Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP202200002 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2022-03-04401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, County of Albemarle VA 222 Telephone: 434-296-96-5832SS32 +1� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WWW,ALBEMARLE.ORG ` `IRGINIP„ Memorandum To: Ryan Yauger (rvaueer&bohlereng corn) From: Kevin McCollum — Senior Planner I Division: Planning Services Date: March 4, 2022 Subject: SDP202200002 RST Residences — Final Site Plan Review Comments The Planner for the Planning Services Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approval of the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] Anolicable Comments from Initial Site Plan Action Letter (dated November 24. 2021) Comments that have been addressed have been blurred out. Additional comments are added in bold font, like this. 1. [36.1(c)] County records show there is an outstanding initial site plan fee balance of $615.66. This fee will need to be paid prior to Friday, December 3, 2021 in order for the initial site plan to be approved. Comment addressed. 2. 132.5.2(b) and 15.31 Will any of the dwelling units be subdivided into individual properties? If so, show lot lines and provide their dimensions on each proposed lot. Comment addressed. 3. [32.5.2(i)] Please clarify the following: a. Private Road C is the only vehicular accessway within the site that is labeled as a private road. Please verify that this is being done in order to provide the inter parcel access to the adjoining property, as shown on the ZMA Application Plan. If so, a private street easement that grants access to the adjoining parcel needs to be recorded prior to final site plan approval. Comment partially addressed, Private Road C (Archer Avenue) will be a private street. Prior to final site plan approval, a private street easement will need to be created through recordation of an easement plat. See comment #12 below for further information. b. Please verify that all other travelways are not intended to be either public or private streets. Comment addressed. 4. [32.5.2(a)] Revise the Parcel ID label on the Cover Sheet to state "Tax Map and Parcel Number" or simply "TMP." Please include a reference to both TMP 46-108 and TMP 46-109. Please revise the "PIN" reference and chance it to "TMP" in the Site Data table on the Cover Sheet. 5. [32.6.2(a)] Please include a placeholder for the Final Site Plan application number and include a reference to the Initial Site Plan application: SDP202100079. Please include Final Site Plan application number SDP202200002 and please label SDP202100079 as the Initial Site Plan number. 6. [32.5.1(c)] Provide setback lines on the Site Plan sheets. Comment addressed. 7. [32.6.2(a)] Provide the Site Data table shown on Sheet C-300 on the Cover Sheet. a. Use TMP instead of PIN/PID references. Please revise. See comment 4 above. b. Include a reference to Special Exception SE202000003 underneath the ZMA information. Comment stands. c. Include all information provided in the Site Data on the Cover Sheet of ZMA202000007. This includes all required calculations, recreational facility information, affordable dwelling unit information, buffer information, etc. Comment stands. Please refer to the approved Application Plan dated 6/1/2021. 8. [32.6.2(a)] Paste a copy of the conditions associated with SE202000003 onto one of the general notes sheets. Comment addressed. 9. [32.6.2(i)] Zoning approval of the proposed parking requirements and the provided layout is required prior to Final Site Plan approval. Provide a breakdown of types and numbers of units in the apartment buildings to confirm parking requirements. For example, how many studio apartments, one -bedroom, two -bedroom, etc. a. Please confirm how parking is being provided for the attached 78 units. Are there driveways and garages? Where are the guest spaces? 10. [32.6.2(a)] Correct any reference to PID to TMP including labels for adjacent properties. Comment addressed. 11. [General Comment] Please add the Site Review Committee (SRC) signature panel (attached) to the cover sheet. Comment addressed. 