Industrial use = $1,020
I:l Private clublrecreational facility = $1,020
I:l Mobile home park or subdivision = $980
I:l Public utilities = $1,020
-B Grade/fill in 1he flood plain = $870
I:l Minor amendment to valid special use pennit or a special use pennit to allow minor expansion of a non-conforming use = $110
o Extending special use permits = $70
I:l Home Occupation-Class B = $440
I:l For day care centers - six (6) to nine (9) children = $490
I:l For day care centers - ten (I 0) or more children = $980
I:l All other uses except signs = $980
I:l Signs - Per Chapter 18 Section 4.15.5 Electric message signs, off-site signs, and signs in public rights-of-way _ $120.00
(Heard before the BoaId of Zoning Appeals - BZA).
8/7106 Page 4 of 4
Attachment B
I J
North Pointe Stream Crossing
Special Use Permit Application
What is the Comprehensive Plan designation for this property?
The portion of the North Pointe property that is the subject of the special use
permit application is designated Neighborhood Density Residential.
How will the proposed special use affect the character of the district(s) surrounding
the property?
The proposed special use will not have an adverse affect on the character of the
districts surrounding the property. The property and the area surrounding it on the same
side of Route 29 is all now zoned Planned District Mixed Commercial (PD-MC) pursuant
to a rezoning approved by the Board of Supervisors on August 2, 2006. The land across
Route 29 from the property is the University of Virginia Research Park, which is zoned
Planned Development Industrial Park (PD-IP). The proposed stream crossing will merely
facilitate the implementation of the approved PD-MC uses on the North Pointe property,
as shown on the Application Plan for North Pointe that was approved with the rezoning.
The general location and concept of the stream crossing at this location was also accepted
with the rezoning, and is shown on the approved North Pointe Application Plan. The
proposed stream crossing will not introduce any new or incompatible uses to the North
Pointe community. In addition, the proposed special use permit will simply allow for the
modification (enlargement) of an existing stream crossing that has been in place for many
years.
How is the use in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance?
The proposed stream crossing is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the
Zoning Ordinance in that it will enable the physical development of the North Pointe
community consistent with the approved Application Plan that was carefully and fully
considered by the Board of Supervisors. The uses shown on the approved Application
Plan, particularly those residential uses in the northern-most section of the North Pointe
community, could not realistically be implemented without the stream crossing proposed
by this application.
How is the use in harmony with the uses permitted by right in the district?
As the stream crossing is a necessary and a desired element of the approved North
Pointe rezoning, granting the Special Use Permit is in harmony with the uses permitted
by right in the district in that it will facilitate the development ofthe North Pointe
community in accord with the approved Application Plan. As those uses are now the
"by-right" uses of the property, the stream crossing is in harmony with the permitted
uses. The uses permitted by right in the district are not inconsistent with the uses shown
G lL
.
on the Application Plan. The general location and concept of the stream crossing at this
location was included on the approved Application Plan. Consequently, it was known
that the crossing is needed to develop the community consistent with the approved Plan.
Furthermore, the stream crossing will not have any adverse impact on any by right uses in
the district.
What additional regulations provided in section 5.0 of the Zoning Ordinance apply
to this use?
None
How will this use promote the public health, safety and general welfare of the
community?
.
The proposed stream crossing will promote the public health, safety and general
welfare ofthe community by allowing the construction of an important northern entrance
into the North Pointe community from Route 29. That will complete a County desired
roadway element parallel to Route 29 as a potential alternative route that will help
alleviate traffic congestion on Route 29. This roadway entrance will be located in line
and directly across from the Lewis & Clark Drive entrance into the University of Virginia
Research Park. This stream crossing will allow the construction of Northwest Passage,
which, combined with North Pointe Boulevard and Leake Road, will allow the residents
of North Pointe and traffic from the south (Hollymead and Forest Lakes) and areas to the
east of North Pointe (via Proffit Road) to access the large business and employment
centers at both North Pointe and the UV A Research Park without traveling on Route 29.
This parallel road network will promote the safety and general welfare of the overall
community, and subsequently, the proposed stream crossing will provide for that safety
and general welfare.
In addition, the stream crossing will facilitate the physical development of the
single-family detached residential lots in the northern portion of the North Pointe
community, which provide much-needed single-family detached homes in the Hollymead
growth area. By providing lots for the construction of such single-family detached homes
in a designated growth area, the North Pointe community will help alleviate some of the
pressure for development of the County's Rural Areas and also help accommodate the
anticipated job growth and housing demand from future development in the Research
Park and from the expansion ofthe National Ground Intelligence Center just north of
North Pointe. As such, the stream crossing will further promote the general welfare of
the community and further the goals and strategies of the Comprehensive Plan.
.
Furthermore, initially, the stream crossing will facilitate the public health and
safety in that it has been designed to accommodate the recently expanded flood plain area
south of the crossing without significant disturbance to the existing natural stream
system. The applicant's engineering consultants at Williamsburg Environmental Group
and Dominion Development Resources have designed the stream crossing to upgrade the
existing five foot diameter pipe with a 6 foot by 6 foot flat-bottomed box culvert that will
2
6
13
permit any increase in stream flow to more easily pass through the existing stream
crossing piping. The flat-bottomed piping is considered to be more consistent with a
natural stream bed and, therefore, will provide a better passageway for aquatic wildlife in
the stream.
For all of these reasons, the proposed stream crossing will promote the public
health, safety and general welfare of the community.
Describe your request in detail and include all pertinent information such as the
number of persons involved in the use, operating hours, and any unique features of
the use:
The Flat Branch stream bed generally runs to the north, parallel to Route 29. At
the point of the proposed crossing, the stream bed is approximately eighty feet east ofthe
main roadway and approximately twenty-five feet below the roadway. A stream crossing
exists at this point for vehicular travel that is approximately 25 feet above the streambed.
The crossing utilizes a five foot diameter culvert pipe which carries the stream water flow
under the crossing and northward to the North Fork of the Rivanna River.
Granting the stream crossing Special Use Permit as proposed will allow the
existing crossing to be expanded to accommodate the wider roadbed that is needed for
construction of Northwest Passage as shown on the approved North Pointe Application
Plan. Northwest Passage will be wider and will include four lanes (with a wide median
strip and shoulders on each side for potential sidewalks and plantings), and will include
the installation of a six-foot by six-foot concrete box culvert to carry the stream flow. The
expanded stream crossing will allow for the construction of a new roadway that, when
combined with the other roadways of North Pointe, will create a parallel road alternative
to Route 29 that will allow the residents of the Hollymead, Forest Lakes and North Pointe
communities to interconnect without having to travel on Route 29. The new road will
also allow residents ofthose neighborhoods to travel north and to cross Route 29 and
directly enter the University of Virginia Research Park (a significant employment center)
without having to travel on Route 29. Furthermore, the road will also allow the residents
ofthose residential communities south of Airport Road (Hollymead and Forest Lakes) to
bypass the heavily used intersection of Airport Road and Route 29 if they are traveling
north to the National Ground Intelligence Center, which is another significant
employment center that is scheduled to expand. Importantly, the detailing of the
proposed stream crossing in accord with the Places 29 Consultants' suggestions, may
provide pedestrians and bicyclists with the same potential benefit of traveling north to
this intersection and then using the proposed pathways down to the river, under the Route
29 highway bridge, and back up from the river to Lewis and Clark Drive leading to the
Research Park, without ever having to cross Route 29 at all.
1334689vl
G :\DOCS\ WPINorthPointe\SpeciaIUsePennitslNorthwestPassage\WMCD-1334689-vl-NP Stream Crossing SP Application Narrative.FinalCL.DOC
6 14
3
UJO::).'lt^)IOO
(I) 1\1" 'GLG'v.v
(d) I ~ I g'SLS'K"
I I GZZ V^ '''III\~~:J
~J\IJO o;r.:IOlWd tpnot; ?L!
OT1 'S90JnOS9}:1
IU9UJdOI9^9a
UOIUIWO a
i.
1::1
0\
D-
\
i
,
,
..
'Ii
'l
"
\
.
11
i
11
!II
,
Ie
i
il
*
I
f
~
l
I
*
l
l
t .S
II /0
~ ;-
. aio....
f a;-o
,II ..- '. 0
;:t" 0"1 \0 _
>~; .~ L:.t-
.....JE -+-' ~- ,
,.(f)o -:..
"\'x Q).
\:tW >- \
"~ ..
"i$
.~
...
'f<
..
'l
.\
.
i!>
~
..
.
$
- i
I
c
o
D-
,
J
; -0
\0
;0
l)\LL U
0:, ~ 0
0....', ~ ~\ 0
E ?- m\ LL
-i mi
10 f"); ~
0.> ;0 \ >-
1:::..---- '
o i c/ 0
N! 0'> q 0
; 1:::";:':;
-0: ~ rb
Ci (f) 1>
B 'x /0.>
u..;.W!W
.........
4-+
I
I
N
0)
r-rD
,
I
'-
I
(
,s
:;.;::;
/0
:?:. ,/ >
0)' 0.>
-:;:;w
,
c
o
:';::::;1
o:e::.
O!._
010
--.Jf(L
i
-0.,. -0
Q)\o
~\o
CLjIL
0';
'- .......
0.... q
\\
-
-
'\ \ \
/
./
\"
\,
,
,
..till :'ON PolDJd
....-n... "WON "U
lIIl ~o POlpOltl
_ :Ae u-oJ(J
.....
__ ., :.ID:JS 6",-oJO
ci
z
NOIJ.J3:SH3:J.NI G3:S0dOHd
.f
I
.'
/
;
I
i
I,
/~\
f \\
: \\
~ ~'.:\
l \\
\ \
\ ~'t.
'\ . r;-
'\ ./ r
...-: D L't..
D
! I
\ "
o ,
: I
......
,/
'.
....
,
,
:' I
I i
i (
I .
; I
f i
I ;
AI
~i
x i /
ot!?
rni~
coJ--i-;,
X!-+i-- ;:.;
co; It "'-'
:i:;-;,.
(]) '...L
z:IRa
iY:;;:
-+-. \J<6~ [% ~s
G ; .~'r~
\ ..~ ~~~:~.
-+-
.'\
~
, ,
:::~'j
/
\1
'!
.
.
-..;
--<
1\
Ii
I
-+-
t C1lS-
,
\ ~~
: \
:, "\
, -'
~~;\ ~ \
.,''!-'-' \
+.: \,:; I
~ g. \
.,,, 'T I
\ I
..1.
: j'\
I. i
; I :
i I!
if;
: I i
i I .
iI
II I
:; ,
!i ",l
il
il :
il
it
il
il
! I
/ I
/ i
! f
: f 0
/ I '
,/ i '
!( i)" \.....\
"', _.-'- i:"
\ /- ,.'j
I . ,
'. \ '
'. \
\. \
... \.
\ \
I
! \.
