HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201600042 Application 2022-11-02Lp qJ
Application for
Initial Site Plan or Final Site Plan or Site Plan Exception
Project Name: 4 E=1514F I
Ica
^110 " Ir/L
Tax map and parcel(s): — Zoning: -D Y
Contact (who sho�u`ddd
Street Address Z
City
i
Phone Number
Owner of Recon
Street Address
City-__17h�``
Phone Number - -I
about this project)
- _n _
U t I ( t A-Y) S
za
R,
Street Address
(J./ A c
h r/
f . V-k
City �h
4 #esa—
I k- State
1O//w)
��
Zip Code
Phone Number
`f.3 5F -9-7
2-- /O /tP
Email '4K4 .1, $O V0 are
Residential
Type of unit(s):
# of building(s):
Sq. ft. of building(s):
# of units per building:
Total # of units:
Resulting density:
Acreage of site:
Acreage in open space:
Acreage in roads:
Average gallons of water used per day:
Non-residential
4! Commercial
❑ Industrial
❑ Quasi -Public
Sq. ft. of building(s): ? I m
Acreage of site: QM (� �^p3
Acreage in open space: 1- Lt7
Acreage in roads: Jp D
Average gallons of water used per day: j 0 fi il�
2ILNC
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SDP #
Fec Amount $ Date Paid By who? Receipt # Ck# By:
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296-5832 Fax: (434) 972-4126
REVISED 11/02/2015 Page 1 of 2
enueu use or InaWfeal,on mr recut [' ,
1Ii00C jjw" 1+'�n(/ �r� �i.1proe- (� pariL,, �`_�6l T)C lUorncn S
sk*r . �,-F,4s4 rz- f ecodcr/ . t�J7 ve�OoMt S
Comments/Attachments:
FEES
SITE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN
SITE PLAN EXCEPTION .
Initial Site Plan
Final Site Plan
Exception to drawing of site
tan under section 32.3.5 a
Approved
No
Preapplication plan
Preapplication plan
$1,613
El$1,613
❑ $752 plus $16/dwelling
❑ $1,290 plus $16/dwelling
unit and/or $0.016 per
unit and/or $0.016 per
square foot of
square foot of
`
nonresidential structure
nonresidential structure
t
$
$
16 folded copies of the plan
# of copies required for submittal will be noted with
8 folded copies of the plan
plus an additional 6 copies if within an Entrance Corridor
your initial approval letter. Copies of the plan should
be folded and in blue or black ink. Also provide I
reduced copy of the plan no larger than 11 by 17 in.
❑ The initial site plan has a parking structure.
❑ The final site plan has a parking
❑ Included are architectural elevations, drawings,
structure.
photographs or other visual materials showing any
❑ Included are revised architectural elevations,
parking structure proposed on the site and surrounding
drawings, photographs or other visual '
structures and land uses.
materials submitted with themitial site plan.
e
The elevations shall be part of the approved
rand site plan.
GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT
(Required for all non-residential site plans not serviced by public water)
❑ If the plans show a use using less than 2,000 gallons/day (average) Tier 3 Groundwater Review = $548
❑ If the plans show a use using greater than 2,000 gallons/day (average) Tier 4 Groundwater Review = $1,183
Special Exception = $457
Notices required by Section 32.4.2.1 (f)
Preparing and mailing or delivering up to fifty (50) notices = $215.00 plus the actual cost of first class postage.
Preparing and mailing or delivering, per notice more than fifty 50 = $1.08 plus the actual cost of first class postage.
Owner/Applicant Must Read and Sign
This site plan as submitted contains all of the information required by Section 32.5 (initial Site Plan) or Section 32.6 (Final Site Plan) of
Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle. I understand that plans which lack information requited by said sections shall be
deemed incomplete and shall be denied by the agent within ten (10) days of submittal as provided in Section 32.4.2.1 or Section 32.4.3.1
of Chapter 18 of the Code as the case may be. By signing this application I am consenting to written comments, letters and or notifications
regarding this application being provided to me or my designated contact via fax and or email. This consent does not preclude such
written communication from also being sent via first class mail.
I- I_ i._ S _
er, Contract Purchase , Agent Date 1
Daytime plTenoTnumber of Signatory
REVISED 11/02/2015 Page 2 of 2
.' iplication for
Major or Minor Site Plan Amendments
ame &Number:
el(s): ��
p
_`(yZoning:
should we contact about this project): id+ t %L (� e```7
�
� `,
v
— xx�.
City ` J> l /"�
r /� �' Zip Code_
State V
Phone Number
Email Q �41h L✓G (/ ��E.G • .� .
Owner of Record ��'
�c% ��i/o!N�• /� /r/ c���
c7�
�/
/:/'
Street Address
�//� o /t
City —w / J (,
7
State Zip Code
Phone Number y3�
Z— / / J
Email
e /"
Applicant
�., �!� Z"O n.'�
e
/
Street Address
e' O .c
City 4L el, �
State �' Zip Code
Phone Number
Email G—G✓./%Pp�.—_
t� �17.r
rr.r.a
Major Amendment
= $1613
Minor Amendment (alterations to parking, circulation, building
size, location) = $538
ro olaea copies o Plan are required I 8 olded co iea ofplan are required
Notices required by Section 32.4.2.1 (t)
Preparing and mailing or delivering up to fifty (50) notices = $215.00 plus the actual cost of first class postage.
Preparing and mailing or delivering, per notice more than fifty (50) = $1.08 plus the actual cost of first class postage.
GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT
(Requiredfor all non-residential site plans not serviced by public water)
Was a Groundwater Assessment conducted for the existing site plan?
❑ Vs
O
If NO and the new plans show a use using less than 2,000 gallons/day (average) ❑ Tier 3 Groundwater Review = $548
If NO and the new plans show a use using greater than 2,000 gallons/day (average) ❑ Tier 4 Groundwater Review = $1,183
If YES and the use goes from using less than to more than 2,000 gallons/day (average) Tier 4 minus Tier 3 = $635
If YES and the use does not change from using less than to more than 2,000 gallons/day (average)
o fee
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296-5832 Fax: (434) 972-4126
REVISED 11/1/2015 Page 1 of
Owner/Applicant Must Read and Sign
Wz Manor Amendment
This major amendment as submitted contains all of the information required by Section 32.5 (Initial Site Plan) and Section 32.6 (Final
Site Plan) of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. I understand that plans which lack information required by said sections shall be
deemed incomplete and shall be denied by the agent within ten (10) days of submittal as provided in Section 32.4.2.1 or Section 32.4.3.1
as the case may be.
❑ Minor Amendment
This minor amendment as submitted contains all of the information required by Section 32.5 (Initial Site Plan) and Section 32.6 (Final
Site Plan) of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance.
I hereby certify that the information provided on this application and accompanying information is accurate, true, and correct to the best
of my knowledge. By signing this application I am consenting to written comments, letters and or notifications regarding this application
being provided to me or my designated contact via fax and or email. This consent does not preclude such written communication from
also being serAvisSrst class mail;
Owner,
Date — Q/
/�4'��Z? Da a ph a tuber o Signatory
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SDP # 1 t ('
Fee Amount sD 1� Date Paid 16 By who? rt D LLCReeeipt # `� } �33 ck# ` 14 By, E40
REVISED I1/1/2015 Page 2 of
Initial Site Plan
Projec
Firm:
This checklist must be completed, signed and submitted with the application. The information contained in this checklist
reflects the contents of the Section 32 of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle also known as the Site Plan
Ordinance as of January 1, 2013. The applicant is responsible for insuring that no revisions to the Ordinance have
occurred since preparation of this document
Plans which lack the information required by this checklist shall be deemed to be incomplete and shall be denied by the
agent with ten (10) calendar days after the applicable submittal deadline [Section 32.4.21.
An Initial Site Plan shall contain the following:
W"r� [-3�2.5.1 a] Number of copies.
�d
��Sixteen (16) clearly legible copies in blue or black ink of the plan shall be submitted.
0 3 .2 1b] Scale and size.
�3 The plan shall be prepared to the scale of one (1) inch equals twenty (20) feet or to another scale approved by the
gent in a particular case. No sheet shall exceed forty-two (42) inches by thirty-six (36) inches in size.
M / The plan may be prepared on one (1) or more sheets. If prepared on more than one (1) sheet, match lines shall
early indicate where the several sheets join.
The top of the sheet shall be approximately either north or east.
&'[[32 .1c] Dimensions.
