Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA200100021 Staff Report 2002-03-19 STAFF PERSON: ELAINE K. ECHOLS,AICP PLANNING COMMISSION: MARCH 19, 2002 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APRIL 3, 2002 ZMA 01-021: Carriage Gate Apartments SDP 02-016: Carriage Gate Apartments Applicant's Proposal: Virginia Land Company has requested a rezoning of a property located at the end of Woodbrook Drive adjacent to Agnor Hurt School from R-6 residential to R-15 residential. At present, the property is wooded and undeveloped. With this rezoning, the applicant is requesting approval of a 41-unit apartment complex with a density of 14 units per acre. The applicant is proffering development in accordance with the"Rezoning Application Plan dated 2/8/02". (See Attachment A for Plan and Proffers.) The applicant is also proffering conformity with the building features and colors shown on the renderings entitled"Carriage Gate Apartments."(See last attachment -- Attachment J.) It should be noted that, due to their recent receipt, these proffers have not yet been reviewed or approved by the County Attorney's office for form. A site development plan has been submitted to accompany this rezoning. The site plan mirrors the"Rezoning Application Plan". The contract purchaser for the property, Rick Carter with Southland Homes,has developed the site development plan. Petition: The petition is a request to rezone 2.742 acres from R-6 Residential to R-15 Residential to allow apartments with a density of 14 dwellings per acre. The petition also includes a request for approval of a site development plan. The property described as Tax Map 45 Parcel 91 is located in the Rio Magisterial District on Woodbrook Drive approximately 1/4 miles from the intersection of Woodbrook Drive and Berkmar Drive. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Transitional recommended for mixed-use areas with Urban Density uses and non-residential land uses on the scale of Neighborhood Service and Office Service. Urban Density uses include 6 - 34 units per acre in Neighborhood 1. (See Attachments B & C.) Character of the Area: The properties adjoining the parcel vary in their level and type of development. Agnor Hurt Elementary School is located to the south of the property. To the east are offices and small retail shops. Further to the east are two fairly large shopping areas (Lowe's and Rio Hills Shopping Center). To the north is a fairly large wooded undeveloped property which is also shown as Transitional on the Land Use Plan. To the west are two parcels,which were recently subdivided from the property proposed for this rezoning. Two houses are located on the parcel closest to the parcel proposed for this rezoning. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed the proposal and associated proffers for conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance and cannot recommend approval at this time. Planning and Zoning History: The parcel was zoned from R-2 to R-6 in 1980 with the County's entire new zoning ordinance and map revisions. The old R-2 district allowed up to 5.3 units per acre with public water and sewer. Prior to 1996, the parcel contained 5.5 acres. Approximately 0.5 acres was subdivided off to make the cul-de-sac of Woodburn Road. 1 Two new parcels were created at that time that are now TMP's 45-91A and 91-B. (SUB 96- 056) The parcels contain an office building and the Northside Daycare. The original parcel was further subdivided in September of last year(SUB 01- 175)to create two new parcels whose access would be from Woodburn Road. The Planning Commission approved a private road for these two parcels on September 18, 2001. Specifics on the Proposal: The layout of the development is shown in Attachment A as the "Rezoning Application Plan". The apartment complex requested would allow for the development of 41 units in this mixed use area in Neighborhood 1. The design and form of the complex is fairly conventional. A recreational feature is provided at the rear of the site surrounded by the parking lot for the Building C. The recreational feature has been described verbally by the applicant as an area depressed and screened from the surrounding parking area in which vegetation and benches will be provided(see Attachment D). The applicant has said that the recreational feature and the configuration of the parking lot is important to provide for circular movement for moving trucks and other emergency vehicles. Applicant's Justification for the Request: The applicant has provided a narrative in support of his rezoning which is shown as Attachment E. Key points are that the applicant believes this project will provide housing in an area that is adjacent to an elementary school, transit is nearby, and convenient shopping is within a short walking distance. The applicant thinks that commercial development of this property(which could be requested since "Transitional"uses include commercial uses)would be difficult because of the lot size and configuration. He has said "the development of this site is contingent on getting maximum density to make it economically feasible to build and lease". By-right Use of the Property: If developed under the current R-6 zoning, the property could provide 16 dwellings. With bonus densities or a cluster development, 24 units could be provided. Comprehensive Plan and The Neighborhood Model: Requests for rezonings in the Development Areas are assessed for conformity with the Neighborhood Model and the Land Use Plan. The Land Use Plan shows this area as Transitional, which should: • Be used primarily between residential areas and commercial or industrial areas, or in areas where flexibility of land uses may be necessary or appropriate to blend changing circumstances or areas where redevelopment/reuse is encouraged. • Provide an opportunity to develop mixed-use areas with Urban Density Residential uses and non-residential land uses on a scale of Neighborhood Service and Office Service • Include neighborhood-scale commercial areas, office buildings,townhouses, and apartment buildings • Be developed under an overall plan for the designated area to ensure coordination of uses, access and circulation, landscaping, and maintenance of natural/environmentally sensitive areas. 2 The density of the proposed project is consistent with the Urban Density classification. The addition of a residential use in this area provides for a mixed-use area of the county. Many services for the residents are within walking distance of the proposed apartment complex. The Open Space Plan shows this area to be in a significant wooded area shown between Woodburn Road and Route 29 in Neighborhood 1. The Open Space Plan says, "Preserve or establish trees or vegetative buffers in the following specific areas as development occurs: The wooded ridge along Berkmar which is highly visible from Route 29 North and provides a buffer between adjacent residential and commercial land uses. Staff notes that keeping this wooded area wooded with a Transitional Use or even the existing R-6 zoning could be difficult. Much of the tree cover would be removed regardless of the development. The ways in which the proposed project meets the twelve principles for development in accordance with the Neighborhood Model are provided below. Pedestrian Sidewalks extend from the cul-de-sac around all buildings and Orientation parking. Sufficient pedestrian access is provided. Pedestrian access would also be important with a modified design of the development. Neighborhood No new streets are proposed; if the driveway were relocated to a Friendly Streets location parallel with the northern property line, trees could be added and Paths alongside the drive. A mulch pedestrian path has been proffered to connect to the school. The Schools division of the County believes the mulch path is adequate to provide for pedestrian access. Interconnected A proffer has been made for a 20 wide reservation of r.o.w. for Streets and dedication on demand of the County to serve the adjoining parcel Transportation TMP 45-90. An existing access easement of 30 feet on the adjacent Networks property could be added to provide for sufficient r.o.w. for a public road, if necessary. Access to the property to the east is not provided because the properties have access to Woodburn Road via a private road. This access was approved with a recent subdivision. Parks and Open The recreational amenity area is shown in the parking lot, which is Space viewed as a less than ideal location. A more central location within the complex and adjacent to the school would be safer and provide for better amenity opportunities. It should be noted here that the applicant will be requesting that the Planning Director substitute tot lot equipment for landscaping and benches through the site plan process. The reason for the substitution is that playground equipment on the school property can provide for the needs of the younger children in the development. Neighborhood The property is located is in an area near several centers, including Centers the elementary school and nearby shopping centers. The location of a multi-unit complex near the school and shopping centers is a very positive aspect of this proposal. Buildings and Perspective drawings indicate shape, massing, and number of stories; Spaces of Human however the grades on the site plan don't match with the Scale perspectives. At this juncture it is difficult to tell whether or not buildings and spaces of human scale are provided adequately. Relegated Parking Since all parking is shown in front of the buildings, staff believes it 3 I does not meet this principle of the Neighborhood Model. Mixture of Uses As indicated previously for"centers", the property is located in an area near shopping centers, offices, and a school. In conjunction with these other uses, a"mixture of uses" is achieved with the surrounding properties. This proposal provides for residential use currently not present in the area. Mixture of Housing The proposed development does not provide a mixture of unit types Types and (i.e., detached, attached, duplexes, etc.). Such a mixture could take Affordability place on this small parcel,but it might be difficult to achieve because of the size and shape of the parcel. The applicant intends this complex to be a rental complex only. Affordability is unknown. There are two single-unit dwellings to the rear that belong to the property owner requesting this rezoning; however, the future use of those units on R-6 property is unknown. Redevelopment Not applicable. Site Planning that How the proposed project respects terrain is still unknown. Minimal Respects Terrain grading is shown; however, it doesn't match the perspective drawings or indications by applicant that the unit type requires flat pads. Clear Boundaries Not applicable—the property doesn't border Rural Areas with the Rural Areas STAFF COMMENT Relationship between the application and the purpose and intent of the requested zoning district According to the Zoning Ordinance, the R-15 zoning district is intended to provide for compact, high-density residential development. The district permits a variety of housing types and provides incentives for clustering of development and provision of locational, environmental, and developmental amenities. The existing R-6 zoning district is intended to provide for compact,medium-density residential development. It also permits a variety of housing types and provides incentives for clustering of development and provision of locational, environmental, and developmental amenities. The application is for a higher density residential use than the R-6 allows. