HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201800066 Staff Report 2019-06-25ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING
STAFF REPORT SUMMARY
Project Name: SDP201800066 Longhorn
Staff: Christopher Perez, Senior Planner
Steakhouse — Special Exception
Planning Commission meeting:
Board of Supervisors meeting:
June 25, 2019
July 17, 2019
Owners: CV Associates c/o Simon Property Group
Applicant: Rare Hospitality International Inc. c/o
Jack DeGagne
Location: Vacant parking lot associated with 1531
Acreage: 12.56 acres (lease area 89,948 SF)
Rio Road East, Charlottesville, VA 22911 (Fashion
Square Mall
TMP: 06100-00-00-13200
By -right use: PD-SC Planned Development
Shopping Center — shopping centers, retail sales
and service uses; residential by special use
permit 15 units/acre
Magisterial District: Rio
Conditions: Yes
Requested # of Dwelling Lots: NA
DA — X
Proposal: Request to vary the approved
Comp. Plan Designation: Core Area within
application plan to develop a 89,948 SF leased
Rio29 Small Area Plan- area intended to have the
area of TMP 61-132 that currently functions as
highest intensity of development with a mix of
overflow surface parking for the Fashion Square
uses including residential, commercial, retail,
Mall. The new use will consist of a 5,465 SF
office, institutional and employment uses.
restaurant building and associated parking.
Character of Property: Parking lot of existing
Use of Surrounding Properties: Commercial
commercial and retail uses.
and retail uses.
Factors Favorable:
Factors Unfavorable:
1. The proposal does not increase the overall
1. The proposal fails to meet Comprehensive
intensity of the approved development.
Plan's pedestrian access and connectivity goals
2. The proposal reduces the amount of
of the district.
existing impervious surfaces.
2. Applicant lacks appropriate documentation for
3. The proposal utilizes existing road
Jack DeGagne to sign the special exception
connections.
application.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Special Exception with conditions.
STAFF PERSONS: Christopher Perez, Senior Planner
PLANNING COMMISSION: June 25, 2019
AGENDA TITLE: SDP201800066 Longhorn Steakhouse — Special Exception
APPLICANT: Rare Hospitality International Inc. c/o Jack DeGagne
PROPERTY OWNER: CV Associates c/o Simon Property Group
APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL:
Request to vary the approved application plan to develop a 89,948 SF area of TMP 61-132 that currently
functions as overflow surface parking for the Fashion Square Mall. The new use will consist of a 5,465
SF restaurant building and associated parking (see Attachment A).
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Core Area within Rio29 Small Area Plan- area
intended to have the highest intensity of development with a mix of uses including residential,
commercial, retail, office, institutional and employment uses.
SELECTED PLANNING AND ZONING HISTORY:
• SDP-125 Fashion Square Mall— Offsite Road Improvements
Approved 7-5-1979
• SDP1979-7 Fashion Square Mall Application plan for the PD-SC Zoning
Approved 10-26-1979 (see Attachment B)
• SDP2009-74 Red Lobster Seafood Co — Final Site Plan
Variation to application plan approved administratively
Site Plan approved 2-26-2010
• SDP2018-66 Longhorn Steakhouse — Initial Site Plan
Under review
• ARB-2018-153 Longhorn Steakhouse
Under review: scheduled for the 6-17-2019 ARB meeting
REASON FOR PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW:
The applicant has requested a special exception to vary the application plan for the Fashion Square Mall
development as authorized by County Code Section 18-8.5.5.3. Staff is recommending approval with
conditions requiring the construction of sidewalks and associated improvements in certain locations
(condition 1). The applicant opposes providing all the pedestrian access mentioned in this condition.
Based on Board of Supervisor's policy for processing Special Exceptions, if an applicant does not agree
to staff recommended conditions, then the Special Exception request will be reviewed by the Planning
Commission. The Commission's recommendation will be forwarded to the Board for consideration
during their review and action on the request. The applicant has provided justification for the request
(see Attachment Q.
ANALYSIS OF 8.5.5.3 VARIATION FROM APPROVED APPLICATION PLAN:
The [Board of Supervisors] are authorized to grant a variation upon a determination that the variation:
(1) is consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan;
The Special Exception request is to allow a modification of the application plan associated with the PD-
SC Zoning of the site. The proposed modification to the application plan is to allow a currently
designated parking area to be developed with a commercial use. Staff finds this modification is more
2
consistent with Rio29 Small Area Plan than the current parking lot use of the site. It provides for more
efficient use of the property and improves the character of the frontage of the site.
There is one aspect of the proposed site development, the proposed sidewalks/pedestrian connections,
that are not consistent with the recommendations of Rio29 Small Area Plan. The Rio 29 Small Area Plan
designates this site as being part of the Core Zone of the district, which is bordered by a planned street
network consisting of wider pedestrian accessways to accommodate the heavier flow of pedestrian and
bike traffic planned for this area. Shared use paths are required in this zone as it is intended to have the
highest development intensity of the district with a focus on pedestrian access (see Attachment D).
The applicant has attempted to meet the pedestrian access and connectivity goals of the district by
providing an 8' wide shared use path along the northern boundary of the lease area. The shared use path
connects to the existing sidewalks on Rte. 29 and permits pedestrians internal access to the site (east to
west); however, the shared use path does not continue southbound throughout the site, thereby failing to
provide pedestrians safe internal access from north to south. Instead pedestrians utilizing the path are
guided to the vehicle travelway accessing the site or left to traverse the site's parking lot in order to
move throughout the site.
In order to successfully satisfy the County's pedestrian access and connectivity goals for this planned
area the applicant should provide a shared use path southbound along the eastern border of the lease area
(adjacent to the mall "ring road") and connect it to the required sidewalk along the southern egress for
the site.' Additionally, the shared use path should be increased to 10' wide and provided with a 6' wide
landscape strip between the "mall ring road" and the shared use path in order to buffer pedestrians from
vehicles. Staff has proposed condition 1 to address these required improvements. The applicant opposes
providing all the pedestrian access mentioned in this condition.
Prior to site plan approval the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) shall approve the
proposed shared use path connection to the existing sidewalks within the Rte. 29 right-of-way, therefore
ensuring that the connection is permitted. If the proposed shared use path connection to the existing
sidewalk on Rte. 29 is not permitted by VDOT then the applicant shall provide either a shared use path
or a 10' wide sidewalk in place of the required sidewalks along the southern egress of the site, which
shall connect to the existing sidewalks on Rte. 29. At the time this report was being written VDOT had
not provided their review comments on the current proposal.
(2) does not increase the approved development density or intensity of development;
The development of this outparcel does increase the square of development on -site by approximately
5500 square feet. The square footage increased on this site is permitted under PD-SC zoning for the site.
Staff opinion is that the limited additional square footage will not practically increase the overall
intensity of the approved development because many of the approved uses in the mall have closed. This
portion of the approved development currently consists of 261 existing parking spaces, which
historically remain vacant for most of the year. As proposed the parking count of this area is being
reduced to 131 spaces, 85 spaces designated for the proposed restaurant use and 46 remaining for the
existing mall use. With the reduction in parking the overall development remains in compliance well
beyond the minimum required for the mall.
1 On October 17, 2018 the applicant received stairs initial review of the proposal, which explained the above deficiencies in the proposal and provided
guidance to remedy them. The applicant requested a deferral and began a written dialog with staff to discuss how to revise the proposal to meet the
requirements and gain a recommendation of approval. See the attached email correspondence with the applicant from December 4, 2018 and Much 19, 2019
(see Attachment E).
3
The development of this outparcel also reduces the amount of impervious surfaces from 79,127 SF down
to 64,625 SF. The proposal provides 4,497 SF of new landscape islands throughout the parking lot.
Additionally, a substantial amount of new landscaping is being installed in these new landscape islands,
around the proposed building, along Route 29, and along the access road south of the site.
The proposal utilizes the existing road connections for the Fashion Square Mall development. No new
connections are proposed.
(3) does not adversely affect the timing and phasing of development of any other development in
the zoning district;
The timing and phasing of the development is unaffected.
(4) does not require a special use permit; and
A special use permit is not required.
(5) is in general accord with the purpose and intent of the approved application.
The proposed modification is in general accord with the purpose and intent of the approved application.
ANALYSIS OF 33.44(b) WHO MUST SIGN AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL
EXCEPTION:
b. The application shall be signed by the owner or the eligible easement holder of each parcel that
is the subject of the special exception.
On October 17, 2018 the applicant was informed that the SE application was lacking the appropriate
signatures. On May 23, 2019 the applicant submitted a certificate of incumbency to act as signing
authority to submit the SE application. The certificate acknowledges that Washington Prime Group is
affiliated with the ground lessee of TMP 61-132, not the underlying property owner. Under County
Code §18-33.44(B), the application requires the signature of the underlying owner(s). This certificate
does not suffice. The SE application is lacking the appropriate signatures.
ANALYSIS OF 33.45(C) DETERMINATING COMPLETENESS OF SPECIAL EXCEPTION
APPLICATION:
C. The Director shall determine whether an application is complete within 10 days after the
application was received.
Staff failed to determine whether the special exception application was complete within the allotted 10
days after the application was received. The applicant was notified of the application's deficiency on
October 17, 2018 with the County's first review of the initial site plan.
SUMMARY:
In consideration of the above analysis staff finds that the requested variation is not acceptable per the
relevant factors discussed in the staff report and summarized below.
Factors Favorable:
1. The proposal does not increase the overall intensity of the approved development.
2. The proposal reduces the amount of existing impervious surfaces.
3. The proposal utilizes existing road connections.
Factors Unfavorable:
4
1. The proposal fails to meet Comprehensive Plan's pedestrian access and connectivity goals of
the district.
2. Applicant lacks appropriate documentation for Jack DeGagne to sign the special exception
application.
Staff recommends approval of the Special Exception with the following conditions:
The following items shall be adequately addressed with the final site plan:
a. Continue the shared use path southbound along eastern border of the lease area and connect it to
the required sidewalk along the southern egress for the site.
b. Provide a 6' wide landscape strip between the southbound shared use path and the travelway
shared with the mall to buffer pedestrians from vehicles.
c. The shared use path(s) provided onsite shall each be a minimum of 10' wide.
d. If the proposed shared use path connection to the existing sidewalk on Rte. 29 is not permitted by
VDOT then the applicant shall provide either a shared use path or a 10' wide sidewalk in place
of the required sidewalks along the southern egress of the site, which shall connect to the
existing sidewalks on Rte. 29 (see Attachment E for location of sidewalk).
2. Prior to final site plan approval provide written documentation permitting Jack DeGagne to sign the
special exception application for this variation on behalf of the property owner.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Exhibit A — Initial Site Plan/layout
B. SDP1979-7 Fashion Square Mall Application plan
C. Special exception request and justification
D. The Rio 29 Small Area Plan - Core Zone Standards and Guidelines
E. Email correspondence from December 4, 2018 and March 19, 2019
5
PROTECT YOURSELF
All STATES REWIRE NORFlCARON OF EXCAVATORS, DESIGNERS, OR ANY PERSON
PREPARING TO DISTURB THE EARN'S SURFACE ANYWHERE IN ANY STATE
r..!%kmpa
FOR STATE SPECIFIC DIRECT PHONE NUMBERS VISIT:
WWW.CALL81l.COM
PRELIMIN
"91:11ligul
FOR
DARDEN, INC.
SITE PL-j
am
PROPOSED LONGHORN STEAKHOUSE RESTAURANT
PARCEL ID# 06100-00=,,,,0043200
SEMINOLE TRAIL (SR 29) &EAST RIO ROAD
Rio MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
19
a'n¢9i'Z i�Tia ;.'
AREA MAP
V - 200'
��1�I.2C15
DYNAMIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, P.C.
1904 MAIN STREET
LAKE COMO, NJ 07719
W WW.DYNAMICEC.COM
COVER SHEET
C1.1
SURVEY (BY OTHERS)
CI.2
GENERAL NOTES
C2•1
DEMOURION PtAN/ThFE CONSERVATION PLAN
C2.2
SITE PLAN
C2.3
GRADING PLAN
C2.4
DRAINAGE & UTILITY PLAN A
C2.5
DRAINAGE & UTILITY PLAN B
C2.6
UTILITY PROFILES (STORM)
C3.1
UTILITY PROFILES (SANITARY)
C3.2
UTILITY PROFILES (SANITARY)
C3.3
LIGHTING PLAN
C4.1
LIGHTING PLAN DETAILS
C4.2
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
C6.1
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
C6.2
CONSTRUCTOR DETAJLS
C6.3
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
C6A
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
C6.5
SOIL BORING LOGS
C7.1
VEHICLE CIRCULATION PLAN (WB-67)
C6.1
VEHICLE CIRCULATION PLAN (REFUSE)
G6.2
LANDSCAPE PLAN
ILIA
LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES & DETAILS
L1.2
F FCC H
DESIGN WORLDWIDE
311 Elm Street Suite 600
Cincinnati OH 45202
513 241 3000
www.frch.com
ARCHITECTS PROJECT#:
35651.000
DYNAMIC
ENGINEERING
LANDDMLOPMENTCONSUVING. PERMn11NG
GEOTEGNMICAL • ENVIRONMENTAL.
TRAPPIC •:SURVEY. PLANNING & ZONING
1904 Maln Sheet, Lake Como, NJ 07719
T: 732.04.019E LP. 732.974.3621:
A cIfflo of ORkas oonyenlBMIv IucCW at.
