HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO201300012 Assessment - Environmental 2013-02-11 EROSION &SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE
Church Campus Improvements
Crozet United Methodist Church,Crozet Virginia
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project is necessitated because of Church Property acquisition by VDOT for the Jarman's
Gap Road Project and the County acquiring Church property and building a new future Public
Entrance into as a part of the Crozet Avenue Streetscape Project. Site improvements include
replacement parking areas, replacement pedestrian and handicap access facilities, relocated
playground area,and new utilities to support the site improvements. Approximately 1.97 acres,
including on-site and off-site areas,will be disturbed during construction.
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
The topographic and existing conditions on the site are depicted on the accompanying plans.
The site currently consists of gravel parking areas,pedestrian pavements,a playground and
grass areas.
ADJACENT AREAS
The project area is bounded on the north by the Blue Goose properties, on the south by Jarman's
Gap Road, on the east by Crozet Avenue and on the west by Carter Street and a small
commercial property.
OFF-SITE AREAS
The majority of the work will occur on-site,but the Owner also has an agreement with the Blue
Goose property Owner to permit temporary, gravel staging and parking areas on that property
during site construction. These gravel facilities will be completely removed and the areas
restored to pre-existing conditions at the end of construction.
SOILS
Four soil boring where taken and a soils report was also prepared by Froehling and Robertson
for the project. The soil boring summaries are attached to this document. The Soil Types and
associated areas, from the Soils Survey of Albemarle County are shown on the Erosion and
Sediment Control Plan. The soil survey soils include:
7B - Braddock Loam. Fine,mixed,semiactive,misic typic hapludults. These soils are
formed in allubium and dcolluvium derived from acid crystalline rocks located on
fans, and mountains. The surface water runoff class is medium and the natural
drainage condition of the soil is well drained. The seasonal water table is at a depth of
more than 6 feet. Slope gradient in the 2%-7% range.
36C- Hayesville Loam. Fine,kaolinitic,mesic typic kanhapludults. These soils are
formed in residuum weathered from granite and gneiss located on hillslopes and
piedmonts. The surface water runoff class is medium and the natural drainage
condition of the soil is well drained. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of
more than 6 feet. Slope gradient is typically 7%-15%.
CRITICAL AREAS
There are no critical areas on site
ANHOLD ASSOCIATES February 8, 2013 1
EROSION&SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE
Church Campus Improvements
Crozet United Methodist Church,Crozet Virginia
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES
The contractor shall provide,construct and maintain erosion and sediment control measures as
shown on the Erosion Control Plan and in accordance with the Virginia Department of
Transportation,and the County of Albemarle. All vegetative and structural erosion and
sediment control practices shall be constructed and maintained according to the minimum
standards and specifications of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook.
Permanent or temporary soil stabilization shall be applied to denuded areas within seven (7)
days after final grade is reached on any portion of the site. Temporary soil stabilization shall be
applied within seven (7) days to denuded areas that may not be at final grade but will remain
dormant (undisturbed) for longer than 30 days. Permanent stabilization shall be applied to
areas that are to be left dormant for more than one year.
Soil stabilization refers to measures that protect soil from the erosive forces of raindrop impact
and flowing water. Applicable practices include vegetative establishment, mulching,and the
early application of gravel base on areas to be stone. Soil stabilization measures should be
selected to be appropriate for the time of the year,site conditions,and estimated duration of
use. Sediment basins and traps,perimeter dikes,sediment barriers and other measures
intended to retain sediment shall be constructed as a first step in any land-disturbing activity
and be make functional before up slope land disturbance takes place.
Stabilization measures shall be applied to any earthen structures such as dams, dikes and
diversions immediately after installation.