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that urban density residential uses are appropriate in Transitional areas. R-6, R-10 or R-15 could fit into this category of Urban Density. Staff believes that the R-15 zoning district,with proffers, could provide appropriate density if the character and form of the development is supportive of the density requested. Public need and justification for the change-- The County's policy for encouraging development at higher densities within the Development Areas provides a public need and justification for the request. Form and design are as important to a successful project, though, as the density. Anticipated impact on public facilities and services 4 Transportation—An additional 287 vehicle trips per day are expected from this development. The surrounding road network of Woodbrook, Berkmar, and Route 29 are capable of absorbing this additional traffic with minimal impact. Water and Sewer-Water and sewer are available to serve the site. Off-site easements from the school will be necessary at least for the sewer extension and possibly the water extension, as currently proposed on the plan. There should be no issue with fire flow because apartment buildings are required to be sprinkled. Schools - Children from this development would attend Agnor Hurt Elementary School, Middle School, and High School. Using the County's multipliers for multi-unit development, a total of 8 children are anticipated with the 41 units. Stormwater Management—A stormwater facility is shown on the site. The site plan comments note the needed changes in order for it to be approved. Fiscal impact to public facilities—A fiscal impact analysis is provided as Attachment F. As with all residential rezonings, the fiscal impact is greater than the revenue generated to pay for services. Anticipated impact on natural, cultural, and historic resources—The site is a gently rolling, with trees. There are no recognized cultural or historic resources located on the property, which would be affected by either a by-right development or this rezoning. There is existing forest cover; however, the more intense and dense the development,the fewer trees that can remain. It is likely that a by-right development of between 16 and 24 units, designed to retain some of the trees, could successfully integrate wooded areas into the development. Existing regulations for by-right development could not be used to ensure preservation of the trees on the site. Other Issues—Staff reviewed the"Application Plan"with the rezoning request during the first month of review. Staff was concerned that two important principles of the Neighborhood Model were not included as part of the design. These principles were "relegated parking"and a"central amenity". Staff suggested to the applicant that the buildings be rotated 90 degrees and parking be relocated so as to be less visible from the public road. Staff also suggested that recreational amenity be located between the buildings adjacent to the school property. (See Attachment G.) The applicant countered that to make these changes would require an exorbitant amount of grading and provided a cross-section elevation with the second submittal of the plan. (See Attachment H.) The County Engineering Department found that the cross-section did not scale and that the grades shown did not correspond to any plan of comparison. Engineering's comments are as follows: The ZMA for Carriage Gate has been reviewed. Engineering staff reviewed the cross-section to assess the difference in grading between the plan provided and the design suggested by staff. A comparison of the two plans was not practical for the following reasons: 5 1. There was a cross-section of the "design suggested by staff"but no cross section of the applicant's plan to compare it to. 2. The cross-section was not to scale. 3. The cross-section of the "design suggested by staff"did not include the same grading concepts as the originally submitted plan. These include 5%parking lot grades, 10%travel way grades, and buildings constructed on slopes within the original plan but shown on flat pads with alternative plan. The original plan shows an average grade around 6%while the cross-section plan shows an average grade around 2%. 4. It is impractical to compare grading plans without an equivalent site plan with grade lines for the "design suggested by staff." Of difficulty to the staff is the fact that on the proposed site plan, the buildings are to be constructed on the slopes; but with the cross-section(relating to staff's suggested reorientation of buildings), the applicant has shown totally flat pads. Staff thinks that the ability exists for the reorientation of buildings to occur without providing totally flat pads. When asked about the need for totally flat pads with a change in building orientation, the applicant said that the building design he wanted to use required flat pads. In the site plan comments,Planning staff noted the discrepancy between the architectural elevations shown with flat building pads and the site plan showing buildings to be constructed on slopes. (See Attachment I.) Because of the lack of consistent information relative to grading and the architectural designs, staff cannot determine how well the principle of"buildings and spaces of human scale"is being met. Although staff asked the applicant to provide additional information on grading or request direction from the Planning Commission through the worksession process,the applicant declined. The applicant has requested the Planning Commission's public hearing and decision on the plan submitted as the Rezoning Application Plan. Preliminary Site Plan A preliminary site plan was received for this development following the submittal of the rezoning request. The site plan has several deficiencies,which are noted in Attachment H. At this time, staff cannot recommend approval of the site plan if the rezoning is approved. The most important issues include: 1. Stormwater infrastructure and grading needs more definition Engineering Comment: The easternmost drop inlet and drainpipe system (adjacent to TMP 45-91A) appears to drain uphill or flat. Please give details of the drainage system from"Str-4"to the"SWM facility"that demonstrate proper drainage. 2. Tightness of the utilities and planting area widths may make planting installation very difficult: Engineering Comment: Though not typically an Engineering concern, it should be noted that the location of the proposed sewer lines would prevent a tree buffer between the site and Agnor Hurt Elementary School. Planning Dept. Comment: [32.7.9.8] Please be advised that screening at a depth of 20 feet may be required along the Stormwater Management Facility and the boundary 6 with the school. Plan accordingly to accommodate vegetation in such areas and be aware of potential conflicts with utilities. Planning Dept. Comment: [32.5.6s] It appears that there is insufficient space for landscaping with the aforementioned utilities. A conceptual landscape plan shall be submitted prior to preliminary site plan approval to assess this issue. The plan must meet the minimum requirements for screening along the stormwater facility and the parking lots, as well as screening from the rear property and the school. The conceptual plan need not specify the distinct species,but rather would describe the vegetation by its type (i.e., medium shade tree, screening shrub etc.) SUMMARY Staff has identified the following factors, which are favorable to this rezoning request: 1. The proposal is for a use,which is supported by the Land Use Plan at this location. 2. The proposed use provides for a"mixed-use"community in this part of Neighborhood One. 3. Residential uses are supported by a pedestrian network,public services (schools, fire, and rescue services, transit) and close proximity to shopping and employment. 4. The residential use next to the elementary school is viewed as extremely compatible. 5. Perspective drawings are proffered to depict the appearance of the structures. 6. Pedestrian access to the elementary school is provided by the applicant and the proximity of the complex to the school allows for recreational use of the school's playground Staff has identified the following factors, which are unfavorable to this request: 1. The design does not conform to the Neighborhood Model principles for relegated parking and a central amenity. 2. While density is supported by the Comprehensive Plan, it is unclear why the R-15 designation is superior to the R-6 designation given the conventional design of the development. Each of the factors above is also true for the existing R-6 district. 3. Insufficient information has been provided relative to grading to know what difference in grading a redesign might have. For that reason, it is also not known whether or not there is conformity with the principle of"buildings and spaces of human scale". 4. As shown, it appears that insufficient screening and landscaping area exists in some places, especially in relation to utility lines. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff believes that a residential use is appropriate for the property and that greater density could be supported with a modified design. Without an alternative design or information substantiating that grading with an alternative design is so massive as to make the alternative infeasible, staff cannot recommend approval of the rezoning at this time. Because there is no recommendation for approval of the rezoning, and because the preliminary site plan requirements have not been met, staff cannot recommend approval of the preliminary site plan. Because staff believes that density greater than that allowed by-right could be appropriate at 7 this location with a different design, we request that the Planning Commission provide direction to both the staff and the applicant on these questions: 1. Does the design shown on the plan, in general, meet the Planning Commission's recommendations for the Neighborhood Model? 2. Should a more central amenity, located closer to the center and along the adjoining property boundary with the school, be provided? 3. Should the parking be relegated, at least in part, to the rear of the structures or is it shown adequately given the type of apartment complex requested by the applicant. 4. Should additional grading information/cross-section information be provided to better assess the differences between the redesign suggested by staff? 5. If no comparative grading information is necessary is it because the existing design is viewed as appropriate or is it because a redesign is necessary and comparative-grading information is no longer important? ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A—Proffers dated 2/25/02 with Application Plan dated 2/8/02 Attachment B—Tax Map Attachment C—Vicinity Map Attachment D—Drawing of Common Meeting Space/Tot Lot dated Dec. 2001 Attachment E—Applicant's Attachment to Rezoning Application dated 12/17/01 Attachment F—Fiscal Impact Analysis dated 3/12/02 Attachment G—Staff Comments dated 1/24/02 Attachment H—Cross-Section Based on Staff Recommendations for Site Layout dated 2/19/02 Attachment I—Staff Comments dated March 5, 2002 Attachment J—Carriage Gate Apartments Elevations dated 2/21/02 (3 pages) 8 ATTACHMENT A Original Proffer Amended Proffer (Amendment# ) PROFFER FORM Date: 4/3/2002 ZMA# 01-021 Tax Map and Parcel Number(s) 45-91 2,742 Acres to be rezoned from R-6 to R-15 Pursuant to Section 33.3 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance, the owner, or its duly authorized agent,hereby voluntarily proffers the conditions listed below which shall be applied to the property, if rezoned. These conditions are proffered as a part of the requested rezoning and it is agreed that: (1) the rezoning itself gives rise to the need for the conditions; and (2) such conditions have a reasonable relation to the rezoning request. (1) SEE ATTACHED BERKMAR LAND TRUST BY: _ / CHARLES W. HURT 2/25/2002 Siena !o'All Ow.- Printed Names of All Owners Date BY: �/ ., , . �,�� SHIRLEY L. FISHER 2/25/2002 OR Signature of Attorney-in-Fact Printed Name of Attorney-in-Fact (Attach Proper Power of Attorney) a Attachment To Proffer Dated May 3, 2002 ZMA 01-021 Tax Map 45— Parcel 91 1. The development shall be in general accord with the application plan entitled "Rezoning Application Plans for Carriage Gate Apartments," dated December 17, 2001 and last revised February 8, 2002. a) Conformity with the building features and colors shown on the renderings entitled"Carriage Gate Apartments". b) Additional vegetative screening of a portion of the Southern property line with Tax map 45-Parcel 95A(Agnor Hurt School) if required by the schooL c) Appropriate fencing and vegetative screening around the storm water management facility. d) A central amenity consisting of approximately 4000 sq. ft. that would provide a private landscaped area with benches for residents and guests. e) Tenant and guest parking along with pedestrian access via concrete walks accessing Woodbrook Drive and buildings "A", "B" and"C". 2. A pedestrian path located on the southern property line that would create access to the Agnor Hurt School grounds. The pathway would be a 5' wide mulched surface with 10' cleared on either side for safety and visibility. This pathway would be complete before the release of the performance bond. 3. The owner shall reserve the number of residential units on the above-mentioned parcel to 41. 4. The owner shall reserve for dedication upon demand by the County of Albemarle a 20' r.o.w. as shown on the Plan, for the future extension of Woodbrook drive to Tax map 45-Parcel 90. ATTACHMENT B LEGEND _51 51 c y z REZONING APPLICATION PLANS FOR m 10 Benchmark 500 Existing Elevation/Contour a V 0 axuri --W/E-- Existing Waterline z[500] Proposed Spot Elevation w a. a 2 8 ry --0/E-- Overhead Electnc rall Proposed Contour Z ,:, [ , Power Pde CARRI AGE GATE APPARTMENTS z z ' xlDp SITE � ,�ViJ� MH Manhde Prop ht Pole W r N TM-45, PARCEL 91 z zc4zg RIVANNA DISTRICT ' �' a c� ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA a���^,TH7 VICINITY MAP c TI( MYRMLER CERTIFICATE No. • SCALE 1• = 2000' _ po 30542 r/ • ... ''Ss,ONAL EHc`� \\.\\ • \ _ Revision$: ��-� DATE �o S6 S s`O F SPrN Commaid Ls s� s� s6 o s S s SITE DATA s. SCLP s LEGAL REFERENCE TM 45 PARCEL 91 LOT C TM 45 Par 91 Lot •B TM 45 Par 90 MAGESTERIAL DISTRICT. 1x Berkmark Land Trust Charlie & Geneve Anderson RIVANNA DB 2097-286 DB 368-548 SOURCE OF TITLE FOR PARCEL Zoned R-6 Zoned R-6 20.AEASEMET DB 1680 PAGE 660 Q ' x Use. Residential Use. .Residential • OWNER: S 62 29 21`E 600 64' 2730'39"W BERKMARX LAND TRUST Q TT 18 O ' _ _ P0 BOX 8147 � — — Q• • DEVELOPER• —� Arthur M. Valente SOUTHLAND HOMES, INC 60' 2 tt SPACES.91 x 6' ,I 3 .Ls q9', is cc 2 SPACES'. x 1 . I / �. DB 1894-268 VE CHARLOTTESVILLERI VA 22901 11 -R ,. ' a,• �5 // Zoned C-2 U 1 o ¢- N ..._____ oi •, S h r a G 1 Z Use. Commercial CURRENT ZONING. R-6 — 0 5 .t CS-2 Co47 e� / \R\• " PS I As. f a X �J J L cs PROPOSED ZONING. R-15 c5 6 1.. .. r. y / 12 AC(5 d 9' 16 \Q. m , �2 S AC •y'0 1 I i v l 3a 1 s, �` SOURCE OF BOUNDARY SURVEY A/ CG+G , I. \ ..1ST•-T CG-6 ,j PLAT BY B AUBRY HUFFMAN RECORDED IN DB 2097-286 w -- T`p N' .• . 8•DI A ���. 6•DI WATER MAIN. a fiST SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY u e a �F• �� �NC�+ ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY 1 Mv y ti y ,y m��`.�U, �''�.-ee- r' _ sin 3• �_9 g8g-' \ . 1/4:4;4, 2251r�R TOPOGRAPHIC MAP USGS DATUMa - �.h �� I n . no' 1 � Tic BPDI �• To Ike;- ii r BPD 1Bunw:Ns A R�iy�B Sp' 9UILDING SETBACKS s N ry • / • BUILDING•9• \ lby Rl �/ _ FRONT 25' • Z •A�CJ� 24' 's' -1 24' —Tr—'• 6' 3-STORY ` 3'/Fy •r `�R� \ SIDE YARD 15' c .: 6,600 SF/FLOOR I, O 6.600 SF L00R P� co 19,600 SF TOTAL co 19,800 SF TOTAL 1 �2. REAR YARD- 20' a 5' • 14 U'mts i FFe=56r •'I - f.. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 65' GO y iffl• fPF569 w I / p1 t Px 0�9'1,6' ' `1 II/ i PARKING SCHEDULE O' C6 , 1 3- z. �} yJ��- REQUIRED. 2 41SPACES UNITS zPER=812 SPACES E ,›, ._ •"a ,'"K.,'..'::A. . '. �� SIR-8 ,6•RCP— i _ ,_ SIR{6' -. Sil•1 / fO Z Z — — -R —�` t' — — — 4 — _ q MR_, PROVIDED 92 SPACES(INCLUDING 2 HC SPACES) n �O IIN-3 '0'.15 MSC / 12i, r i 15'SIDE YARD SETBACK IAN-2 '6•SOR-36 ��• P ' £ a' U o1..v[�s PAD t,C. + v LAND USE SCHEDULE • __--- Q ...FeuE N 62'S3'39"W 414 01' :' \ , " /'..�-° TM 'ar 91, o Aa �, - - • ENCLOSLRE \ STR-5 SIR-t ). Co PRE-DEV % POST-DEV % F." d a] /' idD Nort �' e r l • is urch BUILDINGS 00 AC 00 21,600 SF 18% ' 5'WIDE TM 45 Par 95A ' • \ 6YM FACILI ►B " 1- 'MUIDE ryg' °` PARKING 0.0 AC 00 36,316 SF 30.4% U Ew-. y ' PAIN C.inty School Board' of Albemarle/ - s. /a` OPEN. 119,442 SF 100 61,526 SF 51 5% •-� 'T DB 1128-650 \ 5•0� nned C-1 TOTAL. 119,442 SF 100 119,442 SF 100% a c-7 ¢ Zoned R-6 \ �'." s': Day Care GROSS RESIDENTIAL DENSITY. 15 UNITS PER ACRE d C7 y ti P c5 .� I E. 2� Use' School • oo� �, I�� 3 • �5 6 4AAPARTMENTTSSNG UNITS: Z C ad Q 1 �'i • N N V Q - •�v • Ouatfi .' EY MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVER 32,436 SF Wx STRUCTURE - \ IF ,N NO RAD TAN a C DELTA CHORD CH.BEARING i 00 1 55 000'196 84'142.82' 14.8'46'42" 105 94' S 43'06'27"W cPV% . \ / a J . g •/ ' , / Sheet No: If30 0 Gf, .'' so 90 Al of 1 i / '.......*:,::::, ... --,-. . . , / /„ • . 1..Z". .' . / ,4163/• '-\' . ...'s.".'.... ."././..."....---. I' ., ., 440 ' ..../... „,„‹.:..."-... .... ..:0>il ti----..., EC'.0 438 ,/4 sz2 /478 : ' , ' ....' .--•••1--- ......--- •or ' _... . , •••°'0135 \ / ., - ., ...., .set• f.7 47 .24 , ,, 4 - / c:.,...\,, /4301/ .e. ' /, 1:‘ \ ,ra 4:Peri / ..9.-N..../ '-4.X.,..,....,\:„....e.,,,c:i 21.1"1::12):1„......4,..../..50:: '.941,5.:.1 :''ii•-•71:1:!:‘:3„:•..:\I' I'•-•.Z. / 430 47- ( / / A / .s5s: -I . '-';',9:s''... '."--**N\ ''. ' ; 1 ••=%. . s' ....." - - 411C / / , ' ,JE 3',.. '\ :.1'-'s ,j • I I ... 7 -- aSC' . ‘ •80 ... -...., 4•ac,...e59 414,•\„,. ,5084.. ,1..... 53 . L 1 •36 ...e.....---• .-•-•13.C. /r. . /.\.. .5. 465 . ... . • ...". `Iss, 50E. \ .../.44 /5 \ N .3•C\ s \ -*--'---35 5 ••• \\.,;..-..\/•‹, . \ . 44:1100. 5914 \....„ \/ .394 13-1 56, 85, 5.656A554 ."••••-;6•• .... -ACI.-.'1.4%..4.6%. ....... ....•••,,,,,,, •••• ......!/•i• _,/....07:7,;''''.... ..:.„....... '•••••••••,,..;, •,.. 591.\ \\MK\35 a 16 :,...----- s%,• ,, 5sati -----• / ----,..!..---- • „ , NV ',..,„._ ,,,,d4 \*,\\: '4\ W • ..54.0.,-'''' 00 , 1 14. _,_•C,....›.„.\ i '‘‘\5\C\C‘1:'1""‘ \. ....,•20. ‘4.:.•\ ie,.;., .> „.%\„,, ,,,.. If- 38 --7-s,---- .=•:••-r, /• , „‘. •14V. ., ,if1\ J .. -•,f,..„7„, -- / . ,\\s, 41.-........-N. \ / ../.......\ ' ...I...Ns, Ak / 55 • 6/',,,, / \ :IG•al,,,,.,., i ,\\\ — 1.0,K.v. ,ii. / • . , , ,„ --'- •;-,--v, c#rr ,_,),,.' 17 \ ‘ \.„..... 34. , ••:. .' .„....--- _.-- ...,, I" 3 ,.•'/L-__0 0.p P/t.E . "G4..1 , . ..,.."'' / 61 ..-4----.. / s • : 43A .. - 114• •••• C1 1 c> ,• ,: :f - '•\56 ,.•,........... 43 , . i,.,;,1341•37\, ‘.,..../. .: • • /'•• /. '--- .2; • ....2 '')." • ; , .6 r - '..---•‘°••• 4.-..-.---• ' 41 "..1, 44 _17---- ...- eq.,,t, . . \ ..„ • . 4,4 ',...L.,. 7 .„. ,45,4/94. , 40, •C‘%) •- • 544 Es '..`,67,<",c4, 394\ 65 s c e iiiii 31111>4111, I ,....,„4.. ..or ,' 40C 405/40./.0 , '4'• T. \ . ' 491111.111111k .:•./1,-- 4 Z. , .4.2, II 3..-7...a.S.0 C -.-"Z-"-..".---- -.\\ •,cl A. _ ... 7.--- i — ,.r.-.' 7,,..;,\-4416' 364 8 i' : ' ‘. 37 "6 ‘RS i /ISO ,cl—',..., ,„ Cita 34, . 6( • Nr..4., „...• 4 46 <31, '• .. ,_. .• up,. • ...•-•/Ns . ‘§ C.M.•14061. 444, : 5, N., • ,i. \• \ '. 34c9K14114 .0 . - 3S4 1 3" i , . • 3u 32 345 34311 34o , ifit 688 ,, , 1 •• 35 •.•• ••-•47 ./ 00 •----/ ; /1 5•dr . ,SK 1$1,.\ "/lee 11).... ....LI . trN.--..., ,.-21- . , • '11. 1;,: 31.• '---"---.,f.....33 '34c 1 34o _ 3.6 14 41: ,t ,/\ i •8•111C t• 1,----- (/ / -a-----.....,,,4‘ 3G/(t.•' '" '`• 1$ 1•16.-__/ v' Z 3;v .:."------... a 23" i,"1/..f (-'1 . • ..)6805 " ...,,,.., 5•1 C!'„., • ' .,,i ''`4 5,4 v ......-, \ .,.'"