HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201400094 Application 2014-07-21 Albemarle • unty Community Development Department
401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902-4596
tr tt Planning Application Voice:(434)296-5832 Fax:(434)972-4126
(PARCEL/ OWNER INFORMATION
TMP 07800-00-00-05800 Owner(s):
RIVERSIDE VILLAGE PROPERTIES INC
Application # ARB201400094
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Legal Description ACREAGE
Magisterial Dist. Rivanna Land Use Primary Forest
Current AFD Not in A/F District Current Zoning Primary Neighborhood Model District
APPLICATION INFORMATION
Street Address Entered By
Judy Martin
Application Type Architectural Review Board 107/21/2014
Project (Riverside Village- Final
Received Date 07/21/14 Received Date Final Submittal Date 07/21/14 Total Fees 1000
Closing File Date Submittal Date Final Total Paid 1000
Revision Number
Comments
Legal Ad
SUB APPLICATION(s)
� Typ� Sub Ap�licap Comment
I`rnal >!te lve�+apment Plan
(APPLICANT/ CONTACT INFORMATION
ContactType I Name j Address , CityState j zip Phone PhoneCell
own®r/1 51►tlnt RIVERSIDE VILLAGI PROPERTIES INC «<µ 200 GAFRETi'ST STE S CHARLOTTESVILL 222902
Primary Contact JUSTIN SHIMP, P.E. 201 E. MAIN ST.,STE. M CHARLOTTESVILL 2292 4342078086
Signature of Contractor or Authorized Agent Date
Architectural Review Board Application `r ell
,llkA��a
Part A: Applicant,Contact and Parcel Information
Project Name: Ft vey ltAe V;i1aq
tv.1 ejzc near i y1>re.eseahor,
Tax map and parcel(s): 1 M 1 7e-5-,e Physical Street Address: Nip- or t l i' pf
Contact Person: -3-0 6-g/ c5.11141/0 7E
Business Name: Shah f Ei/iweeY149,?�i•
Address 10 E MAi/l $l £ k m J City I0/e6Ui11e- State Zip ZZ9OZ
Daytime Phone Fax#( ) E-mail J t��""N�/ y f -eY)f feel 1 j.CO/I')
207—gf36 + J
Owner of Record: 2wei6 e Vi tier {?{o,e*e51 T c.
Address 200 tsavlye* 5; t0i-it D City C alp}0-CSV r`I/e- State V)? Zip 2002
Daytime Phone( ) Fax#( ) E-mail
Part B: Review Type and Fee
Select review type
Review by the Architectural Review Board
Conceptual Plan/Advisory Review(for a Special Use Permit or a Rezoning) No Fee
Preliminary Review of a Site Development Plan No Fee
Final Review of a Site Development Plan $1000.00
Amendment to an approved Certificate of Appropriateness $225.00
Building Permit Review $590.00
County-wide Certificate of Appropriateness
Structures 750'or more from the EC,no taller than 5 stories No Fee
Structures located behind a structure that fronts the EC No Fee
Personal wireless service facilities No Fee
Fencing or Equipment or Lighting No Fee
Additions to ARB-approved buildings No Fee
Minor amendments to site or architectural plans No Fee
Building permits where the change is 50%or less of the altered elevation No Fee
NOTE: For SIGNS, use the combined APPLICATION AND CHEKLIST FOR SIGNS.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY BP# ARB# L_ �/
Fee Amount$ I)�DbiP Date Paid '2 t'l4 By w � 19 m R l eipt#(164f31 Check# r l By P t v►-
(
County of Albemarle Dept of Community Development,401 McIntire Rd,Charlottesville,VA 22902 Voice:(434)296-5832 Fax:(434)972-4126
11/2010 Page 1 of 2
OVER->
sew
v..
Part C: Description of Proposal
Describe your proposal.Attach a separate sheet if necessary.
