Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201300011 Review Comments 2013-02-05Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 2B- RUTHERFOORD HOTEL - MAJOR Final Plat Date Completed: IThursday, May 15, 2014 Reviewer: Johnathan Newberry Department /Division /Agency: Planning Reviews Received approval from Jeremy Lynn at ACSA on 4- 30 -14. Review Status: Approved Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 2B- RUTHERFOORD HOTEL - MAJOR Final Plat Date Completed: Friday, February 28, 2014 Reviewer: Jay Schlothauer Department /Division /Agency: Inspections Reviews Based on plans revised December 9, 2013. No further comments or conditions. Review Status: No Objection Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 2B- RUTHERFOORD HOTEL - MAJOR Final Plat Date Completed: 1wednesday, January 15, 2014 Reviewer: Robbie Gilmer Department /Division /Agency: Fire Rescue Reviews Review Status: No Objection Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 2B- RUTHERFOORD HOTEL - MAJOR Final Plat Date Completed: Friday, December 20, 2013 Reviewer: Johnathan Newberry Department /Division /Agency: Planning Reviews Review Status: No Objection Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 2B- RUTHERFOORD HOTEL - MAJOR Final Plat Date Completed: 1wednesday, December 18, 2013 Reviewer: Michael Koslow Department /Division /Agency: Engineering Reviews all site plan amendment comments have been addressed; however, amendment requires an approved WPO plan (currently under review) Review Status: See Recommendations Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 2B- RUTHERFOORD HOTEL - MAJOR Final Plat Date Completed: Friday, December 06, 2013 Reviewer: Margaret Maliszewski Department /Division /Agency: ARB Reviews Review Status: Approved Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 2B- RUTHERFOORD HOTEL - MAJOR Final Plat Date Completed: Monday, December 02, 2013 Reviewer: Margaret Maliszewski Department /Division /Agency: ARB Reviews Additional clarification on the up- lights is needed. Applicant has been contacted. Review Status: Requested Changes Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 2B- RUTHERFOORD HOTEL - MAJOR Final Plat Date Completed: Monday, December 02, 2013 Reviewer: Robbie Gilmer Department /Division /Agency: Fire Rescue Reviews Based on plans dated 11/12/13 The required fire flow for this project will be 1500 gpm @20 psi. Please submit the proper paper work showing the results of the fire flow test. Review Status: See Recommendations Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 2B- RUTHERFOORD HOTEL - MAJOR Final Plat Date Completed: 1wednesday, November 27, 2013 Reviewer: Alexander Morrison Department /Division /Agency: ACSA Reviews Please instruct the applicant to submit 3 sets of plans directly to the ACSA (ATTN: Jeremy Lynn) for construction review. I will send the official sheet when our offices open again on Monday with this comment for your records. Thank you. Review Status: Requested Changes Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 2B- RUTHERFOORD HOTEL - MAJOR Final Plat Date Completed: ITuesday, November 12, 2013 Reviewer: Johnathan Newberry Department /Division /Agency: Planning Reviews Received revised copy of plan dated 11/12/13. Review Status: See Recommendations Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 2B- RUTHERFOORD HOTEL - MAJOR Final Plat Date Completed: ITuesday, September 17, 2013 Reviewer: Shawn Maddox Department /Division /Agency: Fire Rescue Reviews 1.Thank you for the addition of the FDC location and associated fire hydrant assembly. 2. Please provide the total square footage of the structure so that the required fire flow can be determined by Fire Rescue staff. The design engineer must provide documentation verifying the presence of the minimum required fire flow. Fire Rescue will not require an additional submittal as item number 2 can be satisfied via email. SNM Review Status: Requested Changes OF ALg vlttcmi� COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Plan preparer: Owner or rep.: Plan received date: (Rev]) Date of comments: (Rev]) Reviewer: Review coordinator: Old Trail Village Block 2B: Rutherford Hotel SDP201300011 Collins Engineering Rutherford Hospitality, LLC 6 February 2013 9 September 2013 19 March 2013 10 September 2013 Michael Koslow JT Newberry [tel 434- 293 -3719] The second major site plan amendment submittal (SDP201300011) submitted 30 August 2013 has received Engineering Review and does not appear to meet Albemarle County minimum checklist items for approval. This review does not include a review of Erosion & Sediment Control or Stormwater Management. Please adequately address the following comments for major site plan amendment approval: A. Existing Conditions Information 1) Please identify existing 20' private drainage easement shown on sheet 5 by deed book and page number. Recommend same for existing 20' sanitary sewer easement shown on sheet 5; however this is an ACSA easement. (Rev]) Comment remains. B. Proposed Plan View Information 1) Please indicate a temporary grading easement or VDOT right of way permit for proposed entrance modifications along Claremont Lane in VDOT right of way. (Rev]) Comment remains. 2) Please either widen sidewalk along north end of parking lot to 6' or include bumper blocks for ten proposed adjacent parking spaces on sheet 4. (Rev]) Comment has been addressed. 