HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB202200008 Staff Report 2022-03-15ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #/Name
ARB-2022-08: RST Residences — Final
Review Type
Final Site Plan and Architectural Review
Parcel Identification
04600-00-00-10800, 04600-00-00-10900
Location
East side of Rt. 29, north of Ashwood Blvd. (See Figures 1 and 2.)
Zoned
Planned Residential Development (PRD) / Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner/Applicant
Seminole Trail LLC C/O RST Development, LLC / Bohler (Ryan Yauger)
Magisterial District
Rivanna
Proposal
To construct a residential development with approximately 254 apartments in 4 buildings and 78 townhouses in 6 blocks, with associated site improvements.
Context
The property is currently occupied by a motel and the Ridgewood mobile home community. The Forest Lakes neighborhood, with a mix of single-family attached and
detached dwellings, is located to the east and southeast. The Brookhill development is located to the south across Ashwood Blvd. Forested properties are to the west
across U.S. Route 29 and to the north.
Visibility
The townhouse blocks at the back of the property are not expected to have a significant visual impact from the EC street due to distance and topography, and because most
are located behind the apartment buildings as viewed from the EC.
A vegetative buffer is proposed along most of the Rt. 29 frontage at a depth of 100'. Most of the buffer will consist of a mix of newly planted trees. Once these trees mature,
the buffer will substantially limit visibility of the apartment buildings but building colors could increase noticeability through the buffer. Until the buffer is mature, Buildings
3 and 4, at 4-stories tall, will be visible through and beyond the trees. Visibility of Building 1 will be further mitigated by trees at the cemetery and the greater distance
from the EC (approx. 440'). Tree buffers on the northeast property line will also help mitigate views, but it isn't clear if there are more distant, elevated vantage points on
the EC from which the buildings will be seen. (See Figures 3 — 6.)
ARB Meeting Date
March 21, 2022
Staff Contact
Khris Taggart
PROJECT HISTORY
A rezoning (ZMA 2020-07, RI Residential to PRD Planned Residential Development) and Special Exception (SE2020-03, to waive some stepback requirements) were approved for this property on 9/15/21. The
ARB recommended approval of the Initial Site Plan and provided preliminary comments on the architectural design on November 15, 2021.
4630L
I638G \ i
5,0
46-11 I -,
0 41101 ��0 1550
29r3 �.rl
J• +�� 46.3 BX 46-18G � 1.OI..S.
6618E a931
2W
6-20A1
2885 •' \
/4fi 14C /
/4611
40 2883 1]]
1366-
�ayyC 1358
.389 p0a 13J51493 2899
1381 1411 288J
IQ 1385 1494 2875
.67
1485 1988 2828 265
1413 ]395 2812
1406 1397 2794 2815
10114]5 1474 3791
4]0
1913 1.
1424 1419 1461
14. 0
]450 2627 'BBSbI
``\ \
2626 FJ
S6B5-iC
46-20J
UB51
46B5 1
46-19BJ�Wu00161y-�tl'_—
V h'
d6-1980 1358
262 _ 46B5-ON"14 d6B 5-G�
=4- �ti��I 46B5K r \
i \asy9,
Figure 1: Project
site near the comer of Rt. 29 North and Ashwood Blvd.
z
E
6
f
r
r� NV
card -Gooqlc OEM
.
��
Figure 4: View looking east from Rt. 29 at Ridgewood Drive.
s t`
n
W-2
ARCHER
AVENUE
(FUTURE/
T
r I, nn
b • ,
m ..
Figure 6: Proposed site layout.
IR
ANALYSIS
REF
GUIDELINE
RECOMMENDATION
ISSUE 3/21/22
RECOMMENDATION
11/15/21
3/21/22
GENERAL GUIDELINES
Purpose; ConradbUily with significant historic sues; Structure design
1
The goal of the regulation of the design of development within the
Consider revising the
The proposed building design remains contemporary in style
Consider a more muted
designated Entrance Corridors is to ensure that new development within
west elevations of
with no strong connection to the historic architecture of the
color substitute for the
the corridors reflects the traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is
Buildings 3 and 4 so that
County. Some changes have been made to the west elevations of
white fiber cement.
the purpose of ARB review and of these Guidelines, that proposed
these EC -facing
Buildings 3 and 4. The changes include additional recesses and
development within the designated Entrance Corridors reflect elements of
elevations have the
windows, a redesign of the stair tower, rearrangement of other
Revise the building
design characteristic of the significant historical landmarks, buildings, and
appearance of primary
forms, redistribution of materials, and the addition of a canopy
elevation drawings to
structures of the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote
elevations.
over the entrances at the middle of these elevations. These
include a material and color
orderly and attractive development within these corridors. Applicants
changes help to further break up the mass of these elevations but
schedule that is keyed to
should note that replication of historic structures is neither required nor
Provide material/color
overall, they still have the appearance of secondary elevations.
the sample board. Provide
desired.
samples for review.
