HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP202100087 Review Comments Major Amendment, Final Site Plan 2022-03-09County of Albemarle
Community Development Department - Planning Division
MEMORANDUM
To: Todd Burnett, Freeland and Kauffman, Inc (tburnettOfk-inc.com)
Bret Flory, Cross Architects, PLLC (bflory@crossarchitects.com)
From: Mariah Gleason
Division: Community Development - Planning
Date: December 21, 2021
Revision 1: March 9, 2022
Subject: SDP202100087 Caliber Collision - Major Site Plan Amendment
Mariah Gleason
mgleason@albemarle.org
tel: 434-296-5832 ext. 3097
fax:434-972-4126
The site plan amendment referenced above has been reviewed by the Planning Services Division of the Albemarle County
Department of Community Development (CDD) and by other members of the Site Review Committee (SRC).
The Planner will approve the plan when the following items (from the Planner and other SRC plan reviewers) have been
satisfactorily addressed and when all SRC plan reviewers have indicated in writing their tentative approvals. [Each
comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.]
1. [Sec 24.2] Special use permit. Per the requirements of the zoning district, approval of a special use permit for the
proposed body shop use is required prior to approval of the major site plan amendment. Rev. 1: Comment
addressed. Special use permit SP202100003 was approved by the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors on
February 16,2022.
2. [Sec 35.1] Fees. There looks to be an outstanding fee on the account for this application. An amount of $448.00 is
needed for the required notice fee, which includes preparing and mailing notices and published notice. Please
submit this payment through the County Portal and email a copy of the transaction receipt to the Planning
reviewer. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
3. [32.5.2(a)] Zoning information.
a. If/when special use permit SP202100003 is approved, the notes will need to indicate that the site plan is
subject to special use permit SP202100003 and its conditions. The conditions will also need to be listed on
the site plan. Rev. 1: Comment not fully satisfied. Special use permit SP202100003 was approved by the
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors on February 16, 2022. Please update the Special Use Permit
information on Sheet 4 to note that the site is subject to SP202100003 and its conditions, and then list
the conditions as approved by the Board. A copy of the SP Action Letter is attached. The conditions can
be found on the last page.
b. Provide notes on the site plan regarding overlay districts that apply to the subject parcel. Applicable
overlay districts include Entrance Corridor (EC), Airport Impact Area (AIA), and Steep Slopes (Managed).
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
4. [32.5.2(d)] Managed Steep Slopes. Managed steep slope areas exist on the parcel. Please label and locate these
areas on the plan map. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
5. [32.5.1(c), 32.5.2(a)] Setbacks.
WWW.ALBEMARLE.ORG
401 McIntire Roadl Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
a. Revise the front setback to state that the front maximum setback is "None", due to the parcel's location
along a principal arterial highway. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
b. Include a side/rear setback stating that the minimum setback is per the building code. Rev. 1: Comment
addressed.
c. Show the minimum front setback on the plan map. Note, the location of the front minimum setback may
change based on the final placement of the proposed shared use path, per the conditions associated with
the special use permit currently under review (SP202100003). Rev. 1: Comment not fully satisfied. When
originally writing this comment, the "note" sentence was intended to be for the awareness of the
applicant, rather than a request for a specific note. While staff acknowledges this confusion, staff find
benefit in having the aforementioned note on the site plan. However, since the special use permit (SP) is
no longer "under review" but approved, staff ask that the note on Sheet 4 be revised to state: "...per the
conditions of special use permit SP202100003."
6. [32.5.2(b)] Parking schedule.
a. How many service stalls are proposed for this facility? Please identify the number of proposed service
stalls on the site plan. Rev. 1: Comment not fully satisfied. Are the service bays shown on Sheet 4
intended to be diagrammatic in nature? It looks as though existing bollards to remain may conflict with
ingress/egress to proposed service bays as shown. Please review and revise as appropriate.
b. The site plan will need to provide the required number of parking spaces per service stall, as required by
Sec 4.12.6. There are alternatives available to providing the minimum number of parking spaces. Those are
described in Sec 4.12.8. If the required number of parking spaces cannot be achieved, the number of
service stalls may need to be reduced. Rev. 1: The applicant has submitted a parking waiver request,
which is currently under review by Zoning staff. Staff will forward Zoning's comments or determination
upon receipt, which is anticipated by the end of the week.
