Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201300056 Review Comments 2013-04-23 Community Development Document Review County Attorney's Office TO: \.1 ( I v 2- t'l) 19, 1('1('y PROJECT NUMBER: S U P 20 ( 3 060 S6 0 ki Tr&i l V t, I l z A/3j / You have requested that our office review the attached development document identified below: Drainage easement Shared parking agreement/easement Open space/greenway easement Dedication of right-of-way Parcel determination / Other: VGv.C.CA-t(Orl The document: / - w ,� /� is approved (reps ,/ by y-- C4v n'bi *-5, f', o r- nC,-1 L 6.150 n eeac is approved with nlin'br edits as noted on the attached is not approved because: — : Signatures or acknowledgement need to be redone (see comment below) : Legal description needs to be revised (see comment below) : Other(see comment below) Comment: If the document is approved,was submitted with the applicants' signatures, and is one to which the County is a party, signatures indicating this office's approval as to form and the County Executive's approval or acceptance 00 behalf of the County are provided. If the document did not include the applicants' signatures, a final version of the document with the required signatures may now be submitted. AL. •A...A — Date: 1 0 0 3 /3 i/, R .mpil er ,1 :p_ Cou ty 4. torney Johnathan Newberry From: Greg Kamptner Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 10:51 AM To: Johnathan Newberry Subject: RE: Old Trail - Blocks 29A and 35A 1T- I can use the electronic version. The process for vacation is governed by Virginia Code 15.2-2271 (no lots sold)or 15.2-2272 (lots sold). In this case, because we are dealing with street right-of-way and the subdivider is the owner of the land abutting the portion to be vacated,there really is no difference in the process or who must sign the instrument.A recital in the deed of vacation should be added to refer to the plat by which the street right of way was dedicated because it is the portion of that plat that is being vacated. If lots from the original plat sold and the vacation is processed under Virginia Code 15.2-2272,the "owners"who must sign include "lien creditors except those whose debts are secured by a recorded deed of trust or mortgage." In this case, it would be those lien creditors of the subdivider.There is not a similar requirement under Virginia Code 15.2-2271. Lastly, check with Bill about his signature, but I think he always signs as "William D. Fritz." Greg Kamptner Deputy County Attorney County of Albemarle gkamptner @albemarle.org From: Johnathan Newberry Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 2:37 PM To: Greg Kamptner Subject: RE: Old Trail - Blocks 29A and 35A Hi Greg, Would you like for me to send the attachments of this email up for your review, or do the electronic files work okay? More than happy to do it, but I just didn't want to send you something you don't really need anyway. Thanks, J.T. Newberry Planner County of Albemarle, Planning Division 434-296-5832, ext. 3270 From: Reback,Thayer [mailto:treback(awoodsrogers.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 1:19 PM To: Johnathan Newberry; Greg Kamptner Cc: English, J. Alden; Bill Ledbetter(biIR roudabush.com) Subject: Old Trail - Blocks 29A and 35A J.T. and Greg: 1 sive I understand from Bill Ledbetter that the attached plat of Blocks 29A and 35A in Old Trail Village are close to final approval. Attached for review is a deed of vacation whereby the County vacates small portions of Golf Drive. Those portions are shown on sheet 4 of the attached plat as Parcel A containing 0.048 acre and Parcel C, containing 5.51 square feet. Let us know if you have any questions. Thayer Reback Paralegal trebacka,woodsrogers.com (434)220-5683 Fax: (434)220-5687 Woods Rogers PLC 123 East Main Street, 5th Floor P.O. Box 2496 Charlottesville,VA 22902 CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Any federal tax advice contained in the foregoing message or any attachment hereto is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purposes of(1) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer or(2) promoting, marketing or recommending a partnership or other entity or an investment plan or arrangement to any person. NOTICE: This communication from Woods Roaers PLC, including attachments, if any, is intended as a confidential and privileged corumunication, if received in error,you sh ou d not copy, save or reproduce in any manner or form, bar dr ete imnrnediarre(y and notify the sender. 2 RILL. 1 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper, Virginia 22701 -3819 Gregory A. Whirley Commissioner of Highways May 14, 2013 Mr. Max Greene Albemarle County Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: SUB - 2013 -00054 Old Trail Village Block 29A & 35A Dear Mr. Greene: We have reviewed the plans for the subject project and offer the following comments: General 1. The plans have not been sealed and signed by the design engineer. 2. The pavement structure has been shown, but the design computation needs to be provided for review. Sheet 3 1. The sight line needs to be shown from a point on Golf View Drive that is 14.5' from the edge of travel way for Golf Drive and 4' from the center line of Golf View Drive. It needs to be measured to the midpoint of the nearest travel lane on each side of the entrance. 