HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA202100013 Correspondence 2022-07-06 (4)• • • • S S
� s
1001 Boulders Parkway
TIMMONS GROUP Suite300
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. Richmond, VA23225
To: Kevin McDermott, PE (Albemarle) and
Doug McAvoy, Jr., PE (VDOT)
From: Steve Schmidt, PE, PTOE (Timmons Group)
RE: Southwood Phase 2 TIA Response to County/VDOT Comments
Date: May 27, 2022
P 804.200.6500
F 804.560.1016
www.timmons.com
Timmons Group submitted a revised Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) on February 21, 2022 for the Southwood
Phase 2 project located in Albemarle County, Virginia. The project is County case number ZMA2021-
00013.
The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) issued comments on the revised TIA on March 28,
2022.
Timmons Group (TG) has reviewed VDOT's comments (in bold below) and prepared the responses below.
As a result of the comments/responses, no updates to the TIA are required.
Our responses to VDOT comments are as follows:
VDOT Comments
1. Comments from District Traffic Engineering:
a. The agency is still on SIDRA version Sand as such cannot analyze submitted
SIDRA 9 files. Please include printouts of the options and Roundabout data tabs.
TG Response: The printouts of the options and roundabout data tabs are attached to this
response to comments.
b. Besides being conservative, is there another reason internal capture was
not factored?
TG Response: Internal capture was not factored/considered for several reasons. As
VDOT notes, one reason was to provide a conservative, or worst -case analysis.
Additionally, at the time of the analysis, there were no identified users or types of
office/retail available and any internal capture between the residential units and
office/retail uses would be speculative.
c. Pages 39, 40 and 75: As the loth Edition of the ITE Trip Generation manual was
referenced on the scoping document, is there a reason why the 11th Edition was
used instead for this submission (page 40)? In addition, the previous submission
was also based on the loth Edition. To facilitate a better estimation of the "net
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Southwood Phase 2 Response to Comments
May 27, 2022
Page 2 of 3
increase" in development, the 10the Edition of the ITE Trip Generation manual should
be used to estimate the trips from Phase 2.
TG Response: The 11" edition of Trip Generation was used in the revised analysis as it
contained significant updates to the 10`h edition based off of additional studies. The 1th
edition is more statistically relevant and provides a more accurate estimate of the trip
generation.
For example, in the 10`h edition, the mobile home park (Land Use Code 240)
rates/equations were based off of only 1 study. The 11t' edition updated the mobile
home park rates/equations to include data from 13 studies. Other land use codes had
similar updates.
Therefore, the trip generation contained in the revised analysis (using the 11t') edition is
more accurate and provides a better estimate of site traffic.
d. Pages 39 and 40: Pease clarify the Mobile Home Park status and also explain
why the "Existing Residential Development —To be Removed" were not
estimated as occupied dwelling units?
TG Response: The existing mobile home park is still in use and residents occupy the
units.
The "Existing Residential Development — To be Removed" trips were calculated based
on the number of dwelling units as that represents the entire traffic potential of the
existing use. This approach is consistent with VDOT guidelines on estimating traffic for
redevelopment sites.
Further, ITE Trip Generation for this land use code (240) only contains data for "dwelling
units" and not "occupied dwelling units".
e. Pages 42: Please include missing distributions at Hickory Street intersection.
TG Response: Page 42 (Figure 5-1) shows the residential trip distribution for the site.
Per the discussion on page 41, it was assumed that 80% of residential site traffic will use
the Old Lynchburg Road/Hickory Street intersection to access the site.
The remaining 20% of residential traffic will access the site via Hickory Street (north) to
Oak Hill Road to Stagecoach Road. This traffic appears on Figure 5-1 at the 5" Street
Extended/Stagecoach Road intersection.
Southwood Phase 2 Response to Comments
May 27, 2022
Page 3 of 3
Per County comments on the initial TIA submission, no analysis was required along
Hickory Street.
f. Page 52, Figure 7-1: "2036 Existing" could be better revised as "2036 No
Build."
