Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201300028 Review Comments 2013-02-25i' COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper, Virginia 22701 -3819 Gregory A. Whirley Commissioner of Highways May 7, 2013 Mr. Christopher Perez County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: SUB- 2013 -28 Lochlyn Hill Preliminary Sub Plat Dear Mr. Perez: We have reviewed the subject project and offer the following comments: 1. Per previous VDOT comment dated March 22, 2013, a 1978 Resolution for the Rio Heights subdivision shows a 50 ft r/w on Pen Park Lane up to 0.08 miles (447 ft) south easterly of the intersection with Rio Road. The plat indicates the r'w is 48' Var. ROW. The documentation needs to be provided showing the correct right of way width. 2. The existing right of way on the south side of Pen Park Lane does not appear to line up with the proposed right of way for Pen Park Lane. This needs to be corrected. 3. The right of way on the north side of Pen Park Lane needs to be defined and shown where Pen Park is being realigned. 4. The CG -12 shown at the end of the side walk along Pen Park needs to be located near the midpoint of the radius of the intersection of Pen Park and Woodmont Drive. 5. It was our understanding the side walk would be extended on the south side of Pen Park Lane all the way to Rio Road. This has not been reflected in this plan. 6. Is on- street parking proposed on both sides of Pen Park Lane? The minimum width face of curb to face of curb for VDOT standards is 29' for on- street parking on both sides at this location. 7. The sight distance lines should be shown from a point that is located 14.5' off the edge of the travel way. The sight line shown at the intersection of Pen Park Lane and Lochlyn Hill Drive appears to be right on the edge of the travel way. If you need additional information, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, -* X46k Troy Austin, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Culpeper District VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Christopher Perez From: Victoria Fort [vfort @rivanna.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 5:32 PM To: Christopher Perez Cc: Alex Morrison Subject: RE: SUB201300028 Lochyln Hill- preliminary subdivision plat Chris, RWSA has reviewed the revisions to SUB201300028— Lochlyn Hill preliminary subdivision plat and has no further comments at this time. I would however like to offer the following general comments for the developer: RWSA would like to review the utility plan for the townhomes site to confirm that minimum utility separation requirements are met (see my previous comments). The Lochlyn development is located in both the City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County. If projected sewage flows from the overall development (including all phases) is expected to exceed 40,000 gallons per day, RWSA will require that a flow acceptance request be submitted by both the ACSA and the City of Charlottesville for their respective sections before approving each site plan. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need additional information, particularly on item #2 above. Thank you, Victoria Victoria Fort, EIT Civil Engineer Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority 695 Moores Creek Lane Charlottesville, VA 22902 (P): (434) 977 -2970 ext. 205 (F): (434) 295 -1146 From: Victoria Fort Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 6:03 PM To: 'Christopher Perez' Cc: amorrison @serviceauthority.org Subject: RE: SUB201300028 Lochyln Hills- preliminary subdivision plat Chris, I have reviewed the PDF scan you sent me and have the following comments for the applicant: 1. There are two water lines along Pen Park Lane — an 18" ductile iron main belonging to RWSA and a 10" cast iron main belonging to the ACSA. Plans should be revised to show the location of both of these correctly. 2. The new 8" water line tap should be made on the ACSA water line. 3. There appear to be multiple proposed utility crossings with the RWSA water line. All utilities crossing the RWSA main must have at least 18" of vertical separation. 4. RWSA would like to review the site plan once it is submitted for review. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Victoria Victoria Fort, EIT Civil Engineer Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority 695 Moores Creek Lane Charlottesville, VA 22902 (P): (434) 977 -2970 ext. 205 (F): (434) 295 -1146 From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez(aOalbemarle.org] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 4:16 PM To: Victoria Fort Subject: RE: SUB201300028 Lochyln Hills- preliminary subdivision plat As discussed over the phone attached is a PDF scan of the utility plan for the prelim plat. thanks Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development ICounty of Albemarle, Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From: Christopher Perez Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 10:43 AM To: vfort(cbrivanna.ory Subject: SUB201300028 Lochyln Hills— preliminary subdivision plat Victoria, I am checking in on the review status of SUB201300028 Lochyln Hills— preliminary subdivision plat, we just got outta the SRC meeting for this project and the applicant has requested your comments. Please send me your comments, if any, as soon as you finish them and I'll forward them to the applicant. Thanks Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development ICounty of Albemarle, Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Scott Collins From: Christopher P. Perez- Senior Planner Division: Planning Services Date: April 30, 2013 Subject: SUB2013000028 Lochlyn Hill - Preliminary Subdivision Plat The Planner for the Planning Services Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approval of the plat referred above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. 1.14-404A and 404DJS�inggle.poiw ofacces-s. The sinate point of aceesstbr Lots 1.5 20 is Vegas Court, an existing state road, hmvever. pet, chapter 14 section. 404A these lots must be seii?ed by a street established at the time of the subdivision. In order to MoVe ffir",--ard as desiamed a 14-4104 vvaive�r must berequested/pfx)cessed. Please follow the pfocedures outlined in chapter 14 section 41.0-41) for waiver reCIL105L t`eCJLIIrefIICntS. Notably thi.s, waiver is acted of) by the Agent. Rev 1. Waiver ql)proved see atracked approval letter. 2. [Comme-vill As pi•oposed the 1--Aigplinent of' Pen Puk L;,me �4--ill reclujiv alterations in cm,stin,g access for Tlkill 6LA-1.9,20., 21.22. and 23,.A A easements to be provided. to tll.ose cmncrs aer()s;o Loahlr�t llffl� property OR boun(kuy line adlusifyients to transfer the excess [and to those owner,;. l3ependliw, oil tile solution to the above this nv.i\,, also require of ,,ite con truction elisen•ients to coil.,.,,,truct the illodified &M nxays on the. above properties. Rev .1. Per the eq licanr, the'v are tvorffhlg W111 VDOTaud inelivielual ka o",aers on this kyne and thefi nalplal avail rvflect additioned rAv or transfer qf the property to the lot ►vner.q..Arior u)-fInal Pird approval Mis issue will be resolved and ql)proved k , VDOT and the Counr ),-. [New Comment] It appears that there are some inconsistencies between acreages used throughout the plat: 5.13 acres and 5.31 acres. Please clarify which acreage is correct for the development and discontinue use of the incorrect acreage. Prior to approval of the final plat assure that the note is revised throughout the plat. [New Comment] Under General Notes, Phasing of the plan states that there are four phases; however the same note for SDP2013-26 states there are five phases for the project. Assure these notes are consistent throughout the project and assure they are labeled correctly on all the plats and plans. Notably this plat is titled: "Phase I" and SDP2013-26 labels this same phase as "Phase IA". Prior to approval of the final plat, assure that the note and title of the plat are accurately revised to reflect the true phase. [New Comment] Under _General Notes, Building Sites, the note states that "Lots 1 -20" each contain a building site; however, there are 21 lots in the proposed subdivision and - - - the residue lot which is 1.27 acres. If applicable assure all lots and residue is encompassed in the required statement. Prior to approval of the final plat assure that the note is appropriately revised. [14 -317] Instrument evidencing maintenance of certain improvements. Prior to Final Plat approval, an instrument evidencing maintenance of the pocket park, 20' shared driveway easement, and 20' private alley easement will need to be submitted for County review and approval. The County Attorney will be required to review/ approve the maintenance documents prior to final plat approval. 7. [14- 303(G)] Ownership of Common Area On the final plat provide the owner information for all the easements, specifically for the 20' private alley easement. 