The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP201300047 Review Comments 2014-02-24Review Comments Project Name: HOLLYMEAD TOWN CENTER (AREA C) BLOCK IV - FINAL Final Site Development Plan Date Completed: Monday, February 24, 2014 Reviewer: Sarah Baldwin Department /Division /Agency: Reviews Plat can be signed. Review Status: Approved Review Comments Project Name: HOLLYMEAD TOWN CENTER (AREA C) BLOCK IV - FINAL Final Site Development Plan Date Completed: Imonday, February 10, 2014 Reviewer: Robbie Gilmer Department /Division /Agency: Fire Rescue Reviews Based on plans dated 1/22/14 No Comments or Objections Review Status: No Objection �pF A �'717G1L31P COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Hollymead Town Center Block IV -Final Plan preparer: Dominion Engineering [fax 434 - 979 -1681] Owner or rep.: Post Office Land Trust Plan received date: 3 Feb 2014 Date of comments: 7 Feb 2014 Reviewer: Michelle Roberge RE: Site Development Plan (SDP201300047) Hollymead Town Center Block IV (SDP201300047) is approved provided that the following conditions are fully satisfied: Please ensure all items in proffer 2 are addressed prior to approval of site plan. Per proffer 3, "All road improvements listed in proffer 2 above shall be substantially completed prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy in Area C..." Sincerely, Michelle Roberge Review Comments Project Name: HOLLYMEAD TOWN CENTER (AREA C) BLOCK IV - FINAL Final Site Development Plan Date Completed: 1wednesday, February 05, 2014 Reviewer: Andrew Slack Department /Division /Agency: E911 Reviews Approved Review Status: Approved �� GF ALA �'IRGIL�P' County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22902 Phone 434 - 296 -5832 Memorandum To: Michael Myers (mmyers (cD,dominioneng.com) From: Sarah Baldwin, Senior Planner 411� Division: Planning Date: October 9, 2013 Rev. 1123113 Subject: SDP 201300047 Hollymead Town Center Block C4 - Final Fax 434 - 972 -4126 The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further. review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision /Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.].Any new or remaining comments are in black. 1. [Comment] The pending subdivision plat is approved must be approved prior to final site plan approval. 2. [4,17.4(x) ] Please confirm that lighting is full cut off and provide cut sheets for type of lighting. 3. [4.17.4(0)(2)] it is unclear if lighting for B -5 rl'iL'€:'•ts spillover requirements. Please provide more information. 4. [32,6.2(n) I The open space and recreation areas contain different square footage arnounts from that shown on the subdivision plat. Please clarify the correct amount. 5. [4.12.1 (2)] The minimum dimensions for parallel parking are 9 x 20'. Please revise the parking spaces along Meeting Street. Also clarify Jf these are the guest spaces. The notes reference 8 spaces, yet only 7 spaces are sho�k£n. 6. [Code of Development] AAB approval required. 7. [AFB Co arrsent] A ce rtificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. The applicant small submit for review an application for a Countywide Certificate of Appropriateness for- a structure(s) located 750' from the Entrance Corridor-. 8. [Code of Development] The pergola and benches as shown in the Plaza Exhibit for Block 4, elated September 17; 2013 are an appropriate use of the recreation area per, the COD. Please provide those changes on the site plan. 9. [4.12.6] Clarify the Total Provided Parking for Townhomes table. It seems to conflict with the Parking Tabulation and provides-more than 20% over the maximum parking requirements, which is not permitted in the Ordinance. 10. [4.4] Sheet 5 shows sight distance going through the back of unit 6, which must be corrected. Please contact Sarah Baldwin in the Planning Division by using sbaldwin .albemarle.orq or 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3313 for further information. �oF A �'717G1L31P COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Hollymead Town Center Block IV -Final Plan preparer: Dominion Engineering [fax 434 - 979 -1681] Owner or rep.: Post Office Land Trust Plan received date: 17 Dec 2013 Date of comments: 13 Jan 2014 Reviewer: Michelle Roberge Engineering has completed the Site Development Plan review. Please see below for the following comments. A. Site Development Plan (SDP201300047) Please label proposed streets as public, private or alley. If streets are private /alley, please ensure it meets private road standards from section 14 -410 and 14 -412. [Revision 11 Comment not addressed. Please show crowned road with curb and gutter. [Revision 21 Comment addressed. Also, per meeting on Sep 12, 2013 roads with 2% cross slopes are acceptable. I recommend aligning the far western entrance with the Laurel Park Subdivision entrance. [Revision 11 Comment addressed. 