Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO202200009 VSMP - SWPPP 2022-09-15Al ,rl COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE �oF v Department of Community Development ." -J 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Tel. (434) 296-5832 • Fax (434) 972-4126 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Project Name: Address: For Construction Activities At: 1757 Avon Street Ext., Charlottesville, VA 22902 Prepared by: Name: Timmons Group Prepared for: Name: Albemarle County School Board SWPPP Preparation Date: May 20, 2022 (This document is to be made publicly available according to 9VAC25-880-70, Part II, section D) Issued — 10/2014 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Albemarle County CONTENTS: (from Albemarle County Code Sec. 17-405) 1. Registration statement 2. Notice of general permit coverage 3. Nature of activity 4. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. 5. Stormwater Management Plan 6. Pollution Prevention Plan. 7. Discharges to impaired waters, surface waters within an applicable TMDL wasteload allocation, and exceptional waters. 8. Qualified personnel 9. Signed Certification 10. Delegation of authority. 11. General permit copy 12. Inspection logs Issued — 10/2014 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Albemarle County Section 1. Registration statement (Provide a signed completed copy of the DEQ registration statement) Issued — 10/2014 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Albemarle County VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY GENERAL VPDES PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES OF STORMWATER FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (VAR10) REGISTRATION STATEMENT 2019 Application type. 12 NEW PERMIT ISSUANCE (CHOOSE ONE) ❑ MODIFICATION WITH ACREAGE INCREASE ❑ MODIFICATION WITHOUT ACREAGE INCREASE ❑ EXISTING PERMIT RE -ISSUANCE Sartinn I_ nnoraMr/Permittee Information PERMIT#: PLAN/ID #: TECHNICAL CRITERIA: IIB ❑ IIC ❑ A. Construction Activity Operator (Permittee). The person or entity that is applying for permit coverage and will have operational control over construction activities to ensure compliance with the general permit. A person with signatory authority for this operator must sign the certification in Section V. (per Part III. K. of the VAR10 Permit). Operator Name: Albemarle County Public Schools Contact person: Lindsay Snodd Address: 401 McIntire Road City, State and Zip Code: Charlottesville VA 22902 Phone Number: Primary and CC Email: Icsnoddy@kl2albemarle.org B. Electronic correspondence. To receive an emailed coverage letter or to pay by credit card, you must choose YES and include a valid email. May we transmit correspondence electronically? YES ® NO ❑ Sartinn II_ Cnnstruction Activity Information. A. Include a site map showing the location of the existing or proposed land -disturbing activities, the limits of land disturbance, construction entrances and all waterbodies receiving stormwater discharges from the site. B. Project site location information. Construction activity Name: Mountain View Elementary School Address: 1757 Avon Street Ext. City and/or County and Zip Code: Charlottesville VA 22902 Construction Activity Entrance Location (description, street address and/or latitude/longitude in decimal degrees): 1757 Avon Street Ext., Charlottesville, VA 22902 Latitude and Longitude (6-digit, decimal degrees format): 37.996383,-78.499868 C. Acreage totals for all land -disturbing activities to be included under this permit coverage. Report to the nearest one -hundredth of an acre. Total land area of development (include entire area to be disturbed as approved in the Stormwater Management Plan): 15.96 ac Primary estimated area to be disturbed (include portions with Erosion and Sediment Control Plan approval only): 3.95 ac Off -site estimated area to be disturbed (if applicable): D. Property Owner Status: FEDERAL ❑ STATE ❑ PUBLIC ® PRIVATE ❑ E. Nature of the Construction Activity Description (i.e. commercial, industrial, residential, agricultural, environmental, utility): public F. Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) name(s) (if the site is discharging to a MS4): Albemarle County G. Estimated Project Dates (MM/DD/YYYY). Start Date: 09/01/2022 Completion Date: 12/31/2023 H. Is this construction activity part of a larger common plan of development or sale? YES ❑ NO IN Rev 11/2020 PAGE 1 16 CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT (VAR10) REGISTRATION STATEMENT 2019 I. 61h Order Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) and Receiving Water Name(s). Include additional areas on a separate page. HUC NAME(S) OF RECEIVING WATERBODY 020802040402 Cow Branch S Y 111 Off -site Su ort ec ion . PP •-••y ---- - --"­ " - List all off -site support activities and excavated material disposal areas being utilized for this project. Include additional areas on a separate page. Off -site Activity Name: n/a Address: City or County: Off -site Activity Entrance Location (description, street address and/or latitude/longitude in decimal degrees): Latitude and Longitude (6-digit, decimal degrees format): Is this off -site activity an excavated material disposal area? YES ❑ NO ❑ If this off -site activity is an excavated material disposal area, list the contents of the excavated fill material: Will a separate VPDES permit cover this off -site activity? YES ❑ NO ❑ r__.:..., ill robe. aeCLIOn A. A stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) must be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the General VPDES Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities prior to submitting the Registration Statement. By signing the Registration Statement, the operator is certifying that the SWPPP has been prepared. B. Has an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan been YES N NO ❑ submitted to the VESC Authority for review? Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Approval Date (for the estimated area to be disturbed MM/DD/YYYY): C. Has land -disturbance commenced? YES ❑ NO IZ D. Annual Standards and Specifications. If this project is utilizing approved Annual Standards and Specifications (AS&S), attached the completed AS&S Entity Form. AS&S Entity Name (if different from the Operator identified in Section 1): E. Billing information (leave blank if same as the Operator identified in Section I. above). This entity will receive Annual Permit Maintenance and Permit Modification Fee invoices (if applicable). Billing Name: Contact Name: Address: Cit ,State and Zip Code: Phone Number: Primary and CC Email: Rev 11/2020 PAGE 2 16 CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT (VAR10) REGISTRATION STATEMENT 2019 Section V. Certification. A person representing the operator as identified in Section I. A. and meeting the requirements of 9VAC25-880-70. Part III. K must physically sign this certification. A typed signature is not acceptable. Please note that operator is defined in 9VAC25-870-10 as follows: "Operator" means the owner or operator of any facility or activity subject to the Act and this chapter. In the context of stormwater associated with a large or small construction activity, operator means any person associated with a construction project that meets either of the following two criteria: (i) the person has direct operational control over construction plans and specifications, including the ability to make modifications to those plans and specifications or (ii) the person has day -today operational control of those activities at a project that are necessary to ensure compliance with a stormwater pollution prevention plan for the site or other state permit or VSMP authority permit conditions (i.e., they are authorized to direct workers at a site to carry out activities required by the stormwater pollution prevention plan or comply with other permit conditions). In the context of stormwater discharges from Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s), operator means the operator of the regulated MS4 system. 9VAC25-880-70. Part III. K. Signatory Requirements. Registration Statement. All Registration Statements shall be signed as follows: a. For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this chapter, a responsible corporate officer means: (i) a president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy -making or decision -making functions for the corporation; or (Y) the manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities, provided the manager is authorized to make management decisions that govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment recommendations, and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long-term compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager can ensure that the necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate information for state permit application requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures; b. For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively, or c. For a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. For purposes of this chapter, a principal executive officer of a public agency includes: (1) the chief executive officer of the agency or (U) a senior executive officer having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency. Certification: "I certify under penalty of law that I have read and understand this Registration Statement and that this document and all attachments were prepared in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is to the best of my knowledge and belief true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." Printed Name: Signature (signed in ink): Date Signed: t_i ND SAI (INODD y Section VI. Submittal Instructions. Submit this form to the VSMP Authority. If the locality is the VSMP Authority, please send your Registration Statement submittal directly to the locality; do NOT send this form to DEQ. A list of local VSMP Authorities is available here: VSMP Authorities. If DEQ is the VSMP Authority please send to: If the locality is the VSMP Authority please send to: Department of Environmental Quality Office of Stormwater Management Suite 1400 PO Box 1105 Richmond VA 23218 constructiongpiPdeq.V Irginia.goV Rev 11/2020 PAGE 3 16 CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT (VAR10) REGISTRATION STATEMENT 2019 INSTRUCTIONS PLEASE DO NOT PRINT OR SUBMIT This Registration Statement is for coverage under the General VPDES Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities. This form covers the following permit actions: new permit issuance, existing permit modification with an increase In acreage, existing permit modifications that result in a plan modification but do not result in an increase in disturbed acreage, and reissuance of an active permit coverage. Application type. Select NEW PERMIT ISSUANCE to obtain a new permit coverage. Modifications are for modifying an existing, active permit coverage. Select MODIFICATION WITH ACREAGE INCREASE when the previously approved acreage(s) increases (permit modifications are not performed for decreases in acreage unless they result in plan changes — see Modification WITHOUT Acreage Increase). Select MODIFICATION WITHOUT ACREAGE INCREASE when there is a change to the site design resulting in a change to the approved plans with no increase in acreage(s). Select EXISTING PERMIT REISSUANCE to extend an expiring permit coverage for the next permit cycle and include the existing permit number. Section I. Operator/Permittee Information. A. Construction Activity Operator (Permittee). The person or entity that is applying for permit coverage and will have operational control over construction activities to ensure compliance with the general permit. For companies, use the complete, active, legal entity name as registered with a state corporation commission. Entities that are considered operators commonly consist of the property owner, developer of a project (the party with control of project plans and specifications), or general contractor (the party with day-to-day operational control of the activities at the project site that are necessary to ensure compliance with the general permit). If an individual person is listed as the operator, that person (or a legal representative of) must sign the certification in Section V. An operator may be one of the following: 9VAC25-870-10. Definitions. "Operator" means the owner or operator of any facility or activity subject to the Actand this chapter. In the context of stormwater associated with a large or small construction activity, operator means any person associated with a construction project that meets either of the following two criteria: (i) the person has direct operational control over construction plans and specifications, including the ability to make modifications to those plans and specifications or (6) the person has day-to-day operational control of those activities at a project that are necessary to ensure compliance with a Stormwater pollution prevention plan for the site or other state permit or VSMP authority permit conditions (i.e., they are authorized to direct workers at a site to carry out activities required by the stormwater pollution prevention plan or comply with other permit conditions). In the context of Stormwater discharges from Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s), operator means the operator of the regulated MS4 system. "Owner" means the Commonwealth or any of its political subdivisions including, but not limited to, sanitation district commissions and authorities, and any public or private institution, corporation, association, firm or company organized or existing under the laws of this or any other state or country, or any officer or agency of the United States, or any person or group of persons acting individually or as a group that owns, operates, charters, rents, or otherwise exercises control over or is responsible for any actual or potential discharge of sewage, industrial wastes, or other wastes or pollutants to state waters, or any facility or operation that has the capability to alter the physical, chemical, or biological properties of state waters in contravention of § 62.1-44.5 of the Code of Virginia, the Act and this chapter. 'Person" means any individual, corporation, partnership, association, state, municipality, commission, or political subdivision of a state, governmental body, including a federal, state, or local entity as applicable, any interstate body or any other legal entity. B. May we transmit correspondence electronically? If you choose YES to this question and provide an email address in Section I. A., all correspondence, forms, invoices and notifications will be transmitted by email to the operator. This will also give the operator the ability to pay by credit card and to receive permit coverage approval letters immediately upon permit aooroval. Section 11. Construction Activity Information. A. A site map indicating the location of the existing or proposed land -disturbing activities, the limits of land disturbance, construction entrances and all water bodies receiving Stormwater discharges from the site must be included with the submittal of this form. Aerial imagery maps or topographic maps showing the required items are acceptable. Plan sheet sized site maps are not required. Please consult your VSMP authority if you have additional questions regarding site map requirements. B. Construction Activity Name and location. Provide a descriptive project name (it is helpful to use the same naming convention as listed on the Stormwater Management plans), 911 street address (if available), city/county of the construction activity, and the 6-digit latitude and longitude in decimal degrees format for the centroid, main construction entrance or start and end points for linear projects (i.e. 37.1234N/-77.1234W). C. Acreage totals for all land -disturbing activities, on- and off -site, to be included under this permit. Acreages are to be reported to the nearest one -hundredth acre (two decimal places; i.e. 1.15 acres). Provide the total acreage of the primary development site as approved on the Stormwater Management Plans and the primary on -site estimated acreage to be disturbed by the construction activity as approved under the Erosion and Sediment Control Plans. The off -site estimated area to be disturbed is the sum of the disturbed acreages for all off -site support activities to be covered under this general permit. Do not include the off -site acreage totals in the primary, on -site total and estimated disturbed acreage totals. Permit fees are calculated based on your disturbed acreage total for all on- and off -site areas being disturbed under this permit coverage (the sum of all on -site and off -site disturbed acreages). D. Property owner status. The status of the construction activity property owner. Any property not owned by a government entity or agency (Le. federal, state or local governments) is PRIVATE Rev 11/2020 PAGE 4 16 CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT (VAR30) REGISTRATION STATEMENT 2019 INSTRUCTIONS PLEASE DO NOT PRINT OR SUBMIT E. Nature of the construction activity description. Choose the designation that best describes the post -construction use of this project (you may choose more than one). (i.e. Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Agricultural, Environmental, Educational, Oil and Gas, Utility, Transportation, Institutional, etc.). Describe the post -construction use of the project (i.e. Commercial —one new office building and associated parking and utilities; Transportation — Linear roads, sidewalks and utilities; Agricultural-3 Poultry Houses, etc.). F. Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) name(s) if discharging to a MS4. If stormwater is discharged through a M54 (either partially or completely), provide the name of the MS4(s) that will be receiving water from this construction activity. The MS4 name is typically the town, city, county, institute or federal facility where the construction activity is located. G. Estimated project dates. Provide the estimated project start date and completion date in Month/Day/Year or MM/DD/YYYY format (i.e. 07/30/2019). H. Is this construction activity is part of a larger common plan of development or sale? "Common plan of development or sale" means a contiguous area where separate and distinct construction activities may be taking place at different times on different schedules per 9VAC25-870-10. Definitions. Le. a subdivision, commercial development, business park, etc. I. 6th Order Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) and associated Receiving Water Name(s). Provide all 6th order HUCs and receiving waterbody names, for the primary site and any Off -site areas included under this permit coverage, that could potentially receive stormwater runoff discharging from this activity. The HUC can be either a 12-digit number (i.e. 0208010101) or 2-letter, 2-number code (i.e. 11-52). Include additional HUCs or receiving waters on a separate page. You may utilize DEQ's web -based GIS application, VEGIS, to obtain this information. • VEGIS application link: DEQ's VEGIS Mapping Aoolication • Instructions for utilizing DEQ's VEGIS application link: CGP-GIS HUC Instructions Section III. Off -site Support ACtivdy Location Information. This general permit also authorizes stormwater discharges from support activities (e.g., concrete or asphalt batch plants, equipment staging yards, material storage areas, excavated material disposal areas, borrow areas) located on -site or off -site provided that (1) the support activity is directly related to a construction activity that is required to have general permit coverage; (ii) the support activity is not a commercial operation, nor does it serve multiple unrelated construction activities by different operators; (Ill) the support activity does not operate beyond the completion of the construction activity it supports; (iv) the support activity is identified in the Registration Statement at the time of general permit coverage; (v) appropriate control measures are identified in a SWPPP and implemented to address the discharges from the support activity areas; and (vi) all applicable state, federal, and local approvals are obtained for the support activity. Off -site activity name and location information. Provide a descriptive off -site project name, 911 street address (if available), construction entrance location (address or decimal degrees coordinates and description), city/county and the 6-digit latitude and longitude in decimal degrees (i.e. 37.1234N,-77.1234W) of all off -site support activities. Indicate whether the off -site support activity will be covered under this general permit or a separate VPDES permit. If excavated material (i.e., fill) will be transported off -site for disposal, the name and physical location address, when available, of all off -site excavated material disposal areas including city or county; 6-digit latitude and longitude in decimal degrees (i.e. 37.1234N,-77.1234W) and the contents of the excavated material. List additional off -site areas to be included under this permit coverage on a separate page. Off -site areas not included on this registration will need to obtain coverage under a separate VPDES permit. Section IV. Other Information. A. A stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) must be prepared prior to submitting the Registration Statement per 9VAC25-880. See 9VAC25-880-70. Part II, of the General Permit for the SWPPP requirements. B. If the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for the estimated area to be disturbed listed in Section II. C. has been submitted to the VESC Authority for review and plan approval, choose YES. If you are submitting this application to reissue an existing permit coverage, please provide the date that the VESC Authority approved the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for the estimated area to be disturbed. C. If land disturbance has commenced, choose YES. "Land disturbance" or "land -disturbing activity" means a man-made change to the land surface that may result in soil erosion or has the potential to change its runoff characteristics, including construction activity such as the clearing, grading, excavating, or filling of land per §62.1-44.15:24. Definitions. D. If this project is using approved Annual Standards and Specifications (AS&S), attach the completed AS&S Entity Form. If the AS&S Entity is different from the operator identified in Section I. A., list the AS&S Entity Name. The AS&S entity is the entity or agency that holds the approved annual standards & specification. Please indicate if this project is also requesting a plan waiver. • AS&S Entity Form link: Annual Standards and Specifications Entity Information Form Rev 11/2020 PAGE 5 16 CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT (VAR10) REGISTRATION STATEMENT 2019 INSTRUCTIONS PLEASE DO NOT PRINT OR SUBMIT E. Billing information. If the person or entity responsible for bllling/invoicing is different from the operator, please complete this section. It they are the same, leave this section blank. Section V. Certification. A properly authorized individual associated with the operator identified in Section I. A. of the Registration Statement is responsible for certifying and signing the Registration Statement. A person must physically sign the certification, a typed signature is unacceptable. State statutes provide for severe penalties for submitting false information on the Registration Statement. State regulations require that the Registration Statement be signed as follows per 9VAC25-880-70 Part III. K. 1.: o. For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this part a responsible corporate officer means: (I) Apresident, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation In charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy -making or decision -making functions for the corporation, or Ill) the manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities, provided the manager is authorized to make management decisions that govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capitol investment recommendations, and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long-term compliance with environmental lows and regulations; the manager can ensure that the necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate informotion for permit application requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures. b. For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively. C. For a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. For purposes of this part a principal executive officer of a public agency includes: (i) The chief executive officer of the agency, or (ii) A senior executive officer having responsibilityfor the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency. Section VI. Submittal Instructions. Submit this form to the VSMP Authority that has jurisdiction for your construction activity. The VSMP Authority maybe either DEQ or your locality depending on the location and type of project. If your project is under the jurisdiction of a Local VSMP Authority, please contact the locality for additional submittal Instructions. A blank area is provided forthe Local VSMP Authority's mailing address. Who is the VSMP Authority for my arolect? DEQ or the locality • DEC : DEQ is the VSMP Authority and administers permit coverage for land -disturbing activities that are: ➢ within a locality that is not a VSMP Authority; ➢ owned by the State or Federal government; or ➢ utilizing approved Annual Standards and Specifications. • The Locality: The local government (locality) Is the VSMP Authority and administers permit coverage for all other projects not covered by DEQ as listed above. For these projects, please submit permit forms directly to the Local VSMP Authority. A list of Local VSMP Authorities is available on DEQ's website here: Local VSMP Authority List. DEQ'S CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT WERSITE www.deg.virginia.gov/Programs/Water/StormwaterManagement/VSMPPermits ConstructionGeneralPermit.aspx Email the completed and signed form to: constructiongp@deq.virginia.gov Rev 11/2020 PAGE 6 16 Section 2. Notice of general permit coverage (This notice is to be posted near the main entrance according to 9VAC25-880-70, Part II, section C.) (Provide a copy of the DEQ coverage letter when obtained) Issued — 10/2014 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Albemarle County Section 3. Nature of activity (Provide a detailed narrative of the construction activities. Include or reference a construction schedule and sequence. Include any phasing.) This project includes the demolition of existing mobile classroom areas, playground areas, and a bioretention pond and the construction of building additions, a new bus loop, outdoor learning spaces and associated site work. Limits of clearing and grading are 3.95 acres. The western property line is bound by Avon Street Ext. The southern and eastern properties are bound by residential properties. The northern adjacent property is a health care center. All construction shall take place in accordance with the Erosion and Sediment Control Sequence of Installation on plan sheet C3.0. Estimated construction dates are as indicated on the Registration Statement. Issued — 10/2014 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (S WPPP) Albemarle County Section 4. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. (Provide a reduced, 11x17 copy of the latest Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. Do not reference only.) Issued — 10/2014 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Albemarle County PROLI CIIEBNPnON BERRICHOWN.C. MINIMUM STANDARDS: UOUR OFF MDER,ORTAXO SPACES AND CORRELATED SIDE WE. SITE WORK RK . AN NUMBER AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PROGRAM ADOPTED BY A DIATENT O0.10W31Y MUST AS CONSISTENT WITH ME FOLLOWING[RIRALL, Lx130FCLE<nluGADD G0.NIXG 4lEM1 MPFS. IFCH I ffry¢jµENTOORCHN R TEMPO ARMED TO DENUDED M1-1 IS WITHIN ARGON DARK AMR MAL NNOW ACTEARIENTIVERSELITY BE WAILEDTHIS SCE. TEMPORARY SOILSTAIMFLLINZAnOnSMALLAD SLWEWHOUACY dNANY E APPLIED DDWNENTEN DADS BENG ME WITHIN THE PROPERTY 50VM I5 RE51OENML TH NE iAOA MERSONNE EPoRIIOHVOF L��S RAIN CIAABC PROPEAn¢.A¢Mx6va ROPERTY LLE NORM DF MES HNLNOMY.IUlXE Ms APPLIEDAREA.1A.I FE IEMWONMANNT NR IpRE TNN RAW YEAR. Z AWASTEMFSSSMiALL DIAMONDBULL GCON5RUCNOn OF DVARAND PROWEEP'u OIL SANST UCCUMBCOMS ANDBONTS RBS OW US ECTION fPIMnC�RDD fALL9LLsroO9L¢Ox M f SIEXISTIDE IS CURCORERTLYW TWELVE of FOUNTAIN VIEW ELwENTMr 2M0E oING SITE AS WELL AS BORROW AREAS AND ARM INIFMIOINLY TRANSMITTED FROM ME PWWCI SIEEnO AND.E xs PERMANENT APPARENT PARE T OBSTETRICS SMALL SMALLLL rMHN BECORRROSION ESTAABLISHED UNTIED AREAS A OUNOTHERWISE CNSUCHIEVED THAT IS UNF�ORM, NATURE WF EUE m M CONNECTIONS WILL MARBLE MADE CONFECTIONS. SURARGVIVE AND WILL INHIBIT SABRES M5 FAR A AWARD NEW APERVITIC ND SMALL WE FUNCTIONALUNCLEAR A@uxeArte oAmR NBE O CRITICAL EAPON AREA EXIST rvfss1ae BROOMS AND N BROWSES LLL Ms sNLLNafMnPEuforoWOMAN smlxxuRA¢suGx AS DAMms, DlEs fRsiDls ENTTOXPAIN U UNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED,AIGNT VEGETATTE ML EXCEEDS AND SEDIMENT CONTROL M56. SEDIMENT BE DESIGNED AND REGISTRATION BASED UPON THE IDEAL DRAINAGE AREA ID FF SOUND BY ME TRIM. PR ATTOWS SMALL IF M Sm EFFECTUATING OF THE CURRENTIAEROLWI AND SEDIMENT CONTROL CAPACITY LEA SUMMARY NEAR MUCH IN ISO CUBIC WHEN R0. ACRER CHAMBER ARM MY THE UPS SULL CHEY CONTROL OMWAW AREAS LESS MAN THREE P@B. ORAMWE BV ADEPORM VHARIANCE 9V LOCAL AUTHORITIES NAME IUNSMMOX UNIESSOTXE0.WI5EWAHYID MS BE ODING¢RESSHVECV WITHIN ONE YEAROFSTABiLL]ATON SMALL BE FRWHCW WITH MINIMAL SLOW FO NO I OBLEM IS CONNECTED EASURESwNM UNDERGROUND OERNndM PNUARKWATER RUNOFF LIES WILL BE USED T3 CONTROL CARBIDE WMFF. ANDELR0.5 WILL BE WED CONCENGENTRATED SMALL ACTFRMANDOWN CUT WHETHER MS NTCLOXNIH NLME ON SLOPE DRAIN STRUCTURE SLOES un1£SS CONTAINED WITHIN An ADEQUATE TEMPORARY OR TO TREAT RMWARR RCHAR IY. ME 9. W M SLOPE THAT ARE fADEA ANAGUATE DRAINAGEOPERABLE DUMP ORCLUB WORCTI0X SHELL BE xRACCED CTION MAIL BE DESTROYED AD FLAT ANDIN ON LANCEN WATER IN ALL SUPPORTER GNN LF INNER WE DWAS JNVEYANQ SYSTEM W➢Xprt MET BUNG METERED OR ONSFARIGE THAND IN REMSE DOCUMENT MtcnosxIN` 5WMWWNTRFAUSUWSGMLBEFANTaXNMACCORGxKWnHVKCx NTH I S I.B�EEE NEWLY CONADsmADUGFED SUREMARTER NMCYAMF CLANNEK OR USES AXE BADE OPEUILNA. ADEQUATE amK THFC i<UEKE, IXUODTNG ME INSPECTION OF ALL REUNION BRER NL EACH FV¢R. PROTECTIONANN MY RMDNG CINNNELRPoRARY M SHIPMENT CXAN NFL FOXING SMALL EE INSTALLED IN NEW ME CONVEYANCE CHANNEL crvnAL K: Uino UNEI MTHFGeuIdESFxreiimXEP FB�DUMNNCE GMD SADIMENTITMERIBEFFxs MRKARu RRUCN�ON.CONDUCT NBE oM1'a IvTMATE:MAMOUNDDIWDEuiEMAIGS rtiSIMPREADTIVEOTNUTHISMEiaaeeE Ia RUs SEWAYSMOWFwMS. EARMRIMLMAYSEUSEDwRMESE FRAINCUMBITURELLACHOUTOONSTRTREAUSPORTHED DCTUR POADs YK PU R1 VACCLE, CA 0.UN]FFENWUXIOF MUD MS-I3. WHEN A LUCE WPRRttURSE MUSTY CROSSED BY CON5IRUCTION VEHICLES MOM WAR MICE IN ANY ARINAM PERIOD,A Z. ULF FIXES BROWN E3. D5 BILL MACE SEDIMEFM DRAWGRAL L BE MOAMED LOYM5LOR OF GM CROSSWISE CONTRACTION CF NEWCOMERS MATERIAL. WALL BE PROVIDED. AREASSWITH EDIMEWDEN ND0. ED W NPLL LEEDdµ BAADEMDO LUGUGi10NSPETMMNGMI ROXGINORCR NGWEWAR0.COMSMF B SE AMOUNTSM IT PEOW IS TO INTLEGROMIST SMALL EFROMORDLMSHB RFASPXD NTMINPGESTRUCNREGASINDIGTEDONPLANS ISCOMBLEMEN MGI6. NDERGRWNDMNVFLIX¢SHRILLBXWSAAIEO XPB RW ACE® TXYEWLL WIWsrANAF�MMINSPOHOSWPDDMONM1 HNO 15WRp5ERT3PREVEHIr SEDIMBrt FROM AWLCBBLECRED. E5PRIOF¢HPKTMD SLM I AiBIN� DNEUW MFWMACERTNN AREA E. IXGVATED MUTUAL PART BE PACED ON THE GAMUT MEd TRENCHES. C EFFLUENT FIRMMG OPEMnOM SHELL BE 'CURED OR VOWED THROUGH AN APE4VLD SEDIMENT IRMNxG DEVICE, EOSTORMNAERRELSEID OR SLUMP USED NCEFFULLINGT ENCXg SNARL BEPRROPERRTY FR09OM MYPR0glE DETAIN FROM x wEr AND CPV' STORAGE LONG THROUGH MATERIAL MR COMBRACfW ORDER TO MONDE FORTIS MATURITY OF SFOI I�MFHANUMBERS TOME OVA.DISCUSSES XBNCF PE RV ENGNRMEMWEERLYTOEXBNZ09 CFBEEIMENTIRW-IN9 GFUNCLUESEATEEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH MESS REGULATIONS. GRIND T Y VHPS MLGPAE SADMIY REGULATIONS SOUL BE LESSON WITH . EGFD�AVOTICK SGLLBEd W➢VYWID�xFA�LLEVEM.OIKEI6ACHEOMEPTIENT T MORE BLCESS Ms TROUTS LOWELLPAYED ON PURELY SWEET PROVISIONS SMALL BE ME TO IMPOSE ME DOLE1TYP LR ITS OMF. NTIOL ISNBE KEOM0.0Jd ME511E IX BA d¢ERA SUURTRACONGONNMEMVEBURFACEWH¢ED OF ECHWAYGDONE¢ONAULTEE ARMED OR W WL Ai E DI NT EACH WAY Y WHEN PF FROM SURSFALPNDAIR MLVEMS ANLDMGWGNLY REMOVED WARNING ME BEARDS BY CRADLING OR WA A SEDIMENT GURU O0.5WHIS REFOMINUNWRAPPED PROVISION WAANG SHALL BEEAR WELL M TO AIR HINDWICHINTDREF5 REFORM IN THIS MANNER. THIS P0.GV@OX SHELL APPLY r01XONI0UPL hPoEMENAT s GRGMNM EUTORGNGB�SEK. R EWEEKNIGHT UNEXPL - SEL FIRM BE SUSAN MN RAGS ro BE CANOED xs WEAN DAYS AMR SHOWN l9. oA TEMPORARY PEW LONGER NEDED, OTHEERRWISE TTHHE vaaRAn�a�. Gnnu N STAHWHI RAfPM\PY SELL Ono VEGEETinnONLLBE LOCYEDON... AS�UTORIZEo NR0.PWMAE FVEFUNG NO UNLESS LOCAL E DISTURBED HALL AREAS RESULTING MEN THE COULOMB OF IMPOREM IMMUNE PLACE BE 2. IHG,331 AL DENUDED ARCS WHICH FILL BE OF CURRANT TOR MINE HIM 30 TEMPORARY GIEEYSTANCLnory PREVENTRUMFR FxosIONANOSEINFNTATON. MOVE FFU s PREPARING ME APPLEBAUM MAINSTREAM MOM DGLWM Mn SnK SMALL BE PROIECLD FROM SEDIMEW DMOSmONM FIBERS. SELECGERMINATING UON OF ME SEED DS 9nw o®[M1D ON ME TIMES Of WATER I! FAIMPLED.P NARROWRIME VELMW AND ANNE FLUM RACE OF BmRMA'ADE0. RUNOFF MY ME WARTED FREQUENCY STE0.MOF S7-XWa WEWIN M E STANDARDS AND CENSOR LLSCED IN SWITCH IN OF WINNER FOLLOWING AMONG Arnvm¢, ESTABLISH PMwxw YFGnanVE ADMINISTRATIVE WM M WC,AL UC MINIMUM UNFEAROS. COVER BY XG SEED ID REDUCE SUNNI SFABILZE DIMMED AREAS, AND ENHANCE NATURAL 4. -DOHA PEMNX IVECNMFIW RADIUM SOIL PABILIZATIWMATSGLBE NS*DBLNONPREPPREDX NEWEG VFCHPNNELSNMDIER I SPENELDS RATTERSINE DEMIT WANTING ROUTINES MSTEP In GG, SEEN AN D PUMP LYIWLLOVE. INSTALLATION.N RR MDW A ARCANE TEMPORARY BINDING OR IMMEDIATELY AFTER GRADINCN. RUNINCEE"U" U0.015 TILITIES ME DRAINAGE FROM DOWNST0.EPN CONVEYANCES CONVEYAxs IN MEAN B AT SERIES AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PREMIUMS WALL. PF MAINTAINED UNTIL IHBY ME NO LONGER REQUIRED TO COMPLY WILD THE CONT0.Mi DOCUMENTS OR START LAN. PERMANENT STAREPLEGAIRON ALL NON DINNUMSED BY CONGETCHUSEXTIVEN MUCH WE MEARLYFOL TONG WERE SMALL BCONFIRMED IN MIWRWMF WILD NO B SRCC XVHOM S MR ORESiIIIBT�N 3.CDI RFOR ELDERS GREATER THAN 3: I, SEED 11 VALE PE AS SPECIFIED FOR MAINTENANCE SOAK' D M MINWHY CAPE CABINET AND OA' IN TABLE EN OF E HPNC�UR FIN LDHAND HOOK (STRAW OR FIIEA) sXOLL BEVSE00N ALL sEEDW SV0.FAV5. INALLSFEOINGDPBLLnON55FFO, FERnuZM AND LIME SHALL BE AWNED MN TO MEETING. PO�HASE I(SEEESUET 0 INFORMATION G¢ REFUSED ARM AIBNMLE CDUNW AM IMMUNECOInxuT3R OAWNTE OEX6mEE0.SETHIS MEETING SXNLTARE MCEon SEE. CIEAPINGLM EMESTM Z. w5IAM. P9MET NEW RECURSHEBONN SCREW SUMMIKEXWi WINSLEM AND GRADE SEDIMENT WINEXCEFTEM. OPPOSING SIT PENCE, FARM FMCS TREE MUSEUM, DIVERSION DIRES, ANY FRET RUPEE NSIO CHN s. AFNEDTER ALL LEROOSSIIaRARGMfM CONTACT MEASURES ARE IN PLACE, SITE WORK CAR BEGIN. E. SEED ALL DENUDED AREAS PER VOWED SIAXGPDS. 71.1 R(SEE EMS, E331 FINE GREW ESWEET AREA. AHIVBUTLRESMTNSHETRGAxAGXADF¢ ACHIEVED FBI ESNWIMUST ABANDONED THROUGH AFTER AND 3. ONCE ME CE LAIR UP HILL MOM ME BEYOND BYCM HAS SAM STABILIZED AND APPROVED BY ¢L INSPECTION, CANED ME SEDIFEn RAP M ME DAY POND. ET PROTECTION WHERE SHOWN ON ME SHAPE L FRO MM MY SEDIMENT KNKxW IN HE UNDERGRO DETENTION MOUNT BRAFAFTEMF FAMILIES REMAIN COLLInonno SUSPECTEDMUNBmoN 7. NLSN MENRDUTCH RPIREW S STRUCTURES, INCLUDING INDICATION FACILITIES BGLL BE COWMAN FOR SCHWENTIIMEPW IONOFIME ,MLTECTOp IMEMSXUMCIEANEDW MF ESYs MMD EONCE CONSTRUCTION IN BRUTE AND AM CONNECTING BUREAT AM SLAMMED, FROMM GENERA MJ GENERAL EROSION EUXMEXWARNER.I WNOTES'. EGI.UNL¢501XE0. EONDIUDED,COIRIRURANDMAMAINALLVEGM WPXDGIRUCNRAL UG ESPENIF GIIONSNAN SOF ME TRUST DUTCH OFMXMWVERDI EROSIONµ LDMGROS PXD WHO M{BEGUALLATNPS0VIRGONA RBNNnONSM6Z5 OZN NOSIONSXO GEDIPIWELD<pnROLAD ES3: ME CONNECTING WOMEN AND SEDIMENT COMPACT AUTHORITY WILL DRAW A CONTINUING REVIEWEVALUATION FINE HOW OF ME EROSION CONTROL MX. ES3: BRIEF AN. MGMNGAND GNOENTURGNCE MEASURES PRIOR IN OR. ME MET STEP PC CLEARING,FIR: MINTAN A COPY N ME AMENDED EROSION WON SEDIMENT COMMENT ALN ON ME SITE AT ALL EGS: PRIOR TO COMMENCING LAND -N MAILED ACTIVITIES IN ABUSE MEN MAN INNGIFD ON a��Mi NAaYEROvai CONTROL Sun IN ME.umURETISnaxeW AND THE CONTROLIN� N AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MINORITY FOR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE. ESE: PROVIVE ADDITIONAL SENIOR WNR0. MIKEL W WRONGLY TO MFEn MOLE AND Esl: ALLDNSMLARND NEUTRONSLMOD TRINES ANND OCCUR ITE onENUMBU.TMERaRFSPTALL nnK DURI,IF DURING MONITORING OPERATING, NMP WATER XIN AN UNPAVED RUMMAGE DEVICE. G. INS ANY PKESSSARY RO D OR TWINP IN MAINTAIN THE OTHOLUGNKSSHARES CONTROL ORDERS CHUN MAINLY OF THE AIROWNERS T LOAN, I N I I.. A.." WASELOGIC : .I GROUPVO ITS W BUN CLAY IOAn,1 TELI PERCENTSIDMS, .L ASIL MULGROUP:B GP.T EXE LLESILT LOAM, ON 35 PERCENT, HYDROLWL SOIL FEES BANK B CLAY, I TO 15 R0.CEMSMORM HYDROLOGIC SOIL SPUR IL e GENERAL WNSMUCIION NOTES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 2 y. ONE I WEEK PRIOR ME PLAN SUCHRUNINGMME oriMEPm�rerv.OBE LAND DISUSSINGACCnv�m AND ONE WEEK PRIOR m ME FINAL LAST ILLSWEDEN PN OMINIMUM Z. SSEDIMENT CONSUL MEASURED WILL H RD ECONSTRUCTED CONSUL COMMO TO NO "m BECAMESTANDARDS REGULATIONS VR 625 NCO l'ZALLEXPERVIDEs: iRovOW •, wmvOFTHE rwEs. wnFROOSOIisDNTiuDMDwPPoEIPMFWCCn LPu S�BEM TMNMOmEse EATAG�NS 0' s' UNCLUDMG BNT NET LIMITED TO, OFF -SITE COMEDY OBw<LDEARGsy ME CONTINUOUS WHALL SUBMIT A SUPPLEMENTARY EROSION CONTROL NTH HE ME OWXN FOR REGION AND APPROVAL BY ME PLAN APPRannG � s E. IEMCODNR RISRAEDI SlBLLMRIls NOFNYADDMMu MOSIODCaIRa MF RESNEaSGRITOPEREVENT O"s ~ I. EAXD Be DURING DMA�ENG XPERATUNS, WATER FILTER PUMPMAS ANDD 9. ME CONTRACTOR GRAVEL MESSIEST ALL SWEDEN CONTROL MEASURES MACDIGLLY AFTER EACH ER10 SIu'ATDavwiBEM`E niINHuvm MAINTAIN ME EFFECTIVENESS OF THE EROSION CONTACT DEFECTORS BE MADE IN LATHE M TAKEN 1 AVN. AML¢W RMEHAINEXTMATERSONLY. IS 0 EPEE B OFF C 1 MADE APPEAR ARE MDBE 0.fCWME WITHIN 17 DAYS OF COMPLETION M0.3ONOXG ORDINANCE SAMUEL 5.10.3 13 ALL M HATIOUBM GMVN� SE TRANSMITTED IN CORPORATE WITH SECTION 13 SEE OF THE COVE OF ALSOMARM. J W Va V. GO XX 1 ACTIVITY INWLVId NNDUSTUN W TYPE BOOM EQUIPMENT MALL AS UNITED TO iX E XRs 5V� 5EU B SUPPORT, OR 1 ORDERTO INIDi�P ANNEY XA�iam ro PERSONS, MUSICAL osAMus M AMMEW HAND Moxs LATERAL VD RD TO ES OB OF CTNELMNdMDEw W, AND EXPRESS E WHYSUGAR OF SLIDSNAxG, OR WLUPg s 0 0 I6. EVEEMTRITHE PNELD ME MGM NO INGLARLE, WINTER. REMOVE UP CONVERT OP E E SIFAOLMH WHOLE APPLICABLE ALL EROSION CONTRVE DN DERMANAGEMENT BONUSESWENDED WERNUSS OF M E SA6 E OF ANY HOT, LOW OR DMPORTION OF THE PROPERTY. - - -m 1 SLWAACRE, AND IN THE FORMS OF SOMEHOW M RESPOND IORWMSIST A SASE MIIXOFGANNUALASNWAS AND USUAL GOLDENRYE ry ry ry SA. SFY fFY FGEMM . NRRXAlOVE5 ARE 9JBOKilOPi9RWA1 BYAECWLDY SWEET LNAIWOWIWSFEROSION CONDUCT INSPECTION. 18 PRAINGUNITSNAB M SMALL BE LIME AND INFUSER,,*MMEW S¢DING, ANN MUTER AGRICULTURAL O PAGES i BILIOUSNESS, INCORPORATED MID TX E TOP RA RICH IS OF SCR.GE APPLIED NO OMAJACRE D CONSUL OF 10-2010 MOMENT MIX. PERMPNELD GOING LIC ES SMALL BE CRASHED AT MUMMERS AN D CONSIST OF 95%MEMORY 31 CA FALL SEEMS CAP O5%MUSICAL O�nLeY[CSmPS¢0 PieOIs1E0sR ALTERNATIVES ARE suBroNaWBY THE DNISHCO wOEcTHEIR 19 FNOUS SMALL BE MORSELLED WEEKLY AND AFTER EXXON MARSHALL EVENT AMC DAMAGE OF CLEGARGING TO CULTURAL MAIL SEEMED IMMEDIATELY CUT INGUM SHALL AS FILMED WHEN 50% Z OF RS.SI IURES OF ME STORAGE MEAT REDO NDEX 0YXE5 WX1[X COMBED SEDIMENT TO HALF THEIR x E U BE RANT N OUST BE CLEAN ED ANOD SESSION IMM GILTREY,DIVERSION a Y O0. ALL TEMPORARY GUYANA SEDIMENT MEASURES GUAM BE COMMAND WITHIN N NOYS OF FINAL US g E PARTNER AM NO WAGES NEEDED, WEITO APPROVAL AS ME COUNTY EROSION CONTRL INFLICTER 1 THIS PLAN SHOW BE SILnN NIEME SErnNOExBBEEF w.ILDAN A PERMIT WHEN I YEAR OF ME DAN OF mPRNAL(WATE & W SEA NTV@41WTATIONNXALSESNSTALLED ON ALL (ASSUMED ARMS WITHIN NIXE(9( MONTHS AMR ME DAN M, LWOO VT N30.IWXRR 9ROFECIIWH OROINvcF FACTOR IJ-ZO1G V sXsel C3.0 IXTARIOR FLOATERS OR EWIVNEN PISEACRESi ELEVPTIgI IIHE11 II 1 Pitt. III. szEv3gNRE IEe3T 3'IMOTXEGPpJNO. D C B A .,AD. TOWNEFEENTY SEEDING PLARK MATERIALS SQUIEN REFERENCE FROP AFT SECTORS' sEttt fEa is WON MIX OF uwLTErGAPARK ryoL X. EADDENTS, 1. to-roR.IS SO1. ILo uAu el� nPEi1m) NNAYI -Mq 01 E OOAI lGERANRN LL TABLE "'D SITE SPECIFIC SEEDING PARISHES FOR LOWESTTAFER, TOTAL. PER ACHE COLMENTUCKY PORTU IAL a5 IBs. FALL OE ED KEIIUCHVBWEGRA30 IMPROVED RE MORAL YEEPP93 06% GENERAL STEPS ON 1 OR WANT les. SFA9pNL NVPSE CROP LG1Y#NNIE MI MANS-, I 9 �� DRDmTRETCH-SEESESTRABLINTIRS CDOTH FAR ENT RE� 'POTTER I APRON LINI NO MAY BE Al IUP, BOXWOOD ORION, GABION SANET, OR PLATES S. 1. ANO3�. IT, PAPAPPON 0.4 WLCUUiEOL&IHG IS INBRE3. m SPONE DIM.. BOI NOT LESS TNN e1 OAPPASPONTRES BED ON TE AN OF B Plavn vau eE PPTN.,yPPP, L.RA P,��.LLa , INNEITHESUREINEWSPAPEA awAPFPPAPPKEENT BID cTPxF,; T O O ERSTLEARTHROUGHIPOOUGN iM NNEAL LPYE LET WORSHIPPER THROUGH PRESSURES D -.... WINIEP PYE .IAFDARD CREEL ESTATE OOP PLASTIC CONSTROCTION FENCE ATTACHED TO "HE -NEATHEREG'REW rtN- I RCN OR TH OR PVC PLASTIC), AT LEAST BE- AA.Vl o1 NNSHSTANDSGOE WITH SPAN SEEPR SESTATE NO GREATERTHA 6 ON CENTER RY REST SONALL FENCE AS A TREE REDEMPTION FENCE WHERE N A SOUTH NO III ON PNYmm iX� I�I __ —. A<»..� r,EAB _SIP------Q'M ..E. Y^ mISATTEB mWASN RACK E. —ATL iyyti - SPAN axnvn NxNP[vwTm AMOSEfPPPPEARS, ixE[i O11EBTNI15.x FEF d"x�PPOSTROnmw-SENSROLwvio SOa-0 nwA eww _ i Ort LANEINANXTRES F��Toi1eA e E s.wo u�/, "BRAPTL"P A z XD, awo GET FwCE EAKP II...ED. TH IS'" III uRN __.._._. DNA RE THEINGSTS CE U U PEPSPECTRE NEGG '— toPw TO n[xnxo ITIm I THE Parr THE� � STATEO ,1 oE.L A FT£VAndl ON STAKE AND FABRIC GRIENTATEN LMIwNw AT FAamc THE mLl1w. ET WEEPAR aw O cwcexnAlEo ARE o zi`aTHE INLET STEET IN x HOT.A PLIFIRTOe NOSTA:.MAP` CENTS, '0�" ssF RLrzx rAex A'AREARSEES, 1. ter.,» 1. PRET ��• DO10b !,1 ASK 111 miz GO .Is SIR ART A, BIT IAI �E10 Amy.WeIS m 1.,1 mql BE wIN»10YM1 "AR"I HAS El .1 ,DO Prsurt'e Or, Aimnmr IS.Ne W P I'1 TA ywn.Ncam,DGREAryeS 101 N rt TRAHmm OONII DO Im�P rA I- TFI Tl 1. mn Ml M qRE lnl Z LrVA, OWNEIEPAR'EIT,T1 AlI ANWI Rl ISTEALSP SO loaf SARX.IwasrnsEnu SOLI) SE REN pp11 PER le I—, mMISIG, OMRYI PreOslKNE a srrlaEl :o.n mmemnn N eoaars w> �Me RKa.R reattl 0.1. NO e.m4—II Im" PER rHNIlxe Onl OW SIX, LnNRAW SO A ERS, AEPIT E. 11 dWANX..NI 11 I.S.)ASS, WP Z b H � H � W QE 0 a o6 J zoLu Z Ul J z} 0 � � H O W 00 2 W Z mW cW ED L w LU O LL W � � W rc QED to Q zED 0 ON Z m�NOW O 05 O OnBE yam^ W SO AD TO SHEET C3.1 10111 G F E D c B A �T IT ♦Y IF SOILTYPE: � 1� 1p it .PE tit �w fIFMTMP 9113 ' r I' en'vGSONTYSONOOL 61 m `MAORLE DOUNIY ODO DC L B OJ3 P. r I n__ YYY1 wv wr aou,ew w.w ree�u ZpNEO RI r m SOIL TYPE: �I m D r m SOIL TYPE: �I m D I Ir:�1 e�; �,° PGF per , 1 a: I 11 II ., sF I I 1 IP NO I l I I 1 1 j11 I t _� \ r 4 cav] BAF P TS m w r I - I TP arzrm.�ec I Q (q 6q s"a Z s: O a � �ArE,.ee X`x Du ED — E w SF rn4v � 6/ — q� \ \\ rn m m �? IF SIF Ts e °i/ r I DIP IF ROOF � 4 �y / P, ye _ ATCXTECTS. PC 11Ric IM1 d.Venil. Bulk9 v.a `.', \ am na. vlralnk sezle �``` �` � q eoa naeev m : m,7. P r I 1 I I; 1 1 1� •�\r`. `. a -ua _ �' I I• 1 .I I'i I r���`� 'Xi SOIL TYPE 58C� I n>- IF I 1 ue mw r�p�D SAF I �11 I„ I I I I W 1 I II ,1, 6F BFIT ]] I I I I I 1 r l i 1. I . I 1w rL OFEF tr I I 1 "l i lr A ',14� 1 I rrr I 1vl I , i �. `�' ;'r 0 00 _ werw "SOILTYPE � ,'� I 1 I� rl r s ✓� �� A �. TB 7203 L BF w � us xw 1 I I I 1 yf I �l 1 rr i�'i' ERWIDN CONTROL IEGEND IP — � - �D�D.��NXD9NDDk�D,°D PCE I r�Trc. �� PVC r rr r��W x IP i•r.e BAF L —� ... I 599'` ea M 515' /r � r r I t Al a I B� a ' 9JLLli $a[gdr I a � P e!.I Eui dy, I I tt02X51P°LI OX EMNH¢ OSF 3.03 IF � u IP -E SF - 'u�S}�e�ii'/, 1 I rrrl wmnavreuce ].os it /r ZoID�_-•':5:,i/�lii��l' ory Xwx o°N ]aa p wkre9ovxarory a.a9 nq,F,::%/�d ���mnry LE DID I IT r - A �� T,Iffe° IF TREE -EX., N ],° C3.2 I P I V I ID I 11 I t9 I D C B I C /IN\\ \ ,_I11 — I 'IN j\ I_ 1111 IN IN IN 141 ,11 IN' n Y � IaJV „d w( ' lllll'l'I'I�I�` �II --— ri '�-� " . `dllllllll'l�llllr;!II -- ilr;lll"ll�p, 'I� f'I'll'lgll';lillljljl I� � -,� ■ Q ---: -__ __-------- - ii' _--__- o _ - i R e R ME--- ' --- --- „ J W DJECT SCHOOL BOARD OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADDITIONS 1767 AVON STREET EXTENDED CXANLOTTESVILLE, VA 229J2 VIIGiNA OEPMTMENT Cf EWCAT W. MNSM AW'NG EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE II IN 1l9;IN ` IN 11,IN IIIN IN/ ;,jb; I —T /+' ;my OATS OSgUG 2022 51 TIMMONS VSMP AND SITE I PROJECT g9W8 PLAN REVISIONS 3u � T-11-2012 TIMMONS PC CCU S TIMMON$ GROUP y 111 OESIGNEO HBIMNW gpyp22 TIMMONS cexwl —F ONAWN MKW/CGISX MARK DATE Sy DESCRIPTON sw.xassw sex,s,.ias .. ?- T CXECKEO NB Section 5. Stormwater Management Plan (Provide a reduced I Ix17 copy of the latest stormwater management plan. Do not reference only.) Issued — 10/2014 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Albemarle County 1 1 z 1 a 1 a 1 5 I 6 1 i 1 a 1 s 1 10 1 11 1 12 aE DOMINION CRiltIE&P RIGGING INC _ I •L{ I ZONED LIGHT IN 59S ZONED: LIGHiINDUSTRY d ��$ v , � � i- _ rill f /♦ N 8e� J �.mwAwsepe \ V A I� i- I :o a _ s ----- _ _ 9 a se,. n%ti,.,.,�•;.. _______�-- — • a i ti six � � wo.am ram, �• _ —_ --W— _ — _ p.o--' ---------------------------------- `iJO. xa.0j, 'I AVA A L J iz ins 4c�ee.O1' Il pAAli` r r 6 w K S I \ \ i I `[ PPEAFOMIEUY �i "° ���°�, RR_MM ♦ �® • HR.Ma ARCXITECT9. PC 1j Ix - M .viva IIS BwN 15N 56w1.5UHe 2@F I 'm 1' mco R1mmord,lil aaz+z,a I 1 1 1 �� I eoa znaem a Gar r' frzn i rL vzv •" r 1 f d" -'t aeB�0.ur® nwG �R'O VNVEflfVUIH. R �m mm ro � J1 LJ I I` curmmrs vren �.� \ DTI _ E � loPE' W —O _ b. 11.1.m o 1 �r tit 1 I _ \ I h.�� ""I°• / im. crnaBz�s orer Z p' I i I mn, x 1 � I I C - .. mill 71 � I I ''I •1 �« � o ff Q C r •I � W I � I W Q ° ion• rsm i 1 1i�il I r �( � I' I • f rvtiole W W J r 1 3' 1 w li I •I Q W Z ,,..ksi® 1 � m - 11111 I a� ! /fir it i 6P owl"x of o> a I I r O -*', _ I I 11 AE _ 5 r 1 _ — <Z ,a II I tiI - `o — C7 a I e a mwBRowx \ I• o 0 I ��N 16i va 1 1 2 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 a 1 9 1 10 1 11 1 1 J ere 0 c e Y G -- 7 O a a 30 KEV PLAN g o € a � o f � � WFIRMR ' F F F m ^ s $ evsnroeAo'�xu� R � o � o 'ze Iy�/ `I`VJ e I I I e'4 I I, � �,{��{ ' � 7�7�♦ncei7Ecra. vc '11� al I I, it � i I I I nssann lsm sweat sulreaz I �1111 ; � \ � RiMmY/J. VIgIX3 y1319 PVC /! Go0.o s9a zna9av ' � � I I 1 � Vue I fin \ I ,e o I I � I woI _� r one �o0 4 e wa m .ec`o9„ v,)� _ swtiEron I wa - i a = 1 +k= �-- ------------- ---------- J 0 9 A i I S fi 1 7 P A _ I I; f I ' F it I I Y yY 9 IV IY E I I � 1 I ��1 II 11 1 ,,X». aED IN LLij ON o L — I I A� - - - - - - - I I I I I I 1 I 2 1 3 e T ] 1 9 1 9 1 10 1 11 //` - E1 Eao _ 1 �_Mrys,aoE � l a 1 1-1 MIDI 1 s\ E .777 ATED O ED — W �q IN 0 �-E NO 1 I 1 I II I I I Y _ oX DNI- EwuETO INLET I rye, % � . �r ---, 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 9 9 � — — my/1 o�wEo ; O O N Q G / RRMM / / PC 15S RIME 1,59wN 151A 56w1a=190P F � , RlchmiM,VIgIX3 y1319 A�toxntl � P �d Z �s o e Q Q 8 J $ Z O 5U to z� o� Q J Z J w a a2 w w 0 W z oW= z& of aw owI miaH0 z 00 E 0 9 A Lam. ai m / C5.2 KEY PLAN H I 14 I H G F E D c B A iai A. �S ;1r I 10 �H \ ° PRE DAAB `1' _ \ UNDISTURBED t. �\ 1 0.&S ACRES ill�py-y `GN=Bb r J' nNuv.. STURBANCR BE0 A�/ „'ll;r','-'// 61 ACRES SITE1 I }1�M�3ICryryf��� 1 PR A3A- u •1 J �• '1 DISTURBED II�� 1 ' r ,/,,' .'�,; ,' / ,+q.y,Y� 1 r r/ 063 SERE6`'1�1 lair, w x,louE IDEA. SPEND F -]1 l gad"4xAINASEDMO �, ui'n�v MINr/' Ecs]u •I ° ® �'� n `'� �,, 1„'; yy,// , 'P�q,/fop, r_,' 0yu F I tim' p COUR]YSCNOOL BOAROOF ' ALBEMARCE CO=.VIR AF IN 1.3. PG 3]3 `� � IDNE-0r R1 ' 1NDA IE L unDISTERSE, ,T1IL13AORE8 LN=ES AIR IF MIN ®-- PREDAIB- UNDISTURBEo 0.08 ACRES AN=80 Tc=6 IN �\) PRE DA2 ,r TO SHEET FLOW " i1INEACRES T. 15L 65 5t IN v III lY ^ PRE DCA'DISTURBED AAA El ,6SHACRES aN a2 I _IN _-- - ?tit, _pHAP:,,;i.N, T_ a° I SF'�Ip aRg#Y2 f3€I7aN`'=%'_1Y-iyy IV 3 s fp� A �:i ih��X�a laxs ISQj ore. 6 WSNNAGWAS"'E�ENFEFTO I,FEE DEVELOPED DRAINAGE AREA lTHE HITCH RESPEACEND THE usA SAMS"asmFRPTHICONDITIEA oNsNO a BE aALOFTx BICRETENTIcx oSEE L' Z x: LA. eOGC FOR MmE NEfuL T•' O J: x2 rAHR �= vHE Fe I I II ,W~-i, QIN o 1 ap�w n min. m U Y / � Y 6 y g F "AI \ \ AFICXTECTS�PC III OI I �A A Richnwnd VEPI 23218 �1� al ,ol„1 'aIF' 1 VA 1, r,l M4 1 �r, ii7 V v A. -�7`` r/ 0CS� ftd I$;an I � w P° /I �as � e a � 4 GA]tx,4E I U) & Z a O Q a Q J z O > 5 U W SA Q W Z aw W mw U- . LL W oWz d o>�^ O Sc w UI E,ED W YOH K ENS C6.0 D c B J H G F E D C B A vOST OAee 0.& ACRES To, BMINTo y \' , I / 1� �l ` sT ORM b x DISTURBED o 161 ACRES I ,/ 11 CN 50 li c=3 MIN 37DA3B- `r> 1 \ me 1IT1111NL£TNNED T3 ACRES Fo9NvanNCE \ _ I• I I m4P \ %l. /� i. 'I„Illi 1 I Sol, I �PasT OAS.roH ' �'a 6HEEf FLOW' . oasADREs, - �vl CN=9f 111 Tc=BMIN ' i r MP 9I ( . CCUNTY LOtB OF ALBMAAL.RIA 9 IMPG.3 ZCIER, �..! fi+ o PC\ST DA 3A ®[ l_ OI6TURBEO/ DETAINED J,""RE' POBTDA31C CN=BB UNDISTURBED Tc=6 MIN 113ACRES T. -6 — Tc=6 MIN i POST W UNDIDEElINEETAD O_ O8 ACRES 'CS,w .CN8S ON=61__ Tc=6MIN� _ a. — — 1\ �s1�Y oo is � sat � � �IFgga , I ,F@5 rFd9r �°34 ,?a AVINNy(ODe MIN 13{d i2�N I c ACRES 6 1 DRA FADF SIIt N60a3W%WTII, RANTH ETW�DBEHEN �." ""sEDI,--. s= �DTDN is UBI ^MwALL TI ei =NTTHIS MNTSFE R DRm DEFA f (. $ - \ Z x: 0 J` � 6GPLE1--0' �F 1 I O�w O y i x f E 2 _� qy ry p E U V RRNIM AFHEINT-11I PC 1158Mh 15NSbeal.SDlbffi, IR"N Ifs g, Ids' iHit yytfRgl sf II as` NrH. a F3. IFgt�ll ��- _,� +Yn T 'lA°+ns Sr4 88 z z _. O F- cl Q a 20 Q J d= ' Q > Q O Q F W QW p EDW p <>C W a OW= O BE I, J az.w > 0 s. �04 .j O 02 . a $XEET I C6.1 I 1 111 I 11 I 19 I H G F E D C B A i H G F E D B A WERTIATCHOUTS I.Tw HI GKTODEPROYmEDOVERWEIRW ORIRICSO DETENTION SYSTEM IN81PECTONAPINTNLNIOE SOH DUIE WNTNOLETFUCTUREFNISNIMEN NII➢VPONAVEPPLY 86516E WEIR PIATE 2INS 9. I FF MPNSURM SE➢IMENT FULD VP NCN➢S 2p OFTHE Y LY LAYS IF ANY CONTROL ORIFICES ARE CLUDGED EP PE OI FIFS0. THE SYSTEM CHAD. CE CLEANED VIA A VACUUM TFUCK OR AGJAE METHODS O'€ 99 A 8= u= OUTFACE 1 � yF CHANNEL PROTECTION AND FLOOD PROTECTION CALCULATIONS Z -= p jI. a .1 CHANNEL PROTECTION(ENERGY BALANCE)-1 YR S =w QI YRPOST-DEVTOTAL < IF- (QI YRPRE-DEV -RV, YR PRE-DEV)/RVIVRPOST-DEV+ QIYROFFSITE I" 0.73 CFS 5 0.800 IF It 1.48 * 0.07 / 0.11 . 0.21 0.73 CFS S 0.93 CFS OK FLOOD PROTECTION -10 YR gi L`#i Q10YR PO5T-OEVTOTAL G Q10YR PRE-DEV iSa O O O 4.00 CF5 5 4.20 CFS 4.00 CFS < 4.20 CFS pp qq OK e R � o OUTFALL3 CHANNEL PROTECTION AND FLOOD PROTECTION CALCULATIONS ' 3 y CHANNEL PROTECTION (BNERGY BALANCE)-1 YR Q1 YRP057-DEVTWAL<_IF-(QI YRPRE-DEV *RFI YRPRE-OEV)IRPIYRPOST-DEV+QIYROFFS?E Q Y Y $ F p F p 472 CFS 5 0.800 * ( 0.70 * 0.03 0.06 + 4.72 w w 3 4.72 CFS S 5.02 CFS OK FLOOD PROTECTION -10 YR Q10 YR POST-DEVTOTAL 5 Q10 YR PRE-DEV 10.90 CFS 5 11.04 CF5 10.90 CFS 5 11.04 CFS luuVUVl ABBCHRECIS, PC OK , 1EBwm15h&WN,Su.2u PGmanE.ViSNnia33115 OUTFALL 4 CHANNEL PROTECTION AND FLOOD PROTECTION CALCULATIONS Zt+ CHANNEL PROTECTION(ENERGY BALANCE)-1 YR Ql YRPOST-DEVTOPAL < IF * (QIYRPRE-DEV * RVl YR PFE-DE VRVIYRPOST-DEV+ QIYROFFSITE onav 5.32 CFS 5 0.80 * ( 4.87 IF 0.22 / 0.25 + 2.07 5.32 CFS 5 5.47 CFS OK FLOOD PROTECTION -10 YR Q10YRP0ET-DEVT0TAL � QIOYRPRE-DEV 8.50 CFS 5 15.97 CFS 8.88 CFS < 15.97 CFS OK MNDEPOTIDOL OARDIT RdNFpAXALYBS FEW NE MET LOCATED AREA "CONDITIONLREGAIN NDW IN THE POT THEYASO HRADAA REDUCTION MSTDEVELOPAA NCE WTH SECTION ALL IcwSEE ADCHOSEN,iSEDIMENTATIONNT IN �ESH TMFLOODING, OR CANINES TO FOUND TO I.NLVSI6 FEW 3EPPUPER E NET SDUAGNTARADENT UTILZIXG A CMPSSATER QUANTITY IryIGH SYSTEM LOCATED WFUR N ONE OF THE PLAY CHANNELANDRESOURCES THUS HE FURTHER TM ROOD PEWW M NTS ARE BA�TIB ED USING A NEW DIY AS FEW MALYS IS POINT 6PONG as R� m� U) �d O y3 ~ $ In cl J Q IL QO 0 Z O Rc � = Z 0) EL g } a z� F- �¢ z ow w 2w mW Q alp g o OWz W rc z�> I - a Z.w Q m Q 0 z AAU, c L O0°p On yam^ In J H G E D B C6.2 _ 7_,-_- ` x 7�7 71 gf -1 I i 9 -, -------- ----------- ________-_ `-------------ss��� �/I I — ,I I -- ` -1. -- ,, _ �llk 1 00 00 14, 00 -------------- -------------- ------------------- 'a ;W "t PROJECT SCHOOL BOARD OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA o {� DATE osAuc zou szaxzz TIMMON5 lISNPnrvosla MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADDITIONS p�p a s. $ m x PRQIEcr aBMB PER CR it " n67 AVON STREETS ENDED S �£ 'F vd� pESIGNEo 1(BIMItW T3Y2U22 nMMONs lXAAMENTNS TIMMONS GROUP Q� CHARLOTTES .VAZ emnm i _p BULYIII2 TIMMONS 4i vwuM[ArvmevT,.sewurw wn,yb,q :,_949 $ Si NwymsusN MORI( WTE W DESCRIPMN °HPN D INLET DRAINAGE AREA MAP mg J raw NI r rM H G E B A R(vavm HF<a Nemx frttlB Bm_ No.hmWlY NUY 2. pR3 SswmaSb:Mbn .WaS �w-SIXESANN -xvr rt yz: Nuve: xinweiv Vor Flemenien SeFml xop:: OXH..G. w.