( ',',/ 55 5 s 1 ill .., - 514.502 " :1; ' a. 31 v i SIT, 13,4 Mc— .1,.' _A a,,, ..0 , Do, , I ' • ..,..... .H,'",... . *14 - A. .3,s• 3.:)=.,,v4.7. ./0 ...1 -- •)i.. .', '. \ to' '4I \ .,•7. 3,, - , / •,..."—.....,,,..." . , .44,• .....,.. .- , `.. •,,A: :N N....-, , / ••• ,o, / , ::".,...--1 ":.• ' --7 ti't! / t CC -•••••67,...6: 1 I _ 31w ..‘c __ • /,‘ / (........„, \ __.....: / :31•1 Sim IP 3 - 7- ,7' ••• :-''' 5- ' I •4 31L .0.i e ‘,.... I -- .4,, '''''--- -..--___,...'''' ,Roa.‘ 6 1„.., ,....... , y• 4,1 / GGI,•°4 .0;6 1\6. 74A X,4‘ 7 •,, NM ) / fiv. ...., no\is 1'1,7.7 ....- ,4. _......,710':•i 5,.,75 80\,:.;i6 se ,f1 4't‘ .........\d „...--- • . \ " . ft i= c' -.., ----- :./.... ''..ac:,.... •'.. ,...go. , ,,, j' ZMA-01-21 Carria•e Gate Si•n #69 ,,,;,;" T, -6, „ea.,,...•-•,-------- ----. ....... Iv i.\\ " ' IAD • 4111141b, h. * . . .9.-• '., _.,—„--.. .. , .J , A , /,i.,,,,,,iii.••it,j_I .....l,..__. „.....z c.....1: . , . :... .,,,,,,..._0 0 0....0 0„. I . : ,, /•0•'' )0;"//10.-‘181411r --...WM/Aftw, gib, / A, I.'-''-•••• iii ‘.. .....1%-- ,:. 's!..„0""(r,. N ' •••.:• "mA ., "".1.r....''''.. ,,,, ........ . ..-____22...... . bc ? . / \'' .. : ,,4 • , , • ....... 4.6.,07.. .. u = , • '4°° / ‘. 1•‘... ip7\ .0.110 V .,' . 41 a t"ntilk Ida • .:',... •• 0 /1.ss.\7,...„.....\ 4A\S\.\\\*%1t. (1,, IAA k isiN.N. IVA . Zal ‘. ''4" 5P ,F: Ellies'cc.. . ••114.700 " . 27 4:4-4,4644 94!! k 17:::: ,=,..„--,..4„),„,, ,,....\ , ,.. • aim . c.,,, .. _,- ..........,„______„,.., 2 0 ,,,,,,• 140. itt__Imaiiiik IS c....17‘..„,-.. ,o,v• •zsAz $,..4...t, 1 ,...A i.:: ltV ..,,. •'- SECT'ON •se ..... . .>c -ve•e' _oh;,74:1,077,,, - c`.--2,`• A\V \ .../..°.,/''I' ',so I mat ---- pow,: ....,i. •% ....=...—__—.•_ 4 \ (C7e04 444 .111.#4.0 ,01.16 •14c ...8M11111=1111 ,54 '....,./ .,„,,,_•_,„.... ***F0 :5•., 4414111.•4* 2Pg4/&-IP°ilir. -.0i,"...-...,.%.......:_.,-- - -"' .4.61 - ••-i 111, ,,, l 61 SCALE 15I FUT RI 0 • RIVANNA a . •.. . NM I••• M. I••• JACK JOUETT DISTRICTS SECTION 45 ..,.. -- 12 04A; \ .A/•yill I I i•1 p•• .<\ 0 cid V 0 ."- '0' il .0 0 — \ 11141414t 4:.:5, .. - ..vp. ----- —-r\ ,I i 0 j • • • p,4/,c e)4 4/7 ( r J , 1, ,$) [..-'. , ,,,%8 sok • 4.0 / / c_e)6fr 4I P Ai'i AI kr. ` - "- 6.9 0 .\---7 4 p �• �` i y44?• J 598 1► •���i * ... \ i L owe ' s _ _ \ 511.5 l A no u 0 ille/ N / � i- I E,S h�. r 0� / r-. ,�. I ' io Hi I I ' r �`'4±: +� -I 1 - Shopping Li ' 1,. -I 1� ZMA-2001-21 550 X 517. / CARRIAGE GATE \ / ;N. I1. PR%PM80 a TISS MAP IS FOR DISPLAY AJRPOSPSOMrp HAM=l11 1/ N / GRAPHICS y y a x iim tii n ATTACHMENT D al to N o , ..- ,,-. -,,-.4tti.,7,91-,,,,,,,u,,,.. .,,:„., .) ..: •}� : '� t n } >4 r fax � n . k r {f` � ' F< I- �`k' � �' w J h " \� �3,'r y � ���� � r�',f jo� rr � ' /¢ d 3 f' Q7 `'of t . 10 1 j 2(n 1;1,.. , , fr-, -,, -- . ,, 1 1 - " I. ,r �{ c• ti 't>a I 1 o \f rs j @5" r �'�� yM �� ri,. 7+ x '-.per .. � ,� r� S.� �. -0 D 'K 1S /C"� . \' \\ 8A -� : �� � ,�# s '`' _ Sri �9 t 3 yi.-.��� } / \i ; N ATTACHMENT E /q aCkmenf D /ee°6' J/ I /a/°//'CeO APPLICATION DATE: December 17, 2001 PROJECT NAME: CARRIAGE GATE APARTMENTS OWNER: BERKMAR LAND TRUST LOCATION: Woodbrook Drive—West of Intersection with Berkmar Drive CURRENT ZONING: R-6 PROPOSED ZONING: R-15 PROPOSED USE: Apartments The Comprehensive Plan designation for this property is office service. The public need and benefit this rezoning would serve is to bring about the availability of housing in an area that is adjacent to an elementary school, buses and convenient shopping within walking distance. Public water, sewer, gas and road(Woodbrook Drive) is available and in place to serve this site. It is our opinion that the additional 42 apartments would not impact the road or utility services in the area. A traffic signal is located at the intersection of Woodbrook and Berkmar Drive. There will not be an impact to the natural, scenic and historical resources with the construction of this project. The site sits off from the commercial buildings and is not heavily wooded. There are plans to develop the property if the rezoning is approved. A contract is in place and site plan preparation is underway (see attached) to start the project a soon as approval can be obtained. The plan calls for 42 apartments that will be owned, leased and maintained by Southland Homes, Inc. As shown on the attached site plan drawing, this property consisting of 2.742 acres is ideal for the residential buildings that are proposed. Surrounded on the South by Agnor Hurt Elementary School (Kindergarten—5th grade) the two sites are buffered by a wooded tract. It would be desirable to be able to provide a walkway thru the wooded area to access the playground facilities of the school. This would be a natural pathway of mulch that would meander through the woods to minimize the need to cut trees. The construction and maintenance of the pathway would be borne by the developer. A meeting on site with the project manager of Albemarle County Building Services will take place December 20m to see if a pathway would be feasible. Some of the factors to be considered will be the topo, accessibility and visibility around the pathway for safety. Although the current land use designation for this property is office service (currently zoned R-6), due to the size (narrow width) and the distance from Berkmar Drive, this would be a difficult site to market commercial property because it is not visible from a main road (Berkmar Drive).Also, trying to design commercial buildings on the narrow lot with the setbacks/buffers that are required for commercial use adjacent to residential zoning (South and West boundary) would be difficult. Business and office buildings require large trucks for service and parcel delivery on a daily basis. The configuration of this site hampers design for these vehicles. There is ample land along Berkmar Drive that is better suited for commercial use, allowing easier access and visibility. The topo of this land and the location presents a quiet, safe and very convenient location for residential development along the fringes of commercial development that would allow a nice mixed use. The site is adjacent to Agnor Hurt Elementary school to the South, two homes to the West, vacant land zoned R-6 to the North, Legend Development Office building to the north entrance of the site and Northside Christian School to the South. A planting area around the perimeter of the site would allow for additional privacy and screening. The site will have a protected tot lot of approximately 4,500 sq. ft. with benches, trees and playground equipment. This area on site along with the recreational facilities provided at Agnor Hurt School, if approved, will allow ample play area for children. The development of this site is contingent on getting maximum density (42 units) to make it economically feasible to build and lease. This plan has been engineered with buildings positioned to allow for ample parking with tree islands and giving each tenant 2 parking spaces plus 8 for guests. In summary, this site is a natural for residential use. The interior sidewalks on the site will be connected to the existing walk on Woodbrook Drive, which ties to Berkmar Drive allowing for a good mixed use flow. The walks allow for safe pedestrian access to school or shopping in the Rio Hill Center, Woodbrook Center, Lowes and even Walmart. Public transit is available on the corner of Woodbrook Drive and Berkmar(Bus Route #7). The buildings will be owned and leased by Southland Homes, Inc., and will be similar in building materials to Lakeside and Carriage Hill. 16 12/14/2001 13:32 Lyb'jb41 ril..i PILL-UMa^UuRr+vL'L BERKMAR LAND TRUST THIS TRUST AGREEMENT made this 28th day of September, 1995, by and between Charles Wm. Hurt and Shirley L. Fisher, as Trustees, (whether one or more and which designation shall include all successor or substitute Trustees) , and all other parties who shall execute this Trust Agreement as evidenced by their signatures set forth below, who are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Beneficiaries" (which designation shall include all successors and assignees who have acquired a beneficial interest as contemplated by and in accordance with the terms of this Trust Agreement) , provides: I. RECITALS - OBJECTS AND PURPOSES The Beneficiaries are about to cause to be conveyed to the Trustees, as Trustees under this Trust Agreement, the property described on Exhibit A attached hereto, reserving to themselves as Beneficiaries only those rights in the nature of personalty as expressly set forth herein. When the Trustees have taken title to the trust property as Trustees under this Trust Agreement, and any other property subsequently conveyed to them, and added to Exhibit A, all collectively hereinafter the "Property", the parties agree, for themselves and their successors and assigns and any other person or persons who may become entitled to any interest in the Property by operation of law or as provided herein, that the Trustees shall hold the Property for the following uses and purposes and subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein. 17 LLB 14/ LVV1 1J. JL _.- BERKMAR LAND TRUST CERTIFICATION OF BENEFICIARY'S INTEREST The undersigned Trustees under a certain Trust Agreement dated September 28, 1995, establishing the Berkmar Land Trust,hereby certify as of the date set forth below,that Charles Wm. Hurt is the beneficiary and beneficial owner of 100% of the Berkmar Land Trust. A copy of the original Trust Agreement,described below,is retained at the office of McCallum&Kudravetz,P.C., 250 East High Street, P.O. Box 224, Charlottesville,Virginia,22902. This certificate does not embody any legal title and is non-transferrable. The beneficial interest owned by the aforenatned Beneficiary is transferrable only pursuant to the provisions of the Trust Agreement and any amendments thereto. DATED: December 24. 1996 / 97 Charles Wm. Hurt, Trustee Shirley L. fisher, Trustee 6-C:\WPAATA\%RB\HURT\0374.ben.wpd 13 ,12/14/[nevi I.,. L70JOY1 �• ��• ^•�•� BERKMAR LAND TRUST CERTIFICATION OF BENEFICIARY'S INTEREST The undersigned Trustees under a certain Trust Agreement dated September 28, 1995, establishing the Berkmar Land Trust, hereby certify as of the date set forth below, that Virginia Land,L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company,is the beneficiary and beneficial owner of 100% of the Berkmar Land Trust. A copy of the original Trust Agreement, described below, is retained at the office of McCallum&Kudravetz,P.C., 250 East High Street,P.O. Box 224, Charlottesville, Virginia, 22902. This certificate does not embody any legal title and is non-transferrable. The beneficial interest owned by the aforenamed Beneficiary is transferrable only pursuant to the provisions of the Trust Agreement and any amendments thereto. DATED: January 1. 