HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCP201700002 Correspondence 2023-01-10 (2)Requests for comprehensive plan amendments are reviewed at a higher level of policy than
zoning map amendments which require a fair amount of detail. All CPA requests are
reviewed as follows:
A. Any proposed change in the Land Use Map will be evaluated for protection of the
health, safety, and welfare of the general public rather than the proprietary interests
of an individual.
Issues of health, safety, and welfare generally relate to capacity of utilities, such as water
and sewer, and infrastructure, such as roads to serve an area. The site is served by public
water and sewer. Upgrades may be required depending on projected levels of use and will
be determined with the review of construction plans.
The level of traffic to be added to Berkmar Drive is not known at this time; however, VDOT
has indicated that a traffic impact analysis will likely not be needed.
The County Engineer has recommended the extension of Myers Drive to improve access in
the area. VDOT has not recommended that Myers Drive be extended as a public road at
this time. They have expressed concerns about parallel parking along Myers Drive,
circulation within the Rio Hill Shopping Center and whether spacing of existing access
points on Myers Drive can meet VDOT standards. Because of the number of unknowns,
staff believes that further study of the need and appropriateness for an extension of Myers
Drive from Route 29 to Berkmar should take place with the Small Area study. Rezoning
plans and site plans should not foreclose on an opportunity for Myers Drive extension at
this time.
The proposed land use change has the ability to improve opportunities for future
employment. Provision of an entrance to the Colonial Auto Center from Berkmar has a
short term public benefit by providing an alternate route for customers and employees to
access the site during the Rio Road/Route 29 intersection construction.
B. The merit of Comprehensive Plan amendment requests shall be largely
determined by the fulfillment of support to the "Goals and Objectives" specified in
the Comprehensive Plan.
The Comprehensive Plan supports economic development expansions primarily in the
Development Areas and in accord with the Neighborhood Model. As mentioned in the
previous section the request supports economic development objectives of the plan.
Important principles of the Neighborhood Model are a pedestrian orientation, intercon-
nected streets and paths, employment centers in close proximity to housing, relegated
parking, and buildings and spaces of human scale. The proposal would enlarge an
employment center. It may provide additional opportunities for interconnecting streets,
which should be studied with a Small Area Plan.
In a rezoning, a sidewalk and streetscape improvements would be expected with
development along the frontage of Berkmar. Provision of relegated parking and ways in
which buildings address the street could be considered as part of a rezoning. The applicant
should accommodate both short-term and long-term objectives when rezoning the property.
Since use of the site is expected to change after completion of the construction of the Rio
Road/Route 29 intersection it will be important that the rezoning ensure that while the site is
used primarily for parking and storage it will be screened from view of Berkmar Drive. The
immediate redevelopment of the site should provide a sidewalk and street trees and an
additional layer of screening between the sidewalk and the site to screen the parking area
from view. If in the future the applicant constructs a sales or retail center, the screening
should be removed and the building should address the street. Parking on the site should
be relegated to the back of the building and should remain screened from view.
C. A primary purpose of the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map is to facilitate
the coordination of improvements to the transportation network and the expansion
of public utilities in an economical, efficient and judicious manner... No
Comprehensive Plan amendment shall be considered in areas where roads are non -
tolerable or utilities are inadequate unless the improvement of those facilities is
included in the Comprehensive Plan amendment proposal.
As mentioned earlier, the request is for infill development within a Development Area, on a
parcel served by public utilities. As mentioned above, issues of connectivity between
parcels, the use of the Berkmar Drive entrance as a backdoor to neighboring Rio Hill
Shopping Center and the extension of Myers Drive needs to be further studied with the
Development of the Small Area Plan.
D. Proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments shall be evaluated for general
compliance with adopted County plans, policies, studies and ordinances and to
determine if corresponding changes are necessary.
