HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP202200019 Action Letter 2022-05-20County of Albemarle
o °• "� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4579
May 20, 2022
Mr. Jonathan Showalter, PE
Timmons Group
608 Preston Avenue, Suite 200
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-227-1681
Jonathan.showalter@timmons.com
RE: SDP-2022-00019 TJACH Premier Circle - Initial Site Plan - Action Letter
Dear Mr. Showalter,
phone:434-296-5832
www.albemarle.or¢
The Agent for the Board of Supervisors hereby grants conditional administrative approval to the above -
referenced site plan. See below and attached for conditions and process:
SITE PLAN: This approval shall be valid for a period of five (5) years from the date of this letter, provided
that the developer submits a final site plan for all or a portion of the site within one (1) year after the date
of this letter as provided in section 32.4.3.1 of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle, and
thereafter diligently pursues approval of the final site plan.
In accordance with Chapter 18 Section 32.4.2.8 Early or Mass Grading may be permitted after the
following approvals are received:
1. Engineering approval of a VSMP plan meeting the requirements of Chapter 17 of the Code of the
County of Albemarle.
2. Approval of all easements for facilities for stormwater management and drainage control.
3. Submittal of a tree conservation checklist with areas for tree preservation identified.
The final site plan will not be considered to have been officially submitted until the following items are
received:
1. A final site plan that satisfies all of the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code.
2. Applicable fee outlined in the application.
Please submit 13 copies of the final plans (or digital submission) to the Community Development
Department. The assigned Lead Reviewer will then distribute the plans to all reviewing agencies.
The Department of Community Development shall not accept submittal of the final site plan for signature
until tentative approvals for the attached conditions from the following agencies/reviewers have been
obtained:
SRC Members:
Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner) - 3 copies
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) - 1 copy
Albemarle County Information Services (E911) - 1 copy
Albemarle County Building Inspections —1 copy
Albemarle County Fire & Rescue —1 copy
Albemarle County Service Authority —3 copies
Virginia Department of Transportation - 2copies
Albemarle County Planning Services (Architectural Review Board) - 1 copy
Please contact Andy Reitelbach at the Department of Community Development at mreitelbach@albemarle.org or at
(434) 296-5832 ext. 3261 for further information or if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
W sQwdru. Rented"
Andrew Reitelbach, Senior Planner II
Albemarle County
Department of Community Development
Planning Division
Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner)
Andy Reitelbach, mreitelbach@albemarle.org - Required changes to be addressed prior to final site plan approval:
1. [ZMA2020-00011] The final site plan must demonstrate conformance with the application plan, the code of
development, and the proffer statement approved by the Board of Supervisors with the zoning map amendment
request ZMA2020-00011.
2. [SE2020-00023] The final site plan must demonstrate conformance with the special exception approved by the
Board of Supervisors with the request SE2020-00023.
3. [General Comment] The final site plan must demonstrate conformance with all requirements of Section 18-32.6
of the Zoning Ordinance. The checklist for the initial site plan requirements is helpful as a good place to start.
That checklist can be found at the following link:
httos://www.a I be ma rl e.o r¢/home/showou b I ished docu ment/ 1014/637540811404730000.
4. [32.5.2(a)] On the cover sheet of the plan, provide the zoning district, and all zoning overlay districts, that apply to
the subject property. The zoning district is NMD. The applicable zoning overlay districts are Managed Steep Slopes,
Airport Impact Area, and Entrance Corridor.
5. [32.5.2(a)] On the cover sheet of the plan, identify the approved ZMA and SE requests that apply to this project -
ZMA2020-00011 and SE2020-00023.
6. [32.5.2(a)] Provide copies of the ordinance, resolution, and proffer statement, including any conditions of approval,
on the site plan.
7. [32.5.2(a)] On the cover sheet of the plan, provide the assigned site plan number.
B. [32.5.2(a)] On the cover sheet of the plan, provide a full signature panel for the signatures of all relevant County
and partner agency officials, for when the site plan is ready to be approved.
9. [32.5.2(a)] Provide the source of the topography and the source of the survey.
10. [32.5.2(a)] Provide, on the cover sheet, the most recently recorded legal instrument information for the subject
property and Premier Circle.
