Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SDP200300028 Application 2003-04-11
OFFICE USE ONLY � y,r SDP# _ (' -re,) TMP - -Application for A OF A 4.41111:111* Site Development Plans and Site Plan Waivers ®gym Preliminary Site Development Plan ❑Residential=$1,190 plus$13/dwelling unit • ❑Non-residential=$1,580 plus$13/1,000 sq.ft.of dev. APR 1 2003 16 folded copies of plan required ❑Final Site Development Plan(Administrative) U Final Site Development Plan(Commission) ❑Residential_$41!l ❑Prior to preliminary approval=$1,130 ❑Non-residential=$410 ❑After preliminary approval=$790 Two(2) mylars and one(1)folded copy of required U Site Plan Waiver(Ordinance Section Number )=$270 7folded copies of sketched plan required Project Name: Forest hakpr Tarrara Tax map and parcel 46 B 4-?0 Magisterial District: R i v a n n a Zoning: P D S C Physical Street Address(if assigned) Location of property(landmarks,intersections,or other) Between A r by ' s and Ti g e r Fuel , n o r t h of Forest Lakes entrance Does the owner of this property own(or have any ownership interest in)any abutting property? If yes,please list those tax map and parcel numbers Contact Person(who should we call/write concemmg thts project?) Nancy Long / Raymond E . Gaines , Architect Address_ P . O . Box 6255 City Charlottesville State VA Zip_22 .0 .10 Daytime Phone(439 979-5245 Fax# 979-9126 E-mail rgtect@intelos . net Owner of Record Fermium L L C Address 235 Terrell Rd . West City CbarlottesvilleState VA Zip 22901 Daytime Phone(434) 2 96-336 7 Fax# 979-7394 E-mail Applicant(Who is the Contact person representing?) Robert Br u g h Address ( same a s o W n e r) City State Zip Daytime Phone( ) Fax# E-mail OFFICE USE ONLY Fee amount S Date Paid Check# By Who? Receipt# By: County of Albemarle Department of Planning& Community Development 401 McIntire Road ❖ Charlottesville,VA 22902 ❖ Voice: (804)296-5823 ❖ Fax: (804)972-4035 7/31/02 Page 1 of 2 • Type of Development: ❑ Residential ® Non-residential Type of unit(s): ❑ Commercial #of building(s): U Industrial ❑ Quasi-Public Sq.ft.of building(s): Sq.ft.of building(s): 8 , 640 #of units per building: Acreage of site: 1 . 0 0 Total#of units: Acreage in open space: 0 . 247 Resulting density: Acreage in roads: 0 . 0 0 Acreage of site: Acreage in open space: Acreage in roads: Intended use or justification for request: The purpose of this proiect is to construct a commercial. structure and appurtenances . Owner/Applicant Must Read and Sign This site plan as submitted contains all of the information required by Section 32 5(Preliminary Plan)or Section 32.6(Final Plan)of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. I understand that plans which lack information required by said sections shall be deemed incomplete and shall be denied by the agent within ten(10)days of submittal as provided in Section 32.4.2.1 or Section 32.4.3.3 as the case may be. For Final Plans Only:To the best of my knowledge,I have complied with Section 32.4.3.1 and obtained tentative approvals for all applicable conditions from the appropriate agencies. �✓� ._ .'~ , - .. it April 9 , 2003 Signature of Owner,Contract Purchaser;Agent Date. Rnhprt RrrOh (434) 296-3367 Printed Name Daytime phone number of Signatory 7/31/02 Page 2 of 2 OffICE USE ONLY ISDP# TMP Preliminary Site Development Plan 0V A 419 ClieCk lisi ..11fr ,, ►3. APR 1 1 ?flffl `� Project Name: Forest Lakes Terrace Firm: Raymond E . Gaines , Architect This checklist must be completed,signed and submitted with the application. The information contained in this checklist reflects the contents of the Site Plan Ordinance as of August 5, 1998. The applicant is responsible for insuring that no revisions to the Ordinance have occurred since preparation of this document. Plans which lack the information required by this