1997 eiI Charles Wm. Hurt, Trustee Shirley L. Fisher, Trust e ti 6-C:\WPDATA\LRB\HURT\0374.bn2.wpd 19 Ai u ATTACHMENT F A ofl Z _ =Neff: COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Planning&Community Development 401 McIntire Road,Room 218 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 (804)296-5823 Fax(804)972—4012 January 24, 2002 Mr. Steve Melton Virginia Land Company 195 Riverbend Drive Charlottesville, VA 22911 RE: ZMA 01-021 CARRIAGE GATE APARTMENTS Dear Steve: The staff has reviewed your recently submitted rezoning proposal referenced above. The following paragraphs and pages provide comments that are designed to provide information and suggestions for this rezoning. I am scheduled to meet with Kennan Blackwood with Rivanna Engineering tomorrow to review the specific design elements. Please be advised that this project is scheduled for a Planning Commission public hearing on March 19, 2001. The staff would like to provide a second set of comments to you on this project prior to your final submittal of plans for the rezoning. In order to provide a second set of comments, staff needs to have your second submittal of plans and a first draft of proffers no later than February 4, 2001. Comments from the Planning Department are below. Comments from Building Codes and Zoning Services, Fire and Rescue, Engineering, and the Service Authority are provided on the attached pages. VDOT will provide comments next week. Additional design comments may be provided after I meet with my Planning team on Monday. Design The parcel is small (2.74 acres) and its shape is "long and narrow"which limits the number of designs for residential units that could go on the site. The site has rolling topography and is adjacent to an elementary school. Both of these features are advantageous to the proposed use of the property. Planning staff believes that a less conventional design may be able to occur on this site which does not significantly affect the density you desire for the site. Please also be advised that you have proposed one more unit than is allowed for this zoning district (see Zoning's comments). If you were to make your buildings step up the hill rather than be parallel to the hill, you could O Page 2 Steve Melton—Carriage Gate Apartments January 24, 2002 provide parking behind the first building and provide for a central green area that is outside of the parking lot. We have done a rough sketch that is attached to this letter that will be explained further to Mr. Blackwood at our meeting tomorrow. Most likely, this change would involve a different architectural style for the buildings. Because of required distances from the parking to the entrances to the units, you would want to have fewer units in the buildings closest to the cul-de-sac and more units to the rear of the site. One idea staff had was for"townhouse" appearing units in the front and an "apartment building" look in the rear. Connection of Woodbrook to the Adjoining Property Please consider extending a reservation for dedication of r.o.w. for a future extension of Woodbrook Drive to Tax Map 45 Parcel 90. A redesigned entrance would be necessary if this occurs; a redesigned entrance may be necessary with the change in layout proposed above. Connection to Tax Map 45 Parcel 91B A connection from this property to Tax Map 45 Parcel 91 B is strongly recommended to allow for access to Berkmar. If built, the western bypass will have limited access and it is unlikely that it would provide the best access to 918. Elevations As indicated in early meetings on this project, the Planning Commission has an expectation that elevations will be provided with proposed developments accompanying a special use permit or rezoning. When you decide on the building types for the parcels, please provide elevations and consider proffering characteristics of those elevations. Screening Vegetative screening along property lines will help to create privacy for the development. I am asking the School Division right now if they believe screening is needed between the apartment complex and the school. Please consider the appropriateness of screening between this parcel and TM 45 Parcel 91B given your knowledge of the future use of that parcel. Central Amenity You provided some detail on the tot lot in the parking lot. We believe that the design you provided is innovative but a safer design (i.e., one that doesn't require all residents from all three units to cross over the parking lot) would be between units. Pedestrian Access Pedestrian access is shown well throughout the site. With a redesign, you can also provide for similar pedestrian access. It appears that there is no sidewalk extending from the day care along the 21 Page 3 Steve Melton—Carriage Gate Apartments January 24, 2002 bulb of the cul-de-sac in front of your property. This sidewalk will need to be extended across the bulb and into your site. Staff notes your contacts with Lisa Glass in the Schools Division and appreciates your efforts towards making a pedestrian connection. We are also working on this item. R-15 Zoning District Request and Proffers My impression from your submittal is that you are requesting this rezoning with proffers. Because of the size of the parcel, a"planned district"designation is not possible. Planned districts have an "application plan" that is part of the rezoning. The plan provided with this submittal could be proffered with this rezoning. Please be advised that the level of variation from the plan would be entirely within the purview of the Zoning Administrator. The Planning Director could not approve variations to the plan. For that reason, if you proffer the plan, it is important that you highlight the features that are essential to the design and development. Some standard language for proffers is provided below: 1. Development of the parcel shall be in general accord with the (application)plan entitled "xx" dated"xx" and last revised"xx" (where applicable) herein referred to as"The Plan" Specific features of The Plan which are proffered are: a. spell out the feature, such as, "a central amenity", relegated parking as shown on the plan. pedestrian access as shown, ect. b. Conformity with the following features of the elevations entitled"xx"dated"xx". c. Screening for the full-length of the southern boundary of the site where the parcel adjoins with TM 45 Parcel 95A(if considered necessary by the Schools Division). 2. Pedestrian paths consisting of(specs—asphalt, concrete, mulch whatever) shall be installed (where specifically) and completed before release of the performance bond. 3. Where site grading is performed, the owner shall minimize use of slopes steeper than 3:1, subject to approval by the Department of Engineering and Public Works. The Applicant shall install additional low maintenance vegetation to provide stabilization for proposed slopes steeper than 3:1 as approved by the County's Landscape Planner. Nothing contained in these proffers shall be deemed a waiver of the Planning Commission's review of Applicant's critical slope waiver under Section 4.2.5 of the Ordinance. 4. The Owner shall limit the number of residential units on the parcel to "xx"residential units. 5. The Owner shall reserve for dedication upon demand of the County sufficient r.o.w to extend Woodbrook Drive to the adjoining property Tax Map 45 Parcel 90, as shown on The Plan. 6. (If you want to make a cash proffer or off-site improvement) By not later than(some point in time or key event), the owner shall provide to the County (cash for a County improvement relating to the rezoning or and off-site improvement). Should(that improvement) not take place within the next (specific time period) from the approved proffer date, it shall be refunded to (whom?). 22 Page 4 Steve Melton— Carriage Gate Apartments January 24, 2002 I hope this information is useful to you with your next submittal. Please feel free to call me if you have questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Elaine K. Echols, AICP Principal Planner attach • 23 A Ske I-1-0,k) stAy5k71 1 Oti-lotirvi,4 \le, ebcfer . , I ,....., ___,....„„a / , 2,., . 7\41,,,,... . ... 2 .. ...... .. ,. F I1 .. ,-...., --"- ----",„(.4110.— .. 4(,. \>-•„ -.4 .... ....+7 •rs .17 , 41 .• 1 . '. . _ ....(Nrs. . \ ' , • 11 .. ,I. I ... < 11...4 •. 5 2 4'4211 1 If :... -•1,...-1-: --.0.,,,,,,•.„,;'vr.I.- . -... I ' ii i ---, .., 1 gliiii --. ..-....l_ ,I 1 -- rd _ . ... 4 1 — ------ . i .)1 iiei e . i ' , , • _ (.. __,.) , - • , ___ , ... , - , _______ ,. ____ , . • , ,.. „--- 2 4 ...... ,--/ Li ,... Albemarle County Development Departments ZMA-2001-021 SPIN Submission and Comments Carriage Gate Apartments Building "Application Plan" revision 1 reviewer received reviewed decision Jay Schlothauer 12/21/01 1/2/02 approved Based on information submitted December 17, 2001. No comments or conditions concerning this zoning map amendment. Comments will follow when a detailed site plan is developed. 1/24/02 09:03 AM Page 1 of 7 25 Albemarle County Development Departments ZMA-2001-021 SPIN Submission and Comments Carriage Gate Apartments Engineering "Application Plan" revision 1 reviewer received reviewed decision steven snell 12/21/01 1/22/02 approved with conditions FROM:Steve Snell, Engineer DATE:22 January 2002 RE:Carriage Gate, ZMA-2001-021 The ZMA for Carriage Gate has been reviewed. The Engineering Department can recommend approval when the following conditions: 1. The proposed internal sidewalk must connect to the existing sidewalk on Woodbrook Drive. Though not typically an Engineering concern, it should be noted that the location of the proposed sewer lines will prevent a tree buffer within this site. Any tree buffer between this site and the Agnor Hurt Elementary School will thus have to be located on school property. It is possible that an insufficient tree buffer exist on the school property. Please contact me if you have questions or require additional information. 1/24/02 09:03 AM Page 3 of 7 r�"1. Albemarle County Development Departments ZMA-2001-021 SPIN Submission and Comments Carriage Gate Apartments Fire/Rescue "Application Plan" revision 1 reviewer received reviewed decision Jay Schlothauer 12/21/01 1/2/02 approved Based on information submitted December 17, 2001. No comments or conditions concerning this zoning map amendment. Comments will follow when a detailed site plan is developed. 