HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201400031 Review Comments Initial Site Plan 2014-05-07�Y OF ALg�'Lr
�IRGIN�P
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Phone 434 - 296 -5832
Memorandum
To: Justin Shimp ( lustin(a)shimp- engineering.com)
From: Ellie Ray, CLA, Senior Planner
Division: Planning
Date: May 7, 2014
Subject: SDP 201400031 Pantops Corner - Initial
Fax 434 - 972 -4126
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the
following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been
identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.):
[Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision /Zoning Ordinances unless
otherwise specified.]
1. [32.5.2(a)] The scales noted on Sheet 3 don't match; clarify the scale used.
2. [32.5.2(a)] The departing lot lines for parcels 5E and 5C appear to be incorrect; remove what looks to be an
internal boundary line between these two parcels.
3. [32.5.2(a)] GIS shows Parcel 58G1 having one small boundary line adjacent to a parcel zoned R -1 to the
North. If this is correct, list the setbacks and buffer zone required adjacent to residential districts and
provide parcel information (owner, zoning district etc) for that parcel.
4. [32.5.2(a)] A 10' parking setback from public streets is listed on the cover sheet, but a 15' parking setback
is shown from Route 250 on the site plan; please clarify.
5. [32.5.2(b)] Clarify the maximum square footage for the proposed grocery store. The plan notes 17006 SF,
but the dimensions give something closer to 19800 SF.
6. [32.5.2(b)] Provide a parking schedule that includes the maximum amount required and the amount
provided. If on- street parking is proposed, label and dimension the spaces. Keep in mind that the parking
requirement for grocery stores is based on gross square footage.
7. [32.5.2(b)] Provide the maximum amount of paved parking and vehicular circulation for use in landscape
plan calculations.
8. [32.5.2(d)] This parcel no longer contains "critical slopes "; it has a combination of both "managed slopes"
and "preserved slopes" based on the approved overlay map. Show both the managed and preserved
slopes as represented on the approved map and label them accordingly. These slopes should be shown on
the site plan as well as the existing conditions sheet to give a better understanding of the impacts on each
type of slope. The proposed disturbance of the preserved slopes is allowed based on the exhibit and
Proffer approved with ZMA201300002 which requires construction of the proposed interconnected road.
Additionally, disturbance of managed slopes is now permitted without a waiver as long as certain
performance standards are met. Coordinate with engineering to make sure the construction proposed on
the managed slopes meets these requirements.
9. [32.5.2(f)] Show the location of any watercourses adjacent to or on the site.
10. [32.5.2(1)] Dimension the proposed access easement (which will need to be a private street easement if
subdivided).
11. [32.5.2(1)] Label the width of the existing rights -of -way for Routes 250 and 20.
12. [32.5.2(1)] Provide the pavement widths for Routes 250 and 20.
13. [32.5.20)] Verify that all existing water, sewer and drainage facilities (and their sizes) have been shown on
the plan. All existing utility easements should be labeled with the Deed Book and Page Number.
14. [32.5.2(k)] Verify that all necessary easements for proposed water, sewer and drainage facilities have been
shown on the plan.
15. [32.5.2(1)] Provide the location of any other existing or proposed utilities and utility easements including
telephone, cable, electric and gas.
16. [32.5.2(m)] Show the distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection from the proposed
ingress and egress location on Route 20.
17. [32.5.2(n)] As noted above, clarify the maximum footprint for the proposed grocery store.
18. [32.5.2(n)] Dimension all walkways.
19. [32.5.2(n)] Dimension the length and full width of the retaining wall required for construction.
20. [32.5.2(n)] The dumpster pads as proposed do not meet the requirements of section 4.12.19(b); the
concrete pad must extend a minimum of 8' beyond the front of the dumpster. Additionally, if this parcel is
subdivided, the smaller building would no longer have a dumpster.
21. [32.5.2(n)] If any lighting is proposed, a lighting plan must be submitted with the Final Site Plan.
22. [32.5.2(n)] Dimension the proposed loading dock.
23. [32.5.2(0)] Clearly show any areas intended to be dedicated or reserved for dedication to public use (such
as street right -of -way), and provide a note stating that the land is to be dedicated or reserved for public use.
24. [32.5.2(p) & 32.7.9.4(d)] The landscape plan shall provide notes and schedules to verify that it satisfies the
minimum landscaping and screening requirements. The plan submitted does not provide enough
information to verify that all requirements are satisfied; a detailed landscape plan with notes will be required
with the Final Site Plan. On quick review, it appears the dumpster screening and screening of parked cars
visible from Route 250 may not meet the minimum requirements. Additionally, verification that no conflicts
exist between proposed landscaping and existing or proposed utilities and their easements will be required.
25. [Comment] ARB approval is required.
26. [Comment] A plat submittal will be required for any proposed right -of -way dedication or the recordation of
any access or private street easements.
27. [Comment] If any off -site easements are required, they must be approved and recorded prior to Site Plan
approval.
Please contact Ellie Ray in the Planning Division by using eray(a)albemarle.orp or 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3432 for
further information.
6. �f
..d4
CC)MMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper, Virginia 22701
Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E.
Commissioner
May 5, 2014
Ms. Ellie Carter Ray
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Re: SDP - 2014 -00031 Pantops Corner
Dear Ms. Ray:
We have reviewed the initial site plan for Pantops Corner dated 3/24/14 as submitted by Shimp
Engineering and offer the following comments:
1. An AM -E spacing exception will be necessary for the proposed entrance onto Route 250.
This form can be found on the VDOT website. Please advise if assistance is needed in
finding the appropriate form.