checklist shall be deemed to be incomplete and shall be denied by the agent with ten (10) calendar days after the applicable submittal deadline[Section 32.4.21. Office Use A Preliminary Site Development Plan shall contain the following: l 1. Sixteen (16)clearly legible and folded blue or black line copies;[32.5.1]Initial Sub- ❑ mittal ❑ 2. Seven (7) full-sized revised copies and one (1) reduced revised copy no larger than ❑ eleven(11) inches by seventeen(17) inches; [32.5.2]Revision Submittals El 3. All waiver,variation and substitution requests... clearly state the specific items being ❑ requested for waiver,variation or substitution;[32.5.3]Provide justification for all waiver, variation and substitution requests. El 4. Dimensioned to the accuracy standards required in section 32.5.6r. [32.5.4] bound- ❑ _ ary, setback and zoning lines-one foot in one thousand(1:1,000)feet; Existing contours- one-half(1/2)of the contour interval;Proposed contours-within five(5)feet horizontally and vertically; Existing structures, roads, parking lots, and other improvements - within five(5)feet; Proposed structures,roads,parking lots and other improvements-within five (5)feet; [32.5.6r] El 5. Scale of one(1) inch equals twenty(20)feet or to such scale as may be approved by ❑ the agent.No sheet shall exceed forty-two (42) inches by thirty-six (36) inches in size. If prepared on more than one(1) sheet, match lines shall clearly indicate where the several sheets join. The top of the sheet shall be approximately either north or east; [32.5.5] El 6.Name of development;[32.5.6a] ❑ El 7.Name of owner, developer...; [32.5.6a] ❑ l 8. Individual who prepared the plan;[32.5.6a] ❑ El 9. Tax map and parcel number; [32.5.6a] ❑ 10.Zoning; [32.5.6a] ❑ Z1 11.Descriptions of all variances,zoning proffers and bonus factors...; [32.5.6a] ❑ County of Albemarle Department of Planning & Community Development 401 McIntire Road ❖ Charlottesville, VA 22902 ❖ Voice: (804) 296-5823 ❖ Fax: (804) 972-4035 9/14/98 Page 1 of 4 Office Use C� 12.Magisterial district; [32.5.6a] ❑ ® 13.County and state;[32.5.6aJ ❑ ® 14.North point; [32.5.6a] ❑ ® 15.Scale;[32.5.6aJ ❑ ® 16.Datum reference for elevation;[32.5.6aJ ❑ ® 17.Source of the topography; [32.5.6a] ❑ • 18.Source of the survey; [32.5.6a] ❑ • 19.Sheet number and total number of sheets;[32.5.6a] ❑ • 20.Date of the drawing; [32.5.6a] ❑ 21.Date and description of latest revision;[32.5.6a] ❑ 22.Owner, zoning, tax map and parcel number and present use of adjacent parcels; ❑ departing lot lines;[32.5.6a] l 23.Minimum setback lines,yard and building separation requirements;[32.5.6a] ❑ • 24.Vicinity sketch showing the property and its relationship with adjoining streets, sub- ❑ divisions and other landmarks; [32.5.6a] • 25.Boundary dimensions; [32.5.6a] ❑ ® 26.Proposed uses and maximum acreage occupied by each use; [32.5.6b] ❑ • 27.Maximum number of dwelling units by type;[32.5.6b] ❑ ® 28.Gross residential density;[32.5.6b] ❑ l 29.Square footage of recreation area;[32.5.6b] ❑ ® 30.Percent and acreage of open space; [32.5.6b] ❑ l 31.Maximum square footage for commercial and industrial uses;[32.5.6b] ❑ lf] 32.Maximum number of employees;[32.5.6b] ❑ 111 33.Maximum floor area ratio and lot coverage if industrial;[32.5.6b] ❑ 7 34.Maximum height of all structures;[32.5.6b] ❑ 7 35.Schedule of parking including maximum amount required and amount provided; ❑ [32.5.6b] • 36.Maximum amount of impervious cover on the site; [32.5.6b] ❑ ® 37.If a landscape plan is required, maximum amount of paved parking and vehicular ❑ circulation areas; [32.5.6b] • 38.If phasing is planned, phase lines and proposed timing of development;[32.5.6c] ❑ 9/14/98 Page 2 of 4 4 F ti Office Use l 39.Existing topography (up to twenty [20] percent slope, maximum five [5] foot con- ❑ tours, over twenty [20] percent slope, maximum ten [10] foot contours)...with sufficient offsite topography to describe prominent and pertinent offsite features and physical char- acteristics, but in no case less than fifty(50)feet outside of the site unless otherwise approved by the agent; [32.5.6d] 40.Proposed grading (maximum five [5] foot contours) supplemented where necessary ❑ by spot elevations;[32.5.6d] 41Areas of site where existing slopes are twenty-five percent or greater;[32.5.6d] ❑ 42.Existing landscape features as descried in section 32.7.9.4c;[32.5.6e] ❑ • 43.The name and location of all watercourses and other bodies of water adjacent to or ❑ on the site; [32.5.6f] 44.Indicate if the site is located within a reservoir watershed;[32.5.6f]If so, state the. ❑ name of the watershed. ® 45.Location of septic setback lines from watercourses including intermittent streams ❑ and other bodies of water; [32.5.6g] • 46.One hundred year flood plain limits as shown on the official flood insurance maps ❑ for Albemarle County;[32.5.6h] 47.Existing and proposed streets, access easements and travelways,together with street ❑ names, street route numbers,right-of-way lines and widths,centerline radii,and pavement widths; [32.5.6I] ® 48_Location and size of: existing water and sanitary sewer facilities and sand ease- ❑ ments, storm sewer facilities, drainage channels,and drainage easements; [32.5.6j] 49.Proposed "Conceptual Lay-out" for water and sanitary sewer facilities and storm ❑ drain facilities including storm detention ponds or structures, indicating direction of flow in all pipes and watercourses with arrows;[32.5.6k] "Conceptual Lay-out"shall include: general location, size and type of stormwater management facilities, pipes, culverts, inlets, channels, etc. 50.Location of other existing and proposed utilities and utility easements;[32.5.61] ❑ • 51.Location of existing and proposed ingress to and egress from the property, showing ❑ the distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection; [32.5.6m] • 52.Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed improvements including: ❑ buildings(maximum footprint and height) and other structures, walkways, fences, walls, trash containers, outdoor lighting; landscaped areas and open space;recreational areas and facilities; parking lots and other paved areas; loading and service areas together with pro- posed paving material types for all walks,parking lots and driveways; and signs;[32.5.6n] • 53.All areas intended to be dedicated or reserved for public use; [32.5.6o] ❑ • 54.Landscape plan in conformance with section 32.7.9 if required;[32.5.6p] ❑ • 55.Where deemed appropriate by the agent... estimated traffic generation figures... ❑ based upon current Virginia Department of Transportation(VDOT)rates; [32.5.6q] 9/14/98 Page 3 of 4 Office Use , In addition to the items required by the ordinance, Albemarle County Engineering, • the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Albemarle County Service Author- ity, and the Thomas Jefferson Health District require these items on plats and plans submitted for preliminary approval. Plats and plans will not be rejected if these items are not present, but they are required for approval. These items are provided in an effort to communicate all preliminary comments. ® 1. Reference the benchmarks used for surveys. (Albemarle County Engineering Policy) ❑ ® 2. Indicate the available sight distance for entrances and left turn lanes. (Albemarle ❑ County Engineering Policy) © 3. Label the maximum height of all retaining walls. (Albemarle County Engineering ❑ Policy) ❑ 4. Provide copies of off-site easements, or letters of intent to grant them from off-site ❑ property owners. (Albemarle County Engineering Policy) m 5.Show and label stream buffer limits. (WRPA Ordinance) ❑ a 6.Indicate the deed book and page reference for all existing utility easements located on ❑ the property. (Albemarle County Service Authority) Read and Sign In representing the above referenc d firm submitting this plat for preliminary approval, I hereby sate that, to the best of my knowledge, he attached plat contains all information required by this checklist. - ) ç April 10 , 2003 -- Signature of person co leting checklist Date Nancy K . Lo g \,_f (434)979-5245 Printed Name Daytime phone number of Signatory 9/14/98 Page 4 of 4 . 