11. [32.5.2(a)] Clarify the uses proposed by each block/phase. The use is listed as accessible supportive housing;
however, Block 1 does not allow residential uses. Also, provide the number of residential units proposed, and the
density of the development. The use of accessible supportive housing is not one of the permitted uses in the code
of development. Use the COD language to identify the proposed use.
12. [32.5.2(a)] On the cover sheet of the plan, revise the setback notes. Several of the stated setbacks do not match
what is listed in the approved COD for this development.
13. [32.5.2(b)] On the cover sheet of the plan, provide the proposed use and the maximum acreage of the site occupied
by each use, including by each block of the proposed development
14. [32.5.2(b)] On the cover sheet of the plan, provide the percentage and acreage of open space.
15. [32.5.2(b)] On the cover sheet of the plan, provide the maximum height of all structures, including numberof stories,
as there is a limit on stories identified in the COD.
16. [32.5.2(b)] On the cover sheet of the plan, revise the schedule of parking on the site. The parking requirements are
based on use, not on the phase in which it is developed. With 80 units provided in phase 1, a minimum of 28 parking
spaces are required (if all 80 units are less than 500 sq.ft.). Also, ensure there continues to be sufficient parking
provided based on the other buildings that are proposed to remain, along with their unit type.
17. [32.5.2(b)] Clarify how many units (and of what type/square footage/number of bedrooms) are remaining in the
existing buildings that will continue to operate along with the new phase one building. This clarification is also
needed to help staff accurately count the number of required parking spaces.
18. [32.5.2(b)] On the landscape plan, provide the maximum amount of paved parking and other vehicular circulation
areas.
19. [32.5.2(c)] If the development is proposed to be phased, as it appears to be, provide clear phase lines on the site
layout sheets identifying the various proposed phases. All improvements and features required by each phase must
be included within the appropriate phase lines. Also, clearly delineate between Block 1 and Block 2 on the site
layout sheet.
20. [32.5.2(e)] Provide the existing landscape features on the site, as described in section 32.7.9.4(c).
21. [32.5.2(f)] Indicate whether the site is located within the watershed of a public water supply reservoir.
22. [32.5.2(i)] On the site plan, provide any existing or proposed access easement, rights -of -way, and travelways.
23. [32.5.2(i)] On the site plan, provide the right-of-way lines and widths for all adjacent streets or other rights -of -way.
24. [32.5.2(i)] On the site plan, provide the centerline radii and pavement widths for any proposed travelways.
25. [32.5.20); 32.5.2 (k)] Label all existing and proposed water, sewer, and storm drainage easements by type and
include a size/width measurement For existing easements, state the deed book and page of the recorded
instrument. For proposed easements, an easement plat will need to be submitted, reviewed, approved, and
recorded at the courthouse prior to approval of the final site plan being granted.
26. [32.5.2 (1)] Label all existing and proposed utility easements by type and include a size/width measurement. For
existing easements, state the deed book and page of the recorded instrument. For proposed easements, an
easement plat will need to be submitted, reviewed, approved, and recorded at the courthouse prior to approval of
the final site plan being granted.
27. [32.5.2(m)] Provide the location of the existing and proposed ingress to and egress from the property.
28. [32.5.2(m)] Show the distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection from the proposed ingress
and egress.
29. [32.5.2(n)] Provide the locations and dimensions of all existing and proposed improvements on the site, including
the following:
a. Maximum footprint and height of structures.
b. Walkways.
c. Fences and/or walls.
d. Trash containers. The dumpster area must be screened. Provide more information on this screening.
e. Parking lots and other paved areas.
f. Loading, service, and construction areas.
g. Signs.
h. Proposed paving materials for any paved improvements.
i. Retaining walls, including height.
j. Outdoor lighting.
k. Landscaped areas and open space.
30. [32.5.2(n)] Provide a lighting plan that complies with Section 18-4.17 and 18-32.7.8 of the Zoning Ordinance, as
well as any relevant conditions of the approved special exception and rezoning.
31. [32.5.2(o)] Identify all areas, if any, proposed to be dedicated to public use, and identify the entity (VDOT, the
County, etc.) to which those areas will be dedicated. Areas of dedication will require a plat and/or deed.
32. [32.5.2(p)] Provide a landscaping plan that complies with Section 18-32.7.9 of the Zoning Ordinance, including the
tree conservation checklist if proposed., as well as any relevant conditions of the approved special exception and
rezoning.
