Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP202200046 Correspondence 2022-06-22 (2)S� 608 Preston Avenue P 434.295.5624 Suite F434.295.1800 TIMMONS GROUP Charlottesville, VA 22903 www.timmons.com June 21, 2022 Andrew Reitelbach County of Albemarle Community Development 401 McIntire Rd, North Wing Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: SDP2022-00019 TJACH Premier Circle — Initial Site Plan Review —Action Letter Dear Mr. Reitelbach: We have reviewed all of the comments provided May 20, 2022 and made the necessary revisions. Please find our responses to the comments below in bold lettering. Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner) - Andy Reitelbach Required changes to be addressed prior to final site plan approval: 1. [ZMA2020-00011] The final site plan must demonstrate conformance with the application plan, the code of development, and the proffer statement, approved by the Board of Supervisors with the zoning map amendment request ZMA2020-00011. Comment Acknowledged. We believe they do please let us know if there are specific comments. 2. [SEC2020-00023] The final site plan must demonstrate conformance with the special exception approved by the Board of Supervisors with the request SE2020-00023. The buildings and unit types in Phase 1 are the first phase multifamily building of two as planed and approved in the ZMA2020-0001 and SEC2020-00023. 3. [General Comment] The final site plan must demonstrate conformance with all requirements of Section 18-32.6 of the Zoning Ordinance. The checklist for the initial site plan requirements is helpful as a good place to start. That checklist can be found at the following link: httos://www.albemarle.ore/home/showoublisheddocument/1014/6375408114047300 00 Comment Acknowledged. We believe they do please let us know if there are specific comments. ENGINEERING I DESIGN I TECHNOLOGY 4. [32.5.2(a)] On the cover sheet of the plan, provide the zoning district, and all zoning overlay districts, that apply to the subject property. The zoning district is NMD. The applicable zoning overlay districts are Managed Steep Slopes, Airport Impact Aera, and Entrance Corridor. Comment Acknowledged. See cover sheet Site Data for information. S. [32.5.2(a)] On the cover sheet of the plan, identify the approved ZMA and SE requests that apply to this project — ZMA2020-00011 and SE2020-00023. The approved ZMA and SE requests have been added to the cover sheet under site date. 6. [32.5.2(a)] Provide copies of the ordinance, resolution, and proffer statement, including any conditions of approval, on the site plan. Proffers have been included on their own sheet in the plan set. See Sheet C1.2. 7. [32.5.2(a)] On the cover sheet of the plan, provide the assigned site plan number. The site plan number has been included on the cover sheet as requested. B. [32.5.2(a)] On the cover sheet of the plan, provide a full signature panel for the signatures of all relevant County and partner agency officials, for when the site plan is ready to be approved. A signature panel is now included on the cover sheet. 9. [32.5.2(a)] Provide the source of the topography and the source of the survey. Source of topography can be found on the cover sheet under Site Data. 10. [32.5.2(a)] Provide, on the cover sheet, the most recently recorded legal instrument information for the subject property and Premier Circle. The most recent recorded legal instrument for the subject property has been added to the cover sheet. 11. [32.5.2(a)] Clarify the uses proposed by each block/phase. The use is listed as accessible supportive housing: however, Block 1 does not allow residential uses. Also, provide the number of residential units proposed, and the density of the development. The use of accessible supportive housing is not one of the permitted uses in the code of development. Use the COD language to identify the proposed use. See Overall Site Layout Plan. Block one is called out as Phase 3. This phase will comply with the code of development and will be used for a future non-residential building and services. Block 2 includes Phases 1 and 2. The supportive housing referenced is provided within Block 2 Phase 1 and is under Multifamily, Special Needs Housing in the rezoning. 12. [32.5.2(a)] On the cover sheet of the plan, revise the setback notes. Several of the stated setbacks do not match what is listed in the approved COD for this development. The required setbacks have been updated accordingly to match the COD for this development. 13. [32.5.2(b)] On the cover sheet of the plan, provide the proposed use and the maximum acreage of the site occupied by each use, including by each block of the proposed development. The proposed use for Phase 1 has been included on the cover sheet. The other phases will be addressed in more detail through separate Site Plans. The proposed use and developmental square footage of each block table has been added to the plan./ 14. [32.5.2(b)] On the cover sheet of the plan, provide the percentage and acreage of open space. The required green space and amenities table has been added to the cover sheet. See landscape plans for additional information about open space acreage. 