Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO201400087 Plan - Revision 2022-03-08Frank Pohl From: Frank Pohl Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 1:37 PM To: Richard Park Cc: Geoff Elsie; Dan Ratzlaff Subject: RE: LM - Lofts at Meadowcreek Biofilter Richard, This is allowed per the DEQ biofilter guidance, therefore, there are no objections. I've added dimensions to your sketch to reflect your text below. Please let us know when you begin the work, as Geoff will probably want to visit the site. Please document all steps in the process to make the closeout easier for all of us by taking photos, including showing gravel conditions, dimensions/thickness of each layer, etc. MIXTURE IN ACCORDANCE TO VIRCINN BMP CLEAPoNGHOUSE SPECIFICATIONS. LATEST EDITION Emm (e,wen LrG,R�frAen �Mo �..m ree mvra �ora.a. TOP OF —:vlenn.. ��H MULCH ELEV, s28.50 Js,m. 7fl" 1 PEA GRAVEL 12 FILTER STONE VDOT NO. 57 AGGREGATE PROVIDE MINIMUM BOTTOM OF8' DN. 6' SUMP BELOW BIORETENTION PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN FACILRY-425.00 UNDERDRAIN Don't hesitate to let me know if anything else is needed from us at this time. I will include this in the file. Thanks, Frank Frank V. Pohl, PE, CFM County Engineer Albemarle County fpohl@albemarle.org 434-296-5832 x7914 401 McIntire Road, North Wing, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Richard Park<rpark@pinnacleconstructionva.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 12:51 PM To: Frank Pohl <fpohl@albemarle.org> Cc: Geoff Elsie <gelsie@albemarle.org> Subject: LM - Lofts at Meadowcreek Biofilter CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Frank, Per our previous discussions, the biofilter at Lofts at Meadowcreek is not draining as specified. We had F&R collect and analyze samples of the filter media and it has insufficient sand and excess soil fines which are causing this lack of permeability. We have reviewed the VA DEQ Stormwater Design Specification No. 9 for Bforetention and propose the following to remedy this issue: 1. Remove the existing shrubs and trees (which have mostly drowned) and mulch 2. Remove the existing biofilter media down to the top of the small stone layer ("pea gravel' on the detail below) 3. Assess the small stone choker layer to make certain it is sufficiently permeable 4. In lieu of the 24" depth of V1.9 biofilter media, Install =20" deep layer of sand with =4" of V1.9 biofilter media on top 5. In lieu of the Tree, Shrub, and Herbaceous Plants planting template, use the Turf and Tree planting template. To this end we will eliminate the shrubs shown on the original plan, plant (4) suitable trees in the biofilter area (smaller trees than the sycamore shown on the original plan as it will quickly outgrow the available space and its leaf litter is a continuous problem), sow the Ernst Rain Garden Mix onto the surface of the V1.9 topping layer, then cover with turf which will provide a great nurse cover and prevent the Rain Garden Mix from being displaced before becoming established. Relevant info from Specification No. 9: Section 6.6 (page 25): • Alternative to Mulch Cover. In some situations, designers may consider alternative surface covers such as turf, native groundcover, erosion control matting (coir or jute matting), river stone, or pea gravel. The decision regarding the type of surface cover to use should be based on function, cost and maintenance. Stone or gravel are not recommended in parking lot applications, since they increase soil temperature and have low water holding capacity. Media for Turf Cover. One adaptation is to design the filter media primarily as a sand filter with organic content only at the top. Leaf compost tilled into the top layers will provide organic content for the vegetative cover. If grass is the only vegetation, the ratio of compost may be reduced. Section 6.8 (oaae 26): and free. This option is a lower maintenance version of the tree -shrub -herbaceous cover. Trees are to prevent Since we will not be mowing this area, mulched islands are neither needed nor desired. See proposed revisions below (in color) to the original cross section detail from Sheet C.20 (attached). 3 PEA GRAVEL BIORETENTION SOIL MIXTURE IN ACCORDANCE TO VIRGINIA BMP CLEARINGHOUSE SPECIFICATIONS, LATEST EDITION TOP OF MULCH GI nit -d9A Sn (Ernst Conservation Seeds Rain Garden) Mix with sod nurse crop cover v1.9 filter media r_-71 �a!�iiia!!.-aa&jilliii r� i LYI Ste. ♦LYL�� yLY�•rI Y�.��.Y�.,^mow, „dpy� FILTER STONE VDOT NO. 57 AGGREGATE PROVIDE MINIMUM) 6" SUMP BELOW UNDERDRAIN BOTTOM OF J BIORETENTION FACILITY=425.00 FILTER NOT TO SCALE dULCH `6• DIAI PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN I have highlighted the proposed trees from the original plan Sheet C.22. Yellow — sycamore; purple — redbud; green — maple. This is a fairly small space for four trees, particularly with a sycamore. Please let me know at your earliest convenience if these proposed measures will be a suitable approach to this issue as we want to get this completed. Best regards, Richard Park I Vice President Pinnacle Construction and Development Corporation 1821 Avon St. Ext., Ste 200 Charlottesville, VA 22902 Office: 434.979.2900 rpark@pcdcva.com I www.pinnacleconstructionva.com /I PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OVER 30 YEARS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 6