®sc..etErt. chalo:m ak Yw?dY02 iPi�mYnm�s�mssGm mmxe.m.W, eeea.L.zemlr- 1i%Qryu bm wr.fiam llNX,I XI vomm (afiiu- e3borc)oE nu GHW Nvviam emeus a,B'umR mom,.. x® r�abova.xUaae emmame mBd:mmnmvf Nm:em amm .wbhnJTON— mwHrsmaT emmlxQYDM,SUN' U - —S.— guvani mdmavgetl un�'Nre Mmx nik Rnhvtlm fmPkmmtaDvn Pb�fo tle 9wkdPd Nmm:M 301 ], xbil. wuy MMxieN 6r N4Q) m S'gMvbu 5, 3018 ThCBak hna h'c emlmusQb Wwiech'WwX0oti6 frc urc w:hc laoo Biw wnluvAd. '1Des rndile ee Yms6atli to Lve mtl:i J4 veea DFQ9 gtmm WenvMwgmeot pugmm rexaW:¢e aniA VA GM621 4. 15L5.27,:2] iEe mk pelm yealb nYpMPlm:maia Sl?$OG. b_ibia priang is vJtl:4myJ:luue y M1bie1 S: 1C � �I.IC,BmY SPPwoa lew HI-4 I JRaavv MVW:mcvm Anaeea Aivv NMiW OHx<Tntlti Il�W Sl fnartnSrs4N'nrreNm, V✓ymm 30106 THE �OHEOim PVISTJRPFDMFAOHI M ACRES DIINGEAN EXIISnNG BI0FEIENnon FMw1Y H.EVER THE ADJACENT EXISTING BIDGETENSION FAGL� DESIGNED IN MIT THROUGH LOR 2 TG P�MISTORASSEA F0REATION ON ME E%I6i NGRIORE NTII FPGILi �E6 P FWNDIFROUHEDI N2@1L=ROFREE USED FOR THE —GSEGWV310U6 m MANAGED TURFXEI WMDD 233 AGRE60FIMP�ERG0YER PER MEOMEl. 6XFEiGAGS, PEO IR THEIR EµMAINII R U�IREIE�MCAED1iRRUSRN ISI1 WRN 11 BLBNRWILLBEPMGNP£O FN0N AR qmq� U) 0g O u9 F Q Q 6 Q J U) Z� A, Z a 0 d'= H >� Q �< U J oZ U aW � W J mW j 1 �G 0 LL O Wz W I �z m H a;Fc Q J~ w c L O O U O n yam^ (n sHEEi C6.4 J E A 1111©111111®■■11®®� 11111111111®■■11@■i 11111111111®■■110 111�11111111■■111� 111 0118111®■®188 1191®110011®■®1100 116111111111■®118■■1 181811111111■■011 ■■1 111111111111■■111® 101011011®11■■1111■■ 111011111111■■111 111118111111■■11111■t 611011111111■■111 IIIa11111111n■811111 IIIIIIIIIIIIn■11111� 11101811111111■011� IIIIIIIIIIIIn■111■■1 11181111111111■811� III811111111n■111■® 11111111111111■111® IIIBIIIIIIIIn■111■■1 111111111111■■111■■1 111111111111■■1111� m11111111111■■1111� 111111111111■■111 ■■1: 111111111111■■1111� DIIII8111111■■1111' 111111111111■■111 DIIIIIIIIIII■■1111� 611111111111 ■ ■ 11111111 ®11111111111®■111® �11111111111�■'11© �1111�111111�■'11® 111111111111■■111® :CT i{ �Gg 6 Les sssYaYs s L E s q$ ••• s °;. 'a el9 e11L55° Ea. �i ay 4q: N C9 88: Rie d bG:Cas vi FpB £ifR##i&ERi pqC pp9 qhL 8« yE t"&�gRXkRi}R3#%XIFXi qm pY pip gtl8 5y� =ga@"s=°E_'6egaksa�g&�° °Sy'a e¢aa o�$e000io oRao�o• a�ie ep° e °a°s=°°=°.�e°C •�o op�'y '�°ve'g vov�R°�•,oa oe�•°e 4 py � om d e�e �§evg d °® 7aEL :GzS�$aYffi° 9sa e� °ovmooeS��" YvEva�v�•oaavog�v .. F Ep5G5�'S���u NflG.Y aR8 SYEC88q.Y 555�ig3):SL� ui«G- y��E3���i @tlp 'Y d 5155ek£�55'�a555i�ii51i��$ia55 i GGY88o'.L GL==898L BLLid3•EYU� !? RiR� Y `49'8 969&®«2&9Yi�i«yii}amL.�iG YxEoo 94R4 R�89RP5R°�9 B E SCHOOL BOARD OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADDITIONS 1767 AVON STREET EXPENDED CXANLOTPESVILLE, VA 22A2 viFGiNw oEPMTMEXi6 EnCPiip! Mt1 NO STORM WATER DESIGN TABLES AND CALCULATIONS 1®� I11111111�11111111� 11111111111111111111 II®� 1BI0811B8@01� 1m1 101 1011111 Uy DATE OS qUG 2022 5.pp12 TIMMONS VSMP AND SITE �aFI IPROJECT 7-311@2 TIMMOG99gg FLAN REVISIONS :•�'S NS PER CWNTY ,Y 5^'m DESIGNED HBIMNW COMMENTS TIMMONS GROUP ,Q+ ��� 40320P2 iIMMONS aoe9w=. w.:.e su ce xwl � mm '� DNAWN MKW/CGISX ttW.393.36N fwN wH.395.e3�] wxx. n�. i MARK DATE BY DESCRIFTON IA`�- ;•Ry CXECKEO NB H G r E D D e A STOW PIPE TABLE H G STR EX2118 E CMP #3 III IERTEEL EPE. INV ll MlLVN­ . . Ill Hl 310:t BPaeI-Grtub�Gnia NVOUT VR.1 p,11 vI NE LEI HIT, aT27 .Eo STRV310-CMP #1T. .E.1z a wv wn III ��s°? sx rng a Ell" sTT.Ill11 6�@ ixN wsgalEvansl NV NVELT S73NE E�F.1011 if di IRE EXIST E.ENO E55rzi3Exs x p \ Z0F ® mw NiL lEM ®OCl a.� 10•� oo CMP #1 - STR EX300 T_ „ z z : �I s.. III..ao 1.. 11.0 ll ,.. 10.11.,E STR EX216 - CMP #3 CMP #3 - EX200 STR 226 - STR 202 STR 228 - STR EX200 STR 100 - STR EX102 - s --Ell=As G 3 azm T03 .2 yin ®vilg7,l MI A ®nu s®m .- milli MEN WOMEN �� M0 I WE �E�l= Now >>€ � 8= / N � Z s: Qoy p% gC qq Z a F5 S `a 2 i i 1oSEALEI i� 0 HERZ STR 324 - CMP #1 STR 104-STR 106 HESZVEII EQ I `FTSLEGGVE A? R� z d Z _. O F a Q J 2O > Z5 �U iU z� 'a of z rcW W J SW LL mW K a� aw LL D O W W 3 3r aZ w W 0 < w (n IP_� W O D°p 0 O SHEET C7.1 Section 6. Pollution Prevention Plan. (reference County Code 17-404 and State Regulation 9VAC25-880-70 part II section A.4) A. Plan showing pollution activities and prevention practices (Provide a reduced I W7 copy of a site plan on which all of the following activity locations are clearly marked. Keep this plan up-to-date with ongoing site changes and inspections.) Issued — 10/2014 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Albemarle County 10111 G F s A \I`,IN IT I `, SOIL TYPE. µS` - 6 6_- NIL MR < WILL ` eY WI _ _ _ __ =`TK _ ° -RAW, A \ \ DID, �� HIT AD IS ART A ' e 1 j 1' O / S ¢v . MP 911E SF GD 1'-J"�f �A �; r I� ,>YY COl/NIYSCNOOL6i AN ; ALBEMAAA I", AAN20NED R! DNENi BP6Nl ev j�}( 8' j sm. I \ COETE TP I L WASHILUT IS TYPE TP FRI TP �. 1 I vl E III e�1J I �ErTP I IF I 1 SAF I I -i' `1 II'• II'ljll { I I AR, v I\ 1p `v I Tp I ITT ST SA II rAIN,- -Z GF HE s TP TP '+Na" a,Am v -- / S &F �. / SHALL., u,m A. A. iO cDNa,a. / v. mncNETs w.sxoui M�cs1 z ; / °u TASHO on znE. ms mvcuTs wisnour nw A. BE Evnra. f v„ sEucoNTuxEO. Z - cesdWOxu5oxnx05AND • Z :A / x A Ma SI • Qd� 11U mmuc,ASsUTA O ! P°�StaI PNn MM O0.HANDEN,°SBdT1uE� ...IS i El ME COx<as,s wnsX • Vuffi SEOI Em TON / � ,xE wnsx<uT rs m DE .0�,® — N .1 Rm°nwx. srAN IS - WE 8 HAD AFTE R) NDT WASTED TPA NSER.T,aNs Ass°onreD wm, ORAW AND MORTAR.MULLE,s� _ : asp iocAT,oM. wASNwr �, smEnn, wEOAxAN aaoD <O.T,NOEN<. x.. x zr HAND,«E �+ 1 \ m. SIDES BE MARED AT WE `NEF—T xRc.Nv, UN ut WHO ISSURNE BASS T,:11N��ARExS1SHa� E1.wm, oy=� F _ =1 W. na as�ED.. O TC MR i AD�DA,E xDROEND W]CPY AND < NIL KLYMw NE WAE.,NG „� _ UF e/r�ailF°WASHHOOUT Mwsl sxSSURUS ' MI w,s x ISHERKED AMR NEWS ASSES, xOLD ____ EAmNR .A O O O IS NEW WE WASNE DAN BE FROURS AT AN UPLAND AS 0 IDIOM Ey WE M�MREHI ALL COMMODE WASTE SHALL BE DISPOSED OF _ - AW AN mREneD n Ei1�0. F 1. FANDERE. LOADIERW WASTE E E IN A MANNER ABHORRENT neix BUT E A. / ar LINER WE (BERNARD LOW S 9 �A OF THE NORoR UN IS RESIDENTS., ALL APPLICABLE LAREFF noxs N, x IS a DR s�iD MANNINTT IS IS 11 Fnnrarul E FIASS"v \. CONCRETE WAENOOT •RRA a g Gw BUT ,wre xl O J i LAFOI _ SFAS TS �"� F, a e IY� I / ./ /5T PAR - A �Si00V I ■ .mew: w,.r �' _ J; _ _ ,_ _ 3i l I L _ L 1 SOIL TYPE: s 58C I`I GF IP "- 1 f:�'✓ C� o AA. . .... r INAI \ �` ` IH $s Ts DG O 1 1 I, 1 \ : IT \ II IF 1, ✓ 1 GAF oo WEREE1 �I� 1 SF q' IHIS F E<os I RESULAN RA. 1, CLOOMITHISTICAN WO �aiMNDAR I I / %l,/,,,� A•, GROUND FUEL c 'A r i / ,"JRA,�r ,,/ AWAREMR NffiullexewWNxE�// ♦ IS w USLINERSESSATED O TSNORDERED ETE° o�OAR�i , I N moat w IEasm u��'S'� T <E DA fC .. .,.5... �T �. . r EROSIDN CONTROL IEGEND , IP S WM1i6 R \ 6F SLOACHE PER ""__- 1'' A0 LF AT SF sAF L _ram— SAF 'P y m GAF _ - IN-" y 5 Ems, (}� , ,rover"WEN `1,, „J-.l RIO t£ A 'r > �' , sa Al RAP -A d� I I �� Y -- jf _ _1 / " I�N� 1 E I � �� �� _ o! l °, Ra'. es l �,I 93 x " 1 0 1 ¢. Rs aay' 9•,P a r " ' �7 yv,rY , RIPS / B 1 x I ?'��a`� $Id °,3aD� J ICY / MR n R 7 6 1 V IS OC ow l Al RAM T.D� ' I O rcomxsmun ox E-- s.DO FOUL,TMEAD s.Ds INESURMAN TO E 1ERmsEmNs -A O I-WNAIXTmN iExx IRAI O ASS IS R� fob Z O ya o Q a _ J ZO 1 W O Q 2 >L) a Z g o� a Z rcW O_ aw z W Z m>W> W Qiw W p W a O>Z> d a Z.w Z 0 < U— O m~UR DE OODOS J yam^ d snEET C3.2 D G s y gA y I � E D C R A or C , \same L -- �I 0'i I 1 TO 11 D"-WASxDArA TM« o G maN AREASr w., HAR L-Or �,E ONE. Irwxruxm NEENEENI de mxureI _ _—141milox AxE, BEFAS • " Z u A x A par i llo suu e[ wmw®m m[ [lumen. Q z,a'sa;ln wvxs oA omel A. W FOSxF / ms wns"wr rs ro BE Haulm w,m x ms xmorwx. m - sam Z ewr um,rto m. ceeannw¢ ssmonreo wrtx aaoar um ..—A.Nm""'D D. xme a)eN"' ~ $� xlls[e e[IM 0 ury s'"su'<wm swc wx n st nooae:s ,"s rcn me aao Al.: III I. REST . wEeC.N. NuwxE .D CDNESH AC • I .,ID C�IICAzre w.s,E aENENA,.D rr w.Nnaw arca.,IDNs maDDmD. .I / z.:N.ANCE DISTRANCE Is HE ASEEr.ANHE. mmEmaE, NAY NAIEs as a,xm __------ —__-_______--_ THERSEEND THE TERMISTS BE THE BASKET Wo EST AOULDlul FRESH AT FEE �a�O", xluxe,THE LESCREAD OF AT xm. w ED r wcs`°"w`.u"xoxwr RDPPROVED EixBEFFFELD RICT TO i 1u ff SOFT" O 0— ININTATE o"z K F OD ulsl snE TOHEusrEelea AT Irssr ax¢ a x�tt wa EEE wlE : a mH wHrr xE sxEmex: `Ez w � w A. w.E ,« xrwH,a Ixrtaartv ADmaA,E pNmlllD m AND s a reAR, oa xa m Wo e ml:oxxaz u I BO°w I,ox :E`wOn.l`w'ASHOlom enw:) s" SEEDD .1 > �E ED E. s� BE ED -. `w N TH Eo WASTE HAS CCsm L roam HER THE THE C NDIRMw s°lSUFF o 0 0 _ — - "Elaxr'xE E WAS E O ACCUMULATED :r AN wwlo ss _ _ m alEo x. Ellall�a> s s a nzNw ma xmlm A MANNER NATTIN. wm ALL Arruueu Lour aeon..." AND s ' ' A.rtsIND NNy SE ,HT, HHARE NO RE, TER SPEEHHOR A. E.H.m A. SHAL BE DISPOSED OF a rm .. mN reC rxoan. RCwomc sire Rem 11,BO. THE C0Y enAlvAAxD zz oN z o 8 m / a M w xm m suu ISEE r ail I yl6 i III ,W II�tl"`I� R_ AT x�_— i „ SO, �_ I_ + AN '__—_--- p, I�IN - I'fg Id/E.i d3' I f , 1 9 1 3 1 < 1 R 1 N 1 , 1 IP, rPoIlb r;Il Cll; i 1"" hllj .' I or Ir", ;I III r r pro,'�'' Ifl%IIICV\,l I llr''I'Iror'li'i; EROSIDN CDMRDLI END W "H.REARN %%l',i;;;' ,I Dm ~�IE.B.OlYE�IDN E14 O,ExrEENOSED . ,,, PEREENUFFIBEDD. -A F O ,affm�EESSMAJRE"� III C3.3 Dxr I IN D C R B. Sources of Pollutants, locations, and prevention practices Pollutant, or Pollutant Location on site Prevention Practices, Generating Activity Control Measures C. Sources of Pollutants, continued. Common activities and minimum control and prevention ractices Pollutant, or Pollutant Location on site Prevention Practices, Generating Activity Control Measures Follow Erosion and Sediment Control Clearing, grading, excavating, and on- Land disturbance area Plan. Dispose of clearing debris at stabilized areas acceptable disposal sites. Seed and mulch, or sod within 7 da s of land clearing Cover stomr drain inlets and use drip Paving operations Roads and driveways pans and absorbentloil dry for all paving machines to limit leaks and spills Direct concrete wash water into a leak - Concrete washout Current location and detail shown proof container or leak -proof settling and cement waste on plan basin that is designed so that no overflows can occur Enclose or cover material storage areas. Mix paint indoors in a containment area or Structure construction, stucco, Structures in a flat unpaved area Prevent the painting, and cleaning discharge of soaps, solvents, detergents and wash water, paint, form release oils and curing compounds. Water shall be filtered, settled or similarly Dewatering operations Dewatering sites shown on plan treated prior to discharge as shown on plan. Designated areas for material delivery Material delivery and storage Designated area shown on plan and storage. Placed near construction entrances, away from waterways and drainage paths Material use during building process Building areas Follow manufacturer's instructions . MSDS's attached. waste collection area will not receive a substantial amount of runoff from upland Solid waste disposal Current designated container areas areas and does not drain directly to a on plan waterway. Containers have lids covered before periods of rain, or are in a covered area. Scheduled collection to prevent Issued — 10/2014 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Albemarle County Pollutant, or Pollutant Location on site Prevention Practices, Generating Activity Control Measures overfilling. MATERIALS NOT TO BE BURIED ON -SITE Convenient and well -maintained portable sanitary facilities will be Sanitary waste Current locations shown on plan provided, and located away from waterways or inlets. Such facilities shall be regularly maintained. Apply fertilizers in accordance with Landscaping operations Landscape areas shown on plan manufacturer's recommendations and not during rainfall events To be treated in a sediment basin or Wash Waters Wash areas shown on plan better control as specified on plan. Minimize the discharge of pollutants from equipment and vehicle washing Vehicle and equipment washing Designated areas and details shown on Provide containment and filtering for all plan wash waters per the plan Minimization of exposure to precipitation and stormwater. Minimize the exposure of building materials, building products, construction wastes, trash, landscape materials, fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, detergents, sanitary waste, and other materials present on the site to precipitation and to stormwater. (Identify all non-stormwater discharges to occur on your site. Keep this plan up-to-date with ongoing site changes and inspections. See CGP, 9VAC25-880-70 section E for examples of non-stormwater discharges.) I13 Issued — 10/2014 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Albemarle County E. Persons responsible for pollution prevention practices (Provide the names and contact information for all persons responsible for prevention practices as listed above.) F. Response and reporting practices Maurni=e discharges from spills and leaks. Minimize the discharge of pollutants from spills and leaks and implement chemical spill and leak prevention and response procedures as follows. Respond to all spills, leaks and discharges as follows, Report all spills, leaks and discharges as follows, (Provide detailed response and reporting practices according to 9VAC25-880-70, Part II, section A.4.e.) G. Pollution Prevention Awareness (Describe training and procedures to provide awareness and compliance for all measures in this document; waste management, wash waters, prevention measures, etc.) Issued — 10/2014 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (S WPPP) Albemarle County Section 7. Discharges to impaired waters, surface waters within an applicable TMDL wasteload allocation, and exceptional waters. (Provide detailed measures for any applicable TMDL) Issued — 10/2014 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Albemarle County Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek, and Schenks Branch Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Action Plan Permit Cycle: 2018-2023 General Permit No.: VAR040073 April 30, 2021 Prepared by: University of Virginia Facilities Management, Environmental Resources Division 1490 Leake Drive, Charlottesville, VA 22904 (434)243-5380 �1- V IVERSIrIY 0 IRGINIA Table of Contents Background...................................................................................................................................................1 1. Final TMDL Report Names and EPA Approval Dates..................................................................................2 2. Pollutants Causing the Impairments...................................................................................................2 3. WI -As Assigned to the Permittee.........................................................................................................2 4. Significant Sources of Pollutants of Concern.......................................................................................3 5. BMPs Designed to Reduce the POCs...................................................................................................4 6. Outreach Strategies to Enhance Public Education..............................................................................9 7. Interim Milestones and Implementation of BMPs and Outreach....................................................10 List of Appendices Appendix A -Impaired Stream Segments in the Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek and Schenks Branch Watersheds Appendix B— Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek, and Schenks Branch Watersheds and Land Cover within UVA's Regulated MS4 Appendix C - University of Virginia Campus -Wide Stream Assessment, Phase I: Near -Term Projects Appendix D - UVA Training Plan and Frequency Background The University of Virginia (UVA) occupies approximately 1,200 acres and is located within the borders of both the City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County. The University is also situated in the Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek and Schenks Branch watersheds. These watersheds drain to the Rivanna River on the eastern boundary with the City of Charlottesville, then flow to the James River, and ultimately discharge to the lower Chesapeake Bay. As a predominately urbanized state entity with separate storm and sanitary sewer conveyance systems, the University is classified as a non-traditional Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4). Therefore, UVA is mandated to follow the regulations of the Environmental Protection Agency as outlined in the Clean Water Act, the Virginia Stormwater Management Act and the MS4 General Permit granted by the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). In compliance with Section 11.13 of the General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Small MS4s (Permit No.: VAR040073), and the Special Condition described therein, the University of Virginia, an MS4 Operator, has developed a Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Action Plan for Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek and Schenks Branch. This TMDL action plan has been prepared in accordance with the requirements in the November 1, 2018 DEQ General VPDES Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Small MS4s. Additionally, the University has coordinated with Albemarle County and the City of Charlottesville in the preparation of this Action Plan. The TMDL for these watersheds sets limits on the amount of the pollutant of concern (POC), which in this case is total suspended solids (TSS) or sediment, that can be discharged to the local streams without detrimentally impacting water quality. The MS4 Permit Special Condition for local TMDLs requires all MS4 operators to reduce existing levels of this POC to a level that will be protective of water quality. This process typically requires that the MS4 operator install best management practices (BMPs) that will, through various means, lower the contaminant levels in stormwater discharged to local streams and other water bodies. 1. Final TMDL Report Names and EPA Approval Dates Wasteload allocations (WLAs) for sediment were assigned to the University for the Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek and Schenks Branch Watersheds in the approved Final TMDL (TMDL) report as follows: Sediment TMDLs for Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek, and Schenks Branch Albemarle County and Charlottesville City, Virginia (Revised: January 20, 2016) (TMDL Report) • EPA approval date was 7/26/2016. 2. Pollutants Causing the Impairments The TMDL report noted in Section 1 identified four separate tributaries to the Rivanna River or stream segments which receive runoff from UVA with benthic impairments as listed in Virginia's 2012 Section 303(d) Report on Impaired Waters: Moores Creek (VAV-H28R_MSC01A00), Lodge Creek (VAV-H28R_XRC01A04), Meadow Creek (VAV-H28R_MWC01A00), and Schenks Branch (VAV-H28R_SNK01A02) (Appendix A). The Lodge Creek and Meadow Creek tributaries were originally listed as impaired on Virginia's 2006 305(b)/303(d) Water Quality Assessment Integrated Report whereas the Moores Creek and Schenks Branch segments were first indicated as impaired in the 2008 report. The TMDL Report (page 45) states: "Since a benthic impairment is based on a biological inventory, rather than on a physical or chemical water quality parameter, the pollutant is not explicitly identified in the assessment, as it is with physical and chemical parameters. The process outlined in USEPA's Stressor Identification Guidance Document (USEPA, 2000) was used to identify the critical stressors for each of the impaired watersheds in this study." The resulting stressor analysis identified sediment as the most probable stressor for all four of the watersheds listed in the TMDL. Additionally, hydrologic modification was recognized as a stressor for all of the applicable streams except Moores Creek. 3. WI -As Assigned to the Permittee The affected area MS4s, including UVA, have been assigned aggregated waste load allocations and percent reduction requirements for each of the four watersheds in the TMDL Report as is shown in Table 1. Table 1 Regulated MS4 Aggregated Sediment ... Allocation Within the Impaired Moores..•Meadow from Tables 6-4 — 6-7 of the Sediment TMDIL Development Re Existing Required Load Percent Allocated Watershed Total Load* Reduction Reduction (%) Load (tons/yr) (tons/yr) (tons/yr) Moores Creek 835.5 14.6 713.8 121.7 Lodge Creek 91.3 50.1 45.6 45.8 Meadow Creek 898.5 50.7 442.6 455.9 Schenks Branch 1 290.4 1 56.4 126.7 1 163.6 (*) The existing total load accounts for all land sources including forested areas. 4. Significant Sources of Pollutants of Concern The TMDL Report identified several factors that attributed to the sediment impairment ranging from active erosion, poor vegetative cover, large amounts of impervious surfaces, urban land uses, poor ripariran vegetation, forest harvesting operations and unstable stream banks. This section identifies significant sources of sediment to the UVA MS4 that are not covered under a separate VPDES permit. UVA's Parking and Transportation facility is covered under a VPDES Industrial Stormwater General Permit (VAR051372) for sediment and is excluded from this analysis. The most recent MS4 permit (2018) states: "a significant source of pollutants means a discharge where the expected pollutant loading is greater than the average pollutant loading for the land use identified in the TMDL". Since the University owns and operates all of the facilities within the MS4 boundary, a process was established to evaluate all activities and land uses to identify any potential sites with significant sources of sediment. Through desktop and site inspection analysis, it was determined that the University does not contain any sites that are significant sources of sediment. However, the areas identified in the analysis will continue to be monitored. Potential Sources at UVA Potential significant sources of sediment discharging and applicable to UVA's MS4 include construction sites, litter and street dust. In addition, there are several sites with municipal operations that were identified as high -priority facilities under the MS4 Permit requirements that require SWPPPs. These sites have the potential to contribute to the benthic impairment as a result of urban runoff. For example, UVA's Facilities Management maintenance yards contain stockpiles of mulch and sand that could enter the storm sewer system and streams if not managed appropriately. Similarly, the Main Heat Plant has coal and ash handling operations that create an increased risk for sediment entering the storm system during runoff events. Other areas of consideration, due to the increased risk of urban runoff, are large parking lots and other impervious surfaces that discharge to the storm system and are not treated by a downstream BMP. These sizeable impermeable surfaces increase the velocity of runoff during storm events. Large volumes of water entering streams at high velocities, can cause erosion of stream banks and scour -related degradation which can be compounded by a lack of or minimal riparian buffer. In -stream erosion associated with bank instability is identified as one of the largest contributors of land based non -point sediment load in the benthic impaired watersheds. Due to the University's location at the top of the four noted tributaries, UVA is more prone to this condition. S. BMPs Designed to Reduce the POCs Historical Efforts Appendix E in the TMDL Report noted several BMPs that have been implemented between 2009 and 2014 that demonstrate previous progress toward reducing sediment within the University's affected impaired watersheds. The report, however, did not include the sediment reductions from these BMPs. In order to account for this inventory, the University plans on verifying the eligibility of these BMPs and calculating the associated sediment reductions using the latest version of DEQ Guidance Memo GM20-2003: Chesapeake Bay TMDL Special Condition Guidance (Rev. 11/12/2020). In addition, the University intends to use the same methodology for all eligible BMPs constructed after 2014 to meet the WLA. Ongoing Efforts Before the issuance of the most recent MS4 Permit, the University of Virginia had taken a proactive stance and made an aggressive effort to reduce POCs within its watersheds. The University's MS4 Program Plan includes a wide array of BMPs that aim to reduce pollutants including sediment. The list of BMPs below outlines some of those practices and correlates with the Minimum Control Measures found in the Annual MS4 Report: BMPs 1. Websites and Social Media— Information on erosion and sediment control (E&SC) and stormwater management (SWM) can be found on the Environmental Resources website (https://www.fm.virxinia.edu/depts/operations/environmental/index.htmi). Additionally, a Facebook page, has been created in conjunction with the University -formed "Clean Water Working Group" to promote good water quality practices and behaviors. 2. Public Awareness Events -The University tables at events such as World Water Day and Earth Week for education and outreach. 3. Rivanna Stormwater Education Partnership (RSEP) Member —Asa member of RSEP, the University strives to make citizens aware of stormwater issues to help reduce impacts and improve local water quality. Membership in this partnership is an effective and fundamental part of UVA's education and outreach program and is further described in Section 6. 4. Advertising —Through RSEP, advertisements are displayed in a local newspaper (Cville Weekly), movie theaters and buses addressing methods to reduce sediment with car washing tips and other reminders to prevent anything except stormwater from entering storm drains, etc. 5. Utility Bill Mailings— Mailings are coordinated via RSEP and are sent to all water customers in the City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County. Mailings address POC awareness and mitigation methods. 6. Educational Lectures— Members of the Environmental Resources team routinely guest lecture in classes for Engineering, Architecture and Environmental Science at the University to talk about the importance of POC awareness and reductions. 