15. [32.5.2(b)] On the cover sheet of the plan, provide the maximum height of all structures, including number of stories, as there is a limit on stories identified in the COD. Maximum height of all structures has been provided on the cover sheet. Phase 1 building height has been provided and future phases will be provided as necessary as construction and final site plans are set into production. 16. [32.5.2(b)] On the cover sheet of the plan, revise the schedule of parking on the site. The parking requirements are based on use, not on the phase in which it is developed. With 80 units provided in phase 1, a minimum of 28 parking spaces are required (if all 80 units are less than 500 sq. ft.). Also, ensure there continues to be sufficient parking provided based on the other buildings that are proposed to remain, along with their unit type. The parking spaces for Phase 1 have been revised and added to the cover sheet. Parking requires a total of 28 spaces and 28 spaces have been provided for phase 1. 17. [32.5.2(b)] Clarify how many units (and of what type/square footage/number of bedrooms) are remaining in the existing buildings that will continue to operate along with the new phase one building. This clarification is also needed to help staff accurately count the number of required parking spaces. Information for phase 1 has been added to the plans to help clarify the required parking for the site at this time. Other phases will be addressed as needed in future final site plans for other phases on the property. 18. [32.5.2(b)] On the landscape plan, provide the maximum amount of paved parking and other vehicular circulation areas. The gross parking area has been updated to show all paved area and is shown on sheet L2.1 in the Interior Parking Lot Landscape Area Requirements table. 19. [32.5.2(c)] If the development is proposed to be phased, as it appears to be, provide clear phase lines on the site layout sheets identifying the various proposed phases. All improvements and features required by each phase must be included within the appropriate phase lines. Also, clearly delineate between Block 1 and Block 2 on the site layout sheet. An overall sheet has been provided to better show the phasing of the project. This plan will be resubmitted as a final site plan for Phase 1 only. Future phases will be submitted as separate final site plans as development proceeds. 20. [32.5.2(e)] Provide the existing landscape features on the site, as described in section 32.7.9.4(c). See existing conditions survey for existing landscape features on site. 21. [32.5.2(f)] Indicate whether the site is located within the watershed of a public water supply reservoir. Site information has been added to the cover sheet under the Site Data. 22. [32.5.2(i)] On the site plan, provide any existing or proposed access easement, rights -of - way, and travelways. All easements are shown on the site plan and on the existing conditions sheet. 23. [32.5.2(i)] On the site plan, provide the right-of-way lines and widths for all adjacent streets or other rights -of -way. See existing conditions sheet for right of way lines and widths for all adjacent properties. 24. [32.5.2(i)] ON the site plan, provide the centerline radii and pavement widths for any proposed travelways. Comment Acknowledged. See site plan for requested information. 25. [32.5.2(j)]; 32.5.2(k)] Label all existing and proposed water, sewer, and storm drainage easements by type and include a size/width measurement. For existing easements, state the deed book and page of the recorded instrument. For proposed easements, an easement plat will need to be submitted, reviewed, approved, and recorded at the courthouse prior to approval of the final site plan being granted. See exiting conditions and site survey for all existing easements on site. All proposed easements will be platted for review and approval as needed. 26. [32.5.2(I)] Label all existing and proposed utility easements by type and include a size/width measurement. For existing easements, state the deed book and page of the recorded instrument. For proposed easements, an easement plat will need to be submitted, reviewed, approved, and recorded at the courthouse prior to approval of the final site plan being granted. See existing conditions sheet for all existing easements and width information. 27. [32.5.2(m)] Provide the location of the existing and proposed ingress to and egress from the property. See the existing conditions sheet for ethe existing ingress and egress locations on the property. 