33. [32.5.2(q)] On the cover sheet, provide the estimated traffic generation figures for this facility.
34. [32.5.2(r)] Provide a legend showing all symbols and abbreviations used on the plan.
35. [ZMA2020-00011] The required transit stop does not appear to be identified on the site plan. Depict the location
of this transit stop and its improvements.
36. [ZMA2020-00011] Provide the required sidewalk along Premier Circle.
37. [ZMA2020-00011] Provide the required bike racks on the property, as required by the application plan.
38. [ZMA2020-00011] Show on the site plan the improvements to Premier Circle and the proffered transit stop that
are required by the approved proffer statement.
39. [ZMA2020-00011] Provide a table, calculations, or in some other way demonstrate that the required amount of
green space and amenities is being provided on the site with this development. Those areas must also be labeled
on the site plan. At least 2,500 square feet of the amenity space must be provided with Phase 1.
40. [ZMA2020-00011] Provide the required recreation facilities as found in 18-4.16. Otherwise, submit a substitution
request for the Director of Planning to consider.
41. [ZMA2020-00011] The code of development requires at least 60% of the residential units to be affordable. Identify
the affordable units on the site plan.
42. [General Comment] Please note that additional comments may be provided with the submission and review of the
final site plan for this project.
43. [General Comment] See the attached comments provided by neighboring property owners and other members of
the community.
Comments from Other Reviewing Departments and Agencies
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer)
John Anderson, landerson2@albemarle.o- Requested changes; see the attached memo.
Albemarle County Architectural Review Board (ARB)
Khris Taggart, ktaggart@albemarle.org - Requested changes; see the comments below:
ARB recommends approval of Initial Plan, items to be addressed with the final site plan submittal are detailed in
the ARB action letter in ARB2022-29 application.
Albemarle County Information Services (E911)
Andy Slack, aslack@albemarle.org - No objections at this time.
Albemarle County Building Inspections
Betty Slough, bslough@albemarle.ore - Requested changes; see the comments below:
Add the following note to the general notes page:
Retaining walls greater than 3 feet in height require a separate building permit. Walls exceeding 4 feet in height
require a stamped engineered design also. Walls require inspections as outlined in the USBC.
Add the following note to the general notes page:
Where the flood level rims of plumbing fixtures are below the elevation of the manhole cover of the next
upstream manhole in the public sewer, the fixtures shall be protected by a backwater valve installed in the building
drain, branch of the building drain or horizontal branch serving such fixtures. Plumbing fixtures having flood level
rims above the elevation of the manhole cover of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer shall not
discharge through a backwater valve.
Add the following note to the general notes page:
All water, sewer and fire lines require NEW inspection and testing procedures. The ACSA performs any testing and
inspections of the public sewer and water main(s).
The Albemarle County Building Inspections Department(ACBID) does a visual inspection and witnesses the testing
of the building drain, water service pipe and the sprinkler lead-in connection.
The developer/contractor is responsible to retain a Special Inspector as outlined in the updated Albemarle County
Policy for Site Utilities to perform the visual inspection and testing of all utilities
not covered by the ACSA or ACBID. This includes building sewers, water and fire line branches between the main
and the meter(s)/building(s).
The Special Inspector's report must be submitted and approved by the Albemarle County Engineering Department
prior to a Certificate of Occupancy being issued.
The site lighting plan does not appear to provide the 1fc required from each building exit to the public way
Albemarle County Fire -Rescue (ACFR)
Howard Lagomarsino, hlagomarsino@albemarle.ore - Requested changes; see the comments below:
1) During construction and/or demolition, the following fire prevention steps are required, so please note them on
the plan:
a) Smoking shall be prohibited in areas where smoking makes conditions such as to make smoking a hazard and
these areas shall be designated with no smoking signs per Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code.
b) Areas where smoking can occur, shall have appropriate receptacles for discarded smoking materials per
Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code.
c) Per the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code, vehicular access for firefighting shall be provided at all
construction and demolition sites, provide access to within 100 ft. of temporary or permanent fire department
connections, and have no overhead wiring or other overhead obstructions lower than 13 ft. b inches; this access
may be via permanent or temporary road, but shall be capable of supporting fire apparatus in all weather
conditions.
d) Contractor shall ensure the street numbers are always plainly visible from the frontage street during
construction per the Virginia Statewide Fire Code
e) An approved water supply for firefighting operations shall be in place and available as soon as combustible
materials arrive on site.
