HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB202200015 Staff Report 2022-03-15ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #/Name
ARB-2022-15: Crozet Self Storage
Review Type
Final Site Development Plan
Parcel Identification
05600000003200 and 056000000032A0
Location
5696 Rockfish Gap Turnpike (See Figures 1 and 2.)
Zoned
Highway Commercial (HQ / Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner/Applicant
Yousef LC / Merchants Retail Partners LLC (Andrew Lewis)
Magisterial District
White Hall
Proposal
To construct a 90,000 sf, 3-story self -storage building with associated site improvements.
Context
The surrounding area is a mix of residential development and wooded lots, with institutional and commercial development further west on Rt. 250.
Visibility
All four sides of the proposed building will be visible from the Entrance Corridors.
ARB Meeting Date
March 21, 2022
Staff Contact
Margaret Maliszewski
PROJECT HISTORY
Three conceptual designs for a storage building were presented for review at the September 7, 2021 ARB meeting. A design like one of the conceptual designs was reviewed by the ARB in an initial site
plan review on December 20, 2021. (See Figures 3 and 4.) Comments from the December meeting are included in the analysis section of this report. Since December, the applicant has significantly
revised the proposal to address the ARB's concerns. The building has been shifted to the east, away from Crozet Avenue and the intersection; a community meeting room has been incorporated into the
plan; and substantial revisions have been made to the architectural design to address form, mass, and scale. (See Figure 5.)
ANALYSIS
REF
GUIDELINE
RECOMMENDA-
ISSUE 3/21/2022
RECOMMENDATION
TION 12/20/21
3/21/2022
Purpose; Compatibility with significant historic sites: Compatibility
with the character of the Entrance Corridor; Structure design
1
The goal of the regulation of the design of development within the
Provide perspective
Perspective views have been provided showing the
Revise the roof form of
designated Entrance Corridors is to insure that new development within the
renderings that show
building from both directions on the corridor. There are no
the southwest tower for
corridors reflects the traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the
the proposed
buildings located close enough to the site to be included in
greater coordination
purpose of ARB review and of these Guidelines, that proposed development
building in the
the images for scale comparison. The architectural
throughout the building.
within the designated Entrance Corridors reflect elements of design
surrounding context
changes improve the mass and scale of the building, and
characteristic of the significant historical landmarks, buildings, and
to clarify the scale,
the images show that the landscaping will help soften the
Replace some of the EIFS
structures of the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote orderly
extent of visibility,
appearance of the development.
with masonry (brick or
and attractive development within these corridors. Applicants should note that
and visual impacts
stone) to establish a
re lication of historic structures is neither required nor desired.
along both corridors.
The architectural design has been revised to include a
change from a flat roof to a mansard roof, the addition of
stronger tie to the historic
architecture of the area.
2
Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and
Albemarle area experience these sites as ensembles of buildings, land, and
Revise the
gabled bays on the EC elevation alternating with trellises,
The southeastern tower
vegetation. In order to accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and
architectural design
a pyramidal roof on the tower at the southeast corner of
and/or the first stories of
vegetation characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines require attention to
to incorporate forms,
the building, and a tower added at the southwest comer
the gabled bays are
four primary factors: compatibility with significant historic sites in the area;
features and
where a new community meeting room is located. These
appropriate locations for
the character of the Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; and
materials that reflect
elements are a better reflection of historic architectural
additional masonry.
landscaping.
the traditional
architecture of the
forms than the previous proposal and they provide greater
visual relief than the previous proposal. In this design, the
3
New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should respect
the traditions of the architecture of historically significant buildings in the
area.
bays project over 3' from the main wall.
Charlottesville and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in the
area, as well as drawings of architectural features, which provide important
Revise the
The southwest tower is an improvement over the window
examples of this tradition are contained in Appendix A.
architectural design
to include
that was previously proposed in that location, but it has a
roof form that differs from the others used in the building
4
The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for
building design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic
architectural
and this results in an uncoordinated appearance.
structures is not intended to impose a rigid design solution for new
elements with
development. Replication of the design of the important historic sites in the
greater relief.