Ii
I
!~
I'
,
,_
I
,-
!I
:=
I
t
,
.
crt
I
II
i!
'. :
I ,
I ,
~.. ~
:r
i. !
i 1f :
!1Il :
it I
'i I
i. I
I. i
it;
il i
!. !
i. ;
i II i
I' :
: ii!
ill;
; ",
! -,-(
! ;
\, ][i
\ II:
\ IIi
Ii
i
.
1i
!!.
,
,
;
,
(
\.
"
,
,
,
,
,
"'lOa
81UlBJl,A 'AlUUOJ alJ8maqlY 'lO>J.Il8l0 8UU8AIH
&J.NIOd HJ.HON
~R!1 blJ!MO.I(]
,
*
II
.
i
II
~
II
ii
Ii
1$
:..
'':11.'
';...;
(il)
,0....
10
IW
'0"1
\ Ie
,1.-
" It:;
','.-
:IX
'qW
~
\
Ii
I:
"
-+-
\i~\J~
I
I
I
I
I
11 I
\1
,I
lil
\
:,
la
I.
'I
I II
I a
: ,
: I li
; I !I!
! I I
,'I !II
i.1 iI!
--------.....-.;..: ;
,I ;r
i I if
;1 If
-.. ',I"
._,..~;
/
/
/
(
I
I '
I
I
I.'
I j
I)
/'r
. I
I
I
I
--.J I
CD
z:
en
N
W
f-
=:)
o
0::::
I
,
,
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
'. I
, I 1
'..' 1
'~'''-''''''---'-1.
I I'.
I I'"
: I '.
I I
I I
I I
I --.J :
: CD I
I tn 1
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
;"'. I
" " c..r i; :
Ii ~u'1.- \ :
V-:A \,'
! \'Y.J( ~ ;II
. '~---"\~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I .,
, '.
(..r' 0
-+-
c;~ \~
\
\
i
\
\
,
~---""...../
.,
\
\
I
I
,
I
I
i. I
1. I
\ I
. I
1. I
:1
\1
~
i
r,
, ~
I '..
I \
I \
I '..
I .
I
I
1
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
,
^
/\
f \
j-- \
( :
I I
) -.1,
, 1
, .
t 1
(l" -\
- ,
\
\
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
en
N
W
f-
:::::;l
o
0::::
..................
/
/
/
f
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I '
I :
1/
I;
I!
I!
II
I:
Ii
Ii
II
f
J
...__........1
I
,
I'
I
I
I
I
I
o
Z
~
.
en
....
a.>
a.>
...c=
:;nu l~OJd UJ
""""
If\
-,
t.....,' /
\, i ( .
. 1:- -q
. . \0 CI.l
i IIIi lco >t
.c:l IIi 0
.,2'i :l \-0 8
-0 ; I \~ <l>
lJ.~ !0"1~
:o-9?-i::J<l!>
i-.JOf- .!o....on
: Q) . , i :
:-+-- l::b - ; 0"1 CD
i 0 <D '*1 e::.1-:-
! E <t> Jt i.- !
./ .- CZ · / ~ ~
.' ~ , :!,.- ""'"
i 0 ""'- ..; X""""
;.....O.;WCf
/ $/,:/ ,:'
./' ,/ ,..
I I ;
" $ /
" 1/
~ ..../
,. I'
:' /
/ / +t~./ ./
" / / ~//' /
/ ,I ':'<. 4<~ --.' -',' /"
,/ : \ '
\ '
.... \...., ...'..... "
" '. .. '. .
~~" ,
'.. "..... \.
'." .~\ \ ' "
i,
'. '\
\ .. '\"
\" ..
\ \'.
4 ...
'. \ \
\. \\
. *rl ...
~
,
\.
..
~\'\"\
.,
'0
/' \
,/ ',\
.,' ";'-----
i ~ ....._..
'. 1",.'. ....,
l ~/ ....,.,
I"--\-- --1-------- '~....
( \, i
'- \ ./
~--\~3Af~-o >l~\flJ
-.,
ON\f SIM3l
/~-----~~---------
. \CJ~ ~
L
.'
b
'0
......
.'
"
-0
./ I!)
(/ ~~Q
'~
/ _u
I .... .
: .~-
I I""
, , 0
o
'. .m-.....
1"6
;I!)
;
,
,
,
i
f
~/
';...:j
(j /:.'.:-::-
YJ;<;.---..
,<-.f,'"
,.. . 1
... I /
" /.,:'
i / :'
I /"i,/
i " I .:
f r f ( ~l
;--: ~:!:; j
!~.! '1/ L-~
i i i / ~ ,I/..;
f ~,' /
. ! /
~2!
"
.'/~
.....
"
/
i.. .~..,
.///
~~~~::O"'CD"l)
~~~C~~-<::;;
;~iTf~a~~~
~~e~~~~~
~::o~~O~Mr;t
(")?SZ:J:fTI<E -I
~~~~~~~~
>P'~,,~~;:Ji'
~-<~l;~ogrr1
:;::oit:VlZ:J:::OVl
i'8!Z!>:-<i'>;a
:~vt~2~~~
;aQ...,::O::Orlcr
~~~~~~~Q
~~:r~~rr1:2@
~fTI...,-<git:fi'l~
~gz~pl~0~
\!!~;;l"'z,,?;;U>
zo~coiTI-<~
~::o~aM::::o~;ptl
O~:::lITl-l rr1
>.cO..:z:X{':
~. ZAl~1'Tl ~
~,r;Si'g~u>
. Qg~;~~~
~;~~~~~
;S~~OJ:~
(;; i':<~~;;li\'i
OfTl!~~~:E
>U>Ot:!;:a.::01D
r-;a ift~;'-<
~~~Fj~zx
,..:I::-<::::Irr1;o'"
i:()>~O:::()
1'Tl::oli)o~cg
~~O"":r:tiz
~~ ~fT1~=<
0(;') z>
... ....Z
u>0
\J\)
~
@ Z
~ 0
c ::a
ii1 -I
to :I:
-\\ ==
m
(J)
-I
~
(J)
(J)
~
m
(J)
-I
::a
m
)>
3:
o
::a
o
(J)
!:!2
z
o G>
~
'" ~
:tJ
o
~
r-
~
:10l
~Ol I
00
f ~~
l>
Z
Z
Il>
I
v
Q
t
I Ol>
"1111
I .11
"11 ill
rO
I gX
r
I 110
rO
l>l>
I :z=' ~~ ~ll
IN ~ ~~ l>~
-0 011
Z(Il :z0
Ji'l1ll Ji'I(Il
o ~
o 7\
o 0
ill ----1>
~l
~h
~H r€""
l!!"iZ
~
~!
rill
~~
!(Illl
;ti~ '
,Zll .
1110
~(Il
l>1ll
rO
r7\
o
l>
(Jl0l 01
iti.::f ill
1110 l>
l>O Z
:1 - 0
r
01
111
o
~ll :ii)-u
I ~!U EJ~ ~~
"11 II -0 011
I 5~ ~(Il :z@
OX 111 Ji'l1ll
I 0 0 ~o
llb O! 7\
I rO o,~ 0
l>l> ill'~ l>
_-I -1<
hJ~ 4
I iliA
~ 00
Ol l>O
(J> 00
:-I OIQ
8 111
.+ 0
i
U
~~
8 z fI~
~ 0 ~II
~ ::a U
:! -I
~ :I: i: Il'
(j == ~
z m F~ ~
'1l (J)
m -I ~.. ~
r "'tI ll~ [ii
~ )> I~ u
(J)
(J) ~~ $~ r\"
~ ;11 ~
m !I
::a Il'
0 IU ~
)> ~~ m
0 ijil -;
o == 2*
~ ~~
(J) ~~
m ~
0 !"
-I ...
0
Z
l!r~]!.~ I "
n ~~ i
Ii 00
liimmmUHlllmll ; I i ~ i ~
>'i 'J)l~: ~~~'iJ l.f;IJ!
K \\\ ~ '\(.)/ ~., /~;ti
:E ~r' I .... I I / It=::
,i&, --.-'~' - - ;..,". ~
\,~ \)~ JL0~~I" \/ri ~ '(<re- .
',' . I,ll p,/3fN1 ~Q.n~ \ ' rfl~"i __ <\
,(), r--Af\"\ _-,'" ;~~~Mlo~.... J~___..._".' , h;
~'~ : Ii~ : (//(t.6...,:....JJJ/If>>~CI-.;\\1~ '''I 1 '~\,I '"
IIi' ~~~!';:--\\'i:,~~I/!{iJQQ" ~'... '....,,:.. \, II ,(-(_~I\
\\ ~ -, :\)--- " \ \1" 1 : ll,~ ... -_ .. \ r I
:,eJ! ' \'l__~.) /" ;(:~:~~::::>--:::.)j) ~-~ i'> ~-V- '1)]'- -.:.\ " \~ ~l
I <~. / > -. -- :,-,::~:::::')f~~:~:'~0~~~i..~~~:: ,---\ . _" ,D) 11 ~ I\' ~
,'" / , \;'/ ..'.J. '~-:\.::>->;>/-__-:ot.---.-;-_-___- - '",'1" 'In ~ -...~\
", -' ;'0 I~ ~y V'---7~~..~-'-<;':_JIIl"-~'-. 'r~ ~ ....'lltJlf-Jd'
~ --' ~//\\ /...."-;..,/~. ,0:: :.~::~.~;~~::~ ' ~~:~\ ", _' \' ~
O~~j~ /,<:f' ,rd:k0i'\ '~~~::=::~~~::-, ',"'" , ~
o (--\~p~': /I')~~~t-'; \~ ~".0 ,>~ 7" I:" ~ '. 'v-,.~'
"-r>:f~ ";~, ~'\) \
I} /(!~ ~ -- ~.c,~---S:~:~s:~ ", , . ,/;~
i~ c' (!~ ~~:":-~--7-~>.-j~;-'~--'--- ,,~ I " : ?:~
li < "'" ;~ 2 jJ1. u , ~~~~">J..; , ~/
\. ~ !I:' '~i,m ~~~:. " ;l\~1 ''''' :' , l
>- '! i '! :;:-', \ :. 1-1 .- , '" ,';i~,j~,,i' i ,
W i;1D m ;; ~.." li~ ,\,' ~~ ~ \,..',......~\\\""" I I l\J "
:,::.. \'!<~ ~ ~ ; ~I" , -~' ~'i::::- ',\ \ I 1: II' ~I\ =..... _
~ i ~ i I I (J' \ \ \ II I ~1J "C'I-l -:.~
o L S . '. ,', _ ~' ," ;) l,Ii _ _,_
g 1m i i I! :;=:<':!~ ~?~~,~,~~ ,:'
! IIII t ~,\!~, ~ '~:~::;':;~;~~J.$f~ii~ ~
! I ??~~~:<~:\ ;:;~~~;;~~;~~;:~~~:;~~~~~~:;,:\~~~:~ _
~...~- ~')j' .." / I I '-----~.............. ................ ,.~l...... , \ \ /._ ...