Qaler 4vlrMni/;1A`P&9 PL9
rmuma w.f.9ry. rm.n,oisA
vrMo-nn PanM1.v+ .1 w.e9:one
n.* rmswaia
MNn ray.naLroA�
�siaeujata
aM.e.ca.Rauo, r.�fv lnsv
www.dMwmkee.eam
IONAL IENGINEE
LICENSE No. 51627
Job #: 2627-99-002
Issue Date: 08.27.18
REVISION INFORMATION
REV. PER OWNER UPDATES
REV 1 10/04/18 KAK
REV. PER OWNER UPDATES
REV 2 11/26/18 KAK
REV. PER PROTOTYPE UPDATES
REV 3 02/08/19 KAK
REV. PER OWNER CHANGES/COUNTY COMMENTS
REV 4 04/24/19 KAK
Restaurant 5600
LONGHORN
LH9
Prototype current thru 06-15-2018
1600 Rio Road East
Charlottesville VA 22901
AUTHORIZED FOR:
PERMIT / BID
CHARLOTTESVILLE VA
Drawing
COVER
SHEET
C111
N
GENERAL NOTES
1. THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON REFERENCES INCLUDING:
ALTyNSPS
LAND TITLE SURVEY
FlRss�I ORDER
4383 HECIKTOWN
LLC
ROAD, SUITE B
BETHLEHEM, PA 18020
PROJECT NO. 6262
2 APPLICANT:
DARDEN INC.
1000 tkDEN CENTER DRIVE
ORBANDO, FL 32837
3. PARCEL DATA
SEMINOLE TRAIL (SR 29) & FAST RIO ROAD
PARCEL ID 061-00-00-13200
RIO MAGI AL DISTRICT
ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
4. ZONE
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SHOPPING CENTER (PD-SC ZONE)
5. COSTING USE:
PARKING AREA (PEIiIEO USE) (§ 18-22.2.1A2.)
6. PROPOSED USE:
EATING�
f0(APPLICATION18�22.2.1
EXCEPTION FLSHMENTAI AAVVA�ION PLAN SDP197900007)
7. SCHEDULE OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY ZONING REQUIREMENTS (§ 18-4.20)
ZONE REQUIREMENT
ZONE PD-SC
EXISTING
PROPOSED
MINIMUM LOT AREA [1]
1 AC.
12.56 AC. (546,937 SO
12.56 AC. (546,937 SF)
MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK (BUILDING) [2]
10 FI
529,3 FT
41.7 FT
MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK (PARKING) [2]
10 FT
4.7 FT {q
10.5 FT
MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK [3]
5 FT
N/A
39.0 FT
MAXIMUM BUILDING HOW
40 Fr
N/A
< 40 FT
MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA
40,000 SF
-
5,465 SF
LEASE AREA CALCULATION
N/A
N/A
2.06 AC. (89,948 SF)
IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE CALCULATION
N/A
88.0% (79,127 SO
71.8% (64,625 SF)
LOTS IN VILLAGE NEIOHBORHOOD CENTERS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM AREA OF 1 ACRE AND MAXIMUM OF ACRES, IN COMMUNITY CENTERS A MINIMUM AREA OF 5
ES AND A MAXI U
1M OF 30 ACRES AND IN REGIONAL CE3TIEFIS A MINIMUM AREA M 30 ACRES. (§ 18-25.3)
VIZ IN COMMERCIAL AND INDUSIRIA. DISTRICTS, A MINIMUM SETBACK OF 10 FEET FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY N THE EXTERIOR EDGE OF THE SIDEWALK IF THE SIDEWALK IS
OUTSIDE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IS REQUIRED.(§ 184.20)
f31 IF THE ABUTTING LOT IS ZONED COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIU ANY PRIMARY STRUCTURE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND SEPARATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT
ION OF THE BUILDING CODE (§ 18-420)
[41 NO OFF-STREET PARKING OR LOADING SPACE SHALL BE LOCATED CLOSER THAN 20 FEET TO THE DISTRICT BOUNDARY (§ 18-4.20)
5 THE MAXIMUM SETBACK SHALL BE 30 FEET FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE EXTERIOR EDGE OF THE SIDEWALK IF THE SIDEWALK IS OUTSIDE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
a MAXIMUM SETBACK SHALL NOT APPLY TO ANY LOT ABUTTING A PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL HIGHWAY (§ 18-420)
8. PARKING REQUIREMENTS
A. THE MAXIMUM GRADE FOR PARKING SPACES, LOADING SPACES, AND ACCESS AISLES ABUTTING PARKING OR LOADING SPACES SHALL NOT EXCEED FIVE (5) PERCENT IN
ANY DIRECTION. 18-4.1215C.
B, THE MINIMUM IN ECTION SIG DISTANCE FOR INTERNAL INTERSECTIONS OF ACCESS AISLES,
AND PEDESTRIAN WAYS, AND ACCESS AISLES AROUND BUILDINGS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN ONE HUNDRED (100) FEET. (§ 18.4.12.17D)
C. CURBS SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AT THE EDGES OF PARKING AREAS OR ACCESS AISLES IN ALL COMMERCIAL OR INSTITIRONAL DEVELOPMENTS REQUIRING EIGHT (8) OR
D. TTHEEMINIIMMUMGSEPARRATTIIONd§OF PARKINGG EA FROM PUBLIC STREET PARKING AREAS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER AND WILL BE BASED ON THE
INTENSITY OF TRAFFIC ON THE SITE. IN ANY CASE, THE MINIMUM SEPARATION SHOULD NOT BE LESS THAN ONE (1) CAR LENGTH FOR THE MOST MINIMAL USE. (§
18-4.12.15H.
E FOR PERPEN CULAR PARKING THE MINIMUM SPACE AND AISLE WIDTH SHALL BE TEN 10) FEET BY EIGHTEEN (18) FEET WITH A TWENTY (20) FEET AISLE WIDTH OR
NINE (91 FEET BY EIGHTEEN t18) FEET PARKING STALL WITH A TWENTY-FOUR (24) F WIDE AISLE ((§ 18-4.12.16C1.)
F. TURNINGG`` RADII SHALL BE LIMITED BY THE REQUIREMENT TO MAINTAIN ONE HUNDRED &100) FOOT 51% DISTANCE TURNING MOVEMENTS FOR DELIVERY VEHICLES OR
OTHER EXPECTED TRUCK TRAFFIC SHALL BE EVALUATED BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER USSIING AASHTO SINGLE UNIT TRUCK STANDARDS OR OTHER AASHTO STANDARD
VEHICLE AS APPROPRIATE. 18-4.1217D.
G. BUMPER BLOCKS SHALL BE ROVIDED IN PARKING SPACES IN THE FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES:
LTHE PARKING AREA HAS NO CURB OR CURB AND GUTTER; (§ 18-4.12.16E)
nAREA, EXCEPTETHAATT BUMPKING ER BLOCKS SHALCURB OR L NOT BE REQUIRED WHEREB AND GUTTER D IS A SIDEWALK A SIDEWALK HAS A�MIFNNIIMUUDTER H 0 81XO($2))FEET FEEL ($8 THE EDGE THE PARKING
H. VEHICLE ACCESS AISLES THAT ARE NOT ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES, SHALL NOT EXCEED A GRADE OF TEN ((10) PERCENT. (§ 18-4.12.17A)
I. ENTRANCES TO PARKING AREAS FROM PUBLIC STREETS N PRIVATE ROADS SHALL PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE EARTH AND OR GRADE TRANSITION FOR VEHICLE ACCESS
AISLES. AS A GUIDELINE, THE APPROACH GRADE SHOULD NOT EXCEED FOUR (4) PERCENT FOR A DISTANCE OF NOT a THAN FORTY (40) FEET MEASURED FROM THE
EDGE OF THE STREET OR ROAD BEING INTERSECTED. § 18-4,12.17B)
J. THE MINIMUM TRAVELWAY WIDTH FOR TWO-WAY ACCESS ASLES S41 BE TWENTY (20� FEET. _(§ 18-4.12.17C1.)
K. WHEN THE CALCULATION OF THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES R ULTS INLNA SOMEMING Or OR THAN A WHOLE NUMBER, THE MINIMUM REQUIRED
NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES SHALL BE ROUNDED OFF TO THE CLOSEST WHOLE NUMBER (§ 18412.4C)
L RESTAURANT SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THIRTEEN (13) SPACES PER ONE THOUSAND (1,000) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA (§ 18-4.12.6)
M. PARKING CALCULATION:
(5,465 SF]t(13 PARING SPACES 1,000 S = 71 SPACES
TOTAL PROPOSED (WHIN LEASE AREA) = 131 SPACES (COMPIEM
N. THE MINIMUM PARKING FOR SHOPPING CENTERS SHALL BE BASED UPON THE GROSS LEASABLE AREA AS FOLLOWS:
GROSS LEASABLE AREA (SF) MINIMUM NUMBER OF SPACES PER 1,000 SF
10,000 TO 24,999 5.50
50 001 TO 96 000 4.775
20b,001 T 696,000 4.50
600,001 TO 750000 4.75
7ED,DXN AND LARGER 5.00
O.PARKING CALCULATION g570653 SF + 5465 S N(4.5 SPACES/1,000 SF) = Z593 SPACES
TAL PROPOSED ISHOP I G CENTER) = 2,921 SPACES PROVIDED (BASED ON EX. INFORMATION BY LANDLORD)
P. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SPACES- THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES IN A PARKING AREA MAY NOT EXCEED THE NUMBER OF SPACES REQUIRED BY MORE THAN TWENTY
2 PERCENT. (§ 18-4,12.4A)
H REFME:
71 SPACES X 1.2 = 85 SPACES
TOTAL PROPOSED = 131 SPACES (AEQ W FOR MEW S11014I IG MITER PARKA)
9, LOADING REQUIREMENTS
A. ONE AlALL LOADING SPACE SHBE PROVIDED IN ADDITION TOAND EXCLUSIVE OF ANY PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR THE FIRST EIGHT THOUSAND (8,000) SQUARE
OF R L GROSS LEASABLE AREA, PLUS ONE (1) SPACE FOR EACH ADDITIONAL TWENTY -THOUSAND 20,OCO)SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL GROSS LEASABLE AREA; (§
18-4.12.13C)
B. LOADING SPACES SHAH BE A MINIMUM P TWELVE 12) FEET IN WIDTH, FOURTEEN AND ONE-HALF 14 1 FEET IN CLEARANCE HEIGHT AND A LENGTH SUFFICIENT
TOACCOMMODATE THE LARGEST DELIVERY TRUCKS NG THE ESTABLISHMENT, BUT IN NO CASE LL S LENGTH BE LESS THAN TWENTY-FIVE (25) FEET. (§
18-4.12.18A
C. LOADING SPACES SHAH BE DELINEATED IN A MANNER THAT IDENIIFIES AND PRESERVES THE REQUIRED DIMENSIONS WITH PANT STRIPING, SIGNA;E, OR BY OTHER
MEANS APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. § 18-4.1218B)
D. EACH SITE PUN THAT DEPICTS A COMMERCIAL OR I DUSTRAL BUILDING P FOUR THOUSAND (4,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OR MORE SHALL PROVIDE A DUMPSTER PAD
THAT DOES NOT IMPEDE ANY REQUIRED PARKING OR LOADING SPACES, NOR ANY PEDESTRIAN OR V ICULAR CIRCULATION AISLES. 18-4.12.13E
E THE PAD SHALL EXTEND BEYOND THE FRONT OF EACH DUMPSTER SO THAT THE F(RO)NT WHEELS OF A TRUCK SERVICING THE DUN I� WILL }ON THE CONCRETE,
F. BUT
IN NO
CASESHALL
DELSIGNEDLSO TGTHAOFC STORMWATER OOPN NOT RUN LESS THROUGH, AN80 D IRONBEYOND
AW AWAY FROM,, ARRAS WHERE DUMPSSTERS(ARE LOCATEDB(N ORDER T
MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR CONTAMINATING STORMWATER RUNOFF DUE TO CONTACT WITH SOLID WASTE. (§ 18-4.12.19B)
10. BUFFER AND SCREENING
A. COMMERCIAL AND IN
B. PARKING AREAS CON
C. FUTURES THAT MAY
D. NO CON
DISTRICT.
;OM ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AND RURAL AREAS DISTRICTS. 18-32.7.9.7A2))
, LOADING AREAS AND REFUSE AREAS; SHALL BE SCREEN FROM ADJACENT
OCCUR CLOSER THAN TWENTY (20) FEET TO ANY' RESIDENTIAL. OR RURAL AREAS
ADA NOTES
ALL SLOPES INDICATED ARE ACTUAL. CONTRACTOR TO REFER T LATEST ADA GUIDELINES FOR SLOPE UMITS. AT THE TIME OF PLAN DESIGN, THE SLOPE UNITS ARE AS FOLLOWS
SIDEWALKS/ ACCESSIBLE ROUTES
- RUNNING SLOPE: 1:2D 57 MAX. 4.5% MAX. FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION
- CROSS SLOPE: 1:48 (2.08 ") MAX. 1.0% MIN. ((1.5% MAX. FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION)
- INTERSECTION SLOPE: 1:48 (208%} MAX, IN AIL DIRECTIONS (1.5% MAX. FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION)- CHANGE IN LEVELS: ( j
- PS: X" MAX. WIDTH ^ELONGATED OPENINGS SHALL BE PLACED SHT WITH O ILLONG DIMENSIOEDGE N IDS PERPENDICULAR CLLAR T0OPE OF 2PATH ()F TRAVEL
CURB
- SLDOPE1:12�E SLOPE: MAX.