7. Stream Cleanups— UVA students, faculty and staff are encouraged to participate in stream enhancement and education projects and programs where possible. 8. Illicit Discharge Program —The University's program involves monitoring, detection and elimination of illicit discharges. The University maintains a 24-hour response team for reported discharges. Additionally, the RSEP website provides an online reporting tool for illicit discharges which are distributed to the appropriate MS4 operator. Utility mapping is updated regularly, and illicit discharges are discouraged through public education. The University follows procedures for reporting and tracking illicit discharges and procedures for enforcing policies. An SOP has been written for illicit discharge detection and response. Procedures were revised and updated to ensure compliance with new MS4 program requirements. 9. MS4 Outfall Inspections/Dry Weather Discharge Inspections —An inspection program for all stormwater outfalls utilizes written procedures to detect, investigate and report illicit discharges, and document the investigation. The procedures set forth in Item 8 are followed if any suspicious discharges are noted. 10. Storm Drain Stenciling Program - Staff and volunteers label stormwater catch basins and inlets to raise awareness that they lead directly to local creeks in an effort to prevent illicit discharges. 11. Erosion and Sediment Control Program — UVA follows Annual Standards and Specifications (AS&S) for E&SC in compliance with the Virginia E&SC Law and Regulations. E&SC Plans are required for all land disturbances over 10,000 square feet (sf) in Albemarle County and 6,000 sf in the City of Charlottesville. UVA requires E&SC controls to be installed on all land disturbing projects, even if a formal E&SC plan is not required. Additionally, plan approval is required prior to commencement of any regulated land disturbing activity. UVA notifies DEQof project initiations and also reports E&SC plan approvals and annual disturbed acreage in accordance with the AS&S and MS4 Permit. 12. Construction General Permit - Land disturbances over 1 acre require a construction site Virginia Stormwater Management Program (VSMP) permit issued by DEQ, which requires the project to develop a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). UVA has provided a SWPPP template for construction activities to help guide contractors to plan for appropriate controls to prevent non-stormwater discharges. 13. Construction Site Inspections - UVA inspectors conduct E&SC inspections for applicable land disturbing activities: 1) upon initial installation, 2) at least once within every 2 week period, 3) within 48 hours of a runoff producing storm event, and 4) upon completion of the project. Pollution -generating activities are addressed during E&SC inspections, and full SWPPP audits are conducted routinely. 14. Stormwater Management Master Plan - The University has developed a Stormwater Management Master Plan as a proactive effort to implement a range of projects that not only provide solutions to drainage and flooding issues, but for water quality improvement needs on a watershed level. The plan strategically identifies projects that would meet pollutant load reduction targets associated with TMDLs assigned to the University. 15. Stormwater Management Project Review — UVA follows AS&S for SWM in compliance with the Virginia SWM Act and Virginia SWM Program (VSMP) Regulations as related to MS4s and construction activities. SWM Plans are required for all land disturbances over 1 acre in Albemarle County and 6,000 sf in the City of Charlottesville. Plan approval is required prior to commencement of any regulated land disturbing activity. 16. Structural BMP Implementation— UVA has installed over 100 structural BMPs that reduce the pollutant load to local streams and is actively installing more. Additionally, construction projects occurring within the MS4 are encouraged to oversize their proposed BMPs to generate additional pollutant reductions. All newly constructed or retrofitted BMPs will be built in accordance with the latest version of the Virginia BMP Clearinghouse. 17. Structural BMP Inspections - UVA inspects and maintains all structural BMPs on its property, unless subject to a long-term lease to another entity. In these cases, the entity leasing the property is responsible for the maintenance. Inspectors conduct routine inspections and complete maintenance as needed. Debris is cleaned from catch basins and conveyances within the stormwater drainage system on a routine basis and after large storms. 18. Storm Drain Inspection and Cleaning— UVA currently inspects and cleans all catch basins or storm drains on a quarterly basis and after large storms to compliment the Structural BMP inspections noted in BMP 17. UVA's work order management system tracks all installed storm drains and issues reminders every 3 months for inspection and cleaning. Practicing this strategy throughout the campus is away to reduce sediment, across the entire MS4. 19. Street Sweeping and Vacuuming - UVA is responsible for the cleaning of streets (under its control), parking lots and permeable pavement. Operations include street sweeping at least 5 times per year, removal of trash and leaves at least twice per year and vacuuming permeable sections once a year. 20. Municipal Facility Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping - UVA has developed and implemented site -specific SWPPPs for all its municipal high priority facilities. 21. Biennial Staff Training Plan— UVA implements a training plan on IDDE, good housekeeping, pollution prevention, spill prevention, environmental awareness, and other required topics. Training is provided to appropriate staff at least every two years. See Appendix D. The minimum control measures and the associated BMPs under the MS4 Program Plan are further detailed at: https://www.fm.virginia.edu/docs/operations/environresources/2019/MS4 Program Plan 2018-2023- Update 2019-09.pdf. Potential Projects In an effort to make progress toward the sediment reduction requirements under the TMDL of the noted watersheds, UVA conducted a stream assessment on UVA and UVA Foundation property that evaluated streams adjacent to near -term redevelopment projects under design. The following list identifies potential stream restoration projects currently under consideration (from University of Virginia Campus -Wide Stream Assessment, Phase I: Near -Term Projects - September 2019 — Appendix C): Table 4 Potential Stream Restoration Segments on University Grounds Adjacent Estimated TSS Redevelopment Restoration Reductions Stream Location Zone Watershed Length (ft) (tons/yr)* Meadow Creek North Grounds (MDC- Meadow 006/012) Darden Creek 1,041 23.36 Moores Fontaine Park— West (FPW-001) Fontaine Park Creek 1,315 29.51 Ivy Mountain / Moores Ivy Mountain Area (MBW-002) KCRC Creek 413 9.27 * TSS Reductions are calculated by multiplying the proposed length of restored stream by 44.88 Ibs/ft/yr, which is the Edge -of - Stream 2011 Interim Approved Removal Rates from Table 3 of Recommendations of the Expert Panel to Define Removal Rates for Individual Stream Restoration Projects. Reductions may increase if BANCS assessment and protocols are used. UVA also identified several potential BMP retrofits in the 2015 SWM Master Plan. The below list identifies projects under consideration with the most potential for contributing to the sediment reduction goal: Table 5 Stormwater Facility Name Potential Stormwater Basin Existing BMP Type Retrofit OpportunitleSA Proposed BMP Type Watershed The Park Basin Dry Detention Wet Pond Meadow Creek FM Basin Dry Detention Wet Pond Meadow Creek Gilmer Basin Dry Detention Extended Det. & Add Forebay Lodge Creek ^ UVA will model sediment load reductions pursuant to the Chesapeake Bay TMDL Action Plan Guidance Document published by DEQ (latest edition) as well as any additional guidance received from DEQ to track both the effectiveness and progress toward the TMDL requirement. Inter -Jurisdictional Agreement The University, Albemarle County and the City of Charlottesville have agreed to take responsibility for the sediment loads generated within their regulated area boundary regardless of sheet flow draining to or from another jurisdiction. Sediment reduction credit for BMPs installed on any lands with inter -jurisdictional sheet flow will be received by the permittee that installs and maintains the BMP. However, each entity reserves the right to enter into agreements in which TMDL credit is shared with adjacent permittees for any projects which treat drainage from their own and/or multiple permittees' lands and could target the specific watersheds. 6. Outreach Strategies to Enhance Public Education One of the most important and effective BMPs in controlling and reducing sediment in local streams is the Education and Outreach program at the University. UVA has developed separate strategies to educate the general public versus employees. These strategies are described in detail below. Education, Outreach and Public Participation Program UVA's primary outreach and education initiatives are achieved through their role as a founding member and sponsor of the RSEP. This partnership is a collaborative effort among local MS4 permit holders and other governmental agencies interested in stormwater protection. The mission of RSEP is to provide public education, outreach, and opportunities for participation in stormwater related issues in the area to help improve local water quality. Many students, faculty, and staff live in the areas targeted by RSEP campaigns. In this way, UVA is able to convey the same stormwater related messages at the University which are also promoted in the local community, further reinforcing their importance beyond jurisdictional or MS4 boundaries. The objective of all public education and outreach efforts, whether they are implemented by the University directly or as part of RSEP are to 1) focus public outreach campaigns to address the viewpoints and concerns of target audiences and 2) utilize diverse media (including TV and radio PSAs, print ads, flyers on buses, mailings, etc.) to increase public awareness about stormwater pollution prevention. The University's Environmental Resources division maintains a webpage (http://www.fm.virginia.edu/depts/operations/environmental/index.htmi) which provides information on stormwater, best management practices, the University's MS4 permit, TMDLs and a link to the RSEP website. RSEP's website (http://www.rivanna-stormwater.org/), provides links to public service announcements, publications, stormwater education articles as well as videos, and other useful stormwater pollution prevention related tools. Both the University's and the RSEP's webpage also provide methods for the public to report illicit discharges. Some of the resources or publications that are available on the RSEP website include: • Rain, Runoff and Your Backyard Pamphlet • Raingarden Brochure • Stormwater Runoff Management Brochure • Vehicle Washing Brochure • RSEP Stormwater PSA Video • After the Storm (EPA) Video • Prevent Storm Drain Pollution Video Employee Training Programs Another way that the University helps prevent or reduce the release of pollutants to stormwater is through employee training. All training presentations are updated regularly and incorporate specific language for sediment with respect to stormwater pollution. In addition, other environmentally related topics are covered in order to minimize impacts to stormwater from UVA operations. Customized presentations are made to all of the operations staff at the University and the associated auxiliary departments whose job responsibilities may have the potential to impact stormwater (Appendix D). At a minimum, each presentation includes information about spill prevention, stormwater pollution prevention and reviews the specifics of illicit discharge detection and elimination. The training focuses on stormwater pollution prevention, recommendations for good housekeeping practices, standard operating procedures (SOPs), proper erosion and sediment control practices on construction sites, and the importance of post construction stormwater management and BMPs as applicable. 7. Interim Milestones and Implementation of BMPs and Outreach The University is committed to using a variety of management practices and control techniques for the purposes of reducing sediment. The University intends to use an adaptive, iterative approach for the implementation of these BMPs and milestones over multiple permit cycles, as referenced in the MS4 General Permit, Section II.B.2. Table 7 presents a schedule of anticipated actions planned for implementation during this permit term. These milestones or schedules may need to be modified in order to achieve the POC reductions necessary to restore the water quality of Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek, and Schenks Branch, and ultimately removing the impairment listing. Current projections estimate an end date to meet the WLA for this TMDL in 2071. 10 Table 7 BMP/ Milestone Best Management Practices and Implementation Schedule Item Description Scheduled Completion/ Frequency BMP 1 Websites and Social Media Update as needed BMP 2 Public Awareness Events At least 4 annually BMP 3 Rivanna Stormwater Education Partnership Member Ongoing BMP 4 Advertising Annually BMP 5 Utility Bill Mailings Once every two or three years BMP 6 Educational Lectures At least 2 annually BMP 7 Stream Cleanups At least 1 annually BMP 8 Illicit Discharge Program As needed / annually BMP 9 MS4 Outfall Inspections/Dry Weather Discharge Inspections Annually BMP 10 Storm Drain Stenciling Program As needed / ongoing BMP 11 Erosion and Sediment Control Program Ongoing / annually BMP 12 Construction General Permit Ongoing / annually BMP 13 Construction Site Inspections (E&SC) As needed / annually BMP 14 Stormwater Management Master Plan Ongoing / annually BMP 15 Stormwater Management Project Review As needed / ongoing BMP 16 Structural BMP Implementation As needed / ongoing BMP 17 Structural BMP Inspections Monthly BMP 18 Storm Drain Inspection and Cleaning Quarterly BMP 19 Street Sweeping and Vacuuming At least 1 annually BMP 20 Municipal Facility Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping Ongoing/ annually BMP 21 Biennial Staff Training Biennially Milestone 1 Sediment (Local) TMDL Action Plan to DEQ May 2021 Milestone 2 Identify Proposed BMPs for Upcoming Permit Cycle October 2021 11 Appendix A Impaired Stream Segments in the Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek and Schenks Branch Watersheds Legend Impaired Streams —Lodge Creek Meadow Creek Moores Creek — Schenk's Branch Other Streams - Waterbodlee Watersheds u� Lodge Creek u Meadow Creek O Moores Creek SChenks Branch 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 Miles Source: TMDL Report Figure 5-1: Sediment TMDLs for Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, and Schenks Branch (Revised January 20, 2016) Appendix B Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek, and Schenks Branch Watersheds and Land Cover within LIVA's Regulated MS4 �aa'a a / aaaa,�aa a a a a a a aaa,a,'a a a a Id J _. a a a'a a a, as aa,a a a ID a ° � a a a a .. aaa aa, a a , a aaa a a a a a a,�a aa•, a as aa, a a aaa a, a a a 'a as a , ,ate' a a'o J a or ''a'a It, a as as aa,a a a a s a s a s a a a a IDs ' 0. a ' o aaJ' a o o~ as aa" as as a a'aaa a'aa aa,aa as as ,' a ' aaa ,aaaa N Lodge Creek M Mea Creek Schenks Branch L M Moores Creek 1 �_ Forest Watershed Name Lodge Creek Meadow Creek Moores Creek Schenks Branch mpervious UVA MS4 a Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek, and Schenks Branch AMIRL w E U VERSITY Watersheds and Land Cover within UVA's Regulated MS4 °�IRGINIA IIIIIII s Date: 4/30/2021 , Appendix C University of Virginia Campus -Wide Stream Assessment, Phase I: Near -Term Projects ))gBiohabitats The Stables Building 2081 Clipper Park Road Baltimore, MD 21211 410.554.0156 �.biohabitatsxom MEMORANDUM Date: September 4, 2019 To: Dawson Garrod, University of Virginia, Facilities Management From: Biohabitats, Inc. Subject: University of Virginia Campus -Wide Stream Assessment, Phase I: Near -Term Projects As a Phase II Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit holder, the University of Virginia (University) must achieve specific nutrient and sediment reductions to address Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (1'MDL) requirements (DEQ, 2018). The Phase II MS4 permit requires the University to reduce its share of nutrients and sediments by 5% during the last MS4 permit cycle (2013-2018), farther reduce pollutant loads by an additional 35% (40% total) during the current permit cycle (2018-2023), and a final 60% (100% total) reduction during the third permit cycle (2023-2028). In the first permit cycle, the University met and exceeded the 5% nutrient and sediment reduction through the implementation of a variety of BMPs and restoration practices including stream restoration. The University has restored over 1,000 linear feet of stream in the following reaches (see Figure 1): • Meadow Creek and Distillery Branch — JPJ Arena • Meadow Creek — Lambeth • Tributary to Meadow Creek — Carr's Hill Field Park In the interest of continuing progress towards Chesapeake Bay TMDL pollutant reduction requirements, the University is evaluating streams and adjacent wetlands on University and University of Virginia Foundation (Foundation) properties. Evaluation is planned in two phases. In the first phase, approximately three miles of stream adjacent to near -term redevelopment projects were assessed in June 2019. The second phase will evaluate the remainder of the unrestored stream reaches on University and Foundation properties (approximately 14 miles of stream). The purpose of this technical memorandum is to document the first phase of stream and wetland assessments. Methods are reviewed followed by results and recommendations. Page 1 of 16 University of Virginia Campus -Wide Stream Assessment, Phase I: Near -Term Projects MOREY CREEK HIGHWiAZBYPASS WEST MOREY CREEK HIGHWAY BYPASS - EAST, T „3 IVY AND ROTHFRY MEADOW CREEK-LAMBETH +' ROAD TRIB P _ - TRIBUTARYTOMEADOWCREEK- pp CARR'S HILL FIELD PARK MEADOW CREEK DISTILLERY BRANCH - 9PI ARENA T i (LODGE CREEK \ FONTAINE RESEARCH PARK- WEST FONTAINE RESEARCH / PARK - SOUTH 1 Overview Legend Previously Restored Streams Assessed Streams 0 900 1,800 Feet Near -term Priority Streams Restoration Tier i I — Streams — 1 UVA Stream Assessment Z 81011av1t3tS Charlottesville, VA 3 - 4 August, a Figure 1. UVA Stream Assessment Locator Map Page 2 of 16 University of Virginia Campus -Wide Stream Assessment, Phase I: Near -Term Projects Methods The assessment and evaluation of stream reaches for restoration potential primarily consisted of two steps: field assessment and prioritization. Stream and wetland assessments were conducted for stream reaches identified by University staff as near -term priorities due to their proximity to future redevelopment projects (Figure 1). The stream assessment was conducted on reaches with defined channels and located on University or Foundation properties (ie., field crews did not assess streams on private property). Stream assessment data was collected on tablets using the Collector for ArcGIS app. Field nomenclature abbreviations utilized for field data collection is provided in Attachment A. Field Assessment Summate The stream and wetland field assessment included the following: • Bank Erosion Hazard Index/ Near Bank Stress (BEHI/NBS; modified from Rosgen, 2001) • Habitat Assessment (DEQ, 2008) • Modified Unified Stream Assessment (CWP, 2005) • Wetland Assessment BEHI/NBS The purpose of BEHI and NBS measurements is to predict streambank erosion rates. BEHI evaluates erodibility potential of a stream reach and looks at several factors including bankfull height, root density, bank angle, and bank composition. NBS assesses the stress applied by erosion processes. There are seven methods that can be used to assess NBS. For the purposes of this assessment, Method 5 was utilized. Method 5 documents the ratio of near bank maximum depth to the bankf A mean depth to determine NBS. Together, BEHI and NBS can be used to estimate bank erosion and determine the amount of nutrient and sediment reduction credit for a potential stream restoration opportunity. According to the Stream Restoration Expert Panel (WQGIT, 2014), nutrient and sediment reduction credit is determined based on four general protocols, which are described briefly below: • Protocol 1: Credit for Prevented Sediment during Storm Flow - Stream restoration practices that prevent channel or bank erosion • Protocol 2: Credit for Instream and Riparian Nutrient Processing during Base Flow — stream restoration practices that promote denitrification during baseflow through hyporheic exchange • Protocol 3: Credit for Floodplain Reconnection Volume — stream restoration projects that reconnect stream channels to the floodplain • Protocol 4: Credit for Dry Channel Regenerative Stormwater Conveyance (RSC) as an Upland Stormwater Retrofit — based on stormwater treatment volume. o RSCs were considered as a separate opportunity. Feasible RSC opportunities were identified and documented using the modified Unified Stream Assessment described below. For the purposes of estimating nutrient and sediment reduction credit, it was assumed that the potential stream restoration projects will be able to achieve Protocol 1. This is a conservative estimate, as qualifying for credit under additional protocols is additive. Achieving additional Page 3of16 University of Virginia Campus -Wide Stream Assessment, Phase I: Near -Term Projects protocols (and therefore additional nutrient and sediment credit) may be determined at the concept stage. As part of the nutrient and sediment reduction calculations for stream restoration projects using Protocol 1, the average BEHI and NBS ratings for each stream reach were converted to bank erosion rates using the North Carolina Piedmont Region Bank Erosion Prediction Curve (North Carolina State University Stream Restoration Program, 1989) (Figure 2). Due to similarities in site conditions, the North Carolina Piedmont Region Bank Erosion Prediction Curve was used over other regional curves including South Central Colorado, which has steep slopes and Hickey Run in Washington, DC, which has a high level of impervious cover. 100 10 0 JI 0 001 North Carolina Streambank Erodibility Produced by NRCS and NCSU 11 1 -- 1 11 Very L. Lw AIOEttMe H� ':ery l4gn Eiem+c Near Bank Stress Index • IAIEe1M BEHI High BEM a Very Mtn BEHI ■ EFrtnx BEM IEmeme BEHiI +Ew (Very HOBEHII—Eo (MaOeraWKHU E=m(M MMH Figure 2. North Carolina Piedmont Region Bank Erosion Prediction Curve HabitatArsessment Each reach assessed includes a record of data that documents the overall habitat condition of the reach using Virginia Department of Environmental Quality's (DEQ) Method for Habitat Assessment for Streams (2008). Habitat assessment sites were assessed at approximately 14 mile intervals. Additional representative sites were assessed, depending on changes in geomorphic conditions (e.g., changes in stream order, grade/profile changes, or severity of erosion). The habitat assessment documents the general conditions of the physical in -stream habitat and adjacent stream corridor using 10 habitat parameters: epifaunal substrate, embeddedness, velocity/depth regime, Page 4of16 University of Virginia Campus -Wide Stream Assessment, Phase I: Near -Term Projects sediment deposition, channel flow, channel alteration, frequency of riffles, bank stability, bank vegetation, and bank vegetation width. Modified Unified Stream Assessment The assessment utilized a modified version of the Center for Watershed Protection's (CWP) Unified Stream Assessment (2005) to document the following stream conditions: • Erosion Sites: This record includes data on areas of eroding banks or channels. Severity was documented from 5 (most severe) to 1 (minor). The most severe rating is for a long section of stream (> 1,000 ft) that is actively eroding and incision of several feet on both sides of the stream. A minor rating would be a short section limited to one area (e.g., a meander bend). • Headcuts: This record includes data on headcuts in the stream channel, including the distance of the vertical drop in feet. • Inadequate Buffer: This record includes data on the vegetative status of the area within 50 feet of either side of the stream. Inadequate buffers were generally recorded when forested areas adjacent to the stream are less than 50'. Severity was documented from 5 (most severe) to 1 (minor). • Pipe/Outfalls: This record includes data for pipes, outfalls, and culverts discovered along or adjacent to a stream reach. This is not a comprehensive documentation of pipes/outfalls but may be useful to the University in identifying currently undocumented outfalls. • RSC/Opportunity for Channel Stabilization: This record documented potential sites for RSC and/or channel stabilization along or adjacent to the stream reach. Documentation includes severity of the channel erosion and potential length in feet. • Utilities: This record includes data for utilities discovered along or adjacent to a stream reach. Documentation includes utility type and whether or not repair is needed. This is not a comprehensive documentation of utilities. Additional stream data collection included: • Reach Breaks: This record indicates where a stream reach begins and ends; generally, a break occurs when there is a change in stream condition (e.g., gradient change; major tributary comes in; change in land use, etc.); • Streams Not Assessed: Streams that were not assessed; field form documents reason that a given area was not assessed such as lack of defined stream channel and private property. • Streams Assessed: Streams assessed in Phase I; streams were broken into "Reach Breaks" and given a unique ID Wetland Assessment Any land disturbing activity in wetlands and any alteration, fill, or back -flooding of streams is regulated by the US Corps of Engineers (US COE) and DEQ. Permits for such activities may be required by one or both agencies. Permit applications must be accompanied by survey located mapping of jurisdictional wetlands and streams and a Jurisdictional Determination letter from the COE verifying the jurisdictional limits for