HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB202200070 Staff Report 2022-08-12ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #/Name
ARB-2022-70: Maplewood Initial Site Plan
Review Type
Initial Site Development Plan
Parcel Identification
046134-00-00-00400
Location
At the southwest corner of Proffit Rd. and Worth Crossing (See Figure 1)
Zoned
Planned Residential Development (PRD) / Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner/Applicant
Ja-Zan Limited Partnership / Collins Engineering (Scott Collins)
Magisterial District
Rivanna
Proposal
To construct 72 multi -family residential units in six buildings with associated site improvements.
Context
The site has been cleared and graded. Commercial development is located to the north and west of this parcel.
Immediately to the south is a vacant lot, with the Forest Lakes Shopping Center beyond. Single family residential
development is to the southeast and institutional to the east.
Visibility
Visibility of this development will be limited by its location partially behind the Walgreen's pharmacy at the comer of
Proffit and Rt. 29 and the auto parts store adjacent to the pharmacy to the south. However, the new 4-story residential
buildings will be seen rising above the frontage commercial buildings and southbound traffic on Rt. 29 will see the
buildings across the intersection at Airport/Proffit Roads. (See Figures 2 and 3)
ARB Meeting Date
August 15, 2022
Staff Contact
Margaret Maliszewski
PROJECT HISTORY
A rezoning was approved for this project in June 2022. Staff comments were provided on the potential impacts of the proposal on the Entrance Corridor.
The comments focused on providing sufficient area to meet landscape requirements.
Figure 1: Location of the proposed Maplewood residential development.
2
Figure 2: View of the Maplewood site from the Rt. 29 Entrance Corridor, facing southeast. Site is behind the Walgreens building as viewed from Rt. 29.
Figure 3: View of the Maplewood site from the Rt. 29 Entrance Corridor, facing east. Site is behind the Wal greens and Advance Auto buildings.
ANALYSIS
Gray highlight = means the guideline can't be reviewed at initial site plan stage, but recommendations can be provided for final
Yellow highlight = means the guideline can only be reviewed for location/configuration at the initial plan stage, and location/configuration can be made a
condition of initial plan approval, and can be the basis for denial
Regular text = means the guideline can be reviewed at initial plan stage, can be made a condition of initial plan approval, and can be the basis for denial
REF
GUIDELINE
ISSUE
RECOMMENDATION
ftrpose
1
The goal of the regulation of the design of development within the
Architectural designs were not
Include architectural
designated Entrance Corridors is to insure that new development
submitted with the initial site plan.
plans with the next
within the corridors reflects the traditional architecture of the area.
Comments on architectural guidelines
submittal.
Therefore, it is the purpose of ARB review and of these Guidelines,
will be provided when that submittal is
that proposed development within the designated Entrance Corridors
made.
reflect elements of designMaracteristic of the significant histori
landmarks, buildings, and structures of the Charlottesville and
Albemarle area, and to promote orderly and attractive development
within these corridors. Applicants should note that replication of historic
structures is neither required nor desired.
2
Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and
Albemarle area experience these sites as ensembles of buildings, land,
and vegetation. In order to accomplish the integration of buildings,
land, and vegetation characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines require
attention to four primary factors: compatibility with significant historic
sites in the area; the character of the Entrance Corridor; site
development and layout; and landscaping.
Compalibil' with si ni scant historic sites:
3
New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should
Architectural designs were not
Include architectural
respect the traditions of the architecture of historically significant
submitted with the initial site plan.
plans with the next
buildings in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area. Photographs of
Comments on architectural guidelines
submittal.
historic buildings in the area, as well as drawings of architectural
will be provided when that submittal is
features, which provide important examples of this tradition are
made.
contained in Appendix A.
4
The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for
Architectural designs were not
building design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic
submitted with the initial site plan.
structures is not intended to impose a rigid design solution for new
Comments on architectural guidelines
development. Replication of the design of the important historic sites
will be provided when that submittal is
in the area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of
made.
compatibility can be met through building scale, materials, and forms
which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well
as traditional. The Guidelines allow individuality in design to
accommodate varying tastes as well as special functional
requirements.
