Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201300057 Correspondence 2014-04-04 Ellie Ray From: Ellie Ray Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 11:32 AM To: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library plan approval (MJH) Looks good to me, but I'll try to get David to give it a quick look. Hopefully I can get that done and the plans signed this afternoon. Ellie Carter Ray, PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 From: Ron Lilley Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 11:01 AM To: Ellie Ray Subject: FW: Northside Library plan approval (MJH) Ellie— I received the below e-mail from Ron Cottrell at Martha Jefferson Hospital stating their approval of our development plan. Will this suit for your plan approval needs ? - Ron L. From: RON COTTRELL [mailto:RJCOTTRE@ sentara.com] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 10:56 AM To: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library plan approval (MJH) Hi Ron, We have reviewed the site development plan for your Northside Library and find it consistent with the goals and objectives of our shared access easement. If you need something more than this e-mail to document our approval, please let me know. Thanks, Ron Cottrell VP, Planning and Corporate Development Martha Jefferson Hospital From: Ron Lilley [mailto:RLILLEY(aalbemarle.orq] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 8:47 AM To: RON COTTRELL Subject: Northside Library plan approval (MJH) 1 Good Morning, Ron— '"""` __ Sony to pester you on my Northside Library issues, but I'm quite pressed to get our Building Permit, which is pending site plan approval now. I had hoped Valerie's confirmation with Andy Herrick on the ACSA/shared access easement items being agreeable would meet the need with respect to getting MJH approve our plans with respect to consistency with the goals and objectives of the shared access easement, but I'm told we still need a statement on the plan "approval". I believe a response to this e-mail will satisfy the immediate need. I may be told that a follow-up letter would be necessary, but I think we'd have a little more time to provide that if it is, and I could still get the site plan approved. Eager, Hopeful, and Pressed, - Ron L. Disclaimer This electronic message and its contents and attachments contain information from Sentara Healthcare and is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us immediately and destroy the original message and all copies . 2 rrr ..r Ellie Ray From: Andy Herrick Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 3:57 PM To: Ron Lilley Cc: Ellie Ray Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Ron, Again, if MJH approval of the site plan is needed, I'd suggest the more direct approach of asking for it, rather than relying by inference on approval of related documents. Though Valerie is out of the office this week, are there any specific plans you'd like me to forward for her review? Andy Herrick Sr. Asst. County Attorney Notice: This email may contain attorney-client privileged information,privileged work product,or other confidential information. It is intended only for the designated recipient. If you receive this message and are not a designated recipient you are requested to delete this message immediately and notify me that you have received this by mistake. Thank you. From: Ron Lilley Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 2:33 PM To: Andy Herrick Cc: Ellie Ray Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Andy— I'm referring to the language in the shared access easement (attached),para 3(d) [pg 4] that refers to MJH review of the plans for consistency with the goals and objectives of the easement. I did provide MJH a copy of the plans a couple of months ago and have been anticipating a letter from Ron Cottrell indicating their approval, but it was shortly after I provided those plans that we realized the ACSA easement needed MJH's participation as well, so Ron C. sort of deferred to Valerie Long on that approval. I will press Ron C. for the approval letter if you think it's necessary. I think he thinks that Valerie's approval met the need(but I'm having a hard time getting word back from Ron C.). - Ron L. From: Andy Herrick Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 2:17 PM To: Ron Lilley Cc: Ellie Ray Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Ron, I'm not sure I understand your question. MJH has approved a deed of easement and associated plat. I'm not sure they've approved (or even seen) the proposed site plan. If MJH approval of the site plan is needed, I'd suggest that we forward the site plan, and ask. Thanks. 1 Andy Herrick Sr. Asst. County Attorney Notice: This email may contain attorney-client privileged information,privileged work product,or other confidential information. It is intended only for the designated recipient. If you receive this message and are not a designated recipient you are requested to delete this message immediately and notify me that you have received this by mistake. Thank you. From: Ron Lilley Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 1:55 PM To: Andy Herrick Cc: Ellie Ray Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Indeed (no pun intended...). Do you think the easement review and the clause MJH will add about ensuring access over ACSA easement constitutes the MJH approval of our site plan in terms of their"conformanace with intent of easement"review envisioned in the shared access easement? - RL From: Andy Herrick Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 1:50 PM To: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Ron, Great. Thanks for the confirmation. Andy Herrick Sr.Asst. County Attorney Notice: This email may contain attorney-client privileged information,privileged work product,or other confidential information. It is intended only for the designated recipient. If you receive this message and are not a designated recipient you are requested to delete this message immediately and notify me that you have received this by mistake. Thank you. From: Ron Lilley Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 1:49 PM To: Andy Herrick Cc: Ellie Ray Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Thanks, Andy. Yes, ACSA has looked over the deed and boundaries for the easement and is comfortable with them. - RL From: Andy Herrick Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 1:47 PM To: Ron Lilley 2 Cc: Ellie Ray Now, Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Ron, We're agreeable to the 1VUH's proposed revisions to the ACSA Deed of Easement. Remind me: Have you shared the proposed deed with the ACSA as well? It occurs to me that ACSA may wish to review this deed, to ensure it meets their standards. Otherwise, I think the deed is ready for signatures. Thanks. Andy Herrick Sr. Asst. County Attorney Notice: This email may contain attorney-client privileged information,privileged work product,or other confidential information. It is intended only for the designated recipient. If you receive this message and are not a designated recipient you are requested to delete this message immediately and notify me that you have received this by mistake. Thank you. From: Ron Lilley Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 11:25 AM To: Ellie Ray Cc: Andy Herrick Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Thanks. I was planning to get a letter from MJH, although I've wondered if that's become duplicative given the further detail we've been through in getting their look at easement matters. Andy—would you offer an opinion on whether MJH's agreement on the easement that's pending constitutes their review of our plan with respect to conforming to the intent of our shared driveway easement ? - Ron L. From: Ellie Ray Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 11:18 AM To: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan The sheets look fine. We'll need Andy's confirmation as discussed. Can you also clarify in what form you received MJH's approval of the plans (which I think you're determined constitutes approval of the work within the easement)?...we don't have any record of that. Four full sets should be submitted for signature once the items above are resolved. Ellie Carter Ray,PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 From: Ron Lilley Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 5:11 PM To: Ellie Ray Subject: FW: Northside Library Plan 3 Hi Ellie— Here are the sheets with"new'' easements called out. If this suits you, I think we're all set, so I'll print whatever you need for signature. Let me know as soon as you can. - Ron L. From: Carty, John [mailto:JPCarty @VHB.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 5:07 PM To: Ron Lilley Subject: Fwd: Northside Library Plan Ron, Let me know if you need anything else. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID Original Message Subject: FW: Northside Library Plan From: Ron Lilley<RLILLEY @albemarle.org> To: "Carty, John" <JPCarty @VHB.com> CC: "Temkin, Becki" <BTemkin @VHB.com> John— Please see below and make minor adjustments needed. - RL From: Ellie Ray Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 10:17 AM To: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Ron, I could only give these a very quick look...I have 15 reviews in my queue. The easements should be labeled as "new" if they're new. The temporary construction easement should be labeled as such, not"area for..." I think that's a little confusing. Ellie Carter Ray, PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 From: Ron Lilley Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 2:54 PM To: Ellie Ray 4 Cc: Andy Herrick Nov, Subject: FW: Northside Library Plan Hi Ellie— I'm attaching updated sheets with respect to easement labels and a revised limits of construction boundary that stays within the existing easement on the MJH shared access easement. I'll be happy to get whatever prints you'll need, but would you take a look and see if this addresses what you need? Also, I'm copying Andy Herrick on this in case it's useful for him to provide a semi-formal confirmation that that easement we need (for ACSA) on the MJH side of our shared access easement has been agreed to by MJH, but I think formal recordation may take some days yet, so I'm hopeful that you'll be able to accept a confirmation from Andy that we've got that squared away with recordation forthcoming. Thanks. - Ron L. From: Carty, John [mailto:JPCarty VHB.