Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB202200122 Assessment - Environmental 2022-07-01Page / _ of - 6 Construction Permit OSE/PE Report For: ®Repair ® Voluntary Upgrade Permit Permit ElCertification � Subdivision Letter Approval Property Location: 911 Address: City: Lot 1 Section Subdivision GPIN or Tax Map # 58-95 Health Dept ID # Latitude Longitude Applicant or Client Mailing Address: Name: Blue Springs Land Corp. Street: PO Box 1285 City: Charlottesville State VA Zip Code 22902 Prepared by: OSE Name Thomas G. Hogge License # 1940-001091 Address PO Box 418 City Ruckersville State VA Zip Code 22968 PE Name License # Address City State Zip Code Date of Report A0 ` ti "a / Date of Revision #1 OSE/PE Job # Date of Revision #2 Contents/Index of this report (e.g., Site Evaluation Summary, Soil Profile Descriptions, Site Sketch, Abbreviated Design, etc.) 1-cover 2,3-Site and Soil Evaluation Report 4-Site Sketch 5,6-Design Calculations Certification Statement I hereby certify that the evaluations and/or designs contained herein were conducted in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Sewage Handling and Disposal Regulations (12 VACS-610), the Private Well Regulations (12 VAC5-630), the Regulations for Alternative Onsite Sewage Systems (12VAC5-613) and all other applicable laws, regulations and policies implemented by the Virginia Department of Health. I further certify that 1 currently possess any professional license required by the laws and regulations of the Commonwealth that have been duly issued by the applicable agency charged with licensure to perform the work contained herein. VIThe work attached to this cover page has been conducted under an exemption to the practice of engineering, specifically the exemption in Code of Virginia Section 54.1-402-A.11 I recommend that a (select one): construction permit ©certification letter ® subdivision approval Elbe (select one) Issued In replir permit Q voluntary upgrade Q Denied O This forth contains personal information subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. Revised 12/1/2014 Site and Soil Evaluation Report Page 9 of 6 VDH Use Only HDIN: General Information Date: / Albema^e County Health Department Owner: Blue Springs Land Corp. Phone: Owner Address: Property Address: Tax Map/GPIN #: 58-95 Subdivision: Section: Block: Lot: Soil Information Summary 1. Position in landscape satisfactory: 9 Yes ❑ No Describe landscape position: Sideslope 2. Slope: 13 °/a 3. Depth to rock/impervious strata: Max. 60+ in. Min. 45 in. ❑ Not observed 4. Free Water Present: ❑ Yes M No Range in inches: 5. Depth to seasonal water table (gray mottling or gray color): inches ® Not observed 6. Soil percolation rate estimated: ® Yes ❑ No Estimated rate: 70 min/in at 24 inches depth Texture Group: ❑ I 911 N I11 ❑ IV 7. Percolation test performed: © Yes El No If yes, provide additional data on percolation test results. Name and title of ev uator: homas Graham Hogge, OSE Signature: El Site approved: Ab—poo^ t—hes (describe dispersal area, e.g. absorption trenches) dispersing Septic tank effluent (proposed level of treatment at time of evaluation) to be placed at 24 (inches) depth at site designated on permit. Site provides a total of 12,000+ square feet of absorption area for primary and reserve (if applicable). Site disapproved: Reasons for rejection (check all that apply) 1. ❑ Position in landscape subject to flooding or periodic saturation. 2. ❑ Insufficient depth of suitable soil over hard rock. 3. ❑ Insufficient depth of suitable soil to seasonal water table. 