Building materials have been revised to EIFS (in colors
area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of
SW 6112 and 6101) above a stone water table, white vinyl
compatibility can be met through building scale, materials, and forms which
windows and white accents, and a mix of metal and
may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as
fiberglass shingle roofs. The amount of EIFS is extensive.
traditional. The Guidelines allow individuality in design to accommodate
Replacing some of the EIFS with masonry (brick or stone)
varving tastes as well as special functional requirements.
could establish a stronger tie to the historic architecture of
the area. The southeastern tower and/or the first stories of
9
Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials,
colors and textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the
the gabled bays would be appropriate locations for
significant historic buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to)
additional masonry.
the buildings described in Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The
standard of compatibility can be met through scale, materials, and forms
The gabled bays and general arrangement of architectural
which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as
elements are reminiscent of the design of the buildings
traditional. The replication of important historic sites in Albemarle County is
fronting Rt. 250 at the Shops at Clover Lawn, an ARB-
not the objective of these guidelines.
approved development. The proposed building height is
35' to the top of the mansard on the Rt. 250 side (and 45'
to the top of the southeastern tower roof). The gabled bays
are approximately 33' tall and 21' wide. This compares to
the 40' height of the main roof of the Clover Lawn
buildings, and 37' height and 20' width of Clover Lawn's
able bays. See Figure 6.
5
It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a pattern of
Revise the
The revised building measures 135.5' x 225.5'. The
None.
compatible architectural characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in
architectural design
previous building size was 260' x 120'. The current
order to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should demonstrate
with a combination
proposal reduces the building size by 645 sf in footprint.
sensitivity to other nearby structures within the Entrance Corridor. Where a
of reduced footprint,
Although the height of the main building has not changed,
designated corridor is substantially developed, these Guidelines require
reduced height,
the change from flat roof to mansard roof tends to reduce
striking a careful balance between harmonizing new development with the
substantial breaks in
the visual impact. (For comparison, the Clover Lawn
existing character of the corridor and achieving compatibility with the
the building form,
buildings measure approximately 175' x 60' and 186' x
sianificant historic sites in the area.
and substantial
changes in depth for
recesses and
70'.)
The building design has been further revised with
10
Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of buildings.
11
The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale should be
integral to the building and site design.
projections along the
walls to reduce the
increased breaks in the building form and greater changes
in depth. The gabled bays project over 3' from the main
12
Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms,
shapes, scale, and materials to create a cohesive whole.
mass and scale of
wall. A canopy has been added above the overhead doors
the building.
on the east elevation. These changes substantially improve
the general character and appearance of the building.
The addition of the community meeting room with the
canopy on two sides and the small patio introduces
elements of human scale and pedestrian orientation into
the design.
13
Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building design should be
Revise the
The change in roof form significantly reduces blankness
None.
relieved using design detail or vegetation, or both.
architectural design
on all the elevations. The trellises, tower elements, gabled
to eliminate
bays, and material/color changes further reduce blankness
blankness on all
on the Rt. 250 side of the building.
sides of the building.
14
Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting devices should be
None.
A single building is proposed.
None.
used to unify ou s of buildings within a development.
15
Trademark buildings and related features should be modified to meet the
None.
The building does not have the appearance of a trademark
None.
requirements of the Guidelines.
design.
16
Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly tinted or highly
None.
The architectural drawings note the window glass as
Provide specs on the
reflective. Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the following
"clear."
window glass for review.
criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 40%. Visible
light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%. Specifications on the proposed
window glass should be submitted with the applicationforfinal review.
Accessorystructures and equipment
17
Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated into the overall
Include a detail of
The dumpster has been removed from the plan.
Add holly shrubs to wrap
plan of development and shall, to the extent possible, be compatible with the
the dumpster
around the western side
buildina desums used on the site.
enclosure in the
plan.
Ornamental grasses and shrubs (Miscanthus sinensis and
ilex crenata Hoogendom) are proposed near the lift
of the equipment at the
northwest comer of the
18
The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance
Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, these features will still have a
station.
building for better
negative visual impact on the Entrance Corridor street, screening should be
Add low level
screening.
provided to eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse
planting to screen
HVAC equipment is proposed at the northeast and
areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment,
the lift station from
northwest comers of the building. Holly trees and shrubs
f Above -ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor wire,
view.
are proposed for screening. Wrapping these shrubs around
and similar security fencing devices.
the comer of the northwest equipment would provide for
increased screening.
19
Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and
surrounding natural vegetation and may consist of a. Walls, b. Plantings,
and c. Fencing.
21
The following note should be added to the site plan and the architectural plan:
Add the standard
The note appears as general note #34 on Sheet C 1.0 of the
Add the standard
"Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be
mechanical
site plan, but it is not on the architectural drawings.
mechanical equipment
eliminated."
equipment note to
note to the architectural
the site and
drawings.
architectural plans.
22-
Lighting
Provide a complete
A lighting plan is included in the site plan set.
See below.
31
lighting plan for
review. Include all
proposed building -
and ground -mounted
lighting in the plan.