28. [32.5.2(m)] Show the distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection from the proposed ingress and egress. The distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection from the proposed ingress and egress has been added to the plan on sheet C0.1. 29. [32.5.2(n)] Provide the locations and dimensions of all existing and proposed improvements on the site, including the following: a. Maximum footprint and height of structures. b. Walkways. c. Fences and/or walls. d. Trash containers. The dumpster area must be screened. Provide more information on this screening. e. Parking lots and other paved areas. f. Loading, service, and construction areas. g. Signs. h. Proposed paving materials for any paved improvements. i. Retaining walls, including height. j. Outdoor lighting. k. Landscaped areas and open space. Comment acknowledged. See layout sheet for information above. 30. [32.5.2(n)] Provide a lighting plan that complies with Section 18-4.17 and 18-32.7.8 of the Zoning Ordinance, as well as any relevant conditions of the approved special exception and rezoning. Sheets L3.1, L4.0 and L4.1 provide a lighting plan that complies with section 18-4.17 and 18-32.7.8. 31. [32.5.2(o)] Identify all areas, if any, proposed to be dedicated to public use, and identify the entity (VDOT, the County, etc.) to which those areas will be dedicated. Areas of dedication will require a plat and/or deed. Comment Acknowledged 32. [32.5.2(p)] Provide a landscaping plan that complies with Section 18-32.7.9 of the Zoning Ordinance, including the tree conservation checklist if proposed., as well as any relevant conditions of the approved special exception and rezoning. Sheet 1.1.1 and Sheet L2.1 provide a landscaping plan that complies with section 18- 32.7.9. 33. [32.5.2(q)] Provide a legend showing all symbols and abbreviations used on the plan. A legend has been provided on sheet C3.0. 34. [32.5.2(r)] Provide a legend showing all the symbols and abbreviations used on the plan. A legend has been provided on sheet C1.0 35. [ZMA2020-00011] The required transit stop does not appear to be identified on the site plan. Depict the location of this transit stop and its improvements. The potential location for a future transit stop has now been called out on the layout plan. 36. [ZMA2020-00011] Provide the required sidewalk along Premier Circle. Sidewalk is now provided along Premier Circle. 37. [ZMA2020-00011] Provide the required bike racks on the property, as required by the application plan. Bike Racks have been added to the site plan as required by the application plan 38. [ZMA2020-00011] Show on the site plan the improvements to Premier Circle and the proffered transit stop that are required by the approved proffer statement. The proffered transit stop is a proposed future location and has not been officially accepted by the Charlottesville area transit. The location shown on the layout plan is just an approximate location and will require future coordination. 39. [ZMA2020-00011] Provide a table, calculations, or in some other way demonstrate that the required amount of green space and amenities is being provided on the site with this development. Those areas must also be labeled on the site plan. At least 2,500 square feet of the amenity space must be provided with Phase 1. A hatching and a table has been added on sheet LM to demonstrate that the required greenspace and amenities are being met for phase 1. 40. [ZMA2020-00011] Provide the required recreation facilities as found in 18-4.16. Otherwise, submit a substitution request for the Director of Planning to consider. Recreational areas are shown on the site plan and on the landscape plan. 41. [ZMA2020-00011] The code of development requires at least 60% of the residential units to be affordable. Identify the affordable units on the site plan. All of the proposed units in phase 1 are affordable residential units. 42. [General Comment] Please note that additional comments may be provided with the submission and review of the final site plan for this project. Comment Acknowledged. 43. [General Comment] See the attached comments provided by neighboring property owners and other members of the community. Comment Acknowledged. Albemarle County Engineering Services — Engineer — John Anderson: 1. General: a. WPO202200013 approval is required prior to FSP approval. Comment Acknowledged b. An easement plat must be recorded prior to WPO plan approval: SWM facility / public drainage. Comment Acknowledged c. A SWM facility maintenance agreement must be recorded prior to easement plat recordation. Comment Acknowledged. 