~2\l-_ ../ /..~- ';,""r'""~ \....- -:::::,:,,:"\ /'."r,. <\ \ \ \ '- ,..- \ ....
\ ...."/' "..... ;;.... /"\ ~..... ...... '\ \\ \ \ 0-:./ \ \ \ ~ 1.....<.........
.. ........,..,..., I '"" \ \ \ ' ... I \ 1 \ ..... ._
~ ~-- , , .---' r, "H' ",' _ ,I V ----
~~~..._...- /.. I .., 1\ , I I \ ,,/ ,I, \ \ "
g"...::::- ..,--.'.../: ,.---~.;' l \\ (~~\ .~_.._..-.., '\ '\ \'-....1 .,""~_
"-~..-_...... 1 I "'--\ ' I I~t" ,...--....', \ \ "I" _~
r~- "...... \ 1 ~ I' .. \, ....... ,
-. ,', ( \ , '~:.~/" " ' ''. /
,I ,.j _ \'____:"" '\ ;, :,J~ ,\ \ '. ';___ _
'.......---..---------~:- ~=.~=~: ......, --- "It- I.~ ,1'1 .... ...
;,::~,..~~=:~.--...:.~_:-:~:.~~',\,\d~~iF;~~r:~,i~,,> ' ,
,'.--...- ,~~..... i~::~- ,I \., I
" '._--,,/ >~:, ,_..,:~".-,... "" , ,
::::::___~~~/:;:~~~~~: ::~~~--~ :-;; I i I ~~.:ti
--. -- 'r.-------, ~~~11';
, mli iiil!l 1";,;:;:~;(~{~',~/:i,:.'
:--;::, ~ Will.~D -' (,/ / / '-"- 'I ' ,,-
i U ~ t!~~I~: ::'///,. '-;--.:-:f!:;,/,/, .. .
" "",; ~ lilts B .... / / / ... ..(. "p.....'-J
~ ~ ~. ~ ill~ II .,/ I .. ,.,1 ( \ ' '-
i I iI il :~~I~' <. \ \, \, \ " ( W
889 8 :Qhi~ _', "" ',_ _',\ \, \ ..
[;] ~h~;!! ~.,-' -- '-:.<: :.-\ \\,:':<~
LJ '/--. ~ ':;::~~:~;- ;'~ ::\1' '
f ..I ~_"'......I ....~..~...... :s~'
;~~;. ,!\ "<( I /;-::;:::::~~::~~ ::,~-.~ :;_~::::'-" ~':~' "
I ..... \ \ \ , \ \ I I ' __" ...'\".. ...... ....... ..... , .. _
""'::' \ \ \ \ .. " " [',-' ,/..--' . ,-/ .--, \ .(J-' ~
:<---:~~::},?) \ Y::':,\ r-': '-~. -/\\~b;::> '
... .c) / II ! '..... ........;::-1 /,ll,~ I .J 1"... } __... ' ~./
'... 1-..... ........ -....:..:11, \ ) ;::, .... ~,
... .-:------... ...... ....... '..../1"11 ,I \ ,. - r:::::::~ .., ~
;;;:-:..:-=-':-"'-':-"::~:::>>-:i:\I\\ \"'\>>"" ...~~:'\~ \ I
_..~-......-~~..... "- ... -"'1 1\\....... ..," ....... ~~', I
'~',,!~~s~~~~;~);~~~;;;:~;,> ~; /,
,-, " : ,r-_- / " -..-</. // I,..i'
" (;~;:_-_::~~;~~~!: c;.~:::<,-~~~~~.)// 1:)
,\\~\ \ I, f" '-.........::'} i (/........... \) ,/'
~ \ \ ,,\ \ \ ..--.... 'J l : I //
' \ \ \ \ \ \: .......j J I . \ /....,' / J
--- \ \ , , , \ ,-~- , I rL......... I / I
----.. l' , \" "_.' Y _r""..' ,
:E~;::!!r~~ t" , : .
~.'" "~{~'~.. ',,
,:"'-~~---""".:.:>:: 6Z"..~ f ' ...
..I ..~-~ '~,;..:..._,"~ ......... ..- I \ \ ... / / I
>: ~: ,2>_/~' I " '. //,
~/,- / ,\,:,' ~~~ " ',.' .
-:\ / / /,""7/'" .. ," \ ( i:::'" '~. .,'
:')'\ I'////;' S '__ \, \,'~ :- - ,';i ::;~:";~,,>~
1/'(',' ,/ /,i j ..r/' .....\ \', ... ___ ..,,/~...~ ' ,
::,1 I "\ .......::------.., \} ~ '~I It ,
\ \ \: \ \ .......:-:-,...,\ '\ ) , ~~:: . I ',', ,~~ 1/ i:'
. II I' [J,........,', II. ' ~~':"..,~_ /1 I ,t/,'PI1
' , ...... , , I. ....,,':-......., , ..""'" ,.
;' I, ,'1\ \ \I{' ,'!!! ' I 1\ '\\':~'':,''A:' .~{\\,
\ " .. I , ,'.':1"""",' -.....,..... '.1 \\\ \Il~ ""<~,~~-:..t:~~~~,, ........
'(,', f...t1I..1 ~ I\I\\"',\-"",~"f"""::"",,,,,,
I '.. ~ . ~ ..... '~~\\ 1,:,1 \\'-hI!, \){1{.-=--' J
~I;~~=~::":'~=~ - I .. ~" ~I '1'.\ //';', ,,'/:'
~'-'\ {" ~ I ~ _,~, *E:.;/ ~JIII I\:/~~,' Itf. ,'-:
':;~I I ~ ,~~...~, 'JI t-...__ 1 If
-:(.. ,^ , '. i~' f;;:< ,~,~. ~"r;.~- \ ':
If (~y', \ e~__;-a,~.; "~~~':~,'~" ;\ \'
V'\, A'~IIr!~~, _ " ", 0/ "
"'-,~~~~~~~~~~~~::;,,:_ _' '~/,~lll .)~~i\
&) ;'~ /
, ," , ',\ '.. \V '\\~'\\\"'-"/-:'''::'''' '.. I. I
,'~\\ \"', ',,, '-:~~,\ C';-~""""'~..../lj'3"~:'~ ,rJ.l:i /
Hlo\\" 1...._, ) \,"<',\ \\\\\'\..... ~...:::;.'..:':.......~~~ ,F!'-
~ '>-' \ "...--:~ ,,\\ \">~' I<S~~~0.~~\\ ,...~~\~:'..~..l/ \'_ ...
I ...A.l "'-, ...... ,.""",.... '\", _..,~.,::.-fi
___:C .:- ::'~-::~~" \ ',<::~:<~;'~:!~t.'?~." ,,,-,,-,,-
[:::i1, ':'-', ,\,I!,' I) ,~~,,,.. \' ) / ..' ) ) '<"~~~~"'~"'1
~::~ ,.""/;///'// '1~1 . ...0/.//>1'/_...., .ill)/
~';;) t;::::::r::,/ '-,?<'I\' I -:.';;;/ /::;;::~:;;f;,:'
I ,~"""..I' II / .,.. I'~ A / // "1..,,,,-:.":._..._:..:,"
I 'l...:;/I/"I/ - <~/ ..'1//,' I~;;:~~~::~~::_-_---
II 'f,... ,......'~'III,,,I..I'..
','.', I ~t)..' :~/9</:;::;":~~r'y.
ga.~..liILe l~ ~
oooa:.9.l.6ttoo)~J.
~08lZ VA '3Tv.s3llO"l\:M-O
I. 3J.ns '3OVld Y'l3H0'f'8 U?l
~0fl8~1l01'" .~raH:J'otS.
.......... ocv, 9l9S-S06<2 VA "3TlAs3.uO'llNHo
,...... .... "" 9~ XOO .O.d '0'1'00 orTMoIOAH 6lSa
ANVdVi08 lN3Vi38\'NV'Vi NH31S\13 l\13l:l8
.."
VA 'AlNllOO nNl't38lVHJ.WN 6<: STl
A1INnV\JV\J08
u31NIOd HltJONu
~
5s
::Jo.
t
GO'JJJ:J'a#Q.jW'~n<J'MiCll
S.103lIHOl:N '00 i' A,3JfNj3J3J){}
r-
J~I
~h
.. ;ill
~ I~II
n~!
~~I~
nih
'---
G
!~
:t
o
Z
\oJ
o
~
I '
III
\oJ
: II . M€;
a II
<l > > > >
-'" ! !~ ! ! i
eiilildil
0:
- - - :p
;~l' .
" .("".- '..
~ ~,
11"5:):_ -_
"
,
\ , >~\,~:'-= ~!~:.:
I(
"
"
" ,-
'/;, ~'
.... ~~ It; ,
~ {"x- _,~.~
I '"--1,- <.:~-,~ti
" ,is / Q (~<~~~...- ,_
~ ( \ \,:"~:~::-:~~s-~~ ~
JlIt ~ \ \ \ '.. ......~,':.~~~...
. ,'~ \,.......'>~..,:~,'~~....':..
'JIL..,... ,\ I",'
.'.'. \.\\1111\-"
"!'!'.r; . ,~}I ,..
.ll, f
-
/,~,...,-
..... ..' /
, "
.. /i
'- .
I
:lI1ij/,' ':~/~/'/ ("
'l'i", .. / I ..
fj 1, ',1 ' I
I I I'll' f !tr,~
t U\I,\" ~.......::~~-.:
i ;<::~~~;~~f~?:
:-;~
,"'
......~':........
~"':..'\\ I
, ,
!
;
.
'(. {.:I-
I l ~;~::...{1;:,,-:::
:\( ! I: l ( ( {:Y;\~:<.......:- l I
"'~I"\!lf//l l-""~ ,
\ liP 'II ,n' ,
, I ~ ,\ 'ii', \.J'. .
I ,"'~U' Ii' I," II \H 1Lt' '
/..~' ( ~1~II'JII\~"'-J...~>-;O};
. ~{i;~~~~" \" '~~~~~ijgf.
.............. 1 .... ,,,, \...., '\ ....._____.__.. _ I
" '::~:~~~~\~~1j) ! ','
\1 lil5-.........~~_,\\\\ '\ I........ /7/
)1\\\\ I ~ ~ \ \ \ I
:::.;,.:-0..::-~___---_/.../~))2~, \ l' J~) I Jb C;
- ~---,~~": It' 111'/ .,...
'\'~,... ..../ / .." ";/ ~%]JI''/I'
\,~~~ ..- -::.....:::...:~~~;: :--
""~~', .. ::;:;:::...-- ~~:?"J .,1', _...-:'
,.. ..~~ /~ "....P..--
I \ (~<A~/~-:-.;:;
~~:p~-)- .