?ha5e 1 C 6)15+4)040v/ Con s is4tr//y of 5: Ie 1y cd#td l
I5wnhanIt5 G., A-ea revs ,. 5ec shee-t 4.2 roc itt6nKah'
Part D: Applicant Agreement
Applicant must read and sign
• Each application package must contain(8)folded copies of all plans and documents being submitted. Only
(1)set of building material samples is required. All submittal items, including building material samples,
become the property of Albemarle County. Applicants are encouraged to maintain duplicate copies of all
submittal items in their own files.
• Only complete application packages will be scheduled for ARB review. The application package is not
complete without the appropriate checklist, completed, signed, and included with the required submittal
materials indicated on the checklist.
I hereby certify that I own the subject property or have the legal power to act on behalf of the owner in filing this
application. *See submittal requirements below. I also certify that the information provided on this application
and accompanyin: •rmation is accurate,true, and correct to the best of my knowledge, and that the attached
plans contain . inform ion required by the appropriate checklist.
21 2aly
Signature of• . , . •r s representative Date
or contr. purchaser
4A1 cIV"20 7- 80g6
Printed name,Title Daytime phone number of Signatory
*Ownership Information:
• If ownership of the property is in the name of any type of legal entity or organization including, but not
limited to, the name of a corporation, partnership or association, or in the name of a trust, or in a fictitious
name, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted certifying that the person signing above has
the authority to do so.
• If the applicant is a contract purchaser, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted containing
the owner's written consent to the application.
• If the applicant is the agent of the owner, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted that is
evidence of the existence and scope of the agency.Attach the owner's written consent.
11/2010 Page 2 of 2
OVER—�
SHIM PROJECT MANAGEMENT
CIVIL ENGINEERING
LAND PLANNING
ENGINEERING
July 21, 2014
Ms. Margaret Maliszewski
Regarding: ARB 2014-00007- Riverside Village
Initial Site Development Plan
Dear Ms. Maliszewski,
I have attached 8 copies of the Final Site Development Plan addressing your comments dated March 21, 2014. The
specific changes are outlined below.
ARB:
1. N/A
2. N/A
3. Initial Site Plan Approval:
1. Comment Noted
2. SWM#3 is now more integrated with the proposed landscaping. New landscaping is now shown around
the facility as screening from Route 20 and Lot 1.
3. All shrubs are now listed with a 24" minimum planting height as shown on sheet C12.
4. The requested note has been added to the cover sheet under"entrance corridor."
5. All proposed lighting is now removed from the plan. Lighting is no longer required since the standalone
parking has been eliminated in block 2C.
6. Proposed lighting is no longer shown.
7. Proposed lighting is no longer shown.
8. Proposed lighting is no longer shown.
o 9. Large shade trees and flowering ornamentals are shown for the entire length of the road frontage of this
parcel as required. See sheet C11/C12.
( 10. Flowering ornamentals are now shown along the Route 20 road frontage as required in the approved
ZMA.
I Z11. The proposed trees on the north east corner have been shifted outside of any potential electric
easement.
1 312. All plant sizes are now shown in the landscape schedule on sheet C12.
I 413. Shrubs are now shown on the edge of the parking area for block 2C at 24"min. height.
i c 14. The Himalayan birch is no longer specified in the landscape schedule. A Virginia native tree is now
shown in its place as required.
(4, 15. The screening along the north east property line has been revised to what was required in the approved
ZMA. A mix of tree and shrub species are now proposed. See sheets C11/C12.
i") 16. New tree protection fencing has been added to this location and the proposed retaining wall has been
revised to not impact this area as it previously did. See sheet C12.
VI 17. The proposed grading has been smoothed out to create a more natural appearance at the north east
corner of the site.
18. The 50' tree preservation buffer has been revised to be outside of the proposed sanitary easement. New
tree protection fencing is also shown in this location.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact Justin Shimp, P.E. at your earliest opportunity. He may be
reached at: Justin(a.shimp-engineerinq.com or by phone at 434-953-6116.
Best Regards,
Oit)
Chris Norvelle
Shimp Engineering, P.C.