HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB202200058 Staff Report 2022-07-13Project #/Name
ARB-2022-58: Scruby Verizon
Review Type
Advisory Review - Tier 3 PWSF
Parcel Identification
05500-00-00-01400
Location
7418 Greenwood Station Road
Zoned
Rural Area (RA) / Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner/Applicant
Brian Gray Scruby / GDN Sites (Nathan Holland)
Magisterial District
White Hall
Proposal
To construct a telecommunications facility consisting of a 140'-tall monopole topped by a 2'-tall lightning rod, with
associated structures and equipment. The proposal includes a request for a Special Exception regarding the distance
between the face of the monopole and the backs of the antennas.
Context
The subject parcel is nearly 45 acres in size and is bisected by I-64. The portion of the parcel located south of the interstate,
where the monopole is proposed, has wooded borders on the north, east and west, and some hedgerows and scattered trees
in the eastern half Most of the property is occupied by open fields. The surrounding area is rural in character with residential
and agricultural buildings, many of which are historic. (Fig. 1
ARB Meeting Date
July 18, 2022
Staff Contact
Margaret Maliszewski
HISTORY
The ARB has reviewed no previous proposals on this parcel. A balloon test was held for the current proposal on June 15, 2022. (Note that this proposal
differs in content and location from other previous applications with the same name.)
Figure 1: Project location
PROJECT DETAILS The proposal includes the following:
• Installation of a 140'-tall monopole (plus a 2'-tall lightning rod) within a 20' x 20' fenced compound in a 40' x 40' lease area, with monopole
located approximately 33' from the I-64 right-of-way.
• Installation of ground equipment including various cabinets, a generator, an H-frame for other equipment, and an ice bridge, most on concrete pads.
• Installation of a 10'-tall board -on -board wooden post screening fence around the compound.
• Creation of a 20'-wide access and utility easement from the existing gravel access drive to the lease area along the path of what appears to be an old
farm road.
• Installation of three arrays: 1) one array with six antennas using a mounting collar and frames; 2) one array with six remote radio heads below the
antenna array; and 3) one array with two fiber optic sure protection boxes below the remote radio heads. Antenna size is: 96" high x 11.9" wide x
7.1" deep.
• The project description notes that there are numerous mature trees along the north property line. Six individual trees are drawn on the plan. They are
located on the property line, which is 23'8" from the proposed monopole center. Tree species are not identified. No tree removal is proposed.
• Monopole, antennas, base station equipment, and fence are to be painted Java Brown SW 6090.
• A Special Exception is requested to allow the antennas to be mounted with their backs 18" from the face of the pole. (See below for additional
information.)
ANALYSIS REGARDING THE GROUND EQUIPMENT
A Certificate of Appropriateness from the ARB is required for the base equipment portion of telecommunications facilities in the Entrance Corridors.
The ARB may impose conditions on the Certificate of Appropriateness, based on the EC Guidelines, and consistent with Section 5.1.40 of the Zoning
Ordinance.
Ref
Guideline
Issues
Recommendations
Accessory structures and equipment
17
The following should be screened to
The compound is proposed to be surrounded by a board -on -board wood
None.
eliminate visibility from the Entrance
fence, so the ground equipment is not expected to be visible from the I-64
Corridor street: e) Mechanical equipment
Entrance Corridor. The proposed fence material is appropriate given the rural
setting. It is expected to blend with the wooded buffer between the Interstate
and the prope , but the screening plants are not located on site. (Fig. 2
ANALYSIS REGARDING VISIBILITY OF THE FACILITY
The ARB may act in an advisory capacity to the Agent as to whether the facility is being sited to minimize its visibility. If constructed as proposed, the monopole
will be readily visible from the I-64 Entrance Corridor. When visible along I-64, the balloon was seen well above the trees and was skylit. Trees and other
vegetation along the property line and in the I-64 right-of-way only screen the lower portion of the monopole. Over 50' of the monopole rises above the nearby
trees. East of the site, travelling westbound on I-64, the balloon was visible from the I-64 EC for approximately 3370'. West of the site, travelling eastbound, the
balloon was visible for approximately 1100'.
Ref
Guideline
Issues
Recommendations
Development pattern
33
The relationship of buildings and other structures to the
As described above, the balloon test
Given the degree of visibility displayed at the
Entrance Corridor street and to other development
revealed that the monopole would be
balloon test, the proposed location of the facility
within the corridor should be as follows: f. The
readily visible both east- and westbound
does not sufficiently minimize the visibility of the
placement of structures on the site should respect
on I-64. It would be seen well above the
monopole from the I-64 EC. Significant negative
existing views and vistas on and around the site.
trees and would be skylit. (Figs. 3, 4, 5)
visual impact on the Entrance Corridor is
Photo -simulations confirm that the
anticipated.
monopole will have an obtrusive
appearance from the I-64 Entrance
Corridor. (Figs. 6, 7
Figure 3: The monopole site is highlighted in red. The blue lines represent the distance along the I64 Entrance Corridor that the balloon was visible.
!- , .140,
Figure 5: Traveling west on I-64, the balloon was seen well above the trees and was skylit.
Fig. 6: Applicant's photo -simulation of the monopole as viewed from east of the site, traveling westbound on I-64.
Fig. 7: Applicant's photo -simulation of the monopole as viewed from west of the site, traveling eastbound on I-64.
10
SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUESTS
Request
Applicant's Reasoning
Staff Comment
Request to allow the closest point of the
The applicant states that the proposed mounts will not
Staff agrees that a consistent 18" standoff will
backs of the mounted antennas to be 18"
allow the antennas to meet the 12" requirement.
not create significant additional negative visual
from the face of the monopole. 12" is the
Internal electric tilting (not physical tilting) of the
impact as viewed from the I64 EC.
standard requirement. 5.1.40.b(2)(c)
antenna is proposed, with a consistent 18" standoff for
the full length of the antennas.
bS
PROPOSED
J140',X�'
V/�EWZON ANTENNp
( YP. OF B)
PROPOSED
NONOPOIf MOUNT
�
s ANTENNA ORIENTATION PLAN AT 136'
Ci2 NT9
Fig. 8: Applicant's detail showing 18" from face of monopole to back of antenna.
I
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Points of Discussion
1. Anticipated visibility of the monopole
2. Anticipated visibility of the ground equipment and base station
Recommendations
Regarding the Certificate of Appropriateness for the ground equipment and base station:
Because the ground equipment is expected to be sufficiently screened from the EC and the wooden fence is not expected to appear out of place in the
surroundings, staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for the ground equipment and base station.
Regarding visibility of the monopole:
Staff recommends that the ARB forward the following recommendation to the Agent:
1. The ARB finds that the proposed location will not sufficiently minimize the visibility of the monopole from the I-64 Entrance Corridor.
Regarding the Special Exception:
Staff recommends that the ARB forward the following recommendation to the Agent:
1. The ARB finds that a consistent 18" standoff will not create significant additional negative visual impact as viewed from the I64 EC.
ATTACHMENTS
Attach. 1: ARB2022-58: Scruby Verizon project description
Attach. 2: ARB2022-58: Scruby Verizon site plan
12