TG Response: Figure 7-1 (page 52) is titled "2036 Existing+ Growth Peak Hour
Volumes". As discussed in Section 7.1 (page 49 of the pdf), this figure contains the
summation of the existing traffic volumes plus 1%annual growth over the 15 year
period from 2021 to 2036.
g. Pages 113 and 125: Please code the Synchro models per the signal timing data.
TG Response: Page 113 shows the basic signal timing data for the 5`h Street Extended/1-
64 Eastbound ramp intersection. TG acknowledges that in the PM Synchro model, the
vehicle extension for Phases 2/6 should be coded as 3.5 seconds and not the 3.0
seconds in the model.
Page 125 shows the basic signal timing data for the 5tn Street Extended/1-64 Westbound
ramp intersection. TG acknowledges that in both the AM and PM models, the minimum
green time for Phase 4 should be 8.0 seconds and not the 10.0 seconds in the model and
that for Phase 2, the minimum green time should be 10.0 seconds and not the 8.0
seconds in the model. It is noted that these minimum green times do not materially
impact the analysis as the signal is running time of day plans during both peak hours
where each phase is receiving more than the minimum green time.
Both of these intersections are over capacity and have been identified by VDOT for
future study/improvement. The changes in the base signal timings noted above will not
materially impact the results of the analysis or the conclusions of the traffic study.
2. Note that the final plan must show conformance with the VDOT Road Design Manual
Appendices B(1) and F, as well as any other applicable standards, regulations or other
requirements.
TG Response: Noted.
® ROUNDABOUTS - 5th Street @ Old Lynchburg Road - 2030 Background (Site Folder: General)
Options I Roundabout Data
Roundabout Model Options
Roundabout Capacity Model
,, SIDRA Standard
O US HCM 6
(1 US HCM 2010
Roundabout Level of Service (LOS) Method
Q SIDRA Roundabout LOS
'h Same as Signalised Intersections
ej Same as Sign Control
Delay Model
Exclude Geometric Delay
❑® HCM Delay Formula
HCM Roundabout Capacity Model Extension
Apply the SIDRA Model for Unbalanced Flow Conditions for HCM 6
Apply the SIDRA Model for Unbalanced Flow Conditions for HCM 2010
Other Roundabout Models
FH WA 2000
LU Use Urban Compact Roundabout
❑E HCM 2000
Q NAASRA 196E
When you change the Roundabout Capacity Model, the related parameters Roundabout LOS
Method, HCM Delay Formula and Exclude Geometric Delay will remain unchanged- This enables the
comparison of the effect of the change of roundabout capacity model in terms of the capacity model
only while other parameters remain unchanged. However. you can specify any combination of these
parameters for the selected Roundabout Capacity Model.
Table: Default settings of related parameters involved in changing between the US HCM 6I US HCM
2010 and SIDRA Standard roundabout capacity models
Roundabout Capacity Model
Related Parameters
SIDRA Standard
US HCM 6 1 US HCM 2010
Roundabout LOS Method
Same as Signalised Intersections
Same as Sign Control
Unchecked
Checked
HCM Delay Formula
(use Ube SIDRA Standard Delay
(use the HCM Delay equation)
equation)
Exclude Geometric Delay
Unchecked
Checked
(include geometric delay)
(exclude geometric delay)
Help OK Appty Process Site
Options Roundabout Data
La
Site Display Geometry
1i
W I ® ' — E
S
Current Capacity Model:
SIDRA Standard
Dialog Tics
Number of Girc Lanes
Circulating Width
Island Diameter
Inscribed Diameter
1
20.0 ft
1D0.0 ft
Program
2
20.0 ft
100.0 ft
Program
2
20.0 ft
100.0 ft
Program
1
20.0 ft
10D.0 ft
Program
Entry Radius
65.0 ft
65.0 ft
65.0 It
65.0 ft
EnIFy Angle
30.00
30.00
3D.0 0
30.00
Raindrop Design
❑p
0
M
Circulating Transition Line
Number of Downstream Circ
Lanes
❑0
0
Program
Program
Program
Program
SIDRA Standard Roundabout Model Calibration
Environment Factor
Enky/Circ Flow Adjustment
OK Ap* I Process Site
Layout
x
1N
+ 50%