8. .14 -4351 Roads must be built or bond -ed prior to diQ s.i gning 1....i21 ;i. Rev 1. Commew acknowledged Fire and Rescue – Shawn Maddox 1. Per the letter from Scott Collins, PE dated April 15, 2013 all streets will only have parking on one side. Fire Rescue has no objections to the plan submitted by Collins Engineering dated 4/15/2013 for job number 112062. E911- Andrew Slack Approved Engineering – Max Greene No objection Building Inspections - Jay Schlothauer No objection RWSA - Victoria Fort Comments pending VDOT – Joel DeNunzio Comments pending ACSA – Alex Morrison Comments pending Please contact Christopher P. Perez at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext. 3443 for further information. �� OF AL8 �'IRGINZP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 April 23, 2013 Louis J. Lopez 300 2" d Street NE Charlottesville VA 22902 RE: Tax Map Parcels 061A0- 00 -00- 00200, 061A0- 01- 00- 034A0, and 061AO- 01- 00 -034BO (404 Waiver) Dear Mr. Lopez, You have submitted a request for waiver of the requirements for a single point of access for a possible division of the above referenced parcels. This access regulation and waiver criteria are found in Chapter 14 Section 404 of the Albemarle County Code. In order to approve the waiver the following findings must be met: In approving a waiver, the agent shall find that requiring the extension would not forward the purposes of this chapter or otherwise serve the public interest; and granting the waiver would not be detrimental to the. public health, safety or welfare, to the orderly development of the area, to sound engineering practices, and to the land adjacent thereto. As proposed Lots 15 -20 front State Route 1483 (Vegas Court) and help to visually complete an undeveloped portion of the Rio Heights Neighborhood with compatible infill development. As proposed Lots 15 -20 have no vehicular access to the Lochlyn Hill Neighborhood, rather access is provided through Vegas Court. If all the lots in the Lochlyn Hill subdivision were to access one street developed at the time of the subdivision the proposed lots would have double frontage on Vegas Court and the proposed internal road (Road A). Notably the rear of the homes for these lots would face Vegas Court and it is conceivable that this would result in fences being put up along the frontage of Vegas Court causing unsightly views for existing Rio Heights residents and causing a disconnect between the neighborhoods. As a representative of the Agent, it is my opinion that the request meets the requirements for granting the waiver in accordance with 14 -404 (D)(2)(ii) which states that the construction of a single point of access would substantially impact features existing on the property prior to October 14, 2009. It is also my opinion that the proposal is consistent with the orderly development of the area and no adverse impact on adjacent property is anticipated, and therefore the waiver is granted. If you have any questions or would like additional information please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Christopher P. Perez Senior Planner 0 April 15, 2013 nulestone Christopher Perez Albemarle County— Community Development 410 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: Lochlyn_ Hill Preliminary Subdivision Plat — 404 Waiver Dear Chris: Thank you for your review of the Lochlyn Hill Preliminary Subdivision Plat. This letter is being provided as the formal 404 Waiver Request per Albemarle County Zoning Code Chapter 14 - Section 404. We respectfully request the waiver of the Single Point of Access Requirement for lots 15 -20 as shown on the Phase 1 Preliminary Subdivision Plat dated 4/15/13. These lots are to be accessed via the Rio Heights Neighborhood along the existing street Vegas Court. No vehicular access is provided to the Lochlyn Hill Neighborhood. However, an emergency access (blocked by bollards) is provided adjacent to lot 20 and will also allow for pedestrian access. Sidewalks will be provided in front of lots 15 -20 as shown on the plan. The waiver of the connection from Vegas Court to Road A has been previously discussed with Staff and VDOT and the pre - application meeting and was agreed not to be a necessary requirement since all roads lead to the intersection of Penn Park Lane and Rio Road. Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions: 434.245.5803 — work Ilopez @milestonepartners.co - email Very truly yours, Louis J. Lopez III £ , 300 2nd Street we, Charlottesville w, 22902 1 434.245.5805 1 r 866.948.7684 Review Comments Project Name: Lochlyn Hill - Preliminary Preliminary Plat Date Completed: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 Reviewer: Andrew Slack Department /Division /Agency: E911 Reviews Approved Review Status: Approved Review Comments Project Name: Lochlyn Hill - Preliminary Preliminary Plat Date Completed: IFriday, April 19, 2013 Reviewer: Max Greene Department /Division /Agency: Engineering Reviews Road plans willl be required for final plat approval. Review Status: No Objection Review Comments Project Name: Lochlyn Hill - Preliminary Preliminary Plat Date Completed: IThursday, April 18, 2013 Reviewer: Shawn Maddox Department /Division /Agency: Fire Rescue Reviews Per the letter from Scott Collins, PE dated April 15, 2013 all streets will only have parking on one side. Fire Rescue has no objections to the plan submitted by Collins Engineering dated 4/15/2013 for job number 112062. SNM Review Status: No Objection Review Comments Project Name: Lochlyn Hill - Preliminary Preliminary Plat Date Completed: ITuesday, April 16, 2013 Reviewer: Jay Schlothauer Department /Division /Agency: Inspections Reviews Based on plat revised April 15, 2013. No comments or conditions. Review Status: No Objection Christopher Perez From: Alex Morrison [amorrison @serviceauthority.org] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 10:20 AM To: Christopher Perez Subject: RE: SUB201300028 Lochyln Hills- preliminary subdivision plat Christopher, I have reviewed the preliminary plat and have the following comments: Label City /County line on Sheet 4. 3 sets of final plans are required for ACSA Construction review. The ACSA and City of Charlottesville are having ongoing conversations about the capacity and ownership of the existing and proposed sewer. Because my comments are minimal, I am approving the preliminary plat. Changes should be reflected on the final plat. Thank you. Alexander J. Morrison, EIT Civil Engineer .f -berm k (c:lnly Service hth6rity 168 Spotnap Road Charlottesville, VA 22911 Office: (434)977-4511 EXT: 116 This email may contain confidential information that should not be shared with anyone other than its intended recipient(s). From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperezCd)albemarle.org] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 10:40 AM To: Alex Morrison Subject: SUB201300028 Lochyln Hills- preliminary subdivision plat Alex, I am checking in on the review status of SUB201300028 Lochyln Hills— preliminary subdivision plat, we just got outta the SRC meeting for this project and the applicant has requested your comments. Please send me your comments as soon as you finish them and I'll forward them to the applicant. Thanks Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development ICounty of Albemarle, Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 Christopher Perez From: Oleynik, Megan (VDOT) [ Megan .Oleynik @vdot.virginia.gov] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 11:51 AM To: Christopher Perez Cc: Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Subject: Lochlyn Hills Preliminary Plat Chris, Joel and I have reviewed the subject plan and have the following comments: 1. A 1978 Resolution for the Rio Heights subdivision shows a 50 ft r/w on Penn Park Lane up to .08 miles (447 ft) S. Easterly of the intersection with Rio Road. This existing 50 ft r/w should be shown on the plat and should continue along the proposed section of road. 2. Clearly define and label r/w and easements along Penn Park Lane. 3. The proposed section of Penn Park Lane should be centered within the r/w with curb and gutter on both sides and sidewalk located one foot off the r /w. 4. SSAR Regulations require that sidewalks shall be provided along both sides of the street in areas with a median lot size of one half acre or less. Sidewalks should be provided on both sides of Penn Park Lane. 5. Road B needs to provide parking on both sides, and should meet the Fire and Rescue requirements of 32 ft F /C- F/C. 6. An exception will be needed for the SSAR Multiple Connection Requirement. Please let us know if you have any questions, Thanks Megan Oleynik Engineering Intern VDOT- Culpeper District Christopher Perez From: Victoria Fort [vfort @rivanna.org] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 6:03 PM To: Christopher Perez Cc: Alex Morrison Subject: RE: SUB201300028 Lochyln Hills- preliminary subdivision plat Chris, I have reviewed the PDF scan you sent me and have the following comments for the applicant: 1. There are two water lines along Pen Park Lane — an 18" ductile iron main belonging to RWSA and a 10" cast iron main belonging to the ACSA. Plans should be revised to show the location of both of these correctly. 