The following structural practices will be implemented according to the requirements set forth
by the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Manual.
a) Temporary Stone Construction Entrance (3.02) - Due to the small areas and accessibility
issues, the existing entrance road is proposed as the construction entrance. Where
construction vehicle access routes intersect paved public roads or paved private access
areas, provisions shall be made to minimize the transport of sediment by vehicular
tracking onto the paved surface. Where sediment is transported onto an adjacent
private or public road surface, the road shall be cleaned thoroughly. Sediment shall be
removed from the roads by shoveling or sweeping and transported to a sediment
control disposal area. Street washing shall be allowed only after sediment is removed in
this manner.
b) Construction Road Stabilization (3.03) -The temporary stabilization of access roads,
subdivision roads, parking areas,and other on-site vehicle transportation routes with
stone immediately after grading. To reduce the erosion of temporary roadbeds by
construction traffic during wet weather. To reduce the erosion and subsequent
regarding of permanent roadbeds between the time of initial grading and final
stabilization.
c) Silt Fence (3.05)-A temporary sediment barrier constructed of posts,filter fabric and in
some cases,a wire support fence, placed across or at the toe of a slope or in a minor
ANHOLD ASSOCIATES February 8, 2013 2
EROSION &SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE
Church Campus Improvements
Crozet United Methodist Church,Crozet Virginia
drainage way to intercept and detain sediment and decrease flow velocities from
drainage areas of limited size;applicable where sheet and rill erosion or small
concentrated flows may be a problem. Maximum effective life is six (6) months.
d) Drop Inlet Protection(3.07) -A sediment filter or an excavated impounding area around
a storm drain drop inlet or curb inlet to prevent sediment from entering storm drainage
systems prior to permanent stabilization of the disturbed areas.
e) Curb Inlet Protection (3.07) - A sediment filter or an excavated impounding area around
a storm drain drop inlet or curb inlet to prevent sediment from entering storm drainage
systems prior to permanent stabilization of the disturbed areas.
f) Stormwater Conveyance Channel (3.17) - A permanent, designed waterway, shaped,
sized, and lined with appropriate vegetation or structural material used to safely convey
Stormwater runoff within or away from developing areas.
g) Outlet Protection (3.18) -Structurally lined aprons or other acceptable energy dissipating
devices placed at the outlets of pipes or paved channel sections. To prevent scour at
Stormwater outlets, to protect the outlet structure,and to minimize the potential for
downstream erosion by reducing the velocity and energy of concentrated Stormwater
flows.
h) Topsoiling (3.30) - Methods of preserving and using the surface layer of undisturbed
soil, often enriched in organic matter,in order to obtain a more desirable planting and
growth medium.
i) Temporary Seeding (3.31) -Establishment of temporary vegetative cover by planting
rapidly growing annual plant seed on rough-graded areas.
j) Permanent Seeding (3.32) -The establishment of perennial vegetative cover on
disturbed areas by planting seed.
k) Sodding (3.33) -Stabilizing fine-graded disturbed areas by establishing permanent
stands of grass with sod.
1) Dust Control (3.39) - Reducing surface and air movement of dust during land
disturbing,demolition and construction activities. To prevent surface and air movement
of dust from exposed soil surfaces and reduce the presence of airborne substances which
may present health hazards, traffic safety problems or harm animal or plant life.
PERMANENT STABILIZATION
All areas disturbed by construction will be stabilized with permanent sodding, gravel or
pavement immediately following finish-grading operations. All sod will be approved by the
"Virginia Crop Improvement Association", Blacksburg Virginia.
ANHOLD ASSOCIATES February 8, 2013 3
EROSION &SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE
Church Campus Improvements
Crozet United Methodist Church,Crozet Virginia
Specification for fertilizer are FS 0-F-241C,Type 1 solid form;Grade A or B;recommended for
grass,with one hundred (100) percent of the elements derived from organic sources of the
following properties:
a) Nitrogen 12.0%
b) Phosphoric Acid 8.0%
c) Soluble Potash 8.0%
With at least fifty (50) percent of the nitrogen from a non-water soluble organic source.
The following measures shall be incorporated during fertilization:
a) Apply fertilizer at a rate of 1000 lbs/acre.
b) Apply lime at a rate of 2000 lbs/acre.
c) Apply additives after smooth raking of topsoil.
d) Till fertilizer into upper two (2) inches of topsoil.
e) Water as necessary to aid germination and dissipation of soil additives.
STORMWATER RUNOFF CONSIDERATIONS
Stormwater Water Management and BMP for the project are not required on-site. The Church
shall make a pro-rata share payment for use of existing County SWM and BMP facilities.
CALCULATIONS
None required for proposed measures.
MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
a) Construction will be sequenced so that grading operations can begin and end as quickly
as possible.
b) Use existing road as construction entrance. Mud and debris shall be removed from all
construction vehicles and equipment before leaving the site.
c) Install silt fence and curb inlet protection controls as a first step in grading per the plan.
