Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201400041 Review Comments 2014-02-28Review Comments Project Name: Lots 3,4,5 & 6 Oakhaven Sub. - BLA Boundary Line Adjustment Date Completed: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 Reviewer: Johnathan Newberry Department /Division /Agency: Planning Reviews Review Status: Approved No. Noe Johnathan Newberry From: Keith Lancaster[klancaster @southern-development.corn] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 4:33 PM To: Johnathan Newberry Cc: Kris Winters, LS(kwinters @dominioneng.com) Subject: RE: Pen Park BLA-SUB 2014-41 Yes please,thanks. From: Johnathan Newberry [mailto:jnewberry@albemarle.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 4:31 PM To: Keith Lancaster; Kristopher C Winters, LS Subject: RE: Pen Park BLA- SUB 2014-41 Keith and Kris, Shall I fill in the "Statement of Title" section on the cover sheet to this plat with D.B.4491, PG. 51? The Agent has requested I confirm this information with you prior to his signing the plat. Thanks, J.T. From: Keith Lancaster [mailto:klancaster southern-development.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 5:22 PM To: Johnathan Newberry Subject: Re: Pen Park BLA- SUB 2014-41 Thanks, will do. Sent from my iPhone KEITH LANCASTER I Planner O 434-245-0894 x 106 M 434-962-5158 klancaster @southern-development.com SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT HOMES southern-development.com 2010-2013 Charlottesville Family Favorite Builder 2010-2013 Daily Progress Readers Choice Favorite Builder On Apr 22, 2014, at 4:43 PM, "Johnathan Newberry" <inewberry@albemarle.org>wrote: Looks good. Please submit the signed notarized plat for signature. From: Keith Lancaster [mailto:klancaster @southern-deveiopment.corrm] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 1:03 PM To: Johnathan Newberg' Subject: RE: Per Pari. BJa- SUB 2014-41 *r„ `w✓ J.T. Here's the revised plan,thanks. From: Johnathan Newberry [mailto:jnewberry@a)albemarle.orq] Sent:Tuesday, April 22, 2014 11:38 AM To: Keith Lancaster Subject: RE: Pen Park BLA- SUB 2014-41 Thanks for sending this over, Keith. The only elements lacking from this exhibit are mentioned in 32.7.9.4(b)(1). This language also corresponds to the first five check boxes on the Conservation Checklist that requires certain items to be shown on the plan. We could approve the plat once the plan shows the limits of clearing, location and type of fencing,etc. <image001.jpg> From: Keith Lancaster [mailto:klancaster@)southern-development.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 11:00 AM To: Johnathan Newberry Subject: RE: Pen Park BLA- SUB 2014-41 J.T. I had our surveyors locate the largest trees along the back of the lot and we ended up expanding the tree conservation area to include one additional tree. If this all looks good to you I'll update the plat with the expand tree conservation and get it over to you,thanks. Keith From: Johnathan Newberry [mailto:jnewberry@ albemarle.orq] Sent:Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:36 PM To: Keith Lancaster Subject: RE: Pen Park BLA- SUB 2014-41 Ha,that's one thing that will never change.... Okay, sounds good. From: Keith Lancaster [mailto:klancasterCa)southern-development.com] Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:32 PM To: Johnathan Newberry Subject: RE: Pen Park BLA- SUB 2014-41 Let me see what I can have the surveyor do and get back to you. You know you never get the correct answer in that meeting or I guess the same answer twice.