A material sample board and perspective views have been
accurate material/color
notations along the building
2
Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and
Albemarle area experience these sites as ensembles of buildings, land, and
Consider a more muted
provided. The colors shown on the material board include earth
elevations.
vegetation. In order to accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and
color substitute for the
tone shades of fiber cement (BM CC542 and BM 1475), brick
vegetation characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines require attention to
white fiber cement.
and mortar, which are expected to be compatible with the
four primary factors: compatibility with significant historic sites in the
surroundings. However, the color samples for the white (BM
area; the character of the Entrance Corridor; site development and layout;
Provide perspective
2125-70) and tan/copper (SW 7718) fiber cement panels appear
and landscaping.
views of the apartment
buildings.
brighter than what is shown in the elevations and perspectives.
The applicant has indicated that the shade of white has been
3
New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should
respect the traditions of the architecture of historically significant buildings
revised from the previous submittal, but the color is still
in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings
expected to be conspicuous through the vegetated buffer. The
in the area, as well as drawings of architectural features, which provide
elevations and materials board do not include a materials
important examples of this tradition are contained in Appendix A.
schedule that identifies manufacturers or color names or
numbers.
4
The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for
building design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic
structures is not intended to impose a rigid design solution for new
The partial elevation and material/color notations shown on the
development. Replication of the design of the important historic sites in the
material board do not appear to coordinate with the ones shown
area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of
on the building elevation drawings (sheet DD101), and the
compatibility can be met through building scale, materials, and forms
canopy form shown over the west elevation entrances is not the
which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as
same one shown on the elevation drawings and the perspectives.
traditional. The Guidelines allow individuality in design to accommodate
varying tastes as well as special functional requirements.
9
Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials,
colors and textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the
significant historic buildings in the area, exemplified b but not limited to
the buildings described in Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The
standard of compatibility can be met through scale, materials, and forms
which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as
traditional. The replication of important historic sites in Albemarle County
is not the objective of these guidelines.
�B
11
The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale should be�
integral to the buildingand site design.
C
13
Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building design should be
relieved using design detail or vegetation, or both.
5
It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a pattern of
compatible architectural characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor
in order to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should
demonstrate sensitivity to other nearby structures within the Entrance
Corridor. Where a designated corridor is substantially developed, these
Guidelines require striking a careful balance between harmonizing new
development with the existing character of the corridor and achieving
compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area.
10
Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of
buildings.
12
Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms,
None.
No changes have been made to the design of the apartment
None.
shapes, scale, and materials to create a cohesive whole.
building that will detract from the cohesive appearance of the
development.
14
Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting devices should be
None.
The updated drawings no longer show a pedestrian bridge that
None.
used to unify groups of buildings within a development.
connects the two parts of Building 1.
15
Trademark buildings and related features should be modified to meet the
None.
The buildings do not have the appearance of trademark design.
None.
requirements of the Guidelines.
16
Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly tinted or highly
None.
Information on window glass was not provided. Given the
None.
reflective. Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the
distance from the street and the vegetated buffer, the type of
following criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below
glass is not expected to have a significant visual impact on the
40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%. Specifications
EC street.
on the proposed window glass should be submitted with the application for
final review.
Accessorystructures and equipment
17
Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated into the overall
None.
The site plan has been revised to show a dumpster enclosure
See recommendation at
plan of development and shall, to the extent possible, be compatible with
along the western perimeter of the large parking lot south of
#36.
the building designs used on the site.
Building 4. The detail in the plan notes that the enclosure will be
a wane dark brown brick to match the one used in the apartment
18
The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance
Provide a detail for the
Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, these features will still have a
cemetery fence in the
building. However, in this location the enclosure is reliant on
negative visual impact on the Entrance Corridor street, screening should be
site plan. Chain link
existing offsite vegetation on the adjacent VDOT parcel to the
provided to eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse
fence is not appropriate.
west to provide screening. Revising the landscape plan to show
areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment,
shrubs along west side of the enclosure, 24" at time of planting,
f. Above -ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor wire,
would be appropriate.
and similar security fencing devices.
A detail for the cemetery fence has been provided. The detail
19
Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings
and surrounding natural vegetation and may consist of. a. Walls, b.
notes aluminum ornamental fencing in black which is expected
Plantings, and c. Fencing.
to have an appropriate appearance.