MAINTENANCE
All erosion and sediment control measures must be maintained and repaired immediately to
insure continued performance of their intended functions as stated in the latest edition of the
Virginia Erosion&Sediment Control Handbook. In general,all erosion and sediment control
measures will be checked daily and after each significant rainfall event. All seeded and sodded
areas will be checked regularly to ensure that a good stand is maintained. Areas will be
fertilized, reseeded,and re-sodded as required (See project specifications).
DISPOSITION OF TEMPORARY MEASURES
All temporary erosion and sediment control measures shall be removed within 30 days after
final site stabilization is achieved or after the temporary measures are no longer needed unless
otherwise authorized by the County Erosion Control Officer. Trapped sediment and other
disturbed soil areas resulting from the disposition of temporary measures shall be permanently
stabilized to prevent further erosion and sedimentation.
ANHOLD ASSOCIATES February 8, 2013 4
NNW, N411.110e
C rozet thiteietfioit Church
4z)
yO gro- Douglas Forrester, Pastor Established 1856
tiV.
1156 Crozet Avenue P. 0. Box 70 Crozet, Virginia 22932 (434) 823-4420
go Email: office @crozetumc.org Webpage: www.crozetumc.org
February 8, 2013
Mr. Glenn Brooks, Director of Engineering
County of Albemarle
Community Development Department
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Re: Crozet United Methodist Church
1156 Crozet Ave.
Dear Mr. Brooks,
Crozet United Methodist Church (CUMC) is excited to be submitting our plans for erosion and
sediment control and stormwater management plan review. As you may know this project was
necessitated by public action of VDOT and the County related to roadway and entrance
improvements on both Jarman's Gap Road and Crozet Ave. The church property sits on the
northwest corner of this intersection and is impacted by both projects.
We are moving forward as directed by the County following a pre-application meeting in
September 2011. This direction is outlined in an e-mail by William D. Fritz and is attached for
reference. The site work described on the attached plans prepared by Anhold Associates,
Greenwood, VA outlines the work required on our site in order to respond to the two public
projects. CUMC is adhering to the scope of work referenced in the e-mail and is therefore not
submitting a site plan for review or approval.
CUMC desires to continue coordination and communication with the County on this project and
other related Owner directed work that may occur parallel to the site plan activity. We are
interested in meeting with you and other staff to review our plans and map out an appropriate
strategy for ensuring that proper process is followed. We recommend that this coordination
meeting occur at a regularly scheduled pre-application meeting and request that this be
scheduled within the next few weeks. Please feel free to contact our CUMC representative
and Project Manager, Mike Carmagnola at 434-422-0380 to arrange a meeting.
Sincerely,
-744 j-ivkAm)
J. Douglas Forrester, Pastor
Crozet United Methodist Church
Gmail - Crozet United Method: church Page 1 of 1
Sew' "r4mon,
lIIcs1 I I Mike Carmagnola< mjcarmagnola @gmail.com>
Crozet United Methodist Church
1 message
Bill Fritz< BFRITZ @albemarle.org> Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 5:03 PM
To: david anhold <danhold @hughes.net>, Mike Carmagnola <mjcarmagnola @gmail.com>
This is a follow up of our meeting today.
Your changes are to improve the existing parking and coordinate with the changes being made to your
entrances by VDOT and the County. Because the entrance changes are occurring because of public
action and are not the churches proposal I find no site plan is required. Also, you are not making changes
to the site that increase the need for parking. The only changes you may be making to the building would
be entrances or handicap access. These changes do not require a site plan. If the changes require a
building permit and the work is visible from the entrance corridor district you will need approval from the
Architectural Review Board. If the work requires a building permit and the work is not visible from the
entrance corridor district you will not need approval from the Architectural Review Board. Sign permits are
their own application and require review by the Architectural Review Board although in some cases this
review is administrative.
The changes to your parking will require an Erosion and Sediment Control Permit and approval of a
Stormwater Management Plan.
I hope that this information is helpful. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.
