HomeMy WebLinkAboutACSA201100095 Other 1992-11-25 RECEIVED
� ;II i� tr
it _ '` NOV 2 5 1992
acfb�'4!u r('✓'�r ty:
Planning Dept.
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
• STATE WATER CONTROL BOARD
Richard N.Burton 2111 Hamilton Street
Executive Director
Post Ofhco Rox 11143
Richmond.Virginia 23230 1 143 Please reply to: Valley Regional Office
(804)367-0056 116 North Maln Street
P.O.Bo\268
Bridgewater,Virginia 22812
(703)828-2595
August 14 , 1989
Mr. Sherwood Exum
924 Harris Street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Re: Shadwell GOCO "76" - Albemarle County, PC 89-1392
Dear Mr. Exum: •
This is in regard to the report of the taste and odor of petroleum in
the domestic well water supply at the referenced site. On April 28,
1989 Mr. John Paul Jones, Albemarle Fire Inspector, reported
petroleum contamination at the referenced site. On June 29 , 1989
Mr. Larry Carpenter of this office obtained water samples for
analysis from the well which serves this site. Analytical results
from these samples (copy attached) indicate substantial petroleum
contamination is affecting ground water at this site.
Due to the presence of this contamination, Valley Regional staff
believe that a site, risk and remediation assessment is necessary to
protect human safety and the environment. Therefore, I must request
GOCO Oil Company to submit a site, risk and remediation assessment by
September 29, 1989 . To be considered complete, these assessments
must address the following elements.
i
August 14 , 1989 -2- Mr. Sherwood Exum
SITE ASSESSMENT
A. Include data on the physical/chemical properties of the
contaminant
B. Nature and quantity of release
C. Site characterization [soils, aquifer, strata]
1) Geologic
2) Hydrologic
D. Land/water usage, potential usage [population distribution,
potential receptors]
E. Contamination characterization - Vertical and lateral
extent for each phase [if applicable]
1) Vapor phase
2) Dissolved phase
3) Free product phase
RISK ASSESSMENT
A. Potential migration
B. Migration routes
1) Man-made
2) Natural
C. Potential and impacted receptors [Human and Non-Human]
D. Potential/level further environmental damage
REMEDIATION ASSESSMENT
A. Potential for remediation [feasibility]
B. Degree of remediation/end point
C. Applicable technologies
D. Projected duration
00;11000000,- ve-
t 14, 1989
-3-
Mr. Sherwood Exum
,', Thank you for your continuing cooperation.
d
consultant have any questions, do not �
Should yor your
t too contact me.
Sincerely,
1 r N,-,r\s 2} .__, aN• , Z A,1_9_
ames D. Green
Regional UST Geologist
Enclosure
cc: Mac Sterrett/VRO File
PReP Central
Mr. John P. Jones
401 McIntire Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22901-4596
Dy