MTh plan shall be dimensioned to at least the following standards for accuracy:
U; /Boundary, setback and zoning lines: One foot in one thousand (1:1,000) feet.
xisting contours: One-half (1/2) of the contour interval required in section 32.5.2(d).
;W Proposed contours: Within five (5) feet horizontally and vertically.
p/,�-sting structures, utilities and other topographic features: Within five (5) feet.
LY Proposed structures, roads, parking lots and other improvements: Within five (5) feet.
�.5'.�j� General information.
�e name of the development;
yamof the owner,
developer and individual who prepared the plan;
1x map and parcel number;
/�btoundary dimensions;
oning district;
descriptions of all proffers, special use perrnits and conditions thereof, special exceptions and conditions
thereof, variances and conditions thereof, application plans, codes of development and bonus factors applicable
Yto the site;
agisterial district;
ncounty and state;
orth point;
LT tale; one datum reference for elevation (where section 30.3, flood hazard overlay district, is involved, United
ates Geological Survey vertical datum shall be shown and/or correlated to plan topography);
e source of the topography;
departing lot lines;
�ninirnum setback lines, yard and building separation requirements;
2V4.he source of the survey;
0 heet number and total number of sheets; and
the names of the owners, zoning district, tax map and parcel numbers and present uses of abutting parcels.
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296-5832 Fax: (434) 972-4126
REVISED 06/10/2015 Page 1 of 4
County of Albemarle - Initial Site Plan Checklist
i[32.5.2 b] Information regarding the proposed use.
L( W}itten schedules or data as necessary to demonstrate that the site can accommodate
Q t#ie proposed uses,
Including proposed uses and maximum acreage occupied by each use;
Q-/ maximum number of dwelling units by type including the number of bedrooms for multifamily dwellings;
❑/ gross residential density;
square footage of recreational areas;
4L the percentage and acreage of open space;
3' maximum square footage for commercial and industrial uses;
El/maximum floor area ratio and lot coverage for industrial use;
❑/maximum height of all structures;
6" schedule of parking including the maximum amount required and the amount provided;
C9!the maximum amount of impervious cover on the site; and
C( if a landscape plan is required, the maximum amount of paved parking and other vehicular circulation
areas.
4fp [32.5.2 cJ Phase lines.
II '' ❑ If phasing is planned, phase lines and the proposed timing of development.
3 [32 5.2 d] Topography and proposed grading.
Existing topography (up to twenty [20] percent slope, maximum five [5] foot contours, over twenty [20] percent
slope, maximum ten [10] foot contours) for the entire site with sufficient offsite topography to describe prominent
and pertinent offsite features and physical characteristics, but in no case less than fifty (50) feet outside of the site
—/ unless otherwise approved by the agent;
Ub proposed grading (maximum five [5] foot contours) supplemented where necessary by spot elevations;
Q/ areas of the site where existing slopes are critical slopes.
!� [3215.2 e] Landscape features.
LAY The existing landscape features as described in section 32.7.9.4(c).
1' [3 .5.2 f] Watercourses and other bodies of water.
! The name and location of all watercourses and other bodies of water adjacent to or on the site;
UJ indicate whether the site is located within the watershed of a public water supply reservoir.
[32.5.2 W Onsite sewage system setback lines.
❑ The location of onsite sewage system setback lines from watercourses including intermittent streams and other
bodies of water.
[:5.2 h] Floodplain and related information.
The boundaries of the flood hazard overlay district, the base flood elevation on the site, the elevation of the lowest
floor, including any basement, and for any structures to be flood -proofed as required by section 30.3, the elevation
to which the structures will be flood -proofed.
VJ .5.2 i] Streets, easements and travelways.
[30 The existing and proposed streets, including
t proposed bike lanes,
p //access easements,
c7/ alley easements and rights -of -way, and travelways,
W.together with street names,
3/ state route numbers,
C3 --right-of--way lines and widths,
W centerline radii and pavement widths.
REVISED 06/10/2015 Page 2 of 4
County of Albemarle - Initial Site Plan Checklist
lSY [32 T.2 jJ Existing sewer and drainage facilities.
CI T—hf'Iocation and size of
GI xisting water and sewer facilities and easements,
LJ the storm drainage system,
Y�rainage channels, and
❑//drainage easements.
G2'[32.5.2 kJ Proposed sewer and drainage facilities.
l9� The proposed conceptual layout for
l�water and sewer facilities and
❑/the storm drainage system, indicating the direction of flow in all pipes and watercourses with arrows.
Q [32 5.2 lJ Existing and proposed utilities.
17T location of other existing and proposed utilities and utility easements,
including existing telephone,
Eiable,
Vlectric and
as easements.
Q,`�[32.5.2 mj Ingress and egress.
Y The location of existing and proposed ingress to and egress from the property,
lYShcw the distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection from the proposed ingress and egress.
O"�[32..2 nj Existing and proposed improvements.
6Y The location and dimensions of all existing and proposed improvements including
CY buildings (maximum footprint and height) and other structures;
U'�walkways;
ences;
1alls;
)}Mv rash containers;
Ll//outdoor lighting;
Ylandscaped areas and open space;
recreational areas and facilities;
parking lots and other paved areas;
L� loading and service areas;
signs; and
the proposed paving material types for all walks, parking lots and driveways.
[32.5.2 of Areas to be dedicated or reserved.
❑ All areas intended to be dedicated or reserved for public use under sections 32.7.1.1, 32.7.1.2 and 32.7.1.3, and
❑ shall include a note on the plan stating that the land is to be dedicated or reserved for public use.
a %[3� 5.2 pj Landscape plan.
j A landscape plan that complies with section 32.7.9, if it is required to be submitted with the initial site plan.
❑ [32.5.2 g] Traffic generation figures.
❑ If deemed appropriate by the agent due to the intensity of the development, estimated traffic generation figures for
the site based on current Virginia Department of Transportation rates;
❑ indicate the estimated number of vehicles per day and the direction of travel for all connections from the site to a
public street.
9 [3 ..5.2 rJ Symbols and abbreviations.
A legend showing all symbols and abbreviations used on the plan.
REVISED 06/10/2015 Page 3 of 4
County of Albemarle - Initial Site Plan Checklist
Ul '[32.,5r2 s] Additional infom )n.
The agent may require a. -,tional information to be shown on the init.- site plan as deemed necessary to provide
sufficient information for the agent and the site review committee to adequately review the plan_
Grading Permit Requirements -Ifyou will be looking to obtain a grading permit and the initial plan is approved and you
have satisfied the conditions of approval identified by the agent in the letter required by section 32.4.2.5(c) then a separate
Water Protection Ordinance Application for an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan must be submitted for review and
approval
In addition to the items required by the ordinance, Albemarle County Engineer, Groundwater Program Authority,
the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Albemarle County Service Authority, and the Thomas Jefferson
Health District require these items on plans submitted for initial approval. Plans will not be rejected if these items are
not present, but they are required for approval. These items are prodded in an effort to communicate all initial
comments.
3- I. Reference the benchmarks used for surveys. (Albemarle County Engineering Policy)
,��'r�" 2�. Indicate the available sight distance for entrances and left turn lanes. (Albemarle County Engineering Policy)
W 3. Label the maximum height of all retaining walls. (Albemarle County Engineering Policy)
❑ 4. Provide copies of off -site easements, or letters of intent to grant them from off -site property owners. (Albemarle
County Engineering Policy)
❑ 5. Show and label stream buffer limits. (WRPA Ordinance)
❑ 6. Indicate the deed book and page reference for all existing utility easements located on the property. (Albemarle
County Service Authority)
❑ 7. Tier 3 - Draft Groundwater Management Plan (17-403)
El 8. Tier 4 - Aquifer testing work plan (17-403)
Read and Sign
In representing the above referenced firm submitting this plan for initial approval, I hereby sate that, to the best of my knowledge, the
attached contains all info anon required by this checklist.
Si tore ooffJOO/wn r, Contract Purchaser Age t Date l 3
6-1
Print Name Daytii a -phone number of Signatory
REVISED 06/10/2015 Page 4 of 4
Final Si..:, Development Plan
Checklist
Profec
Firm:
This checklist must be completed, signed and submitted with the application. The information contained in this
checklist reflects the contents of the Section 32 of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle also known as
the Site Plan Ordinance as of January 1, 2013. The applicant is responsible for insuring that no revisions to the
Ordinance have occurred since preparation of this document. /J
This flUd site plan has: �;'� if I� �,✓1�,cA
Id an initial /site plan that was approved for the development and it remains valid; SDP - 20 _
satisfied all of the requirements of section 32.6 below; and
(y satisfied all of the conditions delineated in the letter provided under section 32.4.2.5(c) required to be satisfied prior to
/ submitting the final site plan.
laJ Authorixedpreparer.
q The plan, and any amendments to a plan, is prepared and sealed, signed and dated by one of the following
❑, / An architect licensed to practice in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
LY' A professional engineer licensed to practice in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
❑ A land surveyor licensed to practice in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
J/ ❑ A certified landscape architect licensed to practice in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
fJ Numbe f copies when first submitted.
vide the number of copies as directed in the Initial Site Plan approval letter J
/ One (1) reduced copy of the plan no larger than eleven (11) by seventeen (17) inc es in size.
