Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO201400021 Correspondence 2014-03-11 Jonney Otto From: Chris Henry[chenry@pbmcap.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 4:56 PM To: Jonney Otto Subject: RE: Riverside Village(WP0201400021) Great.Thanks. From: Jonney Otto [jotto @albemarle.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 4:54 PM To: Chris Henry Subject: RE: Riverside Village (WP0201400021) Hey Chris I found your guy. We are all set. I will see you tomorrow at 1:00 here at the County office building William T Goodman 11/21/2011 11/21/2014 36773 Jonney Otto Albemarle County Engineer Inspector II Office 434.296.5832-Ext 3245 Cell 434.981.5154 From: Chris Henry [mailto:chenryftbmcap.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 4:47 PM To: Jonney Otto Subject: RE: Riverside Village (WP0201400021) Jonney, Sorry for the typo. Goodman's RLD license # is 36-773 according to the phone conversation I just had with him. Best, Chris From: Jonney Otto [jotto @albemarle.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 4:45 PM To: Chris Henry Subject: RE: Riverside Village (WP0201400021) Hey Chris, A SLD license won't work as a RLD substitution, also not sure what a SLD is exactly. We will still going to require an Responsible Land Disturber with a current state certification. 1 Jonney Otto 44110. Nftir, Albemarle County Engineer Inspector II Office 434.296.5832-Ext 3245 Cell 434.981.5154 From: Chris Henry [mailto:chenrypbmcap.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 4:36 PM To: Jonney Otto Cc: Jeremy Glode; iustin(ashimp-engineering.com; boodmanexcavatinglic @yahoo.com Subject: RE: Riverside Village (WP0201400021) Jonney, Thanks for getting back to us on this. We would ideally like to hold the pre con meeting tomorrow afternoon (06-05- 2014). Please let us know if this is possible. If not,Tuesday morning would work. The attendees for the pre construction meeting are: Justin Shimp Shimp Engineering justin@shimp-engineering.com (434) 953-6116 Dino Goodman Goodman Excavating LLC goodmanexcavatinglic(ayahoo.com (540) 894-3342 Chris Henry PBM Capital Group chenrypbmcap.com (540) 353-0183 Goodman's SLD license is #36-773, expiration date 11/21/2014. Best Regards, Chris Henry PBM Capital Group 200 Garrett St., Suite P Charlottesville, VA 22902 (540) 353-0183 chenry@pbmcap.com From: Jonney Otto [jotto @albemarle.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 4:14 PM To: Chris Henry Cc: Jeremy Glode Subject: Riverside Village (WP0201400021) Hi Chris, 2 I just received your project folder`1 'r Riverside Village (WPO201400021) with 4 copies of the approved plans. I can set up a Precon with you as early as tomorrow. I will have to get the engineer here on board but I think the mornings are the best time to have these precons. An RLD will have to be acquired prior to the meeting Prior to the Precon I will need the following info • A list of everyone attending with contact info (name/address/phone#) • Your RLD Contact info and their Certification number Joriney Otto Albemarle County Engineer Inspector II Cell 434.981.5154 3 Now PROJECT INSPECTION B RESPONSIBLE LAND DISTURBER The RLD should inspect the site frequently throughout the project, with careful inspection at installation of critical measures (e.g., sediment basins) and at the end of each phase for phased projects. The RLD will need to coordinate to ensure that appropriate parties (job superintendent, foreman, etc.) are available to participate in the inspection. Additionally, communication with the inspector from the Program Authority may also be required to coordinate on site visits. The RLD should be familiar with the plan and construction schedule ahead of time. Any required repairs or corrective actions indicated by the RLD should be made immediately. Any plan modifications recommended by the RLD should be discussed with the Owner and Plan-Approving Authority prior to implementation on site. The RLD should also use a standard checklist when performing inspections. Most of the items on that checklist refer to a specific Minimum Standard (MS). The items from the checklist are listed below: ✓ Are there any denuded areas that require temporary or permanent stabilization? (MS-1) ✓ Are soil stockpiles adequately stabilized with seeding and/or sediment trapping measures? (MS-2) ✓ Does permanent vegetation provide adequate stabilization? (MS-3) ✓ Have sediment-trapping facilities been constructed as a first step? (MS-4) ✓ Are perimeter sediment trapping measures in place and earthen structures seeded and mulched? (MS-5) ✓ Have sediment basins been installed where needed? (MS-6) ✓ Are all cut and fill slopes adequately stabilized? (MS-7) ✓ Are all on-site drainage channels and outlets adequately stabilized? (MS-8&9) ✓ Are all operational storm sewer inlets protected so that sediment will not enter the system? (MS-10) ✓ Have stormwater conveyance channels been adequately stabilized? (linings and/or outlet protection) (MS-11) ✓ Is there any work going on in live streams that may require stabilization or a temporary stream crossing? (MS-12, MS-13, MS-14) ✓ Are utility trenches backfilled, seeded, and dewatered properly? (MS-16) ✓ Is there any evidence of dirt or mud the road? (MS-17) ✓ Are there any structural practices that should be removed because they are no longer needed? (MS-18) ✓ Do any structural practices require repair or clean-out to maintain adequate function? (MS-18) ✓ Are properties and waterways downstream from development adequately protected from erosion and sediment damage due to