Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201300038 Correspondence 2013-08-23 Sarah Baldwin From: Long, Valerie [vlong©williamsmullen.com] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 1:50 PM To: Sarah Baldwin Subject: RE: Elledge Tower Sarah, thank you for this information. I am not surprised that the waiver is being pulled from the consent agenda, but am surprised to hear that it might go to the PC. Can you explain why that might be? Thank you, Valerie From: Sarah Baldwin [mailto:sbaldwin@albemarle.org] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 11:28 AM To: Long, Valerie Subject: Elledge Tower Valerie: I wanted to give you an FYI that the critical slopes waiver is going to get pulled from the consent agenda onto the regular for Sept. 11tn Also, I am getting conflicting information on how the County Attorney's Office wants to handle the waiver. It is possible it might have to go to the PC as well. As soon as I hear anything, I will let you know. Thanks. Sarah D. Baldwin Senior Planner County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 (434)296-5832 (434)972-4126, fax Al Please consider the environment before printing this mail. 1 Sarah Baldwin From: Robert Toplin [rbtklb©gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 12:49 PM To: Sarah Baldwin Subject: Re: From Toplin re cell tower question Thanks. Just a brief question, if the answer is evident from a map. Are the towers in Belair and Colthurst somewhat more removed from the populations there --perhaps near the edge of the subdivisions? I recall,too that the acreage of lots is rather large in those neighborhoods,possibly leaving most neighbors farther removed from the towers than would be the case in Key West. Thanks. -Bob Toplin On Fri,Aug 16,2013 at 9:35 AM, Sarah Baldwin<sbaldwin@albemarle.org>wrote: I was able to do some checking but not of the whole County. Both the Belair and Colthurst neighborhoods have towers. Hope this helps. From: Robert Toplin [mailto:rbtklb@gmail.com] Sent: Fri 8/16/2013 12:30 PM To: Sarah Baldwin Subject: From Toplin re. cell tower question Sarah: Just checking: Is there any information about any other cell tower located inside a neighborhood in our county?A response is appreciated -- either by email or my cell phone is 434-989-3564. Thanks - Bob Toplin i Sarah Baldwin From: Alex Morrison [amorrison©serviceauthority.org] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 2:05 PM To: Sarah Baldwin Subject: SDP201300038: Cingular Wireless/ CV313A COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Dear Sarah : The Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) has received and reviewed the plan/document/project described above. All ACSA comments have been addressed by the applicant. The ACSA hereby approves the plan/document/project described above. Please feel free to contact me at the number below with any comments or questions you may have. Thank you. Alexander J. Morrison, EIT Civil Engineer Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road Charlottesville, VA 22911 Office: (434)977-4511 EXT: 116 This email may contain confidential information that should not be shared with anyone other than its intended recipient(s). 1 Sarah Baldwin From: Bill Fritz Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 3:05 PM To: Sarah Baldwin Subject: FW: AT&T Proposal CV 313 Elledge Property William D. Fritz,AICP Chief of Special Projects 434-296-5823 ext. 3242 From: Mark Graham Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 8:08 AM To: Bill Fritz; Amelia McCulley Subject: FW: AT&T Proposal CV 313 Elledge Property FYI From: Long, Valerie [mailto:vlong@williamsmullen.com] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 8:26 PM To: Mark Graham; Wayne Cilimberg; Greg Kamptner; David Benish Subject: AT&T Proposal CV 313 Elledge Property Gentlemen: Just a heads up to you that this afternoon AT&T resubmitted an application for a Tier 2 PWSF on Mrs. Elledge's property in Key West (adjacent to Mr. Sinclair). This is essentially the same exact application approved by the Planning Commission in 2010 — a Tier 2 facility at 103 feet, in the exact same location. Since then the trees have grown, and we had our engineers re-measure trees, and the pole is just 3.8 feet above the reference tree (it was 7 feet when approved in 2010). We have included the additional landscaping to screen the base of the ground equipment from the Clem and Sinclair residences as well. The one difference is that when we had the engineers re-survey the site to provide current plans, they obtained more precise critical slope data on site and determined that the area of critical slopes being disturbed is actually larger than originally thought. It was thought to be 409 square feet of total disturbance in 2010, but now is 2,316. Still a very small fraction of the total parcel, and a fairly small disturbed area. I have included a detailed critical slope waiver request with the application. We will be reaching out to the neighbors and Mr. Sinclair very to discuss the proposal, but I wanted to make you aware of it right away, for we expect there will be interest in the proposal. Please let me know if you have any questions. If you would like us to meet with the Planner to provide background, I would be happy to do so. The original application was handled by Elizabeth Marotta. I have also alerted Ken Boyd and Cal Morris. Thank you, Valerie Valerie Wagner Long Williams Mullen 1