3. Please provide typical sections and profiles for proposed street. [Revision 11 Comment addressed. [Revision 21 The profiles are now shown. The road with ribbon curb and 2% cross slopes was discussed as approvable on Sept 12, 2013. However, the vertical alignment does not work well on site. I recommend the following: a) Reduce to 3 or 4 vertical curves for better transition (This # excludes entrance curves). b) Show the grade break from road to all driveways to not exceed 10 %. Driveway should still resemble grading on CG91) (section A -A). Label grades for each driveway. c) Revise vertical curve #10 to have a K value of 5, at a minimum. [Revision 31 The vertical curves and entrances to driveways are approvable. The entrances to subdivision are adequate. 4. Per 14 -410 H, please show curb and gutter for proposed street. Please show standard entrance gutter, CG -9D, and improve runoff catchement by placing additional DI's. Also, a DI shall be placed before intersections. Please provide a DI near lot 7. [Revision 11 Comment not addressed. Provide curb and gutter for road with the standard CG -91) for each driveway entrance. The painted white line is not recommended. Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 3 [Revision 2] A concrete ribbon was discussed as approvable. Please label on Sheet SPSA where CG -2, CG -6, rolltop curb, ribbon curb should be constructed. Also, extend median to curb between each lot from 13 to 16 and between lot 20 and 21. [Revision 31 There are still areas where the median can be extended. Please extend between lots 2 -3, 4 -5 and 14 -15. This is after discussing it with the County Engineer. We are trying to establish the curbline for driveways. Please show the sight distances. 280' is VDOT requirement for 25 mph roads. Also, per 18 -4.12 please ensure 100' sight distance for travelways within site. [Revision I I Comment not addressed. Remove trees within all required sight distances. [Revision 21 Comment addressed. 6. Lots 15 -22 do not have adequate frontage access due to horizontal curve. Please revise. [Revision 11 Comment addressed. 7. All entrances shall be a 4% grade or less for a minimum of 40' from the edge of pavement at the intersected street. The entrance on the far west is about 6% for 20'. [Revision 11 Comment partially addressed. Ensure the flow line on CG-11 entrance is aligned with flow line to DI -1. Also, update profile to show the sag at flow line. [Revision 21 Comment addressed. 8. Please provide the Albemarle County general construction notes for streets. [Revision 11 Comment addressed. 9. Please provide traffic control signage. [Revision 11 Comment addressed. 10. Please ensure all items in proffer 2 are addressed prior to approval of site plan. Per proffer 3, "All road improvements listed in proffer 2 above shall be substantially completed prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy in Area C..." [Revision 11 Comment not addressed. [Revision 21 Comment acknowledged by developer. 11. Please label ROW on private roads. [Revision 21 Comment addressed. 12. Please provide street signs. [Revision 21 Comment addressed. 13. Change the white hatching of light duty pavement on SP5. [Revision 21 Comment addressed. 14. Clearly show limits of removal for the 15" RCP on SP3. [Revision 21 Comment addressed. 15. Show handicap ramp symbols on plans and not just labels. [Revision 21 Comment addressed. 16. It appears there is a concrete median between each driveway. Will this be concrete, a planting Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 3 strip or gravel? Please clarify. Also, note a minimum of 3' should be provided for a concrete median. [Revision 2] Comment addressed, but the grading for median will not work well in areas where there is a 1' drop. I recommend providing a 1' wall to make up the elevation change between lots with a 1' drop or provide an alternative solution. [Revision 31 There are still three areas where a 1' wall is recommended rather than making up the 1' drop with a 3' concrete median. Please show a 1' wall between lots 28 -29, 24 -25, and 22 -23. 17. Clarify what will be in the 6' median between each driveway. Grass or gravel? [Revision 2] Comment addressed, but the grading for median will not work well in areas where there is a 1' drop. I recommend providing a l' wall to make up the elevation change between lots with a 1' drop or provide an alternative solution. [Revision 31 There are still three areas where a 1' wall is recommended rather than making up the 1' drop with a 3' concrete median. Please show a 1' wall between lots 28 -29, 24 -25, and 22 -23. 