1 APR 1 1 2nnl 1 Short Version BMP Computations For Worksheets 2 - 6 - - - Albemarle County Water Protection Ordinance. Modified Simple Method Plan: FOREST LAKES TERRACE Water Resources Area: Preparer: Woody Parrish Date: RE 4/11 Project Drainage Area Designation Total Parcel L storm pollutant export in pounds, L=[P(Pj)Rv/12][C(A)2.72] Rv mean runoff coefficient, Rv=0.05+0.009(1) Pj small storm correction factor,0.9 I percent imperviousness P annual precipitation,43"in Albemarle A project area in acres in subject drainage area, A= 1 00 C pollutant concentration,mg/I or ppm target phosphorus f factor applied to RR V required treatment volume in cy,0.5"over imperv.area= A(I)43560(0 5/12)/27 RR required removal, L(post)-f x L(pre) %RR removal efficiency, RR100/L(post) Impervious Cover Computation(values in feet&square feet) Item pre-development Area post-development Area Roads Length Width subtotal Length Width subtotal 205 205 Driveways Length Width no subtotal Length Width no subtotal and walks 0 1941 Parking Lots 1 1 1 0 ' 20487 Structures Area no. subtotal Area no. subtotal 0 0 0 0 10368 Area Area Grass/Landscaped areas 433551x 0.08= 3468 4 107641x 0.08= 861 12 Active crop land Area Area 1 x 0.25= 0 1 x 0.25= 0 Other Impervious Areas 0 0 Impervious Cover I 8%' I 78%, I(pre) l(post) Rv(post) V V(c.f.) 0.75 52.3 1411 New Development(For Development Areas,existing impervious cover<=20%) C f I(pre)* Rv(pre) L(pre) L(post) RR %RR 1 Area Type 0.70 1.00 20% 0.23 1.41 4 60 3.19 69% Development 0.35 1.00 0% 0.13 0 39 2.30 1 91 83% Drinking Water Watersheds 0.40 1.00 1% 0.13 0.44 2.63 2.19_ 83% Other Rural Land *min values Redevelopment(For Development Areas,existing impervious cover>20%) C f I(pre)* Rv(pre) L(pre) L(post) RR 1 %RR 1 Area Type 0.70 0.90 20% 0.23 1.41 4.60 3.33 72% Development 0.35 0.85 0% 0.13 0.39 2.30 1 97 86% Drinking Water Watersheds 0.40 0.85 1% 0 13 0.44 2 63 2.25_ 86%Other Rural Land Interim Manual,Page 69 rev.31 March 1998 GEB ECEIVED APR 1 2003 ] 1C 7. Short Version BMP Computations For Worksheets 2 -6 ��-J Albemarle County Water Protection Ordinance: Modified Simple Method Plan: FOREST LAKES TERRACE Water Resources Area: Preparer: Woody Parrish Date' Re 4/11 Project Drainage Area Designation Total Parcel L storm pollutant export in pounds, L=[P(Pj)Rv/12][C(A)2 72] Rv mean runoff coefficient, Rv=0.05+0.009(1) Pj small storm correction factor,0 9 I percent imperviousness P annual precipitation,43"in Albemarle A project area in acres in,subject drainage area, A= 1 00 C pollutant concentration, mg/I or ppm target phosphorus f factor applied to RR ✓ required treatment volume in cy,0.5"over impery area= A(1)43560(0 5/12)/27 RR required removal , L(post)-f x L(pre) %RR removal efficiency, RR100/L(post) Impervious Cover Computation(values in feet&square feet) Item pre-development Area post-development Area Roads Length Width subtotal Length Width subtotal 205 205 Driveways Length Width no. subtotal Length Width no subtotal and walks 0 1941 Parking Lots I I 0 I I 20487 Structures Area no. subtotal Area no. subtotal 0 0 0 0 10368 Area Area Grass/Landscaped areas 433551x 0 08= 3468 4 10764 x 0.08= 861 12 Active crop land Area Area x0.25= 0 I x025= 0 Other Impervious Areas 0 0 Impervious Cover 8%I I 78%1 I(pre) l(post) Rv(post) V