Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200400106 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2005-01-11 OF A gAllirtib•A tt' ©0_: `IRGINIP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,Room 227 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126 January 11, 2005 David Jensen WW Associates Inc. 1402 Greenbrier Place Charlottesville,VA 22901 RE: SDP-2004-0106 Charlottesville Self Storage @ Crozet Final Site Plan Dear David, Your final site plan has been distributed to the reviewing agencies and the attached comments have been received. Please review the comments and revise the plan of the proposed development accordingly. Your revisions should be resubmitted directly to the reviewer who commented. All tentative final approvals must be granted prior to submitting the plan for signatures. If all tentative approvals have been received the final site plan may be signed. For signing you will need to submit the$410 fee with two signed and sealed mylar copies of the site plan(the original and a copy for County records)and two paper copies. Once submitted the plan should be signed within one week. If you have any questions about the comments of a specific agency please contact that agency directly. If you have any questions about the review process please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Francis H.MacCall Senior Planner Review Comments Project Name: Charlottesville Self Storage @ Final-Non-residential-Commission Date Completed: Monday, December 20, 2004 Reviewer: Gary Whelan Department/Division/Agee ACSA Reviews Comment 1 Final approval will require backflow prevention and plumbing fixture information to size the meter. 1-Gary Review Status: Requested Changes Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed Oi Tuesday,January 11 La.\ County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: David Jensen From: Francis H.MacCall Division: Zoning&Current Development Date: 1/3/05 Subject: Charlottesville Self Storage @ Crozet Final Site Plan 1. The lighting plan shows a maintenance factor of.75. The foot candles need to be shown with a maintenance factor of 1.0. 2. The plat for the boundary line adjustment needs to be submitted for approval. The plat will need to be recorded before we sign the final site plan. Review Comments Project Name: Charlottesville Self Storage @ Date Completed: Reviewer: Jim Kesterson Reviews Commeni Steve, A typical section for the frontage improvements should be added to the plan along with the pavement design. The pavement will need to consist of 6"#21A, 4 1/2"BM-25 and 1 1/2" SM-9.5A. The proposed 8"waterline connection as shown on sheet 9 of 16 will require a boring of route 240 and will need to be shown as a bore. If there is sufficient evidence that existing utilities prohibit Final—Non-residential—Commission open cutting. However the pavement restoration will require a patch in accordance with Special provision MP-71 and the area adjacent to the patch must be milled 25' in each direction and Overlaid with 1 1/9"of SM-4 5A Department/Division/Agee VDOT Under the ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION NOTES,# 11 should be revised to indicate TRUNCATED DOME rather than exposed aggregate. Please have the plan revised to address the above comments prior to final approval. Jim Kesterson Review Status: Pending Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed Oi Tuesday,January 11 SDP-2004-106 Charlottesville S ' "torage @ Crozet, Final Site Plan - Rc 240 Page 1 of 1 Francis MacCall From: Kesterson, Jimmy [Jimmy.Kesterson@VDOT.Virginia.gov] Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 8:29 AM To: Steve Snell (E-mail) Cc: Francis Maccall (E-mail) Subject: SDP-2004-106 Charlottesville Self Storage @ Crozet, Final Site PI an - Route 240 Steve, A typical section for the frontage improvements should be added to the plan along with the pavement design. The pavement will need to consist of 6"#21A, 4 1/2" BM-25 and 1 1/2" SM-9.5A. The proposed 8"waterline connection as shown on sheet 9 of 16 will require a boring of route 240 and will need to be shown as a bore. If there is sufficient evidence that existing utilities prohibit a bore, consideration may be given for open cutting. However the pavement restoration will require a patch in accordance with Special provision MP-71 and the area adjacent to the patch must be milled 25' in each direction and overlaid with 1 1/2" of SM-9.5A. Under the ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION NOTES, # 11 should be revised to indicate TRUNCATED DOME rather than exposed aggregate. Please have the plan revised to address the above comments prior to final approval. Jim Kesterson 1/11/2005