...... ----..., ,'" ..-
"~', <~ ( <
!o.~,' \
\, \\
/ \\~
(.., I
,
..-. r'-- ,
~... "
!
~, : -,:" ....
\
o ~,
~; ...
,;",;::1//
" .. ......~,
\
,
,.
~
"
}.'
II ...
'\\ \ ~ -\ I
\t,'
\\\ \\
III II
~L,
/11,' , I
' "'" \J
'.ii/Iii I
r~~,
','" ~
" I
" .
.'
'\/,
..
~/
'1;.',
.'
.J I .
, ...
1,-;. . I
'//'
."
\( ;/J
,~~{ i:~~--"
, ... \",;\\\
, 1\\',\'
'lillI,
-;?-..._.." :i,~bJ
,
~
I
, 'I!
" ,
'~~
",
,
"
"
,>
.
..~..._'...
,'I ---~"""'{"
~/,I ,.....J'..-\\~'
," ..'~) 'I' 't.. ,\
,/ /' / .... :"\\'\~'i"
/'/' /'/.1, ~ .'\ \:'\,"'"
, I ,'" , , '.. ' \. '\
,"'/'1/ /1 /' / 1_ , \ \ \} ) )\:
,...J~,IJI..I ;," ..I' I 1/ ""}:'\\ \t,\(....
..' .. ,.... ....... I.... 1..1 I ,,'" .. \ \ '.. \\\
/ J/" I'.... .I I' ,1'1 ,"
,/ /' ,//' I"...,.." 1''''/1/ /1 \ \ \ III f))
I / /"/~//J"'" .1-..." yl.../ ) 1 J JIlII
I: 1/ / /1 /..... ,.... ........... / ////,~~'
I J '/ / ~//.. II/l~lj:J.
../../ 1/ 1/;,~'..;~,1f
_..../ // . / /~,~;(;:l'
// ...--/' '//;':';/
.' (..' /:"/"/
) /~<:~~~t.
J (I;-""j:?
: ('/~/I
, "
,
,
, \
JlI
, ,"
,~~,
,
"
I I' t\\
~~~~, \ \ \ \~\ \~~~,
\~~, .../ \\\~\\\' 1\
\~\::', :.... ) ') })), \1
\~,~~,~,'..~_/ / J; I!
W\\\:...v<</ /(,)
l~~~~~~r::';)
~'
l,f,,1
r/
..
..~ [-;'
~
...-.....~- -.
.
ooi
\
~
.z
:5
a..
z
o
~
o
:J
!L
!L
<(
..
. ;
8"
"'~
~I
~~
~g
,I
'III
"
~~
E8
';1 :
,
I,
, ,
~ .....':~:-::
~~:-= ... .
,--,:< ?.:.:::::::~~~~
,-, ~-- -
I ... ...._.--~..~:~_
'I 'i ~ j \J !;;:;~
I !C ~O~~
i rn~f' L~:-?>~;
I ~ \ _........'1,',1
110 --:_..:~~:: \
-..- -~-;..::~ II
::.
I ~',' l: ( (c.... l /
~I~I"I' "......1-f
I ' " \ \ \, \ \
1. l \ _r{~~1
,\ " -' \ ~~L
! -'~gi:~~~~{~;~);1
\ ...:; -~=3E3:~, 11'1;
K-' ,.,~." I "
'\ 1';;'1 ,,"rt L.l;.-;
t ~}. ..' ~A"""T
~o'J;ff< t~/~,
i - h\lJ. ~~J
" 'I , "",' ,1~
I 'f;? \'~
'. \ \ -~ \....-
" ct:i '---__:
I~ ~~ :i~~
~ ......:;.c..; ~I.J
,\!,(:~;-~
\ .t 'P".:'-::,;<~" , \.1;
" '~ - Y' l)l: 1,C
~'. I:WO n ,:;~~:' ;;;::<,
~I ~r ','/
'~ . " ~, ',----
'. I , !!: ~ {__,...::
" .~,' I~~,: " __:>~~
~ '~~,~\\ ..~,/;,..
......\ 1\\\\\ '///
"1, l\ \ \~..:~ ; ...~~;~;,
.- ~!\ \'~ ,...~Ii:;,
~'CT f!\ \ _&i'//
~-:~7n':::
~ \ I U
I \ /:/ ~ \
I ',I,
I '\~(' ..' - ;'.1: "
I \1 I
, ~.\'~\\ 1 ~ \:~
, ","1 ~ .,.
, I:j,
. I',
~ \ \
" ,
, ,
, ,
~
,
,
,
,It.
,
'. I '4"""
...~~
~,
'~I(n~ lVSf,\\'ll
Ib' ~~~~
' '~~I
l~/ ~;II~
1 ;,j r;u~
1F l
~ i~
~ :
I,' ~ '
I ,'-
I,
'i:~'!\:~
lI.... ~
" II: ..
I,
-I
8
~
~
E
~
8
I
t
~
~
~~ ~
I
~
~
.;
!
~
/
)
,
,
,
,
,
,
: 1!'!' :..,
: 'i'./: II J
........' /S I:: I
t/ t f I:
",' > 1:: I
-...... "'.... J : I
--:~~~:---) i 1
/' ...-..... .....~l
.. ,".. -- "t'/
, ,
\ /
'OJ ....."
.-,-"
\-",
,
,
\
)
.'\00.
1:
8
~
,
,
,
,
,
,
'\)
'\,
\,\
\\\
\
\
...
:
,
t\
,
I
\
,
I
\
I
I
,
I
\
I
,
:
,
\
\
4tO.. \
, I
, I
, I
, I
I I
I I I
\ \,}
I "
I
0 I\)
I\)
0
m
1: ~
r=
0
II
~
B
0 >,
8 r "'-~-"':>
m ......,--
'" m /,-- /_-r--~
0
~ Z l .'@'
-I t.{ ~J'
:0 \ t..... !i
" }> _:::~_:"~.J",1 J
111 z " ....., \ I
0 r -", I I I
m \ (.._/,..<,/J.. ..7
';;;::::..).1
,
///
--
r , /
,
/ ,
i
~I
Ii
2
!, 0
m
~z !I -I
1: }>
>0 " r=
r I' 0
5! ,I II
\l;g " en
I~ II 0
~
8
~tll II :r: 95
12 I' '" m
.... II ~ , ,
Z , ,
~ 'I J; -I \ ii I
)> I. :0 'Iii
" )>
JJ 'I !'1 z
01 0
01 m ........... --
II (fJ ..- II
0 ..-// ///~ 500 \ Ii
:J:
0
0 - , ~I
r ,/ -, la\
~I ~' ,,' \
./ " ,
Ii ,/' \ , , ,
, ,
I,
505 "
Q
C><)
gLJ ~;mmmmmmmH; :D - "NORTH POINTE"
o~ ~~ ~~amm~lmllllm09~lfi 0 ffi ~ COMMUNITY
(Xl IlUmmll 15 >! ~ :D ~ us. 29 NCffil"\Al.BEMAAI.E COOml'. VA
~ 0.. i ! ~lllllmDlPIII I ~ ~ ~ ~ ;EAT EASTERN MA.NAGEMENT COMPANY
I" . ~ ~ '< ...... 2819 H'1'!lR.'U.lJ ROAD. P,D. BOX 5528 "" ..._,
~ l!. . . I CHAFLOTTES\II.l.E., VA ~ FA)t 1_ 2lIIWi.1
/KtEtENtEy.l\ CO, ARCHITECTS
FlOHoILDMI&t>E'(.R.I,,~arr.C8
.os.-.cHEM VIl...1...A.aE" ).Je.t 011 HychuIo Fbad
'KG &&.CHEM PL.."Ce, SlXTE .,
Q-W'lLCJTT-....."-1.E,. VA 22W1
T......,., '78-2DOO
~(4e 8
.
.
.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
October 27, 1997
Katurah S. Roell
195 Riverbend Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
RE: SP-97-46 Virginia Land Trust (Korean Community Church) Floodplain Crossing
Tax Map 32, Parcel 22K, Lot A
Dear Mr. Roell:
The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on October 15, 1997, approved
.'.
the above-noted request to permit crossing of the Flat Branch floodplain. Please note that this approval
is subject to the following conditions:
1. Grading within the flood plain shall occur only in association with relocation of the entrance road
from Route 29, and such grading shall comply with all requirements set forth in the August 1,
1997 memorandum from the Department of Engineering, included herein as Attachment I (copy
attached); and
2.
The use, structure or activity for which this pem1it is issued shall commence within five years
from the date this permit is issued. The term "commenced" shall mean commencement of any
structure necessary for the use of the permit or the issuance of a VDOT entrance permit.
~.
In the event that the use, structure or activity for which this special use permit is issued shall not be
commenced within five (5) years after the issuance of such permit, the same shall be deemed abandoned
and the authority granted thereunder shall thereupon terminate.
Before beginning this use, you must obtain a zoning clearance from the Zoning Department. Before the
Zoning Department will issue a clearance, you must comply with the conditions in this letter. For
further information, please call Jan Sprinkle at 296-5875.
1C1
Attachment C
Page 2
October 27, 1997
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above-noted action, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Sincerely,
David B.Benish
Chief of Community Development
David B. Benish, Chief of Community Development/jcf
cc: Amelia McCulley
Jack Kelsey
cc: Amelia McCulley
Jo Higgins
c/ 20
.
jATTACHMENT I]
;:~ 2.: ~ :~. ':-: ~ if::. '
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Engineering & Public Works
MEMORANDUM
fllll I: 1 19~7
M. ,1 . .
j:i! ,", n I'~ ; ;'"~ rr \-.\;~ r.f
. I G',: :: ..: :::j W .."..' l
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Susan Thomas, Senior Planner
Glenn E. Brooks, Senior Engineer ul713
1 August 1997
Korean Church (Virginia Land Trust)
The sketch plan and special use permit application received on 18 July 1997 has been reviewed.
This application is for the church use as well as for access road fill in the floodplain of Flat
Branch near its confluence with the North Fork Rivanna River. Thereis an existing crossing of
Flat Branch as shown on the applicant's sketch plan, with a 48" diameter corrugated metal pipe
culvert in fair condition. The existing access road fill is not wide enough to accommodate a road
under current private or public road standards, nor the commercial travel way standards of the
Zoning Ordinance. Steep wooded river valley slopes surround the proposed site. The sketch
plan indicates that the intent is not to disturb these slopes.
.
The floodplain level in this area appears to be dictated by the North Fork Rivanna River
downstream, rather than the Flat Branch tributary. Thus, relocating and increasing the amount of
fill for the access road crossing should not significantly affect flood levels. The water level
downstream of the culvert and access road fill will continue to be dictated by the water level in
the North Fork Rivanna River. Upstream of the culvert, in the worst case, water levels will
increase above downstream levels enough to push the Flat Branch flow through the submerged
culvert.