f) Waste and combustible debris shall be removed from the building at the end of each day and disposed of in
accordance with the Virginia Statewide Fire Code
g) Fire extinguishers shall be provided, with not less than one approved fire extinguisher at each stairwell, on all
floor levels where combustible materials have accumulated, in every storage and construction shed and in areas of
special; hazards, such as where flammable and combustible liquids are stored or used, in accordance with the
Virginia Statewide Fire Code
h) Operations involving the use of cutting and welding shall comply with the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention
Code and shall require a permit from the Albemarle County Fire Marshal's Office
Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA)
Richard Nelson, rnelson@serviceauthority.org — Requested changes; see the comments below:
Submit utility drawings to ACSA for review.
Provide a room count of the existing motel to determine water/sewer connection fee credit.
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority (RWSA)
Dyon Vega, dvega@rivanna.ore — Requested changes; see the comments below:
1. RWSA will require a sewer flow acceptance prior to final site plan approval for each phase/block
The request will need to be sent to us by ACSA and will include the following:
*Estimated average daily dry weather sewage flow (ADDWF)
*Point of connection into RWSA system (which manhole)
*Number of units/square footage
*Estimated in-service date
Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT)
Doug McAvoy, douglas.mcavovCa)vdot.vireinia.¢ov - Requested changes; see the attached memo.
Attachments
Engineering Division Comment Memo, dated April 15, 2022
VDOT Comment Memo, dated April 19, 2022
Comments from Community Members
qoH nt 401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4579
County of Albemarle
o � � Telephone:434-296-5832
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WWW.ALBEMARLE.ORG
Site Plan review
Project title:
Tjach Premier Circle Initial Site Plan
Project file number:
SDP202200019
Plan preparer:
Jonathan Showalter, PE [ ionathan.showalter(c dmmons.com j
608 Preston Ave., Suite 200 / Charlottesville, VA 22903
Owner or rep.:
Pha Premier Circle LLC / 682 Berkmar Cir., Charlottesville, VA 22901
smathon(a7pledmonthousing. org
Plan received date:
29 Mar 2022
Date of comments:
15 April 2022
Plan Coordinator:
Andy Reitelbach
Reviewer:
John Anderson
Engineering has reviewed the initial site plan and offers these review comments for Final Site Plan approval.
1. General
a. WPO202200013 approval is required prior to ESP approval.
b. An easement plat must be recorded prior to WPO plan approval: SWM facility /public drainage.
c. A SWM facility maintenance agreement must be recorded prior to easement plat recordation.
2. C2.2
a. Overall Demolition and C4.0 Overall Site Plan appear inconsistent in that nearly all existing
hardscape requires partial /complete demolition to construct proposed improvements. Please
revise demolition plan for consistency.
b. Ensure that pre -developed site condition reflects discharge at parcel boundary that includes effect
of existing SWM facility labeled to be abandoned. That is: pre -developed condition includes
controlled storm runoff condition.
c. Identify existing SWM easement, if any. If easement exists, provide easement vacation plat.
Ensure post -developed SWM provides requisite SWM control compared with a pre -developed
condition that includes attenuating effect or treatment of storm runoff by existing SWM facility
3. C5.0: Provide, show, label SWM facility easement for proposed 125 LF detention system. See ACDSM
Easement diagram- p. 15, for Min. width, which increases with detention system diameter and depth.
4. C4.0
a. If development is phased, an approved WPO plan must correspond with all phases shown on the
final site plan. A final site plan may not be approved that does not provide SWM control for any
phase depicted. That is, a comprehensive SWM plan (WPO plan) is required prior to ESP
approval. C4.0 indicates Phase 2 and Phase 3 potential locations of future building by others, but
unless VSMP /WPO for Tjach Premier Circle accounts for approximate impervious area/s of
future development, the ESP does nothing more than indicate potential locations, while deferring
to a future date a WPO plan amendment or separate WPO required to construct potential buildings
or establish impervious areas not previously accounted for.
i. C4.1 (Phase 1 site layout) shows no underground detention.
