The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP200500014 Correspondence 2005-02-28 � ti.. �.. �, 4�F AL� o$� 9�r U�� Cj7 �l �,�,. �A7�-'� �IRGTN�P COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 _ Phone(434) 296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126 May 18, 2005 Steve Edwards Terra Partners 200 Sixth Street, NE Suite B Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: SDP-2005-0014 Grace Community Church Preliminary Site Plan Dear Sir: The Deparhnent of Community Development hereby grants administrative approval to the above- referenced site plan. The approval of the preliminary site plan is valid for(1)one year in accordance with Zoning Ordinance Section 32.4.3.1. Therefore, the preliminary approval shall expire May 18, 2006. If the preliminary site plan approval expires, a new application must be filed and processed. Please address all of the requirements and conditions listed below and submit eight(8)tentative plan copies to the Department of Community Development. This letter must be submitted with the tentative plans, as a checklist, to document that you have addressed all requirements or conditions, or the tentative plan will be denied. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and the BMP Stormwater Management Plan, with the associated applications and fees, may also be submitted with the eight(8)tentative Plans. Failure to do so will result in a separate application to be filed with the Deparhnent of Community Development at a later date. After the initial tentative plan submittal,each department/agency will contact you to discuss any remaining conditions. After all aforementioned deparhnent/agencies have granted a tentative approval, you may submit the final mylars (2 sets), two paper copies, final site plan application, final site plan fee, and a copy of all written tentative approvals to the Department of Community Development. Signing of the plans will occur within one week once it is determined that the final site plan mylars reflect all tentative approvals. The final site plan�vill be subject to all final site plan requirements (Zoning Ordinance Section 32.6), in addition to the following conditions. 1. T`he Zoning&Current Development Division shall not accept submittal of the final site plan for signature until tentative approvals for the following conditions have been obtained. The final site plan shall not be signed until the following conditions are met: � �.r •..� A. Planner approval to include: 1. [32.6.3) Approval of a landscape plan in compliance with Section 32.7.9. and, . 2. Compliance with all conditions of SP-2004-023, in particular the conservation plan, landscaping requirements, and road dedication requirements. and, : 3. [32.6.6(j)] Submittal of a description and photograph or diagram and show the location of each type of outdoor luminaire that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens. Please be aware that installation of such luminaires in the future that are not shown on this plan shall require an amendment to this plan. and, 4. [32.6.6(j)] [4.17.4(b)] Submittal of a photometric plan on the site plan demonstrating that parking area luminaires are in compliance with 4.17.4 b. �� B. Engineer approval to include: 1. The engineering review for current development needs to review and approve all applicable items as specified in the Design Standards Manual, section 902, before recommending tentative approval to the final site plan. and, . 2. The Erosion Control Plan will need more detail and improvements for final approval. Please size all ESC structures far appropriate drainage area. Please include all areas of disturbance in ESC plan. The Drainfields must be in the limits of disturbance. C. Groundwater Manager approval to include: The following revisions should be addressed for the Final Groundwater Management Plan, which is required prior to the Site Plan approval for the Grace Community Church. : 1. Surface drainage and divides should be apparent and labeled in map form. I believe the addition of the drainage divides on Figure 1 will fulfill this requirement and, 2. Please provide a table or spreadsheet of the water well data within the 1000' surrounding zone of the site. Include flow rates, well depth, depth to bedrock or casing length, and water level where these data are present and, 3. Please include your Virginia Certified Professional Geologist seal on the report. D. Virginia Deparhnent of Transportation approval to include: : 1. A drainage easement is necessary where the 30" culvert outfalls on the opposite side of route 606. An easement may exist, however it needs to be labeled and, ' 2. Standard erosion control stone, EG 1 will be required at the outlets of both pipes and, 3. The entrance landing will need to be redesigned with a negative 2% leaving route 606 rather than the positive grade of 4%as shown and, 4. The entrance radii should be increased to 25'. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, �' '� Francis H. MacCall Senior Planner Zoning&Current Development finaccall@albemarle.org Copy: Grace Community Church; CHRIS SCHARNBECK, ELIZABETH H BOSSINGER ETAL POBOX8142 CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22906 File: SDP-2005 -0014 f. . _ , _ _ �" � �� 9 �� progressive l�nd nnse s�➢�a�ion� , . '��,> �� '�.