20
Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be designed to fit into
None.
Underground stonnwater facilities are proposed and are not
None.
the natural topography to avoid the need for screening. When visible from
expected to have a visual impact on the EC street.
the Entrance Corridor street, these features must be fully integrated into the
landscape. They should not have the appearance of engineered features.
21
The following note should be added to the site plan and the architectural plan:
Add the standard
The plan has been revised to include the standard mechanical
None.
"Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall
mechanical equipment
equipment note.
be eliminated."
note to the plan.
Li hfrn
General Guidelines
22
Light should be contained on the site and not spill over onto adjacent
Revise the lighting plan
Spillover still exceeds .5 fc at the new entrance into the site from
Revise the lighting plan to
properties or streets;
to eliminate spillover in
Rt. 29.
eliminate spillover in
excess of .5 fc.
excess of .5 fc.
23
Light should be shielded, recessed or flush -mounted to eliminate glare. All
Revise the lighting plan
The plan has been revised to show pole -mounted fixtures that are
Revise the lighting plan to
fixtures with lamps emitting 3000 lumens or more must be full cutoff
to include details on light
full cutoff. No details on the fixture type and style have been
include details on wall light
fixtures.
fixture type and style.
provided for wall -mounted lights.
fixture type and style.
24
Light levels exceeding 30 footcandles are not appropriate for display lots in
None.
The plan shows a maximum illumination at the ground of 8.2 fc,
Revise the lighting plan to
the Entrance Corridors. Lower light levels will apply to most other uses in
which is expected to have an appropriate appearance; however, a
indicate that the plan was
the Entrance Corridors.
LLF of less than 1.0 has been noted on the luminaire schedule.
calculated using an LLF of
1.0 for all fixtures and
revise the photometrics
accordingly.
25
Light should have the appearance of white light with a warm soft glow;
Revise the lighting plan
The lighting plan has been revised to include information of light
Revise the color
however, a consistent appearance throughout a site or development is
to include information
fixture color temperature. All fixtures shown on the plan specify
temperature of the proposed
required. Consequently, if existing lamps that emit non -white light are to
on light fixture color
a color temperature approximating neutral white (4000K).
lighting to indicate a warm
remain, new lamps may be required to match them.
temperature. Warm
white light with a
10
white light is
temperature in the range of
appropriate.
2000K-3000K.
26
Dark brown, dark bronze, or black are appropriate colors for free-standing
Revise the lighting plan
The color of the pole -mounted light fixtures has been indicated
Revise the luminaire
pole mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors.
to include information
as black on the cutsheets (sheet C-714) but not the luminaire
schedule to indicate the
on light fixture
schedule.
color of the pole -mounted
color/finish.
fixtures.
27
The height and scale of freestanding, pole -mounted light fixtures should be
Revise the lighting plan
The lighting plan has been revised to indicate pole heights. The
Revise the plan to indicate
compatible with the height and scale of the buildings and the sites they are
to include proposed pole
heights noted do not exceed 20' but the plan does not indicate if
the fixture heights will not
illuminating, and with the use of the site. Typically, the height of
heights, with a maximum
the fixture heights shown include the pole base.
exceed 20' including the
freestanding pole -mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors should
not to exceed 20'.
base.
not exceed 20 feet, including the base. Fixtures that exceed 20 feet in
height will typically require additional screening to achieve an appropriate
appearance from the Entrance Corridor.
28
In determining the appropriateness of lighting fixtures for the Entrance
Revise the lighting plan
The lighting plan has not been revised to include wall -mounted
Revise the lighting plan to
Corridors, the individual context of the site will be taken into consideration
to include wall -mounted
lights. Fixture locations and illumination values will be needed
include fixture locations
on a case -by -case basis.
lights.
to confirm appropriate site lighting.
and illumination values for
the wall -mounted lights.
29
The following note should be included on the lighting plan: "Each outdoor
Add the standard
The standard lighting note has been added to the plan.
None.
luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens
lighting note to the plan.
shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect
light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent
roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and
property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one
half footcandle."
30-
Guidelines for the Use of Decorative Landscape Lighting
None.
No decorative landscape lighting is proposed.
None.
31
Landscaping
7
The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping are intended to
Provide a complete row
The landscape plan has been revised to provide street trees in the
Provide the frontage street
reflect the landscaping characteristic of many of the area's significant
of street trees along the
gap along the Rt. 29 frontage near the cemetery.
trees at 3%" caliper.
historic sites which is characterized by large shade trees and lawns.
