The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZMA202100011 Review Comments Zoning Map Amendment 2022-03-29t COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 March 29, 2022 Ms. Megan Nedostup Williams Mullen 321 E. Main St., Suite 400 Charlottesville, VA 22902 mnedostQ@williamsmullen.com / 434-951-5709 RE: ZMA202100011 The Heritage on Rio; 31 Submittal Dear Ms. Nedostup: Fax (434)972-4176 Staff has reviewed your re -submittal for the zoning map amendment, ZMA202100011, The Heritage on Rio. We have a number of questions and comments which we believe should be addressed before we can recommend favorably on your ZMA request. We would be glad to meet with you to discuss these issues. Follow-up review comments are provided below, organized by Department, Division, or agency. Planning comments are provided first below: Planning— General ZMA Comments (ZMA2021-00011) 1. Seethe attached document provided by ACPS for more information regarding expected student yields in the various school districts. This information will be used in the staff report to the Planning Commission identifying the expected impact of this development on the local schools. Student generation numbers and school capacity have been closely considered by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors recently The project narrative indicates that all students who will live in this development will come from elsewhere in the County. How is it known that there will be no new County residents living in this development, adding additional students to the school system from current enrolment levels? Provide more information on the expected number of students to be generated by this proposed development. Thank you for providing the additional information on the expected impacts to schools from this development. Schools continue to be a significant topic of discussion among both the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors for proposed residential projects. For your information, the School Board and the County are currently working on the FY23 budget, so more information on the proposed school improvement projects to be included in that budget will be available in the coming months. No additional information was provided on the assertion that students in this development will simply come from other parts of the County. Even if that is the case, new students could move into those housing units vacated by this development's residents, still increasing the overall number of students served by the school district. 2. The main recreational amenity space in the center appears to be smaller than originally proposed, with a chunk taken out for the proposed dumpster pad. Having a large central amenity space is important to creating a cohesive community and providing a center to the community for residents to congregate in. 3. See the attached memorandum from Stacy Pethia regarding the provision of affordable housing. As mentioned in her comments, the affordable housing proposal is not in accordance with the recommendations of the County's Comprehensive Plan that 15% of the total units permitted be designated as affordable housing. Neighborhood Model Projects located within the Development Areas are typically reviewed for consistency with each of the Neighborhood Model Principles found in the Comprehensive Plan. Comments are provided (see attached document Consistency with Neighborhood Model) on relevant aspects of the Neighborhood Model principles. Plannin¢ Division — Transportation The following comments were provided by Jessica Hersh-Ballering, Principal Planner for Transportation, jhballering&albemarle.org: Standards for transit amenities: 1) The shelter should be placed outside of the ROW, if possible. (If not possible, the property owner will need to work with VDOT to ensure all their requirements are met.) la) The shelter should still be sited as close to the transit stop as practicable. 2) Shelters must be able to be accessed by ADA-compliant sidewalks or shared use paths. Asphalt or concrete must provide a continuous ADA-compliant connection to the concrete pad on which the shelter is sited. 3) The shelter and any amenities adjacent to the shelter (trash cans, lighting, etc.) must remain out of the pedestrian walkway 4) Property owners should confirm all transit shelter plans with Charlottesville Area Transit staff. (Albemarle County staff can provide contact information upon request.) 5) The shelter should be a Tolar 13' Non -Ad Stop Shelter with Strap Bench (model #10869-00). If a different shelter is desired, the property owner should consult with CAT staff for appropriate alternative models. Installation instructions are attached. 6) The concrete pad should exceed the size of the shelter. 7) The concrete pad should follow City of Charlottesville concrete mix requirements. (See attached.) Planning Division — Architectural Review Board (ARB) Please see the comments below provided by Margaret Maliszewski, ARB Staff Planner (Planning Manager), mmal iszewski@albemarle. org: Additional revisions to the plan could result in buildings that more frilly address the street and landscape and hardscape elements that are fully coordinated with the buildings to establish usable, orderly and attractive urban spaces. 1. Some shifting of building envelopes has been proposed to address some of the previous building alignment comments. Other comments were not addressed: building envelope 3 is still not oriented parallel to travelway B, building envelopes 3 and 4 are still not equally set back from Rio Road, and the plan does not ensure that parking areas will be set back from all street -facing building elevations. Making these changes would present an improved, more orderly and attractive face on the Entrance Corridor street. 