� �- , 1;� . �� ,; �� ,.- - 4 April 2005 d"�:i'.'��,��E I�R i T��l,.� --^,r ��--..',�.,,. Mr. Francis MacCall " Planner 401 Mclntire Road, Room 218 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 RE: Grace Community Church Preliminary Site Plan; SDP 2005-0014 Comment Response Letter Dear Francis: On March 22, 2005 we received your second review comments regarding the special use permit submission for the project above. Below are our responses to each of the comments. Planning, Francis MacCall 1. See revised vicinity sketch shown on cover sheet. 2. See sheet 3. 3. See transition note shown on sheet 3. 4. Location of refuse storage is shown on sheet 3 and described in basic information note#6. 5. Sidewalk width is 6' and bumper blocks are not required. Zoning, John Shepherd 1. No written comments were provided at this level of review. Engineering, Steve Snell 1. Uphill stormwater will be captured by two swales constructed at the top of the slope above the proposed improvements. One swale drains to the western boundary of the property to an existing natural drainage way, while the other drains to the eastern most roadside ditch of the entry drive. 2. We feel that all required erosion control measures can be installed entirely on-site. We have added a Conceptual Erosion & Sediment Control Plan sheet to the set for your review. Please note the construction sequence at the top left of the page. 3. Please review and comment on the conceptual erosion control plan and construction sequence. We would be happy to meet with you to further develop this plan of attack. 4. The requested additional topography is now shown on Sheets 2 and 4. 5. The proposed entrance culvert and cutvert under Route 606 have been sized and are shown on the plans. See sheet 4 and attached calculations. 6. Sight distance at the entrance is shown on sheets 3 and 4 as 400+'. The speed limit on Route 608 was assumed to be 35 mph. Please advise if this is not correct. 7. VDOT comments are addressed below. VDOT, Chuck Proctor and Jim Kesterson CIVIL]El�GI1�EERI1lTG • I.AI�IDSCA�E ARC�IITECT�JR]E • LA�TI�S�JRV�Yd�iG 200 6th Street,NE • Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 • Office 434-295-6496 • Fax 434�296�6497 • www.terra-partners.com � �� Mr. Francis MacCall Page 2 1. The proposed entrance culvert has been sized and is shown on the plans. See sheet 4 and attached calculations. 2. We designed the proposed entrance to comply with the Minimum Standards for Entrances to State Highways. A profile of the entrance drive will be included with the final site plan documents for approval by VDOT. 3. Sight distance at the entrance is shown on sheets 3 and 4 as 400+'. The speed limit on Route 608 was assumed to be 35 mph. Please advise if this is not correct. 4. The proposed culvert under Route 606 has been sized and is shown on the plans. See sheet 4 and attached calculations. 5. Please find the attached drainage calculatians for the two proposed culverts at the proposed entrance. Inspections, Jay Schlothauer 1. Done. See Sheet 3. 2. The sidewalk is proposed to be flush with the pavement adjacent to all handicap parking spaces. 3. Three van-accessible parking spaces are now specified on the plans, see Sheet 3. Water Resources, David Swales 1. Tier 3 Groundwater Assessment is in process. Historic Resources 2. No comments were provided from this agency. VA Department of Health 1. No comments were provided from this agency. Building Official 1. No comments were provided from this agency. Fire and Rescue 1. No comments were provided from this agency. We appreciate everyone's effort and respectfully request that approval be granted for our preliminary site development plans. In the event there are additional questions please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, ,� � Alan Franklin PE - -� � :- 4�� .� , � xc: Jeff Dreyfus, Bushman Dreyfus Win Wood, Grace Community Church en�losures: Preliminary Site Development Plan, dated 4-4-05 �.,. �., �.._, �, - .� :,,;� Preliminary Storm Calculations �`'""S'`'��~"� ` � '` � � �. O�� U�� [J �� ..,_ vIRGIN�P COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,Room 227 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126 March 22, 2005 Steve Edwards Terra Partners 200 Sixth Street,NE Suite B Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: SDP-2005-0014 Grace Community Church Preliminary Site Plan Dear Sir: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary Comments for the following divisions of the Community Development Department and other agencies,as applicable,are attached: Albemarle County Division of Zoning&Current Development(Engineer) Albemarle County Division of Zoning&Current Development(Planner) Albemarle County Division of Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary far preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions,please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit seven full size copies and one 11" x 17" copy to the Community Development Depariment. Responses to the attached comments of the Site Review Committee must be submitted by April 4,2005. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. S incerely, _ ,�� ` ��L��,f%�,,� Francis H. MacCall `� Senior Planner � � , �A��`'r �,�� '� �1RCIN�P COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development,Current Development Group Engineering Plan Review TO: Francis MacCall, Seniar Planner FROM: Steve Snell, Engineer DATE: 21 March 2005 RE: Grace Community Church, Preliminary Site Plan, SDP 2005-00014 The Preliminary Site Plan for Grace Community Church has been reviewed. Engineering has the following comments: 1. Off-site water(from northward uphill) should not drain across the sidewalks and parking spaces. Please show how the stormwater north of the structure and parking area will be conveyed through the site. [18-32.5.6j,k] 2. It appears a sediment basin will be needed on TMP 21-11 A., along the southwest corner of this site where the site is graded to the property line. Please show a proposed sediment basin location and supply the County with documentation to show an off-site easement can be obtained for this basin. [DM1103, 18-32.5.6j, k, n] 3. A sediment basin will be needed between the entrance road and the parking on the southeastern section of this site. It would be unrealistic to keep this area as a tree preservation area. Please exclude tree preservation from the area for the sediment basin and the area for the ditch downstream of the BMP. As a note: this basin may be converted for stormwater storage if adequate storage is note shown with the swale on the final. It may require the outlet of the BMP to be relocated but would otherwise just require just a retrofit of the sediment basin. [18-32.5.6j, k, n] 4. Please show off-site topography for at least 50-feet along the eastern borders of this property. This is needed to show how the site drains through TMP 21-11 A and TMP 21 - 12C 1. [18-32.5.6d] 5. Please show the culverts for the site entrance and across route 606. [18-32.3.5.6j, k, n] 6. Please show the sight distance at the entrance. [VDOT, DM CD-15] 7. Please address all VDOT comments. [Policy] Please contact me if you have questions or require additional information. � ,� ��OF ALR„ �$ 1 , `�� ,`,�' a a ..� �'�RGtN1P County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Steve Edwards From: Francis H. MacCall, Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date: 3/22/OS Subject: SDP-2005-0014 Grace Community Church Preliminary Site Plan The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will approve the preliminary site plan when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Code of Albemarle.] 1. [32.5.6 a] Provide a vicinity sketch showing the property and its relationship with adjoining streets, subdivisions and other landmarks. The one provided does not do this. 2. [32.5.6 c] Provide a better delineation of the phase lines. 3. [32.5.6 n] Identify you CG-12 curb cuts for handicap access to the sidewalks. 4. [32.5.6 n] Show the location of the refuse storage area. 5. [4.12.16 e] Provide bumper blocks in the parking spaces adj acent to the sidewalks that are not 6' wide. The current sidewalks along the parking show 5'. Final tentative approval from this department will be subject to the following conditions: [These conditions are those which have been identified at this time. Conditions may be added or eliminated based on additional review.] l. [32.6.3] Approval of a landscape plan in compliance with Section 32.7.9. 2. Compliance with all conditions of SP-2004-023, in particular the conservation plan, landscaping requirements, and road dedication requirements. 3. [32.6.6(j)] Submittal of a description and photograph ar diagram and show the location of each type of outdoor luminaire that emits 3,000 ar more initial lumens. Please be aware that installation of such luminaires in the future that are not shown on this plan shall require an amendment to this plan. 4. [32.6.6(j)] [4.17.4(b)] Submittal of a photometric plan on the site plan demonstrating that parking area luminaires are in compliance with 4.17.4 b. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Copy: SDP-2005-0014 �.�I �� . .S��i.�g%i`�.-..� �a . c. ; 4 E. '. � � '" `�� w�R co�vr�vro��wE�,�H of vr��IN.rA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 701 VDOT Way CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22911 PHILIP A.SHUCET James S.Utterback,PMP COMMISSIONER Residency Administrator March 17, 2005 Glenn Brooks Depar�menC of Engineer and Development 401 Mclntire Rd. Charlottesville. VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments for the Site Plans reviewed at the March 15, 2005 Site Plan Review Meeting: SDP 2005-00017 Old Trail—Ballard Field Townhouses,Route 691: (Yadria Amarante) § The site is internal to the Ballard Field Developrnent, witl�roadways and entrances that l�ave previously been reviewed and approved; � Part of this phase, develops the area at the end of Haden Lane. This existing roadway is not adequate to support traffic that may waut to use this access. Improveinents to Haden Lane were previously discussed with the�pplicant who agreed to make the connection and some of the improvements. If this connection is made traffic will attempt to use this substandard roadway. The developer will need to install a permanent baizacade at the connection or make the necessary road imprc�vements. § It is the Departments recommandation have the south end and east side improverrients made with this development. The Jarman Gap Road project will make the intersection