3) Please provide a number label for proposed 6" drain connecting proposed trench drain to EX- STR -26 on sheet 5. (Rev]) Trench drain detail on sheet 6 no longer appears to be included in plan view on sheet 5. If trench drain is no longer proposed, please remove this detail from sheet 6. Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 3 Please also adequately address the following comments for major site plan amendment approval: C. Application Information 1) Owner is required to provide a completed copy of the standard stormwater maintenance agreement and fee for recordation for any stormwater management facilities (could reference an existing agreement with a comparison of proposed vs previously approved impervious surface). (Rev]) Comment remains. 2) Prior to final site plan approval, a separate set of Water Protection Ordinance plans must be approved including: stormwater management plan and erosion and sediment control plan (could reference an existing plan with a comparison of proposed vs previously approved impervious surface for SWM). (Rev]) Comment remains. 3) Prior to final site plan approval: • water protection ordinance — erosion and sediment control and stormwater management and • water and sewer bonds must be calculated by the county (water and sewer bonds are calculated by ACSA) and paid by owner after receipt of a Bond Request Form from owner (could reference an existing SWM bond or county accepted SWM facility with a comparison of proposed vs previously approved impervious surface). (Rev]) Comment remains. 4) Prior to final site plan approval, pro -rated share for this site which drains into Lickinghole Basin is required. (Rev]) Comment remains. D. Plan Detail Information 1) Please provide traffic generation and distribution summary (ADT's). (Rev]) Comment has been addressed. 2) Please provide calculations for pavement section thicknesses for the proposed entrance pavement section on sheet 4. (Revl) Please provide calculations to show Dp of 9.30 for drive aisle will support loading of 445 ADT as indicated on sheet 6. 3) Please include sidewalk and dumpster pad details meeting requirements per 14- 422 and Albemarle County Design Standards Manual. (Revl) Comment has been addressed. Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 3 E. Drainage Profiles 1) Please include drainage profiles for all proposed pipes and ditches. (Rev]) Comment has been addressed. F. Drainage Computations 1) Please include drainage computations including for proposed trench drain outlet. (Rev]) Comment has been addressed. Community Development Engineering is available from 2:30 -4 PM on Thursdays to discuss these review comments. Please contact Michael Koslow at 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3297 or email mkoslow @albemarle.org to schedule an appointment. Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 2B- RUTHERFOORD HOTEL - MAJOR Final Plat Date Completed: Reviewer: Ron Higgins Department /Division /Agency: Zoning Reviews Ron is reviewing the revised parking analysis submitted by Scott Collins. Review Status: Pending .vim. err' y } P-. COMMONWEALTH of VIRQINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper,Virginia 22701-3819 Gregory A.Whirley Commissioner of Highways March 20, 2013 Mr.Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville,VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments March 21"site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the March 21st,2013 Site Review Committee Meeting: SDP-2013-00008 New Hope Community Church(Phase I)-Initial Site Plan(Megan Yaniglos) 1. The posted speed for Route 606 in this section is 35 mph. The necessary sight distance for 35 mph is 390 feet in accordance with the VDOT Road Design Manual Appendix F-35. Please include a vertical profile of the sight line and existing ground. 2. Final site plan will need to include the entrance profile in accordance with the CG-11 standard. 3. A Land Use Permit will be required for construction within the Route 606 right of way. SDP-2013-00009 Seminole Trail Fire Station—Major Amendment(Ellie Ray) 1. Show sight distances for proposed entrances in accordance with the VDOT Road Design Manual Appendix F. 2. Entrance profiles in accordance with the VDOT Standard CG-11 need to be shown for both entrances. SDP-2013-00011 Old Trail Village Block 2B—Major Site Plan Amendment(Johnathan Newberry) 1. The minimum effective entrance radii are 25 feet. This plan shows a radius of 15 feet at the entrance and does not appear to properly tie into the drainage structure. The drainage structure needs to be relocated and the radius increased. 2. Show the entrance profile in accordance with the VDOT CG-11 Standard. If you have any questions,please contact me. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio,P.E. Area Land Use Engineer VDOT Culpeper Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 2B- RUTHERFOORD HOTEL - MAJOR Final Plat Date Completed: 1wednesday, March 20, 2013 Reviewer: Joel DeNunzio Department /Division /Agency: VDOT Reviews Review Status: Requested Changes Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 213- RUTHERFOORD Final Plat HOTEL - MAJOR Date Completed: 1wednesday, March 20, 2013 Reviewer: Johnathan Newberry Department /Division /Agency: Planning Reviews The revised site plan amendment must meet all the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code. Please make the following revisions: 1.[General Comment] Where applicable, please label the plan as a "Major Amendment' instead of an "Initial Site Plan." 2.