2. Additional information has been provided on the retaining walls located near the EC street. These are shown at Buildings 1 and 2, wrapping from the front of the buildings around to both sides. The 3'-tall walls run through the landscape buffer located between the buildings and Rio Road, with approximate distances between wall and building ranging from 5' to 8'. The walls are not used to establish integrated site features, like courtyards or plazas. As proposed, they are engineered elements that bisect a cramped planting area. Incorporating the walls into urban site elements that are fully integrated into the streetscape and planting area and that provide more useable spaces would establish more comfortable urban spaces with an orderly and attractive appearance for the Entrance Corridor. 3. Insufficient planting area is provided along Rio Road. Planting area is as little as 4' deep and runs alongside a power easement, which could limit tree species, and retaining walls bisect the landscape buffer at Buildings 1 and 2. Zoning Division, Community Development Department Please see the attached memorandum with comments from the Zoning reviewer, Rebecca Ragsdale, Planning Manager, rraQsdalegalbemarle.org. Albemarle County Housing Division Please see the attached memorandum with comments from Stacy Pethia, Principal Planner for Housing, spethia&albemarle.org. Virainia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Please see the attached memorandum with comments from the VDOT contact — Douglas McAvoy, douglas.mcavoy@vdot.vir ig nia. gov. Resubmittal If you choose to resubmit, please use the attached form. There is no fee for the first resubmittal. The resubmittal dates are the first and third Monday of each month. Notification and Advertisement Fees It appears that the Public Notice Requirement fees have already been paid for this application. Additional notification fees will not be required unless a deferral takes place in which adjoining owners need to be notified of a new date. Please feel free to contact me if you wish to meet or need additional information. My email address is areitelbach&albemarle.org, and my phone number is 434-296-5832 ext. 3261. Sincerely, V. AU*ea# ,Reuel Wld Andy Reitelbach Senior Planner II Planning Division, Department of Community Development enc: Consistency with Neighborhood Model Shelter Installation Instructions Concrete Mix Requirements Memorandum from Rebecca Ragsdale, Planning Manager Memorandum from Stacy Pethia, Principal Planner for Housing Memorandum from Douglas McAvoy, VDOT Zoning Map Amendment Resubmittal Form r_`iMrTii EWA171EWr%0iQr111111007.3: - , : • • r :7R Staff Analysis of Application's Consistency with Neighborhood Model Principles Pedestrian Orientation Mixture of Uses Neighborhood Centers Mixture of Housing Types and Affordability Interconnected Streets and Transportation Networks Multi -modal Transportation Opportunities L There are several pedestrian facilities provided throughout the site, including a multi -use path along the Rio Road frontage and sidewalks, with planting strips, along Travelways A and B. This principle is mostly met. The application provides for only one type of residential unit. In addition, a portion of this property is designated for Urban Mixed -Use Center; however, no mixture of uses is being promoted or provided for. This principle is mostly met. Strategy 2f in Chapter 8 of the Comprehensive Plan identifies neighborhood centers as having four components: 1) a centralized park or outdoor amenity which is surrounded by 2) a ring of commercial or mixed uses with 3) surrounded by medium to high density residential uses and a final 4) outer ring of low density residential. The central amenity area appears to have become smaller than previous versions, as the dumpster pad has now taken a chunk out of the space. This principle is mostly met. The proposal provides for only one type of residential unit; however, the applicant does propose to provide some affordable units. See comments from Stacy Pethia. The affordable housing that is proposed does not meet the recommendations of the comprehensive plan for the provision of affordable housing. This principle is mostly met. The internal street network appears to largely be interconnected. In addition, there is an interparcel connection provided to the property to the south. This principle has been met. This development appears to be mostly automobile -centric. However, there is a multi -use path proposed for the Rio Road frontage of the development. In addition, a transit stop with shelter is proposed to be located along Rio Road. Sidewalks are proposed along the travelways. This principle is mostly met. Parks, Recreational The proposal provides some areas of open space, including vegetative buffers Amenities, and Open and recreational facility areas, and also indicates that at least 25% of the site Space will be open space. This principle is mostly met. Buildings and Space I The buildings appear to be consistent with recommended building heights of Human Scale In addition, there appear to be some large retaining walls around the site; however, their proposed heights are not identified. Retaining walls along the west side of the site and along Rio Road could create areas that do not support spaces of human scale, depending on their proposed height. These retaining walls, although not large, continue to break up spaces that should be appropriate for human scale and appropriate screening of the buildings from the roadwaysttravelways. See also comments from ARB. This principle is partially met and could be strengthened. Relegated Parking Most of the parking areas appear to be relegated from the Rio Road frontage. For the areas that are not, screening landscaping would be appropriate to help buffer this parking. The buffer areas have been identified with a proposed width. Parking in the Neighborhood Service Center area should be relegated and not visible from the Rio Road frontage. Screening of a parking area in a Center should be more substantial than other areas. See also comments from ARB about parking setbacks. This principle is partially met and could be strengthened. Redevelopment The requested rezoning will permit redevelopment of the