U Scale a size.
UThe plan is prepared to the scale of one (1) inch equals twenty (20) feet or larger, or to another scale approved by
the agent in a particular case.
❑ Other scale approved - one (1) inch equals feet, by
I�����U//// No sheet exceeds forty-two (42) inches by thirty-six (36) inches in size.
he plan IS prepared on one (1) sheet. OR
'he
plan IS prepared on more than one (1) sheet and match lines clearly indicate where the several sheets join.
IY9 The top of each sheet is approximately
❑ North or
❑ East
Dimensions.
The plan is dimensioned to at least the following standards for accuracy:
3' Boundary, setback and zoning lines: Within one one -hundredth (0.01) of a foot.
LY Existing contours: Within one-half (1/2) of the contour interval required in section 32.6.2(c).
l�Proposed contours: Within one (1) foot horizontally and vertically.
W�Spot elevations: Within one -tenth (0.10) of a foot.
❑✓Existing critical structures including utilities and other topographic features: Within two (2) feet,
provided that for critical structures, which include, but are not limited to, gas lines, other utilities, pipes,
— /conduits, walls and buildings to be preserved, within one -tenth (0.10) of a foot.
ICY Proposed structures, roads, parking lots and other improvements: Within one one -hundredth (0.01) of a
foot.
REVISED 06/10/2015 Page 1 of 4
.lbemarle County - Final Site Plan Checklist
Site Plan Ordinance Section 31.6 - Contents of final site plan
In addition to containing all of the information required to be on an initial site plan, as provided in section 32.5, a final
site plan shall contain thefollowing.-
® Demonstrate compliance with chapter. Specific written schedules or notes as necessary to demonstrate that the
— requirements of this chapter are satisfied.
[a P/ropoos�grading.
L�' Proposed grading (up to twenty [201 percent slope, maximum two [2] foot contours; over twenty [20]
percent slope, maximum five [51 foot contours).
td Wate d sewer facilities.
�p�etailed plans for proposed water and sewer facilities, including all pipe sizes, types and grades;
WV,proposed connections to existing or proposed central water supplies and central sewage systems;
GW location and dimensions of proposed easements and whether they are to be publicly or privately
/maintained;
l/,profiles and cross sections of all water and sewer lines including clearance where lines cross;
UY all water main locations and sizes; valves and fire hydrant locations;
C(/all sewer appurtenances by type and number;
U the station on the plan to conform to the station shown on the profile and indicate the top and invert
— J elevation of each structure.
l3" Drain a and grading plans.
Detailed conston drainage and grading plans:
C3 Profiles of all ditches and channels whether proposed or existing, showing existing and
proposed grades, and invert of ditches, cross pipes or utilities; typical channel cross
7s [ions for new construction; and actual cross sections for existing channels intended
o remain;
yrofiles of all storm sewer systems showing existing and proposed grades;
W, Plan view of all drainage systems with all structures, pipes and channels numbered or
le ered on the plan and profile views. Show sufficient dimensions and bench marks to
,Allow field stake out of all proposed work from the boundary lines;
A drainage summary table for culverts, storm sewer and channels as described in the
following example:
I Structure
Description
Length
Invert
Invert
Slope
Remarks
Number
In
Out
1
42" RCP
50'
24.50
424.00
100.00°/u
Provide
Class III
2, EW
2
DI- 3B
Lr8
26.00
432.00
-
IS-1
To
3
PG-2A
400'
420.00
400.00
5.00%
D=12"
4
Grade
200'
420.00
415.00
2.50%
D=18"
Swale
legend showing all symbols and abbreviations used on the plan;
��{ General notes, typical sections, and details of all items not covered by Virginia
� J>�eepartment of Transportation standard drawings; and
/Flood plain limits for the one hundred (100) year storm for all watercourses with an
upstream drainage area of fifty (50) acres or more provided that the county engineer
may waive this requirement for drainage areas of less than one hundred (100) acres
upon determining that the information is unnecessary for review of the proposed
development.
REVISED 06/10/2015 Page 2 of 4
Alb le County - Final Site Plan Checklist
Street sections.
❑ Typical street sections together with specific street sections where street cut or fill is five (5) feet or
greater;
❑ centerline curve data;
❑ radius of curb returns or edge of pavement;
❑ location, type and size of proposed ingress to and egress from the site together with culvert size;
❑ symmetrical transition of pavement at intersection with existing street;
❑ the edge of street surface or face of curb for full length of proposed street;
❑ when proposed streets intersect with or adjoin existing streets or travelways, both edges of existing
pavement or travelway together with curb and gutter indicated for a minimum of one hundred (100)
feet or the length of connection, whichever is the greater distance.
(Public cilities and utilities.
All public facilities, utility and drainage easements outside the right-of-way of public streets, provided
hat new easements may be generally shown and accurately dedicated by separate plat.
❑ All water and sewer facilities to be dedicated to public use and the easements for those facilities and
shall be identified by a statement that the facilities are to be dedicated to the Albemarle County Service
Authority.
W"Signatup panel.
❑- Signature panel for signature by each member of the site review committee.
t" Parking and loading areas.
CL-P& all parJcing and loading areas, indicate the
7 size,
angle of stalls,
CJ/ width of aisles and specific number of spaces required and provided, and
Cc3/ method of computation. Indicate type of surfacing for all paved or gravel areas.
0v Landscappe plan.
lYA landscape plan that complies with section 32.7.9
L"utdo9r lighting.
W Outdoor ligbring information including
L a photometric plan with
location, description, and photograph or diagram of each type of outdoor luminaire.
iW*Ll Recreational facilities.
❑ Specifications for recreational facilities.
In addition to the items required by the ordinance, Albemarle County Engineer, the Virginia
Department of Transportation, the Albemarle County Service Authority, and the Thomas Jefferson
Health District require these items on plans submitted for final site plan approval. Plans will not be
rejected if these items are not present, but they are required for approval. These items are provided in
an effort to communicate all final site plan comments.
d11. Reference the benchmarks used for surveys. (Albemarle County Engineering Policy)
Ce 2. Indicate the available sight distance for entrances and left turn lanes. (Albemarle County Engineering Policy)
td/3Label the maximum height of all retaining walls. (Albemarle County Engineering Policy)
ll✓3.. 4. Provide copies of off -site easements, or letters of intent to grant them from off -site property owners.
(Albemarle County Engineering Policy)
REVISED 06/10/2015 Page 3 of 4
Ibemarle County - Final Site Plan Checklist
Aar -5. Show and label stream buffer limits. (Water Protection Ordinance, WPO)
Uk 6. Indicate the deed book and page reference for all existing utility easements located on the property.
(Albemarle County Service Authority)
/7. Tier 3 - Draft or Final Groundwater Management Plan (WPO Section 17-403)
71 S. Tier 4 — Aquifer testing work plan (WPO Section 17403)
Read and Sign
In representingg,the above referenced firm submitting this plan for final approval, I hereby sate that, to the best of my knowledge, the attached plan
contains a1Knf6unation required by this checklist.
7
;h gent Date _
Dayti , phone number of Signatory
REVISED 06/10/2015 Page 4 of
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 229024596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax
August 17, 2016
Alan Franklin
418 East Main St
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: SDP2016-42 Region 10 —Major Site Plan Amendment
Dear Mr. Franklin:
The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Initial comments
for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as
applicable, are attached:
Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner)
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer)
Albemarle County Information Services (E911)
Albemarle County Building Inspections
Albemarle County Planning Services (Architectural Review Board)
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue
Albemarle County Service Authority (to be forwarded upon receipt)
Virginia Department of Transportation
Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should
not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that
will be required to be resolved prior to site plan approval. The applicant has 6 months in which to
resubmit the site plan amendment to address reviewers' comments.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Y u��-r^-C WA;�D
Rachel Falkenstein
Senior Planner
Planning Services
0
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Phone 434-296-5832 Fax 434-972-4126
Memorandum
To: Alan Franklin (afranklin@waterstreetstudio.net)
From: Rachel Falkenstein, Senior Planner
Division: Planning
Date: August 17, 2016
Subject: SDP 201600042 Region Ten — Major Site Plan Amendment
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the
following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been
identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further
review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning
Ordinances unless otherwise specified.]