2. C2.2: a. Overall Demolition and C4.0 Overall Site Plan appear inconsistent in that nearly all existing hardscape requires partial / complete demolition to construct proposed improvements. Please revise demolition plan for consistency. Phase 1 demo plan has now replaced the overall demolition plan as the plans will be re -submitted as a final site plan submission. b. Ensure that pre -developed site condition reflects discharge at parcel boundary that includes effect of existing SWM facility labeled to be abandoned. That is: pre -developed condition includes controlled storm runoff condition. Labels for Phase 1 demo plan have been updated. SWM facility will remain unchanged through phase 1 and impervious are to SWM facility and on entries site will be reduce meeting stormwater requirements at discharge at the parcel boundary. c. Identify existing SWM easement, if any. If easements exist, provide easement vacation plat. Ensure post -developed SWM provides requisite SWM control compared with a pre -developed condition that includes attenuating effect or treatment of storm runoff by existing SWM facility. After researching, no existing storm easement could be found for the existing stormwater management facility on site. Pre and Post conditions have been evaluated to ensure that the existing facility is still functioning as intended. 3. C5.0: Provide, show, label SWM facility easement for proposed 125 LF detention system. See ACDSM Easement diagram, p. 15, for Min. width, which increases with detention system diameter and depth. The detention system is not required until Phase 2 of the site. An easement will be added for the future Phase 2 final site plan submission. 4. C4.0: a. If development is phased, an approved WPO plan must correspond with all phases shown on the final site plan. A final site plan may not be approved that does not provide SWM control for any phase depicted. This is, a comprehensive SWM plan (WPO Plan) is required prior to FSP approval. C4.0 indicates Phase 2 and Phase 3 potential locations of future building by others, but unless VSMP/WPO for TJACH Premier Circle accounts for approximate impervious area/s of future development, the FSP does nothing more than indicate potential locations, while deferring to a future date a WPO plan amendment or separate WPO required to construct potential buildings or establish impervious areas not previously accounted for. Comment Acknowledged. Per comments with County, Phase 1 precondition will be used for all future phase WPO preconditions. Each phase's post condition will have adequate SWM measures to meet regulations. i. C4.1 (Phase 1 site layout) shows no underground detention. Underground detention for the site is not required until phase 2 of the project begins. Phase 1 removes a large portion of the site's existing impervious area and converts that area to grass reducing flow and meeting energy balance without detention for phase 1. Underground detention will be added in future phases when needed. ii. C5.0 shows 125 LF of underground detention, an intentional level of SWIM design detail, yet WPO202200013 design intent is unclear: 1. If UG detention is required for Phase 1, please revise FSP to clarify when UG detention is to be installed, and which phase or phases it is to treat. Underground detention is not required for phase 1 and will no longer be shown for phase 1 final site plan. 2. Engineering recommends TJACH Premier Circle WPO provide comprehensive SWM quality/quantity control for all phases: Quality requirements may be met with letter of nutrient credit availability without purchasing credits until a Grading Permit is requested for a particular phase. Expense of credit purchase may be timed to development. A drawback of a less comprehensive WPO plan is that physical space may not be assigned to on -site detention or on -site water quantity control may prove problematic if not integrated into initial WPO plan design to account for reasonably anticipated final build -out imperviousness (i.e., walks, parking, patios, buildings, etc.). An overall stormwater management plan will be submitted along with a stormwater management plan for phase 1. And updated narrative shall be provided in the calc book to help clarify quality and quantity for the site. b. Engineering recommends early coordination with APCO/VEPCO re. potential location of phase 3 future building which may encroach within existing OHP easement. Recommend show existing APCO/VEPCO utility easement on Existing Conditions plan sheet. Comment Acknowledged. The easement can be found on the existing conditions sheet and will be further coordinated during the phase 3 final site plan. c. Engineering cautions it is unclear this development may construct improvements within recorded access easement (Premier Circle). Instrument at deed bk. -pg. 797-242 was recorded May 2, 1984. Provide evidence of coordination, as needed, with access easement holder at bk. -pg. 797-242, or if this 1984 instrument benefits TMP 061M0-00-00-00600. Engineering recommends FSP title sheet clarify access easement benefits development parcel. Letters have been sent to all property owners on the road and owners have no objection to the installation of sidewalk along Premier Circle. d. Location of existing sanitary manhole in proposed sidewalk is questionable since sanitary MHs may be noxious or repellant, and separation from pedestrian facilities is typically recommended. Storm MHs/utility vaults do not pose equivalent concern, but sanitary sewer is a separate class. Comment Acknowledged e. ISP proposes to replace existing 21" RCP in certain locations with 18" DIA pipe. Provide calculations to support diminished pipe capacity (18" DIA has 73.5% capacity of 21" pipe). 