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 2:44 PM To: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Ron, Unfortunately the limits of work shows up on most of the sheets. We've updated all the sheets, but I've attached just the layout,grading, and utility files. Let me know if you need any of the others. Sincerely, John P. Carty, PE, LEED AP, ENV SP Project Manager 804.343.7100 x7456 www.vhb.com From: Ron Lilley [mailto:RLILLEYftalbemarle.orq] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 8:07 AM To: Catty, John Subject: FW: Northside Library Plan Hi John— As discussed, I'd like to pull back the limits of construction on the MJH parcel to be within the existing shared driveway easement,to avoid an additional temporary construction easement. Would you be able to adjust that and label other easements and send me whatever sheets are revised? If at all possible, I'd like to get this submitted today, and I think we can get our site plan signed. - Ron L. 5 Nair From: Ellie Ray Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 8:43 AM To: Ron Lilley; John Carty Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan All easements should be shown and labeled. Ellie Carter Ray,PL4 Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 From: Ron Lilley Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 8:23 AM To: John Carty; Ellie Ray Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Morning, John. I talked with Ellie about this. I believe it's just a matter of labeling "temporary construction easement" on the S&B parcel, and I'm still trying to determine if we need such (and therefore label for such)on the MJH property. Ellie can chime in, but she may need a label indicating where the proposed ACSA easement is—I know we issued an addendum sketch with the bid documents showing that, but I'm not sure it's clear enough on the site plan sheets. - Ron L. From: Carty, John [mailto:JPCarty@VHB.com] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 11:36 PM To: Ellie Ray; Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Ellie, In reference to the necessary easements, is there something in particular you feel is missing from the plans. I am not aware of anything that needs to be added. Sincerely, John P. Carty, PE, LEED AP, ENV SP Project Manager 804.343.7100 x7456 www.vhb.com From: Ellie Ray [mailto:eray @albemarle.orq] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 11:32 AM To: Ron Lilley Cc: Carty, John Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Ron/John, 6 Ellie Ray From: Andy Herrick Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 1:43 PM To: Valerie Long Cc: Shevlin, Kenneth Subject: RE: Rio Road Property Attachments: Blackline-ACSA_Deed-of-Easement_Northside_library.doc Valerie, Thanks for your message. Your proposed revisions to the Deed of Easement look fine to me. Let me know when you're ready to discuss next steps. Thanks. Andy Herrick Sr. Asst. County Attorney County of Albemarle (434) 972-4067 Notice: This email may contain attorney-client privileged information,privileged work product,or other confidential information. It is intended only for the designated recipient. If you receive this message and are not a designated recipient you are requested to delete this message immediately and notify me that you have received this by mistake. Thank you. From: Long, Valerie [mailto:vlong @williamsmullen.com] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 11:07 AM To: Andy Herrick Subject: RE: Rio Road Property Andy: Sorry for the delay on my end on this. I have reviewed the draft easement and added a clause to the very end expressly stating that it is subject to the terms and conditions of the Declaration that MJH recorded just prior to closing, establishing the shared driveway,so that it is clear that the parties can continue to use that area as a driveway,even where it overlaps with the ACSA area. I made a few other minor technical revisions as well, all of which are highlighted in the blackline of the draft,which is attached. Let me know if you have any questions or want to discuss this further. Thanks,Valerie Valerie W. Long Williams Mullen 321 East Main St. Suite 400 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-3200 T 434.951.5709 F 434.817.0977 vlong@wil liamsmu Ilen.com www.williamsmullen.com/vIong Follow us on Linkedln,Facebook,and Twitter. Sign up for legal email alerts here. NOTICE: Information contained in this transmission to the named addressee is proprietary and is subject to attorney-client privilege and work product confidentiality. If the recipient of this transmission is not the named addressee,the recipient should immediately notify the sender and destroy the information transmitted without making any copy or distribution thereof. 1 CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE:To the extent that thiNelfilmunication and any attachments contain any feder' x advice,such advice,unless stated otherwise, is not intended or written to be used,and can not be used,by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service From: Andy Herrick [mailto:aherrick(aalbemarle.orq] Sent:Tuesday, March 04, 2014 1:37 PM To: Long, Valerie Subject: RE: Rio Road Property Valerie, As promised, here is a proposed plat for the new ACSA easement along the boundary between the County and Hospital properties on Rio Road West. Because the plat only calls for a new fire service line easement, and does not require relocation of the existing access easement(as I had previously thought), I think that we can serve that more limited purpose with a more limited deed of easement to the ACSA. Also attached is a draft ACSA deed of easement, for your consideration. Let me know of any corrections or suggestions. Thanks. Andy Herrick Sr. Asst. County Attorney County of Albemarle (434) 972-4067 Notice: This email may contain attorney-client privileged information,privileged work product,or other confidential information. It is intended only for the designated recipient. If you receive this message and are not a designated recipient you are requested to delete this message immediately and notify me that you have received this by mistake. Thank you. From: Andy Herrick Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 1:31 PM To: 'Long, Valerie' Subject: RE: Rio Road Property Valerie, Thanks for your message. I agree with your approach:We'll look to amend the Declaration to reflect any relocation of the existing shared access easement. If you have suggested language, I'd be happy to see it. Otherwise, I'll await the arrival of a survey/plat to draft a proposed Amendment. Let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss. Thanks. Andy Herrick Sr. Asst. County Attorney Notice: This email may contain attorney-client privileged information,privileged work product,or other confidential information. It is intended only for the designated recipient, If you receive this message and are not a designated recipient you are requested to delete this message immediately and notify me that you have received this by mistake. Thank you. From: Long, Valerie [mailto:vlong@lwilliamsmullen.com] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 12:45 PM To: Andy Herrick Subject: RE: Rio Road Property 2 Thank you,Andy, I appreciate the up`clle and clarification on the water line issue`""fince the Hospital does not know whether it will retain or sell its parcel, it has decided not to try and coordinate sizing it at this time. But they appreciate your willingness to coordinate. The Hospital also does not want in any way to hold up your progress on the library and development aspects related to it. With the Service Authority's confirmation that the fire line can be located within the driveway easement area,we are comfortable. But to the extent that your project requires a shift in the location of the joint easement area, I continue to feel that we'll need to amend the Declaration to reflect that change. I'll just be on the lookout for the plat when you have it available.Will that be what you need to prepare a draft amendment? Thanks again, Valerie Valerie W. Long Williams Mullen 321 East Main St. Suite 400 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-3200 T 434.951.5709 F 434.817.0977 vlongOwil liamsmullen.com www.williamsnnullen.com/vIong Follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook,and Twitter. Sign up for legal email alerts here. NOTICE: Information contained in this transmission to the named addressee is proprietary and is subject to attorney-client privilege and work product confidentiality.If the recipient of this transmission is not the named addressee,the recipient should immediately notify the sender and destroy the information transmitted without making any copy or distribution thereof. CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE:To the extent that this communication and any attachments contain any federal tax advice,such advice,unless stated otherwise,is not intended or written to be used,and can not be used,by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service From: Andy Herrick [mailto:aherrick©albemarle.orq] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 5:10 PM To: Long, Valerie Subject: RE: Rio Road Property Valerie, Thanks for your message. Ron Lilley tells me that the ACSA line proposed for relocation is a fire line to serve a fire hydrant to be relocated. As I understand, the County's building is (and will continue to be) served by a separate private water line. In any event, Ron also discussed with ACSA the potential sharing of the relocated fire service line, and it appears we'd very likely have adequate capacity in the size line we'd install that it could suit the needs for the MJH site as well. He understands that the Hospital's remaining site doesn't already have a separate fire service line, so this would appear to be a good option. Attached is the most current