It is recommended a wide enough crossing of the Flat Bra.nch be provided to accommodate any
future development of the property beyond the proposed church property, especially if multiple
exit lanes are anticipated at the entrance.
A left turning lane may be required within the median on Rt. 29. This can be resolved with the
site plan for the church. The University Real Estate Foundation will be installing an entrance at
the median break across Rt. 29 and a traffic signal for their North Fork Research Park.
Additional signal faces and phases will be required for the church.
The Engineering Department recommends approval of the special use permits provided that the
following conditions are met:
1.
The entrance and Flat Branch crossing are aligned with the North Fork Research Park
entrance across Rt. 29, with appropriate signal and turn lane improvements to be
incorporated with the improvements provided by the University Real Estate Foundation.
.
2. The Flat Branch crossing is to be used for the remainder of the property (T.M. 32-22K).
3. The site construction is not to disturb the natural water quality buffer of stream and river
valley wooded slopes. c- 2--1
.
.
.
,.-
.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 218
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(434) 296 - 5823 .
Fax (434) 972 - 4012
October 22, 2002
Dr. Yong I. Kim
Korean Community Church
2480 Spring Brook Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22901
RE: SP-2002-035 Korean Community Church - Expansion
SP-2002-047 Korean Community Church - Floodplain Crossing
Tax Map 32, Parcel 22K1
Dear Dr. Kim:
The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on October 9, 2002, unanimously approved
the above-noted requests. Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions:
SP-2002-035 Korean Community Church - Expansion:
1. The Korean Community Church shall be operated in general accord with the justification provided
with the application submitted for SP-2002-035, included herein as Attachment B. The capacity of the
church facility will not exceed one hundred fifty (150) individuals. No daycare or church school
activities are intended with this special permit. Changes to this plan of operation may require an
amendment to this special use permit; .
2. At the time of site development, all requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation
regarding relocation of the access road to align with the North Fork Research Park entrance across
Route 29, furnishing of signal components for the eastern side of the existing intersection shared with
the research park, installation of a turn and taper lane along Route 29, and other requirements
described in correspondence from VDOT dated August 1, 1997, February 10, 1997, and June 26,
2002, shall be met. It is anticipated that the applicant will work with the Towers Land Trust and other
property owners to the south to equitably share in the cost of the necessary improvements to the
eastern side of the above-desCribed intersection;
3. At the time of issuance of a building permit, determination of the availability of public water and sewer
shall be made by the Director of Planning and Community Development. If water and sewer are
determined to be reasonably available, the church shall be required to connect to these utilities;
4. The final site plan shall include a greenway dedication of one hundred (100) feet minimum in width or
that area necessary for the establishment of a greenway trail on that portion of the property along the
North Fork Rivanna River and its tributary to the north;
5. The use, structure or activity for which this permit is issued shall commence within five (5) years from
the date this permit is issued. The term "commenced" shall mean commencement of any structure
necessary for the use of the permit or the issuance of the VDOT entrance permit; and
6. At the time of site plan submittal, the applicant shall work with the Engineering Department to locate
the road access out of the critical slopes, to the extent practical.
Attachment D
21.
Page 2
October 22, 2002
SP-2002-047 Korean Community Church - Floodplain Crossing:
1. The Flat Branch crossing shall be used for the remainder of the property (Tax Map 32 Parcel 22K). It
is recommended that the crossing of Flat Branch be wide enough to accommodate any future
development of the property beyond the proposed church site;
2. The site construction shall not disturb the natural water quality buffer of stream and river valley
wooded slopes;
3. Grading within the floodplain shall occur only in association with the relocation of the entrance road
from Route 29, and such grading shall comply with all requirements of the Department of Engineering
and Public Works, included here as Attachments G and H; and
4. The use, structure or activity for which this permit is issued shall commence within five (5) years from
the date this permit is issued. The term "commenced" shall mean commencement of any structure
necessary for the use of the permit or the issuance of the VDOT entrance permit.
In the event that the use, structure or activity for which this special use permit is issued shall not be
commenced within twenty-four (24) months after the issuance of such permit, the same shall be deemed
abandoned and the authority granted thereunder shall thereupon terminate. For purposes of this section,
the term "commenced" shall be construed to include the commencement of construction of any structure
necessary to the use of such permit within two (2) years from the date of the issuance.
Before beginning this use, you must obtain a zoning clearance from the Zoning Department. Before the
Zoning Department will issue a clearance, you must comply with the conditions in this letter. For further
information, please call Jan Sprinkle at 296-5832.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above-noted action, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Sincerely,
VWC/jcf
Cc: Amelia McCulley
Jack Kelsey
Tex Weaver
Steve Allshouse
Matt Grimes, VDOT
D 2-?
f""\ I I f""\\.I1 IIVIL...I"f I \,;:J
DAVID R. GEHR
COMMISSIONER
L')!
r ;ann:::-..., ~_
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA ." :;, ,;::., L<=;i.~"'
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
701 VDOT WAY
CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22911
u ..~ '~""~
L~: j "V'"F: r
.
Jl ul If"" {l
'-I D IJ 1 1007
'/"'1
A. G. TUCKER
RESIDENT ENGINEER
August 1, 1997
Virginia Land Trust
SP-97-03
Ms. Susan Thomas
Dept. of Planning &
Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VJl. 22902
Dear Ms. Thomas:
This
.. ential
t side
site may be impacted by possible Route 29 widening or more so with
interchange to serve UREF site and the long range plan for development of
of Route 29.
In a shorter time frame period, a traffic signal will be provided
their development and when this occurs the user of the entrance on the
Route 29 will be required to furnish signal components for their side.
possibly be cost shared with UREF, depending how the two sites develop
signal is warranted.
by UREF for
East side of
This can
and when the
A minimum 100 foot taper and 100 foot turn lane should be installed along NBL
Route 29, and this to be extended if there is additional development or usage of
property.
If there are any further questions or concerns, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
ji/ /J;~jZ,
H. W. Mills
Assistant Resident Engineer
HWM/ldw
.
D 2+
17
TRANspnRTATlnN FnR TI-H= ?1.C:T r'J:::/\ITIIOV
-',
I
ATTACHMENT H
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
RAY D. PETHTEL
INTERt.t ca.MSSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
701 VDOTWAY
CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22911
JAMES L BRYAN
RESIDENT ENGINEER
6/26/02
Mr. David Benish
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Site Review Meeting
July 2002
Dear Mr. Benish:
Below are my comments for the July Site Review Meeting:
SP-2002-032 Dan's Automart. Seminole Ln, Route 29 N. (Stephen Waller)
No comments
SP-01-046 Snow's Rental Units Route 742 (Yadira Amarante)
No Comments
SP-2002-031 Puopolo Cottage. Route 620 (Steven Biel)
A minimum standard commercial entrance must be constructed, and sight distance requirements
must be met.
SP-2002-033 Bentivar Subdivision Route 643 (Scott Clark)
No comments
SP-2002-034 Gillums Mountain Route 708 (Stephen Waller)
A minimum standard commercial entrance must be constructed, and sight distance requirements
must be met.
SP-2002-035 Korean Community Church Route 29 (Susan Thomas)
Please see the comments from H. W. Mills, dated August 1, 1997.
SP-2002-036 Evergreen Church Route 649 (Joan McDowell)
The entrance shown must meet sight distance requirements, and the available sight distance should
be shown on the plans.
D
r2.-c;
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
18
.
.
.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
ATTACHMENT I
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
TO: Susan Thomas, Senior Planner (to be in SPIN)
FROM: Jeff Thomas, SeniorEngineer
DATE: August 20, 2002
SUBJECT: Korean Cormnunity Church Special Use Permit, SP 02-035 and SP 02-047
The special use permit application (SP 02-047) for the Korean Community Church received on August 9,2002 has
been reviewed. This permit is to allow filling in the floodplain on Flat Branch for construction of an access road
from U.S. 29 to the proposed church site. SP 02-047 is an extension ofa previously approved special use permit, SP
97-046. As noted in our comments dated August 1, 1997 (see attached), the floodplain in this area is associated with
backwater effects from the North Fork Rivanna rather than the Flat Branch tributary. Therefore, relocating the
existing driveway crossing and increasing the amount offill to construct an access road should not significantly affect
flood levels.
A concurrent special use permit application, SP 02-035, is an extension of SP 97-003, to allow the church
construction on the parcel.
The Engineering Department recommends approval ofSP 02-035 and SP 02-047 with the following conditions.
1. The entrance and Flat Branch crossing are aligned with the North Fork Research Park entrance across
U.S. 29, with appropriate signal and turn lane improvements to be incorporated with the improvements
provided by UREF. At the time of site development, the applicant shall comply with all VDOT
requirements in this regard.
2. The Flat Branch crossing is to be used for the remainder of the property (TMP 32-22K). It is
recommended that the crossing of Flat Branch be wide enough to accommodate any future development
ofthe property beyond the proposed church site.
3. The site construction is not to disturb the natural water quality buffer of stream and river valley wooded
slopes.
Attachments: Engineering Department comments dated August 1, 1997
Copy: File: 2361 (SP 02-035 & SP 02-047)
File: special use permit review 2.doc
D 2fp
19
.
Photograph 1 - View of existing stream crossing from Route 29 Northbound
.
.It.':
Photograph 2 - View of existing stream crossing from Route 29 Northbound
Attachment E ~ I
7
Photograph 3 - View of upstream side of crossing - note that the 60" culvert is blocked due to
slope failure above.
Attachment E
u
8
.
.
.
"'. .t.' \
S~-.)I' "., .,!:....,'"......" ",';..r "c,....,;.,
,':"-' ~Y' ~'I'\"': ',-
'".~;; ;..... . .
~.. t~:~fir;-_ ............ \... ;: _
Photograph 5 - View of downstream side of crossing - 60" culvert now visible
9
Attachment E
2ij
.
~te: The motion carried unanimously (5:0).
ARB-2006-129: North Pointe Stream Crossin,,: Review of a Special Use Permit (Tax
Map 032, Parcel 22K)
Proposal: To fill in the floodplain of Flat Branch Creek to establish a road crossing that
will provide access to residential development.
Motion: Mr. Missel made a motion to forward the following recommendation to the
Planning Commission regarding the proposed stream crossing for North Pointe Stream
Crossing.
.
The ARB has no objection to the proposed stream crossing, with the following
conditions:
1. Provide an informal planting of mixed tree and shrub species and sizes to
compensate for removed vegetation, and low-growing plants to stabilize
slopes in the "proposed landscaping areas" shown on the plan submitted for
ARB review entitled "Proposed Entry Layout with Landscaping North West
Passage Intersection @ Route 29 North" with revision date of 12-04-06. This
planting shall occur regardless of the grading proposal (DDR or KCA) chosen.
2. Provide large shade trees on the north and south sides of Northwest
Passage, along the sidewalk and space reserved for the sidewalk, 2~" caliper
minimum at planting, 40' on center, for a minimum distance of 400' from the
existing edge of pavement of Route 29 North.