7. [32.5.2(i)] Travelways. Provide the narrowest width of the southern entryway, along the side of the building. Note,
per Sec. 4.12.17(c), the minimum width of the vehicular travelway must be at least 20 feet for two-way access.
Rev. 1: Comment not satisfied. The minimum design standards for vehicular travelways cannot be met by utilizing
a pedestrian -oriented sidewalk. Revise the plan to ensure that at least a 20 foot vehicular travelway width is
provided along the entire southern ingress/egress to the site.
8. [32.5.2(s)] Circulation. Please provide an exhibit to demonstrate vehicular circulation and turning for large vehicles,
such as flat-bed and towing trucks, that may have occasion to visit the site based on the nature of the proposed
use. Rev. 1: Comment not fully satisfied. Thank you for providing this exhibit. A revised exhibit will be needed to
show circulation given the need for a dumpster enclosure. Please see Comment 10 below for more information.
9. [32.5.2(n)] Shared use path. Note: The design of the proposed shared use path and the planting strip along Rt 29
may be subject to change based on the conditions of the proposed SP that is currently under review
(SP202100003)
a. Will bollards be used to deter vehicles from the shared use path? Incorporating these types of safety
features had been discussed previously with the review of the special use permit application. Rev. 1:
Comment addressed.
b. The shared use path shown on the landscaping sheet does not match the proposed site plan map. The
landscaping sheet shows a tapering of the shared use path. Please revise such that this amenity is shown
consistently throughout all plan sheets. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
c. Will the shared use path have lighting? If so. please see Sec. 4.17 and for the minimum design standards
nd Sec
d. [Rev. 1] Note 3 on Sheet 4 states "Unless otherwise noted, pavement shall be standard duty asphalt",
however the special use permit (SP) approval for the body shop use specified a condition, wherein the 8
WWW.ALBEMARLE.ORG
401 McIntire Roadl Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
foot shared use path along Rt 29 must be constructed of permeable pavement. Please revise the plan to
align with the SP condition.
10. [32.5.2(n)] Dumpster.
a. Will the dumpster area be enclosed and/or screened? If so, please see Sec 4.12.19 for the screening
requirements. Screening may also need to be approved by the Architectural Review Board. Also, would
screening impede vehicular circulation in this area? Rev. 1: Per comments from the Architectural Review
Board (ARB) staff, a dumpster enclosure will be needed as the gate on the northern side of the property
is likely to open. See ARB Comment 6 below. Be aware, this will likely impact vehicular circulation on the
property.
neasurement in front of both dumpsters. Per Sec. 4.12.19, the length of the concrete pad must
extend at least eight feet beyond the front of the dumpster(s). Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
11. [32.5.2(n)] Loading area. Is a loading area planned or needed for this use? If so, the standards for loading spaces are
contained in Sec. 4.12.13 and 4.12.18. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
12. [32.5.2(b)] Impervious and paved areas.
a. Note on the plan the maximum amount of impervious cover on the site. Rev. 1: Comment not fully
satisfied. Thank you for adding this information. Please identify whether the provided acreage is
proposed or existing. Be advised, the site plan regulations require the proposedacreage be given.
ii iiuiii uiii��iii vi Nuv�v Nisi i� iib i iiu v�ii�i ♦�iii��i �i � i ��iu iivii ui �i�.r. i.�v. r. �.�ii ii ii�iii
addressed.
13. [32.5.2(q)] Traffic generation figures. Provide on the site plan the estimated number of vehicles per day, based on
current Virginia Department of Transportation rates, and the direction of travel for all connection from the site to
the public street. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
14. [32.5.2(f)] Water. Indicate in a note that the parcel is not located within a water supply watershed. Rev. 1:
Comment addressed.
15. [32.5.2(f)] Existing landscaping. On the site plan, include the existing landscape features as described in Sec.
32.7.9.4(c). Is there a small group of trees at the rear of the property? Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
16. [32.5.2(a)] Abutting parcels. Provide the present uses of abutting parcels within the information provided for these
properties. Rev. 1: Comment not fully satisfied. Please revise the use for TMP 45-106A, to the south, to be
"commercial/retail". A "shopping center" use has a specific definition in the Albemarle County Code, which it not
met by this property.
17. [32.5.2(a)] North point. The north arrows on Sheets LI- 1 and LP -1 appear to need adjustment to match the
rotation of the site as depicted on the plan sheet. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
18. [32.5.2(a)] Scale bar. Please adjust the scale bar on Sheet 2, such that tin on the plan sheet is equal to 20ft on the
scale bar. Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
19. [32.6.2(h)] Signature panel. Provide a signature panel for signature by each member of the site review committee.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed.