drawing we have to show proposed locations vis-a-vis the property line. This drawing doesn't include the 30' shared access easement, but we expect to get an initial plat that includes that within about a week. This is our best drawing for now. We'd be happy to help decipher as needed. Thanks. Andy Herrick Sr. Asst. County Attorney 3 County of Albemarle N`""/ N■"i° (434) 972-4067 Notice: This email may contain attorney-client privileged information,privileged work product,or other confidential information. It is intended only for the designated recipient. If you receive this message and are not a designated recipient you are requested to delete this message immediately and notify me that you have received this by mistake. Thank you. From: Long, Valerie [mailto:vlong(awilliamsmullen.com] Sent:Tuesday, February 25, 2014 4:47 PM To: Andy Herrick Subject: Rio Road Property Andy: thanks for your time on the phone today to discuss the proposed water line along the boundary between the two parcels. As we discussed,the Hospital is generally agreeable to having the water line easement be along the shared driveway easement, since the Service Authority has confirmed it is ok for the water line to be within the driveway. We are interested, however, in looking into whether it would be appropriate to have the water line upsized to accommodate the water needs for the future development on the Hospital property. I'm trying to confirm the issues with current water lines to the Hospital property. In the meantime, if you want to go ahead and draft a proposed amendment to the Declaration to memorialize what I understand is a necessary shift in the boundaries of the shared driveway easement, we would be happy to review it. I think there is also a proposed plat floating around, but I have not seen a copy of it yet. If you could provide me with a copy that would be great. Thanks,Valerie Valerie W. Long Williams Mullen 321 East Main St. Suite 400 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-3200 T 434.951.5709 F 434.817.0977 vlongCa�williamsmullen.com www.williamsmullen.com/vIonq Follow us on Linkedln,Facebook,and Twitter. Sign up for legal email alerts here. NOTICE: Information contained in this transmission to the named addressee is proprietary and is subject to attorney-client privilege and work product confidentiality.If the recipient of this transmission is not the named addressee,the recipient should immediately notify the sender and destroy the information transmitted without making any copy or distribution thereof. CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE:To the extent that this communication and any attachments contain any federal tax advice,such advice,unless stated otherwise,is not intended or written to be used,and can not be used,by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service 4 Ellie Ray From: Ron Lilley Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 1:48 PM To: Andy Herrick Cc: Ellie Ray Subject: FW: Northside Library Plan Hi Andy— Would you be able to supply a confirmation that MJH has agreed in principle to the easement we need to provide to ACSA that gets onto their side of our shared access easement? That will allow Planning to consider the off-site easements question taken care of. Ron L. From: Ellie Ray Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 1:42 PM To: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan David said we will accept the confirmation from the CAO. Ellie Carter Ray, PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 From: Ron Lilley Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 10:42 AM To: Ellie Ray Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Thanks. From: Ellie Ray Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 10:42 AM To: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan I've asked David about the confirmation from the County Attorney and will let you know when I hear back from him. Effie Carter Ray,PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 From: Ron Lilley Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 10:19 AM To: Ellie Ray Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan 1 Thanks. I'll get that done. Would you be OK in terms of verification of off-site easements with a confirmation from County Attorney that what is needed has been agreed to by MJH ? - RL From: Ellie Ray Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 10:17 AM To: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Ron, I could only give thes: a very quick look...l have 15 reviews i► my queue. The easements should be labeled as"new" if they're new. The tempo rary construction easement shou • be labeled as such, not"area for..." I think that's a little confusing. Ellie Carter Ray, PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Develop -nt ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 From: Ron Lilley Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 2:54 PM To: Ellie Ray Cc: Andy Herrick Subject: FW: Northside Library Pla Hi Ellie— I'm attaching updated shee . with respect to easement label .nd a revised limits of construction boundary that stays within the existing e,sement on the MJH shared access e: ement. I'll be happy to get wh. ever prints you'll need, but would you tak- . look and see if this addresses what you need? Also, I'm copying dy Herrick on this in case it's useful for him to pro 'de a semi-formal confirmation that that easement we nee. (for ACSA) on the MJH side of our shared access e. ement has been agreed to by MJH, but I think formal rec e rdation may take some days yet, so I'm hopeful that y. '11 be able to accept a confirmation from An. that we've got that squared away with recordation fo coming. Thanks. - Ron L. From: Carty, John [mailto:JPCarty@NHB.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 2:44 PM To: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan 2 Ellie Ray From: Michael Vieira [mvieira @serviceauthority.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 10:20 AM To: Ron Lilley; Margaret Maliszewski Cc: Ellie Ray Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Attachments: Northside Library_Owner Approval Letter.pdf Good morning Ron, Attached you will find a copy of the ACSA approval letter for the Northside Library.The original will go out in the mail today. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Michael Vieira,P.E. Civil Engineer Comity Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road Charlottesville,VA 22911 Office: (434)977-4511 ext. 113 This e-mail may contain confidential information that should not be shared with anyone other than its intended recipient(s). From: Ron Lill- [mailto:RLILLEY @albemarle.org] Sent: Tuesday, . ch 25, 2014 9:57 AM To: Margaret Malisze ki Cc: Ellie Ray; Carty, John, ichael Vieira Subject: RE: Northside Libr.-k Plan Good question. I think the only thing left is to satisfy a cou e of Ellie's •omments. I expect ACSA will confirm they're OK today. Ellie—I'll bring you a copy of the Brown Collisi. Ce -r temp construction easement. The MJH easement matters are in process and I think real close to ..ne... When the time comes, should I provide ne site plan sheets for the t uilding permit set of drawings? - Ron L. From: Margaret Maliszewski Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 •.50 AM To: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Libr. Plan Yes. One set of building p-rmit drawings is in my office. Will you be updating them to match the site plan? 1 '1 IA Albemarle County Service Authèrity Serving*Conservir March 25, 2014 Office of Facilities Development Attn: Mr. Ron Lilley 401 McIntire Road, Room 228 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Re: Northside Library Dear Mr. Lilley: Enclosed is a copy of the construction plan approval letter dated March 24, 2014. A copy of the approved plan shall be on the job site throughout construction and shall be modified by the contractor to show as-built conditions. It is the contractor's responsibility to provide this information to you and your consultant for use in developing the final as-built plan, which shall be submitted in the format of one paper copy and one mylar copy. A preconstruction conference is required prior to the start of construction. I can be reached at 977-4511 to schedule the meeting. The preconstruction conference will help to ensure project coordination, clarify ACSA requirements pertaining to construction, and answer any questions you may have. We have also enclosed copies of our "Utility Inspection Policy," "Letter of Dedication," and "As- Built Guide"for your information. These documents should be reviewed before the preconstruction conference. A water construction inspection fee will be invoiced to you at the time of the preconstruction conference. The inspection fee for this project is $324.00 for the water system. A plan review fee will be invoiced to you within the next few days. It will be based upon the actual time of plan review billed at the current hourly rate established by the Board of Directors of the ACSA. At the end of the project, you will also be invoiced for an as-built plan review fee. It will be billed in the same manner as the plan review fee. The utility easements shall be reviewed and approved prior to recordation. Copies of the deed of easement, plat, as-built plan and Letter of Dedication shall be submitted as soon as possible following installation of the utility systems. Timely submission of these documents will help you avoid delays in receiving utility service. 