18" DIA is more susceptible to obstruction than ex. 21" RCP. Engineering is unlikely to approve design that reduces existing storm conveyance given potential downstream effects, and comparable existing site to proposed full build -out impervious area, should all phases develop. Comment Acknowledged. Pipe calcs shall be provided to ensure that smaller pipe is adequate for the site and can handle any future development on the site. f. Label Premier Circle lane width at its narrowest at centerline stripe near U.S. 29 SBL. Ensure not less than 12' lane width in both directions along Premier Circle length wherever this site plan proposes improvements immediately adjacent to Premier Circle. 12' lane width does not appear to exist at all locations where project proposes improvements. Premier Circle Road widths have been added to the site plan. It has been ensured that all lane widths are 12' minimum or greater. g. Revise Premier Circle curbing to CG-6, as exists on opposite side of Premier Circle. CG-2 is not approved for Premier Circle. CG-6 has now been provided as required on premier circle. S. C4.1: a. No portion of parking lots maybe without curbing; 4 spaces along west edge of Phase 1, for example. The 4 parking spaces along the western edge of phase 1 is a temporary condition. A 1' gravel shoulder has been added to allow water to sheet flow off the asphalt to a proposed ditch. This will help save cost to the owners and developers and prevent them from having to remove new curb for future phases of development. Curb is proposed in the overall final buildout of the site and will be called out as necessary in future site plan phase 2 submissions. b. Provide/label safety railing at retaining wall. Safety railing has been called out to be provided at the proposed retaining wall. c. Provide TW/BW elevations for all retaining walls. Wall elevations have been added to the plan as requested. d. Note: Retaining wall ht. >3' requires a building permit; retaining wall ht. >4' requires sealed retaining wall design (not generic typ. Sections, Diamond Pro TM, for example). Submit sealed retaining wall plans for Engineering review prior to / as condition of FSP approval. Comment Acknowledged. The appropriate permits and wall plans shall be submitted for review once completed or ready to be obtained. e. While possible to construct proposed retaining wall south of Phase 1 Virginia Supportive Housing during site work phase, prior to building erection, once phase 1 building is constructed, any future maintenance / replacement of this wall necessitates off -site easement/s. Obtain temporary off -site construction easements to operate intermittently in the future during any period of routine or emergency retaining wall maintenance or replacement. Comment Acknowledged. A temporary off -site construction easement will be considered for construction and wall maintenance. f. Recommend stop sign or stop bar at site exit/s. Comment Acknowledged 6. C5.0: a. Provide CG-6 wherever proposed grade concentrates runoff against curb, rather than CG-2. CG-6 has now been provided where proposed grade concentrates runoff against curb. b. Provide VDOT LD-204 (stormwater inlet computations), LD-229 design tables (storm drain design computations). The above calculations shall be provided in the calc book. c. Provide pipe profiles. Pipe profiles are now included in the plan set d. Provide spot elevations to ensure no nuisance pending on parking surfaces. Spot elevations are now included in the plan set. e. Avoid SAN —Storm conflict near contour label 475 NE of phase 1 building, near Premier Circle. Relocate one or the other to ensure adequate SAN-Storm separation. Profiles have been added to the plan set and all crossings have been called out to avoid conflicts. 