22
Light should be contained on the site and not spill over onto adjacent
There is no excessive spillover.
None.
ro erties or streets;
23
Light should be shielded, recessed or flush -mounted to eliminate glare. All
Proposed light fixtures are full cutoff styles.
None.
fixtures with lamps emitting 3000 lumens or more must be full cutoff
fixtures.
24
Light levels exceeding 30 footcandles are not appropriate for display lots in
The maximum illumination at the ground is 9.9
Revise the photometric
the Entrance Corridors. Lower light levels will apply to most other uses in
footcandles. However, the photometric plan was
plan using an LLF of 1.0.
the Entrance Corridors.
calculated usin an LLF of .95 instead of 1.0.
25
Light should have the appearance of white light with a warm soft glow;
The lamps are proposed with a color temperature of
Revise the lighting plan
however, a consistent appearance throughout a site or development is
4000K. 3000K would produce a warn white light,
to use lamps with a color
required. Consequently, if existing lamps that emit non -white light are to
consistent with the EC guidelines.
temperature of 3000K.
remain, new lam s may be required to match them.
26
Dark brown, dark bronze, or black are appropriate colors for free-standing
The color of the finish for the fixtures and pole has not
Revise the lighting plan
pole mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors.
been identified.
to identify the color of the
finish for the light
fixtures and poles.
Bronze is recommended.
27
The height and scale of freestanding, pole -mounted light fixtures should be
A 20' pole is proposed, but a base for the pole is not
Include a note on the plan
compatible with the height and scale of the buildings and the sites they are
addressed.
stating that maximum
illuminating, and with the use of the site. Typically, the height of
pole fixture height is 20',
freestanding pole -mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors should
including any base for the
not exceed 20 feet, including the base. Fixtures that exceed 20 feet in height
pole.
will typically require additional screening to achieve an appropriate
appearance from the Entrance Corridor.
28
In determining the appropriateness of lighting fixtures for the Entrance
The surrounding area is generally not very brightly lit.
See other lighting
Corridors, the individual context of the site will be taken into consideration
recommendations.
on a case by case basis.
29
The following note should be included on the lighting plan: "Each outdoor
The note appears on the plan.
None.
luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall
be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light
away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The
spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in
residential or real areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half
footcandle."
30-
Guidelines for the Use of Decorative Landscape Lighting
No decorative lighting is proposed.
None.
31
Landscaping
7
The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping are intended to
None.
Lawns and shade trees are characteristic of residential
None.
reflect the landscaping characteristic of many of the area's significant
properties in the surrounding area but are not typical of
historic sites which is characterized by large shade trees and lawns.
commercial properties. The portions of the site not
Landscaping should promote visual order within the Entrance Corridor and
occupied by structures or parking do not have the
help to integrate buildings into the existing environment of the corridor.
appearance of lawns.
8
Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by plantingNone.
Sycamores and dogwoods are proposed along the Rt. 250
None.
different types of plant materials that share similar characteristics. Such
EC. Red Oaks are proposed west of the building. A variety
common elements allow for more flexibility in the design of structures
of other trees are proposed throughout the site. The tree
because common landscape features will help to harmonize the appearance
species are used throughout the corridors.
of development as seen from the street upon which the Corridor is centered.
32
Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include
See other landscape
13 large shade trees are provided along the Rt. 250
None,
the following:
recommendations,
frontage. The spacing of the trees is adjusted to
a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the Entrance Corridor
below.
correspond to the architectural features of the building
Street. Such trees should be at least 3% inches caliper (measured 6 inches
elevation facing the street.
above the ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such
trees should be located at least every 35 feet on center.
On the Crozet Ave. side, an informal mix of trees is
b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be
proposed between the building and existing wooded area
interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The
to remain along the frontage. Note that much of the
ornamental trees need not alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They
existing wooded area stands in the right-of-way.
may be planted among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern.
c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone
Ornamental trees are interspersed on both frontages.
wall, typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor
street.
d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and
fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and
exclusive of road right-of-way and utility easements.
33
Landscaping along interior roads:
Provide 16 large
A mix of trees and shrubs is proposed along Brownsville
None.
a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior roads. Such trees
shade trees along
Road, including large deciduous, ornamental, and
should be at least 2% inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground)
Brownsville Rd.,
evergreen, in an informal arrangement. The quantity of
and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be
2%" caliper at
trees is sufficient to meet the intent of the guideline.
located at least every 40 feet on center.
planting.
34
Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways:
None.
Trees are provided along or near all sidewalks on site.
None.
a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior pedestrian ways.