1/24/02 09:03 AM Page 4 of 7 fir 7 Albemarle County Development Departments ZMA-2001-021 SPIN Submission and Comments Carriage Gate Apartments Service Authority "Application Plan" revision 1 reviewer received reviewed decision Pete Gorham 12/21/01 1/23/02 approved with conditions We do not object to the zoning map amendment for this development. Existing water and sewer lines of sufficient diameter are immediately adjacent to the site, on the Northside Ministries School property. Off-site easements from the school will be necessary at least for the sewer extension and possibly the water extension, as currently proposed on the plan. Final approval will not be granted until the water and sewer construction drawings have been approved by our office. As we understand it apartment buildings are required to be sprinklered so there shouldn't be an issue with fire flow. In any case the flow at the intersection of Woodbrook Drive and Berkmar Drive is in the range of 2700 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. Let us know if you have any questions. Thanks. 1/24/02 09:03 AM Page 6 of 7 28 Albemarle County Development Departments ZMA-2001-021 SPIN Submission and Comments Carriage Gate Apartments Zoning "Application Plan" revision 1 reviewer received reviewed decision John Shepherd 12/21/01 1/16/02 Pending BOS approval This parcel contains 2.74 acres. If it is rezoned to R-15 the parcel can contain 41, not 42 dwelling units. (2.74 x 15 =41.1) If the applicant submits proffers with this proposal, this department would appreciate the opportunity to review them. The Application Plan is being reviewed as just that. If the rezoning is approved, this project will be subject to a separate review and approval of a site plan. 1/24/02 09:03 AM Page 7 of 7 29 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE ATTACHMENT G pF:11,gF,A MEMORANDUM TO: Elaine Echols, Principal Planner FROM: Steven A. Allshouse, Fiscal Impact Planner f i G. DATE: March 12, 2002 RE: ZMA 01-21 (Carriage Gate Apartments) I analyzed two separate scenarios for the properties in question. The first scenario involved the maximum new development that could take place under existing zoning, while the second scenario involved the new development that would occur if the County approved the proposed zoning changes for the property. The results of these two analyses appear in the attached "Budget Summary: Existing Zoning" and "Budget Summary: Proposed Zoning" documents. In the case of the first scenario, I assumed that 24 multifamily units(MF's)would be built during the course of the next year. CRIM estimates that, after build-out, the type and level of development that could take place under existing zoning would result in the following net annual fiscal impact: Fiscal Impact -- Current Zoning Property Taxes $14,000 Other Revenues 31,000 Total Revenues $45,000 School Expenditures ($53,000) County Govt. Expenditures (13,000) Total Expenditures ($66,000) Net Annual Fiscal Impact ($21,000) 30 ZMA 01-21 March 12, 2002 Page Two In terms of the annual impact that the development of three SFD's would have on the County's capital costs, CRIM estimates the following result: CIP Impact-- Current Zoning Schools CF Pay-As-You-Go ($0) Schools CF Debt Service ($22,000) Total Schools CIP Impact ($22,000) County CF Pay-As-You-Go ($0) County CF Debt Service ($0) Total Cty. Govt. CIP Impact ($0) Net Annual CIP Impact ($22,000) Note that these CIP figures are included in the fiscal impact numbers listed on the previous page. (The $22,000 in capital costs is part of the $66,000 in the estimated total annual expenditures resulting from the development of 24 MF's). These CIP numbers are presented separately to highlight the magnitude of the capital costs that would be associated with such development. The second scenario that I ran involved the proposed construction of 41 MF units on the property. I assumed the development would be completed in one year. CRIM estimates that, after build-out, this project would have the following net annual fiscal impact: Fiscal Impact -- Proposed Zoning Property Taxes $23,000 Other Revenues 54,000 Total Revenues $77,000 School Expenditures ($95,000) County Govt. Expenditures ($24,000) Total Expenditures ($119,000) Net Annual Fiscal Impact ($42,000) Note that, although the proposed development would have not quite twice as many MF's as would the maximum allowed under existing zoning, CRIM estimates that the net annual fiscal impact of the 3! ZMA 01-21 March 12, 2002 Page Three development associated with the proposed zoning would be twice as great as the net annual fiscal impact associated with the existing zoning. This seeming discrepancy results from rounding errors in the CRIM program. As for the impact of this proposed development on the County of Albemarle's capital costs, CRIM estimated the following outcome: CIP Impact -- Proposed Zoning Schools CF Pay-As-You-Go ($0) Schools CF Debt Service ($33,000) Total Schools CIP Impact ($33,000) County CF Pay-As-You-Go ($0) County CF Debt Service ($0) Total Cty. Govt. CIP Impact ($0) Net Annual CIP Impact ($33,000) Again, these CIP numbers are included in the total annual expenditures of$119,000 shown on the previous page, and are presented separately to illustrate the relative magnitude of capital costs. The numbers generated by the two scenarios that I ran indicate that, if the County approves ZMA 01-21, the differential net annual fiscal impact would be $21,000 - $42,000 = -$21,000. This number means that, annually, the County would be $21,000 worse off approving ZMA 01-21 than denying the proposal. Notes: (1) Although my analysis suggests that the approval of ZMA 01-21 would result in a net annual fiscal drain to the County, this fact alone does not necessarily mean that ZMA 01-21 should be denied, since the total mix of development taking place in Albemarle County in any given year might generate a revenue-neutral outcome; (2) If Albemarle does not approve ZMA 01-21, the growth that is assumed to be associated with this proposed development would likely take place somewhere else in the County; and (3) When deciding whether or not to approve a proposed development, Albemarle takes into consideration a number of issues other than just the project's fiscal impact. These issues include, but are not necessarily limited to, affordable housing, transportation impacts, and environmental well-being. SAA/saa 3? cc N 2 1 Qo za 03 m 0 Z_ c ocnm� ° _ -I"0 cc D Co n > C =m a o m o m-0 T' ': N. p Z 8 V)0 Er m sr Cl) ti r A 1 o El C) �' Z 3 C) N N N N N 3 0 r r A WN"O(O CO O(JIAW N�O(O OOV O(nA WN W C)D~ Z(nOOCnQ Cn00(nQ Z KM C(nDc(nO2C)Cn0TT W0O(nKT-ola v Z)Zt c3 CTTgv CTTEt a ocTTZmISs°9: w=5`� oorTOowymAc 3 5omom .z 3 c C W O T A m W�)-0�� C 9, D o Z d m 5 am m� u°i 3 g o 0 V'i N vmi g o m m H m um, m 07fy 1-OQ� O - 0o• o `! 1- ir. el mgD1Dc �ODmO. < 1C ooR. (n D ° m 0r-01 1 f° I-0 1 ° at,m CD 3 a0 A., o�rD �ao o Tr m a, llm o cv° Z 1 r° mom w K COnr2 c N rz c N < c N �mm CO > �cc S m N N 1�^ �C �C m ° sv N v1i O m c bt n m c Fit Z ((I I Z 7 ° ea a z c w - ^ o m X c1i Z Z1 1 N °-' o m S. C C) I G) C SO3 �1 �N m 0m, xSN vvm !G o 8 o rri 0, m g-1i i u°i g a �p a o rNI CO (D x ( N N O E. o B. to C co 8" u Ni V Ni 4A4A 429 4A 40 49 40 4A 40 4A 4A 40 44 fp M _ A A 0 CA 4A FA N N EA A C.) 4A Ni FA 44 4A M (A 4+A 4A M fA 4A fA fA fA fA 44 4A 4A fA 4A 4A 4A fA 4/14A AA NAO V AA ONUI�(p co A O000�-+"00-+000-s000 W OOONO A OOOOA . ()- Ni IIA 4A 40 49 fA 410 44 4A 4A 410 fA 0)N o) 4A 4A 4A (n N SA . W 40 4A 4A 4A 49 44 44 4A 4A 4A 4A 40 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 40 40 4A 4A 69 4A 4A 4A 4A 49 4j O)-, V A O 0 A-, CO N O—co N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0—0 0 0(.)O O O N O A 0 0 0 0 A A N C) XI Ni 13 M 40 40 40 4A 4A 40 44 40 40 4A OD j co4A 4A 4A n N M( A (a) 4A 4A 40 40 49 44 40 4A 4A 40 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 40 40 44 4A-4A 40 4A 44 4A 69 4j V A O O A" Co)N 0 co N N O O O O O-, O O_.0 0 0 0 O O W O 0 O N 0 A O O O 0 A (n W =. m Er N O j °)-4A4A4A� (n N 40 0 69 4A �CO44 4A 4A A C.) 4A 4A 4A 4A 444A 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 444-•4A -a 494A4A4A-a OOii (O V A O O A W N O O N Ni 0 0 0 0 O O O"O O O O O OW O O O N O A 0 0 0 O A A 3 0 Ni N W Ni °)-4A4A4 -s N N 4A�+- A CO 4A4A4A4A4A4A 4A 49 49 4A 49 49 4A 4A 4A 44 44 4A 4A 4A 40 4A — 4A 4A 4A 4A�+ 8 OO O V A O O A W N O—(O 0) Na 0 0 0 0 0-, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4)0 0 0 Na 0 A O O O 0 A V N N N Ni w 4A 4A 4A 40 4A 4A 4A 40 8 j j 0) 49 4A 69 01 N 4A A W 4A 4A 4A 4A 40 44 4A 4A 40 44 44 40 44 4A 40 4A 4A 49 4A 4A 69 4j 44 4A 4A 4A 4A V A O O 4a-9 W N O (O (n N 0 0 0 0 0-+-s O O—0 0 0 0 0 0 W O 0 0 N 0 A O O O O A CO O) 4AA N vs 4A fA 01 4A 4+9(A 4ppA fA • 4A 4A 49 40 4A 49 4A 40 4A 40 4A 4A 4A 4A 40-9 444 4A 4A 49 40 N W A O 0 A-+ W N O (O VI N 0 0 0 O O -s-s O O O 0 0 0 0 0 W O O O Na 0 A 0 0 0 O A §V 40 Ni (O- N O)"4A494A� CO N 4A�� A W 4A4A4A4A4A4A-4A 44 49 404A 4A 49 4A 49 49 4A 49 4A 4A 49 4j4A " 4A4A4A44-. 0 A V A O 0 A (+)N O-+co N N O O O O O -• 0 0 0 0 O—0 0 0 C)0 0 0 N 0 A 0 0 0 0 A 000 CO 3 Ca M N.) fD N_ 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 40 4A 40 4A 4A 0 0 j 0) 4A 4A 4A CO N to A 4) 44 4A 40 4A 40 4A 40 4A 4A 4A 4A 44 49 4A 40 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 4j 4A . 4A 4A 4A 44.. O) V AO0A� W NO�(O N N O0000-.-s-s 00 000�0004)OOONO A OOOOD -+(O N L? 0 N W N 4A 49 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A r CO A O O A—a (Ni)Ni O-.(O &1 W 44 4A 4A 4A 4A 40-•44 4A to 40 4A 49 4A 40 49 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A 4j 4A 4-9 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A O N 0 0 0 0 0 O O-.0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 N O A 0 0 0 0 A NO 8 N _8 W D C 13 on m R 0 Q (O of 0 N 8 N N ON M0000 M 000001f1000N000N00 0N00000 V CO M0)0MN (O(D00 V 0) NM a- N W/A IA V► N V►N 64 Vf W 64 V►V►VI V►V►64 Vf/A V►(A V►N Vf 64 V►(A VI 64 1f1 N M N V►M V►44 W N a- V IA fh o fA Vf VI Vf IA V► V►(A Vf 64 V► 64 a- NI* 0 N 64 OM,- M0000 M 000000000NOOON00 ON00000 V CO MO)0MD (o(000 xi-co CM N IA64 Vf V► N 64 N 64(A V.64 64 44 64 IA(A CO V►6464 64 W A n N 64 64(A(A V►64 I M N V►M V►(A VI N a- V O V♦ Vf V► 64 (A IA 64 VI Vf 64 64 64 N VV► m N C) 2° m too (0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0IA 0 0 0 N O O O N O 0 O N 0 0 0 0 0 V CO M M 0 M D (O(O O O V O) N O N V►Vf V►IA N V►N(A 64 Vf V►V►Vf V►V►IA10 VI Vs V►IA 64 Cl IA 64 V►IA V►10 IA N M N M V► V►V►64 N a- V M 0 V► 64 di IAVf V►40 (A 6464 V►VI V► N I-O) M M0000 00000 If)000 NOOO NOO ON00000 `I' CO M M O M 1D (O(000 NI*a) Na) O N IA VI 64 64 N to N 64 VI 64 V►64 IA V►IA IA(A Vi CA IA tn.6/1N V►IA 64 6464 64 If) I's VI N 64 InV►V►V►N a- V N 0 Vf V► VI 64 V► V► V►Vf 1A Vf Vf V►,- el N (O CO M0000 c,) 000001f)000N 000 N 00 0N00000 Tr CO M CO 0 VI IA (0(000 NI-0) N R 8 N 64 VI(A IAN V!N IA(A 64 Vi 64 Vi VI(A IA Vf(A 64 M Vi V!N(A Vf V►(A(A 1A w) I-- M N V►CI0) 1A(A IAN T.. .O.