12. [32.5.2 (k)(1), 32.6.2(g)] Any new easements required for water, sewer, drainage facilities, or any proposed utilities will need to be reviewed, approved, and recorded prior to final site plan approval. Please submit an easement plat application the County for review. The final site plan will need to be updated so that all easements are shown and labeled identifying easement type, whether it's public or private, a width dimension, and the recorded instrument with deed book and page number. Comment stands. Per the site access note on Sheet 1 of the Application Plan, all travelways within the development will need to have an easement granting public access and use of the travelways. These easements need to be recorded prior to final site plan approval. Sheet 3 of the Application Plan identifies the travelways that need the public access easement with a gray dashed line. Please show this easement on the site plan on all applicable drawings. 13. 132.7.9.7 (a)(3)] Please provide a construction detail in plan and profile view of the proposed dumpster enclosure. The detail should identify materials to be used, color, dimensions, etc. Comment addressed. 14. 132.7.8 and 4.171 Lighting Plan a. 14.17.4 (a)] Provide manufacturer cut -sheets for all proposed outdoor luminaires. Comment addressed. b. [4.17.4 (a)] All proposed outdoor luminaries exceeding 3,000 lumens must be full -cutoff fixtures. Please provide documentation from the manufacturers that all fixtures will be full -cutoff. Comment addressed. c. Please state the pole height of all outdoor luminaires. Comment addressed. d. [4.17.4 (b)] Please add a note to which states "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one-half footcandle." Comment addressed. 15. [32.6.2(f)] Provide a typical street section for Private Street C (See Engineering comment if applicable). Comment addressed. 16. [General Comment] Final site plan must meet all other requirements of 18-32.6, 18-32.7, and 18-32.8 prior to final approval. Final Site Plan Review Comments: 1. [32.5.2(a)] Please provide the total number of sheets at the bottom of the Sheet Index table on the Cover Sheet. The Sheet Index count suggests there are 42 sheets, but there are 53 total sheets in the set. 2. [General Comment] Add a date of revision. 3. [32.6.2., 4.121 Ensure all parking spaces are counted and labeled properly. In the screenshot below there are 11 parking spaces in the upper right bubble where it is labeled as 9, and in the larger bubble along Travelway A there are 7 street parking spaces, but labeled as 8. Travelway B appears to be missing a street parking count as well. w �\Xis'- M/ cwenu.wn /NIIE MT MWENC\s BOHLER SITE PLAN C-301 4. [4.16.2, ZMA2020000071 Finalize all proposed improvements within the recreational areas and show these features on all applicable sheets. a. Per recreational area notes on Sheet 1 of the Application Plan, the specific amenities required by Section 18-4.16 of the Zoning Ordinance must be provided on site unless the applicant requests an amenity substitution request. b. Please provide recreational area along the southern property line abutting the landscaping buffer as shown on the Application Plan. 5. [32.7.8 and 4.17.41 Please use alight loss factor of 1.0 to determine footcandles on site. Update the lighting plan accordingly. 6. [General Comment] Prior to final site plan approval, a WPO plan must be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the Engineering Division. Please see Engineering comments below for additional information. 7. [18-30.7.4 (b)(1)(h)] In order to disturb the areas of Preserved Steep Slopes highlighted in red on the plan, the applicant must provide new topographic information that is based on more accurate or better technical data demonstrating, to the satisfaction of the county engineer, that the slopes are less than 25 percent prior to approval of the final site plan. Please contact Kevin McCollum at the Department of Community Development at kmccollum@albemarle.org or 296-5832 ext. 3141 for further information. Additional Reviewer Comments Albemarle County Engineering Services — John Anderson, 4anderson2&albemarle.org— Requested changes, see attached. Albemarle County Building Inspections — Betty Slough, bslou hg &albemarle.org — Requested changes, see below. 1. Based on the size of the pool area, a minimum of 3 means of egress are needed, of which 2 must be accessible. It is possible that a 4th gate may be needed. These gates must be located per Section 1007 Of the 2018 Virginia Construction Code. 2. Add the following note to the general notes page: Retaining walls greater than 3 feet in height require a separate building permit. Walls exceeding 4 feet in height require a stamped engineered design also. Walls require inspections as outlined in the USBC. 3. Add the following note to the general notes page: Accessible parking spaces, access isles, and accessible route shall be installed in accordance with ICC ANSI A117.1- 09 and the 2018 Virginia Construction Code. 4. Add the following note to the general notes page: Where the flood level rims of plumbing fixtures are below the elevation of the manhole cover of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer, the fixtures shall be protected by a backwater valve installed in the building drain, branch of the building drain or horizontal branch serving such fixtures. Plumbing fixtures having flood level rims above the elevation of the manhole cover of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer shall not discharge through a backwater valve. 