18. Please label Laurel Park Lane as public or private. [Revision 21 Comment addressed. 19. The pipe between structures 62 and 61 will be undersized when the drainage system for this site is connected. Please refer to WP0201300058 comments. [Revision 31 Even if the HGL calculation works, it appears the structures were not built to VDOT watertight standards. The pipe will still need to be replaced to meet this standards. Please clarify plan of action. Sincerely, 1)16� Michelle Roberge Review Comments Project Name: HOLLYMEAD TOWN CENTER (AREA C) BLOCK IV - FINAL Final Site Development Plan Date Completed: IFriday, January 03, 2014 Reviewer: Margaret Maliszewski Department /Division /Agency: ARB Reviews Review Status: Approved Review Comments Project Name: HOLLYMEAD TOWN CENTER (AREA C) BLOCK IV - FINAL Final Site Development Plan Date Completed: ITuesday, November 26, 2013 Reviewer: Margaret Maliszewski Department /Division /Agency: ARB Reviews Review Status: Approved Review Comments Project Name: HOLLYMEAD TOWN CENTER (AREA C) BLOCK IV - FINAL Final Site Development Plan Date Completed: IThursday, November 21, 2013 Reviewer: Sarah Baldwin Department /Division /Agency: Planning Reviews Please note prior Planning Comments dated Oct. 9, 2013 - Comment 1 Should say final site plan must be approved prior to the subdivision plat. Review Status: No Objection �oF A �'717G1L31P COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Hollymead Town Center Block IV -Final Plan preparer: Dominion Engineering [fax 434 - 979 -1681] Owner or rep.: Post Office Land Trust Plan received date: 31 Oct 2013 Date of comments: 6 Nov 2013 Reviewer: Michelle Roberge Engineering has completed the Site Development Plan review. Please see below for the following comments. A. Site Development Plan (SDP201300047) Please label proposed streets as public, private or alley. If streets are private /alley, please ensure it meets private road standards from section 14 -410 and 14 -412. [Revision 11 Comment not addressed. Please show crowned road with curb and gutter. [Revision 21 Comment addressed. Also, per meeting on Sep 12, 2013 roads with 2% cross slopes are acceptable. I recommend aligning the far western entrance with the Laurel Park Subdivision entrance. [Revision 11 Comment addressed. 3. Please provide typical sections and profiles for proposed street. [Revision 11 Comment addressed. [Revision 21 The profiles are now shown. The road with ribbon curb and 2% cross slopes was discussed as approvable on Sept 12, 2013. However, the vertical alignment does not work well on site. I recommend the following: a) Reduce to 3 or 4 vertical curves for better transition (This # excludes entrance curves). b) Show the grade break from road to all driveways to not exceed 10 %. Driveway should still resemble grading on CG91) (section A -A). Label grades for each driveway. c) Revise vertical curve #10 to have a K value of 5, at a minimum. 4. Per 14 -410 H, please show curb and gutter for proposed street. Please show standard entrance gutter, CG -9D, and improve runoff catchement by placing additional DI's. Also, a DI shall be placed before intersections. Please provide a DI near lot 7. [Revision 1] Comment not addressed. Provide curb and gutter for road with the standard CG -9D for each driveway entrance. The painted white line is not recommended. [Revision 21 A concrete ribbon was discussed as approvable. Please label on Sheet SP5A where CG -2, CG -6, rolltop curb, ribbon curb should be constructed. Also, extend median to curb between each lot from 13 to 16 and between lot 20 and 21. Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 3 Please show the sight distances. 280' is VDOT requirement for 25 mph roads. Also, per 18 -4.12 please ensure 100' sight distance for travelways within site. [Revision 11 Comment not addressed. Remove trees within all required sight distances. [Revision 21 Comment addressed. 6. Lots 15 -22 do not have adequate frontage access due to horizontal curve. Please revise. [Revision 11 Comment addressed. All entrances shall be a 4% grade or less for a minimum of 40' from the edge of pavement at the intersected street. The entrance on the far west is about 6% for 20'. [Revision 11 Comment partially addressed. Ensure the flow line on CG -11 entrance is aligned with flow line to DI -1. Also, update profile to show the sag at flow line. [Revision 21 Comment addressed. 8. Please provide the Albemarle County general construction notes for streets. [Revision 11 Comment addressed. 9. Please provide traffic control signage. [Revision 11 Comment addressed. 