property. This Principle is met. Respecting Terrain The property contains areas within the Managed Steep Slopes Overlay Zoning and Careful Grading District. Pursuant to Section 18-30.7.4 of the Zoning Ordinance, Managed and Re -grading of Steep Slopes can be disturbed if the design standards of Section 18-30.7.5 are Terrain adhered to. This includes future buildings and parking areas. This principle appears to be met. Clear Boundaries with The subject property is located within Neighborhood 1 of the Places29 Master the Rural Area Plan area. It is adjacent to the Rural Area boundary (across Rio Road). The proposed size of the landscape buffer along Rio Road has been provided. This principle has been met. TOLAR DURABILITY WITH DISTINCTION INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR 10869-00 13' NON AD STOP SHELTER WITH STRAP BENCH TOLAR MANUFACTURING COMPANY INC. TRANSIT SHELTERS I STREET FURNITURE I DISPLAYS & DIRECTORIES I TRANSIT SOLAR LIGHTING 1 258 Mariah Circle, Corona, CA USA 92879-1751 1 800-339-6165 1 951-808-0081 1 www.tolarmlg.com 2 4.3.5 Kwik Bolt 3 Expansion Anchor 4.3.5.3 Technical Data Table 1 - Kwik Bolt 3 Specifications' BOR 91ze11n. 1/4 318 12 Details( (8.4) (9.5) (12.7) tl nominal bit diametw2 IM 3M 12hti(h_(h ydepth of embedment 1-1/8 2 3 I-WS 2-1/2 3-12 2-1/4 3-1/2 4-3/4 (29) 051) (76) (41) (64) (89) (57) (89) (121) he minmun/standard/deep 13/8 2-1/4 3-1/4 2 2-7/8 3-78 23/4 4 5-1/4 hole depth (35) (57) (63) (51) (73) (89) (70) (102) (133) di wedge deamnos 5/15 7/16 9/16 hole In Mum (mrr) (8) (11) (14) Normal Carbon Sted It-6 4 20 40 Tyr & MIT HOG thing (5) (27) (54) Fleciam- weight Stainless 11-6 6 20 40 nwlded nehla3al Concrete steel (Nm) (8) (27) (54) Toque Grout ft-Ile 4 15 25 Flak Carbon Steel (5) CM (34) (NM) h min base material thickness In. 3Inch (76 mrg or 1.3 Imes embedment whichever amber is greater Carbon Steel 2900lb" 72001bae 12400 lot Boll Fracture Load HDG no offering no offering12400 Ile+ Stainless steel 29001ba7 72001ba7 12400 b+ Bolt Sze11n. 5I8 314 1 Details (15.9) (19.1) R5.4) tl rumnal bit diameters SIB 3/4 1 ha,`r eu/hyP mHnum(stadlyddeep 23/4 4 6-12 3-1/4 43/4 6-1/Y 4-12 e 9Oep8ldembednerA (7q (102) (140) (83) 121) (166)(114) (152)R291he minimumrstandard/deW 33/e 45/8 6-12 4 S•1/2 8.45 54/2 7 10 holedepth (86) (117) (156) (102) (140) (173) (140) (178) (254) as wedge clearance 11/16 13/16 1-1/8 hole In fkture (mrr) (17) (21) 99) Normal Carbon Steel 11-11, 85 150 260 That u�'t& HDG (Non) (115) (2fA) C339! weight Stainless 11-I1b) 85 15D 235 mantled Concrete Steel (NM)Installation,Installation,routm) (115) R20) 1319) Torque G it-lb t35 17D Rled Carbon Sled (88) (1683) - Block Mfig h min base material thickness In. 3Inch (Mmm)or1.3 times embedment wfichewr nwitiar is greater Carbon Steel 19600lb- 28700Ito0 fur a 88 kd, fy a 75 ksi BON Load Loatl HDG 19600 lb- 2870016+ no offering Stainless stew 219001 W fut a 76 ksl, f a 84 We I fula 78 Wit, 1,. 64 kale 1 See Kwik Boh 3 Product Line Table in Section 4.5.3.3 for a ful list and anchor length and thread length mnfiguma... 2 Loads for Kwik Boh 3 are applicable for both carbide drill bite (see Section 8.4.1) and anti: hod tolerance Hilt DD-C diamond cos bile in sizes ranging from 1/2 inch to 1 Inch. 3 The deep embedmemdepth for stable as small(wik Soh 3 anchors is 8imh(203 mm). 4 Sort fracture load. are determined by being in ojig as part of product qualify control. Them values are net intended for design purposes. 5 Boa strength specified b/ minimum tensile and yield strength. Bah fracture load not applicable. 6 Bol fracture load nd applkobleto cabm steel Couraensrnk Kwik Bch 3. The tensile and yield strengths are. fur a 105 ksi end fy a 90 kei. 7 Bolt fracture load not applicableto stainless steel Cmntersrnk Kwk Bolt 3. The tensile and yield stregth, ere. fur a 90 ksi and Iy a 78 W 8 Fa 314 x 12. far a 88 kd and fy a 75 kai. Belt fracture load nit applicable. 228 Hill, Inc. M)1-800.87&80001 www.as.hiNican I anespend 1-800.871-5000I Nhi(Cenade) Cap. 1-800.363-44581 wwwsa.hilizarn I Podud Technical Cwida20o8 3 4/28/2020 1:40:18F TOLAR DURABIIITY WITH DISTINCTION Tolar Manufacturing Company, Inc. 258 Mariah Circle, Corona, CA 92879 P: (951) 808 - 0081 1 F: (951) 808 - 0041 PACKING LIST Report Missing Items to Tolar Mfg. Customer Service within 48 Hours of Receipt Order Number 13526 Customer Code PINCON01 QTY Ordered Part Number Part Description 1.00 10869-00 13NALDGLNOEL Jobsite: Color Verfication: Components -- --- ----- ---------------- Counted Checked Part Number Description QTY /Unit QTY Total Load By By Customer Received By 7029-OOA ROOF ASSEMBLY, 13NALD, NO ELEC. 1.00 1.00 9094-00 ROOF BRONZE LEXAN PANEL 48 X 56 5/16 3.00 3.00 4412-00 ROOF END BAND (FLANGED) 55" 2.00 2.00 1087-00 ROOF PRESSURE RIB, 55" 2.00 2.00 3569-OOA DUAL POST ASSY. W/ END LEG GLASS EXTRU. 2.00 2.00 1658-00 SHOE WELDMENT, 18" TALL, 7" X 7" W/ 5/8" HOLES 4.00 4.00 15664-00 GLASS CLIP ASSEMBLY (NEW DESIGN) 6.00 6.00 1090-00 ASSY. BOTTOM GLASS CLIP, 12" 5.00 5.00 13337-00 GLASS EXTRUSION SHIM 4.00 4.00 __________________________ Hardware Part Number Description QTY /Unit QTY Total Load 6011513 GLASS, CLEAR, TP., 3/8" X 19" X 77" 2.00 2.00 COMMENTS: U.N.O. TOUCH UP PAINT REQUIREMENT IS ---------------------------- Counted Checked Customer Ship BY By Received by Direct Report Missing Items to Tolar Mfg. Customer Service within 48 Hours of Receipt P: (951) 808 - 0081 1 F: (951) 808 - 0041 customerservice@tolarmfg.com REV. 09/15/2015 Page 1 of 2 6011565 GLASS, CLEAR, TP, 3/8" X 34" X 79" 4.00 4.00 1106030 BIT, TORX T-25, TAMPER-PRUF 1.00 1.00 1106040 BIT, TORX T-27, TAMPER-PRUF 1.00 1.00 8086115 BOLT, 3/8"-16 X 1 ", STAINLESS STL. 16.00 16.00 8705068 LOCK WASHER, 3/8", STAINLESS STL. 16.00 16.00 8685100 FLAT WASHER, 3/8", STAINLESS STL. 16.00 16.00 8645150 TEK SCREW, #14 X 1-1/2", SELF TAP, FLANGE HD W/ 20.00 20.00 8176075 HEXNUT, 1/2"-13, STN. STL. TOP LOCKING 4.00 4.00 8087425 BOLT, 1/2"-13 X 4", STAINLESS STL. 4.00 4.00 8537055 DRIVE SCREW, #14 X 3/4" 4.00 4.00 8027450 