2. The new 8" water line tap should be made on the ACSA water line. 3. There appear to be multiple proposed utility crossings with the RWSA water line. All utilities crossing the RWSA main must have at least 18" of vertical separation. 4. RWSA would like to review the site plan once it is submitted for review. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Victoria Victoria Fort, EIT Civil Engineer Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority 695 Moores Creek Lane Charlottesville, VA 22902 (P): (434) 977 -2970 ext. 205 (F): (434) 295 -1146 From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperezCabalbemarle.org] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 4:16 PM To: Victoria Fort Subject: RE: SUB201300028 Lochyln Hills- preliminary subdivision plat As discussed over the phone attached is a PDF scan of the utility plan for the prelim plat. thanks Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development County of Albemarle, Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From: Christopher Perez Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 10:43 AM To: vfort(a )rivanna.org Subject: SUB201300028 Lochyln Hills— preliminary subdivision plat Victoria, I am checking in on the review status of SUB201300028 Lochyln Hills— preliminary subdivision plat, we just got outta the SRC meeting for this project and the applicant has requested your comments. Please send me your comments, if any, as soon as you finish them and I'll forward them to the applicant. Thanks Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development ICounty of Albemarle, Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 �I.11111��� County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Scott Collins From: Christopher P. Perez- Senior Planner Division: Planning Services Date: March 20, 2013 Subject: SLJB2012000028 Lochlyn Hill - Preliminary Plat The Planner for the Planning Services Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approval of the plat referred above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] [Chapter 18 Section 15.31 It appears this development intends to utilize Bonus Density calculations for Conventional Development by providing Affordable Housing; however, Lots 19 — 20 and A -G do not meet the minimum square footage (7,260SF) requirements for the zoning district (R -4) utilizing the Bonus Density for Conventional Development. Revise appropriately. [14 -404A and 404D] Single point of access. The single point of access for Lots 15 — 20 is Vegas Court, an existing state road; however, per chapter 14 section 404A these lots must be served by a street established at the time of the subdivision. In order to move forward as designed a 14 -404 waiver must be requested/processed. Please follow the procedures outlined in chapter 14 section 404D for waiver request requirements. Notably this waiver is acted on by the Agent. 3. [14 -413, 14- 410H,14 -422] Sidewalks. Vegas Court is proposed to be the primary access for Lots 15 -20, thus sidewalks shall be provided on this section of Vegas Court to provide access to the Common Area Open Space. Please be advised that per discussions with the Agent these sidewalks will likely be a condition of approval of the 14 -404 waiver. 4. [14 -106, 14 -234] As depicted the access for Lots 7 -9 does not qualify as a "shared driveway." Per definition shared driveways only serve two lots; currently this access serves 3 lots. If the design remains, a private street shall be requested and the street shall be revised to meet private road standards. 5. [14- 302(A)6] Shared driveways. While not applicable if/when redesigned, Shared Driveway easements must be a minimum of 20' in width. Revise. 6. [14 -404A] Single point of access. Each lot, other than a corner lot within the development areas, shall have reasonable access to the building site from only one street, shared driveway or alley established at the same time as the subdivision... As such if the design remains the same, provide a note on the plat that states Lots 7 -9 shall not be provided access along the frontage of their property on Pen Park Lane, rather they shall utilize the "Private Road". Also, provide a note on the plat which prohibits Lot 15 from utilizing the "Private Road". 