© From: Johnathan Newberry [mailto:jnewberry(a)albemari€..orgl Sent: Thursday, Apri' 10, 2014 2:27 PM To: Keith Lancaster Cc: kwinte-sna dominione:g.corr Subject: RE: Per Park B�L- SUE 2014-41 I get to Section 32 from the language in 15.4.1. I brought it up at our Staff meeting because I wanted to be sure I wasn't misinterpreting the requirements somehow and I was told this is the way to go. <image002.jpg> From: Keith Lancaster [mailto:klancaster@@southern-development.com] Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:19 PM To: Johnathan Newberry Cc: kwintersC&dominioneng.com Subject: RE: Pen Park BLA- SUB 2014-41 J.T., Section 32 is for a site plans. The last plat we did with a bonus density all we did is showed the tree line as undisturbed. Looking at what is shown below I would have to do a tree survey of all the parcels. I think our surveyors should be able to show the existing tree line on another sheet,will that work? Thanks, Keith From: Johnathan Newberry [mailto:jnewberry@aalbemarle.orq] Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:12 PM To: Keith Lancaster Cc: kwinterscfdominioneng.com Subject: RE: Pen Park BLA- SUB 2014-41 Thanks for dropping off the revised plat and original conservation checklist. I'm sure we'll hear from Fire/Rescue soon. The revised plat addresses all of the comments except number 2a. In order to qualify for the Section 15.4.1 "Environmental Standards" bonus,we need to review a separate sheet that shows the conservation area meets the definition of a "wooded area." Here is the definition of"wooded area" from Section 3: <image003.jpg> Essentially, a conservation plan is a landscape plan for existing trees and landscape features. <image004.jpg> From: Keith Lancaster [mailto:kaancaster @asouthern-development.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:25 AM To: Johnathan Newberry Subject: RE: Pen Park BLA- SUB 2014-41 Thanks, VII drop off the original with the plat. From Johnathan Newberry [mailtc:mewbern'(c;albe^-,E-i ..:.--. Sent, °uesday, April 08, 2014 7.C': c t;ry To: ;_:Lr _ancaster RE: Per Park BLA.- SJE _. :'-t- Thanks. Our printer made it a little difficult to read,so I modified it to be clear and added who signed it. I'll put this version in the file. From: Keith Lancaster [mailto:klancaster@southern-development.com] Sent:Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:17 AM To: Johnathan Newberry Subject: RE: Pen Park BLA- SUB 2014-41 No, it's Frank Ballif the owner of Southern Development and will take title to the property under Southern Property LLC, which our home building side of the company. I have the revised plat and I'll bring it down to the COB in the next day or so,thanks. From: Johnathan Newberry [mailto:jnewberry(aalbemarle.orq] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:10 AM To: Keith Lancaster Subject: RE: Pen Park BLA- SUB 2014-41 Thanks, Keith. Is this your signature at the bottom of the checklist? From: Keith Lancaster [mailto:klancasterCasouthern-development.com] Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 1:36 PM To: Johnathan Newberry Cc: Kris Winters, LS (kwinters(adominioneng.com) Subject: RE: Pen Park BLA- SUB 2014-41 J.T., Here's the signed Conservation Checklist for the file,thanks. From: Johnathan Newberry [mailto:jnewberry@>albemarle.orq] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 4:39 PM To: Keith Lancaster; kwintersAdominioneng.com Subject: RE: Pen Park BLA- SUB 2014-41 Keith and Kris, Here are Planning comments for SUB201400041: 1. 14-302(A)(4) Private easements. On Sheet 2, please label existing easements with the deed book and page number and the name of the owner of record. 2. 14-302(A)(14) Land to be dedicated in fee or reserved. On Sheet 1, please re-label the area currently shown as a "Conservation Easement" to be labeled as a "Conservation Area." On Sheet 1, please revise Note 12 to read: "New lot acreages shown hereon were calculated under the bonus level conventional development requirements. Lots shown hereon comply with Section 15.4.1 "Environmental Standards" by conserving a 0.097 acre area that comprises 11.4% of the total area of subdivided parcels." a. To qualify for the Sectior 15.4.1 "Environmental Standards" bonus, please submit a separate sheet for the 'conservation plan'. as specified in Section 32.7.9.4. Please show or attach the Conservatfor. Checi:G-- or this seua:-ate sheet. 14-302(A)(15) 'dentificono- °r c. .c ce',01, t-sere_. hoiaers. On Sheet 2, plea_ the name and address o' th Nino 4. 14-303(A)Statement o}consent to division. On Sheet 1, please revise the statement to match the language found in this Subdivision Ordinance section. I will copy both of you on an email to Fire/Rescue regarding the side yard reduction. If they issue approval for the reduction, please also make the change shown below. If not, please revise Note 10 to read the side setback is 15'. 