7. C5.1: a. Shows no storm detention: WPO202200013 for TJACH Premier Circle (under review) must provide SWM to meet SWM requirements for each phase. Only phases meeting SWM requirements may be approved with FSP. WPO202200013 appears to provide comprehensive SWM control via 125 LF underground detention which appears required with Phase 1 development / Phase 1 building - parking, etc., but WPO is ambiguous. Concept of a Master Plan does not exist in state regulations per se (9VAC25-870-). Rather, proposed elements of development / site improvements are evaluated against requirements and SWM control provided to meet requirements for proposed improvements. WPO/FSP should clarify that SWM is provided for design elements shown on either plan. FSP title sheet should include reference to WPO202200013 (review pending). Underground detention for the site is not required until phase 2 of the project begins. Phase 1 removes a large portion of the site's existing impervious area and converts that area to grass reducing flow and meeting energy balance without detention for phase 1. Underground detention will be added in future phases when needed. S. 1-1.0, L3.0: a. Labels do not discriminate between phase 1, 2, 3, buildings; all are labeled proposed buildings, whereas other plan sheets indicate phase 2, 3, potential future building locations. Also related comments elsewhere. Revise 'proposed building' labels for consistency across plan sheets. Labels have been updated on sheet L3.1 to differentiate between phases. Albemarle County Architectural Review Board — (ARB) — Khris Taggart: 1. ARB recommends approval of Initial Plan, items to be addressed with the final site plan submittal are detailed in the ARB action letter in ARB2022-29 application. Comment Acknowledged Albemarle County Information Services — (E911) — Andy Slack: 1. No objections at this time. Comment Acknowledged Albemarle County Building Inspections — Betty Slough: 1. Add the following note to the general notes page: a. Retaining walls greater than 3 feet in height require a separate building permit. Walls exceeding 4 feet in height require a stamped engineered design also. Walls require inspections as outlined in the USBC. Comment Acknowledged. 2. Add the following note to the general notes page: a. Where the flood level rims of plumbing fixtures are below the elevation of the manhole cover of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer, the fixtures shall be protected by a backwater valve installed in the building drain, branch of the building drain or horizontal branch serving such fixtures. Plumbing fixtures having flood level rims above the elevation of the manhole cover of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer shall not discharge through a backwater valve. The above note has been added to the plans as requested. 3. Add the following note to the general notes page: a. All water, sewer and fire lines require NEW inspection and testing procedures. The ACSA performs any testing and inspections of the public sewer and water main(s). The above note has been added to the plans as requested. 4. The Albemarle County Building Inspections Department (ACBID) does a visual inspection and witnesses the testing of the building drain, water service pipe and the sprinkler lead-in connection. Comment Acknowledged 5. The developer / contractor is responsible to retain a Special Inspector as outlined in the updated Albemarle County Policy for Site Utilities to perform the visual inspection and testing of all utilities not covered by the ACSA or ACBID. This includes building sewers, water and fire line branches between the main and the meter(s)/building(s). Comment Acknowledged 6. The Special Inspector's report must be submitted and approved by the Albemarle County Engineering Department prior to a Certificate of Occupancy being issued. Comment Acknowledged. 7. The site lighting plan does not appear to provide the 1fc required from each building exit to the public way. An updated lighting plan has been provided with this submission. Albemarle County Fire Rescue — (ACFR) — Howard Lagomarsino: 1. During construction and/or demolition, the following fire prevention steps are required, so please not them on the plan: a. Smoking shall be prohibited in aeras where smoking makes conditions such as to make smoking a hazard and these areas shall be designated with no smoking signs per Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. The above note has been added to the plan as requested. b. Areas where smoking can occur, shall have appropriate receptacles for discarded smoking materials per Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. The above note has been added to the plan as requested. c. Per the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code, vehicular access for firefighting shall be provided at all construction and demolition sites, provide access to within 100 ft. of temporary or permanent fire department connections, and have no overhead wiring or other overhead obstructions lower than 13 ft. 6 inches; this access may be via permanent or temporary road, but shall be capable of supporting fire apparatus in all weather conditions. The above note has been added to the plan as requested. d. Contractor shall ensure the street numbers are always plainly visible from the frontage street during construction