168 Spotrzap Road • Charlottesville, VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977-4511 • Fax (434) 979-0698 www.serviceauthority.org The plan approval is valid for a period of 18 months. If construction is not in progress at the end of the approval period, the approval shall be void. The contractor shall be responsible to comply with the no-lead regulation regarding brass fittings that is effective on January 4, 2014 (Senate Bill 3874 which amends the Safe Drinking Water Act). If you have any questions or if we may be of assistance, please give us a call at 977-4511. Sincerely, t / r • Michael Vieira, P.E. Civil Engineer MV/dbh cc: ACSA Inspector 050601 NorthsideLibraryOwnApprovalLtr032514 Ellie Ray From: Ron Lilley Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 4:01 PM To: Ellie Ray Subject: FW: Rio Road Property FYI. Hopefully, MJH easement in place soon... - RL From: Andy Herrick Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 3:35 PM To: Valerie Long Cc: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Rio Road Property Valerie, I did receive your e-mail yesterday, but after being out of the office for much of last week, I'm still catching up from a significant backlog. I'll let Ron and you know once I've had a chance to review your latest comments. Thanks. Andy Herrick Sr. Asst. County Attorney County of Albemarle (434) 972-4067 Notice: This email may contain attorney-client privileged information,privileged work product,or other confidential information. It is intended only for the designated recipient. If you receive this message and are not a designated recipient you are requested to delete this message immediately and notify me that you have received this by mistake. Thank you. From: Long, Valerie [mailto:vlongOwilliamsmullen.com] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 5:26 PM To: Andy Herrick Subject: Rio Road Property Andy: I wanted to confirm that you had received the email I sent you this morning with my minor comments to the ASCA Easement for the Rio Road property. Our client received a call from Ron Lilly, and he worried I'd not responded to you yet. I told him it was just this morning that I'd emailed you, and that it was possibly that things had crossed, but offered to respond to you regardless. The hospital is agreeable to the easement with those minor revisions and if agreeable to you and ACSA,we can move forward quickly to have the plat and easement executed. Thanks again, and let me know if you need anything else from me. Valerie Valerie W. Long Williams Mullen 321 East Main St. Suite 400 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-3200 1 T 434.951.5709 `w "✓ F 434.817.0977 vlong@iwil liamsmul len.com www.williamsmullen.com/vIong Follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook,and Twitter. Sign up for legal email alerts here. NOTICE: Information contained in this transmission to the named addressee is proprietary and is subject to attorney-client privilege and work product confidentiality.If the recipient of this transmission is not the named addressee,the recipient should immediately notify the sender and destroy the information transmitted without making any copy or distribution thereof. CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE:To the extent that this communication and any attachments contain any federal tax advice,such advice,unless stated otherwise,is not intended or written to be used,and can not be used,by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service 2 Ellie Ray From: Ellie Ray Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 11:32 AM To: Ron Lilley Cc: Carty, John Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Ron/John, The adjoining parcel info(as pointed out in John's email) is fine as is...l had previously reviewed it on the layout sheet and didn't even notice that it was on the 'existing conditions' sheet. I reviewed the 'existing conditions'on the demolition sheet...it's a bit odd that this plan set has both 'demolition' and 'existing conditions' and they're not near each other in the plan set...but, hey,they're all different. Anyway,what's shown on the existing conditions sheet meets the ordinance. If you want to,you can show it on the layout sheet as well, but it isn't required. The only other item is to show and label all of the necessary/required easements. Ellie Carter Ray, PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 From: Ron Lilley Sent:Tuesday, March 2 , 014 10:14 AM To: Ellie Ray Cc: Carty, John Subject: FW: Northside Library P Ellie— I think, aside from the remaining easement .nfirmation, e only thing that actually needs to change on the plan is the adjoining parcel info. If you'll confirm that, I'll ask VHB to get that do • ickly and will get the updated plans to you ASAP. I'll also plan to update the Building Plans sets with e up.. ed civil sheets. - Ron L. From: Margaret Maliszewski Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 10:00 M To: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library PL As far as I know, no one was -ale to complete their review of the building permit beca - the site plan wasn't approved. You'll want to update both -ts of the building permit drawings so that review can continu- Jay or Stewart or Keith can probably help you locate e second set of permit drawings. From: Ron Lilley Sent: Tuesday, Ma' h 25, 2014 9:57 AM To: Margaret Ma' zewski Cc: Ellie Ray; :rty, John; Michael Vieira Subject: RE. orthside Library Plan 1 Ellie Ray From: Carty, John [JPCarty @VHB.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 10:29 AM To: Ron Lilley; Ellie Ray Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Attachments: SV1.pdf; C3.01 LM.pdf Ellie, The site plan package that you have currently has the property information listed on the existing conditions drawing, sheet SV-1. Since we are zoomed in on the site plans,we don't shown any adjacent owner information on any other sheet. Can you clarify which additional sheets you need us add the adjacent owner information to? I assume you will want all adjacent owners listed. I've attached the SV-1 and C3.01 from the current set for reference. Sincerely, John P.Carty, PE, LEED AP, ENV SP Project Manager 804.343.7100 x7456 www.vhb.com From: Ron Lilley • ailto:RLILLEY©albemarle.org] Sent: Tuesday, Mar • 25, 2014 10:14 AM To: Ellie Ray Cc: Carty, John Subject: FW: Northside Libr. Plan Ellie— I think, aside from the remaining easem; t confirmation,the only thing that actually needs to change on the plan is the adjoining parcel info. If you'll confirm that, I'll ask VHB to get that d• e • ickly and will get the updated plans to you ASAP. I'll also plan to update the Building Plans sets with th- •dated civil sheets. - Ron L. From: Margaret Maliszewski Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 10:00 AM To: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan As far as I know, no one was able o complete their review of the building permit b:cause the site plan wasn't approved. You'll want to update both sets '. the building permit drawings so that review can co •'nue. Jay or Stewart or Keith can probably help you locate the •cond set of permit drawings. From: Ron Lilley Sent: Tuesday, March , , 2014 9:57 AM To: Margaret Malisze ,ski Cc: Ellie Ray; Carty John; Michael Vieira Subject: RE: Nor side Library Plan 1 see Ellie Ray From: Ron Lilley Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 10:14 AM To: Ellie Ray Cc: Carty, John Subject: FW: Northside Library Plan Ellie— I think, aside from the remaining easement confirmation, the only thing that actually needs to change on the plan is the adjoining parcel info. If you'll confirm that, I'll ask VHB to get that done quickly and will get the updated plans to you ASAP. I'll also plan to update the Building Plans sets with the updated civil sheets. - Ron L. From: Margaret Maliszewski Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 10:00 AM To: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan As far as I know, no one was able to complete their review of the building permit because the site plan wasn't approved. You'll want to update both sets of the building permit drawings so that review can continue. Jay or Stewart or Keith can probably help you locate the second set of permit drawings. From: •en Lilley Sent: Tue •ay, March 25, 2014 9:57 AM To: Margaret aliszewski Cc: Ellie Ray; , John; Michael Vieira Subject: RE: Nort 'de Library Plan Good question. I think the only thing left is to ttisfy a couple of Ellie's co . ents. I expect ACSA will confirm they're OK today. Ellie—I'll bring you a copy of the Brown ollision 'enter temp construction easement. The MJH easement matters are in process and I think real close t• so,e... When the time comes, should I provide new ite pl. heets for the Building permit set of drawings? - Ron L. From: Margaret Maliszewski Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 .:50 AM To: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Lib .ry Plan Yes. One set of buildin, permit drawings is in my office. Will you be updating them to match the site plan? 1 Ellie Ray From: Ron Lilley Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:57 AM To: Margaret Maliszewski Cc: Ellie Ray; Carty, John; Michael Vieira Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Good question. I think the only thing left is to satisfy a couple of Ellie's comments. I expect ACSA will confirm they're OK today. Ellie—I'll bring you a copy of the Brown Collision Center temp construction easement. The MJH easement matters are in process and I think real close to done... When the time comes, should I provide new site plan sheets for the Building permit set of drawings? - Ron L. From: Margaret Maliszewski Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:50 AM To: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Yes. One set of building permit drawings is in my office. Will you be updating them to match the site plan? From: Ron Lilley Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:48 AM To: Margaret Maliszewski Subject: FW: Northside Library Plan Does this work for you? From: Ellie Ray Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 3:44 PM To: Ron Lilley Cc: Carty, John Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Looks fine to me. Ellie Carter Ray,PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 From: Ron Lilley Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 3:42 PM To: Ellie Ray 1 Ellie Ray From: Ron Lilley Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 3:42 PM To: Ellie Ray Cc: Carty, John Subject: FW: Northside Library Plan Hi Ellie— Is the attached an acceptable form of documentation from Dominion regarding the trees that would be under their lines? E5 - Ron L. From: Carty, John [mailto:JPCartyC)VHB.com] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 10:05 AM To: Ron Lilley; James Moore (jmoore(&waterstreetstudio.net); James Shook(jshook @hbmarchitects.com) Subject: FW: Northside Library Plan FYI. John P. Carty, PE, LEED AP, ENV SP Project Manager 804.343.7100x7456 www.vhb.com From: Dale Crutchfield (VirginiaPower - 1) [mailto:dale.crutchfield(adom.com] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 9:45 AM To: Carty, John Cc: Ann Marie A Knight(VirginiaPower- 1) Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Good morning John, The tree species proposed for the Northside Library are compatible with Dominion's overhead infrastructure. Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed landscape plan. Please let me know if you need any additional information. Thanks, Dale Crutchfield Dominion Virginia Power Distribution Forestry Technical Consultant 1719 Hydraulic Road Charlottesville,VA 22901 Email: dale.crutchfieldPdom.com Office Telephone: 434 972 6874 1 Mobile: 540 290 7381 Nee From: Carty, John [mailto:JPCarty@VHB.com] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 5:27 PM To: Dale Crutchfield (VirginiaPower- 1) Subject: RE: Northside Library Plan Dale, Just to clarify,Ann Marie suggested that we send our landscape plan to you for the Northside Library. We are proposing trees in the front of the building. She wanted us to make sure you were ok with the types of trees we were proposing. Let us know if you see any issues. Sincerely, John P. Carty, PE, LEED AP, ENV SP Project Manager 804.343.7100 x7456 www.vhb.com From: James Moore [mailto:jmoore@waterstreetstudio.net] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 1:29 PM To: dale.crutchfield @dom.corn Cc: Carty, John; Eugene Ryang Subject: Northside Library Plan Hi Dale, Attached is a plan for the Northside Library planting.As far as planting within the front easement,we are replacing the existing dogwoods with new dogwoods because of road realignment. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, James james harris moore waterstreet !1 third s: so �Itorioftt'SVi11ic,va 22902 This ooinmun{cation and any attachmenm tc this are confidential and imacace only fc'ate recipient(s) Any other LSE.,di:;sem nador,copying or disclosure of o o communication is strictly prohibited I,you nave received this communication in error,please not fy us and destroy it immediately Vanasse Brushy,. Inc. is nor responsible for any undetectab,e al:era:ion virus,transmission errci conversion media degradation,software erro' of interference with tics transmission attacri ments to this transmission Var <:se Hanger*Brostlin.Inc .infoavhb.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains information which may be legally confidential and/or privileged and does not in any case represent a firm ENERGY COMMODITY bid or offer relating thereto which binds the sender without an additional express written confirmation to that effect. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is 2 ' ~ unauthorized. If you are not the ioteded recipient, any disclosure, ' or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. This cnn'mun'caour"n''an> nacmne'u^x'I':�.are confidential and me'meu only m' /ec|p/on*m.Arty m^e' use r.:z"r.`.um,qpymo. o`^c/nuurwthis communication is strictly pror;icirec you nave received tis conrnnrurnicationi in erno olease notify us and deotra it omnrreuateh vanau,,*a,m"n trio no:res on,mlem. orvu^uete:taw,z:e,m,o!. sinus trar:smrssron error cn/*arso: memv degradation.software error or intede,ence vith av`,mnr``,�m':' onocin`omczo this transmission. vonasa Hanger o'ustnn.Inc.|infoevou.nvm Ellie Ray From: David Benish Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 5:05 PM To: Ellie Ray Subject: RE: Northside Library--shared access easement adjustment According to OFD/Co.Atty.work in the existing easement work is OK. If they are showing work off-site (off their property and outside the easement)then that needs to be addressed. Ron's e-mail says, " I've gotten buy-in from Co. Atty. that MJH's approval of our plans with respect to their easement interests..." I wonder in what form did OFD get MJH's approval of our plans, and did those plans show this current off-site work on MJH's property(or is some of the off-site work on property owned by someone else—Brown's Auto)? From: Ellie Ray Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 4:08 PM To: David Benish Subject: FW: Northside Library -- shared access easement adjustment Found this looking through my email. It looks like this covers the improvements within the existing easement on the library site (?)...but I guess the off-site easements still need to be addressed? Ellie Carter Ray, PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 z-, From: Ron Lilley Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 11:37 AM To: Ellie Ray Cc: Trevor Henry Subject: RE: Northside Library -- shared access easement adjustment Thanks, Ellie. Since we spoke, I've gotten buy-in from Co. Atty. that MJH's approval of our plans with respect to their easement interests would satisfy the terms of the easement and the language need not be changed. - Ron L. From: Ellie Ray Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 11:26 AM To: Ron Lilley; Trevor Henry Subject: RE: Northside Library-- shared access easement adjustment I talked to David and he thinks that in a case like this where the easement already exists...it's just the deed language that may need to change,that we would be willing to accept a letter of intent or"approval" documentation from the adjacent owner. However, as I said on the phone,this is really a bigger issue and that is the liability the County may be taking on by not clearly taking care of this issue prior to final plans/construction. Since the County Attorney's Office was involved with the easement modifications earlier this year,you should bring them in on this issue (if you haven't already)to get their opinion on howl easement and deed language should be hffIldled. If they are comfortable with a letter of intent,then we will be too. Hope this makes sense... Ellie Carter Ray, PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 From: Ron Lilley Sent:Tuesday, December 10, 2013 1:21 PM To: Ellie Ray Subject: RE: Northside Library -- shared access easement adjustment Oy! Thanks.... From: Ellie Ray Sent:Tuesday, December 10, 2013 1:21 PM To: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library-- shared access easement adjustment I think we're now requiring actual recordation instead of allowing letters of intent...we've had too many issues with the letters. Ellie Carter Ray,PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 From: Ron Lilley Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 1:19 PM To: Ellie Ray Subject: Northside Library -- shared access easement adjustment Hey Ellie— Were you able to learn anything more solid about whether a letter of intent from MJH regarding amending our easement language from "30' without obstruction"to "two travel lanes of at least 10' " (that's what Engineering said would be minimum) ... would a letter of intent be acceptable for site plan purposes ? - RL 2 Ellie Ray From: Ellie Ray Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 4:42 PM To: 'JPCarty @VHB.com' Cc: Ron Lilley Subject: SDP201300057 Northside Library- Minor Attachments: CDP3_sdp_ECR_Northside Library.pdf; SDP-2013-00057 VDOT Comments-3-21-14.pdf Mr. Carty, Please find attached my comments for the above referenced application. I am awaiting comment from ARB and ACSA and will send them along as soon as any comments are received. I have attached VDOT's `no objection'. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions,concerns, or need further clarification. Thank you, Ellie Carter Ray, PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development Planning Division 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 fax: 434.972.4126 1 Transportation Land Development • Environmental • • • Services 1/[7 imagination innovation energy Creating results for our clients and benefits for our communities Vanasse Hangen I3rustlin, Inc. February 26, 2014 Ref: 33781.00 Ms. Ellie Carter Ray Senior Planner County of Albemarle • Department of Community Development 401 McEntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville,VA 22902-4596 Re: Response to Comments Northside Library Ms. Ray: On behalf of HBM Architects and Albemarle County—Office of Facilities Development, VHB is providing this letter detailing how we have responded to comments received from Department of Community Development and Virginia Department of Transportation. With this letter are revised plans based on your comments. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me (804-441-7456) or via email at JPCarty @VHB.com. Very truly yours, VANASSE HANGEN BRUSTLIN, INC. "411:e John Carty, PE, LEED AP, ENV SP Project Manager • 115 South 15th Street,Suite 200 Richmond,VA 23219-4209 \\vhb\prof\Richmond\33781.00 HBM Northside Library\docs\VARIOUS\County Comments\Round 2\14 0226 Response to cours43.7100■FAX 804.343.17' Comments.docx email:info @vhb.com www.vhb.com Ms. Ray Northside Library Page 2 Department of Community Development 5. The parcel information has been updated and labeled as 'Village Office Condos,various owners'. See SV-1. 6. The parking chart on the cover page has been updated to show 82 spaces provided instead of 84. One of the back parking lot rows has 7 spaces instead of 8; the Layout and Materials plan has been updated accordingly. We also lost one parking spot due to the revised property line. 8. Overhang line placed on landscape and lighting plans. 16. The large dark circles(storm manholes) have been labeled on the Layout and Materials Plan. 19. 5 additional Thuja labeled and added to overall counts 20. Dale from Dominion approved plan for trees within easement. Proposed utilities included on landscape plan.VHB has approved plantings.Trees which appear to be in conflict with existing storm drain approved by VHB as the pipes are buried deep below ground. 22. ARB approved plan. 24. ARB approved plan. 26. See A1.1 for reference for enclosure in lieu of a dumpster, the site is proposing 50 gallon trash cans,therefore pad not necessary. 27. Counts corrected and updated as requested. 28. Plant counts corrected and updated as requested. 