7. [14 -404A] Single point of access. If the design of the lots remains the same, also provide a similar note as mentioned above for Lot 20, to assure that the lot does not gain access across the 20' Emergency Access Road which runs alongside the property. [4.6.3] Street line for measurement of required yards adjacent to streets. Required yards and setbacks shall be measured from a line equidistant from the public street or private road right -of -way line(s) at all points...The above provision is applicable to Lot 9, as the access traverses a front yard, thus the side yard setback needs to start from the easement. Currently it starts at the property line and crosses the easement. Revise. [14- 302(B)8] Yards. Lot 9 incorrectly depicts the setbacks for the lot. Revise so the front yard of the property is facing Pen Park Lane (25' setback) for the entire frontage of the lot, revise so the side yard for this property faces the "Shared Driveway" Easement (15' setback, or if applicable the reduction to 10' setback), and another side yard for the property faces Lot 8 (15' setback, or if applicable the reduction to 10' setback). 10. [14- 302(B)(8)] Setbacks. As noted above, side yard setbacks for R4 zoning is 15% however the plan lists and depicts the side yard setbacks as 10'. Thus it appears the applicant is seeking the reduction to 10' side setbacks based on fire flows. If this is the case please coordinate this effort with the Fire and Rescue Dept before the resubmittal to assure compliance with Section 4.11.3 (A1). In the case of a side yard reduction, the Albemarle County fare official may require a guarantee as deemed necessary to insure compliance with the provisions of this section, and this guarantee may include, but not be limited to, appropriate deed restrictions, disclosure, and other such instruments, which shall be of a substance and be in a form approved by the fare official and the county attorney, and shall be recorded in the records of the circuit court of the county; " 11. [14- 303(G)] Provide the owner information for all the easements, specifically for the Pocket Park and the Public Access easement which appears to be located on portions of Lots 7 -9. Is the Pocket Park intended to be maintained by the HOA or will each individual owner of the three lots maintain the space? 12. [14- 302(A)8] On the cover sheet Open Space is listed as 0.46 acres of the site; however in the chart located on page 3 and on the plat the acreage and location of the open space is not specifically designated. Because of this it unclear as to the applicant's intent for the Pocket Park, is it intended to be a part of developments "Open Space ", to avoid confusion between the Pocket Park and the Common Area Open Space assign each a specific designation with acreages. 13. [14- 302(A)4] Private easements. For the public access easement depicted in the pocket park a maintenance easement will also be required as the access is outside of the right -of- way. Before the Final Plat can be approved, an instrument evidencing maintenance of the sidewalk will need to be submitted for County review and approval. Also, as 2 depicted the Common Area Open Space will be maintained privately by the HOA. As proposed a maintenance agreement will be required during final plat approval. Also, the Access and Maintenance Easement of the SWM pond will require a maintenance agreement. Also, the 30' access easement will require a maintenance agreement. The County Attorney will be required to review/ approve the documents prior to final plat approval. 14. [14- 302(A)8] Proposed lots. Provide dimensions for all boundary lines of each lot, including frontage on any proposed street. 15. [Comment] On Lot 21, revise the reference to "7 TH units" and replace with "Reserved for 7 TH Units." 16. [14- 302(A)5] Easements. Provide and label the location and dimensions of all existing easements. Existing easements must include the deed book, page number, and owner of record. Any proposed easements should be labeled `dedicated to public use'. 17. [14- 303(0)] The requested proposal is a subdivision not a site plan. Remove the signature block on sheet 1. Rather the signature panel for the County should read "Agent for the Board of Supervisors ". 18. [14 -435] Roads must be built or bonded prior to the signing of the final plat. 19. [Comment] VDOT approval is required for this project as it proposes to realign sections of Pen Park Lane, thus this development will have an effect on public right of way. 20. [Comment] As proposed the realignment of Pen Park Lane appears to require alterations in existing access for TMP 61A -19, 20, 21, 22, and 23A. As such this may require access easements to be provided to those owners across Lochlyn Hills property OR boundary line adjustments to transfer the excess land to those owners. Depending on the solution to the above this may also require offsite construction easements to construct the modified driveways on the above properties. 