per the Virginia Statewide Fire Code. The above note has been added to the plan as requested. e. An approved water supply for firefighting operations shall be in place and available as soon as combustible materials arrive on site. The above note has been added to the plan as requested. f. Waste and combustible debris shall be removed from the building at the end of each day and disposed of in accordance with the Virginia Statewide Fire Code. The above note has been added to the plan as requested. g. Fire extinguishers shall be provided, with not less than one approved fire extinguisher at each stairwell, on all floor levels where combustible materials have accumulated, in every storage and construction shed and in areas of special; hazards, such as where flammable and combustible liquids are stored or used, in accordance with the Virginia Statewide Code. The above note has been added to the plan as requested. h. Operations involving the use of cutting and welding shall comply with the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code and shall require a permit from the Albemarle County Fire Marshal's Office. The above note has been added to the plan as requested. Albemarle County Service Authority — (ACSA) — Richard Nelson: 1. Submit utility drawings to ACSA for review. Final Site Plan drawings shall be submitted to ACSA for review. 2. Provide a room count of the existing motel to determine water/sewer connection fee credit. Existing room count to remain added to C4.0. Rivanna Water Source Authority — (RWSA) — Dyon Vega: 1. RWSA will require a sewer flow acceptance prior to final site plan approval for each phase/block. a. The request will need to be sent to us by ACSA and will include the following: i. Estimated average daily dry weather sewage flow (ADDWF) ii. Point of connection into RWSA system (which manhole) iii. Number of units/square footage iv. Estimated in-service date Mid 2024. Virginia Department of Transportation — (VDOT) — John Wilson: 1. Please provide trip generation data, for proposed apartment units. Trip generation was provided in the Traffic Assessment with the rezoning and review by the County and VDOT. This has been provided in an email to John Wilson on 6/14/2022 and coordination is ongoing through email along with the other comments below. 2. Please provide right/taper turn lane and queuing analyses on Route 29. The Traffic Assessment includes an analysis of the signal and analysis of the right turn at the 29/Premier Circle unsignalized intersection. While not a typical turn lane analysis, it does show the site has no impact on the southbound right move. We didn't show typical warrants because there will be minimal to no traffic at that entrance. From the report, we are projecting a maximum of 5 right turns in the PM peak hour. That will not warrant a right turn lane. 3. Appears the first entrance does not meet VDOT's requirements on Downstream Corner clearance, needs to be a minimum of 225' ft., please refer to VDOT's Road Design Manual Appendix F-pg., F-111, for recommendation of design criteria. Also it appears to be a potential conflict on Premier Circle making a left turn into parcel 61M-4.. The new entrance is still overlapping part of the existing entrance. While it is shifted a little bit to the east of the existing entrance the traffic to that new entrance serving the office is only about half of the existing traffic. Premier Circle is a private street, and our access point is further away from Route 29 than the existing entrance across the street, so they are already the limiting factor in corner clearance. With the peak hour projection only being 5 right turns into that entrance from Route 29 in a whole hour and more than 100' from Route 29 to the entrance there seems to be plenty of clearance. 4. Please provide pre and post construction drainage calculations for adequacy of discharge to day light. The plans show that we will be meeting energy balance for the 1 year and keeping the 10-year flow from the site at or below the pre -flow for each phase of the development to satisfy the state stormwater requirements for the discharge from the site to the existing pipe running under Premier Circle. Therefore, it seems downstream analysis is not required and provides no practical value. Whether the downstream system is adequate or not we are maintaining or reducing flows from the pre -condition per the state regulations. 5. Note that the final site plan must show conformance with the VDOT Road Design Manual Appendices B(1) and F, as well as any other applicable standards, regulations or other requirements. Acknowledged. We have included PDF copies of the plans and calculations for your review. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to give me a call at 434.295.5624 or email 4onathan.showalter(@timmons.com . Sincerely, Jonathan Showalter, PE Project Manager