20. [Comment] Application. Is Peter Wsay - the individual who signed the application - an owner, contract purchaser,
or agent of the property? If not, a new signed application may be needed. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. Thank you.
WWW.ALBEMARLE.ORG
401 McIntire Roadl Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
21. [Comment] Reminder that revised plans should include the original date of drawing and the revision dates) for
each subsequent version of the plan.
Additional comments based on revised plan dated 1/14/2022:
22. [Comment] As also noted by ARB staff, it appears new fencing areas and a relocated keypad associated with this
development may be proposed on adjacent parcel TMP 45-105. If off -site improvements are proposed, they will
require a construction easement (temporary or permanent, based on the desire of the applicant regarding ongoing
maintenance after construction). Please submit an easement application, materials, and fee. The County will review
the plat accordingly. Once approved, the easement will need to be reflected on the site plan by name, location, and
deed book and page of the recording instrument. (Applications and information related to easements are available
via the County website at: https://www.albemarle.org/government/community-development/apply-for/planning-
and-site-development-applications under "Subdivisions" and "Applications".)
23. [32.6.20), 32.7.9] Landscape Plan.
a. On landscaping plan, locate the existing water main along Rt 29. Per comments from the Albemarle
County Service Authority (ACSA) below, it will be necessary for staff to confirm that proposed tree
plantings are at least 10ft away from the existing water main. If trees cannot be planted between the
shared use path and the Rt 29 travelway, staff will want to explore with the applicant whether other
plantings in this area might be acceptable to ARB and ACSA, as plantings in this area were a specific desire
of the Planning Commission at special use permit hearing.
b. It looks like there may have been a layout issue in the Plant Schedule provided on Sheet 12. Please revise
the schedule so the size information for the Boxwoods falls into the appropriate slot and is legible. It looks
like this information is provided but mistakenly overlaid with a column heading.
c. Please identify existing light pole locations on the landscaping plan so staff can confirm that there are no
conflicts with proposed landscape elements.
d. Will the existing trees in the southeastern corner of the property remain? The site and demolition plans do
not show their removal, however, the landscape plan suggests that existing trees will be removed and
replaced with new plantings. If the existing trees are not removed, it is possible they could help the
property meet landscaping requirements along the southern boundary of the parcel, in lieu of providing
new trees in the same area.
e. The planting material symbology shown on the site plan on Sheet 4 should be extended to the building
front, such that the landscape plan and site plan are consistent with one another. Please review and revise
as appropriate.
C07101 g 'Al [19 1J:k1FJ I: LIFITI4:b1
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer)
John Anderson, landerson2@albemarle.org - Requested Changes, see comment letter attached
Albemarle County Information Services (E911)
Elise Kiewra, ekiewra@albemarle.org - No Objection
Albemarle County Building Inspections
Betty Slough, bslough@albemarle.org - No Objection
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue
Howard Lagomarsino, hlagomarsino@albemarle.org - No Objection
Albemarle County Service Authority
WWW.ALBEMARLE.ORG
401 McIntire Roadl Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
Richard Nelson, rnelson@serviceauthority.org - Requested Changes
1. A completed irrigation application should be submitted (link below).
2. Is the intent to have ACSA establish the irrigation connection, or a contractor?
3. Trees should be a minimum of 10-feet away from the existing water main along Rt 29.
https://serviceauthority.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Irrigation Application.pdf
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority
Dyon Vega - No Objection
Virginia Department of Health
Alan Mazurowski, alan.mazurowski@vdh.virginia.gov - No Objection
Virginia Department of Transportation
Doug McAvoy Jr., douglas.mcavoy@vdot.virginia.gov - Requested Changes, see comment letter attached
Albemarle County Planning Services - Architectural Review Board (ARB)
Khristopher Taggart, ktaggart@albemarle.org - Requested Changes
Dear Applicant,
I have reviewed the above noted application and a few revisions to the plan are requested.
1. The building paint colors still appear to be labeled incorrectly on the elevation drawings. The front elevation
notes the base and upper wall color as Nomadic Desert (PT-3) while the other elevations show Nomadic Desert as
the upper wall color and Kilim Beige (PT-5) for the garage bay doors and the base along the right elevation. Please
confirm that the locations labeled for the building colors are correct or revise the architectural drawings to
correctly note the illustrate building paint colors.