[32.6.2.h] On Sheet 1, please provide signature panel for each member of the Site Review Committee. 3.[32.5.2.a] Please note that "ZMA200800005 — Old Trail Village, Block 2" applies to this site. 4.[18 -4.12] On Sheet 2, please update the parking calculations to match the information attached to the 2/4/2013 letter to Ron Higgins regarding the Block 1 and Block 2 shared parking agreement. If necessary, please update this information and the current shared parking agreement based on his pending comments. 5.[32.5.2.n] Please show the location and dimensions of the proposed "43 room hotel and 1,000 sf restaurant' including maximum footprint and height. 6.[32.5.2.n] Please show additional information for the island in parking area by labeling and its features and listing the height of any feature that is above 4 feet. 7.[32.5.2.n] On Sheet 4, please show the height of the brick walls that encompass the trash compactor and shied the loading area. 8.[32.6.2.j] On Sheet 8, please revise the number of Cherokee Princess Dogwood trees in the plant schedule. It appears that 3 "CF" trees are shown, but they are labeled as 12 "CF" trees. The plant schedule shows a total quantity of 4 "CF" trees. 9.[32.6.2.j] On Sheet 8, please label the type of trees located in the island and update the planting schedule. 10.[32.6.2.k] If any outdoor lighting is proposed in the revised plan, then please submit a photometric plan with location, description and photograph or diagram of each type of outdoor luminaire. Review Status: Requested Changes OF ALg vlttcmi� COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Old Trail Village Block 213: Rutherford Hotel SDP201300011 Plan preparer: Collins Engineering [te1434- 293 -3719] Owner or rep.: Rutherford Hospitality, LLC Plan received date: 6 February 2013 Date of comments: 19 March 2013 Reviewer: Michael Koslow Review coordinator: JT Newberry The first initial site plan and comps submittal (SDP201300011) submitted 4 February 2013 has received Engineering Review and does not appear to meet Albemarle County minimum checklist items for approval. This review does not include a review of Erosion & Sediment Control or Stormwater Management. Please adequately address the following comments for initial site plan approval: A. Existing Conditions Information 1) Please identify existing 20' private drainage easement shown on sheet 5 by deed book and page number. Recommend same for existing 20' sanitary sewer easement shown on sheet 5; however this is an ACSA easement. B. Proposed Plan View Information 1) Please indicate a temporary grading easement or VDOT right of way permit for proposed entrance modifications along Claremont Lane in VDOT right of way. 2) Please either widen sidewalk along north end of parking lot to 6' or include bumper blocks for ten proposed adjacent parking spaces on sheet 4. 3) Please provide a number label for proposed 6" drain connecting proposed trench drain to EX- STR -26 on sheet 5. Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 2 Please adequately address the following comments for final site plan approval: C. Application Information 1) Owner is required to provide a completed copy of the standard stormwater maintenance agreement and fee for recordation for any stormwater management facilities (could reference an existing agreement with a comparison of proposed vs previously approved impervious surface). 2) Prior to final site plan approval, a separate set of Water Protection Ordinance plans must be approved including: stormwater management plan and erosion and sediment control plan (could reference an existing plan with a comparison of proposed vs previously approved impervious surface for SWM). 3) Prior to final site plan approval: water protection ordinance — erosion and sediment control and stormwater management and water and sewer bonds must be calculated by the county (water and sewer bonds are calculated by ACSA) and paid by owner after receipt of a Bond Request Form from owner (could reference an existing SWM bond or county accepted SWM facility with a comparison of proposed vs previously approved impervious surface). 4) Prior to final site plan approval, pro -rated share for this site which drains into Lickinghole Basin is required. D. Plan Detail Information 1) Please provide traffic generation and distribution summary (ADT's). 2) Please provide calculations for pavement section thicknesses for the proposed entrance pavement section on sheet 4. 3) Please include sidewalk and dumpster pad details meeting requirements per 14- 422 and Albemarle County Design Standards Manual. E. Drainage Profiles 1) Please include drainage profiles for all proposed pipes and ditches. F. Drainage Computations 1) Please include drainage computations including for proposed trench drain outlet. Community Development Engineering is available from 2:30 -4 PM on Thursdays to discuss these review comments. Please contact Michael Koslow at 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3297 or email mkoslowgalbemarle.or� to schedule an appointment. Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 213- RUTHERFOORD Final Plat HOTEL - MAJOR Date Completed: ITuesday, March 19, 2013 Reviewer: Alexander Morrison Department /Division /Agency: ACSA Reviews I have reviewed the above referenced plans. These plans may require full construction review. If Fire and Rescue requires another fire hydrant, then 3 copies of the plan must be submitted to the ACSA for construction review. Also, please include a grease interceptor and provide fixture counts. Review Status: See Recommendations Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 2B- RUTHERFOORD HOTEL - MAJOR Final Plat Date Completed: Imonday, March 18, 2013 Reviewer: Margaret Maliszewski Department /Division /Agency: ARB Reviews ARB approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. The applicant shall submit an application for a Countywide Certificate of Appropriateness for a structure located 750' or more from the Entrance Corridor. The applicant is advised that 1) building mass, roof form, building materials /colors, blank walls, equipment, and landscaping will be the focus of review of the Countywide Certificate of Appropriateness, and 2) there are discrepancies between the plant schedule and the landscape plan that require correction. Review Status: Requested Changes Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 2B- RUTHERFOORD HOTEL - MAJOR Final Plat Date Completed: lFriday, March 15, 2013 Reviewer: Josh Kirtley Department /Division /Agency: Health Department Reviews Review Status: Approved Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 2B- RUTHERFOORD HOTEL - MAJOR Final Plat Date Completed: 1wednesday, March 13, 2013 Reviewer: Victoria Fort Department /Division /Agency: RWSA Reviews As with all new developments in the Crozet service area, RWSA will need to issue a sewer flow acceptance prior to site plan approval. Please let me know if you have any questions. Review Status: Requested Changes c411(' Ai,4 Apar" COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126 MEMORANDUM TO: Architectural Review Board FROM: Margaret Maliszewski,Principal Planner RE: SDP-2013-11 and ARB-2013-18: Old Trail Village Block 2B Rutherfoord Hotel Major Site Plan Amendment DATE: March 1,2013 Background and Requirements SDP-2013-11: Old Trail Village Block 2B has been submitted for review as a major site plan amendment.As a result of a Zoning Ordinance amendment that became effective on January 1,2013,the ARB,as a member of the Site Review Committee,is required to review and comment on this plan(32.3.3 and 32.4.2.2). The purpose of this ARB review is to determine consistency of the plan with the EC design guidelines pertaining to 1) size and arrangement of structures,2) location and configuration of parking areas and landscaping,and 3)preservation of existing vegetation and natural features(30.6.4(c)(2) and(3)and(5)).This ARB review is limited to the information provided in the initial plan under Sections 32.5.2-5.As a result of this review,the ARB shall transmit to the agent 1)its requirements to satisfy the design guidelines,2)recommendations regarding the plan as it relates to the guidelines,and 3)recommended conditions of plan approval,including conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit. Review and Recommendations Staff has reviewed the plan and has determined that it is eligible for staff review as a Countywide Certificate of Appropriateness for a structure located 750' or more from the Entrance Corridor. Consequently,staff recommends that the ARB forward the following recommendations to the agent: • Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per 30.6.4(2),(3)and(5): None. • Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None. • Regarding recommended conditions of initial site plan approval: ARB approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. The applicant shall submit an application for a Countywide Certificate of Appropriateness for a structure located 750' or more from the Entrance Corridor. The applicant is advised that 1)building mass,roof form,building materials/colors,blank walls, equipment, and landscaping will be the focus of review of the Countywide Certificate of Appropriateness, and 2)there are discrepancies between the plant schedule and the landscape plan that require correction. • Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit: None. Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 2B- RUTHERFOORD HOTEL - MAJOR Final Plat Date Completed: IThursday, February 28, 2013 Reviewer: Shawn Maddox Department /Division /Agency: Fire Rescue Reviews 1. If this is to be a sprinklered building the fire department connection location must be shown on the site plan. The fire department location shall be on the address side of the structure within 50 feet of a hydrant. The fire department connection and hydrant will not obstruct access to the building for other fire apparatus. 2. Please provide the construction type for this structure to allow for the appropriate fire flow calculation. Once calculated documentation must be provided to the Fire and Rescue Department that the minimum required fire flow is available at the site. Review Status: Requested Changes Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 2B- RUTHERFOORD HOTEL - MAJOR Final Plat Date Completed: 1wednesday, February 20, 2013 Reviewer: Andrew Slack Department /Division /Agency: E911 Reviews No Objection. Review Status: No Objection Review Comments Project Name: OLD TRAIL, BLOCK 2B- RUTHERFOORD HOTEL - MAJOR Final Plat Date Completed: IThursday, February 14, 2013 Reviewer: Jay Schlothauer Department /Division /Agency: Inspections Reviews Based on plans dated February 4, 2013. Relocate the CG -12 curbcut in the main entrance sidewalk to a location closer to the barrier -free parking spaces, or provide another curbcut at the closer location. Review Status: Requested Changes