As previously mentioned, the proposal could help to advance economic development
objectives of the County. No policy or ordinance changes would be needed for this land
use change. However, development of a Small Area Plan would help determine the need
for expansion of Myers Drive. If a different streetscape than the one proposed in Places29
for on Berkmar Drive is needed, the Small Area Plan can also provide appropriate
guidance. Development of the Small Area Plan would be expected prior to construction of
any new buildings along Berkmar Drive for permanent expansion of the automobile
dealership.
E. Except as otherwise provided, the following conditions may be considered in the
evaluation of a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan.
1. Change in circumstance had occurred; or
2. Updated information is available; or
3. Subsequent portions of the Comprehensive Plan have been adopted or
developed; or
4. A portion of the Plan is incorrect or not feasible; or
5. The preparation of the Plan as required by the Code of Virginia was
incomplete or incorrect information was employed.
Since adoption of the Places29 Plan, there have been two changes in circumstance. The
first is the closure of the Greenfield Mobile Home Park in June of 2013 which provides an
opportunity for business expansion. The second change is the speed with which the
planned Rio Road and Route 29 intersection improvement is occurring. Expected
construction in the near future will affect the frontage of Colonial Auto Center and cause the
business to lose some inventory storage throughout the construction process.
Expectations for Rezoning Plans, should the CPA be Approved
Johnathan Newberry
From:
Elaine Echols
Sent:
Wednesday, August 16, 2017 5:10 PM
To:
Johnathan Newberry
Subject:
FW: SPCA CCP
From: Kevin McDermott
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 4:12 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>; Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: SPCA CCP
I spoke with Ms. Leckner on this today and have a better understanding on what is happening with the 3 parcels AC5PCA
used to own and are trying to buy back. There is only one parcel that was not formerly SPCA's and it was previously
Faulconers and directly north of the formerly SPCA parcels. They still have right of first refusal on it. If they do not want
it all properties will be auctioned together and SPCA will have no chance to acquire them because they will be way to
expensive for them. Even if Faulconertakes back their parcel it very likely SPCA will not be able to afford to purchase the
other 3 back. That takes the Concept B included in the submittal basically off the table. VDOT has spoken with SPCA on
instead doing a land swap so that VDOT could acquire the small parcel still owned by SPCA that fronts Woodburn in
exchange for a small portion of 45-86A0. This would allow them to build what as shown in the submittal as Concept A
and VDOT could then auction off a contiguous group of parcels along Woodburn.
I hope that clears up any of the confusion on this.
Kevin
From: Elaine Echols
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 4:31 PM
To: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.ore>; Kevin McDermott <kmcdermott@albemarle.ore>
Subject: FW: SPCA CCP
From: U Lopezfmailto:llopez@milestoneoartners.co]
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 1:09 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Cc: Ellie Ray <erav@milestonepartners.co>
Subject: Re: SPCA CCP
Elaine:
Please find attached a Letter of Acknowledgement from VDOT.
-U
U Lopez
milestone partners
434.245.5803 T
434.409.1005 C
From: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Date: Friday, July 28, 2017 at 11:08 AM
To: "L.J. Lopez" <Ilopez@milestonepartners.co>
Cc: Ellie Ray <erav@milestonepartners.co>
Subject: RE: SPCA CCP
Not a problem. I was just asking. We'll be glad to process it.
From: U Lopez [mailto:Ilopez@milestonepartners.coj
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 11:07 AM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarie.org>
Cc: Ellie Ray<erav@milestonepartners.co>
Subject: Re: SPCA CCP
Elaine:
It is my understanding that VDOT will be providing a letter of acknowledgement of the application to us by the end of
the day today. We will furnish the letter to you as soon as it is received. Acquisition of the properties involved in the
sale is not out of the question, the answer is dependent on the outcome of the discussion with Staff/Planning
Commission regarding our application. Yes, we want to process the application.
Ellie is back on Monday and we would be happy to meet to discuss further.