3. Provide trees in the median of Northwest Passage, beginning at the point
closest to Route 29 North that can be approved by VDOT and extending for a
minimum distance of 400' from the existing edge of pavement of Route 29
North. The planting shall take the form of a continuous informal mix of large,
medium and small deciduous trees ranging from 1~" to 2~" caliper and
evergreen trees ranging from 4'-6' in height.
4. All of the above-noted landscaping shall be shown on the road plans
submitted for Northwest Passage. The plans shall include a complete planting
schedule keyed to the plan. The plans are subject to review of the ARB.
5. Planting shall be emphasized in height to provide hierarchy at the ends of the
walls.
6. End piers shall also be emphasized at wall ends. (For example, provide
greater mass or greater width of pier.)
7. The proposed KCA grading is preferred.
8. Mitigate the visual impact of the southern elevation of the culvert using earth
tone materials if the culvert is visible from Route 29. (Visibility shall be
determined by the ARB based on site sections provided by the applicant for
review. )
9. Design details of the retaining walls, including column cap design, pier
design, stone finish, other materials, etc., are subject to ARB approval as part
of the review and approval of the road plans.
.
Attachment F '36
ALBEMARLE COUNTY ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD - PAGE 3
FINAL ACTION MEMO 12-18-06
Second: Mr. Lebo seconded the motion.
Vote: The motion carried unanimously (5:0).
Mr. Missel left the meeting at 2:55 p.m.
Mr. Snow left the meeting at 2:55 p.m.
~HER BUSINESS
Wickham Pond I: Townhouse elevations
It was the consensus of the ARB that proposed changes to the townhouse elevations, as
reflected in the drawings presented at the meeting, could be approved. A revised site
plan/landscape plan will need to be reviewed by the ARB. The revised plan should show
proposed site improvements between the townhouses closest to the western boundary line and
the proposed entry road for Wickham Pond II (Road A). Typical site improvements, including
proposed grading and landscaping, should be included. It was suggested by the ARB that a site
section would be helpful in understanding what proposed site conditions would look like with the
hedgerow removed along the western boundary. It was determined that the next review of this
proposal could be handled as a work session.
Ayinitv: Request for ARB comment
Based on revised grading in the most recent set of plans, it was the consensus of the
ARB that the ARB wants to conduct a full review of the Avinity rezoning proposal prior to
public hearing with the Planning Commission. Preliminary comments/concerns include:
1. Block elevations (not just elevations of individual units) showing the attached units
along Avon Street are required. The elevations should accurately show the
relationship of the buildings and steps/sidewalks to the grade.
2. Site sections illustrating the condition along Avon Street are required to clarify the
change in grade from the EC to the units. Multiple sections should be provided to
accurately illustrate varying conditions.
3. Monotony in the blocks along Avon Street is a concern. Stepped units might be more
appropriate.
4. The break in the blocks on Avon Street is positive. Planting between the blocks
would be appropriate.
5. Blank side elevations are not appropriate for the EC. This is a concern for units 11,
12,16,17,21,22.
6. Some ARB members were concerned that Block 22-28 doesn't respond to the
proposed topography. Grading following the orientation of the block and grading that
makes sense with the fronts of the units would be more appropriate.
Mr. Missel returned to the meeting at 3:30 p.m.
ALBEMARLE COUNTY ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD - PAGE 4
FINAL ACTION MEMO 12-18-06
f" 31
~~~~
'f-
( \~<;..
\,
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
i
)
:
I
i
i
I
i
i
i
\
\
,
I I '
I I:
It\\\1i! \1 i
.!.J : i : , I
ir- I: : , I
\ I Ii ;' : :
'::,,,: ':, ,:i /! i
;" ",_.j{ : I I
I I, \ I :
: :: \: I I
I /, \ / :
: : I' \ I I
,:1 ::i \ i I :
I II \ I I
\ 1:: \ I I
,i ! I I i \ ii :
: / I I '1',
'I :' I : I : "'"
J I"
:i ' : I I : :: \
: : I 'f-: I : \
'I J I I i \ C;';.\' ! i \
: : II : I: \
8 " !CL I I : \ : : \
,Q,.\ 10 ,\ : I: \
O WI' I / '
w\: I I I : I I \
\ 101 1/\,' 1 1 '
<l>~:, II..~, ,'..' I ' I \
__ ' \ : I l \
Z 1,.!21 I; i \: / I \
:IX ,,' \ / I \
v~w ,f II I"~ \ I I \
, \ I I' \
.'i I If: \ ,:: \
~ i\..__../A ! \ \,,! I ! \.
~,I I I f \ \: i !
. , : \ 'r"T',1 \
i i I I i \ J I i'\ \
w , I' I I" \
~,: I I ,: ,! : : \, \,
o I -l I \ \
.01 :!: a:i: \, \
, I I I vi I" "
i:! I l i : i g: f\ \,
I~ !(j1G,1'I~!i ,:! ~! cp \ '\
, ' ' ~, \ \
I : I I : /': I : I I\'\'
, , ' " r'" \ '
i : 'i'\~' \" ' '
i : ~I, -:A \ i I : \\ \,
i' ,~i J' '
:, I' ,I ....,,11___;...,-' I :, \
\ " I, \
I I i \ \ ,"i \,"""""'"
I : ; \ '_____m_..-' '1;--
ii i \ \cj2 /
I i I) ct--l--~~'::"
f I ;.-_-_ / ..JPlltlO >i\l\.Jl" \
-n ,,_' mJ '
\ ' (\ 7', /__-9"' SIM31 '
: : I ( Y'-.' \ / ----
!: :,1 \ ii, \G' -!- --
, 1/ \ I I l--
I :: \ : I
, 1/ \ I :
: '".._A' \: I
I I : i I I
:: \: I :
I -l' ~ I I r---------
I cD I I I r
:21 II 11:1
I I '\ II
: ~ : : \ :!
: W : : I, I I :!
If-' I I, /I
, ::J I I " II
I 0 ' : I, 'I
, Cl::: ' / '1 ~ /,
I I I' f
: I : I ,--- _..1,
: Iii I I I
: : :
I / /
I ! I I I i
I I I
I ! 1 I I !
I ' /
Ii! I I !
I ' I
I ! \ I I I
I I '
Ii \ I I i
I I I
I 1 \ I I i
I I I
I ! \ I I I
I I I
Ii \ I I !
: \:
I : \ I I :
I I'
I I /
I' \:
o I I I
I I I I
: I I
I \:
I I I
I I /
, I I
I , I I
I : I I
,: r I '
I : t<;..l(:i.... I I
i \ -!- I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I' I I
I I
I I
I
cp
,,~;_................
/
//
,/-',
/ \\",.
I
I
/
I
I
I
I
,
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
,
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
I
I
I
I
.-
!j!l'! lj
~;~a~~~
",~lj~>-i~
~~~!~~~
~lj~",L1il
5~!:c>-t-='fE~
1li;5<i!!~O>-
!:!l!l"'!:!>-"~
~~~%:~::I
~i!ll!l:~~h
il!:~~i~i~
~S~~~~~~
~.....~!J~~G~
tij/!!",l!5>-w 5
51!ii!lffi~~:ri
"'5!i!:i!~~~
"'~ i2 l'! ~
~<I "'~%~~
:::!tloiS!i.!~~o
~d;l!~a~>-"
~i~!t;w ~
~Io!U~;i=5
~iJj~i~el~
~~~li!~Io!~~~
~>-3al;l;5 ~
CDb..O::~~ ~
/
N
\'(\
:...
o ~
'" ~
.
.
.
f
Albemarle County Planning Commission
January 9, 2007
The Albemarle County Planning Commission held a meeting and a public hearing on Tuesday, January 9,
2007, at 6:00 p.m., at the County Office Building, Room 241, Second Floor, 401 Mcintire Road,
Charlottesville, Virginia. Members attending were Bill Edgerton, Eric Strucko, Jon Cannon, Calvin Morris,
Duane Zobrist, Pete Craddock and Marcia Joseph. Julia Monteith, Senior Land Use Planner for the
University of Virginia, representative for David J. Neuman, FAIA, Architect for University of Virginia was
absent.
Other officials present were Wayne Cilimberg, Planning Director; Tamara Ambler, Natural Resources
Manager; David Benish, Chief of Planning; Lori Allshouse, Strategic Planning Manager and Greg
Kamptner, Deputy County Attorney.
Call to Order and Establish Quorum:
Mr. Cilimberg called the regular meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. and established a quorum.
Regular Items:
SP 2006-034 North Pointe - Stream Crossing (Sign #8)
PROPOSED: Fill in the floodplain of Flat Branch Creek for a road crossing to provide access for
residential development.
ZONING CATEGORY/GENERAL USAGE: Planned Development Mixed Commercial with which allows
large-scale commercial uses; and residential by special use permit (15 units/ acre). A special use permit
exists for residential use.
SECTION: 30.3.05.2.1. of the Zoning Ordinance which allows for fill in the floodplain
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE/DENSITY: Neighborhood Density Residential - residential (3-6
units/acre) and supporting uses such as religious institutions and schools and other small-scale non-
residential uses.
ENTRANCE CORRIDOR: Yes
LOCATION: East Side of Route 29 North (Seminole Trail) across from Lewis and Clark Drive
TAX MAP/PARCEL: 32-22K
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Rivanna
STAFF: Tamara Ambler
Ms. Ambler, Natural Resources Manager, presented a power point presentation and summarized the staff
report.
o This is SP-2006-34, North Pointe - Stream Crossing at Northwest Passage. The North Pointe
community was previously approved as a rezoning. This special use permit is only for the fill in
the floodplain associated with the stream crossing that would be associated with that northern
most entrance. The parcel is Tax Map 32, Parcel 22K. This location is right across from Lewis
and Clark Drive. Flat Branch is the stream that the flood plain is associated with that will be
crossed. That stream runs parallel to and very close to Route 29,
o In summary, the request itself is for fill in the flood plain for a road crossing in accordance with the
Zoning Ordinance. More specifically, the applicant is proposing to modify an existing stream
crossing by replacing an existing 60" corrugated metal pipe with a box culvert to serve the
proposed Northwest Passage entrance to the North Pointe community.
o The 2005 FEMA Flood Study and the maps included Flat Branch in the detailed study. That
means that the base flood elevations were determined as well as the 1 OO-year flood elevation on
the upstream part of the existing crossing. The upstream of the existing pipe is base flood
elevation at 399.7'. That is fairly high and is likely influenced by the existing 60" pipe. In some
cases it appears that the flood waters could impact Route 29 northbound. The 100-year flood
elevation on the downstream side is lower at 385.5'.
o The applicant states and the County engineering staff concur that the replacement with a larger
box culvert in the current design of 8' X 6' could reduce the flood elevation. The applicant is
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION - JANUARY 9, 2007
DRAFT MINUTES - SP-2006-034 NORTH POINTE - STREAM CROSSING
1
stating that would reduce the upstream elevation to 392', which would reduce or eliminate any
apparent impacts to Route 29 northbound. Therefore, it would actually be an improvement.
a The FEMA Flood Study has assumed that the 60" culvert is operating at full capacity. In reality
this is the upstream side standing at stream level looking at that culvert. As shown in the slide,
the culvert cannot be seen because the fill slope associated with that has failed and is blocking
the culvert. So when standing down there the stream is basically winding its way through the
collapsed fill and finding its way into that culvert underneath the road.
a She presented the upstream conditions in a slide noting that wh11e standing at the upstream side
looking further up there is a lot of evidence of inundation there. On the downstream side of the
60" culvert the water is actually passing through it.
a The applicant's proposal is to replace that existing corrugated metal pipe with a larger box culvert.