Such trees should be at least 2% inches caliper (measured six inches above
the ground) and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees
should be located at least every 25 feet on center.
35
Landscaping of parking areas:
Add a large tree on
Trees of the required planting size are distributed around
None.
a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, located 40 feet on
the north side of the
the perimeter of the parking areas at the required spacing.
center. Trees should be planted in the interior of parking areas at the rate of
parking lot, 2%"
one tree for every 10 parking spaces provided and should be evenly
caliper at planting.
distributed throughout the interior of the parking area.
b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 2% inches
caliper (measured six inches above the ground); should be evenly spaced;
and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be planted
in planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain the health of the tree and
shall be protected by curbing.
c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area's
impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 inches in
height.
36
Landscaping of buildings and other structures:
Increase the planting
The number of trees along the Rt. 250 frontage remains
Extend the shrubs and
a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the front of long
along the Rt. 250
the same, but significant low-level plantings have been
ground cover planting
buildings as necessary to soften the appearance of exterior walls. The
side of the building
added, including a double row of shrubs and ground
along the Rt. 250 side of
spacing, size, and type of such trees or vegetation should be determined by
to offset the impacts
cover. Extending the shrubs and ground cover along the
the stormwater facility.
the length, height, and blankness of such walls.
of the scale of the
street side of the stormwater facility would provide for a
b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other structures;
building.
more coordinated appearance. Along Crozet Avenue,
dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru" windows; service
existing wooded area is now to remain, and a mix of large
areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height.
Add low level
shade and ornamental trees is proposed between the
plantings all along
wooded area and the building. The proposed sizes and
the Rt. 250 frontage.
uantities meet the requirements.
37
Plant species: a. Plant species required should be as approved by the Staff
None.
The plants are on the various lists.
None.
based upon but not limited to the Generic Landscape Plan Recommended
Species List and Native Plants or Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D .
38
Plant health: The following note should be added to the landscape plan: "All
None.
The note is on the plan.
None.
site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be
maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and
trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the
plant. -
Site Development and layout; Development pattern
6
Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural landscape and
Revise the design to
Much of the site is already developed. Large groups of
None.
should contribute to the creation of an organized development plan. This
reduce the scale of
mature trees currently stand near the center of the site and
may be accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the trees and
the building to not
along the western perimeter. Smaller groups are at the
rolling terrain typical of the area; planting new trees along streets and
overpower the
southeastern comer and at the driveway accessing
pedestrian ways and choosing species that reflect native forest elements;
setting of the site.
Brownsville Rd. Previously, all trees were to be removed.
insuring that any grading will blend into the surrounding topography thereby
Now, with the building shifted to the east, the trees at the
creating a continuous landscape; preserving, to the extent practical, existing
western end of the site are to remain, though a large
significant river and stream valleys which may be located on the site and
portion of them are within the right-of-way.
integrating these features into the design of surrounding development; and
limiting the building mass and height to a scale that does not overpower the
The proposed building is oriented parallel to Rt. 250. The
natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor.
chamfered comer at the intersection with Crozet Ave. has
been replaced with a projecting bay with hipped roof and
39
The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance Corridor
street and to other development within the corridor should be as follows:
canopy. The layout appears generally organized. Access is
a. An organized pattem of roads, service lanes, bike paths, and pedestrian
proposed off Brownsville Rd. near the intersection with
walks should guide the layout of the site.
Rt. 250. A sidewalk is proposed along Rt. 250.
b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street should be
parallel to the street. Building groupings should be arranged to parallel the
The design has been revised to take better advantage of
Entrance Corridor street.
topography to reduce scale and to increase landscaping to
c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian and
offset visual impacts.
vehicular circulation systems.
d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity
within the Entrance Corridor.
e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys,
steep slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical,
then such natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the
provisions of Section 32.5.2.n of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance
apply, then improvements required by that section should be located so as to
maximize the use of existing features in screening such improvements from
Entrance Corridor streets.
f The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and
vistas on and around the site.
Site Grading
40
Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site to surrounding
Indicate on the plan
The building has been redesigned with a slightly reduced
Provide in the plan
conditions by limiting the use of retaining walls and by shaping the terrain
the material and
footprint, a partial below -grade basement and a mansard
details, including material
through the use of smooth, rounded land forms that blend with the existing
color proposed for
roof. This takes better advantage of the topography to
and color, on the design
terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed contours
the retaining wall. A
reduce the mass and scale of the building.
of the seat wall. A muted
on the grading plan shall be rounded with a ten foot minimum radius where
muted earth tone
earth tone color is
they meet the adjacent condition. Final grading should achieve a natural, rather
color is
The stormwater facility has been redesigned. It now
recommended.
than engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller, when
recommended.
includes an emergency spillway on the EC side.
necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend with the landscape.