ILE
U Lopez
milestone partners
434.245.5803 T
434.409.1005 C
From: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Date: Friday, July 28, 2017 at 10:20 AM
To: "erav@milestonepartners.com" <erav@milestonepartners.com>, "L.J. Lopez"
<Ilopez@milestonepartners.co>
Subject: SPCA CCP
Hi Ellie and U,
I tried to reach Ellie yesterday and sent an email about the SPCA. Kim Leftner (sp?) with VDOT called to talk to me about
what kind of letter we needed to accompany your request for the CCP on the SPCA. Over the course of the conversation,
she told me that the first right of refusal option has expired and that the full set of VDOT properties in that area will be
offered using a sealed bid process. I asked if the properties the SPCA showed on their plan would be pulled out and she
said, "no". All offers would have to be for the entire bundle of properties.
While we are glad to process your application for PC input, if acquisition of the properties involved is not realistic for the
SPCA, it might be better for you to pull that application.
I'd be glad to talk to you further about this. Please feel free to call me.
Elaine
Elaine K. Echols, FAicp
Chief of Planning
Albemarle County Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5823 x 3252
Johnathan Newberry
From: Elaine Echols
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 10:13 AM
To: Ellie Ray; Johnathan Newberry
Cc: Rachel Falkenstein; U Lopez; David Fox
Subject: RE: Comp Plan Amendment Question
Yes, on the CASPCA as a location. Yes, we can provide a list of owners and emails for the CAC members. While this is not
a "required community meeting" at this time, you may want to touch base with your BOS and PC members to let them
know and see if they want to come.
Thanks.
Elaine
From: Ellie Ray[mailto:eray@milestonepartners.coj
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 9:34 AM
To: Johnathan Newberry <jnewberry@albemarle.org>
Cc: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>; U Lopez <Ilopez@milestonepartners.co>; David Fox
<dfox@albemarle.org>; Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Subject: Re: Comp Plan Amendment Question
JT,
The CASPCA would like to hold a community meeting. Since the Places29-Rio CAC isn't meeting in August, is it
appropriate for them to hold the meeting at the CASPCA itself? That way they could offer a tour of the outdoor areas
that will be impacted. Does the County provide the list of adjoining owners that need to be invited? Depending on what
date this goes to the PC, this meeting could need to happen in the next couple of weeks, so we'd like to get moving on
this as soon as we can.
Thanks,
Ellie Ray, PLA
milestone partners
434.270.8771 T
434.760.3752 C
From: Ellie Ray <erav@milestonepartners.co>
Date: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 3:33 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>, JT Newberry <jnewberry@albemarle.org>
Cc: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>, U Lopez <Ilopez@milestonepartners.co>, David Fox
<dfox@albemarle.org>
Subject: Re: Comp Plan Amendment Question
Sounds good. Just as a FYI, she had said she didn't see any reason why it couldn't go on the 22"d, but that if for some
reason it couldn't, then the 5`^ would be the latest. Otherwise, it's a pointless exercise if we can't get to the PC prior to
the CPA application deadline. Let us know what you come up with.
Thanks,
Ellie Ray, PLA
milestone partners
434.270.8771 T
434.760,3752 C
From: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Date: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 2:59 PM
To: Ellie Ray <erav@milestonepartners.co>, JT Newberry <jnewberry@albemarle.org>
Cc: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>, U Lopez <Ilopez@milestonepartners.co>, David Fox
<dfox(d)aibemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Comp Plan Amendment Question
Hi Ellie,
Rachel is out of the office until next week, so we can't talk to her about the schedule and what she had in mind. The
other staff and I will see if there is any way to get it on the Aug. 22 schedule, but I'm just not sure at this time. The next
possibility might be Sept. 5. Right now, there are 3 public hearing items on that agenda. Let us talk internally and get
back with you.
Elaine
From: Ellie Ray[mailto:erav(@milestonepartners.coj
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 4:55 PM
To: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>; Johnathan Newberry <inewberrv@albemarle.org>
Cc: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>; U Lopez <Ilopez@milestonepartners.co>; David Fox
<dfox@albemarle.org>
Subject: Re: Comp Plan Amendment Question
From our previous conversations, it seemed it might be possible for this to get to the PC on Aug 22; is that no longer the
case? If we need to submit a CPA application the only submittal date is 9/11 so it would be great if we had a little extra
time in between, if at all possible.