21. [14 -409B] As depicted "Road B" does not extend to the abutting property line. Pursuant to 14 -409B `All public streets within a subdivision shall be extended and constructed to the abutting property lines to provide vehicular and pedestrian interconnections to future development on adjoining lands, terminating within the subdivision with a temporary turnaround... ". Revise the plat to extend the road, landscape strip and sidewalks to the abutting property line. The only way around this requirement is to request a waiver per section 14 -409D of the subdivision ordinance. If this is your intent, please review the section of the ordinance which speaks to the waiver and submit the required information for staff review. 22. [Section 14- 302A(3)] Existing or Platted Streets. On the plat provide the route numbers for the existing state road; Pen Park Lane (Rte 1481). E911 - Andrew Slack 1. The applicant should contact this office with a list of three (3) potential names for 'Road A' and'Road B' before the final plans are submitted for approval. Fire and Rescue — Robbie Gilmer 1. Streets less than 36 ft wide shall have one side marked No Parking. 2. Verify Fire Flow requirements of 1000 gpm @ 20 psi Engineering — Max Greene 1. Shared driveway needs to meet the 3 -5 lot private road standards. [14- 412.A.2] Public road frontage does not appear useable by parcels 7 and 8 and access is across lot 9. 2. Road "B" needs to be shown constructed to the property line. 3. Private access easement does not appear required across the middle of lots 7, 8, and 9. 4. VDOT approval is required. 5. Access and maintenance easement is required for SWM facility. 6. No parking signs may be required for final approval. 7. Pen Park Lane should be the through road and road "A" shown intersecting Pen Park Lane. 8. WPO plans with application and fees will be required for final approval. 9. Plat appears to have more than 3 attached dwellings and will require a site plan. 10. Off -site grading easements will be required to construct this project. Building Inspections - Jay Schlothauer No objection RWSA - Victoria Fort Comments pending VDOT — Joel DeNunzio Comments pending ACSA — Alex Morrison Comments pending Please contact Christopher P. Perez at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext. 3443 for further information. 4 Review Comments Project Name: Lochlyn Hill - Preliminary Preliminary Plat Date Completed: ITuesday, March 19, 2013 Reviewer: Max Greene Department /Division /Agency: Engineering Reviews *Shared driveway needs to meet the 3 -5 lot private road standards. [14- 412.A.2] Public road frontage does not appear useable by parcels land 8 and access is across lot 9. *Road "B" needs to be shown constructed to the property line. *Private access easement does not appear required across the middle of lots 7, 8, and 9. *VDOT approval is required. *Access and maintenance easement is required for SWM facility. *No parking signs may be required for final approval. *Pen Park Lane should be the through road and road "A" shown intersecting Pen Park Lane. *WPO plans with application and fees will be required for final approval. *Plat appears to have more than 3 attached dwellings and will require a site plan. *Off -site grading easements will be required to construct this project. Review Status: Requested Changes Review Comments Project Name: Lochlyn Hill - Preliminary Preliminary Plat Date Completed: Monday, March 11, 2013 Reviewer: Andrew Slack Department /Division /Agency: E911 Reviews The applicant should contact this office with a list of three (3) potential names for 'Road A' and 'Road B' before the final plans are submitted for approval. Review Status: Requested Changes Review Comments Project Name: Lochlyn Hill - Preliminary Preliminary Plat Date Completed: Isunday, March 10, 2013 Reviewer: Robbie Gilmer Department /Division /Agency: Fire Rescue Reviews Based on SUB dated 2/25/13 1. Streets less than 36 ft wide shall have one side marked No Parking. 2.Verify Fire Flow requirments of 1000 gpm @ 20 psi Review Status: Requested Changes Review Comments Project Name: Lochlyn Hill - Preliminary Preliminary Plat Date Completed: Thursday, March 07, 2013 Reviewer: Jay Schlothauer Department /Division /Agency: Inspections Reviews Based on plat dated February 25, 2013. No comments or conditions. Review Status: No Objection