Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO201100010 Approval - Agencies 2011-06-07Philip Custer From: Pero, Vincent D NAO [Vincent.D.Pero@usace.army.mil] Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 5:58 AM To: Philip Custer Subject: RE: Old Trail Block 23 (UNCLASSIFIED) Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Phil Sorry I didn't get back to you yesterday but internet was down all day. The area they want to extend the pipe is not jurisdictional. They do not need anything from me to extend the culvert. However, as I told Scott yesterday. The area is reverting to wetland and any future work in that area would likely need a delineation and authorization from my office. You did great in catching that and potential saving the developer a violation, even though I am sure they don't see it that way. Thanks again for the good catch and let me know if you need anything else. Vinny Vinny Pero USACE - Norfolk District Charlottesville Virginia Regulatory Field Office 920 Gardens Boulevard, Suite 200 Charlottesville, VA 22901 434-973-0568 -----Original Message ----- From: Philip Custer [mailto:pcuster(@albemarle.orgl Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 11:47 AM To: Pero, Vincent D NAO Subject: FW: Old Trail Block 23 Here is the email I sent to my county engineer and ESC inspector for the area. The question I was asking them was whether the drainage area had been disturbed to construct Golf Drive. They could not remember. From: Philip Custer Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 12:21 PM To: Glenn Brooks; Mark Hopkins Subject: Old Trail Block 23 1 The construction plans for Block 23 essentially requires a 30ft extension of the pipe in the photos below. The pipe appears to outfall into a wetland area. The Construction Plans for the Golf Course Access Road (in my office) indicates that a sediment trap was proposed along this drainageway. We're trying to determine whether we should withhold Block 23 plan approval until the Army Corps authorizes this disturbance. This pipe is located just about the number 23 in the pdf I have attached. It should be noted the DEQ holds an easement adjacent to the construction (near L27 in the plat I have attached), but it does not include the area we are talking about. Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE 7