I'll check with the CASPCA and see which route they prefer, but my guess is the community meeting will likely be their
choice.
Thanks,
Ellie Ray, PLA
milestone partners
434.270.8771 T
434.760.3752 C
From: Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Date: Monday, July 31, 2017 at 3:30 PM
To: Ellie Ray <erav@milestonepartners.co>, JT Newberry <jnewberry@albemarle.org>
Cc: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>, U Lopez <Ilopez milestonepartners.co>, David Fox
<dfox@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Comp Plan Amendment Question
Hi Ellie,
Yes, your application is being processed. There are two different routes that can be followed. The first is to hold a
community meeting and explain the proposed project and what and why you are getting input from the PC. The seconc
would be for us to notify adjoining owners of the work session and they get all of their info at the work session. I think I
would recommend the former, since this wouldn't get to the PC until Sept. If you want to have a community meeting,
please coordinate with JT as to a date, time, and location. Most of the CACs are not meeting in August.
Elaine
From: Ellie Ray [mailto:erav@milestonepartners.coj
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 1:30 PM
To: Johnathan Newberry<inewberrv@albemarle.ore>; Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@aIbemarle.ora>
Cc: Rachel Falkenstein <rfaIke nsteinPal bemarle.org>; U Lopez<Ilopez@milestonepartners.co>
Subject: Re: Comp Plan Amendment Question
Hi All,
As I understand it, our application is being processed. Can one of you answer the question below about neighbor
notification? Do neighbors get notified? If so, when?
Thanks,
Ellie Ray, PLA
milestone partners
434.270.8771 T
434.760.3752 C
From: Ellie Ray <erav@milestonepartners.co>
Date: Monday, July 17, 2017 at 3:44 PM
To: JT Newberry <inewberrv@albemarle.ors>, Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.ore>
Cc: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.ortt>, U Lopez <Ilopez@milestonepartners.co>
Subject: Re: Comp Plan Amendment Question
We just dropped off the application. We have a good contact at VDOT that is working on getting us an authorization
letter, which we should have in the next day or two. We will forward it along as soon as we receive it.
The application didn't list a number of copies, so we only submitted one copy of our narrative and exhibits. I have
attached PDFs, or we're happy to print more and drop them if needed, just let me know how many.
The application mentions adjacent neighbor notification; once this gets assigned, will we know when the notification
gets sent out?
Please let me know if you need anything additional from me.
Thanks,
Ellie Ray, PLA
milestone partners
434.270.8771 T
434.760.3752 C
From: JT Newberry dewberry@albemarle.org>
Date: Friday, July 14, 2017 at 8:58 PM
To: Ellie Ray <eray@milestonepartners.co>, Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Cc: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>, U Lopez <Ilopez@milestonepartners.co>
Subject: RE: Comp Plan Amendment Question
Got it.
The example referenced below was located out in Crozet. As a result of that meeting, the Planning Commission made it
clear that they expect us to confirm the property owners of all the properties being discussed in a work session to be
informed of the proposal and at least not opposed to the discussion taking place.
Elaine, can you guide us on whether or not the SPCA's first right of refusal is sufficient in this case?
From: Ellie Ray fmailto:erav(@milestonepartners.coj
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 3:30 PM
To: Johnathan Newberry <inewberrv@albemarle.org>
Cc: Rachel Falkenstein <rfaIke nstein@albemarle.org>; Elaine Echols <EECHO LS@albemarle.org>; LJ Lopez
<Ilopez@milestonepartners.co>
Subject: Re: Comp Plan Amendment Question
Thanks for the information. We'll see what we can do about providing a "limits of disturbance" of sorts, but my guess is
we won't have anything concrete on that by Monday. We will submit what we have and go from there. I do not think
the SPCA is interested in rezoning only a portion of either property as they would want to know the parcel(s) could be
used for their "purpose" in the future. Also, future opportunities for residential uses would likely be low given the
general lack of desire to live directly next to an animal shelter.