1. [32.3.4] Pay outstanding balance for the cost of mailing/delivery of notices ($215.00).
2. [32.5.1(a)] Include scale and north arrow on all sheets.
3. [32.5.1(a)] Minimum setback line along Old Lynchburg Road is labeled as 30'; front minimum setback is
10'. Please revise label.
4. [32.5.1(b)] Include a note on the cover stating the proposed use.
5. [32.5.1(b)] A note on the cover sheet states "see letter" for parking requirements. Staff did not receive
a letter with this plan. Please clarify or provide letter. Approved parking numbers will need to be
stated on plan once approved by zoning staff.
6. [32.5.1(d)] Add setback lines on grading and utility sheet.
7. [32.5.1(d)] Managed slopes are labeled but not shown. Provide graphic delineation of slopes (shading
or other symbol).
8. [32.5.1(1)] Provide a sidewalk along Old Lynchburg Road along the extent of the project. Staff is
exploring the ability to provide a connection via crosswalk to the multi -use path on the western side of
Old Lynchburg Road.
9. [32.5.1(i)] Provide a sidewalk or a pedestrian connection to the project from the sidewalk on Old
Lynchburg Place and a pedestrian connection to sidewalk along Old Lynchburg Road.
10. [32.5.1(n)] Label the maximum retaining wall height on plans. The wall is currently labeled as 2 feet in
height, but portions appear to be taller than this.
11. [32.5.2(k)] Verify that all necessary easements for proposed water, sewer and drainage facilities have
been shown on the plan. Any new easements being proposed should be shown and dedicated with a
separate easement plat.
12. [32.7.9] The County's landscaping and screening requirements do not require perimeter parking trees.
Parking areas are required to be screened in accordance with section 32.7.9.6.
13. [32.7.9] There appears to be a discrepancy between the plant quantities listed in the plant list and the
plants drawn on the plans for the following plants: CA and PL. Please correct as necessary.
14. [32.7.9.6] An area of at least 5% of the paved parking and vehicular circulation must be landscaped.
Please provide calculations to show this requirement is met.
15. [32.7.2.1] Show site distance at proposed entrance.
16. [32.6.2(d)] Show profiles of water and sewer line laterals and clearance where lines cross.
17. [32.6.2(k)] Show locations of light fixtures on layout sheet.
Special Exception requests:
1. Provide a complete list of proposed disturbances to the 20' buffer and include total area of
disturbance. Depict disturbances graphically on the site plan by showing buffer setback line on grading
and utility sheet.
2. Provide additional screening between Old Lynchburg Place and the proposed biofilter consistent with
Section 32.7.9.7 in the form of shrubs or a planting strip as space permits.
3. Board approval is required for special exceptions.
Please contact Rachel Falkenstein in the Planning Division by using rfalkenstein@albemarle.ora or 434-296-
5832 ext. 3272 for further information.
Keview uommencs
SDP201600042
•oject Name: egion Ten Women's Shelter - Major
ate Completed: vlonday. August 08. 2016 1 Major -Amendment
eviewer: Matthew Wentland
epartmenil0ivisionlAgency: 1 Engineering
aviews Comments:
ased on plans dated 715116:
An approved VSMP plan will be required before amendment approval,
Review status: Requested Changes R
age: i County of Albemarle Printed On: 08117/2016
Rachel Falkenstein
From:
Margaret Maliszewski
Sent:
Monday, August 15, 2016 5:39 PM
To:
Rachel Falkenstein
Cc:
Ron Higgins
Subject:
Region 10 ARB action
Rachel, here is the action from today's ARB meeting on the Region 10 proposal. A formal action memo and action letter
will follow.
ARB-2016-82: Region Ten Women's Treatment Center — Final Site Plan - (TM/Parcel 076000000046F0)
Proposal: To construct a women's treatment facility with associated site improvements.
Location: South of 164, east of Old Lynchburg Road (Rte. 780)
Motion: Mr. Lebo moved for approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for ARB-2016-82: Region Ten Women's
Treatment Center — Final Site Plan with the conditions listed in the staff report, modified as follows:
I. The following note should be added to the site plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance
Corridor shall be eliminated."
2. The following note should be included on the lighting plan: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that
emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light
away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads."
3. The following note should be added to the landscape plan: "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed
to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned
minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant."
4. Assurances will need to be provided that trees along Old Lynchburg Road will not conflict with utility lines or
easements or trees will be relocated and/or alternate species selected, as appropriate.
Mr. Binsted seconded the motion.
The motion carried by a vote of 4:0.
Margaret Maliszewski, Principal Planner
Albemarle County Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832 x3276
mmaliszewski@albemarle.org
Keyiew comments
SDP201600042
,ojectName: egion Ten Women's Shelter -Ma}or
ate Completed: Saturday. July 23 2016 MajorAmendment
aviewer: Robbie Gilmer
epartmentOlvisionlAgency: Fire Rescue
eviews Comments:
ased on plans dated 7/5/16.
Fire Flow test required before final approval.
Show FDC location on the address side of the building_
Add a note "Knox box required, please contact Albemarle County Fire Marshal office for location."
Review Status: Requested Changes I - I
'age: €1
County of Albemarle
Printed On: r0811712016
8
Charles A. Kilpatrick,.P.E.
Commissioner
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Omnge Read
Culpeper, Virginia 22701
August 02, 2016
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Attn: Rachael Falkenstein
Re: Region Ten Women's Shelter— Site Plan
SDP-2016-00042
Review #1
Dear Ms. Falkenstein:
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Waterstreet Studio, dated 05
July 2016, and offers the following comment:
L The proposed entrance is off of an existing private road and with no proposed work
within the state's right-of-way, a permit will not be needed -
If further information is needed, please contact Caroline Awua-Mensah at 434-422-9381
Sincerely,
Adam J. Moore, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRIANIA MOVING
Rachel Falkenstein
From: Alexander Morrison <amorrison@serviceauthority.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 8:37 AM
To: Rachel Falkenstein
Subject: SDP201600042: Region Ten Woman's Shelter - Major Site Plan Amendment
Rachel,
I have reviewed the above referenced application and have the following comments:
• Call -out the lateral connection to the sewer as a saddle connection.
• Call -out a 2" meter vault and large service tap per ACSA detail TD-12 ( or provide fixture counts to determine if a
1" meter will suffice).
• Call -out the meter "to be sized by the ACSA."
• Relocate the proposed tree that is in conflict with the existing fire hydrant. Ensure at least 10' of separation.
• Add the 2" meter vault detail.
• Add TD-12.
• Add the sewer lateral detail.
• Add a profile of the existing sewer where parking lot construction is proposed.
• Confirm if each unit will have a kitchen or if there will be a centralized kitchen within the facility.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Alexander J. Morrison, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Albemarle County Service Authority
168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22911
(0) 434-977-4511 Ext. 116
(C) 434-981-5577
(F)434-979-0698
Soils Report
for
REGION TEN WOMEN'S SHELTER
Tax Map ID: 76-46F
Item Number: SDP201600042
Prepared: August 15, 2016
LOUISA
Thomas Jefferson Soil & Water Conservation District
"To exercise leadership in promoting natural resource protection."