10. Please ensure all items in proffer 2 are addressed prior to approval of site plan. Per proffer 3, "All road improvements listed in proffer 2 above shall be substantially completed prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy in Area C..." [Revision 11 Comment not addressed. [Revision 21 Comment acknowledged by developer. 11. Please label ROW on private roads. [Revision 21 Comment addressed. 12. Please provide street signs. [Revision 21 Comment addressed. 13. Change the white hatching of light duty pavement on SP5. [Revision 21 Comment addressed. 14. Clearly show limits of removal for the 15" RCP on SP3. [Revision 21 Comment addressed. 15. Show handicap ramp symbols on plans and not just labels. [Revision 21 Comment addressed. 16. It appears there is a concrete median between each driveway. Will this be concrete, a planting strip or gravel? Please clarify. Also, note a minimum of 3' should be provided for a concrete median. [Revision 21 Comment addressed, but the grading for median will not work well in areas where there is a 1' drop. I recommend providing a 1' wall to make up the elevation change between lots with a 1' drop or provide an alternative solution. 17. Clarify what will be in the 6' median between each driveway. Grass or gravel? Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 3 [Revision 2] Comment addressed, but the grading for median will not work well in areas where there is a 1' drop. I recommend providing a 1' wall to make up the elevation change between lots with a 1' drop or provide an alternative solution. 18. Please label Laurel Park Lane as public or private. [Revision 21 Comment addressed. New Comment: 19. The pipe between structures 62 and 61 will be undersized when the drainage system for this site is connected. Please refer to WPO201300058 comments. Sincerely, mlv� Michelle Roberge COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 November 13, 2013 Katurah Roell Piedmont Development Group 2811 Hydraulic Road Charlottesville, VA 22901 RE: ARB- 2013 -165: Hollymead Town Center Block 4 Townhouses Dear Katurah, I have reviewed the above -noted application. The following revisions are requested to make the proposal consistent with the design criteria that apply to the county -wide Certificate. 1. The quantities listed in the plant schedule do not appear to match the number of plants drawn on the plan. Please check and correct the AF (10 or 14 ?), QP (25 or 21 ?) and CK (21 or 22 ?). 2. Include the following note on the landscape plan: "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant." 3. Include the following note on BOTH the site and architectural plans: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." 4. Add the standard lighting note to the site plan: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle." Within 15 days of the date of this letter, please send me a letter (by email is acceptable) indicating whether you will or will not proceed with these revisions. If you choose not to proceed with these revisions, staff will be unable to approve your application. If you choose to proceed with the revisions, please forward me one set of revised drawings together with a memo summarizing the revisions you've made and the attached resubmittal form. Your decision to make the revisions will suspend the 60 -day review period associated with your original submittal. However, I expect to complete the review of your revised proposal within 2 weeks of your re- submittal. If you have any questions about this action, please contact me as soon as possible. I look forward to receiving your revisions and completing this review with an approval letter. Sincerely, Margaret Maliszewski Principal Planner cc: ARB File COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development REVISED APPLICATION SUBMITTAL This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. County staff has indicated below what they think will be required as a resubmission of revisions. If you need to submit additional information please explain on this form for the benefit of the intake staff. All plans must be collated and folded to fit into legal size files, in order to be accepted for submittal. TO DATE: PROJECT NAME: ARB- 2013 -165: Hollymead Town Center Block 4 Townhouses (HTC C4) Submittal Type Requiring Revisions () indicates submittal Code County Project Number # Copies Erosion & Sediment Control Plan (E &S) # Copies Distribute To: Mitigation Plan (MP) 1 M. Maliszewski Waiver Request (WR) Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) Road Plan RP Private Road Request, with private /public comparison (PRR) Private Road Request — Development Area (PRR -DA) Preliminary Site Plan (PSP Final Site Plan or amendment FSP Final Plat (FP) Preliminary Plat (PP) Easement Plat (EP) Boundary Adjustment Plat BAP Rezoning Plan (REZ) Special Use Permit Concept Plan (SP -CP) Reduced