As far as getting documentation from VDOT, we are working on it, but given the lack of time, we may not have that by
Monday. This is a little bit of an odd beast in that TMP 45-86 (the current SPCA parcel), 45-86A and 45-86A1 were all
one parcel until 2001 when the VDOT take for the bypass resulted in the subdivision of the property. The entirety of 45-
86 was the SPCA parcel up until that time. Now that the bypass is a no-go, the SPCA has first of refusal on purchase of
the VDOT parcel. VDOT and the SPCA have been in negotiations, so you would think that VDOT would have no issue
with the SPCA studying the parcel and are well aware of what the SPCA does and how they might use the parcel. Is the
example you reference below about this parcel or a different project all together?
I can't think of any questions, but if we do, we'll add them to the application.
Thanks!
Ellie Ray, PLA
milestone partners
434.270.8771 T
434.760.3752 C
From: JT Newberry <inewberry@albemarle.org>
Date: Thursday, July 13, 2017 at 6:10 PM
To: Ellie Ray<erav@milestonepartners.co>
Cc: Rachel Falkenstein <rfaIke nstein@albemarle.org>, Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Comp Plan Amendment Question
Yes, that sounds reasonable. Elaine or Rachel may have more to add, but here are a few additional things to consider as
you complete the application:
1. Although the plan can be conceptual, it would be very helpful to at least identify an approximate "limits of
disturbance" for the proposal.
a. One of our questions to the Planning Commission will ask whether or not they agree with our
assessment of when a CPA is needed. Rachel's 7/11 email explains that we can see a scenario where a
ZMA/SP could move forward without a CPA if only a portion of TMP 45-86A and 45-88 would be
impacted by the proposal (and, as a result, the expansion would not prevent future opportunities for the
majority of those parcels to develop residential uses consistent with how they are currently designated
in the Comp Plan). So, highlighting the extent to which these properties would be impacted will be
important.
2. If the VDOT property is going to be included in the request, then we will need some documentation that they
are aware of the proposal and do not object to it being studied for a future request.
a. I can give you more background on this requirement if you want, but the property owner came to the
last work session in April and objected to the request.
3. Do you have any specific questions that you would like the PC to consider? Your own list of questions can be
included in your application.
Thanks,
J.T.
From: Ellie Ray [mailto:erav@milestoneoartners.co]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 3:33 PM
To: Johnathan Newberry <inewberrv@albemarle.ora>
Cc: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>; Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Subject: Re: Comp Plan Amendment Question
Hey J.T.,
Thanks for the follow-up. Our goal is to try to get the CCP/Pre-application work -session application submitted
Monday. There will still be some unknowns from our end, in particular whether or not the SPCA will in fact attempt to
purchase the VDOT parcel, but we'll include that parcel for review to make sure it's covered. We should know by the
time of the work -session whether or not that parcel is of sufficient benefit and if the SPCA can negotiate a
purchase. Given that, we also do not have a concrete plan, as the layout could change depending on the VDOT
parcel. Our application will likely be fairly conceptual, discussing the use in general and not specifics about where each
element might be located. I figure that's for the ZMA/SP process anyway.
Does this sound reasonable?
Thanks,
Ellie Ray, PLA
milestone partners
434.270.8771 T
434.760.3752 C
From: JT Newberry <Inewberry(c@albemarle.org>
Date: Thursday, July 13, 2017 at 3:22 PM
To: Ellie Ray <eray@milestonepartners.co>
Cc: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>, Elaine Echols <EECHOLS@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Comp Plan Amendment Question
Hey Ellie,
After working with Zoning and the County Attorney's office, it was concluded the CASPCA cannot be considered a
"public use." This decision was based on the proportion of public funding relative to the size of their overall budget, and
the nature of the agreement to provide services mandated by State Code being a contract (subject to future renewal
and negotiation).