ANCHOR HILTI KWIK BOLT TZ 1/2" X 4-1/2" ZINC 16.00 16.00 OTY Ordered Part Number Part Description Color Verfication: 1.00 13297-111 6BNCHSTRPNOBCK2VB 6' STEEL STRAP BENCH, NO BACK WITH 2 VAGRANT BARS IN 1L Components -- --- ----- ---------------- Counted Checked Part Number Description QTY /Unit QTY Total Load By By Customer Received By F13297 6' STEEL STRAP BENCH, NO BACK WITH 2 1.00 1.00 -------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- Hardware Counted Checked Customer Ship Part Number Description QTY /Unit QTY Total Load BY By Received by Direct 8047375 ANCHOR, SUP-R-STUD 1/2" X 3-3/4" ZINC 4.00 4.00 1 1 1 1 ❑ COMMENTS: U.N.O. TOUCH UP PAINT REQUIREMENT IS Report Missing Items to Tolar Mfg. Customer Service within 48 Hours of Receipt P: (951) 808 - 0081 1 F: (951) 808 - 0041 customerservice@tolarmfg.com REV. 09/15/2015 Page 2 of 2 4 ROOF PANEL INSTALLATION 1. There is a film on both sides of the Lexan panel. Examine the panel and note which surface is to be faced externally. Remove film from both sides of Lexan panel. Install edge into groove as shown in Fig 1(Page 5). Press the panel over the top and into groove on opposite side. There should be a 1/2" gap between panels. Press down firmly so the panel contacts the roof bow at its top. 2. See Fig 2(Page 6). Place the pressure bands with the two rubber bulb seals over the center joints. There can be a short gap at either end. Use the TEKS screws #14 x 1 1/2"(5 per bow) to secure the pressure rib to the roof bow. The TEKS screw is self -drilling and tapping. A 3/8" nut driver with suitable power tool should be used. PROCEDURE: 1. Install center screw first -be sure band is centered. Use the #14 x 1 1/2" TEKS screw. 2. Install next screws down; use the #14 x 1 1/2" TEKS screws. 3. Press band down and install bottom screws, use the longer #14 x 1 1/2" TEKS screws. 3. See Figure 3(Page 7). Slip the 55" long rubber J-channel over one edge of the curved 3" wide band. This band is used at each end of the roof. The edge of the band without the J-channel will be aligned to the outer edge of the last bow and on top of the 1/4" square bead. Use 5 of the TEKS screws per each of these bands. PROCEDURE: 1. Install center screw first -be sure band is centered. Use the #14 x 1 1/2" TEKS screw. 2. Install next screws down; use the #14 x 1 1/2" TEKS screws. 3. Press band down and install bottom screws, use the longer #14 x 1 1/2" TEKS screws. 5 W W d w q 0 :27 U W �3 LLJ 0 >z~ q U a'" WwWW WWx �Qw n �Wpq zz >�� 0 zz� W Q �x Ww W J U � Q O � W W W 00\ z L% a x w J It; �/tb z W � z LL-� Ww Q Q z w W W 0 LJ LL- x H 3 W Of 1 J R1 .� ¢ q GO Q z Z N W H r-i U z 2 Z o Cie .�. 3 w ao Z vi w \ 7 q J � (7 L1 Z ¢ Q' �_ ¢ W Y / ❑ i( Qr Qo l7 R1 H J y W ❑ 7 q x 0 " (4 W V) } J Z O V1 3 a as W U ❑ Q Z N ¢ r Q W q y ❑ W H Q Q Q W ¢ q Z W J 0 H 3 q Z PO O q w ( r W J J Z z w U w q ww 3 d Z ¢ q ly N W Z q y 3w o Ld x h ti ur 3 w P° LLJ Z W H ¢ WW VIZ A Z H ❑ W Z W N H Z U W Q a3 lyz Nw3 V1 Z .r 1=1< cy ❑ W q —ii W ^ Zxq Z q W U Q Pq J W .K- W Q,LLJ J Q F ti 0 g N W � y W V1 V1 XL)ZZo- ..Q YQ�❑Q, .. r O ry w LD~ zz w U a� W V J Q J 0 Q N F- A vj z r-i z Q O r � PCI p Z} W Zia �o =¢w q U 3 z ca Mpq LLI pqJf w W w LO F- Q zz Q Q A w W J r J LL- J O a U N 3 Q o Z .. ry J CL Q U L] N 7) L` Z Rl O H Q W u y N W Q �3 -i aW w m1 Zr fK OCq� r� iQ wZ WWQ (=/1� UVZ L3 NNC3 z .rq Wxf=i w J wi. W=N ZZZ WW x Y a Q x(U -J jU_j z W J= J F WJNW rwi,Q o� �a a Xwo wm� w N X H O iC O � N Y W I �J L'1 Z O cm c+) CV r t L r 0 z Q LI J C7 O g mW CD in U O Q LJ_I � � Lj W = F-- C' U) Z) Z � O O Q O �— z � � Lil 0- Lil Li N 't I I I I 0 ROOF INSTALLATION SEE PAGES 10 1. Slide the four 18" long shoes into the two support posts of each dual post assembly. 2. Raise the roof (weight-175-250 pounds) and position the dual post assemblies under the roof crossbeams. 3. Insert and tighten eight (8) each 3/8-16 x 1" Hex Head Bolts, 3/8 Lock - washers and 3/8 Flat -washers at the top of each dual post assembly and center post. 4. Level the roof by placing a carpenter's level on the roof's gutter. The roof height can be increased if desired. Drill a .50(1/2") diameter hole completely through the shoe. Install and tighten the 1/2-13 x 4" Hex Head Bolt at each post. Use the self-locking hex -nut to secure. The small 1/4 diameter may be used initially to level the roof. Drill a .221(#2) diameter hole through the shoe. Hammer in a drive screw #14 x 3/4" long completely through the shoe pipe. It is not necessary to use this drive screw; some installers use it to level the roof preliminarily. 5. Plumb the support posts and measure between the posts at each end. The measurement between posts should be 20 5/8" I.D.. Force the posts in or out at the bottom to maintain this measurement. 6. Plumb the support posts and Refer to Anchor Spec Sheet for anchor installation. 10 3 w 0 z w L L- 0 cr 11 REAR GLASS INSTALLATION SEE PAGE 12 & 13 1. Drop a plumb line from the rear glass insertion groove of the roof perimeter. Do this at the back right and the back left of the shelter. Mark the concrete near both ends of the roof and snap a chalk line 2. on the concrete under the back of the shelter. The rear glass support/anchor assemblies will be inserted on this line. Mark the chalk line at the intervals shown on the elevation drawings. These marks will be the proper spacing for the support/anchor assemblies. 3. Drill five (5) 1 1/4 diameter holes into the concrete on the marks with a masonry drill. These holes will need to be at least 6" deep and may penetrate into the grade below the concrete for the anchor threaded rod clearance. 4. Place the bottom glass support/anchor assemblies into the holes. The total height of the glass is 79". Measure from inside the glass insertion groove to the glass support anchor. Rotate the threaded rod inside the anchor to adjust height. Tighten the 3/4-10 hex -nut to expand and secure anchor. Slide glass up into glass insertion groove of roof and onto bottom glass support/anchor assemblies (separate clip can be slid off). Place rubber setting u-channels onto the support and under and alongside the glass. Replace clip. Leave a gap of 5/8" between glass panes for the side glass clip (See pg 13) 5. Disassemble the side glass clip. Place one part inside the glass and one part outside the glass. The part with the exposed screw is to be outside the glass (to back). Replace screw. 