5. Add the following to the general notes page: All roof drains shall discharge in a manner not to cause a public nuisance and not over sidewalks. 6. Note to developer: Due to required distances from lot lines and structures as required by the NFPA, underground propane tanks may be prohibited. Plan accordingly. 7. Add the following note to the general notes page: Buildings or structures built before January 1, 1985 must have an asbestos survey performed in order to apply for a demolition permit. Asbestos removal permits are required if positive for such from Albemarle County and VDOLI. Contact VDOLI for their additional requirements and permits for demolition projects at 540-562-3580 x131. 8. Add the following note to the general notes page: All water, sewer and fire lines require NEW inspection and testing procedures. The ACSA performs any testing and inspections of the public sewer and water main(s). The Albemarle County Building Inspections Department(ACBID) does a visual inspection and witnesses the testing of the building drain, water service pipe and the sprinkler lead-in connection. The developer/contractor is responsible to retain a Special Inspector as outlined in the updated Albemarle County Policy for Site Utilities to perform the visual inspection and testing of all utilities not covered by the ACSA or ACBID. This includes building sewers, water and fire line branches between the main and the meter(s)/building(s). The Special Inspector's report must be submitted and approved by the Albemarle County Engineering Department prior to a Certificate of Occupancy being issued. Albemarle County E911—Elise Kiewra, ekiewra@albemarle.org—Requested changes, see attached. Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) — Richard Nelson, melson&serviceauthority.org — Review pending. Comments will be forwarded to the Applicant upon receipt. Albemarle County Architectural Review Board (ARB) — Margaret Maliszewski, mmaliszewski@albemarle.org — Review pending. This plan will be reviewed by the ARB at the March 21, 2022 meeting. Comments will be available after that meeting. Virginia Department of Transportation— Doug McAvoy Jr., douglas.mcayoy@a vdot.vir ig nia.gov —Requested changes, see attached. Virginia Department of Health — Alan Mazurowski, alan.mazurowski@vdh.vir ig nia.gov — Review pending. Comments will be forwarded to the Applicant upon receipt. Albemarle County Fire -Rescue — Howard Lagomarsino, hlaeomarsino@albemarle.org — Requested changes, see below. On the plans dated 1/10/2022, they indicate apartment buildings are to be constructed on the site, though the requirement for fire suppression/fire sprinkler systems is the purview of the building official, it is anticipated the apartment buildings will require the installation of a fire sprinkler system. As such, this requires a fire department connection (FDC). I do not see the location of the FDC indicated on any of the plan sheets for these buildings. This is important to assess the placement of hydrants as a fire hydrant needs to be within 100 feet of the fire department connection and arranged so that when the hydrant and the FDC are in use, it does not obstruct the fire apparatus access. 2. I did not locate the note on the plans the note for the needed fire flow for the buildings. The flow for the apartments will be different than the flow for the townhomes. Please place a note on the plans that identifies the needed fire flow for the buildings. 3. In line with comment # 2, the needed fire flow coincides with the analysis of the available fire flow at the hydrants. Please place a note on the plan the available fire flow for the hydrants (This calculation is needed to accurately assess if the hydrant numbers and spacing are sufficient). 4. The hydrant spacing for the townhome section is insufficient. In the least stringent scenario, the spacing is hydrants every 500 feet but arranged so that no building is more than 250 feet from a hydrant. The townhomes on the west side of travelway D and travelway E do not conform to this requirement. 