V(c.f) 0.75 52 3 1411 New Development(For Development Areas,existing impervious cover<=20%) C f I(pre)* Rv(pre) L(pre) L(post) RR %RR Area Type 0.70 1.00 20% 0.23 1.41 4 60 3 19 69% Development 0.35 1.00 • 0% 0.13 0.39 2.30 1 91 83% Drinking Water Watersheds 0.40 1.00 1% 0 13 0 44 2.63 2.19 83% Other Rural Land *min values Redevelopment(For Development Areas,existing impervious cover>20%) C f I(pre)* Rv(pre) L(pre) L(post) RR I %RR Area Type 0.70 0.90 20% 0 23 1.41 4.60 3.33 72// Development 0.35 0.85 0% 0 13 0 39 2.30 1.97 86% Drinking Water Watersheds 0.40 0.85 1% 0.13 0.44 2.63 2 25 86% Other Rural Land Interim Manual,Page 69 rev 31 March 1998 GEB • Short Version BMP Computations For Worksheets 2 -6 Albemarle County Water Protection Ordinance: Modified Simple Method Plan: FOREST LAKES TERRACE Water Resources Area: Preparer: Woody Parrish Date: RE 4/11 Project Drainage Area Designation Total Parcel L storm pollutant export in pounds, L=[P(Pj)Rv/12][C(A)2 72 Rv mean runoff coefficient, Rv=0.05+0.009(I) Pj small storm correction factor,0 9 percent imperviousness P annual precipitation,43"in Albemarle A project area in acres in subject drainage area, A= 1 00 C pollutant concentration,mg/I or ppm target phosphorus factor applied to RR V required treatment volume in cy,0.5"over impery area= A(I)43560(0.5/12)/27 RR required removal, L(post)-f x L(pre) %RR removal efficiency, RR100/L(post) Impervious Cover Computation(values in feet&square feet) Item pre-development Area post-development Area Roads Length Width subtotal Length Width subtotal 205 205 Driveways Length Width no. subtotal Length Width no subtotal and walks 0 1941 Parking Lots I 1 1 0 1 1 20487 Structures Area no. subtotal Area no subtotal 0 0 0 0 10368 Area Area Grass/Landscaped areas 433551x 0 08= 3468 4 10764 x 0.08= 861.12 Active crop land Area Area x0.25= 0 x0.25= 0 Other Impervious Areas 0 0 Impervious Cover 8% 78% I(pre) ((post) Rv(post) V V(c f) 0.75 52.3 1411 New Development(For Development Areas,existing impervious cover<=20%) C f I(pre)* Rv(pre) L(pre) L(post) RR l %RR Area Type 0.70 1.00 20% 0.23 1 41 4.60 3.19 69% Development 0.35 1.00 0% 0 13 0.39 2.30 1.91 83% Drinking Water Watersheds 0.40 1.00 1% 0.13 0.44 2 63 2.19 83% Other Rural Land *min.values Redevelopment(For Development Areas,existing impervious cover>20%) C f I(pre)* Rv(pre) L(pre) L(post) RR { %RR Area Type 0.70 0.90 20% 0.23 1.41 4 60 3 33 72% Development 0.35 0.85 0% 0.13 0 39 2.30 1.97 86% Drinking Water Watersheds 0.40 0.85 1% 0.13 0.44 2.63 2.25 86% Other Rural Land Interim Manual,Page 69 rev.31 March 1998 GEB Short Version BMP Computations For Worksheets 2 -6 Albemarle County Water Protection Ordinance: Modified Simple Method Plan: FOREST LAKES TERRACE Water Resources Area: Preparer: Woody Parrish Date: Re 4/11 Project Drainage Area Designation Total Parcel L storm pollutant export in pounds, L=[P(Pj)Rv/12][C(A)2 72] Rv mean runoff coefficient, Rv=0.05+0.009(I) Pj small storm correction factor,0.9 I percent imperviousness P annual precipitation,43"in Albemarle A project area in acres in,subject drainage area, A= 1 00 C pollutant concentration,mg/I or ppm target phosphorus f factor applied to RR ✓ required treatment volume in cy,0.5"over imperv.area= A(I)43560(0.5/12)/27 RR required removal, L(post)-f x L(pre) %RR removal efficiency, RR100/L(post) Impervious Cover Computation(values in feet&square feet) Item pre-development Area post-development Area Roads Length Width subtotal Length Width subtotal 205 205 Driveways Length Width no. subtotal Length Width no. subtotal and walks 0 1941 Parking Lots 1 I I 0 I 1 20487 Structures Area no. subtotal Area no. subtotal 0 0 0 0 10368 Area Area Grass/Landscaped areas 433551x 0.08= 3468.4 I 107641x 0 08= 861 12 Active crop land Area Area x0.25= 0 x0.25= 0 Other Impervious Areas 