5. 14-302(B)(8) Yards. On Sheet 1, please revise Note 10 to read: "The setbacks are: 25' Front, 10' Side (as permitted by Section 4.11.3) and 20' Rear as shown graphically on the plat." Thanks, J.T. Newberry Planner County of Albemarle, Planning Division 434-296-5832, ext. 3270 From: Keith Lancaster [mailto:klancasterCasouthern-development.com] Sent:Thursday, April 03, 2014 6:19 PM To: Johnathan Newberry Subject: Re: Pen Park BLA- SUB 2014-41 Perfect,thanks. Sent from my iPhone KEITH LANCASTER I Planner O 434-245-0894 x 106 M 434-962-5158 klancaster @southern-development.com SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT HOMES southern-development.com 2010-2013 Charlottesville Family Favorite Builder 2010-2013 Daily Progress Readers Choice Favorite Builder On Apr 3, 2014, at 6:16 PM, "Johnathan Newberry" <inewberry @albemarle.org>wrote: Hey Keith, Sorry for the delay. I should have comments for you tomorrow afternoon. J.T. From: Keith Lancaster [mailto:kaancaster@asouthern-development.com] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 8:5E AM To: Johnathan Newberry Subject: Per Park BLh- S:;E 2 :4-4: J.T., I wanted to see if youiad any comments for this boundary line plat? Thanks, KEITH LANCASTER I Planner O 434-245-0894 x 106 M 434-962-5158 klancaster @southern-development.com SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT HOMES southern-development.com 2010-2013 Charlottesville Family Favorite Builder 2010-2013 Daily Progress Readers Choice Favorite Builder Review Comments Project Name: Lots 3,4,5 & 6 Oakhaven Sub. - BLA Boundary Line Adjustment Date Completed: Thursday, April 10, 2014 Reviewer: Johnathan Newberry Department /Division /Agency: Planning Reviews See email to Keith Lancaster on 4/10/14. In part, it reads: The revised plat addresses all of the comments except number 2a. In order to qualify for the Section 15.4.1 "Environmental Standards" bonus, we need to review a separate sheet that shows the conservation area meets the definition of a "wooded area." Review Status: Requested Changes Review Comments Project Name: Lots 3,4,5 & 6 Oakhaven Sub. - BLA Boundary Line Adjustment Date Completed: IFriday, April 04, 2014 Reviewer: Johnathan Newberry Department /Division /Agency: Planning Reviews Keith and Kris, Here are Planning comments for SUB201400041: 1.14- 302(A)(4) Private easements. On Sheet 2, please label existing easements with the deed book and page number and the name of the owner of record. 2.14- 302(A)(14) Land to be dedicated in fee or reserved. On Sheet 1, please re -label the area currently shown as a "Conservation Easement" to be labeled as a "Conservation Area." On Sheet 1, please revise Note 12 to read: "New lot acreages shown hereon were calculated under the bonus level conventional development requirements. Lots shown hereon comply with Section 15.4.1 "Environmental Standards" by conserving a 0.097 acre area that comprises 11.4% of the total area of subdivided parcels." a. To qualify for the Section 15.4.1 "Environmental Standards" bonus, please submit a separate sheet for the "conservation plan" as specified in Section 32.7.9.4. Please show or attach the Conservation Checklist on this separate sheet. 3.14- 302(A)(15) Identification of all owners and certain interest holders. On Sheet 2, please add the name and address of the current owner of Lot 2. 4.14- 303(A) Statement of consent to division. On Sheet 1, please revise the statement to match the language found in this Subdivision Ordinance section. I will copy both of you on an email to Fire /Rescue regarding the side yard reduction. If they issue approval for the reduction, please also make the change shown below. If not, please revise Note 10 to read the side setback is 15'. 5.14- 302(B)(8) Yards. On Sheet 1, please revise Note 10 to read: "The setbacks are: 25' Front, 10' Side (as permitted by Section 4.11.3) and 20' Rear as shown graphically on the plat." Review Status: Requested Changes