HomeMy WebLinkAboutACSA200000001 Application 2000-11-14 APPLICATION TO AMEND THE ���F� `� County of Albemarle
1 j 715 Department of Planning and Community Development
SERVICE AUTHORITY °� ®=� 401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville,VA 22902-4596
JURISDICTIONAL AREAS Novo• 804 2ottesv 3
APPLICANT Name: 2 O5i— cnct-%."
Signature:(Q-zv Phone: 804.974.9786
Address:
1140 ug ck Mount Road
Earlysville, VA 22936-1902
O- R Name (or agent, 'f any): Rhonda S. Reid 8 Alex Montiel
S. lure: 804.823-5158
dd ss: 94 rownsvill oad
V harlottesville, VA 22903
J :y.s IONAL AREA DESIGNATION REQUESTED:
❑ Water and Sewer ❑ Water Only
❑ Water Only to Existing Structure(s) ❑ Limited Service (Describe in Justification
below)
PROPERTY LOCATION (Address) 3465 Ivy Road, Charlottesville
Tax Map(s)/Parcel Number(s): Tax Map 59, Parcel 16
CURRENT SERVICE AREA DESIGNATION (If any):
❑ Water and Sewer ❑ Water Only
❑ Water Only to Existing Structures ❑ Limited Service
JUSTIFICATION FOR REQUEST: Parcel is zoned Cl which allows a restaurant by right.
All other zoning and public health related laws can be met except sewage removal.
The parcel does not allow space for a septic drain fieeld to accommodate a viable
restaurant. The owners of the surrounding parcels with adequate space and soil
are unwilling to provide easements to support the mass drain field required by
public safety regulation.
For Staff Use Only
' ' 1 �Cl 3�03
DATE$130 FEE PAID: ,CeC y'` �333�DATE SUBMITTED: I
PROPERTY IS LOCATED (Check Appropriate):
❑ Inside or ❑Outside a Growth Area? 0 Adjacent to SAJA?
❑ Inside or ❑Outside a Water-Supply Watershed? ❑ Adjacent to a Growth Area?
Location and distance of water/sewer line proposed to provide service
REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT ADOPTED: 0 Yes❑ No Date of Action
rL.uLIVIFAI L—I—. VVUIN I i
43
--/7---7-73.-------\ II V'' / :4------", 82 \ .3 .
u I ` 30E / �•
" \ \ ,oe 1 / axA a\
�!(/ 4P'78<
"� Lam.. A/ ► •
•
4.;•i I i ri \ °-, P"'--2.• . l'41"41 27°
:I: :1 12A 0
•
` wellioar----:
r ; a � • •S
` tip, x7r � r Sec
/a/ 2ec 3•A
., .," ix
\\ SEc 4..4. Al , /0 .,,,5.
TIittir:il t �/
lax 37A \ 3BE /
:to
37.
1
t� Ai 7n _ kt� �
.7
fi
`zu 1 ` 2a /
58 �` zoA l 1 z '/
v.
p / //
" - ---.1 2° ir r 40,
/:,'
--): 4 // i
1 k 4,
109 ____ 19 . 59iki::' ' / il.
— :7411 - *„ • .6
ittvo—
.7
` IOA un Ixa `\ iea/,���F�' \ ,AID-.e..-.7c i.—'-f7j i/�--l",ti' -- .., ;ro
/////',. .i'�
,,',N:,:::.Ati4 i-R)i7 25 \/2 31..
® II-a 4ND - 2 liko/'/r//i//,/,,/7/—'r
/i
p1 ,. �-v H" ".a MSt' 27.2 27A . h;r /
12 [ 7A 4..'
I : �•OA
N 0 14A 111 / p,2 ``- 4 .:
Ii2C � \
A. — , SOC
I4A1
4,4 :.,-eCCC , \• slo
i30 IS. I]A 7 \` 14 ( /
uc /- ) r 4\ .e sac
,c
75
SCALE IN FEET SAMUEL MILLER DISTRICT SECTION 59
••• NOCRMANS RIVER AGRICULTURAL aFCRESTAL015TRICTa
F
•
/9C.te,ctije- og pg-740y- — . 6c1
u42-- - Ua-ce,.ar
s — 7 hi;44 Seol
-----
a �.%J U Vic,c.0 c V S1Q s 4Qii-, • I"69- 1-°--1A e_-
9'-'1fW1-41c‘A- frtN. _4444A.1‘11
ACZ-S2_01 Nab daz �C4 (As..Jlt. ovt 54r J ti
k r
a
/1
uts 51/17
-S at ao 4 =u 4' - _ - 6e,d
-
217,1 - T r'iP3F/14 42- (es;
(�
�60 Ck A5-bilfteNM,,,‘
t 55 C,2&. -LMAA L- 6 P 5 -z3 G'J
"2-(30 a944,444,1-- Timi 59 -5IA- 60/7/u)
— 2153 d 1, 59 -31A
ZI 73 4),1'. /‹-Gici-(247_ (r/ a 5t- 23/30)
•
Alit j6
AUG 27 1992
.XWUTIV OfFIt 1t
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE.