706 Forest Street, Suite G
Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
Phone: (434) 975-0224
�°
G4' o``O �
� 1�a; 04
��j�ti
4
M. a If
3 9zrN
Soil Map —Albemarle County, Virginia
(Region Ten Women's Shelter)
i 3
ro -
- Map Smk: 1:1,930 fiprrmtedm A porbdit (8.5" x 11") strct. -
Meten;
N0 25 50 100 150
— Feet
0 50 100 200 300
k Mapprojtttlon: Web Mercator Comermordinates:WGS84 Edge bm: URN Zone 17N WGS84
38° 03PN
3 021-N
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
8/1512016
Page 1 of 3
0
Z
W
0
W
J
a
Q
0
o
m
r �
O
p�
D-
> (E
O U
a
W
o
N O C
W
E
da
tq m
aW�°
W a W E
@
m
c E
s
CD
W
M O
=w Z L y
Z
P� N
E N
� a
0V
m
E
V
ow
awnm
o
0 0< i
W
O
U
yj >
w
mmo15v
53
d�
m
t
Es w�
o
m°°°'
w a
> =o .- W
o 3
—
o
W
mL3
o mcDD
W d
E E
m
3
yo"tE
J
CO
N
O
Z7E
w
W
`o .arc
av
da
rn`
ids
1
E
ow
�
�
w
D yU
DD.�'E
N W
U a
w U b
a w
fn w
I E
w3U
2 nvQ 8F$
mm
m o
a N
F 8 .E`o
N y y
O q 1
N
UJ w b O'
N G O O E p •�. O p a
N y D coE
w
3 � m
b
0
y w D
a o y n 3 a
2 N
w b N j jp n 2
4 N y E yy
m p o 0 o
� Q N N N Cl M U U (7 f7
u n
Q W
Z
�u
Soil Map —Albemarle County, Virginia Region Ten Women's Shelter
Map Unit Legend
Albemarle County, Virginia (VA003)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
�27B
Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent
5.7
51.0% i
L
slopes
I11127D
Elioak loam, 15 to 25 percent j
1.5
13.5°%
slopes
34B I
Glenelg loam, 2 to 7 percent
2.6
23.2%
slopes
134C I
Glenelg loam, 7 to 15 percent
1.0
6.9% 1
slopes
I
39D 1
Hazel loam, 15 to 25 percent
0.41
3.3%
slopes
j
Totals for Area of Interest
100.0%'
�
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey SN5l2016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) --Albemarle County, Virginia
Region Ten Women's Shelter
Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated)
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions in this
report, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and
properties of a unit
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
The Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) report displays a generated
description of the major soils that occur in a map unit. Descriptions of non -soil
(miscellaneous areas) and minor map unit components are not included. This
description is generated from the underlying soil attribute data.
Additional information about the map units described in this report is available in
other Soil Data Mart reports, which give properties of the soils and the limitations,
capabilities, and potentials for many uses. Also, the narratives that accompany the
Soil Data Mart reports define some of the properties included in the map unit
descriptions.
Report —Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated)
Albemarle County, Virginia
Map Unit: 27B—Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes
Component: Elioak (80%)
The Elioak component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 7
percent. This component is on hillslopes, piedmonts. The parent material consists
of residuum weathered from mica schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater
than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the
most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is
moderate. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded.
There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter
content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability
classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.
Map Unit: 27D—Elioak loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
USpA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/15/2016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3
Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) ---Albemarle County, Virginia
Region Ten Women's Shelter
Component: Elioak (80%)
The Elioak component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 15 to 25
percent. This component is on hillslopes, piedmonts. The parent material consists
of residuum weathered from mica schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater
than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the
most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is
moderate. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded.
There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter
content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent Nonirrigated land capability
classification is 4e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.
Map Unit: 3413—Glenelg loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes
Component: Glenelg (90%)
The Glenelg component makes up 90 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 7
percent. This component is on hillslopes, piedmonts. The parent material consists
of residuum weathered from mica schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater
than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the
most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is
high. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There
is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content
in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification
is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.
Map Unit: 34C—Glenelg loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes
Component: Glenelg (85%)
The Glenelg component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 7 to 15
percent. This component is on hillslopes. piedmonts. The parent material consists
of residuum weathered from mica schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater
than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the
most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is
high. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There
is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content
in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonimigated land capability classification
is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.
Map Unit: 39D—Hazel loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
Component: Hazel (80%)
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8115Y10 56
'� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3
Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) ---Albemarle County, Virginia
Region Ten Women's Shelter
The Hazel component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 15 to 25
percent. This component is on piedmonts, hillslopes. The parent material consists
of residuum weathered from graywacke sandstone and mica schist. Depth to a root
restrictive layer, bedrock, lithic, is 20 to 40 inches. The natural drainage class is
excessively drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is high. Available
water to a depth of 60 inches is low. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not
flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72
inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent.
Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4e. This soil does not meet hydric
criteria.
Data Source Information
Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia
Survey Area Data: Version 10, Dec 11, 2013
uSDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/15/2016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings--Albemade County, Virginia
Region Ten Women's Shelter
Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings
Soil properties influence the development of building sites, including the selection
of the site, the design of the structure, construction, performance after construction,
and maintenance. This table shows the degree and kind of soil limitations that affect
dwellings and small commercial buildings.
The ratings in the table are both verbal and numerical. Rating class terms indicate
the extent to which the soils are limited by all of the soil features that affect building
site development. Not limited indicates that the soil has features that are very
favorable for the specified use. Good performance and very low maintenance can
be expected. Somewhat limited indicates that the soil has features that are
moderately favorable for the specified use. The limitations can be overcome or
minimized by special planning, design, or installation. Fair performance and
moderate maintenance can be expected. Very limited indicates that the soil has
one or more features that are unfavorable for the specified use. The limitations
generally cannot be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design, or
expensive installation procedures. Poor performance and high maintenance can
be expected.
Numerical ratings in the table indicate the severity of individual limitations. The
ratings are shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0.01 to 1.00. They indicate
gradations between the point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative
impact on the use (1.00) and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation
(0.00).
Dwellings are single-family houses of three stories or less. For dwellings without
basements, the foundation is assumed to consist of spread footings of reinforced
concrete built on undisturbed soil at a depth of 2 feet or at the depth of maximum
frost penetration, whichever is deeper. For dwellings with basements, the
foundation is assumed to consist of spread footings of reinforced concrete built on
undisturbed soil at a depth of about 7 feet. The ratings for dwellings are based on
the soil properties that affect the capacity of the soil to support a load without
movement and on the properties that affect excavation and construction costs. The
properties that affect the load -supporting capacity include depth to a water table,
ponding, flooding, subsidence, linear extensibility (shrink -swell potential), and
compressibility. Compressibility is inferred from the Unified classification. The
properties that affect the ease and amount of excavation include depth to a water
table, ponding, flooding, slope, depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, hardness of
bedrock or a cemented pan, and the amount and size of rock fragments.
Small commercial buildings are structures that are less than three stories high and
do not have basements. The foundation is assumed to consist of spread footings
of reinforced concrete built on undisturbed soil at a depth of 2 feet or at the depth
of maximum frost penetration, whichever is deeper. The ratings are based on the
soil properties that affectthe capacity of the soil to support a load without movement
and on the properties that affect excavation and construction costs. The properties
that affect the load -supporting capacity include depth to a water table, ponding,
flooding, subsidence, linear extensibility (shrink -swell potential), and
compressibility (which is inferred from the Unified classification). The properties that
affect the ease and amount of excavation include flooding, depth to a water table,
ponding, slope, depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, hardness of bedrock or a
cemented pan, and the amount and size of rock fragments.
U Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/1512016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3
Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings ---Albemarle County, Virginia
Region Ten Women's Shelter
Information in this table is intended for land use planning, for evaluating land use
alternatives, and for planning site investigations prior to design and construction.
The information, however, has limitations. For example, estimates and other data
generally apply only to that part of the soil between the surface and a depth of 5 to
7 feet. Because of the map scale, small areas of different soils may be included
within the mapped areas of a specific soil.
The information is not site specific and does not eliminate the need for onsite
investigation of the soils orfor testing and analysis by personnel experienced in the
design and construction of engineering works.
Government ordinances and regulations that restrict certain land uses or impose
specific design criteria were notconsidered in preparing the information in this table.
Local ordinances and regulations should be considered in planning, in site
selection, and in design.
Report —Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings
[Onsite investigation may be needed to validate the interpretations in this table and
to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site. The numbers in the value columns
range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value, the greater the potential limitation.