�10%7.4% MAD(. (FOR
NEW NE PEES CRQCTION) Pj
- BOTTOM LANDING: 48" MIN. LENGTH; WORTH T MATCH CURBSS RM1 ; 1:48 MAX. (2.08%9 IN ALL DIRECTIONS ((1.5% MAX. FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION)
- TOP LANDING: 36" MIN. LENGTH; WIDTH TOMATH CURB RAMP; 1:48 MAX. (2. )CROSS SLOP (1.5% MdX. FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION) AND 1:20 (5%)
RUNNING SLOPE (4.5% MAX FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION)
ACCESSIBILITY PARKING STALLS
- SPACE AND ACCESS AISLE SLOPE: 1:48 MAX. (2.08%) IN All DIRECTIONS (1.5% MAX. FOR NEW CONSrRUCRON)
CROSSWALKS -RUNNING SLOPE 120 (5%) MAX. (4.5% MAX. FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION)
- CROSS SLOPE: 1:48 (2.08%) MAX.
(1.5% MAX, FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION)
GLLORSSLBP5LEDGE. BEVELED
10PIFf}
N TRAVEL
RAMPS
- GAPS: MAX WIDTH ELH [Off OGHAL E A BEVELED
CA
- SLOPE: 1:12 T8.3%) MAX. (7.4% MAX. FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION)
- EXISTING RAMA; SLOPE: 1:10 (10%) MAX. FOR RISE OF 6'; 1:8 (12.5%) MAX. FOR MAX. RISE OF 3'
- MAX. RISE: 30'
- MIN. CLEAR WIDTH: 36"
- MIN. LANDING CLEAR LENGTH: 60'
- MAX. CROSS SLOP: 1:48 (2.08%) (1.5% MAX. FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION)
PROTECT YOURSELF
Al STATES REWIRE NOORCAOON OF EXCAVATORS. DESIGNERS. OR ANY PERSON
PREPARNG TO DISTURB THE FARIH'S SURFACE ANYWHERE IN ANY STATE
8 �4 /00
�IIr ritl'r OOp
Cd wn pW LITIr,
FOR STATE SPECIFIC DIRECT PHONE NUMBERS VISIT:
WWW. CALL811. COM
11. ARB DEVELOPMENT LAYOUT:
A. AN ORGANIZED PATTERN OF ROADS, SERVICE LANES, BIKE PATHS, AND PEDESTRIAN WALKS SHOULD GUIDE THE LAYOUT OF THE SITE.
B. IN GENERAL, BUILDINGS FRONTING THE ENTRANCE CORRIDOR STREET SHOULD BE PARALLEL TO THE STREET. BUILDING GROUPINGS SHOULD BE ARRANGED T
PARALLEL THE ENTRANCE CORRIDOR STREET.
C. OPEN SPACES SHOULD BE TIED IWO SURROUNDING AREAS TO PROVIDE CONRNUITY WITHIN THE ENTRANCE CORRIDOR
D. IF SIGNIFICANT NATURAL FEATURES EXIST N THE SITE (INCLUDING CREEK VALLEYS, STEEP SLOPES, SIGNIFICANT TREES OR ROCK OUTCROPPINGS), TO THE
EXTENT PRACTICAL, THEN SUCH NATURAL FEATURES SHOULD BE REFLECTED IN THE SITE AYOUF. IF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 32.5.6.N OF THE ALBEMARLE
COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE APPLY, THEN IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY THAT SECTION SHOULD BE LOCATED SO AS TO MAXIMIZE THE USE OF EXISTING
FEATURES IN SCREENING SUCH IMPROVEMENTS FROM ENTRANCE CORRIDOR STREETS.
E. THE PLACEMENT OF STRUCTURES N THE SITE SHOULD RESPECT EXISBNG VIEWS AND VISTAS ON AND AROUND THE SITE.
12. ABSITE �AE GRADING SHOULD MAINTAIN THE BASIC RELATIONSHIP P THE SITE TO SURROUNDING CONIXRONS BY UMITNG THE USE OF RETAINING WALLS AND BY
SHAPING THE TERRAIN THROUGH THE USE OF SMOOTH, ROUNDED LAND FORMS THAT BLEND WITH THE EXISTING TERRAIN. STEEP CUT OR ALL SECTIONS ARE
GENERALLY UNACCEPTABLE. PROPOSED CONTOURS N THE GRADING PLAN SHALL BE ROUNDED WITH A TEN FOOT MINIMUM RADIUS WHERE THEY MEET THE
ADJACENT CONDITION. FINAL GRADING SHOULD ACHIEVE A NATURAL, RATHER THAN ENGINEERED, APPEARANCE RETAINING WALLS 6 FEET IN HEIGHT AND TALLER,
WHEN NECESSARY, SHALL BE TERRACED AND PLWTED TO BLEND WITH THE LANDSCAPE.
B. NO GRADING, TRENCHING, OR TUNNELING SHOULD OCCUR WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF ANY TREE OR OTHER EXISRNG FEATURES DESIGNATED FOR PRESERVATION
IN THE FINAL CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS. ADEQUATE TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHOULD BE SHOWN ON, AND COORDINATED THROUGHOUT, THE GRADING,
LANDSCAPING AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS.
C. AREAS DESIGNATED FOR PRESERVATION IN THE FINAL CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS SHOULD BE CLEARLY DELINEATED AND PROTECTED ON THE SITE PRIOR
TO ANY GRADING ACTIVITY ON THE SITE THIS PROTECTION SHOULD REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL COMPLETION OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE.
D. PRESERVATION AREAS SHOULD BE PROTECTED FROM STORAGE OR MOVEMENT OF HEAVY EQUIPMENT WITHIN THIS AREA
E. NATURAL DRAINAGE PATTERNS (OR TO THE EXTENT REQUIRED, NEW DRAINAGE PATTERNS) SHOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO THE FINISHED SITE TO THE EXTENT
POSSIBLE.
13. THE APPLICANT REQUESTS ANY AND ALL SUBMISSION WAIVERS THAT ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED HEREIN. TESTIMONY WILL RE SUPPLIED AT THE PUBLIC
HEARING T SUPPORT SAID SUBMISSN WANtERS.
14. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED.
NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATIOR STILL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS RECEIVED AND THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS BY ALL
OF THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES.
15. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNING
AUTHORITY.
16. THE SOILS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS SEE FORTH THEREIN ARE A PART OF THE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND IN CASE OF CONFECT SHALL TAKE
PRECEDENCE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY
DISCREPANCY BETWEEN COILS REPORT & PLANS.
17. SITE CLEARING SKI INCLUDE THE LOCATION AND REMOVAL OF ALL UNDERGROUND TANKS, PIPES, VALVES, ETC.
18. THE PROPERTY SURVEY SHALL BE CONSIDERED A PART OF THESE PLANS.
19. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE HELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSIRUCDON. CONTRACTOR SFWl NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY
DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN CHANGES. NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAD TO THE CONTRACTOR
FOR WORK HAVING TO BE REDONE DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR GRATES SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON THESE PLANS IF SUCH NOTIFICATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN.
20. SOLID WASTE T BE DISPOSED OF BY CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS.
21. ALL EXCAVATED UNSUITABLE MATERIAL MUST BE TRANSPORTED T AN APPROVED DISPOSAL LOCATION.
22. WE AADDDITTIIO�P IONFSMTALASSURESTABILITY OF CONRGUt� VSTR¶UCCTURLS, ASSLLFIELD CONDITIONS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT OSHA STANDARDS, AS
23. ALL CONTRACTORS MUSE CARRY STATUTORY WORKERS COMPENSATION, EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE AND APPROPRIATE LIMITS OF COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
AND AGAINST ANY DAMAGES LIABILITIES OR COSTS INCLUDING REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND DEFENSE COSTS, ARISING OUT P OR IN
WITH THE PROJECT, INCLUDING ALL CLAMS BY EMPLOYEES OF THE CONTRACTORS.
24. NEITHER THE PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES OF DYNAMIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, P.C., NOR THE PRESENCE OF DYNAMIC ENGINEERING CONSL
EMPLOYEES AND SUBCONSULTANTS AT A CONSTRUCTION PROJECT SITE SHALL RELIEVE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR OF ITS OBLIGATIONS DUT
SUUPPERINTEN SUPERINTENDING AND COOOINATING THE WORKTIIN ACCORDANCE RRQANCEE WITH THt CONTRACTSDOCUI TECHNIQUES HEOALLTHH PROCEDURES PRECAUTION
REGULATORY AGENCIES. DYNAMIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS P.C. AND ITS PERSONNEL HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO EXERCISE ANY CONTROL OV
CONTRACTOR OR ITS EMPLOYEES IN CONNECTION WITH THEIR WORK N ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PROGRAMS OR PROCEDURES. THE GENERAL
SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR JOBSI SAFETY. DYNAMIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, P.C. SHALL BE INDEMNIFIED BY THE GENERAL CONIRACTOL
ADDITIONAL INSURED UNDER THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S POLICIES OF GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
25.
26.
IN AN EFFORT T RESOLVE ANY CONFUCTS THAT ARISE DURING THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT OR FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF THE
PROJECT DYNAMIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS P.C. AND THE CONTRACTOR MUST AGREE THAT ALL DISPUTES BETWEEN THEM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS
AGREEMENT OR THE PROJECT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO NONBINDING MEDIATION UNLESS THE PARTIES MUTUALLY AGREE OTHERWISE.
27. THE CONTRACTOR MUST INCLUDE A M
AND TO REQUIRE ALL INDEPENDENT C
SUBEONIRACTORS SUBCONSULTANT
BETWEEN THE PANTIES TO ALL TH11
28.
PROJECT
29. ALL TRAFFIC SIGNS AND STRIPING SHALL FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED IN THE MANUAL ON 'UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR STREETS AND
HIGHWAYS' PUBLISHED BY THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION.
30. THE BUILDING SETBACK DIMENSIONS ILLUSTRATED AND LISTED ON THE SITE PLAN DRAWINGS ARE MEASURED FROM THE OUTSIDE SURFACE OF BUILDING WALLS.
THESE SETBACK DIMENSIONS DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR ROOF OVERHANGS, ORNAMENTAL ELEMENTS, SINAGE OR OTHER EXTERIOR EXTENSIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY
NOTED,
31. CONTRACTOR TO BE ADVISED THAT THE ENGINEER WAS NOT PROVIDED WITH FINAL FLOOR PUN DRAWINGS FOR THE BUILDING AT THE TIME OF SITE PUN DEIGN.
32. AS A RESULT ENTRANCE DOOR LOCATIONS AS DEPICTED HEREON MAY NOT BE FINAL AND MUST BE CONFIRMED WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION. THE HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES AND THE ASSOCIATED RAMPS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTE MUST COMPLY WITH ADA REQUIREMENTS AND
THE HANDICAP PARKING SPACES MUST BE LOCATED AS THE NEAREST SPACES TO THE ENTRANCE. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF
ANY DISCREPANCY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
ALBEMARLE COUNTY NOTES
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION WITHIN ANY EXISTING PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, INCLUDING CONNECTION TO ANY EXISTING ROAD, A PERMIT SOUL BE OBTAINED FROM
THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (YDOT). THIS PLAN AS DRAWN MAY NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. WHERE AW
DISCREPANCIES OCCUR THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT SHALL GOVERN.
2. ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS OF VOOT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3. EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL MEASURE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO
ANY CLEARING, GRADING OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION.
4. ALL SLOPES AND DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO BE FERTILIZED, SEEDED AND MULCHED.
5. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE IS 2:1 (HMIZONTAL:VERTICAL). WHERE REASONABLY OBTAINABLE, LESSER SLOPES OF 3:1 M BETTER ARE TO BE ACHIEVED.
6. PAVED, RIP -RAP OR STABILIZATION MAT LINED DITCH MAY BE REQUIRED WHEN IN THE OPINION OF THE COUNT( ENGINEER, OR DESIGNEE, IT IS DEEMED NECESSARY
IN ORDER TO STABILIZE A DRAINAGE CHANNEL
7. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS BALL CONFORM WITH THE VIRGINIA MANUAL FOR UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ALL CONCRETE PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE - CUSS 111.
9. ALL EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND PIPE INSTALLATION MUST COMPLY WITH OSHA STANDARDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY (29 CAR PART 1926).
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS
1. ALL DAMS AND CONSTRUCTED FILL TO BE WITHIN 95% P MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND 2% OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. ALL FILL MATERIAL TO BE APPROVED BY
A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER IS TO BE PRESENT DURING CONSTRUCTION OF DAMS,
2. PIPE AND RISER JOINTS ARE TO BE WATERTIGHT WITHIN STORMIER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES.
3. FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS M BASINS WHICH ARE T BE CONVERTED T PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES; CONVERSION IS NOT TO TAKE
PLACE UNTIL THE SITE IS STABILIZED, AND PERMISSION HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR.