the subject parcel identified in the application. For an area to be considered a jurisdictional wetland, three parameters must be present: hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology. The US COE provides the protocol to make a determination of the presence/absence of each parameter (US COE, 2012). Page 5 of 16 University of Virginia Campus -Wide Stream Assessment, Phase I: Near -Term Projects Two types of wetland assessments are available based on project needs: a Preliminary Wetland Evaluation (PREWET) and a Wetland Delineation (WETDEL). The level of detail required for planning, design and construction of a project determines the type of assessment to be used for any given site. With use of either assessment, the soil survey for the subject parcel is obtained to determine those areas having soils which may have the potential to support wetlands. The PREWET protocol was utilized for this phase of the stream and wetland assessment. Identifying the approximate location of wetlands within the Phase I study area will aid University staff in understanding potential constraints to restorability of each reach. Once a reach has been selected for restoration, the PREWET is sufficient for concept design. A WETDEL should be completed and COE confirmation obtained prior to the start of the Design Development phase of construction plans. PREWET employs a visual assessment of the plant community as being hydrophytic or upland. If the plant community is hydrophytic, a limited number of soil samples are taken, and wetland hydrology is visually assessed to determine the presence/absence wetland hydrology. The approximate limits of potential wetland areas and streams were marked on a topographic map of the subject parcel and digitized into GIS as part of the post -field work data processing. Prioritization Criteria A prioritization and weighting process was used to score and rank the results of the field data. The goal is to use data from the field forms with limited amount of added computational requirements. Three potential projects can be inferred from the field data and include: • Stream restoration • Stream buffer reforestation • RSCs Prioritization parameters for the three project types are provided in Tables I — 3. Total Nitrogen (TN) was selected for the purposes of assigning a score to nutrient and sediment reductions. In future project phases (e.g., concept design), additional sediment and nutrient credit may be determined under additional protocols. In particular, additional TN credit may be available if a project qualifies for Protocol 2 (Hyporheic Zone). Page 6 of 16 University of Virginia Campus -Wide Stream Assessment, Phase I: Near -Term Projects Table 1. Stream Restoration Prioritization Factors Ranldng Factor Score Best Possible Score = 52 is Habitat Assessment 12 is Velocity & Depth • Poor (1 — 5) [4] • Marg W (6 —10) [3] • Suboptimal (I1 —15) [2] • Opurrial 16 — 20 [i] Embeddedness • Poor (1 — 5) [4] • Marginal (6 —10) [3] • Suboptimal (I I —15) [2] • Optimal 16 — 20 [1] Bank Condition • Poor (0 — 2) [4] • Marg nal (3 — 5) [3] • Suboptimal (6 — 8) [2] • Optimal 9 —10 [t] Erosion Site 25 is Total Length • >— 1000 feet [10] • >— 300 feet and < 1000 feet [5] • < 300 feet [i] Average Severity • Most severe [5] • Severe / moderate [4] • Moderate [3] • Minor / moderate [2] • Minor [I] Average Correctability • Best [5] • Best / moderate [4] • Moderate [3] • Worst / moderate [2] • Worst [i] Average Access • Easy [5] • Easy/ moderate [4] • Moderate [3] • Difficult/ moderate [2] • Difficult [I] Wetland Presence / • N [3] • y [1] TN Reduction lbs/ r from BEHI/NBS data 12 is • >200 [12] • >100 — 200 [8] • >10 —100 [4] • <10 [i] Page 7 of 16 University of Virginia Campus -Wide Stream Assessment, Phase I: Near -Term Projects Table 2. RSC Prioritization Factors Ranking Factor Score Best Possible Score = 31 is Erosion Severity (5 pts) • Most severe [5] • Severe / moderate [4] • Moderate [3] • Minor / moderate [2] • Minor [i] Project Extent and Feasibility (18 pts) Correctability • Best [5] • Best / moderate [4] • Moderate [3] • Worst / moderate [2] • Worst [1] Access • Easy [5] • Easy/ moderate [4] • Moderate [3] • Difficult / moderate [2] • Difficult [i] Length • > 350 feet -1000 feet [5] • > 150 feet - 350 feet [4] • > 100 feet -150 feet [3] • > 50 feet - 100 feet [2] • 0 feet - 50 feet [i] Obstructions (ie., mature trees, wetlands) • No [3] • Yes [1] TN Reduction lbs/yr (8 pts) • >2.75 [8] • >2.35 — 2.75 [6] • 0.95-2.35 [4] • < 0.95 [i] Page 8of16 University of Virginia Campus -Wide Stream Assessment, Phase I: Near -Term Projects Table 3. Stream Buffer Reforestation Prioritization Factors Ranldng Factor Score Best Possible Score = 38 is Inadequate Buffer Severity • Most severe [5] • Severe / moderate [4] • Moderate [3] • Minor / moderate [2] • Minor [1] Project Extent and Feasibility Inadequate on both sides • Yes [5] • No [i] Existing Width • <— 10 feet [5] • > 10 feet and <— 30 feet [3] • > 30 feet [i] Length • >— 900 feet [5] • > 250 feet and < 900 feet [3] • < 250 feet [i] Correctability • Best [5] • Best / moderate [4] • Moderate [3] • Worst / moderate [2] • Worst [i] Access • Easy [5] • Easy / moderate [4] • Moderate [3] • Difficult / moderate [2] • Difficult [I] TN Reductionlbs/yr • >2.75 [8] • >2.35 — 2.75 [6] • 0.95-2.35 [4] • < 0.95 [i] Results The prioritization process described in the previous section was used to score and rank potential projects. A summary of the prioritization results is provided in Tables 4 - 6. Detailed prioritization tables are provided in Attachment B and maps of the assessed reaches (with Reach IDs) in Attachment C. Additional field assessment results, including reach and assessment IDs are available via the ArcGIS online map. Page 9of16 University of Virginia Campus -Wide Stream Assessment, Phase I: Near -Term Projects Table 4. Stream Restoration Prioritization Results Reach ID Habitat Assessment Subtotal Erosion Site Subtotal Wetlands Presence TN Reduction Score' Total Score out of 52 Rank Tier2 MDC-006 it 15 3 12 41 1 MDC-012 9 15 3 12 39 2 FPW-001 9 21 1 8 39 3 MDC-002 8 15 3 12 38 4 1 FPS-002 10 13 3 12 38 5 MBW-002 7 16 3 12 38 6 MDC-007 11 10 3 12 36 7 MDC-009 6 19 1 8 34 8 MBW-004 7 15 3 8 33 9 FPS-001 7 21 1 4 33 10 2 IRT-001 9 12 3 8 32 11 MBE-001 7 16 1 8 32 12 MBW-005' 9 18 3 1 31 13 LDC-001 10 17 1 1 29 14 MBW-001 7 15 3 4 29 14 MDC-003 9 15 3 1 28 16 3 MBW-0031 8 16 3 1 28 17 MDC-004 9 11 1 4 25 18 MDC-011 7 14 3 1 25 19 MDC-001 7 14 3 1 25 20 MDC-005 7 13 1 4 25 20 MDC-0101 6 14 3 1 24 22 4 MDC-008 6 13 1 1 21 23 MDC-013 1 6 1 10 1 3 1 1 20 1 24 1: The lowest TN reduction score (1 point) was assigned to reaches where nutrient reductions could not be calculated as a result of little to no erosion observed on these reaches 2: The tiering of stream restoration opportunities is also depicted in Figure 1 Table 5. RSC Prioritization Results Reach ID Assessment ID Erosion Extent and Feasibility TN Total Rank Severity Subtotal Reduction Score Score Score out of 31 MDC-006 MDC-006-RC-0011 4 12 4 20 1 MDC-001 MDC-002-RC-001 2 10 4 16 2 1: Outfall primarily drains US Highway 250; implementation may require coordination with other stakeholders Table 6. Stream Buffer Reforestation Results Reach ID Assessment ID Severity Score Extent and Feasibility Subtotal TN Reduction Score Total Score out of 38 Rank FPS-001 FPS-001-IB-001 3 21 6 30 1 FPW-001 FPW-001-IB-002 3 17 8 28 2 FPW-001 FPW-001-IB-003 3 16 8 27 3 MDC-002 MDC-002-IB-001 3 12 4 19 4 MBE-001 MBE-001-IB-002 3 12 4 19 4 MBE-001 MBE-001-IB-001 3 14 1 18 6 FPW-001 FPW-001-IB-001 3 11 1 15 7 Page 10 of 16 University of Virginia Campus -Wide Stream Assessment, Phase I: Near -Term Projects An estimate of nutrient and sediment load reductions associated with the potential projects is provided in Table 7. It is unlikely that the University would implement all the potential projects and therefore realize the total pollutant removal loads due to feasibility, budget, and other constraints. Table 7. Estimate of Pollutant Load Reductions Assessment ID' TSS Load Reduction ]bs/ r TP Load Reduction lbs/ r TN Load Reduction Ibs/ r Stream Restoration.} MDC-006 70,909.2 205.7 446.6 MDC-012 39,499.5 114.6 248.8 FPW-001 20,708.5 60.1 130.4 MDC-002 44,629.5 129.5 281.1 FPS-002 142,599.2 413.6 898.1 MBW-002 34,037.7 98.7 214.4 MDC-007 32,022.0 92.9 201.7 MDC-009 31,658.9 91.8 199.4 MBW-004 25,500.5 74.0 160.6 FPS-001 9,489.9 27.5 59.8 IRT-001 16,862.5 48.9 106.2 MBE-001 23,507.3 68.2 148.1 MBW-005 0.6 n/a n/a LDC-001 601.1 1.7 3.8 MBW-001 6,337.8 18.4 39.9 MDC-003 1,179.5 3.4 7.4 MBW-003 1.1 n/a n/a MDC-004 2,279.9 6.6 14.4 MDC-011 1,565.2 4.5 9.9 MDC-001 352.8 1.0 2.2 MDC-005 1,934.1 5.6 12.2 MDC-010 n/a n/a n/a MDC-008 56.1 0.2 0.4 MDC-013 358.7 1.0 2.3 RSC4 MC-006-WC-001 1,082.0 0.3 1.2 C-002-RC-001 366.8 0.3 1.1 Stream Buffer Reforestations FPS-001-IB-001 24.9 0.2 2.2 FPW-001-IB-002 82.0 0.7 7.1 FPW-001-IB-003 106.5 0.9 9.3 MDC-002-IB-001 10.4 0.1 0.9 MBE-001-IB-002 21.3 0.2 1.8 MBE-0Ol-IB-001 4.1 0.0 0.4 FPW-001-IB-001 8.4 0.1 0.7 1: Projects are sorted by prioritization rank with the highest scoring projects first and lowest scoring projects last 2: Load reductions for stream restoration calculated using Protocol I methodology outlined in WQGIT, 2014 3: n/a indicates reaches where nutrient reductions could not be calculated as a result of little to no erosion observed on these reaches 4: Load reductions for RSCs calculated using Protocol 4 methodology outlined in WQGIT, 20 5: Forest buffers can be credited as both a land use change and efficiency BMP (DEQ, 2015). Load reductions quantified here reflect stream buffer reforestation as a land use change. Additional load reductions are available as an efficiency BMP but were not calculated as part of this initial effort. An estimate of construction costs associated with each project type are provided in Table 8 below. Generally, project construction cost estimates, at this preliminary stage of project identification, are a function of project length or area and therefore cost was not factored into the prioritization as it Page 11 of 16 University of Virginia Campus -Wide Stream Assessment, Phase I: Near -Term Projects would be duplicative with project extent scoring. Construction cost estimates assume typical/average conditions, permitting, and site constraints and do not take site -specific considerations into account. Table 8. Estimate of Project Construction Costs Assessment IDt Project Extent Construction Unit Cost3A Estimated Construction Cost Cost / lbs of TN Removed StreartlRestoradon qinearfeeo MDC-006 731.2 $400/lf $ 292,460 $ 655 MDC-012 310.1 $ 124,055 $ 500 FPW-001 1,314.8 $ 525,925 $ 4,030 MDC-002 899.2 S 359,680 $ 1,280 FPS-002 370.6 $ 148,235 $ 165 MBW-002 412.8 $ 165,115 $ 770 MDC-007 294.0 $ 117,610 $ 585 MDC-009 1233.8 $ 493,530 $ 2,475 MBW-004 419.1 $ 167,660 $ 1,045 FPS-001 1280.9 S 512,350 $ 8,570 IRT-001 143.3 $ 57,305 $ 540 MBE-001 764.8 $ 305,930 $ 2,065 MBW-005 570.0 $ 227 985 n/a LDC-001 514.8 $ 205,910 $ 54,390 MBW-001 355.0 $ 141,995 $ 3,555 MDC-003 307.1 S 122,820 $ 16,535 MBW-003 321.9 $ 128,755 n/a MDC-004 397.0 $ 158,790 $ 11,060 MDC-011 337.3 $ 134,905 $ 13,685 MDC-001 217.1 $ 86,850 $ 39,085 MDC-005 332.4 $ 132,945 $ 10,915 MDC-010 592.6 $ 237,050 n/a MDC-008 526.5 $ 210,590 $ 596,160 MDC-013 102.1 $ 40,825 $ 18,070 RSC . car feer MDC-006-RC-001 100.0 $400/lf $ 40,000 $ 34,865 MDC-002-RC-001 100.0 $ 40,000 $ 32,095 Stream BufferReforestadon acres FPS-001-IB-001 0.43 $680/ac2 planted S 290 $ 135 FPW-001-IB-002 1.42 S 965 $ 135 FPW-001-IB-003 1.84 $ 11255 $ 135 MDC-002-IB-001 0.18 $ 120 $ 135 MBE-0Ol-IB-002 0.37 $ 250 $ 135 MBE-0Ol-IB-001 0.07 $ 50 $ 135 FPW-001-IB-001 0.14 $ 100 $ 135 1: Projects are sorted by prioritization rank with the highest scoring projects first and lowest scoring projects last 2: Cost for stream buffer reforestation is for planting only; many of these areas may require invasive species removal fast, which is not accounted form the cost 3: Construction Costs for all three project types do not include permitting and design which will likely run approximately 30% of construction costs 4: Project construction cost estimates, at this preliminary stage of project identification, are a function of project length or area and do not take project specific constraints or efficiencies into consideration Recommendations/ Next Steps As the University continues to address Chesapeake Bay TMDL requirements, the University should consider moving the top six (i.e., Tier 1, top 25%) stream restoration opportunities to concept. This Page 12 of 16 University of Virginia Campus -Wide Stream Assessment, Phase I: Near -Term Projects will further identify potential feasibility and site constraints and potentially refine pollutant load reductions. In addition, this can assist the University in identifying potential grant opportunities, such as the Virginia Environmental Endowment, that may provide supplemental funding for design and construction costs. In addition to moving the most cost effective and feasible Phase I stream reaches to concept, the University should continue to explore restoration opportunities by assessing the remaining stream miles (approximately 14 miles) on University and Foundation properties. This will allow the University to build a list of the most cost effective projects to meet Chesapeake Bay TMDL requirements. Stream buffer reforestation may not yield a high level of pollutant removal credit, but it is a low cost option where stream restoration will not be pursued. Stream buffer reforestation may also be combined with a stream restoration project for potential additional load reductions. Credit may be received for reforestation occurring beyond the stream restoration project limits of disturbance and will need to be determined on a case -by -case basis. As noted in Table 8, costs do not account for invasive plant removal, which is needed at nearly all sites. Similarly, the two potential RSCs may not appear to be particularly lucrative opportunities, but they can be combined with stream restoration projects to realize cost efficiencies and potentially increase the pollutant removal credit associated with the stream restoration project. In addition, the credits being allowed for RSCs are under review by the Chesapeake Bay Program, where preliminary indications are that the load reduction benefits will be increasing. Both RSCs are located on highlight prioritized stream reaches (MDC-002 and MDC-006). The top stream restoration candidates are briefly summarized below and depicted in Figure 3. The reaches can also be located as "Tier 1" in Figure 1 and via unique ID (e.g., MDC-006) in Attachment C. AMC-006 This portion of Meadow Creek runs between US 29 and the Law School Student Faculty Center. It has an average of four foot high banks and is more than 700 feet in length. The BEHI rating is high and active erosion was rated as severe. The surrounding riparian corridor is forested and in good condition. This project may be combined with the RSC, AMC-006-RSC-001. MDC-012 This 300 foot tributary to Meadow Creek, originates from an outfall that drains US 29. The reach is actively eroding and includes 4.5 foot high stream banks. BEHI was rated high and active erosion was rated severe. The adjacent riparian corridor is forested and in good condition. FPW-001 This stream reach of 1,300 feet runs to the west of Fontaine Park. It is an actively widening channel with an average of four feet high banks. The adjacent riparian corridor is sparsely forested with shrubs and invasives throughout. It is worth noting that the cost per lbs of TN removed is high due to the low -moderate level of erosion. This stream primarily consists of backwater due to a downstream beaver dam located just downstream from BEHI point, FPW-001-BH-028. A sewer line is exposed and running across the stream near the confluence with FPS. However, additional Page 13 of 16 University of Virginia Campus -Wide Stream Assessment, Phase I: Near -Term Projects credit may be available if Protocols 2 and/or 3 can be achieved. This may also be an attractive option if partnership opportunities are available with the City of Charlottesville. MDC-002 This nearly 900 foot long reach is located behind University athletic fields at The Park and has an average of three foot high banks. The actively eroding channel has a BEHI rating of moderate with a riparian corridor that is forested and in good condition. Several headcuts exist on this reach along with bedrock located on the lower portion. This project may be combined with the RSC, MDC-002- RSC-001. FPS-002 This stream channel, located to the south of Fontaine Park, is actively incising and has an average of 11 foot high stream banks. The BEHI rating is very high and erosion was rated very severe. The riparian corridor is moderate due to patches where invasives dominate. As a restoration project, this reach has the potential to reduce a relatively high load of nutrients and sediment. This also makes it one of the most cost-effective projects on cost per pounds of pollutant removed basis. The stream is located against the railroad embankment which could pose some constraints. MBW-002 This portion of Morey Creek is located to the west of the US 250-US 29 highway bypass. This 400 foot long channel is actively widening and has an average of three foot high stream banks. BEHI was rated high and there are areas with poor riparian coverage. Page 14 of 16 University of Virginia Campus -Wide Stream Assessment, Phase I: Near -Term Projects MDC-006 FPS-002 MDC-012 MBW-002 Figure 3. Photos Depicting Top 6 Ranked Stream Conditions Page 15of16 University of Virginia Campus -Wide Stream Assessment, Phase I: Near -Term Projects References Center for Watershed Protection (CWP). 2005. Unified Stream Assessment. Ellicott City, MD. North Carolina State University Stream Restoration Program. 1989. North Carolina Piedmont Region Bank Erosion Prediction Curve. Raleigh, NC. Rosgen, D. 2001. A practical method of computing stream bank erosion rate. Proceedings of the Seventh Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference. Vol. 2, pp. II- 9-15, March 25-29, 2001, Reno, NV United States Army Corps of Engineers (US COE). 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). 2008. Methods for Habitat Assessment for Streams. Richmond, VA Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). 2015. Chesapeake Bay TMDL Action Plan Guidance Memo No. 15-2005. Richmond, VA. Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). 2018. General Permit for the Discharge of Stormwater from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems. General Permit No. VAR04. Richmond, VA. Water Quality Goal Implementation Team (WQGI ). 2014. Recommendation of the Expert Panel to Define Removal Rates for Individual Stream Restoration Projects. Chesapeake Stormwater Network and EPA Chesapeake Bay Program. Page 16 of 16 ATTACHMENT A UVA STREAM ASSESSMENT — Phase I FIELD ASSESSMENT NOMENCLATURE STREAM ASSESSMENT [REACH ID] — [REACH SEGMENT ID] — [ASSESSMENT ID] — [UNIQUE ID] EXAMPLES IFourth erosion site identified in Lodge Creek: LDC-001-ER-004 First habitat assessment on Morey Creek near Highway Bypass East: MBE-001-HB-001 BEHI/NBS BH Habitat HB Erosion Site ES Inadequate Buffer IB Headcuts HC Pipe Outfall OT RSC RC Utility UT Reach Break RB Streams Not Assessed' SN Wetlands WT 1: Use to indicate where stream could not be assessed for various reasons such as safety or access (i.e., snarling dogs, fencing) 2: Whenever possible, assessments were conducted facing downstream F'STREAM REACH _'jjW Fontaine Research Park — West ID FPW Fontaine Research Park —South FPS Morey Creek near Highway Bypass — East MBE Morey Creek near Highway Bypass — West MBW Ivy and Rothery Rd Trib IRT Lodge Creek LDC Meadow Creek MDC Attachment B UVA Stream Assessment - Phase I Stream Restoration Prioritization Habitat Assessment Erosion I Wetlands I Pollutant Load Reduction I I Cost Stream Reach Name Reach ID Habitat Assessment ID Velocity &Depth Rating Velocity &Depth Score Embededness Rating Embeddedness Score Bank Condition Left Rating Bank Condition Right Rating Bank Condition Score (based on bank with lower score) Habitat Assessment Subtotal Total Reach Length Length Score Average Severity Score Average Correctability Score Average Access Score Erosion Subtotal Wetland Presence Wetland Score Sediment Load Reduction (Ibs/yr) TP Load Reduction (Ibs/yr) TN Load Reduction (Ibs/yr) TN Load Reduction Score Total Score Rank Total Estimated Construction Cost Cost / Lbs of TN Removed Fontaine Research Park - South FPS-001 FPS-001-HB-001 it 2 11 2 5 3 3 7 1280.9 10 3 5 4 21 Y 1 9,489.9 27.5 59.8 4 33 10 $ 512,350 $ 8,570 Fontaine Research Park - South FPS-002 FPS-002-HB-001 8 3 8 3 2 2 4 10 370.6 5 5 1 2 13 N 3 20,708.5 413.6 898.1 12 38 5 $ 148,235 $ 165 Fontaine Research Park - West FPW-001 FPW-001-HB-001 6 3 5 4 7 7 2 9 1314.8 10 3 4 4 21 Y 1 16,862.5 60.1 130.4 8 39 3 $ 525,925 $ 4,030 Ivy and Rothery Rd Trib IRT-001 IRT-001-HB-001 12 2 3 4 5 3 3 9 143.3 1 3 3 5 12 N 3 601.1 48.9 106.2 8 32 11 $ 57,305 $ 540 Lodge Creek LDC-001 LDC-001-HB-001 1 4 1 4 8 8 2 10 514.8 5 3 5 5 17 Y 1 23,507.3 1.7 3.8 1 29 14 $ 205,910 $ 54,390 Meadow Creek MDC-001 MDC-001-HB-001 14 2 12 2 5 9 3 7 217.1 1 3 5 5 14 N 3 6,337.8 1.0 2.2 1 25 20 $ 86,850 $ 39,085 Meadow Creek MDC-002 MDC-002-HB-001 it 2 6 3 4 4 3 8 899.2 5 3 4 3 15 N 3 34,037.7 129.5 281.1 12 38 4 $ 359,680 $ 1,280 Meadow Creek MDC-003 MDC-003-HB-001 9 3 8 3 3 7 3 9 307.1 5 3 4 3 15 N 3 1.1 3.4 7.4 1 28 16 $ 122,820 $ 16,535 Meadow Creek MDC-004 MDC-004-HB-001 9 3 9 3 4 7 3 9 397.0 5 3 3 1 11 Y 1 25,500.5 6.6 14.4 4 25 18 $ 158,790 $ 11,060 Meadow Creek MDC-005 MDC-005-HB-001 13 2 it 2 4 7 3 7 332.4 5 3 3 2 13 Y 1 0.6 5.6 12.2 4 25 20 $ 132,945 $ 10,915 Meadow Creek MDC-006 MDC-006-HB-001 7 3 5 4 2 2 4 11 731.2 5 4 3 3 15 N 3 352.8 205.7 446.6 12 41 1 $ 292,460 $ 655 Meadow Creek MDC-007 MDC-007-HB-001 7 3 4 4 2 2 4 11 294.0 1 3 3 3 10 N 3 44,629.5 92.9 201.7 12 36 7 $ 117,610 $ 585 Meadow Creek MDC-008 MDC-008-HB-001 12 2 12 2 7 8 2 6 526.5 5 2 4 2 13 Y 1 1,179.5 0.2 0.4 1 21 23 $ 210,590 $ 596,160 Meadow Creek MDC-009 MDC-009-HB-001 12 2 12 2 7 8 2 6 1233.8 10 3 3 2 19 Y 1 2,279.9 91.8 199.4 8 34 8 $ 493,530 $ 2,475 Meadow Creek MDC-010 MDC-010-HB-001 5 4 16 1 9 9 1 6 592.6 5 3 3 3 14 N 3 1,934.1 n/a n/a 1 24 22 $ 237,050 n/a Meadow Creek MDC-011 MDC-011-HB-001 14 2 11 2 4 4 3 7 337.3 5 2 4 3 14 N 3 70,909.2 4.5 9.9 1 25 19 $ 134,905 $ 13,685 Meadow Creek MDC-012 MDC-012-HB-001 9 3 15 2 2 2 4 9 310.1 5 4 3 3 15 N 3 32,022.0 114.6 248.8 12 39 2 $ 124,055 $ 500 Meadow Creek MDC-013 MDC-013-HB-001 12 2 16 1 8 4 3 6 102.1 1 3 4 3 10 N 3 56.1 1.0 2.3 1 20 24 $ 40,825 $ 18,070 Morey Creek near Highway Bypass - East MBE-001 MBE-001-HB-001 15 2 15 2 4 6 3 7 764.8 5 3 4 4 16 Y 1 31,658.9 68.2 148.1 8 32 12 $ 305,930 $ 2,065 Morey Creek near Highway Bypass - West MBW-001 MBW-001-HB-001 6 3 17 1 8 4 3 7 355.0 5 3 4 3 15 N 3 1,565.2 18.4 39.9 4 29 14 $ 141,995 $ 3,555 Morey Creek near Highway Bypass - West MBW-002 MBW-002-HB-001 it 2 9 3 6 6 2 7 412.8 5 4 4 3 16 N 3 39,499.5 98.7 214.4 12 38 6 $ 165,115 $ 770 Morey Creek near Highway Bypass - West MBW-003 MBW-003-HB-001 9 3 11 2 5 6 3 8 321.9 5 3 4 4 16 N 3 358.71 0.0 1 0.0 1 28 17 $ 128,755 n/a Morey Creek near Highway Bypass - West MBW-004 MBW-004-HB-001 1 15 1 2 1 it 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 3 1 7 1 419.1 1 5 1 4 1 4 1 3 1 15 1 N 1 3 1 142,599.21 74.0 1 160.6 1 8 33 1 9 $ 167,660 $ 1,045 Morey Creek near Highway Bypass - West MBW-005 MBW-005-HB-001 1 5 1 3 1 4 1 4 1 8 1 8 1 2 1 9 1 570.0 1 5 1 4 1 4 1 5 1 18 1 N 1 3 0.0 1 0.0 1 1 31 1 13 $ 227,985 n/a Attachment B UVA Stream Assessment - Phase I RSC Prioritization Erosion Severity Project Extent and Feasibility TN Reduction Potential Cost Potential Extent and TSS Load TP Load TN Load Estimated Stream Reach Correctability Access Length Obstruction TN Reduction Total Cost/Lbs of TN Unique ID Severity Score Project Length Obstructions Feasibility Reduction Reduction Reduction Rank Construction Name Score Score Score Score Score Score Removed (ft) Subtotal (Ibs/yr) (Ibs/yr) (Ibs/yr) Costs Meadow Creek MDC-006-RC-001 4 4 3 100 2 Yes 3 12 366.8 0.3 1.1 4 20 1 $ 40,000.00 $ 34,865 Meadow Creek MDC-002-RC-001 2 2 3 100 2 Yes 3 10 1082.0 0.3 1.2 4 16 2 $ 40,000.00 $ 32,095 Attachment B UVA Stream Assessment Phase I Stream Buffer Reforestation Prioritization Severity Score Project Extent and Feasibility Nutrient Reduction Potential Cost Stream Reach Name Unique ID Severity Score Inadequate Both Sides Inadequate Both Sides Score Existing Forested Width Existing Forested Width Score Length of Gap Length of Gap Score Correctability Score Access Score Extent and Feasibility Subtotal TSS Load Reduction (Ibs/yr) TP Load Reduction (Ibs/yr) TN LoadTN Reduction (Ibs/yr) Reduction Score Total Score Rank Estimated Construction Cost Cost /Lbs of TN Removed Fontaine Research Park —South FPS-001-IB-001 3 Right 1 5 5 936 5 5 5 21 24.9 0.2 2.2 6 30 1 $ 290 $ 135.00 Fontaine Research Park —West FPW-001-IB-002 3 Right 1 5 5 651 3 4 4 17 82.0 0.7 7.1 8 28 2 $ 965 $ 135.00 Fontaine Research Park —West FPW-001-IB-001 3 Left 1 1 50 1 1 1 126 1 1 1 4 1 4 1 11 8.4 0.1 1 0.7 1 1 1 15 7 1 $ 100 $ 135.00 Fontaine Research Park— West FPW-001-IB-003 3 Left 1 5 5 845 3 4 3 16 106.5 0.9 9.3 8 27 3 $ 1,255 $ 135.00 Morey Creek near Highway Bypass — East MDC-002-IB-001 3 Right 1 25 3 105 1 4 3 12 10.4 0.1 0.9 4 19 4 $ 120 $ 135.00 Morey Creek near Highway Bypass— East MBE-001-IB-002 3 Left 1 25 3 213 1 4 3 12 21.3 0.2 1.8 4 19 4 $ 250 $ 135.00 Morey Creek near Highway Bypass — East MBE-001-IB-001 3 Right 1 20 3 205 1 4 5 14 4.1 0.0 0.4 1 18 6 $ 50 $ 135.00 Assessed Stream Reach Maps N y _ J J ------ MM0 os 1 ^ 41DC-004 p^ DO --" MDC.008 ,i MDC-pOj 1 MOG-pO� �l 3 0 ♦ MDC-009 0o`3 MOC-00213 MO � ' —' •t5 / fit, t, 1 A r J 1 y Y s sc +1 MI._? �i St EI BUS `50 �a /A •a Morey Creek Legend 0 125 250 Feet Bypass Reach break — Assessed Streams I ® RSC Streams UVA Stream Assessment Inadequate Buffer Reach ID (example) Charlottesville, VA *Biohabitats Erosion August, 2019 r� y �O 00- Ivy and Rothery Road Trib UVA Stream Assessment Charlottesville, VA 1V Legend 0 25 50 Feet Reach break — Assessed Streams I ® RSC Streams — Inadequate Buffer Reach ID (example) jBiohabitats Erosion August, 2019 Lodge Creek UVA Stream Assessment Charlottesville, VA Legend Reach break ® RSC Inadequate Buffer Erosion 4 � � MA — Assessed Streams Streams Reach ID (example) • f 0 37.5 75 Feet i I I i Biohabitats August, 2019 Yj RP1��O�o Fontaine Research Park UVA Stream Assessment Charlottesville, VA 4 -f{ Legend 0 175 350 Feet Reach break Assessed Streams I I ® RSC Streams Inadequate Buffer Reach ID (example)OBi6habitats Erosion August, 2019 Appendix D UVA Training Plan and Frequency UVA Training Plan and Frequency Department Reason Required Training Type/ Objective Frequency Means to Achieve Training Requirement SPCC Operator, Spill Response, IDDE, Athletics 6.1.