2. Detail 08 on sheet SP1.1 notes 1" sq. ornamental pickets but does not indicate fence material. Revise the
ornamental fence detail to indicate material.
3. The plant schedule notes 40 Boxwoods but no planting size has been indicated. Revise the site plan to indicate
that the shrubs in the planting area along the frontage will be a minimum of 24" at time of planting.
4. A tree line has been added to the Grading Plan (sheet #5) of the site plan but this tree line is not shown on the
Demolition, Site, or Landscape plans. If this tree line is to be removed, revise the demolition plan to show this. If
this tree line is to remain, revise the demolition, site, grading, and landscape plans to show the tree line and
coordinate tree protection fencing on the plans.
5. New fencing is shown off -site on parcel 45-105. A construction easement will be required for construction of
the off -site fencing shown.
6. The Dumpster Enclosure detail (02 on SP1.0) only addresses the concrete pad. It is anticipated that the gate will
remain open during business hours. This will allow for unimpeded views of the proposed dumpster location. Revise
the plans to show a dumpster enclosure that matches the ornamental fencing.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code, if the applicant fails to submit a revised
site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter, the application shall be
deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the applicant.
Please contact Mariah Gleason in the Planning Division by using mgleason@albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext. 3097 for
further information.
W W W.ALBE MARLE.ORG
401 McIntire Roadl Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
,S.{.OF AL8
County of Albemarle
Community Development Department - Planning
March 3, 2022
Bret Flory
Cross Architects, PLLC
879 Junction Dr
Allen TX 75013
bfiory@crossarchitects.com
RE: SP202100003 Caliber Collision Action Letter
Dear Mr. Flory,
Mariah Gleason
mgleasonPal bemarle.org
Telephone: (434) 296-5832 ext. 3097
On February 16, 2022, the Board of Supervisors took action on your Special Use Permit on Tax Map Parcel Number
04500000010600 in the Rio District.
The Special Use Permit was approved by the Board's adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions.
Please be advised that although the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors took action on the project noted
above, no uses on the property may lawfully begin until all applicable approvals have been received and
conditions have been met. This includes:
• compliance with the approved SPECIAL USE PERMIT;
• approval of and compliance with a SITE PLAN; and
• approval of a ZONING COMPLIANCE CLEARANCE.
Should you have questions regarding the above -noted action, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Mariah Gleason
Senior Planner II
Planning Division
CC: Tap Investments LLC
2903 North Augusta Str
Staunton VA 24401
WWW.ALBEMARLE.ORG
401 McIntire Road, North Wing, I Charlottesville, VA 22902-4579
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE
SP202100003 CALIBER COLLISION
WHEREAS, upon consideration of the staff report prepared for SP 202100003 Caliber Collision and
the attachments thereto, including staffs supporting analysis, the information presented at the public
hearing, any comments received, and all of the factors relevant to the special use permit in Albemarle
County Code §§ 18-24.2.2(17) and 18-33.8(A), the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors hereby finds
that the proposed special use would:
I . not be a substantial detriment to adjacent parcels;
2. not change the character of the adjacent parcels and the nearby area;
3. be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance, with the uses permitted by
right in the Highway Commercial zoning district, with the regulations related to body shops in
§ 18-5.1.31, and with the public health, safety, and general welfare (including equity); and
4. be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
hereby approves SP 202100003 Caliber Collision, subject to the conditions attached hereto.
*ss
I, Claudette K. Borgersen, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a
Resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, by a vote of six to
zero, as recorded below, at a regular meeting held on February 16, 2022.
Clerk, Board of County'SipeVl6rs
Ave Nav
Mr. Andrews
Y _
Mr. Gallaway
Y _
Ms. LaPisto-Kirtley
Y _
Ms. Mallek
Y
Ms. McKeel
Y _
Ms. Price
Y
SP202100003 Caliber Collision Special Use Permit Conditions
Development of the use must be in general accord (as determined by the Director of Planning
and the Zoning Administrator) with the Conceptual Plan titled "Caliber Collision: Conceptual
Site Plan 01," prepared by Bret Flory, dated October 1, 2021. To be in general accord with
the Conceptual Plan, development must reflect the following essential major elements:
• Building footprint
• Parking areas
2. Development also must reflect the following additional major elements:
• A Fourteen (14)-foot wide planting strip
• An Eight (8)-foot wide shared use path constructed of permeable pavement (subject
to existing easements and other site constraints)
Minor modifications to the plan that do not conflict with the elements above may be made to
ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance.