ACSA GENERA. WATER AND SEWER CONDRINS
1. WORK SHALL BE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION BY ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY (ACSA) INSPECTORS. THE COKIRACTM WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING
THE PROPER ACSA OFFICIALS AT THE START P THE WORK.
2. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES ACROSS THE LINE OF THE PROPOSED WORK ARE NOT NECESSARILY SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND WHERE SHOWN ARE ONLY
APPROXIMATELY CORRECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHAH, ON HIS OWN INITIATIVE, LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND UNES AND STRUCTURES AS NECESSARY.
3. ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT EDTION OF THE GENERAL WATER AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS, AS ADOPTED BY
THE ACSA.
4. DATUM FOR ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN NATIONAL GEMERC SURVEY.
5. THE CONTRACTOR SWILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING MISS UTILITY (1-800-552-7001).
6. ALL WATER AND SEWER PIPES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF THREE AND A HALF (3.5) FEET OF COVER MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF THE PIPE, OVER THE CENTERLINE
OF PIPE THIS INCLUDES ALL FIRE HYDRANT LINES, SERVICE LITERALS AND WATER LINES, LEC.
7. ALL WATER AND SEWER APPURTENANCES ARE TO BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF ROADSIDE DITCHES.
8. VALVES ON DEADEND ONES SHALL BE NODDED T PROVIDE ADEQUATE RESTRAINT FOR THE VALVE WRING A FUTURE EXTENSION OF THE UNE.
9. TREES ARE NOT PERMITTED IN THE ACSA EASEMENT.
10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH THE MG -LEAD REGULATION REGARDING BRASS FITTINGS EFFECTIVE JANUARY 4, 2014
(SENATE BILL 3874 WHICH AMENDS THE SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT).
EXISTING UTILITY NOTES
DEEOLITION NOTES
1. ALL DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES ARE T BE PERFORMED IN STRICT ADHERENCE TO ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.
2. PROCEED WITH DEMOLITION IN A SYSTEMATIC MANNER, FROM THE TOP OF THE STRUCTURE(S) TO THE GROUND.
3. COMPLETE DEMOUTON WORK ABOVE EACH FLOOR OR TIER BEFORE DISTURBING ANY OF THE SUPPORTING MEMBERS P THE LOWER LEVELS.
4. DEMOLISH CONCRETE AND MASONRY IN SMALL SECTIONS
5. REMOVE STRUCTURAL FRAMING MEMBERS AND LOWER THEM T THE GROUND BY MEANS OF HOISTS, DERRICKS OR OTHER SUITABLE METHODS.
6. BREAK UP CONCRETE SLABS -ON -GRADE, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY OWNER.
7. LOCATE DEMOLITION EQUIPMENT THROUGHOUT THE STRUCTURE AND REMOVE MATERIALS CO AS TO NOT IMPOSE EXCESSIVE LOADS ON SUPPORTING WALLS, FLOORS, OR
FRAMING.
8. PROVIDE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR SHORING, BRACING TURD SUPPORTS TO PREVENT MOVEMENT, SETTLEMENT OR COLLAPSE OF STRUCTURES TO BE DEMOLISHED (AND
ADJACENT FACILITIES, IF APPUCABLE).
9. DEMOLISH AND REMOVE ALL FOUNDATION WALLS, FOOTINGS AND OTHER MATERIALS WITHIN THE AREA OF THE DESIGNATED FUTURE BUILDING. ALL OTHER FOUNDATION
SYSTEMS INCLUDING BASEMENTS, SHALL BE DEMOLISHED TO A DEPTH OF NOT LESS THAN ONE FOOT BELOW PROPOSED PAVEMENT OR BREAK BASEMENT FLOOR SLABS.
SEAL ALL OPEN UTILITY LINES WITH CONCRETE. CONTRACTOR _TO_REVIEW STRUCTURE_ PRIOR_ TO_DEMOLTION.TO DETERMINE IF BASEMENT, CRAWL SPACE OR ANY
10. ERECT
IN MAINTAIN
TAINT PASSAGEWAYS IN
IOWEPAND PERSONAL INJURY TO STRUCTURES PERSONS
BUILDINGS ANDALLPEDRSONS ON. CONDUCT ALL DEMOLITION
11. REFRAIN FROM USING ANY EXPLOSIVES WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER AND APPLICABLE GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES.
12, CONDUCT DEMOMON SERVICES IN SUCH A MANNER TO ENSURE MINIMUM INTERFERENCE WITH ROADS STREETS WALKS AND OTHER ADJACENT FACILITIES, 00 NOT CLOSE
OR OBSTRUCT STREETS,_WALNS, OR OTHER_ OCCUPIED FACIUTIES WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF OWNER AND ANY APPLICABLE GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES,
13. USE WATERING TEMPORARY ENCLOSURES AND OTHER SUITABLE METHODS AS NECESSARY TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF DUST AND DIRT RISING AND SCATTERING IN THE AIR.
CLEAN AD,ACF`NT STRUCTURES AND IMPROVEMENTS OF ALL EXIST ANd DEBRIS CAUSED BY THE DEMOLITION OPERATIONS RETURN ALL ADJACENT AREAS TO THE
CONDITIONS EXISTING PRIOR T THE START OF WORK.
14. ACCOMPLISH AND PERFORM THE DEMOUTION IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO PREVENT THE UNAUTHORIZED ENTRY OF PERSONS AT ANY TIME
15.
16. REMOVE FROM THE DESIGNATED SITE, AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE TIME, ALL CEBRIS, RUBBISH, SALVAGEABLE VMS, HAZARDOUS AND COMBUSTIBLE SERVICES. REMOVED
MATERIALS MAY NOT BE STORED SOLD OR BURNED N THE SITE REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS AND COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS SHALL BE ACCOMPUSHED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE PROCEDURES AS AUT16RIZED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT OR OTHER APPROPRIATE REGULATORY AGENCIES AND AUTHORITIES,
17, DISCONNECT, SHUT OFF AND SEAL IN CONCRETE ALL UTILITIES SERVING THE STRUCTURES TOBE DEMOLISHED BEFORE THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE DESIGNATED
DEMOUTION. MARK FOR POSITION ALL UTILITY DRAINAGEAND SANITARY LINES AND PROTE ALL ACTIVE LINES. CLEARLY IDENTIFY BEFORE THE COMMENCEMENT OF
DEMOLJTION_SENCES-TH_E_REQUIRED INTERRUFTION OF ACTIVE SYSTEMS THAT MAY AFFECT OTHER PARTIES, AND NUTTY ALL APPLICABLE UTILITY COMPANIES TO ENSURE
18. THIS DEMOUTION PUN IS INTENDED TO IDENTIFY THOSE EXISTING CONDITIONS WHICH ARE T BE REMOVED. T IS NOT INTEND T PROVIDE DIRECTION OTHER THAN
THAT ALL PROCEDURES ARE TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE, FEDERAL, LOCAL, AND JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
ALL SAFE11' PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY.
NOTES
1. IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW, THE CONTRACTOR SH AU. BE REQUIRED TO CALL THE BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES ONE CALL OAMAGE PROTECTION SYSTEM
OR H ITY MARK OUT IN ADVANCE P ANY EXCAVATION,
2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFYING ALL EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS AND UTILITIES. ALL DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED T THE
ENGINEER IN WRITING.
3, ALL EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE ABANDONED SHALL BE DISCONNECTED AND CAPPED AT THE MAIN FOR WATER, AT THE CLEM-OUT FOR SEWER AND THE
SHUT-OFF VALVE N MAIN FOR GAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUNICIPAL AND LOCAL UTILITY REQUIREMENTS.
4. ALL EXISTING DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED BY CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUNICIPAL AND LOCH. UTILITY COMPANY REQUIREMENTS.
UTILITY NOTES
1. LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SERVICES ARE APPROXIMATE AND MUST BE CONFIRMED INDEPENDENTLY WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO
COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION OR EXCAVATION, SANITARY SEWER AND ALL OTHER UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTION POINTS SHAG. BE CONFIRMED
INDEPENDENTLY BY THE CONTRACTOR IN FIELD PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED IMMEDIATELY IN WRITING
TO THE ENGINEER. CONSTRUCHON SHALL COMMENCE BEGINNING AT THE LOWEST INVERT (POINT OF CONNECTION AND PROGRESS UP GRADIENT. INTERFACE POINTS
(CROSSINGS) WDH EXISTING UNDERGROUND tTILITIES SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY TEST PIT PRIOR TO CDMMENCINT OF CONSTRUCTION.
2. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY UTILITY "ONE -CALL" NUMBER 72 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION ON THIS SITE. CONTRACTOR SHALL
ALSO NOTIFY LOCAL WATER & SEWER DEPARTMENTS TO MARK OUT THEIR UTILITIES.
3. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS. WHERE CONFLICTS EXIST WITH THESE SITE PLANS, ENGINEER IS TO BE
NOTIFIED PRIM T CONSTRUCTION TO RESOLVE SAME SERVICE SIZES T BE DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT.
4. WATER SERVICE MATERIALS SHALL BE SPECIFIED BY THE LOCAL UnUTY COMPANY. CONTRACTORS PRICE FOR WATER SERVICE SHALL INCLUDE ALL FEES AND
APPURTENANCES REQUIRED BY THE UTILITY TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE WORKING SERVICE.
6. ALL WATER MAIN SHALL BE CEMENT-UNED, CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE DESIGNATED.
6. THE MINIMUM DIAMETER FOR DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES SHALL BE 1 INCH.
7. SEWER MANS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM WATER MANS BY A DISTANCE OF AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY. WHETS THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE, THE PIPES SHALL
BE IN SEPARATE TRENCHES WITH THE SEWER MAIN AT LEAST 18 INCHES BELOW THE WATER MAIN. ALL SEWER MANS SHALL BE SDR-35 PVC PIPE UNLESS
OTHERWISE DESIGNATED.
B. ALL SEWER PIPE INSTALLED WITH LESS THAN 3 FEET OF COVER, GREATER THAN 20 FEET OF COVER M WITHIN 18 INCHES OF A WATER MAIN SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE All. DUCTILE IRON SEWER PIPE BALL BE CEMENT -LINED, CUSS 52 PIPE, FURNISHED WITH SEWER COAT, OR APPROVED
EQUAL
9. WHERE SANITARY SEWER LATERALS ARE GREATER THAN 10' DEEP AT CONNECTION TO THE SEWER MAN, CONCRETE DEEP LATERAL CONNECTIONS ARE TO BE UTILIZED.
10. LOCATION & LAYOUT OF GAS ELECTRIC & TELECOMMUNICATION UTILITY ONES AND SERVICES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE SCHEMATIC IN NATURE ACTUAL LOCATION
& LAYOUT OF THESE unurn'8 & SERVICES ARE TO BE PER THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY PROVIDER.
11. ROOF LEADER COLLECTION PIPING ARE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND ARE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIN. ACTUAL ROOF LEADER COLLECTION PIPING IS TO BE
COORDINATED W/ ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL BUILDING. ALL ROOF LEADER COLLECTION PIPING SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC UNLESS OTHERWISE
DESIGNATED.
12. ALL SEWER AND WATER FACILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATORY AUTHORT(S RULES AND REGULATIONS.
13. ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES TO BE INSTALLED UNDERGRWND UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
14. MANUFACTURED REINFORCED CONCREE STORM PIPE TO CONFORM TO ASIM C-76 CLASS III UNLESS OTHERWISE DESIGNATED. MANUFACTURED REINFORCED
TEENWACCAL ANCEMPIPE MOOTREPPSCLASS N19TGEORANFOREFREDRETE BEJOINTRATINNSALD IACCORDANWITH AER�ICNCETIEASSOADoN0TION UDNES AND MORTAR ORPOMFLEXIIJOINT SEALANTS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C 990 TO BE UTILIZED TO PROVIDE A SILT -TIGHT JOINT. WHERE SPECIFICALLY INDICATED, REINFORCED CONCRETE STORM PIPE ANTS
SHALL BE WATERTIGHT AND CONFORM TO ASTM C-443.
15. HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH WALL INTERIOR WITH ANNULAR EXTERIOR CORRUGATIONS AND CONFORM TO ASTM F2306. SOLID PIPE SHALL HAVE
GASKETED WATER -TIGHT JOINTS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2306 AND ASTM D3212, PERFORATED PIPE SHALL HAVE GASKETS) SILT -TIGHT JOINTS
MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2306 AND ASTM F477. HOPE PIPE SHAD. BE FROM A MANUFACTURER WHO IS AN EASTERN STATES CONSORTIUM (ESC)
QUALIFIED MANUFACTURER OF HOPE PIPE AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PIPE MANUFACTURE RECOMMENDATIONS.
16. HP DRAINAGE PIPE SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH WALL INTERIOR WITH ANNULAR EXTERIOR CORRUGATIONS AND CONFORM TO ASTM F2736 (12"-30' PIP)) AND ASTM F2881
R(36-60' PIPE. PIPE SHALL HAVE GASKEFED WATER -TIGHT JOINTS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM D3212 AND ASD F477. FIEtb WATERTIGHTNESS
RFORMANCE IFICATION MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F2487. HP PIP SHALL BE FROM A MANUFACTURER WHO IS AN EASTERN STATES
CONSORTIUM (ESC) QUALIFIED MANUFACTURER OF HP STORM PIPE AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PIPE MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS.