Concept Plan (R -CP) Proffers (P) Bond Estimate Request (BER) Draft Groundwater Management Plan (D -GWMP) Final Groundwater Management Plan (F -GWMP) Aquifer Testing Work Plan (ATWP) Groundwater Assessment Report (GWAR) Architectural Review Board (ARB) ARB- 2013 -165 1 Other: Please explain (For staff use only) Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: Submittal Code # Copies Distribute To: ARB 1 M. Maliszewski IRGIk County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22902 Phone 434 - 296 -5832 Fax 434 - 972 -4126 Memorandum To: Michael Myers (mmyers .dominioneng.com) From: Sarah Baldwin, Senior Planner Division: Planning U120 Date: October 9, 2013 Subject: SDP 201300047 Hollymead Town Center Block C4 - Final The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision /Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.] 1. [Comment] The pending subdivision plat is approved must be approved prior to final site plan approval. 2. [4.17.4(a)] Please confirm that lighting is full cut off and provide cut sheets for type of lighting. 3. [4.17.4(b)(2)] It is unclear if lighting for B -5 meets spillover requirements. Please provide more information. 4. [32.5.2(n)] The open space and recreation areas contain different square footage amounts from -that shown on the subdivision plat. Please clarify the correct amount. 5. [4.12.16(2)] The minimum dimensions for parallel parking are 9 x 20'. Please revise the parking spaces along Meeting Street. Also clarify if these are the guest spaces. The notes reference 8 spaces, yet only 7 spaces are shown. 6. [Code of Development] ARB approval required. 7. [ARB Comment] A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. The applicant shall submit for review an application for a Countywide Certificate of Appropriateness for a structure(s) located 750' from the Entrance Corridor. 8. [Code of Development] The pergola and benches as shown in the Plaza Exhibit for Block 4, dated September 17, 2013 are an appropriate use of the recreation area per the COD. Please provide those changes on the site plan. 9. [Engineer Comments] Are attached. Please contact Sarah Baldwin in the Planning Division by using sbaldwin(calbemarle.orp or 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3313 for further information. A C� li viii COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Hollymead Town Center Block IV -Final Plan preparer: Dominion Engineering [fax 434 - 979 -1681] Owner or rep.: Post Office Land Trust Plan received date: 15 Aug 2013 Date of comments: 9 Sep 2013 Reviewer: Michelle Roberge Engineering has completed the Site Development Plan review. Please see below for the following comments. A. Site Development Plan (SDP201300047) 1. Please label proposed streets as public, private or alley. If streets are private /alley, please ensure it meets private road standards from section 14 -410 and 14 -412. Comment not addressed. Please show crowned road with curb and gutter. 2. I recommend aligning the far western entrance with the Laurel Park Subdivision entrance. Comment addressed. 3. Please provide typical sections and profiles for proposed street. Comment addressed. 4. Per 14 -410 H, please show curb and gutter for proposed street. Please show standard entrance gutter, CG -91), and improve runoff catchement by placing additional DI's. Also, a DI shall be placed before intersections. Please provide a DI near lot 7. Comment not addressed. Provide curb and gutter for road with the standard CG -9D for each driveway entrance. The painted white line is not recommended. 5. Please show the sight distances. 280' is VDOT requirement for 25 mph roads. Also, per 18 -4.12 please ensure 100' sight distance for travelways within site. Comment not addressed. Remove trees within all required sight distances. 6. Lots 15 -22 do not have adequate frontage access due to horizontal curve. Please revise. Comment addressed. 7. All entrances shall be a 4% grade or less for a minimum of 40' from the edge of pavement at the intersected street. The entrance on the far west is about 6% for 20'. Comment partially addressed. Ensure the flow line on CG -11 entrance is aligned with flow line to DI -1. Also, update profile to show the sag at flow line. Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 2 Please provide the Albemarle County general construction notes for streets. Comment addressed. Please provide traffic control signage. Comment addressed. 10. Please ensure all items in proffer 2 are addressed prior to approval of site plan. Per proffer 3, "All road improvements listed in proffer 2 above shall be substantially completed prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy in Area C..." Comment not addressed. New Comment 11. Please label ROW on private roads. 