HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP197600010 Action Letter 2022-06-01F
F
April 21, 1976 (Regular meeting
Night)
Mr. Tucker then stated that the Planning Commission recommended approval with the
followingfourconditions:
1. Approval of appropriate state and county agencies;
2. Four off-street parking spaces to serve the two-family dwelling;
3. Health department approval;
4. Health statement received from Mrs. Gibson's doctor'.
Mr. Roudabush asked if a special permit is issued to the -applicant only or if it runs
with the land,. Mr. Tucker said the County Attorney said the permit nuns-•wltb the land-bec
it could not be defended in court if issued to the applicant only.
Mr. Marvin Gibson was present in support of his petition. He presented to the Board
a letter from his wife's doctor stating her health condition. The Board members read the
letter.
The public hearing was opened,but no one spoke for or against issuance of this permit.
At this time, motion was offered by Mr. Henley to approve SP-08-76 with the Planning
GaaQf`lxsion'.s recommendations_ Dr. Iachetta seconded the motion and vote was carried as
follows:
AYES: Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta, and Roudabush.
NAYS! None,
No„ d5. SP-10-76.The Junior Order United Ame scan Mechanics, Free Union Council
#166. To locate an addition'to a fraternal lodge o 2 acres zoned A-1 Agricultural. Propert
on south side of Route 609 about one-half mile west of Route 665. County Tax Map 29,
Parcel 2B.. White Hall District,
Mr, Tucker read the staff report:
"The area is rural in nature with wooded areas to the north and east -of the site and
pasture to the south. The building is clearly visi Is from seven single-family homes to the
west.
The applicant informed the staff that activity lI at the existing structure consists of two
night meetings per month of the Order and dances evgry other week. In addition, the building
is a poll for a voting precinct and is used for othdr community activities. The proposed
addition would add seating capacity for seventy people. _
Approval of this petition would bring the existing use in conformity with the zoning
ordinance. The Planning Commission recommended approval of this petition subject to the
following conditions:
1. Approval of appropriate state and local agencies;
2. Review of proposed addition and existing structure by Albemarle County
Fire Marshal;
3. Parking and access - egress to be approved by staff;
4. Screening from single family uses to the west and Route 609 to be
determined by the 'staff."
Mr. Curtis Wood, was present representing the Order. He stated the council is opposed
to screening with white pines four feet tall on 10 foot centers.
Mr. Roland Via presented to the Board a petition signed by ten adjacent property owners
who did not feel it necessary to have screening surrounding the lot. He also had a letter
which was submitted by a property owner who owns property between the ball and his house.
This property owner was opposed to the screening.
No one else rising to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Mr. Henley offered motion to approve SP-10-76 with the Planning Commission's recommenda-
tionselin!,tnating condition 4. Dr. Iachetta seconded .the motion and vote was recorded as
follows:
AYES: Mrs. David and Messrs. Dorrier, Fisher, Henley, Iachetta, and Roudabush.
NAYS: None.
No. 6. The Albemarle County Planning Commission adopted a resolution of intent to
amend the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance to include "Article 7.1, Commercial Office Distri
CO." The purpose of this zone is designated primarily to accommodate transitional land
uses between commercial activities and residential land uses, and shall be limited to
offices for business and professional use and other similar uses which are not characterized
heavy trucking or by other nuisance factors. Mr. Tucker said the Planning Commmission
recommended the amendment with the following wording:
"Article 7.1 Commercial Office District CO
For state law as to authority ofboard of supervisors
to establish commercial' zoning districts, see Code
of Va., Section 15.1-486(a).
Section 7.1-1. Purpose
This district is designed primarily to accommodate transitional
land uses between commercial activities and residential land uses, and
shall be limited to offices for business and professional use and other
similar uses which are not characterized by heavy trucking or by other
nuisance factors.