17. PIPE LENGTHS ON THIS PLAN HAVE BEEN MEASURED AS THE DISTANCE BEPWEEN THE CENTER POINT OF THE 2 CONNECTED STRUCTURES ACTUAL PHYSICAL PIPE
LENGTH FOR INSTALLATION IS EXPECTED TO BE LESS AND SHOULD BE ACCOUNTED FOR BY THE CONTRACTOR ACCORDINGLY.
aRADINa NOTES
2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION AND UTILITY INVERT ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY
CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE 0.75% MIN. SLOP AGAINST ALL ISLAND GUTTERS CURBS AND 1.0% ON ALL CONCRETE SURFACES AND 1-I 2%
MIN. ON ASPHALT, TO PREVENT PORTING. ANY DISCREPANCIES THAT MAY EFFECT THE PUBLIC SAFETY M PROJECT COST, MUST BE IDENTIFIED TO E
ENGINEER IN WRITING IMMEDIATELY. PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION WITH DESIGN DISCREPANCIES IS DONE SO AT THE CONTRACTOR'S OWN RISK.
3. PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS ARE GENERALLY 6' ABOVE EXISTING LOCAL. ASPHALT GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. FIELD ADJUST TO CREATE A
MIN, OF 0.75% GUTTER GRAPE ALONG CURB FACE. ENGINEER T APPROVE FINAL. CURBING CUT SHEETS PRIOR T INSTALLATION.
4. SUBBASE MATERIAL FOR SIDEWALKS, CURB, OR ASPHALT SHALL BE FREE OF ORGANICS AND OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIALS. SHOULD SUBBASE BE DEEMED
UNSUITABLE, SUBBASE IS T BE REMOVED AND FILLED WITH APPROVED FILL MATERIAL COMPACTED T 95% OPTIMUM DENSITY (AS DETERMINED BY MODIFIED
PROCTOR METHOD).
5. REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES
6. IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN PLANS, THE SITE PLAN WILE SUPERCEDE IN ALL CASES. CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY ENGINEER OF RECORD OF ANY
CONFUCT IMMEDIATELY.
7. MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 2% ON ALL SIDEWALKS.
B. CONTACTOR TO ENSURE A MAXIMUM OF 2% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS IN ADA PARKING SPACES AND ADA ACCESS AISLES. CGNTRACTOR TO ENSURE A
MAXIMUM OF 5% RUNNING SLOPE AND 2% CROSS SLOPE ALONG All OTHER PORTIONS OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF RAMPS AND CURB
RAMPS._ CONTRACTOR SHALL CLARIFY ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING CONSTRUCTION IN ADA AREAS WITH THE ENGINEER PRIM TO THE START OF
9. THE OWNER SHALL RETAIN DYNAMIC EARTH LLC-(90B-B79-7095] OR ALTERNATE QUA nED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO TEST SOIL PERMEA ILRY AND
PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION PHASE INSPECTIONS OF E BASIN BUT m SOILS AND ANY FILL MATERIALS WITHIN ANY PROPOSED INFILTRATION OR RETENTION
BASIN TO COMPARE RESULTS T DESIGN CRITERIA
10. CONTRACTOR IS T REMOVE EXISTING UNSUITABLE OR OVERLY COMPACT SOIL OR ROCK AS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE RREEp%URED PERMEABILITY AS DIRECTED BY
THE OWNERS GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, AND NEW ALL, IF NEEDED, SHALL HAVE AN IN PLACE PERMEABILITY GREk THAN OR EQUAL TO THE DESIGN
CRRERA
11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING THE OWNER'S GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO ONSET OF CONSTRUCTION TO SUBMIT AND CONFIRM THE
CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSED MEANS AND MATERIALS AND TO SCHEDULE INSEECTONS FOR BOTTOM OF BASIN, REMOVAL P UNSUITABLE SOIL, FILL PLACEMENT,
AND FINAL. BASIN PERMEABILITY TESTING.
12. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AS -BUILT PLANS AND GRADE CONTROL UNLESS DEFINED OTHERWISE ELSEWHERE IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.
FRICH
DESIGN WORLDWIDE
311 Elm Street Suite 600
Cincinnati OH 45202
513 241 3000
www.frch.com
ARCHITECTS PROJECTM
35651.000
JOSEP
P ONE
PROFE
ZONAL VNGINEER
VIRGIN
LICENSE No, 51627
Job #:
2627-99-002
U
Issue Date: 08.27.18
REVISION INFORMATION i
REV. PER OWNER UPDATES
REV 1 10/04/18 KAK
REV. PER OWNER UPDATES
REV 2 11/26/18 KAK
REV. PER PROTOTYPE UPDATES
REV 3 02/08/19 KAK
REV. PER OWNER CHANGES/COUNTY COMMENTS
REV4 04/24/19 KAK
Restaurant#: 5600
LONGHORN
LH9
Prototype current thru 06-15-2018
1600 Rio Road East
Charlottesville VA 22901
AUTHORIZED FOR:
PERMIT / BID
CHARLOTTESVILLE VA
i
C2,1
2AD STORY BURS
w ' Alffl Do
SMIN AN (ABOVE DRNE ]HRU) 1
N
N� 571dY IN 'UW
CDNC• �� WI
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE
9a S If a .1, ' i�CUl%fa ic Aan7'43 E316.18 . ............. �r
i
1 / ,
f F 11..
4! r
1 .I
y � z��'' t...�.. ,�- � � r �;' f f' r ,/ ,f� r� � ��1. ��•111 °,;z, h i� '�. 1'li i t
T� � : I - O � 1'1 /FY •, `� y { 1 r ^ + It ' 1 i I + � � :' 1 1 l 11! r'1 1 ��r l� 1 :{�'/�y'i � �.'�1 I��a
L r . e� F —_'." ^ - � % r � , .I 1:";: 1. ; � �✓ , I +; : i 1 % 1 •' - 1 j\ I 1 .t" L.1 �:^ I I .'' sr y ,�1-� �•/�/(�1�\'a 11 �'`,.d <iy " A,
1��
W 1 It .� 11 ( t`t 11:� 'I,t1tl/ ,t T°1,1 ,•$.
byy '�.u. i _•Yff :I i �i,:': ill .r 1 i . !'"i `i i t :^' rl, ii t I .1 1..[ r I I ^. i1 I'I('
, { _— — r /i• ,III , i ; I I ;.; 1 I__. Tl _. --� I l + 11 !' 1 '�'F
'� tt• _-_- ' r! �-' ?Ir` It •'"/tl i,i' +1 ��� .,Ni tlh.'��tlt r tP �1B ,�i is '.5ii
i i i �.• i t 'i i i'1 :i 1 t i 11 / tp t. I I ' j M* 4'` � ��
_ -- -
- - -'
M��VVOOlTenTEy�,I�iPWC�7AKRiMT j titi $mm irL i i r^ !rr ,r i 1 i 'I ', 'r i �', i +t II 1 1 i 1�1 j,•i r +' ' //F� r : E
CONS V4WN LMLRY•I
PER OR 4594, PD. 065 f + ' - ` -
PA VEMW
PROP. TREE
EE
PROTECTION FENCE
i---- EX SIGN, TO P.cAWN t I t ; 1
pflf 11
DO. p N _ , 11 '{q1
I'1 t', 11 t i. I : 1 1 t : t 1 1 CURB -- r I
_ I I I '1
Hlll 487j., 20
y l;T) = 43i 39
U19IIY FACLETTY EASEMENT AND $ tl . I ' i i t I' i t _ - -'
CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF MGMD/B�SR
_''�•� _yl
CEN1URrilNKt„ STOP 'FASKR�-
i—�`f
D.B. 14594 PG 165 ' H ' I y = - �Irr
--ti
S w
' MH 0
Y 1k,1 1 u 0
0 _
1 tA4 rn 1 EBB EX. TREE TO ROAN (iYP.) EB
PROTECT YOURSELF
ALL SWATES REWIRE NORFlCARW OF EXCAVATORS, DESIGNERS, OR ANY PERSON
PREPARING TO DISTURB THE EARTH'S SURFACE ANYWHERE IN ANY STATE
Cd atas m 4
FOR STATE SPECIFIC DIRECT PHONE NUMBERS VISIT:
WWW.CALL81l.COM
APPROX. LOCO
t907 War
DM EASEYM
PER D.B. 1314, P&
D.B. 4594, PG 65 --
TOP. CONSTRUCIM EASU M
FOR ENIRANCE
PER D.B. 4679, PC. 554
TO RBWN
,ul i{
II
ILL
1 +'
t � �
t"1
11
I I
11
11
tI
I I ,
44
\ ASPHALT \ \
\ PAVEMEM \ \
`` A=35.34'•
} \ R=45.00'
1
1 y
CHB=S 71'46'51` E
C. �JRB �►� \ CHD=34.44'
u \ S 4T16'58 E �•
�-, 23.73'
wi,1 • G) \
I'
1 tl' n
CIE' \ �,
A=105.53'
R=155.75'
A--M49'17'
CHB=N 6618'37' E
CHD=103.52'
APPROX. LOG4DON
\. \ 10' wpm EAsam
\ D.B. 1690 PC. 651
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE = 89,247 SF. (2.049 Aa.
BENIC10WK \
JUG NAIL
Elft = 491.23
AF
II
II
I ,I
,l I
, 1
II
tt
,l 12
1
'I 1.
I'I
,
•lye IQ SOUTH 29
1� 70 hYllllH 29" 41
r
7pRM MH
RIM 488.12
INV (OUT) = 482.12.
/ \ STOPSM MH
/
SGIV
I,
'I I
PARCEL ID: 06100-00-00-13200
LANDS N/F
CV ASSOCIATES
D.B. 1908 PG. 726
DEMOLITION PLAN LEOIEND
M � - PROPOSED LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE LINE
W TW - PROPOSED TREE PROTECTION FENCE
EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS TO BE REMOVED
/ UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
f _
l EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT TO BE
MILLED & OVERLAY AS NECESSARY
rr N 4T1101f W 242.02��r
/ 14" 5
uv / " a w/ / 3 r l� MATCNLINE
GRAPHIC SCALE
++ f 0? -20 0 10 20 40
Sill �' Oi'13
31'' '
Si , "�' I / �- �w 94.00, + .�
+.. IN FEET )
5m m
1 INCH = 20 Fi.
80
INSET A
FRCH
DESIGN WORLDWIDE
311 Elm Street Suite 600
Cincinnati OH 45202
513 241 3000
www.frch.com
ARCHITECTS PROJECT #:
35651.000
DYNAMIC
ENGINEERING
LAND DEVEEOPMENTCONSUOING ♦ PEWMRDNG
GEOWRANCAL •EANIWONMENNAE
TRAENC •.SURVEY MANNING 870NiNG
191M Maln Sheet, take Como, NJ 07719
T:732 910.01961 E 732,97436M
AtltllNolgl oltkecronranleMM IocaHd ot.
aorta. w.�r:• rwxmv vm
w:r:.m'nmx.+a. rav mcwe
: .Yi"am r9>I SN11b
1k4,IMI rbl iV.lW
' Arit.ImE L512eM$H3
LYlv,le-.0 fla'6v. f b19I1690
N'IYIY.ttjMlnk'=L'.LIX11
JOSEP SP ONE
PROFE ZONAL NGINEER
VIRGIN LICENSE No. 51627
Job #: Z627-99-002
�0
�a
�1
Issue Date: 08.27.18
REVISION INFORMATION
REV. PER OWNER UPDATES
REV 1 10/04/18 KAI<
REV. PER OWNER UPDATES
REV 2 11/26/18 KAK
REV. PER PROTOTYPE UPDATES
REV 3 02/08/19 KAK
REV, PER OWNER CHANGES/COUNTY COMMENTS
REV 4 04/24/19 KAK
Restaiurant#: 5600
LONGHORN
LH9
Prototype current thru 06-15-2018
1600 Rio Road East
Charlottesville VA 22901
AUTHORIZED FOR:
PERN1IT j BID
CHARLOTTESVILLE VA
DraDEMOLITION PLAN
TREE CONSERVATION'
PLAN
C2,2
k � I
A
i
R
a r l
9
F
j y
N ,
E
s 1
a
1
p�
-0
MAlk
♦ IN
1Mv
1 AROG
MOT AW01W
CaV57RU T N EASriIENT {
PEB RB. 4594, PG. 065 $ jl
UTNM FACUTY ISCH1EN1 AND
CENDIAL TRUHONE COMPANY OF WRGIMA D
CENB7BYL(MT � � 1�S}
D.B. /4594 PC. 165 {
8
PROTECT YOURSELF
ALL STATES REWIRE NORFlCADON OF DnVATORS, DESIGNERS, OR AID' PERSON
PREPARING TO DISTURB THE WETS SURFACE ANYWHERE IN MY SATE
bw vk h bdow
CAI 6dan ya 4
FOR STATE SPECIFIC DIRECT PHONE NUMBERS VISIT:
W WW. CALL81 l . COM
l
L, , H7F`�9111ti� 1�T�I'F AEI! •"
f• r' - ' 8'
ADM.. LLGt1�b�1
W7WRX COMB)
DEWCE EAS6YFIVT
PH? D9. 134, PG 46
D.S 45K PG 65
l
_J
1
8 PA
1 NS�
1
8 PA
o D
i,
--
-`v
N '23' W
45.32'
O
♦ 3 JHW
1 GD +
1 GD
6src�i
1
fr
PROP. TREE
to
7 MP
—
• 1 N$ t
1 FAAP 1 FPS
f �1
T
1 FAAP
6 m ua._
1 FAAP
� I
1 MV� GD i
o i 0
1ENP. GYN4S)R[1CBON F76QlENi
FOB ENTRANCE
PER D.B. 4679, PG. 554
A=77.32'
R=188.24'
A=23'32'08'
CHB=N 42'47'17' W
CHD=76.78'
N 31 1� 3 94
JHW
r 3 PA
`" 1
_ — --- UG£T -
-U—~
------6 _-__— —
1 FAAP l _
-.- l-_----- - 6
WL
I3 JHW rI
I r
3 PA !
3 JHW
I
!