(O W V> Vi (A (A Vi 10 VI V►64 V> V► N N Vf VI N 0 tor- MOOOO M OOOOOIf000NO00NOO ON00000 ‘I" CO MMOM1f) CO(000 V 0) Cal CO 0 N Vf(A V►VI N 64 N V►V►V►6464 VI 64 10 V►V►V►V♦VI Vf V►N V►(A V!(A(A 44 M N M N V;M 0) V►64 V►N.- V V N V► (A V► VI VI V► V►Vf V/V► IA- (A 64 N N N lh 0 E V(O M0000 M 00000 000N000N00 ON00000 Cr CO M0)0 U (0(000 V a) N V 8 N Vi Vi V!V) NN N IA 64 Vf IA VI V►Vi 64 4 V!VI 64 V!VIV(IAN V>I fA 6 IA 64 64 IA I- C')N VI M 0) V!VIM N a- 'Cr0 O V► 4 (A 64 V► V►V► V► V►V► V► (0 N 1g m a M 1() el O O O in 0 0 0 0 0 I A 0 0 0 N O O O N O 0 O N 0 0 0 0 0 V CO M M M U O ) CO(O 0 0 V 0) N M 2 8 N V►10 V►V► N (AN IA Vi(A(A VI IA V►V►M M(A64 M VI MN VI VI(A VI VI V► 10 N M N to el M V►(A(A N' V(O a Vf. VI V► VI V► 64 (A V► (A V► V► V►'- Vf N VI m Q' U — N V M 0 0 0 0 CI 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 N O O O N 0 0 O N 0 0 0 0 0 V CO M a)O c.,)If) co co c)O Tr 0) N `+ NV►(A(A IA N VI(A(A64 V►/A(A IA IA IA V►V►V!IA tO V*N(A VI 64 IA IA 64 1AI IAelNN IA In 0)64 4A -V►V►Vf Noma- Tr O (4 IA (A N 64 '-M MOOOO VI00000 )000N000N00 ON000 V O COMM(O MM NI'(O(O0(0 00 8 N V►V►V►V► N 64 N V(A V►VI(A 64 V►Vf V►V►V►Vf V►Vf Vf N VI 64 64 IA V►V► 10 CO M N 10 M 0 N Vf N Vs If)(O CO CO VI VI V► Vf VI 64 Vf V► 1/4 a— V► el 64 - Vf N IA A N II 0)N m Y QP— C O N 0 } N a co co m m o (n 8J F C 0 H H W W O O Z (f) (10i oa m (xo d o x x (7)) o 0 0 2 La_ E m oo Z D C� I 0 D O ToW c.3 ��ZF m�Z d_I Z �t W x j Z V �U y f)8(A a A a o- (�i a F x 0 m e m g W 0 > C m j c rn o --U N O c c as H H m (� m m d Ii a o W v E (ci W 0 } m J 0 } m J O m R mom' I- Z 0.0. _F ut o o m c� �ti?`o > ' C)42¢rF wPQ«FV > G. c-c EaQ to o o~.6---� m(tj{L y-o 8 0 0:o Q 49 u �x a J F o > a0 c o > a0 m m o m 1n... aaea � o>A0 ma O a m Q - n III y c (`) z N 0. m e c O V r E m m:: cY AzO<r� `m z o a8 m a))tta80~°z 2 E m o n o$$ ° = m m A m o o a to 0 m.2.c 19 mom ¢ m Z 1L IL o 0 1g 11 lL 0.13 LL(L 7 c r �z�ZO d aaa2(n00(05 i_0000IO(n2Q(n(0 ¢ O( 00(n O(nUUtnQ �QU E ,-NM V IA(OI�(o MO'NM V N(DI�(O MO.-NM V N N N N N J i_ J N N >0 O -. Tr Y V) 0Iy V) 19 re . O(O j 0 Q m • - SO CL W 2.1 O x .0 <0 Q C1 Cf NZce< (� NI ▪ jWal- tO O 0 Ha0 0 1- 0 CO• ZCC OF 0 ki 2 N 31 l ATTACHMENT H CARRIAGE GATE APPARTMENTS CROSS-SECTION BASED ON STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR SITE LAYOUT 1" = 10' Vertical . 1" = 50' Horizontal . . . Pao PE 14.TY Liria 60 0 I I 1 I I 1+1-- 5 0 t -•.1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I 1 I I I "-----,, 1 0 -..........._.........i. I I I 1 1 I . I EXISTING- . I I I I I 1 I \:1 G-RADE 1 -. I I I I i I I ,.. ,., 0, •. , _.._ 1 L - .V. t I I 580 I I I % ,..:.;,, I -t -1"'------, ,.-; I I ! :' „ ,,, ---"-- --...,1 ,,- .: I ' I -' I I ::- 4:. .t r,,,v , ;k i -;:k. I I I I I 1- ::'-i: I -: ''''.....4:? ......'"'s I i* 7, I ,, A:. -ic.zi I .;-: I I I I 7.i; •. .,.. ,;', - d I' (:kk.--;',,,_.,,_ ; • ---," -'-:=:.i 1 :-i Ir_ .1, - ..w t :.:, -. .•.---,..,. ...... ViO• .! 4, .-- I 1., 570 I - '-- \1 I ,ts,..,,,Z=; I I ----- ------ ____.,6--. I '': I I I I 1 • I I ,t,4! ..,. L ..:t ----... I . I I I I I I . . .. I 1, -1,,,..,;,--40.7,. .i.'.!:,--...;',41,,-;..r...,.,,,-- - .- I - :i'i.' N I '1' I •.........1 f-gi--. ; 2,-.77 :.:. I I I I I I I I I I 1• \--L-,-,I:,I ' I 1 I I I I ! I I I I 1 . 3r, A ATTACHMENT I fritidito COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Planning&Community Development 401 McIntire Road,Room 218 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 (804)296-5823 Fax(804)972-4035 March 5, 2002 Mr. Steve Melton Virginia Land Company 195 Riverbend Drive Charlottesville, VA 22911 RE: SDP 01-016 CARRIAGE GATE APARTMENTS Dear Mr. Melton: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments from the following agencies, as applicable, are attached. Albemarle County Department of Engineering and Public Works Albemarle County Department of Building Code Enforcement and Zoning Services Albemarle County Department of Planning & Community Development Albemarle County Division of Fire Safety Albemarle County Service Authority Virginia Department of Transportation Albemarle County E-911 Mapping Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues, which could affect approval of the proposed project. Please note that, in addition to the comments attached, approval of this site plan is contingent on the approval of the pending rezoning ZMA-01-21. These comments could change subject to the approved proffers, actions of the Planning Commission, or action of the Board of Supervisors. This site development plan will be heard with ZMA 01-016 at the Planning Commission meeting on March 19. At that meeting, the Commission will advise you of any additional changes necessary to the site plan for preliminary site plan approval if the rezoning is approved. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Karl Karl Guiler Planning Technician 36 Albemarle County Development Departments SDP-2002-016 SPIN Submission and Comment Carriage Gate Apartments Preliminary Building preliminary site plan revision 2 reviewer received reviewe decision Jay Schlothauer 2/14/02 2/20/02 requested changes Based on plans dated February 8, 2002. Rearrange the barrier-free parking space at Building "C"so that it is van-accessible (similar to the one at Buildings "A"/"B".). [2000 Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code; 1996 BOCA National Building Code, Section 1105.4] Note: The buildings must include sprinkler systems. 3/5/02 11:26 AM Page 1 of 1 37 Albemarle County Development Departments SDP-2002-016 SPIN Submission and Comment Carriage Gate Apartments Preliminary Fire/Rescue preliminary site plan revision 1 reviewer received reviewe decision Jay Schlothauer 2/14/02 2/20/02 approved Based on plans dated February 8, 2002. No comments or conditions. Note: The buildings must include sprinkler systems. 3/6/02 09:10 AM Page 1 of 1 38 Albemarle County Development Departments SDP-2002-016 SPIN Submission and Comment Carriage Gate Apartments Preliminary Engineering preliminary site plan revision 2 reviewer received reviewe decision steven snell 3/4/02 3/4/02 requested changes DATE:❑4 March 2002 RE:❑❑Carriage Gate, SDP-2002-0161 The Preliminary Site PLan for Carriage Gate has been reviewed. The Engineering Department can recommend approval when the following items are addressed: 1. The BMP appears to have no berm. The bottom of the BMP is at 555-feet and the next downhill elevation is shown to be 555-feet. Please show more detail for the BMP structure. [18-32.5.6d] 2. The parking grades vary from 5-1/2% to 8%. Parking grades cannot exceed 5%. Please show grading that does not exceed 5% for all parking areas. 3. The parking space just east of the dumpster will need a drop inlet at its lowest elevation or another means to alleviate stormwater at this location. 4. The easternmost drop inlet and drainpipe system (adjacent to TMP 45-91A) appears to drain uphill or flat. Please give details of the drainage system from "Str-4"to the "SWM facility"that demonstrate proper drainage. 5. All VDOT comments must be addressed. The following items must reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department before the final plat can be recommended for approval. A completed submittal form and application, available at the Engineering Department, must accompany all submittals. The required number of copies and the required fees are indicated on the form and application. a. An erosion control plan, narrative and computations. [17-203] b. A completed application and fee for erosion control and stormwater management. [17-203, 17-303] c. A stormwater management/BMP plan and computations. Computations must include water quality, and detention routing for the 2yr and 10yr storms. [17-304] d. A completed stormwater management facilities maintenance agreement and fee. [17.323] e. Drainage computations. [Policy] Please contact me if you have questions or require additional information. It is the applicant's responsibility to verify that all conditions and proffers are met by this plan. Any conditions not satisfied may, at the discretion of the County, delay or invalidate this site plan. 3/6/02 09:09 AM Page 1 of 1 39 Albemarle County Development Departments SDP-2002-016 SPIN Submission and Comments Carriage Gate Apartments Preliminary Planning preliminary site plan revision 8 reviewer received reviewed decision Elaine Echols 2/14/02 3/11/02 requested changes The Department of Planning and Community Development has reviewed the preliminary site plan referenced above and will recommend preliminary approval once the following conditions are satisfied. The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments may be added or eliminated based on further review. Each comment is preceded by the applicable zoning reference. Please note that approval of this site plan is contingent on the approval of the pending rezoning ZMA-01- 21. These comments could change subject to the approved proffers, actions of the Planning Commission, or action of the Board of Supervisors. 1. Please correct the spelling of'Apartments'on the title of the cover sheet. 2. The property being reviewed in this case is designated "TM 45 Parcel 91." Please remove any references to Lot C on the plan. See title and legal reference. 3. TM 45 Parcel 91 lot B has also been given a new lot designation. It is now TM 45 Parcel 91 D. Please make this change as well on the plan. This property is directly behind the Parcel 91. 4. Please correct the spelling of'Aubrey' in the source of'boundary survey'note. 5. For clarification purposes, please add "For R-15 districts"after the 'building setbacks' note. 6. [32.5.6a] One datum elevation reference was not found on the plan. Please add this feature. 7. [4.16] Please identify the Recreation Area on the plan. 8. [32.5.6b]A note stating the square footage of recreation area must appear on the plan. Please add this note to the plan. 9. [32.5.6d] The code requires that at least 50 feet of offsite topography and pertinant features must be on the plan. The rear portion (northern)of the property does not meet this requirement. Please extend the topography and show any relevant features (structures) a full 50 feet from the rear property line. 10. [32.7.9.8] Please be advised that screening at a depth of 20 feet may be required along the Stormwater Management Facility and the boundary with the school. Plan accordingly to accommodate vegetation in such areas and be aware of potential conflicts with utilities. 