5. During construction, the following fire prevention steps are required, so please note them on the plan: a. Smoking shall be prohibited in areas where smoking makes conditions such as to make smoking a hazard and these areas shall be designated with no smoking signs per Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. b. Areas where smoking can occur, shall have appropriate receptacles for discarded smoking materials per Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. c. Per the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code, vehicular access for firefighting shall be provided at all construction and demolition sites, provide access to within 100 ft. of temporary or permanent fire department connections, and have no overhead wiring or other overhead obstructions lower than 13 ft. 6 inches; this access may be via permanent or temporary road, but shall be capable of supporting fire apparatus in all weather conditions. d. Contractor shall ensure the street numbers are always plainly visible from the frontage street during construction per the Virginia Statewide Fire Code e. An approved water supply for firefighting operations shall be in place and available as soon as combustible materials arrive on site. f. Waste and combustible debris shall be removed from the building at the end of each day and disposed of in accordance with the Virginia Statewide Fire Code g. Fire extinguishers shall be provided, with not less than one approved fire extinguisher at each stairwell, on all floor levels where combustible materials have accumulated, in every storage and construction shed and in areas of special; hazards, such as where flammable and combustible liquids are stored or used, in accordance with the Virginia Statewide Fire Code h. Operations involving the use of cutting and welding shall comply with the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code and shall require a permit from the Albemarle County Fire Marshal's Office 6. There are places on the roads and travelways where parking spaces are not delineated and the width of the road does not permit parking without obstructing the travelway below the required 20 foot width for areas with buildings less than 30 feet tall accessed by the road or travelway or if over 30 feet tall, the 26 foot width. These roads will require no parking signs that are noted on the plans. Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority —Dyon Vega, dvega&rinavvan.org — Request changes, see below and attached. RWSA has reviewed the RST Residences Final Site plan dated 1/10/2022 by Bohler civil and consulting engineering and has the following comments: General Comments: 1. Please include RWSA general notes. Attached. Sheet C-400: 1. Please show RWSA 24" DI WL on overall grading sheet. Sheet C-500: 1. RWSA would prefer to not have a tap off the 24" DI WL along Seminole trail. Please consult with ACSA as to whether this is needed or the 6" tap off Ashwood blvd from the ACSA line is enough. 2. With a proposed tap from the RWSA 24" DI WL, RWSA would like the ACSA 12" line to prepare for a future connection to serve the adjacent parcels and connect through Hollymead, or Rubin Ln. 3. Please plan to perform a wet tap on the 24" DI WL so a shutdown is not required. 4. How do you plan to abandon the existing 2" service lateral, meter, and PRV at Ridgewood Drive? Sheet C-501 1. The proposed tap calls out a 12"xl2" Tee but should be a 12"x24" Tee. County of Albemarle COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Site Plan review Project title: Final Site Plan for RST Residences Project file number: SDP202200002 Plan preparer: Ryan Yauger, PE [ rvaueerkbohlereng.com ] Bohler Engineering 9100 Arboretum Pkwy, Suite 360 Richmond, VA 23236 Owner or rep.: AlexArstdevelooment.com RST Development, LLC 6110 Executive Blvd., #620 Rockville, MD 20852 Plan received date: 20 Jan 2022 Date of comments: 3 Mar 2022 Plan Coordinator: Kevin McCollum Reviewer: John Anderson Engineering has reviewed the initial site plan and offers these review comments. 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, VA 22902-4579 Telephone: 434-296-5832 WWW.ALBEMARLE.ORG For final site plan (FSP) Approval (comments are ISP Engineering review comments /SDP202100079): 1. VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix A(1), prohibits `parking within 20 feet of any intersection measured from the curb return of the intersection.' Recommend remove parking proposed within 20-ft. of any VDOT Road Design Manual No parking zone. For example: Int. travelway A and private road C, travelway E and private road C. Ref. Appendix A(1), p. A(1)-77. (FSP) Addressed. 