12 FR❑NT=-==-_-__-�� PLAN VIEW II DRILL HOLES IN CONCRETE II n �bi 1/4' REAR CHALKLINE �sam 79' RUBBER %U-CHANNEL SUPPORT/ ANCHOR / ASSEMBLY / � �-7SEE PLAN VIEWxm iorrx —� I 4' MINIMUM BACK VIEW GLASS INSTALLATION(TYPICAL) SEE FLOOR PLAN PAGE 8 FOR SUPPORT ANCHOR LOCATION 13 14 END GLASS INSTALLATION SEE PAGE 15 1. Install end glass. Slide the glass fully into either of the glass extrusions that are bolted to the end posts. Then insert glass into opposite extrusion. See end glass installation diagram Page 15. After the glass is securely in place, run a bead of silicone along the length of the glass forming a seal between the glass and rubber bulb in the glass extrusion. Both the exterior and interior of the glass must be sealed. NOTE: It may be necessary to loosen the anchors at the bottom of the supports pipes and/or the bolts at the top of each post so that the pipes may be moved in or out for a better fit. 15 SLI➢E GLgSS QO SLIDE GLASS O SUPPORT BL❑D 1. INSTALL 3/9' X 19' X 77' GLASS PANE. 2. SLIDE EDGE OF PANEL COMPLETELY INTO THE VERTICAL EXTRUSION OF EITHER SUPPORT POST. 3. THEN SLIDE THE PANEL INTO THE VERTICAL EXTRUSION ON THE ADJACENT POST. GLASS 3/8' X 19' X 77' SAFETY GLASS END LEG GLASS EXTRUSI❑N INSTALLATI❑N 16 USE HOLE AT EACH FOO1 MARK CONCRETE, DRILL 3/8' X 2 1/2' HOLE (4 TO PLCS) 1. PLACE THE 6' BENCH INSIDE THE SHELTER. iT SHOULD BE PLACED TOWARD ONE END OF THE SHELTER TO COMPLY WITH ADA STANDARDS. 2. MARK THE CONCRETE AT EACH OF THE MOUNTING PADS AND WITH A %" DIAMETER MASONRY DRILL, MAKE THE HOLES IN THE CONCRETE FOR THE BENCH 3. PLACE THE %" HILTI ANCHORS INTO THE HOLES. SECURE THE BENCHES TO THE ANCHORS. BENCH INSL4LL4Th;iIJ 17 Sup-R-Stud® �= Sup-R-Stud' Available Materials • Carbon steel, zinc plated • Carbon steel,mechanically galvanized • Grade 5, yellow di-chromated • 3031304 stainless steel • 316 stainless steel Featums/Advantages • Required hole diameter equals anchor diameter • Excellent for setting immediately • Can be loaded immediately • Can be set in a bottomless hole • Simple installation • Nut and washer supplied in package • ROHS compliant except for Grade 5 Concerns • Do not use in brick or black • Not advised for use where vibratory loads are high • Oversize holes are detrimental and will reduce load performance Approvals/Lis ings • G.S.A. Spec FF-S-325C, Group II, Type 4, Class 1 • UL listed 3/8"-l' (except 7/8' i • FM 318", 1/2', 314' • Contact customer service for approvals I listings for slate D.O.T.'s C Made in USA Installation 1 Drill hole 1/2' to 1' deeper than anchor embedment. 2 Clean hole of debris. 3 With nut threaded past the end of stud, hammer into position. 4 Tighten finger tight plus an additional 3-5 turns with wrench. 5 If anchor spins in hole, force anchor up using screwdriver until clip binds into concrete. nn1E. The load salunhebw On or alln Pas of ary.n 5medr usabkalrurhng ne'iexfied eo .. Manse Tens,h as shear toad, in Jos. 200011E 400011E cornea, Meads Eo&6 Tension knsion Shea 114'-20 1118' 1,173 1.015 1.472 2 1/4' 2.573 2.711 Anchor Spacing I Edge Distance Andwr Min Anchor Min. Edge oswete Swop- oinrna- 114' 2la, 11/4' 3/8" 3 3/4' 1 7/8" 112" 5" 2 1/2' 518" 61/4" 31/8" 314' 7112" 33/8' 1' 10' 5' 1 114' 121/2' 6114" ' To obtain 100%load as published 18 TABLE 2-1 CONCRETE MIX REQUIREMENTS Class Design Strength 1 Cement 2 Fine Aggregate 3 4 Coarse Aggregate 3 4 Water A3 3000 psi 588 Ib/cu yd 1362 Ib/cu yd 1811 Ib/cu yd 33.5 gaUcu yd City Mix (9) 3500 psi 588 Ib/ou yd 1260 Ib/cu yd 1811 lb/cu yd 33.5 gaUcu yd A4 4000 psi 635 Ib/cu yd 12191 yd 1811 ib(cu yd 33.5 gaUcu yd Flowable Fill 30 psi 0()) (10) (10) [Class WIC Ratio 5 Fly Ash AE Range B WR 7 HRWR 8 Slump Range Inches A3 0.56 6 +/- 2% 1.5^ City Mix 0.49 Not allowed 6 +l- 2% A4 0.45 -- 6 +l-1 % 2-4" Flowable Fill (10) (10) — _ 8-10" N021S. (1) Mmimrun campre vc strength in psi at 29 days. (2) Mrnirmm errannu of 7'}pc 1 a'1)pc 11 Pordand Cementper ASTM C-150. (3) Saturated saface dry wvior (4) 657 size manutacturrd and tested fm acceptance h% AN tM C33 mid'M-- Vinginia tv-r,211+mMr of I canSommtion Road and Hndac Srucificauccv;. (5) Marima_ms rover - eementittauS ratio by wri& ,t, (E) AE ix percent air-emraimncm. AE admix% a n w meet m exceed rrqucena: of AS7hl C-260 and AASHTU M-155. (7) WR is water -reducer admixture. WR admixtures to meet or exceed regairements of AS'rM 42494 and .AASHID M-194. (9) HRN'R is high-nmE,e water-raiucer admixture. HRN'R admnlurrs w meet or exceed requirements of A51Ai C 449 Types A & F end A_ASldl'f l M-194 Types A & F. (9) `City- Mix' to be coloird Ydmrlu "fun" usmE Rockwood Pqg is(Lavis Colors k5084. `Cin, Mix" sha11 nz,t rrquvements of VDt71 A3.5 concrcie unless otherwtsc indicated. (10) Mrx design shall be submitied far approval with labo atary test data vm4mE mmpl urge uith 28-day compressive strcnFth requirements. Mix design shag be approved 1n• the Cay EnE racer Finer to placement 33 V REBECCA RAGSDALE County of Albemarle Planning Manager COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT rragsdale@albemarle.or 434-296-5832 ext. 3226 To: Andy Reitelbach, Senior Planner Date: March 28, 2022 Re: Zoning Review for ZMA202100011 The Heritage on Rio -Revision 2 The following comments are provided as input from the Zoning Division regarding the above noted application. Sheet 1-Application Plan 1. Number building envelopes and active recreation areas. 