increases in peak stormwater runoff? (MS-19) If violations of a plan or potentially hazardous situations are noted,they should be immediately reported to the Owner. The RLD may be able to suggest economical ways to achieve desirable corrections. In any case, it is wise to set a reasonable deadline for accomplishing necessary corrections. Plan changes or cases of non-compliance (such as commencing land disturbance without an approved plan) should be addressed with the Plan-Approving Authority and Program Authority as appropriate. The common thread in any successful plan implementation is the need to reach timely solutions to issues that arise on site prior to and during plan implementation. By becoming knowledgeable in the Virginia ESC Program, developing a cooperative working relationship with on site parties, and exercising common sense,the RLD can facilitate efficient and economical plan implementation. SHIMP PROJECT MANAGEMENT CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING April 10, 2014 Mr. Max Greene Regarding: Riverside Village Early Grading Plan (WP0201400021) Dear Mr. Greene, I have attached 2 copies of the plans addressing your comments dated April 9, 2014. The specific changes are detailed below. 04( 1. All topography should be at least visually field verified by the designer within the last year [18-32.6.6, 14-302, Policy for date] Please state this on the plan. A note regarding the most recent visual field inspection has been added to the cover page in the "Plan Notes"section. 0 IC. 2. Limit of disturbance appears to run off the page. Please show all areas on the plan. The limit of disturbance was shown incorrectly: it included the future Route 20 improvements, which are not proposed as a part of this permit. The limit of disturbance has been updated and is now fully shown on the plan. �3. Please show dust controls on the plan. Dust control is now specified on the plan. 4. Please note on the plan that it will be critical for the contractor to keep the roadside ditch separate from the site so no off-site water enters the sediment basin#1, or else the basin will need to be enlarged to accommodate the additional drainage area. A new display is now provided, showing the full drainage areas for the sediment basins for the current Early Grading Plan (Phase I) as well as for the anticipated final grading (Phase II). SB-1 is designed to accommodate the maximum drainage area, including off-site areas. The offsite drainage divides were determined by a visual inspection in January 2014. /5. Please show the stock pile areas for topsoil or state where the topsoil will be taken off- site. A designated area for topsoil stockpiles is now shown. ¢, Please update management strategies and sequences notes for this site. Appears to be for another site near a fire station. Thanks for catching this error, the text has been updated to reflect the current plan. 7. Does site have excess fill or cut material in excess of 10,000 cubic yards? If so, please show 4 r or state on plans along with location of waste or borrow area. T grading design for the plan has been adjusted to reduce the height of the retaining wall and the equired import material. The fill material is now less than 10,000 cubic yards, so a designated borrow area should not be necessary. . Please show staging, parking, and/or materials storage areas or other construction related areas on the plan. A construction staging area is now shown on the plan. CrK— 9. Please place a sediment trap at the top of DD1 to catch the runoff from the proposed drainage swale. The drainage swale perpendicular to a diversion will cause the diversion to fail. The drainage swale has been re-designed to curve into DD1 instead of entering at a perpendicular angle. 6 IL 10. Please address MS-19 requirements. A note regarding MS-19 compliance has been added to the narrative. 11. Please place a note on the plans for the contractor to maintain the drainage divide to the 0 l(. basins as shown on the plans to prevent overloading either basin. See response to Comment#4: the sediment basins have been designed to accommodate the maximum flows from Phase I versus Phase II. X12. Basin#2 needs safety fence and signage. Safety fence and signage have been added to the plan for Sediment Basin#2. 13. Please show the dewatering snout on the basin details. The dewatering snout has been added to the basin details. 4. Please clarify the location and design of the emergency spillways from the basins. The emergency spillways from the basins are now shown in the plan to match the calculations. X15. Anti-seep collar for sediment basin#1 detail will need to match the calculations. Thanks for calling attention to this error, the computation for the both the detail and the calculation sheet was outdated. Both have been correctly updated. 16. Please show the baffles required to achieve the 2:1 inlet to outlet ratio and construction details. Baffles are now shown in the plan and the standard detail is shown on C5. ,1-7. Please show a typical section for each temporary channel or diversion, referenced from the plan sheets. Existing ground should be shown at the maximum cross-slope on the plan. A detail showing the dimensions of typical DD sections has been added to sheet C5. '$. VDOT approval for entrance location will be required. The developer is applying for a temporary construction permit. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest opportunity. I may be reached at: Justinshimp-engineering.com or by phone at 434-953-6116. Best Regards, Justin Shimp, P.E. Shimp Engineering, P.C.