- -- BEAYxAll4RA'
1WG NAY
H&.. = 491.23 �4
4 IPA --
FA ! rr
r ,
/
r
PARCEL ID: 06100-00-00-13200
4 JHW LANDS NSF
1 FAAP r. < CV ASSOCIATES
D.B. 1908 PG. 726
THIS PLAN TO BE UTILIZED FOR LANDSCAPE PURPOSES ONLY
NOTE: ALL SITE PLANTINGS OF TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL
BE ALLOWED TO REACH, AND BE MAINTAINED AT MATURE
HEIGHT; THE TOPPING OF TREES IS PROHIBITED. SHRUBS AND
TREES SHALL BE PRUNED MINIMALLY AND ONLY TO SUPPORT
THE OVERALL HEALTH OF THE PLANTS
JIAMISME
1�1
1 1 KEY STY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CANOPY REMARKS
SHADE TREE(S)
` - 3 PA 11 ` I ARCO 8 ACER RUBRUM 'OCTOBER GLORY' OCTOBER GLORY RED MAPLE 3 1/2' CAL MIN. 50, - 70, B+B
3 JHW - / 1 1 FAAP 7 FRAXINUS AMERICANA 'AUTUMN PURPLE' AUTUMN PURPLE ASH 2 1/2 3" CAL 50' 70' B+B
Jr
1 I
FPS 6
FRAXINUS PENSYLVANICA 'SUMMW
SUMMIT GREEN ASH
2 1/2-3" CAL
50,
- 70,
B+B
_ r
1 1
GO 7
GYMNOCLADUS DIOCUS
KENTUCKY COFFEEREE
2 1/2-3" CAL
50'
- 70'
B+B
° r
l I
NS
NYSSA SYLVATICA
SOURGUM OR TUPELO
3 1/2' CPI. MIN.
50,
- 70'
B+B
r
l I
_6
!
�`A
ORNAMENTAL TREE(S1
!
ii
CFR 5
CORNUS FLORIDA RUBRA
PINK FLOWERING DOGWOOD
2-2 1/2' CAL.
20,
- W
BIB
U 5
IAGERSTROEMIA INDICA
COMMON CRAPEMYRTLE
74
10'
- 20'
30 GAL.
I I
MV
MAGNOLIA VIRCINIANA
SWEETBAY MAGNOLIA
8-10'
10'
- 20,
B+B
13
EVERGREEN TREE(S)
ABC 2
ABIES CONCOLOR
WHITE FIR
6-7'
20,
- 70,
B+B
,!
✓v 6
JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA
EASTERN RED CEDAR
8-10'
20'
- 70'
B+B
EVERGREEN SHRUB(S1
/
1 1
PSN 19
PINES STROBUS 'NANA'
DWARF EASTERN WHITE PINE
24-30'
3' -
15'
B+B
PYCM 28
PYRACANTAA COCCINEA 'MOHAVE'
'GIRARD
MOHAVE FIRETHORN
24-30°
3' -
15'
}3 CAN
RGHS 19
RHODODENDRON X GIRARD HOT SHOT'
GIRARD HOT SHOT AZALEA
18-24'
3' -
15'
#3 CAN
TMD 20
TAXUS X MEDIA 'DENSIFORMIS'
DENSIFORMIS YEW
24-30'
3' -
15'
B+B
66
1 Ir
i 11
DECIDUOUS SHRUB(S1
l
II
I
1
1
1
1
1
CA 18
AL GRASS(ESi
CLETHRA ALNIFOUA
SUMMERSWEET CLEIHRA
24-30'
3'
- 30'
#3 CAN
FXI 36
FORSYTHIA X INTERMEDIA 'SPECTABIUS'
SHOWY BORDER FORSYTHIA
3-4'
3'
— 30'
B+B
HVCW 12
HAMAMELIS VIRGINWdA
COMMON W(TCHHAZEL
3-4'
3'
— 30'
B+B
MP 29
MYRICA PENSYLVANICA
NORTHERN BAYBERRY
30-36,
3'
— 15,
B+8
VD 10
VIBURNUM DENTATUM
ARROWWOOD VIBURNUM
3-4'
3,
— 30'
B+B
105
GROUND COVERJHW
52
JUMPERUS HORIZONTAUS 'WILTONP
WILTON'S BLUE RUG JUNIPER
15-18' SPRD
#3 CAN
l ORNAMENT
1 PA 46 PENNISEIUM AL)PECUROIDES FOUNTAIN CRASS 2 GAL CONTAINER
1 NOTE: IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN AMOUNTS SHOWN IN THE PLAN AND THE PLANT UST, THE PLAN SHALL DICTATE.
I
�1
1
{
wl
�I {�1
—fir
1 cI b— N 451658' W 242.02
1�1
1 {
h
1 1
1 1
1 }
1�I1
I{I
1�1
1 1
lw1
1 1
I 1
{ 1
1 1
l cm41
l
I1 t.
SEE SHEET L1■2 FOR LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES 81l DETAILS
GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET )
1 INCH = 20 FT.
FRCH
DESIGN WORLDWIDE
311 Elm Street Suite 600
Cincinnati OH 45202
513 241 3000
www.frch.com
ARCHITECTS PROJECT #:
35651.000
DYNAMIC
ENGINEERING
1AND DEYELpPMEN7 CGNglli71NG. 4ERM RDNG
GEOIECNNICAL. EAVOICKMENTAL
TRAFFIC. SOME. PLANNING A10NING
1904 Moln SIR6011 lake Como, NJ 07T19
i 732.974.4198 1 A 732 974,3621
AddiNI aNkax oamNnlwNW Iocobd at
,r.,anr rxnmw rmn.ow
-
�. ,
�nT..1w
�� ,aveazue
xvw.dpamktt.eam
JOSEP SP ONE
PROFE ZONAL NGINEER
VIRGIN A LICENSE No, 51627 I
i
Jab #: 2627-99-002
i
�� II
Issue Date: 08.27.18 I',
REVISION INFORMATION
REV. PER OWNER UPDATES
REV 1 10/04/18 KAI<
REV. PER OWNER UPDATES
REV 2 11/26/18 KAK
REV. PER PROTOTYPE UPDATES
REV 3 02/08/19 KAK
REV. PER OWNER CHANGES/COUNTY COMMENTS
REV 4 04/24/19 KAK
Restaurant #: 5600
LONGHORN
LH9
Prototype current thru 06-15-2018
1600 Rio Road East
Charlottesville VA 22901
AUTHORIZED FOR:
PERMIT / BID
CHARLOTTESVILLE VA
Drawing
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
L1.1
M
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL
❑ Request for a waiver, modification, variation 9 Variation to a previously approved Planned
or substitution permitted by Chapter 18 = $457 Development rezoning application plan or
Code of Development = $457
OR
❑ Relief from a condition of approval = $457
Provide the following
X 3 copies of a written request specifying the
section or sections being requested to be
waived, modified, varied or substituted, and
any other exhibit documents stating the
reasons for the request and addressing the
applicable findings of the section authorized
to be waived, modified, varied or substituted.
Provide the following
CK 3 copies of the existing approved plan
illustrating the area where the change is
requested or the applicable section(s) or
the Code of Development. Provide a
graphic representation of the requested
change.
D4 1 copy of a written request specifying the
provision of the plan, code or standard for
which the variation is sought, and state the
reason for the requested variation.
Project Name and Assigned Application Number (SDP, SP or ZMA): I angHarn Steakhouse
Tax map and parcel(s): 0610000offl'1200
Contact Person _Jack DeGa9ne RiteDevelopment Mgr
Address 1000 Darden Canter Drive city Orlando State Fl Zip 32837
Daytime Phone# ( 407) 342 6781 Fax# (_) Email
Id=gagne(�dard n om
Owner of Record CV Associates c/o Simon Property Group
Address P. 0. 7019 City Indianapolis state (jam, zip 46907-7n19
Daytime Phone# (_31TR36 1600 Fax# ( ) Email Karen W. einaE w ashin9tanpdma P.
Applicant (Who is the Contact Person representing?)
RARE Hospitality InternMInnni InC
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 Mclutire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296-5832 Fax: (434) 9724126
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION
Owner/Applicant Must Read and Sign
The foregoing information is complete and correct to the best of my knowledge.
By signing this application I am consenting to written comments, letters and or notifications
regarding this application being provided to me or my designated contact via fax and or email.
This consent does not preclude such written communication from also being sent via first class
mail.
Signature of Owner, Contract Purchaser, Agent
Jack DeGagne, Site Dev. Mgr.
Print Name
9/04/2018
Date
407-342-6781
Daytime phone number of Signatory
***If multiple property owners are required to sign the application per Section 33.2 b (1b)
then make copies of this page and provide a copy to each owner to sign. Then submit each
original signed page for the Special Exception Application.
Tax Map & Parcel Number: 06100000013200
Owner Name of above Parcel: CV Associates c/o Simon Property Group
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SDP, SP or Z.MA # ` ,A / Q:�C i F-- U (Ales Amount �$1 �— Date Paid
Bywho? C-1 1N, IncReceipt# 115139 cioi Ld4& By_u
SPECIAL EXCEPTION NARRATIVE
Tax Map and Parcel # 06100000013200
September 2018
The subject of this Special Exception Application is currently an outparcel with paved
parking and almost no landscaping at Fashion Square Mall. Framed by Wells Fargo Bank,
Seminole Trail/Route 29, an entrance drive into Fashion Square Mall and the Mall, the property
is zoned Planned Development -Shopping Center Entrance Corridor Overlay. A site plan
approved as SDP197900007 has gone through several changes over the years with this
particular area remaining as parking distant from the mall's main building.
The project proposes to redevelop a portion of Parcel 132 introducing a new LongHorn
Steakhouse 5,465 square foot freestanding single story full -service casual dining restaurant. The
restaurant will serve lunch and dinner seven days each week. The project proposal is similar to
what was permitted for the Red Lobster on parcel 133 with an administrative approval (Section
8.5.5.3). This was prior to the 2012 code change no longer allowing the Director of Planning to
approve a variation without a special exception through the Board of Supervisors.
Redevelopment of the Urban Mixed -Use Area from paved parking into the restaurant
site will not change the character of the area or be a detriment to adjacent lots since the area is
totally commercial with no adjacent residences. The restaurant use is allowed in the PD-SC /EC
zoning district and the use will be in harmony with the mall as well as other nearby businesses.
Transportation will be minimally influenced since only existing entrances and exits for
the mall will serve the restaurant location. These existing access points are in multiple locations
on Seminole Trail and Rio Road. No additional burden on housing, schools, parks, playgrounds
or recreation areas will be created. Initial research reference utilities to serve the restaurant
has proven sufficiency. The new structure will include quality materials plus have a full sprinkler
system and modern alarm system for fire and emergency protection.
Although the current use of the proposed site is paved parking, the mall parking will
continue to be compliant. Additionally, the 2 acres plus redevelopment area will meet the
county's minimum parking regulation plus introduce new landscaping and improved lighting.
AAAL
y
r//oyA
125 250 5 Afeet 375
40
WASHINGTON
PRIME GROUP
November 20, 2018
County of Albemarle
Dept. of Community Development
401 McIntire Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832
RE: Charlottesville Fashion Square, LLC —Darden, Inc.
To Whom It May Concern:
Please accept this letter as authorization for Jack DeGagne, Site Development Manager — Darden,
Inc. — 1000 Darden Center Drive, Orlando, FL 32837, to act as agent for Charlottesville Fashion
Square, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, hereon referred to as "Owner", for all
municipal processing/permitting for the proposed Longhorn Steakhouse Restaurant project,
located at out -lot of Charlottesville Fashion Square,1600 East Rio Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22901.
This authorization is for proposed improvements within the proposed leased premises (property)
only.
If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact Stephen Harris at
614-887-5984
Sincerely,
A%k, o�
Dan Scott
Senior Vice President — Development
180 East Broad Street
Columbus, OH 43215
Dan. Scott:uvwashi ngtonprime.com
WASHINGTON
PRIME GROUP
County of Albemarle
Dept. of Community Development
401 McIntire Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832
To Whom It May Concern:
Please accept this letter as authorization for Jack DeGagne, Site
Development Manager — Darden, Inc. — 1000 Darden Center Drive,
Orlando, FL 32837, to act as owner's agent for all municipal
processing/permitting for the proposed Longhorn Steakhouse Restaurant
project, located at out -lot of Fashion Square Mail, 1600 East Rio Rd.,
Charlottesville, VA 22901. This authorization is for proposed
improvements within the proposed leased premises (property) only.