2. Update this sheet so that limits of Travelways A and B are clearly dlSCernauic ul i Ll lu Neal 10. ,.._- 4. Add front setback lines along Travelway B serving TMP45-26. -Rev. 1 and 2 Not addressed. The ordinance requires a front setback. Even if it didn't, staff would recommend it be required in this situation. Reference Section 4.6.3(d). and Section 4.19 provides how to measure front setbacks: 5 feet from the right-of-way or the exterior edge of the sidewalk if the sidewalk is outside of the right-of-way .ront Setna,. I U IQ LI ICLS, UUUQII L IIIUI .arc uIan .vI r.w. vv yvu •v establish a 35' with the PRD or want to be consistent with ordinance? 5. Provide a deed book and page number reference on the application plan for Travelway B. Provide verification that the travelway can serve as access to the proposed development. Rev. The for Travelway B shows the proposed sidewalk outside of the easement area. The plans should be adjusted so that the sidewalks are within the access easement or the access easement expanded/additional easements to include them. 8. Transit Stop- Comments from transportation reviewers are needed to finalize comments on the proposed transit stor, Minimum standards must be established on the application plan for the transit stop. Rev. Partially addressed. The note indicates a shelter and a bench will be provided but minimum specifications are not included. Rev. 2 See comments provided by Transportation Planning. 9. The application plans need to clarify how the limit of 20 units within the Neighborhood Service Center will be enforced. Does the note apply to the entire building envelope at the corner of Rio and Travelway? The Urban Density/Neighborhood Service Center line is bisecting the building envelope. 10. Establish minimum standards for the interparcel connection to TMP 45-26131. Sheet 2- 11. Allowable Uses -Please clarify whether the intent is to allow future non-residential uses within the PRD. 12. Parking reductions may only be approved after review of a full parking study: a. For each request to modify the minimum number of parking spaces required by section 4.12.6, the developer shall submit a study prepared by a transportation planner, traffic consultant, licensed engineer or architect justifying the modification. The study shall include the following: (i) a calculation of the number of off-street parking spaces required by section 4.12.6; WWW.ALBEMARLE.ORG 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228 1 Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 (ii) the total square footage of all uses within the existing and proposed development and the square footage devoted to each type of use therein; (iii) trip generation rates expected for the uses within the existing and proposed development; (iv) data pertaining to a similar use or uses and the associated parking needs; (v) the developer's plan to provide alternative solutions to off-street parking on the lot; (vi) the developer's plan to provide incentives for employees to use transportation modes other than single -occupancy motor vehicles; and (vii) an amended site plan, or if no site plan exists, a schematic drawing, demonstrating that the number of off-street parking spaces required by section 4.12.6 can be established on the lot, and �`- -------- «�_ modification is granted. Rev. Parking reduction request was submitted and reviewed. It appears consistent with other recently approved reductions. Enhanced bike/ped facilities must be provided. See Transportation comments. 13. Land dedicated to public use -This note needs to specify minimum standards for the ROW dedication along with any other improvements necessary to mitigate transportation impacts identified by transportation reviewers. The project narrative seems to indicate in the last bullet under the traffic study on page 6 that two improvements are necessary? 14. Building architecture -Is this note necessary given that the buildings along Rio are subject to the ARB review and EC guidelines? If there are specific standards staff believes are important and beyond the guidelines and notes are needed, the note will need to be revised. As written, it is too general for zoning enforcement purposes. 15. Buffers -Specific minimum standards for all buffers and screening need to be established. It is preferred that standards already in the ordinance apply such as those found in Section 32.7.9.7. Rev. I am not sure the updated plan captures all of the discussion from the coordination meeting on January 19 but I would defer to ARB and Planning comments. Also, I think the application plan could better define what is required in buffer areas and active rec area, particularly along the eastern property line. 16. Affordable Housing -The Housing Planner should review these regulations before they are finalized. At a minimum, language should be added to ensure the requirements are enforceable and use standard language. Examples can be provided. Also, the narrative describes this note as a proffer, which it is not. 17. Notes should be organized by category. All open space and rec requirements should be in one place. All public road requirements/notes should be in the same place. Please reorganize accordingly. 18. Regarding open space, it appears the notes are intended to clarify the regulations of Section 4.7. Please replace them with the exact wording from the ordinance. Any modifications to the section must be expressly authorized in the rezoning action. 19. Delete Notes 1, 9 20. Notes 8 appears to indicate that the requirements of Section 4.16 will be met and no reduction in amenities has been requested. Based on the number of units, 5 tot lots would be required for example along with the other recreation requirements of Section 4.16. To avoid any confusion at site plan stage, clarify what is required and specific waivers and substitutions should be addressed with the rezoning. For example, if the number of required tot lots are being reduced, this needs to be documented as to what equivalent substitution is acceptable. The swimming pool, club house, and rec field are acceptable substitutions for the basketball courts. Minimum specifications must be provided for the amenities listed proposed Sheet 3-Grading Plan 21. A legend should be added to this sheet. 