�q off pig 401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4579
County of Albemarle Telephone: 434-296-5832
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WWW,ALBEMARLE.ORG
��BGIN�Q'
Site Plan review
Project title:
Caliber Collision (SDP000000413), Major Amendment
Project file number:
SDP202100087
Plan preparer:
Todd Burnett, PE [tbumett(d�fk-inc.coml
Ankita Kot [ akot(a),fk-inc.com ]
Freeland and Kauffman, Inc., 209 West Stone Ave., Greenville, SC 29609
Owner or rep.:
Tap Investments LLC, 2903 E. Augusta St., Staunton, VA 24401
labailey@trianglerealtors.net
Plan received date:
15 Nov 2021
(Rev. 1)
2 Feb 2022
Date of comments:
12 Dec 2021
(Rev. 1)
22 Feb 2022
Plan Coordinator:
Manah Gleason
Reviewer:
John Anderson
Engineering has reviewed this Major site plan Amendment and offers these review comments.
SDP202100087, Caliber Collision, Rt. 29
1. Title sheet: List Area of Disturbance (demolition /construction /utility work), x..x\ (Rev. 1) Addressed.
f0.09 Ac.
2. Sheet 1
a. Provide deed bk.-pg, ref. for U.S. Rt. 29. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
b. Provide deed bk-pg. ref for multiple existing utility (or other) easements that intersect or u
parcel, or project. (Rev. 1) Addressed/NA. Applicant response (letter d. 1/13/22): `There are no
easements that intersect or affect parcel.'
3. Sheet 3
a. Label U.S. Rt. 29 right-of-way. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
b. Note: A VDOT Land Use Permit (LUP) is required to work within public RW. (Rev. 1)
Applicant: `Acknowledged.'
c. Please coordinate LUP with VDOT; coordinate Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) plan with VDOT.
(Rev. 1) Persists. Applicant: `VDOT has reviewed the Caliber Collision plans.' Note: site plan
review and LUP permit are separate review and approval processes.
4. Sheet 4
a. Since exit is right -out only, recommend revise pavement marking arrow to indicate right -turn,
only. Also recommend sign advise patrons that exit is right-tum, only (No Left Tom). (Rev. 1)
Addressed.
b. Recommend label area between existing sidewalk (to remain) immediately adjacent to building
and proposed 14' wide shared use path. If area is turf, please label turf (Rev. 1) Addressed.
c. Revise Pavement Design Note reading "Asphalt pavement shall be per the specifications outlined
in the Virginia DOT Standards... " since VDOT standards apply within public or private street
right-of-way. Provide asphalt pavement design specific to this site, for aisles and parking, specific
to vehicle class anticipated to use this facility. Plan Note shifts design responsibility to owner, or
contractor, neither of whom may be prepared/able to design asphalt pavement, per VDOT
Pavement Design Guide. (Rev. 1) Addressed. As follow-up: Note 3 states: `Unless otherwise
noted, pavement shall be standard duty asphalt.' Recommend provide typ. detail for standard duty
asphalt. Perhaps overlooked on S-1, S-2, or S-3.
d.
e.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 3
Provide vehicle access aisle centerline with radius at NW comer of building. (Rev. 1) Not
addressed. Vehicle access aisle radius is not provided, but distance, corner of building to
dumpster enclosure, is—25.4'(f). There appears to be a concrete landing at NW comer. 25.4'
dimension appears problematic since Autotum indicates conflict (next comment), and aisle
appears too narrow for vehicles rounding NW comer of building. At this potential pedestrian -
vehicle conflict point, there is little safety or sight provision for either personnel exiting building
at NW comer (if exit exists at this location), or for drivers approaching this blind comer.
Provide Autotum for SU truck, 20' wheelbase, as this or longer wheelbase (typical) waste
management vehicle must round NW comer of building. Reverse maneuver from proposed
dumpster location is impermissible if sight distance or proximity to U.S. Rt. 29-Rio Road exit
ramp impede or compromise visibility, or vehicle or pedestrian safety, as they would appear to.
link, p. 8 of VDOT document [Road Design Manual Appx. B1] at
https://www.virginiadot.org/business/resources/LocDes/RDM/AppendBLpddf ) (Rev. 1) Persists.