ConWatibility with the character of the Entrance Corridor
5
It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a pattern
Architectural designs were not
Include architectural
of compatible architectural characteristics throughout the Entrance
submitted with the initial site plan.
plans with the next
Corridor in order to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs
Comments on architectural guidelines
submittal.
should demonstrate sensitivity to other nearby structures within the
will be provided when that submittal is
Entrance Corridor. Where a designated corridor is substantially
made.
developed, these Guidelines require striking a careful balance between
harmonizing new development with the existing character of the
corridor and achieving compatibility with the significant historic sites
in the area.
Structure design
9
Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors,
Architectural designs were not
Include architectural
materials, colors and textures should be compatible with the forms and
submitted with the initial site plan.
plans with the next
features of the significant historic buildings in the area, exemplified by
Comments on architectural guidelines
submittal.
(but not limited to) the buildings described in Appendix A [of the
will be provided when that submittal is
design guidelines]. The standard of compatibility can be met through
made. Information provided on the site
scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture
plan indicates that maximum building
which is contemporary as well as traditional. The replication of
height will be 4 stories/65'. The
important historic sites in Albemarle County is not the objective of
stepback requirement has been waived
these auidelines.
for this site. Building footprints range
from 4,865 to 9,710 sf.
10
Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of
buildings.
l I
The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale should
be integral to the building and site design.
12
Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms,
sha es, scale, and materials to create a cohesive whole.
13
Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building design should
be relieved using esign detail or vegetation, or both.
14
Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting devices should
be used to unify ou s of buildings within a development.
15
Trademark buildings and related features should be modified to meet
the re uirements of the Guidelines.
16
Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly tinted or
highly reflective. Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet
the following criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop
below 40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 3001o.
Specifications on the proposed window glass should be submitted with
the application orfinal review.
Accessory structures and equipment
17
Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated into the
No accessory structures or equipment
Indicate locations and
overall plan of development and shall, to the extent possible, be
are show on the plan. Low-level,
heights of building -
compatible with the building designs used on the site.
ground -mounted equipment wouldn't
likely have a visual impact on the
mounted equipment.
Show how visibility of
18
The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance
Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, these features will still have a
corridor due to the intervening
the equipment will be
negative visual impact on the Entrance Corridor street, screening should
development. Rooftop equipment
eliminated from the
be provided to eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c.
could be visible.
Entrance Corridor.
Refuse areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment,
f. Above -ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor
wire, and similar security fencing devices.
19
Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the
buildings and surrounding natural vegetation and may consist of. a.
Walls, b. Plantings, and c. Fencing.
21
The following note should be added to the site plan and the architectural
The note appears on sheet 3 of the site
Include the standard
plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance
plan set. It will also be needed on the
mechanical equipment
Corridor shall be eliminated."
architectural drawings.
visibility note on the
architectural plans.
Lighting
General Guidelines
22
Light should be contained on the site and not spill over onto adjacent
The initial site plan includes no
Include a complete
ro erties or streets;
lighting. Comments on lighting will be
provided when that submittal is made.
lighting plan with the
next submittal.
23
Light should be shielded, recessed or flush -mounted to eliminate glare.
All fixtures with lamps emitting 3000 lumens or more must be full
cutoff fixtures.
24
Light levels exceeding 30 footcandles are not appropriate for display
lots in the Entrance Corridors. Lower light levels will apply to most
other uses in the Entrance Corridors.
25
Light should have the appearance of white light with a warm soft
glow; however, a consistent appearance throughout a site or
development is required. Consequently, if existing lamps that emit
non -white light are to remain, new lamps may be required to match
them.
26
Dark brown, dark bronze, or black are appropriate colors for free-
standing pole mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors.