2. Similarly, parallel parking is proposed coincident with curb return on travelway A, at entrance/exit to roundabout (Int. travelway B and travelway A). Recommend eliminate parallel parking proximate to roundabout on travelway A, both N and S of the roundabout intersection. (FSP) Addressed. 3. C-501 a. Check match -line labels (recommend revise match -line sheet references to ref. C-503, C-501, etc.) (FSP) Addressed. b. Re -designation of steep slopes is a process not accomplished automatically by field run survey, or submittal of a site plan. Please see 18-30.7.4.b. Lh., and submit new topographic information for Engineering review. Submit a steep slopes exhibit. (FSP) Persists. Applicant response (letter, Jan-10, 2022): `Comment acknowledged. Steep slope exhibit will be provided under separate cover.' 4. Remove proposed improvements (parking /travelway/s, or grading) located on preserved steep slopes unless such slopes are re -designated as non -steep by Albemarle county, via process outlined at 18-30.7.4. (FSP) Persists. Applicant: `Comment acknowledged. Improvements have remained for now, while the steep slope exhibit is under review. Steep Slope exhibit will be provided under separate cover for review.' 5. C400-C404 a. Add flow lines to storm pipes. (FSP) Addressed. b. Label all travelways. (FSP) Addressed. c. On either C-400 (Grading) or C-500 (Utility) series of FSP sheets, label all pipes and inlets. (FSP) Addressed. d. Provide VDOT LD-204 stormwater inlet computations. (FSP) Persists. Although plan sheet index indicates utility computations are included, sheets C505 C-506 are not included in the plan set. Additional comments possible. Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 4 e. Provide VDOT LD-229 storm drain design computations. (FSP) Persists. Ref. item 5.d., above. f. Provide storm profiles. (FSP) Addressed. As follow-up (C-8XX series): i. Recommend labels on storm profiles showing pipe or inlet structures substantially or entirely in fill be revised from `Prop. Compacted Fill' to require (or at least include reference to) 95% compaction. ii. Revise pipe slope, Str. A-32 to A-31, to >_ 0.50%. Ref. Drainage Plan checklist. iii. Revise pipe slope, Str. A-24 to A-23, to >_ 0.50%. iv. Check profile proposed Storm Profile A-20 to A-24, which proposes 15" DIA downstream of 18" DIA RCP (18" may be a typo). v. Str. C-10, C-802: Include SL-1 (safety slab) label on profile, since ht. structure >12'. vi. Proposed storm profile — UG-B to B-30 appears cropped. Please show entire profile. vii. If Str. UG-B manway ht. >12-11., incl. SL-1 design, provide SL-1 label on profile. viii. C-803 1. UG-D to D-20 caption appears to require edit (to D-30). 2. UG-D to D-20 profile requires structure /pipe data (D-20). 3. Pipe slope, UG-D to D-10, is <0.50%, revise slope to >_0.50%. 4. Profile UG-F to Ex-FI includes text overlays; revise text so readable. 5. Profile UG-10 to UG-G is incomplete. Provide complete profile details. 6. Revise UG-10 to UG-G leader lines to point to Ex. and proposed grade. g. With FSP, demonstrate compliance with storm runoff requirements at U.S. Rt. 29, where ISP proposes to increase runoff onto U.S. Rt. 29, without storrnwater capture or conveyance. (FSP) Persists. Ref. item 5.d., above. 6. C-500: Label all travelways. (FSP) Addressed. 7. C-503 a. Compare proposed storm structure easement with Albemarle County Design Standards Manual easement diagram, p. 15, to ensure easement sufficient for installation and future maintenance. Link: https://www.albemarle.org/Home/ShowDocument?id=270 (FSP) Addressed. As follow-up: Revise label, C-502, `10' SWM facility easement,' to read [accurate value, or variable width] SWM facility easement' for UG Detention west of Travelway E. b. Add flow lines to all storm pipes (C501-0503). Add flow lines to SWM facility outfalls. (FSP) Addressed. c. GIS indicates natural conveyance at approximate location of 80,000 cf SWM facility proposed outfall, but this outfall must comply with state storrnwater management regulations at 9VAC25- 870-65 (water quality' VRRM.xls) and 9VAC25-870-66 (water quantity, energy balance at discharge to natural conveyance). Please ensure ESP is consistent with WPO Plan design. (FSP) Addressed. Applicant: `Acknowledged —plans have been revised to be consistent.' d. Albemarle does not