It was a question worth investigating because it could have changed the path of the review process (a "Compliance with
the Comp Plan" application vs. however they choose to move forward).
Anyway, it sounds like the pre -application work session is the best option to go forward, but you may have new
information after meeting with the clients. Do you have a sense of how they would like to move forward?
Thanks,
j.T. Newberry
Senior Pla,nucr
Count' -of Albemaxle, Planning Division
434-296-583), eNt. 3270
From: Rachel Falkenstein
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 9:00 PM
To: Ellie Ray <erav@milestonepartners.co>
Cc: Johnathan Newberry <inewberry@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Camp Plan Amendment Question
Ellie,
JT and I were able to catch up with Elaine this afternoon and we have a few thoughts we can share on the SPCA
proposed expansion.
First, I think we are all in agreement that if the request is to rezone the entirety ofTMP 45-86A and 45-88, then a comp
plan amendment (CPA) will be needed. The CPA process would be first for the PC to accept the application and pass a
resolution of intent to amend the comp plan, and then the application could go through the review process as I
described in my previous email. Ideally, we would want this to track a little ahead of the rezoning because the
recommendations from the CPA would need to inform our review for the rezoning. But in talking to Elaine, it sounds like
the rezoning and SP can still be reviewed before the CPA is adopted/approved by the BOS, we would just want to track it
a little ahead so we have some direction on how to review/condition the SP and rezoning. So hopefully, this shouldn't
delay the overall project timing.
The other scenario we discussed is if the SPCA decides to only use a portion of the adjacent parcel(s), then a CPA may
not be needed. For instance, if the request was to only rezone an acre or two (such as only TMP 45-88) staff would feel
comfortable with this moving forward without a CPA because the majority of the residential zoning would remain in
place. I will add the caveat that the rezoning request could come before the PC and the PC could have a different
opinion than staff. For this reason, we do still feel that a preapplication work session with the PC would be a good idea
because it could give your client the level of comfort they would need to move forward (with or without the CPA
depending on what is proposed).
The last thing I wanted to mention is that 1T brought up the question of whether or not this would be considered a
"public use" because it serves as the animal shelter for both the City and the County. Unfortunately, we won't be able to
answer this question before your meeting with the client. But we plan to check in with zoning and legal on Thursday and
hopefully can let you know by the end of the week. If the SPCA were considered a public use then they would not need a
rezoning or SP because public uses are by right in both zoning districts. The process for approval of the public use is a
compliance with the Comp Plan review —which is an identical process to the preapplication work session.
Sorry for the long email. If you have any questions on this, feel free to give me a call tomorrow. I should be around in the
morning.
Thanks,
Rachel
From: Ellie Ray[mailto:erayCc@milestoneoartners.co]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 12:02 PM
To: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.ora>
Cc: Johnathan Newberry <inewberrv@albemarle.crg>
Subject: Re: Comp Plan Amendment Question
It just occurred to me that we have a meeting with the SPCA on Wednesday... if there is any possible way to get us
additional information before then, that would be awesome. I know if may be difficult, but it would be great if you
could.
Hope all is well,
Ellie Ray, PLA
milestone partners
434.270.8771 T
434.760.3752 C
From: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.org>
Date: Monday, July 10, 2017 at 10:09 AM
To: Ellie Ray <eray@milestonepartners.co>
Cc: JT Newberry <jnewberry@albemarle.ora>
Subject: RE: Comp Plan Amendment Question
Hi Ellie,
I just wanted to touch base and let you know that JT and I haven't forgotten about this. Our intention has been to talk to
Elaine to see if she is familiar with the history and reasoning behind why this area is designated as urban density
residential in Places29 to see if there might be some justification for changing the designation (or also to see if this use
might be allowable on a portion of 45-86A without a comp plan amendment, since the existing building is already
here...). Last week Elaine's son's appendix ruptured and he has not been doing well, so she has been out of the office.