One of the issues is that the fill causes this special use permit. Of course, there would be new fill
associated with the actual fill over the box culvert associated with the Northwest Passage. In
addition, there may be some additional fill required as a result of constructing that interchange
associated with either turning lanes onto northbound Route 29 into Northwest Passage or turning
lanes coming out of there. It is not quite determined yet the level of improvements that may be
required along Route 29 Northbound. Those designs are being coordinated now with VDOT as
well as the water quality agencies. So the intent of this special use permit is to authorize the
necessary fill associated with the final lane configuration associated with this road crossing.
There may be more or less fill associated with those Route 29 improvements.
a The length of the new box culvert and the treatment and design of the fill slopes has not yet been
finalized. So one reason is that VDOT approval is still needed for the length and configurations.
The applicant is currently working with VDOT on that. In addition, the applicant will need to get
Federal and State Water Quality Permits for the crossing over Flat Branch. Those agencies have
certain requirements about the length of the stream that can be impacted. Therefore, a shorter
box culvert or a longer box culvert could be recommended, which is being coordinated with those
agencies.
a The request is to authorize whatever necessary fill is associated with that final design for that
intersection. It is confusing because they have a couple of different options. Staff has tried to
illustrate the two different things that might happen.
· The typical cross section with the longer culvert situation was shown in green. If a longer
box culvert is used, then the fill slopes and the treatment of the fill slopes would be just
the standard 2:1 vegetative fill slopes just like any other highway.
· If a shorter box culvert is utilized, then it will be, as shown in blue, with a shorter fill slope
that still allows for the cross section of the roadway through a retaining wall. That
retaining wall could be 7' to 10' in height. So those are the two different options for the
way that fill slope may be treated depending on the length of the box culvert.
a Since this will be visible from the Entrance Corridor staff had the Architectural Review Board
provide some advisory conditions. The ARB reviewed the request and ~de comments, which
have been incorporated into the conditions recommended by staff.
a Regarding the history, this site has been a subject of a special use permit in the past. In 1997, a
special use permit was approved to expand the crossing for a proposed Korean Community
Church. That permit was valid for 5 years. That permit was extended in October, 2002 for
another 5 years. Even though it has not quite expired that special use permit would not be
suitable for the level of fill that would be needed for the lane configuration on 29 north. So it was
determined that a new special use permit was needed and the existing one would not be
satisfactory .
a In summary, factors favorable includes:
· No impact to neighboring properties.
· No increase in flood levels. It may reduce flood levels.
a Staff did not find any factors unfavorable.
a Therefore, staff recommends approval of this request with the conditions as stated in the staff
report with one additional condition. Because the previous special use permits were valid for 5
years and given the level of coordination that will have to happen with FEMA and that sort of
thing, the applicant has requested that if approved that this special use permit also be valid for 5
years. But, it is not listed in the conditions. Therefore, staff would ask for that condition to be
added.
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION - JANUARY 9, 2007
DRAFT MINUTES - SP-2006-034 NORTH POINTE - STREAM CROSSING
2
.
1
. Ms. Joseph asked if there were any questions for staff.
Mr. Strucko asked if the conditions for large shade trees and trees in the median are from the ARB, and
Ms. Ambler replied that was correct.
Mr. Edgerton said that he did not have any problem with what was being proposed. But, it does not
sound like there is any value to going ahead and making a decision before VDOT makes a decision. He
asked if that was correct.
Ms. Ambler replied yes, that in a sense that no matter what final lane configuration is done that it will
require fill in the floodplain, which would require a special use permit.
Mr. Edgerton asked if the Commission was basically being asked to approve whatever is required by
VDOT or the federal agencies.
Ms. Ambler replied that was basically true.
Mr. Edgerton asked if the applicant would not be able to go ahead and do anything with this until all of
those issues are resolved.
Ms. Ambler replied yes, that was correct.
Mr. Edgerton asked why the Commission was reviewing it now rather than when that has been resolved.
.
Ms. Ambler said that in the past there have been examples of special use permits being reviewed and
actually granted when the designs were still conceptual. Final approvals had not been given at that time
and the water quality permits had not yet been obtained.
Mr. Edgerton said that the Commission was not approving something that would authorize the applicant
to go ahead and put in a culvert, which then subsequently could be determined to be shorter or longer
and then have to do it again. He asked if the applicant was not going to go ahead and do this. Although,
it looks like it would help if they went ahead and put a box culvert in yesterday.
Ms. Ambler replied that before the applicant could actually do work in the stream they would certainly
need their water quality permits from the CORE and DEQ.
Mr. Edgerton asked if staff has any idea when that is going to happen.
Ms. Ambler said that the applicant could address that. She acknowledged that the applicant was in
current conversations with VDOT as well as with the federal and state water quality agencies. So it is not
something that they are waiting to initiate that conversation because that conversation is occurring.
Mr. Morris asked if staff could explain since they were talking about a culvert why there was an ARB
review.
Ms. Ambler said that it was a policy of the Planning Department that when there is a special use permit
that was within the Entrance Corridor, which this request is, that the ARB be given the opportunity to
provide their opinion and advice. Staff asked the ARB if they would like to do a review and provide that.
The ARB said that they would like to provide that review and did so. Therefore, the ARB has provided
these advisory recommendations that have been included in staffs recommendation.
.
Mr. Cilimberg asked to take it a step further. The Planning Commission had a joint meeting with the ARB
a little over a year ago in which they asked to be able to give comments. Of course, the Commission
does not have to accept any of the advisory conditions or comments if they don't feel they are
appropriate. But, staff as a matter of course has been referring Entrance Corridor projects to the ARB for
that opportunity.
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION - JANUARY 9, 2007 3
DRAFT MINUTES - SP-2006-034 NORTH POINTE - STREAM CROSSING
Mr. Craddock asked if the size of the culvert was still is up in the air depending upon what FEMA, VDOT,
and other reviewing agencies decides and the Commission does not have any thing to do with that they
decide.
Ms. Ambler replied yes, that certainly the length of the culvert is still yet to be determined. In actuality the
6' X 6' was the original proposal. Then after a review based upon review of the drainage area that was
originally shown the county engineer made some recommendations that actually a larger drainage area
was going to it. Based upon that review the applicant increased it to an 8' X 6' culvert. That was a result
of staff review. But, he was correct that the final length of the culvert certainly is not yet determined.
Mr. Craddock asked if that was why there was no specific requirement for the size of the culvert in the
conditions.
Ms. Ambler replied that was correct. Also, the advice of the engineering staff is that if they require it down
to the nth degree and if there is a minor design change, then that may require coming back for a special
use permit modification. That was an issue that was brought up by the county engineering review staff.
There being no further questions for staff, Ms. Joseph opened the public hearing and invited the applicant
to address the Commission.
Valerie Long, representative for the applicant, said that Ron Keeney, architect for the project, was also
present to answer any of the more technical issues.
o As staff indicated, the stream crossing will not increase the elevation of the flood. In fact, it may
reduce the 100-year flood elevation. The applicant is agreeable to the conditions that staff
recommended. They particularly appreciate staff's support for the 5 year expiration period as
opposed to the 2 year period. They hope that they won't need more than 2 years, but as staff
indicated the legalistic coordination required with working with the state and federal agencies can
be a challenge and be time consuming. The applicant would rather not have to come back to the
Commission to ask for an extension of the special use permit.
o In response to Mr. Craddock's question about condition 2 it does require County and VDOT
approval of the final design plans and hydrologic computations for the stream crossing. Once the
final decisions are made by DEQ, the Core and all of the other agencies that are required, they
obviously have to show those on the final plans and submit those to the County for final review
and approval. The applicant acknowledges that it will all be subject to County review.
Ms. Joseph asked Ms. Long if this was a Neighborhood Model.
Ms. Long replied no, that it was a Planned Development - Mixed Commercial development.
Ms. Joseph asked if the development did not have a code of development.
Ms. Long replied that was correct that the development did not have a code of development. The
development has an extremely detailed set of application plans.
Ms. Joseph pointed out that the Planning Commission has never seen those plans. She had looked at
some sections that the ARB had looked at, but no complete plans.
Ms. Long said that she could pass around sheets 01 and 02, but only had one copy of the application
plan, which she would be happy to circulate.
Ms. Joseph asked if it was approved as part of the rezoning.
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION - JANUARY 9, 2007
DRAFT MINUTES - SP-2006-034 NORTH POINTE - STREAM CROSSING
4
~
.
Ms. Long replied that was correct. There are many sheets to the application plan, which were approved
with the rezoning. She pointed out that Mr. Keeney had a large copy of the approved plans that were
approved with the rezoning. By approving the rezoning with the application plan that makes for binding
plans subject to any flexibility that the Zoning Ordinance may offer. But, the development of the
community must be in accord with the approved application plan.
Mr. Keeney pointed out that Ms. Ambler's cross sections were generated from one sheet of the approved
plans for North Pointe. The street used was actually taken from one of the Northwest Passage street
cross sections in the main section.
Mr. Kamptner noted that these particular plans were accepted with the approval of the rezoning.
Ms. Long pointed out that the proffers state that the applicant has an obligation to submit the final detailed
road plans to VDOT and to the County for review. So certainly if they say that they want different road
plans or different configurations it would still be subject to County and VDOT review.
Mr. Keeney explained the three cuts in the Northwest Passage that remain in the North Pointe
Subdivision. He explained the cut where it connects to Route 29. They had negotiated and worked out
with planning staff that they wanted a 2-lane roadway at that point with bicycle lanes on both sides and
street trees in the median. That is Northwest Passage as it comes to Route 29. That is where VDOT
takes over, decides and tells us how big the intersection of 29 has to actually be. So they have taken that
street section as it comes down the hill and just before it starts across the stream and gone to the 5 or 6
lane intersection that the Commission has seen their review as part of the intersection with Route 29, but
not as part of the main element of North Pointe itself.
Ms. Long asked if they had answered Ms. Joseph's question.
.
Ms. Joseph replied yes. The road itself was something that was to be reviewed by County staff and it was
. not part of the application plan that was approved by the Board.