accept improvements within public drainage easement, i.e., retaining walls. Revised design (C-503) to remove pipe crossing beneath stepped retaining walls. (FSP) Addressed. e. Show /label existing drainage easement for existing storm line between Ex. grate inlet (located along proposed 20,000 cf detention system outfall) and Ashwood Blvd. right-of-way. If easement does not exist, provide public drainage easement over existing elements of storm line on development parcel that lie beyond Ashwood Blvd. right-of-way. (FSP) Addressed. f Since design relies on existing storm elements, verify adequacy of existing storm pipes, grates, etc. (FSP) Persists. Ref. item 5.d. above. Applicant: `Storm computations have been provided for the existing system, immediately downstream of the proposed improvements.' g. Provide public drainage easement between proposed f20,000cf UG detention system (SWM facility easement) and existing storm system (grate inlet). (FSP) Addressed. h. Label easement over outfalls (storm pipes) downstream of SWM facilities public drainage, and submit separate easement plat. (FSP) May persist. Applicant: `The easements over the outfalls have been labeled as public drainage easements. Please see sheets C-502 and C-503.' Asfollow- up: Please see and complete separate easement plat application, link: hftps: //www.albemarle. orp/home/shgW ublisheddocument/ 1052/637624089314100000 Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 4 i. Please check match -line sheet reference labels. (FSP) Addressed. j. Note: Easement plat must be recorded prior to WPO Plan approval, and WPO plan must be approved prior to ESP approval. (FSP) Persists. Applicant: `Comment acknowledged.' 8. C-403 a. Label underground detention system. (FSP) Addressed. b. Show /label SWM facility easement. (FSP) Addressed. As follow-up: Revise label, C-403, `10' SWM facility easement,' to read [accurate value, or variable width] SWM facility easement' for Vault 1. c. Avoid impact to currently mapped preserved steep slopes, impact appears imminent with proposed retaining wall design. Applies to other design elements and grading, C-401, C-402, as well. If field run survey indicates topography flatter than 25%, comment will be withdrawn provided applicant coordinates survey with Engineering (slopes exhibit /survey data submittal required). (FSP) Acknowledged. Applicant: `Steep slope exhibit will be submitted under separate cover for review.' d. Acquire temporary off -site construction or permanent grading easement, as needed, to construct proposed retaining walls along southern parcel boundary. Applies to C-401, C-402, as well, where proposed grading or improvements may require temporary or permanent easement beyond development parcel boundary. (FSP) Withdrawn/NA. Applicant: `It is intended for all construction to take place within the proposed LOD and property boundary as indicated on the grading plan, including the retaining wall construction.' 9. C-402 a. Label SWM facility easement. (FSP) Addressed. b. Provide /label public drainage easement over SWM facility outfall pipe. (FSP) Addressed. 10. C-401 a. Provide capture for runoff from entrance to this development, at U.S. Rt. 29, since approximate 8' vertical grade break sends uncaptured runoff into U.S. Rt. 29 NBL. (FSP) Persists. Applicant: `System is being analyzed, however currently unable to capture the runoff here due to the depth of the proposed system.' b. Resolve apparent conflict between CG-12 and inlet on E side of roundabout (Int. travelway A- travelway B). (FSP) Addressed. c. Provide spot elevations to ensure positive drainage to inlets, especially grate inlets in pavement (travelway E, for example). (FSP) Addressed. 11. C-305 a. Proposed Road A/Rt. 29 sight distance (left) vertical separation between sight line and U.S. Rt. 29 pavement appears to be < 0.25'. If as -built condition prevents 680' sight distance left, the intersection of Road A / Rt. 29 may require constructive revision prior to zoning (or road plan) bond release, or VDOT acceptance of this entrance onto U.S. Rte. 29 NBL. (FSP) Acknowledged. 12. C-303 a. Unless overlooked, please provide paver detail and curb transition detail (Private Road C). (FSP) May persist. Applicant: `Details have been provided for pavement material.' C-901 provides construction details, but cannot locate Road C paver detail, please indicate detail location in plan. b. Recommend remove 6 parking spaces at east end of private road C, 3 spaces north and south of 6.T R curb bullnose to enhance visibility and safety for operators reversing from these six spaces, and for vehicles approaching on private road C. (FSP) Addressed. 