William D. Fritz, AICP
Chief of Current Development
434-296-5832 ext. 3242
.....,.��,. ,,,...../.,..._:1/../n/0.,:-12,;1.—..n.1M411Al JP4.7;A.:r-n1-J17n—hfr41-7 JPrnc=tniPRicvar 7/7/71 1�
. ��~ `�~�
7 ~\ i ~..,t,, :Ls..::‘,,‘_ ,..1
) i I t . 1 ' I 1 IIIIIP ' 1111PF
110160481/M.4.WI' TOTAL•5091Crb•fir
. ..i
ir,,, ,_,.. , , „.„... . . ..,
4,..„.
.,„„„, , p, .
- it , ._.. . , , : 1 „. c ri 1 41,
. 4tiro_17,,,_54,4,0_, ,,., it, _iimilimussim., ...„...... : , ,,,_ _ _7., 4 **-T:.....:..'..,,I411 i
4111111m_,, __.,4211 ter
gafftr
aia. . I "1" : 1
-14*li 4-• alit*
' '''14 - 1 I r' 44111*9M11111V411111115..........—•••^ -4;,.- -htwillW jillik
.~ ^ - ._
���
_
/�_~� - -----�.—/ ` \
____ - - � / �` `�~�� -~.��
FROEHLING ea ROBERTSON, INC. Boring Location Plan
f•-8,p. Engineering Stability Since 1881
szoz Rockfish Gap Turnpike Client:Anho|dAssociates
Project: Crozet United Me
thodist Church Parking Lot
Crozet,Virginia 22932'3330 F&R Project No. 71N-015IG
T 434.823.5154 I F 434.823.4764
sauce Nom, Nr.s
BORING LOG
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
Boring: B-1 (1 of 1)
1881,
Project No: 71N-0152 Elevation:690.5± Drilling Method: HSA
Client:Anhold Associates Total Depth: 10.0' Hammer Type:Automatic
Project:Crozet United Methodist Church Parking Lot Date Drilled: 11/15/11
City/State:Crozet,Virginia Boring Location:See Boring Location Plan Driller:C. Ellis
Description of Materials *Sample Sample
Depth N-Value
Elevation Depth Remarks
(Classification) Blows (feet) (blows/ft)
Surficial Gravel 10-8-5 0•
690.0 - 0.5 ; 13
;.; Dark Brown, Moist,Stiff,Gravelly Elastic SILT
•;+ (MH),Some Sand,Some Organics
• FILL
689.0 1.5 • Dark Brown, Moist,Very Stiff,Sandy Elastic Silt 6-8-9 1.5
_ (MH) 17
RESIDUUM
3.0 Subsurface water was not
687.0 - 3.5 - 3.5 encountered during
Brown and Reddish Brown, Moist to Very Moist, 5-7-9 drilling or upon auger
_ Very Stiff to Medium Stiff,Sandy SILT(ML) 16 removal
RESIDUUM
5.0
Cave-in occured at 5.5 ft
3-5-9 6.0
— 14
7.5
2-3-5 8.5
8
680.5 10.0 10.0
Boring Terminated at 10 FT
Z
Z
O
9
O
O
,
*Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30"to drive 2"O.D.,1.375" I.D.sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6"increments.
The sum of the second and third increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance,N-Value.
SINCE Sire
BORING LOG
FROEHLING at ROBERTSON, INC.
Boring: B-2 (1 of 1)
,eat•
Project No:71N-0152 Elevation:688± Drilling Method: HSA
Client:Anhold Associates Total Depth: 10.0' Hammer Type:Automatic
Project:Crozet United Methodist Church Parking Lot Date Drilled: 11/15/11
City/State:Crozet,Virginia Boring Location:See Boring Location Plan Driller:C. Ellis
Elevation Depth Description of Materials *Sample Depth N-Value Remarks
(Classification) Blows (feet (blows /ft)
'o Surficial Gravel 8-6-3 0
687.5 - 0.5 9
;.; Dark Brown, Moist,Stiff, Elastic SILT(MH),Some
•
V Organics
•;• FILL
686.5 - 1.5 • 1.5
V Dark Brown, Moist,Stiff,Sandy Elastic SILT 8-7-8
•.• (MH), 15
•;• FILL
•
•�� 3.0 Subsurface water was not
684.5 - 3.5 �• 3.5 encountered during
Gray and Brown, Moist, Medium Dense,Silty 3-7-8 drilling or upon auger
SAND(SM) 15 removal
ALLUVIUM
5.0
•
682.0 6.0 Light Brown,Very Moist, Medium Dense,Silty 3-5-7 6'0 Cave-in occured at 6 ft
- SAND(SM) 12
RESIDUUM
• 7.5
679.5 8.5 Light Brown, Dark Brown,and Black,Very Moist, 3-3-5 8.5
- Medium Stiff,Sandy SILT(ML) 8
RESIDUUM
678.0 10.0 Boring Terminated at 10 FT 10.0
V1
Z
Z
O
C7
9
Z
z
O
m
*Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30"to drive 2"O.D., 1.375" I.D.sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6"increments.