If you should have any questions or need additional information, please
contact me at 614-887-5984.
Sincerely,
Stephen H. Harris, AIA
Vice President, Development
180 East Broad Street
Columbus, OH 43215
Stephen. harris @ wash ingtonprime.com
County of Albemarle - GIS-Web - Property Information
913118, 5:00 PM
Parcel ID:06100-00-00-13200
Parcel Assessment Data (CAMA) Last Updated On: 06/24/2018
Other Parcel Data Last Updated On: 06/24/2018
GIS/Mapping Data Last Updated On: 06/24/2018
Summary Information
Parcel Information
Total Acres 12.39
Primary Prop. 1531 RIO RD E
Address
Other Address N/A
Property Card(s)
1
Lot
13200
Property Name
Sears Roebuck
Subdivision
N/A
Description ACREAGE PARCEL D SEARS
Owner Information
Owner CV ASSOCIATES C/O SIMON PROPERTY GROUP
Address P O BOX 7019
INDIANAPOLI IN, 46207-7019
Owner as of Jan 1st CV ASSOCIATES C/O SIMON PROPERTY GROUP
Most Recent Assessment Information
Year
2018
Assessment Date
01/01/2018
Land Value
$6,474,400
Land Use Value
$0
Improvements Value
$827,600
Total Value
$7,302,000
Most Recent Sales History
Previous Owner SHOPPING CENTER ASSOCIATES C/O SEAR COLLIERS CAUBLE &
CO
Owner CV ASSOCIATES C/O SIMON PROPERTY GROUP
Sale Date
Sale Price
04/12/2000
$0
file:H/Users/michefewright20l6/Documents/LongHorn/Charlottesville...b%20-%20Property%201nformation%20Sears:LongHorn:Fashion%20Sq.html Page 1 of 2
WASHINGTON
PRIME GROUP
County of Albemarle
Dept. of Community Development
401 McIntire Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832
To Whom It May Concern:
Please accept this letter as authorization for Jack DeGagne, Site
Development Manager— Darden, Inc. —1000 Darden Center Drive,
Orlando, FL 32837, to act as owner's agent for all municipal
processing/permitting for the proposed Longhorn Steakhouse Restaurant
project, located at out -lot of Fashion Square Mail, 1600 East Rio Rd.,
Charlottesville, VA 22901. This authorization is for proposed
improvements within the proposed leased premises (property) only.
If you should have any questions or need additional information, please
contact me at 614-887-5984.
Sincerely,
Stephen H. Harris, AIA
Vice President, Development
180 East Broad Street
Columbus, OH 43215
Stephen.harris@washingtonprime.com
GROUND LEASE
by and Wa n
CHARLOTTESVILLE FASHION SQUARE, LLC
a Delawam limilcd b.10ty company
("LANDLORD")
and
RARE HOSPITALITY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
aCc rea comoratioa
("TENANT")
CHARLOTTESVILLE FASHION SQUARE
CHARLOTTESV UL VIRGINIA
GROUND LEASE
CHARLOTTESVILLE FASHION SQUARE
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA,
THIS GROUND LEASE (ads "Lease') is made as of thctt� j�'Syr
day of
2017 (the "Execution Date"), by and between CHARLOTTFSVILLE FASHI - - UARE,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Landlord"), and RARE HOSPITALITY
INTER -NATIONAL, INC., a Georgia cwWrntion and wholly owned subsidiary of Darden
Restaurants, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Tenant").
WITNESS M. THAT.
WHEREAS, Landlord owns an approximately ninety thousand two hundred (40,200)
square foot (2.07 acre) parcel of real property situated in the City of Charlottesville, County of
Albermarte. Commonwealth of Virginia, as more particularly described hereinbclow as the
"Prvanises"; and
WHEREAS, Landlord desires to lease and demise to Tenant, and Tenant desires to lease
and take from Landlord, the Premises in aceortlanee with the terms, covenants, conditions and
agreements hereinafter act forth.
NOW, THER"ORE, in consideration of the Rent (as defined in Section 5.3 hereof) to
be paid and the otter terms, covenants, conditions and agreemants to be kept, honored, observed,
satisfied and performed by Landlord and Tenant bercunder, and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which arc haaby acknowledged, Landlord and
Tenant, being duly authonited to do so, hereby enter into this Lease and agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
BASIC LEASE INF
Section IA Rasie Lease Information.
This Sectiou t.I co didus a summary of some of the basic terns of this Lease. In addition
to other terms and provisions defined elsewhere in this Lease, the following terms sball have the
meanings set forth in this Section 1.1, as the sumo may be morn full' set forth elsewhere in "his
Lease:
(a) Center: Charlottesville Fashion Square, situated in the City of Charlottesville (tho
"Cit)), Albermarle County (the "County") Virginia (the "State').
(b) Landlord's Truett That portion of the Center owned and/or ground leased by
Landlord from time to time. together with any other real property acquired an"T
ground leased by Landlord and added thereto.
of and as provided in Section 8.1 hereof; or (iii) such other uses as are permitted in
Section 8.1 hereof. Any and all other uses shall require Landlord's prior written
consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed.
EN Notice Address:
Landlords Charlottesville Fashion Square, LLC
do Washington Prime Group Inc.
Alto- Development Department
180 East Broad Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215
copy to: Charlottesville Fashion Square, LLC
do Washington Prime Group Inc.
Attn: General Counsel
180 East Broad Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Tenant: Before Opening:
RARE Hospitality International, Inc.
clo Darden Restaurants, Inc.
Attw Robert T. Ricketts, Development Law Department
1000 Darden Center Drive
Orlando, Florida 32837
After Opening:
RARE Hospitality international, Inc.
uo Darden Restaurants, Inc.
Attn: General Counsel
1000 Darden Center Drive
Orlando, Florida 32837
copy to; RARE Hospitality International. Inc.
cfo Darden Restaurants. Inc.
Attn: Property Law Administration Department
1000 Darden Center Dnvt
Orlando, Florida 32837
{r) Protected Area: Those portions of the Center depicted on the site plan attached
hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit B-2. and further described in Section 2.5
hereof.
Longflam Steakhouse Gmund Lease
Charlottesville Fashion Square
Landlord's Signature Page
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord has signed and sealed this Lease as of the ��
day of ,. 2017.
LANDLORD:
CHARLOTTES VILLE FASHION SQUARE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
By: WAS14 NGTON PRIME GROUP, I..P., an Indiana hinted partnership, its sole member,
By: WASHINOTON PRIME GROUP INC., an Indiana corporation, its general partner,
By:
Title: cr .ar srw_
GongHorn Steakhouse Ground Lease
Charlottesville Fashion Square
Tenant's Signature Page
LN TNFSS WHEREOF, Tenant has signed and sealed this Lease as of the A7
-day of 1017.
TENANT:
RARE HOSPITALITY €NTERNATIONAL, INC., a Georgia emporation,
t�l�ll#It r-
LongHorn Sjte View Lease Area from Opposite Side of Route 29 — Mail In Background
Route 29 Site Street Frontage and Neighborhood View Towards Rio Road Intersection
Route 29 Frontage and Neighborhood View Toward Mau Entrance urive at the Lea De ra ea DUUI JUeI y
Lease Area Toward Rio Rd. Depicting the Grade Change Kestricting view rrom I nat MUdU auu LIILI O..,. 1�1
FUTURE STREET NETWORK STREET DESIGN AND SCALE
The Connectivity Plan proposes a grid -like street network for Rio29. A connected grid can better
connect existing and future residents on the periphery of the Plan to Rio29's center of activity fie. the
"Core" area, which is detailed in the next chapter). A connected grid can also connect neighborhoods
to one another without diminishing the quality or the character of the neighborhoods within or around
Rio29. Proposed streets should be designed for motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit riders.
The grid network provides more direct routes to destinations that will allow people to more easily walk,
bike, or drive to locations within Rio29.
STREET TYPOLOGIES
BOULEVARD
AVENUE
LOCALSTREET
<. ........... .>
THROUGH CORRIDOR
Route 29
INTERSECTION TYPES
Signalized
Roundabout
Dog Bone
Streets shown in the
Connectivity Plan that
are dotted convey the
approximate street locations.
The Street network overall
shows a conceptual plan that
achieves the Plan's goals for
connectivity. Redevelopment
and new development in
Rio29 will determine the
exact placement of streets.
The Connectivity Plan proposes a hierarchy of streets based on street capacity (how
many people, cars, bikes, and buses it can accommodate) and function. The scale
and design of streets should be both a reflection of a street's capacity as well as a
street's role in the network.
As an example, a street that is designed to hold a high amount of traffic can traverse
through different areas of the community and serve different functions along its
length. One segment can be designed to carry traffic quickly through an area and
another segment of the same street can be designed as a main street, serving as a
destination for the community, while still maintaining the same capacity through
both segments.
In Rio29, the boulevard (Rio Road) is an example of a street serving these different
functions. The boulevard is the highest capacity street that connects traffic from
outside Rio29 to Ri029's activity center. Within this center, or "Core" area of Rio29
(detailed in the Character chapter), Rio Road should be designed as a main street
with slower traffic speeds so that all modes of transportation can interact safely.
When designed appropriately, the boulevard can maintain its high capacity through
the Core without altering the neighborhood character.
The street design and function can also impact what uses are appropriate along a
street. Many businesses seek busier streets that provide drive by -traffic and therefore
they often prefer to be located Orion a high capacity street within the slower -speed
Core area. Residents, however, do not want cars driving quickly through their
neighborhoods, and may choose to locate in the Core along roads where speeds are
slower. The resulting street could have a mix of uses and become an activity center
for the area.
Alternatively, some residents may not wish to live along the high capacity streets but
still want easy access to the Core area. Local streets can provide quieter streets with
NOTE: Street sections shown on the next several pages were developed using guidance from the Virginia
Department of Rail and Public Transportation's Multimodal system Design Guidelines, The National
Association of City Transportation Officials Urban street Design Guidelines, and The Virginia Department
of Transportation's (/DOT) Road Design Manual. Best practice recommendations from these guidelines
were adjusted to reflect existing conditions and local preferences.
Cross sections depict "optimal" dimensions or a range of allowable street element dimensions.
Variations and reductions to widths may be permitted to accommodate special circumstances, such as
existing streets with constrained rights -of way, and where an equivalent alternative can be provided.
Appropriate transitions to adjacent properties must be provided where width reductions are permitted.
Reductions in mad width may be permissible, where deemed appropriate by VDOT Furthermore,
flexibility needs to be provided to allow for streets to evolve over time as needed. All public streets are
subject to VDOT approcal.
Local Streets
Local Streets are low -capacity, low -speed streets that form the majority of Rio29's
the street network. Local Streets are expected to fill in as redevelopment of private
property occurs. Local Street locations on the Connectivity Plan are conceptual and
do not need to be located exactly as shown. At a minimum, the same number of
streets and connections should be provided and block sizes should be between 200-
600 feet where possible, depending on location (see the Character Chapter for more
on block size).
Inside of the Core Outside of the Core
Dimensions
Dimensions
A
B
Ptage Zone 5'-15'
Pedestrian Zo 1012
,Separation Zo 6'
Parking Zone 8"
5'-15"
6'
C
6'
D
8"
E
Lane Width
9'-10'
9'-10'
' LaWafrontage zones could be approved by exception when a street is nearthe Comto allow fora future
transition far wider pedestrian zones and to accamodate outdoor seating as the area grows
' Reduction to 8' pedestrian zone maybe permitted where right-of-waylimitabons exist and appropriate
transitions are provided to adjacent properties, if deemed appropriate by Planning staff.
' Appropriate locations for on -street parking should be determined in collaboration with Planning and Vern staff
during project design. On -street parking is not expected or required for the entire length of roadways.
V)
Z
O
_F
C
Z
O
v
Z
z
F_
N
X
w
Rio East Court
Greenfield Terrace
N
Z
Z
w
In
w
U
w
a
Decatur,GA
Hudson, OH
Streets Inside of the
Core are intended to be
placemaking streets with
speeds of 25 - 30 mph.
Land uses include room
for caf6 tables and wider
facilities.
Streets Outside of the
Core are intended to be
connectors with speeds
of 30 - 35 mph. These will
have no caf6 tables, more
lawns/front yard space,
and narrower facilities.
FUTURE CONSERVATION NETWORK
To91 L TYPOLOG I ES
SHARED -USE
PATH (SUP)
H
TRAIL
ABOUT THE CONSERVATION NETWORK
County -owned property and critical resources provide the foundation for the
Conservation Plan. The Plan highlights how underutilized County -owned properties
can be re -imagined as key public amenity spaces, while also providing important
ecosystem services to the surrounding area. The Conservation Plan shows
Conservation Networkthat is made up of Public Amenity Spaces, Trails, and
Critical Resources. The Conservation Network is expected to be developed (and, in
some cases, preserved) through a combination of public investment and private
redevelopment activities.
The Plan recommends the protection of existing critical resources. Currently, all
TWO-WAY CYCLE TRACK
ORSUP
of the critical resources are within the northeast quadrant of Rio29. These consist
of several preserved slopes along the northern and eastern periphery of the plan
boundary, as well as a perennial stream just south of the Woodbrook Neighborhood.
PU BLIC AM EN ITY
These areas should be protected with future development.
SPACES
The Plan also recommends outdoor public amenity spaces within each quadrant
. LINEARPARK
of Rio29. Three of the four quadrants (northeast, northwest, and southwest)
. PLAZA/GREEN
contain County -owned properties that provide stormwater treatment for adjacent
development. The Plan envisions how these publicly -owned properties ran be
. NATURALAREA
redesigned to become public amenity spaces for active, passive, and/or social
recreational opportunities, all while continuing to treat stormwater runoff.
. FLOODABLE PARK
COUNW OWNED
The Conservation Plan proposes a Linear Park in the Northwest quadrant and Plazas/
LAND
Greens within the other three quadrants. There are two Natural Areas recommended
C' THESQUARE•
/N
in the northern quadrants and a Floodable Park proposed in the southwest quadrant.
PEDESTRIAN
One of the Plazas/Greens should serve as the Square or central amenity space for
CROSSING
Rio29. The Square is intended to provide a space that can accommodate large
EXPOSED STREAM
gatherings and events, and should be associated with a civic facility such as a library
oraschool.
CRITICAL RESOURCES
® PRESERVEDSLOPES
Another potential element of the Conservation Network is the green street. All streets
in Rio29 are expected to include street trees, but some streets could be designed
. 1001 STREAM
to have additional green amenities. Green streets are those that give priority to
BUFFER
pedestrian circulation, open space, and/or stormwater treatment. Though specific
streets are not identified on the plan as green streets, developers and the County
• Theflnallocmaa for the Sgaare
should beencouragedto pursue green street designs where possible. Green streets
wlllbedete.;redbasedonhow Ue
could take the place of identified trials, shared use paths, or required open space, if
area redevelops, but iris anticipated
thotoneoftheldeadfiedplazas/
these facilities are adequately incorporated into the design of the street.
greens will serve as The Square (see
Page 35).
Christopher Perez
From:
Christopher Perez
Sent:
Tuesday, March 19, 2019 11:05 AM
To:
'Scott Collins'
Cc:
Heather McMahon; Margaret Maliszewski
Subject:
Longhorn Pedestrian Connections
Scott,
Longhorn Pedestrian Connections
It was good to attend the ARB work session meeting to see the latest ideas for the proposal. After the ARB
meeting I brought your idea back and discussed it with our master plan folks.
We liked the pedestrian connection being proposed in place of the stairway accessing Rte. 29; however, the
connection alone still won't be enough to function or meet the intent of the 10' shared use path for bikes and
pedestrians throughout the site, which is recommended in the adopted master plan. Your current proposal only
brings pedestrians from Rte. 29 into the site but doesn't allow them to access the site from the south of the site.
Staff suggestions for sidewalk improvements as noted in the 12-4-18 email to Michele are still applicable.
However, you could propose other ideas to meet that same intent and function. Feel free to email me any ideas
you have and I'll provide you some initial guidance on each individual solution before you submit it in the site
plan.
Hope this helps
Christopher Perez I Senior Planner
Department of Community Development iCounty of Albemarle, Virginia
401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville, VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext. 3443
Christopher Perez
From:
Christopher Perez
Sent:
Tuesday, December 04, 2018 11:53 AM
To:
'Michele'
Cc:
Heather McMahon; Margaret Maliszewski; Andrew Gast -Bray
Subject:
Longhorn Steakhouse
Michele,
RE: Longhorn Steakhouse
As discussed the initial site plan is still deferred and shall be fully revised and reviewed prior to initial site plan
approval. The most recent submittal was a revision of the variation/SE request and the plan provided is to be
used as a concept plan for ARB and BOS consideration.
Heather has provided the following guidance: "After some consideration, Margaret and I believe we can take
the present application to the ARB as a Concept Plan/Advisory Review [for a Special Exception Request] on
January 7. However, the submission still fails to meet the checklist for a Concept Plan/Advisory Review in one
regard: the site plan you submitted is missing "Existing and proposed topography and conceptual grading drawn
with contour intervals of 5-feet or less, and with sufficient offsite topography to describe prominent and
pertinent off -site features and physical characteristics, but in no case less than 50-feet outside of the site," noted
in section B.B. If you can provide me this information before December 10 at the latest, and preferably by this
Friday, December 7, my staff report and review will be complete; if not, then my staff report will mention this
lack of data. It may mean that my staff report recommends that the applicant revises the application to provide
this information for a subsequent review, or the ARB may ask for such information at the meeting. I just want to
make you aware of that.
One more thing: although Margaret, Chris, and I have not undertaken a full review of this submission, we are
aware of the ramp feature that is proposed for Rt. 29, to provide bicycle and pedestrian access directly to the site
from the right-of-way. While we believe this connection is important, we believe this design solution is not
appropriate for the Entrance Corridor and we will not recommend approval of the site plan to the ARB given
the magnitude of this feature on the Entrance Corridor. We encourage you to find alternate design solutions that
would require less pavement and railing. Please let me know if you have further questions."
I would like to use this opportunity to discuss the proposed pedestrian and bike connection. Whereas you have
provided a compact 10' shared multi use path from the sidewalk along the frontage to the site, and moved a
long way towards meeting the suggestions of staff, we think some improvements will improve what you are
providing and more likely to receive endorsement from the pertinent boards and commissions. After an initial
review staff does not feel this design forwards the intent of the 10' shared multi use path because it is not
convenient for cyclists to use. The short switchbacks require riders to get off their bikes and walk up the hill.
Staff thinks that there is a better, more usable design that would make it more convenient for all
users. Additionally, I have a feeling this design will not be aesthetically pleasing to the ARB upon their review
of the profile due to the large concentration of pavement and railings fronting the EC (as discussed above). To
these ends, I offer the following suggested change:
Provide a 6' wide sidewalk along the access road south of the site, provide a sidewalk min 5' bordering the
parking (I'd prefer 6'), and replace the proposed 30' ramp with a 5' wide staircase accessing the frontage (see
below).
w
1
1
RF N
and
� • IA rwV .y
4 c,11�•.
J
t}
1
--A _ \ .\ .._r%- sin c-s iw�• 1
a .x •. ,ter .�' � � 1 � �. _"M_-�.;`�'^ ., -
and
z
Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you
Christopher Perez I Senior Planner
Department of Community Development ;County of Albemarle, Virginia
401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville, VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext. 3443
From: Christopher Perez
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 4:14 PM
To:'Michele' <michelew@ldreeves.com>; Heather McMahon <hmcmahon@albemarle.org>
Cc: Jack Degagne <JDegagne@darden.com>; Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: ARB2018-153: Longhonr Steakhouse Initial, resubmission -- application incomplete
Michele,
I have some additional feedback on revisions to the plan that I will send you on Monday... please wait till you
hear from me before you make a decision on your next move with this plan....
Thank you
Christopher Perez I Senior Planner
Department of Community Development JCounty of Albemarle, Virginia
401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville, VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext. 3443
From: Michele <michelew@ldreeves.com>
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 12:48 PM
To: Heather McMahon <hmcmahon@albemarle.ore>
Cc: lack Degagne <JDegagne@darden.com>; Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>; Christopher Perez
<cperez@albemarle.org>
Subject: Re: ARB2018-153: Longhonr Steakhouse Initial, resubmission -- application incomplete
3
Ok. We are determining our best and most efficient course of action. We have everything available except the drainage
and grading and may decide to revise those immediately. Jack or I will update you.
Thanks,
Michele "Shelly" Wright
Ph 540.969.8221
michelew@ldreeves.com
On Nov 30, 2018, at 10:02 AM, Heather McMahon <hmcmahon@albemarle.ore> wrote:
Hi Michele,
From our previous email conversations, I thought that you intended to submit a full, revised Initial Site
Plan set for review to both Planning staff (i.e., Chris) and to ARB staff, in which case, for the ARB review
process, your revised project would undergo the same level of review (i.e., full board review) as your
first submission. The checklist for a Preliminary Review of a Site Development Plan (which we also use
for Initial Site Plans) can be found here. I want to draw your attention to Part B.B; what you have
submitted is missing the criteria for: existing and proposed topography; location and size of existing
proposed utilities and easements; and conceptual stormwater management plan. Without this data, my
review of an Initial Site Plan cannot be complete.
I have conferred with Chris, and I understand that you have submitted this in consideration of a special
exception. While the data your provided may suffice for such a review as a special exception, it does not
for ARB review of an Initial Site Plan. What you have submitted more closely aligns with the
requirements for an ARB Concept Plan/Advisory Review, the checklist for which can be found here. We
could take this to the ARB on January 7, 2019 as a Concept Plan, but you would still need to come to the
ARB again in the future with a full Initial Site Plan set.
So, my recommendation is that you defer indefinitely until you have a full Initial Site Plan Set in hand.
You will need to respond to this email and inform me that you wish to defer. If I hear from Chris in the
near future that what you have submitted meets his requirements, then we will re-evaluate how to
move forward.
Thanks,
Heather McMahon, Senior Planner
Albemarle County Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832 x3278
hmcmahon@albemarle.org
From: Michele <michelew@ldreeves.com>
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 9:18 AM
To: Heather McMahon <hmcmahon@albemarle.ore>
Cc: Jack Degagne <1Deeaene@darden.com>
Subject: Re: ARB2018-153: Longhonr Steakhouse Initial, resubmission -- application incomplete
Heather: We are on hold with the engineering related site plan review until the Special Exception is
approved. Since we have significant layout changes due to the mandated building position change and
new multi -use path, we do not want to do grading and drainage revisions until we at least have the first
Special Exception review for this week's resubmission.
Can the ARB progress without grading and drainage plans?
Thanks,
Michele "Shelly" Wright
Ph 540.969.8221
michelew@ldreeves.com
On Nov 29, 2018, at 3:22 PM, Heather McMahon <hmcmahon@albemarle.orP> wrote:
Hello Michele and Jack,
I have just checked your application package for completeness and it is incomplete.
Review cannot commence until the missing information is provided and the application
is deemed complete. 8 hardcopies of a complete site plan set are required for a full
review of an Initial Site Plan. Your scheduled ARB meeting date may be postponed if
copies are not received in a timely manner.
Please see the attached checklist for the areas in which your application is deficit.
Furthermore, your previous submittal of an Initial Site Plan included the following:
Sheet p
Drawing Name
Dr
Da
C1.1
Cover Sheet
8/:
C2.1
General Notes/Tree Conservation Plan
8/:
C2.2
Demolition Plan
8/:
C2.3
Site Plan
8/:
C2.4
Grading Plan
8/:
C2.5
Drainage & Utility Plan A
8/.
C2.6
Drainage & Utility Plan B
8/:
C3.1
Utility Profiles (Storm)
8/:
C3.2
Utility Profiles (Sanitary)
8/:
C3.3
Utility Profiles (Sanitary)
8/:
C4.1
Lighting Plan
8/:
C4.2
Lighting Plan Details
8/:
C5.1
Soil Erosion & Sediment Control Plan
8/.
C5.2
Soil Erosion & Sediment Control Notes & Details
8/:
C6.1
Construction Details
8/:
C6.2
Construction Details
8/:
C6.3
Construction Details
8/:
C6.4
Construction Details
8/:
C6.5
Construction Details
8/:
C6.6
Construction Details
8/.
C7.1
Soil Boring Logs
8/:
C8.1
Vehicle Circulation Plan (WB-67)
8/.
C8.2 I
Vehicle Circulation Plan (Refuse)
8/:
L1.1
Landscape Plan
8/
1-1.2
Landscape Plan Notes & Details
8/
Sheet 1 of 2
Survey
7/.
Sheet 2 of 2
Survey
7/:
A1.1
Dimensioned Floor Plan
8/
A1.2
Noted Floor Plan
8/.
A3.1
Roof Plan
$/
A4.2
Schedule, Notes and Details
$/
A5.1
Exterior Elevations
$/
A5.2
Exterior Elevations
$/
n.p.
Color renderings (2 pages)
6/.
p. 1-15
Sign permit drawings
6/.
n.p.
Manufacturer's specifications on lighting
n•(
Material samples boards (2)
n.(
In contrast, this submittal includes the following:
n.p.
Color renderings (2 pages)
11,
T1.1
Title Sheet
8/,
C2.3
Site Plan
11,
C4.1
Lighting Plan
11,
L1.1
Landscape Plan
11,
A3.1
Roof Plan
8/,
A5.1
Exterior Elevations
8/,
A5.2
Exterior Elevations
8/,
At the least, your site plan must include the following missing sheets for ARB review
(and they must be the latest revisions, facsimiles of those submitted to Chris Perez, the
lead planner on your Site Review Committee):
C1.1
Cover Sheet
C2.1
General Notes/Tree Conservation Plan
C2.2
Demolition Plan
C2.3
Site Plan
C2.4
Grading Plan
C2.5
Drainage & Utility Plan A
C2.6
Drainage & Utility Plan B
C4.1
Lighting Plan
C4.2
Lighting Plan Details
1-1.1
Landscape Plan
1-1.2 1
Landscape Plan Notes & Details
A1.1
Dimensioned Floor Plan
A1.2
Noted Floor Plan
Please let me know if you would like to defer this project or when I can expect to receive
8 hardcopies of a complete site plan set and architectural drawings.
Thanks,
Heather McMahon, Senior Planner
Albemarle County Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832 x3278
hmcmahon@albemarle.org
<ARB2018-153 Preliminary SDP Checklist for Completeness.pdf>