22. Update this sheet so that limits of Travelways A and B are clearly discernable on the plans and where on -street parking is proposed. WWW.ALBEMARLE.ORG 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228 1 Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 23. Make sure all proposed retaining walls are shown on the plans. If proposed or recommended by other staff, include any special standards for the retaining ways on that sheet if they differ from the ordinance. 24. Are the stormwater facilities proposed sufficient? Can all stormwater requirements, minimum recreation and other open space requirements be met within the open space shown? 25. SE202100041- The application plan needs to indicate which buildings, and where on the buildings, any conditions of approval related to the special exception apply. Conditions should be listed on the application plan. 26. SP200900005-A special use permit was approved on this parcel to allow an-offsite sign for the Charlottesville Health and Rehabilitation Center. There are no conditions of approval with the SP and off -site signs are allowed in all districts. R6 and PRD are subject to the same sign regulations. Off -site signs count towards the number of freestanding signs that may be allowed on the parcel where they are located. Please refer to Section 4.15 for complete sign regulations along with Section 3 for definitions. Please let me know if you would like to discuss signage further. SE202100041-Special exception request for stebacks • The note on the application plan should indicate buildings #s and regulations need to be further clarified in the note. • Buildings 1,2,3,4 will be three stories. What is the maximum height proposed? • Buildings 5,6,7 are not subject to stepback requirements and shall be a maximum of what height? • No architectural renderings have been submitted to support the request for a stepback and no conditions offered that would mitigate the absence of a stepback. BUILDING HEIGHTS: THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE 4 STORIES(EXCLUDING BASEMENTS) WITH A BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 65 FEET. FOR EACH STORY THAT BEGINS ABOVE 4o FEET IN HEIGHT OR FOR EACH STORY ABOVE THE THIRD STORY, WHICHEVER IS LESS, THE MINIMUM STEPBACK SHALL BE 15 FEET. NOTE: THE BUILDING HEIGHT FOR STRUCTURES ALONG RIO ROAD SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO (3)THREE STORIES, AND SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST (SE2o2i-o42) IS BEING REVIEWED WITH THIS APPLICATION PLAN FOR FOR RELIEF OF THE 15' SETBACK REQUIREMENT FOR BUILDINGS GREATER THAN 3 STORIES OR 4o' IN HEIGHT. WWW.ALBEMARLE.ORG 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228 1 Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 AFFORDABLE HOUSING EVALUATION Project Name: ZMA202100011- The Heritage on Rio Address: TMP04500-00-00-026A2:04500-00-00-026135:04500-00-00-026134:04500-00-00-26133:04500-00-00-026132 Description: Rezone approximately 8.23 acres from R6 Residential zoning district, which allows residential uses at density of up to 6 units/acre. to Planned Residential Development (PRD) with a gross density of 31.28 dwelling units/acre. Project contact name: Phone: Email: Table 1: Housing Supply Reduction - Existing units to be removed or demolished by the project Fill out the following information for each unit taken out of use by the project. This Includes anyhousingunits that mayhavealready been demolished in advance of this project filing. Current rental Income # of # of ($/month) or # # income- level of Term of deed Unit Type bedrooms/ units Sale price per HCV/PBV restricted restricted restriction unit tenants? units units (through mm/yy) unit (%AMI)' Single-family detached' 3 Single-family attached' 2 Multifamily' Studio/efficiency One bedroom Two bedroom Three bedroom IM Four bedroom Five + bedroom Total units removed 5 To be filled out only if any units are income -restricted 2 Includes manufactured (mobile) homes 3 Includes townhomes & duplexes Includes condominiums & apartments Table 2: Housing Supply Addition -New units in proposed project Fill out the following information for new housing units that will result from the project. Current rental Income # of (a/ or # # income- level of Term of deed Unit Type s bedrooms/ nit rice unit Sale price per p HCV/PBV restricted restricted restriction unit unit tenants? units units (through mm/yy) (% AMI)s Single-family detached' Single-family attached' Multifamily' 250 30 <_ 80%AMI 10 ears Studio/efficiency One bedroom Two bedroom Three bedroom Four bedroom Five + bedroom Total units proposed 250 30 Net ain/loss 245 30 Table 3: Compliance with Albemarle County policies List the policy objectives/strategies, or strategic priorities, addressed through this project. Policy Objective, strategy, priority Board of Supervisor Strategic Goals Infrastructure Investment: Prioritize, plan, and invest in critical infrastructure that responds to past and future changes and improves the capacity to serve community needs Comprehensive Plan Objective 4: Use Development Area land efficiently to prevent premature expansion of the Development Areas. 