13. C-302 a. 4.5' sidewalk width near retaining wall is insufficient, provide Min. 5' sidewalk width. (FSP) Addressed. b. Provide guardrail for parking spaces that face retaining walls. (FSP) NA/addressed. Applicant: `The walls on sheet C-302 have been removed. Guardrail has been added to sheets C-301 and C- 303 where parking spaces face retaining walls.' Engineering Review Comments Page 4 of 4 c. Provide /label street name signs for internal travelways. (FSP) Partially addressed. As follow-up: Please label street name signs. Revise location of travleway B street name sign to east side of Int. Archer Ave and Travelway B, opposite stop sign. 14. C-301 a. Provide roll-top curb at roundabout at proposed grass paver fire access since CG-6 may limit clearance for fire apparatus. (FSP) Addressed. b. Provide roll-top -to -CG6 curb transition detail. (FSP) Addressed. 15. C-301 — C-303 (C301-C-304) [ Note: certain comments maybe duplicative.] a. Provide sealed geotechnical drawings for retaining wall height > 4-ft. (FSP) Persists. Applicant: `Comment acknowledged —plans will be provided under separate cover.' b. Label all traffic control signs (No parking, stop, speed limit, etc.). (FSP) May persist. Please label No parking and speed limit signs, or indicate which sheet includes labeled No parking and speed limit signs. c. Recommend against curb radii < 3'. Recommend curb wipe -down for radii < 3'since such tight radii susceptible to damage, or rapid deterioration. (see Roundabout, for example). (FSP) Addressed. d. Label curb type/s, incl. CG-12. (FSP) Addressed. e. Show /label attached unit drive /garage entrance curb radius. (FSP) Not addressed. Please show and label private driveway entrances for each attached unit, geometry displayed to scale, with (typ.) radius labeled. 16. C-200: Provide deed bk.-pg. reference for Ashwood Blvd. right-of-way. (FSP) Not addressed. Public right-of-way deed bk.-pg. reference is required. New 17. C-308, Truck Movement plan a. Revise design to avoid wheel -curb strike at parking aisle between Travelway A and Travelway B, parking area located SW of Travelway A. b. Auto -turn figure appears to indicate truck must mount Travelway B curb as vehicle approaches Archer Ave. from the NW. Please revise to avoid wheel -curb strike. c. Revise to avoid CG-12 — truck conflict at Int. Travelway B and Archer Ave. d. Revise to avoid wheel -median curb strike at Travelway A exit from roundabout. e. Design of entrance to development from Rt. 29 appears deficient, with vehicle mounting curb, walks, planting strip, etc. Please revise design to avoid wheel -curb strike conflicts. f. Entrance to development from Ashwood Blvd, while not indicating wheel -curb strike is certain, indicates it is likely with any deviation from the drawn vehicle path. Recommend widen entrance to avoid possible wheel -curb strike at Ashwood Blvd entrance. Please feel free to call if any questions: 434.296-5832 -x3069 Thank you I Anderson SDP202200002 RST Residences ESP 030322.docx �� pF AL8 County of Albemarle GEOGRAPHIC DATA SERVICES OFFICE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ��8GIN14' PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS - E911 APPLICATION#: SDP202200002 TMP: 04600-00-00-10800,04600000010900 DATE: 1/28/22 Travelways A,B,D,E, will all require a road name. Elise Kiewra ekiewra@albemarle.org tel: 434-296-5832 ext. 3030 fax:434-972-4126 This site will require a four (4) new private road name. Per Sec. 7-200-B of the County's Road Naming and Property Numbering Ordinance (Page 2 of PDF). "It is intended by this article that all roads within the County which serve or are designed to serve three or more addressable structures will be named; and that all addressable structures within the County will be assigned property numbers. WWW.ALBEMARLE.ORG 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228 1 Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Stephen C. Brich, P.E. 1401 East Broad Street Commissioner Richmond, Virginia 23219 January 24, 2022 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Attn: Kevin McCollum Re: RST Residences — Final Site Plan SDP-2022-00002 Review # 1 Dear Mr. McCollum: (804) 7862701 Fax: (804) 7862940 The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as prepared by Bohler, dated 10 January 2022, and offers the following comments: 1. The Auto -TURN diagrams for the ingress movement at the Route 29 entrance shows the fire truck mounting the sidewalk and taking out a street sign. Also, the egress movement runs on top of the median for its entire length at the same entrance. Please make adjustments to the turn tracks or design accordingly. 