We will try to follow up with David this week to get his thoughts as well.
But to answer your question below so you can at least discuss this in broad terms with your client, the CPA timeline is
very similar to the rezoning process. If there are any comments from staff, you'll receive them within 45 days of the first
submittal. I have only reviewed one CPA since I've been here, but in my experience there was a lot less back and forth
than in a rezoning. There may or may not even be a need for a resubmittal with a CPA since there is typically not a
specific application plan to be adopted and there are no proffers/conditions. Staff may have some recommended
language to be added to the Comp Plan to address the proposed use and this may need to be worked out with the
applicant ahead of time.
One other thought is that this might be a good candidate for a preapplication work session with the Planning
Commission. Rather than just having staff initial thoughts on the comp plan compliance, you can ask the planning
commission to weigh in. Essentially, this is an opportunity for the Planning Commission to state a) whether or not they
think this use rises to the level of requiring a comp plan amendment and b) if a comp plan amendment is needed, they
can give preliminary thoughts on whether or not this is something they could support. The second page of the link above
explains the process in more detail. If this is something you think the client might be interested in, there is no cost, and if
you submitted this soon we could likely get to the PC in August before the Sept CPA submittal date.
I'll try to follow up with some more thoughts on the consistency with the Comp Plan this week after discussing with
David.
Thanks,
Rachel
From: Ellie Ray[mailto:eravC@milestonepartners.co]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 1:33 PM
To: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.ore>
Subject: Re: Comp Plan Amendment Question
Great, thanks.
Ellie Ray, PLA
milestone partners
434.270.8771 T
434.760.3752 C
From: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.orR>
Date: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 12:52 PM
To: Ellie Ray<erav@milestonepartners.co>
Subject: RE: Comp Plan Amendment Question
Ellie,
Just realized I never responded to you on this. I'm going to get with JT and one of us will try to get back to you by the
end of the week.
Thanks,
Rachel
From: Ellie Ray [mailto:eras@milestonepartners.col
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 2:26 PM
To: Rachel Falkenstein <rfaIke nstein @albemarle.ore>
Subject: Re: Comp Plan Amendment Question
Thanks.
So, if we were to submit a CPA, ZMA and SP... how would the timing of applications work to get all applications to vote at
the same time? I see the CPA deadline is 9/11 but the closest ZMA/SP submittal is 9/18.
Sorry if this is a silly question, but it looks like the CPA process is kind of open-ended (not timelines provided online). I'm
trying to put together an informed timeline for our clients and I want to make sure I'm considering all the various
submittal deadlines and timelines.
I think I told you this on the phone, but this would be for expansion and renovation of the SPCA parcels on
Berkmar. They may move forward with just a SP amendment for their current parcel and a SP for stand-alone parking
on the adjacent parcel, but It may be more prudent to attempt to get all their ducks in a row to rezone the adjacent
parcel (and perhaps the parcel behind them, if they decide to purchase it) and expand their SP to those parcel(s) and
reflect their entire Master Plan versus a piecemeal approach.
By the way, JT is who attended the pre-app meeting so feel free to forward this to him if he is the better person to
answer, I just thought you might know more about the CPA process.
Thanks for your help!
Ellie Ray, PLA
milestone partners
434.270.8771 T
434.760.3752 C
From: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.ore>
Date: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 8:41 AM
To: Ellie Ray <eray@milestonepartners.co>
Subject: RE: Comp Plan Amendment Question
Yes — we only accept these twice a year.
From: Ellie Ray [mailto:eray@ milestonepartners.co]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 5:04 PM
To: Rachel Falkenstein <rfalkenstein@albemarle.ora>
Subject: Comp Plan Amendment Question
Is it true that the next submittal date for a comp plan amendment is 9/11?
Thanks,
Ellie Ray, PLA
] ] ] i I t stone
milestone partners
300 2nd Street NE
Charlottesville VA 22902
434.270.8771 T
434.760.3752 C
10