Office of County Attorney
416 Park Street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Telephone 296-7138
GEORGE R. ST.JOHN August 25, 1992
JAMES M_ BOWLING, IV
COUNTY ATTORNEY DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY
Robert Brandenburger
Deputy County Executive
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Re: Agenda Item #16, Action letter January 16, 1992 (6---0-04/1A-f--
Dear Bob:
I will answer the four questions set out in the above action
letter, in the order in which they appear in that letter;
1. What rights does the applicant have to a septic disposal
system that exists with his purchase of the property vs. the
applicant's request to be included in the service area
boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority for sewer
service?
Answer: The location of, and amendment of, the
jurisdictional areas for the Albemarle County Service Authority
is a legislative function of the supervisors. It is my opinion
that no land-owner has a right to special legislation, to
provide a remedy to a topographic problem which was not created
by government in the first place, but rather by act of nature
and/or by the character of the topography itself, which I
believe to be the situation in this case.
2 . Based on the rationale above in Paragraph 1, I believe
that if the Board denies the request, the denial does not remove
the property from use without compensation. The purchaser was
well aware of the situation when he acquired the property, and
was aware that the pump and haul permit was not to be permanent.
3 . Approval by the County Executive of a pump and haul
system did not reestablish a use on the property, since the pump
and haul permit was clearly temporary in the hope, repeat the
hope, not the certainty, that a permanent solution could be
Robert Brandenburger Page 2 August 25, 1992
found.
4 . A pump and haul system does not place a vested interest
on the property because the pump and haul permit itself, on its
face, was temporary, not permanent.
In providing these answers I have considered the recent U. S.
Supreme Court case of Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Commission
and I do not believe that case applicable to this situation. I
do believe, that if a decision denying access to the public
sewer, were to be challenged in court, there would be
justiciable arguments on both sides, as to the "taking" issue,
but in my opinion the County should prevail.
In giving you this opinion I am in no way advocating, one way
or the other, how I feel the Board should act on this request.
I am simply stating the legal parameters within which their
decision can be made.
Sincerely yours,
C �
George R. St. John
GRStJ/sh
4
0?AL
pm CI,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
January 24, 1992
W. Benton Downer
Associate Broker
Montague, Miller & Company
500 Westfield Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
RE: Request to Amend Albemarle County Service Authority
Jurisdictional Area - Galerie Restaurant
Dear Mr. Downer:
The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on January 15,
1992, deferred action on the above-noted request. This request has
tentatively been re-scheduled for February 19, 1992. This request was
deferred in order to receive a legal opinion from the County Attorney on
the following issues :
1. What rights does the applicant have to a septic disposal system
that exists with his purchase of the property vs. the applicant's
request to be included in the service area boundaries of the
Albemarle County Service Authority for sewer service?
2. If the Board denies the request, does that denial remove the
property from use without compensation?
3. Does approval by the County Executive of a pump and haul system
reestablish a use on the property?
4. Does a pump and haul system place a vested interest on the property?
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted
action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
•
(/). 0) /
il
V. Wayne ilimberg Pr
Director of Planninl & ommunity Development
VWC/j cw
cc: Lettie E. Neher
- ern,,,•.
County of Albemarle
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •
,GENDA TITLE: AGENDA DATE: ITEM NUMBER:
;urisdictional Area for the Ridge (Galerie) September 2, 1992
restaurant
ACTION: X INFORMATION:
;UBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
.pplicant request for public sewer CONSENT AGENDA:
jurisdictional area be extended to the ACTION: INFORMATION:
tidge Restaurant property.
ATTACHMENTS: Yes (2)
STAFF CONTACT(S) :
>iessrs. Tucker, Brandenburger,✓Cilimberg REVIEWED BY: (
BACKGROUND: This request was initially submitted in January, 1992 but was deferred by the
Board, and subsequently by the applicant, pending investigation of other alternatives. This
property is located at the intersection of Routes 240 and 250 and was found to not have
adequate sewage disposal when health department permits were being issued for the new Ridge
Restaurant. In order for the Ridge to open, a temporary pump and haul permit was issued by
the Commissioner of Health for six months. This permit is due to expire on September 11,
1992 and will not be extended unless certain conditions are met - specifically, a permanent
solution is in hand and under construction with completion within six months. Four potential
options were initially proposed:
(1) Package treatment plant
(2) Permanent pump and haul
(3) Septic system off site as on-site is not feasible
(4) Connection to public sewer
DISCUSSION:
(1) The package treatment plant is unlikely as the state has been reluctant to allow
such plants in any watershed.
(2) Permanent pump and haul is not desirable and would require agreement by the
County and state in which the County assumes responsibility for its operation.
(3) Off-site septic was actively pursued but is not an option due to poor site
conditions and the inability to get the necessary easements from private property
owners.
(4) Connection to public sewer is an option but would only be to the gravity line as
the Service Authority will not allow connection to the forced main. Connecting
to the gravity line is being investigated. Even if easements and engineering
solutions are obtained, the cost implications may result in the applicant not
pursuing this option. The applicant has not completed this feasibility review.
The applicant is requesting a public hearing be set to extend the jurisdictional area. This
action will allow them to complete their investigation of the feasibility of connecting to
public sewer. The applicant feels this step is necessary for them to request continuance of
their temporary pump and haul but there is no guarantee the Health Department will grant any
extension.
Staff has no recommendation at this time. The Board's questions from January and the County
Attorney's response are attached for information.
RECOMMENDATION: None, provided for discussion in response to the applicant's request for a
public hearing on October 7, 1992 to consider extending the jurisdictional area.
92.126