0 0 Impervious Cover I 8%1 78% I(pre) [(post) Rv(post) V V(c.f) 0 75 52.3 1411 New Development(For Development Areas,existing impervious cover<=20%) C f I(pre)* Rv(pre) L(pre) L(post) RR I %RR Area Type 0.70 1.00 20% 0 23 1.41 4 60 3.19 69% Development 0.35 1.00 0% 0 13 0.39 2.30 1 91 83% Drinking Water Watersheds 0.40 1.00 1% 0 13 0.44 2.63 2 19 83% Other Rural Land *min.values Redevelopment(For Development Areas,existing impervious cover>20%) C f I(pre)* Rv(pre) L(pre) L(post) RR %RR Area Type 0.70 0.90 20% 0.23 1.41 4 60 3.33 72% Development 0.35 0.85 0% 0.13 0.39 2.30 1 97 86% Drinking Water Watersheds 0.40 0.85 1% 0.13 0.44 2 63 2.25 86%Other Rural Land Interim Manual,Page 69 rev.31 March 1998 GEB 04' I w{i{).J 09 .fV 1':1.. 43y L11.1) (_1111L l\ Lt).\1\l, 4Joulf • APR 1 1 ?owl 4ikGItio• aAr. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5823 post-it'Fax Note 7671 Date gm Pa9Esy �J January 23 , 1989 Co./Dept. Co. Ai Phone# Phone u , J Fax# Fax# u Forest Lakes Associates c/o Frank Kessler P. O. Box 5207 Charlottesville, VA 22905 RE: ZMA-88-16 Forest Lakes Associates Tax Map 32 , Parcels 36, 36F and 42 and Tax Map 46, Parcel 29D; Route 29N Dear Mr. Kessler: The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on January 18 , 1989, unanimously approved the above-noted request to rezone 13 .9264 acres from HC (Highway Commercial) R-1 (Residential) and R-15 (Residential) to PD-SC (Planned Development-Shopping Center) for a community shopping center of 71, 800 square feet with an additional 3 . 96 acres in unspecified outlots. Property, located on the east side of Rt. 29 North and the north side of Timberwood Boulevard. Rivanna Magisterial District. Please note that this approval is subject to the following modifications and agreements between the applicant and the County: MODIFICATIONS,TO APPLLCATION PLAN: 1. Note on plan that outlots are not approved for uses involving drive-in window. To include revised access plans of entrance only and exit only as shown on sketch of Tiger Fuel site, initialed by Mr. John T. P. Horne and dated January 18, 1989 ; 2. Relocate access near Timberwood for outlot 1 to align with main access aisle parallel to Phase I of the shopping center; 3 . Provide joint or cross easement between Outlots 2 and 3 . (14• iji LUU.i 1,1:1:JJ 1—A.1 d•id l� •11Lv LLL Lli i L i,\i.\t, 4J :• _ Forest Lakes Associates Page 2 January 23 , 1989 AGREEMENTS MADE BY THE COUNTY AND THE APPLICANT: 1. Agreement to develop property in general compliance with the Application Plan. Variations may be permitted as provided in Section 8 . 5. 6. 3 of the Zoning Ordinance; 2 . Staff approval of shopping center subdivision plats and Tiger Fuel subdivision plat. All plats shall reflect appropriate access easements and carry notes, regarding restriction of access to U.S. Rt. 29 North to the satisfaction of the Planning staff; 3 . Staff approval of site plan for Forest Lakes' shopping center and revised site plan for Tiger Fuel service station. Staff may request administrative approval of site plans for individual. outlots. Staff may approve an additional exit only to Timberwood Boulevard near outparcel 3 . To include revised access plan of entrance only and exit only as shown on sketch of the Tiger Fuel site, initialed by Mr. John T. P. Horne and dated January 18 , 1989 ; 4 . Agreement by applicant that traffic generation from the +24 .2 acres of commercial zoning shall not exceed 10, 350 vehicle trips per day. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. S '. erely, o T. P. Horne `Director of Planning & Community Development JTPH/jCw cc: Kathy Dodson U-i•"lU• �UUJ 11a. 40 }'A.. 4.j4 y. il�u uLu i,1,i r } r 1. � , - - . ..:......w — .