The table shows only the top five limitations for any given soil. The soil may have
additional limitations]
Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings —Albemarle County, Virginia
Map symbol and soil
Pet. of
Dwellings without basements
Dwellings with basements
Small commercial buildings
name
map
unit
Rating class and
Value
Rating class and
Value
Rating class and
Value
limiting features
' limiting features
limiting features
27B—Elioak loam2 to
,
'
,
7 percent slopes
Elioak
80
Not limited
Not limited
Somewhat limited
Slope
0.13
27D—Elioak loam, 15
!0 25 percent slopes
I Elioak
80
Very limited
j
I Very limited
Very limited
Slope
1.00
I Slope
1.00
Slope
1.00
�I 34B—Glenelg loam, 2
to 7 percent slopes
'
Glenelg
90
Not limited
Not limited
Somewhat limited —�
Slope
0.13
34C—Glenelg loam. 7
to 15 percent slopes
Glenelg
Ir 85
Somewhat limited
—0.37
Somewhat limited
Very limited
Slope
Slope 0.37
Slope
100
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/15/2016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3
Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings --Albemarle County, Virginia
Region Ten Women's Shelter
Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings —Albemarle County, Virginia
Map symbol and soil
name
Pct of
map
unit
Dwellings without basements
Dwellings with basements
Small commercial buildings
Rating class and
limiting features
Value
Rating class and
limiting features
Value
Rating class and
limiting features
Value
39D—Hazel loam, 15
to25 percent slopes
Hazel 80
Very limited
Very limited
Very limited
Slope _ _ 1.00
Depth to hard bedrock 0.46
Slope
1.00
Slope
1.00
Depth to hard bedrock. 0.46
Depth to hard bedrock 1.00
Data Source Information
Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia
Survey Area Data: Version 10, Dec 11, 2013
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/15/2016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
Roads and Streets, Shallow Excavations, and Lawns and Landscaping —Albemarle County,
Virginia
Region Ten Women's Shelter
Roads and Streets, Shallow Excavations, and Lawns and
Landscaping
Soil properties influence the development of building sites, including the selection
of the site, the design of the structure, construction, performance after construction,
and maintenance. This table showsthe degree and kind of soil limitations that affect
local roads and streets, shallow excavations, and lawns and landscaping.
The ratings in the table are both verbal and numerical. Rating class terms indicate
the extent to which the soils are limited by all of the soil features that affect building
site development. Not limited indicates that the soil has features that are very
favorable for the specified use. Good performance and very low maintenance can
be expected. Somewhat limited indicates that the soil has features that are
moderately favorable for the specified use. The limitations can be overcome or
minimized by special planning, design, or installation. Fair performance and
moderate maintenance can be expected. Very limited indicates that the soil has
one or more features that are unfavorable for the specified use. The limitations
generally cannot be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design, or
expensive installation procedures. Poor performance and high maintenance can
be expected.
Numerical ratings in the table indicate the severity of individual limitations. The
ratings are shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0.01 to 1.00. They indicate
gradations between the point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative
impact on the use (1.00) and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation
(0.00).
Local roads and streets have an all-weather surface and carry automobile and light
truck traffic all year. They have a subgrade of cut or fill soil material; a base of gravel,
crushed rock, or soil material stabilized by lime or cement; and a surface of flexible
material (asphalt), rigid material (concrete), or gravel with a binder. The ratings are
based on the soil properties that affect the ease of excavation and grading and the
traffic -supporting capacity. The properties that affect the ease of excavation and
grading are depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, hardness of bedrock or a
cemented pan, depth to a water table, ponding, flooding, the amount of large
stones, and slope. The properties that affect the traffic -supporting capacity are soil
strength (as inferred from the AASHTO group index number), subsidence, linear
extensibility (shrink -swell potential), the potential for frost action, depth to a water
table, and ponding.
Shallow excavations are trenches or holes dug to a maximum depth of 5 or 6 feet
for graves, utility lines, open ditches, or other purposes. The ratings are based on
the soil properties that influence the ease of digging and the resistance to sloughing.
Depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan, the
amount of large stones, and dense layers influence the ease of digging, filling, and
compacting. Depth to the seasonal high water table, flooding, and ponding may
restrict the period when excavations can be made. Slope influences the ease of
using machinery. Soil texture, depth to the water table, and linear extensibility
(shrink -swell potential) influence the resistance to sloughing.
u_uiNatural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/15/2016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3
Roads and Streets, Shallow Excavations, and Lawns and Landscaping --Albemarle County,
Virginia
Region Ten Women's Shelter
Lawns and landscaping require soils on which turf and ornamental trees and shrubs
can be established and maintained. Irrigation is not considered in the ratings. The
ratings are based on the soil properties that affect plant growth and trafficability
after vegetation is established. The properties that affect plant growth are reaction;
depth to a water table; ponding; depth to bedrock or a cemented pan; the available
water capacity in the upper 40 inches; the content of salts, sodium. or calcium
carbonate; and sulfidic materials. The properties that affect trafficability are
flooding, depth to a water table, ponding, slope, stoniness, and the amount of sand,
clay, or organic matter in the surface layer.
Information in this table is intended for land use planning, for evaluating land use
alternatives, and for planning site investigations prior to design and construction.
The information, however, has limitations. For example, estimates and other data
generally apply only to that part of the soil between the surface and a depth of 5 to
7 feet. Because of the map scale, small areas of different soils may be included
within the mapped areas of a specific soil.
The information is not site specific and does not eliminate the need for onsite
investigation of the soils or fortesting and analysis by personnel experienced in the
design and construction of engineering works.
Government ordinances and regulations that restrict certain land uses or impose
specific design criteria were notconsidered in preparing the information in thistable.
Local ordinances and regulations should be considered in planning, in site
selection, and in design.
Report —Roads and Streets, Shallow Excavations, and Lawns
and Landscaping
[Onsite investigation may be needed to validate the interpretations in this table and
to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site. The numbers in the value columns
range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value, the greater the potential limitation.
The table shows only the top five limitations for any given soil. The soil may have
additional limitations]
Roads and Streets, Shallow Excavations, and Lawns and Landscaping —Albemarle County, Virginia
Map symbol and soil
Pet of
Local roads and streets
Shallow excavations
Lawns and landscaping
name
map
unit
Rating class and
Value
Rating class and
Value
Rating class and
Value
limiting features
limiting features
limiting features
2713—Elioak loam. 2 to
7 percent slopes
Elioak
80
I Very limited
Somewhat limited
Very limited
Low strength 1.00
Too clayey
0.1$
Low exchange
1.00
capacity
Frost action 0.50
Dusty
0.08
Too clayey
0.50
Unstable excavation
D.Ot
Dusty
0.08
I
walls
U. Sn,4 Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/1512016
i� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3
Region Ten Women's Shelter
Roads and Streets, Shallow Excavations, and Lawns and Landscaping -Albemarle County,
Virginia
Roads and Streets, Shallow Excavations, and Lawns and Landscaping -Albemarle County, Virginia
Map symbol and soil
Pct. of
Local roads and streets
Shallow excavations
Lawns and landscaping
name
map
unit
Rating class and Value
Rating class and
Value
Rating class and
Value
limiting features
limiting features
limiting features
27D-Elioak loam, 15
to 25 percent slopes
Elioak j 80
Very limited
Very limited
Very limited
Slope
-
1.00
Slope
1.00
Slope
1.00
Low strength
1.00
Too clayey
0.13
Low exchange
1.00
capacity
Frost action
0.50
Dusty
0.08
Too clayey 0.50
Unstable excavation
0.01
Dusty 0.08
JI
walls
346--Glenelg loam, 2 '
to 7 percent slopes i
Glenelg 90
Very limited
Somewhat limited
Somewhat limited
I
Low strength
1.00
Dusty
0.07
Low exchange 075
j
capacity
Frost action
0.50
Unstable excavation
0.01
Dusty
0.07
walls
a
-
{ 34C-Glenelg loam, 7
to 15 percent slopes
j
Very limited
Glenelg
Somewhat limited
Somewhat limited
_85
Low strength
1.00
Slope
0.37
Low exchange
0.75
capacity
Frost action
0.50
Dusty
0.07
Slope I
0.37
Slope
0.37
Unstable excavation
0.01
Dusty
O.D7
j
walls
39D-Hazel loam, 15
to 25 percent slopes
Hazel I
80
Very limited
Very limited
Very limited
Slope
1.00
Depth to hard bedrock,
1.00
Slope
1.00
Frost action
0.50
Slope
1.00
Low exchange
0.75
capacity
Depth to hard bedrock
0.46
Dusty
0.D4
Depth to bedrock j 0.46
Unstable excavation
0.01
Dusty I O.D4
walls
Data Source Information
Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia
Survey Area Data: Version 10, Dec 11, 2013
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/1512016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
Physical Soil Properties —Albemarle County, Virginia
Region Ten Women's Shelter
Physical Soil Properties
This table shows estimates of some physical characteristics and features that affect
soil behavior. These estimates are given for the layers of each soil in the survey
area. The estimates are based on field observations and on test data for these and
similar soils.
Depth to the upper and lower boundaries of each layer is indicated.
Particle size is the effective diameter of a soil particle as measured by
sedimentation, sieving, or micrometric methods. Particle sizes are expressed as
classes with specific effective diameter class limits. The broad classes are sand,
silt, and clay, ranging from the larger to the smaller.
Sand as a soil separate consists of mineral soil particles that are 0.05 millimeter to
2 millimeters in diameter. In this table, the estimated sand content of each soil layer
is given as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters
in diameter.
