The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutARB201300008 Review Comments 2013-01-23 3114 4 "414V 1. Provide di nsi.ahed architectural elevations (blend white tine drawings) with all standard information: the visib'1' note, materi l (ool sch 1e, materials identific keyed to the drawings, the a 'ng scale, drawing date, etc. N,� is .. X11// »-, ,,---, Q I — , , x e 2 .1 Revise the elevation drawings to show the location and height of rooftop equipment. Ensure that all �,p.� equipment will not be visible. w „, , ,� .-,..-�- ,. - e `L " !I NA, � Provide samples of the proposed EIFS colors (other than SW6150 and SW6151) for review. Revise the / Sherwin Williams "sandtrap" to a color with less pink and more khaki. —1 _,iz, , _ I?.t ( 4 -‘ 3 '' Ensure that the visibility note will appear on the architectural drawings submitted with the building permit application. , 4 ) Provide cutsheets on the plan for the wall pack fixtures. Include the wall packs in the photometric calculations.Ensure that the decorative wall lights meet pie scale and proportion shown in thp elevation C42,1 41-c-- f, #4.0- 4 / u r z w d w ( � ", l i O f 3 6 n ) C vta -,^�! ■ d wu - w '' x Z j ,ayeciQ /Artiu4.0 c 5P' x io j C� 5'lZ x/ 7 2 17H -z -----N7 6) R evise the luminaire sc edule to include the wall packs and the decorative wall fixtures. u , 1 � devise the photometrics using an LLF of 1.0. r 1 Revise the luminaire schedule to specify the flat lens for the shoebox fixtures. h't � c ` � V Revise the luminaire schedule to include the lamp type and catalog numbers for all proposed fixtures. Ensure that the lamps will provide a consistent appearance throughout the development by specifying a consistent lamp type. (Metal halid appears to be a common lamp type i the development.) SA d w P a,..t. ,- e� - o-t'2:rt..e ) -,,,, ,� e .,...ei / Z /3 A- /hLvt/. 1..e. i, /k L- / --v 4.. ,@Indicate if the entrance element is illuminated. If it is, add the information to the photometric plan. evise the lighting plan to eliminate lighting /utility conflicts. 1 ,ZIndicate whether or not the parking lot pole lights will be placed on bases. If bases will be used, indicate �/ this on the plan and clarify on the plan that the 20' height includes the base height. /;".4,4 A 6Clearly identify all utik and ease son the site plan. Provide all landscapint on si it and outside of .-- - — 7 . e asements without r edo it Tie quantity of plants or the general character of t - • antin illustrated on the 1/15/13 plan. ,S ell- Q I —( h- V UT A -o -w V 14. Provide a grading plan. "0 r" / '' L 41- `,3 SIztit "? d-- oK- ( 06/1 1 qva,y4121:11- t'-'4\-kr6 phfri\. 5. Maintain all grading on sit d / >�t.,y� ,- ,ii,t,.,,d oV\ 1 . Clarify and coordinate the grading and planting near the existing individual trees to remain on the south side of the site. Show tree protection fencing and related relevant details. f Consider replacing the dogwoods at the building with an evergreen species or other scale appropriate tree with visual interest for year -round effect. /fr 4',24 V Extend the street trees along rain garden #3. 3/2q) e 1. Provide dimensioned architectural elevations (black and white line drawings) with all standard information: the visibility note, materials /color schedule, materials identification keyed to the drawings, the drawing scale, drawing/revision date, etc. 2. Revise the elevation drawings to show the location and height of rooftop equipment. Ensure that all equipment will not be visible. 3. Provide samples of the proposed EIFS colors (other than SW6150 and SW6151) for review. Revise the Sherwin Williams "sandtrap" to a color with less pink and more khaki. • I don't have a sample of the "balanced beige" color. It was not included in your submittal. Please explain how the condition has been met. u „ z � 2ccx�2 3/D ! /I 3 - (4.4 � / —1/4=7 p� , t1 +a' t� r� � vv∎ to c, . - Es lU c C e - I t� ' d Lxo L G i� U ' `-q 4. Ensure that the visibility note will appear on the architectural drawings submitted with the building permit application. 5. Provide cut sheets on the plan for the wall pack fixtures. Include the wall packs in the photometric calculations. Ensure that the decorative wall lights meet the scale and proportion shown in the elevations. • The sizes of the decorative wall light provided in the cut sheet, in the current elevation drawing, and in the previous elevation do not match. Please explain how the condition has been met. ( 6. Revise the luminaire schedule to include the wall packs and the decorative wall fixtures. • There are 4 cut sheets on the lighting plan and three fixtures in the schedule. Please explain. /,� � lin 724 -t.Q„ c �t c-r� c iX G,1 - 7. Revise the photometrics using an LLF of 1.0. 