•fir .;—i•oidillign�m ~ RECEIVED . JAN 7 1498 COUNTY OF ACBE_MARLE Department of Building Code and Zoning Services I P I a n n i n g Dept. 401 McIntire Road, Room 223 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Building Code Information FAX(804)972-4126 Zoning Information (804)296-5832 TTD(804)972-4012 (804)296-5875 January 6, 199E Don Franco,P.E. The Kessler Group P.O. Box 5207 Charlottesville,VA 22905 Re: Forest Lakes Commercial Area Traffic Generation Determination of Proffer Dear Mr.Franco: I have reviewed the vehicle trip analyses by Wilbur Smith Associates transmitted to you on August 27. 1997 and I concur with their findings. Bill Fritz, Senior Planner has also reviewed the information and reached the same conclusion. Therefore,the traffic proffer can be interpreted to allow a reduction of the total site vehicle trips based on pass-by traffic between the homcs and Routcs 29 and 649 and a further reduction of the vehicle trips based on • multiple-use trips. The reduction is 12 percent for multiple land uses and 24 percent for pass-by traffic,with a total of 36%. I agree with the methodology you suggest for traffic generation: 5th Edition of ITE Trip Generation Manual and weekday rates for the individual uses using square footage as the independent variable, adjusted by 36$to account for traffic generation not impacting Route 29. It was useful to have actual data from traffic counts on 4/23 and 4/24 in addition to analysis based on ITE trip rates. As the report from Wilbur Smith Associates notes,the fact that these numbers closely match lends credence to the presumptions in this analysis. We will appreciate the updating of these figures with each plan. In response to your question about how to include traffic generation from additional property near the cemetery,I am not prepared to give a final answer. It.vrould be reasonable to consider it under the same methodology. If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Amelia G.McCulley,A. .C.P_ Zoning Administrator cc: Bill Fritz I:IGENERAL1st1AJE\ALD&ZON\AMELIAWLKTRAF.WPA-pscivasy 6,199a RAYMOND E. GAINES LIALLCIVIAR O T o AGMHO 1 Architect P.O. Box 6255 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22906 /// DATE 4 / 1 0 /03 JOB NO Q�5 (434) 979-5245 ATTENTION `/ / TO A � /r,L,O� g CO u ,/'r RE Po it '5! I...A/<I5 7EIz G P L A,j/V/ N cT p P i. *l fftil4 cj/vr9,rz. Tkyt n 4L6if5z71 — to / WE ARE SENDING YOU IF(Attached Under separate cover v the following items: ❑ Shop drawings Prints Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications lB'Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO DESCRIPTION I J to 410'403 �5 col VEtz 3kEET ,i If G—/ Pg i /ri,iV' ey 517s . pL/tnl i. f' c•2. off l rE Uf`IG.. InE5 Pi. AAl 1 zi - 7-0; A 1'rL I DTI oh1 f01" 511E ✓1:G-of'rh r FLA A1.5 1 1.1• 1d•03 P/Kg1- /i l_ '1 TV 17EVE i--M11 PI-A-Al c iL1 sr / tit. 9, 03 n " Pg-5-GMk' /33go l 10 °DT Go pY © r TizAK�IG Izo p-p zrnA -88 - f!,o 4- Li ,/I, 0.3 ? Mp 641-CV/ 47'IcAJ THESE ARE TRANSMI as checked below: or a oval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval or your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As re sted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints > or review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS i'L..),1 COPY TO SIGNED. K If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. I\ 1Jf111,1LJ ILL •OV4 JI J J1LV flNl 11 eVJ 1 ' • LV IYU . VVI I . Vl NEEL 1d 11 RAYMOND E. GAINES r l l I l N t ...N ARCHITECT FAX TRANSMITTAL 1 0 0 6 EAST MAR /GE / 6 "f . - SUITE D P. 0. Box 6255 C II A R L O T T E S V I L L E , VIRGINIA 2 2 9 0 6 1434) 9 7 9-5 245 FAX 1434) 979.9 1 26 EMAIL R G T E C T@ N T E L❑ S . N E T DATE: 2/ 1)1 o 3 FAX NUMBER; q 7 2— T❑: - m ]74 L covAL 74 ATTN: PM' V i/v v p r PROJFCT # Ot3/ RE: f'/ YT 2A K Es 76 X4 &: 5 c PP/.nsc C- FR❑M: LA /VG / 2 ©N6 REMARKS: LL�iTi � `ZTR E f�il�G�/1N °Ai TO rH j' J 7i pi.4 N pA6x 66_ . L �nlFo m- 14T)6n/ G,/As iJ$EP fox 7/ i/Z/i-/ i 2c (-L&/r:g0977 L (-.11.. i l .' �ovex - -51--)&E 'f . __... ... . nfl' Et O U — #OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET : 3 ^" THIS FACSIMILE IS INTENDED CNI Y MR THE maw OF THE INDIVIDUAL NAMED ABOVE. IF THE RFAoFR OF TIIIR MEOSAOQ IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT PERPONSIDI-C TO DELIVr6 TO INTENDED RECIPIENT, You ARE He1lEDV NoTle-leo THAT ANY DI9NEMINATION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IR STRICTLY PROHISITCD. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS FAX IN ERROR, PLEASE CONTACT US rlY PHONE AND PETu1W YHE ORIGINAL FACSIMILE TEl LIP or I19 MAIL THANK You! K Uh 1INLJ ILL •aLLI.Th y— 1I LO h f11 11 e uJ 1 J • L.) !NU . uu r r .uL • Land Use: 832 .„ High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant ` Description This land use consists of sit-down eating establishments with turnover rates of approximately one t hour or less. This type of restaurant is usually moderately priced and frequently belongs to a restaurant chain. Generally, these restaurants serve lunch and dinner; they may also be open for breakfast and are sometimes open 24 hours per day. Some facilities contained within this land use may also contain a bar area for serving food and alcoholic drinks. Quality restaurant (land .o use 831), fast-food restaurant without drive-through window (land use 833), fast-food restaurant with drive-through window (land use 834), fast-food restaurant with drive-through window and no . indoor seating (land use 835), and drinking place (land use 836) are related uses. • Additional Data Vehicle occupancy ranged from 1.39 to 1.69 persons per automobile on an average weekday. The average for the sites that were surveyed was approximately 1.52. A significant number of the studies in this land use were conducted prior to 1980. A study was conducted to test the sensitivity of the older versus newer data. It was determined that there is no statistically significant difference between the pre-and post-1980 data, therefore, all of the data points were retained to maximize the size of the database. Users should exercise caution when applying statistics during the A.M. peak period as the sites contained in the data base for this land use may or may not be open for breakfast. The sites were surveyed from the 1960s to the 1990s throughout the United States. Source Numbers 2, 4, 5, 72, 90, 100, 126, 269, 275, 280, 300, 301, 305, 338, 340, 341, 358, 384, 424, 432, 437, 438, 444 • • Trip Generation, 6th Edition 1375 Institute of Transportation Engineers R V r1111 G J ILL -VV'4 'I J J J.L V 1-11,JI 11 l VJ 1J •LJ I'IU _VVI I .VJ 1 I High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant ` . Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area I t ' .i 1 On a: Weekday I I Number of Studies: 12 I' Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 7 • I Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting I 'I Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate -- 9 Range of Rates Standard Deviation 1: ! i c 1.30.34 73.51 - 246.00 43.77 ' ----- - - "-- e-, C)5`=. -z: t.).-'Y n•-i ►C-•ti E ,/ r= 11 Data Plot and Equation 1 1,500 - - - 1 1,400 • • • . • . . - - . - • • • • • • . . . . - , - . . . . . 1.300 - • - - - , I 1 - ' v, ,200 - - 0 ; 1.100 1 a1 ; U i j 1,000 . . . . X .. I a) x ; al X j 2.1 900 - - x i a' I- ' ' X 800 — - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 (00 .x. . x. .,<'. . . . . ... .. . . . X•r 1 l x i fl' JOO -____,- .t-T..I ' .1 --'--t-- , - I 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 X: 'Moo Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area y , X Actual Data Points . Av era go Rate. ! Fitted Curve Equation: Not given R2=•••• x: Trip Generation,6th Edition 1376 institute of TransportaLz,:;