Silt as a soil separate consists of mineral soil particles that are 0.002 to 0.05
millimeter in diameter. In this table, the estimated silt content of each soil layer is
given as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters
in diameter.
Clay as a soil separate consists of mineral soil particles that are less than 0.002
millimeter in diameter. In this table, the estimated clay content of each soil layer is
given as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters
in diameter.
The content of sand, silt, and clay affects the physical behavior of a soil. Particle
size is important for engineering and agronomic interpretations, for determination
of soil hydrologic qualities, and for soil classification.
The amount and kind of clay affect the fertility and physical condition of the soil and
the ability of the soil to adsorb cations and to retain moisture. They influence shrink -
swell potential, saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat), plasticity, the ease of soil
dispersion, and other soil properties. The amount and kind of clay in a soil also
affect tillage and earthmoving operations.
Moist bulk density is the weight of soil (ovendry) per unit volume. Volume is
measured when the soil is at field moisture capacity, that is, the moisture content
at 1/3- or 1/10-bar (33kPa or 1OkPa) moisture tension. Weight is determined after
the soil is dried at 105 degrees C. In the table, the estimated moist bulk density of
each soil horizon is expressed in grams per cubic centimeter of soil material that is
less than 2 millimeters in diameter. Bulk density data are used to compute linear
extensibility, shrink -swell potential, available water capacity, total pore space, and
other soil properties. The moist bulk density of a soil indicates the pore space
available forwaterand roots. Depending on soil texture, a bulk density of more than
1.4 can restrict water storage and root penetration. Moist bulk density is influenced
by texture, kind of clay, content of organic matter, and soil structure.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 811512016
211111111111111 Conservation service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 6
Physical Soil Properties —Albemarle County, Virginia
Region Ten Women's Shelter
Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) refers to the ease with which pores in a
saturated soil transmit water. The estimates in the table are expressed in terms of
micrometers per second. They are based on soil characteristics observed in the
field, particularly structure, porosity, and texture. Saturated hydraulic conductivity
(Ksat) is considered in the design of soil drainage systems and septic tank
absorption fields.
Available water capacity refers to the quantity of water that the soil is capable of
storing for use by plants. The capacity for water storage is given in inches of water
per inch of soil for each soil layer. The capacity varies, depending on soil properties
that affect retention of water. The most important properties are the content of
organic matter, soil texture, bulk density, and soil structure. Available water capacity
is an important factor in the choice of plants or crops to be grown and in the design
and management of irrigation systems. Available water capacity is not an estimate
of the quantity of water actually available to plants at any given time.
Linear extensibility refers to the change in length of an unconfined clod as moisture
content is decreased from a moist to a dry state. It is an expression of the volume
change between the water content of the clod at 1 /3- or 1 /10-bar tension (33kPa or
10kPa tension) and oven dryness. The volume change is reported in the table as
percent change for the whole soil. The amount and type of clay minerals in the soil
influence volume change.
Linear extensibility is used to determine the shrink -swell potential of soils. The
shrink -swell potential is low if the soil has a linear extensibility of less than 3 percent;
moderate if 3 to 6 percent; high if 6 to 9 percent; and very high if more than 9 percent.
If the linear extensibility is more than 3, shrinking and swelling can cause damage
to buildings, roads, and other structures and to plant roots. Special design
commonly is needed.
Organic matter is the plant and animal residue in the soil at various stages of
decomposition. In this table, the estimated content of organic matter is expressed
as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in
diameter. The content of organic matter in a soil can be maintained by returning
crop residue to the soil.
Organic matter has a positive effect on available water capacity, water infiltration,
soil organism activity, and tilth. It is a source of nitrogen and other nuthentsfor crops
and soil organisms.
Erosion factors are shown in the table as the K factor (Kw and Kf) and the T factor.
Erosion factor K indicates the susceptibility of a soil to sheet and rill erosion by
water. Factor K is one of six factors used in the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE)
and the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) to predict the average
annual rate of soil loss by sheet and rill erosion in tons per acre per year. The
estimates are based primarily on percentage of silt, sand, and organic matter and
on soil structure and Ksat. Values of K range from 0.02 to 0.69. Other factors being
equal, the higher the value, the more susceptible the soil is to sheet and rill erosion
by water.
Erosion factor Kw indicates the erodibility of the whole soil. The estimates are
modified by the presence of rock fragments.
Erosion factor Kf indicates the erodibility of the fine -earth fraction. or the material
less than 2 millimeters in size.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/15/2016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 6
Physical Soil Properties —Albemarle County, Virginia
Region Ten Women's Shelter
Erosion factor is an estimate of the maximum average annual rate of soil erosion
by wind and/or water that can occur without affecting crop productivity over a
sustained period. The rate is in tons per acre per year.
Wind erodibility groups are made up of soils that have similar properties affecting
their susceptibility to wind erosion in cultivated areas. The soils assigned to group
1 are the most susceptible to wind erosion, and those assigned to group 8 are the
least susceptible. The groups are described in the "National Soil Survey
Handbook."
Wind erodibility index is a numerical value indicating the susceptibility of soil towind
erosion, or the tons per acre per yearthat can be expected to be lost to wind erosion.
There is a close correlation between wind erosion and the texture of the surface
layer, the size and durability of surface clods, rock fragments, organic matter, and
a calcareous reaction. Soil moisture and frozen soil layers also influence wind
erosion.
Reference:
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 43041. (hftp://soils.usda.gov)
LwA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/16/2016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 6
N
d
4)
Q
Q
L
a
•O
fQ
ii
A
A
L
a
I-
O
a
ca9
'W
j
I
A
'
c a o
I
I
I
W
O
w
it
I
I
.q s
Q u
Y
-
N
N
<
N
N
V I
Y
I
N
N
V
Cl!
N
V
O
O
m
1�l
A
a
N p
6 0
of
CS
p'O
dp
6Mlop
6ci
I—~
o
',
io
b
3
to
_
�o
CS
6
1
c
u
m
o
Li
o
c
c
o l
W? W
4 Q
ap N
pp N
.-
O
C
O
p
G
1 O
0
O
O
O
O
C
0
�LL°0I'o
ioi
a
a r=
N t$
E
,ai
t o
n
v
loi
o
'oi
l o
n
v
c
u
LI
v0
thO
t+IO
Yp
j Mp l
Cio
N
t0
N
N
t0
f\
A
U
'
T
t16
W
R
r
ao
A
is
I ab
I M
M
Y
L9
I
O I
M
M Ili
m
m
W
r N I
Iy=yA�NON
aW
laar660o'w llIW ^�aa u1
w �
Z
I
y 9
S Q �
}—t---
v�a
r
I I O
I N
I
II N
Y
V
n]
V
V
O U
N
V
ryI-t
N O
O N
O l n
N O O Y f
O Y I
O
O
O N
0E
LL
'Id'i
dodo,
dni d61
cs
i�Ci:
do
do.
'o
o
to
fV M
i N
'I,. N I N I N
I II iV
Ia
jo
I'a
d
a is a
a
a
0
p
w
o
io
o
to Igo o
q l0 4
`m
Ilo
�o
lo ��
.Ewa
o
jo
do
o io
vv�
to
a a
�co ao:
I
'
li
O
i 0
O
O O O
� O
9ua
o Q.
to
s o to
N N N
g Ig
g
Ig
O
O
O v
O
O
O
O O O
N N N
a
Nt
@
o
o
o
o o o
oo! qo ooi poi
U
Q N
N
'I1 d
jd ib
I
I
I
I
c
w
m
4
r a
v n Y
Y q Y I
d
C
l
N
O N aOD
O N t'O�J m
�
m
0 N
d QI N
d I O I N i m i
i
j 00
I O
P�
_NN CN101 'fin Ctll Ol lw�pw
E2a'� 2II E�a
wvoam
w m I 'Id oaN'. m
I
Uoam
IsL
J
r,w
0
so
U
81
Soil Features ---Albemarle County, Virginia
Region Ten Women's Shelter
Soil Features
This table gives estimates of various soil features. The estimates are used in land
use planning that involves engineering considerations.
A restrictive layer is a nearly continuous layer that has one or more physical,
chemical, or thermal properties that significantly impede the movement of water
and air through the soil or that restrict roots or otherwise provide an unfavorable
root environment. Examples are bedrock, cemented layers, dense layers, and
frozen layers. Thetable indicates the hardness and thickness of the restrictive layer,
both of which significantly affect the ease of excavation. Depth to top is the vertical
distance from the soil surface to the upper boundary of the restrictive layer.