30. Spec sheet removed. 33. Lighting plan altered to satisfy spillover requirements. 36. Ron Lilley is currently working to gain approval of these limited areas of disturbance that are off the property. 37. Understood. VDOT: 1. Rio Road West has been relabeled to the correct route number(Route 631). 2. STM 40 has been moved slightly to correct this situation.The new 1 ft of pipe section to be installed will not be deflected from the main line. ARB 1. Note changed to indicate a 24" base so light pole height is 20' 2. Dominion Virginia Power has approved plantings in there easement.The ACSA easement has been moved so not to conflict with trees. Three trees in the back of the parking lot are located over storm line that is 10-15 ft below grade. Due to the depth of pipes in rear parking lot, Waterstreet and VHB do not believe there to be a conflict between trees and pipes. 3. Callouts and plant calculations revised. • RECEIVED MAR ' 2 201k COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ellie Ray From: Ellie Ray Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 9:35 AM To: 'JPCarty @VHB.com'; Ron Lilley Subject: FW: SDP-2013-00057 Northside Library Attachments: SDP-2013-00057 Northside Library Comments-2-12-14.pdf VDOT comments attached. Ellie Carter Ray, PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 From: Austin, Nathran. (VDOT) [mailto:Nathran.Austin@vdot.virginia.gov] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 9:34 AM To: Ellie Ray Subject: SDP-2013-00057 Northside Library Troy Austin, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation Land Development—South Culpeper District P.O. Box 1017 Troy,VA 22974 Phone: (434) 589-5871 Fax: (434) 589-3967 1 Ellie Ray From: Ellie Ray Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 4:28 PM To: 'JPCarty@VHB.com' Cc: Ron Lilley Subject: SDP201300057 Northside Library- Minor Attachments: CDP2_sdp_ECR_Northside Library.pdf Mr. Carty, Please find attached my comments for the above referenced application. I am awaiting comment from Engineering, VDOT,ARB, Fire/Rescue and ACSA. I will send them along as soon as I receive them. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions, concerns,or need further clarification. Thank you, Ellie Carter Ray, PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development Planning Division 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 fax: 434.972.4126 1 . Transportation Land Development Environmental • • • •°'r' -vow S e r v i t c �� • Mimagination innovation energy(rt aurg rt r∎Ar,∎ur clients and t r:r=rrts tor n ur,onimunitu Vwiasse llangen Brustlin, Inc. January 31, 2014 Ref: 33781.00 Ms. Ellie Carter Ray Senior Planner County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McEntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville,VA 22902-4596 Re: Response to Comments Northside Library Ms. Ray: On behalf of HBM Architects and Albemarle County—Office of Facilities Development, VHB is providing this letter detailing how we have responded to comments received from County departments for the Plan of Development. With this letter are ten (10)sets of plans revised as noted on the following pages. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me (804-441-7456) or via email at JPCarty @VHB.com. Very truly yours, VANASSE HANGEN BRUSTLIN, INC. "4"41 John Carty, PE, LEED AP, ENV SP Project Manager A-6sA re W 64-44.1 41- .f ,4 A-494. Iii 's, r;th 1-Oh S:\1-Projects\Northside Library_Albemarle Co\Record\Export\14_0203_NSL_County_Resubmit_Package\Dots\14 0130 RCS oi'tse"to 2''I'r } County Comments.docx •FAX soa.3a;.1713 mill int,,-.-;i,i Ms. Ray Northside Library Page 2 Department of Community Development 1. The owner has been shown in the Site Data section on the cover sheet. 2. EC, Entrance Corridor has been added to the cover sheet. 3. The written and graphic scales now match on sheet C7.01. 4. The other drawings are added to the cover sheet index. 5. All adjacent property information is provided on sheet C3.01. 6. A parking chart is included on the cover sheet. 7. The maximum impervious coverage is added to the plan (74%or 100,249 sf) 8. The light pole has been moved to more than 2'from the back of curb. A dimension is shown. 9. The route, ROW and pavement info are provided on sheet C3.01. 10. An easement does exist and has been noted on sheet C3.01. 11. The demo plan incorrectly removed an entire run of 12" storm pipe. Sheet C2.01 is corrected. 12. A formal boundary survey was not completed for this project. However, Miss Utility was ordered on site and marked the utilities shown on the plan. 13. Distance from stop bar at entrance to centerline of Berkmar Drive and Route 29 provided on sheet C3.01. 14. All square footages have been clarified on the cover sheet. 15. Labels and dimensions have been added throughout the site plan. 16. Those "large dark circles" are new storm manholes. 17. A detail is added to sheet C8.02 for a CG-6 and CG-6R curb and gutter. 18. Angle of parking is labeled. 19. Landscape plan has been clarified. Call outs now have the associated quantity. Symbols are now consistent among plant types. 20. Proposed plantings have been moved away from proposed utilities and easements. 21. Planting size of each species has been listed and meet minimum standards. 22. ARB approved proposed planting along street. 23. We are removing all dogwoods along the front and replacing with new trees. 24. ARB approved proposed planting between parking lot and street. 25. Impervious and landscape area calculations have been reviewed and updated. 26. Notes have been added to sheet C3.01. 27. Buxus'Green Velvet' has been deleted from canopy calculations. 28. The number of Acer rubrum has been updated to reflect the plan. 29. Lighting plan has been updated 30. Resolved spec sheet listing a fixture not in schedule. 31. The luminaire schedule includes quantity, lumen level, maintenance factor, and tilt for each fixture. 32. Placed a note to verify that LLF is 1.0. 33. Note added to plan. 34. Benchmarks are shown on plan sheets("Benchmark" label added and benchmark boxed.) 35. The limits of work have been adjusted and all removed items and work are now within those limits. 36. Ron Lilley is currently working to gain approval of these limited areas of disturbance that are off the property. 37. Understood. Ms. Ray Northside Library Page 3 Engineering: 1. A single unit truck movement is provided. 2. Radii added throughout the site except for radii that are 5' which are standard. There is a note on sheet C1.01 stating this requirement. 3. VHB policy is to not modify or alter the existing conditions background drawing. We believe this helps the contractor understand the existing conditions compared to the proposed. We also believe this protects our clients. 4. Understood. 5. An easement does exist and has been noted on sheet C3.01. 6. A detail is added to sheet C8.02 for a CG-6 and CG-6R curb and gutter. 7. The light pole has been moved to more than 2'from the back of curb. A dimension is shown. 8. Bumper blocks(wheel stops) are added to the plan. 9. Distance from stop bar at entrance to centerline of Rio Road West provided on sheet C3.01. 10. ARB required that monument signs not be shown on the site plan. Fire: 1. The fire department connection is now shown adjacent to the fire hydrant. 2. The drive aisle is revised to 20'width. 3. Fire lane markings and signage are provided on sheet C3.01. VDOT: 1. Dimensioned taper added to sheet 3.01. (100' Long x 12'wide taper) 2. The entrance radius is revised to 25'. 3. Additional signage has been provided at the drop off area of the library. 4. The drainage system in this location has been redesigned. 5. Sight distance lines are shown on sheet C3.01. The end of the lines is off the sheet. 6. After further review,VDOT will not require a signal queue analysis. 7. A 30' Access Easement currently exists and "straddles" the property line between the library property and property to the south. Erosion and Sediment Control 1. State standards have been adhered to and Design Standards Manual notes and details are included. 2. The limits and perimeter measures have been revised as necessary. 3. All stages protected adequately. Sediment trap is designed to contain less frequent, larger storm events (purpose of dry volume storage). 4. A channel analysis was completed on January 10th showing that the channel is adequate. This information was included in the Northside Library Calculations Package. 5. With the addition of the creek analysis, MS-19 is addressed. 6. Contour elevations are now shown for the sediment trap. 7. The sequence of construction has been updated appropriately. 8. Inlet protection and silt fence were added in phase II Erosion and Sediment Control. Diversion dikes and silt fence will not be necessary once curb is installed. 9. Discussed with Max Green-this comment can be ignored. See comment 10 for reason. Ms. Ray Northside Library Page 4 10. VHB policy is to not modify or alter the existing conditions background drawing. We believe this helps the contractor understand the existing conditions compared to the proposed. We also believe this protects our clients. 11. Understood. Stormwater Management 1. There is enough capture and treatment for on-site areas. Calculations showing this are included. 2. We are reducing the impervious area therefore the detention storage is adequate. 3. Sealed hydrologic and hydraulic computations were provided. 4. The 103 b drainage area was confirmed as correct (the dashed line in the middle of 103 b is the time of concentration, not a drainage divide). 5. The storm water calculations were provided in the Northside Library Calculations Package. 6. The 36" RCP is not missing from the storm profiles; it is an existing pipe so it shows up lighter. The layer has been edited so it will show up slightly darker than before. 