Ms. Long noted that certain sections and basic perimeters of the road plans was a better way to say it for
the road designs. The cross sections are certainly shown. But, the final more detailed road plans that
have not even been prepared yet are subject to VDOT and County approval.
Ms. Ambler noted that in the conditions the ARB would have review of those road plans
There being no further questions for the applicant, Ms. Joseph asked if there was any public comment
regarding this request. There being none, the public hearing was closed and the matter before the
Planning Commission.
Ms. Joseph said there would be some improvements with the stream bank and that the applicant was
going to do some stabilization. It will lower the flood plain in that area and improve the existing situation.
She was reacting to the ARB's comments because she thought that this had a code of development with
it. She thought that they were putting the applicant through unnecessary review if the code existed. But,
apparently it does not exist. So that is a whole different item here. She was a little concerned with the
ARB looking at tinting the color for the culvert. She did not know how irT)portant something like that is
because in time vegetation will cover that up. She was concerned with the stabilization of the stream
bank. That should be in the purview of Ms. Ambler and not something that they work out regarding the
vegetation size and location. The optimum they need to get is stream bank stabilization. If they can
make it look good, that will be great. But, what is most important is that stream bank is stabilized with
whatever vegetation that they choose. She worried about that being a discussion with the ARB at any
time. She expected that DEQ and the other agencies will be involved and she wanted to avoid any
confusion. She supported the bike paths as shown.
. Mr. Craddock asked if this request would affect the Korean Church approval.
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION - JANUARY 9, 2007
DRAFT MINUTES - SP-2006-034 NORTH POINTE - STREAM CROSSING
5
Mr. Cilimberg said that actually the Korean Church was the subject of this special use permit that exists
now that would have given a certain level of crossing for them. His understanding is that they will be
taking access through this crossing.
Mr. Edgerton asked the applicant if there would be another crossing further south.
Ms. Long replied yes, there will be 2 additional entrances into the North Pointe community. This is the
one called the northern entrance. There is a second one called the middle entrance that aligns with
Northside Drive, which exists on the other side of Route 29 right now. There will be a third entrance,
called the southern entrance.
Mr. Edgerton asked if they would need additional stream crossings.
Ms. Long replied yes, that the applicant knows that they will need one more stream crossing. In fact, they
are in the process of preparing the application for the middle entrance. There will be fill required in the
flood plain there.
Mr. Keeney pointed out that they were not present asking for permission to cross the stream. They were
here because of having to fill within the flood plain line. The original lake and that sort of thing that was
designed in North Pointe are going to alter the flood plain line. They are unfortunately asking for the first
one, which is going to be at the bottom of all of the construction. That is why the size of the pipe is rather
vague. They have to guess the size to get the mouth of that bottle large enough to make certain that it
handles everything else that happens above it. Most of the flood plain will actually disappear. In other
words, when the lake is put in that gathers the water coming off of the Airport Road area it is designed to
stop the flooding down stream. The flood plain line at Northside Drive may disappear to the point where
they may no longer have to come back to the Planning Commission for fill in the stream bed at that point.
Ms. Long asked to respond to Mr. Craddock's question about the Korean Church. She did not represent
the Korean Church, but her understanding was that part of the delay may have been due to the expense
of constructing Northwest Passage. It was going to be very expensive to build a road to access the
property. This could help facilitate it. But, she did not know what their current or present plans may be.
This will obviously build a very high quality road that could perhaps provide some access for them if they
were still interested in that area.
Motion: Mr. Morris moved, Mr. Cannon seconded, to approve SP-2006-034, North Point - Stream
Crossing, subject to the conditions, as amended with the addition of condition 11 regarding the 5 years.
1. County and VDOT approval of the final lane configuration for the Northwest Passage over the
stream crossing with the final road plans
2. County and VDOT approval of final design plans and hydrologic/hydraulic computations for the
stream crossing.
3. The applicant must obtain a map revision, letter of revision, or letter of amendment as required
from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and copy the County Engineer on all
correspondence.
4. County approval of a grading and an erosion and sediment control plan prior to the issuance of a
grading permit for modification of the existing stream crossing.
5. Natural Resources Manager approval of a stream buffer mitigation plan prior to the issuance of a
grading permit for modification of the existing stream crossing
6. Provide an informal planting of mixed tree and shrub species and sizes to compensate for
removed vegetation, and low-growing plants to stabilize slopes in the "proposed landscaping
areas" shown on the plan submitted for ARB review entitled "Proposed Entry Layout with
Landscaping North West Passage Intersection @ Route 29 North" with revision date of 12-04-06.
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION - JANUARY 9, 2007
DRAFT MINUTES - SP-2006-034 NORTH POINTE - STREAM CROSSING
6
.
.
.
7. Provide large shade trees on the north and south sides of Northwest Passage, along the sidewalk
and space reserved for the sidewalk, 2Y:z" caliper minimum at planting, 40' on center, for a
minimum distance of 400' from the existing edge of pavement of Route 29 North.
8. Provide trees in the median of Northwest Passage, beginning at the point closest to Route 29
North that can be approved by VDOT and extending for a minimum distance of 400' from the
existing edge of pavement of Route 29 North. The planting shall take the form of a continuous
informal mix of large, medium and small deciduous trees ranging from 1 W' to 2W' caliper and
evergreen trees ranging from 4'-6' in height.
9. All of the above-noted landscaping shall be shown on the road plans submitted for Northwest
Passage. The plans shall include a complete planting schedule keyed to the plan. The plans are
subject to review of the ARB.
10. Design details of the retaining walls, including column cap design, pier design, stone finish, other
materials, etc., culvert color, plant size and planting configuration shall be shown on the road plans
and are subject to ARB approval as part of the review and approval of the road plans.
11. If the use, structure, or activity for which this special use permit is issued is not commenced
within sixty (60) months after the permit is issued, the permit shall be deemed abandoned
and the authority granted there under shall thereupon terminate.
Mr. Kamptner suggested that the motion leave open conditions 9 and 10 so that staff can look at those
two conditions. He did not know if the culvert was visible from the Entrance Corridor and if there is a site
plan that is going to be reviewed that will include this crossing or a building permit. Staffs position has
always been that special use permit conditions cannot expand the authority of the ARB. They understand
the concepts that they are trying to address and staff can massage those conditions if necessary by the
time it gets to the Board. There will be some review by County staff in particular to take into Ms. Joseph's
comments about stabilization being the primary focus of the conditions.
The Commission also ruled that conditions 9 and 10 shall remain open for the applicant and staff to
review at and revise if necessary before the Board of Supervisors public hearing date.
Ms. Joseph said that she appreciated Mr. Kamptner saying that because when she went back and looked
at the ordinance and saw what the ARB was responsible for and it was not for roads or culvert colors. So
if that can happen, she would really appreciate that.
Mr. Morris added that amendment to the motion, which was seconded by Mr. Cannon.
The motion passed by a vote of 7:0.
Ms. Joseph said that SP-2006-034, North Point - Stream Crossing, would go before the Board of
Supervisors on February 14, 2007 with a recommendation for approval.
(Recorded and transcribed by Sharon Claytor Taylor, Recording Secretary.)
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION - JANUARY 9, 2007
DRAFT MINUTES - SP-2006-034 NORTH POINTE - STREAM CROSSING
7
Kenneth C. Boyd
Rivanna
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(434) 296-5843 FAX (434) 296-5800
February 5, 2007
David L. Slutzky
Rio
Undsay G. Domer, Jr.
ScottsviDe
Dennis S. Rooker
Jack Jouett
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
David C. Wyant
White Hall
TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS ON THE ATTACHED LIST
RE: ZMA-2005-007. Haden Place
TAX MAPI PARCEL: Tax Map 55 Parcel 69 and Tax Map 56 Parcel 9
Dear Sir or Madam:
This letter is to notify you as an adjacent property owner of the public hearing on the above-referenced petition described
as follows:
PROJECT: ZMA-2005-007. Haden Place (Sians #12.13). PROPOSAL: Rezone 6.69 acres from R-2 Residential
(2 units/acre) to NMD Neighborhood Model District - residential (3 - 34 units/acre) mixed with commercial, service
and industrial uses for 20 single family homes and 14 town homes. PROFFERS: Yes. EXISTING
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE/DENSITY: Community of Crozet; CT-3 Urban Edge: single family
residential (net 3.5-6.5 units/acre) supporting uses such as religious institutions and schools and other small-scale
non-residential uses. ENTRANCE CORRIDOR: No. LOCATION: Between Haden (Rt. 1209) & Killdeer Lanes (Rt.
1215), south of Jarman's Gap Road. TAX MAP/PARCEL: TM 55 Parcel 69 & TM 56 Parcel 9. MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT: White Hall.
These petitions have been scheduled for review and public comment by the Board of Supervisors on WEDNESDAY,
FEBRUARY 14,2007. The Board of Supervisors meeting will be held at 6:00 p.m., in the Lane Auditorium, Second Floor,
County Office Building, 401 Mcintire Road, Charlottesville, Virginia.
You may review the file in the Department of Community Development, at the address above. If you should have any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (434) 296-5843.
Si ,rely,
,
- / Q~~
Clerk
/ewc
cc: V. Wayne Cilimberg
Rebecca Ragsdale
Amelia McCulley
Elaine Echols
*
Printed on recycled paper
LIST OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS
ALLEN, ROE CLYDE OR LILA FARTHING A
RUSSELL, JOHN E OR MARTHA A
LAWSON, NANCY SLOAN
SAUL, CLAUDE H OR PATRICIA C
COLES, VIVIAN D
LAYNE, DONALD D SR OR BETTY F
RYALLS, LORA S
O'DELL, JERRY D OR SUZANNE B
RIVET, SHERRY L
DAMERON, ERNEST B & BETTY J
MARKEY, KEVIN M OR DONNA W
SAZ LLC
MARCH MOUNTAIN PROPERTIES LLC
WENDELL W GIBSON INC
LEVOKOVE, SCOTT & JODI ORDOVER & JONATHAN OR SHARI PERKES
ART PROPERTIES LLC
SHIFFLETT, DAVID W OR GLORIA B
CHURCH HILL RENTALS LLC
CHURCH HILL DEVELOPMENT LLC
KAUFFMANN, JONATHAN P OR MEGAN D KAUFFMANN OR JOYCE M GRUNEWALD
SUMMERFORD LANE LLC
LICATA, PETER J
SCHOOL, MICHAEL F OR KATHLEEN C
GRUNINGER, JOHN H OR WENDI R C/O PETER J LICATA
SUMMERFORD LANE LLC
AUGUST, JERRY REVOCABLE TRUST ETAL & VALASIE AUGUST REVOCABLE TRUST
ETAL
BOYLE, KEVIN OR LYNNE D
LICATA, PETER J
CARRERA, F LUDWIG & J SCOTT JUST & DANIEL K BENJAMIN JR
LICATA, PETER J