2. Limits of mill -and -fill must extend 2 feet beyond the limits of work in the right-of-way for entire lane widths. 3. Limits of mill -and -fill on Rte 29 South must include the left-thru-lane for the entire length of the turn -lane to eliminate the angled cross joint. Please provide a digital copy in PDF format of the revised plan along with a comment response letter. If further information is desired, please contact Doug McAvoy Jr. at (540) 718-6113. A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process. Sincerely, Doug McAvoy Jr., P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Charlottesville Residency VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority (RWSA) General Water & Sanitary Sewer Notes Last Revised: April 2016 1. All materials and methods of construction shall comply with the latest version of the General Water and Sewer Design and Construction Standards — Version 1.0, adopted in December 2015, except as modified below or modified in special notes. 2. RWSA shall approve all construction materials and methods of construction. A preconstruction conference shall be held with RWSA prior to the start of any work. 3. The contractor shall be responsible for notifying Miss Utility (1-800-552-7001). 4. RWSA Engineer (Victoria Fort at (434) 977-2970 ext. 205) shall be notified three business days prior to the start of construction. 5. All work is subject to inspection by RWSA staff. No tie-ins to the existing system shall be made without coordination with and the presence of RWSA staff. No work shall be conducted on RWSA facilities on weekends or holidays without special written permission from RWSA. 6. For sanitary sewer line construction: RWSA may require bypass pumping for tie-ins to the existing system. All doghouse manholes must be pressure -tested before a connection is made to the system. 7. The location of existing utilities as shown on the plans is from data available at the time of design and is not necessarily complete or accurate. The Contractor shall be responsible for the verification of the location, size and depth of all existing utilities, both surface and subsurface. The Contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of any discrepancies between the plans and field conditions. The Contractor shall use due diligence to protect all utilities and structures from damage at all times, whether shown on the plans or not. Damage to any existing utilities shall be repaired by the Contractor to the original condition at no additional cost to the Owner. 8. Erosion and sediment control facilities shall not be permitted in the RWSA easement without special written permission from RWSA. No grading shall be permitted in the RWSA easement unless permitted otherwise by RWSA in writing. 9. No blasting shall be permitted within 100 feet of RWSA facilities without written permission and RWSA approval of the blasting plan. Ground monitoring during blasting and a pre -blast survey may be required. For blasting within 100 feet of any operative RWSA sewerlines, bypass pumping and/or pre- and post -CCTV may be required. RWSA may also require certification from a licensed professional engineer stating that the proposed blasting will not damage any RWSA facilities. Damage to any utilities due to blasting shall be repaired by the Contractor to the original condition at no additional cost to the Owner. 10. The contractor shall observe minimum separation requirements for utility crossings. When a crossing is made under an existing facility, adequate structural support shall be provided for the existing pipe. The area of the crossing shall be backfilled with compacted 57 stone to the springline of the existing pipe. 11. New water main installations shall be pressure tested, chlorinated, flushed and have water samples approved prior to making any permanent connection to the public water system. Approved methods of filling and flushing new water mains will be required to prevent any contamination of the public water system. 12. All easements for new RWSA facilities shall be recorded prior to placing the new facilities into service. 13. No permanent structural facilities will be permitted in the RWSA easement. This includes building overhangs, retaining walls, footers for any structure, drainage structures, etc. 14. Trees are not permitted in the RWSA easement.