improvements, and the Haden Lane development has plans to improvernent part of the west side of the Roadway. SDP 2005-00014 Grace Communitv Church Route 606: (Francis MacCall) � Entrance pipe will be required; § Entrance need to be desi�ned in accordance with the Minimum Standards for Entrances to State Highway; � TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY _ _ _ __ . . _ _. _ _ __ _ __ � � Mr. Braoks March 17, 2005 Page Two � Si�hl distances need to be shown on the plans; � PrevioLls comment and discussion include installation of a cross pipe, under Route 606; � Site plans and Drainage Computations are required. SUB 2005-00061 Haffner Farm Route 654: (Francis MacCall) § Entrance need to be designed in accordance with the Minimum Standards for Entrances to State Highway. The radi should be 50 foot with a 1.00' taper; § Streets need to be designed in accordance with the cui7ent Subdivision Street Standards, � Sight distances need to be shown on the plans; § Site plans and Drainage Computations are reyuired. SL1B 2005-00018 Wood,Larry and Barry,Route 1670: (Steve Tugwell) � Site access wi11 need to be maintained off of the side streets for botl�properties; � Entrance need to be designed in accordance with the Minimum Standards for Entrances to State Higl�way. Please request the applicants submit a written description of the revisions when resubmitting for review. If you should have concerns with these comments,please discuss with this office prior to sharing with the applicants. Sincerely, CJ�"" " � C. C. Proctor III Assistant Resident Engineer cc Alan Schuck, Steve Snell, Bill Fritz, David Benish, Juan Wade, Yadria Amarante, Elaine Echols, Joan McDowell, Francis MacCall, Steve Tugwell, and Marshall Barron , � �•�► .,,• o��F.at8��9�r o �'� e� �—�. s.�� .�7r� w vIRGINIP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,Room 227 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126 March 11, 2005 RE: SDP 2005-014 Grace Community Church - Tax Map 21 Parcel 11 Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is to notify you that the following development proposal has been submitted to the Couniy for review: ■ SDP 2005-014 Grace Community Church: Request for preliminary site plan approval tc� create Grace Community Church in two phases. Phase 1 being an 8,750 square foot building and Phase 2 being a 14,045 square foot building on 19.11 acres.The property is zoned RA,Rural Area with an approved Special Use Permit SP-2004-023. The property, described as Tax Map 21 Parcel 11 is located in the White Hall Magisterial District on Dickerson Road [Route # 606] approximately .25 miles from the intersection of Dickerson Road and Seminole Trail (US Route 29N). The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Rural Area. This development proposal is scheduled for the Site Review Committee meeting on the date listed below. The applicant's attendance is not mandatory, although it may be requested by the County. Regardless of whether the applicant will be attending, the County staff will be available for consultation on the Site Review Committee meeting date at 10:00 a.m., in Room 235 of the County Office Building on McIntire Road in Charlottesville. This meeting will be an informal session with the Site Review Committee to discuss issues and share information. The development proposal will be reviewed and approved, subject to compliance with applicable ordinances, by the Site Review Committee, unless a written request is made for Planning Commission review by a member of the Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors, or an abutting property owner by the Request for Review deadline. If requested for review, the development proposal will be reviewed by the Planning Commission. All applicable dates scheduled for this development proposal are listed below. Site Review comments available (Tuesday, March 22) Site Review Committee meeting date (Thursday, March 24, 10 a.m.) Revision & Request for Review deadline (Monday, Apri14) Planning Commission meeting (Tuesday, April 26) • ; � �� SDP 2005-014 Grace Community Church March 11, 2005 Plans for the proposed development are available for your review in the Department of Planning and Community Development. Interested members of the public are encouraged to contact this department at any time during working hours(8 a.m.-5 p.m.,Mon-Fri),and make an appointment to discuss the proposed development. Should you wish to attend the Site Review Committee meeting, please notify the Department of Community Development so that any concerns may be adequately addressed. Sincerely, �---�`"—� �, -�'�7�''' / // //' ��,./��`�"�--�-�' Francis MacCall Senior Planner Zoning and Current Development Division /aer C: CRQV�,�N COMMUNICATION INC PMB 353 GE FANUC AUTOMATION MANUFACTURING 1NC C/O EPROPERTY TAX INC DEPT 201 GRACE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH HANEY,GARY F HANEY,JAMES M OR MARILYN R HANEY,PHILLIP H NORTHRIDGE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE;DAVID R MARSH ETAL TRS PARAN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH QUINN,GREGORY H cc: Edwards, Steve Terra Partners,LLC 200 6`�' Street,NE Charlottesville,VA 22902 Grace Community Church; Chris Scharnbeck, Elizabeth H Bossinger Etal POBox8142 Charlottesville,VA 22906 File