27
The height and scale of freestanding, pole -mounted light fixtures
should be compatible with the height and scale of the buildings and the
sites they are illuminating, and with the use of the site. Typically, the
height of freestanding pole -mounted light fixtures in the Entrance
Corridors should not exceed 20 feet, including the base. Fixtures that
exceed 20 feet in height will typically require additional screening to
achieve an appro riate appearance from the Entrance Corridor.
28
In determining the appropriateness of lighting fixtures for the Entrance
Corridors, the individual context of the site will be taken into
consideration on a case by case basis.
29
The following note should be included on the lighting plan: "Each
outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more
initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or
shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and
away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires
onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning
districts shall not exceed one half footcandle."
30-
Guidelines for the Use of Decorative Landscape Lighting
The initial site plan includes no
Include a complete
31
lighting. Comments on lighting will be
lighting plan with the
provided when that submittal is made.
next submittal.
Landscaping
7
The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping are intended
The initial plan includes no
Include a complete
to reflect the landscaping characteristic of many of the area's
landscaping. Detailed comments on
landscape plan with the
significant historic sites which is characterized by large shade trees
landscaping will be provided when that
next submittal for review.
and lawns. Landscaping should promote visual order within the
submittal is made.
Entrance Corridor and help to integrate buildings into the existing
environment of the corridor.
The subject parcel does not have
frontage on the Entrance Corridor
8
Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by
planting different types of plant materials that share similar
street.
characteristics. Such common elements allow for more flexibility in
the design of structures because common landscape features will help
to harmonize the appearance of development as seen from the street
upon which the Corridor is centered.
32
Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should
include the following:
a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the Entrance
Corridor Street. Such trees should be at least 3% inches caliper
(measured 6 inches above the ground) and should be of a plant species
common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 35 feet
on center.
b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be
interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The
ornamental trees need not alternate one for one with the large shade trees.
They may be planted among the large shade trees in a less regular
spacing pattern.
c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low
stone wall, typical of the area, should align the frontage of the
Entrance Corridor street.
d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings
and fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street,
and exclusive of road right-of-way and utility easements.
33
Landscaping along interior roads:
The plan does not consistently provide
a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior roads. Such
planting area for trees along the
trees should be at least 2'/z inches caliper (measured six inches above
interior roads, but the layout matches
the ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such
the approved application plan. Trees
trees should be located at least every 40 feet on center.
are provided along the western side of
Caspian Lane, at the western perimeter
of the site. The planting area has
minimal width; it is approximately 6'
wide.
34
Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways:
The plan shows grass and possible
a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior pedestrian
planting areas along sidewalks.
ways. Such trees should be at least 2'/z inches caliper (measured six
inches above the ground) and should be of a species common to the
area. Such trees should be located at least every 25 feet on center.
35
Landscaping of parking areas:
One 7-space parking row is proposed.
a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, located 40
There is sidewalk and planting area
feet on center. Trees should be planted in the interior of parking areas
nearby.
at the rate of one tree for every 10 parking spaces provided and should
be evenly distributed throughout the interior of the parking area.
b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 2%
inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground); should be
evenly spaced; and should be of a species common to the area. Such
trees should be planted in planters or medians sufficiently large to
maintain the health of the tree and shall be protected by curbing.
c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking
area's impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24
inches in height.
36
Landscaping of buildings and other structures:
There is very limited space for trees
a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the front of long
near the proposed buildings. Trees
buildings as necessary to soften the appearance of exterior walls. The
planted in the planting area along the
spacing, size, and type of such trees or vegetation should be
western property line will eventually
determined by the length, height, and blankness of such walls.
provide some softening of the
b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other
buildings.
structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru"
windows; service areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24
inches in height.
37
Plant species: a. Plant species required should be as approved by the
The initial plan includes no
Staff based upon but not limited to the Generic Landscape Plan
landscaping. Species will be reviewed
Recommended Species List and Native Plants for Virginia Landscapes
when a landscape plan is provided.
(Appendix D .
38
Plant health: The following note should be added to the landscape plan:
This note will be needed on the
"All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be
landscape plan.
maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited.
Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the
overall health of theplant."
Site Development and layout
Develo ment Dattern
6
Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural landscape
The site has already been cleared and
None.
and should contribute to the creation of an organized development
graded. Planting area has been
plan. This may be accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving
provided for trees along Proffit Road.
the trees and rolling terrain typical of the area; planting new trees
No streams are located on the parcel.
along streets and pedestrian ways and choosing species that reflect
Building mass and height will be
native forest elements; insuring that any grading will blend into the
mitigated somewhat by the location
surrounding topography thereby creating a continuous landscape;
beyond other existing buildings as
preserving, to the extent practical, existing significant river and stream
viewed from the corridor.
valleys which may be located on the site and integrating these features
into the design of surrounding development; and limiting the building
The site layout appears organized. Two
mass and height to a scale that does not overpower the natural settings
buildings have their long elevations
of the site, or the Entrance Corridor.
almost parallel to the Rt. 29 corridor.
The other buildings are oriented
39
The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance
Corridor street and to other development within the corridor should be
toward Proffit Road. The orientation is
as follows:
expected to appear appropriate given
10
a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, and
the intervening development.
pedestrian walks should guide the layout of the site.
b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street should be
A sidewalk is provided from the site to
parallel to the street. Building groupings should be arranged to parallel
Proffit Road. The development is not
the Entrance Corridor street.
expected to impact any important
c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian
views as seen from the corridor.
and vehicular circulation systems.
d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide
continuity within the Entrance Corridor.
e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek
valleys, steep slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the
extent practical, then such natural features should be reflected in the
site layout. If the provisions of Section 32.5.2.n of the Albemarle
County Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements required by that
section should be located so as to maximize the use of existing
features in screening such improvements from Entrance Corridor
streets.
f The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views
and vistas on and around the site.
Site Grading
40
Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site to
The site has been cleared and graded.
None.
surrounding conditions by limiting the use of retaining walls and by
The cover sheet notes state that no
shaping the terrain through the use of smooth, rounded land forms that
grading is currently proposed.
blend with the existing terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are generally
unacceptable. Proposed contours on the grading plan shall be rounded
with a ten foot minimum radius where they meet the adjacent condition.
Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than engineered,
appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller, when necessary,
shall be terraced and planted to blend with the landscape.
41
No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the drip line of
There are no trees to remain on the
None.
any trees or other existing features designated for preservation in the final
site.
Certificate of Appropriateness. Adequate tree protection fencing should
be shown on, and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and
erosion and sediment control plans.
42
Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of
Appropriateness should be clearly delineated and protected on the site
prior to any grading activity on the site. This protection should remain
in place until completion of the development of the site.
II
43
Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of
heaw a ui ment within this area.
20
Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be designed to fit
An underground detention facility is
None.
into the natural topography to avoid the need for screening. When
proposed in the recreation area at the
visible from the Entrance Corridor street, these features must be frilly
south end of the site. It is not expected
integrated into the landscape. They should not have the appearance of
to have a visual impact on the corridor.
en ' eered features.
44
Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage
patterns) should be incorporated into the finished site to the extent
ossible.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends that the ARB forward the following recommendations to the Agent for the Site Review Committee:
• Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18-30.6.4c(2), (3) and (5) and recommended conditions of initial plan approval:
o Prior to Initial Plan approval the following items shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the ARB: None.
o The ARB recommends approval of the Initial Plan without conditions.
• Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None.
• Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit: None.
• Regarding the final site plan submittal:
A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. The following items and all items on the ARB Final Site Plan
Checklist must be addressed:
1. Provide architectural, landscape and lighting plans for review.
2. Indicate locations and heights of building -mounted equipment. Show how visibility of the equipment will be eliminated from the
Entrance Corridor.
3. Include the standard mechanical equipment visibility note on the architectural plans: Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the
Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated."
ATTACHMENTS
Attach. 1: ARB2022-70: Maplewood Initial Site Development Plan
12