(1) - Field Personnel SOPS Once every 24 months Training provided by ER or appropriate designated staff John Paul Jones Arena 6.1.(1) - Field Personnel Spill Response, IDDE, SOPs Once every 24 months Training provided by ER or appropriate designated staff Class C UST Operator, Spill Response, IM-Rec Sports 6.1.(1) - Field Personnel IDDE, SOPS Once every 24 months Training provided by ER or appropriate designated staff Class C UST Operator, Spill Response, Heat Plant 6.1.(1) - Field Personnel IDDE, SOPS Once every 24 months Training provided by ER or appropriate designated staff Recycling 6.1.(1) - Field Personnel Spill Response, IDDE, SOPs Once every 24 months Training provided by ER or appropriate designated staff SPCC Operator, Spill Response, IDDE, Utilities 6.1.(1) - Field Personnel SOPS Once every 24 months Training provided by ER or appropriate designated staff Class C UST Operator, Spill Response, Power and Light 6.1.(1) - Field Personnel IDDE, SOPS Once every 24 months Training provided by ER or appropriate designated staff Class C UST Operator, Spill Response, North Grounds Zone Maintenance 6.1.(1) - Field Personnel IDDE, SOPS Once every 24 months Training provided by ER or appropriate designated staff Class C UST Operator, Spill Response, Newcomb Zone Maintenance 6.1.(1) - Field Personnel IDDE, SOPS Once every 24 months Training provided by ER or appropriate designated staff Class C UST Operator, Spill Response, West Grounds Zone Maintenance 6.1.(1) - Field Personnel IDDE, SOPS Once every 24 months Training provided by ER or appropriate designated staff Class C UST Operator, Spill Response, McCormick Zone Maintenance 6.1.(1) - Field Personnel IDDE, SOPS Once every 24 months Training provided by ER or appropriate designated staff Class C UST Operator, Spill Response, Central Grounds Zone Maintenance 6.1.(1) - Field Personnel IDDE, SOPS Once every 24 months Training provided by ER or appropriate designated staff Class C UST Operator, Spill Response, FM HSPP Zone 1 Maintenance 6.1.(1) - Field Personnel IDDE, SOPS Once every 24 months Training provided by ER or appropriate designated staff Class C UST Operator, Spill Response, FM HSPP Zone 2 Maintenance 6.1.(1) - Field Personnel IDDE, SOPS Once every 24 months Training provided by ER or appropriate designated staff Class C UST Operator, Spill Response, FM HSPP Zone 3 Maintenance 6.1.(1) - Field Personnel IDDE, SOPS Once every 24 months Training provided by ER or appropriate designated staff Class C UST Operator, Spill Response, FM HSPP Zone 4 Maintenance 6.1.(1) - Field Personnel IDDE, SOPS Once every 24 months Training provided by ER or appropriate designated staff 6.1.(1)-(2) - Field Personnel, Street and Class C UST Operator, Spill Response, Landscaping Parking Lot Maintenance IDDE, SOPS Once every 24 months Training provided by ER or appropriate designated staff Class C UST Operator, Spill Response, Renovations 6.1.(1) - Field Personnel IDDE, SOPS Once every 24 months Training provided by ER or appropriate designated staff Facilities Management Administrative 6.m.(3) - Work around maintenance Staff facility IDDE Once every 24 months Training provided by ER or appropriate designated staff 6.m.(4) - Pesticide and herbicide FM Pesticide and Herbicide Applicators applicators VCACS Certification As required for certification VCACS Program Certification Requirements E&SC and SWM Combined Inspector or Environmental Resources 6.m.(5)-(6)- E&SC and VSMP inspectors Administrator As required for certification DEQ E&SC and SWM Officers provide training in-house on UVA emergency response UVA Police 6.m.(7) - Emergency response IDDE Once every 24 months procedures. EHS 6.m.(7) - Emergency response HAZWOPER As required for certification EHS to receive training by a certified trainer as appropriate. Section 8. Qualified personnel The following personnel are responsible for inspections; (Provide the name, telephone number, and qualifications of the qualified personnel conducting inspections.) Issued — 10/2014 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Albemarle County Section 9. Signed Certification (Provide certification according to 9VAC25-870-370) "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." Operator Name: U NDShy S N ✓ b Y Company: GouN��! �li(lL SGIFt��f Title: 1 L r612 6 to t 1. I) I N Ci S E YLV t( S Signature: Date: C1 r l t Issued — 10/2014 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Albemarle County Section 10. Delegation of authority. (Provide the persons or positions with authority to sign inspection reports or to modify the stormwater pollution prevention plan. A formal, signed delegation of authority is needed.) Delegation of Authority I, (name), hereby designate the person or specifically described position below to be a duly authorized representative for the purpose of overseeing compliance with environmental requirements, including the Construction General Permit, at the construction site. The designee is authorized to sign any reports, stormwater pollution prevention plans and all other documents required by the permit. (name of person or position) (company) (address) (city, state, zip) (phone) By signing this authorization, I confirm that I meet the requirements to make such a designation as set forth in the Construction General Permit (CGP), and that the designee above meets the definition of a "duly authorized representative". Operator Name: Company: Title: Signature: Date: Issued — 10/2014 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Albemarle County Section 11. General permit copy (Provide a copy of the construction general permit, 9VAC25-880) Issued — 10/2014 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Albemarle County COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY General Permit No.: VAR10 Effective Date: July 1, 2019 Expiration Date: June 30, 2024 GENERAL VPDES PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES OF STORMWATER FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ACT In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended, and pursuant to the Virginia Stormwater Management Act and regulations adopted pursuant thereto, operators of construction activities are authorized to discharge to surface waters within the boundaries of the Commonwealth of Virginia, except those specifically named in State Water Control Board regulations that prohibit such discharges. The authorized discharge shall be in accordance with the registration statement filed with the Department of Environmental Quality, this cover page, Part I - Discharge Authorization and Special Conditions, Part II - Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, and Part III - Conditions Applicable to All VPDES Permits as set forth in this general permit. Construction General Permit Effective July 1, 2019 Page 2 of 26 192TO 1 DISCHARGE AUTHORIZATION AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS A. Coverage under this general permit. During the period beginning with the date of coverage under this general permit and lasting until the general permit's expiration date, the operator is authorized to discharge stormwater from construction activities. This general permit also authorizes stormwater discharges from support activities (e.g., concrete or asphalt batch plants, equipment staging yards, material storage areas, excavated material disposal areas, borrow areas) located on -site or off -site provided that: a. The support activity is directly related to the construction activity that is required to have general permit coverage for discharges of stormwater from construction activities; b. The support activity is not a commercial operation, nor does it serve multiple unrelated construction activities by different operators; c. The support activity does not operate beyond the completion of the last construction activity it supports; d. The support activity is identified in the registration statement at the time of general permit coverage; e. Appropriate control measures are identified in a stormwater pollution prevention plan and implemented to address the discharges from the support activity areas; and f. All applicable state, federal, and local approvals are obtained for the support activity. B. Limitations on coverage. 1. Post -construction discharges. This general permit does not authorize stormwater discharges that originate from the site after construction activities have been completed and the site, including any support activity sites covered under the general permit registration, has undergone final stabilization. Post -construction industrial stormwater discharges may need to be covered by a separate VPDES permit. Discharges mixed with nonstormwater. This general permit does not authorize discharges that are mixed with sources of nonstormwater, other than those discharges that are identified in Part I E (Authorized nonstormwater discharges) and are in compliance with this general permit. Discharges covered by another state permit. This general permit does not authorize discharges of stormwater from construction activities that have been covered under an individual permit or required to obtain coverage under an alternative general permit. Page 3 of 26 4. Impaired waters and total maximum daily load (TMDL) limitation. Nutrient and sediment impaired waters. Discharges of stormwater from construction activities to surface waters identified as impaired in the 2016 § 305(b)/303(d) Water Quality Assessment Integrated Report or for which a TMDL wasteload allocation has been established and approved prior to the term of this general permit for (i) sediment or a sediment -related parameter (i.e., total suspended solids or turbidity) or (ii) nutrients (i.e., nitrogen or phosphorus) are not eligible for coverage under this general permit unless the operator develops, implements, and maintains a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) in accordance with Part II B 5 of this permit that minimizes the pollutants of concern and, when applicable, is consistent with the assumptions and requirements of the approved TMDL wasteload allocations and implements an inspection frequency consistent with Part II G 2 a. Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) impaired waters. Discharges of stormwater from construction activities that include the demolition of any structure with at least 10,000 square feet of floor space built or renovated before January 1, 1980, to surface waters identified as impaired in the 2016 § 305(b)/303(d) Water Quality Assessment Integrated Report or for which a TMDL wasteload allocation has been established and approved prior to the term of this general permit for PCB are not eligible for coverage under this general permit unless the operator develops, implements, and maintains a SWPPP in accordance with Part II B 6 of this permit that minimizes the pollutants of concern and, when applicable, is consistent with the assumptions and requirements of the approved TMDL wasteload allocations, and implements an inspection frequency consistent with Part II G 2 a. Exceptional waters limitation. Discharges of stormwater from construction activities not previously covered under the general permit effective on July 1, 2014, to exceptional waters identified in 9VAC25-260-30 A 3 c are not eligible for coverage under this general permit unless the operator develops, implements, and maintains a SWPPP in accordance with Part II B 7 of this permit and implements an inspection frequency consistent with Part II G 2 a. 6. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts C. Commingled discharges. Discharges authorized by this general permit may be commingled with other sources of stormwater that are not required to be covered under a state permit, so long as the commingled discharge is in compliance with this general permit. Discharges authorized by a separate state or VPDES permit may be commingled with discharges authorized by this general permit so long as all such discharges comply with all applicable state and VPDES permit requirements. D. Prohibition of nonstormwater discharges. Except as provided in Parts I A 2, 1 C, and I E, all discharges covered by this general permit shall be composed entirely of stormwater associated with construction activities. All other discharges including the following are prohibited: 1. Wastewater from washout of concrete; 2. Wastewater from the washout and cleanout of stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds, and other construction materials; Page 4 of 26 3. Fuels, oils, or other pollutants used in vehicle and equipment operation and maintenance; 4. Oils, toxic substances, or hazardous substances from spills or other releases; and 5. Soaps, solvents, or detergents used in equipment and vehicle washing. E. Authorized nonstormwater discharges. The following nonstormwater discharges from construction activities are authorized by this general permit when discharged in compliance with this general permit: 1. Discharges from firefighting activities; 2. Fire hydrant flushings; 3. Waters used to wash vehicles or equipment where soaps, solvents, or detergents have not been used and the wash water has been filtered, settled, or similarly treated prior to discharge; 4. Water used to control dust that has been filtered, settled, or similarly treated prior to discharge; 5. Potable water sources, including uncontaminated waterline flushings, managed in a manner to avoid an instream impact; 6. Routine external building wash down where soaps, solvents or detergents have not been used and the wash water has been filtered, settled, or similarly treated prior to discharge; 7. Pavement wash waters where spills or leaks of toxic or hazardous materials have not occurred (or where all spilled or leaked material has been removed prior to washing); where soaps, solvents, or detergents have not been used; and where the wash water has been filtered, settled, or similarly treated prior to discharge; 8. Uncontaminated air conditioning or compressor condensate; 9. Uncontaminated ground water or spring water; 10. Foundation or footing drains where flows are not contaminated with process materials such as solvents; 11. Uncontaminated excavation dewatering, including dewatering of trenches and excavations that have been filtered, settled, or similarly treated prior to discharge; and 12. Landscape irrigation. F. Termination of general permit coverage. 1. The operator of the construction activity shall submit a notice of termination in accordance with 9VAC25-880-60, unless a registration statement was not required to be submitted in accordance with 9VAC25-880-50 A 1 c or A 2 b for single-family detached residential structures, to the VSMP authority after one or more of the following conditions have been met: Page 5 of 26 a. Necessary permanent control measures included in the SWPPP for the site are in place and functioning effectively and final stabilization has been achieved on all portions of the site for which the operator has operational control. When applicable, long term responsibility and maintenance requirements for permanent control measures shall be recorded in the local land records prior to the submission of a complete and accurate notice of termination and the construction record drawing prepared; b. Another operator has assumed control over all areas of the site that have not been finally stabilized and obtained coverage for the ongoing discharge; c. Coverage under an alternative VPDES or state permit has been obtained; or d. For individual lots in residential construction only, final stabilization as defined in 9VAC25- 880-1 has been completed, including providing written notification to the homeowner and incorporating a copy of the notification and signed certification statement into the SWPPP, and the residence has been transferred to the homeowner. The notice of termination shall be submitted no later than 30 days after one of the above conditions in subdivision 1 of this subsection is met. 3. Termination of authorization to discharge for the conditions set forth in subdivision 1 a of this subsection shall be effective upon notification from the department that the provisions of subdivision 1 a of this subsection have been met or 60 days after submittal of a complete and accurate notice of termination in accordance with 9VAC25-880-60 C, whichever occurs first. 4. Authorization to discharge terminates at midnight on the date that the notice of termination is submitted for the conditions set forth in subdivisions 1 b through 1 d of this subsection unless otherwise notified by the VSMP authority or department. 5. The notice of termination shall be signed in accordance with Part III K of this general permit. G. Water quality protection. 1. The operator shall select, install, implement, and maintain control measures as identified in the SWPPP at the construction site that minimize pollutants in the discharge as necessary to ensure that the operator's discharge does not cause or contribute to an excursion above any applicable water quality standard. If it is determined by the department that the operator's discharges are causing, have reasonable potential to cause, or are contributing to an excursion above any applicable water quality standard, the department, in consultation with the VSMP authority, may take appropriate enforcement action and require the operator to: a. Modify or implement additional control measures in accordance with Part II C to adequately address the identified water quality concerns; b. Submit valid and verifiable data and information that are representative of ambient conditions and indicate that the receiving water is attaining water quality standards; or Page 6 of 26 c. Submit an individual permit application in accordance with 9VAC25-870-410 B 3. All written responses required under this chapter shall include a signed certification consistent with Part III K. 7_1:M STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN A. Stormwater pollution prevent plan. A stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) shall be developed prior to the submission of a registration statement and implemented for the construction activity, including any support activity, covered by this general permit. SWPPPs shall be prepared in accordance with good engineering practices. Construction activities that are part of a larger common plan of development or sale and disturb less than one acre may utilize a SWPPP template provided by the department and need not provide a separate stormwater management plan if one has been prepared and implemented for the larger common plan of development or sale. The SWPPP requirements of this general permit may be fulfilled by incorporating by reference other plans such as a spill prevention control and countermeasure (SPCC) plan developed for the site under § 311 of the federal Clean Water Act or best management practices (BMP) programs otherwise required for the facility provided that the incorporated plan meets or exceeds the SWPPP requirements of Part II B. All plans incorporated by reference into the SWPPP become enforceable under this general permit. If a plan incorporated by reference does not contain all of the required elements of the SWPPP, the operator shall develop the missing elements and include them in the SWPPP. 3. Any operator that was authorized to discharge under the general permit effective July 1, 2014, and that intends to continue coverage under this general permit, shall update its stormwater pollution prevention plan to comply with the requirements of this general permit no later than 60 days after the date of coverage under this general permit. B. Contents. The SWPPP shall include the following items: 1. General information. a. A signed copy of the registration statement, if required, for coverage under the general VPDES permit for discharges of stormwater from construction activities; b. Upon receipt, a copy of the notice of coverage under the general VPDES permit for discharges of stormwater from construction activities (i.e., notice of coverage letter); c. Upon receipt, a copy of the general VPDES permit for discharges of stormwater from construction activities; d. A narrative description of the nature of the construction activity, including the function of the project (e.g., low density residential, shopping mall, highway, etc.); e. A legible site plan identifying: Page 7 of 26 (1) Directions of stormwater flow and approximate slopes anticipated after major grading activities; (2) Limits of land disturbance including steep slopes and natural buffers around surface waters that will not be disturbed; (3) Locations of major structural and nonstructural control measures, including sediment basins and traps, perimeter dikes, sediment barriers, and other measures intended to filter, settle, or similarly treat sediment, that will be installed between disturbed areas and the undisturbed vegetated areas in order to increase sediment removal and maximize stormwater infiltration; (4) Locations of surface waters; (5) Locations where concentrated stormwater is discharged; (6) Locations of any support activities, including (i) areas where equipment and vehicle washing, wheel wash water, and other wash water is to occur; (ii) storage areas for chemicals such as acids, fuels, fertilizers, and other lawn care chemicals; (iii) concrete wash out areas; (iv) vehicle fueling and maintenance areas; (v) sanitary waste facilities, including those temporarily placed on the construction site; and (vi) construction waste storage; and (7) When applicable, the location of the on -site rain gauge or the methodology established in consultation with the VSMP authority used to identify measurable storm events for inspection as allowed by Part II G 2 a (1) (ii) or Part II G 2 b (2). Erosion and sediment control plan. a. An erosion and sediment control plan designed and approved in accordance with the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Regulations (9VAC25-840), an "agreement in lieu of a plan" as defined in 9VAC25-840-10 from the VESCP authority, or an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in accordance with annual standards and specifications approved by the department. b. All erosion and sediment control plans shall include a statement describing the maintenance responsibilities required for the erosion and sediment controls used. c. An approved erosion and sediment control plan, "agreement in lieu of a plan," or erosion and sediment control plan prepared in accordance with department -approved annual standards and specifications, implemented to: (1) Control the volume and velocity of stormwater runoff within the site to minimize soil erosion; (2) Control stormwater discharges, including peak flow rates and total stormwater volume, to minimize erosion at outlets and to minimize downstream channel and stream bank erosion; Page 8 of 26 (3) Minimize the amount of soil exposed during the construction activity; (4) Minimize the disturbance of steep slopes; (5) Minimize sediment discharges from the site in a manner that addresses (i) the amount, frequency, intensity, and duration of precipitation; (ii) the nature of resulting stormwater runoff; and (iii) soil characteristics, including the range of soil particle sizes present on the site; (6) Provide and maintain natural buffers around surface waters, direct stormwater to vegetated areas to increase sediment removal, and maximize stormwater infiltration, unless infeasible; (7) Minimize soil compaction and, unless infeasible, preserve topsoil; (8) Ensure initiation of stabilization activities, as defined in 9VAC25-880-1, of disturbed areas immediately whenever any clearing, grading, excavating, or other land - disturbing activities have permanently ceased on any portion of the site, or temporarily ceased on any portion of the site and will not resume for a period exceeding 14 days; and (9) Utilize outlet structures that withdraw stormwater from the surface (i.e., above the permanent pool or wet storage water surface elevation), unless infeasible, when discharging from sediment basins or sediment traps. 3. Stormwater management plan. a. Except for those projects identified in Part II B 3 b, a stormwater management plan approved by the VSMP authority as authorized under the Virginia Stormwater Management Program (VSMP) Regulation (9VAC25-870), or an "agreement in lieu of a stormwater management plan" as defined in 9VAC25-870-10 from the VSMP authority, or a stormwater management plan prepared in accordance with annual standards and specifications approved by the department. b. For any operator meeting the conditions of 9VAC25-870-47 B of the VSMP regulation, an approved stormwater management plan is not required. In lieu of an approved stormwater management plan, the SWPPP shall include a description of, and all necessary calculations supporting, all post -construction stormwater management measures that will be installed prior to the completion of the construction process to control pollutants in stormwater discharges after construction operations have been completed. Structural measures should be placed on upland soils to the degree possible. Such measures must be designed and installed in accordance with applicable VESCP authority, VSMP authority, state, and federal requirements, and any necessary permits must be obtained. Pollution prevention plan. A pollution prevention plan that addresses potential pollutant - generating activities that may reasonably be expected to affect the quality of stormwater discharges from the construction activity, including any support activity. The pollution prevention plan shall: a. Identify the potential pollutant -generating activities and the pollutant that is expected to be exposed to stormwater; Page 9 of 26 b. Describe the location where the potential pollutant -generating activities will occur, or if identified on the site plan, reference the site plan; c. Identify all nonstormwater discharges, as authorized in Part I E of this general permit, that are or will be commingled with stormwater discharges from the construction activity, including any applicable support activity; d. Identify the person responsible for implementing the pollution prevention practice or practices for each pollutant -generating activity (if other than the person listed as the qualified personnel); e. Describe the pollution prevention practices and procedures that will be implemented to: (1) Prevent and respond to leaks, spills, and other releases including (i) procedures for expeditiously stopping, containing, and cleaning up spills, leaks, and other releases; and (ii) procedures for reporting leaks, spills, and other releases in accordance with Part III G; (2) Prevent the discharge of spilled and leaked fuels and chemicals from vehicle fueling and maintenance activities (e.g., providing secondary containment such as spill berms, decks, spill containment pallets, providing cover where appropriate, and having spill kits readily available); (3) Prevent the discharge of soaps, solvents, detergents, and wash water from construction materials, including the clean-up of stucco, paint, form release oils, and curing compounds (e.g., providing (i) cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent contact with stormwater; (ii) collection and proper disposal in a manner to prevent contact with stormwater; and (iii) a similarly effective means designed to prevent discharge of these pollutants); (4) Minimize the discharge of pollutants from vehicle and equipment washing, wheel wash water, and other types of washing (e.g., locating activities away from surface waters and stormwater inlets or conveyance and directing wash waters to sediment basins or traps, using filtration devices such as filter bags or sand filters, or using similarly effective controls); (5) Direct concrete wash water into a leak -proof container or leak -proof settling basin. The container or basin shall be designed so that no overflows can occur due to inadequate sizing or precipitation. Hardened concrete wastes shall be removed and disposed of in a manner consistent with the handling of other construction wastes. Liquid concrete wastes shall be removed and disposed of in a manner consistent with the handling of other construction wash waters and shall not be discharged to surface waters; (6) Minimize the discharge of pollutants from storage, handling, and disposal of construction products, materials, and wastes including (i) building products such as asphalt sealants, copper flashing, roofing materials, adhesives, and concrete admixtures; (ii) pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, and landscape Page 10 of 26 materials; and (iii) construction and domestic wastes such as packaging materials, scrap construction materials, masonry products, timber, pipe and electrical cuttings, plastics, Styrofoam, concrete, and other trash or building materials; (7) Prevent the discharge of fuels, oils, and other petroleum products, hazardous or toxic wastes, waste concrete, and sanitary wastes; (8) Address any other discharge from the potential pollutant -generating activities not addressed above; (9) Minimize the exposure of waste materials to precipitation by closing or covering waste containers during precipitation events and at the end of the business day, or implementing other similarly effective practices. Minimization of exposure is not required in cases where the exposure to precipitation will not result in a discharge of pollutants; and f. Describe procedures for providing pollution prevention awareness of all applicable wastes, including any wash water, disposal practices, and applicable disposal locations of such wastes, to personnel in order to comply with the conditions of this general permit. The operator shall implement the procedures described in the SWPPP. SWPPP requirements for discharges to nutrient and sediment impaired waters. For discharges to surface waters (i) identified as impaired in the 2016 § 305(b)/303(d) Water Quality Assessment Integrated Report or (ii) with an applicable TMDL wasteload allocation established and approved prior to the term of this general permit for sediment for a sediment - related parameter (i.e., total suspended solids or turbidity) or nutrients (i.e., nitrogen or phosphorus), the operator shall: a. Identify the impaired waters, approved TMDLs, and pollutants of concern in the SWPPP; and b. Provide clear direction in the SWPPP that: (1) Permanent or temporary soil stabilization shall be applied to denuded areas within seven days after final grade is reached on any portion of the site; (2) Nutrients shall be applied in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations or an approved nutrient management plan and shall not be applied during rainfall events; and (3) A modified inspection schedule shall be implemented in accordance with Part II G 2 a. SWPPP requirements for discharges to polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) impaired waters. For discharges from construction activities that include the demolition of any structure with at least 10,000 square feet of floor space built or renovated before January 1, 1980, to surface waters (i) identified as impaired in the 2016 § 305(b)/303(d) Water Quality Assessment Integrated Report or (ii) with an applicable TMDL wasteload allocation established and approved prior to the term of this general permit for PCB, the operator shall: Page 11 of 26 a. Identify the impaired waters, approved TMDLs, and pollutant of concern in the SWPPP; b. Implement the approved erosion and sediment control plan in accordance with Part II B 2; c. Dispose of waste materials in compliance with applicable state, federal, and local requirements; and d. Implement a modified inspection schedule in accordance with Part II G 2 a. 7. SWPPP requirements for discharges to exceptional waters. For discharges to surface waters identified in 9VAC25-260-30 A 3 c as an exceptional water, the operator shall: a. Identify the exceptional surface waters in the SWPPP; and b. Provide clear direction in the SWPPP that: (1) Permanent or temporary soil stabilization shall be applied to denuded areas within seven days after final grade is reached on any portion of the site; (2) Nutrients shall be applied in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations or an approved nutrient management plan and shall not be applied during rainfall events; and (3) A modified inspection schedule shall be implemented in accordance with Part II G 2 a. 8. Identification of qualified personnel. The name, phone number, and qualifications of the qualified personnel conducting inspections required by this general permit. 9. Delegation of authority. The individuals or positions with delegated authority, in accordance with Part III K, to sign inspection reports or modify the SWPPP. 10. SWPPP signature. The SWPPP shall be signed and dated in accordance with Part III K. C. SWPPP amendments, modification, and updates. 1. The operator shall amend the SWPPP whenever there is a change in the design, construction, operation, or maintenance that has a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants to surface waters and that has not been previously addressed in the SWPPP. The SWPPP shall be amended if, during inspections or investigations by the operator's qualified personnel, or by local, state, or federal officials, it is determined that the existing control measures are ineffective in minimizing pollutants in discharges from the construction activity. Revisions to the SWPPP shall include additional or modified control measures designed and implemented to correct problems identified. If approval by the VESCP authority, VSMP authority, or department is necessary for the control measure, revisions to the SWPPP shall be completed no later than seven calendar days following approval. Implementation of these additional or modified control measures shall be accomplished as described in Part II H. Page 12 of 26 3. The SWPPP shall clearly identify the contractors that will implement and maintain each control measure identified in the SWPPP. The SWPPP shall be amended to identify any new contractor that will implement and maintain a control measure. 4. The operator shall update the SWPPP as soon as possible but no later than seven days following any modification to its implementation. All modifications or updates to the SWPPP shall be noted and shall include the following items: a. A record of dates when: (1) Major grading activities occur; (2) Construction activities temporarily or permanently cease on a portion of the site; and (3) Stabilization measures are initiated; b. Documentation of replaced or modified controls where periodic inspections or other information have indicated that the controls have been used inappropriately or incorrectly and were modified; c. Areas that have reached final stabilization and where no further SWPPP or inspection requirements apply; d. All properties that are no longer under the legal control of the operator and the dates on which the operator no longer had legal control over each property; e. The date of any prohibited discharges, the discharge volume released, and what actions were taken to minimize the impact of the release; f. Measures taken to prevent the reoccurrence of any prohibited discharge; and g. Measures taken to address any evidence identified as a result of an inspection required under Part II G. 5. Amendments, modifications, or updates to the SWPPP shall be signed in accordance with Part III K. D. Public notification. Upon commencement of land disturbance, the operator shall post conspicuously a copy of the notice of coverage letter near the main entrance of the construction activity. For linear projects, the operator shall post the notice of coverage letter at a publicly accessible location near an active part of the construction project (e.g., where a pipeline crosses a public road). The operator shall maintain the posted information until termination of general permit coverage as specified in Part I F. E. SWPPP availability. 1. Operators with day-to-day operational control over SWPPP implementation shall have a copy of the SWPPP available at a central location on -site for use by those identified as having responsibilities under the SWPPP whenever they are on the construction site. Page 13 of 26 The operator shall make the SWPPP and all amendments, modifications, and updates available upon request to the department, the VSMP authority, the EPA, the VESCP authority, local government officials, or the operator of a municipal separate storm sewer system receiving discharges from the construction activity. If an on -site location is unavailable to store the SWPPP when no personnel are present, notice of the SWPPP's location shall be posted near the main entrance of the construction site. The operator shall make the SWPPP available for public review in an electronic format or in hard copy. Information for public access to the SWPPP shall be posted and maintained in accordance with Part II D. If not provided electronically, public access to the SWPPP may be arranged upon request at a time and at a publicly accessible location convenient to the operator or his designee but shall be no less than once per month and shall be during normal business hours. Information not required to be contained within the SWPPP by this general permit is not required to be released. F. SWPPP implementation. The operator shall implement the SWPPP and subsequent amendments, modifications, and updates from commencement of land disturbance until termination of general permit coverage as specified in Part I F. All control measures shall be properly maintained in effective operating condition in accordance with good engineering practices and, where applicable, manufacturer specifications. If a site inspection required by Part II G identifies a control measure that is not operating effectively, corrective actions shall be completed as soon as practicable, but no later than seven days after discovery or a longer period as established by the VSMP authority, to maintain the continued effectiveness of the control measures. If site inspections required by Part II G identify an existing control measure that needs to be modified or if an additional or alternative control measure is necessary for any reason, implementation shall be completed prior to the next anticipated measurable storm event. If implementation prior to the next anticipated measurable storm event is impracticable, then additional or alternative control measures shall be implemented as soon as practicable, but no later than seven days after discovery or a longer period as established by the VSMP authority. G. SWPPP Inspections. 1. Personnel responsible for on -site and off -site inspections. Inspections required by this general permit shall be conducted by the qualified personnel identified by the operator in the SWPPP. The operator is responsible for ensuring that the qualified personnel conduct the inspection. 2. Inspection schedule. a. For construction activities that discharge to a surface water identified in Part 11 B 5 and B 6 as impaired or having an approved TMDL or Part I B 7 as exceptional, the following inspection schedule requirements apply: (1) Inspections shall be conducted at a frequency of (i) at least once every four business days or (ii) at least once every five business days and no later than 24 hours following a measurable storm event. In the event that a measurable storm event occurs when Page 14 of 26 there are more than 24 hours between business days, the inspection shall be conducted on the next business day; and (2) Representative inspections as authorized in Part II G 2 d shall not be allowed. b. Except as specified in Part II G 2 a, inspections shall be conducted at a frequency of: (1) At least once every five business days; or (2) At least once every 10 business days and no later than 24 hours following a measurable storm event. In the event that a measurable storm event occurs when there are more than 24 hours between business days, the inspection shall be conducted on the next business day. c. Where areas have been temporarily stabilized or land -disturbing activities will be suspended due to continuous frozen ground conditions and stormwater discharges are unlikely, the inspection frequency described in Part II G 2 a and 2 b may be reduced to once per month. If weather conditions (such as above freezing temperatures or rain or snow events) make discharges likely, the operator shall immediately resume the regular inspection frequency. d. Except as prohibited in Part II G 2 a (2), representative inspections may be utilized for utility line installation, pipeline construction, or other similar linear construction activities provided that: (1) Temporary or permanent soil stabilization has been installed and vehicle access may compromise the temporary or permanent soil stabilization and potentially cause additional land disturbance increasing the potential for erosion; (2) Inspections occur on the same frequency as other construction activities; (3) Control measures are inspected along the construction site 0.25 miles above and below each access point (i.e., where a roadway, undisturbed right-of-way, or other similar feature intersects the construction activity and access does not compromise temporary or permanent soil stabilization); and (4) Inspection locations are provided in the inspection report required by Part II G. e. If adverse weather causes the safety of the inspection personnel to be in jeopardy, the inspection may be delayed until the next business day on which it is safe to perform the inspection. Any time inspections are delayed due to adverse weather conditions, evidence of the adverse weather conditions shall be included in the SWPPP with the dates of occurrence. 3. Inspection requirements. a. As part of the inspection, the qualified personnel shall: (1) Record the date and time of the inspection and, when applicable, the date and rainfall amount of the last measurable storm event; Page 15 of 26 (2) Record the information and a description of any discharges occurring at the time of the inspection or evidence of discharges occurring prior to the inspection; (3) Record any land -disturbing activities that have occurred outside of the approved erosion and sediment control plan; (4) Inspect the following for installation in accordance with the approved erosion and sediment control plan, identification of any maintenance needs, and evaluation of effectiveness in minimizing sediment discharge, including whether the control has been inappropriately or incorrectly used: (a) All perimeter erosion and sediment controls, such as silt fence; (b) Soil stockpiles, when applicable, and borrow areas for stabilization or sediment trapping measures; (c) Completed earthen structures, such as dams, dikes, ditches, and diversions for stabilization and effective impoundment or flow control; (d) Cut and fill slopes; (e) Sediment basins and traps, sediment barriers, and other measures installed to control sediment discharge from stormwater; (f) Temporary or permanent channels, flumes, or other slope drain structures installed to convey concentrated runoff down cut and fill slopes; (g) Storm inlets that have been made operational to ensure that sediment laden stormwater does not enter without first being filtered or similarly treated; and (h) Construction vehicle access routes that intersect or access paved or public roads for minimizing sediment tracking; (5) Inspect areas that have reached final grade or that will remain dormant for more than 14 days to ensure: (a) Initiation of stabilization activities have occurred immediately, as defined in 9VAC25-880-1; and (b) Stabilization activities have been completed within seven days of reaching grade or stopping work; (6) Inspect for evidence that the approved erosion and sediment control plan, "agreement in lieu of a plan," or erosion and sediment control plan prepared in accordance with department -approved annual standards and specifications has not been properly implemented. This includes: Page 16 of 26 (a) Concentrated flows of stormwater in conveyances such as rills, rivulets, or channels that have not been filtered, settled, or similarly treated prior to discharge, or evidence thereof; (b) Sediment laden or turbid flows of stormwater that have not been filtered or settled to remove sediments prior to discharge; (c) Sediment deposition in areas that drain to unprotected stormwater inlets or catch basins that discharge to surface waters. Inlets and catch basins with failing sediment controls due to improper installation, lack of maintenance, or inadequate design are considered unprotected; (d) Sediment deposition on any property (including public and private streets) outside of the construction activity covered by this general permit; (e) Required stabilization has not been initiated or completed or is not effective on portions of the site; (f) Sediment basins without adequate wet or dry storage volume or sediment basins that allow the discharge of stormwater from below the surface of the wet storage portion of the basin; (g) Sediment traps without adequate wet or dry storage or sediment traps that allow the discharge of stormwater from below the surface of the wet storage portion of the trap; and (h) Land disturbance or sediment deposition outside of the approved area to be disturbed; (7) Inspect pollutant generating activities identified in the pollution prevention plan for the proper implementation, maintenance, and effectiveness of the procedures and practices; (8) Identify any pollutant generating activities not identified in the pollution prevention plan; and (9) Identify and document the presence of any evidence of the discharge of pollutants prohibited by this general permit. 4. Inspection report. Each inspection report shall include the following items: a. The date and time of the inspection and, when applicable, the date and rainfall amount of the last measurable storm event; b. Summarized findings of the inspection; c. The locations of prohibited discharges; d. The locations of control measures that require maintenance; Page 17 of 26 e. The locations of control measures that failed to operate as designed or proved inadequate or inappropriate for a particular location; f. The locations where any evidence identified under Part II G 3 a (6) exists; g. The locations where any additional control measure is needed; h. A list of corrective actions required (including any changes to the SWPPP that are necessary) as a result of the inspection or to maintain permit compliance; i. Documentation of any corrective actions required from a previous inspection that have not been implemented; and The date and signature of the qualified personnel and the operator or its duly authorized representative. 5. The inspection report shall be included into the SWPPP no later than four business days after the inspection is complete. The inspection report and any actions taken in accordance with Part II shall be retained by the operator as part of the SWPPP for at least three years from the date that general permit coverage expires or is terminated. The inspection report shall identify any incidents of noncompliance. Where an inspection report does not identify any incidents of noncompliance, the report shall contain a certification that the construction activity is in compliance with the SWPPP and this general permit. The report shall be signed in accordance with Part III K of this general permit. H. Corrective actions. The operator shall implement the corrective actions identified as a result of an inspection as soon as practicable but no later than seven days after discovery or a longer period as approved by the VSMP authority. If approval of a corrective action by a regulatory authority (e.g., VSMP authority, VESCP authority, or the department) is necessary, additional control measures shall be implemented to minimize pollutants in stormwater discharges until such approvals can be obtained. The operator may be required to remove accumulated sediment deposits located outside of the construction activity covered by this general permit as soon as practicable in order to minimize environmental impacts. The operator shall notify the VSMP authority and the department as well as obtain all applicable federal, state, and local authorizations, approvals, and permits prior to the removal of sediments accumulated in surface waters including wetlands. Page 18 of 26 PART III CONDITIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL VPDES PERMITS NOTE: Discharge monitoring is not required for this general permit. If the operator chooses to monitor stormwater discharges or control measures, the operator shall comply with the requirements of subsections A, B, and C, as appropriate. A. Monitoring. 1. Samples and measurements taken for the purpose of monitoring shall be representative of the monitoring activity. Monitoring shall be conducted according to procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136 or alternative methods approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, unless other procedures have been specified in this general permit. Analyses performed according to test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136 shall be performed by an environmental laboratory certified under regulations adopted by the Department of General Services (1 VAC30-45 or 1 VAC30-46). 3. The operator shall periodically calibrate and perform maintenance procedures on all monitoring and analytical instrumentation at intervals that will ensure accuracy of measurements. B. Records. 1. Monitoring records and reports shall include a. The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements; b. The individuals who performed the sampling or measurements; c. The dates and times analyses were performed; d. The individuals who performed the analyses; e. The analytical techniques or methods used; and f. The results of such analyses. 2. The operator shall retain records of all monitoring information, including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, copies of all reports required by this general permit, and records of all data used to complete the registration statement for this general permit, for a period of at least three years from the date of the sample, measurement, report or request for coverage. This period of retention shall be extended automatically during the course of any unresolved litigation regarding the regulated activity or regarding control standards applicable to the operator, or as requested by the board. C. Reporting monitoring results. Page 19 of 26 1. The operator shall update the SWPPP to include the results of the monitoring as may be performed in accordance with this general permit, unless another reporting schedule is specified elsewhere in this general permit. 2. Monitoring results shall be reported on a discharge monitoring report (DMR); on forms provided, approved or specified by the department; or in any format provided that the date, location, parameter, method, and result of the monitoring activity are included. If the operator monitors any pollutant specifically addressed by this general permit more frequently than required by this general permit using test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136 or using other test procedures approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or using procedures specified in this general permit, the results of this monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted in the DMR or reporting form specified by the department. 