4. ❑ Rates of absorption too slow. 5. ❑ Insufficient area of acceptable soil for required absorption area, and/or reserve area. 6. ❑ Proposed system too close to well. 7. ❑ Other (specify) This form contains personal information subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. Revised 12/1/2014 Page .3 of 6 Date of Evaluation: 5-18-21 Profile Description SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Property ID: Division of TM 58-95. "Lot 1' Where the local health department conducts the soil evaluation the location of profile holes may be shown on the schematic drawing on the construction permit or the sketch submitted with the application. If soil evaluations are conducted by a private Onsite Soil Evaluator or Professional Engineer, location of profile holes and sketch of the area investigated including all structural features (i.e. sewage disposal systems, wells, etc.) within 100 feet of the site and reserve site shall be shown on the reverse side of this page or prepared on a separate page and attached to this form. AUGER BORINGS ❑ See a 3plication sketch ❑ See Construction Permit N See sketch on reverse side or pa e attached to this form. Hole # Horizon Depth Inches Description of color, texture, etc. Texture Grou 1 A 0-5 7.5 YR 5/6 strong brown loam, gravelly loam 2 Bt 5.22 2.5 YR 418 red clay loam; few mottles of 5 YR 6/8 reddish yellow 3 C 22.45 5 YR 4/6 yellowish red sandy loam granitic saprolite, variegated with 2 7.5 YR 414 brown and 5 YR 6/8 reddish yellow; auger refusal at 45" 2 A 0-5 10 YR 4/3 brown loam 2 E 5-9 7.5 YR 5/6 strong brown loam 2 Bit 9-48 10 R 4/8 red, micaceous day loam 3 Bt2 48-60 2.5 YR 4/8 red, micaceous clay loam; few mottles of 5 YR 6/8 reddish yellow 3 3 at 0-48 10 R 4/8 red, micaceous day loam 3 C 48-60 5 YR 5/8 yellowish red sandy loam saprolite; firm 2 4 A 0-5 5 YR 416 yellowish red sandy day loam 2 st 5-20 5 YR 4/6 yellowish red, friable day loam 3 Ct 2036 5 YR 416 yellowish red loam 2 C 36-46 5 YR 5/8 yellowish red sandy loam saprolite; firm; auger refusal at 46" 2 5 at 0-24 2.5 YR 3/6 dark red, highly micaceous clay loam 3 C1 24.42 7.5 YR 4/6 strong brown, micaceous, channery loam saprolite, firm, with 5 YR 6/6 reddish yellow 2 C2 42-60 5 YR 518 yellowish red, friable sandy loam saprolite with 2.5 Y 5/6 light dive brown 2 REMARKS: This form contains personal information subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. Revised 12/1/2014 r:wr. unraiai !LL as �h 9042'01 " W 404,95' *' \ L13 �Y N C1 _ ?16- 30'' PRIVATE C14 4CCESS`EASEMENT C1 (,CENTERLINE) CC18 FS3910 LOT CONSERVATION AREA "A" (SEE SHEET 3) i 21.28 AC. Pre HoVa� 57004'57" W 459. -f ®3C, PROP. w 8 `^1eil-�� / so //-�i9n , ,L SrR�q,�r Y 56'36'20" W L21 C21-- , L 2 [1�V�' °pee�seeuuejae C o Ipy Oh Pj! ftTG� S I 200 191, [: RAIN FIF.-<..05 re U � C'7 702.76' L24// TMP 58-95C 24'/ C25 , 1 1 Design Calculations Proposed Division of Tax Map 58-95 "Lot 1" Albemarle County, VA PRIMARY DRAINFIELD Design Basis A. Estimated Percolation Rate (Minutes per inch) B. Trench bottom square feet Required per Bedroom (from Table 5.4) based on ❑X Gravity ❑ LPD ❑ other: EZ FLOW, PER GMP 135.A C. Number of Bedrooms Area Calculations: D. Length of Trench (ft.) E. Length of Available Area (ft.) F. Width of Trench (ft.) G. Number of Trenches H. Center -to -center spacing (ft.) I. Width required (ft.) J. Width of available area (ft.) K. Total square footage required L. Square footage in design M. Is a reserve area required? 100 0 10 113 Including reserve 117 2176 2400 yes See next page Page .6of—� Page (0 of (O Design Calculations Proposed Division of Tax Map 58-95 "Lot 1" Albemarle County, VA RESERVE DRAINFIELD Design Basis A. Estimated Percolation Rate (Minutes per inch) B. Trench bottom square feet 289 (150GPD/0.52 GPD PER SQ. FT.) Required per Bedroom (from Table 5.4) based on ❑ Gravity ❑ LPD Z other: *TL-3 EFFLUENT TO GRAVITY -DOSED TRENCHES, PER 12 VAC 5-613-10, REGULATIONS FOR ALTERNATIVE ONSiTE SEWAGE SYSTEMS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH GMP 156, TL-3 EFFLUENT MUST BE PROVIDED BY AN APPROVED PROPRIETARY NITROGEN REMOVAL TREATMENT UNIT, PROVIDING A NET TOTAL NITROGEN REMOVAL (AT THE PROJECT BOUNDARY) OF 50%. C. Number of Bedrooms Area Calculations: D. Length of Trench (ft.) E. Length of Available Area (ft.) F. Width of Trench (ft.) G. Number of Trenches H. Center -to -center spacing (ft.) 1. Width required (ft.) J. Width of available area (ft.) K. Total square footage required L. Square footage in design 100 100 0 10 113 Including primary 117 1156 1200 Note: alternative reserve is based on space limitation within the staked footprint. When the reserve is needed, there is plenty of room to expand the footprint and possibly eliminate the need for an alternative design.