Include a detail of
Low level landscaping was not added at the facility, but
Extend the shrubs and
ground cover planting
44
Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage patterns)
should be incor orated into the finished site to the extent possible.
the retaining wall
safety railing in the
ground cover was added to the west, between the parking
area and the EC, and all along the EC side of the building.
along the Rt. 250 side of
the stormwater facility.
20
Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be designed to fit into the
natural topography to avoid the need for screening. When visible from the
plan.
If shrubs were continued along the EC side of the
Entrance Corridor street, these features must be frilly integrated into the
stormwater facility, a more continuous landscape would
landscape. They should not have the appearance of engineered features.
Add low-level
be achieved.
landscaping in the
vicinity of the
The retaining wall is no longer proposed. A "seat wall" is
stormwater facility
proposed west of the community meeting room. Details
to integrate it more
have not been provided but the comment response letter
fully into the
states that the wall will match the stone of the building's
landscape.
water table.
41
No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the drip line of any
None.
The building location has been shifted to the east to retain
Show tree protection
trees or other existing features designated for preservation in the final
most of the wooded area along Crozet Avenue, a large
fencing for the wooded
Certificate of Appropriateness. Adequate tree protection fencing should be
portion of which is in the right-of-way. Tree protection
area to remain at the west
shown on, and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and erosion
fencing is not shown on the plan.
end of the site.
and sediment control plans.
42
Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness
should be clearly delineated and protected on the site prior to any grading
activity on the site. This protection should remain in place until completion
of the develo ment of the site.
43
Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy
e ui ment within this area.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. The revised building design: scale, style, character.
2. The extensive use of EIFS.
3. Landscaping: quantity and character relative to the building scale and building design.
Staff recommends approval with the following conditions:
1. Revise the roof form of the southwest tower for greater coordination throughout the building.
2. Replace some of the EIFS with masonry (brick or stone) to establish a stronger tie to the historic architecture of the area. The southeastern tower and/or the first stories of the gabled bays are
appropriate locations for additional masonry.
3. Provide specs on the window glass for review.
4. Add holly shrubs to wrap around the western side of the equipment at the northwest corner of the building for better screening.
5. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the architectural drawings.
6. Revise the photometric plan using an LLF of 1.0.
7. Revise the lighting plan to use lamps with a color temperature of 3000K.
8. Revise the lighting plan to identify the color of the finish for the light fixtures and poles. Bronze is recommended.
9. Include a note on the plan stating that maximum pole fixture height is 20', including any base for the pole.
10. Extend the shrubs and ground cover planting along the Rt. 250 side of the stormwater facility.
11. Provide in the plan details, including material and color, on the design of the seat wall. A muted earth tone color is recommended.
12. Extend the shrubs and ground cover planting along the Rt. 250 side of the stormwater facility.
13. Show tree protection fencing for the wooded area to remain at the west end of the site.
ATTACHMENTS
Attach. 1: ARB2022-15: Crozet Self Storage Site Plan
Attach. 2: ARB2022-15: Crozet Self Storage architectural drawings
67 CF 56-35A
^ 55-I5 + U
N
56-32C1 51
5 6-35 G
I 57 597
I I � '.
gzfO„W1S1,
r.:
56,
-350
5634E 56-34f
s 56-34C56-32C J 4
5708
5870 5716 680 5676 5584 5
5676
J
56-16
562 f�V� onnn
/ 97(
—j—t 56-26E
S a""-i 6A 1
56-3282
56-17G IS, 5651� 5646
"0 502 56-32D 56-32BIJ 5645 56-
It 562'
ab.
ss-1sF It,
17F 501 7/1
5861 5805 -26F2
"+ 5 6-30 B 1 56
56-17Gi T?
482 _-
1{ 4 55-16B 56-3082 56.27
y 4�
479
56-16E 1
56-31 A2
4760 loll. 562.9
17 56-16C 56-31A1
SC-)CC1
Figure 1: Project location.
10
Figure 2: View of existing development at subject property, looking west on the Route 250 West Entrance Corridor.
Figure 3: One of three conceptual designs presented at the September 7, 2021 ARB meeting.
Figure 4: The design for the Crozet Self Storage Building reviewed at the December 20, 2021 ARB meeting.
13
Figure 5: Revised Crozet Self Storage Building design submitted for the March 21, 2022 ARB meeting.
14
Figure 6: Google street view of the Shops at Clover Lawn.
15