12. Please provide street signs. 13. Change the white hatching of light duty pavement on SP5. 14. Clearly show limits of removal for the 15" RCP on SP3. 15. Show handicap ramp symbols on plans and not just labels. 16. It appears there is a concrete median between each driveway. Will this be concrete, a planting strip or gravel? Please clarify. Also, note a minimum of 3' should be provided for a concrete median. 17. Clarify what will be in the 6' median between each driveway. Grass or gravel? 18. Please label Laurel Park Lane as public or private. Sincerely, r&qr- Michelle Roberge Sarah Baldwin From: Austin, Nathran. (VDOT) [Nathran.Austin @vdot.virginia.gov] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 2:44 PM To: Sarah Baldwin Subject: SDP-2013-00047 Hollymead Town Center Block IV Sarah, Since the roads in this development will be private, I have no further comment concerning the site plan. Do you need any additional information from me concerning this project? Troy Austin, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation Land Development—South Culpeper District P.O. Box 1017 Troy,VA 22974 Phone: (434) 589-5871 Fax: (434) 589-3967 1 Review Comments Project Name: HOLLYMEAD TOWN CENTER (AREA C) BLOCK IV - FINAL Final Site Development Plan Date Completed: Monday, September 30, 2013 Reviewer: Margaret Maliszewski Department /Division /Agency: ARB Reviews A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. The applicant shall submit for review an application for a Countywide Certificate of Appropriateness for a structure(s) located 750' or more from the Entrance Corridor. Review Status: Requested Changes �pF A �'717G1L31P COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Hollymead Town Center Block IV -Final Plan preparer: Dominion Engineering [fax 434 - 979 -1681] Owner or rep.: Post Office Land Trust Plan received date: 15 Aug 2013 Date of comments: 9 Sep 2013 Reviewer: Michelle Roberge Engineering has completed the Site Development Plan review. Please see below for the following comments. A. Site Development Plan (SDP201300047) Please label proposed streets as public, private or alley. If streets are private /alley, please ensure it meets private road standards from section 14 -410 and 14 -412. Comment not addressed. Please show crowned road with curb and gutter. 2. I recommend aligning the far western entrance with the Laurel Park Subdivision entrance. Comment addressed. Please provide typical sections and profiles for proposed street. Comment addressed. 4. Per 14 -410 H, please show curb and gutter for proposed street. Please show standard entrance gutter, CG -9D, and improve runoff catchement by placing additional DI's. Also, a DI shall be placed before intersections. Please provide a DI near lot 7. Comment not addressed. Provide curb and gutter for road with the standard CG -91) for each driveway entrance. The painted white line is not recommended. 5. Please show the sight distances. 280' is VDOT requirement for 25 mph roads. Also, per 18 -4.12 please ensure 100' sight distance for travelways within site. Comment not addressed. Remove trees within all required sight distances. 6. Lots 15 -22 do not have adequate frontage access due to horizontal curve. Please revise. Comment addressed. 7. All entrances shall be a 4% grade or less for a minimum of 40' from the edge of pavement at the intersected street. The entrance on the far west is about 6% for 20'. Comment partially addressed. Ensure the flow line on CG -11 entrance is aligned with flow line to DI -1. Also, update profile to show the sag at flow line. Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 2 Please provide the Albemarle County general construction notes for streets. Comment addressed. 9. Please provide traffic control signage. Comment addressed. 10. Please ensure all items in proffer 2 are addressed prior to approval of site plan. Per proffer 3, "All road improvements listed in proffer 2 above shall be substantially completed prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy in Area C..." Comment not addressed. New Comment 11. Please label ROW on private roads. 12. Please provide street signs. 13. Change the white hatching of light duty pavement on SP5. 14. Clearly show limits of removal for the 15" RCP on SP3. 15. Show handicap ramp symbols on plans and not just labels. 16. It appears there is a concrete median between each driveway. Will this be concrete, a planting strip or gravel? Please clarify. Also, note a minimum of 3' should be provided for a concrete median. 17. Clarify what will be in the 6' median between each driveway. Grass or gravel? 18. Please label Laurel Park Lane as public or private. Sincerely, 1)16J� Michelle Roberge