HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201700070 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2019-04-05 Patricia Saternye
From: John Anderson
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2019 3:39 PM
To: Patricia Saternye
Subject: Planning Application Review for SDP201800057 CALIBER COLLISION - FINAL.
The Review for the following application has been completed:
Application Number= SDP201800057
Reviewer=John Anderson
Review Status = Requested Changes
Completed Date = 04/05/2019
This email was sent from County View Production.
Paty,
Thanks for your patience.
Please share with Applicant at your convenience.
CV comments:
"i (Rev. 2)Addressed.
2. (Rev 2) Addressed. Note Engineering has no objection to Easement Plat, including SWM Facility Easement(see
email, SIJB201800160, 1 0/22/20 1 8 3.41 PM)
3. As noted elsewhere,VSMP approval is required prior to FSP approval. VSMP/WPO is in process,and reviewer
is in contact with Applicant re.VSMP/WPO plan status. No further WPO plan revisions are required,but nutrient credit
purchase,tree conservation plan, SWM Maintenance Agreement,and Easements are required,and are for the moment
outstanding. (Rev.2)Not addressed. As of 11/28/18,all items remain incomplete:nutrient credit purchase,tree
conservation plan, SWM Facility Maintenance Agreement,and easement recordation. It is Engineering's understanding
that the SWM Facility Maintenance Agreement is at impasse since property has not transferred to future owner,which is
entity applying for Site Plan Approval. If this understanding is incorrect, please notify. Most recent correspondence on
SWM Facility Maintenance Agreement: email sent 11/28/2018 8:29 AM. (Rev.3,4)Comment persists. Applicant
response: `Noted.' As follow-up: If SWM Maintenance Agreement has been recorded,please send Engineering reviewer
circuit court deed bk.-pg.reference to the recorded Agreement.
4 As follow-up to 1SP Engineering review comment 10 g., keynote"U"appears in legend, sheet 8, but unless
overlooked,this symbol does not appear on the site layout; please include symbol at each location to receive a CG-12
ramp, on site layout, sheet 8 (Rev. 2)Not addressed Three sidewalk ramp details appear on sheet 9 Add symbol ("U ',
ramp type 2) to plan view to show VDOT CG-12 location at radius curb north of entrance on Avon Street Ext This ramp
should be constructed with entrance curb. (Rev.3)Addressed. Applicant response. 'Ramp not located at north radius
curb, reference grading plan Area is flush with drive no ramp needed. A call out has been added to the Site Plan sheet to
help clarify. this.'
5. As follow-up to ISP Engineering review comment 19.: Engineering defers to VDOT to request or require specific
additional MUTCD traffic control measure detail, or Maintenance of Traffic Plan(if any),beyond level of detail presented
with the FSP. (Rev.3,4)Comment persists. Applicant response: `Noted.' [Note: VDOT appears to have made no
further request for specific additional traffic control measure details. During construction,VDOT authority over work
within state right-of-way leaves open possibility of adjustment to MUTCD requirements,or MOT Plan element
requirements.]
Supplement to item#3,above; 7/17/18 VSMP-WPO Plan review comment: "This project is denied,but eligible for
approval pending receipt of Agreement of Sale for 1.38 lb. nutrient credits, in document format acceptable to county,and
1
upon receipt of scan of recordation of Deed of Dedication of SWM Facility,Act.cbb, and Permanent Drainage Easement
(acquisition of easements,and purchase of Nutrient Credits are in process)." (Rev.4)As follow-up: Engineering is unsure
whether nutrient credit purchase is complete. If applicant has affidavit of purchase,etc.,showing purchase is complete,
please forward to reviewer. PLEASE NOTE: Engineering plan reviewer is not point of contact on nutrient credit
purchase. It is reviewer's belief that Applicant is working with Ana Kilmer,Albemarle County CDD/Management
Analyst,on nutrient credit purchase requirements. Ana is the proper point of contact.
New comment:
6. Revision dates: Please ensure all site plan sheets include revision dates,per standard design practice,beginning with
first revision through most recent,to identify revisions occurring on any plan sheet.
Thanks—have a nice weekend.
best,J.Anderson -x3069
2