8. Revise the luminaire schedule to specify the flat lens for the shoebox fixtures. , 9. Revise the luminaire schedule to include the lamp type and catalog numbers for all proposed fixtures. Enwc that the lamps will provide a consistent appearance throughout the development by specifying afconsistent lamp type. (Metal halide appears to be a common lamp type in the development.) • For most of the proposed fixtures, the descriptions in the luminaire schedule don't match the available catalog numbers on the cut sheets. Please explain. n,1 e EL� _a -' • What is the lamp type for the BA fixture? Where is this indicated on the plan? QA : c „,4_,71-1Q 1pk- _ 10. Indicate if the entrance element is illuminated. If it is, add the information to the photometric plan. • The photometrics have been changed, but no additional fixtures are indicated. What is the fixture type that has been added? What are the locations? Where does this information appear on the plan? 10,6,4e, 11. Revise the lighting plan to eliminaf lighting/utility conflicts. 12. Indicate whether or not the parking lot pole lights will be placed on bases. If bases will be used, indicate this on the plan and clarify on the plan that the 20' height includes the base height. 13. Clearly identify all utilities and easements on the site plan. Provide all landscaping on site and outside of easements without reducing the quantity of plants or the general character of the planting illustrated on the 1/15/13 plan. 14. Provide a grading plan. ,, r • Please provide a hard copy. ,a?,t 0V 15. Maintain all grading on site. 16. Clarify and coordinate the grading and planting near the existing individual trees to remain on the south side of the site. Show tree protection fencing and related relevant details. 17. Consider replacing the dogwoods at the building with an evergreen species or other scale appropriate tree with visual interest for year -round effect. It appears that you chose not to make this change, correct? - 18. Extend the street trees along rain garden #3. v t .'There are still a few shrubs that are shown in the VDOT right -of -way. These will need to be moved on site, or we'll V need documentation from VDOT that they are acceptable in the right -of -way. k C CY tj214L j2_ U11 w l Add stone bases for the log supports on the front elevation. I _-2: Revise the color of the emergency exit doors to minimize noticeability. Gel/ -7`) / ti P- -1 �4' e. ry L ..:. L 1 u . t c— (A, (, c-t: L A— t 3. Increase and extend the landscaping at the western end of the southern property line. Provide a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees, with evergreens being the primary component. Extend the planting to the location of the proposed tree line. / li• i,.44 -44 — ( ),. i.i L / (b b - t i.l."l�c,G /tit" .(.1 ;1" ° ' "I' ' ( 1 '/ / L.i..C_ _). (L'.-L.. 9 Llti( -, .Lk_ Ibt l l'i (.P ! . 1 __/ ( . ; - 4. Consider a darker color for the back of the entrance gable, to reduce noticeability. n m' ' 5. Revise the elevation drawings to show the location and height of rooftop equipment. Ensure that L___--- all equipment will not be visible. �� ✓ 444 r , , - 344 -r� ex--7.4.... ca c.r r ` t : . 4°. / -, v 1 „ 6. Include the following note on the architectural elevation sheet: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." c. , 7 � _ � - 0 ,k ,, c1t4 (/7: Label the elevation drawings (north, south, east, west). 8. Revise the landscape plan to show large shade trees along the Entrance Corridor spaced 35' on center. Ensure that all EC landscaping guidelines are met. 71.k..w -•(,l' ' , ,/l.e -' , , 4 ., r > ' ? //-, `` C A../ ,, y vt - 1 t4 cJ �'L` e., iii. 7 9. Revise the light fixtures to integrate their design with the design of the piers and wall Cev composition �� 4,,,,,,,,_...4„.,,A. ,. / ".. �. d Lax,. C.t ` x , ..4 ,,, j„-p4 tr �,y .. c : J ` // t c / . c4444 77,, C,�- r*.s --4-r, rs'�/ � �"' ' Lr x > /�e 1 .d , - -d 1�✓t �� 10. Revise the stucco color of the uppermost portion of the (lateral) side bays on the west elevation to coordinate more effectively with the middle bay. , st,...J. IA i/'~ �, ,, e ;� /P AL �- ci., 1. t - -.I 4,...:_i, ,:..z. - _ ,. a - 1.. , /V,L671 / - 1 r.-c.o2. . C,- , .. 3 (nl (A.:3;# �Y z.( . O r, ! --4 C,ti " __� ;L... z .: 4�.C._. (1- ._. r Wiz....- [."1—`TZ. t7`. g—(57. (c _,, ._ 'CALLA-, i' °'1.' v 1 4 = Alii14.444,1,, CVVYL..' 1,..4 ' On the architectural elevation sheet, in the southern bay of the west elevatit , the wall area below the cornice is labeled "EIFS 1 Color: Sherwin Williams Balanced Beige SW7073." This appears to be a mistake and should read "EIFS 2 Color: Sherwin Williams Cobble Brown SW6082" based on the color elevations last reviewed by the ARB. Also, note that the color number for Balanced Beige is SW7037, not 7073. • Please confirm these two issues. 9,i 2. This issue remains from my March 21 comments: An ARB condition of approval stated, Ensure that the decorative wall lights meet the scale and proportion shown in the elevations. The sizes of the decorative wall light provided in the cut sheet don't match the size shown in the color elevation drawing the ARB reviewed. Also, the dimensions of the fixture shown on the more recent black and white line drawing do not match the dimensions iven in the cut sheet or on the color rendering. • evise the lighting plan to show a decorative wall light that meets the scale and proportion shown in the color elevations last reviewed by the ARB. { " I , a 6 -6141 ."4/yAA- ..-11 /4,e .z - 2 L Y e . This issue remains from my March 21 comments: There are four cut sheets on the lighting plan and three fixtures in the schedule. • Revise the lighting plan to include the canopy fixture in the luminaire schedule. i r�< f 1 This issue remains from my March 21 comments: An ARB condition of approval stated, Ensure that the lamps will provide a consistent appearance throughout the development by specifying a consistent lamp type. (Metal halide appears to be a common lamp type in the development.) r • The four proposed fixtures all appear to have different lamp types. Revise the lighting plan to provide a consistent lamp type throughout the development. (Metal halide appears to be a common lamp type in the development.) • L� identification of of fixture b color. This hasn't n't b en done l on the Gander Mountain lighting plan. The standard color for the parking lot pole light you've proposed is bronze and a range of colors are available for the Westwood fixture. Confirm the bronze color for the pole light and indicate the color of the Westwood fixture on the plan. Bronze would be most appropriate. i . . �,,, �,,� This issue remains from my march 21 comments: Indicate if the entrance element is illuminated. If it is, add the 1,- information to the photometric plan. The photometrics have been changed, but no additional fixtures are indicated. What are the locations? Where does this information appear on the plan? • Indicate the qp di and loca f the fixtures on the plan, confirm th t the photometrics include the illumination om these fixtures, and indicate the proposed c�,olef /fin the fixtures on the plan. Y ou've added a Progress Lighting fixture. The lamp for this fixture exceeds 3000 lumens and the fixture is not a full cutoff style. • Revise the lighting plan so that all fixtures emitting 3000 lumens or more are full cutoff fixtures. Include 4 information on the plan sufficient to confirm this. e 42-0- ir,a Pet-14,.t, ekA,c i r,' . -/ 7. llie has brought to my attention the condition of final site plan approval that requires the "stream valley design" to be consistent with the design reviewed by the ARB on October 3, 2005. That plan showed the graded slopes in the stream valley replanted with "indigenous canopy and screening trees." Consequently, the graded slope between the wetlands and the proposed Redi -rock retaining wall should be planted with new trees. ti l*°W f ' "ccJ ..4______ ) P a Ca 4.4(Att---yx c„... S c.,4_,,,,L, i, ,.e.,C i c4/ C--(... 4.,,t-,-4,...\/ 14 ..-- r t J „9' Z. t•C. <C. s , , q ` v 4� j "e- .1 %( ' W _,{,: 'C -,' /N SO . This issue remains from the March 21 comments: An ARB condition of approval stated, Ensure that the decorative wall lights meet the scale and proportion shown in the elevations. You have revised the fixture, but the size of the fixture still does not match the size shown in the color elevation drawing presented to the ARB. The decorative light fixtures presented on the color elevations measures approximately 36" x 18 ". The fixture currently proposed measures 26" x 8 ". I have confirmed with the ARB chairperson that the 26" x 8" fixture is not acceptable. • Revise the lighting plan to show a decorative wall light that meets the scale and proportion shown in the color elevations last reviewed by the ARB. 2 /You have added trees to meet the "stream valley design" condition of approval. However, the tree counts in the plant schedule do not match the quantity drawn on the plan. The schedule says 16 Red -- Maple and I count 14. The schedule says 15 River Birch and I count 16. • Please correct and coordinate the plant counts. k,t, :„