Applicant: `Autotum — truck route has been shown in exhibit drawing.' As follow-up: Image from
exhibit, below, appears to show truck path striking dumpster enclosure. If this is the case, please
resolve conflict. Blue circle indicates dumpster enclosure /truck path apparent conflict.
f. Label U.S. Rt. 29 SBL Rio Rd. exit ramp, for clarity. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
g. Show and label dumpster enclosure. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
h. Label distance from NW comer of building to SE corner of dumpster enclosure as was done for
the SW comer wing of building (25', corner of building to paint markings). (Rev. 1) Addressed.
i. Recommend note clarify that the row of parking spaces against 6' high chain link fence is reserved
for collision vehicles to be repaired, not employees or customers. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
j. Legend. EE: Revise description to include parenthetical (VDOT CG-12). (Rev. 1) Addressed.
k. Recommend label identify brick -like linework at entrance/exit, for clarity. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
1. Design pedestrian accommodations along existing sidewalk, including safety barrier/s, warning
placards, and unobstructed transit of site during construction/demolition. Ref. image (blue circle):
(Rev. 1) Not addressed. Applicant response that `Safety fence will be provided along existing
sidewalk during construction of proposed 8' wide shared use path,' is assurance in a letter that
should translate to final site plan as notes Aabels that guide contractor to install specific measures
(safety barriers, warning placards, for example) designed to protect pedestrians.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 3
5. Sheet 5
a. Submit VSMP Application, if required, with a VSMP/WPO plan. A VSMP/WPO plan is required
for this site plan if area of land disturbance associated with project>10,000. Link:
https://www.albemarle.org/home/showpublisheddocument/170/637631758586300000 (Rev. 1)
Addressed/NA. Disturbed area is 0.09 ac. VSMP application not required.
b. Transfer general and specific ESC /SWM data from the site plan to the WPO plan, if WPO plan is
required. A site plan cannot approve a WPO plan. A WPO plan cannot approve a Site Plan, but
WPO plan approval is prerequisite to site plan approval. Feel free to contact Site Plan reviewer if
any questions. (J. Anderson, 434.296-5832-x3069) (Rev. 1) NA. WPO plan is not required.
c. Retain grading elements of sheet 5, remove ESC elements, which would be reviewed/approved as
part of the WPO plan. (Rev. 1) NA. WPO plan is not required.
d. Label Str. 2 in storm drain profile with VDOT nomenclature (DI-1?). (Rev. 1) Addressed.
e. Provide calculations for storm pipe (LD-229) and grate inlet (LD-204). (Rev. 1) Addressed.
Applicant: `Existing inlet is within proposed shared use path. Existing inlet will be converted to
manhole and new inlet will be placed outside the shared use path. As discussed on the phone, for
minor changes to storm drain system, calculations are not required.'
Please feel free to call if any questions: 434.296-5832 -x3069 ( landerson2(a),albemarle.or ).
Thank you
J. Anderson
SDP202100087_Maj_Caliber Collision_Rio-U.S.Rt29_022222revl.doc
(Z)
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Stephen C. Brich, P.E. 1401 East Broad Street
Commissioner Richmond, Virginia 23219
March 01, 2022
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Attn: Mariah Gleason
Re: Caliber Collision — Initial Site Plan
SP-2021-00087
Review #2
Dear Ms. Gleason:
(804)786,2701
Fax: (804) 786,2940
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Freeland & Kauffman, Inc.,
dated 11 November 2021, revised 14 January 2022, and have the following comments:
1. The Standard Drawings contained in the VDOT Road & Bridge Standards are signed and
sealed engineering drawings that are copyrighted materials of VDOT and the
Commonwealth of Virginia. VDOT's policy is to offer the Standard Drawings in a secure
electronic format and each Standard is available on this website.
htto://www.virginiadot.org/business/locdes/vdot road and bridge standards.asp
2. Please remove all VDOT standards and drawings from plan set, to be used for referenced
only.
3. Note that the final site plan must show conformance with the VDOT Road Design
Manual Appendices B(1) and F, as well as any other applicable standards, regulations or
other requirements.
Please provide two copies of the revised plan along with a comment response letter. If further
information is desired, please contact Willis Bedsaul at 434-422-9866.
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The
owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process.
Sincerely,
Doug McAvoy, Jr., P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING