Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200200016 Review Comments Preliminary Site Plan 2002-09-17 r r _ 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 Phone#:296-5823 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Fax#:972-4012 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fax To: Paul Tschiderer From: Francis MacCall Fax: 984-8863 Pages: 4 Phone: 984-1599 Date: 09/17/02 Re: Carriage Gate CC: ❑ Urgent 0 For Review ❑Please Comment 0 Please Reply ❑Please Recycle • Comments: The letter was sent out on the 12th for preliminary approval. It was sent to Rivanna Engineering as well with attachments. Here is a copy of the letter. If you have received this fax in error please let us know immediately by telephone. `�Ies COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Planning&Community Development TRANSMITTAL MEMORANDUM DATE: August 28, 2002 TO: Susan Carol Snead, Zoning Jay Schlothauer,Building Code/Fire Rescue FROM: Francis H. MacCall RE: SDP-02-016 Carriage Gate Preliminary Site Plan Attached is a copy of the Carriage Gate Preliminary Site Plan. Please review and comment if needed on the amendment. Please have comments to me or in SPIN by 9/12/02. Thanks. 9 08/28/2002 12:50 804984886300 RIVANNA ENGINEER " 1 PAGE 03 P.O. Box 7603 Rivanna Engineering 804.984.1599 Charlottesville, VA 22906 & Surveying, PLC (F)804.984.8863 Memorandum To: Susan Snead From: Paul Tschidere CC: Date: 28 August 2002 Re: CARRIAGE GATE APARTMENTS (SDP--2002-016) The following comments are in response to your letter, dated August 13, 2002. 1. Proffers have been listed on the front cover sheet under"Proffers". 2. The required recreation area has been exceeded (6,052 sf), see Sheet S-2. A Tot Lot has been added to the recreation area, and the required features of this facility have been listed on the cover sheet under "Site Specific Notes" (note#4). Please call if you have any questions. Regards. 08J28/2002 12:50 804984886300 RIVANNA ENGINEERT'g, PAGE 114 P.O. Box 7603 Rivanna Engineering 804.984.1599 Charlottesville,VA 22906 & Surveying, PLC (F)804.984.8883 Memorandum To: Jay Schlothau From; Paul Tschidere cc Date: 28 August 2002 Re: CARRIAGE GATE APARTMENTS (SDP-2002-016) Dear Jay: The following comments are in response to your letter dated July 30, 2002. 1. Dumpster has been relocated per requirements, see plan sheet. 2. Fire flow information will be sent under separate cover. 3. Sprinkler system note has been added to"Site Specific Notes" (Note#5). Please call if you have any questions. Regards. 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 Phone#:296-5823 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Fax#:972-4012 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fax To: Paul Tschiderer From: Francis MacCall Fax: 984-8863 Pages: 2 Phone: 984-1599 Date: 08/28/02 Re: Carriage Gate CC: ❑ Urgent 0 For Review ❑ Please Comment 0 Please Reply 0 Please Recycle • Comments:Fire Rescue Comments If you have received this fax in error please let us know immediately by telephone. Albemarle County Development Departments SDP-2002-016 SPIN Submission and Comments Carriage Gate Apartments Preliminary Fire/Rescue preliminary site plan revision 2 reviewer received reviewed decision Jay Schlothauer 7/30/02 7/30/02 requested changes Based on plans revised July 24, 2002. Verify that adequate fireflow is available. Required fireflow is 1,950 gpm @ 20 psi. [Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance, Section 32.7.6] Relocate the dumpsters so that they are at least 15'from buildings and property lines. [2000 Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code; 1996 BOCA National Fire Prevention Code, Section 2103.3] Note: The apartments buildings must include sprinkler systems. 8/28/02 12:38 PM Page 1 of 1 • Francis MacCall From: Elaine Echols Sent: Monday,August 26, 2002 12:49 PM To: Francis MacCall Subject: FW: Carriage Gate Apartments: neighbor to Agnor-Hurt School ----Original Message--- From: Lisa Glass Sent: Monday,August 26,2002 12:08 PM To: 'steve melton' Cc: Mark Trank;Al Reaser;Elaine Echols;Susan Snead Subject: Carriage Gate Apartments:neighbor to Agnor-Hurt School Dear Steve, This is to document our phone conversation this morning. The school division is still willing to finalize an agreement for the pedestrian path from Carriage Gate Apartments onto the school property as requested by the Planning Department. Please send a draft maintenance agreement and site plan to me for approval by our attorney when you finalize the location. Please be aware that the realistic use of school facilities by Carriage Gate residents is actually quite limited. The Agnor- Hurt Elementary School playground and fields are considered a County Park after school hours and before dark. Agnor- • Hurt, like other elementary schools, has an after-school-program which utilizes the play areas until 6 in the evening (and a similar YMCA program during the summer). Therefore the times when the playground is available as a public park is limited to the few evening hours that are light and the weekends. In fact the school division is in the process of posting signs at all the schools stating"no trespassing during school hours or after dark,"so that all potential users know the limited hours. Don't hesitate to contact me if you need a more formal response or if you have other questions or concerns, Lisa Lisa Glass,Project Manager, Albemarle County Building Services 804-975-9340 fax: 975-9341 1 -ti 1 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 Phone#:296-5823 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Fax#:972-4012 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fax To: Tim Miller From: Francis MacCall Fax: 984-8863 Pages: Phone: 984-1599 Date: 08/24/02 Re: Carriage Gate Apartments Prelim CC: ❑ Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply 0 Please Recycle • Comments:Zoning has a couple things before they will grant preliminary approval. Please get two copies back to me on this. One for Zoning and one for the Planning file. Thanks oc-4- ptc If you have received this fax in error please let us know immediately by telephone. Son.c.tvk c", arN, Albemarle County Development Departments SDP-2002-016 SPIN Submission and Comments CarriageGate-Apartments Preliminary Zoning [description and date] revision 2 reviewer received reviewed decision susan snead 3/4/02 8/13/02 requested changes FROM: Susan Carol Snead,Zoning Plans Reviewer DATE: August 13,2002 RE: SDP 02-016 Carriage Gate Apartments Preliminary Site Plan The Albemarle County Department of Building Code and Zoning Services will approve this preliminary site plan for zoning compliance when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed.The Building Official may provide separate comments. [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference,which is to the Zoning Ordinance unless otherwise specified.] 1. [ZMA 01-021] Once the rezoning is approved it may be necessary to list some or all proffers on the site plan. Final approval of the site plan is subject to compliance with all proffers. 2. [4.16] A minimum of 5,972 square feet of recreation area is required. Only 5,125 square feet of recreation area is being shown. A tot lot is required. All modifications must be approved by the Director of Planning and Community Development. Final tentative approval from the Department of Building Code and Zoning Services will be subject to the following conditions: (The following conditions are those that have been identified at this time. Additional conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) 1. [32.5.6(n)] Show the location of all outdoor lighting on the plan. 2. [32.6.6(j)] Provide a description and photograph or diagram and show the location of each type of outdoor luminaire that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens. Please be aware that installation of such luminaires in the future that are not shown on this plan shall require an amendment to this plan. 3. [32.6.6(j)] [4.17.4(b)] Include a photometric plan on the site plan demonstrating that parking area luminaires are in compliance with 4.17.4(b). 8/20/02 09:26 AM Page 1 of 1 Albemarle County Development Departments SDP-2002-016 SPIN Submission and Comments Carriage Gate Apartments Preliminary Planning preliminary site plan revision 8 reviewer received reviewed decision Elaine Echols 2/14/02 3/11/02 requested changes The Department of Planning and Community Development has reviewed the preliminary site plan referenced above and will recommend preliminary approval once the following conditions are satisfied. The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments may be added or eliminated based on further review. Each comment is preceded by the applicable zoning reference. Please note that approval of this site plan is contingent on the approval of the pending rezoning ZMA-01- 21. These comments could change subject to the approved proffers, actions of the Planning Commission, or action of the Board of Supervisors. 1. Please correct the spelling of'Apartments'on the title of the cover sheet. 2. The property being reviewed in this case is designated "TM 45 Parcel 91." Please remove any references to Lot C on the plan. See title and legal reference. 3. TM 45 Parcel 91 lot B has also been given a new lot designation. It is now TM 45 Parcel 91 D. Please make this change as well on the plan. This property is directly behind the Parcel 91. 4. Please correct the spelling of'Aubrey' in the source of'boundary survey' note. 5. For clarification purposes, please add "For R-15 districts"after the'building setbacks' note. 6. [32.5.6a] One datum elevation reference was not found on the plan. Please add this feature. 7. [4.16] Please identify the Recreation Area on the plan. 8. [32.5.6b]A note stating the square footage of recreation area must appear on the plan. Please add this note to the plan. 9. [32.5.6d]The code requires that at least 50 feet of offsite topography and pertinant features must be on the plan. The rear portion (northern)of the property does not meet this requirement. Please extend the topography and show any relevant features (structures)a full 50 feet from the rear property line. 10. [32.7.9.8] Please be advised that screening at a depth of 20 feet may be required along the Stormwater Management Facility and the boundary with the school. Plan accordingly to accommodate vegetation in such areas and be aware of potential conflicts with utilities. 11. [32.5.6s] It appears that there is insufficient space for landscaping with the aforementioned utilities. A conceptual landscape plan shall be submitted prior to preliminary site plan approval to assess this issue. The plan must meet the minimum requirements for screening along the stormwater facility and the parking lots, as well as screening from the rear property and the school. The conceptual plan need not specify the distinct species, but rather would describe the vegetation by its type (I.e medium shade tree, screening shrub etc.) 7/11/02 02:31 PM Page 5 of 9 , Albemarle County Development Departments SDP-2002-016 SPIN Submission and Comments Carriage Gate Apartments Preliminary Planning preliminary site plan revision 8 reviewer received reviewed decision Elaine Echols 2/14/02 3/11/02 requested changes 12. [32.7.9.9] Also be advised that the landscaping on the site must meet a fifteen (15) percent tree canopy. This is required for any residential development that is between 10 and 20 dwelling units per acre. Please demonstrate this on the conceptual landscape plan. 13. [18.3] Please add notes to each building stating as follows, "Building not to exceed 65 feet in height." 14. The note under'Woodbrook Drive' is incorrect. The distance is actually to the intersection with 'Berkmar Drive." Please replace'Greenbriar'with 'Berkmar.' 15. There is a 20'access easement shown on the property. Please clarify whether it is an access easement or a R.O.W. Please label accordingly and specify whether it is existing or proposed. 16. [4.12.6.2] Please be advised that for the purposes of safety, internal signage for pedestrians may be required before final plan approval. 17. The buildings on the site do not accurately match the submitted elevations for the site. It should be noted that the buildings be drawn to show their exact footprint on the final site plan. 7/11/02 02:31 PM Page 6 of 9 • COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Planning&Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902-4596 c Q TO: J(` i �(1 �-�-+ .li) FROM: 1144C.. _PAWOff 6 0)(QJ Date: 712 ? /0 9--) TT1 ai - C/.SOT' JOB NO/FILE NAME 5f P - / CGC�r-,aq 6Q.fe We are sending you the following items, ❑Attached, or ❑Under separate cover. ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Plats ❑ Specifications ❑ Other COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION TuLv 02_ 7fre.14 mi handl n''tt Ply Ca�r�i`a _ Y L774 / 7 Vt n 1 i h � These re transmitted as checked below: I VI For approval ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ Submit copies for distribution Returned for corrections ❑ Other / .161 S Remarks: 7 I ZSe U t Cd`Yl lA��TS �i N ;BY � //3/° 2 , • • Signature: C.1%1116 - i P.O. Box 7603 Rivanna Engineering 804.984.1599 Charlottesville,VA 22906 & Surveying, PLC (F) 804.984.8863 Memorandum To: Susan Snead From: Paul Tschidere CC: Date: 24 Jul 2002 Re: CARRIAGE GATE APARTMENTS (SDP-2002-016) The following comments are in response to your letter, dated March 4, 2002. 1. Will be addressed with final. 2. Revised. 3. Acreage provided. 4. Bedrooms per unit were noted on building. 5. Substitute for the tot lot has been proposed. 6. Acreage noted. 7. Location labeled. Please call if you have any questions. P.O. Box 7603 Rivanna Engineering 804.984.1599 Charlottesville,VA 22906 & Surveying, PLC (F) 804.984.8863 Memorandum To: Jay Schlothau From: Paul Tschidere CC: Date: 24 July 2002 Re: CARRIAGE GATE APARTMENTS (SDP-2002-016) Dear Jay: The following comments are in response to your letter dated February 20, 2002. 1. The barrier-free parking space at building "C" has been modified to make it van accessible. Please call if you have any questions. P.O. Box 7603 Rivanna Engineering 804.984.1599 Charlottesville,VA 22906 & Surveying, PLC (F) 804.984.8863 Memorandum To: Elaine Echols From: Paul Tschidere CC: Date: 24 Jul 2002 Re: CARRIAGE GATE APARTMENTS (SDP-2002-016) Dear Elaine: The following comments are in response to your letter dated 24-Jan-2002. 1. , Spelling corrected. 2. Reference to Lot C removed. 3. TM 45 Parcel 91 lot B was changed to TM 45 Parcel 91D. 4. Spelling corrected. 5. Added for clarification. 6. Benchmark Datum reference was added. 7. Recreation Area added. 8. Square footage added. 9. Viewport increased to show a minimum of 50' beyond property line. 10. Issue will be addressed. 11. Conceptual Landscape included on Sheet S2. 12. 15 percent canopy requirement met. 13. Put on Plans. (Pg. 1 of 2) P.O. Box 7603 Rivanna Engineering 804.984.1599 Charlottesville,VA 22906 & Surveying, PLC (F) 804.984.8863 Memorandum To: Elaine Echols From: Paul Tschiderer CC: Date: 24 Jul 2002 Re: CARRIAGE GATE APARTMENTS (SDP-2002-016) 14. Corrected. 15. Easement labeled accordingly. 16. NA 17. Building footprints added to preliminary plan. Please call if you have any questions. (Pg.2 of 2) P.O. Box 7603 Rivanna Engineering 804.984.1599 Charlottesville, VA 22906 & Surveying, PLC (F) 804.984.8863 Memorandum To: Steve Snell From: Paul Tschidere CC: Date: 24 Jul 2002 Re: CARRIAGE GATE APARTMENTS(SDP-2002-016) Dear Steve: The following comments are in response to your letter dated March 4, 2002. 1. Further detail was included in the area around the SWM Facility for clarity. 2. Further detail was included in the parking areas, by way of spot grades, to more clearly show our intended grading. 3. All drop inlets are in the lowest locations to maximize effectiveness. 4. All storm pipes flow downhill and towards the SWM Facility. Please call if you have any questions. 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 Phone#:296-5823 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Fax#:972-4012 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fax To: r Tim Miller From: Francis,MacCall. _ , Fax: 984-8863 Pages: .41" .;_ , Phone: 984-1599 Date: 07/11/02=,;,'` Re: Carriage Gate Apartments CC: 0 Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply 0 Please Recycle Comments: Tim, Elaine is out, so I am trying to process things while she is out. I took a look at the plans you submitted Tuesday. They do not appear to address the most recent comments from.•the reviewing agencies. am attaching all of those comments. When you resubmit the revisions please include a cover sheet that identifies each of the comments and that you have addressed.them: Please note that the revision block should include all revision dates. If you have any other questions please let me know. If you have received this fax in error please let us know immediately by telephone. Albemarle County Development Departments SDP-2002-016 SPIN Submission and Comments Carriage Gate Apartments Preliminary Building preliminary site plan revision 2 reviewer received reviewed decision Jay Schlothauer 2/14/02 2/20/02 requested changes Based on plans dated February 8,2002. Rearrange the barrier-free parking space at Building"C"so that it is van-accessible (similar to the one at Buildings"A"/"B".). [2000 Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code; 1996 BOCA National Building Code, Section 1105.4] Note: The buildings must include sprinkler systems. 7/11/02 02:31 PM Page 1 of 9 � 1 Albemarle County Service Authèrity 05-03-02 PC2 : 00 IN Serving 6 Conserving TO: Elaine K. Echols, Principal Planner FROM: Peter C. Gorham, Senior Civil Engineer DATE: March 7, 2002 RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: Carriage Gate (TM 45, Parcel 91) The below checked items apply to this site. ZMA-01-021 SDP-02-016 X 1 . This site plan is within the Authority' s jurisdictional area for: X A. Water and sewer B. Water only C. Water only to existing structure • D. Limited service X 2 . An 8 inch water line is located approximately 10' distant. X 3 . Fire flow from nearest public hydrant, located 950' distant from this site plan, is 2700 gpm + at 20 psi residual . X 4 . An 8 inch sewer line is located approximately 10' distant. 5 . An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed. X 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future easements. 7. and plans are currently under review. 8 . and plans have been received and approved. 9 . No plans are required. X 10 . Final water and sewer plans are required for our review and approval prior to granting tentative approval . 11. Final site plan may/may not be signed. 12 . RWSA approval for water and/or sewer connections. Comments: Offsite easement for the sewer extension will be required and possibly for the water extension as well . The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows: meter locations waterline size waterline locations sewer line size sewer line locations expected wastewater flows easements expected water demands 168 Spotnap Road • P.O. Box 2738 • Charlottesville, VA 22902 • Tel (434) 977-4511 • Fax (434) 979-0698 www.acsanet.com r• , t, , Albemarle County Development Departments 002�-0 SPIN Submission and Comment CarriagGap�aritments-. reliminaEy= Planning [description and date] revision 2 reviewer received reviewe decision karl guiler 3/4/02 3/4/02 requested changes The Department of Planning and Community Development has reviewed the preliminary site plan P e- referenced above and will recommend preliminary approval once the following conditions are satisfied. prajoit The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments may be added or eliminated based on further review. Each comment is preceded by the applicable zoning\` 100.3u • reference. 1. Please correct the spelling of'Apartments'on the title of the cover sheet. 2. The property being reviewed in this case is designated "TM 45 Parcel 91." Please remove any references to Lot C on the plan. See title and legal reference. 3. TM 45 Parcel 91 lot B has also been given a new lot designation. It is now TM 45 Parcel 91 D. Please make this change as well on the plan. This property is directly behind the Parcel 91. 4. Please correct the spelling of'Aubrey' in the source of'boundary survey' note. oSL -I S 5. For clarification purposes, please add "For R-15 districts"after the'building setbacks'note. ,' 6. [32.5.6a] One datum elevation reference was not found on the plan. Please add this feature. r ., 7. [4.16] Please identify the Recreation Area on the plan. 1_ ; iii C u 8. [32.5.6b]A note stating the square footage of recreation area must appear on the plan. Please add this note to the plan. CorarAeAtS 9. [32.5.6d]The code requires that at least 50 feet of offsite topography and pertinant features must be Ccild on the plan. The rear portion (northern)of the property does not meet this requirement. Please extend the topography and show any relevant features (structures) a full 50 feet from the rear property line. CjAlt WIC SulOrCt 1$4�� 10. [32.5.6e] ny significant vegetation is to remain on the site, please show these existing �1 landscape fea s. -6 �e \.‘ 11. [32.7.9.8]Though a landscape plan is not required in the preliminary stage, staff believes that tsezrititi J\-it screening will be necessary between the higher density district and the lower density properties behind, 't,9' a as well as of the parking and the neighboring school. Please be advised that screening at a depth of Co�,�, _ h �yt) 20 feet may be required along the rear portions of the property, the Stormwater Management Facility ko 0 and the boundary with the school. Plan accordingly to accommodate vegetation in such areas and be aware of potential conflicts with utilities. `�( 12. [18.3] Please add notes to each building stating as follows, "Building not to exceed 65 feet in SJ l height." JR. , 7,U3/4/0211:43AM Page 1 of2 :3\ r ( s O l� CpAC k0l l rn� }0Aa 611 scs� ei t o;k °{e ,e -l- cI skret1/5�/ 6 J/ / IS-- 4: ,Alec% M( {�AI NIRAI iM MII � Albemarle County Development Departments SDP-2002-016 SPIN Submission and Comment Carriage Gate Apartments Preliminary Planning [description and date] revision 2 reviewer received reviewe decision karl guiler 3/4/02 3/4/02 requested changes 13. The note under'Woodbrook Drive'is incorrect. The distance is actually to the intersection with 'Berkmar Drive." Please replace'Greenbrier'with 'Berkmar.' 14. [4.12.6.2] Please be advised that for the purposes of safety, internal signage for pedestrians may be required before final plan approval. 15. The buildings on the site do not accurately match the submitted elevations for the site. It should be noted that the buildings be drawn to show their exact footprint on the final site plan. Zo, Accszss cks 'eropt,s4 Cior-tcl is an*aca6s eosefivA cavJ. el Q.c-oproktvvgll s 3/4/02 11:43 AM Page 2 of 2 Karl Guiler To: Elaine Echols Subject: Carriage Gate proffer comments The following are comments pertaining to the proffers for Carriage Gate and the Building Elevations. 1. Note#1 is fine, but it might be more appropriate to have it pertain to the submitted site plan than the application plan. A note about screening from the rear property might be necessary as well. I have mentioned that future landscaping may be required as screening from the property behind. 2.The elevations are adequate, but the dimensions of the buildings do not matched the submitted site plan. My site plan comments will reflect that the final must depict them correctly. One problem I found with the elevations is that if the buildings are built vertically into the slopes, one end of the building would have more fill around it that the other.The elevations assume a completely flat site. It might be considered, that whichever way the buildings face,the correct topography around the buildings be accurate. Karl A.Guiler Planning Technician County of Albemarle Department of Planning and Community Development Phone(434)296-5823 ext.3336 Fax(434)972-4012 • • Karl Guiler From: Elaine Echols Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:10 PM To: Barbara Baker; Janice Farrar Cc: Karl Guiler; Margaret Doherty Subject: SDP notification for Carriage Gate Barbara and Janice, The SDP notification for Carriage Gate does not have to go out. We will notify adjoining owners of the pending SDP when we notify of the ZMA. It will still be reviewed at SRC so it will go on the agenda. We just won't notify adjoining owners as we would for an independent SDP. This word came from David and Wayne together today. Please let me have a draft ZMA notification so I can customize it for the SDP. Thanks. Thanks. Elaine Elaine K. Echols, AICP Principal Planner Albemarle County Department of Planning and Community Development 434/296-5823 ext. 3252 Fax 434/972-4012 email eechols@albemarle.org • • Notes from County of Albemarle, Virginia Pre-application Conference Building Code Zoning Services Pp 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville,VA 22902 project: Residential/Commercial Mix phone:804-296-5832 fax:804-972-4126 Attendees Steve Melton/Rich Carter Staff Elaine Echols, Jeff Thomas, Karl Guiler, Susan Snead, Jay Schlothauer Tax ma 00450-00-00-09100 Zoning R-6 Comp Plan transitional Location Route 659 Proposal Rezone for a Residential/Commercial mixture or to a higher density for apartments Proper zoning? Entrance corridor? no SP Required? Water supply watershed no Variance req? Utilities yes Roads yes Waiver req? Driveway entrance yes A/F District? no Storm water management yes Flood Hazard? no Landscaping yes Airport Impact? no Review procedure yes Natural Resource? Staff and agencies yes Open space? Distributed schedule yes Info to be provided by staff: Info to be provided with application: Comprehensive Plan issues: How rezoning to a higher density will affect surrounding properties; relationships of surrounding properties to subject site and use of site Other issues: Access; Utilities The subject site is Lot C of a plat recently approved for a three lot subdivision. Elaine Echols discussed the comprehensive plan designation and the components of a rezoning request. The applicants were to decide exactly what they wanted to do at the site and submit a prelim. Plan. Meeting date 10/22/01 Form printed 2/13/02 Albemarle County Development Departments trzMA'32oo,1asat SPIN Submission and Comment Carriage Gate Apartments Planning "Application Plan" revision 1 reviewer received reviewe decision Elaine Echols 12/21/01 1/24/02 requested changes January 24, 2002 Mr. Steve Melton Virginia Land Company 195 Riverbend Drive Charlottesville,VA .22911 RE:❑ZMA 01-021 CARRIAGE GATE APARTMENTS Dear Steve: The staff has reviewed your recently submitted rezoning proposal referenced above. The following paragraphs and pages provide comments that are designed to provide information and suggestions for this rezoning. I am scheduled to meet with Kennan Blackwood with Rivanna Engineering tomorrow to review the specific design elements. Please be advised that this project is scheduled for a Planning Commission public hearing on March 19, 2001. The staff would like to provide a second set of comments to you on this project prior to your final submittal of plans for the rezoning. In order to provide a second set of comments, staff needs to have your second submittal of plans and a first draft of proffers no later than February 4,2001. Comments from the Planning Department are below. Comments from Building Codes and Zoning Services, Fire and Rescue, Engineering, and the Service Authority are provided on the attached • pages. VDOT will provide comments next week. Additional design comments may be provided after I meet with my Planning team on Monday. Design The parcel is small (2.74 acres)and its shape is"long and narrow"which limits the number of designs for residential units that could go on the site. The site has rolling topography and is adjacent to an elementary school. Both of these features are advantageous to the proposed use of the property. Planning staff believes that a less conventional design may be able to occur on this site which does not significantly affect the density you desire for the site. Please also be advised that you have proposed one more unit than is allowed for this zoning district(see Zoning's comments). If you were to make your buildings step up the hill rather than be parallel to the hill,you could Page 2 Steve Melton—Carriage Gate Apartments January 24, 2002 2/13/02 10:03 AM Page 1 of 4 Albemarle County Development Departments ZMA-2001-021 SPIN Submission and Comment Carriage Gate Apartments Planning "Application Plan" revision 1 reviewer received reviewe decision Elaine Echols - 12/21/01 1/24/02 requested changes provide parking behind the first building and provide for a central green area that is outside of the parking lot. We have done a rough sketch that is attached to this letter that will be explained further to Mr. Blackwood at our meeting tomorrow. Most likely, this change would involve a different architectural style for the buildings. Because of required distances from the parking to the entrances to the units, you would want to have fewer units in the buildings closest to the cul-de-sac and more units to the rear of the site. One idea staff had was for"townhouse"appearing units in the front and an "apartment building"look in the rear. Connection of Woodbrook to the Adjoining Property Please consider extending a reservation for dedication of r.o.w.for a future extension of Woodbrook Drive to Tax Map 45 Parcel 90. A redesigned entrance would be necessary if this occurs; a redesigned entrance-may be necessary with the change in layout proposed above. Connection to Tax Map 45 Parcel 91B A connection from this property to Tax Map 45 Parcel 91 B is strongly recommended to allow for access to Berkmar. If built,the western bypass will have limited access and it is unlikely that it would provide the best access to 91 B. Elevations As indicated in early meetings on this project, the Planning Commission has an expectation that elevations will be provided with proposed developments accompanying a special use permit or rezoning. When you decide on the building types for the parcels, please provide elevations and consider proffering characteristics of those elevations. Screening Vegetative screening along property lines will help to create privacy for the development. I am asking the School Division right now if they believe screening is needed between the apartment complex and the school. Please consider the appropriateness of screening between this parcel and TM 45 Parcel 91 B given your knowledge of the future use of that parcel. Central Amenity You provided some detail on the tot lot in the parking lot. We believe that the design you provided is innovative but a safer design (i.e., one that doesn't require all residents from all three units to cross over the parking lot)would be between units. Pedestrian Access 2/13/02 10:03 AM Page 2 of 4 Albemarle County Development Departments ZMA-2001-021 SPIN Submission and Comment Carriage Gate Apartments Planning "Application Plan" revision 1 reviewer received reviewe decision Elaine Echols 12/21/01 1/24/02 requested changes Pedestrian access is shown well throughout the site. With a redesign, you can also provide for similar pedestrian access. It appears that there is no sidewalk extending from the day care along the Page 3 Steve Melton—Carriage Gate Apartments January 24, 2002 bulb of the cul-de-sac in front of your property. This sidewalk will need to be extended across the bulb and into your site. Staff notes your contacts with Lisa Glass in the Schools Division and appreciates your efforts towards making a pedestrian connection. We are also working on this item. • R-15 Zoning District Request and Proffers - - My impression from your submittal is that you are requesting this rezoning with proffers. Because of the size of the parcel, a"planned district"designation is not possible. Planned districts have an "application plan"that is part of the rezoning. The plan provided with this submittal could be proffered with this rezoning. Please be advised that the level of variation from the plan would be entirely within the purview of the Zoning Administrator. The Planning Director could not approve variations to the plan. For that reason, if you proffer the plan, it is important that you highlight the features that are essential to the design and development. Some standard language for proffers is provided below: 1. Development of the parcel shall be in general accord with the(application)plan entitled "xx"dated "xx"and last revised"xx" (where applicable) herein referred to as"The Plan" Specific features of The Plan which are proffered are: a.spell out the feature, such as,"a central amenity", relegated parking as shown on the plan. pedestrian access as shown, ect. b. Conformity with the following features of the elevations entitled"xx"dated "xx". c. Screening for the full-length of the southern boundary of the site where the parcel adjoins with TM 45 Parcel 95A(if considered necessary by the Schools Division). 2. Pedestrian paths consisting of(specs—asphalt, concrete, mulch whatever)shall be installed (where specifically)and completed before release of the performance bond. 3.Where site grading is performed,the owner shall minimize use of slopes steeper than 3:1, subject to approval by the Department of Engineering and Public Works. The Applicant shall install additional low maintenance vegetation to provide stabilization for proposed slopes steeper than 3:1 as approved by the County's Landscape Planner. Nothing contained in these proffers shall be deemed a waiver of the Planning Commission's review of Applicant's critical slope waiver under Section 4.2.5 of the Ordinance. 2/13/02 10:03 AM Page 3 of 4 it Albemarle County Development Departments ZMA-2001-021 • SPIN Submission and Comment Carriage Gate Apartments Planning "Application Plan" revision 1 reviewer received reviewe decision Elaine Echols 12/21/01 1/24/02 requested changes 4.The Owner shall limit the number of residential units on the parcel to"xx" residential units. 5. The Owner shall reserve for dedication upon demand of the County sufficient r.o.w to extend Woodbrook Drive to the adjoining property Tax Map 45 Parcel 90, as shown on The Plan. 6. (If you want to make a cash proffer or off-site improvement) By not later than (some point in time or key event),the owner shall provide to the County(cash for a County improvement relating to the rezoning or and off-site improvement). Should (that improvement)not take place within the next (specific time period)from the approved proffer date, it shall be refunded to (whom?). Page 4 Steve Melton—Carriage Gate Apartments January 24, 2002 I hope this information is useful to you with your next submittal. Please feel free to call me if you have questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Elaine K. Echols,AICP Principal Planner 2/13/02 10:03 AM Page 4 of 4 Albemarle County Development Departments i ZM 00 �'0`2 SPIN Submission and Comment Carriage Gate Apartments Engineering "Application Plan" revision 1 reviewer received reviewe decision steven snell 12/21/01 1/22/02 approved with conditions FROM:❑Steve Snell, Engineer DATE:022 January 2002 RE:❑❑Carriage Gate, ZMA-2001-021 The ZMA for Carriage Gate has been reviewed. The Engineering Department can recommend approval when the following conditions: 1. The proposed internal sidewalk must connect to the existing sidewalk on Woodbrook Drive. Though not typically an Engineering concern, it should be noted that the location of the proposed sewer lines will prevent a tree buffer within this site. Any tree buffer between this site and the Agnor Hurt Elementary School will thus have to be located on school property. It is possible that an insufficient tree buffer exist on the school property. Please contact me if you have questions or require additional information. 2/13/02 10:05AM Page 1 of 1 Albemarle County Development Departments ZMA-2001-021 SPIN Submission and Comment Carriage Gate Apartments Service Authority "Application Plan" revision 1 reviewer received reviewe decision Pete Gorham 12/21/01 1/23/02 approved with conditions We do not object to the zoning map amendment for this development. Existing water and sewer lines of sufficient diameter are immediately adjacent to the site, on the Northside Ministries School property. Off-site easements from the school will be necessary at least for the sewer extension and possibly the water extension, as currently proposed on the plan. Final approval will not be granted until the water and sewer construction drawings have been approved by our office.As we understand it apartment buildings are required to be sprinklered so there shouldn't be an issue with fire flow. In any case the flow at the intersection of Woodbrook Drive and Berkmar Drive is in the range of 2700 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. Let us know if you have any questions. Thanks. 2/13/02 10:06 AM Page 1 of 1 Albemarle County Development Departments ZMA-2001-021 SPIN Submission and Comment Carriage Gate Apartments Zoning "Application Plan" revision 1 reviewer received reviewe decision John Shepherd 12/21/01 1/16/02 Pending BOS approval This parcel contains 2.74 acres. If it is rezoned to R-15 the parcel can contain 41, not 42 dwelling units. (2.74 x 15=41.1) If the applicant submits proffers with this proposal,this department would appreciate the opportunity to review them. The Application Plan is being reviewed as just that. If the rezoning is approved, this project will be subject to a separate review and approval of a site plan. 2/13/02 10:06 AM Page 1 of 1 SITE PLAN PROFILE SDP- OZ IG Project Name Cc1M -(Dale Agar+rr&nhc Tax Map 1.15 Parcel(s) 41 Received 2-I I-02. Review deadline II-11-0 Z. Site Review Committee 3-1---Q \ ," Revisions Due 3- (22-ii2. Planning Commission date(if needed) `0?.. Submit Tentative Sign Mylar q .ice, Preliminary Site Plan Description: jjec,} for �relirvim ciferlcn cA ,vb„I O Final Site Plan l4TkMD1'(5ug- Q }tjf�I�Li consf ro low o'I`' 3 i i El Minor Amendment rila'(SDP- -1?�� O Site Plan Waiver MoAkesS l (pgs-1r) can{rntntrr9 et}lir 13 or iq dv-el('" l Units ❑ Letter of Revision k km\ d1(`z9 ) pock wt114 00d,,l oe 41 uni15 Z i12 oicltS, Previous Files? Zoning? R-6 (6rlq r'ezanesb ❑ No R Yes L- -Is If yes,obtain the following files: Pre-Apes? i4e5 1 10171101 M or S=inui } Does this Site Plan have other submittals under review? ❑ No(follow regular schedule) .)31( Yes(follow ZMA&SP schedule) Proffers? ZMf-01-21 Corriere Go$e- Will this site plan go to the Planning Commission? O Not yet(see below) ❑ Yes(why?) Does the Site Plan meet the requirements of 18-32.4.2? ❑ No(deny the plan) Yes(review according to Chapter 18) Request for Planning Commission review? Executive Summary or Staff Report? Status: / Ja`�,e. clvet�` 2-13-oZ WO FEE PAID ` Ckeck 1 dcisu�Yi0. ton is corrert - -� MMRnck-1 kcAln PC NAT,}ly� iv< MA`') 3rd 136s Me. 'ihg LIA Poccea}lon Raci rke MUST Coy A I\SY ON PROS- R .RY MARCH Sat:N1E MEE1lNC, FoR A\kS N -6-Ot CaiwwAtz 4u14d 6 Skeve.Melcon T► 1416- 3-4-01 SRC \ I ! • Preliminary Site Development Plan Checklist Project.Name NrsitpnakC Firm Preparing Plan kvf r qq, 1V\c f SNve w This checklist must be completed,signed aild subr tted with th application. The information contained in this checklist reflects the contents of the Site Plan Ordinance as of August 5, 1998. The applicant is responsible for insuring that no revision to the Ordinance have occurred since preparation of this document. Plans which lack the information required by this checklist shall be deemed to be incomplete and shall be denied by the agent within ten(10)calendar days after the submittal deadline.[Section 32.4.2] A preliminary Site Development Plan shall contain the following: Office Use ❑ 1. Sixteen(16)clearly legible and folded blue or black line copies; Planning(clerical staff) [32.5.1J Due at Initial Submittal ❑ 2. Seven(7)full sized revised copies and one(1)reduced revised copy Planning(clerical staff) no larger than eleven(11)inches by seventeen(17)inches;[32.5.2] Due when revisions are requested. ❑ 3. All waiver,variation and substitution requests. Clearly state the Planning specific items being requested for waiver,variation or substitution. Provide justification for all waiver,variation and substitution requests;[32.5.3] )4. Dimensioned to the accuracy standards required in Section 32.5.6r Planning [32.5.4]boundary, setback and zoning lines—one foot in one thousand(1:1000)feet;Existing contours—one-half(1/2)of the contour interval;Proposed contours—within five(5)feet horizontally and vertically;Existing structures,roads,parking lots, and other improvements—within five(5)feet;Proposed structures, • roads,parking lots and other improvements—within five(5)feet; [32.5.6r] X5. Scale of one(1)inch equals twenty(20)feet or to such scale as may Planning/engineering be approved by the agent. No sheet shall exceed forty-two(42) inches by thirty-six(36)inches in size. If prepared on more than one (1)sheet,match lines shall clearly indicate where the several sheets join. The top of the sheet shall be approximately either north or east; [32.5.5] l 6. The name of the development;[32.5.6aJ Planning 7. Names of the owner,developer;[32.5.6a] Planning 3 8. Individual who prepared the plan;[32.5.6a] Planning 2 9. Tax map and parcel number;[32.5.6a] Zoning M. 10. Zoning;[32.5.6a] Zoning Cri 11. Descriptions of all variances,zoning proffers and bonus factors Zoning applicable to the site;[32.5.6a] >42. Magisterial district;[32.5.6a] Planning 13. County and state;[32.5.6a] Planning •► 4. North point;[32.5.6a] Zoning/planning/engineering Scale;[32.5.6a] Planning/engineering/zoning 16. One datum reference for elevation(where section 30.3,flood hazard Engineering/planning/zoning overlay district,is involved,United States Geological Survey vertical datum shall be shown and/or correlated to plan topography); [32.5.6a] '17. The source of the topography;[32.5.6a] Engineering/planning/zoning 18. The source of the survey;[32.5.6a4 Engineering/planning/zoning 19. Sheet number and total number of sheets;[32.5.6a] Planning Ili 0. Date of drawing;[32.5.6a] Planning '1 1. Date and description of latest revision;[32.5.6a] Planning ❑22. Owner,zoning,tax map and parcel number and present use of Zoning/planning adjacent parcels;departing lot lines; [32 5.6a] )// "0,23. Minimum setback lines,yard and building separation requirements; Zoning [32.5.6a/ 24. A vicinity sketch showing the property and its relationship with Planning adjoining streets,subdivisions and other landmarks;[32.5.6a4 25. Boundary dimensions;[32.5.6a] Engineering 13 26. Proposed uses and maximum acreage occupied by each use; Zoning [32.5.6b]27. Maximum number of dwelling units by type;[32.5.6b] Zoning 428. Gross residential density;[32.5.6b] Zoning 7 29. Square footage of recreation area;[32.5.6b] Zoning/planning 0. Percent and acreage of open space;[32.5.6b] Zoning 31. Maximum square footage for commercial and industrial uses; Zoning [32.5.6b] 2. Maximum number of employees;[32.5.6b] Zoning )633. Maximum floor area ratio and lot coverage if industrial;[32.5.6b] Zoning 34. Maximum height of all structures;[32.5.6b] Zoning L]35. Schedule of parking including maximum amount required and Zoning amount provided;[32.5.6b] . 6. Maximum amount of impervious cover on the site;[32.5.6b] Engineering If a landscape plan is required,maximum amount of paved parking Planning and vehicular circulation areas;[32 5.6b] 8. If phasing is planned,phase lines and proposed timing of Planning development;[32.5.6c] JX39. Existing topography(up to twenty[20]percent slope,maximum five Engineering [5] foot contours,over twenty[20]percent slope,maximum ten[10] foot contours). Proposed grading(maximum five [5]foot contours) supplemented where necessary by spot elevations;[32.5.6d] Areas of the site where existing slopes are twenty-five(25)percent Zoning/engineering or greater;[32.5.6d] 41. Existing topography for the entire site with sufficient offsite Engineering topography to describe prominent and pertinent offsite features and physical characteristics,but in no case less than fifty(50)feet outside of the site unless otherwise approved by the agent;[32.5.6d] __ ❑42. Existing landscape features as described in section 32.7.9.4.c; Planning [32.5.6e] 3. The name and location of all watercourses and other bodies of water Engineering adjacent to or on the site;[32.5.6e] Indicate if the site is located within a reservoir watershed;[32.5.6f] T44. Indicate if the site is located within a reservoir watershed;[32.5.6f] Engineering If the site is located within a reservoir watershed state the name of the watershed. ` 45. Location of septic setback lines from watercourses including Engineering intermittent streams and other bodies of water;[32.5.6e 'jRr46. One hundred year flood plain limits as shown on the official flood Engineering insurance maps for Albemarle County;[32.5.6h] oM 47. Existing and proposed streets,access easements and travelways, Engineering together with street names,state route numbers,right-of-way lines and widths,centerline radii,and pavement widths;[32.5.6i] :. Location and size of:existing water and sanitary sewer facilities and Engineering easements;storm sewer facilities,drainage channels;and drainage easements;[32.5.6j] • 49. Proposed conceptual lay-out for water and sanitary sewer facilities Engineering and storm drainage facilities including storm detention ponds or structures,indicating direction of flow in all pipes and watercourses with arrows;[32.5.6k]A conceptual lay-out shall include:general location,size and type of stormwater management facilities,pipes, b � culverts, inlets channels, etc. ,81 50. Location of other existing and proposed utilities and utility Engineering easements;[32.5.61J CA.51. Location of existing and proposed ingress to and egress from the Engineering property,showing the distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection;[32.5.6m] 52. Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed improvements Zoning/planning/engineering/fire including: buildings(maximum footprint and height)and other official structures;walkways;fences;walls;trash containers;outdoor lighting;landscaped areas and open space;recreational areas and facilities;parking lots and other paved areas;loading and service areas together with the proposed paving material types for all walks, .parking lots and driveways;and signs;[32.5.6nJ )53. All areas intended to be dedicated or reserved for public use; Planning/engineering [32.5.6o] �❑ 54. Landscape plan in conformance with section 32.7.9 if required; Planning [32.5.6pJA conceptual landscape plan is required if the site is located within an Entrance Corridor Overlay District or if the impervious coverage of the property is 80%or greater. The agent or Planning Commission may require a landscape plan at an time. T5. Where deemeZ.appropriate by the agent u the intensity of Planning/engineering development,estimated traffic generation figures for the site based upon current Virginia Department of Transportation rates. Indicate the estimated vehicles per day and direction of travel for all connections to a public road.[32.5.6g1 In addition to the items required by the ordinance,Albemarle County Engineering,the Virginia Department of Transportation,the Albemarle County Service Authority,and the Thomas Jefferson Health District require these items on plats and plans submitted for preliminary approval.Plats and plans will not be rejected for review if these items are not present,but they are required for approval. These items are provided in an effort to communicate all preliminary comments. ❑ 1. Reference the benchmarks used for surveys. (Albemarle County Engineering Policy) ❑ 2. Indicate the available sight distance for entrances and left turn lanes. (Albemarle County Engineering Policy) ❑ 3. Label the maximum height of all retaining walls. (Albemarle County Engineering Policy) ❑ 4. Provide copies of off-site easements,or letters of intent to grant them form off-site property owners. (Albemarle County Engineering Policy) ❑ 5. Show and label stream buffer limits. (Water Protection Ordinance) ❑ 6. Indicate the deed book and page reference for all existing utility easements located on the property. (Albemarle County Service Authority) Read and Sign In representing the above referenced firm submitting this plan for preliminary approval,I hereby state that,to the best of my knowledge,the attached plan contains all information required by this checklist. Date Signature of person completing checklist Printed Name Daytime phone number of signatory PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY ENGINEERING GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES z CARRIAGEGATE APARTMENTS I.PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY cNNSTRUCmoN WITHIN ANY EXISTING PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY,INCLUDING CONNECTION TO ANY EXISTING ROAD,A PERMIT SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION W U I(VD.O.T.). THIS PLAN AS DRAWN MAY NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. WHERE ANY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT SHALL GOVERN. Z a o. 912.ALL PAVING,DRAINAGE RELATED MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS OF v.D.O.T.,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. TM 45 PARCEL 3.EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE YATH THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANT CLEARING,GRADING OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION. W ,7-, $ 4.ALL SLOPES AND DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO BE FERTILIZED,SEEDED AND MULCHED. THE MA%IMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE IS 2:1(HORIZONTAL.VERTICAL). WHERE REASONABLY OBTAINABLE,LESSER SLOPES OF 4:1 OR BETTER ARE TO BE C W ACHIEVED. Z, i; RI VANNA DISTRICT 5. PAVED,RIP-RAP OR STABILIZATION MAT LINED DITCH MAY BE REQUIRED WREN IN THE OPINION OF THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING,OR THE DIRECTOR'S DESIGNEE,IT IS DEEMED NECESSARY IN ORDER TO STABIUZE z o 0 '8 A DRAINAGE CHANNEL. 07 o 6.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM MU THE VIRGINIA MANUAL FOR UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. 124 °J • ALBEMARLECOUNTY, VIRGINIA 7. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ALL CONCRETE PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE-CLASS III. e B. ALL EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND PIPE INSTALLATION MUST COMPLY WITH OSHA STANDARDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY(29 CFR PART 1926). •:-.,' TN OF` S 9c 11MOTHY R.MILLER t CERTIFICATE No. SITE DATA GENERAL NOTES GENERAL WATER AND SEWER CONDITIONS 'F 30542 �� AfSSfONAL t*c'ss LEGAL REFERENCE: I.DO NOT SCALE THESE DRAWINGS.USE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ONLY. BRING ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER.IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS. 1. start Work shall the le subject to inspection by the Albemarle County Service Authority inspectors. The contractor will be responsible for notifying the proper service authority officials at Revisions: o TM 45 PARCEL 91 the NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 2.IT 15 THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBIUTY TO FIELD VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILISES. I Spin Comments 07 05 02 MAGESTERIAL DISTRICT: RiVANNA 3.THERE IS NO 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ON THIS SITE. 2. The location of all existing utilities are not necessarily shown on the plans and, where shown, are only approximotely correct. The contractor shall on his own initiative locate 2 'Spin Comments 67.24.02 all underground lines and structures as necessary. SOURCE OF TITLE FOR PARCEL. 4.THIS SITE IS NOT LOCATED IN A RESERVOIR WATERSHED. DB 1680 PAGE 660 5.THE SPILLOVER OF UGHTNG FROM OUTDOOR LUMINAIRES ONTO PUBLIC ROADS AND PROPERTY IN 3. All materials and construction shall comply with General Water and Sewer Construction Specifications as adopted by the Albemarle County Service Authority on January 15, 1998. RESIDENTIAL OR RURAL AREAS ZONING DISTRICTS SNAIL NOT EXCEED ONE-HALF(1/2)FOOT CANDLE.. 4. Datum for all elevations shown in National Geodetic Survey. OWNER: 6.EACH OUTDOOR LUMINARIE EQUIPPED WITH A LAMP WHICH EMITS 3,000 OR MORE INITIAL LUMENS SHALL BE BERKMAR LAND TRUST A FULL CUTOFF LUMINARIE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED OR SHIELDED TO REFLECT LIGHT AWAY FROM'ADJOINING 5. The contractor shall be responsible for notifying "Miss Utility" (1-800 552 7001). t P.O.BOX 8147 'RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS ABS AWAY FROM ADJACENT ROADS. 3 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22906 7.EXISTING LANDSCAPING CONSISTS PRIMARILY OF DECIDUOUS WOODED AREAS. I 6. All water and sewer pipes shall have a minimum of 3 feet of cover measured from the top of pipe, over the centerline of the pipe. This includes all fire hydrant lines, service E z DEVELOPER: 8.BUILDINGS NOT TO EXCEED 65'IN HEIGHT. laterals and water lines, etc. H .1 SOUTHLAND HOMES, INC. E-I a. P. 2119 BERKMAR DRIVE I 7 All water and sewer appurtenances ore to be located outside of roadside ditches. w CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901 W 8. Valves on dead-end line shall be rodded to provide adequate restraint for the valve during a future extension of the line. CURRENT ZONING. R-6 PROPOSED ZONING. R-15 � � m PLAT BY B. AUBREY HUFFMAN RECORDED IN DB 2097-286. SITE SPECIFIC NOTES DRAWING INDEX APPROVALS o d SOURCE OF BOUNDARY SURVEY: w m CD SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY: CD TOALBEMARLEO COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY I.ZMA-2001-021 IS CURRENTLY IN THE APPROVAL PROCESS. ALL CONDITIONS AND PROFFERS ASSOCIATED ' Si of 2 COVER SHEET POGRAPHIC MAP USGS DATUM WITH THAT ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DILL APPLY TO THIS SITEPLAN. S2 of 2 SITE PLAN BUILDING SETBACKS FOR R-15 DISTRICTS: 2.THERE ARE NO EXISTING SLOPES THAT ARE 25%OR GREATER. LI w FRONT: 25' 3.CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER BMP CONSISTS OF A BID-FILTER IN THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY SIDE YARD: 15' PLANNING DEPARTMENT - REAR YARD: 20' :4o MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 65' , s 'H LEGEND ZONING DEPARTMENT PARKING SCHEDULE. ad REQUIRED: 2 SPACES PER UNIT. 40 UNITS x 2 = 80 SPACES Benchmark 500 Existing Elevation/Contour o PROVIDED: 81 SPACES(INCLUDING 3 HC SPACES) O/E Exist. Overhead Electric I500 Proposed Contour INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT/FIRE OFFICIAL "" F LE: Power Pole X[500] Proposed Spot Elevation cn LAND USE SCHEDULE: ctI ti Prop. Light Pole "=x Slopes Greater Than 25% Z PRE-DEV % POST-DEV. FH Fire Hydrant SERVICE AUTHORITY o 0 0 E- BUILDINGS: 0.0 AC 0.0 17,900 SF 15% (0.411ac) GV Gate Valve E-' U BPD Backflow Prevention Device PARKING: 0.0 AC 0.0 36,632 SF 30.7%(0.8410c) PERVIOUS: 119,442 SF 100 64,910 SF 54.3% (1.490ac) p a TOTAL. 119,442 SF 100 119,442 SF 100% (2.742ac) ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT o - � I GROSS RESIDENTIAL DENSITY 15 UNITS PER ACRE Q E- au MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS: Rya VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION .- w 40 APARTMENTS bm .� igirAgner-Hurt V1� C/] CJ U MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVER: 36,632 SF Elementary School SITE Y - I I # "�e`#F moo° VIRGINIA HEALTH DEPARTMENT • Q M CO -01 G °c¢PPo BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW w te' ccf VICINITY MAP FIRE OFFICIAL Sheet No SCALE: 1"= 2000' - - Slof2 i • tN , -.2/.... ._, p ,,...N.,_....„----„- y---\,..._. \ . , , \ .4. , 0 t_S\ S\ ..., s • N c 4z6,Z 4 zc._r:1 1 r" ' : O r>. .. O •.. \ \T 45 Par 91D 1 \\ \ ,_ -- �; % D \ \ TM 45 Par 90 w Berkirark Land Trusfl_• I \ \ z Charti,e & Geneve Anderson\ \ N. a DB097-286 ) \ \ �__�1• ,`1 TDB 368-548 \ N aimed R-6 „L 1 -'1 1 ` • .\ PROPOSED N. o ''ff'� 1 20'ACCESS �'+ o 4,3 /' CONNECT XISIINC ryATER COINER EXISTING SANITARY Zoned R-6 \ - \ EASEMENT \\ Use.(Residential SERNCE WATER AWN SERVICE[p LyTERA! \ \ a L Use. \Res'idential \, l\-...�\ 1 I A N ;\ l\—A , 20DEDICATED A -S'2-77;30'39"W is.. 1 S 62.29'21 I6OQ:b�I-: � ` /\, l,..._�/ 1,. ` .h,A /W! DEMAND/\ `-- .. 18 0"K 1 "2 r �- • 2 ;15'SIDE YARD SETBACK "t 20 Utihly Easement M 1 • v ` °�W LTH OF p, { l ' •,JX .J.� ♦�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-_ 8' rR-35—'. • - _ _ • !, . TM�1.5 Par 91B 1 t, T � ® �` � - \6lrthur 1M. Valente i TIMOTHY R.MILLERS. 15A. e s, w \�� ` DB 1'F1pp�}94-268 CFR7P Na. ��._ tl / 1':$1 tea'1 ::§2'.�: �� t - �;�r.. W,4� ®� -"'�gi 1!ra. ,° ,..!7 ; nA A*.. 1 ... f r `'/ �. ,/ ` v."bl r fib; 0 G��( ed C-1 1 fS tag 1 --A �•9 _I--- ilk- ,Sr 9••A, s i • ILI/4�/ M S itT lik /I/ ". dot♦•re \ V SIONAI E C��i _ __ �_bsi rota 7ii'.2,'�,Nell 1� ! 'c.c'o `;� p Use thr erctial \ Nam, / ✓m o >::���i.r..... —i...2.s�' 18 R P \ s, 0, S l rl•L / -- ,t % 7 / 5'CONCRETE DEWALK ` S �� `�L , - /`'� Revisions: ' - Ir'- iF, , BP.D. — ,.. J - \� NO. DESCRIPTION DATEc, �r I /- / BPD. II w ! i I \\ j ��� l r s i .. O IC 1 /r W ;,.....1 ® / l_�^.„, /'B ILDTORYAO BUILDING.B�/ T p I N r %-�-',„``\ S' `�� w / / I / I� 4-STORY / C BU�DING'C• . �OS��oOrl ' 45j4 ' f \ ` /- !`T c -P 6,600 SF FLOOR I I 4-STORY % \rs O 8 4fl7l 0,.. ,4� +r 27,04-SO TOW, / V. r' I O I < �' C� 0 18,000 SF TOTAL �� �� _ 14 Units 'd r• 1 27,000 SF TOTAL \ LI''�!� !',�i/n ti M o / L\\\h\\\\*�.al,� 12 Units "�'W u"\• 14 Units ]] fir __ Q, I , - S 2 Bedr,�,,,,��nit �G: �p\��\N\ve / \\p eQ --__ I 1 2,�✓ %- I� `" ; N i I CENtRAL• ENITY I --"::- �u^' XU\\ \7,1!a S/2 Bedrooms n" !`�% R jJ 1 - F 'C' / 7 OF 579 r' / /U v S� \CJ9 ; N h . 2 Bedrooms/Unit 1 I - u ✓ lit. J _ y ;� h I / REC ATIONA AREA UFE=568 `� l \ l\ \ / FFE=580 1 I .EFE=569 _ -_c r� �� \ " \ Z I Q / Elms Bldg Ht.=65' pq S,7 5 st 10.1 8 ac) Yid Bldg Ht.=65' '-'1 I+r/ LFE=558 ,�, 1 cS�' / q 1 / I p _ I Max Bldg Nt =65' ).,i . / J�j ' \ /' - c' / w } ■41* �� SETBACK. 15'+18'=31' o,_ I i - E `\ r ¢ ; ti ti ✓fie ,� I I / 5r� N 9 / rn I .. �� '',:.:1_,..-.-,,' i. ntk I l / I • I I / I 'i oil, I I , �~� %5828] ! — {fl t73f -" ; r �` �� It �� �` �� x.MH �' �L— I T '�` V Vf '11•? _ e / �r �r 66.2\ ' ' 1T55' �. Wit- c- �It''.. 11 / — �-{ — mil.-- `-- ` — ��— �. < ♦ r /i ! f ��' ,f 0 f=r�j��_(?+.Y' y� G ` /1\ �' - i ,,\ ___'� W 653' 9"W. 41401' / \ :\E=Im /Wy , 1• / w ;. Y Y �Y yLCE 44, _�.., /.- �- �\.•.\ at \ l /:� f� TM ar 91A E MULChI �..�\' \ .,1.--._ �_�J PATH 7M 45 Pao' S5A . r_.,l - ' \ / a'. �� — \_%b x 1, NCRE ��\ i Y /-�`, �� a ry i�� North. e 2S urch i U) o r\ �✓ ITY �m /a _ / • -' ' MP FENCE PAD WIN E __ Co�inty School Board' of Albemarle/' r \`v a.ter`-•i '� y ENCLOSURE ''- \"'.�,�t - -'' / ,.._ / /` �� I 6ned1 C-1 // // `• DB 112 650 / j t o..�s ®i s 2- o�/ _- - — --- - /`• -\...ma's Zone,( R-6 /, • 20. / ml 'lTs Day Care i- -- �j .4§-e' Schoolf/ i -o _• i 1 /^ / /' 6 \ \ N.,/ ( ,./ / ,--- Y 0'l � s \ / / \ �, ---_____7 .... ,.. )., \, -,, i ,/ „. / ii rTh,,:ti-- .?\1 - • . \\\\ c-Yl\d'C3 i \ , , , I .--, X CJ°/� \ \ '`lF / / I w I 1 \ ) /if : / o 0 x ( o LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS -- -- — ---- ai Ew-' 0 LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE Q XI HEIGHT — TOTAL C.7 d' TREE BOTANICAL& MINIMUM QUANTITY CANOPY \)i INTERIOR LANDSCAPING: KEY COMMON NAME CALIPER PLANNING PLANTED 10 YEARS C EAY 6.5 C- -.-� CANOPY REQUIRED: 0.05'119,432 SF= 5,972 SF T 1 Acer Rubrum 2 I/2' 6 286 sl 1,716 sl A F� QUAN11TY REQUIRED: 1 TREE PER 10 _ Red Maple �' PARKING SPACES T Cards Conodensis 03 T-2 2 1/2' - 12 396 sf 4,572 sf _ C.,. L �,© 81/10 = 8.1 TREES _-`__Eostern Redbud-_-__------_ ______--.-_ CANOPY PROVIDED: 6,288 SF Froxinius Americana 0 T-3 1 1/2" - 15 413 sf 6,195 sf �--� 0 QUANTITY PROVIDED: 18 TREES White Ash _ cd +"+ T_4 Juniperus Virginians 2 1/2' - _-40 16 sf 540 sf I .- a ,'�. \ TOTAL CANOPY Eastern Red Cedar _j - _� REQUIRED: 0.15. 119,432 SF= 17,915 SF Total Canopy 13,123 st1 30 0 30 BO 90 CANOPY PROVIDED: 13,123 SF Sheet No EXISTING CANOPY TO REMAIN: 5,000 SF = 30' S2 of 2