2. The distance to the nearest commercial entrance on each side of the proposed entrance
onto Route 20 should be added to the site plan.
3. The sight lines for the entrance onto Route 20 should be added to the site plan.
4. The sight distance of 430' shown for the entrance onto Route 250 does not meet the
minimum sight distance of 500' required at this location.
5. The right - in/right -out island should be offset 1' from the location shown on the site plan.
6. The right turn lane warrants for each entrance need to be submitted for review. In
addition, the left turn warrant for the entrance on Route 20 needs to be submitted for
review.
7. Not knowing the future needs of the Route 20 corridor at this location, we are not willing
to vacate the right -of -way as shown on the current site plan under review.
If you need additional information concerning this project, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
-2 Troy ustin, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Culpeper District
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
Service Authtrity
TO: Ellie Ray
FROM: Alexander J. Morrison, Civil Engineer
DATE: 5/5/2014
RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: SDP201400031: Pantops Corner - Initial Site Plan
The below checked items apply to this site.
✓ 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for:
✓ A. Water and sewer
B. Water only
C. Water only to existing structure
D. Limited service
✓ 2. An 8 inch water line is located approximately on site distant.
3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is
Gpm + at 20 psi residual.
✓ 4. An 8 inch sewer line is located approximately 50' distant.
5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed.
✓ 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future
easements.
7. and plans are currently under review.
8. and plans have been received and approved.
9. No plans are required.
✓ 10. Final water and sewer plans are required for our review and approval prior to
granting construction approval.
11. Final site plan may /may not be signed.
12. RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections.
13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer.
✓ Comments:
• Submit 3 copies of the final site plan to the ACSA (Attn: Jeremy Lynn) for construction
review.
• Will there be any irrigation required on this site?
• Show easements.
• Call out all bends, fittings, line sizes, etc.
• Include applicable ACSA details water and sewer details (www.serviceauthority.org)
• Add ACSA Water and Sewer General Conditions.
168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville • VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977 -4511 • Fax (434) 979 -0698
www.serviceauthority.org
Review Comments
Project Name: Pantops Corner - Initial Initial Site Plan
Date Completed: Monday, May 05, 2014
Reviewer: Margaret Maliszewski
Department /Division /Agency: ARB
Reviews
• Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18- 30.6.4(2), (3) and (5) and Guidelines #6, 39
and 40, the plan does not minimize the effect of parking on the corridor, grading and the use of retaining walls are
not minimized, the pattern, scale and relationship of the parking lot to the entrance corridor is not consistent with
parking /building relationships along this portion of the entrance corridor. The topography of the site places the
largest building nearly 10' below the Rt. 250 EC at the point of entrance to the site. This will require larger scale
efforts to conceal rooftop equipment and develop an appropriate scale of building for this portion of the Entrance
Corridor.
• Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None.
• Regarding recommended conditions of initial plan approval:
o Revise the site plan to reinforce the relationship of Retail 1 to the Entrance Corridor to minimize the impact of the
parking in front of the building.
o A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval.
o Add tree islands, with large trees 2'/2" caliper at planting, in the central double parking row to break up the
expanse of paved area. Add at least 5 more trees at the interior of the parking lot.
• Add trees 40' on center, 2' /2" caliper at planting, along the eastern perimeter of the parking lot.
• Revise the plan to clearly show all existing and proposed utilities and easements. Locate utilities and easements
to eliminate conflicts with required landscaping. Show all required landscaping outside of utilities and easements.
• Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit: None.
Review Status: Requested Changes
Review Comments
Project Name: Pantops Corner - Initial Initial Site Plan
Date Completed: ITuesday, April 29, 2014
Reviewer: Robbie Gilmer
Department /Division /Agency: Fire Rescue
Reviews
Based on plans dated 3/24/14
1. Fire Flow test required before final approval.
2. Contact Albemarle County Fire Marshal Office to discuss relocating fire hydrants.
3. FDC Shall be on the address side of the building and with in 50 ft of a fire hydrant.
4. Emergency Key secure Box shall be installed. Please contact Fire Marshal Office during construction to discuss
location. Please add note to plans for this.
Review Status: Requested Changes
Review Comments
Project Name: Pantops Corner - Initial Initial Site Plan
Date Completed: JFriday, April 25, 2014
Reviewer: John Anderson
Department /Division /Agency: Engineering
Reviews
The 2 proposed proffers have been reviewed:
Proffer 1: As a public or private road, the standards do not allow for a series of right - angles without intersections.
Flexibility should be provided for other traffic calming measures if necessary. I understand the intent is to prevent
cut - through traffic.
Proffer 2: The "connection" should be clarified as both Rt. 20 and Rt. 250, with frontage improvements as required
by VDOT on those public roads.
A continuous road connecting Rte. 250 and Rte. 20 was proferred. Parking serving proposed retail space and a
separate and continuous private road meeting private road standards should be distinct elements of an approvable
plan. Current design includes parking with access from Rte. 250 and Rte. 20, but does not include a continuous
road. We would be pleased to meet to discuss an approvable plan.
Review Status: Requested Changes
Review Comments
Project Name: Pantops Corner - Initial Initial Site Plan
Date Completed: Tuesday, April 15, 2014
Reviewer: Andrew Slack
Department /Division /Agency: E911
Reviews
Approved
Review Status: Approved
Review Comments
Project Name: Pantops Corner - Initial Initial Site Plan
Date Completed: 1wednesday, April 02, 2014
Reviewer: Jay Schlothauer
Department /Division /Agency: Inspections
Reviews
Based on plans dated March 24, 2014.
No comments or conditions.
Review Status: No Objection