Rt. 29 frontage. (Fill the
Landscaping should promote visual order within the Entrance Corridor and
gap near the cemetery.)
The trees in the vicinity of the existing cable line along the Rt.
help to integrate buildings into the existing environment of the corridor.
Resolve the cable
29 frontage have been shifted slightly east to avoid conflict.
The frontage street trees planting size (3" caliper) is still below
8
Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting
different types of plant materials that share similar characteristics. Such
line/tree conflict along
the 3%" caliper EC requirement.
common elements allow for more flexibility in the design of structures
the frontage while
because common landscape features will help to harmonize the appearance
maintaining an organized
A mixture of deciduous trees and shrubs has been added in the
of development as seen from the street upon which the Corridor is
planting pattern.
wedge located north of Ridgewood Drive and trees have been
centered.
added in the planting area between the eastern perimeter of the
n
32
Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include
Provide the frontage
adjacent VDOT parcel and the large parking lot south of Building
the following:
street trees at 3%"
4.
a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the Entrance Corridor
caliper.
Street. Such trees should be at least 3% inches caliper (measured 6 inches
above the ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area.
Add plants in the wedge
Such trees should be located at least every 35 feet on center.
located east of the VDOT
b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be
parcel, and north of
interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The
Ridgewood Drive.
ornamental trees need not alternate one for one with the large shade trees.
They may be planted among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing
pattern.
c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone
wall, typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor
street.
d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and
fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and
exclusive of road right-of-way and utility easements.
33
Landscaping along interior roads:
Consider adding trees
The site plan has been revised to provide trees, in regular
None.
a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior roads. Such trees
along Travelway B and
intervals, along Travelway B and Archer Avenue (Private Road
should be at least 2% inches caliper (measured six inches above the
Private Road C.
C).
ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees
should be located at least every 40 feet on center.
34
Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways:
a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior pedestrian ways.
Such trees should be at least 2% inches caliper (measured six inches above
the ground) and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees
should be located at least every 25 feet on center.
35
Landscaping of parking areas:
Add perimeter trees
Perimeter parking trees have been added along the east, west,
Increase the planting size of
a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, located 40 feet
(2%" caliper, 40' on
and south sides of the large parking lot. However, these trees and
the exterior and interior
on center. Trees should be planted in the interior of parking areas at the
center) along the east,
the interior parking area trees are still smaller than the 2%"
parking lot trees to 2%"
rate of one tree for every 10 parking spaces provided and should be evenly
west and south sides of
caliper requirement. Additionally, the parking lot relies on
caliper.
distributed throughout the interior of the parking area.
the large parking lot.
existing offsite vegetation on the adjacent VDOT parcel to the
b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 2%: inches
south and west to provide screening. Revising the landscape plan
Revise the landscape plan
caliper (measured six inches above the ground); should be evenly spaced;
Increase the planting size
to show shrubs along the south and west sides of the large
to show shrubs, 24" at time
and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be
of interior parking lot
parking lot would be appropriate to minimize the parking area's
of planting, along the south
planted in planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain the health of
trees to 2%" caliper.
impact on the EC in the event that the existing vegetation on the
and west sides of the large
the tree and shall be protected by curbing.
VDOT parcel is cleared.
parking lot.
c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area's
impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 inches in
height.
12
36
Landscaping of buildings and other structures:
Consider adding trees
Three trees have been added along the west elevation of
Revise the landscape plan
a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the front of long
along the west elevation
Building 1 near the intersection of Travelway A and B, but trees
to show shrubs, 24" at time
buildings as necessary to soften the appearance of exterior walls. The
of Building 1.
have not been provided along the full extent of Building 1.
of planting, along the west
spacing, size, and type of such trees or vegetation should be determined by
side of the dumpster
the length, height, and blankness of such walls.
The site plan has been revised to show a dumpster enclosure
enclosure.
b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other
along the western perimeter of the large parking lot south of
structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thrn"
Building 4. The detail in the plan notes that the enclosure will be
windows; service areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24
a warm dark brown brick to match the one used in the apartment
inches in height.
building. However, in this location the enclosure is reliant on
existing offsite vegetation on the adjacent VDOT parcel to the
west to provide screening. Revising the landscape plan to show
shrubs along the west side of the enclosure, 24" at time of
planting, would be appropriate.
37
Plant species: a. Plant species required should be as approved by the Staff
None.
The plants are found on the various lists.
None.
based upon but not limited to the Generic Landscape Plan Recommended
Species List and Native Plants or Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D .