5 To be filled out only if any units are income -restricted 6 Includes manufactured (mobile) homes 7 Includes townhomes & duplexes 8 Includes condominiums & apartments Objective 5: Promote density within the Development Areas to help create new compact urban places. Objective 6: Promote infill and redevelopment that is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods and uses. Housing Policy Strategy 12a:Promote mixed -income development throughout the County's Development Areas. Climate Action Plan Strategy T.2.4: Increase affordable housing options in areas served by a variety of trans ortation o tions. Other (please name) Narrative: Describe the ways the proposed project supports Albemarle County's affordable housing needs. The applicant proposes to provide 15%of the units representing the difference between the number of units that could be developed on the Property under the current R-6 zoning, and the number that could be developed following the rezoning to PRD as proposed for a maximum of 30 units affordable to households with incomes no greater than 80% of area median income. This proposal is inconsistent with Strategy 6b of the Comprehensive Plan which recommends that'at a minimum, 15% of all units developed under rezoning and special use permits are affordable'. In support of their proposal, the applicant references the by -right credit for affordable housing approved on February 8, 2017, for the nearby Oakleigh development (ZMA201600015). However, the affordable housing proffer approved for the rezoning was for a cash -in -lieu of affordable unit payment. The by -right credit approved for the cash payment as represented the impact of the additional dwelling units on the County's infrastructure. Staff recommends the applicant provide 15%of the total proposed residential units - 38 affordable units - as recommended the 2015 Comprehensive Plan. Overall, Albemarle County needs to add approximately 7,507 affordable units to the housing stock by the year 2040 in order to meet current and future affordable housing needs. To meet this goal, the Countywill need to increase the affordable housing stock by 376 units per year for the next 20 years. The affordable units proposed in this project represents 13%of the affordable housing units needed this year. Project Evaluation: X This project positively impacts affordable housing needs in Albemarle County This project positively impacts workforce housing needs in Albemarle County This project has no impact on affordable or workforce housing needs in Albemarle County This project has a negative impact on the affordable or workforce housing stock in Albemarle County Signature: Housing Policy Manager 3/3/2022 Date COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Stephen C. Brich, P.E. 1401 East Broad Street Commissioner Richmond, Virginia 23219 March 14, 2022 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Attn: Andy Reitelbach Re: The Heritage on Rio — Rezoning Request ZMA-2021-00011 Review #3 Dear Mr. Reitelbach: (804) 7862701 Fax: (804) 7862940 The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as prepared by Collins Engineering, dated 21 February 2022, and offers the following comments: 1. Comments on Traffic Impact Analysis: a. Townwood Drive/Earlysville Road & Hydraulic Road/Rio Road West (Existing, Background and Build conditions) i. Page 1, Comment ii: Previous comment about using Max 1 time does not appear to have been addressed. ii. Page 2, Comment iii: Please code vehicle extension per signal timing data. b. Berkmar Drive & Rio Road West (Existing, Background and Build conditions) i. Page 2, Comment is Northbound and Southbound phases have not been coded per previous comments; they do not match signal timing data. Please code vehicle extension per signal timing data ii. Page 5, Page 7 (Table 2): TOSAM (v2) only references standard control delay outputs from Synchro as MOEs and not the argued "Lost Time" iterations for traffic operations analyses. c. Per TOSAM (v2), the higher of the Existing PUT or 0.92 should be employed for analysis of the future (Background, Build etc.) conditions in urban locations. 2. Note that the final plan must show conformance with the VDOT Road Design Manual Appendices B(1) and F, as well as any other applicable standards, regulations or other requirements. VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING March 14, 2022 Attn: Andy Reitelbach Please provide a digital copy in PDF format of the revised plan along with a comment response letter. If further information is desired, please contact Doug McAvoy Jr. at (540) 718-6113. A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process. Sincerely, Doug McAvoy Jr., P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Charlottesville Residency Resubmittal of information for �$��°F"`8 Zoning Map Amendment t ��RG/NAP PROJECT NUMBER THAT HAS BEEN ASSIGNED: ZMA2021-00011 The Heritage on Rio Owner/Applicant Must Read and Sign I hereby certify that the information provided with this resubmittal is what has been requested from staff Signature of Owner, Contract Purchaser Print Name FEES that may apply: Date Daytime phone number of Signatory Resubmittal fees for original Zoning Map Amendment fee of $2,958 ❑ First resubmission FREE ® Each additional resubmission (TO BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF) $1,479 al Technologv surcharge +4% Resubmittal fees for original Zoning Map Amendment fee of $4,141 ❑ First resubmission FREE ❑ Each additional resubmission (TO BE PAID WHEN THE RESUBMISSION IS MADE TO INTAKE STAFF) $2,070 ❑ Technology surcharge +4% To be Daid after staff review for Dublic notice: Most applications for a Zoning Map Amendment require at least one public hearing by the Planning Commission and one public hearing by the Board of Supervisors. Virginia State Code requires that notice for public hearings be made by publishing a legal advertisement in the newspaper and by mailing letters to adjacent property owners. Therefore, at least two fees for public notice are required before a Zoning Map Amendment may be heard by the Board of Supervisors. The total fee for public notice will be provided to the applicant after the final cost is determined and must be paid before the application is heard by a public body. ➢ Preparing and mailing or delivering up to fifty (50) notices $237 + actual cost of first-class postage ➢ Preparing and mailing or delivering each notice after fifty (50) $1.19 for each additional notice + actual cost of first-class postage ➢ Legal advertisement (published twice in the newspaper for each public hearing) Actual cost (averages between $150 and $250 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Fee Amount $ Date Paid By who? Receipt # Ck# By: Community Development Department 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296-5832 Fax: (434) 972-4126 Revised 7/1/2021 Page 1 of 1