7. Added label "Planted Biofiltration Swale with Subdrain" and hatch to on LM (sheet C3.01). Ellie Ray From: Ron Lilley Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 10:41 AM To: Glenn Brooks; Max Greene Cc: Ellie Ray Subject: FW: Northisde Lib--SWM update Hey guys— This is just a heads-up for you. Hopefully there will be updated info to you before the week is out. - RL From: Catty, John [mailto:JPCartyC)VHB.com] Sent:Tuesday, January 14, 2014 10:37 AM To: Ron Lilley Cc: Alan Franklin (afranklinCa�waterstreetstudio.net); James Shook Subject: RE: Northisde Lib -- SWM update Ron, Thanks for following up. We completed our site visit last week and we currently working on the analysis. From what I've seen so far it looks like everything will work. The new sections will be included the stormwater management report and we will get it back to you before the end of the week. I'm hoping by Thursday. John P. Catty, PE, LEED AP, ENV SP Project Manager 804 343 7100 x7456 www.vhb.com From: Ron Lilley [mailto:RLILLEY@ albemarle.orq] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 10:26 AM To: Catty, John Cc: Alan Franklin (afranklinwaterstreetstudio.net); James Shook Subject: Northisde Lib -- SWM update Hello John— Just wanted to check-in with you and make sure things were on track for the runoff receiving channel assessment that our Engineering reviewers need. I'm copying Alan Franklin at Water Street Studio on this mostly to sort of connect you two. He worked pretty closely with Scott on many of the site plan items and may be a good resource to advise on responses to County Engineering. Give me an update soon if possible. Thanks. - Ron L. i w Ellie Ray From: Amelia McCulley Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 11:30 AM To: Ellie Ray; Ron Lilley Subject: Northside Library parking approval Attachments: 1m351 1_20131219_004708.pdf Ellie, I've also got a paper copy in your mailbox. I'll also attach it to the CV application and add a review. Ellie Ray From: Chapman, Scott[SChapman @VHB.com] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 10:18 AM To: Max Greene Cc: Alan Franklin (afranklin @waterstreetstudio.net); Ellie Ray Subject: RE: northside library Max, I am wondering, did you receive the calculation package with the plan submittal? In that package,there are calculations for MS-19. Scott Scott Chapman, PE Senior Project Manager 804343.7100 www.vhb.com From: Max Green: [mailto:MGreene @albemarle.orq] Sent: Friday, Dece •er 13, 2013 10:57 AM To: Chapman, Scott; E '- Ray Cc: Alan Franklin (afrankli (Awaterstreetstudio.net) Subject: RE: northside libra Please find the attached WPO revie, sheet. From: Chapman, Scott [mailto:SCha•man&HB.com] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 10:39 AM To: Max Greene; Ellie Ray Cc: Alan Franklin (afranklin @waterstreetstudio.net) Subject: RE: northside library Max, I did not received any comments on the WPO .pplication. Can you ..k into this for me please? Scott Chapman, PE Senior Project Manager 804.343.7100 www.vhb.com From: Max Greene [mailto:MGree - • albemarle.or•] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 :57 AM To: Ellie Ray Cc: Alan Franklin (afranklin • -terstreetstudio.net); Chapman, Scott Subject: RE: northside libra- I do not have access to Ci y View at this time. I hope to have it corrected by next week. Comments should have been forwarded to the desig er. Thanks, 1 Ellie Ray From: Max Greene Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 10:57 AM To: Chapman, Scott; Ellie Ray Cc: Alan Franklin (afranklin @waterstreetstudio.net) Subject: RE: northside library Attachments: REVIEWCOMMENTS_WPO_Northside Library_6Nov2013.doc Please find the attached WPO review sheet. From: Chapman, Scott [mailto:SChapman @VHB.com] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 10:39 AM To: Max Greene; Ellie Ray Cc: Alan Franklin (afranklin @waterstreetstudio.net) Subject: RE: northside library Max, I did not received any comments on the WPO application. Can you look into this for me please? Scott Chapman, PE Senior Project Manager 804.343.7100 www.vhb.com From: Max Greene [mailto:MGreene @albemarle.orq] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 9:57 AM To: Ellie Ray Cc: Alan Franklin (afranklin @waterstreetstudio.net); Chapman, Scott Subject: RE: northside library I do not have access to City View at this time. I hope to have it corrected by next week. Comments should have been forwarded to the designer. Thanks, Max From: Ellie Ray Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 5:07 PM To: Max Greene Cc: Alan Franklin (afranklin @waterstreetstudio.net); Chapman, Scott Subject: RE: northside library Max, Can you answer Scott's question regarding the WPO application? Thanks, Ellie Carter Ray, PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 1 From: Chapman, Scott [mailto:SChapman@VHB.com] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 4:57 PM To: Ellie Ray Cc: Alan Franklin (afranklin @waterstreetstudio.net) Subject: northside library Hi Ellie, Should I have received comments from engineering already for SWM and erosion control? I haven't received anything yet. Thanks, Scott Scott Chapman, PE Senior Project Manager VHB Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Transportation Land Development • Environmental Services 115 South 15th Street,Suite 200 Richmond,VA 232.19-4209 Phone:804.343.7100 Fax:804.343.1713 Mobile:804.931.2314 schapman@vhb.com www.vhb.com (hr communrcatror arc any attachments to tnis are confidential and intended only for tht'recidicnt:sr.Any otner use dissem:nazttor. cnpv:ng,c disclosure-of this commun:cahoir is str;cti, ormhihited.I'vas have recorvurl too,con ;unmai,on in error,please notify us and destroy nimediale ana ar herigen Brustlin,Inc.if, not responsible for any undetectable alteration,virus rransmission error conversion,media degradation,software error.or interference with tow transmo:'aor.or attachments to this transmission. Vanasse larder.3rustiir, Inc infoavhb.com This communicatior anc any attacnments to tots are confioenti=!and interoec only for the recicientts).Any other use.dissemination.copying.or disclosure cf tai, communication a strictly prohieitea.If you nave received this communication 1,1 error.please ncnf,,us anc destroy it immed,ates' masse Hamer,£rustlii, Inc is not responsible for any undetectable alte et ati,virus,transmission error conversion media dearadat:on,software error.or interterence with tow transmissior or attachments to this transmission Vanasse Hanger Brustlin,Inc. infoavhb.com 2 Ellie Ray From: Amelia McCulley Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 4:55 PM To: Ellie Ray Subject: FW: Northside Library- Parking Needs I'm going to write you a letter accepting Ron's parking study as valid. Therefore,the required parking is 82 spaces. From: Ron Lilley Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 3:09 PM To: Amelia McCulley Subject: RE: Northside Library- Parking Needs Glad I was able to meet the need. The assumptions are based on actual experience per discussion with the Northside Library location staff, the ESOL staff, and County General Services and Schools Building Services regarding storage/warehouse use. - Ron L. From: Amelia McCulley Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 2:57 PM To: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library - Parking Needs Thanks so much for this thorough information. This is exactly what I need! My only question is what the parking assumptions for programs is based on —actual experience, ITE or whatever? I'll try to format this into a parking determination when this info is complete. From: Ron Lilley Sent: Monday, December 0. 2013 2:55 PM To: Amelia McCulley; Ellie Ray Cc: Chapman, Scott; James Moor-• Alan Franklin; Eugene Ryang Subject: RE: Northside Library- Pa ' g Needs Hello Amelia— I think I may be most suited to respond on this... The SF by use breaks down as: GSF Library 37,320 Storage 23,033 Schools (ESOL) 3,588 Total 63,941 . F This is slightly different to .1 from James' numbers provided 11/25, but very close. 1 'lore 'Vale Ellie Ray From: Ron Lilley Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 11:37 AM To: Ellie Ray Cc: Trevor Henry Subject: RE: Northside Library--shared access easement adjustment Thanks, Ellie. Since we spoke, I've gotten buy-in from Co. Atty. that MJH's approval of our plans with respect to their easement interests would satisfy the terms of the easement and the language need not be changed. - Ron L. From: Ellie Ray Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 11:26 AM To: Ron Lilley; Trevor Henry Subject: RE: Northside Library-- shared access easement adjustment I talked to David and he thinks that in a case like this where the easement already exists...it's just the deed language that may need to change,that we would be willing to accept a letter of intent or"approval" documentation from the adjacent owner. However, as I said on the phone,this is really a bigger issue and that is the liability the County may be taking on by not clearly taking care of this issue prior to final plans/construction. Since the County Attorney's Office was involved with the easement modifications earlier this year,you should bring them in on this issue(if you haven't already)to get their opinion on how the easement and deed language should be handled. If they are comfortable with a letter of intent,then we will be too. Hope this makes sense... Ellie Carter Ray, PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 From: Ron Lilley Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 1:21 PM To: Ellie Ray Subject: RE: Northside Library-- shared access easement adjustment Oy! Thanks.... From: Ellie Ray Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 1:21 PM To: Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library -- shared access easement adjustment I think we're now requiring actual recordation instead of allowing letters of intent...we've had too many issues with the letters. Ellie Carter Ray,PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development 1 ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 `'r' N✓ From: Ron Lilley Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 1:19 PM To: Ellie Ray Subject: Northside Library -- shared access easement adjustment Hey Ellie— Were you able to learn anything more solid about whether a letter of intent from MJH regarding amending our easement language from"30' without obstruction"to "two travel lanes of at least 10' " (that's what Engineering said would be minimum) ... would a letter