ii. C5.0 shows 125 LF of underground detention, an intentional level of SWM design detail,
yet WPO202200013 design intent is unclear:
1. If UG detention is required for Phase 1, please revise ESP to clarify when UG
detention is to be installed, and which phase or phases it is to treat.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 3
2. Engineering recommends Tjach Premier Circle WPO provide comprehensive
SWM quality /quantity control for all phases: Quality requirements may be met
with letter of nutrient credit availability without purchasing credits until a
Grading Permit is requested for a particular phase. Expense of credit purchase
may be timed to development. A drawback of a less comprehensive WPO plan
is that physical space may not be assigned to on -site detention or on -site water
quantity control may prove problematic if not integrated into initial WPO plan
design to account for reasonably anticipated final build -out imperviousness (i.e.,
walks, parking, patios, buildings, etc.).
b. Engineering recommends early coordination with APCO/VEPCO re. potential location of phase 3
future building which may encroach within existing OUP easement. Recommend show existing
APCO/VEPCO utility easement on Existing Conditions plan sheet.
c. Engineering cautions it is unclear this development may construct improvements within recorded
access easement (Premier Circle). Instrument at deed bk.-pg. 797-242 was recorded May 2, 1984.
Provide evidence of coordination, as needed, with access easement holder at bk.-pg. 797-242, or if
this 1984 instrument benefits TMP 061M0-00-00-00600. Engineering recommends ESP title
sheet clarify access easement benefits development parcel.
d. Location of existing sanitary manhole in proposed sidewalk is questionable since sanitary MHs
may be noxious or repellant, and separation from pedestrian facilities is typically recommended.
Storm MHs /utility vaults do not pose equivalent concern, but sanitary sewer is a separate class.
e. ISP proposes to replace existing 2 1 " RCP in certain locations with 18" DIA pipe. Provide
calculations to support diminished pipe capacity (18" DIA has 73.5% capacity of 21" pipe). 18"
DIA is more susceptible to obstruction than ex. 21" RCP. Engineering is unlikely to approve
design that reduces existing storm conveyance given potential downstream effects, and
comparable existing site to proposed full build -out impervious area, should all phases develop.
f. Label Premier Circle lane width at its narrowest at centerline stripe near U.S. 29 SBL. Ensure not
less than 12' lane width in both directions along Premier Circle length wherever this site plan
proposes improvements immediately adjacent to Premier Circle. 12' lane width does not appear to
exist at all locations where project proposes improvements.
g. Revise Premier Circle curbing to CG-6, as exists on opposite side of Premier Circle. CG-2 is not
approved for Premier Circle.
5. C4.1
a. No portion of parking lots may be without curbing, 4 spaces along west edge of Phase 1, for
example.
b. Provide /label safety railing at retaining wall.
c. Provide TWBW elevations for all retaining walls.
d. Note: Retaining wall ht. >3' requires a building permit, retaining wall lit. >4' requires sealed
retaining wall design (not generic typ. sections, Diamond Pro Tm, for example). Submit sealed
retaining wall plans for Engineering review prior to /as condition of ESP approval.
e. While possible to construct proposed retaining wall south of Phase 1 Virginia Supportive Housing
during site work phase, prior to building erection, once phase 1 building is constructed, any future
maintenance /replacement of this wall necessitates off -site easement/s. Obtain temporary off -site
construction easements to operate intermittently in the future during any period of routine or
emergency retaining wall maintenance or replacement.
f. Recommend stop sign or stop bar at site exit/s.
6. C5.0
a. Provide CG-6 wherever proposed grade concentrates runoff against curb, rather than CG-2.
b. Provide VDOT LD-204 (stormwater inlet computations), LD-229 design tables (storm drain
design computations).
c. Provide pipe profiles.
d. Provide spot elevations to ensure no nuisance ponding on parking surfaces.
e. Avoid SAN — Storm conflict near contour label 475 NE of phase 1 building, near Premier Circle.
Relocate one or the other to ensure adequate SAN-Storm separation.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 3
7. C5.1
a. Shows no storm detention: WPO202200013 for Tjach Premier Circle (under review) must provide
SWM to meet SWM requirements for each phase. Only phases meeting SWM requirements may
be approved with the FSP. WPO202200013 appears to provide comprehensive SWM control via
125 LF underground detention which appears required with Phase 1 development /Phase 1
building -parking, etc., but WPO is ambiguous. Concept of a Master Plan does not exist in state
regulations per se (9VAC25-870-). Rather, proposed elements of development /site improvements
are evaluated against requirements and SWM control provided to meet requirements for proposed
improvements. WPO /FSP should clarify that SWM is provided for design elements shown on
either plan. ESP title sheet should include reference to WPO202200013 (review pending).