4. Calculations for all limitations which require averaging of measurements shall utilize an arithmetic mean unless otherwise specified in this general permit. D. Duty to provide information. The operator shall furnish, within a reasonable time, any information which the board may request to determine whether cause exists for terminating this general permit coverage or to determine compliance with this general permit. The board, department, EPA, or VSMP authority may require the operator to furnish, upon request, such plans, specifications, and other pertinent information as may be necessary to determine the effect of the wastes from his discharge on the quality of surface waters, or such other information as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of the CWA and the Virginia Stormwater Management Act. The operator shall also furnish to the board, department, EPA, or VSMP authority, upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this general permit. E. Compliance schedule reports. Reports of compliance or noncompliance with, or any progress reports on, interim and final requirements contained in any compliance schedule of this general permit shall be submitted no later than 14 days following each schedule date. F. Unauthorized stormwater discharges. Pursuant to § 62.1-44.5 of the Code of Virginia, except in compliance with a state permit issued by the department, it shall be unlawful to cause a stormwater discharge from a construction activity. G. Reports of unauthorized discharges. Any operator who discharges or causes or allows a discharge of sewage, industrial waste, other wastes or any noxious or deleterious substance or a hazardous substance or oil in an amount equal to or in excess of a reportable quantity established under either 40 CFR Part 110, 40 CFR Part 117, 40 CFR Part 302, or § 62.1-44.34:19 of the Code of Virginia that occurs during a 24-hour period into or upon surface waters or who discharges or causes or allows a discharge that may reasonably be expected to enter surface waters, shall notify the Department of Environmental Quality of the discharge immediately upon discovery of the discharge, but in no case later than within 24 hours after said discovery. A written report of the unauthorized discharge shall be submitted to the department and the VSMP authority within five days of discovery of the discharge. The written report shall contain: 1. A description of the nature and location of the discharge; 2. The cause of the discharge; Page 20 of 26 3. The date on which the discharge occurred; 4. The length of time that the discharge continued; 5. The volume of the discharge; 6. If the discharge is continuing, how long it is expected to continue; 7. If the discharge is continuing, what the expected total volume of the discharge will be; and Any steps planned or taken to reduce, eliminate and prevent a recurrence of the present discharge or any future discharges not authorized by this general permit. Discharges reportable to the department and the VSMP authority under the immediate reporting requirements of other regulations are exempted from this requirement. H. Reports of unusual or extraordinary discharges. If any unusual or extraordinary discharge including a "bypass" or "upset," as defined in this general permit, should occur from a facility and the discharge enters or could be expected to enter surface waters, the operator shall promptly notify, in no case later than within 24 hours, the department and the VSMP authority by telephone after the discovery of the discharge. This notification shall provide all available details of the incident, including any adverse effects on aquatic life and the known number of fish killed. The operator shall reduce the report to writing and shall submit it to the department and the VSMP authority within five days of discovery of the discharge in accordance with Part III 12. Unusual and extraordinary discharges include any discharge resulting from: 1. Unusual spillage of materials resulting directly or indirectly from processing operations; 2. Breakdown of processing or accessory equipment; 3. Failure or taking out of service of some or all of the facilities; and 4. Flooding or other acts of nature. I. Reports of noncompliance. The operator shall report any noncompliance which may adversely affect surface waters or may endanger public health. An oral report to the department and the VSMP authority shall be provided within 24 hours from the time the operator becomes aware of the circumstances. The following shall be included as information that shall be reported within 24 hours under this subdivision: a. Any unanticipated bypass; and b. Any upset that causes a discharge to surface waters. 2. A written report shall be submitted within five days and shall contain: a. A description of the noncompliance and its cause; Page 21 of 26 b. The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to continue; and c. Steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance. The department may waive the written report on a case -by -case basis for reports of noncompliance under Part III I if the oral report has been received within 24 hours and no adverse impact on surface waters has been reported. 3. The operator shall report all instances of noncompliance not reported under Part III 1 1 or 2 in writing as part of the SWPPP. The reports shall contain the information listed in Part 111 1 2. NOTE: The reports required in Part III G, H and I shall be made to the department and the VSMP authority. Reports may be made by telephone, email, or by fax. For reports outside normal working hours, leaving a recorded message shall fulfill the immediate reporting requirement. For emergencies, the Virginia Department of Emergency Management maintains a 24-hour telephone service at 1-800-468-8892. 4. Where the operator becomes aware of a failure to submit any relevant facts, or submittal of incorrect information in any report, including a registration statement, to the department or the VSMP authority, the operator shall promptly submit such facts or correct information. J. Notice of planned changes. 1. The operator shall give notice to the department and the VSMP authority as soon as possible of any planned physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility or activity. Notice is required only when: a. The operator plans an alteration or addition to any building, structure, facility, or installation that may meet one of the criteria for determining whether a facility is a new source in 9VAC25-870-420; b. The operator plans an alteration or addition that would significantly change the nature or increase the quantity of pollutants discharged. This notification applies to pollutants that are not subject to effluent limitations in this general permit; or 2. The operator shall give advance notice to the department and VSMP authority of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity, which may result in noncompliance with state permit requirements. K. Signatory requirements. 1. Registration statement. All registration statements shall be signed as follows: a. For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this chapter, a responsible corporate officer means: (i) a president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy -making or decision -making functions for the corporation; or (ii) the manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities, provided the Page 22 of 26 manager is authorized to make management decisions that govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment recommendations, and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long-term compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager can ensure that the necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate information for state permit application requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures; b. For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively; or c. For a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. For purposes of this chapter, a principal executive officer of a public agency includes (i) the chief executive officer of the agency or (ii) a senior executive officer having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency. 2. Reports and other information. All reports required by this general permit, including SWPPPs, and other information requested by the board or the department shall be signed by a person described in Part III K 1 or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only if: a. The authorization is made in writing by a person described in Part III K 1; b. The authorization specifies either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity such as the position of plant manager, operator of a well or a well field, superintendent, position of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the operator. (A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position); and c. The signed and dated written authorization is included in the SWPPP. A copy shall be provided to the department and VSMP authority, if requested. 3. Changes to authorization. If an authorization under Part III K 2 is no longer accurate because a different individual or position has responsibility for the overall operation of the construction activity, a new authorization satisfying the requirements of Part III K 2 shall be submitted to the VSMP authority as the administering entity for the board prior to or together with any reports or information to be signed by an authorized representative. 4. Certification. Any person signing a document under Part III K 1 or 2 shall make the following certification: "I certify under penalty of law that I have read and understand this document and that this document and all attachments were prepared in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant Page 23 of 26 penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." L. Duty to comply. The operator shall comply with all conditions of this general permit. Any state permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Virginia Stormwater Management Act and the Clean Water Act, except that noncompliance with certain provisions of this general permit may constitute a violation of the Virginia Stormwater Management Act but not the Clean Water Act. Permit noncompliance is grounds for enforcement action; for state permit coverage, termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of a state permit renewal application. The operator shall comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established under § 307(a) of the Clean Water Act for toxic pollutants within the time provided in the regulations that establish these standards or prohibitions or standards for sewage sludge use or disposal, even if this general permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the requirement. M. Duty to reapply. If the operator wishes to continue an activity regulated by this general permit after the expiration date of this general permit, the operator shall submit a new registration statement at least 60 days before the expiration date of the existing general permit, unless permission for a later date has been granted by the board. The board shall not grant permission for registration statements to be submitted later than the expiration date of the existing general permit. N. Effect of a state permit. This general permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or invasion of personal rights, or any infringement of federal, state or local law or regulations. O. State law. Nothing in this general permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action under, or relieve the operator from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties established pursuant to any other state law or regulation or under authority preserved by § 510 of the Clean Water Act. Except as provided in general permit conditions on "bypassing" (Part III U) and "upset' (Part III V), nothing in this general permit shall be construed to relieve the operator from civil and criminal penalties for noncompliance. P. Oil and hazardous substance liability. Nothing in this general permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the operator from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the operator is or may be subject under §§ 62.1-44.34:14 through 62.1-44.34:23 of the State Water Control Law or § 311 of the Clean Water Act. Q. Proper operation and maintenance. The operator shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances), which are installed or used by the operator to achieve compliance with the conditions of this general permit. Proper operation and maintenance also includes effective plant performance, adequate funding, adequate staffing, and adequate laboratory and process controls, including appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of back-up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems, which are installed by the operator only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of this general permit. R. Disposal of solids or sludges. Solids, sludges or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or management of pollutants shall be disposed of in a manner so as to prevent any pollutant from such materials from entering surface waters and in compliance with all applicable state and federal laws and regulations. Page 24 of 26 S. Duty to mitigate. The operator shall take all steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this general permit that has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. T. Need to halt or reduce activity not a defense. It shall not be a defense for an operator in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this general permit. U. Bypass. 1. 'Bypass," as defined in 9VAC25-870-10, means the intentional diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment facility. The operator may allow any bypass to occur that does not cause effluent limitations to be exceeded, but only if it also is for essential maintenance to ensure efficient operation. These bypasses are not subject to the provisions of Part III U 2 and 3. 2. Notice. a. Anticipated bypass. If the operator knows in advance of the need for a bypass, the operator shall submit prior notice to the department, if possible at least 10 days before the date of the bypass. b. Unanticipated bypass. The operator shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass as required in Part III I. 3. Prohibition of bypass. a. Except as provided in Part III U 1, bypass is prohibited, and the board or department may take enforcement action against an operator for bypass unless: (1) Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage. Severe property damage means substantial physical damage to property, damage to the treatment facilities that causes them to become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources that can reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. Severe property damage does not mean economic loss caused by delays in production; (2) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. This condition is not satisfied if adequate back-up equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass that occurred during normal periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and (3) The operator submitted notices as required under Part III U 2. b. The department may approve an anticipated bypass, after considering its adverse effects, if the department determines that it will meet the three conditions listed in Part III U 3 a. Page 25 of 26 V. Upset. 1. An "upset," as defined in 9VAC25-870-10, means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with technology -based state permit effluent limitations because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the operator. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper operation. 2. An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with technology -based state permit effluent limitations if the requirements of Part III V 4 are met. A determination made during administrative review of claims that noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is not a final administrative action subject to judicial review. 3. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventative maintenance, or careless or improper operation. 4. An operator who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs or other relevant evidence that: a. An upset occurred and that the operator can identify the cause of the upset; b. The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated; c. The operator submitted notice of the upset as required in Part III I; and d. The operator complied with any remedial measures required under Part III S. 5. In any enforcement proceeding, the operator seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof. W. Inspection and entry. The operator shall allow the department as the board's designee, the VSMP authority, EPA, or an authorized representative of either entity (including an authorized contractor), upon presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law to: 1. Enter upon the operator's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted, or where records shall be kept under the conditions of this general permit; 2. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that shall be kept under the conditions of this general permit; 3. Inspect and photograph at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this general permit; and 4. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of ensuring state permit compliance or as otherwise authorized by the Clean Water Act or the Virginia Stormwater Management Act, any substances or parameters at any location. Page 26 of 26 For purposes of this section, the time for inspection shall be deemed reasonable during regular business hours, and whenever the facility is discharging. Nothing contained herein shall make an inspection unreasonable during an emergency. X. State permit actions. State permit coverage may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a request by the operator for a state permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any state permit condition. Y. Transfer of state permit coverage. 1. State permits are not transferable to any person except after notice to the department. Except as provided in Part III Y 2, a state permit may be transferred by the operator to a new operator only if the state permit has been modified or revoked and reissued, or a minor modification made, to identify the new operator and incorporate such other requirements as may be necessary under the Virginia Stormwater Management Act and the Clean Water Act. As an alternative to transfers under Part III Y 1, this state permit may be automatically transferred to a new operator if: a. The current operator notifies the department at least 30 days in advance of the proposed transfer of the title to the facility or property; b. The notice includes a written agreement between the existing and new operators containing a specific date for transfer of state permit responsibility, coverage, and liability between them; and c. The department does not notify the existing operator and the proposed new operator of its intent to modify or revoke and reissue the state permit. If this notice is not received, the transfer is effective on the date specified in the agreement mentioned in Part III Y 2 b. 3. For ongoing construction activity involving a change of operator, the new operator shall accept and maintain the existing SWPPP, or prepare and implement a new SWPPP prior to taking over operations at the site. Z. Severability. The provisions of this general permit are severable, and if any provision of this general permit or the application of any provision of this state permit to any circumstance, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances and the remainder of this general permit shall not be affected thereby. Section 12. Inspection logs (Provide templates for your inspections. Requirements are listed in 9VAC25-880-70, Part II, section B and F.) Issued — 10/2014 Stonnwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Albemarle County STORM WATER INSPECTIONS FOR VSMP GENERAL PERMIT LAND DISTRIBUTING ACTIVITIES Page I PROJECT: MONITORING FOR THE WEEK BEGINNING: DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTION: RAINFALL: Date of Rain Amount Inches Initials EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES INSPECTED: (Inspections shall be conducted according to Part IIF2 of the Permit. However, if the discharges of stormwater from construction activities are to surface waters identified as imparied, inspections shall be conducted according to Part IB4d.) Facility Identification Date and Time of Inspection Operating Properly (Y/N) Description of inspection observations OBSERVATION OF RUNOFF AT OUTFALLS: (Inspections shall be conducted according to Part IIF2 of the Permit. However, if the discharges of stormwater from construction activities are to surface waters identified as imparied, inspections shall be conducted according to Part IB4d.) By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge: Qualified Personnel By this signature, I certify that the contraction activity is in compliance with the SW PP and general permit. Qualified Personnel ceritication statement on page 3 shall be signed. By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge: Operator/Duly Authorized Representative By this signature, I certify that the contraction activity is in compliance with the SWPP and general permit. Operator/Duly Authorized Representative Stormwater Discharge Cattail Identification Date Clarity Floating Solids Suspended Solids Oil Sheen Otherobvious indicators of stormwater pollution (list and describe) Visible sediment leaving the site?(Y/N) If yes, describe actions taken to prevent future releases (may need to attach additional information) Describemeasurestakento clean up sediment outside of disturbed limits (may need to attach additional information) Clarity: Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very, cloudy Floating Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the discharge where 1 is no solids and 10 the surface us covered in floating solids Suspended Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the discharge where 1 is no solids and 10 is extremely muddy. Oil Sheen: Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge (Y or N)? STORM WATER INSPECTIONS FOR VSMP GENERAL PERMIT LAND DISTRIBUTING ACTIVITIES Page I PROJECT: MONITORING FOR THE WEEK BEGINNING: DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTION: RAINFALL: Date of Rain Amount Inches Initials EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES INSPECTED: (Inspections shall be conducted according to Part IIF2 of the Permit. However, if the discharges of stormwater from construction activities are to surface waters identified as imparied, inspections shall be conducted according to Part IB4d.) Facility Identification Date and Time of Inspection Operating Properly (Y/N) Description of inspection observations OBSERVATION OF RUNOFF AT OUTFALLS: (Inspections shall be conducted according to Part IIF2 of the Permit. However, if the discharges of stormwater from construction activities are to surface waters identified as imparied, inspections shall be conducted according to Part IB4d.) By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge: Qualified Personnel By this signature, I certify that the contraction activity is in compliance with the SW PP and general permit. Qualified Personnel ceritication statement on page 3 shall be signed. By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge: Operator/Duly Authorized Representative By this signature, I certify that the contraction activity is in compliance with the SWPP and general permit. Operator/Duly Authorized Representative Stormwater Discharge Cattail Identification Date Clarity Floating Solids Suspended Solids Oil Sheen Otherobvious indicators of stormwater pollution (list and describe) Visible sediment leaving the site?(Y/N) If yes, describe actions taken to prevent future releases (may need to attach additional information) Describemeasurestakento clean up sediment outside of disturbed limits (may need to attach additional information) Clarity: Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very, cloudy Floating Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the discharge where 1 is no solids and 10 the surface us covered in floating solids Suspended Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the discharge where 1 is no solids and 10 is extremely muddy. Oil Sheen: Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge (Y or N)? STORM WATER INSPECTIONS FOR VSMP GENERAL PERMIT LAND DISTRIBUTING ACTIVITIES Page I PROJECT: MONITORING FOR THE WEEK BEGINNING: DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTION: RAINFALL: Date of Rain Amount Inches Initials EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES INSPECTED: (Inspections shall be conducted according to Part IIF2 of the Permit. However, if the discharges of stormwater from construction activities are to surface waters identified as imparied, inspections shall be conducted according to Part IB4d.) Facility Identification Date and Time of Inspection Operating Properly (Y/N) Description of inspection observations OBSERVATION OF RUNOFF AT OUTFALLS: (Inspections shall be conducted according to Part IIF2 of the Permit. However, if the discharges of stormwater from construction activities are to surface waters identified as imparied, inspections shall be conducted according to Part IB4d.) By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge: Qualified Personnel By this signature, I certify that the contraction activity is in compliance with the SW PP and general permit. Qualified Personnel ceritication statement on page 3 shall be signed. By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge: Operator/Duly Authorized Representative By this signature, I certify that the contraction activity is in compliance with the SWPP and general permit. Operator/Duly Authorized Representative Stormwater Discharge Cattail Identification Date Clarity Floating Solids Suspended Solids Oil Sheen Otherobvious indicators of stormwater pollution (list and describe) Visible sediment leaving the site?(Y/N) If yes, describe actions taken to prevent future releases (may need to attach additional information) Describemeasurestakento clean up sediment outside of disturbed limits (may need to attach additional information) Clarity: Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very, cloudy Floating Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the discharge where 1 is no solids and 10 the surface us covered in floating solids Suspended Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the discharge where 1 is no solids and 10 is extremely muddy. Oil Sheen: Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge (Y or N)?