of intent be acceptable for site plan purposes ? - RL 2 Ellie Ray From: Ron Lilley Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 2:55 PM To: Amelia McCulley; Ellie Ray Cc: Chapman, Scott; James Moore; Alan Franklin; Eugene Ryang Subject: RE: Northside Library- Parking Needs Hello Amelia— I think I may be most suited to respond on this... The SF by use breaks down as: GSF Library 37,320 Storage 23,033 Schools (ESOL) 3,588 Total 63,941 GSF This is slightly different total from James' numbers provided 11/25, but very close. The library use would have a peak parking demand during their summertime childrens' program, which is a daytime program that typically has on the order of 100 participants, with an associated parking need of 50 spaces. The library's peak staff loading of 15 (at one parking space each) is also typically during the daytime. The library will also include public meeting rooms, which are not necessarily to be used for library programs, and it is expected that the peak use for those spaces would be during evening hours. During the evening, library staff would not likely exceed 7 persons (one parking space each), and the meeting and library patron loading is expected to generate a need for 65 spaces, assuming an average of two persons per vehicle for such situations. The storage space is actually quite similar to the example you provided. The storage space is primarily for storage of surplus or between-uses furniture and equipment and mostly passive storage of documents and is expected to have 1 daytime staff(warehouse manager), and generally not more than 2 other customers/users at once, with a total need for 3 parking spaces, all of which is expected to be daytime use. The Schools ESOL Program is being planned for a portion of the mezzanine space. The daytime peak loading is 6 staff and 2 families, needing a total of 8 spaces. An evening class may need up to 10 spaces (2 evening staff and 8 spaces for class participants). In summary,the daytime peak parking need would be: Library: 15 staff+ 50 patrons= 65 spaces Storage: 1 staff+2 patrons =3 spaces ESOL: 6 staff+2 patrons= 8 spaces Total daytime peak: 76 spaces The evening peak would be: Library/Public meetings: 7 staff+65 patrons/attendees = 72 spaces Storage: 0 ESOL: 2 staff+ 8 participants= 10 spaces 1 Total evening peak: 82 spaces w '"` Proposed spaces = 84 (inclusive of 4 ADA spaces) It is worth noting that the Northside facility will also have CTS Bus Service. Additionally,though not being relied on for purposes of site plan requirements, we are expecting to identify some overflow parking spaces on-site. Since the likely largest demand can be anticipated on evenings when a large public meeting is occurring and a full-use of ESOL space is occurring,the truck circulation areas associated with the storage use will not be in use during such peak demands, so we expect to provide for overflow parking within those unneeded circulation areas. Another notable intention, again not being relied on at this point, is the reasonable expectation that the adjacent site will have parking space availability during times of peak need. The adjacent site is presently owned by Martha Jefferson Hospital, who is considering development of the site for Medical Office Building use. MJH has indicated they are very open to establishing a shared parking arrangement with the County once their development plan is solidified. I hope this is helpful for analyzing the parking requirement for our planned uses. I'll be happy to elaborate or clarify for any questions you may have. - Ron L. From: Amelia McCulley Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 11:50 AM To: Ellie Ray; James Moore Cc: Chapman, Scott; Alan Franklin; Eugene Ryang; Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library - Gross Square Footage Thanks for this info. It will be most helpful to have it broken down by use with associated square footage. For each use, please list the number of staff associated with that use. Finally, for each use, please provide your own recommended estimate of required parking with information as to what it is based on. I'll show you an example below with everything made up: Passive Storage of documents, etc: 2,000 sq ft of basement. There are 2 full-time staff associated with this use. We estimate the need for 3 parking spaces, based on our current experience with this use. From: Ellie Ray Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 4:49 PM To: James Moore Cc: Chapman, Scott; Alan Franklin; Eugene Ryang; Amelia McCulley; Ron Lilley Subject: RE: Northside Library - Gross Square Footage Thanks for this! Amelia McCulley(in Zoning—they do the parking determinations) contacted Ron Lilley last week to try to get some additional information on which to base the parking determination. I don't know if Ron has gotten back to her or not. I copied Amelia (and Ron) on this email so that she'll have the updated square footage figures. Amelia is out of the office this week, but hopefully either she or Ron can let you know if any other information is needed. 2 Ellie Carter Ray, PLA sow' Nemo Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 From: James Moore [mailto:jmoore(Twaterstreetstudio.net] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 4:43 PM To: Ellie Ray • Cc: Chapman, Scott; Alan Franklin; Eugene Ryang Subject: Northside Library - Gross Square Footage Hi Ellie, Thanks again for the helpful meeting last week. Below are the gross square footages for determining the parking minimum. How should we proceed with this? Thanks, James ACTUAL AREAS Proposed Existing Mezzanine: 5,613 gsf 5,537 gsf First Floor: 29,425 gsf 29,108 gsf Basement: 28,850 gsf 28,753 gsf Total: 63,888 gsf 63,398 gsf fames harris moore waterstreet 11 thrr;i st se r-eharie5esv:11e va 22902?'t 434.225 5177 3 Ellie Ray From: Ellie Ray Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 10:23 AM To: 'Alan Franklin'; Chapman, Scott; James Moore Subject: RE: Northside Library 3:00 sounds good...see you then. Ellie Carter Ray, PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 From: Alan Franklin [mailto:afranklir awaterstreetstudio.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 10:21 AM To: Ellie Ray; Chapman, Scott; James Moore Subject: RE: Northside Library I think we would just need to meet with you. How does 3:00 sound? From: Ellie Ray [mailto:eray@ albemarle.orq] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 10:02 AM To: Alan Franklin; Chapman, Scott; James Moore Subject: RE: Northside Library I'm free in the afternoon on Thursday...did you want anyone else to attend or just me? Ellie Carter Ray, PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 From: Alan Franklin [mailto:afranklinc waterstreetstudio.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 9:54 AM To: Ellie Ray; Chapman, Scott; James Moore Subject: Northside Library Ellie, We would like to schedule a meeting with you on Thursday afternoon to sit down and review revisions and responses to the County comments provided thus far.Our hope is to ensure that we are adequately addressing the comments. Thank you, Alan Franklin waterstreet 111 third si I,ct,arlottesviile va 22902 i7 t 434.29E 8177 1 Ellie Ray From: Amelia McCulley Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 12:04 PM To: Ron Lilley Cc: Ellie Ray Subject: Northside Library Ron, Ellie asked me about the adequacy of parking for this proposed site plan. I'd like to have further information from you in order to make this review and assessment. For example, similar to the Ivy Fire Station—what are the uses and area devoted to them? What parking is proposed for each use? What is your parking proposal based on (adequacy of numbers)? ow Nue Ellie Ray From: Ellie Ray Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 2:19 PM To: 'schapman @vhb.com' Cc: Ron Lilley Subject: SDP201300057 Northside Library- Minor Attachments: SDP201300057- Fire Rescue Comments.pdf Fire rescue comments attached. Ellie Carter Ray, PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development Planning Division 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 fax: 434.972.4126 Ellie Ray From: Ellie Ray Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 2:09 PM To: 'schapman @vhb.com' Cc: Ron Lilley Subject: FW: SDP201300057: Northside Library- Minor Attachments: SDP201300057- Northside Library-Minor.pdf ACSA comments attached. Ellie Carter Ray, PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 From: Alex Morrison [mailto:amorrison @serviceauthority.orq] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 1:10 PM To: Ellie Ray Cc: mvieira@serviceauthoritv.orq Subject: SDP201300057: Northside Library - Minor COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Dear Ellie : The Albemarle County Service Authority(ACSA) has received and reviewed the plan/document/project described above. Attached is the ACSA comment sheet with any relevant comments and concerns we may have regarding the plan/document/project. Please feel free to contact me at the number below with any comments or questions you may have about the attached ACSA comment sheet. Thank you. Alexander J. Morrison, EIT Civil Engineer Service Aut Brit y 168 Spotnap Road Charlottesville, VA 22911 Office: (434) 977-4E11 E/T: 116 This email may contain confidential information that should not be Sh"&"ed with anyon:: c :or than its intended recipie,'"tls . `w v..r' Ellie Ray From: Ellie Ray Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 4:58 PM To: 'schapman @vhb.com' Cc: Ron Lilley Subject: SDP201300057 Northside Library- Minor Attachments: CDP1_sdp_ECR_Northside Library.pdf; SDP201300057- Reviewer Comments.pdf Mr.Chapman, Please find attached my comments for the above referenced application. I have also attached a PDF with other reviewer comments received to date. I am still awaiting comment from ARB, Fire/Rescue and ACSA. I will send them along as soon as I receive them. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions, concerns, or need further clarification. Thank you, Ellie Carter Ray, PLA Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development Planning Division 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 fax: 434.972.4126