11. [32.5.6s] It appears that there is insufficient space for landscaping with the aforementioned utilities. A conceptual landscape plan shall be submitted prior to preliminary site plan approval to assess this issue. The plan must meet the minimum requirements for screening along the stormwater facility and the parking lots, as well as screening from the rear property and the school. The conceptual plan need not specify the distinct species, but rather would describe the vegetation by its type (I.e medium shade tree, screening shrub etc.) 3/13/02 10:54 AM Page 1 of 2 Y Albemarle County Development Departments SDP-2002-016 SPIN Submission and Comments Carriage Gate Apartments Preliminary Planning preliminary site plan revision 8 reviewer received reviewed decision Elaine Echols 2/14/02 3/11/02 requested changes 12. [32.7.9.9] Also be advised that the landscaping on the site must meet a fifteen (15) percent tree canopy. This is required for any residential development that is between 10 and 20 dwelling units per acre. Please demonstrate this on the conceptual landscape plan. 13. [18.3] Please add notes to each building stating as follows, "Building not to exceed 65 feet in height." 14. The note under'Woodbrook Drive' is incorrect. The distance is actually to the intersection with 'Berkmar Drive." Please replace 'Greenbriar'with 'Berkmar.' 15. There is a 20'access easement shown on the property. Please clarify whether it is an access easement or a R.O.W. Please label accordingly and specify whether it is existing or proposed. 16. [4.12.6.2] Please be advised that for the purposes of safety, internal signage for pedestrians may be required before final plan approval. 17. The buildings on the site do not accurately match the submitted elevations for the site. It should be noted that the buildings be drawn to show their exact footprint on the final site plan. 3/13/02 10:54 AM Page 2 of 2 Albemarle County Development Departments SDP-2002-016 SPIN Submission and Comment Carriage Gate Apartments Preliminary Zoning [description and date] revision 1 reviewer received reviewe decision susan snead 3/4/02 3/4/02 requested changes FROM: Susan Carol Snead, Zoning Plans Reviewer DATE: March 4, 2002 RE: ❑ SDP 02-016 Carriage Gate Apartments Preliminary Site Plan The Albemarle County Department of Building Code and Zoning Services will approve this preliminary site plan for zoning compliance when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. The Building Official may provide separate comments. [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Zoning Ordinance unless otherwise specified.] 1. [ZMA 01-021] Once the rezoning is approved it may be necessary to list some or all proffers on the site plan. Final approval of the site plan is subject to compliance with all proffers. 2. [32.5.6(a)] The zoning for adjacent parcel 91 B is C-1. Please revise. 3. [32.5.6(b)] It is necessary to provide the acreage of the parcel in order to verify density. 4. [32.5.6(b)] [4.12.6.6] The parking requirements are based on number of bedrooms per unit. Please note on the plan the number of bedrooms in each unit. If there are variations on the number of bedrooms in units, please note on the plan the number of units with each variation. 5. [4.16] A recreation area, which must include a tot lot, is required for a facility of 30 units or more. Substitutions for the tot lot may be approved by the Director of Planning and Community Development. 6. [32.5.6(b)] Please note on the plan the acreage of Recreation Area and Open Space. 7. [32.5.6(n)] Please show and label the locations of Open Space and Recreation areas. Final tentative approval from the Department of Building Code and Zoning Services will be subject to the following conditions: (The following conditions are those that have been identified at this time. Additional conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) 1. [32.5.6(n)] Show the location of all outdoor lighting on the plan. 2. [32.6.6(j)] Provide a description and photograph or diagram and show the location of each type of outdoor luminaire that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens. Please be aware that installation of such luminaires in the future that are not shown on this plan shall require an amendment to this plan. 3. [32.6.6(j)] [4.17.4(b)] Include a photometric plan on the site plan demonstrating that parking area 3/6/02 09:18 AM Page 1 of 2 42 Albemarle County Development Departments SDP-2002-016 SPIN Submission and Comment Carriage Gate Apartments Preliminary Zoning [description and date] revision 1 reviewer received reviewe decision susan snead 3/4/02 3/4/02 requested changes luminaires are in compliance with 4.17.4(b). 3/6/02 09:18 AM Page 2 of 2 la .Albemarle County Service Authrity ,__.. . -,_, Serving II Conserving TO: Elaine K. Echols, Principal Planner \Q FROM: Peter C. Gorham, Senior Civil Engineer& #---- DATE: March 7, 2002 RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: Carriage Gate (TM 45, Parcel 91) The below checked items apply to this site. ZMA-01-021 SDP-02-016 X 1 . This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for: X A. Water and sewer B. Water only C. Water only to existing structure D. Limited service X 2 . An 8 inch water line is located approximately 10' distant . X 3 . Fire flow from nearest public hydrant, located 950' distant from this site plan, is 2700 gpm + at 20 psi residual . X 4 . An 8 inch sewer line is located approximately 10' distant . 5 . An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed. X 6 . No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future easements . 7 . and plans are currently under review. 8 . and plans have been received and approved. 9 . No plans are required. X 10 . Final water and sewer plans are required for our review and approval prior to granting tentative approval . 11 . Final site plan may/may not be signed. 12 . RWSA approval for water and/or sewer connections. Comments : Offsite easement for the sewer extension will be required and possibly for the water extension as well . The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows : meter locations waterline size waterline locations sewer line size sewer line locations expected wastewater flows easements expected water demands 168 Spotnop Rood • P.O. Box 2738 • Charlottesville, VA 22902 • Tel (434) 977-4511 • Fax (434) 979-0698 www.acsanet.com `.JUG 1L. 1V UCLA V\,YT.,. .,,-.,100 .,,vl V.1LLL [-ILL vv lil.l] t. COMMOJIIWEALTH of VIR GINIA tiEaL'ikRTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 701 VDOT WAY RAY D.PETHTEL CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22911 JAMES L.BRYAN RESIDENT ENGINEER INTERIM COMMISSIONER February 27, 2002 Site Review Meeting March 7, 2002 Mr. Glenn Brooks Dept. of Engineering 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Dear Mr. Brooks: The following are our ccin.r cents: SDP 2002-016 Cxriai f 11:; ate Apartments Preliminary Site Plan- Route 1417 • Minimum 30' entrance wil.!rh required at right-of-way. ➢ Entrance design s:could e :'G-9D. > CG-12 handicap ramps rc;c!i:ired in radii. > Label Woodbrooi:Driv;l;'.:ute 1417. > Drainage compui:itions r .:aired for review. SDP 2002-015 Department o f,rl,!otor Vehicles (old site)Maior Amendment-Route 852/1452 > Plan appears to have add:;:;;sed comments from previous review and should be satisfactory. T ,NSPORTATION FOR THE 215T CENTURY 45 •-• . gj fi, 1 C\MOM\9131\001090 Cr2/21/02 IIIII 1') i la :11.W."Nal. BIM INII . I - • . rjg:iiiiIiii: 11-''..iri111"1: .7-1. ' . I MI- allii 111,eit,mai • .- , an R, .11-., ___ - . F ' , - , 1 lib-- lin ,:,i,,. •;! iw •,:,.:,,.,.,,!.::,=1 i , ,, ,•• ..,.,-t.ili.:::.,t,•:,.1- -.-- - .1 . ;:11/1111/111.11111111r.. I I.k ., 1 MI. _ -. \7 I ' 11 ,I , IL /, . ,/,r. II d . ' 1 • 7 41 ' IC 41 ____, -.=-. ':, —,,. __ 7.41P 1 •=-- : mai I.L..._, , : -. ..11 i 1•11111Cli ____ • _.,._,_,, . _,....,,_ iN, 'i 1 ,, ' ,,,, , , 4,i k 4.— il tvi-__. r& 4 I 1:., — •4i, ! L . :7-ft t ' MI' 1 I, E.,,, .- 0. NI :,:•- 7-\*71 r . - rittill ' . kit._ t' 41 - . -7• ..... . - ..... ......\ - . l'; .1'' ' '''''''"n."' • ' \ I ••' , . re ,,--_—_,,:, -1 ,s;/,....„. .‘..ir I. , A i , , L _. 1. ....____,,! ....., ____i : =___ li IN i ...ri . N 1 ., "Ti ---- — 33 N 1 i IN I ' W ii i • 7971 1 ---....A!,.. j,,,4!_ .., • ' ,/ . , tiff Trr2 l' ;1!,l'il HMI 11111111111 1 . . . _. . -..- - > --1 Irimiii i - • 7. o • b.1 cl, z .. ____ •,•13-Ni. Illit. 1111-----11: ••_._ . • 1 . • •-• I*©l tutui, --'1 00 ,I' • ' 1,4 , 2!.10I9 $1 CARRIAGE GATE APARTMENTS KEENEYa CO.ARCHITECTS ow.PA flak cat ca . 5 'g O W..,D..E..3rO.Dm N.1...O..T..4 9.[.C.A.A.R.4Fa.E.t.7.v1.1i.m1-9.e..•W,..m.OA...a,aW..:.mA.mC-.H` aI?VA 22901 VrArictilfrit:Pwae? ‘,1 1 K. SCUTUM CONSTRUCTM 90 WKIEWOOD ROAD.BUITE 4.1 ALL VIM".IE i i CHN,011199V.E.VA. 22201 wavangwamv OfflanESALLE.VA 22901 T.prola 44.41g.111-2000 Cc...9.0.1.1.1413,3al r 1M3}IHDV1LV Ifol 17 . c\2500nC\0131\0131.01.1) 02/21/02 !V: .' 31 . MI E ril 1 't 1 3 it, 71 4 I 1 4 I L :i.r. L ' I C --). J 1 . 1 . Lm-_-__ y.ff_ --• , 3:1 P 1 I —= --- „it II , II 1 m'IP-P .,[7.71.-p . 1,. ! . ./ -- --no_k _ q m --- h 1 I :il — :-^ > I 1 6 g. z /How oullip r_m_ twit gm awl 1 , , ,i,mai ER an. 1 .i 4 ilir — ft IMIP.- •! ' K‘ I -, - 1 IIII -- , ____---i , - .-.,.i i. ...ft . ,____, 4IYA. III MR_ _ _ . •.• - _ 1.'.‘ii __._ Mir 1011MiEln- . _ •;OR Mg 1 a ,111 1.51 In] 11111 I , ___ 41111111 01111111 IIIIIIII • • . mei 2.13_, 1 2 CARRIAGE GATE APARTMENTS ',....1....;art.ru,...,77747....h R t, -'a i KEENEY a CO.ARCHITECTS POKE AI IEBEE Pk POIRODT OS (2 5 CHARLOT1E690L&VA 22301 mOIK amps nrosENIM q 1 g ME SOUTHLAND COTI3TRUCTION CALAMOTTEEMUE,VA 72901 •SACHEA1 SWOP Juol off TteSnab 1 lima SO WIE TETTuvil ROAD,BUTE El CHAELOTTESELLE.EX EMI T..1E...v.HEY ETE41000 Fe<4164 E7•4•10 IGNIM....1.110 1.“011101 i 1 0 C.\264000\0121\0121.0tw 02/21/02 ..1 1 ■ -III C ',.1 II .a s. I. r, il rn r a�••7� )G ^d v/ H - ' m yy 9' ,4 o 1az °� 1 I '11 lam [*1 i, `.I i i nommi i ' CARRIAGE GATE APARTMENTS "bo o rxtn,aonuwoi � � I�I�L�1��1 a co,nRCHirEcrs ,�.� ,COata .. k 10Y1D 4 gpEY,MB�f,a JD awtrn7E,m1E VA 22601M. m�.N s'"'�® V N M 4011 Beal v41�(iP um dt Nr*b it.a a ..“,lfMmom /Ja W161RJCT,ON W NH1LK000 ROr�,u1E 01 CO-Imo 801/,f4awioriFsrA VA rno, T rmieeaicm vow Hoot ..wan me.399no+a wm lmu 1 Armco 10 .9-90max