Subsidence is the settlement of organic soils or of saturated mineral soils of very
low density. Subsidence generally results from either desiccation and shrinkage,
or oxidation of organic material, or both, following drainage. Subsidence takes place
gradually, usually over a period of several years. The table shows the expected
initial subsidence, which usually is a result of drainage, and total subsidence, which
results from a combination of factors.
Potential for frost action is the likelihood of upward or lateral expansion of the soil
caused by the formation of segregated ice lenses (frost heave) and the subsequent
collapse of the soil and loss of strength on thawing. Frost action occurs when
moisture moves into the freezing zone of the soil. Temperature, texture, density,
saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat), content of organic matter, and depth to the
water table are the most important factors considered in evaluating the potential for
frost action. It is assumed that the soil is not insulated by vegetation or snow and
is not artificially drained. Silty and highly structured, clayey soils that have a high
water table in winter are the most susceptible to frost action. Well drained, very
gravelly, or very sandy soils are the least susceptible. Frost heave and low soil
strength during thawing cause damage to pavements and other rigid structures.
Risk of corrosion pertains to potential soil -induced electrochemical or chemical
action that corrodes or weakens uncoated steel or concrete. The rate of corrosion
of uncoated steel is related to such factors as soil moisture, particle -size
distribution, acidity, and electrical conductivity of the soil. The rate of corrosion of
concrete is based mainly on the sulfate and sodium content, texture, moisture
content, and acidity of the soil. Special site examination and design may be needed
if the combination of factors results in a severe hazard of corrosion. The steel or
concrete in installations that intersect soil boundaries or soil layers is more
susceptible to corrosion than the steel or concrete in installations that are entirely
within one kind of soil or within one soil layer.
For uncoated steel, the risk of corrosion, expressed as low, moderate, or high, is
based on soil drainage class, total acidity, electrical resistivity near field capacity,
and electrical conductivity of the saturation extract.
For concrete, the risk of corrosion also is expressed as low, moderate, or high. It
is based on soil texture, acidity, and amount of sulfates in the saturation extract.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/15/2016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3
I
e
O
I
d
N I�
o
w
¢
m
a
m m
a s
l
d m
a a
O
TL
u
I
I
---
K�
m
l
u
y
d
mu
�mIL
i
I�
��
ICI
III
li
to
v
of
o
o
L
I
I
I I
g
d
aai
I'I
m
I
Q
rg
a
,
A
i
�I
u
I
II
II
II '
I
U
I
J
of
I
�� �w
rnr �I
rn�o
I3m
I
E C
pN
OON
U
TmO)
G
r d YIOJ N
Uol
6
m N N
OO.
'm 0
C:
aN
U(J
GR
NNN«
YU6
�y0
W
m
2
j
N
N
a
m
2
N
v
rme
N1
C
a�
d
m
m
a
m
Z
oll
Waterstreet studio
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE December 20, 2016
PROJECT Region Ten Women's Shelter Final Site Plan Revision
TO Rachel Falkenstein
FROM Alan Franklin
SUBJECT Final Site Plan Revisions
Please find the attached 4 sets of revised site plans which address the remaining review
comments as outlined in the October 24, 2016 letter.
Planning Comments:
8. The requested sidewalk along Old Lynchburg Road has been added to the plans.
11. The existing utilities were turned to a lighter shade of grey to help distinguish
between existing and proposed utilities.
Engineering Comments:
1. VSMP Plan under review.
Fire and Rescue:
1. Shrubs in question moved from around the existing fire hydrant.
The above record constitutes our understanding of the matters discussed and the decisions made. Please send
any additions or corrections to the recorder within five (5) days of receipt.
418 East Main Street Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 434.295.8177 www.waterstreetstudio.net
waterstreet s udio
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE December 20, 2016
PROJECT Region Ten Women's Shelter Final Site Plan Revision
TO Rachel Falkenstein
FROM Alan Franklin
SUBJECT Final Site Plan Revisions
Please find the attached 4 sets of revised site plans which address the remaining review
comments as outlined in the October 24, 2016 letter.
Planning Comments:
8. The requested sidewalk along Old Lynchburg Road has been added to the plans.
11. The existing utilities were turned to a lighter shade of grey to help distinguish
between existing and proposed utilities.
Engineering Comments:
1. VSMP Plan under review.
Fire and Rescue:
1. Shrubs in question moved from around the existing fire hydrant.
The above record constitutes our understanding of the matters discussed and the decisions made. Please send
any additions or corrections to the recorder within five (5) days of receipt.
418 East Main Street Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 434.295.8177 www.waterstreetstudio. net
waters tree t 3
September 19, 2016
Ms. Rachel Falkenstein
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: SDP-201600042 Region 10 Women's Treatment Center
Dear l el $r.
This letter is to accompany the revised Major Site Plan Amendment and serve as response to
your August 17, 2016 review letter: The responses are numbered to match the numbering of the
comments provided.
V/ Response: A check for the outstanding balance for the cost of mailing/delivery of
notices is included with the resubmittal.
`2. Response: Missing scale and north arrow added where missing.
/
Response: Setback label has been corrected.
i-d/Response: The proposed use has been added to the Cover Sheet "Site Data".
5. Response: Parking Determination Letter was approved on 08/08/2016 for 12
required parking spaces. 14 spaces are provided.
6. Response: Setback lines have been added to the grading and utility sheet to help
identify proposed buffer disturbances.
7 Response: The managed slopes delineation hatching has been added to the
drawings.
8. Response: We have examined the possibility of providing new sidewalk
immediately adjacent to the existing curbing for the right turn lane and taper into
Old Lynchburg Place but have not added this to the drawings at this point. There
is a utility pole at the beginning of the turn lane taper that would need to be
relocated to install sidewalk. Additionally, there are many other constraints along
the Old Lynchburg Road shoulder in consideration that do not make it ideal for
safe pedestrian travel. Please advise.
9 Response: Sidewalk has been added to provide a pedestrian connection from Old
Lynchburg Place sidewalk to the building entrance.
111 3r1 street se v. 434.295.8177 t
s1111PL
10. Response: Additional retaining wall height labels and spot elevations have been
added to the grading plan.
11. Response: The existing conditions plan was created with the best information
available on the existence, location, and type of any easements on the property.
Some proposed easements are shown on the plan and others will be added as
determined to be necessary.
12. Response: The perimeter parking lot trees were provided to satisfy ARB
requirements.
13. Response: The plant list and plant quantity discrepancy has been corrected.
14. Response: The 5% of the paved parking and vehicular circulation to be
landscaped calculation has been added to the plan.
15. Response: Sight distance lines have been added to the proposed entrance.
16. Response: Profile of the existing 8" ACSA sanitary sewer has been added to the
plans. On this profile, the proposed sanitary sewer lateral, fire service, and
domestic water service are shown to demonstrate how conflict between the utility
crossings should be handled.
17. Response: The proposed light fixtures have been added to the layout plan sheet.
Special Exception Request:
Response: The site plans propose approximately 1,800 square feet of disturbance
of the 20' buffer adjacent to and including Old Lynchburg Place. 320 square feet
disturbance is required to install the concrete commercial entrance in place of the
existing sidewalk and curb and gutter. The remainder of the disturbance is for a
minimal amount of grading adjacent to the existing sidewalk for the bio-filter, street
tree planting, bio-filter planting, and installation of water and sewer service to the
building. Setback lines have been added to the grading and utility sheet to help
graphically identify the proposed buffer disturbances.
2. Response: Additional screening between Old Lynchburg Place and the proposed
bio-filter has been added.
3. Response: We are hoping to move to the BOS as soon as Staff agrees.
Engineering.
1. Response: A VSMP application is in progress and will be submitted under separate
cover.
Inspections:
1. Response: A 4" fire sprinkler main has been added to the plans.
111 3r, street se - .,.•e,.e , _ /,. 434295.8177 t s e•° s �..
Fire/Rescue:
1. Response: Fire flow test of the existing fire hydrant at Old Lynchburg Place is
attached.
2. Response: FDC location shown on the plan.
3. Response: The "Knox" box note was added to the plan sheet.
ARB:
Comments addressed under separate cover.
Please find the attached 4 copies of revised site plan and architectural drawings for distribution
to Planner, Engineer, Inspector, and Fire/Rescue. We have submitted directly to ACSA. Please
do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or need anything additional.
Sincerely,
Alan Franklin, PE
Waterstreet Studio, LLC
cc:
111 3Id street se r ,•.r-.a. le. , 'z - a 22902 434.295.8177 t v.a e s •-tee....