38
Plant health: The following note should be added to the landscape plan: "All
Add the standard plant
The plan has been revised to include the standard plant health
None.
site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be
health note to the plan.
note.
maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and
trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of
theplant.,,
Site Development and layout, Development paftern, Site Grading
6
Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural landscape and
Revise grading to
The grading near the new entrance from Rt. 29 has been revised
None.
should contribute to the creation of an organized development plan. This
provide rounded
to provide rounded contours.
may be accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the trees and
contours in the vicinity
rolling terrain typical of the area; planting new trees along streets and
of the new entrance from
pedestrian ways and choosing species that reflect native forest elements;
Rt. 29.
insuring that any grading will blend into the surrounding topography
thereby creating a continuous landscape; preserving, to the extent practical,
existing significant river and stream valleys which may be located on the
site and integrating these features into the design of surrounding
development; and limiting the building mass and height to a scale that does
not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor.
39
The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance Corridor
street and to other development within the corridor should be as follows:
a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, and pedestrian
walks should guide the layout of the site.
b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street should be
parallel to the street. Building groupings should be arranged to parallel the
Entrance Corridor street.
13
c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian and
vehicular circulation systems.
d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity
within the Entrance Corridor.
e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys,
steep slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical,
then such natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the
provisions of Section 32.5.2.n of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance
apply, then improvements required by that section should be located so as
to maximize the use of existing features in screening such improvements
from Entrance Corridor streets.
f The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and
vistas on and around the site.
40
Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site to surrounding
conditions by limiting the use of retaining walls and by shaping the terrain
through the use of smooth, rounded landforms that blend with the existing
terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed
contours on the grading plan shall be rounded with a ten -foot minimum radius
where they meet the adjacent condition. Final grading should achieve a
natural, rather than engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height
and taller, when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend with the
landscape.
41
No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the drip line of any
Resolve the conflict
The grading has been revised so that there is no conflict with the
Show tree protection
trees or other existing features designated for preservation in the final
between grading and
drip line of the trees to remain near the cemetery and Rt. 29.
fencing on, and coordinated
Certificate of Appropriateness. Adequate tree protection fencing should be
drip line of trees to
Limits of disturbance are delineated on the plan, but tree
throughout, the grading,
shown on, and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and erosion
remain in the vicinity of
protection fencing has not been added to the plan.
landscaping, and erosion and
and sediment control plans.
the cemetery and Rt. 29.
sediment control plans.
42
Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of
Maintain grading outside
Appropriateness should be clearly delineated and protected on the site prior
the driplines of trees to
to any grading activity on the site. This protection should remain in place
remain. Show tree
until completion of the development of the site.
protection fencing on,
and coordinated
43
Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy
equipment within this area.
throughout, the grading,
landscaping, and erosion
and sediment control
Tans.
44
Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage patterns)
None.
Stormwater facilities are not expected to be visible from the EC
None.
should be incorporated into the finished site to the extent possible.
street.
14
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. The revisions to the architectural design of the apartment buildings.
2. The planting size of EC frontage trees.
3. The planting size of exterior and interior parking area trees.
4. The need for shrubs along the west side of the dumpster enclosure and the south and west sides of the large parking lot.
Staff recommends approval of the Final Site Plan with the following revisions:
1. Consider a more muted color substitute for the white fiber cement.
2. Revise the building elevation drawings to include a material and color schedule that is keyed to the sample board. Provide accurate material/color notations along the building elevations.
3. Revise the lighting plan to eliminate spillover in excess of .5 fc.
4. Revise the lighting plan to include details on wall light fixture type and style.
5. Revise the lighting plan to indicate that the plan was calculated using an LLF of 1.0 for all fixtures and revise the photometrics accordingly.
6. Revise the color temperature of the proposed lighting to indicate a warm white light with a temperature in the range of 2000K-3000K.
7. Revise the luminaire schedule to indicate the color of the pole -mounted fixtures.
8. Revise the plan to indicate the fixture heights will not exceed 20' including the base.
9. Revise the lighting plan to include fixture locations and illumination values for the wall -mounted lights.
10. Provide the frontage street trees at 3%:" caliper.
11. Increase the planting size of the exterior and interior parking lot trees to 2'/z" caliper.
12. Revise the landscape plan to show shrubs, 24" at time of planting, along the south and west sides of the large parking lot.
13. Revise the landscape plan to show shrubs, 24" at time of planting, along the west side of the dumpster enclosure.
14. Show tree protection fencing on, and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping, and erosion and sediment control plans.
ATTACHMENTS
• Attach. 1: ARB-2022-08: RST Residences Final Site Plan
• Attach. 2: ARB-2022-08: RST Residences Architectural Drawings
15