8. L1.0, L3.0
a. Labels do not discriminate between phase 1, 2, 3, buildings, all are labeled proposed buildings,
whereas other plan sheets indicate phase 2, 3, potential future building locations. Also related
comments elsewhere. Revise `proposed building' labels for consistency across plan sheets.
Please feel free to call if any questions: 434.296-5832 -x3069
Thank you
I Anderson
SDP202200019 Tjach Premier Circle ISP 041522.docx
(Z)
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Stephen C. Brich, P.E. 1401 East Broad Street (804) 786,2701
Commissioner Richmond, Virginia 23219 Fax: (804) 786,2940
April 19, 2022
Andy Reitelbach
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Re: SDP-2022-00019- Tjach Premier Circle— Initial Site Plan
Dear Mr. Reitelbach:
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Timmons Group, dated March
21, 2022, and offer the following comments.
1. Please provide trip generation data, for proposed apartment units.
2. Please provide right\taper turn lane and queuing analyses on Route 29.
3. Appears the first entrance does not meet VDOT's requirements on Downstream Comer
clearance, needs to be a minimum of 225'11., please refer to VDOT's Road Design
Manual appendix F-pg., F-111, for recommendation of design criteria. Also it appears to
be a potential conflict on Premier Circle making a left turn into parcel 61M-4.
4. Please provide pre and post construction drainage calculations for adequacy of discharge
to day light.
5. Note that the final site plan must show conformance with the VDOT Road Design
Manual Appendices 13(1) and F, as well as any other applicable standards, regulations or
other requirements.
If further information is desired, please contact Willis C. Bedsaul at 434-422-9866.
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right of way. The
owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency land Use Section at (434) 422-9399
for information pertaining to this process.
Sincerely,
John Wilson, P.E.
Assistant Resident Engineer -Land Use
Charlottesville Residency
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
Andy Reitelbach
From: Susan Cummings-Stimart <dbrd2010@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 1:05 PM
To: Andy Reitelbach
Cc: matthewstimart; Sunshine Mathon; Anthony Haro; Diantha McKeel
Subject: Public Comments SDP 202200019-Premier Circle Initial Site Plan
Attachments: SDP 202200019-Premier Circle Initial Site Plan.pdf
CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open
attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.
By Word of Mouth Auto
446 Westfield Road,
Charlottesville VA 22902
April 7, 2022
Andy Reitelbach
Planning Division
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville VA 22902
Sent via email—areitelbach@albemarle.org
Dear Andy,
Please accept these public comments from an adjoining commercial property owner, By Word of Mouth Auto. I have
owned this business in the county for over 11 years. In 2016, 1 purchased the property 446 Westfield Road, to continue
running an automotive repair business under C-1 zoning.
Since the affordable housing programs of TJACH have begun in this location, I have been told by the County I cannot
place a shed on my property without interfering with their transient shelter operations, even though there is a 1S,
height difference between the parcels (my parcel is lower than TJACH's). This impacts my ability to store materials and
supplies need for auto repair and used car sales.
In addition, since this TJACH operation began, the number of car break-ins has risen substantially. I am suspecting the
transient residents leave their rooms and stroll down the hill to trespass on my property, and illegally enter customer
cars and used -cars -for -sale on my property. To rectify this illegal trespassing, I recommend the applicant, TJACH Premier
Circle erect a fence to separate this property from the others that front on Westfield Road (Canine Campus, By Word of
Mouth Auto, Carmix Auto Sales, Comcast Vehicles, Shear Power hair salon, Sigora Solar). Together, these enterprises
return a substantial tax base to Albemarle County and its residents. However, with these frequent break-ins potentially
due to TJACH's transient residents, this interferes and diminishes the success of these several operations.
Please be advised, By Word of Mouth does NOT support this application until and unless a substantial property fence (6'
or higher) is erected. Additionally, By Word of Mouth would like Community Development to return the C-1 rights of
locating a storage shed on the premises.
Sincerely,
Matthew Stimart, Owner
cc: Anthony Haro, Sunshine Mathon (TJACH Premier Circle), Diantha McKeel