The sum of the second and third increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance, N-Value.
t � 'woo'f F'ROEHLING Sc ROBERTSON, INC.
BORING LOG
Boring: B-3 (1 of 1)
1881
Project No: 71N-0152 Elevation:686± Drilling Method: HSA
Client:Anhold Associates Total Depth: 10.0' Hammer Type:Automatic
Project:Crozet United Methodist Church Parking Lot Date Drilled: 11/15/11
City/State:Crozet,Virginia Boring Location:See Boring Location Plan Driller:C. Ellis
Description of Materials *Sample Sample
Elevation Depth (Classification) Blows Depth(feet) (blows%ft) Remarks
685.8 - 0.2 ,•1 \Surficial Organic Soil �. 2-4-6 0.
:: Dark Brown, Moist, Loose,Clayey SAND (SC), 10
Some Organics
FILL
684.5 - 1.5 •A Light Brown,Very Moist, Medium Stiff,Sandy 3-3-4 1.5
•:*• Lean CLAY(CL) 7
.•4 FILL
3.0 Subsurface water was
682.5 3.5 encountered during
Light Brown and Brown,Very Moist, Loose, 1-4-2 3'S drilling at 6.5 ft
Clayey SAND(SC) 6
• ALLUVIUM
•
5.0 Cave-in occured at 5 ft
680.0 6.0 Brown,Very Moist to Wet, Medium Stiff,Sandy woh-2-4 6.0
_ SILT(ML) 6
RESIDUUM
— 7.5
1-2-5 8.5
7
676.0 - 10.0 10.0
Boring Terminated at 10 FT
O
z
2
0
Z
O
0
9
0
z
O
*Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30"to drive 2"O.D.,1.375"I.D.sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6" increments.
The sum of the second and third increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance,N-Value.
SINCE 'Nee 'NNW"
V
• BORING LOG
f FROEHLING Sc ROBERTSON, INC.
Boring: B-4 (1 of 1)
1881"
Project No: 71N-0152 Elevation:680± Drilling Method: HSA
Client:Anhold Associates Total Depth: 10.0' Hammer Type:Automatic
Project: Crozet United Methodist Church Parking Lot Date Drilled: 11/15/11
City/State:Crozet,Virginia Boring Location:See Boring Location Plan Driller:C. Ellis
Elevation Depth Description of Materials *Sample Sample N-Value
p (Classification) Blows Depth (blows/ft) Remarks
(feet
679.8 - 0.2 = Surficial Organic Soil r 3-3-4 0
;. Dark Brown, Moist, Medium Stiff,Sandy Elastic 7
�.� SILT(MH),Some Organics
• FILL
678.5 - 1.5 ,'J 1.5
// Light Brown and Gray,Very Moist, Medium Stiff, 2-2-3
Sandy Lean CLAY(CL) 5
ALLUVIUM
3.0 Subsurface water was
676.5 - 3.5 `: 3.5 encountered during
Light Brown and Gray,Very Moist to Wet, 1-2-3 drilling at 9 ft
_ Medium Stiff to Soft,Sandy SILT(ML),Trace Clay 5
RESIDUUM
5.0 Cave-in occured at 5 ft
2-1-3 6.0
4
— 7.5
671.5 - 8.5 3611 8.5
Dark Brown and Black, Moist, Medium Dense,
Silty SAND (SM) 17
RESIDUUM
670.0 - 10.0 10.0
Boring Terminated at 10 FT
O
2
2
2
Z
9
9
l7
O
m
*Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30"to drive 2"O.D., 1.375" I.D.sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6"increments.
The sum of the second and third increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance,N-Value.