2. Since the sight distance is based on horizontal as well as vertical obstructions, it may be necessary to grade the bank along the northern side of Golf Drive to the east of Golf View Drive. 3. If the sight line extends outside of the right of way for Golf Drive, a sight line easement will be required. Sheet 4 1. It appears that there may be a ponding problem in at the intersection of Golf View Drive and the future public road at the northern end of Golf View Drive. I think we need to see some spot elevations around the radii of this intersection to make sure that the runoff will drain properly. 2. It appears that there should be an additional DI -313 opposite of structure #13. 3. The minimum H of structure #11 is 4.5'. 4. The data for the existing DI on Golf Drive needs to be added to the plan. 5. Spot elevations need to be added to the top of curb at the intersection of Golf Drive and Golf View Drive to make the drainage at this location more clear. Sheet 5 1. The street trees need to be located at least 30' from the end of radii at each intersection. Sheet 6 1. There is a note to see Sheet 8 for details on VDOT standard IS -1. However, there is not a detail on Sheet 8 or anywhere within the plans for IS -1. 2. It is noted that the storm sewer system discharges directly into a sediment trap, indicating that the storm sewer is likely to convey sediment -laden runoff. Our preference is that the sediment trap be located further downstream from the outlet and the sediment -laden runoff be diverted around the storm sewer system to the sediment trap. If this cannot be achieved, the storm sewer must be thoroughly flushed prior to street acceptance. 3. The pipe information needs to be added to pipe section 2 in the profile. 4. The invert in and invert out of pipe 2 on the profile does not match the information on the storm sewer schedule on Sheet 4. 5. It appears that the invert information in the profile for structure #3 is off by a foot from the information in the storm sewer schedule on Sheet 4. This is causing the grade for pipe section 4 to be different from the information in the storm sewer schedule on Sheet 4. 6. The invert out for structure #11 should be shown on the profile. Sheet 7 1. Structure #13 is not shown on the profile for the future public road; however, scaling the location for structure #13 from the plan layout, it appears that the structure is not located in the sag of profile. There needs to be more detail in regards to the intersection of Golf View Drive and the future public road to ensure that runoff does not pond in the intersection. 2. The contours in plan view for the future road indicate that runoff is going to flow towards the intersection with Golf View Drive. However, the profile indicates the opposite. This needs to be reviewed and corrected. Sheet 10 1. I believe that there maybe more recent revisions to the VDOT details shown on Sheet 10. This needs to be confirmed and the most recent revisions found on the internet should be used. Sheet 11 1. The storm sewer only needs to be designed to the 10 -year storm, but the HGL of couple of the structures is approximately 1' from the rim elevation. It would be helpful to see the HGL for the 100 -year storm. 2. If the storm sewer is going to discharge directly into a sediment trap, the HGL should consider a tailwater elevation in the computations. If you need additional information concerning this project, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Troy Austin, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Culpeper District VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Rd. North Wing Charlottesville, VA 22902 Phone: 434-296-5832 Fax: 434-972-4126 Memorandum To: Ed Campbell, Roudabush, Gale & Associates, Inc. (ed@roudabush.com) From: J.T. Newberry - Planner Date: May 16, 2013 Subject: SUB201300056 Old Trail, Blocks 29A and 35A – Final Plat The Albemarle County Planning Division will grant or recommend approval of the final plat referenced above when the following comments have been addressed. [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference in the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances, unless otherwise specified.] Planning - J.T. Newberry, jnewberry@albemarle.org, 434-296-5832, ext. 3270 1. [14-302(B)(8) and Code of Development, p. 31] Yards. On Sheet 1, please revise the front setback for Block 35A to be 15 feet. On Sheet 3, please graphically show the front setback in Block 35A as 15 feet. 2. [General Comment, Road Plans – SUB201300054] Yards. On Sheet 1 of the Road Plans, please revise the note regarding setbacks to match the note shown on the final plat for both Block 29A and Block 35A. 3. [14-302(A)(9)] Building sites on proposed lots. On Sheet 1, please add a note that states “Each lot contains a building site that complies with Section 4.2 of the Zoning Ordinance.” Engineering - Max Greene, mgreene@albemarle.org, 434-296-5832, ext. 3283 Road will be built and accepted into the State System or bonded prior to final plat approval. VDOT – Troy Austin, Nathran.Austin@vdot.virginia.gov, 434-589-5871 Comments will be forwarded as soon as they are received. ACSA – Alex Morrison, amorrison@serviceauthority.org, 434-977-4511, ext. 116 The ACSA is unable to provide comments on this plat until construction approval has been granted. The plans are currently under review by the ACSA.